UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-25335

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Nevada	88-0409024
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)


256 S. Robertson Blvd, Beverly Hills CA		90211
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

310-358-3323

Issuer’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No x

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “Accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):


Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o	Non-Accelerated Filer o	Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $80548,~~919~~585.

The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of ~~September~~July 1330, ~~2013~~2015: 5475,~~517~~886,~~442~~165.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY RELATED

STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 7

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING

AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

4039

ITEM 9A(T).

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

4039

4140

4241

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

4241

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

4443

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

4544

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

4544

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

4645

PART IV

4746

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

4746

SIGNATURES

4948

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concern the Company’s anticipated results and developments in the Company’s operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

the ability of the Company to earn revenues sufficient to pay its expenses;

prevailing economic conditions which may significantly deteriorate, thereby reducing the demand for the Company’s products and services;

regulatory or legal changes affecting the Company’s business; and the Company’s ability to secure necessary capital for general operating or expansion purposes;

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled “Risk Factors and Uncertainties”, “Description of the Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” of this annual report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the Company’s line of business will be successful or profitable since it depends, among other things, on (a) the ability of the Company to raise funds, (b) the successful development of our products, and services, and (c) the success of the Company’s products, services and opportunities in the marketplace. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law.

We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

PART I

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

General

Occidental Development Group, Inc. (“ODG”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1998. ~~Through~~The ~~its subsidiary MCM Integrated Technologies, Ltd. (“MCM”) the~~ Company ~~operates~~provides inservices ~~the green building sector~~ and ~~has~~support ~~historically~~to ~~offered~~the ~~automation~~legal ~~technology~~marijuana ~~for~~industry ~~single~~through ~~and~~subsidiaries ~~multi unit new construction~~ and ~~existing~~joint ~~buildings~~ventures. ~~The~~Services ~~Company~~span ~~specialized~~the inindustry ~~designing,~~sector ~~supplying, installing, upgrading~~ and ~~servicing control and automation solutions including~~include: ~~energy~~agricultural ~~use~~land ~~monitoring~~ and ~~conservation~~commercial ~~systems,~~space ~~security~~for ~~and~~lease ~~access~~to ~~control~~marijuana ~~systems~~horticulturalists, ~~lighting~~staffing ~~control systems, HVAC~~ and ~~environmental~~payroll ~~controls,~~services ~~and~~for ~~distributed~~the ~~audio/video~~MMJ ~~systems.~~industry ~~Incorporated~~- inconnecting ~~1994,~~employers ~~MCM~~with ~~has~~the ~~supplied~~right ~~home~~talent ~~automation~~to ~~and~~grow ~~energy~~their ~~management~~business, ~~solutions since 2003. The Company maintains its corporate office in Beverly Hills California~~ and ~~has~~technology ~~project~~App’s ~~offices~~connecting ~~in Vancouver~~B2B, ~~British~~MMJ ~~Columbia~~to ~~and~~the ~~Phoenix,~~end ~~Arizona~~consumer. ~~Income~~Historically, isthe ~~derived~~Company ~~from~~operated ~~both~~in ~~equipment sales and~~ the ~~provision~~green ofbuilding ~~installation,~~sector ~~repair~~offering ~~and~~control ~~maintenance services. Customers include residential home owners, developers~~ and ~~builders~~automation oftechnology for single ~~family~~ and multi- unit ~~developments~~new construction and ~~commercial~~existing ~~businesses~~buildings.

The market opportunities for the Company’s control and automation services and products ~~and~~steadily ~~associated~~declined ~~project~~over ~~margins~~the ~~are~~past ~~enhanced when combined with overall building design and construction. Over~~ several ~~quarters~~years ~~the~~due ~~Company~~in ~~actively~~part ~~evaluated and pursued opportunities~~ to ~~expand its business activities vertically within~~ the ~~Company’s~~slowdown ~~current~~in ~~green~~new ~~building, home automation~~ and ~~energy conservation sectors and horizontally within the~~ construction and renovation ~~sectors.~~activity ~~During~~plus ~~FY 2012~~ the ~~Company~~advent ~~began planning the expansion~~ of ~~its~~plug ~~activities to include: design build services targeting small footprint energy efficient housing~~ and ~~multi-strata~~play ~~property~~automation ~~renovation~~technology ~~and~~which ~~development.~~eroded ~~These areas of business capitalize on~~ the Company’'s ~~in-house~~intellectual ~~engineering~~property, ~~design~~reduced ~~and project management capabilities and leverage~~ the ~~Company’s~~need ~~automation and control capability. Early in the planning process it became clear that significant restructuring would be required in order~~ for ~~the~~specialized ~~Company~~technical ~~to attract the working capital financing required to~~ support ~~expansion. The Company began begin implementation of its diversification strategy in FY 2012~~ and ~~expects~~reduced toproject ~~complete in FY 2014~~margins.

Over several quarters the Company actively evaluated and pursued opportunities to expand its business activities vertically within the Company’s historical green building, home automation and energy conservation sectors and horizontally within the construction and renovation sectors. During FY 2012 the Company began planning the shift and expansion of its activities to development and design build services targeting energy efficient housing and multi-strata property renovation and development. Early in the planning process it became clear that significant restructuring would be required in order for the Company to attract the working capital financing required to support expansion.

Initial stages of restructuring were completed during FY 2012. On October 31, 2011 the Company’s board of directors approved a Consent Resolution amending the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to affect a one for one hundred and fifty reverse split of the Company’s common stock, and adjustment of the Company’s authorized capital to eight hundred million common shares and five million preferred shares. The proposed amendments were approved by a majority of shareholders on November 1, 2011. The Company filed a preliminary Schedule 14C Information Statement outlining proposed amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation on November 9, 2011 and a definitive Schedule 14C Information Statement on November 25, 2011. The Company set November 25, 2011 as the record date for notification to shareholders. The Company filed the amended Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 12, 2011, with an effective posting date of December 22, 2012. The reverse split was approved for trading purposes by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority [FINRA] on January 18, 2012.

Through FY 2013 the Company actively pursued design build and renovation opportunities within the British Columbia and Greater Vancouver markets and solicited project financing from commercial lenders and private equity. The Company structured a joint venture proposal with a prominent First Nations forestry company targeting housing needs within First Nations communities and undertook an extensive evaluation of renovation opportunities within the Greater Vancouver condominium market. The Company also responded to an invitation to provide engineering project management services, in concert with First Nations communities, to the early stage LNG development underway in British Columbia. During this period, the Company scaled back its project and marketing efforts within the Company’s traditional home automation sector in favor of pursuing property development opportunities.

Through this process it became apparent that the Company’s financial resources were not sufficient to support available diversification opportunities and that further balance sheet and equity restructuring would

favor of pursuing future market opportunities. Through this process it became apparent that the Company’s financial resources were not sufficient to support available diversification opportunities and that further balance sheet and equity restructuring would be required in order to attract and qualify for ~~conventional~~ project financing support and~~/or~~ equity funding sufficient to grow the business. Management reached this conclusion concurrent with the close of FY 2013.

InBeginning ~~subsequent~~in ~~events,~~June 2013 the Company undertook further restructuring. Onand on June 25, 2013 Murat Erbatur resigned as director and COO and on June 26, 2013 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Ian Gilbey as director. Mr. Gilbey had previously been a ~~director~~consultant to the Company providing re-structuring and merger acquisition support. In June the Company moved its head office to Beverly Hills California to better focus on the US market. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized ~~the~~a merger with the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Occidental Development Group Inc., and in the merger, the name of the company was changed to Occidental Development Group Inc. ~~(the changes to take effect upon approval for trading purposes by FINRA).~~ On July 17, 2013, the Board also approved the filing with the Secretary of State of Nevada a Certificate of Change that effected a 1:10 reverse split in our outstanding common stock and a reduction of our authorized common stock in the same 1:10 ratio, from 800,000,000 shares to 80,000,000 shares. Both of these corporate actions were permitted to be taken by the Company’s Board of Directors without stockholder approval under Nevada NRS 92A.180 (for the merger with the subsidiary and name change) and NRS 78.207 (for the change in authorized and outstanding stock).

The ~~change~~changes of the Company’s name to Occidental Development Group, Inc. and the 1:10 reverse split, with the concurrent reduction of our authorized common stock in the same ratio and the change in the Company’s trading symbol to OXDG, were approved by FINRA and became effective for trading purposes on August 19, 2013.

During the quarter ended August 31, 2013 the Company continued to plan for the complete phase out of its activities in the home automation sector and negotiations were initiated for the acquisition of Ball Park Investments LLC ("BallPark"), a Florida real estate development company. The Company's board of directors considered the acquisition of Ballpark a key step in establishing strategic relationships with debt and equity providers.

Effective September 1, 2013, the Company disposed of its subsidiary MCM Technologies Inc. ("MCM") by sale to a previous related party, Murat Erbatur, the Company's former COO, for $1.00. The transaction was accounted for by rolling up assets and liabilities into a one-time adjustment of ($342,880) to additional paid in capital. Early in the second quarter management completed the acquisition of BallPark. The acquisition of BallPark was done without consideration and did not contribute any assets or result in any liabilities. As a direct result of the Ballpark acquisition and subsequent negotiations for funding, the Company was introduced to and approached by Integrity Aviation and Leasing LLC ("Integrity"), a Texas based company active in the domestic airline industry and specializing in leasing jet aero engines. In preliminary discussions, Integrity disclosed that it had assets in excess of $5 million and long-term lease revenues. On November 22, 2013 the management of Occidental and Integrity executed a binding Letter of Intent outlining terms for the acquisition of Integrity by Occidental. On January 14, 2014 the Company's Board of Directors approved the binding Letter of Intent for the acquisition of Integrity and initiated a due diligence process to, among other things, verify and quantify the assets, liabilities and obligations of Integrity. On January 16, 2014 the Company's Board of Directors approved a consent motion for shareholder approval to increase the Company's authorized common share capital from 80,000,000 shares to 800,000,000 and on the same day received approval from a majority of shareholders.

Effective March 1, 2014, the Company disposed of its remaining Canadian subsidiary by sale to a third party for $1.00. The transaction was accounted for by rolling up assets and liabilities into a one-time adjustment of ($711,990) to additional paid in capital. On March 12, 2014 the Company executed a non binding Memorandum of Understanding with Arrivair LLC ("Arrivair"), an aircraft trading and leasing company based in Florida. Arrivair is active in the sales and leasing of commercial passenger and cargo aircraft and aircraft components to airlines and entrepreneurs worldwide. Under the terms of the MOU the parties agreed to cooperatively pursue the purchase of aircraft and critical aircraft parts for trading, re-sale and leasing.

The timing of this initiative dovetailed to the upswing in the global airline market and industry shift to off balance sheet financing of operations and flight critical capital equipment. After several months of pursuing financing for potential aircraft purchase and lease opportunities the Board of Directors concluded that the

Company needed to significantly strengthen its balance sheet to support activity in this capital intensive sector.

Collateral to the Company's effort to develop activity in the aircraft sector, in September 2014 the Company was introduced to and on October 1, 2014 the Company executed a binding Letter of Intent with Eagle Financial Diamond Group, Inc. ("Eagle") an established Florida company active in the consumer and wholesale diamond trade. The binding Agreement defined the terms under which Occidental would acquire Eagle. In January 2015, the Company was advised by the principal of Eagle that Eagle no longer wished to pursue the buyout. As a result the Board is considering the option to pursue a claim of damages.

On April 27, 2015 the Company executed a binding Letter of Intent with 420 International Corp. ("420"), a California company active in the legal marijuana sector. The Letter of Intent outlines an all share transaction in which Occidental acquires 100 percent of the outstanding shares of 420. Under terms of the Agreement, the principal shareholders of Occidental transfer a portion of their current shareholdings to the seller in exchange for Occidental receiving 100 percent of the outstanding shares of 420. The share transfer is currently underway and Occidental, through 420, is actively engaged in the legal marijuana business.

The Company maintains its corporate office in Beverly Hills California. Income for the period ended May 31, 2013 was derived from the Company's historical activities. The Company’s year-end is May 31.

Employees

As of May 31, ~~2013~~2014, we had a staff of ~~four~~two consisting of ~~three~~the ~~employees:~~Company ~~COO,~~President ~~technical applications specialist, administrative assistant,~~ and ~~one contractor:~~ the Company ~~President~~COO.

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

Readers should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock.

Our failure to successfully address the risks and uncertainties described below ~~would~~could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations, and the price of our common stock may decline and investors may lose all or part of their investment. There is no assurance that we will successfully address these risks or other unknown risks that may affect our business.

Risks Relating to our Company

Our independent auditor has issued an audit opinion which includes a statement describing our going concern status. Our financial status creates a doubt whether we will continue as a going concern.

As described in Note 2 of our accompanying financial statements, our limited revenues and our lack of any guaranteed sources of future capital create substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company had a working capital deficit of ($1,~~446~~298,~~096~~482) at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and a consolidated net loss of $(~~620~~584,~~694~~750) for the twelve months then ended. If the Company does not raise a sufficient amount of capital, it may not have the ability to remain in business until such time, if ever, when it becomes profitable.

Although the Company has continued to restructure its balance sheet and operations, the Company’s operating income is not yet adequate to offset the Company’s aggregate overhead expenses. To rectify this shortfall, on an operating basis the Company needs to find further ways to reduce overhead expenses and increase its operating revenue sufficient to offset the Company’s overhead expense. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to do so.

Until such time as the Company becomes sustainable profitable it will be necessary to raise additional capital to support operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the required capital under terms acceptable to management, or on a schedule and in amounts required to support continued operations if at all. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability could negatively impact the value of our stock.

We have not operated profitably and have a limited operating history that you can use to evaluate us; therefore, we may not survive if we meet some of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered by a company in the early stages of shifting its business activities.

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our current business and prospects. Potential investors must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in the early stages of shifting activities to include new areas of business. These risks and difficulties include, but are not limited to, lack of sufficient customer base, revenue, cash flow and working capital for marketing, ~~product~~inventory ~~development,~~for ~~sub~~re-~~contracting,~~sale ~~supplies~~and leasing and ~~inventory~~sub-contracting. We cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that we will successfully address these and other risks. Our failure to address and mitigate these risks could harm our ability to operate profitably.

We may change our business plan.

Based on the results of our efforts to develop our current operating concept, we are re-evaluating our business plan and our board of directors may determine that it is in the best interests of the shareholders to change our business plan through vertical diversification within the Company’s current business sector and/or horizontal diversification into related sectors. Any such expansion of operations will entail risks, and such actions may involve specific operational activities which may negatively affect the profitability of the Company. Consequently, shareholders must assume the risk that (i) such expansion may ultimately involve expenditures of funds beyond the resources available to the Company at that time, and (ii) management of such expanded operations may divert management’s attention and resources away from its existing operations, all of which factors may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s present and prospective business activities. In addition, we may need to bring in new investors or raise additional capital, all of which could result in dilution of current shareholders. There is no guarantee that our efforts to diversify will be successful.

We require additional funds to achieve our current business strategy and our inability to obtain additional financing would inhibit our ability to expand or even maintain our business operations.

We need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or sale of equity to achieve our current business strategy and capitalize on available opportunities. This financing may not be available when needed. Even if this financing is available, it may be on terms that we deem unacceptable or are materially adverse to shareholder interests with respect to dilution of book value, dividend preferences, liquidation preferences, or other terms. Our inability to obtain financing would inhibit our ability to implement our development strategy, and as a result, could require us or diminish or suspend our development strategy and possibly cease our operations. If we are unable to obtain financing on reasonable terms, we could be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate planned expansion and or introduction of new products and services. In addition, such inability to obtain financing on reasonable terms could have a negative effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition to such extent that we are forced to restructure, file for bankruptcy, sell assets or cease operations.

We currently have outstanding debt that is convertible into shares of our common stock at below market pricing resulting in significant dilution to our current stockholders.

At May 31, ~~2013~~2014 we had a total of $1802,~~308,329~~112 in debt and accrued interest that is convertible into shares of our common stock at discounts ranging from 0% to 42% of the market price. The conversion of all of this debt could result in significant dilution to our stockholders.

We rely heavily on our management, and the loss of their services could materially and adversely affect our business.

The Company’s business is significantly dependent on the Company’s management team and Board of Directors. The unscheduled loss of these individuals would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

~~The Company may not be able to sustain and develop its customer base and sustain market acceptance of its products and services~~7

~~Although~~Market ~~the~~events ~~Company~~and ~~believes~~conditions, itincluding ~~can~~disruptions ~~continue~~in tothe ~~develop~~U.S. ~~home automation equipment~~ and ~~technology~~international ~~packages~~credit ~~that~~markets ~~will maintain~~ and ~~attract~~other afinancial ~~customer~~systems ~~base~~and ~~sufficient to support~~ the ~~Company’s~~deterioration ~~activities, the inability~~ of the ~~Company~~U.S. ~~to sustain~~ and ~~develop~~global ~~such~~economic aconditions, ~~customer base~~ could, ~~have~~among aother ~~material~~things, ~~adverse~~impede ~~effect~~access onto ~~the~~capital ~~Company.~~or ~~There~~increase is the ~~possibility~~cost that competitors could seize on the Company’s ideas and business model and produce competing product matrices and installations. There is the possibility that the competitors could capture significant market share of ~~the~~capital, ~~Company’s~~which ~~intended~~would ~~market.~~have Noan ~~assurance~~adverse ~~can~~effect beon ~~given~~our ~~that~~ability ~~the~~to ~~Company’s,~~fund ~~products~~our ~~and~~working ~~solutions~~capital ~~will generate market acceptance~~ and ~~revenues~~other ~~sufficient~~capital ~~to achieve and sustain profitable operations~~requirements.

