UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

ý Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d)
of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010

o Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d)
of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		45-0485038 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6623 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, CA (Address of principal executive offices)		94555 (Zip Code)

(510) 574-0100
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share		NASDAQ Global Market
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights		NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes oý No ýo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months. Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer ý		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of Registrant's common stock, $0.001 par value per share, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on March 31, ~~2009~~2010, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $90135 million based upon the closing sales price of the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on such date. Shares of the Registrant's common stock held by officers subject to section 16(b) filing requirements, directors and holders of ~~more~~five ~~than~~percent ~~ten~~or ~~percent of~~more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of November 11, 2010, the Registrant had outstanding 47,199,642 shares of common stock.

As of November 30, 2009, the Registrant had outstanding 45,866,110 shares of common stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

~~The~~Certain information required by Part III of this Form 10-K, to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference from the issuer's ~~Proxy~~definitive ~~Statement~~proxy statement to be filed in connection with ~~the~~its ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2009~~2010


	PART I
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	1112
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	1922
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	2022
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	2022
ITEM 4.	~~SUBMISSION~~REMOVED OFAND ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~RESERVED	2024
	PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	2125
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	2227
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	2328
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	4645
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	4846
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	4846
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	4846
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	5249
	PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	5249
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	5249
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	5249
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	5249
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	5249
	PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	5350
	SIGNATURES	5653

Table of Contents

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding our expectations, intentions, strategies, expected operating results, and financial condition. Forward-looking statements also include statements regarding events, conditions and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we disclaim any intent to update any such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those included within the forward- looking statements as a result of various factors. Factors that could cause or contribute to ~~such~~ such differences include, but are not limited to, those described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," under the heading "Risk Factors," and ~~elsewhere~~ elsewhere in this Annual Report.

PART I

ITEM 1: BUSINESS

Overview

ActivIdentity™ Corporation (the "Company" or "ActivIdentity" and also referred to as "we" or "our") is a global leader in strong authentication and credential management, providing solutions to confidently establish a person's identity when interacting digitally. For more than two decades, the Company's experience has been leveraged by security- minded organizations in large- scale deployments such as the ~~U.S.~~United States Department of Defense, ~~Cadence Design Systems,~~ Nissan, and Saudi Aramco. The Company's customers have issued more than 100 million credentials, securing the holder's digital identity. ~~Our~~ActivIdentity ~~strong~~solutions ~~authentication,~~include ~~credential~~a ~~management,~~fully ~~security~~integrated ~~clients~~platform that enables the organizations to issue, manage and ~~authentication~~use identity devices ~~are~~and ~~embraced~~credentials byfor ~~large organizations~~secure access, secure communications and ~~governments~~legally tobinding ~~defend~~digital ~~against~~transactions. ~~security~~In ~~threats~~general, ActivIdentity solutions deliver multiple benefits, including increased digital and ~~identity~~physical security, protection against online fraud, enhanced business process efficiencies, secure access to digital assets and a pathway to regulatory compliance.

~~Founded~~ActivIdentity, informerly ~~1987,~~known ~~ActivIdentity~~as ~~has~~ActivCard ~~been~~Corp., ~~instrumental~~was incorporated in ~~providing~~the ~~identity~~State ~~security~~of ~~software~~Delaware ~~solutions~~in toAugust ~~business~~2002 ~~and~~for ~~government organizations around~~ the ~~world.~~purpose ~~ActivIdentity~~of ischanging the ~~realization~~ domicile of ~~a strategy to elevate~~ the ~~Company~~publicly ~~from~~listed ~~its~~company ~~original~~in ~~role~~the ActivIdentity asgroup aof ~~token~~companies, ~~provider~~previously toActivCard S.A., befrom athe ~~complete~~Republic ~~authentication~~of ~~solutions~~France ~~provider~~to ~~with~~the ~~significant~~United ~~intellectual property~~States. ~~The~~ActivIdentity's ~~Company~~Common ~~has achieved~~Stock ~~success~~is ~~through~~publicly ~~organic~~traded ~~growth~~on ~~and strategic acquisitions.~~ The ~~Company~~NASDAQ isGlobal aMarket ~~Delaware~~under the ~~corporation~~symbol "ACTI."

WeActivIdentity ~~operate~~delivers onsolutions atoday ~~fiscal year ending September 30. For convenience~~ in ~~this~~three ~~Annual~~primary ~~Report,~~markets: ~~we refer to the fiscal year ended September 30~~Enterprise, ~~2007~~Government ~~as fiscal 2007, the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as fiscal 2008~~ and ~~the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as fiscal 2009~~Commerce. ~~We also refer to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 as fiscal 2010.~~

~~ActivIdentity provides~~ Enterprise ~~solutions~~Market toSolutions: As ~~organization~~a leader in establishing trusted online identities, ActivIdentity's ~~for~~Identity ~~identity~~Assurance ~~and~~ enterprise access ~~management~~solution (a) gives byusers ~~providing~~universal ~~strong~~access ~~authentication~~with ~~and~~one card or credential; ~~management~~(b) authenticates ~~solutions.~~to Ina ~~general~~PC, ~~ActivIdentity~~network, application, facility door or copier; (c) digitally signs emails or encrypts data ~~solutions~~and ~~deliver~~(d) leverages ~~multiple~~the ~~benefits,~~same ~~including~~strong ~~increased~~credential ~~digital~~to access logical and physical systems. The ActivIdentity Strong Authentication enterprise solution for remote access provides security, ~~protection~~and compliance ~~against~~assurance ~~online~~in ~~fraud~~an open, ~~enhanced~~standards-based ~~business~~solution. ~~process~~ActivIdentity's ~~efficiencies,~~solutions ~~secure~~make ~~access~~it easy to ~~digital~~deploy ~~assets,~~and support the broadest range of authentication methods such as hardware tokens and software tokens deployed on a ~~pathway~~ tovariety ~~regulatory~~of ~~compliance~~devices, including smartphones.

Government Market Solutions: ActivIdentity ~~delivers~~ ~~solutions~~works ~~today~~with over 200 government agencies in ~~three~~the ~~primary~~U.S., ~~markets:~~Europe, ~~Employer-to-Employee~~Asia, ~~Business-to-Customer~~ Australia, and ~~Government-~~beyond to~~-Citizen~~ develop and deploy the most trusted identity assurance solutions in the world. These solutions provide governments the ability to trust the identity of the users accessing their agency resources. For example, Personal Identity Verification ("PIV") compliant

ActivIdentity's Employer-to-Employee ("E2E") solutions for employee identification access offer a multi-layered security approach across networks, systems, facilities, data, intellectual property, and information assets. The foundation of the Company's E2E solutions is a Versatile Authentication platform to control access to data and / or network assets. The platform supports a variety of authentication methods (e.g., user name and password, knowledge-based authentication, and one-time

Table of Contents

~~password)~~credentials, created and ~~authentication~~managed ~~devices~~by ~~(e.g., soft~~ActivIdentity ~~tokens~~technology, ~~hardware~~support ~~tokens,~~secure ~~mobile devices, and smart cards). The authentication platform's versatility enables employers not only to provide~~ access ~~control for their employees, but also~~ to ~~extend~~multiple ~~the~~physical ~~schema to contractors~~ and ~~employees~~logical ofassets ~~partner~~across ~~organizations.~~agencies Inand ~~these~~for ~~scenarios,~~non-government ~~organizations~~employees ~~can tailor the authentication method based on~~accessing ~~the~~government ~~risk associated with specific types of transactions~~resources. ActivIdentity E2E solutions are highly scalable. In larger deployments, they can be complemented by the ActivIdentity Credential Management products, as well as Security Client software to ease device management.

Commerce Market Solutions: ActivIdentity~~'s commercial~~ ~~Business-to-Customer~~has ~~("B2C")~~substantial ~~solutions~~experience ~~address~~helping regional and global banks around the ~~needs~~world ofin ~~organizations~~offering their ~~with~~customers ~~electronic~~secure ~~channels~~and convenient online banking. ActivIdentity provides a solution that ~~serve~~is ~~consumers~~easy to deploy and supports the broadest range of authentication methods, ~~businesses~~including one-time password tokens, ~~suppliers~~mobile authentication, EMV cards and ~~partners.~~certificate-based ~~ActivIdentity~~authentication, ~~has~~as awell ~~complete~~as ~~Strong~~strong ~~Authentication~~passwords and ~~Credential~~DeviceID. ~~Management~~Our ~~solutions~~4TRESS ~~portfolio~~Authentication toServer, ~~help~~available ~~organizations~~as an appliance or as a local ~~secure~~installation, ~~electronic~~is ~~interactions~~complemented ~~across~~by ~~multiple~~a ~~channels.~~proven ~~ActivIdentity~~portfolio ~~solutions~~of ~~can~~one-time bepassword ~~tailored~~tokens, tosmartcards ~~meet~~and ~~each~~USB ~~organization's~~keys, ~~unique~~enabling ~~needs~~us ~~for~~to offer our customers a ~~range~~complete ofsolution ~~transaction~~based ~~risk-levels,~~on ~~device~~open standards ~~authentication~~that ~~versatility~~is scalable, ~~and~~secure ~~user~~ and ~~credential~~simple ~~life~~to ~~cycle management~~implement.

~~ActivIdentity's~~On ~~Government-to-Citizen~~December 14, ~~("G2C")~~2009, ~~solutions~~the ~~for~~Company ~~government-issued~~completed ~~identity help systems integrators ("SIs") address~~ the ~~challenges~~acquisition of ~~G2C~~CoreStreet. ~~deployments~~CoreStreet byis ~~offering~~ a ~~Credential~~provider ~~Management~~of ~~solution,~~public askey ~~well~~infrastructure as("PKI") ~~complementary~~certification ~~components~~technology, ~~that~~distributed identity SIcredential ~~clients~~validation ~~can~~systems, ~~leverage~~and tophysical ~~securely~~access ~~upload~~control ~~data onto chip-based authentication cards~~products. InTheir ~~addition,~~products ~~ActivIdentity~~are ~~solutions~~used ~~provide~~primarily ~~post-issuance~~by ~~update~~federal ~~capabilities~~and ~~that~~state ~~are~~agencies ~~essential~~in ~~for~~the ~~managing~~United ~~applications that require constant data revisions~~States.

We operate on a fiscal year ending September 30. For convenience in this Annual Report, we refer to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as fiscal 2008, the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as fiscal 2009 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as fiscal 2010.

Recent Developments

On October 11, 2010, the Company, ASSA ABLOY Inc. ("ASSA ABLOY") and FitAcquisition, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ASSA ABLOY ("Merger Sub"), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company. As a result of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist, and the Company will survive as a wholly owned subsidiary of ASSA ABLOY. ASSA ABLOY has indicated its intent after the merger to make the Company part of ASSA ABLOY's HID Global business.

Upon consummation of the merger, each share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the merger (other than (i) shares owned by ASSA ABLOY or Merger Sub, or by any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ASSA ABLOY or Merger Sub and (ii) shares to which appraisal rights are properly sought) and each share of Company common stock subject to restricted stock unit awards, whether vested or unvested, will be converted into the right to receive $3.25 in cash, without interest. Options to acquire shares of Company common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, whether vested or unvested, will be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the product of (A) the excess, if any, of $3.25 over the exercise price per share attributable to such option and (B) the total number of shares of Company common stock issuable upon exercise in full of such option.

