Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission file numbers:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. 001-32596
Reddy Ice Corporation 333-168190

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
REDDY ICE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		56-2381368 75-2244985 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8750 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 1800
DALLAS, TEXAS 75231
(Address of principal executive offices)

(214) 526-6740
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes ý No o
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). *The Registrants are not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T at this time.


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes ý No o
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company ý

Reddy Ice Corporation


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes o No ý
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes o No ý

The number of shares of registrant's common stock outstanding as of ~~August~~November 8, 2011 was:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		23,~~383~~402,~~556~~706 shares of common stock
Reddy Ice Corporation		100 shares of common stock

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY REDDY ICE CORPORATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Financial Statements	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Deficit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	9
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	9
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	10
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3032
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4851
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4852
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5054
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5256
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5256
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	5257
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	5257
Item 5.	Other Information	5257
Item 6.	Exhibits	5257
SIGNATURES		5358
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		5459

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	10,~~455~~802		$	42,173
	Accounts receivable, net			5244,~~968~~416			21,432
	Notes receivable from affiliate			1,~~253~~999			—
	Inventories, parts and supplies			1412,~~018~~943			12,549
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			5,~~291~~214			3,849
	Assets held for sale			12,~~918~~201			1,056
	Deferred tax assets			1,~~251~~395			716
		Total current assets		8778,~~154~~970			81,775
RESTRICTED CASH				1013,~~758~~107			10,110
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				~~197~~189,~~605~~817			204,898
GOODWILL				86,~~989~~876			83,368
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				7573,~~303~~448			72,204
INVESTMENTS				7,357			6,318
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,~~462~~372			12,252
TOTAL			$	~~476~~460,~~628~~947		$	470,925
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			3014,~~100~~500			—
	Accounts payable			2221,~~159~~427			15,290
	Accrued expenses			2824,~~268~~949			24,177
		Total current liabilities		8060,~~528~~877			39,468
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				450,~~747~~775			450,690
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				1513,~~089~~615			10,560
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13)				—			—
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
	Preferred stock: 25,000,000 share authorized; no shares issued or outstanding			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 23,383,556 and 22,962,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			234			230
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 23,402,706 and 22,962,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			234			230
	Additional paid-in capital			226,~~308~~832			225,208
	Accumulated deficit			(~~296~~291,~~278~~386	)		(255,231	)
		Total stockholders' deficit		(6964,~~736~~320	)		(29,793	)
TOTAL			$	~~476~~460,~~628~~947		$	470,925

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,

		2011			2010			2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues		$	126,330		$	120,147		$	273,575		$	260,204
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)			77,800			71,770			181,793			168,787
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			7,819			5,694			23,007			16,655

Gross profit			40,711			42,683			68,775			74,762
Operating expenses			14,725			14,358			41,839			41,850
Depreciation and amortization expense			2,249			2,435			7,233			6,484
Loss on dispositions of assets			629			1,035			461			2,432
Impairment of long-lived assets			1,971			514			2,741			750
Acquisition expenses			1,664			414			4,111			624
Gain on contingent acquisition consideration			(202	)		—			(202	)		—
Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation (Note 13)			785			(3,867	)		2,937			(1,824	)

Income from operations			18,890			27,794			9,655			24,446
Interest expense			(14,698	)		(14,099	)		(43,873	)		(35,678	)
Interest income			4			3			12			15
Gain on bargain purchase			—			264			—			264
Debt refinance costs			—			(310	)		—			(6,478	)

Income (loss) before income taxes			4,196			13,652			(34,206	)		(17,431	)
Income tax benefit (expense)			696			(4,662	)		(1,949	)		5,956

Net income (loss)		$	4,892		$	8,990		$	(36,155	)	$	(11,475	)

Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	0.21		$	0.39		$	(1.59	)	$	(0.51	)

	Weighted average common shares outstanding		23,394			22,949			22,742			22,450

Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	0.21		$	0.39		$	(1.59	)	$	(0.51	)

	Weighted average common shares outstanding		23,466			23,058			22,742			22,450

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues		$	106,493		$	104,163		$	147,245		$	140,057
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)			66,768			62,109			103,993			97,017
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			7,480			5,647			15,188			10,961
Gross profit			32,245			36,407			28,064			32,079
Operating expenses			14,315			14,373			27,114			27,492
Depreciation and amortization expense			2,454			2,173			4,984			4,049
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(114	)		1,170			(168	)		1,397
Impairment of long-lived assets			539			236			770			236
Acquisition expenses			1,844			208			2,447			210
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation (Note 11)			731			1,130			2,152			2,043
Income (loss) from operations			12,476			17,117			(9,235	)		(3,348	)
Interest expense			(14,826	)		(14,320	)		(29,175	)		(21,579	)
Interest income			4			8			8			12
Debt refinance costs			—			(60	)		—			(6,168	)
Income (loss) before income taxes			(2,346	)		2,745			(38,402	)		(31,083	)
Income tax benefit (expense)			400			(613	)		(2,645	)		10,618
Net income (loss)		$	(1,946	)	$	2,132		$	(41,047	)	$	(20,465	)
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,737			22,870			22,713			22,432
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,737			23,165			22,713			22,432

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

		Common Stock

		Number of Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
							(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			22,962		$	230	$	225,208		$	(255,231	)	$	(29,793	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—			—		1,612			—			1,612
Issuance of restricted stock			344			3		(3	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock			(26	)		—		—			—			—
Vesting of restricted stock units			20			—		—			—			—
Issuance of vested shares to directors			96			1		(1	)		—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			7			—		16			—			16
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—			—		—			(36,155	)		(36,155	)

	Total comprehensive loss													(36,155	)

Balance at September 30, 2011			23,403		$	234	$	226,832		$	(291,386	)	$	(64,320	)

(Unaudited)

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
							(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			22,962		$	230	$	225,208		$	(255,231	)	$	(29,793	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—			—		1,088			—			1,088
Issuance of restricted stock			344			3		(3	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock			(24	)		—		—			—			—
Issuance of vested shares to directors			96			1		(1	)		—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			6			—		16			—			16
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—			—		—			(41,047	)		(41,047	)
	Total comprehensive loss													(41,047	)
Balance at June 30, 2011			23,384		$	234	$	226,308		$	(296,278	)	$	(69,736	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Six Months Ended June 30,
				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(4136,~~047~~155	)	$	(2011,~~465~~475	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			2030,~~172~~240			1523,~~010~~139
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			12,~~522~~281			1,~~212~~946
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,168
		Gain on bargain purchase			—			(264	)
		Deferred tax expense (benefit)			2,454			(10,618	)
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,478
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(168	)		1,397
		Deferred tax expense (benefit)			1,545			(6,153	)
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			162			—
		Loss on dispositions of assets			461			2,432
		Impairment of long-lived assets			770			236
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			245			—
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,208			1,031
		Impairment of long-lived assets			2,741			750
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,804			1,423
		Gain on contingent acquisition consideration			(202	)		—
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(3123,~~581~~027	)		(2214,~~110~~476	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		~~(777~~298	)		(~~973~~452	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(12,~~539~~150	)		(~~392~~1,358	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		94,~~453~~589			2016,~~404~~515
	Net cash used in operating activities				(39,371	)		(9,100	)
	Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities				(17,330	)		18,505
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(913,~~154~~163	)		(2328,~~349~~190	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				~~386~~687			~~407~~490
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(~~956~~1,766	)		—(4,002	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				23,~~264~~074			26,~~000~~002
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,305	)		(9,160	)
	Cost of equipment sold to affiliate				(639	)		—
	Other intangible assets additions				(11	)		—
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment sold to affiliate				639			—
	Increase in restricted cash				(648	)		(10,592	)
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,339	)		(12,637	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(1,400	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(14	)		(189	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(22,463	)		(42,094	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(2,997	)		(10,340	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(3,225	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(28,557	)		(52,091	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options				16			17
	Borrowings under the credit facility				60115,~~725~~425			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(30100,~~625~~925	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(1618,~~797~~281	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)
	Net cash provided by financing activities				3014,~~116~~516			4341,~~219~~735
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(31,~~718~~371	)		(78,~~975~~149	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					42,173			44,649
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	10,~~455~~802		$	3652,~~674~~798
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	2744,~~352~~673		$	724,~~430~~327
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	812		$	1215
	Cash payments for income taxes, net			$	458		$	543
	Issuance of notes receivable—affiliate			$	(1,~~253~~999	)		—
	Noncash increase in short-term financing			$	1,253			—
	Noncash short-term financing			$	1,999			—
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	12,~~391~~860		$	~~2,857~~663

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	12,~~023~~158		$	30,153
	Accounts receivable, net			5244,~~968~~416			21,432
	Accounts receivable from Parent			~~306~~41			19
	Notes receivable from affiliate			1,~~253~~999			—
	Inventories, parts and supplies			1412,~~018~~943			12,549
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			5,~~291~~214			3,849
	Assets held for sale			12,~~918~~201			1,056
	Deferred tax assets			1,~~251~~395			716
		Total current assets		7870,~~028~~367			69,774
RESTRICTED CASH				1013,~~758~~107			10,110
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				~~197~~189,~~605~~817			204,898
GOODWILL				86,~~989~~876			83,368
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				7573,~~303~~448			72,204
INVESTMENTS				7,357			6,318
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,~~386~~310			12,149
TOTAL			$	~~467~~452,~~426~~282		$	458,821
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			3014,~~100~~500			—
	Accounts payable			2120,~~984~~990			14,375
	Accrued expenses			2825,~~756~~128			24,665
		Total current liabilities		8060,~~841~~619			39,041
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				439,~~011~~039			438,954
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				2122,~~113~~351			32,344
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13)				—			—
STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT:
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—			—
	Additional paid-in capital			~~307~~308,~~508~~032			306,420
	Accumulated deficit			(~~381~~377,~~047~~759	)		(357,938	)
		Total stockholder's deficit		(7369,~~539~~727	)		(51,518	)
TOTAL			$	~~467~~452,~~426~~282		$	458,821

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	~~106~~126,~~493~~330		$	~~104~~120,~~163~~147		$	~~147~~273,~~245~~575		$	~~140~~260,~~057~~204
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		6677,~~768~~800			6271,~~109~~770			~~103~~181,~~993~~793			97168,~~017~~787
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		7,~~480~~819			5,~~647~~694			1523,~~188~~007			1016,~~961~~655
Gross profit		3240,~~245~~711			3642,~~407~~683			2868,~~064~~775			3274,~~079~~762
Operating expenses		14,~~315~~725			14,~~373~~358			2741,~~114~~839			2741,~~492~~850
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,~~454~~249			2,~~173~~435			47,~~984~~233			46,~~049~~484
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(114	)		1,170			(168	)		1,397
Loss on dispositions of assets		629			1,035			461			2,432
Impairment of long-lived assets		~~539~~1,971			~~236~~514			~~770~~2,741			~~236~~750
Acquisition expenses		1,~~844~~664			~~208~~414			24,~~447~~111			~~210~~624
Income (loss) from operations		13,207			18,247			(7,083	)		(1,305	)
Gain on contingent acquisition consideration		(202	)		—			(202	)		—
Interest expense		(14,504	)		(13,912	)		(28,530	)		(17,805	)
Income from operations		19,675			23,927			12,592			22,622
Interest income		4			8			8			11
Interest expense		(14,377	)		(13,776	)		(42,907	)		(31,582	)
Debt refinance costs		—			(60	)		—			(6,168	)
Interest income		4			3			12			14
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,293	)		4,283			(35,605	)		(25,267	)
Gain on bargain purchase		—			264			—			264
Income tax benefit (expense)		370			(924	)		13,114			8,502
Debt refinance costs		—			(310	)		—			(6,478	)
Net income (loss)	$	(923	)	$	3,359		$	(22,491	)	$	(16,765	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		5,302			10,108			(30,303	)		(15,160	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(2,014	)		(3,511	)		11,100			4,991
Net income (loss)	$	3,288		$	6,597		$	(19,203	)	$	(10,169	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares		Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
						(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			—	$	—	$	306,420	$	(357,938	)	$	(51,518	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—		—		1,~~088~~612		—			1,~~088~~612
Dividend to Parent			—		—		—		(618	)		(618	)
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—		—		—		(2219,~~491~~203	)		(2219,~~491~~203	)
	Total comprehensive loss											(2219,~~491~~203	)
Balance at June 30, 2011			—	$	—	$	307,508	$	(381,047	)	$	(73,539	)
Balance at September 30, 2011			—	$	—	$	308,032	$	(377,759	)	$	(69,727	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Six Months Ended June 30,
				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(2219,~~491~~203	)	$	(1610,~~765~~169	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			2030,~~172~~240			1523,~~010~~139
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			~~848~~1,272			1,~~049~~768
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,168
		Gain on bargain purchase			—			(264	)
		Deferred tax benefit			(13,305	)		(8,502	)
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,478
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(168	)		1,397
		Deferred tax benefit			(11,503	)		(5,189	)
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			162			—
		Loss on dispositions of assets			461			2,432
		Impairment of long-lived assets			770			236
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			245			—
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,208			1,031
		Impairment of long-lived assets			2,741			750
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,804			1,423
		Gain on contingent acquisition consideration			(202	)		—
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(3123,~~581~~027	)		(2821,~~710~~076	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		~~(777~~298	)		(~~973~~452	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(12,~~539~~150	)		(~~394~~1,358	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		105,~~552~~704			2218,~~568~~390
	Net cash used in operating activities				(36,149	)		(7,885	)
	Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities				(13,320	)		15,872
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(913,~~154~~163	)		(2328,~~349~~190	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				~~386~~687			~~407~~490
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(~~956~~1,766	)		—(4,002	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				23,~~264~~074			26,~~000~~002
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,305	)		(9,160	)
	Cost of equipment sold to affiliate				(639	)		—
	Other intangible assets additions				(11	)		—
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment sold to affiliate				639			—
	Increase in restricted cash				(648	)		(10,592	)
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,339	)		(12,637	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(1,400	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(14	)		(189	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(22,463	)		(42,094	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(2,997	)		(10,340	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(3,225	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(28,557	)		(52,091	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Dividends to Parent				(618	)		(6,038	)
	Borrowings under the credit facility				60115,~~725~~425			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(30100,~~625~~925	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(1618,~~797~~281	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)
	Net cash provided by financing activities				2913,~~482~~882			3735,~~164~~680
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(2927,~~130~~995	)		(~~12,815~~539	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					30,153			40,440
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	12,~~023~~158		$	2739,~~625~~901
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	2644,~~734~~057		$	118,~~481~~377
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	812		$	1013
	Cash payments for income taxes, net			$	458		$	543
	Issuance of notes receivable—affiliate			$	(1,~~253~~999	)		—
	Noncash increase in short-term financing			$	1,253			—
	Noncash short-term financing			$	1,999			—
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	12,~~391~~860		$	~~2,857~~663

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

1. General

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp"), referred to collectively as the "Company", manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. The Company consists of a single operating segment. The common stock of Reddy Holdings is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "FRZ".