~~Recent~~Notwithstanding ~~market~~various ~~events~~actions ~~and~~by ~~conditions, including disruptions in~~ the U.S. and ~~international~~foreign ~~credit~~governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital markets, financial instruments, banks, investment banks, insurers and other financial ~~systems~~institutions remain fragile and ~~the~~there ~~deterioration~~is ofresulting ~~the~~volatility Uin world stock markets.S. ~~and~~In ~~global~~addition, general economic ~~conditions~~indicators have been mixed to weak. These include consumer sentiment, unemployment and economic growth and uncertainty about corporate earnings. Recent quarters have seen improvement in the US economy and increased positive consumer sentiment. However the overall situation remains fragile and could, among other things, ~~impede~~continue ~~access~~to make it difficult for us to obtain working capital, or increase ~~the~~our cost of obtaining capital, ~~which~~for ~~would~~our ~~have~~operations. anOur ~~adverse~~access ~~effect~~to onadditional ~~our~~capital ~~ability~~and toproject ~~fund~~financing ~~our~~may ~~working~~not ~~capital~~be ~~and~~available ~~other~~on ~~capital~~terms ~~requirements.~~acceptable to us or at all.

Beginning in 2007 the U.S. credit markets experienced serious disruption due to a deterioration in residential property values, defaults and delinquencies in the residential mortgage market and a decline in the credit quality of banks and borrowers. These problems led to a substantial and ongoing slow-down in residential housing market construction and sales, declining housing prices, delinquencies in non-mortgage consumer credit and a general decline in consumer confidence. These conditions resulted in a loss of confidence in the broader U.S. and global credit and financial markets and have resulted in the collapse of, and government intervention in, major banks, financial institutions and insurers, and have created a climate of volatility, reduced liquidity, widening of credit spreads, increased credit losses, tighter credit conditions and most recently the downgrading of US credit rating. Notwithstanding various actions by the U.S. and foreign governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital markets, financial instruments, banks, investment banks, insurers and other financial institutions remain fragile and there is resulting volatility in world stock markets. In addition, general economic indicators have been slow to recover. These include consumer sentiment, unemployment and economic growth and uncertainty about corporate earnings. These disruptions in the credit and financial markets have had a significant material adverse impact on a number of financial institutions and have limited access to capital and credit. Recent quarters have seen improvement in the US economy and increased positive consumer sentiment. However the overall situation remains fragile and could, among other things, continue to make it difficult for us to obtain working capital, or increase our cost of obtaining capital for our operations. Our access to additional capital and project financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

The Company’s operating results may vary and may not support ongoing development of the business

The Company’s operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to period as a result of a variety of factors including but not limited to: purchasing patterns of customers, competitive pricing and margins, debt service and principal reduction payments, and general economic conditions. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in marketing its products and services or that the revenues from the sale of such products and services will be sufficient to offset costs and support ongoing development of the business.

Unanticipated Obstacles to Execution of the Business Plan

The Company’s business plans may change significantly. Many of the Company’s potential business endeavors are capital intensive and may be subject to statutory or regulatory requirements. Management believes that the Company’s goals and strategies are achievable in light of current economic conditions and regulatory environments with the skills, background, and knowledge of the Company’s principals and advisors. Management reserves the right to make significant modifications to the Company’s stated strategies depending on current and anticipated future events.

Our success in the future may depend on our ability to establish and maintain strategic alliances, and any failure on our part to establish and maintain such relationships would adversely affect our market penetration and revenue growth.

We may be required to establish strategic relationships with third parties in both domestic and international markets. Our ability to establish strategic relationships will depend on a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to establish and maintain strategic relationships in the future.

In addition, any strategic relationships that we establish, will subject us to a number of risks, including risks associated with sharing and potentially losing control over committed assets and financial resources, technical information and know-how, loss of control of operations that are material to our business. Moreover, strategic alliances may be expensive to implement and subject us to the risk that the third party will not perform its obligations under the relationship, which may subject us to losses over which we have no control or expensive termination arrangements. As a result, even if our strategic alliances with third parties are successful, our business may be adversely affected by our exposure to a number of factors that are outside of our control.

No Assurances of Protection for Non-Proprietary Know-How; Reliance on Trade Secrets

In certain cases, the Company may rely on trade secrets to protect the Company’s technology know-how which the Company has developed or may develop in the future and which do not have intellectual property protection. There can be no assurances that others will not independently develop similar or superior technology know-how. The protection of trade secret status has been the subject of increasing claims and litigation by various companies both in order to protect trade secrets as well as for competitive reasons even where claims are unsubstantiated. The prosecution of claims or the defense of such claims is costly and uncertain given the uncertainty and rapid development of the principles of law pertaining to this area. The Company, in common with other firms, may also be subject to claims by other parties with regard to the use of technology information and data which may be deemed proprietary to others.

Risks Related to Our Common Shares

Dividend Record

We have no dividend record. We have not paid dividends on our common shares since incorporation and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.

The trading market for our common stock is limited.

We are quoted on the OTC Markets Group’s OTCQB Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the trading symbol “~~ILVC~~OXDG”. The OTCQB is regarded as a junior trading venue. This may result in limited shareholder interest and hence lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise be obtained.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

The market price of our common shares may fluctuate significantly in response to factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as:

the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;,

developments concerning intellectual property rights and regulatory approvals;,

quarterly variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations;,

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;,

developments in our industry;, and

general economic and market conditions, and other factors, including factors unrelated to our own operating performance.

Further, the stock market in general has recently experienced price and volume fluctuations. Continued market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the price of our common shares, which could cause a decline in the value of our common shares. You should also be aware that price volatility might be worse if the trading volume of our common shares is low.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks” are regulated by certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system), in companies continuously in existence for at least three years with net tangible assets of less than $2,000,000. Penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The broker-dealer must also make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could severely limit their market price and liquidity of our securities.

These requirements may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect your ability to resell our common stock.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (see above for discussions of penny stock rules), the FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

We maintain our statutory registered agent’s office in Reno, Nevada and our principal executive office is located at 256 Robertson Blvd, Beverly Hills California 90211. We currently ~~occupy approximately 1,800 square feet of office and technology demonstration space in Vancouver Canada, and a small marketing office in Phoenix Arizona. We~~ do not have office leases ~~and~~or ~~are~~rental ~~renting~~cost ~~all space on a month-to-month basis. The total monthly rent obligation~~ for ~~all~~the office space ~~used~~utilized by the Company ~~is approximately $1,600~~.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any litigation, nor do we know of any threatened litigation against us that would have a material effect on our financial condition.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our Common Stock is currently quoted in the OTC Markets Group’s OTCQB Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board market as a "penny stock" under the symbol ~~ILVC (~~OXDG ~~post September 18, 2013)~~. The following sets forth the range of high and low closing share price information for the quarterly periods indicated of our last two fiscal years as reported by the National Quotation Bureau:

	CLOSING PRICE ($/SHARE)1
	CLOSING PRICE ($/SHARE)
	LOW	HIGH
2012
First Quarter	0.18	0.88
Second Quarter	0.08	0.34
Third Quarter	0.03	1.02
Fourth Quarter	0.03	0.78
2013
First Quarter	0.0110	01.1770
Second Quarter	0.~~005~~05	0.0550
Third Quarter	0.0220	0.0440
Fourth Quarter	0.~~003~~03	0.0770
2014
First Quarter	0.02	1.00
Second Quarter	0.01	0.04
Third Quarter	0.01	0.02
Fourth Quarter	0.01	0.02

Note 1: Closing prices reflect market pricing prior to the August 19, 2013 effective date for the Company's 1:10 reverse split of authorized and outstanding common shares.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information with respect to our common stock issued and available to be issued under outstanding options, warrants and rights as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014.


	A	B	C
	Number of securities	Weighted-average	Number of securities
	to be issued upon	exercise price of	remaining available
	exercise of outstanding	outstanding	for future issuance
	options, warrants	options, warrants	under equity
	and rights	and rights	compensation plans
Plan category
Equity compensation plans	NA	NA	NA
approved by security holders

Equity compensation plans not	NA	NA	13
approved by security holders
Total	NA	NA	13

2007 OPTION PLAN

The 2007 Option Plan was adopted by the board with 200,000 shares reserved. The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors of the Company. Subject to the express limitations of the Plan, the Board has authority in its discretion to determine the eligible persons to whom, and the time or times at which, restricted stock awards may be granted, the number of shares subject to each award, the time or times at which an award will become vested, the performance criteria, business or performance goals or other conditions of an award, and all other terms of the award. The Board also has discretionary authority to interpret the Plan, to make all factual determinations under the Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for Plan administration. The Board may prescribe, amend, and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan. All interpretations, determinations, and actions by the Board are final, conclusive, and binding upon all parties.

HOLDERS

As of ~~August~~June 294, ~~2013~~2015, the number of holders of record of shares of common stock, excluding the number of beneficial owners, whose securities are held in street name, was approximately ~~180~~168.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future because we intend to retain any positive earnings to finance the expansion of our business. Thereafter, declaration of dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing, including without limitation our financial condition, capital requirements and business condition.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

The following table sets for the information with respect to all securities of the Company sold in its fiscal years ended May 31, ~~2011~~2012, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2013~~2014, and subscription amounts of outstanding debentures, without registration of the securities under the Securities Act of 1933. The securities so sold are believed by the Company to be exempt from registration under either Regulation S or Rule 506 under the Securities Act of 1933.

If we indicate in the following table that we relied on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, we relied on the following factors in determining the availability of the exemption: (a) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by us which did not involve a public offering; (b) there were only a very limited number of offerees; (c) there were no subsequent or contemporaneous public offerings of the stock; (d) the stock was not broken down into smaller denominations; and (e) the negotiations for the sale of the stock took place directly between the offerees and us.

If we indicate in the following table that we relied on Regulation S, (a) the subscriber was neither a U.S. person nor acquiring the shares for the account or benefit of any U.S. person, (b) the subscriber agreed not to offer or sell the shares (including any pre-arrangement for a purchase by a U.S. person or other person in the U.S.) directly or indirectly, in the United States or to any natural person who is a resident of the United States or to any other U.S. person as defined in Regulation S unless registered under the Securities Act and all applicable state laws or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and similar state laws is available, (c) the subscriber made his, her or its subscription from the subscriber's residence or offices at an address outside of the U.S. and (d) the subscriber or the subscriber's advisor has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that the subscriber is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of, and protecting his interests in connection with an investment in the Company.

If we indicate in the following table that we relied on Regulation D, we relied upon Rule 506 and (a) the subscriber was an Accredited Investor (as defined in Regulation D), (b) the subscriber invested in the Company for his own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act, (c) the subscriber agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased shares unless they are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such registration are available, (d) the subscriber represented that he had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that he is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Company, (e) the subscriber had access to all documents, records, and books of the Company pertaining to the investment and was provided the opportunity ask questions and receive answers regarding the terms and conditions of the offering and to obtain any additional information which the Company possessed or was able to acquire without unreasonable effort and expense, and (f) the subscriber had no need for the liquidity in his investment in the Company and could afford the complete loss of the investment.

				Number of
				Shares
			Purchase or	Purchased or	Expiration
			Exercise Price	Purchasable	Date (WTS) or
	Date of	Type of	(USD	Upon Exercise	Due date
Name	Issue	Security1	Per Share)	or Conversion2	(DEB)	Exemption
Private Investors	31/1112	CS	0.8830	791,~~096~~170,100		S, 506
Private Investors	106/1112	CS	0.0930	~~100~~30,000		S506
Private Investors	112/12	CS	0.0308	112,~~701~~462,~~000~~267		S, 506
Private Investors	63/1213-5/13	CS	0.0306	~~300~~580,~~000~~834		S, 506
Private Investors	129/1213	CS	0.01	2450,~~622~~193,~~667~~334		S, 506
Private Investors	310/13-52/1314	CS	0.0102	524,~~808~~981,~~339~~107		S, 506
Private Investor	2/02	DEB		$35,000	2/08	S
Private Investors	11/05-2/06	DEB		$555,000	2/14	506
Private Investors	5/06	DEB		$50,000	6/09	506
Private Investor	2/08	DEB		$460,000	6/13	S
Private Investor	6/08	DEB		$326,773	6/13	S
Private Investors	9/12	DEB		$42,500	6/13	506
Private Investor	12/12	DEB		$32,500	9/13	506
Private Investor	4/13	DEB		$42,500	12/13	506

(1)

CS – Common Stock, WAR – Warrant, DEB – Debenture; ~~(2) DEB dollar amount convertible~~

(2)

(2) DEB dollar amount convertible

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. Some discussions in this report may contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us in this report. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: "believe", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "intend", "project" and similar expressions or words which, by their nature, refer to future events.

In some cases, you can also identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "plans", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Occidental Development Group, Inc. (“ODG”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1998. ~~Through~~The ~~its~~Company ~~subsidiary~~operates ~~MCM~~in ~~Integrated~~legal ~~Technologies,~~marijuana ~~Ltd~~sector. ~~(“MCM”)~~Historically, the Company ~~operates~~operated in the green building sector ~~and~~offering ~~has~~control ~~historically~~and ~~offered~~ automation technology for single and multi unit new construction and existing buildings. The Company specialized in designing, supplying, installing, upgrading and servicing control and automation solutions including: energy use monitoring and conservation systems, security and access control systems, lighting control systems, HVAC and environmental controls, and distributed audio/video systems. Incorporated in 1994, MCM has supplied home automation and energy management solutions since 2003. The Company maintains its corporate office in Beverly Hills California and has project offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Phoenix, Arizona. Income is derived from both equipment sales and the provision of installation, repair and maintenance services. Customers include residential home owners, developers and builders of single family and multi-unit developments and commercial businesses.

Through FY 2013 the Company actively pursued design build and renovation opportunities within the British Columbia and Greater Vancouver markets and solicited project financing from commercial lenders and private equity. The Company structured a joint venture proposal with a prominent First Nations forestry company targeting housing needs within First Nations communities and undertook an extensive evaluation of renovation opportunities within the Greater Vancouver condominium market. The Company also responded to an invitation to provide engineering project management services, in concert with First Nations communities, to the early stage LNG development underway in British Columbia. During this period, the Company scaled back its project and marketing efforts within the Company’s traditional home automation sector in favor of pursuing property development opportunities.

Through FY 2013 the Company actively pursued design build and renovation opportunities within the British Columbia and Greater Vancouver markets and solicited project financing from commercial lenders and private equity. The Company undertook extensive pro-forma analysis of multi-strata development opportunities within greater Vancouver communities and the Company structured a joint venture proposal and entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a prominent First Nations forestry company targeting housing needs within First Nations communities. The Company also responded to an invitation to provide engineering project management services, in concert with First Nations communities, to the early stage LNG development underway in British Columbia. During the 2013 FY the Company scaled back its marketing efforts within the Company’s traditional home automation sector in favor of pursuing higher margin and larger revenue market opportunities. Lack of funding prevented the Company from moving ahead with the First Nations and condominium renovation initiatives, and through this process it became apparent that the Company’s financial resources were not sufficient to support available diversification opportunities and that further balance sheet and equity restructuring would be required in order to attract and qualify for ~~conventional~~ project financing support and~~/or~~ equity funding sufficient to grow the business. Management reached this conclusion concurrent with the close of FY 2013.

InBeginning ~~subsequent~~in ~~events,~~June 2013 the Company ~~has~~undertook ~~begun~~ further restructuring. Onand on June 25, 2013 Murat Erbatur resigned as director and COO and on June 26, 2013 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Ian Gilbey as director. Mr. Gilbey had previously been a ~~director~~consultant to the Company providing re-structuring and merger acquisition support. In June the Company moved its head office to Beverly Hills California to better focus on the US market. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized ~~the~~a merger with the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Occidental Development Group Inc., and in the merger, the name of the company was changed to Occidental Development Group Inc. ~~(the changes to take effect upon approval for trading purposes by FINRA).~~ On July 17, 2013, the Board also approved the filing with the Secretary of State of Nevada a Certificate of Change that effected a 1:10 reverse split in our outstanding common stock and a reduction of our authorized common stock in the same 1:10 ratio, from 800,000,000 shares to 80,000,000 shares. Both of these corporate actions were permitted to be taken by the Company’s Board of Directors without stockholder approval under Nevada NRS 92A.180 (for the merger with the subsidiary and name change) and NRS 78.207 (for the change in authorized and outstanding stock).

