Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission file numbers:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. 001-32596
Reddy Ice Corporation 333-168190

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
REDDY ICE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		56-2381368 75-2244985 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8750 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 1800
DALLAS, TEXAS 75231
(Address of principal executive offices)

(214) 526-6740
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes ý No o
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). *The Registrants are not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T asat this time.


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes o No o*
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes o No o*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company ý

Reddy Ice Corporation


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		Yes o No ý
Reddy Ice Corporation		Yes o No ý

The number of shares of registrant's common stock outstanding as of ~~November~~May 23, ~~2010~~2011 was:

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.		2223,~~944~~311,~~084~~456 shares of common stock
Reddy Ice Corporation		100 shares of common stock

~~Table~~ REDDY ofICE ~~Contents~~HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

REDDY ICE ~~HOLDINGS, INC.~~ ~~AND SUBSIDIARY REDDY ICE~~ CORPORATION ~~QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010~~

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS


~~PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (unaudited)	2
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	3
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)	4
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	5
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)	6
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	7
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statement of Stockholder's Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited)	8
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	9
	Reddy Ice Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	9
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	10
	Notes to condensed consolidated and Reddy Ice Corporation condensed financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3229
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	5045
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5045
~~PART II—OTHER INFORMATION~~	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5147
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5449
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5549
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	5549
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	5549
Item 5.	Other Information	5549
Item 6.	Exhibits	5549
SIGNATURES		5650
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		5751

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)~~

			September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	52,798		$	44,649
	Accounts receivable, net			40,763			26,289
	Inventories, parts and supplies			11,937			11,057
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			4,622			3,840
	Assets held for sale			920			—
	Deferred tax assets			1,702			1,744
		Total current assets		112,742			87,579
RESTRICTED CASH				10,340			—
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				221,524			215,853
GOODWILL				81,143			79,493
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				72,400			70,429
INVESTMENTS				4,873			1,648
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,790			663
TOTAL			$	514,812		$	455,665
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			—			—
	Accounts payable			15,396			13,536
	Accrued expenses			29,063			13,620
		Total current liabilities		44,460			27,157
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				450,662			390,601
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				20,929			29,111
COMMITMENTS AND CONTIGENCIES (Note 12)				—			—
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
	Preferred stock: 25,000,000 share authorized; no shares issued or outstanding			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 22,951,252 and 22,579,016 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively			230			226
	Additional paid-in capital			224,748			223,312
	Accumulated deficit			(226,217	)		(214,742	)
		Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(1,239	)		8,796
TOTAL			$	514,812		$	455,665

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010

			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	11,221		$	42,173
	Accounts receivable, net			22,367			21,432
	Inventories, parts and supplies			13,662			12,549
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,707			3,849
	Assets held for sale			1,052			1,056
	Deferred tax assets			716			716

		Total current assets		52,725			81,775
RESTRICTED CASH				10,191			10,110
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				203,067			204,898
GOODWILL				85,380			83,368
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,031			72,204
INVESTMENTS				6,993			6,318
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,653			12,252

TOTAL			$	445,040		$	470,925

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			12,000			—
	Accounts payable			14,831			15,290
	Accrued expenses			22,216			24,177

		Total current liabilities		49,048			39,468
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				450,718			450,690
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				13,593			10,560
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
	Preferred stock: 25,000,000 share authorized; no shares issued or outstanding			—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 23,311,456 and 22,962,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			233			230
	Additional paid-in capital			225,780			225,208
	Accumulated deficit			(294,332	)		(255,231	)

		Total stockholders' deficit		(68,319	)		(29,793	)

TOTAL			$	445,040		$	470,925

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)~~

		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2010			2009			2010			2009
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues		$	120,147		$	115,446		$	260,204		$	257,591
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)			71,770			64,851			168,787			157,554
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			5,694			5,494			16,655			15,788
Gross profit			42,683			45,101			74,762			84,249
Operating expenses			14,358			12,690			41,850			38,090
Depreciation and amortization expense			2,435			1,772			6,484			5,211
Loss on dispositions of assets			1,035			145			2,432			602
Impairment of assets			514			—			750			—
Acquisition expenses			414			—			624			—
(Gain) loss on diesel hedge			—			144			—			(581	)
Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net (Note 12)			(3,867	)		735			(1,824	)		4,075
Income from operations			27,794			29,615			24,446			36,852
Interest expense			(14,099	)		(6,231	)		(35,678	)		(20,709	)
Interest income			3			18			15			124
Gain on bargain purchase			264			—			264			—
Debt refinance costs			(310	)		—			(6,478	)		—
Income (loss) before income taxes			13,652			23,402			(17,431	)		16,267
Income tax (expense) benefit			(4,662	)		(13,414	)		5,956			(10,008	)
Net income (loss)		$	8,990		$	9,988		$	(11,475	)	$	6,259
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	0.39		$	0.44		$	(0.51	)	$	0.28
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,949			22,502			22,450			22,291
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Net income (loss)	$	0.39		$	0.44		$	(0.51	)	$	0.28
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		23,058			22,683			22,450			22,434

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended March 31,

		2011			2010
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues		$	40,752		$	35,894
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)			37,225			34,908
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			7,708			5,314

Gross loss			(4,181	)		(4,328	)
Operating expenses			12,799			13,119
Depreciation and amortization expense			2,530			1,876
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54	)		227
Acquisition expenses			603			2
Impairment of long-lived assets			231			—
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation (Note 11)			1,421			913

Loss from operations			(21,711	)		(20,465	)
Interest expense			(14,349	)		(7,259	)
Interest income			4			4
Debt refinance costs			—			(6,108	)

Loss before income taxes			(36,056	)		(33,828	)
Income tax (expense) benefit			(3,045	)		11,231

Net loss		$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share:
	Net loss	$	(1.72	)	$	(1.01	)

	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,689			22,406

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' ~~EQUITY (~~DEFICIT) (Unaudited)

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares			Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
							(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2010			22,579		$	226	$	223,312		$	(214,742	)	$	8,796
Balance at January 1, 2011			22,962		$	230	$	225,208		$	(255,231	)	$	(29,793	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—			—		~~1,423~~559			—			~~1,423~~559
Issuance of restricted stock			~~299~~344			3		(3	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock			(181	)		—		—			—			—
Vesting of restricted stock units			15			—		—			—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			6			—		16			—			16
Issuance of vested shares to directors			69			1		(1	)		—			—
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options			7			—		17			—			17
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—			—		—			(1139,~~475~~101	)		(1139,~~475~~101	)
	Total comprehensive loss													(1139,~~475~~101	)
Balance at September 30, 2010			22,951		$	230	$	224,748		$	(226,217	)	$	(1,239	)
Balance at March 31, 2011			23,311		$	233	$	225,780		$	(294,332	)	$	(68,319	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)~~

				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2010			2009
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net (loss) income			$	(11,475	)	$	6,259
	Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			23,139			20,999
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			1,946			1,093
		Gain on bargain purchase			(264	)		—
		Debt refinance costs			6,478			—
		Deferred tax expense (benefit)			(6,153	)		9,835
		Loss on dispositions of assets			2,432			602
		Impairment of assets			750			—
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			—			(290	)
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,423			1,662
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(14,476	)		(6,484	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(452	)		574
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,358	)		(2,541	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		16,515			(3,401	)
	Net cash provided by operating activities				18,505			28,308
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(28,190	)		(20,669	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				490			343
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(4,002	)		(5,994	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				6,002			5,994
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(12,637	)		—
	Other intangible assets additions				(189	)		—
	Restricted cash				(10,340	)		—
	Issuance of note receivable				—			(450	)
	Collection of note receivable				—			483
	Purchase of investments				(3,225	)		(1,105	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(52,091	)		(21,398	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options				17			—
	Repurchase and retirement of common stock				—			(27	)
	Issuance of debt				300,000			—
	Debt issuance costs				(18,281	)		—
	Repayment of long-term obligations				(240,001	)		—
	Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities				41,735			(27	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					8,149			6,883
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					44,649			39,684
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	52,798		$	46,567
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	24,327		$	18,718
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	15		$	107
	Cash payments for income taxes			$	543		$	658
	Borrowings under the credit facility			$	—		$	6,667
	Repayments on the credit facility			$	—		$	(6,667	)
	Increase in fair value of interest rate hedges			$	—		$	2,152
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	663		$	1,130

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Three Months Ended March 31,

				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			10,238			7,190
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			755			425
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,108
		Deferred tax expense (benefit)			3,021			(11,231	)
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54	)		227
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			(16	)		—
		Impairment of long-lived assets			231			—
		Stock-based compensation expense			631			327
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(936	)		9,167
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(1,031	)		(1,347	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10			(224	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		(3,811	)		(264	)

	Net cash used in operating activities				(30,063	)		(12,219	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(3,821	)		(10,020	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				75			261
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				—			2,000
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(8,395	)		(763	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(8	)		—
	Increase in restricted cash				(81	)		(12,292	)
	Purchase of investments				(675	)		(500	)

	Net cash used in investing activities				(12,905	)		(21,314	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options				16			17
	Borrowings under the credit facility				14,200			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(2,200	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(16,745	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)

	Net cash provided by financing activities				12,016			43,271

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(30,952	)		9,738
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					42,173			44,649

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	11,221		$	54,387

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	16,972		$	6,708

	Cash receipts of interest income			$	4		$	4

	Cash (receipts) payments for income taxes			$	(8	)	$	93

	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	2,016		$	1,549

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION ~~CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)~~

			September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	39,901		$	40,440
	Accounts receivable, net			40,763			19,689
	Accounts receivable from Parent			19			20
	Inventories, parts and supplies			11,937			11,057
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			4,622			3,839
	Assets held for sale			920			—
	Deferred tax assets			1,702			1,744
		Total current assets		99,864			76,789
RESTRICTED CASH				10,340			—
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				221,524			215,854
GOODWILL				81,143			79,493
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				72,283			68,377
INVESTMENTS				4,873			1,648
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,790			663
TOTAL			$	501,817		$	442,824
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			—			—
	Accounts payable			14,307			12,691
	Accrued expenses			29,243			11,679
		Total current liabilities		43,551			24,371
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				438,926			240,101
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				47,370			54,589
COMMITMENTS AND CONTIGENCIES (Note 12)				—			—
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT):
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009			—			—
	Additional paid-in capital			305,960			302,782
	Accumulated deficit			(333,990	)		(179,019	)
		Total stockholder's equity (deficit)		(28,030	)		123,763
TOTAL			$	501,817		$	442,824

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010

			(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	590		$	30,153
	Accounts receivable, net			22,367			21,432
	Accounts receivable from Parent			18			19
	Inventories, parts and supplies			13,662			12,549
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,707			3,849
	Assets held for sale			1,052			1,056
	Deferred tax assets			716			716

		Total current assets		42,112			69,774
RESTRICTED CASH				10,191			10,110
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net				203,067			204,898
GOODWILL				85,380			83,368
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net				75,031			72,204
INVESTMENTS				6,993			6,318
OTHER ASSETS, net				11,565			12,149

TOTAL			$	434,339		$	458,821

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term obligations		$	1		$	1
	Revolving credit facility			12,000			—
	Accounts payable			13,900			14,375
	Accrued expenses			22,396			24,665

		Total current liabilities		48,297			39,041
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS				438,982			438,954
DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES, net				19,587			32,344
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)				—			—
STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT:
	Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010			—			—
	Additional paid-in capital			306,979			306,420
	Accumulated deficit			(379,506	)		(357,938	)

		Total stockholder's deficit		(72,527	)		(51,518	)

TOTAL			$	434,339		$	458,821

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION ~~CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)~~

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	120,147		$	115,446		$	260,204		$	257,591
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		71,770			64,851			168,787			157,554
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		5,694			5,494			16,655			15,788
Gross profit		42,683			45,101			74,762			84,249
Operating expenses		14,358			12,690			41,850			38,090
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,435			1,772			6,484			5,211
Loss on dispositions of assets		1,035			145			2,432			602
Impairment of assets		514			—			750			—
Acquisition expenses		414			—			624			—
(Gain) loss on diesel hedge		—			144			—			(581	)
Income from operations		23,927			30,350			22,622			40,927
Interest expense		(13,776	)		(2,100	)		(31,582	)		(8,314	)
Interest income		3			14			14			85
Gain on bargain purchase		264			—			264			—
Debt refinance costs		(310	)		—			(6,478	)		—
Income (loss) before income taxes		10,108			28,264			(15,160	)		32,698
Income tax (expense) benefit		(3,511	)		(11,388	)		4,991			(13,215	)
Net income (loss)	$	6,597		$	16,876		$	(10,169	)	$	19,483

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,

	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	40,752		$	35,894
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		37,225			34,908
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		7,708			5,314

Gross loss		(4,181	)		(4,328	)
Operating expenses		12,799			13,119
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,530			1,876
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(54	)		227
Acquisition expenses		603			2
Impairment of long-lived assets		231			—

Loss from operations		(20,290	)		(19,552	)
Interest expense		(14,026	)		(3,893	)
Interest income		4			3
Debt refinance costs		—			(6,108	)

Loss before income taxes		(34,312	)		(29,550	)
Income tax benefit		12,744			9,426

Net loss	$	(21,568	)	$	(20,124	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION ~~CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Unaudited)~~

		Common Stock
		Number of Shares		Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
				(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2010			—	$	—	$	302,782	$	(179,019	)	$	123,763
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—		—		1,423		—			1,423
Dividend to Parent			—		—		—		(6,038	)		(6,038	)
Contribution from Parent			—		—		1,755		—			1,755
Assumption of Parent debt			—		—		—		(138,764	)		(138,764	)
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—		—		—		(10,169	)		(10,169	)
	Total comprehensive loss											(10,169	)
Balance at September 30, 2010			—	$	—	$	305,960	$	(333,990	)	$	(28,030	)

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

		Common Stock

		Number of Shares		Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
				(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011			—	$	—	$	306,420	$	(357,938	)	$	(51,518	)
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			—		—		559		—			559
Comprehensive loss:
	Net loss		—		—		—		(21,568	)		(21,568	)

	Total comprehensive loss											(21,568	)

Balance at March 31, 2011			—	$	—	$	306,979	$	(379,506	)	$	(72,527	)

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE CORPORATION ~~CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)~~

				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2010			2009
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net (loss) income			$	(10,169	)	$	19,483
	Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			23,139			20,999
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			1,768			550
		Gain on bargain purchase			(264	)		—
		Debt refinance costs			6,478			—
		Deferred tax (benefit) expense			(5,189	)		13,042
		Loss on dispositions of assets			2,432			602
		Impairment of assets			750			—
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			—			(290	)
		Stock-based compensation expense			1,423			1,662
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(21,076	)		(6,473	)
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(452	)		574
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,358	)		(2,541	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		18,390			(3,879	)
	Net cash provided by operating activities				15,872			43,729
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(28,190	)		(20,669	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				490			343
	Cost of equipment placed under operating leases				(4,002	)		(5,994	)
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				6,002			5,994
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(12,637	)		—
	Other intangible assets additions				(189	)		—
	Restricted cash				(10,340	)		—
	Issuance of note receivable				—			(450	)
	Collection of note receivable				—			483
	Purchase of investments				(3,225	)		(1,105	)
	Net cash used in investing activities				(52,091	)		(21,398	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Dividends to Parent				(6,038	)		(7,901	)
	Issuance of debt				300,000			—
	Debt issuance costs				(18,281	)		—
	Repayment of long-term obligations				(240,001	)		—
	Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities				35,680			(7,901	)
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(539	)		14,430
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					40,440			27,638
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	39,901		$	42,068
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	18,377		$	10,808
	Cash receipts of interest income			$	13		$	70
	Cash payments for income taxes			$	543		$	658
	Borrowings under the credit facility			$	—		$	6,667
	Repayments on the credit facility			$	—		$	(6,667	)
	Increase in fair value of interest rate hedges			$	—		$	2,152
	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	663		$	1,130

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Three Months Ended March 31,

				2011			2010
				(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(21,568	)	$	(20,124	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (excluding working capital from acquisitions):
		Depreciation and amortization expense			10,238			7,190
		Amortization of debt issue costs and accretion of tender premium			418			363
		Debt refinance costs			—			6,108
		Deferred tax benefit			(12,768	)		(9,426	)
		(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets			(54	)		227
		Increase in fair value of diesel hedge			(16	)		—
		Impairment of assets			231			—
		Stock-based compensation expense			631			327
		Change in working capital:
			Accounts receivable		(936	)		2,567
			Inventory, parts and supplies		(1,031	)		(1,347	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10			(183	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		(3,813	)		2,006

	Net cash used in operating activities				(28,658	)		(12,292	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions				(3,821	)		(10,020	)
	Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment				75			261
	Reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases				—			2,000
	Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(8,395	)		(763	)
	Other intangible assets additions				(8	)		—
	Increase in restricted cash				(81	)		(12,292	)
	Purchase of investments				(675	)		(500	)

	Net cash used in investing activities				(12,905	)		(21,314	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Dividends to Parent				—			(5,422	)
	Borrowings under the credit facility				14,200			—
	Repayments under the credit facility				(2,200	)		—
	Issuance of debt				—			300,000
	Debt issuance costs				—			(16,745	)
	Repayment of long-term obligations				—			(240,001	)

	Net cash provided by financing activities				12,000			37,832

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS					(29,563	)		4,226
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD					30,153			40,440

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD				$	590		$	44,666

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash payments for interest			$	16,972		$	1,259

	Cash receipts of interest income			$	4		$	3

	Cash (receipts) payments for income taxes			$	(8	)	$	93

	Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable			$	2,016		$	1,549

See notes to condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY ~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009~~

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010

1. General

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp"), referred to collectively as the "Company", manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. The Company consists of a single operating segment. The common stock of Reddy Holdings is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "FRZ".

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report of the Company and Reddy Corp. The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and the ~~condensed~~ condensed financial statements of Reddy Corp included herein are unaudited; however, balance sheets as of December 31, ~~2009~~2010 have been derived from the audited financial statements for that date, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Under the SEC's regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation, and all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been made and are of a normal and recurring nature. The ~~notes~~financial tostatements ~~the~~included ~~condensed~~herein ~~consolidated~~should ~~financial~~be ~~statements~~read ~~apply~~in toconjunction ~~both~~with the ~~Company~~consolidated and Reddy Corp. ~~Reddy~~financial statements ~~Corp~~and ~~comprises~~the ~~all~~related ~~or substantially~~notes ~~all~~thereto ofincluded in the Company's ~~consolidated~~Annual ~~balances~~Report oron ~~activities~~Form 10-K ~~unless~~for ~~otherwise~~the ~~noted~~year ended December 31, 2010. The ~~financial~~notes ~~statements~~to ~~included~~the ~~herein~~condensed ~~should~~consolidated financial bestatements ~~read~~apply into ~~conjunction~~both ~~with~~ the ~~consolidated~~Company ~~financial statements~~ and ~~the~~Reddy ~~related~~Corp. ~~notes~~Reddy ~~thereto~~Corp ~~included~~comprises inall or substantially all of the Company's ~~Amended~~consolidated ~~Registration~~balances ~~Statement~~or onactivities ~~Form S-4~~unless ~~(File~~otherwise Nonoted. ~~333-168190)~~ ~~filed on July 30, 2010.~~ Operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the full year.

2. Recently Adopted ~~and New~~ Accounting Pronouncements

In December ~~2009~~2010, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("~~FASB") issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~2010-28, ~~Update~~Intangibles—Goodwill ("and Other. ASU") ~~2009~~2010-~~17,~~28 ~~"Consolidations~~modifies step ~~(Topic~~one ~~810)—Improvements to~~of ~~Financial~~the ~~Reporting~~goodwill byimpairment ~~Enterprises~~test ~~Involved~~for ~~with~~reporting ~~Variable~~units ~~Interest~~with ~~Entities."~~zero ~~ASU~~or ~~2009-17~~negative ~~changes~~carrying ~~how~~amounts aand ~~reporting~~offers ~~entity~~guidance ~~determines~~on when anto ~~entity~~perform ~~that~~step istwo ~~insufficiently~~of ~~capitalized~~the ortesting. For those reporting units, an entity is ~~not~~required ~~controlled~~to ~~through~~perform ~~voting~~Step ~~(or~~2 ~~similar~~of ~~rights)~~the ~~should~~goodwill beimpairment test ~~consolidated.~~if ~~ASU~~it ~~2009-17~~is ~~also~~more ~~requires~~likely athan ~~reporting~~not ~~entity~~that toa ~~provide~~goodwill ~~additional~~impairment ~~disclosures~~exists ~~about~~based ~~its~~upon ~~involvement~~factors ~~with variable~~such ~~interest~~as ~~entities~~unanticipated ~~and~~competition, ~~any~~the ~~significant~~loss ~~changes~~of inkey ~~risk~~personnel ~~exposure~~and ~~due~~adverse toregulatory ~~that involvement~~changes. ASU ~~2009~~ 2010-1728 is effective for fiscal years ~~beginning after November 15~~, ~~2009~~ and ~~for~~ interim periods within ~~the~~those ~~first~~years, ~~annual~~beginning ~~reporting~~after ~~period~~December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU ~~2009~~2010-1728 ~~on January 1, 2010~~ did not have a material effect on the Company's ~~results~~consolidated ~~of operations and~~ financial ~~position~~statements.