The completion of the merger is subject to customary conditions, including without limitation, (i) the approval of the merger by the Company's stockholders, (ii) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which on November 2, 2010, ActivIdentity was notified that early termination of the applicable waiting periods has been granted, and (iii) receipt of other required foreign antitrust approvals. In addition, ASSA ABLOY's obligation to consummate the merger is subject to the Company having at least $68 million in "Company Available Net Cash" (as defined in the Merger Agreement). The Company distributed a definitive proxy statement related to approval of the Merger Agreement and related matters on November 12, 2010 and has scheduled a Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held December 16, 2010. Pending receipt of stockholder approval, we expect the merger to be completed promptly thereafter.

Table of Contents

Beginning on October 12, 2010, several putative class action lawsuits were filed purportedly on behalf of ActivIdentity's stockholders in the Superior Court of Alameda County, California, the Delaware Chancery Court, the United States District Court for Northern California and the United States District Court in Delaware. The complaints name ActivIdentity and each member of the ActivIdentity Board as defendants. The lawsuits allege a variety of claims, including that our board members breached fiduciary duties owed to ActivIdentity stockholders by failing to engage in a fair process and failing to maximize stockholder value in approving the Merger. Several of the complaints also allege that ActivIdentity aided and abetted the members of the ActivIdentity Board in the alleged breach of their fiduciary duties. The Plaintiffs seek relief that includes, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, rescission—to the extent the Merger terms have already been implemented, and the payment of plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs. On December 9, 2010, ActivIdentity and the defendants in a number of the actions entered into a memorandum of understanding which provides for the settlement and dismissal with prejudice of such actions, subject to customary conditions, including completion of appropriate settlement documentation, consummation of the merger and all necessary court approvals.

Market Trends

There are a variety of market trends that stimulate demand for strong authentication and credential management solutions:

Compliance

Compliance can be seen as a new driver for deployment of strong authentication as it enables a pathway to tamper-proof auditing trails to to track who did what and when. Regulatory requirements and economic realities are pressuring organizations to secure access to applications and networks. Many industry standards and government regulations now deem static passwords as inadequate and establish guidance that multi-factor authentication should replace single- factor authentication. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX"), recommendations from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act have led organizations to use stronger forms of authentication to mitigate fraud and protect customer information and patient privacy.

Internal Threat Risk

While static passwords continue to dominate as the primary mechanism for identity verification, they create numerous issues for users and organizations alike. Static passwords are often created by users to be easily remembered, making them vulnerable to guessing, social engineering, and brute force dictionary attacks. Even static passwords created under a stringent policy are vulnerable because users write them down and display them in open areas. A key security concern with static passwords is the fact that a compromise (via keystroke logger or network sniffer) often goes undetected, introducing unknown risks to the organization. Since the economic downturn, the internal risk for many organizations has increased dramatically:

•: According to the 2010 Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report, stolen credentials were the most common way of gaining unauthorized access into organizations in 2009. 38% of network breaches involved stolen passwords and 86% of the records compromised were from attacks involving stolen credentials.
•: According to the PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2011 Global State of Information Security Survey, the business impacts from security breaches, from financial loss to compromises to brands and reputations, have increased as much as 233% over the last four years.

Table of Contents

New Supply Chain Paradigm

The collaboration between companies, other organizations and government agencies is driving requirements to share data across networks and provide access to applications and data behind the firewall. To mitigate risk, many large organizations and government agencies are replacing traditional user names and passwords with digital certificates that enable strong authentication, encryption, and electronic signatures. However, to fully trust the access control and identity assurance services that digital certificates enable, organizations must securely store these digital identities / certificates on authentication devices such as smart cards or smart USB tokens.

Initiatives to Drive Customer Confidence and Loyalty

As a result of the most recent financial crisis, strong authentication is being leveraged as a tool to enhance customer loyalty, especially in the banking and financial services industry.

Product Lines, ~~Products~~ and Services

ActivIdentity provides key building blocks for securing IT infrastructures and digital transactions to defend against security threats and identity fraud and at the same time increase an organization's resource utilization, improve productivity, and maximize return on investment.

ActivIdentity offers ~~four~~five product lines that are the foundation for its ~~E2E, B2C, and G2C~~ solutions:

Strong Authentication

ActivIdentity Strong Authentication suite of products enables organizations to securely address a variety of end-user access control scenarios, ranging from remote access via virtual private networks ("VPN") and secure access to Web-based applications, to secure access to data and applications ~~from~~on ~~the local~~a local network.

ActivIdentity offers two distinct Strong Authentication platforms for organizations that are seeking to implement a cost-effective, flexible, and scalable solution. ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ AAA Server for Remote Access addresses the security risks associated with a mobile workforce accessing systems and data remotely. ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ Authentication Server offers support for many authentication methods (e.g., user name and password, knowledge- based authentication, one-time password ("OTP"), and ~~public key infrastructure ("~~PKI") certificates) and diverse audiences across a variety of service channels, making it the preferred versatile authentication platform for customer- facing transactions and enterprise authentication needs.

Credential Management

ActivIdentity Credential Management products enable organizations to securely deploy and manage smart cards and USB tokens containing a variety of credentials, including PKI certificates, OTPs, static passwords, biometrics, demographic data, and virtually any other application.

The ActivIdentity ActivID™ Card Management System is a highly scalable, reliable, proven, and extensible solution that enables organizations to securely issue and manage the complete life cycle of digital credentials on devices, as well as securely update applications and credentials on devices after they have been issued to end users.

Table of Contents

Together with its Security Client software, Strong Authentication platform, and Authentication Device offering, ActivIdentity can provide organizations with a complete "Smart Employee ID Solution" that can be leveraged for both physical and logical access control.

Table of Contents

Security Clients

ActivIdentity Security Clients software integrates and works seamlessly with ActivIdentity Strong Authentication and Credential Management offerings to deliver a comprehensive solution for security and network access.

The ActivIdentity ActivClient™ secures desktops and networks with strong authentication based on smart cards and PKI. ActivIdentity ActivClient™ supports the U.S. government's most stringent security requirements and standards. Organizations have issued millions of cards to secure network access, encrypt data, sign emails, and log in to Web applications.

ActivIdentity SecureLogin™ Single Sign-On software provides a simple and secure approach, enabling consistent password management and allowing organizations to provide a single secure sign-on for both local and remote users.

The ActivIdentity™ Authentication Client provides end users with self services to temporarily enable access to workstations and reset Windows passwords. In addition, it allows management with auditing, diagnostic, and policy configuration support and enables smart card password authentication.

Authentication Devices

Organizations' strong authentication needs vary widely based on transaction risks, deployment scenarios, and user communities. ActivIdentity offers a broad range of authentication devices that interoperate with its Strong Authentication and Credential Management products. These devices include the ActivIdentity line of OTP Tokens and other third- party devices such as Smart Cards, Smart Card Readers, Smart USB Tokens, Display Card Tokens, Soft Tokens and Hardware Security Modules.

Physical Access Products

The Company provides technology for the convergence of information technology ("IT") and physical security. The Company provides developer kits to physical access control system ("PACS") vendors to enable their products with Federal Information Processing Standards 201 ("FIPS-201") functionality using the F5 Solution and low cost access control with Card-Connected™ technology. This enables PACS manufacturers and their integrators to enable their products to meet government requirements for FIPS-201 compliance. The Card-Connected Technology uses strong cryptography to extend central access control to standalone doors and mobile locks at a fraction of the cost.

Services

ActivIdentity offers training, implementation, onsite support and ongoing architecture assessment services to guide and support organizations. Professional services are offered to ensure that the ~~deployment~~deployments of ActivIdentity solutions meet an organization's security, compliance, and vulnerability management needs. Training programs help an organization learn quickly how to configure, administer, and optimize ActivIdentity strong authentication and credential management solutions in its network environment.

Customers

Our customers include primarily large- scale organizations in the technology, government, manufacturing, banking and financial services industries.

For fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, ~~Novell~~we ~~accounted~~had ~~for~~one ~~more~~customer ~~than~~that ~~10% of our total revenue. In fiscal 2007, Novell and Electronic Data Systems (EDS)~~ accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue.

At September 30, ~~Sales~~2010, ~~Services~~we had one customer's receivable balance that accounted for an aggregate of 12% of total accounts receivable. At September 30, ~~and~~2009, ~~Marketing~~ our two largest customers' receivable

Our sales and marketing efforts are aimed at building long-term relationships with our customers. We market and sell our products and technologies through our worldwide direct sales force and through a network of partners including SIs, original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), value added distributors ("VADs"), and VARs. Our direct sales force focuses on the top 2,000 companies worldwide and government agencies, working in concert with our channel sales and business development teams supporting initiatives with our SI, OEM, VAD and VAR partners. 7

Table of Contents

Inbalances ~~addition~~accounted tofor ~~sales~~an ~~and~~aggregate ~~service~~of ~~offices~~30% ~~in the United States, we conduct sales, marketing, and services out~~ of ~~wholly-owned~~total ~~subsidiaries~~accounts orreceivable. ~~branches~~We inextend ~~other~~credit ~~countries,~~to ~~including~~these ~~the United Kingdom~~customers, ~~France,~~and ~~Germany,~~management ~~Singapore,~~believes ~~and~~that ~~Australia.~~the ~~International~~receivable ~~revenue~~balances ~~accounted~~from ~~for~~these ~~approximately~~large ~~53%,~~customers ~~58%,~~are collectible ~~and~~based ~~59%~~on of our ~~total~~assessment ~~revenue~~of intheir ~~fiscal 2009~~creditworthiness, ~~2008,~~account aging and ~~2007,~~past ~~respectively~~collection experience. ~~We maintain~~However, anthese ~~export~~customers ~~compliance~~represent ~~program~~a ~~that~~significant isexposure ~~designed~~if toone ~~meet~~or ~~the~~more ~~requirements~~ of ~~the~~them ~~U.S.~~were unable ~~Departments~~to ~~of Commerce and State~~pay.

~~We believe~~ ~~that sales outside the United States will continue to be a significant percentage of our total revenue. Our future performance will depend~~Sales, ~~in part~~Services, ~~on our ability to continue to compete successfully in Europe, one of the largest markets for our solutions. International sales~~ and operations may be adversely affected by the imposition of governmental controls, restrictions on export technology, political instability, trade restrictions, changes in tariffs and the difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations. In addition, international sales may be adversely affected by the economic conditions in each country. The revenue from our international business may also be affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our future business and financial results. Marketing

~~ActivIdentity provides~~Our ~~technical~~sales ~~support~~and ~~from~~marketing ~~offices~~efforts ~~located~~are inaimed ~~the~~at ~~U.S.,~~building ~~France,~~long-term ~~and~~relationships ~~the~~with ~~United~~our ~~Kingdom~~customers. ~~These~~We ~~offices~~market ~~provide~~and ~~technical~~sell ~~support to~~ our products ~~integration~~ and ~~distribution partners,~~technologies ~~who,~~through inour ~~turn,~~worldwide ~~provide~~direct ~~first~~sales ~~level~~force and ~~second~~through ~~level~~a ~~support~~network toof ~~end~~partners ~~users.~~including WeSIs, ~~offer~~Original ~~certification~~Equipment ~~training~~Manufacturers ~~programs~~("OEMs"), ~~and~~Value ~~have~~Added ~~established~~Distributors ~~a worldwide~~ ("~~ActivIdentity~~VADs"), ~~Channel~~and Value ~~Partner~~Added ~~Program~~Resellers ("VARs"). ~~In addition,~~Our wedirect ~~provide~~sales ~~telephone~~force ~~and~~focuses ~~online~~on ~~support~~the ~~services~~top to2,000 ~~answer~~companies ~~inquiries~~worldwide ~~related~~and togovernment ~~implementation~~agencies, ~~integration,~~working ~~and~~in ~~operation~~concert ofwith our ~~products~~channel sales and ~~technologies.~~business ~~Our~~development ~~standard practice is to~~teams ~~provide~~supporting ainitiatives ~~one-year~~with ~~warranty~~our onSI, ~~hardware~~OEM, VAD and ~~ninety~~VAR ~~days on software products~~partners.

