Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission file numbers:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. 001-32596
Reddy Ice Corporation 333-168190

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
REDDY ICE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		56-2381368 75-2244985 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8750 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 1800
DALLAS, TEXAS 75231
(Address of principal executive offices)

(214) 526-6740
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes ý No o
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). *The Registrants are not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T at this time.

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Yes oý No o* Reddy Ice Corporation Yes oý No o*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company ý

Reddy Ice Corporation


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes o No ý
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes o No ý

The number of shares of registrant's common stock outstanding as of ~~May~~August 38, 2011 was:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		23,~~311~~383,~~456~~556 shares of common stock
Reddy Ice Corporation		100 shares of common stock

~~REDDY~~Table ~~ICE~~of ~~HOLDINGS, INC.~~Contents ~~AND SUBSIDIARY~~

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY REDDY ICE CORPORATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION	~~PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
Item 1.	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Financial Statements	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	9
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	9
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	10
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2930
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4548
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4548
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION	~~PART II—OTHER INFORMATION~~
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4750
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4952
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4952
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4952
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	4952
Item 5.	Other Information	4952
Item 6.	Exhibits	4952
SIGNATURES		5053
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		5154

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	1110,~~221~~455		$	42,173
	Accounts receivable, net			2252,~~367~~968			21,432
	Inventories, parts and supplies			13,662			12,549
	Notes receivable from affiliate			1,253			—
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,707			3,849
	Inventories, parts and supplies			14,018			12,549
	Assets held for sale			1,052			1,056
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			5,291			3,849
	Deferred tax assets			716			716
	Assets held for sale			1,918			1,056
		Total current assets		52,725			81,775
	Deferred tax assets			1,251			716
RESTRICTED CASH				10,191			10,110
		Total current assets		87,154			81,775
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				203,067			204,898
RESTRICTED CASH				10,758			10,110
GOODWILL				85,380			83,368
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				197,605			204,898
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,031			72,204
GOODWILL				86,989			83,368
INVESTMENTS				6,993			6,318
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,303			72,204
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,653			12,252
INVESTMENTS				7,357			6,318
TOTAL			$	445,040		$	470,925
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,462			12,252
TOTAL			$	476,628		$	470,925
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			1230,~~000~~100			—
	Accounts payable			1422,~~831~~159			15,290
	Accrued expenses			2228,~~216~~268			24,177
		Total current liabilities		4980,~~048~~528			39,468
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				450,~~718~~747			450,690
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				1315,~~593~~089			10,560
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
	Preferred stock: 25,000,000 share authorized; no shares issued or outstanding			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 23,311,456 and 22,962,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			233			230
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 23,383,556 and 22,962,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			234			230
	Additional paid-in capital			~~225~~226,~~780~~308			225,208
	Accumulated deficit			(~~294~~296,~~332~~278	)		(255,231	)
		Total stockholders' deficit		(6869,~~319~~736	)		(29,793	)
TOTAL			$	~~445~~476,~~040~~628		$	470,925

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended March 31,
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues		$	40106,~~752~~493		$	35104,~~894~~163		$	147,245		$	140,057
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)			3766,~~225~~768			3462,~~908~~109			103,993			97,017
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			7,~~708~~480			5,~~314~~647			15,188			10,961
Gross loss			(4,181	)		(4,328	)
Gross profit			32,245			36,407			28,064			32,079
Operating expenses			1214,~~799~~315			1314,~~119~~373			27,114			27,492
Depreciation and amortization expense			2,~~530~~454			12,~~876~~173			4,984			4,049
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54114	)		~~227~~1,170			(168	)		1,397
Acquisition expenses			603			2
Impairment of long-lived assets			539			236			770			236
Impairment of long-lived assets			231			—
Acquisition expenses			1,844			208			2,447			210
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation (Note 11)			~~1,421~~731			~~913~~1,130			2,152			2,043
Loss from operations			(21,711	)		(20,465	)
Income (loss) from operations			12,476			17,117			(9,235	)		(3,348	)
Interest expense			(14,~~349~~826	)		(714,~~259~~320	)		(29,175	)		(21,579	)
Interest income			4			48			8			12
Debt refinance costs			—			(~~6,108~~60	)		—			(6,168	)
Loss before income taxes			(36,056	)		(33,828	)
Income (loss) before income taxes			(2,346	)		2,745			(38,402	)		(31,083	)
Income tax (expense) benefit			(3,045	)		11,231
Income tax benefit (expense)			400			(613	)		(2,645	)		10,618
Net loss		$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)
Net income (loss)		$	(1,946	)	$	2,132		$	(41,047	)	$	(20,465	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Net loss	$	(1.72	)	$	(1.01	)
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,~~689~~737			22,~~406~~870			22,713			22,432
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,737			23,165			22,713			22,432

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Unaudited)~~

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
							(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			22,962		$	230	$	225,208		$	(255,231	)	$	(29,793	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—			—		559			—			559
Issuance of restricted stock			344			3		(3	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock			(1	)		—		—			—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			6			—		16			—			16
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—			—		—			(39,101	)		(39,101	)
	Total comprehensive loss													(39,101	)
Balance at March 31, 2011			23,311		$	233	$	225,780		$	(294,332	)	$	(68,319	)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

		Common Stock

		Number of Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
							(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			22,962		$	230	$	225,208		$	(255,231	)	$	(29,793	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—			—		1,088			—			1,088
Issuance of restricted stock			344			3		(3	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock			(24	)		—		—			—			—
Issuance of vested shares to directors			96			1		(1	)		—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			6			—		16			—			16
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—			—		—			(41,047	)		(41,047	)

	Total comprehensive loss													(41,047	)

Balance at June 30, 2011			23,384		$	234	$	226,308		$	(296,278	)	$	(69,736	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Three Months Ended March 31,
				Six Months Ended June 30,
				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(3941,~~101~~047	)	$	(2220,~~597~~465	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			1020,~~238~~172			715,~~190~~010
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			~~755~~1,522			~~425~~1,212
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,~~108~~168
		Deferred tax expense (benefit)			32,~~021~~454			(1110,~~231~~618	)
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54168	)		~~227~~1,397
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			(16	)		—
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			162			—
		Impairment of long-lived assets			~~231~~770			—236
		Stock-based compensation expense			~~631~~1,208			~~327~~1,031
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(~~936~~31,581	)		9(22,~~167~~110	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(~~1,031~~777	)		(~~1,347~~973	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10(1,539	)		(~~224~~392	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		(39,~~811~~453	)		~~(264~~20,404	)
	Net cash used in operating activities				(3039,~~063~~371	)		(129,~~219~~100	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(39,~~821~~154	)		(1023,~~020~~349	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				75386			~~261~~407
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				—			2,000
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(956	)		—
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(8,395	)		(763	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				2,264			2,000
	Other intangible assets additions				(8	)		—
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,305	)		(9,160	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(81	)		(12,292	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(11	)		—
	Purchase of investments				(675	)		(500	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(648	)		(10,592	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(12,905	)		(21,314	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(1,400	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(22,463	)		(42,094	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options				16			17
	Borrowings under the credit facility				1460,~~200~~725			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(230,~~200~~625	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(16,~~745~~797	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)
	Net cash provided by financing activities				1230,~~016~~116			43,~~271~~219
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(30,952	)		9,738
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(31,718	)		(7,975	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					42,173			44,649
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	1110,~~221~~455		$	5436,~~387~~674
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	1627,~~972~~352		$	67,~~708~~430
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	48		$	412
	Cash (receipts) payments for income taxes			$	(8	)	$	93
	Cash payments for income taxes, net			$	458		$	543
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	2,016		$	1,549
	Issuance of notes receivable—affiliate			$	(1,253	)		—
	Noncash increase in short-term financing			$	1,253			—
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	1,391		$	2,857

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	~~590~~1,023		$	30,153
	Accounts receivable, net			2252,~~367~~968			21,432
	Accounts receivable from Parent			18306			19
	Inventories, parts and supplies			13,662			12,549
	Notes receivable from affiliate			1,253			—
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,707			3,849
	Inventories, parts and supplies			14,018			12,549
	Assets held for sale			1,052			1,056
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			5,291			3,849
	Deferred tax assets			716			716
	Assets held for sale			1,918			1,056
		Total current assets		42,112			69,774
	Deferred tax assets			1,251			716
RESTRICTED CASH				10,191			10,110
		Total current assets		78,028			69,774
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				203,067			204,898
RESTRICTED CASH				10,758			10,110
GOODWILL				85,380			83,368
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				197,605			204,898
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,031			72,204
GOODWILL				86,989			83,368
INVESTMENTS				6,993			6,318
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,303			72,204
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,565			12,149
INVESTMENTS				7,357			6,318
TOTAL			$	434,339		$	458,821
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,386			12,149
TOTAL			$	467,426		$	458,821
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			1230,~~000~~100			—
	Accounts payable			1321,~~900~~984			14,375
	Accrued expenses			2228,~~396~~756			24,665
		Total current liabilities		4880,~~297~~841			39,041
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				~~438~~439,~~982~~011			438,954
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				1921,~~587~~113			32,344
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT:
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—			—
	Additional paid-in capital			~~306~~307,~~979~~508			306,420
	Accumulated deficit			(~~379~~381,~~506~~047	)		(357,938	)
		Total stockholder's deficit		(7273,~~527~~539	)		(51,518	)
TOTAL			$	~~434~~467,~~339~~426		$	458,821

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	40106,~~752~~493		$	35104,~~894~~163		$	147,245		$	140,057
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		3766,~~225~~768			3462,~~908~~109			103,993			97,017
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		7,~~708~~480			5,~~314~~647			15,188			10,961
Gross loss		(4,181	)		(4,328	)
Gross profit		32,245			36,407			28,064			32,079
Operating expenses		1214,~~799~~315			1314,~~119~~373			27,114			27,492
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,~~530~~454			12,~~876~~173			4,984			4,049
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(54114	)		~~227~~1,170			(168	)		1,397
Acquisition expenses		603			2
Impairment of long-lived assets		539			236			770			236
Impairment of long-lived assets		231			—
Acquisition expenses		1,844			208			2,447			210
Loss from operations		(20,290	)		(19,552	)
Income (loss) from operations		13,207			18,247			(7,083	)		(1,305	)
Interest expense		(14,~~026~~504	)		(313,~~893~~912	)		(28,530	)		(17,805	)
Interest income		4			38			8			11
Debt refinance costs		—			(~~6,108~~60	)		—			(6,168	)
Loss before income taxes		(34,312	)		(29,550	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,293	)		4,283			(35,605	)		(25,267	)
Income tax benefit		12,744			9,426
Income tax benefit (expense)		370			(924	)		13,114			8,502
Net loss	$	(21,568	)	$	(20,124	)
Net income (loss)	$	(923	)	$	3,359		$	(22,491	)	$	(16,765	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares		Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
				~~(in thousands)~~		(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			—	$	—	$	306,420	$	(357,938	)	$	(51,518	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—		—		~~559~~1,088		—			~~559~~1,088
Dividend to Parent			—		—		—		(618	)		(618	)
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—		—		—		(2122,~~568~~491	)		(2122,~~568~~491	)
	Total comprehensive loss											(2122,~~568~~491	)
Balance at March 31, 2011			—	$	—	$	306,979	$	(379,506	)	$	(72,527	)
Balance at June 30, 2011			—	$	—	$	307,508	$	(381,047	)	$	(73,539	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Three Months Ended March 31,
				Six Months Ended June 30,
				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(2122,~~568~~491	)	$	(2016,~~124~~765	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			1020,~~238~~172			715,~~190~~010
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			~~418~~848			~~363~~1,049
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,~~108~~168
		Deferred tax benefit			(1213,~~768~~305	)		(98,~~426~~502	)
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54168	)		~~227~~1,397
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			(16	)		—
		Decrease in fair value of diesel hedge			162			—
		Impairment of assets			231			—
		Impairment of long-lived assets			770			236
		Stock-based compensation expense			~~631~~1,208			~~327~~1,031
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(~~936~~31,581	)		2(28,~~567~~710	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(~~1,031~~777	)		(~~1,347~~973	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10(1,539	)		(~~183~~394	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		(310,~~813~~552	)		222,~~006~~568
	Net cash used in operating activities				(2836,~~658~~149	)		(127,~~292~~885	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(39,~~821~~154	)		(1023,~~020~~349	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				75386			~~261~~407
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				—			2,000
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(956	)		—
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(8,395	)		(763	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				2,264			2,000
	Other intangible assets additions				(8	)		—
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(13,305	)		(9,160	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(81	)		(12,292	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(11	)		—
	Purchase of investments				(675	)		(500	)
	Increase in restricted cash				(648	)		(10,592	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(12,905	)		(21,314	)
	Purchase of investments				(1,039	)		(1,400	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(22,463	)		(42,094	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Dividends to Parent				—(618	)		(56,~~422~~038	)
	Borrowings under the credit facility				1460,~~200~~725			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(230,~~200~~625	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(16,~~745~~797	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)
	Net cash provided by financing activities				1229,~~000~~482			37,~~832~~164
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(29,563	)		4,226
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(29,130	)		(12,815	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					30,153			40,440
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	~~590~~1,023		$	4427,~~666~~625
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	1626,~~972~~734		$	1,~~259~~481
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	48		$	310
	Cash (receipts) payments for income taxes			$	(8	)	$	93
	Cash payments for income taxes, net			$	458		$	543
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	2,016		$	1,549
	Issuance of notes receivable—affiliate			$	(1,253	)		—
	Noncash increase in short-term financing			$	1,253			—
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	1,391		$	2,857