In December 32010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. ~~Acquisitions~~ These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company purchased three and eleven ice companies, respectively, in connection with its ongoing program of acquiring ice businesses. The total purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based upon estimates of their respective fair values as of the closing dates using valuations and other studies.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

32. ~~Acquisitions~~Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

~~The recorded~~date ~~purchase price allocations are preliminary at September 30, 2010, pending further evaluation~~ of ~~market participant data and the fair values of certain equipment acquired~~adoption. ~~No acquisitions were completed during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2009.~~ The ~~following~~Company ~~table~~has ~~summarizes~~reflected the ~~aggregate~~adoption ~~purchase~~of ~~prices,~~ASU ~~estimated~~2010-29 ~~aggregate~~in ~~fair values of~~ the ~~assets acquired~~disclosures ~~and~~accompanying the ~~liabilities~~consolidated ~~assumed~~financial ~~and~~statements. ~~direct acquisition costs expensed:~~

		Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2010			2009		2010			2009
		(in millions)
Purchase price		$	3.5		$	—	$	12.6		$	—
Assets acquired:
	Inventory		0.1			—		0.4			—
	Property and equipment		1.6			—		4.1			—
	Goodwill		0.5			—		1.7			—
	Other intangible assets		1.6			—		6.7			—
	Total assets acquired		3.8			—		12.9			—
Liabilities assumed			—			—		—			—
Net assets acquired		$	3.8		$	—	$	12.9		$	—
Direct acquisition costs expensed		$	0.4			—		0.6			—
Gain on bargain purchase		$	(0.3	)	$	—	$	(0.3	)	$	—

3. Acquisitions

~~The~~ ~~Company~~ During ~~recognized~~the athree ~~gain~~months onended ~~bargain~~March 31, ~~purchase~~2011, inthe ~~one~~Company ofpurchased ~~its~~eight ~~acquisitions~~ice companies in ~~2010,~~connection ~~which~~with ~~was~~its ~~largely~~ongoing ~~driven~~acquisitions ~~by depressed market conditions~~program. The ~~amount~~total ofpurchase ~~tax~~price ~~deductible~~was ~~goodwill~~allocated ~~recognized~~to ~~in connection with~~ the ~~transactions~~acquired ~~described~~assets ~~above is $0.5 million~~ and ~~$1.7 million~~assumed ~~for~~liabilities ~~the~~based ~~three~~upon ~~and~~estimates ~~nine~~of ~~months~~their ~~ended~~respective ~~September 30,~~fair ~~2010.~~values ~~Other~~as ~~intangible~~of ~~assets were~~the ~~comprised~~closing ofdates ~~customer~~using ~~lists~~valuations and ~~non-compete~~other ~~agreements,~~studies. ~~which~~Two ~~are~~acquisitions ~~being~~were ~~amortized~~completed ~~over~~during the ~~useful~~three ~~lives~~months ofended ~~two to 30~~March ~~years~~31, ~~with~~2010. aThe ~~weighted~~following ~~average~~table ~~useful~~summarizes ~~life~~the ~~of 19.2 years.~~aggregate ~~The~~purchase ~~acquisitions~~prices, ~~were~~estimated ~~funded~~aggregate ~~out~~fair values of the ~~Company's~~assets ~~operating~~acquired ~~cash~~and ~~flows~~the ~~and~~liabilities ~~proceeds~~assumed ~~from~~and direct ~~debt~~acquisition ~~offerings.~~costs expensed:

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the Reddy Holdings' consolidated results of operations (i) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as if the 2010 acquisitions

		Three Months Ended March 31,

		2011		2010
		(in millions)
Purchase price		$	8.4	$	0.8
Assets acquired:
	Inventory	$	0.1	$	—
	Property and equipment		2.0		0.1
	Goodwill		2.0		0.1
	Other intangible assets		4.3		0.6

	Total assets acquired	$	8.4	$	0.8
Liabilities assumed			—		—

Gain on bargain purchase		$	—	$	—

Direct acquisition costs expensed		$	0.6	$	—

The Company recognized approximately $0.5 million of revenue from the acquired businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Revenue recognized from acquired businesses during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was insignificant.

The recorded purchase price allocation on certain of the acquisitions made in 2010 and 2011 is preliminary at March 31, 2011, pending further evaluation of market participant data and the fair values of certain equipment acquired.

The amount of tax deductible goodwill recognized in connection with the transactions described above is $2.0 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Other intangible assets were comprised of customer lists and non-compete agreements, which are being amortized over useful lives of 2 to 30 years, with a weighted average useful life of 19.8 years. The acquisitions were funded out of the Company's operating cash flows, proceeds from debt offerings and borrowings under the New Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

3. Acquisitions (Continued)

~~had~~ The ~~all~~following ~~occurred~~unaudited onpro ~~January 1,~~forma ~~2010~~information ~~and~~presents ~~(ii)~~ the Reddy Holdings' consolidated results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2011 and March 31, 2010 as if the ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, ~~2009~~ 2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma revenues	$	~~120~~41,~~809~~174		$	~~120~~38,~~672~~585		$	~~264,569~~		$	~~268,002~~
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	9,115		$	10,873		$	(10,886	)	$	7,427
Pro forma net loss	$	(39,238	)	$	(22,945	)
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.40		$	0.48		$	(0.48	)	$	0.33
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(1.73	)	$	(1.02	)
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share	$	0.40		$	0.48		$	(0.48	)	$	0.33

The following unaudited pro forma information presents Reddy Corp's results of operations ~~(i)~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 asand ~~if the 2010 acquisitions had all occurred on January~~March 131, 2010 ~~and (ii) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009~~ as if the ~~2010~~2011 and 2010 ~~2009~~ acquisitions had all occurred on January 1, ~~2009~~2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	2011			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma revenues	$	~~120~~41,~~809~~174		$	~~120~~38,~~672~~585		$	~~264,569~~		$	~~268,002~~
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	6,722		$	17,761		$	(9,580	)	$	20,651
Pro forma net loss	$	(21,705	)	$	(20,472	)

4. Inventories, Parts and Supplies

Inventories consist of raw materials, finished goods and parts and supplies. Raw materials represent ice packaging material. Finished goods consist of packaged ice. Parts and supplies consist of spare parts for production equipment and ice merchandisers and miscellaneous supplies. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include overhead allocations. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

		September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Raw materials		$	56,~~768~~245	$	56,~~190~~133
Finished goods			23,~~281~~372		2,~~494~~505
Parts and supplies			34,~~888~~045		3,~~373~~911
	Total	$	1113,~~937~~662	$	1112,~~057~~549

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

5. Accrued Expenses

		September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Accrued interest		$	129,~~180~~965	$	213,~~839~~336
Accrued compensation and employee benefits, including payroll taxes and workers compensation insurance			4,~~701~~832		4,~~171~~484
Accrued utilities			~~2,082~~992		1,~~924~~343
Accrued property, sales and other taxes			52,~~373~~219		1,~~488~~555
Other accrued insurance			2,~~067~~050		12,~~704~~169
Other			2,~~660~~158		1,~~494~~290
	Total	$	2922,~~063~~216	$	1324,~~620~~177

Included in "accrued interest" above are $0.5 million and $20.62 million related to Reddy Holdings as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010, respectively. ~~The~~ ~~Reddy Corp stand alone financials include approximately $0.7 million of additional tax accruals within accrued property, sales and other taxes as of September 30, 2010.~~

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010, long-term obligations of the Company consisted of the following:

		September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
		March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes		$	300,000		$	—300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			—139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(~~581~~524	)		—(553	)
Old credit facilities—Term Loan			—			240,000
101/2% Senior Discount Notes			11,736			11,736
101/2% Senior Discount Notes			11,736			150,500
Other Notes Payable			100			101
Other Notes Payable			101			102
Total long-term obligations			450,719			450,691
Total long-term obligations			450,663			390,602
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	450,~~662~~718		$	~~390~~450,~~601~~690

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010, long-term obligations of Reddy Corp consisted of the following:

		September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
		March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
11.25% Senior Secured Notes			300,000			—300,000
13.25% Senior Secured Notes			139,407			—139,407
Less: Unamortized early tender premium on 13.25% Senior Secured Notes			(~~581~~524	)		—(553	)
Old credit facilities—Term Loan		$	—		$	240,000
Other Notes Payable			100			101
Other Notes Payable			101			102
Total long-term obligations			438,983			438,955
Total long-term obligations			438,927			240,102
Less: Current maturities			1			1
	Long-term obligations, net	$	438,~~926~~982		$	~~240~~438,~~101~~954

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the First Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

The first lien leverage ratio under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes means the ratio of ~~EBITDA~~first lien indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) ~~for the most recent four fiscal quarters~~ to ~~first lien~~EBITDA ~~indebtedness~~ (as defined in the indenture) asfor of the ~~end~~most ofrecent ~~such~~ four ~~quarter~~fiscal ~~period~~quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its first lien leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of March 31, 2011, the first lien leverage ratio was 5.2 to 1.0.

The buildup amount equals 50% of the consolidated net income of Reddy Corp accrued during the period (treated as one accounting period) from April 1, 2010 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter for which internal financial statements are available (or, if such consolidated net income is a deficit, minus 100% of such deficit), plus, the net cash proceeds to Reddy Corp of the issuance of capital stock, subject to certain exceptions, and any cash capital contribution received by Reddy Corp from its stockholder, in each case after April 1, 2010, plus the amount by which Reddy Corp indebtedness is reduced on its balance sheet as a result of the conversion or exchange of such indebtedness for capital stock, plus the net reduction in certain restricted investments made by Reddy Corp, less the amount of certain restricted payments made from time to time, including, among other things, the payment of cash dividends. Reddy Corp is not currently permitted to pay dividends under this provision.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~amount~~overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Second Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 6.625% of the principal amount of the Second Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and ~~unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to~~

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~purchase~~unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

The indenture governing the Second Lien Notes restricts the amount of dividends, distributions and other restricted payments Reddy Corp may make. Under the indenture, Reddy Corp is restricted from paying dividends to Reddy Holdings unless, at the time of such payment:

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

The secured leverage ratio under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes means the ratio of ~~EBITDA~~secured indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) ~~for the most recent four fiscal quarters~~ to ~~secured~~ ~~indebtedness~~EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) asfor of the ~~end~~most ofrecent ~~such~~ four ~~quarter~~fiscal ~~period~~quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its secured leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of March 31, 2011, the second lien leverage ratio was 7.5 to 1.0.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 101/2% Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining ~~Discount~~101/2% Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~101/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27~~However, ~~2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in~~ ~~aggregate~~the ~~principal~~ amount ~~at maturity~~ of ~~101/2%~~dividend ~~Senior~~payments ~~Discount~~permitted ~~Notes~~under ~~due~~this ~~2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering~~6.0% ~~The~~provision ~~Discount~~will ~~Notes~~correspondingly ~~were~~reduce ~~subsequently registered with~~ the ~~SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal~~ amount atotherwise ~~maturity.~~available ~~The~~under ~~accreted value of each Discount Note increased from~~ the ~~date~~buildup ~~of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal~~ amount onfor ~~November 1,~~restricted ~~2008. Thereafter~~payments, ~~cash~~including ~~interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually at a rate of 101/2% per annum. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, Reddy Corp paid cash~~ dividends ~~to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6~~.~~0 million~~ ~~to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. No interest payments were made during the three months ended September 30, 2010.~~

10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 10¹/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 10¹/2% per annum. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash dividends to Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6.7 million and $15.8 million, respectively, to fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. No dividends were paid in the three months ended March 31, 2011.

On February 22, 2010, Reddy Corp launched the Exchange Offer, offering $1,000 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In addition, for Discount Notes exchanged on or prior to March 5, 2010, Reddy Corp offered an early tender premium of $5 in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes for each $1,000 of Discount Notes exchanged. In conjunction with the Exchange Offer, Reddy Corp solicited consents to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants from the indenture governing the Discount Notes. At the expiration of the Exchange Offer on March 19, 2010, approximately 92.2% of the aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes had been tendered into the Exchange Offer. Following the final settlement of the Exchange Offer, $11.7 million in aggregate principal amount of the Discount Notes remain outstanding.

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

~~From~~As ~~and~~of ~~after~~ November 1, ~~2008~~2010, Reddy Holdings may redeem any or all of the Discount Notes bywithout paying aany redemption premium~~, which was initially 5~~.~~25%~~ of the principal amount at maturity of the Discount Notes and declined annually to 0% for the period commencing on November 1, 2010 and thereafter. For the period from November 1, 2009 to October 31, 2010, the redemption premium was 2.625%.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, Reddy Corp had the right to request the aggregate commitments to be increased to $50 million provided certain conditions were met. On August 4, 2010, the aggregate commitments under the March 2010 Credit Facility were increased to $50 million.

The March 2010 Credit Facility was an obligation of Reddy Corp and was guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The March 2010 Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on January 31, 2014. ~~At September 30, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding and $50 million of availability under the March 2010 Credit Facility.~~

Principal balances outstanding under the March 2010 Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at Reddy Corp's option, at the sum of the base rate or LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate loans was initially 3.75% and for LIBOR loans was initially 4.75%, with such applicable margins subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio (as defined in the March 2010 Credit Facility). The Company also paid (i) a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.875%, with such availability fee subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio, (ii) a $50,000 annual loan servicing fee, and (iii) an annual commitment fee of $0.2 million to one of the lenders.

On October 22, 2010, Reddy Corp and the lenders party thereto amended and restated the March 2010 Credit Facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility provides for a $50 million revolving credit facility. Macquarie Bank Limited ("Macquarie"), a lender under the March 2010 Credit Facility, is currently the sole lender under the New Credit Facility. On December 10, 2010, Macquarie became the successor administrative agent under the New Credit Facility.

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus aan applicable margin of 7.000% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the Base Rate, plus a an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $12.0 million outstanding and $38.0 million of availability under the New Credit Facility.

The obligations under the New Credit Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Reddy Holdings and will also be guaranteed by any future domestic subsidiaries of Reddy Corp, subject to certain exceptions.

The New Credit Facility does not require any scheduled principal payments prior to its stated maturity date. Subject to certain conditions, mandatory repayments of the New Credit Facility (and mandatory commitment reductions of the New Credit Facility) are required to be made with portions of the proceeds from (1) asset sales, (2) the issuance of debt securities and (3) insurance and condemnation awards, subject to various exceptions. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the New Credit Facility, an event of default will occur under the New Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

The New Credit Facility also contains affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Reddy Corp and its future subsidiaries, subject to materiality and other qualifications, baskets and exceptions. The affirmative and negative covenants are substantially consistent with those contained in the March 2010 Credit Facility. The negative covenants, among other things, restrict the ability of Reddy Corp to:

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp. is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount Notes and pay interest on the Discount Notes. Reddy Corp may also distribute certain investments to Reddy Holdings.

In addition, Reddy Corp may also pay dividends to Reddy Holdings for specified purposes, including the payment of cash interest on the Discount Notes. The New Credit Facility (and the March 2010 Credit Facility, while it was in effect) precludes Reddy Corp from declaring any dividends if an event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default under the New Credit Facility if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility on the last day of each quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the New Credit Facility) over the preceding four quarters) exceeds 2.50:1.00 as of the end of any quarter. The New Credit Facility requires the maintenance of a minimum liquidity amount of $5 million at all times. Liquidity for purposes of this covenant is defined as the sum of available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility and unrestricted cash held by Reddy Corp. The New Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. Reddy Holdings guarantees the New Credit Facility and such guarantee is collateralized by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Reddy Holdings.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

~~through~~Credit ~~September 30,~~Facility ~~2011.~~is ~~While~~collateralized ~~Reddy~~by ~~Corp~~substantially ~~would~~all ~~not have met the leverage ratio requirement~~ of the ~~March~~Company's ~~2010~~assets. ~~Credit~~Reddy ~~Facility~~Holdings atguarantees ~~September 30, 2010, no compliance certificate for that period was delivered before~~ the ~~March~~New ~~2010~~ Credit Facility ~~was amended~~ and ~~restated~~such ~~through~~guarantee ~~the New Credit Facility. Reddy Corp~~ is incollateralized ~~compliance~~by ~~with~~a ~~the~~pledge ~~covenant~~of ~~requirements~~substantially all of the ~~New~~assets ~~Credit Facility.~~of ~~Furthermore,~~ Reddy ~~Corp could also only pay dividends to Reddy~~ Holdings. inAt anMarch 31, ~~amount~~2011, ~~not greater than~~ Reddy Corp's ~~Cumulative~~was ~~Available Cash (as defined~~ in ~~the~~compliance ~~March~~with ~~2010 Credit Facility) for~~ the ~~period~~ratio ~~(taken~~requirements asincluded ~~one~~in ~~accounting period) from April 1, 2010 to~~ the ~~end~~New ~~of its most recently ended fiscal quarter for which a covenant compliance certificate under the March 2010~~ Credit ~~Facility~~ ~~had been delivered to the lenders~~Facility.

Obligations under the New Credit Facility may be declared immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of certain events of default as defined in the credit agreement, including failure to pay any principal when due and payable, failure to pay interest within five (5) days after due, failure to comply with any covenant, representation or condition of any loan document, any change of control, cross-defaults, and certain other events as set forth in the credit agreement, with grace periods in some cases.

An acceleration of the indebtedness under the New Credit Facility would be an event of default under the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes if the outstanding balance of the New Credit Facility at the time of acceleration is over $10 million.

~~Letters~~Old ofSenior Credit Facilities. ~~The~~On ~~New~~August 12, ~~Credit~~2005, ~~Facility~~the ~~does~~Company ~~not~~amended ~~provide~~and ~~for~~restated ~~the~~its ~~issuance~~credit offacilities ~~standby~~with ~~letters~~a syndicate of ~~credit.~~banks, Infinancial institutions ~~March~~and ~~2010,~~other ~~Reddy Corp~~entities ~~entered~~as ~~into~~lenders, ~~a separate~~including ~~letter~~Credit ofSuisse, ~~credit~~Cayman ~~facility~~Islands ~~with~~Branch, ~~JPMorgan~~as ~~Chase~~Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., ~~and~~JP ~~Wells~~Morgan ~~Fargo~~Chase, ~~Bank~~N.A., ~~National~~CIBC World ~~Association~~Markets Corp., Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (the "LCOld ~~Facility~~Credit Facilities"). ~~Letters~~The ofOld ~~credit~~Credit ~~issued~~Facilities ~~under~~provided ~~the~~for LCa ~~Facility~~$60 million ~~are~~revolving ~~cash~~credit ~~collateralized~~facility (the at"Old ~~102%~~Revolving ofCredit ~~the~~Facility") ~~amount~~and ofa $240 million term loan (the ~~letter~~"Old ofTerm ~~credit~~Loan"). The ~~cash~~Old ~~collateral~~Credit ~~provided~~Facilities ~~under~~were ~~the~~obligations LCof Reddy Corp and were guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The Old Revolving Credit Facility isand ~~maintained~~Old inTerm aLoan ~~restricted~~were ~~account~~scheduled atto JPmature ~~Morgan~~on ~~Chase~~August 12, ~~Bank~~2010 and August 12, N2012, respectively.A. ~~and~~On isMarch 15, ~~reported~~2010, asthe ~~"Restricted~~Old Credit Facilities were ~~Cash"~~terminated inand all amounts owed thereunder were repaid from the ~~condensed~~proceeds ~~consolidated~~of ~~balance~~the ~~sheets~~sale of the First Lien Notes.

~~Old~~ Principal balances ~~Senior~~outstanding ~~Credit~~under ~~Facilities. On~~the ~~August 12,~~Old ~~2005,~~Credit ~~the~~Facility ~~Company~~bore ~~amended~~interest ~~and~~per ~~restated~~annum, ~~its~~at ~~credit~~the ~~facilities~~Company's ~~with~~option, aat ~~syndicate~~ the sum of ~~banks,~~the ~~financial institutions~~base ~~and~~rate ~~other~~plus ~~entities~~0.75% asor ~~lenders,~~LIBOR ~~including~~plus ~~Credit~~1.75%. ~~Suisse,~~The ~~Cayman~~base ~~Islands~~rate was ~~Branch,~~defined as ~~Administrative~~the ~~Agent,~~greater ~~CIBC World~~of ~~Markets~~the ~~Corp.,~~prime ~~JPMorgan~~rate ~~Chase~~(as ~~Bank,~~announced ~~N.A.,~~from ~~Wachovia~~time ~~Bank~~to ~~N.A., Bear~~time ~~Stearns~~by ~~Corporate~~the ~~Lending Inc.~~Administrative ~~and~~Agent) ~~Lehman~~or ~~Commercial~~the ~~Paper, Inc.~~federal ~~(the~~funds ~~"Old~~rate ~~Credit~~plus ~~Facilities")~~0.5%. ~~The~~Interest ~~Old~~on ~~Credit~~base ~~Facilities~~rate ~~provided~~loans ~~for~~was apayable ~~$60.0 million~~on ~~revolving~~the ~~credit~~last day ~~facility~~of ~~and~~each ~~a $240~~quarter.~~0 million~~ ~~term~~Interest ~~loan.~~on ~~The~~LIBOR ~~Old~~loans ~~Credit~~was ~~Facilities~~payable ~~were~~upon ~~obligations~~maturity of ~~Reddy~~the ~~Corp~~LIBOR ~~and~~loan ~~were~~or ~~guaranteed~~on bythe ~~Reddy~~last ~~Holdings.~~day Onof ~~March 15,~~the ~~2010,~~quarter if the ~~Old~~term ~~Credit~~of ~~Facilities~~the ~~were terminated~~LIBOR ~~and~~loan ~~all~~exceeded ~~amounts~~90 days. ~~owed~~Reddy ~~thereunder~~Corp ~~were~~also ~~repaid~~paid ~~from~~a quarterly fee on the ~~proceeds~~average ofavailability under the ~~sale~~revolving ofcredit ~~the~~facility ~~First~~at ~~Lien~~an ~~Notes~~annual rate of 0.5%.