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report of the Company and Reddy Corp. The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the condensed financial statements of Reddy Corp included herein are unaudited; however, balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 have been derived from the audited financial statements for that date, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Under the SEC's regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation, and all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been made and are of a normal and recurring nature. The financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and Reddy Corp financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements apply to both the Company and Reddy Corp. Reddy Corp comprises all or substantially all of the Company's consolidated balances or activities unless otherwise noted. Operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the full year.

2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June~~September of 2011, the FASB ~~issue~~issued ASU 2011-0508, ~~Comprehensive~~Intangibles—Goodwill ~~Income~~and Other. ASU 2011-0508 modifies ~~requires~~the ~~that~~goodwill ~~all non-owner~~impairment ~~changes~~test inby ~~stockholders'~~allowing ~~equity~~for bean ~~presented~~assessment ~~either~~of inqualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a ~~single~~determination ~~continuous~~that ~~statement~~it is more likely than not that the fair value of ~~comprehensive~~a ~~income~~reporting orunit inis ~~two~~less ~~separate~~than ~~but~~its ~~consecutive~~carrying ~~statements~~amount. InIf, ~~the two-statement~~based ~~approach~~on this assessment, the ~~first~~entity determines ~~statement~~it ~~should present~~is ~~total~~not ~~net~~more ~~income~~likely ~~and~~than ~~its~~not ~~components~~that ~~followed~~the byfair avalue ~~second~~of ~~statement~~a ~~that~~reporting ~~should~~unit ~~present~~is ~~total~~less ~~other~~than ~~comprehensive~~its ~~income~~carrying amount, the ~~components~~entity ofmay ~~other~~bypass ~~comprehensive~~performing ~~income~~the two-step goodwill impairment test. However, ~~and~~if the ~~total~~entity concludes otherwise, it is required to perform Step 1 of ~~comprehensive~~ ~~income~~the two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-0508 will be effective for fiscal years, ~~and interim periods within those years,~~ beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-0508 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In ~~December~~June ~~2010~~of 2011, the FASB ~~issued~~issue ASU ~~2010~~2011-2805, ~~Intangibles—Goodwill~~Comprehensive ~~and Other~~Income. ASU ~~2010~~2011-2805 ~~modifies step~~requires ~~one~~that ofall non-owner ~~the~~changes ~~goodwill~~in ~~impairment~~stockholders' ~~test~~equity ~~for~~be ~~reporting~~presented ~~units~~either ~~with~~in ~~zero~~a orsingle ~~negative~~continuous ~~carrying~~statement ~~amounts~~of ~~and~~comprehensive ~~offers~~income ~~guidance~~or onin ~~when~~two toseparate ~~perform~~but ~~step~~consecutive ~~two~~statements. ofIn the two-statement ~~testing. For those reporting units~~approach, anthe ~~entity is~~first ~~required~~statement toshould ~~perform~~present ~~Step~~total 2net ofincome ~~the~~and ~~goodwill~~its ~~impairment~~components ~~test~~followed ifby ita issecond ~~more~~statement ~~likely than not~~ that ashould ~~goodwill~~present ~~impairment~~total ~~exists~~other ~~based~~comprehensive ~~upon~~income, ~~factors~~the components ~~such~~of asother ~~unanticipated~~comprehensive ~~competition~~income, and the ~~loss~~total of ~~key personnel~~comprehensive ~~and adverse regulatory changes~~income. ASU ~~2010~~2011-2805 iswill be effective for fiscal years, and interim ~~periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.~~

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and offers guidance on when to perform Step 2 of the testing. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists based upon factors such as unanticipated competition, the loss of key personnel and adverse regulatory changes. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

3. Acquisitions

~~During~~No acquisitions were completed during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011~~, the Company purchased one ice company in connection with its ongoing acquisitions program~~. ~~The~~Three ~~total purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based upon estimates of their respective fair values as of the closing dates using valuations and other studies. Six~~ acquisitions were completed during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company completed nine and ~~eight~~eleven acquisitions, respectively. The ~~following~~total ~~table~~purchase ~~summarizes~~price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed ~~aggregate~~liabilities ~~purchase~~based ~~prices,~~upon ~~estimated~~estimates ~~aggregate~~of their respective fair values as of the ~~assets~~closing ~~acquired~~dates ~~and~~using ~~the~~valuations ~~liabilities assumed~~ and ~~direct~~other ~~acquisition~~studies. ~~costs expensed:~~

		Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
		2011			2010		2011			2010
		(in millions)
Purchase price		$	4.9		$	8.4	$	13.3		$	9.2
Assets acquired:
	Inventory		0.6			0.3		0.7			0.3
	Property and equipment		1.3			2.3		3.6			2.4
	Other assets		0.2			—		0.2			—
	Goodwill		2.1			1.2		3.9			1.3
	Other intangible assets		2.0			4.6		6.2			5.2
	Total assets acquired		6.2			8.4		14.6			9.2
Total liabilities assumed			(1.3	)		—		(1.3	)		—
Direct acquisition costs expensed		$	1.8		$	0.2	$	2.4		$	0.2

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $3.9 million of revenue from the businesses acquired in 2011.

The recorded purchase price allocation related to the acquisition completed during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is preliminary at June 30, 2011, pending further evaluation of market participant data and the fair values of certain equipment acquired. The Company recorded approximately $0.7 million of deferred tax liabilities in connection with this acquisition. In addition, as a result of the acquisition made during the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

3. Acquisitions (Continued)

~~into~~The an earn-out agreement, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to pay the former stockholder of the acquired entity up to $0.8 million in additional consideration if certain revenue targets are achieved by the purchased entity during the twelve months immediately following ~~the~~table ~~acquisition.~~summarizes ~~The fair value of~~ the ~~earn-out~~aggregate ~~liability~~purchase ~~was~~prices, estimated ~~based~~aggregate ~~on management's~~fair ~~assessment~~values of the ~~weighted~~assets ~~average probability that certain revenue targets will be achieved by the~~ acquired ~~entity.~~and ~~As a result,~~ the ~~Company~~liabilities ~~recorded~~assumed aand ~~$0.4 million~~direct ~~contingent liability~~acquisition ~~during~~costs ~~the~~expensed: ~~three months ended June 30, 2011.~~

The Company recorded $1.8 million of tax deductible goodwill recognized in connection with the acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2011. No tax deductible goodwill was recognized as a result of the acquisition completed during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Other intangible assets were comprised of customer lists and non-compete agreements, which are being amortized over useful lives of 2 to 30 years, with a weighted average useful life of 21.4 years. The acquisitions were funded out of the Company's operating cash flows, proceeds from debt offerings and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

		Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,

		2011		2010			2011			2010
		(in millions)
Purchase price		$	—	$	3.5		$	13.3		$	12.6
Assets acquired:
	Inventory		—		0.1			0.7			0.4
	Property and equipment		—		1.6			3.8			4.1
	Other assets		—		—			0.2			—
	Goodwill		—		0.5			3.8			1.7
	Other intangible assets		—		1.6			6.1			6.7

	Total assets acquired		—		3.8			14.6			12.9
Total liabilities assumed			—		—			(1.3	)		—

Gain on bargain purchase			—		(0.3	)		—			(0.3	)

Direct acquisition costs expensed		$	1.7	$	0.4		$	4.1		$	0.6

~~The~~During ~~following unaudited pro forma information presents~~ the ~~Reddy~~nine ~~Holdings' consolidated results of operations for the three and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 ~~and June 30~~, ~~2010~~ asthe ifCompany ~~the~~recognized ~~2011~~approximately ~~and~~$10.1 million ~~2010~~of ~~acquisitions~~revenue ~~had~~from ~~all~~the ~~occurred~~businesses onacquired ~~January 1,~~in ~~2010:~~2011.

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma revenues	$	106,854		$	111,890	$	148,492		$	151,200
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(2,112	)	$	3,615	$	(41,781	)	$	(19,761	)
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.16	$	(1.84	)	$	(0.88	)
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.16	$	(1.84	)	$	(0.88	)

The recorded purchase price allocation related to the acquisition completed during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is preliminary at September 30, 2011, pending further evaluation of market participant data and the fair values of certain equipment acquired. The Company recorded approximately $0.7 million of deferred tax liabilities in connection with this acquisition. In addition, as a result of the acquisition made during the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered into an earn-out agreement, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to pay the former stockholder of the acquired entity up to $0.8 million in additional consideration if certain revenue targets are achieved by the purchased entity during the twelve months immediately following the acquisition. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.4 million contingent liability during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The earn-out agreement is recorded at its fair value of $0.2 million at September 30, 2011. The fair value of the earn-out liability is estimated based on management's assessment of the weighted average probability that certain revenue targets will be achieved by the acquired entity.

The ~~following~~Company ~~unaudited~~recorded ~~pro~~$1.9 million ~~forma~~of ~~information~~tax ~~presents~~deductible ~~Reddy~~goodwill ~~Corp's~~recognized ~~results~~in ofconnection ~~operations~~with ~~for~~ the ~~three~~acquisitions ~~and~~completed ~~six~~during the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Other intangible assets were comprised of customer lists and ~~June~~ non-compete agreements, which are being amortized over useful lives of 2 to 30 years, ~~2010~~with asa ifweighted ~~the~~average ~~2011~~useful life of ~~and~~21.4 years. ~~2010~~The acquisitions ~~had~~were ~~all~~funded ~~occurred~~out onof ~~January 1~~the Company's operating cash flows, ~~2010:~~proceeds from debt offerings and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Pro forma revenues	$	106,854		$	111,890	$	148,492		$	151,200
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(1,089	)	$	4,842	$	(23,225	)	$	(16,061	)

4. Inventories, Parts and Supplies

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

43. ~~Inventories,~~Acquisitions ~~Parts and Supplies~~ (Continued)

~~are~~ The ~~valued~~following atunaudited pro forma information presents the ~~lower~~Reddy Holdings' consolidated results of ~~cost~~operations orfor ~~market~~the three and ~~include~~nine ~~overhead~~months ~~allocations.~~ended ~~Cost~~September 30, is2011 ~~determined~~and September 30, ~~using~~2010 as if the ~~first-in,~~2011 ~~first-out~~and ~~method.~~2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, 2010:

			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
			(in thousands)
		2011			2010			2011			2010
Raw materials			$	6,978		$	6,133
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Finished goods				2,456			2,505
Pro forma revenues		$	126,330		$	128,660		$	274,838		$	279,703
Parts and supplies				4,584			3,911
Pro forma net income (loss)		$	4,892		$	11,214		$	(36,895	)	$	(8,551	)
	Total		$	14,018		$	12,549
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share		$	0.21		$	0.49		$	(1.62	)	$	(0.38	)
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share		$	0.21		$	0.49		$	(1.62	)	$	(0.38	)

The following unaudited pro forma information presents Reddy Corp's results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 as if the 2011 and 2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, 2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2011		2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Pro forma revenues	$	126,330	$	128,660	$	274,838		$	279,703
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	3,288	$	8,821	$	(19,943	)	$	(7,245	)

4. Inventories, Parts and Supplies

Inventories consist of raw materials, finished goods and parts and supplies. Raw materials represent ice packaging material. Finished goods consist of packaged ice. Parts and supplies consist of spare parts for production equipment and ice merchandisers and miscellaneous supplies. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include overhead allocations. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010

		(in thousands)
Raw materials		$	6,198	$	6,133
Finished goods			1,992		2,505
Parts and supplies			4,753		3,911

	Total	$	12,943	$	12,549

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

5. Accrued Expenses

		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Accrued interest		$	1310,~~632~~198	$	13,336
Accrued compensation and employee benefits, including payroll taxes and workers compensation insurance			5,~~503~~932		4,484
Accrued utilities			12,~~940~~101		1,343
Accrued property, sales and other taxes			3,~~105~~770		1,555
Other accrued insurance			21,~~317~~653		2,169
Other			1,~~771~~295		1,290
	Total	$	2824,~~268~~949	$	24,177

Included in "accrued interest" above ~~are~~is $0.5 million and $0.2 million related to Reddy Holdings as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations

At ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term obligations of the Company consisted of the following:

		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
		September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(~~495~~467	)		(553	)
101/2% Senior Discount Notes			11,736			11,736
Other notes payable			100			101
Total long-term obligations			450,~~748~~776			450,691
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	450,~~747~~775		$	450,690

13 In addition, the Company had $14.5 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

InAt ~~addition~~September 30, ~~the~~2011 ~~Company~~and ~~had $30.1~~December ~~million~~31, ~~outstanding~~2010, ~~under~~long-term ~~the~~obligations ~~revolving~~of ~~credit~~Reddy ~~facility~~Corp asconsisted of ~~June 30,~~the ~~2011.~~following:

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term obligations of Reddy Corp consisted of the following:

		September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010

		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(467	)		(553	)
Other notes payable			100			101

Total long-term obligations			439,040			438,955
Less: Current maturities			1			1

	Long-term obligations, net	$	439,039		$	438,954

		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(495	)		(553	)
Other notes payable			100			101
Total long-term obligations			439,012			438,955
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	439,011		$	438,954

In addition, Reddy Corp had $14.5 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2011.