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

1. General

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp"), referred to collectively as the "Company", manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. The Company consists of a single operating segment. The common stock of Reddy Holdings is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "FRZ".

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report of the Company and Reddy Corp. The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the condensed financial statements of Reddy Corp included herein are unaudited; however, balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 have been derived from the audited financial statements for that date, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Under the SEC's regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation, and all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been made and are of a normal and recurring nature. The financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and Reddy Corp financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements apply to both the Company and Reddy Corp. Reddy Corp comprises all or substantially all of the Company's consolidated balances or activities unless otherwise noted. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the full year.

2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June of 2011, the FASB issue ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. ASU 2010-28 modifies step one of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and offers guidance on when to perform step two of the testing. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists based upon factors such as unanticipated competition, the loss of key personnel and adverse regulatory changes. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

~~date~~ In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

3. Acquisitions

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company purchased ~~eight~~one ice ~~companies~~company in connection with its ongoing acquisitions program. The total purchase price was allocated to to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based upon estimates of their respective fair values as of the closing dates using valuations and other studies. ~~Two~~Six acquisitions were completed during the three months ended June 30, 2010. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, the Company completed nine and eight acquisitions, respectively. The following table summarizes the aggregate purchase prices, estimated aggregate fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and direct acquisition costs expensed:

		Three Months Ended March 31,
		Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
		2011			2010		2011			2010
		(in millions)
Purchase price		$	8.4.9		$	0.8.4	$	13.3		$	9.2
Assets acquired:
	Inventory	$	0.16		$	—0.3		0.7			0.3
	Property and equipment		21.03			02.13		3.6			2.4
	Goodwill		2.0			0.1
	Other assets		0.2			—		0.2			—
	Other intangible assets		4.3			0.6
	Goodwill		2.1			1.2		3.9			1.3
	Total assets acquired	$	8.4		$	0.8
	Other intangible assets		2.0			4.6		6.2			5.2
Liabilities assumed			—			—
	Total assets acquired		6.2			8.4		14.6			9.2
Gain on bargain purchase		$	—		$	—
Total liabilities assumed			(1.3	)		—		(1.3	)		—
Direct acquisition costs expensed		$	01.68		$	—0.2	$	2.4		$	0.2

~~The~~During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $03.59 million of revenue from the ~~acquired~~ businesses ~~during~~acquired ~~the~~in ~~three months ended March 31,~~ 2011. ~~Revenue recognized from acquired businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was insignificant.~~

The recorded purchase price allocation onrelated ~~certain~~to of the ~~acquisitions~~acquisition ~~made~~completed induring ~~2010~~the ~~and~~three months ended June 30, 2011 is preliminary at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, pending further evaluation of market participant data and the fair values of certain equipment acquired. The Company recorded approximately $0.7 million of deferred tax liabilities in connection with this acquisition. In addition, as a result of the acquisition made during the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company entered

The amount of tax deductible goodwill recognized in connection with the transactions described above is $2.0 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Other intangible assets were comprised of customer lists and non-compete agreements, which are being amortized over useful lives of 2 to 30 years, with a weighted average useful life of 19.8 years. The acquisitions were funded out of the Company's operating cash flows, proceeds from debt offerings and borrowings under the New Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

3. Acquisitions (Continued)

~~The~~into ~~following~~an ~~unaudited~~earn-out ~~pro~~agreement, ~~forma~~pursuant ~~information~~to ~~presents~~which the ~~Reddy~~Company ~~Holdings'~~is ~~consolidated~~obligated ~~results~~to ofpay ~~operations~~the ~~for~~former stockholder of the ~~three~~acquired ~~months~~entity ~~ended~~up ~~March~~to $0.8 ~~31,~~million ~~2011~~in ~~and~~additional ~~March 31,~~consideration ~~2010~~if certain asrevenue iftargets are achieved by the ~~2011~~purchased ~~and~~entity ~~2010~~during ~~acquisitions~~the ~~had~~twelve ~~all~~months ~~occurred~~immediately following the acquisition. The fair value of the earn-out liability was estimated based on management's ~~January~~assessment of the weighted average probability that certain revenue targets will be achieved by the acquired entity. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.4 1million contingent liability during the three months ended June 30, ~~2010:~~2011.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma revenues	$	41,174		$	38,585
Pro forma net loss	$	(39,238	)	$	(22,945	)
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(1.73	)	$	(1.02	)

The Company recorded $1.8 million of tax deductible goodwill recognized in connection with the acquisitions completed during the three months ended March 31, 2011. No tax deductible goodwill was recognized as a result of the acquisition completed during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Other intangible assets were comprised of customer lists and non-compete agreements, which are being amortized over useful lives of 2 to 30 years, with a weighted average useful life of 21.4 years. The acquisitions were funded out of the Company's operating cash flows, proceeds from debt offerings and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the Reddy ~~Corp~~Holdings's consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 as if the 2011 and 2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, 2010:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma revenues	$	41106,~~174~~854		$	38111,~~585~~890		$	148,492		$	151,200
Pro forma net loss	$	(21,705	)	$	(20,472	)
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(2,112	)	$	3,615		$	(41,781	)	$	(19,761	)
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.16		$	(1.84	)	$	(0.88	)
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.16		$	(1.84	)	$	(0.88	)

The following unaudited pro forma information presents Reddy Corp's results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 as if the 2011 and 2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, 2010:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,

	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Pro forma revenues	$	106,854		$	111,890	$	148,492		$	151,200
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(1,089	)	$	4,842	$	(23,225	)	$	(16,061	)

4. Inventories, Parts and Supplies

Inventories consist of raw materials, finished goods and parts and supplies. Raw materials represent ice packaging material. Finished goods consist of packaged ice. Parts and supplies consist of spare parts for production equipment and ice merchandisers and miscellaneous supplies. Inventories ~~are valued at the lower of cost or market and include overhead allocations. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.~~

		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Raw materials		$	6,245	$	6,133
Finished goods			3,372		2,505
Parts and supplies			4,045		3,911
	Total	$	13,662	$	12,549

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

4. Inventories, Parts and Supplies (Continued)

are valued at the lower of cost or market and include overhead allocations. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010

		(in thousands)
Raw materials		$	6,978	$	6,133
Finished goods			2,456		2,505
Parts and supplies			4,584		3,911

	Total	$	14,018	$	12,549

5. Accrued Expenses

		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Accrued interest		$	913,~~965~~632	$	13,336
Accrued compensation and employee benefits, including payroll taxes and workers compensation insurance			45,~~832~~503		4,484
Accrued utilities			~~992~~1,940		1,343
Accrued property, sales and other taxes			23,~~219~~105		1,555
Other accrued insurance			2,~~050~~317		2,169
Other			21,~~158~~771		1,290
	Total	$	2228,~~216~~268	$	24,177

Included in "accrued interest" above are $0.~~5 million and $0.~~2 million related to Reddy Holdings as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010~~, respectively~~.

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term obligations of the Company consisted of the following:

		March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(~~524~~495	)		(553	)
101/2% Senior Discount Notes			11,736			11,736
Other Notes Payable			100			101
Other notes payable			100			101
Total long-term obligations			450,~~719~~748			450,691
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	450,~~718~~747		$	450,690

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

AtIn ~~March 31~~addition, ~~2011~~the ~~and~~Company ~~December~~had $30.1 ~~31,~~million ~~2010,~~outstanding ~~long-term~~under ~~obligations~~the ofrevolving ~~Reddy~~credit ~~Corp~~facility ~~consisted~~as of ~~the~~June 30, ~~following:~~2011.

		March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes			300,000			300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(524	)		(553	)
Other Notes Payable			100			101
Total long-term obligations			438,983			438,955
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	438,982		$	438,954

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term obligations of Reddy Corp consisted of the following:

		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010

		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(495	)		(553	)
Other notes payable			100			101

Total long-term obligations			439,012			438,955
Less: Current maturities			1			1

	Long-term obligations, net	$	439,011		$	438,954

In addition, Reddy Corp had $30.1 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011.

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 5.625% of the principal amount of the First Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 15, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the First Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

The first lien leverage ratio under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes means the ratio of first lien indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) to EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its first lien leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the first lien leverage ratio was 5.29 to 1.0.

The buildup amount equals 50% of the consolidated net income of Reddy Corp accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from April 1, 2010 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial statements are available (or, if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus, the net cash proceeds to Reddy Corp of the issuance of capital stock, subject to certain exceptions, and any cash capital contribution received by Reddy Corp from its stockholder, in each case after April 1, 2010, plus the amount by which Reddy Corp indebtedness is reduced on its balance sheet as a result of the conversion or exchange of such indebtedness for capital stock, plus the net reduction in certain restricted investments made by Reddy Corp, less the amount of certain restricted payments made from time to time, including, among other things, the payment of cash dividends. Reddy Corp is not currently permitted to pay dividends under this provision.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~overhead~~retirement of the remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Second Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 6.625% of the principal amount of the Second Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If ~~Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and~~

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the Second Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

The secured leverage ratio under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes means the ratio of secured indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) to EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its secured leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the second lien leverage ratio was 78.53 to 1.0.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 101/2% Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining 101/2% Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public ~~equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions.~~

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

101/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 101/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 101/2% per annum. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6.7 million and $15.8 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. NoDuring ~~dividends~~the ~~were~~six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the ~~three~~amount ~~months~~of $0.6 million ~~ended~~and ~~March~~$6.0 31million, ~~2011~~respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes.