~~Fair~~ The Old ~~Value~~Revolving ofCredit ~~Debt~~Facility ~~Instruments. At~~and ~~September 30,~~Old ~~2010~~Term ~~and~~Loan ~~December 31,~~did ~~2009,~~not ~~the~~require ~~fair~~any ~~value~~scheduled ofprincipal ~~the~~payments ~~Company's~~prior ~~debt,~~to ~~was $441.9 million~~their ~~and~~stated ~~$352~~maturity dates.~~9 million,~~ ~~respectively,~~The ~~while~~Old ~~the~~Credit ~~book~~Facilities ~~value~~contained ~~was~~financial covenants, ~~$450.7 million~~which ~~and~~include ~~$390.6 million,~~the ~~respectively.~~maintenance ~~The~~of ~~fair~~certain ~~value~~financial ofratios, as defined in the ~~Company's~~Credit ~~debt~~Facilities, isand ~~primarily based~~were oncollateralized ~~quoted~~by ~~market~~substantially ~~prices~~all ~~for~~of the ~~debt~~Company's assets.

Debt Refinance Costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded expense of $6.1 million for costs incurred in connection with refinancing activities related to its debt. Approximately $5.8 million of the 2010 expense related to the exchange of the Discount Notes for the Second Lien Notes. The exchange was accounted for as a modification of debt.

Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

6. Revolving Credit Facility and Long-Term Obligations (Continued)

Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and are used primarily to secure certain insurance and operating lease obligations. The cash collateral provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted Cash" in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Debt Instruments. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company's long-term debt, was $446.6 million and $437.0 million, respectively, while the book value was $450.7 million and $450.7 million, respectively. The fair value of the Company's debt is primarily based on quoted market prices for the debt.

7. Financial Derivative Instruments

~~There~~ Diesel ~~were~~Hedging noAgreement. On ~~derivative~~March 25, ~~instruments~~2011, ~~outstanding~~the ~~during~~Company entered into a hedge to fix the ~~nine~~price ~~months~~per ~~ended~~gallon ~~September~~of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge begins April 301, ~~2010~~2011 and expires on December 28, 2011. The notional amount of gallons hedged changes on a monthly basis to match anticipated utilization and totals 1.2 million gallons. The Company will pay a weighted average fixed price of $3.17 per gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Net payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly. The Company uses the Diesel Hedge to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedge is not for trading purposes and is accounted for as an economic hedge and was not designated as a hedging instrument.

~~Interest~~ The Company ~~Rate~~considered ~~Hedging~~its ~~Agreement. Effective~~own ~~September 12,~~credit ~~2005,~~risk in the ~~Company~~valuation ~~entered~~of ~~into~~the andiesel ~~interest~~hedge. ~~rate~~Changes ~~hedging~~in ~~agreement (~~the ~~"2005~~fair ~~Hedge") to~~value ~~fix~~of the ~~interest~~hedge ~~rate~~are onrecorded ain ~~portion~~"Cost of ~~its~~sales ~~Term~~(excluding ~~Loan.~~depreciation)" ~~The~~in ~~2005~~the consolidated ~~Hedge~~statements ~~had a term~~ of ~~three~~operations ~~years~~ and ~~ten~~in ~~months~~the ~~and~~operating ~~expired~~activities onsection ~~July 12, 2009. The 2005 Hedge had an initial notional balance~~ of ~~$220 million.~~ ~~The~~cash ~~notional balance decreased by $20~~flows.~~0 million~~ onPayments ~~October 12~~made ofor ~~each~~received ofunder the ~~next~~hedge ~~three~~will ~~years,~~be ~~beginning~~included onin ~~October 12,~~the ~~2006.~~caption ~~The~~"Cost ~~Company~~of ~~paid~~Sales ~~a fixed rate of~~(excluding ~~4.431%~~depreciation)" on the ~~notional~~consolidated ~~balance~~statements ~~outstanding~~of operations and ~~received~~in anthe ~~amount~~operating ~~equal~~activities tosection 1of ~~or 3 month LIBOR. Any net payable or receivable amount was settled quarterly. The 2005 Hedge was accounted for as a~~ cash ~~flow hedge~~flows.

~~Effective February 17, 2009, the Company entered into a second interest rate hedging agreement (the "2009 Hedge") to lock the interest rate on a portion of its Term Loan.~~ The ~~2009~~ ~~Hedge~~following ~~had~~tables apresent ~~term of 10 months and expired on December 17, 2009. The 2009 Hedge had a notional balance of $50.0 million from~~ the ~~inception~~impact ~~date to July 17, 2009, at which time the notional balance increased to $210 million for the remaining term. The Company paid a fixed rate~~ of ~~1.165%~~derivative oninstruments ~~the notional balance outstanding~~ and ~~received~~their anlocation ~~amount~~within ~~equal to 1-month LIBOR. Any net payable or receivable amount was settled monthly. The Company used~~ the ~~interest~~condensed ~~rate~~consolidated ~~hedges~~financial tostatements: ~~minimize the risk of increases in floating interest rates. The interest rate hedges were not for trading purposes and were accounted for as cash flow hedges.~~

The Company considered its own credit risk in the valuation of the interest rate hedges. Payments made or received under the interest rate hedges were included in the caption "Interest Expense" in the consolidated statements of operations and in the operating activities section of the statements of cash flows.

	Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 718

	Amount of Gain Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended March 31,					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Diesel hedge:
Non-cash change in fair value	$	(16	)	$	—
Cash settlements		—			—

Total recognized gain	$	(16	)	$	—	Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)

Diesel Hedging Agreement. On February 2, 2009, the Company entered into a hedge to fix the price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge began February 2, 2009 and expired on December 28, 2009. The notional amount of gallons hedged changed on a monthly basis to match the Company's anticipated utilization. The Company paid a fixed rate of $1.55 per gallon (wholesale basis) and received an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Any net payable or receivable amount was settled monthly. The Company used the Diesel Hedge to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedge was not for trading purposes and was accounted for as an economic hedge and was not designated as a hedging instrument.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

7. Financial Derivative Instruments (Continued)

Collateral Requirements and Counterparty Risk. The ~~following~~ ~~tables~~Diesel ~~present~~Hedge required the ~~impact~~Company ofto ~~derivative~~provide ~~instruments~~cash ~~and~~collateral ~~their~~in ~~location~~the ~~within~~amount ~~the~~of $0.3 million, which ~~condensed~~remained ~~consolidated~~outstanding ~~financial~~as ~~statements:~~of March 31, 2011.

	Derivatives designated as Cash Flow Hedges under ASC 718
	Amount of Loss Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(a)										Amount of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Interest Expense(a)										Amount of Loss Recognized in Interest Expense (Ineffective Portion)(a)
	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009			2010		2009			2010		2009			2010		2009			2010		2009			2010		2009
	(in thousands)
Interest rate hedges	$	—	$	(142	)	$	—	$	(951	)	$	—	$	(590	)	$	—	$	(3,103	)	$	—	$	(35	)	$	—	$	(628	)

There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

(a)Amounts are pre-tax. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in the condensed consolidated Statement of stockholders' equity (deficit) is presented net of tax.

	Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 718
	Amount of Loss Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations					Amount of Gain Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
										Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2010		2009			2010		2009
	(in thousands)
Diesel hedge:
Non-cash change in fair value	$	—	$	(480	)	$	—	$	290
Cash settlements		—		336			—		291
Total recognized (loss) gain	$	—	$	(144	)	$	—	$	581	Gain (loss) on diesel hedge

Collateral Requirements and Counterparty Risk. The Diesel Hedge and the 2009 Interest Rate Hedge required the Company to provide collateral in a minimum amount of $0.8 million to $1.2 million at various times during 2009. As of December 31, 2009 all hedges had expired and all collateral held by the counterparty had been returned to the Company.

8. Stock-based Compensation

On August 8, 2005, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved the Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan (the "Plan"). On April 29, 2010 the stockholders of Reddy Holdings approved an amendment to the Plan, which increased the number of shares of common stock available to be issued to employees, directors and certain third parties in connection with various incentive awards, including stock options, restricted shares and restricted share units to 4,750,000 shares.

The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, imposed by the Compensation Committee. Such restrictions lapse under circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee, including based upon a specified period of continued employment or upon the achievement of established performance criteria. Restricted shares have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote restricted shares and to receive dividends. Unvested restricted shares are generally forfeited upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period as provided for in the related grant documents. During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company granted 343,750 restricted shares to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $2.75. One-third of the restricted shares vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. The fair value of each restricted share is equal the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value is recognized as compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

The Plan provides for option grants with terms, including exercise price and the time and method of exercise, set by the Compensation Committee. However, the exercise price of options is not permitted to be less than the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant and the term is not permitted to be longer than ten years from the date of grant of the options. Stock options for 573,300 shares of common stock were granted during the three month period ended March 31, 2011. The options have seven-year terms and one-third of the options vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. The options granted during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 had weighted average exercise prices of $2.75 per share.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized using a straight-line method over the shorter of the vesting period or required service period adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The following table sets forth the information about the weighted average grant date fair value of options

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

8. Stock-based Compensation (Continued)

~~connection~~granted ~~with~~during ~~various~~the ~~incentive~~three ~~awards,~~months ~~including~~ended ~~stock options~~March 31, ~~restricted~~2011 ~~shares~~ and ~~restricted~~the ~~share~~weighted ~~units~~average toassumptions ~~4,750,000~~used ~~shares~~for such grants.

The Plan provides for awards of restricted shares subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, imposed by the Compensation Committee. Such restrictions lapse under circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee, including based upon a specified period of continued employment or upon the achievement of established performance criteria. Restricted shares have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote restricted shares and to receive dividends. Unvested restricted shares are generally forfeited upon termination of employment during the applicable restriction period as provided for in the related grant documents. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 21,300 and 299,150 restricted shares to employees with a weighted average grant date fair value of $3.10 and $4.17, respectively. One-third of the restricted shares vest, contingent on the employee's continuous service to the Company, on each of the following dates: January 1, 2011, January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2013. The fair value of each restricted share is equal the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The aggregate grant date fair value is recognized as compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Weighted average grant date fair value		$	1.81
Weighted average assumptions used:
	Expected volatility		110.3	%
	Expected lives		3 years
	Risk-free interest rates		1.21	%
	Expected dividend yield		0.00	%

~~The~~Expected ~~Plan~~volatility ~~provides~~is ~~for~~based ~~option~~on ~~grants~~an ~~with~~analysis ~~terms,~~of ~~including~~historical ~~exercise~~volatility ~~price~~of ~~and~~ the ~~time~~Company's ~~and~~common ~~method~~stock. ofExpected ~~exercise,~~lives ~~set~~of byoptions ~~the~~are ~~Compensation~~determined ~~Committee.~~based ~~However,~~on ~~the~~projections ~~exercise price~~ of ~~options~~option isexercise ~~not~~patterns. ~~permitted~~Risk-free tointerest berates ~~less~~are ~~than~~determined using the ~~fair~~implied ~~market~~yield ~~value~~currently ofavailable ~~the~~for ~~shares~~zero atcoupon ~~the~~U.S. ~~time~~treasury ofissues ~~grant~~with ~~and~~a ~~the~~remaining term isequal ~~not permitted~~ to ~~be longer than ten years from~~ the ~~date~~expected oflife ~~grant~~ of the options. ~~Stock~~The ~~options for~~expected ~~48,000~~dividend ~~shares~~yield ~~and~~is ~~615,220~~based ~~shares~~on ~~of common stock were granted during~~ the ~~three and nine month periods ended~~ September 3015, ~~2010.~~2008 ~~The~~announcement ~~options~~that ~~have seven-year terms and one-third of~~ the ~~options vest, contingent on the employee~~Company's ~~continuous~~quarterly ~~service~~cash todividends ~~the~~had ~~Company,~~been onsuspended ~~each~~indefinitely ~~of the following dates: January 1, 2011, January 1, 2012,~~ and ~~January 1,~~ ~~2013. The options granted during~~ the ~~three~~Company ~~and~~does ~~nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 had weighted exercise prices of $3.10 per share and $4.17 per share, respectively.~~not Incurrently ~~April~~anticipate ~~2010,~~paying ~~68,568~~dividends ~~vested~~in ~~shares were granted to non-employee members of~~ the ~~Board of Directors~~future.

~~The~~Total ~~fair~~compensation ~~value~~expense ofassociated ~~each~~with ~~option~~the ~~grant~~Plan was ~~estimated~~$0.6 million onand $0.3 million during the ~~date~~three ofmonths ~~grant~~ended ~~using~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Such compensation expense was recorded in "Operating expenses" in the ~~Black-Scholes~~consolidated ~~option~~statements ~~pricing~~of ~~model~~operations. Compensation expense isfor ~~recognized~~the ~~using~~three amonths ~~straight-line~~ended March 31, 2011 includes a ~~method~~$0.1 million ~~over~~accrual ~~the~~for ~~shorter~~Board of ~~the~~Directors ~~vesting~~stock ~~period~~awards orearned ~~required~~during ~~service~~the period ~~adjusted~~and ~~for~~expected ~~estimated~~to ~~forfeitures.~~be ~~The~~granted ~~following~~in ~~table~~May ~~sets~~of ~~forth~~2011. ~~the~~As ~~information~~of ~~about~~March 31, ~~the~~2011, ~~weighted~~756,384 ~~average~~shares ~~grant~~were ~~date~~available ~~fair~~for grant ~~value~~under ofthe ~~options~~Plan.

9. Net Loss Per Share

The computation of net loss per share is based on net loss divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Restricted shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted shares on which the dividends were paid do not vest. Since restricted shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they are excluded from the basic net loss per share calculation. Accordingly, 620,183 and 350,678 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

For the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share, options to purchase 0.6 million and 1.4 million shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

89. ~~Stock-based~~Net ~~Compensation~~Loss Per Share (Continued)

~~granted~~for ~~during~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~the~~2010, ~~weighted~~respectively, ~~average~~because ~~assumptions~~their ~~used~~effect ~~for~~was ~~such grants~~anti-dilutive.

		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
		Three Months Ended March 31,
Weighted average grant date fair value		$	2.19
		2011			2010
Weighted average assumptions used:
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	Expected volatility		123.5	%
Net loss for basic and diluted computation		$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)
	Expected lives		3 years
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
	Risk-free interest rates		1.13	%
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,689			22,406
	Expected dividend yield		0.00	%
	Net loss	$	(1.72	)	$	(1.01	)

~~Expected volatility~~ ~~is based on an analysis of historical volatility of the Company's common stock~~10. ~~Expected~~Income lives of options are determined based on projections of option exercise patterns. Risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero coupon U.S. treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield is based on the September 15, 2008 announcement that the Company's quarterly cash dividends had been suspended indefinitely and the Company does not currently anticipate paying dividends in the future. Taxes

~~Total~~ ~~compensation~~ The ~~expense~~Company's ~~associated~~effective ~~with~~tax ~~the~~rate ~~Plan~~of ~~was $0~~(8.4%) for the three months ended March ~~million~~31, 2011 differs from the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income and $0margin taxes, the effect of permanent differences and a change in the Company's valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.~~7 million~~ ~~during~~In the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2011, ~~2010~~the ~~and~~Company ~~2009,~~recorded ~~respectively,~~an ~~and~~ additional valuation allowance totaling $116.42 million relating to federal and state deferred assets. The total valuation allowance of $20.1 million is comprised of a $0.73 million ~~during~~of ~~the~~allowance ~~nine~~against ~~months~~certain ~~ended~~state ~~September 30,~~NOL ~~2010~~carryforwards and ~~2009,~~a ~~respectively~~$19.3 million ~~Such~~allowance ~~compensation~~against ~~expense~~the ~~was~~remaining ~~recorded~~deferred inassets. ~~"Operating~~The ~~expenses"~~valuation inallowance ~~the~~is necessary ~~consolidated~~to ~~statements~~reduce ofthe ~~operations.~~recorded Asdeferred oftax ~~September 30,~~assets ~~2010,~~to ~~1,698,387~~the ~~shares~~amount ~~were~~management ~~available~~believes ~~for~~the ~~grant~~Company ~~under~~is ~~the~~more-likely-than-not ~~Plan~~to realize.

Reddy Corp's 9effective tax rate of 36.8% ~~Net~~calculated ~~Income~~on ~~(Loss)~~a ~~Per~~stand-alone ~~Share~~ basis, differs from the Federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to state income and margin taxes and the effect of permanent differences.

The amount ~~computation~~ of ~~net~~gross ~~income~~unrecognized ~~(loss)~~tax ~~per~~benefits ~~share~~related isto ~~based~~uncertain ontax ~~net~~positions ~~income~~was ~~(loss)~~$1.3 million ~~divided~~at byMarch 31, ~~the~~2011 ~~weighted~~and ~~average~~December 31, ~~number~~2010, ofwhich ~~shares~~included ~~outstanding. Restricted shares include rights to receive~~accrued ~~dividends~~interest ~~that~~and ~~are~~penalties ~~not~~of ~~subject~~$0.3 million toas ~~the risk~~ of ~~forfeiture~~March 31, ~~even~~2011 ifand ~~the~~December 31, ~~underlying restricted shares on which the dividends were paid do not vest~~2010. ~~Since~~The ~~restricted~~total ~~shares~~amount doof ~~not~~interest ~~include~~and ~~an obligation to share in losses~~penalties, ~~they are excluded from the basic~~ net ~~loss per share calculation. Accordingly, 407,613 restricted shares were excluded from the computation~~ of ~~basic~~federal ~~net loss per share for the nine months ended September 30~~benefit, ~~2010.~~recognized ~~However, these restricted shares were included~~ in the ~~computation~~ statement of ~~basic~~operations ~~net income per share~~ for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2011 and 2010 was immaterial.

~~For~~As ~~the~~a ~~purpose~~result of ~~computing~~net ~~diluted~~operating ~~earnings~~loss ~~per share~~carryforwards, ~~options~~the toCompany's ~~purchase~~tax ~~1.0 million~~years ~~shares~~from of1998 ~~common~~through ~~stock~~2010 ~~were~~remain ~~not~~open ~~included~~and insubject ~~the~~to ~~computation~~examination ofby ~~diluted earnings per share for~~ the ~~three~~Internal ~~months~~Revenue ~~ended~~Service ~~September 30,~~and/or ~~2010,~~certain state ~~because~~taxing ~~their effect was anti-dilutive~~authorities. ~~Options to purchase 0.1 million shares~~

11. Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a discussion of the Company's significant legal matters. The Company is involved in various claims, suits, investigations, and legal proceedings. The Company accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no accruals had been made in connection with the matters discussed below.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

911. ~~Net~~Commitments ~~Income~~and ~~(Loss)~~Contingencies ~~Per Share~~ (Continued)

~~of common~~ ~~stock~~Antitrust ~~were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, because their effect was anti-dilutive.~~ Matters

		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2010		2009		2010			2009
		(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted computation		$	8,990	$	9,988	$	(11,475	)	$	6,259
Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,949		22,502		22,450			22,291
	Net income (loss)	$	0.39	$	0.44	$	(0.51	)	$	0.28
Diluted earnings per share:
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		22,949		22,502		22,450			22,291
	Shares issuable from assumed conversion of restricted stock units and options		109		181		—			143
	Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted		23,058		22,683		22,450			22,434
	Net income (loss)	$	0.39	$	0.44	$	(0.51	)	$	0.28

In March 2008, the Company and certain of its employees, including members of its management, received subpoenas issued by a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking documents and information in connection with an investigation by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") into possible antitrust violations in the packaged ice industry. In addition, on March 5, 2008, federal officials executed a search warrant at the Company's corporate office in Dallas, Texas. Current and former employees were also subpoenaed to testify and testified before a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan and before a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio. On October 29, 2010, the Company was informed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ would take no action against the Company or any of its employees in connection with its investigation of the packaged ice industry. In January 2011, counsel for the Company confirmed that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ has formally closed its investigation of the packaged ice industry.

On March 25, 102008, the Company was served by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida with an antitrust civil investigative demand (the "Florida CID") requesting the production of documents and information relating to an investigation of agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the market for packaged ice. ~~Income~~On ~~Taxes~~ June 11, 2008, the Company received a civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona (the "Arizona CID"). All of the documents and information requested by the Arizona CID were included in the Florida CID and the Arizona CID states that it will be satisfied by the production of information which had been and would be provided to Florida in response to the Florida CID. On or about June 16, 2009, the Company was served by the State of Michigan, Department of the Attorney General, with a civil investigative demand requesting information and documents relating to sales of ice to units of government in Michigan, sales of ice in Michigan for which we the Company made or received payment, and contracts and agreements with Michigan entities (the "Michigan CID"). The Company has been advised that the Florida CID, the Arizona CID and the Michigan CID are related to a multi-state antitrust investigation of the packaged ice industry and that the Attorneys General of 19 states and the District of Columbia are participating in the multi-state investigation. The states' investigation is related to the investigation of the packaged ice industry by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The Company is cooperating with the investigation and has complied with all requests for documents and information regarding these matters. The Company may in the future receive additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from states participating in the multi-state investigation or conducting their own investigations.

~~The~~At this ~~Company's~~time, ~~effective~~the ~~tax~~Company ~~rate~~is ~~differs~~unable ~~from~~to predict the ~~Federal~~outcome ~~statutory~~of ~~income~~that ~~tax~~investigation, ~~rate~~the ofpossible ~~35%~~loss ~~due~~or topossible ~~state~~range ~~income~~of ~~and~~loss, ~~margin~~if ~~taxes~~any, associated with the ~~effect~~resolution of ~~permanent~~that investigation ~~differences~~or ~~and~~any ~~a $0.3 million~~potential ~~valuation~~effect ~~allowance~~the ~~recorded~~investigation ~~against~~may ~~certain~~have ~~state~~on ~~net~~the ~~operating~~Company, ~~loss~~its ~~carryforwards~~employees or operations.