In addition to sales and service offices in the United States, we conduct sales, marketing, and services out of wholly owned subsidiaries or branches in other countries, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Singapore, and Australia. International revenue accounted for approximately 46%, 53%, and 58% of our total revenue in fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. We maintain an export compliance program that is designed to meet the requirements of U.S. export laws and regulations.

ActivIdentity provides technical support from offices located in the U.S., France, and the United Kingdom. These offices provide third level technical support to end users, integrators, and distribution partners, who, in turn, provide first level and second level support to their end users and customers. We offer certification training programs and have established a worldwide "ActivIdentity Channel Partner Program." The third level support we provide includes email, telephone, and online support services to answer inquiries related to implementation, integration, and operation of our products and technologies. Our standard practice is to provide a one-year warranty on hardware and ninety days on software products.

We have organized our marketing efforts into three functional groups to support our business strategies as follows:

~~Product and~~ Solutions Marketing

The ~~product and~~ solutions ~~marketing~~markets team is responsible for synthesizing data from key customers, partners, and industry analysts to assist us in defining next generation solutions/products. Furthermore, the ~~product and~~ solutions ~~marketing~~markets team develops all sales and market messaging, positioning, collateral, and selling tools to enable our sales force and channel partners to capitalize on market opportunities and effectively position and sell our products.

Channel ~~and Partner~~ Marketing

Our channel ~~and partner~~ marketing organization defines and implements integrated marketing programs to increase brand and product awareness, as well as capture mindshare and enthusiasm for ActivIdentity solutions with our channel ~~and~~ partner sales forces.

Corporate Marketing ~~Services~~

Corporate marketing efforts include public relations, Internet, telemarketing, trade shows, online advertising, email campaigns, channel promotions, associations marketing, and seminars. Our marketing programs target global 2000 companies and government decision makers, information technology managers and service providers using a high value approach addressing business problem solving and return on investment.

~~Competition~~ 8

We compete in the strong authentication, credential management, security clients and authentication devices markets. We compete with numerous companies in each of these technology

Table of Contents

~~categories. The~~ ~~overall number of our competitors may increase and the identity and composition of competitors may change over time.~~ Competition

~~The worldwide~~We ~~market~~compete ~~for~~in ~~identity~~the ~~management~~strong ~~is highly competitive. In each of our product categories~~authentication, wecredential ~~face competition from established and potential competitors~~management, ~~some of which may have greater financial, research, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we have, such as RSA Security (the~~ security ~~division~~clients ~~of EMC Corporation), VeriSign, SafeNet, IBM, Passlogix, Thales Group,~~ and ~~Vasco~~authentication ~~Data~~devices ~~Security International Inc~~markets. We ~~may~~compete ~~also face future competition from new market entrants from other overseas and domestic sources. We expect our competitors to~~with ~~continue~~numerous tocompanies ~~improve~~in ~~the~~each ~~design and performance~~ of ~~their~~these ~~current~~technology ~~products and processes and to introduce new products and processes with improved price and performance characteristics~~categories. WeThe ~~believe~~overall ~~that to~~number ~~remain competitive, we will require significant financial resources to offer a broad range~~ of ~~products,~~our ~~to maintain~~competitors ~~customer~~may ~~service~~increase and ~~support~~the ~~centers~~identity ~~worldwide,~~ and tocomposition ~~invest~~of incompetitors ~~product~~may ~~and~~change ~~process~~over ~~research and development~~time.

WeThe ~~believe~~worldwide ~~that~~market ~~the~~for ~~principal~~identity ~~factors~~management ~~affecting~~is ~~competition~~highly incompetitive. In each of our product ~~segments~~categories, ~~include~~we ~~system~~face ~~performance~~competition from established and potential competitors, ~~ease~~some of ~~use~~which may have greater financial, ~~reliability~~research, ~~installed~~engineering, ~~base~~manufacturing and marketing resources than we have, ~~technical~~such ~~service~~as ~~and~~RSA ~~support~~Security (the Security Division of EMC), ~~product~~ ~~functionality~~VeriSign, ~~scalability~~SafeNet, ~~flexibility~~IBM, ~~use~~Passlogix, ofThales ~~open~~Group, Intercede ~~standards~~Group, ~~return~~and onVasco ~~investment,~~Data Security International. We may also face future competition from new market entrants from other overseas and ~~total~~domestic ~~cost~~sources. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of ~~ownership~~their current products and processes and to introduce new products and processes with improved price and performance characteristics. We believe that to remain competitive, ~~while~~we ~~price~~will ~~and~~require ~~delivery~~significant ~~are~~financial ~~important~~resources ~~competitive~~to ~~factors, the~~offer ~~customers'~~a ~~overriding~~broad ~~requirement~~range isof ~~for~~products, ~~systems~~to ~~that~~maintain ~~easily~~customer service and ~~effectively~~support ~~incorporate~~centers ~~into~~worldwide, ~~their~~and ~~existing~~to ~~ecosystem~~invest in product and ~~enhance~~process research ~~productivity~~and development.

We ~~intend~~believe tothat ~~invest~~we incompete ~~the~~favorably ~~development~~with ofrespect ~~comprehensive,~~to ~~flexible,~~the ~~and~~principal ~~cost-effective~~factors ~~security~~affecting ~~solutions~~competition ~~that~~in ~~adhere~~our toproduct ~~industry~~segments, ~~standards~~which ~~and~~include ~~provide~~system ~~advanced~~performance, ~~features~~ease ~~and~~of use, reliability, ~~functions~~installed ~~for~~base, ~~specific~~technical ~~markets.~~service Inand ~~addition~~support, weproduct ~~will~~functionality, ~~continue~~scalability, toflexibility, ~~leverage~~use ~~our~~of ~~leadership~~open ~~position~~standards, inreturn ~~the~~on ~~U.S.~~investment, ~~Federal~~and ~~government~~total ~~market~~cost toof ~~expand~~ownership. ~~our~~We ~~business~~believe tothat, ~~address~~while ~~customer~~price and ~~needs,~~delivery ~~develop~~are ~~our channel~~important ~~partners~~competitive factors, ~~and~~the ~~implement~~customers' ~~new~~overriding ~~promotional~~requirement ~~campaigns~~is tofor ~~increase~~systems ~~the~~that ~~awareness~~are easily and ~~adoption~~effectively ofincorporated ~~our~~into ~~solutions~~their existing ecosystem and enhance productivity.

Management believes that we are well positioned in the market with respect to both our products and services. However, any loss of competitive position could negatively impact our prices, customer orders, revenue, gross margins, and market share, any of which would negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Industry Associations

~~At ActivIdentity, innovation is born of imagination and molded by pragmatism.~~ As a leading innovator in strong authentication and credential management, ActivIdentity is dedicated to driving industry standards. ActivIdentity belongs to a range of trade groups, ~~and~~ industry associations and standards organizations to advance interoperability, ensure ~~the~~ the highest technical standards, and promote innovative strong authentication and credential management technologies now and in the future.

As of September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ActivIdentity isparticipated ain ~~member of~~ the following industry associations:

•: GlobalPlatform (GP)
•: The Smart Card Alliance
•: Initiative for Open AuTHentication (OATH)
•: Kantara Initiative
•: American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
•: Transglobal Secure Collaboration Program (TSCP)
•: Intellect

Intellectual Property

Our success is heavily dependent on our ability to create proprietary technology and to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, as well as our ability to defend against adverse claims of third parties with respect to our technology and intellectual property.

8 We rely primarily on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, patents, restrictions on disclosure, and other methods to protect our intellectual property. We also enter into

Table of Contents

Weconfidentiality ~~rely primarily on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, patents, restrictions on disclosure,~~ and ~~other methods to protect our intellectual property. We also enter into confidentiality and~~/or invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, and current and potential affiliates, customers, and business partners. We also generally control access to and distribution of ~~proprietary~~our software, documentation and other confidential ~~information. In addition, we limit access to~~ and ~~distribution of our software, documentation, and other~~ proprietary information.

WeAs ~~have~~of ~~been~~September 30, ~~issued~~2010, ~~numerous~~we ~~patents~~had ~~(approximately~~120 ~~100~~patents issued and ~~another~~applications ~~100~~for 110 pending) in the U.S. and abroad, covering a wide range of our technology. ~~Additionally,~~From wetime ~~have filed numerous patent applications with respect~~ to ~~certain~~time, ~~aspects~~we ofacquire license ~~our~~rights ~~technology~~under ~~in the~~ U.S. ~~Patent~~ and ~~Trademark~~foreign ~~Office~~patents and ~~patent~~other ~~offices~~proprietary ~~outside~~rights ~~the~~of Uthird parties.S.

~~From~~Patents ~~time~~may tonot ~~time,~~be weawarded ~~acquire~~with ~~license~~respect ~~rights~~to ~~under~~these ~~United~~applications ~~States~~ and ~~foreign~~even ~~patents~~if ~~and~~such ~~other~~patents ~~proprietary~~are ~~rights of third parties. For instance~~awarded, insuch ~~July 2006 we acquired certain~~ patents ~~and~~ ~~related~~may ~~intellectual~~not ~~property~~provide inus ~~the area of digital identity management from a third party for approximately $4.0 million to enhance our patent position. In June 2005 we out-licensed on an exclusive basis,~~ with ~~retained~~sufficient ~~rights~~protection ~~for internal use, certain~~ of our ~~biometric patents and pending~~intellectual ~~patent applications for $4~~property.~~1 million.~~

We continue to file patent applications both in the U.S. and abroad to protect key technologies and innovations provided by our research and development efforts. Patents may not be awarded with respect to these applications and even if such patents are awarded, such patents may not provide us with sufficient protection of our intellectual property.

Research and Development

We have research and development teams in Fremont, California (United States) and Suresnes (France) that are responsible for the design, development, and release of our products. The research and development function is organized into product management, product architecture, development, quality assurance, and documentation disciplines. When appropriate, we also integrate into our products ~~into~~ third party technology that we purchase or license to shorten our time-to-market.

The focus of our research and development efforts is to bring to market enhanced versions of our existing products, as well as new products, in order to address customer needs while maintaining compliance with government and industry standards. Our research and development expenses were $15.19 million, $1815.91 million, and $1918.9 million in fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007,~~ 2008, respectively.

Operations

We have established relationships with hardware manufacturers and assemblers and software reproducers. Additionally, we have outsourcing arrangements for product warehousing and fulfillment services. Our global production and distribution capacity supports our current requirements and can readily be increased by augmenting existing production lines with current suppliers. We maintain ownership of all manufacturing tools, molds and software, supply all critical components, and define all manufacturing processes and quality control processes, thereby granting us the ability to relocate the manufacturing process or sub-license the manufacturing rights to a third party supplier should any unforeseen interruption occur.

Our hardware products are manufactured by third- party vendors based in China and Singapore. Our hardware products are shipped directly to our distribution partners and customers or to company warehouses in Fremont, California (United States), Hong Kong, Singapore, and Suresnes (France) for subsequent distribution. Software products are produced and packaged in Fremont, California (United States) and Suresnes (France).