~~Results~~During ~~from ongoing operations reported for~~ the ~~year~~quarter ~~ending~~ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013 ~~and~~the ~~2012~~Company ~~relate~~continued to ~~sales~~plan offor ~~home~~the ~~automation~~complete ~~and~~phase ~~energy~~out ~~efficiency~~of ~~products~~its ~~and~~activities ~~services~~in ~~including~~the ~~system~~home ~~design,~~automation ~~equipment~~sector ~~supply, installation~~ and ~~support.~~negotiations ~~Results~~were ~~from~~initiated ~~discontinued~~for ~~operations relate to~~ the ~~Company’s~~acquisition ~~phase~~of ~~out~~Ball ~~activities~~Park inInvestments ~~the~~LLC ~~home~~("BallPark"), ~~décor~~a ~~sector~~Florida ~~and~~real ~~include~~estate ~~costs~~development ofcompany. ~~third~~The ~~party~~Company's ~~legal~~board ~~and~~of ~~professional~~directors ~~time~~considered ~~related~~the toacquisition ~~eliminating~~of ~~and~~Ballpark ~~reducing~~a ~~liabilities~~key ~~and~~step ~~pursuing~~in ~~legal~~establishing ~~recourse~~strategic ~~against~~relationships ~~the~~with ~~Company’s~~debt ~~home~~and ~~décor~~equity ~~supplier~~providers.

Company needed to significantly strengthen its balance sheet to support activity in this capital intensive sector.

Results from ongoing operations reported for the years ending May 31, 2014 and 2013 relate to the Company's corporate activities including restructuring, establishing strategic relationships, compliance and reporting. Results from discontinued operations reported for the years ending May 31, 2014 and 2013 relate to sales of home automation and energy efficiency products and services and phase-out and disposal of assets and liabilities associated with these activities.

Foreign currency translation

The Company's former subsidiaries MCM Integrated Technologies, Ltd. and Cardinal Points Trading, Corp. both ~~use~~used the Canadian Dollar as their functional currency. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are translated into the entity’s functional currency at the exchange rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognized in the statement of income for the period.

On consolidation, the results of operations and cash flows whose functional currency is other than the US dollar are translated into US dollars at the average exchange rate for the period and their assets and liabilities are translated into US dollars at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognized within other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. In the event that such an operation is sold, the cumulative currency translation differences that are attributable to the operation are reclassified to income.

15During the period June 1, 2013 through March 1, 2014 (the date of disposal of the Company's last Canadian subsidiary), the US dollar to Canadian Dollar exchange rate has varied from a low of 0.8945 on January 31, 2014 to a high of 0.9835 on June 18, 2013. The closing exchange rate was 0.900 and the average exchange rate over the period ended March 01, 2014 was 0.9487 resulting in a foreign currency translation loss ($1,551) for the period ended May 31, 2014.

~~During~~Comparison ~~the 12 month period June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013, the US dollar to Canadian Dollar exchange rate has varied from a low~~ of ~~0.9601on June 3, 2012 to a high of 1.0334 on September 15, 2012. The closing exchange rate was 0.9671 and~~ the ~~average~~Years ~~exchange~~Ended ~~rate over the year ended~~ May 31, ~~2013~~2014 ~~was~~and ~~0.9959 resulting in a comprehensive gain of $1,372 for the year ended~~ May 31, 2013.

~~Comparison~~During the quarter ended November 30, 2013 the Company disposed of its home automation business and during the ~~Years~~quarter ~~Ended~~ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company disposed of its remaining Canadian subsidiary. As a result of the dispositions of the Company's Canadian subsidiaries historical revenues and expenses associated with these activities were re-classified to discontinued operations and were reported as such on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Accordingly, for the reporting periods ended May 31, ~~2012~~2014 and 2013 the Company reported $0 current and comparative historical revenue, cost of revenue and gross profit associated with continuing operations.

For the year ended May 31, 2013, revenues from continuing operations were $33,219 compared to $291,954 in the same period ending last year. These revenues are a result of the sale of smart home products and services. The 89% revenue decrease is due to wind down of four longer term projects, reduced business development in the Company’s traditional business sector and a slowdown in real estate new builds and renovations in the greater Vancouver market.

For the year ended May 31, 2013, gross profit from continuing operations was $16,051 compared to $130,061, a decrease of 88% compared to the same period in the prior year. Gross margin (gross profit as a percent of revenue) was 48% for the year ended May 31, 2013, 8% higher than the prior year. The decreased gross profit reflects the net of a substantially reduced cost of revenue per unit of revenue due to an increase in professional time per unit of sales and an overall reduction in revenue. The increase in gross margin reflects higher proportion of labor and reduced cost of goods per unit of sales in the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to the prior year.

Operating expenses associated with ongoing operations for the year ended May 31, 2013, were 475,245 versus $338,717 for the same period in the prior year. The increase in operating expenses reflects the net of increased consulting fees, decreased salary and depreciation expense and increased office and administration costs.

The Company recorded an operating loss from continuing operations of ($459,194) for the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to an operating loss of ($208,656) for the same period in the prior year. This represents a year-on-year 120% increase in operating loss.

Total other expenses for the year ended May 31, 2013 were $161,500 compared to $349,305 for the comparable period in the prior year. The 54% year-on-year decrease reflects a decrease in inventory reserve expense, increased amortization expenses associated with beneficial conversion and fee discounts, decreased interest expenses and recognition of a one-time goodwill impairment expense in the prior year.

The net loss from continuing operations for the year ended May 31, 2013 was ($620,694) compared to a net loss of ($557,961) for the comparable period in the prior year. This is a 11% increase in the year-on-year net loss from continuing operations.

During the year ended May 31, 2013 the Company incurred no expenses associated with its discontinued operations. The net loss from discontinued operations was ($nil) compared to a net loss of ($1,938) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decreased expense was due to the elimination of expenses associated with the Company’s effort to recover costs associated with the closure of the Company’s home décor operations.

The consolidated net loss for the year ended May 31, 2013 was ($620,694) compared to ($559,899) for the comparable period in the prior year. A gain of $1,372 was realized due as a result of foreign currency translation compared to a gain of $21,204 in the comparable period of the prior year. The resulting comprehensive loss for the period ending May 31, 2013 was ($619,322) compared to ($538,695) for the corresponding period in the prior year, an increase of 15%.

Operating expenses associated with ongoing operations for the year ended May 31, 2014, were 515,676 versus $413,049 for the same period in the prior year. The increase in operating expenses reflects increased consulting and professional fees.

The Company recorded an operating loss from continuing operations of ($515,676) for the year ended May 31, 2014 compared to an operating loss of ($413,049) for the same period in the prior year. This represents a year-on-year 25% increase in operating loss.

Total other expenses for the year ended May 31, 2014 were $96,836 compared to $134,087 for the comparable period in the prior year. The 28% year-on-year decrease reflects the net of decreased amortization expenses associated with beneficial conversion and fee discounts, increased interest expenses and a gain on disposal of assets.

The net loss from continuing operations for the year ended May 31, 2014 was ($612,512) compared to a net loss of ($547,136) for the comparable period in the prior year, a 12% increase in the year-on-year net loss from continuing operations.

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company recorded a gain from its discontinued operations of $27,762 compared to a net loss of $73,558 for the comparable period in the prior year.

The consolidated net loss for the year ended May 31, 2014 was ($584,750) compared to ($620,694) for the comparable period in the prior year. A comprehensive loss of ($693,492) was realized due as a result of foreign currency translation and adjustments to paid in capital resulting from disposal activities compared to a gain of $1,372 in the comparable period of the prior year. The resulting comprehensive loss for the period ending May 31, 2014 was ($1,278,242) compared to ($619,322) for the corresponding period in the prior year, an increase of 106%.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

As of May 31, ~~2012~~2014, our principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents, ~~cash flow from our operating subsidiaries,~~ and loans from related parties. At May 31, ~~2013~~2014, cash and cash equivalents totaled $231,~~041~~719 compared to $219,~~685~~342 at May 31, ~~2012~~2013.

Our business continues in transition and our liquidity must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in our stage of re-development. The ~~ongoing~~risk ~~impairment~~factors ~~in the U.S.~~ and ~~Canadian~~other ~~economies~~information ~~and~~included ~~financial~~in ~~markets~~this ~~has~~Annual ~~and~~Report ~~will~~should ~~continue~~be tocarefully ~~impact~~considered. However, the ~~Company’s~~risks ~~sales~~ and ~~liquidity~~uncertainties ~~for~~described ~~the~~in ~~foreseeable~~this ~~future.~~Annual ~~Risk~~Report ~~factors relevant to these events and management decisions include, but~~ are not ~~limited to:~~ the ~~Company’s~~only ~~ability~~ones towe ~~secure~~face. ~~ongoing~~Additional ~~product~~risks ~~supply, foreign exchange fluctuations, continued acceptance of the Company’s traditional products~~ and ~~services,~~uncertainties ~~success~~not ofpresently ~~the~~known ~~Company’s efforts~~ to ~~diversify~~us ~~its~~or ~~products~~that ~~and~~we ~~services~~currently ~~changes~~deem inimmaterial ~~technology~~also ~~and~~may ~~consumer~~impair ~~adoption~~our ofbusiness ~~technology~~operations, ~~the~~financial ~~strength~~condition, ofoperating ~~the North American housing market and consumer economy in general~~results, and ~~cannot~~cash ~~be credibly quantified by the Company at this time~~flows.

Internal and External Sources of Capital

For the year ending May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company realized a loss on operations of ($~~620~~612,~~694~~512) and a net loss of ($~~620~~584,~~694~~750). As of May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,~~446~~298,~~096~~482 and limited assets to sell in order to create short or long term liquidity. Therefore, we are dependent on external sources for funding until such time as the Company develops positive net cash flow to maintain liquidity. Until such time as we have positive cash flow on a sustained basis, the dependence on external capital will remain. There are no guarantees that we will be able to raise external capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us.

Investing Activities

~~There~~During ~~were~~the noyear ~~investing~~ending ~~activities~~May ~~during~~31, 2014 the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~disposed ~~ended~~of ~~May~~two 31vehicles. The Company realized a loss of $640 on one vehicle and a gain of $4,416 ~~2013~~on the other vehicle for a net gain of $3,776.

Financing Activities

Since inception, we financed operations through proceeds from the issuance of equity and debt securities and loans from shareholders and others. To date, we raised approximately $1314.804 million from the sale of common stock and as at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 we have interest bearing and due on demand borrowings of approximately $~~1.33~~583 ~~million~~thousand from investors and shareholders. Funds from these sources were used as working capital to fund the development of the Company.

The Company executed a securities purchase agreement dated as of December 7, 2005 (the "Purchase Agreement") with certain accredited investors under which we agreed to sell to these investors our convertible Debentures due three years from the final Closing Date under the Purchase Agreement in the aggregate principal amount of up to $600,000 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and convertible into restricted shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price for each share of Common Stock equal to 75% of the lowest closing bid price per share (as reported by Bloomberg, LP) of our Common Stock for the fifteen trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion. At any time, the total number of shares held by each debenture holder is not to exceed 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares. At the close of the offering the company the company completed the sale of an aggregate of $555,000 in Debentures under the Purchase Agreement which resulted in net proceeds of $424,850. In February 2011 the debenture holders extended the maturity date of the debentures to February 28, 2014. In 2006 the Company secured additional debenture financing from an accredited investor in the amount of $50,000 under terms similar to the December 7, 2005 purchase agreement.

The Company executed a series of three securities purchase agreements, dated September 6, 2012, December 5, 2012 and April 25, 2013, with a certain accredited investor under which we agreed to sell to the investor convertible Debentures due 8 months from the Closing Dates under the Purchase Agreements in the aggregate principal amount of $117,500, bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum and convertible into restricted shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price for each share of Common Stock equal to 58% of the lowest closing bid price per share (as reported by Bloomberg, LP) of our Common Stock for the ten trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion. At any time, the total number of shares held by the debenture holder is not to exceed 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares.

For the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the ~~net~~balance ~~change~~sheet invalue of the Company’s loan and debenture principal, accrued interest and related party ~~loans~~accrued ~~totaled~~liabilities decreases by $45770,~~990~~996.

FUTURE PLAN OF OPERATIONS

~~Beginning~~Over inseveral ~~2008~~quarters the Company ~~shifted~~actively ~~its~~evaluated ~~focus to the western Canadian housing market. The western Canadian housing market,~~ and inpursued ~~particular~~opportunities ~~the~~to ~~greater~~expand ~~Vancouver housing market, has remained strong through the US housing downturn with new construction~~ and ~~renovation~~shift ~~projects,~~its ~~and~~business ~~momentum in home sales and re-sales~~activities. ~~The~~Early ~~US housing market when viewed nationally reached a bottom~~ in ~~2011-2012~~the ~~and~~planning ~~through~~process ~~2013~~it ~~has~~became ~~generally~~clear ~~shown~~that ansignificant ~~increase~~restructuring inwould ~~year-on-year~~be ~~resale~~required ~~pricing and an upswing~~ in ~~new~~order ~~construction.~~for ~~The Canadian, and in particular~~ the ~~Greater~~Company ~~Vancouver housing market, cooled throughout 2013 with some analysts predicting a protracted downturn. The US market appears~~ to beattract ~~gaining~~the ~~upward~~working ~~momentum~~capital and ~~the~~investment ~~Company~~financing isrequired ~~actively~~to ~~looking~~support ~~at opportunities within the US market~~growth.

~~The~~Through ~~Company~~FY is2013 ~~actively pursuing expansion both vertically within~~ the Company’s ~~current~~scaled ~~green~~back ~~building,~~its ~~home~~project ~~automation~~ and ~~energy~~marketing ~~conservation~~efforts ~~sectors and horizontally~~ within ~~related sectors including home construction and development. The Company is pursuing expansion opportunities in parallel with a shift in~~ the Company'’s ~~focus~~traditional ~~from~~BC ~~supplier/sub-contractor~~based tohome ~~prime~~automation ~~contractor/developer.~~sector ~~This~~and ~~shift~~ in ~~focus~~FY ~~will~~2014 ~~allow~~disposed ~~the~~of ~~Company to gain greater financial and market leverage from~~ its ~~knowhow~~Canadian ~~and~~assets ~~engineering~~ and ~~project~~liabilities ~~management~~in ~~capabilities.~~favor ~~This~~of ~~shift~~pursuing ~~will also increase the Company's flexibility to pursue project and development~~ opportunities. ~~However, the shift of focus is expected to result~~ in ~~a short term impact on revenue, which is evident in~~ the ~~Company's~~US ~~FY 2013 operating results, and will necessitate further restructuring to support equity and debt financing~~market.

The ~~rebound~~Company’s inboard ~~the~~of USdirectors ~~housing~~believe ~~market~~that ~~has~~the ~~created~~acquisition ~~development opportunities and expressions~~ of ~~interest~~420 toInternational ~~become~~Corp. ~~involved~~will inovercome limitations the ~~US market. The~~ Company ishas ~~re-structuring~~historically ~~its~~faced ~~Board~~raising ~~and~~both ~~has~~funds ~~moved~~to ~~its~~support ~~corporate~~growth ~~office~~and to the USinvestment inrequired ~~anticipation~~to ofachieve ~~moving~~market ~~ahead~~potential. ~~with~~Going ~~opportunities~~forward inover the UScoming ~~market.~~24 ~~This~~months, isOccidental ~~expected~~plans to ~~gain~~focus ~~momentum~~on inthe FYopportunities ~~2014.~~available ~~The~~in ~~Company~~legal ismarijuana ~~targeting completion its re-structuring~~sector, ~~secure~~utilize ~~funding~~ and ~~having~~build ~~development~~on ~~project(s)~~existing ~~underway~~relationships ~~during~~and FYwork ~~2014.~~to ~~Markets~~substantially ofincrease ~~interest include south Florida, New York and~~ the SWCompany's USrevenue.

Cash flow from ongoing ~~business~~ activities ~~combined~~and ~~with~~ the availability of ~~loans~~investment from related and third parties are estimated to be sufficient to sustain the ~~current~~Company’s ~~level of operations and~~ planned activities through to the end of the ~~2014~~2015 fiscal year.

OFF BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

During the year ended May 31, 2013 the Company did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a) of the SEC's Regulation S-K.

OFF BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a) of the SEC's Regulation S-K.

ITEM 7A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

~~Our~~The ~~exposure~~Company's tooutstanding ~~market~~loans ~~risk~~and ~~for~~debentures ~~changes in interest rates relates primarily to our bank credit facility because borrowings under the facility~~ are ~~variable~~either ~~rate~~at ~~borrowings.~~zero Atinterest ~~the~~or ~~current~~at ~~time~~fixed ~~all of the borrowings under our credit agreements accrue~~ interest atover ~~bank prime rate plus applicable margins. Assuming that~~ the ~~balance~~term ~~on our line~~ of ~~credit as of May 31, 2013, was~~ the ~~same~~loan ~~throughout~~or ~~the~~debenture. ~~entire year~~Accordingly, ~~each 1.0% increase in~~ the ~~prime~~Company ~~interest~~has ~~rate~~no onexposure ~~our~~to ~~variable~~market ~~rate~~risk ~~borrowings~~for ~~would~~changes ~~result~~ in ~~an increase in annual~~ interest ~~expense and a decrease in our cash flows and income before taxes of approximately $3,955 per year~~rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risks

~~Our~~The ~~Canadian~~Company ~~subsidiaries~~has ~~(MCM~~ceased ~~and~~operations ~~Cardinal~~in ~~Points)~~Canada ~~both~~and ~~have~~has no assets ~~and~~or liabilities in Canadian dollars and ~~both~~limited ~~use~~transactions using the Canadian Dollar as ~~their~~a functional currency. Each financial period, all assets, and liabilities ofrecorded ~~MCM~~in ~~and~~Canadian ~~Cardinal~~dollars ~~Points~~ are translated into U.S. Dollars, our reporting currency, using the closing rate method. ~~In addition, we occasionally purchase goods in Canadian dollars for resale in US dollars and routinely purchase goods in US dollars for resale in Canadian dollars.~~

There are principally two types of foreign exchange risk: transaction risks and translation risks. Transaction risks may impact the results of operations and translation risks may impact comprehensive income. These are discussed more fully below.