On February 22, 2010, Reddy Corp launched the Exchange Offer, offering $1,000 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In addition, for Discount Notes exchanged on or prior to March 5, 2010, Reddy Corp offered an early tender premium of $5 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In conjunction with the Exchange Offer, Reddy Corp solicited consents to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants from the indenture governing the Discount Notes. At the expiration of the Exchange Offer on March 19, 2010, approximately 92.2% of the aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes had been tendered into the Exchange Offer. Following the final settlement of the Exchange Offer, $11.7 million in aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes remain outstanding.

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

As of November 1, 2010, Reddy Holdings may redeem any or all of the Discount Notes without paying any redemption premium.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, Reddy Corp had the right to request the aggregate commitments to be increased to $50 million provided certain conditions were met. On August 4, 2010, the aggregate commitments under the March 2010 Credit Facility were increased to $50 million.

The March 2010 Credit Facility was an obligation of Reddy Corp and was guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The March 2010 Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014.

Principal balances outstanding under the March 2010 Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at Reddy Corp's option, at the sum of the base rate or LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate loans was initially 3.75% and for LIBOR loans was initially 4.75%, with such applicable margins subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio (as defined in the March 2010 Credit Facility). The Company also paid (i) a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.875%, with such availability fee subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio, (ii) a $50,000 annual loan servicing fee, and (iii) an annual commitment fee of $0.2 million to one of the lenders.

On October 22, 2010, Reddy Corp and the lenders party thereto amended and restated the March 2010 Credit Facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility provides for a $50 million revolving credit facility. Macquarie Bank Limited ("Macquarie"), a lender under the March 2010 Credit Facility, is currently the sole lender under the New Credit Facility. On December 10, 2010, Macquarie became the successor administrative agent under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company had $1230.01 million outstanding and $3819.09 million of availability under the New Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under on the New Credit Facility as of June 30, 2011 was 7.3%.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

The obligations under the New Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Reddy Holdings and will also be guaranteed by any future domestic subsidiaries of Reddy Corp, subject to certain exceptions.

The New Credit Facility does not require any scheduled principal payments prior to its stated maturity date. Subject to certain conditions, mandatory repayments of the New Credit Facility (and mandatory commitment reductions of the New Credit Facility) are required to be made with portions of the proceeds from (1) asset sales, (2) the issuance of debt securities and (3) insurance and condemnation awards, subject to various exceptions. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the New Credit Facility, an event of default will occur under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility also contains affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Reddy Corp and its future subsidiaries, subject to materiality and other qualifications, baskets and exceptions. The affirmative and negative covenants are substantially consistent with those contained in the March 2010 Credit Facility. The negative covenants, among other things, restrict the ability of Reddy Corp to:

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp. is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount Notes and pay interest on the Discount Notes. Reddy Corp may also distribute certain investments to Reddy Holdings.

In addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp from declaring any dividends if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in the New Credit Facility.

Obligations under the New Credit Facility may be declared immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of certain events of default as defined in the credit agreement, including failure to pay any principal when due and payable, failure to pay interest within five (5) days after due, failure to comply with any covenant, representation or condition of any loan document, any change of control, cross-defaults, and certain other events as set forth in the credit agreement, with grace periods in some cases.

An acceleration of the indebtedness under the New Credit Facility would be an event of default under the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes if the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility at the time of acceleration is over $10 million.

Old Senior Credit Facilities. On August 12, 2005, the Company amended and restated its credit facilities with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase, N.A., CIBC World Markets Corp., Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (the "Old Credit Facilities"). The Old Credit Facilities provided for a $60 million revolving credit facility (the "Old Revolving Credit Facility") and a $240 million term loan (the "Old Term Loan"). The Old Credit Facilities were obligations of Reddy Corp and were guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan were scheduled to mature on August 12, 2010 and August 12, 2012, respectively. On March 15, 2010, the Old Credit Facilities were terminated and all amounts owed thereunder were repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the First Lien Notes.

Principal balances outstanding under the Old Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at the Company's option, at the sum of the base rate plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 1.75%. The base rate was defined as the greater of the prime rate (as announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent) or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. Interest on base rate loans was payable on the last day of each quarter. Interest on LIBOR loans was payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeded 90 days. Reddy Corp also paid a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.5%.

The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan did not require any scheduled principal payments prior to their stated maturity dates. The Old Credit Facilities contained financial covenants, which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios, as defined in the Credit Facilities, and were collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets.

Debt Refinance Costs. During the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company recorded expense of $0.1 million and $6.12 million, respectively, for costs incurred in connection with refinancing activities related to its debt. Approximately $5.8 million of the ~~2010~~ expense incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to the exchange of the Discount Notes for the Second Lien Notes. The exchange was accounted for as a modification of debt.

Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~Chase~~ Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted Cash" in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Debt Instruments. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company's long-term debt, ~~was~~ was $~~446~~445.67 million and $437.0 million, respectively, while the book value was $450.7 million and $450.7 million, respectively. The fair value of the Company's debt is ~~primarily~~ primarily based on quoted market prices for the debt.

7. Financial Derivative Instruments

Diesel Hedging Agreement. On March 25, 2011, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge ~~begins~~began April 1, 2011 and expires on December 28, 2011. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.2 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.17 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. ~~The~~On May 6, 2011, the Company ~~uses~~entered into an additional hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Second Diesel Hedge"). The Second Diesel Hedge began June 1, 2011 and expires on December 31, 2012. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.1 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.04 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. The Company uses the hedges to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The ~~hedge~~hedges isare not for trading purposes and isare accounted for as an economic ~~hedge~~hedges and ~~was~~were not designated as a hedging ~~instrument~~instruments.

The Company ~~considered~~carries the hedges at fair value on its balance sheet and considers its own credit risk in the valuation of the diesel ~~hedge~~hedges. Changes in the fair value of the hedge are recorded in "Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)" in the consolidated statements of operations and in the operating activities section of cash flows. Payments made or received under the ~~hedge~~hedges ~~will be~~ are included in the caption "Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation)" on the consolidated statements of operations and unrealized gains and losses are presented in the operating activities section of the statements of cash flows.

The ~~following~~Fair ~~tables~~Value ~~present~~Measurements ~~the~~and ~~impact~~Disclosures Topic of ~~derivative~~the ~~instruments~~Codification ~~and~~establishes ~~their~~a ~~location~~hierarchy ~~within~~for ranking the ~~condensed~~quality ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~reliability ~~statements:~~of the information used to determine fair values. The statement

	Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 718
	Amount of Gain Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three months ended March 31,
						Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Diesel hedge:
Non-cash change in fair value	$	(16	)	$	—
Cash settlements		—			—
Total recognized gain	$	(16	)	$	—	Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

7. Financial Derivative Instruments (Continued)

~~Collateral~~requires that ~~Requirements~~assets and ~~Counterparty~~liabilities ~~Risk. The~~carried ~~Diesel~~at ~~Hedge~~fair ~~required~~value ~~the~~be ~~Company~~classified toand ~~provide~~disclosed ~~cash collateral~~ in ~~the~~one ~~amount~~ of ~~$0.3 million, which~~ ~~remained~~the ~~outstanding~~following asthree ofcategories: ~~March 31, 2011.~~

There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2010.


Level 1:		Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
Level 3:		Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The Diesel Hedges are a level 2 fair value measure and are valued using the income approach to calculate the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid under the hedge. The value of the fixed leg is the present value of the known fixed payments discounted at a market interest rate. The value of the floating leg is the present value of the projected floating payments based on the forward diesel prices discounted at a market interest rate.

The following table presents the location of all liabilities associated with the Company's derivative instruments within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

		Liability Derivatives

		Six months ended June 30,
	Balance Sheet location	2011			2010
		(in thousands)
Diesel hedges	Accrued Expenses	$	(162	)	$	—

The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the condensed consolidated financial statements:

	Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 718

	Amount of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations					Amount of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,					Location of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Diesel hedges:
Non-cash change in fair value	$	(178	)	$	—	$	(162	)	$	—
Cash settlements		(30	)		—		(30	)		—

Total recognized loss	$	(208	)	$	—	$	(192	)	$	—	Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

7. Financial Derivative Instruments (Continued)

Collateral Requirements and Counterparty Risk. The diesel hedges required the Company to provide cash collateral in the amount of $1.1 million, which remained outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

The Company is exposed to risk of loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to the diesel hedges. The Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty.

8. Stock-based Compensation

On August 8, 2005, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved the Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (the "Plan"). On April 29, 2010 the stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved an amendment to the Plan, which increased the number of shares of common stock available to be issued to employees, directors and certain third parties in connection with various incentive awards, including stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units to 4,750,000 shares.

The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, imposed by the Compensation Committee. Such restrictions lapse under circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee, including based upon a specified period of continued employment or upon the achievement of established performance criteria. Restricted shares have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote restricted shares and to receive dividends. Unvested restricted shares are generally forfeited upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period as provided for in the related grant documents. During the ~~three~~ six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company granted 343,750 restricted shares to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $2.75. One-third of the restricted shares vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. No grants were made to employees during the three month period ended June 30, 2011. The fair value of each restricted share is equal the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value is recognized as compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

The Plan provides for option grants with terms, including exercise price and the time and method of exercise, set by the Compensation Committee. However, the exercise price of options is not permitted to be less than the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant and the term is not permitted to be longer than ten years from the date of grant of the options. Stock options for 573,300 shares of common stock were granted during the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. The options have seven-year terms and one-third of the options vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. The options granted during the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 had weighted average exercise prices of $2.75 per share. No grants were made to employees during the three month period ended June 30, 2011.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized using a straight-line method over the ~~shorter of the vesting period or required service period adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The following table sets forth the information about the weighted average grant date fair value of options~~

2324

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

8. Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

~~granted~~shorter of the vesting period or required service period adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The following table sets forth the information about the weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and the weighted average assumptions used for such grants.

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Weighted average grant date fair value		$	$1.81
Weighted average assumptions used:
	Expected volatility		110.3%	%
	Expected lives		3 years
	Risk-free interest rates		1.21%	%
	Expected dividend yield		0.00%	%

Expected volatility is based on an analysis of historical volatility of the Company's common stock. Expected lives of options are determined based on projections of option exercise patterns. Risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero coupon U.S. treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield is based on the September 15, 2008 announcement that the Company's quarterly cash dividends had been suspended indefinitely and the Company does not currently anticipate paying dividends in the future.

Total compensation expense associated with the Plan was $0.6 million and $0.37 million during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, and $1.2 million and $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Such compensation expense was recorded in "Operating expenses" in the consolidated statements of operations. Compensation expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 includes a $0.1 million ~~accrual~~expense for ~~Board of Directors~~ stock awards earned during the period ~~and~~by ~~expected~~non-employee tomembers beof the Board of Directors and granted in May of 2011. In May of 2011, 96,318 vested shares were granted to non-employee members of the Board of Directors. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~756~~735,~~384~~ 784 shares were available for grant under the Plan.

9. Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The computation of net income (loss) per share is based on net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Restricted shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted shares on which the dividends were paid do not vest. Since restricted shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they are excluded from the basic net income (loss) per share calculation for loss periods. Accordingly, ~~620~~595,~~183~~965 shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and ~~350~~595,~~678~~965 and 257,350 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, respectively. However, 257,350 restricted shares were included in the computation of basic net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

~~For the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share, options to purchase 0.6 million and 1.4 million shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share~~ 25

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

9. Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Continued)

~~for~~ For the ~~three~~purpose ~~months~~of ~~ended~~computing ~~March 31~~diluted earnings per share, ~~2011~~options to purchase 0.6 million shares of common stock and ~~2010~~35,000 ~~respectively~~RSUs were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010, because their effect was anti-dilutive.