9 Segment Information

~~Table~~ We operate in one reportable segment in which we provide management of ~~Contents~~identity solutions, and accordingly disclose segment information by geographic area only. Information regarding our revenue and property and equipment in the United States and in countries outside the United States is contained in Note—18 Segment Information to our consolidated financial statements included in this report and is incorporated in this section by this reference.

Backlog

Our backlog for products at any point in time is not significant because products are generally ~~shipped~~delivered upon receipt of order. We do not believe that our backlog at any particular point in time is indicative of future sales levels. The timing and volume of customer orders are difficult to forecast because our customers typically require prompt delivery of products and a majority of our sales are booked and shipped in the same quarter. In addition, sales are generally made pursuant to standard purchase orders that can be rescheduled, reduced or canceled prior to shipment with little or no penalty.

Table of Contents

booked and delivered in the same quarter. In addition, sales are generally made pursuant to standard purchase orders that can be rescheduled, reduced or canceled prior to delivery with little or no penalty.

Employees

As of September 30, ~~2009,~~2010 we employed approximately ~~220~~218 people on a full-time basis, 111 in the United States and ~~109~~ 107 elsewhere. Of the total, 8215 were in ~~product~~operations ~~research~~ and ~~development~~customer support, 5496 were in ~~sales~~research and ~~marketing~~development, 3070 were in ~~product~~sales ~~support~~ and ~~consulting services~~marketing, ~~ten~~and in37 ~~product~~were ~~management, five~~ in ~~operations, and 39 in~~ general and administration.

Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements.

Executive Officers

Our executive officers as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 and their ages and titles as of that date were as follows:

Name		Position
Grant Evans	5152	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Jacques Kerrest	63	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Michael Sotnick	42	Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Field Operations
John Boyer	34	Senior Vice President, Worldwide Engineering
John Boyer	33	Senior Vice President, Worldwide Engineering

Grant Evans has served as our Chief Executive Officer since April 2008 and was elected to the Board in March 2008. Mr. Evans served from January 2003 to March 2007 as the Chief Executive Officer and as a Director of A4Vision, Inc., a developer and manufacturer of machine vision technology for identity security. Prior to this, he served from March 1999 to March 2002 as the Executive Vice President at Identix, a publicly traded developer and manufacturer of identification technology solutions. Mr. Evans was also previously Vice President and General Manager of Identicator Technology and was responsible for leading that company's strategic direction and launching the commercial biometric market. Mr. Evans ishas served as a member of the board of directors of Bioscrypt and 3VR, a security access and video surveillance control company.

Jacques Kerrest joined the Company in August 2008 as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company, from September 2004 until March 2008, Mr. Kerrest served as the Chief Financial Officer of Virgin Media, Inc., a communications company. From June 2003 to August 2004, Mr. Kerrest was the Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Equant, N.V., a global enterprise communications infrastructure company. From August 1997 to May 2003, Mr. Kerrest was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Harte-Hanks, Inc., a worldwide direct and targeted marketing company. From August 1995 to July 1997, Mr. Kerrest served as the Chief Financial Officer of Chancellor Broadcasting Company, a radio broadcasting company. From 1993 to July 1995, Mr. Kerrest was the Chief Financial Officer of Positive Communications, Inc., a private telecommunications company. Mr. Kerrest is a member of the board of directors of CKX, Inc., a company engaged in entertainment content management.

10 John Boyer joined the Company in October 2001 and has served as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Engineering since November 2008. Mr. Boyer served from October 2004 to October 2008 as our Director of Architecture and Chief Architect, from January 2003 to September 2004 as our Manager of Product Architecture, and from November 2001 to December 2002 in various engineering management positions. From March 1999 to October 2001, Mr. Boyer held various engineering roles at American Biometric Company, Ltd., a subsidiary of DEW Engineering and Development, Ltd.

Table of Contents

Michael Sotnick joined the Company in December 2008 as our Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Field Operations. Prior to joining the Company, from January 2005 until August 2008, Mr. Sotnick served as the Senior Vice President and General Manager of SAP Americas, Inc., a subsidiary of SAP AG, a software company. From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Sotnick served in various roles at Veritas Software Corporation, a storage and management software company, including as the Vice President of Partner Sales from 2001 to 2004 and other sales positions from 1999 to 2001. From 1994 to 1999, Mr. Sotnick served in various sales positions at Seagate Software Corporation, a software company that was a subsidiary of Seagate Technology, including Managing Director, Europe/Middle East/Africa, Director National Sales, and Eastern Area Sales Manager.

John Boyer joined the Company in October 2001 and has served as our Senior Vice President, Engineering since November 2008. Mr. Boyer served from October 2004 to October 2008 as our Director of Architecture and Chief Architect, from January 2003 to September 2004 as our Manager of Product Architecture, and from November 2001 to December 2002 in various engineering management positions. From March 1999 to October 2001, Mr. Boyer held various engineering roles at American Biometric Company, Ltd., a subsidiary of DEW Engineering and Development, Ltd.

Available Information

Additional information about ActivIdentity is available on our website at www.actividentity.com. We make available free of charge on our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC. Additionally, these filings may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, by mailing a request to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-0213, by sending an electronic message to the SEC at publicinfo@sec.gov or by sending a fax to the SEC at 1-202-772-9295. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Table of Contents

Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC. Additionally, these filings may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, by mailing a request to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-0213, by sending an electronic message to the SEC at publicinfo@sec.gov or by sending a fax to the SEC at 1-202-772-9295. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors That May Affect Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Set forth below are certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and/or stock price. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem less significant also may impair our business operations.

We ~~have~~ Risks aRelating ~~history~~to ~~of losses and we may experience losses in~~ the ~~foreseeable~~Pending ~~future.~~ Merger

~~We have not achieved profitability and we may incur losses for the foreseeable future. In fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, we incurred~~ ~~losses~~Our ofbusiness ~~approximately $5.5 million, $76.5 million,~~ and ~~$9.3 million,~~stock ~~respectively.~~price As of September 30, 2009, our accumulated deficit was $328.6 million, which represents our net losses since inception. Although we had approximately $92.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, and investments as of September 30, 2009, we may ~~not~~ be ~~able~~materially toand ~~raise additional~~adversely ~~capital~~affected inif the ~~event~~merger ~~that~~with ~~our~~ASSA ~~current~~ABLOY ~~cash~~is ~~and~~not ~~cash equivalents are insufficient~~completed.

On October 11, 2010, we entered into a merger an agreement of merger with ASSA ABLOY and Merger Sub, which provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into ActivIdentity, with pursuant to which ActivIdentity surviving would survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of ASSA ABLOY. The announcement of the planned merger could have an adverse effect on our revenues in the near term if customers delay, defer, or cancel purchases in response to the announcement. To the extent that the announcement of the merger creates uncertainty among our current or potential customers contemplating purchases of our products or services such that several large customers, or a significant group of small customers, delay purchase decisions pending completion of the planned merger, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected, our quarterly revenues could be substantially below the expectations of market analysts and the market price for our shares of common stock could decline. Furthermore, activities relating to the proposed merger and related uncertainties could cause employees to seek alternative employment and weaken our ability to recruit qualified personnel which could detract from our ability to generate revenue and control costs.

In addition, completion of the pending merger is subject to certain conditions, including approval by the holders of our common stock of ActivIdentity stockholders. We cannot be certain that these conditions will be met or waived, that the necessary stockholder approval will be obtained or that we will be able to successfully consummate the merger as currently contemplated under the merger agreement or at all. If the merger is not completed, we could be subject to a number of risks that may materially and adversely affect our business and stock price, including:

•: the diversion of our management's attention from our day to day business and the unavoidable disruption to our employees and our relationships with customers which, in turn, may detract from our ability to grow revenues and minimize costs and lead to a loss of market position that we might be unable to regain;
•: the market price of our shares of common stock may decline to the extent the current market price of those shares reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed;

Table of Contents

•: under certain circumstances we could be required to pay ASSA ABLOY a termination fee of approximately $5.0 million;
•: we may experience a negative reaction to any termination of the merger from our customers, employees or affiliates which may adversely impact our future results of operations as a stand-alone entity; and
•: the amount of the costs, fees and expenses and charges related to the merger.

Restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the pending merger with ASSA ABLOY may have a negative impact on our operating results.

We have agreed to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business in connection with the proposed merger with ASSA ABLOY that require us to conduct our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practices, subject to specific limitations. These restrictions may delay or prevent us from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We have a history of losses and we may experience losses in the foreseeable future.

We have not achieved profitability and we may incur losses for the foreseeable future. In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, we incurred losses of approximately $5.7 million, $5.5 million, and $76.5 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, our accumulated deficit was $334.3 million, which represents our net losses since inception. Although we had approximately $78.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, and investments as of September 30, 2010, we may not be able to raise additional capital in the event that our current cash and cash equivalents are insufficient.

We will need to achieve incremental revenue growth and manage our costs to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis thereafter. It is possible that our revenue will grow at a slower rate than we anticipate or that operating expenses will increase beyond our current run rate. The current global economic slowdown could slow customer orders, as well as anticipated revenue growth, and could further delay our prospects for operating profitability.

Our cost-reduction initiatives may not result in the anticipated savings or more efficient operations and may harm our long-term viability.

Over the past several years, we have implemented extensive cost cutting measures and have incurred significant cost-reduction charges as we have attempted to streamline operations, improve efficiency, and reduce costs. We expect that we may undertake further cost-reduction initiatives in the future as we realign our business around areas of strategic focus. Although we believe that it has been and will continue to be necessary to reduce the size and cost of our operations to improve our performance, the reduction in our operations may make it more difficult to develop and market new products and to compete successfully with other companies in our industry. In addition, many of the employees who have been terminated as part of our cost-reduction activities possessed specific knowledge or expertise that may prove to have been important to our operations, and we may be required to rehire them or to hire persons with similar skills in order to develop new products to increase our revenue. These efforts may not result in anticipated cost savings, making it difficult for us to achieve profitability. These cost-reduction initiatives may also preclude us from making complementary acquisitions and/or other potentially significant expenditures that could improve our product offerings, competitiveness or long-term prospects.

Table of Contents

Our operating results may continue to be adversely affected by the current economic environment, unfavorable market and economic conditions.

The current global economic environment may continue to have a negative impact on demand for our services, our business and our foreign operations. The economic environment has or may negatively impact, among other things:

•: Current and future demand for our products;
•: Our customers' continued growth and development of their businesses and our customers' abilities to continue as going concerns;
•: The ability of our customers to maintain their business;
•: Price competition for our products and services;
•: The price of our common stock; or
•: Our liquidity.

In addition, to the extent that the economic environment impacts specific industry and geographic sectors in which many of our customers are concentrated, that may further negatively impact our business. If the economic and market conditions in the U.S. and globally do not improve, or if they further deteriorate, we may experience material adverse impacts on our business, operating results and financial position as a consequence of the above factors or otherwise.

We derive revenue from only a limited number of products and we do not have a diversified product base.

Substantially all of our revenue is derived from the sale of our credential management and strong authentication systems and products. We anticipate that substantially all of our future revenue, if any, will also be derived from these products. If for any reason our sale of these products is impeded or if we divest existing product lines as part of our ongoing strategic realignment, and we have not diversified our product offerings, our business and results of operations could be harmed. We have reduced our product offerings as part of our prior restructuring initiatives to focus on our core products and do not expect to diversify our product offerings in the foreseeable future.

Our customer base is highly concentrated and the loss of any one of these customers or delay in anticipated orders could adversely affect our business.