Transaction risks

Transactions in currencies other than the US dollar (the Company's functional currency) are translated at either an average exchange rate used for the reporting period in which the transaction took place (to approximate to the exchange rate at the date of transactions for that period) or in some cases the rate in effect at the date of the transaction. Differences in exchange rates during the period between the date a transaction denominated in a foreign currency is consummated and the date on which it is settled or translated, are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as foreign exchange transaction gains and losses. This exposes us to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the Statement of Operations. The change in exposure from period to period is related to the change in the balance of the bank accounts based on timing of event receipts and payments. For the year ended May 31, 2014, the Company did not purchase goods valued in US dollars for sale in Canadian dollars and was not subject to transaction risk.

MCM’s and Cardinal Points’ cash balances consist of Canadian Dollars and U.S. Dollars. This exposes us to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the Statement of Operations. The change in exposure from period to period is related to the change in the balance of the bank accounts based on timing of event receipts and payments. For the period ended May 31, 2013, the Company purchased goods and services of approximately $15,000 for sale in Canadian dollars. During the 12 month period June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013, the US dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rate has varied from a low of 0.9601 on June 3, 2012 to a high of 1.0334 on September 15, 2012. Assuming that the majority of the goods and services were priced in U.S. dollars at their point of origin and that the goods and services were purchased at the extremes of the observed swing in the U.S. Dollar exchange rate against the Canadian Dollar, with all other variables held constant a shift of approximately CAD 1,100 in the cost of goods and services would be realized.

Translation risks

The financial statements ofrecorded ~~MCM~~in ~~and~~foreign ~~Cardinal Points, with a functional~~ currency ~~of Canadian dollars,~~ are translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates while revenue, expenses and cash flows are translated at reporting period weighted average exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from these translations are accumulated and reported as the principal component of other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. ~~The magnitude of the adjustment resulting from application of the current rate method is directly related to the difference between the average exchange rate and closing exchange rate for the period.~~

Fluctuation in exchange rates resulted in a year-to-date foreign currency translation loss of ($1,551) on May 31, 2014. For the comparable period in the prior year, the foreign currency translation gain was $1,372.

The fluctuation in the exchange rates resulted in foreign currency translation gains reflected in comprehensive gain in stockholders’ equity of $1,372 for the year ended May 31, 2013. Future changes in the value of the U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar could have a material impact on our financial position.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.. AND SUBSIDIARIES

BEVERLY HILLS CALIFORNIA

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets of Occidental Development Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' ~~equity~~ (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Occidental Development Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 2. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

~~September~~June 134, ~~2013~~2015

Houston, TX

www.mkacpas.com

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. [formerly Intelligent Living Corp] CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
				May 31,		May, 31
				2013		2012
				2014		2013
CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	231,~~041~~719	$	219,~~685~~342
	Accounts receivable, net			132		6,937
	Assets Held for Sale			-		11,754
	Prepaid expenses			294		3,441
	TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			1,719		31,096
	Inventory, net			1,939		1,952
	PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, NET			-		-
	Employee expense advances			70		-
	TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,719	$	31,096
	GST/PST tax refundable			381		156
	TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			25,857		15,171
	PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, NET			5,239		10,263
OTHER ASSETS
	Other Assets, net			-		-
	TOTAL ASSETS		$	31,096	$	25,434
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Line of credit		$	39,551	$	43,437
	Accounts payable		$	55,346		53,213
	Accounts payable			85,226		91,290
	Accrued liabilities			198,291		187,889
	Accrued liabilities			188,920		156,779
	Accrued liabilities related party			200,000		138,997
	Accrued liabilities related party			150,000		122,000
	Accrued interest			259,891		322,876
	Accrued interest			322,876		272,673
	Accrued interest related party			3,794		1,507
	Accrued interest related party			1,507		785
	Short term notes			23,006		23,006
	Short term notes			27,876		27,489
	Short term notes convertible, net			542,221		335,961
	Short term notes convertible, net			335,961		75,000
	Short term loans - related party			17,652		-
	Short term loans - related party			320,036		350,232
	Liabilities associated with assets held for sale			-		408,504
	Current liabilities related to discontinued operations
	TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			1,300,201		1,471,953
		Short term note convertible		-		61,250
	TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			1,471,953		1,200,935
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
	Debentures			~~619,753~~-		~~655~~619,753
	TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES			~~619,753~~-		~~655~~619,753
	TOTAL LIABILITIES			21,~~091~~300,~~706~~201		12,~~856~~091,~~688~~706
	COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES			-		-
STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
	Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value, 0 issued and outstanding			-		-
	Common stock, 80,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value; 4,324,110 and 1,251,008 issued and outstanding respectively			4,324		1,251
	Common stock, 80,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value;75,886,165 and 4,324,110 issued and outstanding respectively			75,886		4,324
	Additional paid in capital			13,893,363		13,506,470
	Stock payable			56,000		-
	Accumulated deficit			(15,872,094)		(15,251,400)
	Additional paid in capital			15,806,171		13,893,363
	Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)			(86,203)		(87,575)
	Accumulated deficit			(16,456,844)		(15,872,094)
	TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)			(2,060,610)		(1,831,254)
	Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)			(779,695)		(86,203)
	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)		$	31,096	$	25,434
	TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)			(1,298,482)		(2,060,610)
	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)		$	1,719	$	31,096

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
[formerly Intelligent Living Corp]
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
			For the 12 month period ended
			May 31		May 31
			2013		2012
			2014		2013
REVENUES
	Intelligent Home: Equipment & Services	$	~~33,219~~-	$	~~291,954~~-
COST OF REVENUES
	Intelligent Home: Equipment & Services		~~17,168~~-		~~161,893~~-
GROSS PROFIT			~~16,051~~-		~~130,061~~-
EXPENSES
	Consulting fees		~~150,000~~-		~~122~~150,000
	Selling expense		826		3,853
	Compensation		200,000		-
	Salaries		5,519		71,378
	Office & Administrative		315,676		263,049
	Depreciation		5,098		8,324
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		515,676		413,049
	Office & Administrative		313,802		133,162
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS			(515,676)		(413,049)
	TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		475,245		338,717
GAIN (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS			(459,194)		(208,656)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
	Inventory reserve expense		-		(3,425)
	Interest, Beneficial conversion and fee discount expense		(96,836)		(113,909)
	Interest income		-		81
	Tax foreign filing reserve expense		-		(20,000)
	Interest, Beneficial conversion and fee discount expense		(141,500)		(82,762)
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(96,836)		(133,909)
	Tax foreign filing reserve expense		(20,000)		(20,000)
(LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS			(612,512)		(546,958)
	Goodwill Impairment		-		(243,199)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS			27,762		(73,736)
	TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(161,500)		(349,305)
CONSOLIDATED NET (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX			(584,750)		(620,694)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS			(620,694)		(557,961)
(LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS			-		(1,938)
CONSOLIDATED NET (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX			(620,694)		(559,899)
	Income Tax Expense		-		-
NET (LOSS)			(~~620~~584,~~694~~750)		(~~559~~620,~~899~~694)
	EARNINGS PER SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED
	(Loss) income per share from continuing operations		(0.3101)		(20.3627)
	(Loss) per share from discontinued operations		-		(0.01)
	Income (Loss) per share from discontinued operations		0.00		(0.04)
	Net (Loss) per share		(0.3101)		(20.3731)
	Weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding, basic and diluted		147,~~994~~252,~~768~~025		~~236~~1,~~306~~994,768
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE GAIN (LOSS)
	Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		1(693,~~372~~492)		211,~~204~~372
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)		$	(~~619~~1,~~322~~278,242)	$	(~~538~~619,~~695~~322)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. [formerly Intelligent Living Corp] CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
								Accumulated
	Common Stock
	Common Stock								Other	Total
	Number of Shares	Amount			Stock to be Issued	Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Total Stockholders' Deficit
	Number				Additional		Accumulated	Comprehensive		Stockholders'
Balance, May 31, 2011	70,909	$	71	$		13,147,621	$	(14,691,501)	$	(108,779)	$	(1,652,589)
	of Shares	Amount			Paid-in Capital		Deficit	Income (Loss)		Deficit
Stock issued for conversion of debt	10,000		10			8,990						9,000
Balance May 31, 2010	41,332	$	41	$	12,816,653	$	(14,113,322)	$	(63,099)	$	(1,359,728)
Stock issued for conversion of debt	1,170,100		1,170			349,860						351,030
Stock issued for conversion of debt	29,577		30		330,968						330,998
Net loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2012								(559,899)				(559,899)
Net loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2011							(578,179)				(578,179)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)										21,204		21,204
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									(45,680)		(45,680)
Balance, May 31, 2012	1,251,009	$	1,251	$		13,506,471	$	(15,251,400)	$	(87,575)	$	(1,831,254)
Balance, May 31, 2011	70,909	$	71	$	13,147,621	$	(14,691,501)	$	(108,779)	$	(1,652,589)
Stock issued for conversion of debt	3,073,101		3,073			236,398		-		-		239,471
Stock issued for conversion of debt	10,000		10		8,990						9,000
Recording Beneficial Conversion Feature	-		-			90,741		-		-		90,741
Stock issued for conversion of debt	1,170,100		1,170		349,860						351,030
Recording Contributed Capital	-		-			59,754		-		-		59,754
Net loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2012							(559,899)				(559,899)
Net loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2013								(620,694)				(620,694)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									~~21,204~~	1,372	~~21,204~~	1,372
Balance, May 31, 2012	1,251,009	$	1,251	$	13,506,471	$	(15,251,400)	$	(87,575)	$	(1,831,254)
Balance May 31, 2013	4,324,110	$	4,324	$		13,893,363	$	(15,872,094)	$	(86,203)	$	(2,060,610)
Stock issued for conversion of debt	3,073,101		3,073		236,398		-		-		239,471
Stock issued for conversion of debt and compensation at an average of $0.01 per share	71,562,055		71,562			857,938						929,500
Recording Beneficial Conversion Feature	-		-		90,741		-		-		90,741
Recording Shares to be Issued					56,000							56,000
Recording Contributed Capital	-		-		~~59,754~~	1,054,870	-		-		~~59,754~~	1,054,870
Net loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2013							(620,694)				(620,694)
Net Loss for the 12 months ended May 31, 2014								(584,750)				(584,750)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									1,372		1,372
Foreign Currency Translation (loss)										(693,492)		(693,492)
Balance May 31, 2013	4,324,110	$	4,324	$	13,893,363	$	(15,872,094)	$	(86,203)	$	(2,060,610)
Balance May 31, 2014	75,886,165		75,886		56,000	15,806,171		(16,456,844)		(799,695)		(1,298,482)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
[formerly Intelligent Living Corp]
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
					For the 12 month period ended
					May 31,		May 31,
					2013		2012
					2014		2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(~~620~~584,~~694~~750)	$	(~~559~~620,~~899~~694)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss
		to net cash used in operating activities:
			Amortization of debt discount		6129,~~002~~739		-61,002
			Depreciation / Amortization		5,098		8,324
			Services paid by issuance of common stock		200,000		-
			Inventory reserve		-		3,338
			Depreciation / Amortization		-		5,098
			Gain on disposal		(3,776)		-
			Services paid by issuance of debt		75,000		-
		Decrease (increase), net of acquisition, in:
			Accounts receivable		6(23,~~805~~256)		96,~~997~~805
			Accounts receivable related party		-		~~20,078~~-
			Prepaid expenses		~~3,147~~-		~~176~~3,147
			Inventory		-		4,292
		Increase (decrease), net of acquisition, in:
			Services converted to note payable		~~125,000~~-		-125,000
			Accrued liabilities and interest		8467,~~498~~867		~~216~~84,~~396~~498
			Accrued liabilities and interest related party		~~150~~202,~~722~~296		-150,722
			Employee advance receivable		~~(70)~~-		-(70)
			Accounts payable		78(14,~~936~~258)		(178,~~081)~~936
			GST tax refundable		~~(225)~~470		~~626~~(225)
	Net cash used in operating activities				(~~105~~50,~~781~~668)		(~~297~~105,~~753~~781)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Good Will				-		243,701
	Purchase of fixed assets				(9,645)		-
	Net cash used in investing activities				-		243,701
	Proceeds from sale of fixed assets				18,507		-
	Net cash provided by investing activities				8,862		-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Contributed Capital				59,754		-
	Contributed capital				-		59,754
	Bank Line of Credit				(37,~~886)~~824		(43,~~816~~886)
	Proceeds of loans				~~117,500~~-		-117,500
	Proceeds of loans, related party net						52,175
	Repayment of loans				(10,140)		-
	Repayment of loans, related party net				(45,990)
	Proceeds of loans, related party net				39,636		-
	Net cash provided by financing activities				127,378		47,359
	Repayment of loans, related party net				(13,797)		(45,990)
Net increase (decrease) in cash					21,597		(6,693)
	Net cash provided by financing activities				23,523		127,378
	Effect of foreign exchange on cash				(1,241)		5,903
Net increase (decrease) in cash					(18,283)		21,597
Cash, beginning of period					2,685		3,475
	Effect of foreign exchange on cash				(3,039)		(1,241)
Cash, end of period				$	23,041	$	2,685
Cash, beginning of period					23,041		2,685
Cash, end of period				$	1,719	$	23,041
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
	Cash paid for interest and income taxes:
		Interest		$	278,~~413~~728	$	2527,~~828~~413
		Income taxes		$	-	$	-
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Common stock issued for accounts payable			$		$	360,030
	Common stock issued for related party debt and interest			$	400,000	$	105,421
	Common stock issued for related party debt and interest			$	105,421	$	-
	Accounts payable converted to third party debt			$	-	$	85,000
	Accounts payable converted to third party debt			$	85,000	$	-
	Common stock issued for third party debt and interest			$	385,500	$	134,050
	Common stock issued for third party debt and interest			$	134,050	$	-
	Accrued liabilities converted to related party debt			$	169,500	$	122,000
	Accrued liabilities converted to related party debt			$	122,000	$	180,000
	Beneficial conversion feature on third party debt			$	-	$	90,741
	Beneficial conversion feature on third party debt			$	90,741	$	-
	Accrued liabilities converted to note payable			$	14,026	$	-
	Accrued liabilities converted to note payable			$	-	$	80,000
	Disposal of subsidiary				1,054,870		-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Occidental Development Group, Inc. (“ODG”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1998. ~~Through~~Occidental ~~its~~Development ~~subsidiary MCM Integrated Technologies~~Group, ~~Ltd~~Inc. (“~~MCM~~ODG”), the “Company ~~operates in the green building sector and has historically offered automation technology for single and multi unit new construction and existing buildings. The Company specialized in designing~~”, ~~supplying~~“we”, ~~installing,~~“us”) ~~upgrading~~was ~~and~~incorporated ~~servicing~~in ~~control~~the ~~and~~State ~~automation~~of ~~solutions~~Nevada including: energy use monitoring and conservation systems, security and access control systems, lighting control systems, HVAC and environmental controls, and distributed audio/video systems. Incorporated in ~~1994, MCM has supplied home automation and energy management solutions since 2003~~1998. The Company ~~maintains~~provides ~~its~~services ~~corporate office in Beverly Hills California~~ and ~~has~~support ~~project~~to ~~offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Phoenix, Arizona. Income is derived from both equipment sales and~~ the ~~provision~~legal ofmarijuana ~~installation,~~industry ~~repair~~through ~~and~~subsidiaries ~~maintenance services. Customers include residential home owners, developers~~ and ~~builders~~joint ~~of single family and multi-unit developments and commercial businesses~~ventures.

~~The~~Historically, the Company ~~previously~~operated ~~engaged~~ in the ~~import~~green ~~and~~building ~~distribution~~sector ofoffering ~~home~~control ~~décor~~and ~~products~~automation technology for ~~the~~single ~~North~~and ~~American~~multi ~~market~~unit new construction and existing buildings. This activity was pursued through its wholly owned ~~subsidiary~~Canadian ~~Cardinal~~subsidiaries. ~~Points~~During ~~Trading~~the ~~Corp.~~year Inended ~~December~~May ~~2006~~31, 2014 the Company discontinued its ~~activity~~activities in the ~~home~~green ~~décor~~building sector and ~~began~~disposed ~~a process to dispose~~ of all assets liabilities and obligations ~~and evaluate ways and means to recover costs~~ related to the ~~home décor import and distribution business~~sector. ~~This~~Future ~~process concluded during the current year and future~~ impact on operations is expected to be de minimis as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Results from ongoing operations reported for the ~~year~~years ending May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 relate to ~~sales~~the ofCompany's ~~home~~corporate ~~automation~~activities ~~and energy efficiency products and services~~ including ~~system design~~restructuring, ~~equipment~~establishing ~~supply~~strategic relationships, ~~installation~~compliance and ~~support~~reporting. Results from discontinued operations ~~relate~~reported tofor the ~~Company’s~~years ~~phase~~ending ~~out~~May ~~activities~~31, in2014 ~~the home décor sector~~ and ~~include~~2013 ~~the~~relate ~~cost~~to sales of ~~third~~home ~~party~~automation ~~legal~~ and ~~professional~~energy ~~time~~efficiency ~~related~~products toand ~~eliminating~~services and ~~reducing~~phase-out ~~liabilities,~~ and ~~pursuing~~disposal ~~legal~~of ~~recourse~~assets ~~against~~and ~~the~~liabilities ~~Company’s~~associated ~~home~~with ~~décor~~these ~~supplier~~activities.