		Three Months Ended March 31,
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net loss for basic and diluted computation		$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted computation		$	(1,946	)	$	2,132		$	(41,047	)	$	(20,465	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,~~689~~737			22,~~406~~870			22,713			22,432
	Net loss	$	(1.72	)	$	(1.01	)
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,737			22,870			22,713			22,432
	Shares issuable from assumed conversion of restricted stock units and options		—			295			—			—
	Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted		22,737			23,165			22,713			22,432
	Net income (loss)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	(1.81	)	$	(0.91	)

10. Income Taxes

The Company's effective tax rate of (86.49%) for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 differs from the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income and margin taxes, the effect of permanent differences and a change in the Company's valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets. In the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance totaling $1618.26 million relating to federal and state deferred assets. The total valuation allowance of $2022.15 million is comprised of a $0.3 million of allowance against certain state NOL carryforwards and a $1922.32 million allowance against the remaining federal and state deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance is ~~necessary~~ necessary to reduce the recorded deferred tax assets to the amount management believes the Company is more-likely-than-not to realize.

Reddy Corp's effective tax rate of 36.8% calculated on a stand-alone basis, differs from the Federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to state income and margin taxes and the effect of permanent differences.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions was $1.3 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~which~~and included accrued interest and penalties of $0.3 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The total amount of interest and penalties, net of federal benefit, recognized in the statement of operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 was immaterial.

As a result of net operating loss carryforwards, the Company's tax years from 1998 through 2010 remain open and subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and/or certain state taxing authorities.

~~11. Commitments and Contingencies~~ 26

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

11. Commitments and Contingencies ~~(Continued)~~

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Antitrust Matters

In March 2008, the Company and certain of its employees, including members of its management, received subpoenas issued by a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking documents and information in connection with an investigation by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") into possible antitrust violations in the packaged ice industry. In addition, on March 5, 2008, federal officials executed a search warrant at the Company's corporate office in Dallas, Texas. Current and former employees were also subpoenaed to testify and testified before a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan and before a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio. On October 29, 2010, the Company was informed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ would take no action against the Company or any of its employees in connection with its investigation of the packaged ice industry. In January 2011, counsel for the Company confirmed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ has formally closed its investigation of the packaged ice industry.

OnIn March 25 2008, June 2008, and June 2009, the Company was served with antitrust civil investigative demands ("CIDs") by the ~~Office~~Offices of the ~~Attorney~~Attorneys General of the ~~State~~States of Florida, Arizona ~~with~~and anMichigan, ~~antitrust~~respectively, ~~civil~~requesting ~~investigative demand (~~the ~~"Florida CID") requesting the~~ production of documents and information relating to an investigation of agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the market for packaged ice. On June 11, 2008, the Company received a civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona (the "Arizona CID"). All of the documents and information requested by the Arizona CID were included in the Florida CID and the Arizona CID states that it will be satisfied by the production of information which had been and would be provided to Florida in response to the Florida CID. On or about June 16, 2009, the Company was served by the State of Michigan, Department of the Attorney General, with a civil investigative demand requesting information and documents relating to sales of ice to units of government in Michigan, sales of ice in Michigan for which we the Company made or received payment, and contracts and agreements with Michigan entities (the "Michigan CID"). The Company has been advised that ~~the~~these ~~Florida~~CIDs ~~CID, the Arizona CID and the Michigan CID~~ are related to a multi-state antitrust investigation of the packaged ice industry ~~and that the Attorneys General of 19 states and the District of Columbia are participating in the multi-state investigation~~. The ~~states' investigation is related to the investigation of the packaged ice industry by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The~~ Company is cooperating with the investigation and has complied with all requests for documents and information regarding these matters. The Company may in the future receive additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from states participating in the multi-state investigation or conducting their own investigations.

At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of that investigation, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of that investigation or any potential effect the investigation may have on the Company, its employees or operations.

InBeginning in 2008 a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the civil actions pending in federal courts have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Home City entered into a settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. On March 30, 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it had entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Preliminary approval of that settlement was granted on July 20, 2011. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers against the Company. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part

2627

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

11. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. In March 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it has entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser claims. On April 26, 2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed ana ~~amended~~Second Amended Class Action complaint asserting violations of the antitrust laws of various states and related claims. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on June 24, 2011.

On March 1, 2010, a putative class action Statement of Claim was filed against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Canada ~~("Ontario Action"),~~ alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, punitive and exemplary damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and costs. ~~Proceedings~~On March 8, 2010, a putative ~~relating~~class toaction ~~Plaintiffs'~~Statement ~~Motion~~of ~~for~~Claim ~~Certification~~was filed against the Company in the Court of aQueen's ~~Class~~Bench ~~are~~of ~~ongoing~~Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary, in ~~that~~Canada, ~~matter~~alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, special and pecuniary damages, punitive and exemplary damages, interest and costs.

OnAn ~~March 8,~~agreement ~~2010,~~has abeen ~~putative~~reached ~~class~~to ~~action~~resolve ~~Statement~~the ofclass ~~Claim~~actions ~~was~~ filed ~~against~~in ~~the~~Canada ~~Company~~against inReddy ~~the~~Ice ~~Court~~and ofArctic ~~Queen's~~Glacier, Inc. ~~Bench~~The ofagreement ~~Alberta~~provides ~~("Alberta~~that ~~Action"),~~Arctic ~~Judicial~~Glacier ~~District~~will ofpay CDN ~~Calgary~~$2,000,000, inall ~~Canada,~~claims ~~alleging~~asserted ~~violations~~against ofReddy ~~Part VI~~Ice ofand ~~the~~Arctic ~~Competition~~Glacier ~~Act~~in both Ontario and ~~seeking~~Alberta ~~general~~will ~~damages~~be dismissed, ~~special~~and Reddy Ice and ~~pecuniary~~Arctic ~~damages,~~Glacier ~~punitive~~will be granted full and ~~exemplary~~final ~~damages,~~releases ~~interest~~with ~~and~~regard to ~~costs~~those claims. ~~On March 4,~~Reddy ~~2011,~~Ice ~~the~~is ~~Company~~not ~~was~~making ~~served~~any payment in connection with anthis ~~Amended~~settlement. ~~Statement~~The ofagreement ~~Claim~~is insubject ~~that~~to ~~matter,~~the ~~which~~execution ~~asserts~~of ~~similar~~final ~~claims~~settlement documents and court approval.

AnOne ~~agreement~~direct ~~has~~action ~~been~~lawsuit ~~reached~~was tofiled ~~resolve~~against us in the ~~class~~United ~~actions~~States ~~filed~~District inCourt ~~Canada~~for bythe ~~direct~~Eastern ~~purchasers~~District of ~~packaged~~Michigan ~~ice~~asserting inclaims ~~Canada~~based ~~against~~on ~~Reddy~~alleged ~~Ice~~violations ~~and~~of ~~Arctic~~federal ~~Glacier Inc.~~and ~~alleging~~state ~~anti-competitive~~antitrust ~~behavior~~laws, inRICO ~~the~~and ~~United~~tortious ~~States~~interference and ~~Canada~~seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The ~~agreement~~defendants ~~provides~~filed ~~that~~motions ~~Arctic~~to ~~Glacier~~dismiss ~~will~~that ~~pay~~case. ~~CDN~~On May $229,~~000~~ 2009,~~000,~~ the Court dismissed all claims ~~asserted~~ against ~~Reddy~~us ~~Ice~~in ~~and~~that ~~Arctic~~lawsuit. ~~Glacier~~On inJune 29, ~~both Ontario~~2009, ~~and~~the ~~Alberta~~plaintiff ~~will~~filed bea ~~dismissed~~motion for reconsideration, and ~~Reddy~~on ~~Ice~~July 17, ~~and~~2009 ~~Arctic~~the ~~Glacier~~Court ~~will~~reversed, bein ~~granted~~part, ~~full~~its ~~and~~May 29, 2009 ~~final~~order, ~~releases~~reinstating ~~with~~only ~~regard~~the toRICO ~~those~~claim ~~claims~~against us. ~~Reddy~~The ~~Ice~~dismissal isof ~~not~~the ~~making~~remaining ~~any~~claims ~~payment~~was innot ~~connection~~affected. ~~with~~On ~~this settlement.~~August 10, ~~The~~2009, ~~agreement~~the isCompany ~~subject~~filed an answer to the ~~execution~~reinstated ofclaim. Discovery ~~final~~is ~~settlement~~ongoing ~~documents~~in ~~and~~that ~~court approval~~matter.

On ~~March~~April 420, 2011, aan ~~putative~~Order ~~class~~was ~~action~~entered ~~lawsuit~~unsealing ~~was~~a ~~filed~~Qui ~~against~~Tam ~~the~~complaint ~~Company~~filed ~~and~~on ~~other~~June 25, ~~defendants~~2008, inby ~~state~~Martin ~~court~~McNulty, inon ~~Kansas.~~behalf ~~That~~of ~~lawsuit~~the ~~alleges~~United ~~violation~~States, ofagainst ~~the~~Reddy ~~Kansas~~Ice ~~Restraint~~Holdings, Inc., ofReddy ~~Trade~~Ice ~~Act~~Corporation, ~~violation~~Arctic ofGlacier ~~the~~Income ~~Kansas~~Fund, ~~Consumer~~Arctic ~~Protection Statute~~Glacier, Inc., ~~and~~Arctic ~~Unjust~~Glacier ~~Enrichment~~International, Inc., and ~~seeks~~Home ~~treble~~City ~~overcharge~~Ice ~~damages~~Company, Inc. ~~full~~The ~~consideration~~complaint alleges ~~damages,~~violations ~~compensatory~~of ~~damages,~~the ~~penalties, costs,~~federal ~~and~~False ~~attorney~~Claims ~~fees.~~Act ~~That~~by ~~lawsuit~~presentation ~~was~~of ~~removed~~false toclaims, ~~federal~~making ~~court~~or ~~and,~~using ona ~~April 26~~false record or statement, ~~2011~~and conspiracy to defraud, anand ~~order~~seeks ~~was~~damages, ~~entered~~civil ~~transferring~~penalties, ~~and~~attorney ~~consolidating~~fees itand ~~with~~costs. ~~other~~The ~~pending~~Government ~~cases~~has ~~for~~elected ~~pre-trial~~not ~~proceedings~~to intervene in ~~the~~that ~~United~~case ~~States~~and ~~District~~the ~~Court~~Company ~~for~~has ~~the~~filed ~~Eastern~~a ~~District~~motion ofto ~~Michigan~~dismiss that complaint.

OnThe ~~April 28,~~Company ~~2011,~~intends ~~two~~to ~~putative~~vigorously ~~class~~defend ~~actions were filed against~~ the ~~Company~~pending ~~and~~lawsuits. ~~other~~At ~~defendants~~this intime, ~~federal~~the ~~courts~~Company inis ~~Tennessee~~unable ~~and~~to ~~Arkansas~~predict ~~alleging~~the ~~violations~~outcome of ~~federal~~these ~~and state~~lawsuits, ~~antitrust~~the ~~statutes~~possible ~~and~~loss ~~seeking~~or ~~injunctive~~possible ~~relief,~~range ~~damages,~~of ~~disgorgement~~loss, if ~~costs~~any, ~~and~~associated ~~attorney~~with ~~fees.~~the ~~The~~resolution ~~Company~~of ~~has not been served with~~ these lawsuits. ~~The~~or ~~Company~~any ~~anticipates~~potential ~~that~~effect ~~these lawsuits~~they ~~will~~may behave ~~transferred~~on ~~and consolidated with other pending cases for pre-trial proceedings in~~ the ~~United~~Company ~~States~~or ~~District~~its ~~Court for the Eastern District of Michigan~~operations.