Our customers consist primarily of medium to large enterprises, governments, system integrators, resellers, distributors, and OEMs. Historically, we have experienced a concentration of revenue in certain of our channel partners and customers. In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, ~~Novell~~one ~~accounted~~customer ~~for more than 10% of our total revenue. In fiscal 2007, Novell and Electronic Data Systems (EDS) each~~ accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. Additionally, a substantial portion of our total product revenue is generated from the governmental sector. In fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008, worldwide government business accounted for approximately 1910%, 2019%, and 2720%, respectively, of total product revenue. Although government spending is currently ~~high~~higher in light of various economic recovery initiatives, diversion of government resources to economic recovery programs and reductions in state and local government spending may harm our business. We expect future revenue variability in this sector due to fluctuations in government ordering patterns and frequent delays associated with larger programs.

Our operating results would be adversely affected if any of the following events occur:

•: The loss of significant customers;
•: The failure of our significant customers to pay us due to their financial difficulties or for any other reason;

1214

Table of Contents

•: The failure of any of our significant channel partners to renew their contracts upon expiration, or the termination by these partners of their contracts;
•: The divestiture of products or product lines, which would cause the loss of related revenue; or
•: Delays in orders from governmental agencies.

We expect to continue to depend upon a small number of large customers for a substantial portion of our revenue, and the occurrence of any of the above events could further extend our reliance on remaining customers.

Our quarterly gross and net margins are difficult to predict, and if we miss quarterly financial expectations, our stock price could decline.

Our quarterly revenue, expense levels, and operating results are difficult to predict and fluctuate from quarter to quarter. It is likely that our operating results in some periods will vary from the guidance we have provided, or otherwise not meet investor expectations. If this happens, the market price of our common stock is likely to decline. Fluctuations in our future quarterly operating results may be caused by many factors, including:

•: The size and timing of customer orders which are received unevenly and unpredictably throughout a fiscal year and may be subject to seasonality relating to the United States federal government's fiscal year and related spending patterns;
•: The mix of products licensed and types of license agreements;
•: The effect of generally accepted accounting principles on the timing of revenue recognition; for example, if prices for our products or services vary significantly, we may not maintain vendor specific objective evidence of fair value of undelivered elements which could result in deferring revenue to future periods;
•: The timing of customer payments;
•: The size and timing of revenue recognized in advance of actual customer billings and customers with installment payment schedules that may result in higher accounts receivable balances;
•: Changes in financial markets, which could adversely affect the value of our assets and our liquidity;
•: The relative mix of our software and services revenue, as well as the relative mix of product offerings, which could change in connection with strategic realignment initiatives;
•: The application of new accounting regulations, which could negatively impact results; and
•: Changes in currency exchange rates.

We have a long and often complicated sales cycle, which can result in significant revenue fluctuations between periods.

The sales cycle for our products is typically long and subject to a number of significant risks over which we have little control. The typical sales cycle is six to nine months for an enterprise customer and over twelve months for a network service provider or government. As our operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue levels, a small fluctuation in the timing of sales can cause our operating results to vary significantly between periods. If revenue falls significantly below anticipated levels, our business would be negatively impacted.

~~Purchasing decisions for our products and systems may be subject to delay due to many factors that are outside of our control, such as:~~ 15

Table of Contents

~~Furthermore,~~Purchasing ~~the~~decisions ~~implementation~~for process can be subject to delays resulting from issues associated with incorporating new technologies into existing networks, deployment of a new network system or preservation of existing network infrastructure and data migration to the new system. Full deployment of our ~~technology~~products and ~~products for such networks, servers, or other host~~ systems ~~can~~may be ~~scheduled~~ subject to ~~occur~~delay ~~over~~due anto ~~extended~~many ~~period~~factors ~~and~~that ~~the~~are ~~licensing~~outside of systems and products, including client and server software, smart cards, readers, and tokens, and the recognition of maintenance revenue would also occur over this period. This interaction, thereby can negatively impact the results of our ~~operations in the near term~~control, ~~resulting~~such inas: ~~unanticipated fluctuations between periods.~~

•: Political and economic uncertainties;
•: Time required for a prospective customer to recognize the need for our products;
•: Time and complexity for us to assess and determine a prospective customer's IT environment;
•: Customer's requirements for customized features and functionalities;
•: Turnover of key personnel at existing and prospective customers;
•: Customer's internal budgeting process; and
•: Customer's internal procedures for the approval of large purchases.

Furthermore, the implementation process can be subject to delays resulting from issues associated with incorporating new technologies into existing networks, deployment of a new network system or preservation of existing network infrastructure and data migration to the new system. Full deployment of our technology and products for such networks, servers, or other host systems can be scheduled to occur over an extended period and the licensing of systems and products, including client and server software, smart cards, readers, and tokens, and the recognition of maintenance revenue, would also occur over this period. This can negatively impact the results of our operations in the near term, resulting in unanticipated fluctuations between periods.

The market for some of our products is still developing and if the industry adopts standards or platforms different from our platform, then our competitive position would be negatively affected.

The market for digital identity products is still emerging and is also experiencing consolidation. The evolution of the market is in a constant state of flux that may result in the development of different network computing platforms and industry standards that are not compatible with our current products or technologies.

We believe smart cards are an emerging platform for providing digital identity for network applications and for the procurement of services from private enterprise and government agencies. A key element of our business model is premised on the smart card becoming a common access platform for network computing in the future. Further, we have focused on developing our products for certain operating systems related to smart card deployment and use. Should platforms or form factors other than the smart card emerge as a preferred platform or should operating systems other than the specific systems we have focused on emerge as preferred operating systems, our current product offerings could be at a disadvantage. If this were to occur, our future growth and operating results would be negatively affected. Additionally, consolidation within this industry has created a more difficult competitive environment and may result in the broader adoption of competing platforms and systems.

In addition, the digital identity market has evolving industry-wide standards. While we are actively engaged in discussions with industry peers to define what these standards should be, it is possible that any standards eventually adopted could prove disadvantageous to or incompatible with our business model and product lines. Uncertainty surrounding the Homeland Security Presidential Directive No. 12 ("HSPD 12") may affect sales of our products to government agencies. If our products do not comply with the requirements of HSPD 12, we may not be able to sell to agencies that must comply with this Directive.

We rely on strategic relationships with other companies to develop and market our products. If we are unable to enter into additional relationships, or if we lose an existing relationship, our business could be harmed. 16

Table of Contents

~~research~~ ~~and~~We ~~development~~rely ~~efforts,~~on ~~and~~strategic torelationships ~~jointly~~with ~~engage~~other incompanies ~~marketing~~to ~~efforts~~develop and ~~reseller~~market ~~arrangements~~our products. ToIf ~~date,~~we ~~none~~are ofunable ~~these~~to ~~relationships~~enter isinto ~~exclusive~~additional relationships, ~~and~~or ~~some~~if ofwe ~~our~~lose ~~strategic partners have~~an ~~cooperative~~existing ~~relationships~~relationship, ~~with~~our ~~certain~~business ofcould ~~our~~be ~~competitors~~harmed.

Our success depends on establishing and maintaining strategic relationships with other companies to develop, market, and distribute our technology and products and, in some cases, to incorporate our technology into their products or their technology into our products. Part of our business strategy has been to enter into strategic alliances and other cooperative arrangements with other companies in the industry. We are currently involved in cooperative efforts to incorporate our products into the products of others, to incorporate their technology into our products, to jointly engage in research and development efforts, and to jointly engage in marketing efforts and reseller arrangements. To date, none of these relationships are exclusive, and some of our strategic partners have cooperative relationships with certain of our competitors.

If we are unable to enter into cooperative arrangements in the future or if we lose any of our current strategic or cooperative relationships, our business could be adversely affected. We do not control the time and resources devoted to such activities by parties with whom we have relationships. In addition, we may not have the resources available to satisfy our commitments, which may adversely affect these relationships. These relationships may not continue, may not be commercially successful, or may require the expenditure of significant financial, personnel, and administrative resources from time to time. Further, certain of our products and services compete with the products and services of our strategic partners, which may adversely affect our relationships with these partners, which could adversely affect our business.

We may be adversely affected by operating in international markets.

Our international operations subject us to risks associated with operating in foreign markets, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. International revenue and expenses make up a substantial portion of our business. A severe economic decline in any of our major foreign markets could make it difficult for our customers to pay us on a timely basis. Any such failure to pay, or deferral of payment, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. During fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008, markets outside of North America accounted for 5346%, 5853%, and 5958%, respectively, of total revenue.

We face a number of additional risks inherent in doing business in international markets, including:

•: Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
•: Potentially adverse tax consequences;
•: Export controls relating to encryption technology;
•: Tariffs and other trade barriers;
•: Difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
•: Laws that restrict our ability, and make it costly, to reduce our workforce;
•: Changing political conditions;
•: Exposures to different legal standards; and
•: Burden of complying with a variety of laws and legal systems.

While we present our financial statements in U.S. ~~Dollars~~dollars, a significant portion of our business is conducted outside of the United States, and we incur a significant portion of our expenses in Euros, Australian ~~Dollars~~dollars and British Pounds. Some revenue transactions are denominated in foreign currencies as well. Significant fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and foreign currencies may adversely affect our future operating results. Due to fluctuations in foreign currencies we recorded a loss of $0.8 million in fiscal 2009, a loss of $2.0 million in fiscal 2008, and a gain of $3.4 million in fiscal 2007, on our consolidated statements of operations.

~~We invest in securities that are subject to market risk and the recent problems in the financial markets could adversely affect the value of our assets.~~ 17

During fiscal 2008, we reclassified $33.0 million at cost of our investments in certain auction rate securities ("ARS") from short-term to long-term investments as the auctions for these holdings effectively ceased with no indication as to when or if these auctions would resume in the future. Given

Table of Contents

~~these~~currencies ~~developments~~as ~~and~~well. ~~the~~Significant ~~resultant~~fluctuations ~~consequences~~in ofexchange rates between the ~~lack~~U.S. ofdollars ~~liquidity~~and ~~for~~foreign ~~these~~currencies ~~investments,~~may ~~coupled~~adversely ~~with~~affect ~~other~~our ~~developments~~future inoperating ~~the~~results. ~~credit~~Due ~~markets~~to fluctuations in ~~general,~~foreign currencies we recorded ~~an other-than-temporary~~losses ~~impairment on these holdings~~ of $210.27 million, ~~resulting in a carrying value of~~ $110.8 million ~~at September 30, 2009~~ and ~~September 30,~~ ~~2008. We hold an additional~~ $32.10 million ~~of ARS~~ in ~~short-term~~fiscal ~~investments~~2010, ~~valued at par as of September 30,~~ 2009. ~~These particular ARS investments have had liquidity events recently~~ and we2008, ~~therefore,~~respectively ~~expect~~on ~~that~~our ~~these~~consolidated ~~will~~statements ~~be called in full and at par within twelve months. We continually monitor all~~ of ~~our ARS investments and evaluate any changes as to impairment factors on a continual basis~~operations.