The Company’s year-end is May 31.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of Occidental Development Group, Inc. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Accounting Method

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting.

Accounts Receivable

The Company ~~carries~~has adopted the policy to record its accounts receivable at net realizable value. Because of the small customer base, direct contact with customers and relatively small number of transactions, the Company ~~uses~~has adopted the direct write off method to account for doubtful accounts. The Company estimates bad debt based on management’s ongoing review and assessment of accounts and creation of reserves for the full amount of doubtful accounts. At May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, there were accounts receivable allowances of NIL.

Advertising and Marketing Expenses

Advertising expenses consist primarily of costs incurred in the design, development, and printing of Company literature and marketing materials. The Company expenses all advertising expenditures as incurred. The Company incurred advertising and marketing expenses of $Nil and $826 for the years ending May 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have cash equivalents.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

Advertising and Marketing Expenses

Advertising expenses consist primarily of costs incurred in the design, development, and printing of Company literature and marketing materials. The Company expenses all advertising expenditures as incurred. The Company incurred advertising and marketing expenses of $826 and $3,853 for the years ending May 31, 2013 and 2012 respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have cash equivalents.

Commitments and Contingencies

We record estimated commitments for future obligations and estimate contingencies when information is available that indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When no accrual is made for a loss contingency because one or both of these conditions are not met, or if an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, we disclose such contingencies when there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred. Determining the likelihood of incurring a liability and estimating the amount of the liability involves significant judgment. If the outcome of the liability is more adverse to us than management currently expects, then we may have to record additional charges in the future. See Note 6 for details on commitments and contingencies.

Comprehensive Income

The Company accounts for Comprehensive Income in accordance with ASC Topic 220. ASC Topic 220 establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. For the year ending May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company reported a comprehensive ~~gain~~loss of $1693,~~372~~492 resulting from the conversion of Canadian dollar subsidiaries into US dollars. For the year ending May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the accumulated comprehensive loss due to the conversion of Canadian dollar subsidiaries into US dollars was $86779,~~203~~695.

Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities

The Company accounts for exit or disposal activities in accordance with ASC Topic 220, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” ASC 220 establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities. There has been no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations from adopting ASC 220.

Earnings per Share

The Company has adopted ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share”. Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be antidilutive.


	For the Year Ended May 31,
(in thousands)	2014		2013
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	(612.5)	$	(547.1)
Gain (Loss) from discontinued operations	27.7		(73.6)
Net (loss) income	$	(584.8)	$	(620.7)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	47,252,025		1,994,768
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants	—		—
Convertible loans	—		—
Basic and diluted	47,252,025		1,994,768

Gain (Loss) per share from continuing operations: basic and diluted	$	(0.01)	$	(0.27)
Gain (Loss) per share from discontinued operations: basic and diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.04)
Net (loss) income per share: basic and diluted	$	(0.01)	$	(0.31)

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

	For the Year Ended May 31,
(in thousands)	2013		2012
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	(620.6)	$	(558.0)
(Loss) from discontinued operations	-		(1.9)
Net (loss) income	$	(620.6)	$	(559.9)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	1,994,768		491,314
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants	—		—
Convertible loans	—		—
Basic and diluted	1,994,768		491,314
Gain (Loss) per share from continuing operations: basic and diluted	$	(0.31)	$	(2.36)
Gain (Loss) per share from discontinued operations: basic and diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.01)
Net (loss) income per share: basic and diluted	$	(0.31)	$	(2.37)

The following potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for the years ended May 31, 2014 and 2013 because their inclusion would have been antidilutive:

The following potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012 because their inclusion would have been antidilutive:


	For the Year Ended May 31, 2014	For the Year Ended May 31, 2013
Outstanding common stock options and warrants	Nil	Nil
Convertible loans	98,630,155	52,520,928

	For the Year Ended May 31, 2013	For the Year Ended May 31, 2012
Outstanding common stock options and warrants	Nil	Nil
Convertible loans	52,520,928	2,184,086

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“Topic 820”). Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.

The following table represents our assets and liabilities by level measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, ~~2013~~2014

Total

Realized

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Loss

Totals

27The following table represents our assets and liabilities by level measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2013:

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2013

The following table represents our assets and liabilities by level measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2012:

Total

Realized

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Loss

Totals

The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Software Development Costs

Software development costs include direct costs incurred for internally developed products classified under Other Assets. We account for software development costs in accordance with ASC 350-40. All capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated useful life and are reviewed for impairment annually. As of May 31, ~~2013~~2014, all software costs were fully amortized.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company's subsidiaries MCM Integrated Technologies, Ltd. and Cardinal Points Trading, Corp. both ~~use~~used the Canadian Dollar as their functional currency. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are translated into the entity’s functional currency at the exchange rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognized in the statement of income for the period.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2014

the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling on the balance sheet date. Currency translation differences are recognized in the statement of income for the period.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company has an accumulated deficit of $1516,~~872~~456,~~094~~844, and current liabilities in excess of current assets by $1,~~446~~298,~~096~~482. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Commencing in ~~July~~September ~~2006~~2013 and continuing through ~~the~~to ~~year~~March ~~ended~~2014 ~~May~~management ~~31,~~systematically ~~2012~~phased ~~management~~out ~~has~~of ~~systematically~~all ~~continued~~Canadian tooperations ~~phase~~and ~~out~~re-located of the ~~home~~Company's ~~décor~~offices ~~sector~~to Beverly Hills CA. Commencing in Q3Q2 ~~2007~~2014 the Company began reporting all home ~~décor~~automation activity under the category of discontinued operations. This transition was completed as of May 31, ~~2012~~2014. In December 2006 the Company moved into the home automation sector with the acquisition of MCM Integrated Technologies. The transition has substantially reduced the Company’s financial obligations with respect to overheads, cost of inventory, cost of sales and need for support services. The Company recorded positive operating income for the year ended May 31, 2007 and loss on operations for the years ended May 31, 2008 through 2013.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2013

Goodwill

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the fair value of consideration paid over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually according to ASC 350-20. An impairment test would also be performed in any period in which events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment would be recognized at that time, to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows expected from its use. For the year ended May 31, 2012 the Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $243,199 related to the acquisition of MCM Integrated Technologies, Ltd. Management reviewed Goodwill and found that there was impairment for the year ended May 31, 2012 and an expense for the full value of goodwill was recognized.

Impairment of long-lived assets

We have adopted ASC 350 for the assessment of impairment of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles on an annual basis. The potential impairment of finite life intangibles is assessed whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

significant underperformance relative to historical or expected projected future operating results;

significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;

significant negative industry or economic trends;

significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time; and

our market capitalization relative to net book value.

When we determine that the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any potential impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model.

Inventory

The Company has adopted ASC 330: Inventory at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 was Nil and ~~2012~~at May 31, 2013 consisted of a variety of home automation equipment. Inventories are recorded using the specific identification method and valued at the lower of recorded cost or market value. The recorded cost of inventory was $~~53,701~~Nil at May 31, ~~2013~~2014, and $53,701 at May 31, ~~2012~~2013. Reserves of $~~51,749~~Nil at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and $51,749 at May 31, ~~2012~~2013 were recorded for home automation inventory.

Inventory	May 31 2013	May 31 2012
	Recorded Cost
Home automation equipment	$53,321	$53,701
Total Recorded Cost	$53,321	$53,701
	Reserve
Home automation equipment	$51,382	$51,749
	Net of Reserve
Total Inventory net of reserve	$1,939	$1,952

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. References herein to the Company include the Company and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014


Inventory	May 31 2014	May 31 2013
	Recorded Cost
Home automation equipment	$Nil	$53,701
Total Recorded Cost	$Nil	$53,701
	Reserve
Home automation equipment	$Nil	$51,382
	Net of Reserve
Total Inventory net of reserve	$Nil	$1,939

Principles of Consolidation

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years (see note 3). ~~Property and Equipment held by MCM are pledged as security for the Company’s line of credit.~~

Provision for Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires that we recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit (expense) results from the change in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740-20, “Income Taxes – Intra-period Tax Allocation,” clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740-20 by prescribing guidance for the recognition, de-recognition and measurement in financial statements of income tax positions taken in previously filed tax returns or tax positions expected to be taken in tax returns, including a decision whether to file or not to file in a particular jurisdiction. FASB ASC Topic 740-20 requires that any liability created for unrecognized tax benefits is disclosed. The application of FASB ASC Topic 740-20 may also affect the tax bases of assets and liabilities and therefore may change or create deferred tax liabilities or assets. We would recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

At May 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had net deferred tax asset calculated at an expected rate of 34% of approximately $4,257,000 principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established at May 31, ~~2013~~2014. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and May 31, ~~2012~~2013 were as follows:

		May 31, 2013		May 31, 2012
		May 31, 2014		May 31, 2013
Net operating loss carryforward	$	13,~~076~~631,~~828~~839	$	1213,~~522~~076,~~234~~828
Deferred tax asset - NOL	$	4,~~446~~634,~~162~~866	$	4,~~257~~446,~~600~~162
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$	(4,~~446~~634,~~828~~866)	$	(4,~~257~~446,~~600~~162)
Net deferred tax asset	$	-	$	-

At May 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13,017,074 which expire in the years 2020 through 2031. The change in the allowance account from May 31, 2012 to May 31, 2013 was $168,246.

The components of current income tax expense as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 respectively are as follows:

	As of May 31,
		2013		2012
Current federal tax expense	$	-	$	-
Current state tax expense	$	-	$	-
Change in NOL benefits	$	188,562	$	98,048
Change in valuation allowance	$	(188,562)	$	(98,048)
Income tax expense	$	-	$	-

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

~~For~~At ~~the period ended~~ May 31, ~~2013~~2014, ~~other~~the ~~than~~Company ahad ~~reserve~~net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $~~170~~13,632,000 ~~for~~which ~~potential~~expire ~~federal~~in ~~tax~~the ~~penalties~~years ~~associated~~2020 ~~with~~through ~~late~~2032. ~~filing~~The ofchange ~~foreign~~in ~~subsidiary disclosures,~~ the ~~Company~~allowance ~~did~~account ~~not~~from ~~record~~May ~~any~~31, ~~liabilities~~2013 ~~for~~to ~~uncertain~~May ~~tax~~31, ~~positions~~2014 was $188,704.

The components of current income tax expense as of May 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively are as follows:


	As of May 31,
		2014		2013
Current federal tax expense	$	-	$	-
Current state tax expense	$	-	$	-
Change in NOL benefits	$	188,704	$	188,562
Change in valuation allowance	$	(188,704)	$	(188,562)
Income tax expense	$	-	$	-

For the period ended May 31, 2014, other than a reserve of $150,000 for potential federal tax penalties associated with late filing of foreign subsidiary disclosures, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenues designing and installing, integrating and servicing automation solutions and energy use monitoring and conservation systems for commercial and residential new construction and renovation projects. The Company generates revenues in three primary ways: first, the Company offers a complete turnkey solution with products and services to contractors and end users; second, the Company sells only products to its contractors and end users; and third, the Company sells only services to its contractors and end users. Revenue on product sales, service agreements and turnkey contracts is recognized using the completed contract method in accordance with ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.”

Use of Estimates

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful lives of property and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are three to seven years. The following is a summary of property, equipment, and accumulated depreciation:

Property and Equipment		May 31, ~~2013~~2014		May 31, ~~2012~~2013
Computer hardware and software	$	~~811~~314,~~741~~903	$	~~815~~811,~~287~~741
Furniture, fixtures, vehicles, leaseholds		~~342,754~~-		~~345~~342,~~199~~754
Book value of property and equipment		1314,~~154,495~~903		1,~~160~~154,~~486~~495
Less accumulated depreciation		(1314,~~149,256~~903)		(1,~~150~~149,~~223~~256)
Property and equipment - net	$	~~5,239~~Nil	$	105,~~263~~239

For the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012 depreciation expenses were $5,098 and $8,324. The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.30

NOTE 4 – COMMON STOCK

During the year ended May 31, 2012 the Company issued 1,180,100 shares of common stock for conversion of debt valued at $360,030.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

For the years ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, depreciation expenses were $Nil and $5,098. The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

NOTE 4 – COMMON STOCK

During the year ended May 31, 2013 the Company issued 3,073,101 shares of common stock for conversion of debt valued at $239,471.

~~All~~During ~~stock~~the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company issued ~~was~~1,264,762 ~~within~~shares ~~terms~~of its unregistered common stock for conversion of $14,900 of third party debt principal at a conversion price per share equal to a discount of 42% from the ~~underlying~~average ~~agreements~~of the lowest three closing prices for the Company’s stock during the ten days prior to conversion.

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company recognized conversion notices for the conversion of $370,600 of third party note and debenture principal and accrued interest into 23,909,678 shares of its unregistered common stock. As of February 28, 2014 the Company issued 20,296,775 shares and recorded the balance of 3,612,903 shares as stock payable. The conversions were at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion.

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company issued 33,333,334 shares of its unregistered common stock for conversions of $400,000 of related party debt principal. The conversions were at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion.

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company issued 16,666,667 shares of its unregistered common stock in fulfillment of a $200,000 related party stock based compensation agreement at a share price equal to $0.01, fair market value as of August 15, 2013, the effective date of the compensation agreement.

All stock issued, and notices of conversion were in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTIES (NOTES PAYABLE RELATED PARTY)

During the year ended May 31, 2012 $180,000 of accrued liabilities, $115,388 of short term note payable and $2,612 of accrued interest due the Company’s CEO was consolidated into a debenture bearing interest at a rate of 6% convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price not less than the greater of $0.0005 per share or the lowest closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for any trading day on which a Notice of Conversion is received, or for any of the 20 consecutive days on which shares of the Company traded immediately preceding the date of receipt of each Notice of Conversion. The Company determined that there was no derivative liability or beneficial conversion associated with the note. The debenture and $5,780 of accrued interest were converted into 992,600 shares of common stock of the Company at an average price of $0.30 per share. The conversion was made in accordance with the underlying debt agreement.

During the year ended May 31, 2012 new loans and accounts payable due to the Company’s officers totaled $52,175. The Company had short-term loans and accounts payable outstanding to corporate officers at May 31, 2012 in the amount of $350,232. They are unsecured, due on demand and bear interest at an average rate of 9.7%. Accrued interest on May 31, 2012 was $785. The total outstanding related party debt [principal plus accrued interest] for the period ended May 31, 2012 was $351,017.

During the year ended May 31, 2013, the Company converted $122,000 of accrued liabilities, into a new related party debenture in the same amount and re-classified and converted a $30,267 short term non-interest bearing note into a new related party debenture. The debentures bear interest at 6% and mature on June 1, 2014. The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion or at a price of $0.0005 per share whichever is greater. The Company determined that there was no derivative liability or beneficial conversion associated with the new debentures.

During the year ended May 31, 2013 the Company converted $103,267 of related party debenture principal and $2,154 of related party debenture interest into 1,405,600 shares of common stock at a share price of $0.10 per share. All conversions were made in accordance with the underlying debt agreement.

~~During the year ended May~~ 31, 2013, the balance sheet liability associated with related party loans, debentures and accrued liabilities decreased by $30,196. Related party loans outstanding as of May 31, 2013 totaled $320,036 are uncollateralized and due on demand. The Company paid the Company’s officers $245,848 of loan principal and $27,413 of interest in cash and accrued related party interest of $722. Total outstanding related party debt [principal plus accrued interest] for the periods ended May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 was respectively $321,543 and $351,017.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~shares~~year ~~office~~ended ~~space~~May ~~and~~31, ~~administrative~~2013, ~~costs~~the inbalance ~~Vancouver~~sheet liability associated with ~~ScanTech~~related ~~Imaging~~party ~~Corp~~loans, debentures and accrued liabilities decreased by $30,196. ~~(“ScanTech”)~~Related party loans outstanding as of May 31, a2013 ~~company~~totaled ~~controlled~~$320,036 byare ~~Murat~~uncollateralized ~~Erbatur~~and due on demand. The Company paid the Company’s ~~former~~officers ~~COO.~~$245,848 ~~The~~of ~~Company~~loan ~~provides~~principal ~~technical~~and ~~consulting~~$27,413 ~~services~~of tointerest ~~ScanTech~~in cash and ~~Scan~~accrued ~~Tech’s~~related ~~clients~~party oninterest anof as$722. ~~needed~~Total ~~basis~~outstanding related party debt [principal plus accrued interest] for the periods ended May 31, 2013 was $321,543.

~~The~~During ~~following~~the ~~table~~year ~~summarizes~~ended May 31, 2014, the ~~position~~Company ofconverted ~~notes~~$150,000 of accrued liabilities and ~~amounts~~$50,000 ~~due~~of toshort ~~related~~term ~~parties~~debt atinto ~~May~~a 31new $200,000 ~~2013~~related party debenture. The debenture bears interest at 6% and ~~May~~matures 31on June 1, ~~2012:~~2014. The debenture is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion or at a price of $0.0005 per share whichever is greater. The Company determined that there was no derivative liability or beneficial conversion associated with the new debenture.