~~The~~In ~~amount~~2008 a number of ~~gross~~lawsuits, ~~unrecognized~~including ~~tax~~putative ~~benefits~~class ~~related~~action tolawsuits, ~~uncertain~~were ~~tax~~filed ~~positions~~against ~~was~~the ~~$3.1 million~~Company, atReddy ~~September 30~~Ice Corporation, ~~2010~~Home ~~and~~City ~~$3.1~~Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, ~~million~~Inc. atand ~~December~~Arctic Glacier International, 31Inc., ~~2009, which~~in ~~included~~various ~~accrued~~federal ~~interest~~courts ~~and~~in ~~penalties~~multiple ofjurisdictions ~~$1.3 million~~alleging asviolations of ~~September 30,~~federal ~~2010~~and state antitrust laws and ~~$1.2 million~~related asclaims ofand seeking ~~December 31,~~damages ~~2009~~and injunctive relief. ~~The~~Pursuant ~~total~~to ~~amount~~an ofOrder ~~interest~~from ~~and~~the ~~penalties~~Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, ~~net~~ ofthe civil actions pending in federal ~~benefit,~~courts ~~recognized~~have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the ~~statement~~United ofStates ~~operations~~District Court for the ~~nine~~Eastern ~~months~~District ~~ended~~of ~~September 30,~~Michigan. ~~2010~~Home ~~and~~City ~~2009~~entered ~~was~~into ~~immaterial.~~a settlement

In October 2010, the Company reached a voluntary settlement for $0.1 million with a U.S. state taxing authority in respect of one of its uncertain tax positions. As a result of the settlement, the Company will reduce its $3.1 million total unrecognized tax benefit by $1.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2010.

As a result of net operating loss carryforwards, the Company's tax years from 1997 through 2009 remain open and subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and/or certain state taxing authorities. The Company is undergoing routine tax audits in certain U.S. state jurisdictions covering multiple years. The Company is not aware of any material proposed income tax adjustments and expects the completion of the audits in the near term.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

11. ~~Other~~Commitments ~~Charges~~ and Contingencies (Continued)

agreement ~~During~~with the ~~three~~direct ~~and~~purchaser ~~nine~~plaintiffs ~~months~~that ~~periods~~was ~~ended~~approved ~~September~~by the Court on February 3022, ~~2010~~2011. In March 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it has entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the ~~Company~~direct ~~recorded~~purchaser ~~charges~~plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of $1direct purchasers.0 On March ~~million~~11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and $2denying in part motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser claims.4 On April ~~million~~26, ~~within~~2011, ~~"Loss~~the onindirect ~~disposition~~purchaser ~~of assets"~~plaintiffs infiled ~~connection~~an ~~with~~amended complaint asserting violations of the ~~disposal~~antitrust laws of ~~excess~~various ~~facilities~~states and ~~other~~related ~~fixed assets~~claims.

~~During~~On ~~the three month period ended September~~March 301, 2010, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~putative ~~recorded~~class anaction ~~out~~Statement of ~~period~~Claim ~~charge~~was offiled ~~$0.7 million~~against asthe aCompany ~~"Loss on disposition of assets"~~ in ~~connection~~the ~~with assets~~Ontario ~~disposed~~Superior ofCourt ~~during the remodel~~ of aJustice ~~production~~in ~~facility.~~Canada ~~This~~("Ontario ~~charge~~Action"), isalleging violations ~~offset by a related tax benefit~~ of ~~$0.3~~Part ~~million.~~VI ~~The~~of ~~disposal~~the ~~should~~Competition ~~have~~Act ~~been~~and ~~recognized~~seeking ~~during~~general ~~the~~damages, ~~three~~punitive ~~months ended~~and ~~March 31~~exemplary damages, ~~2010.~~pre-judgment Asand ~~the~~post-judgment ~~amounts~~interest, ~~involved~~and ~~were~~costs. ~~not~~Proceedings relating ~~material~~ to ~~the Company~~Plaintiffs's ~~consolidated~~Motion ~~financial statements~~ for ~~the~~Certification ~~three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded the cumulative effect~~ of ~~these~~a ~~items~~Class ~~during~~are ~~the~~ongoing ~~three~~in ~~and~~that ~~nine month periods ended September 30, 2010~~matter.

~~During~~On ~~the three and nine months ended September~~March 308, 2010, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~putative ~~also~~class ~~recorded~~action ~~impairment~~Statement ~~charges~~ of ~~$0.5 million~~Claim ~~and~~was ~~$0.8 million.~~filed ~~The~~against ~~charges recorded for~~ the ~~three~~Company ~~month~~in ~~period represent~~ the ~~impairment~~Court of ~~certain~~Queen's ~~fixed~~Bench ~~assets.~~of ~~During~~Alberta ~~the~~("Alberta ~~six~~Action"), ~~months~~Judicial ~~ended~~District ~~June 30~~of Calgary, ~~2010~~in Canada, ~~the~~alleging ~~Company~~violations ~~had~~of ~~recorded~~Part VI anof ~~impairment~~the ~~charge~~Competition ofAct ~~$0.2 million~~and ~~for certain~~seeking ~~assets~~general ~~held~~damages, ~~for~~special ~~sale.~~and ~~The~~pecuniary ~~Company~~damages, ~~may~~punitive beand ~~required~~exemplary todamages, ~~recognize~~interest ~~additional~~and ~~charges~~costs. inOn March 4, ~~future~~2011, ~~periods~~the ifCompany ~~triggering~~was ~~events~~served ~~are~~with ~~identified~~an ~~indicating~~Amended ~~that~~Statement ~~the~~of ~~carrying~~Claim ~~value~~in ofthat ~~its~~matter, ~~assets~~which ~~are~~asserts ~~not recoverable~~similar claims.

InAn ~~addition,~~agreement has been reached to resolve the ~~Company~~class ~~recorded~~actions ~~$0.2 million~~filed ~~and~~in ~~$0.4 million~~Canada by direct purchasers of ~~severance~~packaged ~~expense~~ice in ~~"Operating~~Canada ~~expenses"~~against ~~for~~Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier Inc. alleging anti-competitive behavior in the ~~three~~United States and ~~nine~~Canada. ~~months~~The ~~periods~~agreement ~~ended September~~provides that Arctic Glacier will pay CDN 30$2,000,000, ~~2010~~all claims asserted against Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier in both Ontario and Alberta will be dismissed, ~~respectively~~and Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier will be granted full and final releases with regard to those claims. Reddy Ice is not making any payment in connection with this settlement. The agreement is subject to the execution of final settlement documents and court approval.

On March 4, 122011, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and other defendants in state court in Kansas. ~~Commitments~~That lawsuit alleges violation of the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act, violation of the Kansas Consumer Protection Statute, and ~~Contingencies~~ Unjust Enrichment, and seeks treble overcharge damages, full consideration damages, compensatory damages, penalties, costs, and attorney fees. That lawsuit was removed to federal court and, on April 26, 2011, an order was entered transferring and consolidating it with other pending cases for pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

~~The~~On April 28, ~~following~~2011, istwo aputative ~~discussion~~class ofactions ~~the~~were ~~Company's~~filed ~~significant~~against ~~legal~~the ~~matters. The~~ Company isand ~~involved~~other defendants in ~~various~~federal ~~claims,~~courts ~~suits,~~in ~~investigations,~~Tennessee and ~~legal~~Arkansas ~~proceedings.~~alleging ~~The~~violations ~~Company~~of ~~accrues~~federal aand ~~liability~~state ~~when~~antitrust itstatutes ~~believes~~and ~~that~~seeking itinjunctive isrelief, ~~both~~damages, ~~probable~~disgorgement, ~~that~~costs, aand ~~liability~~attorney ~~has~~fees. ~~been~~The ~~incurred~~Company ~~and~~has ~~that~~not itbeen ~~can~~served ~~reasonably~~with ~~estimate~~these ~~the~~lawsuits. ~~amount~~The ofCompany ~~the~~anticipates ~~loss.~~that Atthese lawsuits ~~September 30,~~will ~~2010~~be transferred and ~~December 31, 2009,~~consolidated nowith ~~accruals~~other ~~had~~pending ~~been~~cases ~~made~~for pre-trial proceedings in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~United States District Court for the ~~matters~~Eastern ~~discussed~~District ~~below~~of Michigan.

One direct ~~Antitrust~~action ~~Matters~~ lawsuit was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against

In March 2008, the Company and certain of its employees, including members of its management, received subpoenas issued by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking documents and information in connection with an investigation by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") into possible antitrust violations in the packaged ice industry. In addition, on March 5, 2008, federal officials executed a search warrant at the Company's corporate office in Dallas, Texas. On August 28, 2008, the Company received a second subpoena for documents from the federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan. Current and former employees were also subpoenaed to testify and testified before a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan and, more recently, before a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio. The search warrant and subpoenas that the Company and our employees received were connected with a broader industry inquiry by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier International, Inc., and three former employees of Arctic Glacier entered guilty pleas regarding a conspiracy to allocate customers and territories in southeastern Michigan and the Detroit, Michigan,

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

1211. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

~~metropolitan~~us ~~area~~in that lawsuit. ~~Sentencing~~On ofJune 29, 2009, the ~~three~~plaintiff ~~former~~filed ~~Arctic~~a ~~Glacier~~motion ~~employees~~for ~~took~~reconsideration, ~~place~~and on ~~February~~July 217, 32009 ~~and~~the 4,Court ~~2010~~reversed, ~~sentencing~~in ofpart, ~~Arctic~~its ~~Glacier occurred on February~~May 1129, ~~2010~~2009 order, ~~and~~reinstating ~~Home~~only ~~City~~the ~~was~~RICO ~~sentenced~~claim onagainst ~~March 2, 2010~~us. OnThe ~~October 29,~~dismissal ~~2010,~~of the ~~Company~~remaining claims was ~~informed~~not ~~that~~affected. ~~the~~On ~~Antitrust~~August 10, ~~Division~~2009, of the ~~DOJ~~Company ~~will~~filed ~~take~~an noanswer ~~action~~to ~~against~~ the ~~Company~~reinstated orclaim. ~~any~~Discovery ofis ~~its~~ongoing ~~employees~~ in ~~connection~~that ~~with its investigation of the packaged ice industry~~matter.

On March 25, 2008, the Company was served by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida with an antitrust civil investigative demand (the "Florida CID") requesting the production of documents and information relating to an investigation of agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the market for packaged ice. On June 11, 2008, the Company received a civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona (the "Arizona CID"). All of the documents and information requested by the Arizona CID were included in the Florida CID and the Arizona CID states that it will be satisfied by the production of information which had been and would be provided to Florida in response to the Florida CID. On or about June 16, 2009, the Company was served by the State of Michigan, Department of the Attorney General, with a civil investigative demand requesting information and documents relating to sales of ice to units of government in Michigan, sales of ice in Michigan for which we made or received payment, and contracts and agreements with Michigan entities (the "Michigan CID"). The Company has been advised that the Florida CID, the Arizona CID and the Michigan CID are related to a multi-state antitrust investigation of the packaged ice industry and that the Attorneys General of 19 states and the District of Columbia are participating in the multi-state investigation. The states' investigation is related to the investigation of the packaged ice industry by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. The Company has complied with all requests for documents and information regarding these matters. The Company may in the future receive additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from other states participating in the multi-state investigation or conducting their own investigations.

On November 19, 2008, the Company was notified by the Civil Fraud Division of the DOJ (the "Civil Fraud Division") that the Civil Fraud Division had opened an investigation with respect to the Company. The Civil Fraud Division's investigation is expected to examine whether the Company may have violated the federal False Claims Act by submitting, or causing to be submitted, false claims to the federal government as a result of entering into allegedly anticompetitive agreements which may have affected the sale of packaged ice to the government. On or about January 6, 2009, the Company received a request for documents in connection with that investigation. The Company has substantially completed providing information and documents requested by the Civil Fraud Division. The Civil Fraud Division's investigation is related to the investigation by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ.

The Company is cooperating with the authorities in the multi-state attorney general investigation and the Civil Fraud Division investigation. The Company expects to continue to make available documents and other information in response to any subpoenas, requests or civil investigative demands received from the investigating agencies. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of those investigations, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of those investigations or any potential effect they may have on the Company, its employees or operations.

On March 6, 2008, the Company's Board of Directors formed a special committee of independent directors to conduct an internal investigation of these matters. The special committee retained counsel

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

12. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

to assist in its investigation. In order to maintain the independence of the special committee's investigation, officers and employees who were employed by the Company at the time the investigation commenced have not had access to information obtained in the special committee's investigation or the results of the investigation to date. The investigation by the special committee and its counsel is substantially complete. The special committee has not reached a determination that any violations of the antitrust laws have occurred.

Effective September 13, 2008, Ben D. Key, the Company's Executive Vice President—Sales & Marketing, was placed on a paid leave of absence and relieved of his duties at the direction of the special committee. The special committee found that Mr. Key violated the Company's policies and was associated with matters that were under investigation.

Following the announcement that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ had instituted an investigation of the packaged ice industry, a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the civil actions pending in federal courts have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. On June 1, 2009, the Court appointed interim lead and liaison counsel for the putative direct and indirect purchaser classes. On September 15, 2009, the lead plaintiffs for each of the putative direct and indirect purchaser classes filed consolidated amended complaints. The Company and Arctic Glacier filed motions to dismiss both of these complaints. Home City filed a motion to dismiss the indirect purchaser complaint and entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. The motions by the Company and Arctic Glacier to dismiss the direct purchaser claims were denied by the Court on July 1, 2010. An order granting preliminary approval of Home City's settlement with the direct purchasers and authorizing dissemination of notice was entered on September 2, 2010. The motions to dismiss the indirect purchaser complaint are pending.

On March 1, 2010, a putative class action Statement of Claim was filed against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Canada, alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, punitive and exemplary damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and costs. A case conference regarding this matter was held on June 9, 2010. In that case conference, a schedule was set for proceedings relating to Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of a Class.

On March 8, 2010, a putative class action Statement of Claim was filed against the Company in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary, in Canada, alleging violations of Part VI of the Competition Act and seeking general damages, special and pecuniary damages, punitive and exemplary damages, interest and costs. This Statement of Claim has not yet been served on the Company.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

12. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

One direct action lawsuit has been filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against us in that lawsuit. On June 29, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, and on July 17, 2009 the Court reversed in part its May 29, 2009 order, reinstating only the RICO claim against us. The dismissal of the remaining claims was not affected. On August 10, 2009, the Company filed an answer to the reinstated claim. Discovery is ongoing in that matter.

The Company intends to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

SEC Inquiry

On or about October 21, 2008, the Company received notice that the Securities and Exchange Commission had initiated an informal inquiry into matters that were the subject of the investigation by the special committee of our Board of Directors. On October 29, 2010, the Company was informed the Securities and Exchange Commission has closed that inquiry and no action will be taken against the Company.

Stockholder Litigation

Beginning on August 8, 2008, purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims under the federal securities laws against the Company and certain of its current or former senior officers. ~~The~~On ~~complaints~~July 17, ~~which are substantially similar~~2009, ~~allege~~ ~~that~~ the ~~defendants~~Court ~~misrepresented~~consolidated the actions and ~~failed~~appointed toa ~~disclose~~lead ~~the~~plaintiff ~~existence of,~~ and ~~the~~interim ~~Company~~lead plaintiff's ~~alleged~~counsel. ~~participation~~The ~~in,~~lead anplaintiff ~~alleged~~filed ~~antitrust~~a ~~conspiracy~~consolidated inamended ~~the~~complaint ~~packaged~~on ~~ice~~November 2, ~~industry~~2009. ~~The complaints~~That ~~purport~~complaint purports to assert claims on behalf of ~~various~~an alleged ~~classes~~class of purchasers of the Company's common stock. Onand ~~July 17,~~alleges ~~2009,~~that the ~~Court~~defendants ~~consolidated~~misrepresented ~~the~~and ~~actions~~failed ~~and~~to ~~appointed~~disclose athe ~~lead plaintiff~~existence of, and ~~interim~~the ~~lead plaintiff~~Company's ~~counsel.~~alleged participation ~~The~~in, ~~lead~~an ~~plaintiff~~alleged ~~filed~~antitrust aconspiracy ~~consolidated~~in ~~amended~~the ~~complaint~~packaged onice ~~November 2, 2009~~industry. The Company and the other defendants have filed ~~motions~~an toanswer ~~dismiss~~in ~~the consolidated~~that ~~amended complaint~~case. ~~A hearing was held on those motions on October 22, 2010. The motions were taken under advisement by the Court.~~

Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former officers and members of the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On ~~September~~March 2717, ~~2010~~2011, a Second Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That ~~petition~~Second Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement and ~~seek~~seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. The consolidated case is currently set for trial on August 2, 2011.

The Company ~~and~~intends ~~the other defendants intend~~ to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

Table of Contents

REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (Continued)

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

12. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

Other Matters

~~The~~We ~~Company~~are is also involved in various other claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property matters. There are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate outcome of such matters and it is difficult to determine the ultimate costs that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ may incur. ~~The~~We ~~Company believes~~believe the resolution of such other ordinary course uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs will not have a material adverse effect on ~~its~~our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3128

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our ~~Amended~~Annual ~~Registration~~Report ~~Statement~~ on Form S10-4K for ~~(File~~the ~~No. 333-168190)~~year ~~filed~~ended ~~on July~~December 3031, 2010, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Except as otherwise noted, there are no material differences between the consolidated balances presented herein and the balances of Reddy Ice Corporation.

Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. ("Reddy Holdings"), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy Corp."), manufacture and distribute packaged ice products. We are the largest manufacturer of packaged ice products in the United States and serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia under the Reddy Ice® brand name.

At September 30, 2010, we owned or operated 58 ice manufacturing facilities, 73 distribution centers and approximately 3,500 Ice Factories. As of the same date, we had an aggregate daily ice manufacturing capacity of approximately 18,000 tons.

Uncertainty of Forward Looking Statements and Information

Other than statements of historical facts, statements made in this Form 10-Q, statements made by us in periodic press releases, oral statements made by our management to analysts and stockholders and statements made in the course of presentations about our company constitute "forward- looking statements" intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are accurate. However, we cannot assure you that such expectations will occur. These forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by the forward- looking statements. Factors you should consider that could cause these differences are:

•: general economic trends and seasonality;
•: weather conditions;
•: the ability of our subsidiary to make distributions to us in amounts sufficient to service our debt and pay our taxes;
•: our substantial leverage and ability to service our debt;
•: the restrictive covenants and financial covenants under our indebtedness;
•: the availability of capital sources;
•: fluctuations in our operating costs, including the prices of electricity, fuel, polyethylene and other required expenses;
•: competitive practices in the industry in which we compete;
•: changes in labor conditions;
•: our capital expenditure requirements;
•: the risks associated with acquisitions and the failure to integrate acquired businesses;
•: technological changes and innovations;
•: the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;
•: legislative or regulatory requirements; and

3229

Table of Contents

•: all the other factors described herein under Item 1A of Part II and in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are discussed elsewhere in this report.

General

Overview. We are the largest manufacturer and distributor of packaged ice in the United States and currently serve a variety of customers in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Our business consists of:

•: the traditional manufacture and delivery of ice from a central point of production to the point of sale; and
•: the installation and operation of The Ice Factory®, our proprietary in-store bagging ("ISB") equipment located in high volume locations that produces, packages and stores ice through an automated, self-contained system.

Seasonality. The packaged ice business is highly seasonal, characterized by peak demand during the warmer months of May through September, with an extended peak selling season in the southern United States. Approximately 6971%, 69% and 6869% of our annual revenues occurred during the second and third calendar quarters in each of ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and a less than proportional decline in expenses during the first and fourth quarters, we typically experience lower margins resulting in losses during these periods.

Revenues. Our revenues primarily represent sales of packaged ice and packaged ice bags for use in our ISB equipment. There is no right of return with respect to these products. A portion of our revenues also represents fees earned under management agreements for ISB systems located outside our primary territories that are recognized as earned under contract terms.

Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation). Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists of costs related to the manufacturing and distribution of our products, including, in particular:

•: manufacturing and distribution labor costs;
•: raw materials (primarily polyethylene-based plastic bags);
•: product delivery expenses, including fuel and vehicle rental expense related to products delivered by our own distribution network, as well as fees paid to distributors who deliver ice to our customers on our behalf;
•: utility expenses (primarily electricity used in connection with the manufacturing, storage and distribution processes); and
•: ISB system costs associated with customer service representatives and machine technicians (ISB systems generally do not increase our plant occupancy, delivery or utility costs).

Depreciation Expense Related to Cost of Sales and Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization are divided into two line items: depreciation expense related to cost of sales and depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense related to cost of sales consists of depreciation expense for our production and distribution equipment. Depreciation and amortization ~~expense consists of depreciation and amortization expense for our selling, general and administrative functions.~~

3330

Table of Contents

~~Operating~~expense consists ~~Expenses. Our~~of ~~operating~~depreciation ~~expenses~~and ~~are~~amortization ~~costs~~expense ~~associated~~for ~~with~~our selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative salaries, insurance, legal and other professional services and costs associated with leasing office space. Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs, but excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense, included in operating expenses represented approximately 9% and 8% of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses are costs associated with selling, general and administrative functions. These costs include executive officers' compensation, office and administrative salaries, insurance, legal and other professional services and costs associated with leasing office space. Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs, but excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expense, included in operating expenses represented approximately 17% and 20% of revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cost of antitrust investigations and related litigation. Costs related to the current antitrust investigations and related litigation, net of insurance recoveries, are composed primarily of legal fees, document collection costs and the fees of other experts and consultants. These costs have been recognized and paid by Reddy Holdings.