In addition, Reddy Corp had $30.1 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011.

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

1415

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~sell~~for ~~all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of~~ the ~~First Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 5.625% of the principal amount of the First Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the~~ period commencing on March 15, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the First Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

The first lien leverage ratio under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes means the ratio of first lien indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) to EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its first lien leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the first lien leverage ratio was 56.90 to 1.0.

The buildup amount equals 50% of the consolidated net income of Reddy Corp accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from April 1, 2010 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial statements are available (or, if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus, the net cash proceeds to Reddy Corp of the issuance of capital stock, subject to certain exceptions, and any cash capital contribution received by Reddy Corp from its stockholder, in each case after April 1, 2010, plus the amount by which Reddy Corp indebtedness is reduced on its balance sheet as a result of the conversion or exchange of such indebtedness for capital stock, plus the net reduction in certain restricted investments made by Reddy Corp, less the amount of certain restricted payments made from time to time, including, among other things, the payment of cash dividends. Reddy Corp is not currently permitted to pay dividends under this provision.

1516

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

retirement of the remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Second Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 6.625% of the principal amount of the Second Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to

1617

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~Reddy~~purchase ~~Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase~~ the Second Lien Notes ~~at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes~~ with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the Second Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

The secured leverage ratio under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes means the ratio of secured indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) to EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its secured leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the second lien leverage ratio was 8.37 to 1.0.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 101/2% Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining 101/2% Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

1718

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~equity~~ 101/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in ~~offerings~~aggregate ~~after~~principal amount at maturity of 101/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the ~~date~~"Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the ~~Second~~accreted ~~Lien~~value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 101/2% per annum. The Discount Notes ~~subject~~mature toand ~~specified~~are ~~conditions~~payable on November 1, 2012. ~~However~~During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of ~~dividend~~$6.7 million and $15.8 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments ~~permitted~~on ~~under~~the ~~this~~Discount 6Notes.0% ~~provision~~During ~~will~~the ~~correspondingly~~nine month period ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, Reddy Corp ~~reduce~~paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount ~~otherwise~~of ~~available~~$0.6 million ~~under~~and ~~the~~$6.0 million, ~~buildup~~respectively, ~~amount~~to ~~for~~fund ~~restricted~~the semi-annual interest payments, ~~including~~on ~~dividends~~the Discount Notes.

101/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 101/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 101/2% per annum. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6.7 million and $15.8 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $0.6 million and $6.0 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes.

On February 22, 2010, Reddy Corp launched the Exchange Offer, offering $1,000 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In addition, for Discount Notes exchanged on or prior to March 5, 2010, Reddy Corp offered an early tender premium of $5 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In conjunction with the Exchange Offer, Reddy Corp solicited consents to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants from the indenture governing the Discount Notes. At the expiration of the Exchange Offer on March 19, 2010, approximately 92.2% of the aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes had been tendered into the Exchange Offer. Following the final settlement of the Exchange Offer, $11.7 million in aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes remain outstanding.

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

As of November 1, 2010, Reddy Holdings may redeem any or all of the Discount Notes without paying any redemption premium.

18 Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility,

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010,~~ Reddy ~~Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks,~~ financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, Reddy Corp had the right to request the aggregate commitments to be increased to $50 million provided certain conditions were met. On August 4, 2010, the aggregate commitments under the March 2010 Credit Facility were increased to $50 million.

The March 2010 Credit Facility was an obligation of Reddy Corp and was guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The March 2010 Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014.

Principal balances outstanding under the March 2010 Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at Reddy Corp's option, at the sum of the base rate or LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate loans was initially 3.75% and for LIBOR loans was initially 4.75%, with such applicable margins subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio (as defined in the March 2010 Credit Facility). The Company also paid (i) a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.875%, with such availability fee subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio, (ii) a $50,000 annual loan servicing fee, and (iii) an annual commitment fee of $0.2 million to one of the lenders.

On October 22, 2010, Reddy Corp and the lenders party thereto amended and restated the March 2010 Credit Facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility provides for a $50 million revolving credit facility. Macquarie Bank Limited ("Macquarie"), a lender under the March 2010 Credit Facility, is currently the sole lender under the New Credit Facility. On December 10, 2010, Macquarie became the successor administrative agent under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company had $3014.15 million outstanding and $1935.95 million of availability under the New Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under on the New Credit Facility as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 ~~was~~ was 7.34%.

19 The obligations under the New Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Reddy Holdings and will also be guaranteed by any future domestic subsidiaries of Reddy Corp, subject to certain exceptions.

The New Credit Facility does not require any scheduled principal payments prior to its stated maturity date. Subject to certain conditions, mandatory repayments of the New Credit Facility (and

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

mandatory ~~The~~commitment ~~obligations~~reductions ~~under~~of the New Credit Facility) are ~~fully~~required ~~and~~to ~~unconditionally~~be ~~guaranteed~~made bywith ~~Reddy~~portions ~~Holdings~~of ~~and~~the ~~will~~proceeds ~~also~~from be(1) asset ~~guaranteed~~sales, by(2) the ~~any~~issuance ~~future~~of ~~domestic~~debt ~~subsidiaries~~securities ofand (3) insurance ~~Reddy~~and ~~Corp~~condemnation awards, subject to ~~certain~~various exceptions. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the New Credit Facility, an event of default will occur under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility does not require any scheduled principal payments prior to its stated maturity date. Subject to certain conditions, mandatory repayments of the New Credit Facility (and mandatory commitment reductions of the New Credit Facility) are required to be made with portions of the proceeds from (1) asset sales, (2) the issuance of debt securities and (3) insurance and condemnation awards, subject to various exceptions. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the New Credit Facility, an event of default will occur under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility also contains affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Reddy Corp and its future subsidiaries, subject to materiality and other qualifications, baskets and exceptions. The affirmative and negative covenants are substantially consistent with those contained in the March 2010 Credit Facility. The negative covenants, among other things, restrict the ability of Reddy Corp to:

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp. is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount Notes and pay interest on the Discount Notes. Reddy Corp may also distribute certain investments to Reddy Holdings.

In addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp from declaring any dividends if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At September 30, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in the New Credit Facility.

2021

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At June 30, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in the New Credit Facility.

Obligations under the New Credit Facility may be declared immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of certain events of default as defined in the credit agreement, including failure to pay any principal when due and payable, failure to pay interest within five (5) days after due, failure to comply with any covenant, representation or condition of any loan document, any change of control, cross-defaults, and certain other events as set forth in the credit agreement, with grace periods in some cases.

An acceleration of the indebtedness under the New Credit Facility would be an event of default under the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes if the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility at the time of acceleration is over $10 million.

Old Senior Credit Facilities. On August 12, 2005, the Company amended and restated its credit facilities with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase, N.A., CIBC World Markets Corp., Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (the "Old Credit Facilities"). The Old Credit Facilities provided for a $60 million revolving credit facility (the "Old Revolving Credit Facility") and a $240 million term loan (the "Old Term Loan"). The Old Credit Facilities were obligations of Reddy Corp and were guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan were scheduled to mature on August 12, 2010 and August 12, 2012, respectively. On March 15, 2010, the Old Credit Facilities were terminated and all amounts owed thereunder were repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the First Lien Notes.

Principal balances outstanding under the Old Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at the Company's option, at the sum of the base rate plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 1.75%. The base rate was defined as the greater of the prime rate (as announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent) or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. Interest on base rate loans was payable on the last day of each quarter. Interest on LIBOR loans was payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeded 90 days. Reddy Corp also paid a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.5%.

The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan did not require any scheduled principal payments prior to their stated maturity dates. The Old Credit Facilities contained financial covenants, which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios, as defined in the Credit Facilities, and were collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets.

Debt Refinance Costs. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company recorded expense of $0.13 million and $6.25 million, respectively, for costs incurred in connection with refinancing activities related to its debt. Approximately $5.8 million of the expense incurred in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 related to the exchange of the Discount Notes for the Second Lien Notes. The exchange was accounted for as a modification of debt.

21 Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy~~provided ~~Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued~~ under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted Cash" in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Debt Instruments. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company's long-term debt, was $~~445~~379.70 million and $437.0 million, respectively, while the book value was $450.78 million and $450.7 million, respectively. The fair value of the Company's debt is ~~primarily~~ primarily based on quoted market prices for the debt.

7. Financial Derivative Instruments

Diesel Hedging Agreement. On March 25, 2011, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge began April 1, 2011 and expires on December 28, 2011. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.2 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.17 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. On May 6, 2011, the Company entered into an additional hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Second Diesel Hedge"). The Second Diesel Hedge began June 1, 2011 and expires on December 31, 2012. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.1 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.04 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. The Company uses the hedges to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedges are not for trading purposes and are accounted for as economic hedges and were not designated as hedging instruments.

The Company carries the hedges at fair value on its balance sheet and considers its own credit risk in the valuation of the diesel hedges. Changes in the fair value of the hedge are recorded in "Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)" in the consolidated statements of operations and in the operating activities section of cash flows. Payments made or received under the hedges are included in the caption "Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation)" on the consolidated statements of operations and unrealized gains and losses are presented in the operating activities section of the statements of cash flows.

The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Codification establishes a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The statement requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:


Level 1:		Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
Level 3:		Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

7. Financial Derivative Instruments (Continued)

~~requires~~ The ~~that~~Diesel ~~assets~~Hedges are a Level 2 fair value measure and ~~liabilities~~are ~~carried~~valued atusing ~~fair~~the income approach to calculate the present value of the future cash flows expected to be ~~classified~~paid ~~and~~under ~~disclosed~~the hedge. inThe ~~one~~value of the ~~following~~fixed ~~three~~leg ~~categories:~~is the present value of the known fixed payments discounted at a market interest rate. The value of the floating leg is the present value of the projected floating payments based on the forward diesel prices discounted at a market interest rate.

Level 1:		Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
Level 3:		Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The Diesel Hedges are a level 2 fair value measure and are valued using the income approach to calculate the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid under the hedge. The value of the fixed leg is the present value of the known fixed payments discounted at a market interest rate. The value of the floating leg is the present value of the projected floating payments based on the forward diesel prices discounted at a market interest rate.

The following table presents the location of all liabilities associated with the Company's derivative instruments within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

		Liability Derivatives
		Six months ended June 30,
	Balance Sheet location	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Balance Sheet location	2011			2010
		(in thousands)
Diesel hedges	Accrued Expenses	$	(~~162~~245	)	$	—

The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the condensed consolidated financial statements:

	Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 718
	Amount of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations					Amount of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
											Location of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Diesel hedges:
Non-cash change in fair value	$	(~~178~~83	)	$	—	$	(~~162~~245	)	$	—
Cash settlements		(3087	)		—		(30117	)		—
Total recognized loss	$	(~~208~~170	)	$	—	$	(~~192~~362	)	$	—	Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)

23 Collateral Requirements and Counterparty Risk. The diesel hedges required the Company to provide cash collateral in the amount of $0.6 million, which remained outstanding as of September 30, 2011. In addition, the Company is required to provide collateral if the market prices fall below the average hedge prices. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has provided cash collateral of $0.3 million related to this requirement.

There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to the diesel hedges. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

7. Financial Derivative Instruments (Continued)

Collateral Requirements and Counterparty Risk. The diesel hedges required the Company to provide cash collateral in the amount of $1.1 million, which remained outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to the diesel hedges. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty.

8. Stock-based Compensation

On August 8, 2005, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved the Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (the "Plan"). On April 29, 2010 the stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved an amendment to the Plan, which increased the number of shares of common stock available to be issued to employees, directors and certain third parties in connection with various incentive awards, including stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units to 4,750,000 shares.

The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, imposed by the Compensation Committee. Such restrictions lapse under circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee, including based upon a specified period of continued employment or upon the achievement of established performance criteria. Restricted shares have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote restricted shares and to receive dividends. Unvested restricted shares are generally forfeited upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period as provided for in the related grant documents. During the ~~six~~ nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company granted 343,750 restricted shares to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $2.75. One-third of the restricted shares vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. No grants were made to employees during the three month period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011. The fair value of each restricted share is equal the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value is recognized as compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

The Plan provides for option grants with terms, including exercise price and the time and method of exercise, set by the Compensation Committee. However, the exercise price of options is not permitted to be less than the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant and the term is not permitted to be longer than ten years from the date of grant of the options. Stock options for 573,300 shares of common stock were granted during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. The options have seven-year terms and one-third of the options vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. The options granted ~~during~~ during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011 had weighted average exercise prices of $2.75 per share. No grants were made to employees during the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

~~The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized using a straight-line method over the~~ 25

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

8. Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

~~shorter~~ The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized using a straight-line method over the shorter of the vesting period or required service period adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The following table sets forth the information about the weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and the weighted average assumptions used for such grants.