~~ARS~~ ~~are~~We ~~structured~~rely toon ~~provide~~certain ~~liquidity~~key ~~through~~employees. aIf ~~Dutch~~we ~~auction~~are ~~process~~not ~~that~~able ~~resets~~to ~~the~~build ~~interest~~and ~~rates~~maintain ~~paid at pre-determined intervals, generally every 28 days. The auctions have historically provided~~ a ~~liquid~~strong ~~market~~management ~~for these securities. Our investments in ARS represent interests in collateralized debt obligations ("CDO")~~team, ~~closed-end mutual funds, derivative product companies, and student loans. Uncertainty in the financial markets has affected the liquidity of~~ our ~~ARS~~ ~~holdings~~ability ~~and resulted in a significant increase in the risks related~~ to ~~the~~manage ~~ARS investments classified as long-term, specifically the CDO~~ and ~~derivative~~expand ~~product~~our ~~companies~~business ~~securities, and~~will tobe ~~a lesser degree, the student loan holdings~~impacted. ~~During fiscal 2009 and 2008, $0.6 million and $12.3 million respectively, of ARS, specifically the closed-end mutual funds~~Employee ~~and~~turnover ~~taxable~~could ~~municipals,~~adversely ~~were~~impact ~~called at par. Based on the liquidity provided by these holdings during the fiscal year, we continue to classify~~ our ~~remaining closed-end mutual fund holdings as short-term. However~~revenue, ~~future~~costs ~~changes in the market regarding these securities may result in reclassifications~~ and~~/or~~ ~~revaluations in future periods~~productivity.

~~Historically, the~~We ~~fair~~rely ~~value~~on the services of ~~ARS~~Grant ~~approximated~~Evans, ~~par~~our ~~value~~Chief ~~due~~Executive toOfficer, ~~the~~Jacques ~~frequent~~Kerrest, ~~auction~~our ~~events~~Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and John Boyer, our Senior Vice President Worldwide Engineering. ~~However~~Michael Sotnick, ~~failed~~our ~~auctions~~Executive ~~that~~Vice ~~began~~President inWorldwide ~~August~~Sales ~~2007~~and ~~have~~Field ~~resulted~~Operations, left the company in ~~most~~July ~~cases~~2010. We may experience further turnover in management in the future and, as a result, we face challenges in ~~revised~~effectively managing our operations during these periods of transition. If new key employees and other ~~estimates~~members of ~~fair~~our ~~value~~senior ~~that~~management ~~are~~team ~~less~~cannot ~~than~~work ~~par.~~together Weeffectively, ~~have~~or ~~reviewed~~if ~~the~~other ~~ARS~~members ~~investments~~of ~~classified~~our assenior ~~long-term~~management ~~and~~team ~~have~~resign, ~~valued~~our ~~these~~ability ~~holdings~~to ~~accordingly~~effectively ~~using~~manage aour ~~discounted~~business ~~cash~~may ~~flow methodology~~be impacted.

~~While~~In part due to our restructuring efforts over the past several years, we have ~~used~~become ~~what~~increasingly wedependent ~~believe~~on toa besmaller annumber ~~appropriate~~of ~~valuation~~employees. ~~model~~If ~~for~~key ~~these~~employees ~~securities~~leave ~~and~~ActivIdentity, ~~have~~we suffer ~~attempted~~loss toof ~~incorporate~~productivity ~~all~~while ~~known~~new ~~and~~employees ~~significant~~are ~~risk~~hired ~~factors~~or promoted into ~~the~~vacant ~~analysis, we~~positions. ~~must~~The ~~still~~departure ~~make~~of ~~certain~~highly ~~estimates~~skilled ~~and~~key ~~assumptions~~employees ~~when~~sometimes ~~assessing~~results ~~the~~in ~~value~~a loss of ~~the~~talent ~~investment~~or ~~portfolio.~~knowledge ~~These~~that ~~estimates~~is difficult to replace. There are ~~based~~also oncosts ~~market~~of ~~conditions,~~recruiting ~~which~~and ~~are~~relocating ~~currently~~new inemployees ato ~~state~~fill ofthese ~~heightened uncertainty~~positions. AsFor ~~a result~~example, ~~there~~the recruiting market for experienced personnel is ~~much~~very ~~independent~~competitive, ~~judgment~~and ~~required~~we may be limited in ~~deriving~~our ~~these~~ability ~~valuation~~to ~~conclusions~~attract and retain key operations talent if the need should arise. ~~Accordingly,~~New ~~assumptions~~employees ~~regarding~~must ~~cash~~learn ~~flows~~the ActivIdentity organization, ~~liquidity~~products, ~~discount~~and ~~rates~~procedures. All of this takes time, ~~default~~reduces productivity and ~~other~~ ~~risks~~increases ~~were~~cost. ~~made~~The aspotential ~~part~~adverse impact of ~~management's~~employee ~~analysis~~turnover ~~and~~is ~~valuation~~greater offor situations involving senior positions in the Company, and our ~~ARS~~turnover ~~holdings~~rate asmay be higher if key employees decided to leave on their own accord. If turnover increases, the adverse impact of ~~September 30~~turnover could materially affect our costs, ~~2009~~productivity, or ability to respond quickly to the competitive environment.

We ~~believe~~We we have ~~made~~recorded ~~reasonable~~significant ~~judgments~~write indowns ~~our valuation exercise. If the relevant assumptions, estimates, or the related analyses still prove incorrect or, if due to additional information received~~ in ~~the~~recent ~~future,~~periods ~~management's~~for ~~conclusions~~impairment ~~change, we may be required to change the recorded value~~ of ~~these~~acquired ~~securities,~~intangible orassets ~~other securities that make up the investment portfolio. We will continue to carefully monitor these securities~~ and ~~the~~goodwill ~~ARS markets,~~ and ~~work diligently to recover any lost value through all available means. We recently sold some of our ARS and the results of those sales~~ may ~~not~~have besimilar ~~indicative~~write ofdowns in future ~~amounts to be realized~~periods. ~~See note—19 Subsequent Events.~~

~~If a~~During ~~liquid~~fiscal ~~market~~2010, ~~for~~in ~~these~~connection ~~securities~~with ~~does~~the ~~not~~CoreStreet ~~develop~~acquisition, ~~the~~we ~~ARS~~recorded ~~holdings may require us to recognize additional impairment charges~~$9.4 million ~~Any~~ of ~~these~~goodwill ~~events~~on ~~could~~our ~~adversely~~balance ~~affect our~~sheet ~~results~~representing ofapproximately ~~operations~~8% ~~and~~of our ~~financial~~total ~~condition~~assets. AAt ~~material~~September 30, ~~change~~2009, inwe ~~these~~had ~~underlying~~no ~~estimates~~goodwill ~~and~~on ~~assumptions~~our ~~could~~balance ~~significantly~~sheet. ~~change~~As ~~the~~of ~~reported~~September 30, ~~value~~2010, we had $9.1 million of ~~the~~other intangible ~~securities~~assets ~~and~~on ~~could~~our ~~cause~~balance ussheet ~~to take~~representing ~~charges~~approximately ~~for~~8% ~~additional~~of ~~write-downs~~our intotal ~~value~~assets.

16 If the Company's enterprise value at a future date is lower than the enterprise value as of our last impairment evaluation, the evaluation could result in an impairment of goodwill and / or other intangible asset impairment charges if the circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Also, if our estimates of future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the use of our other intangible assets drop below the carrying value of such assets, an additional impairment charge may be required.

Table of Contents

We rely on certain key employees and have faced challenges in the past with employee turnover in senior management. If we are not able to build and maintain a strong management team, our ability to manage and expand our business will be impacted. Employee turnover could adversely impact our revenue, costs and productivity.

In recent years, there has been significant and recurring turnover in all levels of management. In March 2008, our Chief Financial Officer, Mark Lustig, announced his resignation, effective in May 2008. In April 2008, Grant Evans became our Chief Executive Officer following the resignation of Thomas Jahn. In August 2008, we hired a new Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer, Jacques Kerrest. In November 2008, our President, Yves Audebert, was terminated. We may experience further turnover in management in the future and, as a result, we face challenges in effectively managing our operations during these periods of transition. If new key employees and other members of our senior management team cannot work together effectively, or if other members of our senior management team resign, our ability to effectively manage our business may be impacted.

In part due to our restructuring efforts over the past several years, we have become increasingly dependent on a smaller number of employees. If key employees leave ActivIdentity, we suffer loss of productivity while new employees are hired or promoted into vacant positions. The departure of highly skilled key employees sometimes results in a loss of talent or knowledge that is difficult to replace. There are also costs of recruiting and relocating new employees to fill these positions. For example, the recruiting market for experienced operations personnel is very competitive and we may be limited in our ability to attract and retain key operations talent if the need should arise. New employees must learn the ActivIdentity organization, products, and procedures. All of this takes time, reduces productivity and increases cost. The potential adverse impact of employee turnover is greater for situations involving senior positions in the Company and our turnover rate may be higher if key employees decided to leave on their own accord. If turnover increases, the adverse impact of turnover could materially affect our costs, productivity, or ability to respond quickly to the competitive environment.

We have recorded significant write-downs in recent periods for impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill and may have similar write-downs in future periods.

We recorded an impairment charge of $35.9 million to goodwill during fiscal 2008, and had previously recorded goodwill impairments in 2005. Due to our declining stock price, we conducted a goodwill impairment analysis in fiscal 2008, and determined the full carrying value of our goodwill was impaired. At September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, we have no goodwill on our balance sheet.

We may terminate additional non-core activities in the future or determine that our long-lived assets or acquired intangible assets have been impaired. Any future termination or impairment related charges could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

As of September 30, 2009, we had $1.8 million of other intangible assets, representing approximately 2% of our total assets. If our estimates of future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the use of our other intangible assets drop below the carrying value of such assets, an additional impairment charge may be required. 18

Table of Contents

While we believe we currently have effective internal control over financial reporting, we may identify a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that could cause investors to lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and result in a decrease in the value of our securities.

We will continue to evaluate, upgrade and enhance our internal controls. Because of inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, errors or omissions, including those caused by human error, the circumvention of overriding controls, the violation of company policies or practices (whether negligent or willful) or fraud, and any projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate. While we believe that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, if we fail to maintain the effectiveness of our internal control including any failure to implement or difficulty in implementing required new or improved controls, our business and results of operations could be harmed, the results of operations we report could be subject to adjustments, we could fail to be able to provide reasonable assurance as to our financial results or the effectiveness of our internal controls or meet our reporting obligations, and there could be a material adverse effect on our stock price and business.

Implementation of the new FASB rules and the issuance of new laws or other accounting regulations, or reinterpretation of existing laws or regulations, could materially impact our stated results.

From time to time, the government, courts and financial accounting rule making bodies issue new laws or accounting regulations, or modify or reinterpret existing ones.

There may be other future changes in FASB rules or in laws, interpretations or regulations that would affect our financial results or the way in which we present them. Additionally, changes in the laws or regulations could have adverse effects on our business that would affect our ability to compete, both nationally and internationally.

We must comply with European governmental regulations setting environmental standards.

Our activities in Europe require that we comply with European Union Directives with respect to product quality assurance standards and environmental standards. Directive 2002/95/ec of the European Parliament on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, known as the RoHS Directive, became effective on July 1, 2006. If we fail to maintain compliance, we may be restricted from selling our products in the European Union and this could adversely affect our results of operations. European Directive 2002/96/EC on waste, electrical and electronic equipment, known as the WEEE Directive, makes manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products. The WEEE Directive became effective on August 13, 2005. We may incur financial responsibility for the collection, recycling, treatment or disposal of products covered under the WEEE Directive. Because the EU member states have not fully implemented the WEEE Directive, the nature and extent of the costs to comply and fees or penalties associated with noncompliance are unknown at this time. Costs to comply with the WEEE Directive and similar future legislation, if applicable, may also include legal and regulatory costs and insurance costs. We may also be required to take additional reserves for costs associated with compliance with these regulations.

We or our suppliers may be impacted by new regulations related to climate change.