~~One direct~~ ~~action~~Stockholder lawsuit was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against Litigation

27 Beginning on August 8, 2008, purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and certain of its current or former senior officers. On July 17, 2009, the Court

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

11. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

usconsolidated inthe ~~that~~actions ~~lawsuit.~~and Onappointed ~~June 29,~~a ~~2009,~~lead ~~the~~plaintiff and interim lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a ~~motion~~consolidated ~~for~~amended ~~reconsideration,~~complaint ~~and~~ on ~~July~~November 172, 2009. ~~the~~That ~~Court~~complaint purports ~~reversed,~~to inassert ~~part,~~claims ~~its~~on ~~May 29,~~behalf ~~2009~~of ~~order,~~an ~~reinstating~~alleged ~~only the~~class ~~RICO~~of ~~claim~~purchasers ~~against~~of ~~us.~~the ~~The~~Company's ~~dismissal~~common ofstock and alleges that the ~~remaining~~defendants ~~claims~~misrepresented ~~was~~and ~~not~~failed ~~affected.~~to Ondisclose ~~August 10,~~the ~~2009~~existence of, ~~the~~and the Company's ~~filed~~alleged participation in, an ~~answer~~alleged toantitrust conspiracy in the ~~reinstated~~packaged ~~claim~~ice industry. ~~Discovery~~The isCompany ~~ongoing~~and the other defendants have filed an answer in that ~~matter~~case.

Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former officers and members of the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On March 17, 2011, a Second Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That Second Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. The trial date has been set for March 13, 2012.

The Company intends to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

Stockholder Litigation

Beginning on August 8, 2008, purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and certain of its current or former senior officers. On July 17, 2009, the Court consolidated the actions and appointed a lead plaintiff and interim lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint on November 2, 2009. That complaint purports to assert claims on behalf of an alleged class of purchasers of the Company's common stock and alleges that the defendants misrepresented and failed to disclose the existence of, and the Company's alleged participation in, an alleged antitrust conspiracy in the packaged ice industry. The Company and the other defendants have filed an answer in that case.

Other Matters

We are also involved in various other claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property matters. There are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate outcome of such matters and it is difficult to determine the ultimate costs that we may incur. We believe the resolution of such other ordinary course uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2829

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Except as otherwise noted, there are no material differences between the consolidated balances presented herein and the balances of Reddy Ice Corporation.

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp."), manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. We are the largest manufacturer of packaged ice products in the United States and serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia under the Reddy Ice® brand name.

Uncertainty of Forward Looking Statements and Information

Other than statements of historical facts, statements made in this Form 10-Q, statements made by us in periodic press releases, oral statements made by our management to analysts and stockholders and statements made in the course of presentations about our company constitute "forward- looking statements" intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are accurate. However, we cannot assure you that such expectations will occur. These forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by the forward- looking statements. Factors you should consider that could cause these differences are:

•: general economic trends and seasonality;
•: weather conditions;
•: the ability of our subsidiary to make distributions to us in amounts sufficient to service our debt and pay our taxes;
•: our substantial leverage and ability to service our debt;
•: the restrictive covenants and financial covenants under our indebtedness;
•: the availability of capital sources;
•: fluctuations in our operating costs, including the prices of electricity, fuel, polyethylene and other required expenses;
•: competitive practices in the industry in which we compete;
•: changes in labor conditions;
•: our capital expenditure requirements;
•: the risks associated with acquisitions and the failure to integrate acquired businesses;
•: technological changes and innovations;
•: the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;
•: legislative or regulatory requirements; and
•: all the other factors described herein under Item 1A of Part II and in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2930

Table of Contents

You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are discussed elsewhere in this report.

General

Overview. We are the largest manufacturer and distributor of packaged ice in the United States and currently serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Our business consists of:

•: the traditional manufacture and delivery of ice from a central point of production to the point of sale; and
•: the installation and operation of The Ice Factory®, our proprietary in-store bagging ("ISB") equipment located in high volume locations that produces, packages and stores ice through an automated, self-contained system.

Seasonality. The packaged ice business is highly seasonal, characterized by peak demand during the warmer months of May through September, with an extended peak selling season in the southern United States. Approximately 71%, 69% and 69% of our annual revenues occurred during the second and third calendar quarters in each of 2010, 2009 and 2008. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and a less than proportional decline in expenses during the first and fourth quarters, we typically experience lower margins resulting in losses during these periods.

Revenues. Our revenues primarily represent sales of packaged ice and packaged ice bags for use in our ISB equipment. There is no right of return with respect to these products. A portion of our revenues also represents fees earned under management agreements for ISB systems located outside our primary territories that are recognized as earned under contract terms.

Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation). Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists of costs related to the manufacturing and distribution of our products, including, in particular:

•: manufacturing and distribution labor costs;
•: raw materials (primarily polyethylene-based plastic bags);
•: product delivery expenses, including fuel and vehicle rental expense related to products delivered by our own distribution network, as well as fees paid to distributors who deliver ice to our customers on our behalf;
•: utility expenses (primarily electricity used in connection with the manufacturing, storage and distribution processes); and
•: ISB system costs associated with customer service representatives and machine technicians (ISB systems generally do not increase our plant occupancy, delivery or utility costs).

Depreciation Expense Related to Cost of Sales and Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization are divided into two line items: depreciation expense related to cost of sales and depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense related to cost of sales consists of depreciation expense for our production and distribution equipment. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation and amortization expense for our selling, general and administrative functions.

30 Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are costs associated with selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative

Table of Contents

~~expense~~salaries, ~~consists~~insurance, oflegal ~~depreciation~~and other professional services and ~~amortization~~costs ~~expense~~associated ~~for~~with ~~our~~leasing ~~selling~~office space. Labor costs, ~~general~~including associated payroll taxes and ~~administrative~~benefit ~~functions~~costs, but excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense, included in operating expenses represented approximately 10% and 11% of revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are costs associated with selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative salaries, insurance, legal and other professional services and costs associated with leasing office space. Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs, but excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense, included in operating expenses represented approximately 17% and 20% of revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cost of antitrust investigations and related litigation. Costs related to the current antitrust investigations and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries, are composed primarily of legal fees, document collection costs and the fees of other experts and consultants. These costs have been recognized and paid by Reddy Holdings.

Facilities. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, we owned or operated 5860 ice manufacturing facilities, 7276 distribution centers and approximately 3,500 Ice Factories. As of the same date, we had an aggregate daily ice manufacturing capacity of approximately 18,000 tons.

Three Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Change from Last Year
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Change from Last Year
	2011			2010			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	40106,~~752~~493		$	35104,~~894~~163		$	42,~~858~~330			132.52
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		3766,~~225~~768			3462,~~908~~109			24,~~317~~659			67.65
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		7,~~708~~480			5,~~314~~647			21,~~394~~833			4532.15
Gross loss		(4,181	)		(4,328	)		147			(3.4	)
Gross profit		32,245			36,407			(4,162	)		(11.4	)
Operating expenses		1214,~~799~~315			1314,~~119~~373			(~~320~~58	)		(20.4	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,~~530~~454			12,~~876~~173			~~654~~281			3412.9
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(54114	)		~~227~~1,170			(~~281~~1,284	)		(~~123~~109.87	)
Acquisition expenses		603			2			601			30,050.0
Impairment of long-lived assets		539			236			303			128.4
Impairment of assets		231			—			231			—
Acquisition expenses		1,844			208			1,636			786.5
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation		~~1,421~~731			~~913~~1,130			~~508~~(399	)		55(35.63	)
Loss from operations		(21,711	)		(20,465	)		(1,246	)		6.1
Income (loss) from operations		12,476			17,117			(4,641	)		(27.1	)
Interest expense, net		(14,~~345~~822	)		(714,~~255~~312	)		(~~7,090~~510	)		97(3.76	)
Debt refinance costs		—			(~~6,108~~60	)		~~6,108~~60			—100.0
Loss before income taxes		(36,056	)		(33,828	)		(2,228	)		6.6
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2,346	)		2,745			(5,091	)		(185.5	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(3,045	)		11,231			(14,276	)		(127.1	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		400			(613	)		1,013			165.3
Net loss	$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)	$	(16,504	)		73.0
Net income (loss)	$	(1,946	)	$	2,132		$	(4,078	)		(191.3	)

Revenues: Revenues ~~increased~~for ~~$4.9 million from~~ the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 toincreased $2.3 million from the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2010. This increase is primarily due to acquisitions, as well as a percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales in the low ~~double~~single digits related to slightly improved weather patterns in most of our markets, stabilized economic conditions, and the addition of new customers through ~~both acquisitions and~~ organic growth, partially offset by the effects of lost customers and reduced pricing as a result of increased competitive activity.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) ~~increased~~for ~~$2.3 million from~~ the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 increased $4.7 million tofrom the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2010. This increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, as well as unit cost increases of fuel and utility costs.

3132

Table of Contents

in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, although cost of sales did not increase proportionally with revenues due to cost savings and efficiencies related to our operational initiatives.

Significant expenses included in cost of sales include the following:

	Percentage of Revenues
	2011			2010
Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance)		3420	%		4021	%
Plastic bags		65	%		6	%
Operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment)		115	%		104	%
Fuel		65	%		54	%
Independent third party distribution services		6	%		6	%
Maintenance		74	%		73	%
Vehicle maintenance and insurance claims		32	%		32	%
Electricity		65	%		74	%

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $21.48 million as a result of a change in accounting estimate to eliminate salvage value on certain equipment and new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2010 and the first ~~three~~six months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses decreased $0.31 million from the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 to the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. This decrease is primarily due to a $0.4 million decrease in professional services costs, a $0.1 million decrease in employee labor and benefits costs, ~~and~~ a $0.1 million ofdecrease in customer relations costs and a $0.1 million decrease in non-cash stock based compensation, partially offset by a $0.34 million increase in miscellaneous ~~non-cash~~operating ~~stock-based~~expenses ~~compensation~~mostly ~~costs~~due to increased severance expense.

Depreciation and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.73 million as a result of new equipment placed in service and the recognition of certain intangible assets in connection with acquisitions in 2010 and the first ~~three~~six months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets: A $0.1 million gain on disposition of assets was recognized inon the ~~three~~disposition ~~months~~of ~~ended~~certain ~~March 31,~~excess assets ~~2011~~during ~~due to~~ the ~~disposition~~three ofmonths ~~certain~~ended ~~excess~~June 30, ~~assets~~2011. A $01.2 million loss on disposition of assets was recognized in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. As a result of ana ~~increased focus~~sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of certain real estate in the future. Based on ~~current~~ real estate market conditions, additional ~~impairments~~ gains or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

~~Acquisition~~Impairment ~~expenses~~of long-lived assets: WeImpairment ~~incurred~~charges of $0.65 million ofand ~~expense~~$0.2 million ~~during~~were recognized in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 inand ~~connection~~2010, respectively, as a result of impairing certain real estate assets during the period. As a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing ~~with~~to evaluate our ~~ongoing~~operating facilities and expect to dispose of additional real estate in the future. Deterioration of current real estate market conditions or changes in facility operations could ~~acquisition~~trigger ~~program~~additional impairments in future periods.

~~Impairment~~Acquisition ~~of assets~~expenses: ~~Impairment~~We ~~charges~~incurred of $01.28 million ~~were~~of ~~recognized~~expense induring the three months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011 asin aconnection with ~~result~~our ofcurrent acquisition ~~impairing~~activities ~~certain~~and ~~real~~on-going ~~estate assets during the period~~negotiations. NoAcquisition ~~impairment~~expense ~~charges~~for ~~were recognized during~~ the three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 was $0.2 million.