Facilities. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011, we owned or operated 58 ice manufacturing facilities, 7372 distribution centers and approximately 3,500 Ice Factories. As of the same date, we had an aggregate daily ice manufacturing capacity of approximately 18,000 tons.

Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Change from Last Year
	Three Months Ended March 31,						Change from Last Year
	2010			2009			Dollars			%
	2011			2010			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	~~120~~40,~~147~~752		$	~~115~~35,~~446~~894		$	4,~~701~~858			413.15
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		7137,~~770~~225			6434,~~851~~908			62,~~919~~317			106.76
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		57,~~694~~708			5,~~494~~314			~~200~~2,394			345.61
Gross profit		42,683			45,101			(2,418	)		(5.4	)
Gross loss		(4,181	)		(4,328	)		147			(3.4	)
Operating expenses		1412,~~358~~799			1213,~~690~~119			~~1,668~~(320	)		13(2.14	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,~~435~~530			1,~~772~~876			~~663~~654			3734.49
Loss on dispositions of assets		1,035			145			890			613.8
(Gain) loss on dispositions of assets		(54	)		227			(281	)		(123.8	)
Impairment of assets		514			—			514			—
Acquisition expenses		603			2			601			30,050.0
Acquisition expenses		414			—			414			—
Impairment of assets		231			—			231			—
Loss on diesel hedge		—			144			(144	)		(100.0	)
Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation		1,421			913			508			55.6
Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net		(3,867	)		735			(4,602	)		(626.1	)
Loss from operations		(21,711	)		(20,465	)		(1,246	)		6.1
Income from operations		27,794			29,615			(1,821	)		(6.1	)
Interest expense, net		(14,345	)		(7,255	)		(7,090	)		97.7
Interest expense, net		(14,096	)		(6,213	)		7,883			126.9
Debt refinance costs		—			(6,108	)		6,108			—
Gain on bargain purchase		264			—			264			—
Loss before income taxes		(36,056	)		(33,828	)		(2,228	)		6.6
Debt refinance costs		(310	)		—			(310	)		—
Income tax (expense) benefit		(3,045	)		11,231			(14,276	)		(127.1	)
Income before income taxes		13,652			23,402			(9,750	)		(41.7	)
Net loss	$	(39,101	)	$	(22,597	)	$	(16,504	)		73.0
Income tax expense		(4,662	)		(13,414	)		(8,752	)		(65.2	)
Net income	$	8,990		$	9,988		$	(998	)		(10.0	)

Revenues: Revenues increased $4.79 million from the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 to the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010.~~ 2011. This increase is primarily due to a percentage increase in packaged ice volume sales in the ~~high~~low ~~mid~~double ~~single~~ digits related ~~primarily~~ to improved weather patterns in most of our markets, stabilized economic conditions, and the addition of new customers through both acquisitions and organic growth, partially offset by the effects of lost customers as a result of increased competitive ~~activity.~~ ~~Additionally, average sales prices were down slightly due to mix changes within our distribution channels and increased competitive~~ activity.

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $62.93 million from the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 to the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011. This increase

3431

Table of Contents

~~increase~~ in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume sales., ~~Cost~~although cost of sales ~~increased~~did ~~proportionally~~not ~~more~~increase ~~than~~proportionally with revenues ~~primarily~~due asto acost ~~result~~savings ~~of customer transition~~ and ~~startup~~efficiencies ~~activities~~related ~~as well~~to ~~as an increase in fuel cost. These increases were partially offset by cost savings from~~ our operational initiatives.

~~Labor~~Significant costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance), accounted for approximately 21% of revenues in each of the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cost of plastic bags, operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment), fuel expenses, ~~expenses~~included ~~for independent third party distribution services, and electricity expense represented approximately 5%, 4%, 4%, 6%, and 6%, respectively, of revenues~~ in ~~the~~cost ~~three months ended September 30, 2010, and approximately 6%, 3%, 3%, 6%, and 5%, respectively,~~ of ~~revenues~~sales ininclude the ~~three~~following: ~~months ended September 30, 2009.~~

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $0.2 million as a result of new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2009 and the first nine months of 2010, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

	Percentage of Revenues

	2011			2010
Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance)		34	%		40	%
Plastic bags		6	%		6	%
Operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment)		11	%		10	%
Fuel		6	%		5	%
Independent third party distribution services		6	%		6	%
Maintenance		7	%		7	%
Vehicle maintenance and insurance claims		3	%		3	%
Electricity		6	%		7	%

~~Operating~~ Depreciation ~~expenses: Operating~~expense ~~expenses~~related ~~increased~~to ~~$1.7 million~~cost ~~from~~of ~~the~~sales: Depreciation ~~three~~expense ~~months~~related ~~ended~~to ~~September 30,~~cost ~~2009~~of tosales ~~the three~~increased ~~months ended September~~$2.4 ~~30,~~million ~~2010.~~as ~~This~~a result ~~increase~~of ~~is primarily due to~~ a ~~$1.3 million~~change ~~increase~~ in accounting ~~labor~~estimate ~~and~~to ~~benefits~~eliminate ~~due~~salvage tovalue ~~additional~~on ~~headcount~~certain atequipment ~~the~~and ~~senior~~new ~~management~~production ~~level,~~and ~~$0.2 million~~distribution ~~of severance~~equipment ~~costs,~~placed ~~and~~in ~~health~~service ~~insurance~~in ~~costs.~~2010 ~~Non-cash~~and ~~stock-based~~the ~~compensation~~first ~~costs~~three ~~decreased~~months byof ~~$0.3 million~~2011, ~~while~~partially ~~communications~~offset ~~and~~by dispositions ~~repair~~ and ~~maintenance~~assets ~~cost~~becoming ~~each~~fully ~~increased by $0~~depreciated.~~2 million.~~

~~Depreciation~~ Operating ~~and amortization expense~~expenses: ~~Depreciation~~Operating ~~and~~expenses ~~amortization~~decreased ~~expense increased~~ $0.73 million asfrom athe ~~result~~three ofmonths ~~new equipment~~ended ~~placed~~March 31, ~~in service~~2010 ~~and~~to the ~~recognition~~three months ofended March 31, ~~certain~~2011. ~~intangible~~This ~~assets~~decrease inis ~~connection~~primarily ~~with~~due ~~acquisitions~~to a $0.4 million decrease in ~~2009~~labor and ~~the~~benefits ~~first~~costs, ~~nine~~and ~~months~~$0.1 million of ~~2010~~customer relations costs, partially offset by ~~dispositions~~a $0.3 million ~~and~~increase ~~assets~~in ~~becoming~~non-cash ~~fully depreciated~~stock-based compensation costs.

~~Loss~~Depreciation onand ~~dispositions~~amortization ~~of assets~~expense: ~~The~~Depreciation ~~loss~~and onamortization ~~dispositions~~expense ~~of assets~~ increased by $0.97 million ~~from the three months ended September 30, 2009~~ as a result of ~~the~~new equipment ~~disposition~~placed ofin service ~~certain excess facilities~~ and ~~other~~the ~~assets.~~recognition ~~As a result~~ of ancertain ~~increased~~intangible ~~focus~~assets onin ~~operational~~connection ~~efficiency,~~with weacquisitions ~~are~~in ~~evaluating~~2010 ~~our operating facilities~~ and ~~expect to dispose of additional real estate in~~ the ~~future.~~first ~~Based~~three onmonths ~~current~~of ~~real estate market conditions~~2011, ~~additional~~partially ~~impairments~~offset orby ~~losses on~~ dispositions ~~may~~and ~~occur~~assets inbecoming ~~future periods~~fully depreciated.

~~Impairment~~ (Gain) loss on dispositions of assets: ~~Impairment~~A ~~charges increased by~~ $0.51 million asgain aon ~~result~~disposition of ~~impairing~~assets was recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the disposition of certain ~~fixed~~excess assets. ~~during 2010~~A $0.2 million Noloss ~~impairment charges~~on ~~were~~disposition of assets was recognized ~~during~~in the three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010. As a result of an increased focus on operational efficiency, we are continuing to evaluate our operating facilities and expect to dispose of certain real estate in the future. Based on current real estate market conditions, additional impairments or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

Acquisition expenses: We incurred $0.46 million of expense during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 in ~~connection~~ connection with our ~~ongoing~~ ongoing acquisition program. ~~We did not complete any acquisitions during the comparable 2009 period.~~

~~Loss~~ Impairment onof ~~diesel hedge~~assets: AImpairment ~~loss~~charges of $0.12 million ~~was~~were recognized ~~during~~in the three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2009~~2011 ~~in connection~~as ~~with~~ a ~~derivative~~ ~~used~~result ~~to hedge the cost~~ of ~~diesel~~impairing ~~used~~certain inreal ~~our~~estate ~~delivery~~assets ~~operations.~~during ~~The loss was composed of a $0.4 million non-cash change in~~ the ~~fair value of the derivative, partially offset by $0~~period.~~3 million~~ ofNo ~~cash~~impairment ~~settlements~~charges aswere ~~the~~recognized ~~floating~~during ~~amount received from~~ the ~~counterparty~~three ~~was~~month ~~greater~~period ~~than~~ended ~~the~~March 31, ~~fixed price we were obligated to pay~~2010.

Costs ~~(insurance recoveries)~~ related to antitrust investigations and related litigation~~, net~~: During the three months ended ~~September~~ March 3031, ~~2010~~ 2011 and ~~2009~~2010, we incurred $1.14 million and $0.89 million, respectively, of ~~gross~~ legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the related litigation. We ~~received~~became aaware ~~$5.0 million settlement in respect~~ of ~~claimed~~and ~~cost~~began ~~reimbursements~~incurring ~~from~~expenses ~~one~~related ofto ~~our insurance carriers during~~ the ~~three~~investigation ~~months~~in ~~ended~~March ~~September 30,~~of ~~2010~~2008. ~~During the three months ended~~

3532

Table of Contents

~~September 30~~ Interest expense, ~~2009,~~ net: Net interest expense increased $07.1 million offrom ~~costs~~the ~~paid~~three ~~directly~~months byended March 31, 2010 to the three months ended March 31, 2011. This change is related to increased interest costs associated with our ~~insurance~~new ~~carriers~~11.25% ~~were~~Senior ~~offset~~Secured ~~against~~Notes ~~gross~~and ~~expenses~~13.25% WeSenior ~~became~~Secured ~~aware~~Notes, as well as additional interest associated with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The amount of net interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.3 million and ~~began~~$3.4 million ~~incurring~~during ~~expenses~~the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, the interest expense related to the ~~investigation~~ inCompany's ~~March~~notes will be comparable to the same periods of ~~2008~~2010 as the notes will have been outstanding for one year.

~~Interest~~Debt ~~expense,~~refinance ~~net~~costs: ~~Net~~Costs ~~interest~~of ~~expense increased~~ $76.91 million ~~from~~were ~~the~~incurred ~~three~~in ~~months ended September 30, 2009 to~~ the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2010. ~~This~~in ~~change~~connection iswith refinancing activities related to ~~increased interest costs associated with~~ our ~~new 11~~debt.~~25%~~ ~~senior~~No ~~secured~~such ~~notes~~costs ~~and~~were ~~13.25%~~incurred senior secured notes, as compared to the indebtedness refinanced, and additional total indebtedness outstanding following the refinancing. The amount of net interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $0.3 million and $4.1 million during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010 and 2009, respectively~~2011.

~~Debt~~ Income ~~refinance~~tax ~~costs~~expense: ~~Costs~~The ofeffective ~~$0.3 million~~tax ~~were~~rate ~~incurred~~decreased infrom 33.2% during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2010 into ~~connection~~(8.4%) ~~with~~during ~~refinancing~~the three months ~~activities~~ended ~~related~~March 31, to2011 ~~our~~primarily ~~debt~~as a result of the effects of a valuation allowance recorded against certain federal and state deferred tax assets.

Income tax expense: The effective tax rate decreased from 57.3% during the three months ended September 30, 2009 to 34.2% during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the effects of state income taxes based on margin, a valuation allowance recorded against certain state net operating loss carryforwards, and our projected annual pre-tax results for 2010.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Change from Last Year
	2010			2009			Dollars			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues	$	260,204		$	257,591		$	2,613			1.0
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)		168,787			157,554			11,233			7.1
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales		16,655			15,788			867			5.5
Gross profit		74,762			84,249			(9,487	)		(11.3	)
Operating expenses		41,850			38,090			3,760			9.9
Depreciation and amortization expense		6,484			5,211			1,273			24.4
Loss on dispositions of assets		2,432			602			1,830			304.0
Impairment of assets		750			—			750			—
Acquisition expenses		624			—			624			—
Gain on diesel hedge		—			(581	)		(581	)		(100.0	)
Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net		(1,824	)		4,075			(5,899	)		(144.8	)
Income from operations		24,446			36,852			(12,406	)		(33.7	)
Interest expense, net		(35,663	)		(20,585	)		15,078			73.2
Gain on bargain purchase		264			—			264			—
Debt refinance costs		(6,478	)		—			(6,478	)		—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(17,431	)		16,267			(33,698	)		(207.2	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		5,956			(10,008	)		(15,964	)		(159.5	)
Net income (loss)	$	(11,475	)	$	6,259		$	(17,734	)		(283.3	)

Revenues: Revenues increased $2.6 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily due to positive increases in packaged ice volume sales related to improved weather patterns in most markets during the second and third calendar quarters of 2010, acquisitions, and new distribution, offset by lower average sales prices primarily related to increased competitive activity and changes in mix within our distribution channels and by unfavorable weather patterns in most of our markets during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

Cost of sales (excluding depreciation): Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $11.2 million to $168.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase is partially due to higher sales volumes, although cost of sales increased proportionally more than related revenues, due to the effects of customer transition and startup activities, our response to peak demand in certain markets where supply was temporarily outstripped during the summer and the effect of fixed costs during the three months ended March 31, 2010 when adverse weather conditions reduced sales volumes in most of our markets.

Labor costs, including associated payroll taxes and benefit costs (including health insurance), accounted for approximately 23% and 24% of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cost of plastic bags, operating leases (including vehicles, plant equipment and ISB equipment), fuel expenses, expenses for independent third party distribution services, and electricity expense represented approximately 5%, 5%, 4%, 6%, and 5%, respectively, of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and approximately 6%, 4%, 3%, 6%, and 5%, respectively, of revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Depreciation expense related to cost of sales: Depreciation expense related to cost of sales increased $0.9 million as a result of new production and distribution equipment placed in service in 2009 and the first nine months of 2010, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses increased $3.8 million to $41.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to a $3.6 million increase in labor and benefits due to additional headcount at the senior management level, $0.4 million of severance costs and health insurance costs. The increase was partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in professional service expense, a $0.4 million reduction in accrued incentive compensation, and a $0.2 million decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation expense.

Depreciation and amortization expense: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.3 million as a result of new equipment placed in service and the recognition of certain intangible assets in connection with acquisitions in 2009 and the first nine months of 2010, partially offset by dispositions and assets becoming fully depreciated.

Loss on dispositions of assets: The loss on disposition of assets increased by $1.8 million from $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the disposition of certain excess facilities and other assets.

Impairment of assets: Impairment charges increased by $0.8 million as a result of impairing a parcel of real estate and certain fixed assets in 2010. No impairment charges were recognized during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. As a result of an increased focus on operational efficiency, we are evaluating our operating facilities and expect to dispose of additional real estate in the future. Based on current real estate market conditions, additional impairments or losses on dispositions may occur in future periods.

Acquisition expenses: We incurred $0.6 million of expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in connection with our ongoing acquisition program. We did not complete any acquisitions during the comparable 2009 period.

Gain on diesel hedge: A gain of $0.6 million was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 in connection with a derivative used to hedge the cost of diesel used in our delivery operations. The gain was composed of a $0.3 million non-cash increase in the fair value of the derivative and $0.3 million of cash settlements as the floating amount received from the counterparty was greater than the fixed price we were obligated to pay.

Costs (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net: During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $3.2 million and $4.9 million,

Table of Contents

respectively, of gross legal fees and other expenses associated with the antitrust investigation being conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the related litigation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received a $5.0 million settlement in respect of claimed cost reimbursements and $0.6 million of cost reimbursements, respectively, from our insurance carriers. One of our insurance carriers also paid $0.2 million of costs directly to certain service providers during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We became aware of and began incurring expenses related to the investigation in March of 2008.

Interest expense, net: Net interest expense increased by $15.1 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This change is related to increased interest costs associated with our new 11.25% senior secured notes and 13.25% senior secured notes, as compared to the indebtedness refinanced, and additional total indebtedness outstanding following the refinancing. The amount of net interest expense recognized by Reddy Holdings was $4.1 million and $12.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Debt refinance costs: Costs of $6.5 million were incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in connection with refinancing activities related to our debt.

Income tax expense: The effective tax rate decreased from 61.5% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to 34.2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the effects of state income taxes based on margin, a valuation allowance recorded against certain state net operating loss carryforwards, and the Company's projected annual pre-tax results for fiscal year 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We intend to fund our ongoing capital and working capital requirements as well as debt service, including our internal growth and acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, ~~the~~and ~~net~~borrowings ~~proceeds~~under ~~resulting from the refinancing of substantially of all~~ our ~~debt~~existing incredit ~~March 2010~~facilities, ~~borrowings~~operating ~~under~~leases ~~our~~and ~~credit~~other ~~facility and~~potential ~~operating~~financing ~~leases~~arrangements.

We generate cash from the sale of packaged ice through traditional delivery methods, by which we manufacture, package and store ice at a central facility and transport it to our customers' retail locations when needed, and through Ice Factories, which manufacture, package and store ice in our customers' retail locations. Our primary uses of cash are (a) cost of sales, (b) operating expenses, (c) debt service, (d) capital expenditures related to replacing and modernizing the capital equipment in our traditional ice plants and acquiring and installing additional Ice Factories, (e) acquisitions, and (f) investments. We have been and may continue to be required to use substantial amounts of cash to pay expenses relating to the investigations by ~~the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and~~ various ~~other~~state ~~government~~ agencies and related civil litigation. See ~~Part II,~~ Item 13. Legal Proceedings. Historically, we have financed our capital and working capital requirements, including our acquisitions, through a combination of cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and operating leases.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011, capital expenditures totaled $283.18 million. ~~During this period, we received $2.0 million related to reimbursement of the cost of equipment acquired in 2009 and subsequently placed under operating leases.~~ As we consolidate acquisitions into the existing Company infrastructure, we have identified non-core and excess assets which can be disposed of, such as real estate and machinery and equipment. From time to time, we also dispose of other assets which are no longer useful in our operations. As a result of dispositions of these non-core and excess assets, we realized proceeds of approximately $0.51 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010. Our net~~ ~~capital expenditures during the nine months ended September~~March 3031, ~~2010 were $27~~2011.~~7 million.~~

38 During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed the acquisition of eight ice companies for a total cash purchase price of approximately $8.4 million. We will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities as they become available. In conjunction with these evaluations, we will consider our liquidity, availability under our credit facility, mandatory principal repayments under our debt agreements and availability of other capital resources.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

Net cash used in operating activities was $30.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 versus net cash used in operating activities of $12.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

~~During~~The ~~the~~increase ~~nine~~in ~~months~~cash ~~ended~~used ~~September 30,~~in ~~2010,~~operating weactivities ~~completed the acquisition~~ of ~~eleven~~$17.8 million ~~ice~~was ~~companies for~~ a ~~total~~result ~~cash purchase price~~ of ~~approximately~~a $1213.61 million. ~~We will~~decrease ~~continue~~in tocash ~~evaluate~~provided ~~acquisition~~by ~~opportunities~~working ascapital ~~they~~primarily ~~become~~due ~~available.~~to Inan ~~conjunction~~increase in accounts receivable associated with ~~these~~increased ~~evaluations,~~sales weand ~~will~~collection ~~consider~~of ~~our~~an ~~liquidity,~~insurance ~~availability~~receivable ~~under~~in ~~our~~the ~~credit~~first ~~facility~~quarter of 2010, ~~mandatory principal~~as ~~repayments~~well ~~under~~as ~~our~~a ~~debt~~$4.7 million ~~agreements~~increase ~~and~~in ~~availability~~net ofloss, ~~other~~adjusted ~~capital~~for non-cash ~~resources~~and non-operating items.

Net cash ~~Cash~~used ~~Flows~~in investing activities was $12.9 million and $21.3 million for the ~~Nine~~three ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $12.2 million increase in the restricted cash balance that was used to collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities in the first quarter of 2010, a $6.0 million decrease in net property and ~~2009~~ equipment additions and a $2.0 million decrease in cash receipts from the reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases offset by the effects of acquisitions of $7.6 million.