Related Parties		Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2013	Interest Accrued to May 31, 2013	Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2012	Interest Accrued to May 31, 2012
Short term notes	$	320,036	1,507	350,232	785
Total	$	320,036	1,507	350,232	785

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company issued a new related party $75,000 convertible note for professional time expenses. The note is non interest bearing and matures on December 31, 2013. The note is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion or at a price of $0.0005 per share whichever is greater. The Company determined that there was no derivative liability or beneficial conversion associated with the new note.

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company recorded related party stock based compensation in the amount $200,000 and in full payment issued 16,666,667 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at a share price equal to $0.01, fair market value as of August 15, 2013, the effective date of the compensation agreement. During this same period the Company received conversion notices for $200,000 of related party debentures and $200,000 of related party convertible notes and issued an aggregate of 33,333,334 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.012 per share.

All stock issued, and notices of conversion were in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements.

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company re-classified $316,750 of related party debt and $14,026 of related party accounts payable to third party.

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company disposed of its subsidiary MCM Technologies Inc. ("MCM") by sale to a previous related party, Murat Erbatur, the Company's former COO, for $1.00. The transaction was accounted for by rolling up assets and liabilities into a one-time adjustment of ($342,880) to additional paid in capital.

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the balance sheet liability associated with related party loans, accounts payable, debentures, accrued interest and accrued liabilities decreased by $250,097. The remaining loans totaling $17,652 are uncollateralized and due on demand. The Company paid the Company’s officers $13,797 of loan principal in cash, and accrued related party interest of $3,794. Total outstanding related party debt [principal plus accrued interest] for the period ended May 31, 2014 and May 31, 2013 was respectively $21,446 and $321,543.

The following table summarizes the amounts due to related parties at May 31, 2014:


Related Parties		Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2014		Interest Accrued to May 31, 2014
Short term notes	$	17,652	$	3,794
Total	$	17,652	$	3,794

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2014

The following table summarizes the amounts due to related parties at May 31, 2013:


Related Parties		Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2013		Interest Accrued to May 31, 2013
Short term notes	$	320,036	$	1,507
Total	$	320,036	$	1,507

The following table summarizes the position of notes, and amounts due to related parties at May 31, 2014 and May 31, 2013:


Related Parties		Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2014	Interest Accrued to May 31, 2014	Principal Outstanding on May 31, 2013	Interest Accrued to May 31, 2013
Short term notes	$	17,652	3,794	320,036	1,507
Total	$	17,652	3,794	320,036	1,507

NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

For the year ending May 31, ~~2013~~2014 the Company did not have any lease or other long term commitments and management was not aware of any contingencies not already provided for. The Company rents office, ~~warehouse, and storage~~ space on a month-to-month basis. This arrangement is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.

NOTE 7 – ~~CONCENTRATION~~THIRD OFPARTY ~~CREDIT~~NOTES ~~RISK~~AND DEBENTURES PAYABLE

~~Cash~~During the 12 months ended May 31, 2013 the Company negotiated a series of three 8% convertible debentures with Asher Enterprises, Inc.

The ~~Company~~First ~~maintains~~Asher ~~cash~~Note, ~~balances~~principal atamount ~~two~~$42,500, ~~banks. Accounts~~due in June 2013, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at ~~each~~the ~~institution~~discretion ~~are~~of ~~insured~~the byholder, commencing 180 days following the ~~Canadian~~date ~~Depository~~of ~~Insurance~~the updebenture at a conversion price per share equal to ~~$60,000~~a indiscount ~~Canadian~~of ~~funds. At~~42% ~~May~~from ~~31,~~the ~~2013~~average ~~and~~of ~~2012,~~the nolowest ~~account~~three ~~exceeded~~closing ~~this~~prices ~~limit~~for the Company’s stock during the ten days prior to conversion or $0.00009 per share whichever is greater.

~~NOTE~~The 8Company –evaluated ~~THIRD~~the ~~PARTY~~First ~~NOTES~~Asher ~~AND~~Note ~~DEBENTURES~~and ~~PAYABLE~~determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute a derivative liability as the Company has obtained authorization from a majority of shareholders such that should conversion occur at the Fixed Conversion Price the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price of $0.03, below the market price on September 6, 2012 of $0.038, resulted in a discount of $42,500 of which $42,294 was amortized during the 12 months ended May 31, 2013.

~~During~~The ~~the~~Second 12Asher ~~months ended May 31~~Note, ~~2012~~due ~~the~~in ~~Company~~September ~~reclassified $80~~2013,~~000~~ ofis ~~accrued~~convertible ~~liability~~ into ashares ~~non interest bearing convertible note maturing on June 1, 2012. The accrued liability resulted from professional fees payable under a consulting contract dated July 2010. Pursuant to terms~~ of the ~~consulting contract, the note formalizes the~~ Company’s ~~option to settle the outstanding liability through issuance of~~ common stock, ~~and~~at the ~~effective~~discretion ~~date~~ of the ~~note~~holder, ~~tacks~~commencing ~~back~~180 todays ~~December~~following ~~2010 reflecting~~ the ~~period~~date ~~in which the Company realized the benefit~~ of the ~~services. The~~debenture ~~note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock~~ at a conversion price ~~not less than the greater of $0.0005~~ per share orequal ~~the~~to ~~lowest closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for any trading day on which~~ a ~~Notice~~discount of ~~Conversion~~42% isfrom ~~received,~~the oraverage ~~for any~~ of the 20lowest ~~consecutive~~three ~~days~~closing onprices ~~which~~for ~~shares of~~ the Company’s ~~traded~~stock ~~immediately~~during ~~preceding~~ the ~~date~~ten ofdays ~~receipt~~prior ofto ~~each~~conversion ~~Notice~~or ~~of Conversion~~$0. ~~The~~00009 ~~Company~~per ~~determined~~share ~~that~~whichever ~~there~~is ~~was no derivative liability or beneficial conversion associated with the note~~greater.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

During the quarter ended November 30, 2012 the Company negotiated an 8% convertible debenture, principal amount of $42,500, (“First Asher Note”) with Asher Enterprises, Inc. The debenture, due in June 2013, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the discretion of the holder, commencing 180 days following the date of the debenture at a conversion price per share equal to a discount of 42% from the average of the lowest three closing prices for the Company’s stock during the ten days prior to conversion or $0.00009 per share whichever is greater.

The Company evaluated the First Asher Note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute a derivative liability as the Company has obtained authorization from a majority of shareholders such that should conversion occur at the Fixed Conversion Price the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price of $0.03, below the market price on September 6, 2012 of $0.038, resulted in a discount of $42,500 of which $42,294 was amortized during the 12 months ended May 31, 2013.

During the quarter ended February 28, 2013 the Company negotiated a second 8% convertible debenture, principal amount of $32,500 (“Second Asher Note”), with Asher Enterprises, Inc. The debenture, due in September 2013, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the discretion of the holder, commencing 180 days following the date of the debenture at a conversion price per share equal to a discount of 42% from the average of the lowest three closing prices for the Company’s stock during the ten days prior to conversion or $0.00009 per share whichever is greater.

The Company evaluated the Second Asher Note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute a derivative liability as the Company has obtained authorization from a majority of shareholders such that should conversion occur at the Fixed Conversion Price the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price of $0.007 below the market price on December 5, 2012 of $0.020 resulted in a discount of $16,226 of which $10,406 was amortized during the 12 months ended May 31, 2013.

~~During~~The ~~the~~Third ~~quarter~~Asher ~~ended February 28~~Note, ~~2013,~~due ~~the~~in ~~Company~~December ~~converted a third party accounts payable of $85~~2013,~~000~~ ~~to a short term non-interest bearing convertible note due June 2013. The principal~~ is convertible into shares of ~~common stock at a conversion price equal to~~ the ~~lowest closing price per share of the~~ Company’s common stock, ~~for~~at the 20discretion ~~days~~of ~~on which~~ the ~~Company's~~holder, ~~shares~~commencing ~~traded~~180 ~~immediately~~days ~~preceding~~following the date of ~~conversion~~the ordebenture at a conversion price ~~of $0.0005~~ per share ~~whichever~~equal ~~is greater. The Company evaluated the $85,000 convertible note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant~~ to ~~the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute~~ a ~~derivative~~discount ~~liability~~of as42% ~~the Company has obtained authorization~~ from athe ~~majority~~average of ~~shareholders~~the ~~such~~lowest ~~that~~three ~~should~~closing ~~conversion~~prices ~~occur~~for at the ~~Fixed~~Company’s ~~Conversion~~stock ~~Price~~during the ~~appropriate~~ten ~~number~~days ofprior ~~shares will be available or issuable for settlement~~ to ~~occur. The beneficial~~ conversion ~~feature~~or ~~discount resulting from the conversion price of~~ $0.~~001~~00009 ~~below~~per ~~the~~share ~~market~~whichever ~~price~~is ~~on December 31, 2012 of $0~~greater.~~021 resulted in a discount of $4,250 of which $4,222 was amortized during the 5 months ended May 31, 2013.~~

During the quarter ended May 31, 2013 the Company negotiated an 8% convertible debenture, principal amount of $42,500, (“Third Asher Note”) with Asher Enterprises, Inc. The debenture, due in December 2013, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the discretion of the holder, commencing 180 days following the date of the debenture at a conversion price per share equal to a discount of 42% from the average of the lowest three closing prices for the Company’s stock during the ten days prior to conversion or $0.00009 per share whichever is greater.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2013

The Company evaluated the Third Asher Note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute a derivative liability as the Company has obtained authorization from a majority of shareholders such that should conversion occur at the Fixed Conversion Price the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price of $0.004, below the market price on September 6, 2012 of $0.007, resulted in a discount of $27,765 of which $4,080 was amortized during the 12 months ended May 31, 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asher debentures, and by agreement with Asher, the Company has instructed its stock transfer agent to reserve an agreed upon number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued if the debenture is converted. As of May 31, 2013, 3,000,000 shares have been reserved, but are not considered as issued and outstanding.

During the year ended May 31, 2013, the Company converted third party accounts payable of $85,000 and $125,000 to short term non-interest bearing convertible notes due June 2013 and December 31, 2013 respectively. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion or at a price of $0.0005 per share whichever is greater. The Company evaluated the convertible notes and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion options were determinate due to the Fixed Floor Conversion Price and, as such, do not constitute a derivative liability as the Company has obtained authorization from a majority of shareholders such that should conversion occur at the Fixed Conversion Price the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount associated with the $85,000 note, resulting from the conversion price of $0.001 below the market price on December 31, 2012 of $0.021, resulted in a discount of $4,250 of which $4,222 was amortized during the 5 months ended May 31, 2013. The $125,000 note was evaluated and it was determined that there was no associated beneficial conversion feature discount.

All outstanding notes and debentures were evaluated for embedded derivatives in accordance with ASC 815 and were found to not include any embedded derivatives.

During the 12 months ended May 31, 2013 the Company converted $9,000 of short term note principal into 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and $36,800 of the First Asher Note principal into 580,834 shares of the Company’s common stock. All ~~conversions~~stock ~~were~~was issued within the terms of the underlying agreements.

During the 12 month period ended May 31, 2013 the Company recorded expenses of $50,201 for accrued interest and $61,002 related to amortization of debenture discounts.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2014

Third party short term principal outstanding on May 31, 2013 was $393,576, consisting of note principal $237,876 and debenture principal $155,700. Total third party long term principal outstanding on May 31, 2013 consisted of debenture principal of $619,753. Total outstanding third party principal outstanding on May 31, 2013 was $1,013,329.

~~The~~During ~~following~~the ~~tables~~twelve ~~summarize~~months ended May 31, 2014 the ~~outstanding~~Company ~~principal~~re-classified ~~and~~$316,750 ~~discounts~~of ~~associated~~related ~~with~~party ~~debentures~~debt and ~~notes~~$14,026 ~~outstanding~~of atrelated ~~May~~party ~~31,~~accounts ~~2012~~payable to third party and ~~May~~retired 31the obligations through the sale of the operation. During this period the Company paid $8,728 ~~2013~~of interest associated with these notes in cash.

May 31, 2012
Long and Short Term Debentures			Notes	Total
Principal at end of period	Remaining Discounts	Balance Sheet Amount net of discounts	Principal at end of period	End of Period Balance Sheet Amount
$730,753	$ -	$730,753	$88,739	$819,492

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company converted $14,900 of Asher debenture principal into 1,264,762 shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion was within the terms of the underlying agreement. During this period the Company exercised its option to repay in cash the balances due on the First and Second Asher Notes. The Company repaid $2,800 of principal, $1,981 of accrued interest and $3,719 of accelerated interest on the First Asher Note and $32,500 of principal, $1,627 of accrued interest and $17,873 of accelerated interest on the Second Asher Note.

During the twelve months ended May 31, 2014 the Company recognized the conversion of a total of $370,600 of third party debenture principal, debenture accrued interest and note principal into 23,909,678 shares of its unregistered common stock. As of May 31, 2014 the Company issued 20,296,775 shares and recorded the balance of 3,612,903 shares as stock payable. The conversions were at a conversion price equal to the lowest closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the 20 days on which the Company's shares traded immediately preceding the date of conversion. The conversions were within the terms of the underlying agreements.

Total third party principal outstanding on May 31, 2014 was $565,227, consisting of note principal $23,006 and debenture principal $542,221. For the period ended May 31, 2014 all third party debt was short term.

The following tables summarize the outstanding principal and discounts associated with debentures and notes outstanding at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2014.


May 31, 2013
Long and Short Term Debentures			Notes			Total
Principal at end of period	Remaining Discounts	Balance Sheet Amount net of discounts	Principal at end of period	Remaining Discounts	Balance Sheet Amount net of discounts	End of Period Balance Sheet Amount
$775,453	$29,711	$745,742	$237,876	$28	$237,848	$983,590


May 31, 2014
Debentures			Notes			Total
Principal at end of period	Remaining Discounts	Balance Sheet Amount net of discounts	Principal at end of period	Remaining Discounts	Balance Sheet Amount net of discounts	End of Period Balance Sheet Amount
$542,221	$Nil	$542,221	$23,006	N/A	$23,006	$565,227

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

The principal and accrued interest on notes and debentures as of May 31, ~~2012~~2013 and May 31, ~~2013~~2014 are summarized in the following tables:

Notes and Debentures		Principal Amount at May 31, 2012	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Accrued Interest May 31, 2012
Third Party Notes	$	88,739	NIL	$	NIL
Third Party Debentures		730,753	6.5%		272,672
Total	$	819,492	5.8%	$	272,672
Notes and Debentures		Principal Amount at May 31, 2013	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Accrued Interest May 31, 2013
Third Party Notes	$	237,876	-Nil	$	-Nil
Third Party Debentures		775,453	6.7%		322,876
Total	$	1,013,329	5.1%	$	322,876
Notes and Debentures		Principal Amount at May 31, 2014	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Accrued Interest May 31, 2014
Third Party Notes	$	23,006	N/A	$	Nil
Third Party Debentures		542,221	6.8%		259,891
Total	$	565,227	6.5%	$	259,891

Principal payments on loans and debentures payable in the years ending May 31, ~~2013~~2015 through ~~2017~~2019 are as follows:

Fiscal Year	Principal
2013	$102,876
2015	$565,227
2014	$523,180
2015	$387,273
2016	-
2017	-
Total	$1,013,329
2018	-
2019	-
Total	$565,227

NOTE 98 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

AtThe Company recorded revenues of $49,454 from discontinued operations and a pre-tax net gain of $27,762 for the twelve month period ended May 31, ~~2012,~~2014. In the ~~Company~~comparable ~~had~~period ~~disposed~~in ofthe ~~all~~prior ~~discontinued~~year ~~inventory~~the ~~and~~Company ~~fully~~recorded ~~depreciated~~revenue ~~all~~of ~~plant~~$33,219 and ~~equipment~~a ~~assets.~~pre-tax Atnet ~~May~~loss ~~31,~~of ~~2013~~($73,736). The assets ~~from~~and ~~discontinued~~liabilities ~~operations~~of ~~were~~MCM deand ~~minimis~~Cardinal Points Trading Corp are segregated in the balance sheet and labeled as held for sale.

AtNOTE ~~May~~9 ~~31,~~- ~~2013,~~CHANGES ~~the~~IN ~~Company~~PRESENTATION ~~had~~OF noCOMPARATIVE ~~liabilities from discontinued operations. The following table summarizes the liabilities from discontinued operations at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012:~~STATEMENTS

Description		May 31, 2013	May 31, 2012
Note Payable	$	-	$	61,250
Total liabilities related to discontinued operations	$	-	$	61,250

The presentation of certain amounts for previous periods has been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted for the current period.