Costs related to antitrust investigations and related litigation: During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $10.47 million and $01.91 million, respectively, of legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United ~~States Department of Justice and the related litigation. We became aware of and began incurring expenses related to the investigation in March of 2008.~~

3233

Table of Contents

~~Interest expense, net: Net interest expense increased $7.1 million from the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the~~States ~~three~~Department months ended March 31, 2011. This change is related to increased interest costs associated with our new 11.25% Senior Secured Notes and 13.25% Senior Secured Notes, as well as additional interest associated with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The amount of ~~net~~Justice ~~interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.3 million~~ and ~~$3.4 million during~~ the ~~three~~related ~~months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively~~litigation. ~~Beginning~~We inbecame ~~the~~aware ~~second quarter~~ of ~~2011,~~and ~~the~~began ~~interest~~incurring ~~expense~~expenses related to the ~~Company's~~investigation ~~notes~~in ~~will~~March ~~be comparable to the same periods~~ of ~~2010~~2008. asThese ~~the~~costs ~~notes will~~ have been ~~outstanding~~recognized ~~for~~and ~~one~~paid ~~year~~by Reddy Holdings.

~~Debt~~ Interest ~~refinance~~expense, ~~costs~~net: ~~Costs~~Net ofinterest expense increased $60.15 million ~~were~~from ~~incurred in~~ the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 into ~~connection~~the three ~~with~~months ended ~~refinancing activities~~June 30, 2011. This change is related to additional interest associated with borrowings under our ~~debt~~revolving credit facility. NoThe ~~such~~amount ~~costs~~of ~~were~~net ~~incurred~~interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.3 million and $0.4 million during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

~~Income~~ Debt ~~tax~~refinance ~~expense~~costs: ~~The~~Costs ~~effective~~of ~~tax~~$0.1 million ~~rate~~were ~~decreased~~incurred ~~from~~in ~~33.2% during~~ the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 toin ~~(8.4%)~~connection with ~~during~~refinancing activities ~~the~~related ~~three~~to ~~months ended~~our ~~March 31,~~debt. ~~2011~~No ~~primarily~~such ascosts awere ~~result~~incurred ofduring the ~~effects~~three ofmonths aended ~~valuation~~June 30, ~~allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets~~2011.

Income tax (expense) benefit: The effective tax rate decreased from 22.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 17.1% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily as a result of the effects of a valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Change from Last Year

	2011			2010			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	147,245		$	140,057		$	7,188			5.1
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		103,993			97,017			6,976			7.2
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		15,188			10,961			4,227			38.6

Gross profit		28,064			32,079			(4,015	)		(12.5	)
Operating expenses		27,114			27,492			(378	)		(1.4	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		4,984			4,049			935			23.1
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(168	)		1,397			(1,565	)		(112.0	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		770			236			534			226.3
Acquisition expenses		2,447			210			2,237			1,065.2
Cost of antitrust investigations and related litigation		2,152			2,043			109			5.3

Loss from operations		(9,235	)		(3,348	)		(5,887	)		175.8
Interest expense, net		(29,167	)		(21,567	)		(7,600	)		35.2
Debt refinance costs		—			(6,168	)		6,168			100.0

Loss before income taxes		(38,402	)		(31,083	)		(7,319	)		(23.5	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(2,645	)		10,618			(13,263	)		(124.9	)

Net loss	$	(41,047	)	$	(20,465	)	$	(20,582	)		(100.6	)

Revenues: Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $7.2 million over the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to acquisitions, as well as a percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales in the mid single digits related to improved weather patterns in most of our markets, stabilized economic conditions, and the addition of new customers through organic growth, partially offset by the effects of lost customers and reduced pricing as a result of increased competitive activity.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $7.0 million from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in cost

Table of Contents

of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales, as well as unit cost increases of fuel and utility costs.

Significant expenses included in cost of sales include the following:

	Percentage of Revenues

	2011			2010
Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance)		24	%		26	%
Plastic bags		6	%		6	%
Operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment)		7	%		6	%
Fuel		5	%		4	%
Independent third party distribution services		6	%		6	%
Maintenance		5	%		5	%
Vehicle maintenance and insurance claims		2	%		2	%
Electricity		5	%		5	%

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $4.2 million as a result of a change in accounting estimate to eliminate salvage value on certain equipment, as well as new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2010 and the first six months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses decreased $0.4 million from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease is primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in employee benefits costs, a $0.4 million decrease in professional services, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in miscellaneous operating expenses mostly due to increased severance expense, as well as a $0.2 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense.

Depreciation expense and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.9 million as a result of new equipment placed in service and the recognition of certain intangible assets in connection with acquisitions in 2010 and the first six months of 2011, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets: A $0.1 million gain on disposition of assets was recognized on the disposition of certain excess assets during the six months ended June 30, 2011. A $1.4 million loss on disposition of assets was recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2010. As a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of certain real estate in the future. Based on current real estate market conditions, additional gains or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

Impairment of long-lived assets: We recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 as a result of impairing certain real estate and fixed assets identified for disposition. Impairment charges of $0.2 million were recognized during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to adjust the carrying value of a facility which was held for sale to its estimated market value. As a result of a sustained focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of additional real estate in the future. Deterioration of current real estate market conditions or changes in facility operations could trigger additional impairments in future periods.

Acquisition expenses: We incurred $2.4 million of expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 in connection with our current acquisition activities and on-going negotiations. Acquisition expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.2 million.

Table of Contents

Costs of antitrust investigations and related litigation: During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we incurred $2.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the related litigation. These costs have been recognized and paid by Reddy Holdings.

Interest expense, net: Net interest expense increased $7.6 million from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This change is related to increased interest costs associated with our new 11.25% Senior Secured Notes and 13.25% Senior Secured notes, as well as additional interest associated with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The amount of net interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.6 million and $3.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Debt refinance costs: Costs of $6.2 million were incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2010 in connection with the refinancing of substantially all of our outstanding debt in March 2010 and consist of certain fees and expenses paid to third parties in connection with the transactions, as well as the write-off of $0.3 million of deferred debt issue costs associated with debt that was repaid in the transactions.

Income tax (expense) benefit: The effective tax rate decreased from 34.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to (6.9%) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of the effects of the valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We intend to fund our ongoing capital and working capital requirements as well as debt service, including our internal growth and acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, and borrowings under our existing credit facilities, operating leases and other potential financing arrangements.

We generate cash from the sale of packaged ice through traditional delivery methods, by which we manufacture, package and store ice at a central facility and transport it to our customers' retail locations when needed, and through Ice Factories, which manufacture, package and store ice in our customers' retail locations. Our primary uses of cash are (a) cost of sales, (b) operating expenses, (c) debt service, (d) capital expenditures related to replacing and modernizing the capital equipment in our traditional ice plants and acquiring and installing additional Ice Factories, (e) acquisitions, and (f) investments. We have been and may continue to be required to use substantial amounts of cash to pay expenses relating to the investigations by various state agencies and related civil litigation. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Historically, we have financed our capital and working capital requirements, including our acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and operating leases.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, capital expenditures totaled $39.82 million. During this period, we received $2.3 million related to reimbursement of the cost of equipment acquired in 2010 and 2011 and subsequently placed under operating leases. As we consolidate acquisitions into the existing Company infrastructure, we have ~~identified~~ identified non-core and excess assets which can be disposed of, such as real estate and machinery and equipment. From time to time, we also dispose of other assets which are no longer useful in our operations. As a result of dispositions of these non-core and excess assets, we realized proceeds of approximately $0.14 million during the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, 2011. Our ~~March~~net capital expenditures during the six months ended June 3130, 2011 were $7.5 million.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, we completed the acquisition of ~~eight~~nine ice companies for a total cash purchase price of approximately $813.43 million. We will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities as they become available. In conjunction with these evaluations, we will consider our ~~liquidity, availability under our credit facility, mandatory principal repayments under our debt agreements and availability of other capital resources.~~

~~Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010~~ 36

Net cash used in operating activities was $30.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 versus net cash used in operating activities of $12.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

~~The~~liquidity, ~~increase~~availability inunder ~~cash~~our ~~used~~credit infacility, ~~operating~~mandatory ~~activities~~principal ofrepayments ~~$17.8 million~~under ~~was~~our adebt ~~result~~agreements ~~of a $13.1 million decrease in cash provided by working capital primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable associated with increased sales~~ and ~~collection~~availability of another ~~insurance~~capital ~~receivable in the first quarter of 2010, as well as a $4~~resources.~~7 million~~ ~~increase in net loss, adjusted for non-cash and non-operating items.~~

~~Net cash~~ ~~used~~Cash inFlows ~~investing activities was $12.9 million and $21.3 million~~ for the ~~three~~Six ~~months~~Months ~~ended~~Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $12.2 million increase in the restricted cash balance that was used to collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities in the first quarter of 2010, a $6.0 million decrease in net property and equipment additions and a $2.0 million decrease in cash receipts from the reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases offset by the effects of acquisitions of $7.6 million.

Net cash ~~provided~~used byin ~~financing~~operating activities was $1239.04 million ~~and $43.3 million~~ for ~~the~~six ~~three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and~~versus ~~2010,~~net ~~respectively.~~cash ~~The~~used ~~decrease~~in operating activities of $319.31 million ~~relates~~for to the ~~refinancing~~six ofmonths ~~substantially~~ended ~~all~~June 30, of2010. ~~our~~The ~~debt~~increase in ~~the~~cash ~~first~~used ~~three~~in ~~months~~operating activities of ~~2010,~~$30.3 million ~~which~~was ~~resulted~~a inresult ~~the net issuance~~ of a $608.09 million ofincrease ~~additional~~in ~~debt~~net loss, ~~as well~~adjusted asfor ~~approximately~~non-cash and non-operating items, and $1621.74 million ofdecrease ~~costs~~in ~~incurred~~cash ~~for~~provided ~~fees~~by ~~and~~working ~~expenses~~capital ~~associated~~primarily ~~with~~due ~~the~~to a ~~refinancing~~smaller ~~transactions.~~increase ~~The~~in ~~decrease~~accounts ~~was~~payable ~~partially~~and ~~offset~~other byaccrued ~~net~~expenses, ~~draws~~as ofwell ~~$12.0 million under~~as ~~our~~an ~~revolving~~increase ~~credit facility~~ in ~~the~~accounts ~~three~~receivable ~~months~~associated ~~ended~~with ~~March 31,~~increased ~~2011~~sales.

Net cash used in investing activities was $22.5 million and $42.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $14.2 million decrease in net property and equipment additions and a $9.9 million decrease in the funding of the restricted cash balance used to collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities in the first quarter of 2010, partially offset by a $4.1 million increase in the cost of acquisitions.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $30.1 million and $43.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease of $13.1 million is due to the refinancing of substantially all of our debt in the first six months of 2010, which resulted in the net issuance of $60.0 million of additional debt, as well as approximately $16.8 million of costs incurred for fees and expenses associated with the refinancing transactions. This decrease was partially offset by net draws of $30.1 million under our revolving credit facility in the six months ended June 30, 2011. We did not utilize our revolving credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Long-term Debt and Other Obligations

Overview. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, we had $~~462~~480.78 million of total debt outstanding as follows:

•: $300.0 million of Reddy Corp's 11.25% senior secured notes due 2015;
•: $138.9 million of Reddy Corp's 13.25% senior secured notes due 2015 (net of unamortized early tender premium of $0.6 million);
•: $11.7 million of Reddy Holdings' 10¹/2% senior discount notes due November 1, 2012;
•: $30.1 million under Reddy Corp's revolving credit facility; and
•: $0.1 million in other notes payable.