		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Weighted average grant date fair value			$1.81
Weighted average assumptions used:
	Expected volatility		110.3%
	Expected lives		3 years
	Risk-free interest rates		1.21%
	Expected dividend yield		0.00%

Expected volatility is based on an analysis of historical volatility of the Company's common stock. Expected lives of options are determined based on projections of option exercise patterns. Risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero coupon U.S. treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield is based on the September 15, 2008 announcement that the Company's quarterly cash dividends had been suspended indefinitely and the Company does not currently anticipate paying dividends in the future.

Total compensation expense associated with the Plan was $0.6 million and $0.74 million during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, and $1.28 million and $1.04 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Such compensation expense was recorded in "Operating expenses" in the consolidated statements of operations. Compensation expense for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 includes a $0.12 million expense for stock awards ~~earned during the period by non-employee members of the Board of Directors and granted in May of 2011. In May of 2011, 96,318 vested shares were granted~~ to non-employee members of the Board of Directors. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, ~~735~~743,~~784~~ 708 shares were available for grant under the Plan.

9. Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The computation of net income (loss) per share is based on net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Restricted shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted shares on which the dividends were paid do not vest. Since restricted shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they are excluded from the basic net income (loss) per share calculation for loss periods. Accordingly, ~~595~~604,~~965~~642 ~~shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011,~~ and ~~595~~407,~~965~~613 ~~and 257,350 restricted~~ shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. However, ~~257,350~~these restricted shares were included in the computation of basic net income per share for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

2526

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

9. Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Continued)

For the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share, options to purchase 01.65 million and 1.0 million shares of common stock ~~and 35,000 RSUs~~ were not included in the computation of ~~diluted~~ diluted earnings per share for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, because their effect was anti-dilutive.

		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
		Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2011			2010		2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted computation		$	(14,~~946~~892	)	$	28,~~132~~990	$	(4136,~~047~~155	)	$	(2011,~~465~~475	)
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		2223,~~737~~394			22,~~870~~949		22,~~713~~742			22,~~432~~450
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.0921	)	$	0.0939	$	(1.8159	)	$	(0.9151	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		2223,~~737~~394			22,~~870~~949		22,~~713~~742			22,~~432~~450
	Shares issuable from assumed conversion of restricted stock units and options		—72			~~295~~109		—			—
	Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted		2223,~~737~~466			23,~~165~~058		22,~~713~~742			22,~~432~~450
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.0921	)	$	0.0939	$	(1.8159	)	$	(0.9151	)

10. Income Taxes

The Company's effective tax rate of (65.97%) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 differs from the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income and margin taxes, the effect of permanent differences and a change in the Company's valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets. In the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance totaling $1821.67 million relating to federal and state deferred assets. The total valuation allowance of $2225.56 million is comprised of a $0.3 million of allowance against certain state NOL carryforwards and a $2225.23 million allowance against the remaining federal and state deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance is necessary to reduce the recorded deferred tax assets to the amount management believes the Company is more-likely-than-not to realize.

Reddy Corp's effective tax rate of 3635.87%, calculated on a stand-alone basis, differs from the Federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to state income and margin taxes and the effect of permanent differences.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions was $1.3 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and included accrued interest and penalties of $0.3 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The total amount of interest and penalties, net of federal benefit, recognized in the ~~statement~~ statement of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010 was immaterial.

As a result of net operating loss carryforwards, the Company's tax years from 1998 through 2010 remain open and subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and/or certain state taxing authorities.

2627

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

11. ~~Commitments~~Other ~~and Contingencies~~Charges

~~The~~In ~~following~~connection iswith ~~a discussion of~~ the Company's ~~significant~~ongoing ~~legal~~remediation ~~matters.~~efforts ~~The~~related ~~Company~~to isthe ~~involved~~material weakness in ~~various~~internal ~~claims,~~control ~~suits,~~over ~~investigations,~~financial ~~and~~reporting ~~legal~~identified ~~proceedings.~~in ~~The~~2010, ~~Company~~we ~~accrues~~determined aduring the ~~liability~~third ~~when~~quarter itof ~~believes~~2011 that itthe isrecorded ~~both~~net ~~probable~~book ~~that~~value aof ~~liability~~our ~~has~~equipment ~~been incurred~~ and ~~that~~machinery itwas ~~can~~overstated ~~reasonably~~by ~~estimate~~approximately ~~the amount of the loss~~$1. ~~At June~~9 ~~30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below~~million.

We have considered the impact of this error, including the assessment of any potential impact on prior periods and loan covenants and concluded that the error was not material to our financial statements for any prior period. As the amounts involved are not material to the Company's projected annual results for the year ending December 31, 2011, or to the trend of earnings, the Company recorded the $1.9 million cumulative effect of this error as an out of period charge in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as "Impairment of long-lived assets".

12. Related Parties

The Company has entered into an agreement with an affiliate in which the Company has a cost method investment. Under the agreement the Company purchases equipment from a third party vendor on behalf of its affiliate and extends payment terms to the affiliate that are comparable to those the Company receives from its vendor. The Company has financed the purchase of approximately $2.6 million of equipment under this agreement, of which approximately $0.6 million has been repaid through September 30, 2011.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Antitrust Matters

In March 2008, the Company and certain of its employees, including members of its management, received subpoenas issued by a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking documents and information in connection with an investigation by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") into possible antitrust violations in the packaged ice industry. In addition, on March 5, 2008, federal officials executed a search warrant at the Company's corporate office in Dallas, Texas. Current and former employees were also subpoenaed to testify and testified before a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan and before a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio. On October 29, 2010, the Company was informed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ would take no action against the Company or any of its employees in connection with its investigation of the packaged ice industry. In January 2011, counsel for the Company confirmed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ has formally closed its investigation of the packaged ice industry.

In March 2008, June 2008, and June 2009, the Company was served with antitrust civil investigative demands ("CIDs") by the Offices of the Attorneys General of the States of Florida, Arizona and Michigan, respectively, requesting the production of documents and information relating to an investigation of agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the market for packaged ice. The Company has been advised that these CIDs are related to a multi-state antitrust investigation of the packaged ice industry. The Company is cooperating with the investigation and has complied with all requests for documents and information regarding these matters. The Company may in the future receive additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from states participating in the multi-state investigation or conducting their own investigations.

At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of that investigation, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of that investigation or any potential effect the investigation may have on the Company, its employees or operations. 28

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

1113. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

~~motions~~investigation toof ~~dismiss~~agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the ~~indirect~~market ~~purchaser~~for ~~claims~~packaged ice. OnThe ~~April 26,~~Company ~~2011,~~has ~~the~~been ~~indirect~~advised ~~purchaser~~that ~~plaintiffs~~these ~~filed~~CIDs are related to a ~~Second~~multi-state ~~Amended~~antitrust investigation ~~Class~~of ~~Action~~the ~~complaint~~packaged ~~asserting~~ice ~~violations~~industry. ofThe Company is cooperating with the ~~antitrust~~investigation ~~laws of~~and ~~various~~has ~~states~~complied with all requests for documents and ~~related~~information ~~claims~~regarding these matters. The Company ~~filed~~may in athe ~~motion~~future toreceive ~~dismiss~~additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from states participating in the ~~Second~~multi-state ~~Amended~~investigation ~~Complaint~~or onconducting ~~June 24,~~their ~~2011~~own investigations.

Beginning in 2008 a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal and state courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. One of the state court cases filed against the Company was dismissed. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the other civil actions have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Home City entered into a settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. On March 30, 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it had entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Preliminary approval of that settlement was granted on July 20, 2011, and a final fairness hearing was held on October 28, 2011. The Court has taken the motion for final approval under advisement. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers against the Company. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser claims. On May 25, 2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint asserting violations of the antitrust laws of various states and related claims. The Company and the other defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Those motions were heard on October 28, 2011, and were taken under advisement by the Court.

On March 1, 2010, a putative class action Statement of Claim was filed against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Canada alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, punitive and exemplary damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and costs. On March 8, 2010, a putative class action Statement of Claim was filed against the Company in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary, in Canada, alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, special and pecuniary damages, punitive and exemplary damages, interest and costs.

An agreement has been reached to resolve the class actions filed in Canada against Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier, Inc. The agreement provides that Arctic Glacier will pay CDN $2,000,000, all claims asserted against Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier in both Ontario and Alberta will be dismissed, and Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier will be granted full and final releases with regard to those claims. Reddy Ice is not making any payment in connection with this settlement. The agreement is subject to the execution of final settlement documents and court approval.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

One direct action lawsuit was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against us in that lawsuit. On June 29, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, and on July 17, 2009 the Court reversed, in part, its May 29, 2009 order, reinstating only the RICO claim against us. The dismissal of the remaining claims was not affected. On August 10, 2009, the Company filed an answer to the reinstated claim. Discovery is ongoing in that matter.

On April 20, 2011, an Order was entered unsealing a Qui Tam complaint filed on June 25, 2008, by Martin McNulty, on behalf of the United States, against Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc., Arctic Glacier International, Inc., and Home City Ice Company, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of the federal False Claims Act by presentation of false claims, making or using a false record or statement, and conspiracy to defraud, and seeks damages, civil penalties, attorney fees and costs. The Government has elected not to intervene in that case and the Company ~~has~~and ~~filed~~the aother ~~motion~~defendants have filed motions to dismiss that complaint. Those motions are set to be heard on November 16, 2011.

The Company intends to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

Stockholder Litigation

Beginning on August 8, 2008, ~~purported~~putative class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and certain of its current or former senior officers. On July 17, 2009, the Court consolidated the actions and appointed a lead plaintiff and interim lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on November 2, 2009. That complaint purports to assert claims on behalf of an alleged class of purchasers of the Company's common stock and alleges that the defendants misrepresented and failed to disclose the existence of, and the Company's alleged participation in, an alleged antitrust conspiracy in the packaged ice industry. The Company and the other defendants have filed an answer in that case, a briefing schedule relating to class certification has been entered, and discovery is ongoing.

28 Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former officers and members of the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On August 1, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Special Exceptions filed by the defendants. The Company filed a petition with the Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus relating to the denial of certain Special Exceptions. On September 1, 2011, a Third Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That Third Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. On October 10, 2011, the petition for a writ of mandamus was conditionally granted by the

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

1113. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

~~consolidated~~Court ~~the~~of ~~actions~~Appeals and ~~appointed~~the atrial ~~lead~~court ~~plaintiff~~was ~~and~~ordered ~~interim lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on November 2, 2009. That complaint purports~~ to ~~assert~~grant ~~claims on behalf of an alleged class of purchasers of~~ the ~~Company's~~Special ~~common~~Exception ~~stock~~relating ~~and~~to ~~alleges~~demand ~~that~~futility. ~~the~~The ~~defendants~~plaintiffs ~~misrepresented~~filed ~~and~~a ~~failed~~Motion tofor ~~disclose the existence of~~Rehearing, ~~and~~which ~~the Company's~~was ~~alleged~~denied ~~participation~~on inNovember 7, ~~an alleged antitrust conspiracy in the packaged ice industry~~2011. The ~~Company~~trial ~~and~~of ~~the~~that ~~other~~case ~~defendants~~is ~~have~~currently ~~filed~~set anfor ~~answer~~March 20, ~~in that case~~2012.

Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former officers and members of the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On March 17, 2011, a Second Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That Second Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. The trial date has been set for March 13, 2012.

Other Matters

WeThe ~~are~~Company is also involved in various other claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property matters. There are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate outcome of such matters and it is difficult to determine the ultimate costs that we may incur. We believe the resolution of such other ordinary course uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

29 As a result of the decline in the Company's stock price and the reduction in its stockholders' equity resulting from its decline in earnings, the Company was notified by the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") in September of 2011 that it was not in compliance with the NYSE continued listing standards. On November 7th, 2011, the Company filed a plan with the NYSE to achieve compliance with the continued listing standards within 18 months. If the plan is accepted by the NYSE, the NYSE will monitor the Company's performance under the plan on a quarterly basis. To the extent (i) the NYSE does not accept the Company's plan, (ii) the Company cannot meet the applicable standards within the 18 month period if its plan is accepted, or (iii) the NYSE determines the Company is not satisfying its obligations under the plan to achieve compliance, the Company's stock could be delisted from NYSE.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Except as otherwise noted, there are no material differences between the consolidated balances presented herein and the balances of Reddy Ice Corporation.

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp."), manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. We are the largest manufacturer of packaged ice products in the United States and serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia under the Reddy Ice® brand name.

Uncertainty of Forward Looking Statements and Information

Other than statements of historical facts, statements made in this Form 10-Q, statements made by us in periodic press releases, oral statements made by our management to analysts and stockholders and statements made in the course of presentations about our company constitute "forward- looking statements" intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are accurate. However, we cannot assure you that such expectations will occur. These forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by the forward- looking statements. Factors you should consider that could cause these differences are:

•: general economic trends and seasonality;
•: weather conditions;
•: the ability of our subsidiary to make distributions to us in amounts sufficient to service our debt and pay our taxes;
•: our substantial leverage and ability to service our debt;
•: the restrictive covenants and financial covenants under our indebtedness;
•: the availability of capital sources;
•: fluctuations in our operating costs, including the prices of electricity, fuel, polyethylene and other required expenses;
•: competitive practices in the industry in which we compete;
•: changes in labor conditions;
•: our capital expenditure requirements;
•: the risks associated with acquisitions and the failure to integrate acquired businesses;
•: technological changes and innovations;
•: the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;
•: legislative or regulatory requirements; and
•: all the other factors described herein under Item 1A of Part II and in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3032

Table of Contents

You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are discussed elsewhere in this report.