Net cash provided by ~~operating~~financing activities was $1812.50 million and $43.3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 ~~versus~~and ~~net~~2010, ~~cash provided~~respectively. byThe ~~operating~~decrease ~~activities~~ of $2831.3 million ~~for~~relates to the ~~nine~~refinancing ~~months~~of ~~ended~~substantially ~~September 30,~~all ~~2009.~~of ~~The~~our ~~decrease~~debt in ~~cash~~the ~~provided~~first three months of 2010, which resulted in ~~operating~~the ~~activities~~net issuance of $960.80 million ~~was~~of ~~primarily the~~additional ~~result~~debt, ofas well aas approximately $2116.97 million ~~decrease~~of incosts ~~net~~incurred ~~income, adjusted~~ for ~~non-cash~~fees and ~~non-operating~~expenses ~~items,~~associated ~~partially~~with ~~offset~~the byrefinancing ~~$12~~transactions.~~1 million~~ ~~increase~~The indecrease ~~cash~~was ~~provided by~~partially ~~working~~offset ~~capital~~by asnet ~~accrued~~draws ~~interest~~of ~~increased~~$12.0 million under ~~significantly~~our asrevolving acredit ~~result~~facility ~~of changes~~ in the ~~timing~~three ofmonths ~~interest~~ended ~~payments~~March 31, ~~related to our new financing arrangements~~2011.

Net cash used in investing activities was $52.1 million and $21.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to a $12.6 million increase in the cost of acquisitions, an increase of $10.3 million in restricted cash balances that collateralize our outstanding standby letters of credit subsequent to the termination of our old credit facilities, a $7.5 million increase in property and equipment additions and a $2.1 million increase in purchases of investments, partially offset by $2.0 million increase in the reimbursement of the cost of equipment placed under operating leases, net of the cost of such equipment.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $41.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as the refinancing of substantially all of our debt resulted in the net issuance of $60.0 million of additional debt. Approximately $18.3 million of the proceeds were used to pay fees and expenses associated with the refinancing transactions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were no material cash flows associated with financing activities.

Long-term Debt and Other Obligations

Overview. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011, we had $~~450~~462.67 million of total debt outstanding as follows:

•: $300.0 million of Reddy Corp's 11.25% senior secured notes due 2015;
•: $138.9 million of Reddy Corp's 13.25% senior secured notes due 2015 (net of unamortized early tender premium of $0.6 million);
•: $11.7 million of Reddy Holdings' 10¹/2% senior discount notes due November 1, 2012;
•: $12.0 million under Reddy Corp's revolving credit facility; and
•: $0.1 million in other notes payable.

There was no balance outstanding under Reddy Corp's revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2010.

11.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "First Lien Notes") in a private placement offering. The First Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. Cash interest accrues on the First Lien Notes at a rate of 11.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The First Lien Notes mature on March 15, 2015. The proceeds of the offering were used to repay certain of Reddy Corp's preexisting debt (see "Old Senior Credit Facilities" below), pay fees and expenses related to the transactions and provide the Company with cash for future use.

Table of Contents

The First Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a first-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

Table of Contents

The First Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 5.625% of the principal amount of the First Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 15, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 15, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the First Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the First Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the first lien leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes is less than or equal to 3.5 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the First Lien Notes.

40 In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and

Table of Contents

~~things,~~overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of ~~cash~~ dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp isfrom all ~~not~~public ~~currently~~equity ~~permitted~~offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to ~~pay~~specified ~~dividends~~conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining 101/2% Senior Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the First Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

13.25% Senior Secured Notes. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp issued $137.6 million in aggregate principal amount of 13.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 (the "Second Lien Notes") in the initial settlement of a private placement exchange offer for the outstanding Discount Notes (the "Exchange Offer"). The Second Lien Notes were subsequently registered within the SEC effective August 2, 2010. On March 24, 2010, Reddy Corp issued an additional $1.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes in the final settlement of the Exchange Offer. Reddy Corp received no cash proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Cash interest accrues on the Second Lien Notes at a rate of 13.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, with the first payment occurring on November 1, 2010. The Second Lien Notes mature on November 1, 2015. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the Company issued $0.6 million of Second Lien Notes to certain bondholders as an early tender premium (see "10¹/2% Senior Discount Notes" below for further information). These additional Second Lien Notes were not reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet upon issuance, but will be recognized as additional debt through interest expense over the term of the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes are senior secured obligations of Reddy Corp and are:

•: guaranteed by Reddy Holdings;
•: secured on a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all of the assets of Reddy Corp and Reddy Holdings;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness; and
•: effectively senior to all of Reddy Corp's and Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Second Lien Notes include customary covenants that restrict, among other things, Reddy Corp's and its future subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt or issue certain preferred stock, pay dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, create liens, enter into arrangements that restrict dividends from its subsidiaries, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets or enter into various transactions with affiliates. From and after March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a redemption premium, which is initially 6.625% of the principal amount of the Second Lien Notes and declines to 0% for the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and thereafter. Prior to March 1, 2013, Reddy Corp may redeem any or all of the Second Lien Notes by paying a "make-whole" redemption premium. If Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

4136

Table of Contents

Reddy Corp experiences a change of control, Reddy Corp will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Second Lien Notes at a price equal to 101% of their accreted value, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Reddy Corp may also be required to make an offer to purchase the Second Lien Notes with proceeds of asset sales that are not reinvested in the Company's business or used to repay other indebtedness.

•: no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
•: the secured leverage ratio set forth in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes is less than or equal to 6.0 to 1.0; and
•: there is sufficient capacity under the buildup amount under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes.

The secured leverage ratio under the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes means the ratio of ~~EBITDA~~secured indebtedness (as defined in the indenture) ~~for the most recent four fiscal quarters~~ to ~~secured indebtedness~~EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) asfor of the ~~end~~most ofrecent ~~such~~ four ~~quarter~~fiscal ~~period~~quarters. Reddy Corp is generally required to calculate its secured leverage ratio on a pro forma basis to give effect to the incurrence and repayment of indebtedness as well as acquisitions and dispositions. As of March 31, 2011, the second lien leverage ratio was 7.5 to 1.0.

In addition, regardless of the leverage ratio or whether Reddy Corp could make any restricted payments under the buildup amount provision referred to above, Reddy Corp is permitted to make certain restricted payments including (1) dividend payments at any time in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million if no default has occurred and is continuing under the indenture, (2) the payment of interest when due on the remaining Discount Notes and the repayment, redemption or retirement of remaining Discount Notes from the proceeds of certain indebtedness of Reddy Corp incurred after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes, (3) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed $1.0 million to pay franchise taxes and overhead expenses of Reddy Holdings and (4) the payment of dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount per year not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by Reddy Corp from all public equity offerings after the date of issuance of the Second Lien Notes subject to specified conditions. However, the amount of dividend payments permitted under this 6.0% provision will correspondingly reduce the amount otherwise available under the buildup amount for restricted payments, including dividends.

101/2% Senior Discount Notes. On October 27, 2004, Reddy Holdings issued $151 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 101/2% Senior Discount Notes due 2012 (the "Discount Notes") in a private placement offering. The Discount Notes were subsequently registered with the SEC, effective August 26, 2005. Each Discount Note had an initial accreted value of $663.33 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity. The accreted value of each Discount Note increased from the date of issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008. Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November 1, 2008 and is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 at a rate of 101/2% per annum. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Reddy Corp paid cash

4237

Table of Contents

~~principal~~dividends ~~amount~~to atReddy ~~maturity.~~Holdings ~~The~~in ~~accreted value of each Discount Note increased from~~ the ~~date~~amount of ~~issuance until November 1, 2008 at a rate of 101/2% per annum such that the accreted value equaled the stated principal amount on November 1, 2008~~$6. ~~Thereafter, cash interest began accruing November~~7 1,million ~~2008~~ and ~~is payable semi-annually at a rate of 101/2% per annum~~$15. ~~During the nine month period ended September~~8 30million, ~~2010~~respectively, ~~Reddy Corp paid cash dividends~~ to ~~Reddy Holdings in the amount of $6.0 million to~~ fund the semi-annual interest payments on the Discount Notes. No ~~interest~~dividends ~~payments~~ were paid ~~made~~in ~~during~~ the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011.

The Discount Notes are unsecured obligations of Reddy Holdings and are:

•: not guaranteed by Reddy Corp;
•: senior in right of payment to all of Reddy Holdings' future subordinated indebtedness;
•: equal in right of payment with any of Reddy Holdings' existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness;
•: effectively subordinated to Reddy Holdings' existing and future secured debt, including the debt under the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the credit facility, which are guaranteed on a secured basis by Reddy Holdings; and
•: structurally subordinated to all obligations and preferred equity of Reddy Corp.

Senior Credit Facilities. On March 15, 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the "March 2010 Credit Facility"). The March 2010 Credit Facility provided for a $35 million revolving credit facility. Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, Reddy Corp had the right to request the aggregate commitments to be increased to $50 million provided certain conditions were met. On August 4, 2010, the aggregate commitments under the March 2010 Credit Facility were increased to $50 million.

43 On October 22, 2010, Reddy Corp and the lenders party thereto amended and restated the March 2010 Credit Facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility provides for a $50 million revolving credit facility. Macquarie Bank Limited ("Macquarie"), a lender under the March 2010 Credit

Table of Contents

~~applicable~~Facility, ~~margins~~is ~~subject~~currently ~~to reduction based upon~~ the ~~Company's~~sole ~~net~~lender ~~leverage~~under ~~ratio (as defined in~~ the ~~March~~New ~~2010~~ Credit Facility). ~~The~~On ~~Company~~December 10, ~~also~~2010, ~~paid~~Macquarie abecame ~~quarterly~~the ~~fee~~successor onadministrative ~~the~~agent ~~average availability~~ under the ~~revolving~~New ~~credit~~Credit ~~facility at an annual rate of 0~~Facility.~~875%,~~ ~~with such availability fee subject to reduction based upon the Company's net leverage ratio.~~

OnThe ~~October 22,~~New ~~2010~~Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 7.0% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, ~~and~~the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin of 6.0% per annum, the ~~lenders~~relevant ~~party~~margin ~~thereto~~being ~~amended~~the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and ~~restated~~Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the ~~March~~LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 ~~2010~~days. ~~Credit~~Reddy ~~Facility~~Corporation (will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the "effectiveness of the New Credit Facility") equal to 1.0% ~~The~~of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the ~~provides~~first ~~for~~anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50 ~~million~~,000 ~~revolving~~quarterly ~~credit~~loan ~~facility~~servicing fee. ~~Macquarie~~Additionally, ~~Bank~~for ~~Limited~~each full calendar year beginning with 2011, aif ~~lender~~the average balance outstanding under the ~~March~~New ~~2010~~ Credit Facility, is ~~currently~~less than $12.5 million for the ~~sole~~calendar ~~lender~~year, ~~under~~the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders ~~New~~an ~~Credit~~amount ~~Facility~~equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility ~~provides~~will ~~the~~mature ~~Company~~on ~~with~~October 22, ~~enhanced~~2014. ~~business~~At March 31, ~~flexibility~~2011, ~~significantly~~the ~~less~~Company ~~restrictive~~had ~~covenants~~$12.0 million outstanding and ~~liquidity~~$38.0 million toof ~~continue~~availability tounder ~~execute on~~ the ~~Company's~~New ~~strategic~~Credit ~~plan~~Facility.

The New Credit Facility provides that outstanding loans will bear interest at rates based on LIBOR plus a margin of 7.00% per annum or, at the option of Reddy Corp, the base rate, plus a margin of 6.0% per annum, the relevant margin being the applicable margin. Swing line loans will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the applicable margin. LIBOR and Base Rates are subject to floors of 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Interest on LIBOR loans is payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeds 90 days. Reddy Corporation will pay an anniversary fee on each anniversary of the effectiveness of the New Credit Facility equal to 1.0% of the commitments under the New Credit Facility on the first anniversary and increasing on each subsequent anniversary by 0.5%, as well as a $50,000 quarterly loan servicing fee. Additionally, for each full calendar year beginning with 2011, if the average balance outstanding under the New Credit Facility is less than $12.5 million for the calendar year, the Borrower shall pay to the Lenders an amount equal to (x) the difference between the average balance outstanding and $12.5 million multiplied by (y) the average interest rate for LIBOR Loans during that calendar year (determined based on average one month LIBOR rates as of the end of each quarter during such calendar year). The New Credit Facility will mature on October 22, 2014.

•: incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;
•: create liens;
•: make investments;
•: pay dividends or make other restricted payments;
•: consolidate or merge or acquire or dispose of assets;
•: enter into transactions with affiliates;
•: permit consensual encumbrances or restrictions on Reddy Corp's restricted subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or make certain other payments to Reddy Corp; and
•: prepay certain indebtedness, including the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

44 Under the restricted payments covenant in the New Credit Facility, Reddy Corp is generally prohibited from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp is permitted to pay certain limited dividends to Reddy Holdings, the proceeds of which must be used for specific purposes, such as to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence, repurchase the Discount

Table of Contents

~~Under~~Notes ~~the~~and ~~restricted~~pay ~~payments~~interest ~~covenant~~on in the ~~New~~Discount ~~Credit~~Notes. ~~Facility,~~ Reddy Corp ismay ~~generally~~also ~~prohibited~~distribute ~~from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to Reddy Holdings. Reddy Corp. is permitted to pay~~ certain ~~limited~~investments ~~dividends~~ to Reddy Holdings~~, the proceeds of which must be used to maintain Reddy Holdings' corporate existence~~.

Under the March 2010 Credit Facility, it was an event of default if Reddy Corp's leverage ratio (as defined in the March 2010 Credit Facility) exceeded the level specified in the credit agreement, which was 7.75:1.00 for periods ending through December 31, 2010, or Reddy Corp's fixed charge coverage ratio was less than the level specified in the credit agreement, which was 1.00:1.00 for periods ending through September 30, 2011. While Reddy Corp would not have met the leverage ratio requirement of the March 2010 Credit facility at September 30, 2010, no compliance certificate for that period was delivered before the March 2010 Credit Facility was amended and restated through the New Credit Facility. Reddy Corp is in compliance with the covenant requirements of the New Credit Facility. Furthermore, Reddy Corp could also only pay dividends to Reddy Holdings in an amount not greater than Reddy Corp's Cumulative Available Cash (as defined in the March 2010 Credit Facility) for the period (taken as one accounting period) from April 1, 2010 to the end of its most recently ended fiscal quarter for which a covenant compliance certificate under the March 2010 Credit Facility had been delivered to the lenders.

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011, Reddy Holdings had $~~12.9~~11 million of cash on hand that was not subject to restrictions under our New Credit Facility.

~~EBTIDA~~EBITDA as defined in our New Credit Facility is hereafter referred to as "Adjusted EBITDA".

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the adjustments related to the acquisition or disposal of businesses which are permitted under the description of the definition of Leverage Ratio as set forth in the New Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA that is derived solely from GAAP components. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income (loss), cash flows from operations or net cash from operating or investing activities as defined by GAAP, and it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations, and this presentation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA follows the table.

45 The following table sets forth pro forma Adjusted EBITDA as calculated under our New Credit Facility and the financial covenants contained in the New Credit Facility:

		Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2011

		(unaudited, in thousands)
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$60,088
Leverage ratio		0.2 : 1.0
Minimum liquidity		$38,299

Table of Contents

businesses which are permitted under the description of the definition of Leverage Ratio as set forth in the New Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA is different from EBITDA that is derived solely from GAAP components. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income (loss), cash flows from operations or net cash from operating or investing activities as defined by GAAP, and it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations, and this presentation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA follows the table.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

		Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2010
		Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2011
		(In thousands)
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Net loss		$	(1356,~~500~~993	)
Depreciation expense related to cost of sales			2228,~~273~~482
Depreciation and amortization expense			89,~~339~~456
Interest expense			4157,~~771~~168
Interest income			(2420	)
Income tax benefit			(123,~~306~~261	)
EBITDA			4634,~~553~~832
Other non-cash items:
	Stock-based compensation expense		1,712
	Stock-based compensation expense(a)		2,379
	Loss on dispositions of assets		42,~~159~~319
	Impairment of assets		750
	Impairment of long-lived assets		10,809
	Increase in fair value of derivative		~~290~~(16	)
	Gain on bargain purchase		(~~846~~232	)
	Acquisition expenses		624
	Acquisition expense		1,777
	Debt refinance costs		62,~~478~~731
Reddy Holdings items:
	Cost (insurance recoveries) related to antitrust investigations and related litigation, net(a)		(6,790	)
	Cost related to antitrust investigations and related litigation(b)		384
Adjusted EBITDA			5254,~~930~~983
Acquisition adjustments(b)			1,304
Acquisition adjustments(c)			5,105
Pro forma adjusted EBITDA		$	5460,~~234~~088

(a)The $2.4 million stock-based compensation expense for the twelve months ended March 31, 2011 includes a $0.3 million accrual for Board of Directors stock awards earned during the year and expected to be granted in May of 2011. (b)Represents the elimination of the costs incurred in connection with the ongoing antitrust investigations and related litigation, ~~net~~ of insurance recoveries. The costs related to the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation and related insurance recoveries are excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as these costs have been paid, and the related insurance recoveries have been received, by Reddy Holdings. Reddy Holdings is currently paying these costs from the excess cash remaining from the initial public offering of its common stock in August 2005, the funds paid to Reddy Holdings by affiliates of GSO Capital Partners LP in February 2008 in connection with the termination of a merger agreement, ~~and such~~ insurance proceeds related to the antitrust investigations and related litigation, and dividends received from Reddy Corp in the amount of $3.0 million since the DOJ investigation began. (bc)Represents the incremental Adjusted EBITDA of acquired businesses as if each acquisition had been consummated on the first day of the period presented. All acquisitions included herein were consummated on or before ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011.

46 Letters of Credit. The New Credit Facility does not provide for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In March 2010, Reddy Corp entered into a separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility"). Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit and

Table of Contents

~~Letters of Credit. Neither the March 2010 nor the New Credit Facility provides for the issuance of standby letters of credit. In~~are ~~March~~used ~~2010,~~primarily ~~Reddy Corp~~to ~~entered~~secure ~~into~~certain ainsurance ~~separate letter of credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.~~ and ~~Wells~~operating ~~Fargo~~lease ~~Bank, National Association (the "LC Facility")~~obligations. ~~Letters of credit issued under the LC Facility are cash collateralized at 102% of the amount of the letter of credit.~~ The cash collateral provided under the LC Facility is maintained in a restricted account at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is reported as "Restricted ~~cash~~Cash" in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated balance sheets.

Old Senior Credit Facilities. On August 12, 2005, the Company amended and restated its credit facilities with a syndicate of of banks, financial institutions and other entities as lenders, including Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent, ~~CIBC World~~Wachovia ~~Markets~~Bank, ~~Corp~~N.A., ~~JPMorgan~~JP ~~Chase~~Morgan ~~Bank~~Chase, N.A., ~~Wachovia~~CIBC World ~~Bank~~Markets NCorp.A., ~~Bear~~ Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (the "Old Credit Facilities"). The Old Credit Facilities provided for a $60.0 million revolving credit facility (the "Old Revolving Credit Facility") and a $240.0 million term loan (the "Old Term Loan"). The Old Credit Facilities were obligations of Reddy Corp and were guaranteed by Reddy Holdings. The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan were scheduled to mature on August 12, 2010 and August 12, 2012, respectively. On March 15, 2010, the Old Credit Facilities were terminated and all amounts owed thereunder were repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the First Lien Notes.

Principal balances outstanding under the Old Credit Facility bore interest per annum, at the Company's option, at the sum of the base rate plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 1.75%. The base rate was defined as the greater of the prime rate (as announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent) or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. Interest on base rate loans was payable on the last day of each quarter. Interest on LIBOR loans was payable upon maturity of the LIBOR loan or on the last day of the quarter if the term of the LIBOR loan exceeded 90 days. Reddy Corp also paid a quarterly fee on the average availability under the revolving credit facility at an annual rate of 0.5%.

The Old Revolving Credit Facility and Old Term Loan did not require any scheduled principal payments prior to their stated maturity dates. The Old Credit Facilities contained financial covenants, which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios, as defined in the Credit Facilities, and were collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets.

Financial Derivative Instruments

~~Interest~~ Diesel ~~Rate~~ Hedging ~~Agreements~~Agreement. ~~Effective~~On ~~September~~March 1225, ~~2005~~2011, wethe Company entered into ana ~~interest~~hedge ~~rate~~to ~~hedging~~fix ~~agreement~~the (price per gallon of a portion of the Company's diesel fuel requirements (the "~~2005~~Diesel Hedge"). toThe ~~lock the~~Diesel ~~interest~~Hedge ~~rate~~begins onApril 1, a2011 ~~portion~~and ofexpires ~~our~~on ~~Term~~December 28, ~~Loan~~2011. The ~~2005~~notional ~~Hedge~~amount ~~had~~of agallons ~~term~~hedged ofchanges ~~three~~on ~~years~~a ~~and~~monthly ~~ten~~basis ~~months~~to ~~and~~match anticipated ~~expired~~utilization onand ~~July~~totals 1.2 ~~12,~~million ~~2009~~gallons. The ~~2005~~Company ~~Hedge~~will ~~had~~pay ana ~~initial~~weighted ~~notional~~average ~~balance~~fixed price of $~~220 million~~3.17 Weper ~~paid~~gallon (wholesale basis) and receive an amount equal to a ~~fixed~~wholesale index rate. ofNet 4payable or receivable amounts are settled monthly.~~431%~~ onThe Company uses the ~~notional~~Diesel ~~balance~~Hedge ~~outstanding~~to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedge is not for trading purposes and ~~received~~is accounted for as an ~~amount~~economic ~~equal~~hedge toand ~~3-month~~was ~~LIBOR~~not designated as a hedging instrument.