In addition to the European environmental regulations noted above, we or our suppliers may become subject to new laws enacted with regards to climate change. In the event that new laws are enacted or current laws are modified in countries in which we or our suppliers operate, our flow of product may be impacted and/or the costs of handling the potential waste associated with our products

Table of Contents

may increase dramatically, either of which could result in a significant negative impact on our ability to operate or operate profitably.

The protection of our intellectual property rights is crucial to our business and, if third parties use our intellectual property without our consent, our business could be damaged.

Our success is heavily dependent on protecting intellectual property rights in our proprietary technology, which is primarily our software. It is difficult for us to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights for a number of reasons, including:

•: Policing unauthorized copying or use of our products is difficult and expensive;
•: Software piracy is a persistent problem in the software industry;
•: Our patents may not cover the full scope of our product offerings and may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or may be enforceable only in certain jurisdictions; and
•: Our shrink-wrap licenses may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions.

Table of Contents

In addition, the laws of many countries do not protect intellectual property rights to as great an extent as those of the United States and France. We believe that effective protection of intellectual property rights is unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries, creating an increased risk of potential loss of proprietary technology due to piracy and misappropriation.

We also seek to protect our confidential information and trade secrets through the use of nondisclosure agreements with our employees, contractors, vendors, and partners. However, there is a risk that our trade secrets may be disclosed or published without our authorization, and in these situations it may be difficult or costly for us to enforce our rights and retrieve published trade secrets.

We sometimes contract with third parties to provide development services to us, and we routinely ask them to sign agreements that require them to assign intellectual property to us that is developed on our behalf. However, there is a risk that they will fail to disclose to us such intellectual property, or that they may have inadequate rights to such intellectual property. This could happen, for example, if they failed to obtain the necessary invention assignment agreements with their own employees.

We ~~are~~have been involved in litigation to protect our intellectual property rights, and we may become involved in further litigation in the future. This type of litigation is costly and ~~could~~ could negatively impact our operating results. See "Item 3 Legal Proceedings." ~~and Note—15 Commitments and Contingencies~~

Our operating results could suffer if we are subject to intellectual property infringement claims.

We may face claims of infringement on proprietary rights of others that could subject us to costly litigation and possible restriction on the use of such proprietary rights. There is a risk that potential infringement or invalidity claims may be asserted or prosecuted against us and our products may be found to have infringed the rights of third parties. Such claims are costly to defend and could subject us to substantial litigation costs. If any claims or actions are asserted against us, we may be required to modify our products or may be forced to obtain a license for such intellectual property rights. However, we may not be able to modify our products or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Table of Contents

We may pursue strategic acquisitions and investments that could have an adverse effect on our business if they are unsuccessful.

As part of our business strategy, we have acquired companies, technologies, product lines and personnel to complement our internally developed products. We expect that we will have a similar business strategy going forward. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

•: Our acquisitions may not enhance our business strategy;
•: We may apply overly optimistic valuation assumptions and models for the acquired businesses, and we may not realize anticipated cost synergies and revenue as quickly as we expected or at all;
•: We may not integrate acquired businesses, technologies, products, personnel and operations effectively;
•: Management's attention may be diverted from our day to day operations, resulting in disruption of our ongoing business;
•: We may not adopt an appropriate business model for integrated businesses, particularly with respect to our "go to market" strategy;
•: Customer demand for the acquired company's products may not meet our expectations;
•: We may incur higher than anticipated costs for the support and development of acquired products;
•: The acquired products may not be compatible with our existing products, making integration of acquired products difficult and costly and potentially delaying the release of other, internally developed products;
•: We may have insufficient revenue to offset the increased expenses associated with acquisitions;
•: We may not retain key employees, customers, distributors and vendors of the companies we acquire;
•: Ineffective internal controls of the acquired company may require remediation as part of the integration process;
•: We may be required to assume pre-existing contractual relationships, which may be costly for us to terminate and disruptive for our customers;
•: The acquisitions may result in infringement, trade secret, product liability or other litigation: and
•: If we are unable to acquire companies that facilitate our strategic objectives, we may not have sufficient time to develop our own products and may not remain competitive.

Table of Contents

As a result, it is possible that the contemplated benefits of these or any future acquisitions may not materialize within the time periods or to the extent anticipated.

Changes in, or interpretations of, tax rules and regulations may adversely affect our effect tax rates.

We are a U.S. based multinational organization subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Unanticipated changes in our tax rates could affect our future results of operations. Our future effective tax rates could be unfavorable affected by changes in, or interpretation of, tax rules and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we do business, by lapses of the availability of the U.S. research and development tax credits, or by the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Table of Contents

We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities as a result of inter-company transfer pricing policies.

As a multinational organization, we conduct business and are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment and analysis is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision and related tax liabilities. In the ordinary course of a global business, ~~inter-company~~intercompany transactions and calculations result in a variety of uncertain tax positions. Our ~~inter-company~~intercompany pricing policies are subject to audits in the various foreign tax jurisdictions. Although we believe ~~that~~ that our tax estimates are reasonable, there is no assurance that the final determination of tax audits or potential tax disputes will not be different from what is reflected in our historical income ~~tax~~ tax provisions and accruals.

It may be difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, which could affect the price of our common stock.

In July 2008, we adopted a stockholder rights agreement, which is sometimes also called a "poison pill." This agreement has the effect of discouraging a stockholder from acquiring more than 20% of our issued and outstanding common stock without prior approval of our Board of Directors. We are also afforded the protections of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prevent us, for a period of three years from engaging in a business combination with a person who acquires more than 15% of our common stock unless our Board of Directors or stockholders' approval is obtained. Defensive measures such as the stockholder rights agreement and Section 203 are expected to have the effect of discouraging coercive hostile takeover attempts where the Board of Directors does not support the transaction. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction could deter potential acquirers or prevent the completion of a transaction in which our stockholders could receive a premium over the then current market price for their shares.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

We have no unresolved staff comments as of the date of this filing.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our properties consist primarily of leased office facilities for sales, marketing, research and development, and support and administrative personnel. Our corporate headquarters are located in Fremont, California. The table below shows the lease expiration dates (or the applicable cancellation period) and approximate square footage of the facilities that we lease ~~globally~~ as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010.

Location		Lease Expiration
Fremont, California(1)	41,000	February ~~2011~~2020
Suresnes, France	721,000	June ~~2012~~2015
Cambridge, Massachusetts	11,500	November 2011
Canberra, Australia	1,200	July 2012
Centreville, Virginia	5,000	June 2010

(1)~~Includes~~During ~~approximately~~fiscal 122010, we entered into an amendment to the lease agreement. The amendment extends the lease term to 10 years from the date of amendment, reduces the office space from 41,000 square feet to 29,000 square feet beginning December 1, 2010, suspends the monthly cash portion of ~~office~~the ~~space~~rent ~~vacated~~payments asfor ~~part~~the first eight months of ~~our~~the ~~2002~~new term ~~restructuring~~and ~~plan~~significantly ~~which~~reduces ~~has~~the ~~been~~annual ~~subleased~~rent ~~since~~expense. ~~July~~The ~~2005~~amendment also provides that we may terminate the lease at any point from the date of amendment, subject to a $1.2 million penalty if terminated within the first 5 years.

We also lease various other smaller properties primarily for our sales and marketing personnel under leases, which are generally for a period of ~~less than~~ one year or less. We believe that our properties are in good condition, adequately maintained and suitable for the conduct of our business. Certain of our lease agreements provide options to extend the lease for additional specified periods. For additional information regarding our obligations under leases, see Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies to ~~the~~ consolidated ~~financial~~ financial statements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

OnFrom ~~October 1,~~time ~~2008~~to time, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~are ~~filed~~involved ~~a complaint~~ in ~~the~~disputes ~~Northern~~or ~~District~~regulatory ofinquiries ~~California,~~that ~~asserting~~arise ~~U.S.~~in Patent No. 6,575,360 against Intercede Group PLC and Intercede Ltd. (collectively, "Intercede"). On January 16, 2009, Intercede filed their answers, including counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability. On February 9, 2009, the ~~Company~~ordinary ~~filed~~course ~~a motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims and to strike certain~~ of ~~Intercede's defenses~~business. OnAny ~~March 26,~~claims ~~2009, Intercede filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, amending their previously-asserted defenses and counterclaims, and asserting~~or ~~additional~~regulatory ~~counterclaims~~actions ~~for~~against ~~monopolization~~us, ~~attempted~~whether ~~monopolization,~~valid ~~fraud,~~or ~~and unfair competition. On May 15~~not, ~~2009,~~could ~~the~~be ~~Company~~time ~~filed a second motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims for monopolization~~consuming, ~~attempted~~result ~~monopolization,~~in ~~fraud~~costly ~~and unfair competition. On September 11~~litigation, ~~2009,~~require ~~the~~significant ~~Court~~amounts ~~granted~~of inmanagement ~~part and denied in part the Company's motion to dismiss. On September 28~~time, ~~2009, Intercede filed a Second Amended Answer~~ and ~~Counterclaims.~~result ~~The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to Intercede's counterclaims. No amounts related to the Intercede litigation have been recorded~~ in the ~~Company's~~diversion ~~financial statements other than legal fees as part~~ of ~~normal~~significant operational ~~expenses for fiscal 2009~~resources.

Beginning on October 12, 2010, several putative class action lawsuits were filed purportedly on behalf of ActivIdentity's stockholders in the Superior Court of Alameda County, ~~ITEM~~California, ~~4. SUBMISSION~~the OFDelaware ~~MATTERS~~Chancery TOCourt, Athe ~~VOTE~~United OFStates ~~SECURITY~~District ~~HOLDERS~~ Court for Northern California and the United

~~None~~ 22

Table of Contents

States District Court in Delaware. The complaints name ActivIdentity and each member of the ActivIdentity Board as defendants. The lawsuits allege a variety of claims, including that our board members breached fiduciary duties owed to ActivIdentity stockholders by failing to engage in a fair process and failing to maximize stockholder value in approving the Merger. Several of the complaints also allege that ActivIdentity aided and abetted the members of the ActivIdentity Board in the alleged breach of their fiduciary duties. The Plaintiffs seek relief that includes, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, rescission—to the extent the Merger terms have already been implemented, and the payment of plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs.

On December 9, 2010, ActivIdentity and the individual defendants in the following actions entered into a memorandum of understanding: (i) in the Superior Court of Alameda County, California (the "Court"), captioned Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. ActivIdentity Corp., et al., RG10541071, Lin v. ActivIdentity Corp., et al., RG10541379, Weisleder v. ActivIdentity Corp., et al., RG10541759, and Gallagher v. Evans, et al., RG10542346 (the "California State Actions"), (ii) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California captioned Beverley & Lionel Sacks v. ActivIdentity, et al., 10-4705-JCS, and (the "California Federal Action"), and (iii) in Delaware Chancery Court captioned Tomaselli v. ActivIdentity, et al., 5928 (the "Delaware State Action")—collectively referred to herein as "the Actions." The memorandum of understanding provides for the settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Actions, subject to customary conditions, including completion of appropriate settlement documentation, consummation of the Merger and all necessary court approvals. Although we believe that the Actions are without merit, we have entered into the memorandum of understanding to avoid any risk of materially delaying the Merger and to minimize the expense of defending the actions. The settlement and dismissal with prejudice—if completed and approved by the court—will resolve all of the claims that were or could have been brought by the plaintiffs in the Actions. In connection with the settlement and dismissal with prejudice, defendants agreed to cause to be paid to plaintiffs' counsel an amount up to $475,000 for its fees and expenses in the action, provided plaintiffs obtain court approval for any such amount. As part of the memorandum of understanding, we also agreed to file supplemental disclosures on (i) the background information leading up to the Merger, and (ii) the opinion of our financial advisor. We expect to file these supplemental disclosures on December 10, 2010.