General

Overview. We are the largest manufacturer and distributor of packaged ice in the United States and currently serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Our business consists of:

•: the traditional manufacture and delivery of ice from a central point of production to the point of sale; and
•: the installation and operation of The Ice Factory®, our proprietary in-store bagging ("ISB") equipment located in high volume locations that produces, packages and stores ice through an automated, self-contained system.

Seasonality. The packaged ice business is highly seasonal, characterized by peak demand during the warmer months of May through September, with an extended peak selling season in the southern United States. Approximately 71%, 69% and 69% of our annual revenues occurred during the second and third calendar quarters in each of 2010, 2009 and 2008. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and a less than proportional decline in expenses during the first and fourth quarters, we typically experience lower margins resulting in losses during these periods.

Revenues. Our revenues primarily represent sales of packaged ice and packaged ice bags for use in our ISB equipment. There is no right of return with respect to these products. A portion of our revenues also represents fees earned under management agreements for ISB systems located outside our primary territories that are recognized as earned under contract terms.

Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation). Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists of costs related to the manufacturing and distribution of our products, including, in particular:

•: manufacturing and distribution labor costs;
•: raw materials (primarily polyethylene-based plastic bags);
•: product delivery expenses, including fuel and vehicle rental expense related to products delivered by our own distribution network, as well as fees paid to distributors who deliver ice to our customers on our behalf;
•: utility expenses (primarily electricity used in connection with the manufacturing, storage and distribution processes); and
•: ISB system costs associated with customer service representatives and machine technicians (ISB systems generally do not increase our plant occupancy, delivery or utility costs).

Depreciation Expense Related to Cost of Sales and Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization are divided into two line items: depreciation expense related to cost of sales and depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense related to cost of sales consists of depreciation expense for our production and distribution equipment. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation and amortization expense for our selling, general and administrative functions.

Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are costs associated with selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative 33

Table of Contents

~~salaries~~ Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are costs associated with selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative salaries, insurance, legal and other professional services and costs associated with leasing office space. Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs, but excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense, included in operating expenses represented approximately 108% and 119% of revenues in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cost of antitrust investigations and related litigation. Costs related to the current antitrust investigations and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries, are composed primarily of legal fees, document collection costs and the fees of other experts and consultants. These costs have been recognized and paid by Reddy Holdings.

Facilities. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we owned or operated 6058 ice manufacturing facilities, 7677 distribution centers and approximately 3,500 Ice Factories. As of the same date, we had an aggregate daily ice manufacturing capacity of approximately 1817,000 tons.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Change from Last Year
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Change from Last Year
	2011			2010			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	~~106~~126,~~493~~330		$	~~104~~120,~~163~~147		$	26,~~330~~183			25.21
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		6677,~~768~~800			6271,~~109~~770			46,~~659~~030			78.54
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		7,~~480~~819			5,~~647~~694			12,~~833~~125			3237.53
Gross profit		3240,~~245~~711			3642,~~407~~683			(41,~~162~~972	)		(~~11.~~4.6	)
Operating expenses		14,~~315~~725			14,~~373~~358			~~(58~~367	)		(02.46	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,~~454~~249			2,~~173~~435			~~281~~(186	)		12(7.96	)
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(114	)		1,170			(1,284	)		(109.7	)
Loss on dispositions of assets		629			1,035			(406	)		(39.2	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		~~539~~1,971			~~236~~514			~~303~~1,457			~~128~~283.45
Acquisition expenses		1,~~844~~664			~~208~~414			1,~~636~~250			~~786~~301.59
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation		731			1,130			(399	)		(35.3	)
Gain on contingent acquisition consideration		(202	)		—			(202	)		(100.0	)
Income (loss) from operations		12,476			17,117			(4,641	)		(27.1	)
Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation		785			(3,867	)		4,652			(120.3	)
Interest expense, net		(14,822	)		(14,312	)		(510	)		(3.6	)
Income from operations		18,890			27,794			(8,904	)		(32.0	)
Debt refinance costs		—			(60	)		60			100.0
Interest expense, net		(14,694	)		(14,096	)		(598	)		(4.2	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2,346	)		2,745			(5,091	)		(185.5	)
Gain on bargain purchase		—			264			(264	)		(100.0	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		400			(613	)		1,013			165.3
Debt refinance costs		—			(310	)		310			100.0
Net income (loss)	$	(1,946	)	$	2,132		$	(4,078	)		(191.3	)
Income before income taxes		4,196			13,652			(9,456	)		(69.3	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		696			(4,662	)		5,358			(114.9	)
Net income	$	4,892		$	8,990		$	(4,098	)		(45.6	)

Revenues: Revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 increased $26.32 million from the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. ~~This~~ ~~increase~~The islow ~~primarily~~single ~~due~~digits ~~to acquisitions, as well as a~~ percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales inis ~~the~~primarily ~~low~~due ~~single~~to ~~digits~~acquisitions, ~~related~~as towell ~~slightly~~as improved weather patterns in most of our ~~markets,~~ ~~stabilized~~Western ~~economic~~and Mid-Western ~~conditions,~~markets and the addition of new customers through organic growth, partially offset by ~~the~~adverse ~~effects~~weather ofin ~~lost~~our ~~customers~~Eastern markets, and ~~reduced~~weakening ~~pricing~~economic asconditions aimpacting ~~result of increased~~same ~~competitive~~store ~~activity~~sales.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 increased $46.70 million from the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. ~~This increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, as well as unit cost increases of fuel and utility costs.~~

3234

Table of Contents

This increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, as well as unit cost increases of fuel and plastic bags.

Significant expenses included in cost of sales include the following:

	Percentage of Revenues
	2011			2010
Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance)		2019	%		21	%
Plastic bags		56	%		65	%
Operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment)		5	%		4	%
Fuel		56	%		4	%
Independent third party distribution services		65	%		6	%
Maintenance		4	%		3	%
Vehicle maintenance and insurance claims		2	%		21	%
Electricity		5	%		46	%

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $12.81 million as a result of a change in accounting estimate to eliminate salvage value on certain equipment ~~and~~in the fourth quarter of 2010, as well as new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2010 and the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses ~~decreased~~increased $0.14 million from the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to the ~~three~~ three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. This ~~decrease~~increase is primarily due to a $0.46 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~professional~~employee ~~services~~labor costs, arelated ~~$0.1 million~~to ~~decrease~~acquired ~~in employee labor and benefits costs~~operations, a $0.12 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~customer~~non-cash stock ~~relations~~compensation, ~~costs~~ and a $0.1 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~non-cash~~bad ~~stock~~debt ~~based compensation~~expense, partially offset by a $0.43 million ~~increase~~decrease in miscellaneous operating expenses ~~mostly~~and ~~due~~a to$0.3 million ~~increased~~decrease ~~severance~~in employee ~~expense~~benefits costs.

Depreciation and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense ~~increased~~decreased $0.32 million as a result of dispositions ~~new~~and assets becoming fully depreciated, partially offset by new equipment placed in service and the recognition of certain intangible assets in connection with acquisitions in 2010 and the first ~~six~~nine months of ~~2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully~~ ~~depreciated~~2011.

~~(Gain)~~Loss ~~loss~~ on dispositions of assets: A $0.16 million ~~gain~~loss on disposition of assets was recognized on the disposition of ~~certain~~ certain excess assets ~~during~~ during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. A $1.20 million loss on disposition of assets was recognized in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. AsWe ~~a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we~~ are continuing to evaluate our ~~operating~~ facilities and other equipment assets and expect to ~~dispose~~make of certain ~~real~~disposals ~~estate~~ in the future. ~~Based~~Additional ~~on real estate market conditions, additional~~ gains or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

Impairment of long-lived assets: Impairment charges of $02.50 million and $0.25 million were recognized in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively,. asApproximately a$1.9 million ~~result~~ of ~~impairing~~the ~~certain~~2011 ~~real~~impairment ~~estate~~charge ~~assets~~relates ~~during~~to the ~~period.~~correction ~~As a result~~ of aerrors ~~sustained~~identified ~~focus~~through onour ~~operational~~2011 ~~efficiency,~~fixed ~~we are continuing~~asset toinventory ~~evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of additional real estate in the future~~counts. Deterioration of current ~~real estate~~ market conditions for our assets or changes in facility operations could trigger additional impairments in future periods.

Acquisition expenses: We incurred $1.87 million of ~~expense~~acquisition expenses during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Substantially all of these expenses were in connection with ~~our~~the ~~current acquisition~~Company's ~~activities~~evaluation of a strategic merger opportunity within the packaged ice industry. While this evaluation is ongoing, no agreement has been reached and ~~on-going~~there ~~negotiations~~can be no assurance that an agreement will be reached. Acquisition expense for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $0.24 million.

Costs related to antitrust investigations and related litigation: During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United 35

Table of Contents

~~States~~ Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation: During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the related litigation. We received a $5.0 million settlement in respect of claimed cost reimbursements from one of our insurance carriers during the three months ended September 30, 2010. We became aware of and began incurring expenses related to the investigation in March of 2008. These costs have been recognized and paid by ~~Reddy~~ Reddy Holdings.

Interest expense, net: Net interest expense increased $0.56 million from the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to ~~the~~ the three months ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ended September 30, 2011. This change is related to additional interest associated with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The amount of net interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.3 million ~~and $0.4 million~~ during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010~~, respectively~~.

Debt refinance costs: Costs of $0.13 million were incurred in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 in connection ~~with~~ with refinancing activities related to our debt. No such costs were incurred during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

Income tax (expense) benefit: The effective tax rate decreased from 2234.32% during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to 17to (16.16%) during ~~the~~ the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 primarily as a result of the effects of a valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Change from Last Year
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Change from Last Year
	2011			2010			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	~~147~~273,~~245~~575		$	~~140~~260,~~057~~204		$	713,~~188~~371			5.1
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		~~103~~181,~~993~~793			97168,~~017~~787			613,~~976~~006			7.27
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		1523,~~188~~007			1016,~~961~~655			46,~~227~~352			38.61
Gross profit		2868,~~064~~775			3274,~~079~~762			(45,~~015~~987	)		(128.50	)
Operating expenses		2741,~~114~~839			2741,~~492~~850			(~~378~~11	)		(10.40	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		47,~~984~~233			46,~~049~~484			~~935~~749			2311.16
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(168	)		1,397			(1,565	)		(112.0	)
Loss on dispositions of assets		461			2,432			(1,971	)		(81.0	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		~~770~~2,741			~~236~~750			~~534~~1,991			~~226~~265.35
Acquisition expenses		24,~~447~~111			~~210~~624			23,~~237~~487			~~1,065~~558.28
Cost of antitrust investigations and related litigation		2,152			2,043			109			5.3
Gain on contingent acquisition consideration		(202	)		—			(202	)		(100.0	)
Loss from operations		(9,235	)		(3,348	)		(5,887	)		175.8
Cost (insurance recoveries) of antitrust investigations and related litigation		2,937			(1,824	)		4,761			261.0
Interest expense, net		(29,167	)		(21,567	)		(7,600	)		35.2
Income from operations		9,655			24,446			(14,791	)		(60.5	)
Debt refinance costs		—			(6,168	)		6,168			100.0
Interest expense, net		(43,861	)		(35,663	)		(8,198	)		23.0
Loss before income taxes		(38,402	)		(31,083	)		(7,319	)		(23.5	)
Gain on bargain purchase		—			264			(264	)		(100.0	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(2,645	)		10,618			(13,263	)		(124.9	)
Debt refinance costs		—			(6,478	)		6,478			100.0
Net loss	$	(41,047	)	$	(20,465	)	$	(20,582	)		(100.6	)
Loss before income taxes		(34,206	)		(17,431	)		(16,775	)		(96.2	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(1,949	)		5,956			(7,905	)		(132.7	)
Net loss	$	(36,155	)	$	(11,475	)	$	(24,680	)		(215.1	)

Revenues: Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $7.2 million over the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to acquisitions, as well as a percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales in the mid single digits related to improved weather patterns in most of our markets, stabilized economic conditions, and the addition of new customers through organic growth, partially offset by the effects of lost customers and reduced pricing as a result of increased competitive activity. 36

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $7.0 million from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in cost

Table of Contents

of Revenues: Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased $13.4 million over the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The low single digits percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales is primarily due to ~~increased volume sales~~acquisitions, as well as ~~unit~~improved ~~cost~~weather ~~increases~~patterns in most of ~~fuel~~our markets and ~~utility~~the ~~costs~~addition of new customers through organic growth, partially offset by the effects of lost customers and reduced pricing as a result of increased competitive activity and weakening economic conditions impacting same store sales.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $13.0 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, as well as unit cost increases of fuel and plastic bags.

Significant expenses included in cost of sales include the following:

	Percentage of Revenues
	2011			2010
Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance)		2422	%		2623	%
Plastic bags		6	%		65	%
Operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment)		76	%		65	%
Fuel		56	%		4	%
Independent third party distribution services		6	%		6	%
Maintenance		54	%		54	%
Vehicle maintenance and insurance claims		2	%		2	%
Electricity		5	%		5	%

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $46.24 million as a result of a change in accounting estimate to eliminate salvage value on certain equipment in the fourth quarter of 2010, as well as new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2010 and the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses ~~decreased~~of $041.48 million ~~from~~incurred in the ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~2011 towere ~~the~~in line ~~six~~with ~~months~~those ~~ended June 30,~~incurred ~~2011.~~in ~~This~~the ~~decrease~~same isperiod ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~the toprior ayear. A $0.79 million decrease in employee benefits costs, aas well as $0.45 million decrease in professional services, ~~partially~~and $0.2 million decrease in customer relations expense was offset by a $0.47 million increase in ~~miscellaneous~~labor ~~operating~~expense ~~expenses~~related ~~mostly~~to ~~due~~acquired tooperations, ~~increased~~a ~~severance~~$0.4 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense, as well as a $0.2 million increase in ~~non-cash~~building ~~stock-based~~rents ~~compensation~~ and a $0.2 million increase bad debt expense.