~~Effective February 17,~~ Liquidity ~~2009,~~Outlook. Due weto ~~entered~~the ~~into~~seasonal anature ~~second~~of ~~interest~~our ~~rate~~business, ~~hedging~~we ~~agreement~~record (the ~~"2009~~majority ~~Hedge")~~of toour ~~lock~~revenues and profits during the months ~~interest~~of ~~rate~~May onthrough September. aThe ~~portion~~majority of ~~our~~the ~~Term~~cash ~~Loan.~~generated ~~The~~from ~~2009~~those ~~Hedge had~~operations ais ~~term~~received ofbetween ~~10 months~~July and ~~expired~~November. onWe ~~December 17,~~fully ~~2009.~~utilized ~~The~~the ~~2009~~excess ~~Hedge~~cash ~~had~~generated afrom ~~notional~~our ~~balance~~2010 ofselling ~~$50 million~~season ~~from~~during the ~~inception~~winter ~~date~~of 2010 and spring of 2011 to ~~July 17~~fund our operations, ~~2009~~debt service, atcapital ~~which~~expenditures ~~time~~and ~~the notional~~acquisitions. ~~balance~~In ~~increased~~March to2010, ~~$210 million~~we ~~for~~refinanced ~~the~~substantially ~~remaining~~all ~~term~~of our outstanding debt. WeThe ~~paid~~March a2010 ~~fixed~~refinancing provided ~~rate~~us with additional cash proceeds of 1$43.~~165%~~5 million, onnet ~~the~~of ~~notional~~transaction ~~balance~~costs, ~~outstanding~~which ~~and~~allowed ~~received~~for anadditional ~~amount~~acquisitions ~~equal~~and tocapital ~~1-month LIBOR~~expenditures. ~~Any~~ ~~net~~In ~~payable~~August or2010, ~~receivable~~we ~~amount~~increased ~~was~~the ~~settled~~size of ~~monthly.~~our Werevolving ~~used~~credit ~~interest~~facility ~~rate~~from ~~hedges~~$35 million to ~~minimize~~$50 million. ~~the~~In ~~risk~~October of2010, ~~increases~~we inamended ~~floating~~and ~~interest~~restated ~~rates.~~our ~~The~~revolving ~~interest~~credit ~~rate~~facility ~~hedges~~to, ~~were~~among ~~not~~other ~~for~~changes, ~~trading~~modify financial ~~purposes~~covenants and ~~were~~extend ~~accounted~~the ~~for~~maturity asdate from January 31, 2014 to October 22, 2014. The annual cash ~~flow~~interest ~~hedges~~associated with our current long-term debt is approximately $55 million.

~~Diesel~~ Our capital ~~Hedging~~expenditures ~~Agreement. On~~are ~~February 2,~~used ~~2009, we entered into a hedge~~ to ~~fix~~maintain ~~the~~and ~~price~~expand ~~per gallon of a portion of~~ our ~~diesel~~ ~~fuel requirements~~traditional ~~(the~~ice ~~"Diesel Hedge"). The Diesel Hedge began February 2, 2009~~ and ~~expired~~ISB ~~on December 28, 2009~~operations. ~~The~~In ~~notional~~the ~~amount~~normal course of ~~gallons hedged changed on a monthly basis to match~~ our ~~anticipated~~ ~~utilization.~~business, Wewe ~~paid~~dispose ~~a fixed rate~~ of ~~$1.55~~obsolete, ~~per~~worn-out ~~gallon (wholesale basis)~~ and ~~received an amount equal to a wholesale index rate. Any net payable or receivable amount was settled monthly. We~~ ~~used~~unneeded ~~the~~assets ~~Diesel Hedge to minimize the risk of rising fuel prices. The hedge was not for trading purposes~~ and ~~was~~have ~~accounted for as an economic hedge and was not designated as a hedging instrument.~~

Liquidity Outlook. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, we record the majority of our revenues and profits during the months of May through September. The majority of the cash generated from those operations is received between July and November. We expect to fully utilize the excess cash to be generated from our 2010 selling season during the winter of 2010 and spring of 2011 to fund our operations, debt service, capital expenditures and acquisitions. In March 2010, we refinanced substantially all of our outstanding debt. The March 2010 refinancing provided us with additional cash proceeds of $43.5 million, net of transaction costs, which will allow for additional acquisitions and capital expenditures. In August 2010, we increased the size of our revolving credit facility from $35 million to $50 million. In October 2010, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility to, 42

Table of Contents

~~among~~historically ~~other~~applied ~~changes,~~those ~~modify~~funds ~~financial~~against ~~covenants~~capital ~~and~~expenditures. ~~extend~~We currently expect our net capital expenditures in 2011 to approximate $8 to $10 million. This represents our minimum capital expenditures for the ~~maturity~~maintenance ~~date~~of our traditional packaged ice and ISB operations net of proceeds from ~~January 31~~dispositions and expected reimbursements of the cost of equipment purchased and placed under operating leases, ~~2014~~although we continue to ~~October 22,~~evaluate ~~2014~~opportunities to deploy additional capital expenditures for projects with attractive returns and/or acquisitions in the packaged ice and ice machine subscription business.

~~Our~~Based ~~capital~~on ~~expenditures~~our ~~are~~expected ~~used~~level toof ~~maintain~~operations, ~~and~~we ~~expand~~believe ~~our~~that ~~traditional~~cash ~~ice~~flows ~~and~~from ~~ISB~~ operations., Intogether ~~the~~with ~~normal~~available ~~course~~borrowings ofunder our ~~business,~~revolving wecredit ~~dispose~~facility, ofwill ~~obsolete,~~be ~~worn-out~~adequate ~~and~~to meet ~~unneeded~~our ~~assets~~future ~~and~~liquidity ~~have~~needs ~~historically~~for ~~applied~~at ~~those~~least ~~funds~~the ~~against~~next ~~capital~~twelve ~~expenditures~~months. ~~Our~~As ~~capital~~of ~~expenditures~~May 3, ~~for~~2011, ~~the~~we ~~nine~~had ~~months~~approximately ~~ended September~~$10.2 ~~30,~~million ~~2010~~of ~~were~~cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, approximately $~~28.~~2.6 million. ~~Additionally,~~of weunrestricted ~~spent~~cash and $1210.6 million ~~during~~of ~~the~~restricted ~~nine~~cash ~~months~~at ~~ended~~Reddy ~~September~~Corp and $21.5 ~~30,~~million ~~2010~~of toavailability ~~acquire~~under ~~other~~our ~~ice~~revolving ~~businesses~~credit facility. ~~Due~~Our cash flows from operations decline to their ~~the~~lowest ~~availability~~point ofduring ~~additional~~March ~~liquidity~~and ~~resulting~~April ~~from~~due ~~the refinancing~~to ofreduced sales in January and February, and we make interest payments on our ~~debt~~outstanding notes in March ~~2010~~ and ~~the~~May. ~~improved~~We ~~terms~~incur a substantial portion of our annual capital expenditures prior to the summer selling season and we need to finance seasonal increases in accounts receivable and inventories as temperatures and sales volumes begin to increase in April and May. The utilization of our revolving credit facility ~~realized~~is incurrently ~~August~~at ~~and~~or ~~October~~near ~~2010,~~its weseasonal ~~expect~~high point. Subject to ~~fund~~the authorization of additional capital expenditures above the current budget and/or the completion of additional acquisitions , we expect that the amount currently outstanding under the revolving credit facility will be begin to be repaid during the ~~remainder~~latter half of ~~2010~~the second ~~and~~quarter ~~early~~of 2011 inwith ~~order~~full repayment during the third quarter of 2011. We would not expect to ~~continue~~utilize ~~our~~the ~~strategic~~revolving ~~growth~~credit ~~plans~~facility again until the latter part of the first quarter of 2012. ~~However,~~In addition atto ~~this~~monitoring ~~time~~opportunities to repay or refinance the $11.7 million of remaining discount notes which mature on November 1, 2012, we ~~cannot~~are ~~estimate~~also evaluating other potential avenues to raise capital to fund our strategic plans, including the ~~amount~~incurrence of ~~these~~additional ~~expenditures~~debt and/or the issuance of equity or equity linked securities.

~~Based~~As onnoted ~~our expected level of operations~~previously, we ~~believe~~record ~~that~~the ~~cash~~majority ~~flows~~of ~~from operations, together with available borrowings under~~ our ~~revolving~~sales ~~credit~~and ~~facility,~~any ~~will~~profits beduring ~~adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for at least~~ the ~~next twelve~~ months. As of ~~November 2,~~May ~~2010,~~through weSeptember ~~had~~and ~~approximately~~the ~~$12.9 million~~majority of the cash ongenerated ~~hand~~from atthose ~~Reddy~~operations ~~Holdings, approximately~~is ~~$32.7 million~~received ofin ~~unrestricted~~July ~~cash~~through ~~and~~November, ~~$10.3 million~~by ofwhich ~~restricted~~time, ~~cash~~we atexpect ~~Reddy~~to ~~Corp~~have ~~and~~repaid ~~$50.0 million~~all ofamounts ~~availability~~borrowed under our revolving credit facility. ~~Depending on our level of capital expenditures and acquisitions over the next twelve months, borrowings under our revolving credit facility may occur~~ in the spring, offunded ~~2011~~current ascapital ~~our~~expenditures ~~cash~~and ~~flows~~debt ~~from operations decline to their~~service ~~lowest point during March~~ and ~~April~~built ~~due~~up tocash ~~reduced sales in January and February, and the timing of interest payments in March and May~~balances. We ~~incur~~expect ~~a substantial portion of our annual capital expenditures prior~~ to ~~the~~be ~~summer selling season and we need to finance seasonal increases~~ in ~~accounts~~compliance ~~receivable~~with ~~and~~our ~~inventories~~debt ascovenants ~~temperatures~~over ~~and sales volumes begin to increase in April and May. We also continue to monitor opportunities to repay or refinance~~ the ~~$11.7 million~~next oftwelve ~~remaining discount notes which mature on November 1, 2012~~months.

AsExpenses ~~noted~~in ~~previously,~~connection wewith ~~record~~the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation may require the ~~majority~~use of ~~our~~cash ~~sales~~on ~~and~~hand ~~any~~at ~~profits~~Reddy ~~during~~Holdings ~~the~~or ~~months~~Reddy Corp. or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of May 3, ~~through~~2011, ~~September~~our cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, net of accrued expenses related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation, was approximately $9.3 million. Based on the ~~majority~~current status of the investigation and related civil litigation and projected expenses, we believe Reddy Holdings' cash ~~generated~~balance ~~from~~will ~~those~~be ~~operations~~sufficient isto fund these ~~received~~expenses infor ~~July~~the ~~through~~next ~~November~~twelve months; however, bythis ~~which~~expectation includes ~~time,~~assumptions weregarding ~~expect~~matters beyond our control or knowledge. If Reddy Holdings were to ~~have~~require ~~repaid~~additional ~~all~~cash ~~amounts~~to ~~borrowed~~fund ~~under~~its ~~our~~expenses ~~revolving~~related to the antitrust investigations, Reddy Corp. has the ability under the credit facility into ~~the~~transfer ~~spring,~~$1 million ~~fund~~to ~~current~~Reddy ~~capital~~Holdings ~~expenditures~~on ~~and~~an ~~debt~~annual ~~service~~basis and ~~build~~an upadditional ~~cash~~general ~~balances~~restricted payment basket of $5 million over the remaining life of the credit facility. WeReddy ~~expect~~Holdings has no restrictions on its ability to beraise inadditional ~~compliance~~debt. ~~with~~We have received reimbursements of $12.2 million to date from our ~~debt~~insurance ~~covenants~~carriers ~~over~~as reimbursements of certain legal expenses. The settlements related to these reimbursements were final and we do not expect to receive any further reimbursements related the ~~next~~antitrust ~~twelve~~investigations ~~months~~and related civil litigation.

Expenses in connection with the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation may require the use of cash on hand at Reddy Holdings or Reddy Corp. or borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of November 2, 2010, our cash on hand at Reddy Holdings, net of accrued expenses related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation, was approximately $11.4 million. Based on the current status of the investigation and related civil litigation and projected expenses, we believe Reddy Holdings' cash balance will be sufficient to fund these expenses for the next twelve months; however, this expectation includes assumptions regarding matters beyond our control or knowledge. If Reddy Holdings were to require additional cash to fund its expenses related to the antitrust investigations, Reddy Corp. has the ability under the credit facility to transfer $1 million to Reddy Holdings on an annual basis and an additional general restricted payment basket of $5 million over the remaining life of the credit facility. Reddy Holdings has no restrictions on its ability to raise additional debt. We have received reimbursements of $12.2 million to date from our insurance carriers as reimbursements of certain legal expenses. The settlements related to these reimbursements were final and we do not expect to receive any further reimbursements related the antitrust investigations and related civil litigation. 43

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, "Consolidations (Topic 810)—Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities." ASU 2009-17 changes how

Table of Contents

~~a reporting~~ ~~entity~~Recently ~~determines~~Adopted ~~when~~Accounting an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. ASU 2009-17 also requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASU 2009-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within the first annual reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2009-17 on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position. Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. ASU 2010-28 modifies step one of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and offers guidance on when to perform step two of the testing. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists based upon factors such as unanticipated competition, the loss of key personnel and adverse regulatory changes. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC 805, Business Combinations, to clarify that pro forma disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and is required to be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. The Company has reflected the adoption of ASU 2010-29 in the disclosures accompanying the consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

General Economic Trends and Seasonality

Our results of operations are generally affected by the economic trends in our market area. We believe end users of our products use packaged ice in many applications, including recreational activities, the construction industry, agriculture and special events. Weakness in the national economy combined with other factors including inflation, interest rate fluctuations, increases in fuel and other energy costs, labor and healthcare costs and the availability of financing, may negatively impact consumer confidence and the business prospects of our commercial customers. If consumer activities associated with the use of our products decline or the business activities of our commercial customers decrease, our revenues and sales volumes may decline.

Our results to date have not been significantly impacted by inflation, other than costs directly related to energy prices, such as fuel, plastic bags and electricity. If we experience high inflation in these costs in the future, or inflationary pressures have significant effects on other cost categories, we may not be able to pass on all of these higher costs to our customers in the short term. We do believe that we will be able to pass on higher costs to our customers over longer periods of time; however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such efforts.

The ice business is highly seasonal, with the bulk of demand coming in the warmer spring and summer months. Accordingly, we experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and profitability. We make a disproportionate amount of our sales in the second and third calendar quarters. We also typically earn any net income in these same periods, whereas we typically experience net losses in the first and fourth calendar quarters. We believe that approximately two-thirds of our revenues will occur during the second and third calendar quarters when the weather conditions are generally warmer and demand is greater, while approximately one-third of our revenues will occur during the first and fourth calendar quarters when the weather is generally cooler. This belief is consistent with historical trends. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and the lack of proportional corresponding expense decreases, we will most likely experience lower profit margins and losses during the first and fourth calendar quarters. In addition, because our operating results depend significantly on sales during our peak season, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of adverse weather during this peak selling period if the weather is unusually cool or rainy on a more national or regional basis.

4944

Table of Contents

during the second and third calendar quarters when the weather conditions are generally warmer and demand is greater, while approximately one-third of our revenues will occur during the first and fourth calendar quarters when the weather is generally cooler. This belief is consistent with historical trends. As a result of seasonal revenue declines and the lack of proportional corresponding expense decreases, we will most likely experience lower profit margins and losses during the first and fourth calendar quarters. In addition, because our operating results depend significantly on sales during our peak season, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of adverse weather during this peak selling period if the weather is unusually cool or rainy on a more national or regional basis.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the value of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our main market risk ~~category~~categories isare fuel prices and interest rate risk.

We are exposed to ~~some~~ market risk due to ~~the~~fluctuations ~~floating~~in ~~interest~~the ~~rates~~prices ~~under~~of ~~our senior credit facility~~fuel. ~~Principal~~From ~~balances~~time ~~outstanding~~to ~~under~~time ~~the~~we ~~New~~enter ~~Credit~~into ~~Facility~~hedging ~~bear~~contracts ~~interest~~to ~~per annum,~~stabilize atprices ~~our~~expected ~~option,~~to atbe ~~the~~paid ~~sum~~for ofdiesel ~~the~~fuel ~~base~~used ~~rate~~in our oroperations. ~~LIBOR~~These ~~plus~~contracts ~~the~~are ~~applicable~~for ~~margin.~~quantities ~~LIBOR~~equal ~~and~~to ~~the~~or ~~Base~~less ~~Rate~~than ~~are~~quantities ~~subject~~expected to ~~floors~~be ofconsumed ~~1.5%~~in ~~and~~our 2operations.~~5%,~~ ~~respectively.~~As ~~The~~of ~~applicable~~March 31, ~~margin~~2011, ~~for~~we ~~base~~had ~~rate loans~~one isdiesel ~~6.0%~~fuel ~~and~~contract ~~for~~maturing ~~LIBOR~~at various ~~loans~~dates isthrough ~~7.0%.~~December ~~The~~2011 ~~base~~with ~~rate~~a isfair ~~defined~~value as ~~the~~an ~~greatest~~asset of 2$0.~~5%,~~02 million. ~~the~~Net ~~prime~~of ~~rate~~effect ~~(as~~of ~~announced~~this ~~from~~contract, ~~time~~a to10% ~~time~~change byin ~~the~~fuel ~~Administrative~~prices ~~Agent),~~would ~~the~~impact ~~federal~~our ~~funds~~results ~~rate~~of ~~plus~~operations by 0$1.5%1 million oron ~~the~~an ~~one-month~~annual ~~LIBOR~~basis, ~~rate~~absent ~~plus~~any 1other contravening actions.~~0%.~~

AsOur results of ~~September 30,~~operations ~~2010,~~can ~~there~~be ~~were~~affected noby ~~balances~~changes in interest rates due to variable rates of interest on our revolving credit facilities. As of March 31, 2011, $12.0 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility. A 1% increase in interest rates would have an insignificant impact on our results of operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

~~Management~~ Evaluation isof ~~responsible~~Disclosure ~~for~~Controls ~~establishing~~ and ~~maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"))~~Procedures. We ~~The~~conducted ~~Company,~~an ~~under~~evaluation ~~the supervision and with the participation~~ of ~~its management, including~~ the ~~Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the~~ effectiveness of ~~the design and operation of~~ our "disclosure controls and procedures" ("Disclosure Controls"), as defined in by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act as of ~~the~~1934, ~~end~~as ofamended (the ~~period~~"Exchange ~~covered by this report~~Act")~~. Based on that evaluation~~, ~~the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective~~ as of ~~September~~March 3031, 2011, ~~2010~~the toend ~~ensure~~of ~~that~~the ~~information~~period ~~relating~~covered toby usthis ~~and~~Quarterly ~~our~~Report ~~consolidated~~on ~~subsidiary required~~Form 10-Q to("Quarterly beReport"). ~~disclosed~~The inDisclosure ~~our~~Controls ~~reports~~evaluation ~~filed~~was orperformed ~~submitted~~ under the ~~Exchange~~supervision ~~Act is recorded, processed, summarized~~ and ~~reported~~with ~~within~~ the ~~time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and~~ ~~that~~participation ~~such~~of ~~information is accumulated and communicated to our~~ management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer, ~~as appropriate to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure~~("CFO"). ItThere ~~should~~are beinherent ~~noted;~~limitations ~~however,~~to ~~that~~ the ~~design~~effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and isprocedures. ~~limited in its ability to detect errors~~Accordingly, ~~and~~even ~~our~~effective ~~system~~disclosure of controls ~~has~~and ~~been~~procedures ~~designed~~can toonly provide ~~only~~ reasonable assurance of achieving ~~the~~their ~~desired~~ control objectives. ABased ~~control~~upon ~~system~~this evaluation, ~~no matter how well designed~~ and ~~operated,~~as ~~can~~a ~~provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control~~result ~~system's objectives will be met. Further, the design~~ of ~~a control system must reflect~~ the ~~fact~~material ~~that~~weakness ~~there~~in ~~are~~internal ~~resource~~control ~~constraints,~~over ~~and~~financial ~~the~~reporting ~~benefits~~disclosed ofby ~~controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of~~ the ~~inherent~~Company ~~limitations~~ in ~~all~~its ~~control~~2010 ~~systems,~~annual noreport ~~evaluation~~on ofForm 10-K ~~controls~~("Annual ~~can~~Report"), ~~provide absolute assurance that all control issues~~ and ~~instances~~as ofdescribed ~~fraud~~below, ~~if any, within~~ our ~~Company~~ ~~have~~CEO ~~been~~and ~~detected.~~CFO ~~There~~have ~~has~~concluded ~~been~~that noour ~~change~~Disclosure inControls ~~our~~were ~~internal~~not ~~control~~effective ~~over~~at ~~financial~~a ~~reporting~~reasonable ~~during~~assurance ~~the~~level ~~three~~as ~~months~~of ~~ended September~~March 3031, ~~2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting~~2011.

50 At December 31, 2010, management, including our CEO and our CFO, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Table of Contents

Based on this assessment, management identified a material weakness resulting from our accounting for ice merchandiser equipment, as identified and disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring with respect to the accuracy, valuation, completeness, and existence of ice merchandiser equipment.

Notwithstanding the existence of the material weakness described above, we performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These additional procedures included, among other things, expansion of our physical inventory procedures and dedication of significant internal resources to review our ice merchandiser and other plant and equipment balances at a detailed level.