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;

3437

Table of Contents

•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The First Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 5.625% of the principal amount of the First Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 15, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

3538

Table of Contents

~~overhead~~retirement of remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Second Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 6.625% of the principal amount of the Second Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

3639

Table of Contents

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

3740

Table of Contents

semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. No dividends were paid in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $60.76 million and $156.80 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. ~~No dividends were paid in the three months ended March 31, 2011.~~

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

As of November 1, 2010, Reddy Holdings may redeem any or all of the Discount Notes without paying any redemption premium.

The March 2010 Credit Facility was an obligation of Reddy Corp and was guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The March 2010 Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014.

3841

Table of Contents

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is ~~currently~~payable upon maturity of the ~~sole~~LIBOR ~~lender~~loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, Onas ~~December~~well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 10million for the calendar year, ~~2010~~the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, ~~Macquarie~~2014. ~~became~~At June 30, 2011, the ~~successor~~Company ~~administrative~~had ~~agent~~$30.1 million outstanding and $19.9 million of availability under the New Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the New Credit Facility as of June 30, 2011 was 7.3%.

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $12.0 million outstanding and $38.0 million of availability under the New Credit Facility.

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount Notes and pay interest on the Discount Notes. Reddy Corp may also distribute certain investments to Reddy Holdings.

3942

Table of Contents

~~Notes~~ In ~~and~~addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp ~~may~~from ~~also~~declaring ~~distribute~~any ~~certain~~dividends ~~investments~~if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings. At June 30, 2011, Reddy Corp was in compliance with the ratio requirements included in New Credit Facility.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, Reddy Holdings had $119.4 million of cash on hand that was not subject to restrictions under our New Credit Facility.

EBITDA as defined in our New Credit Facility is hereafter referred to as "Adjusted EBITDA".

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the adjustments related to the ~~acquisition~~ acquisition or disposal of businesses which are permitted under the description of the definition of Leverage Ratio as set forth in the New Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA that is derived solely from GAAP components. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income (loss), cash flows from operations or net cash from operating or investing activities as defined by GAAP, and it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations, and this presentation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA follows the table.

The following table sets forth pro forma Adjusted EBITDA as calculated under our New Credit Facility and the financial covenants contained in the New Credit Facility:

		Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2011
		Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$6056,~~088~~313
Leverage ratio		0.25 : 1.0
Minimum liquidity		$3814,~~299~~601

4043

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

		Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2011
		Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Net loss		$	(5661,~~993~~071	)
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			2830,~~482~~315
Depreciation and amortization expense			9,~~456~~737
Interest expense			57,~~168~~674
Interest income			(2016	)
Income tax benefit			(34,~~261~~274	)
EBITDA			3432,~~832~~365
Other non-cash items:
	Stock-based compensation expense(a)		2,~~379~~252
	Loss on dispositions of assets		21,~~319~~034
	Impairment of long-lived assets		1011,~~809~~112
	Increase in fair value of derivative		(16	)
	Decrease in fair value of derivative		162
	Gain on bargain purchase		(232	)
	Acquisition expense		13,~~777~~412
	Debt refinance costs		2,~~731~~671
Reddy Holdings items:
	Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation(b)		~~384~~(15	)
Adjusted EBITDA			5452,~~983~~761
Acquisition adjustments(c)			53,~~105~~552
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$	6056,~~088~~313

(a)The $2.43 million stock-based compensation expense for the twelve months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 includes a $0.3 million ~~accrual~~expense for Board of Directors stock awards earned during the year and ~~expected to be~~ granted in ~~May~~April of 2011. (b)Represents the elimination of the net costs incurred in connection with the ongoing antitrust investigations and related litigation of insurance recoveries. ~~The~~ The costs related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation and related insurance recoveries are excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as these costs have been paid, and ~~the~~ the related insurance recoveries have been received, by Reddy Holdings. Reddy Holdings is currently paying these costs from the excess cash remaining from the initial public offering of its common ~~stock~~ stock in August 2005, the funds paid to Reddy Holdings by affiliates of GSO Capital Partners LP in February 2008 in connection with the termination of a merger agreement, insurance proceeds ~~related~~ related to the antitrust investigations and related litigation, and dividends received from Reddy Corp in the amount of $3.0 million since the DOJ investigation began. (c)Represents the incremental Adjusted EBITDA of acquired businesses as if each acquisition had been consummated on the first day of the period presented. All acquisitions included herein were consummated on or before ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral

4144

Table of Contents

~~are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral~~ provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted Cash" in the consolidated balance sheets.

Financial Derivative Instruments

Diesel Hedging Agreement. On March 25, 2011, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge ~~begins~~began April 1, 2011 and expires on December 28, 2011. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.2 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.17 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. ~~The~~On May 6, 2011, the Company ~~uses~~entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Second Diesel Hedge"). The Second Diesel Hedge began June 1, 2011 and expires on December 31, 2012. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated usage and totals 1.1 million gallons, 0.5 million of which relates to expected 2012 usage. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.04 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. The Company uses the hedges to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The ~~hedge~~hedges isare not for trading purposes and isare accounted for as an economic ~~hedge~~hedges and ~~was~~were not designated as a hedging ~~instrument~~instruments.

Liquidity Outlook. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, we record the majority of our revenues and profits during the months of May through September. The majority of the cash generated from those operations is received between July and November. We fully utilized the excess cash generated from our 2010 selling season during the winter of 2010 and spring of 2011 to fund our operations, debt service, capital expenditures and acquisitions. In March 2010, we refinanced substantially all of our outstanding debt. The March 2010 refinancing provided us with additional cash proceeds of $43.5 million, net of transaction costs, which allowed for additional acquisitions and capital expenditures. In August 2010, we increased the size of our revolving credit facility from $35 million to $50 million. In October 2010, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility to, among other changes, modify financial covenants and extend the maturity date from January 31, 2014 to October 22, 2014. The annual cash interest associated with our current long-term debt is approximately $55 million.

~~Our capital expenditures are used to maintain and expand our traditional ice and ISB operations. In the normal course of our business, we dispose of obsolete, worn-out and unneeded assets and have~~ 45

Table of Contents

~~historically applied those funds against capital expenditures. We currently expect our net capital expenditures in 2011 to approximate~~ $~~8 to $10~~50 million. In ~~This~~October ~~represents~~2010, ~~our~~we ~~minimum~~amended ~~capital expenditures~~and ~~for~~restated ~~the maintenance of~~ our ~~traditional~~revolving ~~packaged~~credit ~~ice~~facility ~~and~~to, ~~ISB~~among ~~operations~~other ~~net~~changes, ofmodify ~~proceeds~~financial ~~from~~covenants ~~dispositions~~ and ~~expected~~extend ~~reimbursements of~~ the ~~cost~~maturity ofdate ~~equipment~~from ~~purchased~~January 31, ~~and placed under~~2014 ~~operating~~to ~~leases~~October 22, 2014. ~~although~~The weannual ~~continue~~cash tointerest ~~evaluate~~associated ~~opportunities to deploy additional capital expenditures for projects~~ with ~~attractive~~our ~~returns~~current ~~and/or~~long-term ~~acquisitions~~debt inis ~~the~~approximately ~~packaged ice and ice machine subscription business~~$55 million.

~~Based~~Our oncapital ~~our~~expenditures ~~expected~~are ~~level~~used ofto ~~operations,~~maintain weand ~~believe~~expand ~~that cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under~~ our ~~revolving~~traditional ~~credit~~ice ~~facility,~~and ~~will~~ISB beoperations. ~~adequate~~In ~~to meet our future liquidity needs for at least~~ the ~~next~~normal ~~twelve~~course ~~months. As~~ of ~~May 3,~~our ~~2011~~business, we ~~had~~dispose ~~approximately $10.2 million~~ of ~~cash on hand at Reddy Holdings~~obsolete, ~~approximately~~worn-out ~~$2.6 million of unrestricted cash~~ and ~~$10.6 million of restricted cash at Reddy Corp and $21.5 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. Our cash flows from operations decline to~~ ~~their~~unneeded ~~lowest~~assets ~~point during March~~ and ~~April~~have ~~due~~historically toapplied ~~reduced~~those ~~sales~~funds inagainst ~~January~~capital ~~and February, and we make interest payments on our outstanding notes in March and May~~expenditures. We ~~incur~~currently aexpect ~~substantial portion of~~ our ~~annual~~ net capital expenditures ~~prior~~in to2011 ~~the summer selling season and we need~~ to ~~finance~~approximate ~~seasonal~~$8 ~~increases in accounts receivable and inventories as temperatures and sales volumes begin~~ to ~~increase~~$10 million. inThis ~~April~~represents ~~and May. The utilization of~~ our ~~revolving~~minimum ~~credit facility is currently at or near its seasonal high point. Subject to the authorization of additional~~ capital expenditures ~~above~~for the ~~current budget~~maintenance ~~and/or the completion~~ of ~~additional~~our ~~acquisitions,~~traditional wepackaged ~~expect~~ice ~~that~~and ~~the~~ISB ~~amount~~operations ~~currently~~net ~~outstanding under the revolving credit facility will be begin to be repaid during the latter half~~ of ~~the second~~proceeds ~~quarter~~from ofdispositions ~~2011~~and ~~with~~expected ~~full~~net ~~repayment~~reimbursements ~~during the third quarter~~ of ~~2011. We would not expect to utilize~~ the ~~revolving~~cost ~~credit facility again until the latter part~~ of ~~the first quarter of 2012. In~~ ~~addition~~equipment topurchased ~~monitoring~~and ~~opportunities~~placed tounder ~~repay~~operating ~~or refinance the $11.7 million of remaining discount notes which mature on November 1~~leases, ~~2012,~~although we ~~are~~continue ~~also evaluating other potential avenues~~ to ~~raise~~evaluate ~~capital~~opportunities to ~~fund~~deploy ~~our~~additional ~~strategic~~capital ~~plans,~~expenditures ~~including~~for ~~the~~projects ~~incurrence~~with ofattractive ~~additional~~returns ~~debt~~ and/or acquisitions in the ~~issuance~~packaged ofice ~~equity~~and orice ~~equity~~machine ~~linked~~leasing ~~securities~~businesses.

Based on our expected level of operations, we believe that cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under our revolving credit facility, will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. As of August 8, 2011, we had approximately $9.1 million of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, approximately $2.2 million of unrestricted cash and $12.9 million of restricted cash at Reddy Corp and $30.6 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. Our cash flows from operations decline to their lowest point during March and April due to reduced sales in January and February, and we make interest payments on our outstanding notes in March and May. We incur a substantial portion of our annual capital expenditures prior to the summer selling season and we need to finance seasonal increases in accounts receivable and inventories as temperatures and sales volumes begin to increase in April and May. The utilization of our revolving credit facility reached its seasonal high point in June of 2011. Subject to the authorization of additional capital expenditures above the current budget and/or the completion of additional acquisitions, we expect that the amount currently outstanding under the revolving credit facility will be repaid by the end of 2011. We expect to utilize the revolving credit facility again in the first quarter of 2012. In addition to monitoring opportunities to repay or refinance the $11.7 million of remaining discount notes which mature on November 1, 2012, we are also evaluating other potential avenues to raise capital to fund our strategic plans, including the incurrence of additional debt and/or the issuance of equity or equity linked securities.

As noted previously, we record the majority of our sales and any profits during the months of May through September and the majority of the cash generated from those operations is received in July through November, by which time, we expect to have repaid all amounts borrowed under our revolving credit facility in the spring, funded current capital expenditures and debt service and built up cash balances. We expect to be in compliance with our debt covenants over the next twelve months.