Depreciation expense and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.97 million as a result of new equipment placed in service and the recognition of certain intangible assets in connection with acquisitions in 2010 and the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

~~(Gain)~~Loss ~~loss~~ on dispositions of assets: A $0.15 million ~~gain~~and $2.4 million loss on disposition of assets was recognized on the disposition of certain excess assets during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Aand ~~$1.4 million loss on disposition of assets was recognized in the six months ended June 30~~2010, ~~2010~~respectively. As a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our facilities ~~operating~~and ~~facilities~~other equipment assets and expect to dispose of certain ~~real~~assets ~~estate~~ in the future. ~~Based~~Additional ~~on current real estate market conditions, additional~~ gains or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

Impairment of long-lived assets: We recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 as a result of impairing certain real estate and fixed assets identified for disposition. Impairment charges of $0.2 million were recognized during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to adjust the carrying value of a facility which was held for sale to its estimated market value. As a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of additional real estate in the future. Deterioration of current real estate market conditions or changes in facility operations could trigger additional impairments in future periods. 37

Acquisition expenses: We incurred $2.4 million of expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 in connection with our current acquisition activities and on-going negotiations. Acquisition expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.2 million.

Table of Contents

~~Costs~~ Impairment of ~~antitrust~~long-lived ~~investigations~~assets: We ~~and~~recognized ~~related~~an ~~litigation: During~~impairment charge of $2.7 million during the ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month ~~ended~~period ~~June~~ended September 30, 2011 as a result of impairing certain fixed assets and ~~2010,~~real weestate ~~incurred~~ identified for disposition. Approximately $21.29 million of the 2011 impairment charge relates to the ~~and~~correction $2of errors identified through our 2011 fixed asset inventory counts. Impairment charges of $0.8 million, ~~respectively,~~were ofrecognized ~~legal~~during ~~fees~~the ~~and~~nine ~~other~~month ~~expenses~~period ~~associated~~ended ~~with~~September 30, 2010 to adjust the ~~antitrust~~carrying ~~investigation~~value ~~being~~of ~~conducted~~a byfacility ~~the~~which ~~Antitrust~~was ~~Division~~held offor ~~the~~sale ~~United~~to ~~States~~its ~~Department~~estimated market value. As a result of ~~Justice~~a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and ~~the~~expect ~~related~~to ~~litigation~~dispose of additional real estate in the future. ~~These~~Deterioration ~~costs~~of ~~have~~current ~~been~~market ~~recognized~~conditions ~~and~~for ~~paid~~our byassets ~~Reddy~~or ~~Holdings~~changes in facility operations could trigger additional impairments in future periods.

~~Interest~~ Acquisition ~~expense, net~~expenses: ~~Net~~We ~~interest~~incurred ~~expense increased~~ $74.61 million ~~from~~of expense during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~2011 toin connection ~~the~~with ~~six~~our ~~months~~current ~~ended June 30,~~acquisition ~~2011.~~activities ~~This~~and ~~change~~on-going isnegotiations. ~~related~~Approximately to$3.7 million ~~increased~~of ~~interest~~these ~~costs~~expenses ~~associated~~were ~~with~~in ~~our~~connection ~~new~~with ~~11.25%~~the ~~Senior~~Company's ~~Secured~~evaluation ~~Notes~~of ~~and~~a ~~13.25%~~strategic ~~Senior~~merger opportunity ~~Secured~~within ~~notes,~~the aspackaged ~~well~~ice asindustry. ~~additional~~While ~~interest~~this ~~associated with~~evaluation ~~borrowings~~is ~~under~~ongoing, ~~our~~no ~~revolving~~agreement ~~credit~~has ~~facility.~~been ~~The~~reached ~~amount~~and ofthere ~~net~~can ~~interest~~be ~~expense~~no ~~recognized~~assurance bythat ~~Reddy~~an ~~Holdings~~agreement ~~was~~will ~~$0.6 million~~be ~~and $3~~reached.~~8 million~~ ~~during~~Acquisition expense for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2011 and~~ 2010, ~~respectively~~was $0.6 million.

~~Debt~~Cost ~~refinance~~(insurance ~~costs: Costs~~recoveries) of ~~$6.2 million~~antitrust ~~were~~investigations ~~incurred~~and inrelated litigation: During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, inwe incurred ~~connection~~$2.9 million ~~with~~and ~~the refinancing~~$3.2 million, respectively, of ~~substantially~~ ~~all~~legal offees ~~our~~and ~~outstanding~~other ~~debt~~expenses inassociated ~~March~~with ~~2010~~the ~~and~~antitrust ~~consist~~investigation ofbeing ~~certain~~conducted ~~fees~~by ~~and~~the ~~expenses~~Antitrust ~~paid~~Division toof ~~third~~the ~~parties~~United States inDepartment ~~connection~~of ~~with~~Justice and the ~~transactions,~~related aslitigation. ~~well~~During as the ~~write-off~~nine of months ended September 30, 2010, we received a $05.30 million settlement in respect of ~~deferred~~claimed ~~debt~~cost ~~issue~~reimbursements from ~~costs~~our ~~associated~~insurance ~~with~~carriers. ~~debt~~These ~~that~~costs ~~was~~have ~~repaid~~been inrecognized ~~the~~and ~~transactions~~paid by Reddy Holdings.

~~Income~~Interest ~~tax (~~expense), ~~benefit~~net: ~~The~~Net ~~effective~~interest ~~tax~~expense ~~rate~~increased ~~decreased from 34~~$8.2% million ~~during~~from the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to ~~(6.9%) during~~ the ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. This change is related to increased interest costs associated with our new 11.25% Senior Secured Notes and 13.25% Senior Secured notes, as awell ~~result~~as ofadditional ~~the~~interest associated ~~effects~~with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The amount of ~~the~~net ~~valuation~~interest ~~allowance~~expense ~~recorded~~recognized ~~against~~by ~~certain~~Reddy ~~federal~~Holdings was $1.0 million and ~~state~~$4.1 million ~~deferred~~during ~~tax~~the ~~assets~~nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Debt refinance costs: Costs of $6.5 million were incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in connection with the refinancing of substantially all of our outstanding debt in March 2010 and consist of certain fees and expenses paid to third parties in connection with the transactions, as well as the write-off of $0.3 million of deferred debt issue costs associated with debt that was repaid in the transactions.

Income tax (expense) benefit: The effective tax rate increased from 34.2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to (5.7%) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as a result of the effects of the valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We intend to fund our ongoing capital and working capital requirements as well as debt service, including our internal growth and acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, and borrowings under our existing credit facilities, operating leases and other potential financing arrangements.

We generate cash from the sale of packaged ice through traditional delivery methods, by which we manufacture, package and store ice at a central facility and transport it to our customers' retail locations when needed, and through Ice Factories, which manufacture, package and store ice in our customers' retail locations. Our primary uses of cash are (a) cost of sales, (b) operating expenses, (c) debt service, (d) capital expenditures related to replacing and modernizing the capital equipment in our traditional ice plants and acquiring and installing additional Ice Factories, (e) acquisitions, and (f) investments. We have been and may continue to be required to use substantial amounts of cash to pay expenses relating to the investigations by various state agencies and related civil litigation. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Historically, we have financed our capital and working capital requirements, including our acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and operating leases.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, capital expenditures totaled $9.2 million. During this period, we received $2.3 million related to reimbursement of the cost of equipment acquired in 2010 and 2011 and subsequently placed under operating leases. As we consolidate acquisitions into the existing Company infrastructure, we have identified non-core and excess assets which can be disposed of, such as real estate and machinery and equipment. From time to time, we also dispose of other assets which are no longer useful in our operations. As a result of dispositions of these non-core and excess assets, we realized proceeds of approximately $0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our net capital expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $7.5 million. 38

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we completed the acquisition of nine ice companies for a total cash purchase price of approximately $13.3 million. We will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities as they become available. In conjunction with these evaluations, we will consider our

Table of Contents

~~liquidity~~our traditional ice plants and acquiring and installing additional Ice Factories, (e) acquisitions, and (f) investments. We have been and may continue to be required to use substantial ~~availability~~amounts ~~under~~of ~~our~~cash ~~credit~~to ~~facility~~pay expenses relating to the investigations by various state agencies and related civil litigation. See Part II—Item 1. Historically, ~~mandatory~~we ~~principal~~have ~~repayments~~financed ~~under~~our capital and working capital requirements, including our ~~debt~~acquisitions, ~~agreements~~through ~~and~~a ~~availability~~combination of ~~other~~cash ~~capital~~flows ~~resources~~from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and operating leases.

During the ~~Cash~~nine ~~Flows~~months ~~for~~ended September 30, 2011, capital expenditures totaled $13.2 million. During this period, reimbursements of the ~~Six~~cost ~~Months~~of ~~Ended~~equipment ~~June~~acquired in 2010 and 2011 and subsequently placed under operating leases, net of the cost of equipment acquired in 2011, equaled $1.3 million. As we consolidate acquisitions into the existing Company infrastructure, we have identified non-core and excess assets which can be disposed of, such as real estate and machinery and equipment. From time to time, we also dispose of other assets which are no longer useful in our operations. As a result of dispositions of these non-core and excess assets, we realized proceeds of approximately $0.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. ~~and~~Our ~~2010~~ net capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $11.2 million.

~~Net~~During the ~~cash~~nine ~~used in operating activities was $39.4 million for six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, ~~versus~~we ~~net~~completed ~~cash~~the ~~used~~acquisition ~~in operating~~of ~~activities~~nine ofice ~~$9.1 million~~companies for ~~the~~a ~~six~~total ~~months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in~~ cash ~~used~~purchase inprice ~~operating activities~~ of approximately $3013.3 million. ~~was~~We awill continue ~~result~~to ofevaluate ~~a $8.9 million~~acquisition ~~increase~~opportunities inas ~~net~~they ~~loss,~~become ~~adjusted~~available. ~~for~~In ~~non-cash~~conjunction ~~and~~with ~~non-operating~~these ~~items~~evaluations, ~~and~~we ~~$21.4 million~~will ~~decrease~~consider inour ~~cash~~liquidity, ~~provided~~availability byunder ~~working~~our ~~capital~~credit ~~primarily~~facility, ~~due to~~mandatory aprincipal ~~smaller~~repayments ~~increase~~under inour ~~accounts~~debt ~~payable~~agreements and ~~other~~availability ~~accrued~~of ~~expenses,~~other ascapital ~~well as an increase in accounts receivable associated with increased sales~~resources.

~~Net cash~~ ~~used~~Cash inFlows ~~investing activities was $22.5 million and $42.1 million~~ for the ~~six~~Nine ~~months~~Months ~~ended~~Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $14.2 million decrease in net property and equipment additions and a $9.9 million decrease in the funding of the restricted cash balance used to collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities in the first quarter of 2010, partially offset by a $4.1 million increase in the cost of acquisitions.

Net cash ~~provided~~used byin ~~financing~~operating activities was $3017.13 million ~~and $43.2 million~~ for ~~the~~nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 ~~and~~versus ~~2010,~~net ~~respectively.~~cash ~~The~~provided by ~~decrease~~operating activities of $1318.15 million isfor ~~due to~~ the ~~refinancing~~nine ofmonths ~~substantially~~ended ~~all~~September 30, of2010. ~~our~~The ~~debt~~increase in ~~the~~cash ~~first~~used ~~six months of 2010, which resulted~~ in ~~the~~operating ~~net~~activities ~~issuance~~ of $6035.08 million ofwas ~~additional~~a ~~debt,~~result asof ~~well~~a ~~as approximately~~ $1615.83 million ofincrease ~~costs~~in ~~incurred~~net loss, adjusted for ~~fees~~non-cash and ~~expenses~~non-operating ~~associated~~items, ~~with~~and ~~the~~a ~~refinancing transactions~~$20.5 million ~~This~~ decrease ~~was~~in ~~partially~~cash ~~offset~~provided by ~~net~~working ~~draws~~capital ofprimarily ~~$30.1 million~~due ~~under~~to ~~our~~a ~~revolving~~decrease ~~credit~~in ~~facility~~cash provided by changes in ~~the~~accounts ~~six~~payable ~~months~~and ~~ended~~accrued ~~June 30,~~expenses ~~2011.~~driven Weby ~~did~~changes ~~not~~in ~~utilize~~accrued ~~our~~interest, ~~revolving~~and ~~credit~~an ~~facility~~increase ~~during~~in ~~the~~accounts ~~six~~receivable ~~months~~associated ~~ended~~with ~~June 30,~~increased ~~2010~~sales.