Although we have begun remediation efforts, we have not yet remediated the material weakness described above and cannot conclude when we will have remediated this material weakness. Until remediated, this deficiency could result in a material misstatement of the related accounts and disclosures contained in the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness. We have made and will continue to make improvements to our internal control over financial reporting, and management, with oversight from our Audit Committee, has identified and intends to execute the following actions that we believe will remediate the material weakness described above. Specifically, with regard to the accounting for ice merchandisers, management intends to:

•: Establish increased operational ownership and accountability for the Company's ice merchandisers;
•: Upgrade the fixed asset system and related procedures to provide a more accurate and automated means of managing the Company's fixed assets, including its ice merchandisers, with specific focus on processes and controls governing the tracking and timely disposition and inventory of fixed assets; and
•: Redesign and enhance inventory control procedures over our fixed assets including increased education, training, support and oversight of the Company's employees tasked with the completion of inventory procedures.

Subsequent to filing its Annual Report on March 31, 2011, the Company has initiated a redesign of its fixed asset processes and procedures as well as the implementation of a new fixed asset system. Due to the limited time elapsed since the filing of our 2010 Annual Report, this initiative remains in its early stages. The foregoing notwithstanding, we continue to evaluate the appropriate remediation measures required in order to address the above-described material weakness and progress relative to our remediation measures will be disclosed in our subsequent Exchange Act reports.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Antitrust Matters

In March 2008, wethe Company and certain of ~~our~~its employees, including members of its management, received subpoenas issued by a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan seeking documents and information in connection with an investigation by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") into possible antitrust violations in the packaged ice industry. In addition, on March 5, 2008, federal officials executed a search warrant at ~~our~~the Company's corporate office in Dallas, Texas. ~~On August 28, 2008, we received a second subpoena for documents from the federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Michigan.~~ Current and former employees were also subpoenaed to testify and testified before a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Michigan and, ~~more recently,~~ before a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio. ~~The~~On October ~~search~~29, ~~warrant~~2010, ~~and subpoenas~~the ~~that~~Company wewas ~~and~~informed ~~our~~that ~~employees received were connected with a broader industry inquiry by~~ the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. ~~The~~would ~~Home~~take ~~City~~no ~~Ice~~action ~~Company,~~against ~~Arctic~~the ~~Glacier~~Company ~~International, Inc., and~~or ~~three~~any ~~former employees~~ of ~~Arctic~~its ~~Glacier~~employees ~~entered guilty pleas regarding a conspiracy to allocate customers and territories~~ in ~~southeastern~~connection ~~Michigan~~with ~~and the Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan area.~~its ~~Sentencing~~investigation of the ~~three~~packaged ~~former~~ice ~~Arctic~~industry. ~~Glacier~~In ~~employees~~January ~~took place on February 2~~2011, 3counsel ~~and 4,~~for ~~2010,~~the ~~sentencing~~Company ofconfirmed ~~Arctic Glacier occurred on February 11, 2010, and Home City was sentenced on March 2, 2010. On October 29, 2010, we were informed~~ that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ ~~will~~has ~~take~~formally noclosed ~~action against us or any of our employees in connection with~~ its investigation of the packaged ice industry.

On March 25, 2008, wethe ~~were~~Company was served by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida with an antitrust civil investigative demand (the "Florida CID") requesting ~~the~~ the production of documents and information relating to an investigation of agreements in restraint of trade and/or price fixing with respect to the market for packaged ice. On June 11, 2008, we the Company received a civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona (the "Arizona CID"). All of the documents and information requested by the Arizona CID ~~were~~ were included in the Florida CID and the Arizona CID states that it will be satisfied by the production of information which had been and would be provided to Florida in response to the Florida CID. On or about June 16, 2009, wethe ~~were~~Company was served by the State of Michigan, Department of the Attorney General, with a civil investigative demand requesting information and documents relating to sales of ice to units of government in Michigan, sales of ice in Michigan for which we the Company made or received payment, and contracts and agreements with Michigan entities (the "Michigan CID"). WeThe ~~have~~Company has been advised that the Florida CID, the Arizona CID and the Michigan CID are related to a multi-state antitrust investigation of the packaged ice industry and that the Attorneys General of 19 states and the District of Columbia are participating in the multi-state investigation. The states' investigation is related to the investigation of the packaged ice industry by the Antitrust Division of the DOJ. WeThe ~~have~~ Company is cooperating with the investigation and has complied with all requests for documents and information regarding these matters. WeThe Company may in the future receive additional civil investigative demands or similar information requests from ~~other~~ states participating in the multi-state investigation or conducting their own investigations.

OnAt ~~November 19,~~this ~~2008~~time, ~~we were notified by~~ the ~~Civil~~Company ~~Fraud~~is ~~Division~~unable ofto ~~the~~predict ~~DOJ (~~the ~~"Civil~~outcome ~~Fraud~~of ~~Division")~~ that ~~the Civil Fraud Division had opened an~~ investigation, ~~with respect to~~ the ~~Company.~~possible ~~The~~loss ~~Civil~~or ~~Fraud~~possible ~~Division's~~range ~~investigation~~of ~~is expected to examine whether we may have violated the federal False Claims Act by submitting~~loss, orif ~~causing to be submitted~~any, ~~false~~associated ~~claims~~with to the ~~federal~~ ~~government~~resolution ~~as a result~~ of ~~entering~~that investigation ~~into~~or ~~allegedly~~any ~~anticompetitive~~potential ~~agreements~~effect ~~which~~the investigation may have ~~affected~~on the ~~sale~~Company, ofits ~~packaged~~employees ~~ice to the government. On~~ or ~~about January 6, 2009, we received a request for documents in connection with that investigation~~operations. ~~We have substantially completed providing information and~~

51 In 2008 a number of lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits, were filed against the Company, Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice Company, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and Arctic Glacier International, Inc., in various federal courts in multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief. Pursuant to an Order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the civil actions pending in federal courts have been transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Home City entered into a settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs that was approved by the Court on February 22, 2011. In March 2011, Arctic Glacier announced that it has entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing regarding the claims asserted on behalf of direct purchasers. On March 11, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part

Table of Contents

~~documents~~motions ~~requested~~to bydismiss the ~~Civil~~indirect ~~Fraud~~purchaser ~~Division~~claims. ~~The~~On ~~Civil~~April 26, ~~Fraud~~2011, ~~Division's~~the ~~investigation~~indirect ispurchaser ~~related~~plaintiffs tofiled ~~the~~an ~~investigation~~amended bycomplaint asserting violations of the ~~Antitrust~~antitrust ~~Division~~laws of ~~the~~various ~~DOJ~~states and related claims.

WeOn ~~are~~March 1, ~~cooperating~~2010, ~~with~~a ~~the~~putative ~~authorities~~class inaction ~~the~~Statement ~~multi-state~~of ~~attorney~~Claim ~~general~~was ~~investigation~~filed ~~and~~against the ~~Civil~~Company ~~Fraud~~in ~~Division~~the ~~investigation.~~Ontario WeSuperior ~~expect~~Court toof ~~continue~~Justice ~~to make available documents and other information~~ in ~~response~~Canada to("Ontario ~~any subpoenas~~Action"), ~~requests~~alleging violations orof ~~civil~~Part VI ~~investigative~~of ~~demands received from~~ the ~~investigating~~Competition ~~agencies.~~Act Atand ~~this~~seeking ~~time~~general damages, wepunitive ~~are~~and ~~unable~~exemplary todamages, ~~predict~~pre-judgment ~~the~~and ~~outcome~~post-judgment ~~of those investigations~~interest, ~~the~~and ~~possible~~costs. ~~loss~~Proceedings relating orto ~~possible~~Plaintiffs' ~~range~~Motion offor ~~loss,~~Certification ~~if any, associated with the resolution~~ of ~~those~~a ~~investigations~~Class orare ~~any~~ongoing ~~potential~~in ~~effect~~that ~~they may have on us, our employees or operations~~matter.

On March 68, ~~2008~~2010, ~~our Board of Directors formed~~ a ~~special~~putative ~~committee~~class ofaction ~~independent~~Statement ~~directors to conduct an internal investigation~~ of ~~these~~Claim ~~matters.~~was ~~The~~filed ~~special~~against ~~committee~~the ~~retained counsel~~Company ~~to assist~~ in ~~its investigation. In order to maintain~~ the ~~independence~~Court of ~~the special committee~~Queen's ~~investigation,~~Bench ~~officers~~of ~~and~~Alberta, ~~employees~~Judicial ~~who~~District ~~were~~of ~~employed~~Calgary, byin usCanada ("Alberta atAction"), ~~the~~alleging ~~time~~violations ~~the~~of ~~investigation commenced~~Part VI ~~have~~of ~~not~~the ~~had~~Competition ~~access~~Act toand ~~information~~seeking ~~obtained~~general indamages, ~~the~~ special ~~committee's~~and ~~investigation~~pecuniary ordamages, ~~the~~punitive ~~results~~and ofexemplary ~~the~~damages, ~~investigation~~interest toand ~~date~~costs. ~~The~~On March 4, ~~investigation~~2011, by the ~~special~~Company ~~committee~~was ~~and~~served ~~its~~with ~~counsel is~~an ~~substantially~~Amended ~~complete.~~Statement ~~The~~of ~~special~~Claim ~~committee~~in ~~has not reached a determination~~ that ~~any~~matter, ~~violations~~which ofasserts ~~the~~similar ~~antitrust laws have occurred~~claims.

~~Effective~~An ~~September 13,~~agreement ~~2008,~~has ~~Ben~~been D.reached ~~Key,~~to ~~our~~resolve ~~Executive~~the ~~Vice~~class ~~President—Sales &~~actions ~~Marketing,~~filed ~~was~~in ~~placed~~Canada onby adirect ~~paid~~purchasers ~~leave~~ of ~~absence~~packaged ~~and~~ice ~~relieved~~in ofCanada ~~his~~against ~~duties~~Reddy atIce and Arctic Glacier Inc. alleging ~~the~~anti-competitive ~~direction~~behavior ofin the ~~special~~United ~~committee~~States and Canada. The ~~special~~agreement ~~committee~~provides ~~found~~ that ~~Mr.~~Arctic Glacier will pay CDN ~~Key~~$2,000,000, ~~violated~~all ~~our~~claims ~~policies~~asserted against Reddy Ice and ~~was~~Arctic ~~associated~~Glacier in both the Ontario Action and the Alberta Action will be dismissed, and Reddy Ice and Arctic Glacier will be granted full and final releases with ~~matters~~regard ~~that~~to ~~were~~those ~~under~~claims. ~~investigation~~Reddy Ice is not making any payment in connection with this settlement. The agreement is subject to the execution of final settlement documents and court approval.

~~Following~~On ~~the~~March 4, ~~announcement that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ had instituted an investigation of the packaged ice industry~~2011, a ~~number of lawsuits, including~~ putative class action ~~lawsuits,~~ ~~were~~lawsuit was filed against ~~us,~~the ~~Reddy Ice Corporation, Home City Ice~~ Company, ~~Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc.~~ and ~~Arctic~~other ~~Glacier~~defendants ~~International, Inc.,~~ in ~~various~~state ~~federal courts~~court in ~~multiple jurisdictions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws and related claims and seeking damages and injunctive relief~~Kansas. ~~Pursuant~~That tolawsuit analleges ~~Order~~violation ~~from~~of the ~~Judicial~~Kansas Restraint ~~Panel~~of ~~on Multidistrict~~Trade ~~Litigation~~Act, ~~the~~violation ~~civil~~of ~~actions~~the ~~pending~~Kansas inConsumer ~~federal~~Protection ~~courts~~Statute, ~~have been transferred~~ and ~~consolidated~~Unjust ~~for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. On June 1~~Enrichment, ~~2009, the Court appointed interim lead~~ and ~~liaison~~seeks ~~counsel~~treble ~~for~~overcharge ~~the~~damages, ~~putative~~full ~~direct~~consideration ~~and~~damages, ~~indirect~~compensatory ~~purchaser classes. On September 15~~damages, ~~2009~~penalties, ~~the lead plaintiffs for~~ ~~each~~costs, ~~of the putative direct~~ and ~~indirect~~attorney ~~purchaser classes filed consolidated amended complaints~~fees. WeThat ~~and~~lawsuit ~~Arctic~~was ~~Glacier~~removed ~~filed motions~~ to ~~dismiss~~federal ~~both~~court ~~of these complaints. Home City filed a motion to dismiss the indirect purchaser complaint~~ and, ~~entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the direct purchaser plaintiffs. The motions by us and Arctic Glacier to dismiss the direct purchaser claims were denied by the Court~~ on ~~July~~April 126, ~~2010.~~2011, Anan order ~~granting preliminary~~was ~~approval~~entered oftransferring ~~Home~~and consolidating ~~City's~~it ~~settlement~~ with ~~the~~other ~~direct~~pending ~~purchasers~~cases ~~and~~for ~~authorizing~~pre-trial ~~dissemination~~proceedings ofin ~~notice~~the ~~was~~United ~~entered~~States onDistrict ~~September 2,~~Court ~~2010.~~for ~~The motions to dismiss~~ the ~~indirect~~Eastern ~~purchaser complaint~~District ~~are~~of ~~pending~~Michigan.

On ~~March~~April 128, ~~2010~~2011, atwo putative class ~~action~~actions ~~Statement~~were ~~of Claim was~~ filed against usthe inCompany ~~the~~and ~~Ontario~~other ~~Superior~~defendants ~~Court~~in offederal ~~Justice~~courts in ~~Canada,~~Tennessee and Arkansas alleging violations of ~~Part VI~~federal ~~of the~~and ~~Competition~~state ~~Act~~antitrust statutes and seeking ~~general~~injunctive ~~damages~~relief, ~~punitive and exemplary~~ damages, ~~pre-judgment~~disgorgement, ~~and post-judgment interest~~costs, and ~~costs~~attorney fees. AThe ~~case~~Company ~~conference~~has ~~regarding~~not ~~this~~been ~~matter~~served ~~was held~~with onthese ~~June 9, 2010~~lawsuits. InThe Company anticipates that ~~case~~these lawsuits ~~conference,~~will abe ~~schedule~~transferred ~~was~~and ~~set~~consolidated with other pending cases for pre-trial proceedings ~~relating~~in tothe ~~Plaintiffs'~~United ~~Motion~~States District Court for ~~Certification~~the ofEastern aDistrict ~~Class~~of Michigan.

OnOne ~~March 8,~~direct ~~2010, a putative class~~ action ~~Statement~~lawsuit ~~of Claim~~ was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of ~~Queen's~~Michigan ~~Bench~~asserting claims based on alleged violations of ~~Alberta~~federal and state antitrust laws, ~~Judicial~~RICO ~~District~~and oftortious ~~Calgary~~interference and seeking damages, incivil ~~Canada~~penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, ~~alleging~~2009, the Court ~~violations~~dismissed ofall ~~Part~~claims against us in that lawsuit. On June VI29, of2009, the ~~Competition~~plaintiff ~~Act~~filed ~~and~~a ~~seeking~~motion ~~general~~for ~~damages~~reconsideration, ~~special~~ and ~~pecuniary~~on ~~damages~~July 17, ~~punitive~~2009 ~~and~~the ~~exemplary~~Court ~~damages~~reversed, ~~interest~~in ~~and~~part, ~~costs~~its May 29, 2009 order, reinstating only the RICO claim against us. ~~This~~The ~~Statement~~dismissal of ~~Claim~~the ~~has~~remaining claims was not ~~yet~~affected. On August 10, 2009, the Company filed an answer to the reinstated claim. ~~been~~Discovery ~~served~~is onongoing usin that matter.

52 The Company intends to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on the Company or its operations.

Table of Contents

One direct action lawsuit has been filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims based on alleged violations of federal and state antitrust laws, RICO and tortious interference and seeking damages, civil penalties and injunctive relief. The defendants filed motions to dismiss that case. On May 29, 2009, the Court dismissed all claims against us in that lawsuit. On June 29, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, and on July 17, 2009 the Court reversed in part its May 29, 2009 order, reinstating only the RICO claim against us. The dismissal of the remaining claims was not affected. On August 10, 2009, we filed an answer to the reinstated claim. Discovery is ongoing in that matter.

We intend to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, we are unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on us or our operations.

SEC Inquiry

On or about October 21, 2008, we received notice that the Securities and Exchange Commission had initiated an informal inquiry into matters that were the subject of the investigation by the special committee of our Board of Directors. On October 29, 2010, we were informed the Securities and Exchange Commission has closed that inquiry and no action will be taken against us.

Stockholder Litigation

Beginning on August 8, 2008, purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan asserting claims under the federal securities laws against usthe Company and certain of ~~our~~its current or former senior officers. ~~The~~On ~~complaints~~July 17, ~~which are substantially similar~~2009, ~~allege that~~ the ~~defendants~~Court ~~misrepresented~~consolidated the actions and ~~failed~~appointed toa ~~disclose~~lead ~~the~~plaintiff ~~existence~~and ~~of,~~interim ~~and~~lead ~~our~~plaintiff's ~~alleged~~counsel. ~~participation~~The ~~in,~~lead anplaintiff ~~alleged~~filed ~~antitrust~~a ~~conspiracy~~consolidated inamended ~~the~~complaint ~~packaged~~on ~~ice~~November 2, ~~industry~~2009. ~~The~~That ~~complaints~~complaint ~~purport~~purports to assert claims on behalf of ~~various~~an alleged ~~classes~~class of purchasers of ~~our~~the Company's common stock. ~~On July 17,~~and ~~2009,~~alleges that the ~~Court~~defendants ~~consolidated~~misrepresented ~~the~~and ~~actions~~failed ~~and~~to ~~appointed~~disclose athe ~~lead~~existence ~~plaintiff~~of, and ~~interim~~the ~~lead plaintiff~~Company's ~~counsel.~~alleged participation ~~The~~in, ~~lead~~an ~~plaintiff~~alleged ~~filed~~antitrust aconspiracy ~~consolidated~~in ~~amended~~the ~~complaint~~packaged onice ~~November 2, 2009~~industry. We The Company and the other defendants have filed ~~motions~~an toanswer ~~dismiss~~in ~~the~~that ~~consolidated amended complaint~~case. ~~A hearing was held on those motions on October 22, 2010. The motions were taken under advisement.~~

Two stockholder derivative actions have been filed on ~~our~~the Company's behalf in state district court in Dallas County, Texas, naming as defendants, among others, certain current and former ~~officers~~ officers and members of ~~our~~the Company's Board of Directors. Those cases have been consolidated in the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. On ~~September~~March 2717, ~~2010~~2011, a Second Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Petition was filed in that matter. That ~~petition~~Second Amended Petition asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and ~~gross~~ gross mismanagement and seeks damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, expenses and costs. The consolidated case is currently set for trial on August 2, 2011.

WeThe ~~and~~Company ~~the~~intends ~~other defendants intend~~ to vigorously defend the pending lawsuits. At this time, wethe ~~are~~Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of these lawsuits or any potential effect they may have on usthe Company or ~~our~~its operations.

Other Matters

We are also involved in various other claims, lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property matters. There are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate outcome of such matters and it is difficult to determine the ultimate costs that we may incur. We believe the resolution of such other ordinary course uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

AsThere ahave ~~result~~been ofno ~~the~~material ~~refinancing~~changes ofto ~~substantially all of our indebtedness in March 2010, and amending our credit facility in October 2010, certain of~~ the ~~risk~~ factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2009 have changed as set forth below~~2010.

Despite our current indebtedness levels, we may still incur significant additional indebtedness. Incurring more indebtedness could increase the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness, including additional secured indebtedness, in the future. The terms of the indentures governing the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes, and our New Credit Facility do not limit Reddy Holdings' ability to incur additional indebtedness. The terms of the indentures governing the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes, and our New Credit Facility limit, but do not prohibit, Reddy Corp from incurring additional indebtedness. In addition, the indentures and our New Credit Facility allow us to issue additional First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes under certain circumstances. Such additional notes will also be guaranteed by Reddy Holdings and will share in the collateral that secures the First Lien Notes, the Second Lien Notes and the New Credit Facility. The indentures and our New Credit Facility also allow Reddy Corp to incur certain other additional secured debt and allow any future foreign subsidiaries to incur additional debt. In addition, the indentures and our New Credit Facility do not prevent Reddy Corp from incurring other liabilities that do not constitute indebtedness. If we incur new debt or other liabilities, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness and we may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our payment obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business and economic conditions and other factors. We will not be able to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions in the industry in which we operate and competitive pressures. Our cash flow may not be sufficient to allow us to pay principal and interest on our debt and to meet our other obligations. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, or to sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements, including our New Credit Facility and the indentures relating to the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes, may restrict us from pursuing any of these alternatives.

Our New Credit Facility and the indentures governing the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and our future subsidiaries, which may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and taking some actions.

The agreements that govern the terms of our debt, including the indentures that govern the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes and our New Credit Facility, impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability to, among other things:

Table of Contents

In addition, under our New Credit Facility we are required to satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those ratios and tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our New Credit Facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our New Credit Facility, our lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our New Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If more than $10.0 million of indebtedness is outstanding under our New Credit Facility at the time of any such acceleration, an event of default will occur under the indentures governing the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes.

As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we are limited in how we conduct our business and we may be unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities. The terms of any future indebtedness we may incur could include more restrictive covenants. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default in respect of the related indebtedness. If a default occurs, the relevant lenders could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be due and payable immediately and proceed against any collateral securing that indebtedness.

This, in turn, could cause our other debt to become due and payable as a result of cross-acceleration provisions contained in the agreements governing such other debt. In the event that some or all of our debt is accelerated and becomes immediately due and payable, we may not have the funds to repay, or the ability to refinance, such debt.

Except as set forth above, there have been no material changes to the factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits on page 5751.

5549

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	REDDY ICE CORPORATION
Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Date: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

5650

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.			Description

	31.1†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2†		Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2†		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

57 †Filed herewith.

Filing Compare · REDDY ICE CORP