The Company did not record a loss from discontinued operations for the 12 months ended May 31, 2013. The loss from discontinued operations ($1,938), recorded for the 12 months ended May 31, 2012, was a result of miscellaneous charges related pursuing legal recourse against the Company’s home décor supplier.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 10 - ~~NEW~~DISPOSAL ~~ACCOUNTING~~OF ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~SUBSIDIARY

InEffective ~~February~~September 1, 2013, the ~~Financial~~Company ~~Accounting~~disposed ~~Standards~~of ~~Board~~its ~~(FASB)~~subsidiary ~~issued~~MCM ~~Accounting~~Technologies ~~Standards Update (ASU) No~~Inc. ~~2013-02, Comprehensive Income~~ (~~Topic 220~~"MCM"): ~~Reporting~~by ofsale ~~Amounts~~to ~~Reclassified~~a ~~Out~~previous ofrelated ~~Accumulated~~party, ~~Other~~Murat ~~Comprehensive Income~~Erbatur, ~~to improve~~ the ~~transparency~~Company's offormer ~~reporting~~COO, ~~these~~for ~~reclassifications~~$1.00. ~~Other~~Mr. ~~comprehensive~~Erbatur ~~income~~resigned ~~includes~~as ~~gains~~the ~~and~~Company's ~~losses~~COO ~~that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains~~ and ~~losses~~Director ~~are~~on ~~later~~June ~~reclassified~~25, ~~out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income~~2013. The ~~amendments~~transaction inwas ~~the~~accounted ~~ASU do not change the current requirements~~ for ~~reporting~~by ~~net~~rolling ~~income~~up orassets ~~other~~and ~~comprehensive~~liabilities ~~income~~into ina ~~financial~~one-time ~~statements.~~adjustment ~~All~~ of ~~the~~($342,880) ~~information that this ASU requires already is required~~ to beadditional ~~disclosed~~paid ~~elsewhere~~ in ~~the financial statements under U~~capital.~~S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:~~


Item	Balance
Cash	$4,036
Accounts Receivable	$23,255
Prepaid Expenses	$287
Employee Expense Advances	$68
Inventory, Net	$1,893
Total Assets Available for Sale	$29,539
Bank Line of Credit	($46,381)
Accounts Payable	($28,824)
Accrued Liabilities	$602
Loans Payable	($301,854)
Liabilities associated with Assets Available for Sale	($376,457)
Accumulated other Comprehensive Income/Loss	$4,038
Additional Paid In Capital	($342,880)

~~Present~~Effective ~~(either~~March on1, ~~the~~2014, ~~face of~~ the ~~statement~~Company ~~where~~disposed ~~net~~of ~~income~~its issubsidiary ~~presented~~Cardinal orPoints inTrading ~~the~~Corp ~~notes)~~by ~~the~~sale ~~effects~~to ona ~~the~~third ~~line~~party ~~items~~for of$1.00. ~~net~~The ~~income~~transaction ofwas ~~significant~~accounted ~~amounts~~for ~~reclassified~~by ~~out~~rolling ofup ~~accumulated~~assets ~~other~~and ~~comprehensive~~liabilities ~~income~~into a one-time ~~but~~adjustment ~~only~~of if($711,990) ~~the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP~~ to beadditional ~~reclassified~~paid ~~to net income~~ in ~~its entirety in the same reporting period; and~~capital.


Item	Balance
Cash	$100

Total Assets Available for Sale	$100

Accounts Payable	($16,593)
GST Payable	$78
Loans Payable	($689,986)
Liabilities associated with Assets Available for Sale	($706,510)
Accumulated other Comprehensive Income(Loss)	($5,589)
Additional Paid In Capital	($711,990)

~~Cross-reference~~NOTE to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension11-~~related~~ ~~amounts)~~SUBSEQUENT ~~instead~~EVENTS ~~of directly to income or expense.~~

~~The~~On ~~amendments~~October ~~apply~~1, to2014 ~~all~~the ~~public~~Company's ~~and~~Board ~~private~~of ~~companies~~Directors ~~that~~approved ~~report~~a ~~items~~Letter of ~~other~~Intent ~~comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply~~ with ~~these~~Eagle ~~amendments~~Financial ~~for~~Diamond ~~all~~Group, ~~reporting periods (interim and annual)~~Inc. ~~The~~On ~~amendments~~April ~~are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15~~27, ~~2012,~~2015 ~~for~~the ~~public~~Company's ~~companies.~~Board ~~Early adoption is permitted. The adoption~~ of ~~ASU~~Directors ~~No.~~approved ~~2013-02 is not expected to have~~ a ~~material~~Letter ~~impact~~of onIntent ~~our~~with ~~financial~~420 ~~position~~International ~~or results of operations~~Corp.

InNOTE ~~January~~12 ~~2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013~~-~~01,~~ ~~Balance~~NEW ~~Sheet~~ACCOUNTING (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.PRONOUNCEMENTS

In ~~October~~May ~~2012~~2014, the FASB has issued ~~Accounting~~No. ~~Standards Update ASU 2012~~2014-0409, ~~“Technical~~Revenues ~~Corrections~~from ~~and~~Contracts ~~Improvements”~~with inCustomers ~~Accounting~~(Topic ~~Standards Update No~~606). ~~2012-04.~~ The ~~amendments~~guidance in this update ~~cover~~supersedes athe ~~wide~~revenue ~~range~~recognition ofrequirements ~~Topics~~ in ~~the~~Topic ~~Accounting~~605, ~~Standards~~Revenue ~~Codification~~Recognition. ~~These~~In ~~amendments~~addition, ~~include technical corrections and improvements to~~ the ~~Accounting~~existing ~~Standards~~requirements ~~Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective~~ for ~~fiscal~~the ~~periods~~recognition ~~beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption~~ of ~~ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have~~ a ~~material~~gain ~~impact~~or loss on ~~our~~the ~~financial~~transfer ~~position~~of ornonfinancial ~~results~~assets ~~of operations.~~

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, ~~2013~~2014

Inthat ~~August~~are ~~2012~~not in a contract with a customer (for example, assets within the ~~FASB~~scope ~~issued~~of ~~ASU~~Topic ~~2012-03~~360, ~~“Technical~~Property, ~~Amendments~~Plant, and ~~Corrections~~Equipment, toand ~~SEC~~intangible ~~Sections:~~assets ~~Amendments~~within tothe ~~SEC~~scope ~~Paragraphs~~of ~~Pursuant~~Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, are amended to ~~SEC~~be ~~Staff~~consistent ~~Accounting~~with ~~Bulletin~~the guidance on recognition and measurement (~~SAB~~including the constraint on revenue) Noin this Update. ~~114~~Under the new guidance, ~~Technical~~an ~~Amendments~~entity ~~Pursuant~~should recognize revenue to ~~SEC~~depict ~~Release~~the ~~No.~~transfer ~~33-9250,~~of ~~and~~promised ~~Corrections~~goods ~~Related~~or services to ~~FASB~~customers ~~Accounting~~in ~~Standards~~an ~~Update~~amount ~~2010-22~~that ~~(SEC~~reflects ~~Update)”~~the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in ~~Accounting~~exchange ~~Standards~~for ~~Update~~those goods or services. The amendments in ASU No. ~~2012~~2014-~~03.~~09 ~~This~~are ~~update~~effective ~~amends~~for ~~various~~public ~~SEC~~entities ~~paragraphs~~for ~~pursuant~~annual toreporting ~~the~~periods ~~issuance~~beginning ofafter ~~SAB~~December ~~No.~~15, ~~114.~~2016, ~~The~~including ~~adoption~~interim ofperiods ~~ASU~~within ~~2012-03~~that reporting period. Early application is not ~~expected~~permitted. toThe ~~have~~Company ais ~~material~~currently evaluating the impact onthat ~~our~~this ~~financial~~ASU ~~position~~will orhave ~~results~~on ofits ~~operations~~financial statements.

InOn ~~July~~June ~~2012~~10, 2014, the FASB issued ~~ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in~~ Accounting Standards Update ~~No. 2012-02. This update amends~~ [ASU] ~~2011~~2014-0810, ~~Intangibles~~entitled –Development ~~Goodwill~~Stage ~~and~~Entities ~~Other~~ (Topic ~~350~~915): ~~Testing~~Elimination ~~Indefinite-Lived~~of ~~Intangible~~Certain ~~Assets~~Financial ~~for~~Reporting ~~Impairment~~Requirements, ~~and~~Including ~~permits~~ an ~~entity~~Amendment ~~first~~ to ~~assess~~Variable ~~qualitative~~Interest ~~factors~~Entities toGuidance ~~determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test~~ in ~~accordance~~Topic ~~with Subtopic 350-30~~810, ~~Intangibles~~Consolidation. -The ~~Goodwill~~guidance ~~and~~in ~~Other~~ASU 2014-10 ~~General~~removes ~~Intangibles~~all ~~Other~~incremental ~~than~~financial ~~Goodwill.~~reporting ~~The~~requirements ~~amendments~~from ~~are~~GAAP ~~effective~~ for ~~annual~~development-stage ~~and~~entities, ~~interim~~including ~~impairment~~the ~~tests~~removal ~~performed~~of ~~for~~Topic ~~fiscal~~915 ~~years~~from ~~beginning~~the ~~after~~FASB ~~September~~Accounting ~~15,~~Standards ~~2012~~Codification. ~~Early~~In ~~adoption is permitted~~addition, ~~including~~the ~~for~~update ~~annual~~adds ~~and~~an ~~interim~~example ~~impairment~~disclosure ~~tests~~in ~~performed~~Risks asand ofUncertainties a(Topic ~~date~~275) ~~before~~to ~~July~~illustrate ~~27,~~one ~~2012,~~way ifthat aan ~~public~~ entity’s ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~has ~~for the most recent annual or interim period have~~ not ~~yet~~begun ~~been~~planned ~~issued~~principal ~~or,~~operations ~~for~~could ~~nonpublic~~provide ~~entities,~~information ~~have~~about ~~not~~the ~~yet~~risks ~~been~~and ~~made~~uncertainties ~~available~~related ~~for~~to ~~issuance.~~the ~~The~~company’s ~~adoption~~current ~~of ASU 2012-02 has not had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations~~activities.

InThe ~~December~~accounting ~~2011,~~standards ~~the~~update ~~FASB~~also ~~issued~~removes ~~ASU~~an ~~2011-12,~~exception ~~“Deferral~~provided ofto ~~the~~development ~~Effective~~stage ~~Date~~entities ~~for~~in ~~Amendments~~Consolidations to(Topic ~~the~~810) ~~Presentation~~for ofdetermining ~~Reclassifications~~whether ofan ~~Items~~entity ~~out~~is ofa ~~Accumulated~~variable ~~Other~~interest ~~Comprehensive~~entity—which ~~Income~~may inchange ~~Accounting~~the ~~Standards~~consolidation ~~Update~~analysis, ~~No.~~consolidation ~~2011-05.~~decision, ~~This~~and ~~update~~disclosure ~~defers~~requirements ~~the~~for ~~requirement~~a tocompany ~~present~~that ~~items~~has ~~that~~an ~~are~~interest ~~reclassified~~in ~~from~~a ~~accumulated~~company ~~other~~in ~~comprehensive~~the ~~income~~development tostage. ~~net~~ASU ~~income~~2014-10 inis ~~both~~effective for the ~~statement~~first ofannual ~~income~~period ~~where~~beginning ~~net~~after ~~income~~December is15, ~~presented~~2014 the presentation and ~~the~~disclosure ~~statement~~requirements ~~where~~in ~~other~~Topic ~~comprehensive~~915 ~~income~~will isno ~~presented~~longer be required. The ~~adoption~~revised ofconsolidation ~~ASU~~standards ~~2011-12~~are ~~has~~effective ~~not~~one ~~had~~year alater, ~~material~~in ~~impact~~annual onperiods ~~our~~beginning ~~financial~~after ~~position~~December or15, ~~results~~2015. ofEarly ~~operations~~adoption is permitted. The Company has elected early adoption.

In ~~December~~August ~~2011~~2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. ~~2011~~2014-1115, “~~Balance~~Presentation ~~Sheet~~of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): ~~Disclosures~~Disclosure of Uncertainties about ~~Offsetting~~an ~~Assets~~Entity’s ~~and~~Ability ~~Liabilities~~to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU ~~2011~~2014-1115”). ~~This~~ASU ~~Update~~2014-15 ~~requires~~is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to ~~disclose~~continue ~~information~~as ~~about~~a ~~offsetting~~going concern and to provide related ~~arrangements~~footnote todisclosures. ~~enable~~Specifically, ~~users~~ASU 2014-15 provides a definition of ~~its~~the ~~financial~~term ~~statements~~substantial todoubt ~~understand~~and ~~the~~requires ~~effect~~an assessment for a period of ~~those~~one ~~arrangements~~year onafter ~~its~~the ~~financial~~date ~~position.~~that ~~The~~the ~~objective~~financial ofstatements ~~this~~are ~~disclosure~~issued is(or available to ~~facilitate~~be ~~comparison~~issued). ~~between~~It ~~those~~also ~~entities~~requires ~~that~~certain ~~prepare~~disclosures ~~their~~when ~~financial~~substantial ~~statements~~doubt onis ~~the~~alleviated ~~basis~~as a result of ~~U.S.~~consideration ~~GAAP~~of management’s plans and ~~those~~requires ~~entities~~an ~~that~~express ~~prepare~~statement ~~their~~and ~~financial~~other ~~statements~~disclosures onwhen ~~the~~substantial ~~basis~~doubt ofis ~~IFRS~~not alleviated. The ~~amended~~new ~~guidance~~standard iswill be effective for ~~annual~~ reporting periods beginning ~~on or~~ after ~~January~~December 115, ~~2013~~2016, ~~and~~with ~~interim~~early ~~periods~~adoption ~~within those annual periods~~permitted. ~~The~~Management ~~Company~~ is currently evaluating the impact, ifof ~~any, that~~ the adoption of ~~this~~ASU ~~pronouncement~~2014-14 ~~may have~~ on ~~its~~our ~~results~~financial ofstatements ~~operations~~and ~~or financial position~~disclosures.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE 11 – CHANGES IN PRESENTATION OF COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS

The presentation of certain amounts for previous periods has been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted for the current period.

OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2013

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On June 25, 2013 Murat Erbatur resigned as director and COO and on June 26, 2013 the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Ian Gilbey as a director. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the merger with the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Occidental Development Group Inc., and in the merger the name of the company was changed to Occidental Development Group Inc. (the changes to take effect upon approval for trading purposes by FINRA). On July 17, 2013, the Board also approved the filing with the Secretary of State of Nevada a Certificate of Change that effected a 1:10 reverse split in our outstanding common stock and a reduction of our authorized common stock in the same 1:10 ratio, from 800,000,000 shares to 80,000,000 shares. Both of these corporate actions were permitted to be taken by the Company’s Board of Directors without stockholder approval under Nevada NRS 92A.180 (for the merger with the subsidiary and name change) and NRS 78.207 (for the change in authorized and outstanding stock).

The change of the Company’s name to Occidental Development Group, Inc. and the 1:10 reverse split with the concurrent reduction of our authorized common stock in the same ratio were approved by FINRA and became effective for trading purposes on August 19, 2013.

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this annual report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")) as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014. The evaluation concluded that there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the issuer’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness related to the lack of monitoring or review of work performed by our management and lack of segregation of duties. As of May 31, ~~2012~~2014, in the preparation of audited financial statements, footnotes and financial data, all of our financial reporting was carried out solely by our chief financial and accounting officer and we did not have an audit committee to monitor and review the work performed. The lack of segregation of duties resulted from lack of accounting staff with accounting technical expertise necessary for an effective system of internal control. Based on this evaluation the Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the reasons stated below.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

4039

Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the interim or annual consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness in future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsor Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based upon its evaluation, our management concluded that there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, ~~2013~~2014. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the issuer’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The material weakness related to the lack of monitoring or review of work performed by our management and lack of segregation of duties. As of May 31, ~~2013~~2014, in the preparation of audited financial statements, footnotes and financial data, all of our financial reporting was carried out solely by our chief financial and accounting officer and we did not have an audit committee to monitor and review the work performed. The lack of segregation of duties resulted from lack of accounting staff with accounting technical expertise necessary for an effective system of internal control.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) or 15(d)-15(f)) that occurred during fourth quarter of the period covered by this yearly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

4140

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our executive officers and directors and their ages as of ~~August~~June 294, ~~2013~~2015 are as follows:

NAME	AGE	POSITION
Michael F. Holloran	6566	President, CEO and Director
Ian Gilbey	4546	Director

MICHAEL F. HOLLORAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO

Michael Holloran was elected a director and accepted the position of President & CEO of ODG in 2000. He brings to ODG a wealth of senior management experience spanning 3940 years, including 22 years with the Beak International Group and long-term involvement spearheading strategic corporate expansion into international markets, primarily within Southeast Asia. He has been senior consultant to several international engineering companies including: Simons International Inc., AMEC Inc., and Klohn Crippen Berger. He has served as advisor to several multi-national companies and held advisory board and committee memberships including the University of Guelph School of Engineering and the Canadian Pulp and Paper Association. He holds a Masters Degree in Chemical and Environmental Engineering from McMaster University, a Bachelor of Science (Honors) degree in Applied Mathematics and Physical Chemistry from the University of Waterloo. and a Management Studies diploma from Sheridan College.