Net cash used in investing activities was $28.6 million and $52.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $15.2 million decrease in net property and equipment additions and a $7.3 million decrease in the funding of the restricted cash balance used to collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities in the first quarter of 2010, as well as a $2.2 million decrease in purchases of investments.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $14.5 million and $41.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease of $27.2 million is due to the refinancing of substantially all of our debt in the first nine months of 2010, which resulted in the net issuance of $60.0 million of additional debt, as well as approximately $18.3 million of costs incurred for fees and expenses associated with the refinancing transactions. This decrease was partially offset by net draws of $14.5 million under our revolving credit facility in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We did not utilize our revolving credit facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Long-term Debt and Other Obligations

Overview. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had $~~480~~465.83 million of total debt outstanding as follows:

•: $300.0 million of Reddy Corp's 11.25% senior secured notes due 2015;

Table of Contents

•: $139.0 million of Reddy Corp's 13.25% senior secured notes due 2015 (net of unamortized early tender premium of $0.6 million);
•: $11.7 million of Reddy Holdings' 10¹/2% senior discount notes due November 1, 2012;
•: $14.5 million under Reddy Corp's revolving credit facility; and
•: $0.1 million in other notes payable.

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

Table of Contents

The First Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 5.625% of the principal amount of the First Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 15, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

The first lien leverage ratio under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes means the ratio of first lien indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) to EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its first lien leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of June 30, 2011, the first lien leverage ratio was 5.9 to 1.0. 40

Table of Contents

~~retirement~~ The offirst ~~remaining~~lien ~~101/2%~~leverage ~~Senior~~ratio ~~Discount~~under ~~Notes from~~ the ~~proceeds~~indenture ofgoverning ~~certain~~the ~~indebtedness~~First ofLien ~~Reddy~~Notes ~~Corp~~means ~~incurred after~~ the ~~date~~ratio of ~~issuance~~first oflien ~~the~~indebtedness ~~First~~(as ~~Lien~~defined ~~Notes,~~in ~~(3)~~ the ~~payment~~ ofindenture) ~~dividends~~ to ~~Reddy~~EBITDA ~~Holdings~~(as defined in anthe indenture) ~~amount~~for ~~per~~the ~~year~~most ~~not~~recent tofour ~~exceed~~fiscal $1quarters.~~0 million~~ toReddy ~~pay~~Corp ~~franchise~~is ~~taxes~~generally ~~and~~required ~~overhead~~to ~~expenses~~calculate ofits ~~Reddy~~first ~~Holdings~~lien ~~and~~leverage ~~(4) the~~ratio ~~payment~~on ofa ~~dividends~~pro ~~to Reddy~~forma ~~Holdings~~basis into angive ~~amount~~effect ~~per year not~~ to ~~exceed 6.0% of~~ the ~~aggregate~~incurrence ~~net~~and ~~cash~~repayment ~~proceeds~~of indebtedness ~~received~~as bywell ~~Reddy~~as ~~Corp~~acquisitions ~~from~~and ~~all~~dispositions. ~~public~~As ~~equity offerings after the date~~ of ~~issuance~~September 30, ~~of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However~~2011, the ~~amount~~first oflien ~~dividend~~leverage ~~payments~~ratio ~~permitted~~was ~~under this~~ 6.0% ~~provision~~to ~~will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends~~1.0.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining 10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;

Table of Contents

•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

Table of Contents

~~semi-annual~~to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest ~~payments~~when due on the remaining Discount Notes. Noand ~~dividends~~the ~~were~~repayment, ~~paid~~redemption inor retirement of remaining Discount Notes from the ~~three~~proceeds ~~and~~of ~~six~~certain ~~month~~indebtedness ~~periods~~of ~~ended~~Reddy ~~June 30,~~Corp ~~2011.~~incurred ~~During~~after the ~~six~~date ~~month~~of ~~period~~issuance ~~ended~~of ~~June 30, 2011~~the ~~and~~Second ~~2010~~Lien Notes, ~~Reddy~~(3) the ~~Corp~~payment ~~paid~~of ~~cash~~ dividends to Reddy Holdings in ~~the~~an amount ofper year not to exceed $01.60 million to pay franchise taxes and $overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0 ~~million,~~% ~~respectively,~~of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to ~~fund~~specified conditions. However, the ~~semi-annual~~amount ~~interest~~of dividend payments onpermitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, ~~Discount~~including ~~Notes~~dividends.

10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 10¹/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 10¹/2% per annum. The Discount Notes mature and are payable on November 1, 2012. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6.7 million and $15.8 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. No dividends were paid in the three month period ended September 30, 2011. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $0.6 million and $6.0 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes.

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

As of November 1, 2010, Reddy Holdings may redeem any or all of the Discount Notes without paying any redemption premium.

Table of Contents

Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, Reddy Corp had the right to request the aggregate commitments to be increased to $50 million provided certain conditions were met. On August 4, 2010, the aggregate commitments under the March 2010 Credit Facility were increased to $50 million.

The March 2010 Credit Facility was an obligation of Reddy Corp and was guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The March 2010 Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014.

41 The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $14.5 million outstanding and $35.5 million of availability under the New Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the New Credit Facility as of September 30, 2011 was 7.4%.

Table of Contents

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $30.1 million outstanding and $19.9 million of availability under the New Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the New Credit Facility as of June 30, 2011 was 7.3%.

The obligations under the New Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Reddy Holdings and will also be guaranteed by any future domestic subsidiaries of Reddy Corp, subject to certain exceptions.

Table of Contents

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount Notes and pay interest on the Discount Notes. Reddy Corp may also distribute certain investments to Reddy Holdings.

42 In addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp from declaring any dividends if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At September 30, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in New Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

In addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp from declaring any dividends if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At June 30, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in New Credit Facility.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, Reddy Holdings had $910.48 million of cash on hand that was not subject to restrictions under our New Credit Facility.

EBITDA as defined in our New Credit Facility is hereafter referred to as "Adjusted EBITDA".

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2011 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the adjustments related to the acquisition or disposal of businesses which are permitted under the description of the definition of Leverage Ratio as set forth in the New Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA that is derived solely from GAAP components. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income (loss), cash flows from operations or net cash from operating or investing activities as defined by GAAP, and it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations, and this presentation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA follows the table. 45

Table of Contents

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve month period ended September 30, 2011 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the adjustments related to the acquisition or disposal of businesses which are permitted under the description of the definition of Leverage Ratio as set forth in the New Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA that is derived solely from GAAP components. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income (loss), cash flows from operations or net cash from operating or investing activities as defined by GAAP, and it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations, and this presentation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA follows the table.

The following table sets forth pro forma Adjusted EBITDA as calculated under our New Credit Facility and the financial covenants contained in the New Credit Facility:

		Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011
		Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2011
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$5652,~~313~~471
Leverage ratio		0.53 : 1.0
Minimum liquidity		$1421,~~601~~136

4346

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

		Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011
		Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2011
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Net loss		$	(6165,~~071~~169	)
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			3032,~~315~~440
Depreciation and amortization expense			9,~~737~~551
Interest expense			5758,~~674~~273
Interest income			(1617	)
Income tax benefit			(49,~~274~~632	)
EBITDA			3225,~~365~~446
Other non-cash items:
	Stock-based compensation expense(a)		2,~~252~~456
	Loss on dispositions of assets		~~1,034~~628
	Impairment of long-lived assets		1112,~~112~~569
	Decrease in fair value of derivative		~~162~~245
	Gain on bargain purchase		(232	)
	Adjustment to gain on bargain purchase		32
	Acquisition expense		34,~~412~~662
	Debt refinance costs		2,671
	Gain on contingent acquisition consideration		(202	)
	Debt refinance costs		2,361
Reddy Holdings items:
	Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation(b)		(15	)
	Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries(b)		4,637
Adjusted EBITDA			52,~~761~~834
Acquisition adjustments(c)			~~3,552~~(363	)
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$	5652,~~313~~471

(a)The $2.35 million stock-based compensation expense for the twelve months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 includes a $0.3 million expense for ~~Board~~ Board of Directors stock awards ~~earned during the year and granted in April of 2011.~~ (b)Represents the elimination of the net costs incurred in connection with the ongoing antitrust investigations and related litigation of insurance recoveries. The costs related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation and related insurance recoveries are excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as these costs have been paid, and the related insurance recoveries have been received, by Reddy Holdings. Reddy Holdings is currently paying these costs from the excess cash remaining from the initial public offering of its common stock in August 2005, the funds paid to Reddy Holdings by affiliates of GSO Capital Partners LP in February 2008 in connection with the termination of a merger agreement, insurance proceeds related to the antitrust investigations and related litigation, and dividends received from Reddy Corp in the amount of $3.0 million since the DOJ investigation began. (c)Represents the incremental Adjusted EBITDA of acquired businesses as if each acquisition had been consummated on the first day of the period presented. All acquisitions included herein were consummated on or before ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral 47

Table of Contents

~~provided~~ Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted Cash" in the consolidated balance sheets.

Financial Derivative Instruments

Diesel Hedging Agreement. On March 25, 2011, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge began April 1, 2011 and expires on December 28, 2011. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.2 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.17 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. On May 6, 2011, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Second Diesel Hedge"). The Second Diesel Hedge began June 1, 2011 and expires on December 31, 2012. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated usage and totals 1.1 million gallons, 0.5 million of which relates to expected 2012 usage. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.04 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. The Company uses the hedges to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedges are not for trading purposes and are accounted for as economic hedges and were not designated as hedging instruments.

Liquidity Outlook. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, we record the majority of our revenues and profits during the months of May through September. The majority of the cash generated from those operations is received between July and November. We fully utilized the excess cash generated from our 2010 selling season during the winter of 2010 and spring of 2011 to fund our operations, debt service, capital expenditures and acquisitions. In March 2010, we refinanced substantially all of our outstanding debt. The March 2010 refinancing provided us with additional cash proceeds of $43.5 million, net of transaction costs, which allowed for additional acquisitions and capital expenditures. In August 2010, we increased the size of our revolving credit facility from $35 million to

4548

Table of Contents

from those operations is received between July and November. We fully utilized the excess cash generated from our 2010 selling season during the winter of 2010 and spring of 2011 to fund our operations, debt service, capital expenditures and acquisitions. In March 2010, we refinanced substantially all of our outstanding debt. The March 2010 refinancing provided us with additional cash proceeds of $5043.5 million, net of transaction costs, which allowed for additional acquisitions and capital expenditures. In August 2010, we increased the size of our revolving credit facility from $35 million to $50 million. In October 2010, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility to, among other changes, modify financial covenants and extend the maturity date from January 31, 2014 to October 22, 2014. The annual cash interest associated with our current long-term debt is approximately $5553 million.

Our capital expenditures are used to maintain and expand our traditional ice and ISB operations. In the normal course of our business, we dispose of obsolete, worn-out and unneeded assets and have historically applied those funds against capital expenditures. We currently expect our net capital expenditures in 2011 to approximate $811 to $1013 million. This represents our ~~minimum~~ capital expenditures for the maintenance of our traditional packaged ice and ISB operations net of proceeds from dispositions and expected net reimbursements of the cost of ~~equipment~~ equipment purchased and placed under operating leases, ~~although~~and weadditional expenditures for key projects related to acquisitions and high return opportunities. We continue to evaluate opportunities to deploy additional capital expenditures for projects with attractive returns and/or acquisitions in the packaged ice and ice machine leasing businesses.

Based on our expected level of operations, we believe that cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under our revolving credit facility, will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. As of ~~August~~November 87, 2011, we had approximately $910.12 million of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, approximately $21.21 million of unrestricted cash and $1213.91 million of restricted cash at Reddy Corp and $3032.60 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. Our cash flows from operations decline to their lowest point during March and April due to reduced sales in January and February, and we make interest payments on our outstanding notes in March and May. We incur a substantial portion of our annual capital expenditures prior to the summer selling season and we need to finance seasonal increases in accounts receivable and inventories as temperatures and sales volumes begin to increase in April and May. The utilization of our revolving credit facility reached its seasonal high point in June of 2011. Subject to the authorization of additional capital expenditures above the current budget and/or the completion of additional acquisitions, we expect that the amount currently outstanding under the revolving credit facility will be repaid ~~by the end of~~or ~~2011.~~significantly Wereduced ~~expect~~by toearly ~~utilize~~2012 ~~the~~until ~~revolving~~additional ~~credit~~borrowings ~~facility~~are ~~again~~needed indue ~~the first quarter of 2012. In addition~~ to ~~monitoring opportunities to repay or refinance~~ the ~~$11.7 million~~onset of ~~remaining discount~~our ~~notes~~seasonal ~~which~~liquidity ~~mature on November 1~~needs, ~~2012,~~which webegin ~~are also evaluating other potential avenues~~ to ~~raise~~build ~~capital~~again tolate ~~fund~~in ~~our strategic plans, including~~ the ~~incurrence~~first ofquarter ~~additional debt and/or the issuance~~ of ~~equity or equity linked securities~~2012.

As noted previously, we record the majority of our sales and any profits during the months of May through September and the majority of the cash generated from those operations is received in July through November, by which time, we expect to have repaid all or a substantial portion of the amounts borrowed under our revolving credit facility in the spring, funded current capital expenditures and debt service and potentially built up cash balances. In 2012, we anticipate experiencing the seasonal low point in our liquidity in the May-June timeframe, but available cash balances and borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility are expected to meet our cash needs during this period. In addition, $11.7 million of discount notes are scheduled to mature on November 1, 2012 and we expect to have sufficient liquidity to repay these notes in cash. We are monitoring opportunities to refinance the discount notes and are also evaluating other potential avenues to raise capital to fund our strategic plans and provide additional liquidity. Potential sources of cash and liquidity include the incurrence of additional debt and/or the issuance of equity or equity linked securities, the timing of capital expenditures and the disposition of ancillary facilities, operations and investments. However, there can be no assurances that any of these potential sources of funds can be successfully accessed. We expect to be in compliance with our debt covenants over the next twelve months.