Expenses in connection with the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation may require the use of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings or Reddy Corp. or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of ~~May~~August 38, 2011, our cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, net of accrued expenses related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation, was ~~approximately~~ approximately $9.30 million. Based on the current status of the investigation and related civil litigation and projected expenses, we believe Reddy Holdings' cash balance will be sufficient to fund these expenses for the next twelve months; however, this expectation includes assumptions regarding matters beyond our control or knowledge. If Reddy Holdings were to require additional cash to fund its expenses related to the antitrust investigations, Reddy Corp. has the ability under the credit facility to transfer $1 million to Reddy Holdings on an annual basis and an additional general restricted payment basket of $5 million over the remaining life of the credit facility. Reddy Holdings has no restrictions on its ability to raise additional debt. We have received reimbursements of $12.2 million to date from our insurance carriers as reimbursements of certain legal expenses. The settlements related to these reimbursements were final and we do not expect to receive any further reimbursements related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation.

4346

Table of Contents

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

General Economic Trends and Seasonality

Our results of operations are generally affected by the economic trends in our market area. We believe end users of our products use packaged ice in many applications, including recreational activities, the construction industry, agriculture and special events. Weakness in the national economy combined with other factors including inflation, interest rate fluctuations, increases in fuel and other energy costs, labor and healthcare costs and the availability of financing, may negatively impact consumer confidence and the business prospects of our commercial customers. If consumer activities associated with the use of our products decline or the business activities of our commercial customers decrease, our revenues and sales volumes may decline.

Our results to date have not been significantly impacted by inflation, other than costs directly related to energy prices, such as fuel, plastic bags and electricity. If we experience high inflation in these costs in the future, or inflationary pressures have significant effects on other cost categories, we may not be able to pass on all of these higher costs to our customers in the short term. We do believe that we will be able to pass on higher costs to our customers over longer periods of time; however there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such efforts.

The ice business is highly seasonal, with the bulk of demand coming in the warmer spring and summer months. Accordingly, we experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and profitability. We make a disproportionate amount of our sales in the second and third calendar quarters. We also typically earn any net income in these same periods, whereas we typically experience net losses in the first and fourth calendar quarters. We believe that approximately two-thirds of our revenues will occur 47

Table of Contents

~~during~~ The ice business is highly seasonal, with the bulk of demand coming in the warmer spring and summer months. Accordingly, we experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and profitability. We make a disproportionate amount of our sales in the second and third calendar quarters. We also typically earn any net income in these same periods, whereas we typically experience net losses in the first and fourth calendar quarters. We believe that approximately two-thirds of our revenues will occur during the second and third calendar quarters when the weather conditions are generally warmer and demand is greater, while approximately one-third of our revenues will occur during the first and fourth calendar quarters when the weather is generally cooler. This belief is consistent with historical trends. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and the lack of proportional corresponding expense decreases, we will most likely experience lower profit margins and losses during the first and fourth calendar quarters. In addition, because our operating results depend significantly on sales during our peak season, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of adverse weather during this peak selling period if the weather is unusually cool or rainy on a more national or regional basis.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the value of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our main market risk categories are fuel prices and interest rate risk.

We are exposed to market risk due to fluctuations in the prices of fuel. From time to time we enter into hedging contracts to stabilize prices expected to be paid for diesel fuel used in our operations. These contracts are for quantities equal to or less than quantities expected to be consumed in our operations. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, we had ~~one~~two diesel fuel ~~contract~~contracts maturing at various dates through December ~~2011~~2012 ~~with~~which aare ~~fair~~recorded ~~value~~in asCost anof ~~asset~~Goods Sold at their fair value of approximately $0.022 million. ~~Net~~The ofimpact ~~effect~~ of ~~this contract,~~ a 10% change in fuel prices ~~would~~under ~~impact~~these ~~our~~contracts would ~~results~~result ofin ~~operations~~a by $1.10 million change in our results of operations on an annual basis, absent any other contravening actions.

Our results of operations can be affected by changes in interest rates due to variable rates of interest on our revolving credit facilities. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, $1230.01 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility. A 1% increase in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on our results of operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls ~~and~~ and procedures" ("Disclosure Controls"), as defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Quarterly Report"). The Disclosure Controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, and as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting disclosed by the Company in its 2010 annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and as described below, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

At December 31, 2010, management, including our CEO and our CFO, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. 48

Table of Contents

Based on this assessment, management identified a material weakness resulting from our accounting for ice merchandiser equipment, as identified and disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring with respect to the accuracy, valuation, completeness, and existence of ice merchandiser equipment.

Notwithstanding the existence of the material weakness described above, we performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These additional procedures included, among other things, expansion of our physical inventory procedures and dedication of significant internal resources to review our ice merchandiser and other plant and equipment balances at a detailed level.

Although we have begun remediation efforts, we have not yet remediated the material weakness described above and cannot conclude when we will have remediated this material weakness. Until remediated, this deficiency could result in a material misstatement of the related accounts and disclosures contained in the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness. We have made and will continue to make improvements to our internal control over financial reporting, and management, with oversight from our Audit Committee, has identified and intends to execute the following actions that we believe will remediate the material weakness described above. Specifically, with regard to the accounting for ice merchandisers, management intends to:

•: Establish increased operational ownership and accountability for the Company's ice merchandisers;
•: Upgrade the fixed asset system and related procedures to provide a more accurate and automated means of managing the Company's fixed assets, including its ice merchandisers, with specific focus on processes and controls governing the tracking and timely disposition and inventory of fixed assets; and
•: Redesign and enhance inventory control procedures over our fixed assets including increased education, training, support and oversight of the Company's employees tasked with the completion of inventory procedures.

Subsequent to filing its Annual Report on March 31, 2011, the Company has initiated a redesign of its fixed asset processes and procedures as well as the implementation of a new fixed asset system. ~~Due~~The toCompany has made substantial progress in its remediation efforts during the ~~limited~~second ~~time~~quarter. ~~elapsed~~Key ~~since~~milestones include the ~~filing~~selection of ~~our~~a ~~2010~~new ~~Annual~~fixed ~~Report~~asset system, ~~this~~the re-design ~~initiative~~of ~~remains~~certain policies and procedures to ensure adequate internal controls over fixed assets are maintained, and the design and test of the 2011 fixed asset inventory and tagging procedures. The newly re-designed procedures will be adopted in ~~its~~conjunction ~~early~~with ~~stages~~the final implementation of the selected fixed asset system and the Company's physical inventory will be executed during the second half of 2011. The foregoing notwithstanding, we continue to evaluate the appropriate remediation measures required in order to address the above-described material weakness and ~~progress~~further progress relative to our remediation measures will be disclosed in our subsequent Exchange Act reports.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

4649

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Antitrust Matters

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Antitrust Matters

InBeginning in 2008 a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the civil actions pending in federal courts have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Home City entered into a settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. InOn March 30, 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it ~~has~~had entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Preliminary approval of that settlement was granted on July 20, 2011. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers against the Company. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser claims. On April 26, 2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action complaint asserting violations of the antitrust laws of various

4750

Table of Contents

~~motions~~states toand ~~dismiss~~related ~~the indirect purchaser~~ claims. OnThe ~~April 26,~~Company ~~2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs~~ filed ana ~~amended~~motion ~~complaint~~to ~~asserting~~dismiss ~~violations of~~ the ~~antitrust~~Second ~~laws~~Amended ofComplaint ~~various~~on ~~states and~~June 24, ~~related claims~~2011.

OnAn ~~March 8,~~agreement ~~2010,~~has abeen ~~putative~~reached ~~class~~to ~~action~~resolve ~~Statement~~the ofclass ~~Claim~~actions ~~was~~ filed in Canada against ~~the~~Reddy ~~Company~~Ice inand ~~the~~Arctic ~~Court~~Glacier, Inc. ofThe ~~Queen's~~agreement ~~Bench~~provides ofthat ~~Alberta,~~Arctic ~~Judicial~~Glacier ~~District~~will ofpay ~~Calgary~~CDN $2,000,000, inall ~~Canada ("Alberta~~claims ~~Action"),~~asserted ~~alleging~~against ~~violations~~Reddy ofIce ~~Part VI~~and ofArctic ~~the~~Glacier ~~Competition~~in ~~Act~~both Ontario and ~~seeking~~Alberta ~~general~~will ~~damages~~be dismissed, ~~special~~and Reddy Ice and ~~pecuniary~~Arctic ~~damages,~~Glacier ~~punitive~~will be granted full and ~~exemplary~~final ~~damages,~~releases ~~interest~~with ~~and~~regard to ~~costs~~those claims. ~~On March 4,~~Reddy ~~2011,~~Ice ~~the~~is ~~Company~~not ~~was~~making ~~served~~any payment in connection with anthis ~~Amended~~settlement. ~~Statement~~The ofagreement ~~Claim~~is insubject ~~that~~to ~~matter,~~the ~~which~~execution ~~asserts~~of ~~similar~~final ~~claims~~settlement documents and court approval.

An agreement has been reached to resolve the class actions filed in Canada by direct purchasers of packaged ice in Canada against Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier Inc. alleging anti-competitive behavior in the United States and Canada. The agreement provides that Arctic Glacier will pay CDN $2,000,000, all claims asserted against Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier in both the Ontario Action and the Alberta Action will be dismissed, and Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier will be granted full and final releases with regard to those claims. Reddy Ice is not making any payment in connection with this settlement. The agreement is subject to the execution of final settlement documents and court approval.

On March 4, 2011, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and other defendants in state court in Kansas. That lawsuit alleges violation of the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act, violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Statute, and Unjust Enrichment, and seeks treble overcharge damages, full consideration damages, compensatory damages, penalties, costs, and attorney fees. That lawsuit was removed to federal court and, on April 26, 2011, an order was entered transferring and consolidating it with other pending cases for pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

On April 28, 2011, two putative class actions were filed against the Company and other defendants in federal courts in Tennessee and Arkansas alleging violations of federal and state antitrust statutes and seeking injunctive relief, damages, disgorgement, costs, and attorney fees. The Company has not been served with these lawsuits. The Company anticipates that these lawsuits will be transferred and consolidated with other pending cases for pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

One direct action lawsuit was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against us in that lawsuit. On June 29, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, and on July 17, 2009 the Court reversed, in part, its May 29, 2009 order, reinstating only the RICO claim against us. The dismissal of the remaining claims was not affected. On August 10, 2009, the Company filed an answer to the reinstated claim. Discovery is ongoing in that matter.

On April 20, 2011, an Order was entered unsealing a Qui Tam complaint filed on June 25, 2008, by Martin McNulty, on behalf of the United States, against Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc., Arctic Glacier International, Inc., and Home City Ice Company, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of the federal False Claims Act by presentation of false claims, making or using a false record or statement, and conspiracy to defraud, and seeks damages, civil penalties, attorney fees and costs. The Government has elected not to intervene in that case and the Company has filed a motion to dismiss that complaint.

Table of Contents

Stockholder Litigation

Table of Contents

District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On March 17, 2011, a Second Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That Second Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. The trial date has been set for March 13, 2012.

Other Matters

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits on page 5154.

4952

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE CORPORATION
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

5053

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.			Description
	31.1†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101†		The following financial information from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended June 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Deficit, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, (v) Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheet, (vi) Reddy Ice Corporation Statements of Operations, (vii) Reddy Ice Corporation Statement of Stockholder's Equity, (viii) Reddy Ice Corporation Statements of Cash Flows, (ix) Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements.

†: Filed herewith.

5154

Filing Compare · REDDY ICE CORP