IAN GILBEY, DIRECTOR

Mr. Gilbey, age 4546, is an accomplished senior financial consultant with a background that includes over 18 years in the financial markets where he has developed extensive industry relationships in the origination and execution of a broad range of strategic transactions including: handling domestic mergers and acquisitions, raising venture capital, public offerings and the raising of capital for publicly traded, sponsor owned and private corporations. Mr. Gilbey started his financial career in May 1994 as an account executive with Sutro, where he became licensed for both Series 7 and Series 63. In July 1995 he joined The Boston Group, where he was involved in raising capital for initial public offerings (IPO's). In 1997 he developed a team for managing multi-million dollar portfolios in equity funds, bonds and IPO's. In 1997 Mr. Gilbey moved his team to Prudential Securities and in September 2002, Mr. Gilbey joined Noble Capital in Florida, where he was responsible for raising investment capital for managed portfolios by developing network television financial infomercials and radio talk show news programming. In May 2003 he joined Tide Water Capital, a market neutral hedge fund, where he was responsible for the trading desk, raising capital and product review. In 2006 Mr. Gilbey established an independent consultant practice assisting companies achieve their corporate goals including: corporate structuring for public markets, establishing share structures for internal ownership and public equity, and general corporate development. He has worked with company boards, CEO's, legal departments, corporate investor relations and corporate marketing teams. Mr. Gilbey graduated from Thomas Bennett Community College, Crawley, England in 1986 and during 1991 attended Santa Monica Community College, Business Program.

Directors are elected by the stockholders at annual meetings. Between annual meetings vacancies in our board of directors may be filled by the board itself. There are currently two vacancies on our board of directors. Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their successors are appointed and qualified. Neither of our current directors would qualify as “independent” under NASDAQ rules.

4241

Except as disclosed under Item 12, the Registrant knows of no transactions involving the Registrant during the last two years in which our directors had a direct or indirect interest.

None of our executive officers or key employees is related by blood, marriage or adoption to any other director or executive officer.

To our knowledge, there is no arrangement or understanding between any of our officers and any other person pursuant to which the officer was selected to serve as an officer.

Nominating Committee

We do not have a separate Nominating Committee. Our full Board of Directors performs the functions usually designated to a Nominating Committee.

There have been no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the board of directors.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separate Audit Committee. Our full Board of Directors performs the functions usually designated to an Audit Committee. We do not have an Audit Committee financial expert.

Corporate Code of Conduct

In June 2007 we adopted a Code of Ethics for senior financial management to promote honest and ethical conduct and to deter wrongdoing. This Code applies to our President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, COO, Directors, and other employees performing similar functions. The obligations of the Code of Ethics supplement, but do not replace, any other code of conduct or ethics policy applicable to our employees generally.

Under the Code of Ethics, all members of the senior financial management shall:

Act honestly and ethically in the performance of their duties at our company,

Avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships,

Provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications by our company,

Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments and other private and public regulatory agencies that affect the conduct of our business and our financial reporting,

Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing the member’s independent judgment to be subordinated,

Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of work, except when authorized or legally obtained to disclosure such information,

Share knowledge and maintain skills relevant to carrying out the member’s duties within our company,

Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers and colleagues in the work environment and community,

Achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources of our company entrusted to the member, and Promptly bring to the attention of the Chief Executive Officer any information concerning:

significant deficiencies in the design or operating of internal controls which could adversely to record, process, summarize and report financial date or

II.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in our financial reporting or internal controls.

We will provide a copy of the Code of to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to Occidental Development Group, Inc. 256 S. Robertson Blvd, Beverly Hills Ca 90211.

4342

There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers and/or directors.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

We believe that during the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014, Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were satisfied.

	Number	Transactions	Known Failures
	Of late	Not Timely	To File a
Name and principal position	Reports	Reported	Required Form
Michael F. Holloran, President & CEO and Principal Accounting & Financial Officer	0	0	0
Ian Gilbey, Director	0	0	0
Tom Simons	0	0	0
Steven Levenson	0	0	0

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the annual compensation for services in all capacities to us for the years ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position (a)	Year (b)	Salary ($) (c)	Bonus ($) (d)	Stock Awards [issued and pending] ($) (e)	Option Awards ($) (f)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (g)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (h)	All Other Compen- sation (s) (i)	Total ($) (j)
M Holloran CEO	~~2013~~2014	$0	$0	$~~150~~100,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$150,000
	2012	$0	$0	$122,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$122,000
	2013	$0	$0	$150,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$122,000
I Gilbey Director	~~2013~~2014	$0	$0	$~~125~~100,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$125,000
	2012	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	2013	$0	$0	$125,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0

OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

No options/SARs were granted in the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014.

AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY-END OPTION/SAR VALUES

No officer or Director hold or exercised any options in the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2013~~2014.

LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS - AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

We have not awarded any stock options, stock appreciation rights or other form of derivative security or common stock or cash bonuses to our executive officers and directors.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The members of our Board of Directors are reimbursed for actual expenses incurred in attending Board meetings.

4443

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of September 13, 2013, information concerning the beneficial ownership of the our Common Stock by (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock, (ii) each of our directors and officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)
Title of	Name and Address			% of
Class	of Beneficial Owner	No of Shares Held		Class(1)
Common	Michael F. Holloran	18,171,259	Direct	3324%
Stock	c/o 256 S. Robertson Blvd
	Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Common	~~Thomas~~Ian AE. ~~Simons~~Gilbey	~~915~~16,~~360~~666,667	Direct -	222%
Stock	c/o 256 S. Robertson Blvd
	Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Common	~~Ian~~Steven EH. ~~Gilbey~~Levenson	16,666,667	Direct -	3122%
Stock	c/o 256 S. Robertson Blvd
	Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Common	Steven H. Levenson	16,666,667	Direct	31%
Stock	c/o 256 S. Robertson Blvd
	Beverly Hills, CA 90211
	All officers and directors
	as a Group (2 persons)	34,837,926		6446%

(1)

Beneficial ownership and percentage ownership based on 5475,~~517~~886,~~442~~165 shares issued and outstanding on ~~September~~June 134, ~~2013~~2015.

Changes in Control

There are no arrangements that may result in a change in control of the Registrant.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our By-Laws include a provision regarding related party transactions which requires that each participant to such transaction identify all direct and indirect interests to be derived as a result of the Company's entering into the related transaction. A majority of the disinterested members of the board of directors must approve any related party transaction.

Except for the transactions described below, none of our directors, senior officers or principal shareholders, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing have any interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, during the fiscal periods ended May 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2013~~2014, or in any proposed transactions, in which such person had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

During the year ended May 31, 2012, the Company’s CEO loaned the Company $42,645 and the Company’s former COO loaned the Company $9,530. These amounts are uncollateralized and due on demand. The Company paid $25,828 in interest to its former COO in cash and accrued $7,868 in interest due the Company’s CEO.

During the year ended May 31, 2012 $180,000 of accrued liabilities, $115,388 of short term note payable and $2,612 of accrued interest due the Company’s CEO was consolidated into a debenture bearing interest at a rate of 6% annum. The debenture and $5,780 of accrued interest were converted into 992,600 shares of common stock of the Company at an average price of $0.30 per share. The conversion was made in accordance with the underlying debt agreement.

During the year ended May 31, 2013 the Company’s CEO loaned the Company $38,631, the Company repaid the CEO $109,010 in cash, the Company’s former COO loaned the Company $77,174, the Company repaid the former COO $73,478 in cash and a related party, Tom Simons loaned the Company $30,267. During the year ended May 31, 2013, The Company paid $27,413 in interest to its former COO in cash and accrued $722 in interest due the Company’s CEO.

During the year ended May 31, 2013 $122,000 of accrued liabilities due the Company’s CEO was converted into a debenture bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum and a $30,267 short term related party note was converted into a debenture bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum. During the year ended May 31, 2013 the $122,000 debenture due the Company’s CEO was retired as follows: $13,000 cash principal payment, $36,000 principal transferred to short term note, $73,000 principal plus $1,700 accrued interest converted to 996,000 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share. During the same period the Company converted $30,267 of related party debenture principal and $454 of accrued interest into 409,600 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share. The conversions were made in accordance with the underlying debt agreements.

The Company shares office space and administrative costs in Vancouver with ScanTech Imaging Corp. (ScanTech”), a company controlled by the Company’s former COO Murat Erbatur. The Company provides technical consulting services to ScanTech on an as required basis. 44

principal transferred to short term note, $73,000 principal plus $1,700 accrued interest converted to 996,000 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share. During the same period the Company converted $30,267 of related party debenture principal and $454 of accrued interest into 409,600 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share. The conversions were made in accordance with the underlying debt agreements.

During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company's CEO loaned the Company $91,496, the Company repaid the Company's CEO $7,102 in cash. During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company consolidated $50,000 of short term loans bearing interest at 6% with $150,000 of accrued liabilities due the Company's CEO into a $200,000 convertible debenture bearing interest at 6% per annum. During the year ended May 31, 2014 the convertible debenture due the Company's CEO was converted to 16,666,667 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.012 per share. The conversions were made in accordance with the underlying debt agreement. During the year ended May 31, 2014 two convertible notes totaling $200,000 payable to Ian Gilbey one of the Company's directors were converted to 16,666,667 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.012 per share. The conversions were made in accordance with the underlying debt agreement. During the year ended May 31, 2014 the Company entered into a performance based compensation agreement with Steven Levenson under which the Company issued 16,666,667 shares of common stock valued at $0.012 per share, fair market value on the date of issuance, the shares to be held in escrow pending satisfaction of the terms of the Agreement.

Director Independence

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that none of its directors are independent based on the standards for director independence for the NYSE Amex Equities.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(1)

Audit related fees for audit Year ended May 31, ~~2012~~2014: $25,000

(2)

Audit related fees for audit Year ended May 31, ~~2011~~2013: $25,000

(3)

All other fees: N/A

(4)

Audit committee pre-approval processes, percentages of services approved by audit committee, percentage of hours spent on audit engagement by persons other than principal accountant’s full time employees: N/A.

4645

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following financial statements have been filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are presented in Item 8, herein.

1. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2. Consolidated Balance Sheets

3. Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss

4. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

5. Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(b) The following Exhibits are filed by attachment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
31(2)	Certification of Michael F. Holloran Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
31(1)	Certification of Michael F. Holloran Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32(2)	Certification of Michael F. Holloran Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32(1)	Certification of Michael F. Holloran Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS(1)(2)	XBRL Instance Document
101.INS(1)	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(1)(2)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.SCH(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL(1)(2)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.CAL(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)(2)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)(2)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)(2)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

(2)

Filed herewith.

In addition to those Exhibits shown above, the Company incorporates the following Exhibits by reference to the filings set forth below:


EXHIBIT
NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
3.1	Articles of Incorporation	3.1 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
3.11	By-Laws	3.11 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
3.2	Certificate of Amendment	3.2 in Form 10K/A dated August 18, 2010
3.3	Certificate of Merger, filed effective August 19, 2013	3.3 in Form 8-K dated August 21, 2013
3.4	Certificate of Change, filed effective August 19, 2013	3.4 in Form 8-K dated August 21, 2013
4.2	Form of 12% Convertible debenture	4.2 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
4.3	Form of Stock Purchase Warrant	4.3 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
4.4	Stock Purchase Agreement, between	4.4 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Company and IFG Private Equity LLC
4.5	Commitment Warrant to IFG	4.5 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Private Equity LLC
4.6	Registration Rights Agreement, between	4.6 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Company and IFG Private Equity LLC
4.7	1998 Directors' & Officers' Stock Option Plan	99.1 in Form S-8 dated Feb 29, 1999
4.8	1999 Stock Option Plan	99.2 in Form S-8 dated Feb 29, 1999
4.9	2001 Stock Option Plan	4.7 in Form S-8 filed November 27, 2001
4.10	2003 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed October 25, 2002
4.11	2005 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed July 28, 2005
4.12	2006 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed April 28, 2006
4.13	2007 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed April 13, 2007
10.3	M. Page-Consulting Agreement	10.3 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
10.4	C. Parfitt-Consulting Agreement	10.4 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
10.6	Office lease dated Aug 27, 1998	10.6 in Form 10-SB dated Apr 21, 1999
10.7	Office lease dated Dec 22, 1998	10.7 in Form 10-SB dated Apr 21, 1999
10.8	Wolnosc International-Consulting Agreement	10.8 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.9	Office lease dated Jan 1, 2000	10.9 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.10	Capital Lease Agreement	10.10 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.11	Michael F. Holloran - Consulting Agreement	10.11 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
10.12	Sublease Agreement of Company's offices dated August 7, 2001	10.12 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15, 2001
10.13	Addendum to the Sublease dated August 22, 2001	10.13 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15, 2001
10.14	Paul Morford Consulting Agreement	10.14 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15,
		2001
10.15	8% Secured Convertible Promissory	4.7 in Form 8-K dated January 4,
	Note due December 31, 2006	2005
10.16	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated	10.15 in Form 8-K dated January 13,
	December 7, 2005, by and among the	2006
	Company and the holders of the Company’s
	6% Convertible Debentures, with the form
	of Debenture attached
10.17	Registration Rights Agreement, dated	10.16 in Form 8-K dated January 13, 2006
	December 7, 2005, by and among the
	Company and the Holders of the 6%
	Convertible Debentures
10.18	Walther-Glas Investment Agreement	10.16 Form 10-KSB/A2 dated July 18, 2008
10.19	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization	10.18 in Form 8-K dated Dec 15, 2006
10.20	Consulting Agreement	10.19 in Form 10-Q dated October 21, 2013
10.21	Consulting Agreement	10.20 in Form 10-Q dated October 21, 2013
10.22	Performance Agreement	10.21 in Form 10-Q dated October 21, 2013
10.23	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization	10.22 in Form 10-Q dated October 21, 2013
10.24	Integrity Aviation and Leasing Agreement	10.23 in Form 10-Q dated January 21, 2014
10.25	MCM Agreement	10.24 in Form 10-Q dated January 21, 2014
10.26	Letter of Intent 420 International	10.20 in Form 8-K dated May 5, 2015
21	List of Subsidiaries	21 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000

EXHIBIT
NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
3.1	Articles of Incorporation	3.1 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
3.11	By-Laws	3.11 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
3.2	Certificate of Amendment	3.2 in Form 10K/A dated August 18, 2010
3.3	Certificate of Merger, filed effective August 19, 2013	3.3 in Form 8-K dated August 21, 2013
3.4	Certificate of Change, filed effective August 19, 2013	3.4 in Form 8-K dated August 21, 2013
4.2	Form of 12% Convertible debenture	4.2 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
4.3	Form of Stock Purchase Warrant	4.3 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
4.4	Stock Purchase Agreement, between	4.4 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Company and IFG Private Equity LLC
4.5	Commitment Warrant to IFG	4.5 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Private Equity LLC
4.6	Registration Rights Agreement, between	4.6 in Form SB-2 dated May 17, 2002
	Company and IFG Private Equity LLC
4.7	1998 Directors' & Officers' Stock Option Plan	99.1 in Form S-8 dated Feb 29, 1999
4.8	1999 Stock Option Plan	99.2 in Form S-8 dated Feb 29, 1999
4.9	2001 Stock Option Plan	4.7 in Form S-8 filed November 27, 2001
4.10	2003 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed October 25, 2002
4.11	2005 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed July 28, 2005
4.12	2006 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed April 28, 2006
4.13	2007 Stock Option Plan	4.8 in Form S-8 filed April 13, 2007
10.3	M. Page-Consulting Agreement	10.3 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
10.4	C. Parfitt-Consulting Agreement	10.4 in Form 10-SB dated Feb 2, 1999
10.6	Office lease dated Aug 27, 1998	10.6 in Form 10-SB dated Apr 21, 1999
10.7	Office lease dated Dec 22, 1998	10.7 in Form 10-SB dated Apr 21, 1999
10.8	Wolnosc International-Consulting Agreement	10.8 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.9	Office lease dated Jan 1, 2000	10.9 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.10	Capital Lease Agreement	10.10 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000
10.11	Michael F. Holloran - Consulting Agreement	10.11 in Form 10-KSB dated Aug 21, 2001
10.12	Sublease Agreement of Company's offices dated August 7, 2001	10.12 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15, 2001
10.13	Addendum to the Sublease dated August 22, 2001	10.13 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15, 2001
10.14	Paul Morford Consulting Agreement	10.14 in Form 10-QSB dated Oct 15,
		2001
10.15	8% Secured Convertible Promissory	4.7 in Form 8-K dated January 4,
	Note due December 31, 2006	2005
10.16	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated	10.15 in Form 8-K dated January 13,
	December 7, 2005, by and among the	2006
	Company and the holders of the Company’s
	6% Convertible Debentures, with the form
	of Debenture attached
10.17	Registration Rights Agreement, dated	10.16 in Form 8-K dated January 13, 2006
	December 7, 2005, by and among the
	Company and the Holders of the 6%
	Convertible Debentures
10.18	Walther-Glas Investment Agreement	10.16 Form 10-KSB/A2 dated July 18, 2008
10.19	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization	10.18 in Form 8-K dated Dec 15, 2006
21	List of Subsidiaries	21 in Form 10-SB dated Aug 29, 2000

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

Dated: ~~September~~August 1324, ~~2013~~2015

Occidental Development Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Michael F. Holloran

________________________

Michael F. Holloran,

President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on ~~September~~August 1324, ~~2013~~2015.

SIGNATURE CAPACITY

________________________________________________________________________

/s/ Michael F. Holloran

President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Director

_____________________

Michael F. Holloran

/s/ Ian Gilbey

_____________________

Director

Ian Gilbey

4948

Filing Compare · Occidental Development Group, Inc.