Expenses in connection with the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation may require the use of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings or Reddy Corp. or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of August 8, 2011, our cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, net of accrued expenses related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation, was approximately $9.0 million. Based on the current status of the investigation and related civil litigation and projected expenses, we believe Reddy Holdings' cash balance will be sufficient to fund these expenses for the next twelve months; however, this expectation includes assumptions regarding matters beyond our control or knowledge. If Reddy Holdings were to require additional cash to fund its expenses related to the antitrust investigations, Reddy Corp. has the ability under the credit facility to transfer $1 million to Reddy Holdings on an annual basis and an additional general restricted payment basket of $5 million over the remaining life of the credit facility. Reddy Holdings has no restrictions on its ability to raise additional debt. We have received reimbursements of $12.2 million to date from our insurance carriers as reimbursements of certain legal expenses. The settlements related to these reimbursements were final and we do not expect to receive any further reimbursements related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation. 49

Table of Contents

Expenses in connection with the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation may require the use of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings or Reddy Corp. or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of November 7, 2011, our cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, net of accrued expenses related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation, was approximately $7.9 million. Based on the current status of the investigation and related civil litigation and projected expenses, we believe Reddy Holdings' cash balance will be sufficient to fund these expenses for the next twelve months; however, this expectation includes assumptions regarding matters beyond our control or knowledge. If Reddy Holdings were to require additional cash to fund its expenses related to the antitrust investigations, Reddy Corp. has the ability under the credit facility to transfer $1 million to Reddy Holdings on an annual basis and an additional general restricted payment basket of $5 million over the remaining life of the credit facility. Reddy Holdings has no restrictions on its ability to raise additional debt. We have received reimbursements of $12.2 million to date from our insurance carriers as reimbursements of certain legal expenses. The settlements related to these reimbursements were final and we do not expect to receive any further reimbursements related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September of 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. ASU 2011-08 modifies the goodwill impairment test by allowing for an assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, based on this assessment, the entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the entity may bypass performing the two-step goodwill impairment test. However, if the entity concludes otherwise, it is required to perform Step 1 of the two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June of 2011, the FASB issue ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. ASU 2010-28 modifies ~~step~~Step ~~one~~1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and offers guidance on when to perform ~~step~~Step ~~two~~2 of the testing. For those reporting units, an entity is is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists based upon factors such as unanticipated competition, the loss of key personnel and adverse regulatory changes. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

General Economic Trends and Seasonality

Our results of operations are generally affected by the economic trends in our market area. We believe end users of our products use packaged ice in many applications, including recreational activities, the construction industry, agriculture and special events. Weakness in the national economy combined with other factors including inflation, interest rate fluctuations, increases in fuel and other energy costs, labor and healthcare costs and the availability of financing, may negatively impact consumer confidence and the business prospects of our commercial customers. If consumer activities associated with the use of our products decline or the business activities of our commercial customers decrease, our revenues and sales volumes may decline.

Our results to date have not been significantly impacted by inflation, other than costs directly related to energy prices, such as fuel, plastic bags and electricity. If we experience high inflation in these costs in the future, or inflationary pressures have significant effects on other cost categories, we may not be able to pass on all of these higher costs to our customers in the short term. We do believe that we will be able to pass on higher costs to our customers over longer periods of time; however there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such efforts.

Table of Contents

The ice business is highly seasonal, with the bulk of demand coming in the warmer spring and summer months. Accordingly, we experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and profitability. We make a disproportionate amount of our sales in the second and third calendar quarters. We also typically earn any net income in these same periods, whereas we typically experience net losses in the first and fourth calendar quarters. We believe that approximately two-thirds of our revenues will occur during the second and third calendar quarters when the weather conditions are generally warmer and demand is greater, while approximately one-third of our revenues will occur during the first and fourth calendar quarters when the weather is generally cooler. This belief is consistent with historical trends. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and the lack of proportional corresponding expense decreases, we will most likely experience lower profit margins and losses during the first and fourth calendar quarters. In addition, because our operating results depend significantly on sales during our peak season, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of adverse weather during this peak selling period if the weather is unusually cool or rainy on a more national or regional basis.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the value of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our main market risk categories are fuel prices and interest rate risk.

We are exposed to market risk due to fluctuations in the prices of fuel. From time to time we enter into hedging contracts to stabilize prices expected to be paid for diesel fuel used in our operations. These contracts are for quantities equal to or less than quantities expected to be consumed in our operations. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had two diesel fuel contracts ~~maturing at~~that ~~various~~mature ~~dates~~in ~~through~~ December 2011 and 2012 which are recorded in Cost of Goods Sold and Other Assets at their fair value of approximately $0.2 million. The impact of a 10% change in fuel prices under these contracts would result in a $1.0 million change in our results of operations on an annual basis, absent any other contravening actions.

Our results of operations can be affected by changes in interest rates due to variable rates of interest on our revolving credit facilities. As of June 30, 2011, $30.1 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility. A 1% increase in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on our results of operations. 51

Table of Contents

approximately $0.2 million. The impact of a 10% change in fuel prices not covered under these contracts would result in a $1.0 million change in our results of operations on an annual basis, absent any other contravening actions.

Our results of operations can be affected by changes in interest rates due to variable rates of interest on our revolving credit facilities. As of September 30, 2011, $14.5 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility. A 1% increase in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on our results of operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls ~~and~~ and procedures" ("Disclosure Controls"), as defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Quarterly Report"). The Disclosure Controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, and as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting disclosed by the Company in its 2010 annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and as described below, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2011.

At December 31, 2010, management, including our CEO and our CFO, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

48 A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

~~Table~~ Based on this assessment, management identified a material weakness related to our accounting for ice merchandiser equipment, as identified and disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring with respect to the accuracy, valuation, completeness, and existence of ~~Contents~~ice merchandiser equipment.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Based on this assessment, management identified a material weakness resulting from our accounting for ice merchandiser equipment, as identified and disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring with respect to the accuracy, valuation, completeness, and existence of ice merchandiser equipment.

Notwithstanding the existence of the material weakness described above, we performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These additional procedures included, among other things, expansion of our physical inventory procedures and dedication of significant internal resources to review our ice merchandiser and other plant and equipment balances at a detailed level.

~~Although~~As wea ~~have~~result ~~begun~~of ~~remediation~~the ~~efforts,~~additional weanalyses ~~have~~and ~~not~~other ~~yet~~procedures ~~remediated~~performed ~~the~~as ~~material weakness~~ described above, ~~and~~the ~~cannot~~Company ~~conclude~~identified ~~when~~additional weerrors ~~will~~in ~~have~~its ~~remediated~~accounting ~~this~~for ~~material~~equipment ~~weakness~~and machinery balances. ~~Until~~We ~~remediated,~~have ~~this~~determined ~~deficiency~~that ~~could~~these ~~result~~errors inare aan ~~material~~additional ~~misstatement~~effect of the ~~related~~material ~~accounts~~weakness ~~and~~identified ~~disclosures~~at ~~contained~~December 31, in2010. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring with respect to the ~~consolidated~~accuracy, ~~financial~~valuation, ~~statements~~completeness, ~~that~~and ~~would~~existence ~~not~~of beice ~~prevented~~merchandiser ~~or detected~~equipment onand aother ~~timely~~equipment ~~basis~~and machinery.

~~Plan~~ Although we ~~for Remediation of Material Weakness. We~~ have made ~~and~~substantial ~~will~~progress ~~continue~~in ~~to make improvements to~~ our ~~internal~~remediation ~~control over financial reporting~~efforts, ~~and management,~~we ~~with~~have ~~oversight~~not ~~from~~yet ~~our~~remediated ~~Audit Committee, has identified and intends to execute~~ the ~~following actions that we believe will remediate the~~ material weakness described above. ~~Specifically, with~~and ~~regard~~cannot toconclude ~~the~~when ~~accounting~~we ~~for~~will ~~ice~~have ~~merchandisers,~~remediated ~~management intends to:~~

Subsequent to filing its Annual Report on March 31, 2011, the Company has initiated a redesign of its fixed asset processes and procedures as well as the implementation of a new fixed asset system. The Company has made substantial progress in its remediation efforts during the second quarter. Key milestones include the selection of a new fixed asset system, the re-design of certain policies and procedures to ensure adequate internal controls over fixed assets are maintained, and the design and test of the 2011 fixed asset inventory and tagging procedures. The newly re-designed procedures will be adopted in conjunction with the final implementation of the selected fixed asset system and the Company's physical inventory will be executed during the second half of 2011. The foregoing notwithstanding, we continue to evaluate the appropriate remediation measures required in order to address the above-described material weakness and further progress relative to our remediation measures will be disclosed in our subsequent Exchange Act reports. 52

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

this material weakness. Until remediated, this deficiency could result in a material misstatement of the related accounts and disclosures contained in the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness. We have made and will continue to make improvements to our internal control over financial reporting, and management, with oversight from our Audit Committee, has identified and intends to execute the following actions that we believe will remediate the material weakness described above. Specifically, with regard to the accounting for ice merchandiser and plant and equipment assets, management intends to:

•: Establish increased operational ownership and accountability for the Company's ice merchandiser, plant, and equipment assets;
•: Upgrade the fixed asset system and related procedures to provide a more accurate and automated means of managing the Company's fixed assets, including its ice merchandiser, plant, and equipment assets, with specific focus on processes and controls governing the tracking and timely disposition and inventory of fixed assets; and
•: Redesign and enhance inventory control procedures over our fixed assets including increased education, training, support and oversight of the Company's employees tasked with the completion of inventory procedures.

Subsequent to filing its 2010 Annual Report on March 31, 2011, the Company has initiated a redesign of its fixed asset processes and procedures as well as the implementation of a new fixed asset system. The Company has made significant progress in its remediation efforts during the second and third quarters. Key milestones achieved in the second quarter included the selection of a new fixed asset system, the re-design of certain policies and procedures to ensure adequate internal controls over fixed assets are maintained, and the design and test of the 2011 fixed asset inventory and tagging procedures. During the third quarter the Company initiated the physical implementation of the selected fixed asset system, the training of employees on new and revised policies and procedures, the tagging of the Company's fixed assets with tags readable via a handheld barcode scanner, and execution of the 2011 physical fixed asset inventory. The newly re-designed procedures will be adopted in conjunction with the final implementation of the selected fixed asset system and execution of the Company's tagging and physical inventory activities will continue until fully complete. The Company anticipates completing these remediation activities in 2011.

The foregoing notwithstanding, we continue to evaluate the appropriate remediation measures required in order to address the above-described material weakness and further progress relative to our remediation measures will be disclosed in our subsequent Exchange Act reports.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Antitrust Matters

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Antitrust Matters

Beginning in 2008 a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal and state courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. One of the state court cases filed against the Company was dismissed. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the other civil actions ~~pending in federal courts~~ have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Home City entered into a settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. On March 30, 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it had entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Preliminary approval of that settlement was granted on July 20, 2011, and a final fairness hearing was held on October 28, 2011. The Court has taken the motion for final approval under advisement. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers against the Company. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser claims. On ~~April~~May 2625, 2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a ~~Second Amended~~Consolidated Class Action ~~complaint~~Complaint asserting violations of the antitrust laws of various states

5054

Table of Contents

~~states~~ and related claims. The Company ~~filed~~and athe ~~motion~~other defendants filed motions to dismiss the ~~Second~~Consolidated ~~Amended~~Class Action Complaint. Those motions were heard on ~~June~~October 2428, 2011, and were taken under advisement by the Court.

Stockholder Litigation

Table of Contents

~~District~~ Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former officers and members of the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On ~~March~~August 171, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Special Exceptions filed by the defendants. The Company filed a ~~Second~~petition with the Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus relating to the denial of certain Special Exceptions. On September 1, 2011, a Third Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That ~~Second~~Third Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. On October 10, 2011, the petition for a writ of mandamus was conditionally granted by the Court of Appeals and the trial court was ordered to grant the Special Exception relating to demand futility. The plaintiffs filed a Motion for Rehearing, which was denied on November 7, 2011. The trial of ~~date~~that ~~has~~case ~~been~~is currently set for March 1320, 2012.

Other Matters

We are also involved in various other claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property matters. There are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate outcome of such matters and it is difficult to determine the ultimate costs that we may incur. We believe the resolution of such other ordinary course uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, except as listed below.

Our common stock could be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.

The continued listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") require the Company to maintain, among other things, a market capitalization or stockholders equity above a specified threshold. As a result of the decline in the Company's stock price and the reduction in its stockholders' equity resulting from our decline in earnings, the Company was notified by the NYSE in September that it is not in compliance with the NYSE continued listing standards. On November 7^th, 2011, the Company filed a plan with the NYSE to achieve compliance with the continued listing standards within 18 months. If the plan is accepted by the NYSE, the NYSE will monitor the Company's performance under the plan on a quarterly basis. To the extent (i) the NYSE does not accept the Company's plan, (ii) the Company cannot meet the applicable standards within the 18 month period if its plan is accepted, or (iii) the NYSE determines the Company is not satisfying its obligations under the plan to achieve compliance, the Company's stock could be delisted from NYSE. A delisting of the Company's common stock could materially and adversely affect, among other things, the liquidity and market price of the Company's common stock; the number of investors willing to hold or acquire the Company's common stock; and the Company's access to capital markets to raise capital in the future.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits on page 5459.

5257

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE CORPORATION
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: November 10, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

5358

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.			Description
	31.1†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101†		The following financial information from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Deficit, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, (v) Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheet, (vi) Reddy Ice Corporation Statements of Operations, (vii) Reddy Ice Corporation Statement of Stockholder's Equity, (viii) Reddy Ice Corporation Statements of Cash Flows, (ix) Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements.

†: Filed herewith.

5459

Filing Compare · REDDY ICE CORP