On October 1, 2008, the Company filed a complaint in the Northern District of California, asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,575,360 against Intercede Group PLC and Intercede Ltd. (collectively, "Intercede"). On January 16, 2009, Intercede filed their answers, including counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability. On February 9, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims and to strike certain of Intercede's defenses. On March 26, 2009, Intercede filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, amending their previously-asserted defenses and counterclaims, and asserting additional counterclaims for monopolization, attempted monopolization, fraud, and unfair competition. On May 15, 2009, the Company filed a second motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims for monopolization, attempted monopolization, fraud and unfair competition. On September 11, 2009, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company's motion to dismiss. On September 28, 2009, Intercede filed a Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims. On December 22, 2009, Intercede filed a claim in the U.K. High Court of Justice for revocation of Patent EP [UK] 0 981 803 and a declaration of non-infringement. On March 25, 2010, the Company and Intercede entered into a patent license agreement on mutually acceptable terms. This patent license agreement settles the patent infringement case brought by ActivIdentity before the U.S. District Court of Northern California, and a related case brought by Intercede in the United Kingdom High Court. Based on this agreement, all lawsuits over the "360 patents" (ActivIdentity U.S. patent 6,575,360 and ActivIdentity patent EP [UK] 0 981 803) were dismissed, bringing an end to all patent infringement litigation between the two companies.

Table of Contents

The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements with many of its customers and certain other business partners in the ordinary course of business. These agreements include provisions for indemnifying the customer against any claim brought by a third-party to the extent any such claim alleges that an ActivIdentity product infringes a patent, copyright or trademark, or violates any other proprietary rights of that third-party. It is not possible to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements. To date, the Company has not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. No liability for these indemnification agreements was recorded at September 30, 2010 or September 30, 2009.

As permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreements indemnifying its executive officers and directors for certain events and occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company's request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is not estimable. The Company maintains directors' and officers' liability insurance designed to enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. No liability for these indemnification agreements was recorded at September 30, 2010 or September 30, 2009.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ActivIdentity ~~Corporation~~'s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "ACTI".

The table below sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market.

		High		Low
Fiscal 2010:
	Quarter ended September 30, 2010	$	2.39	$	1.77
	Quarter ended June 30, 2010		3.33		1.86
	Quarter ended March 31, 2010		2.96		2.03
	Quarter ended December 31, 2009		2.78		2.01
Fiscal 2009:
	Quarter ended September 30, 2009	$	3.04	$	2.25
	Quarter ended June 30, 2009		2.77		1.83
	Quarter ended March 31, 2009		2.49		1.50
	Quarter ended December 31, 2008		2.54		1.07
Fiscal 2008:
	Quarter ended September 30, 2008	$	2.88	$	2.26
	Quarter ended June 30, 2008		2.99		2.18
	Quarter ended March 31, 2008		3.69		2.50
	Quarter ended December 31, 2007		5.15		3.39

WeAs ~~estimate~~of ~~that~~November 8, we2010, ~~have~~ActivIdentity ~~approximately~~had 2747,~~619~~183,720 shares of its common stock outstanding, held on record by 170 stockholders. ActivIdentity believes there were 23,573 beneficial owners of ~~our~~its common stock ason ~~of September~~November 308, ~~2009~~2010.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Any future decision to pay cash dividends will depend on our growth, profitability, financial condition, and other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Information regarding equity compensation plans set forth in Note 2—Stock-Based Compensation to ~~the~~ consolidated ~~financial~~ financial statements, is hereby incorporated by reference into this part II, item 5.

Stock Performance Graph

We list our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market. The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from September 30, ~~2004~~2005 through September 30, ~~2009~~2010, with the cumulative total return of (i) the NASDAQ Global Market System Composite Index (NASDAQ Composite), (ii) the ~~NYSE Arca Computer Technology Index (NYSE Arca Technology), (iii) the~~ NASDAQ Computer Index (NASDAQ Computer), and (iviii) the ~~RDG~~NYSE ~~MicroCap~~Arca Computer Technology Index (~~RDG~~NYSE ~~MicroCap~~ Arca Technology) over the same periods. For fiscal 2009, we have presented for the first time the NYSE Arca Computer Technology Index, a market capitalization weighted index designed to represent a cross section of widely-held U.S. corporations involved in various phases of the computer industry, and the RDG Micro Cap Technology Index, an index comprised of technology companies with a market capitalization below $300 million. This graph assumes an initial investment of $100 and the reinvestment of any dividends. The comparisons in the graph below are based upon historical data and may not be indicative of future performance of our common stock.

2125

Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among ActivIdentity ~~-NASNM~~, ~~The~~the ~~NYSE~~NASDAQ ~~Arca~~Composite, ~~Technology~~the ~~Index~~ NASDAQ Computer, and the ~~RDG~~NYSE ~~MicroCap~~Arca Technology Index

*: $100 invested on September 30, 2005 in stock & index including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal Years Ended September 30.

	9/30/04		9/30/05		9/30/06		9/30/07		9/30/08		9/30/09
	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010
ActivIdentity Corporation	$	100.00	$	70108.5255	$	76119.5517	$	8452.0419	$	3663.8197	$	4550.1112
NASDAQ Composite	$	100.00	$	~~113~~104.7896	$	~~121~~125.5055	$	~~143~~97.3722	$	~~109~~98.1564	$	~~112~~110.5508
NASDAQ Computer	$	100.00	$	~~115~~103.3189	$	~~121~~127.7633	$	~~149~~95.5819	$	~~111~~109.6900	$	~~128~~126.4411
RDG MicroCap Technology		100.00		94.27		90.22		83.40		42.51		37.97
NYSE Arca Technology	$	100.00	$	101.25	$	119.81	$	95.84	$	100.90	$	117.80
NYSE Arca Technology		100.00		104.67		105.23		131.26		73.84		71.43

Acquisition of CoreStreet

On December 14, 2009, the Company issued the following securities in connection with the acquisition of CoreStreet; (i) approximately 2.2 million shares of the Company's common stock (the "Shares") (of which approximately 1.5 million shares were subject to an escrow to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of the stockholders of CoreStreet), (ii) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a per share exercise price of $4.25 expiring December 31, 2011 (the "2011 Warrants") and valued at $0.4 million and (iii) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a per share exercise price $5.00 expiring December 31, 2012 and valued at $0.4 million (the "2012 Warrants" and, together with the 2011 Warrants, the "Warrants"). The Shares and Warrants shall be collectively referred to herein as the "Securities." The aggregate offering price of the unregistered securities issued or to be issued in connection with the acquisition of CoreStreet was $5.0 million, or $2.27 per share.

The Securities were all issued in a private placement pursuant to exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The Company is relying on the exemptions provided by Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act in connection with such issuances based on the representations made by the recipients of the Securities as to their status as accredited investors.

The Securities and the underlying shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Warrants have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. For a

Table of Contents

discussion of CoreStreet's acquisition, see Note—3 Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements.

Stock Repurchase Program

On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to $10 million or approximately 8% of its outstanding shares of common stock in the open market. On October 11, 2010 the Board of Directors terminated the stock repurchase program. For further information regarding the stock repurchase program, see Note 16—Stock Repurchase Program to consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides the specified information about the repurchase of shares during fiscal 2010 under the Company's shares repurchase program:

Periods			Average Price Paid per Share			Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

May 12, 2010 - May 31, 2010		338,100	$	2.39	338,100	$	9,190,412
June 1, 2010 - June 30, 2010		406,000	$	2.24	406,000	$	8,281,312
July 1, 2010 - July 31, 2010		100,000	$	2.00	100,000	$	8,081,034
August 1, 2010 - August 31, 2010		113,693	$	1.96	113,693	$	7,857,905
September 1, 2010 - September 30, 2010		127,500	$	2.12	127,500	$	7,587,123

	Total	1,085,293	$	2.22	1,085,293	$	7,587,123

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. We have derived the statement of income data for ~~the~~fiscal ~~years ended September 30~~2010, 2009, ~~2008~~ and ~~2007~~2008 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009 from the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The statement of ~~income~~operations data for ~~the~~fiscal ~~years~~2007 ~~ended September 30,~~and 2006 and ~~2005 and~~ the balance sheet data as of September 30, ~~2007~~2008, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ~~accounting~~United ~~principles~~States generally accepted inaccounting ~~the~~principles ~~United States~~ ("U.S. GAAP"). The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

		Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

		2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue		$	57,706		$	62,321		$	59,009		$	59,553		$	53,375
Loss from operations		$	(9,275	)	$	(7,191	)	$	(56,482	)	$	(18,529	)	$	(27,065	)
Net loss		$	(5,715	)	$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)	$	(9,298	)	$	(22,472	)
Net loss per share:
	Basic	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.50	)
	Diluted	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.50	)

Table of Contents

"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

	September 30,

	2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	76,299	$	78,724	$	79,829	$	121,723	$	128,047
Working capital	$	72,932	$	69,895	$	72,168	$	115,527	$	124,155
Goodwill	$	9,416		—		—	$	35,874	$	35,874
Total assets	$	113,726	$	114,577	$	117,601	$	188,452	$	200,988
Minority interest	$	312	$	311	$	304	$	354	$	373
Total stockholders' equity	$	90,150	$	87,936	$	89,354	$	159,443	$	168,953

		For the Year Ended September 30,
		2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Consolidated Income Statement Data:
Revenue:		$	62,321		$	59,009		$	59,553		$	53,375		$	42,156
Income (loss) from operations			(7,191	)		(56,482	)		(18,529	)		(27,065	)		(51,367	)
Net income (loss)		$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)	$	(9.298	)	$	(22,472	)	$	(47,926	)
Net income (loss) per share:
	Basic	$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(1.11	)
	Diluted	$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(1.11	)

	As of September 30,
	2009		2008		2007*		2006		2005
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	78,724	$	79,829	$	121,723	$	128,047	$	153,554
Working capital		69,895		72,168		115,527		124,155		145,220
Goodwill		—		—		35,874		35,874		36,162
Total assets		114,577		117,601		188,452		200,988		215,347
Minority interest		311		304		354		373		1,240
Total stockholders' equity		87,936		89,354		159,443		168,953		187,419

*$1.4 million has been reclassified from non-current to current deferred revenue as of September 30, 2007, to correct an error identified in the deferred revenue reconciliation during fiscal 2008. The reclassification resulted in a reduction of working capital by $1.4 million for fiscal 2007. This reclassification had no other effect on our reported financial statements.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See discussion of forward-looking statements at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Founded~~We inoperate ~~1987,~~on ~~ActivIdentity~~a ~~has~~fiscal ~~been~~year ~~instrumental~~ending September 30. For convenience in ~~providing~~this ~~identity~~Annual ~~security~~Report, ~~software~~we ~~solutions~~refer to ~~business~~the ~~and~~fiscal ~~government~~year ~~organizations~~ended ~~around~~September 30, 2008 as fiscal 2008, the ~~world.~~fiscal ~~Today's~~year ended ~~ActivIdentity~~September 30, is2009 as fiscal 2009 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as fiscal 2010. We also refer to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 as fiscal 2011.

Table of Contents

realization of a strategy to elevate the Company from its original role as a token provider to be a complete authentication solutions provider with significant intellectual property. The Company has achieved success through organic growth and strategic acquisitions.

We operate on a fiscal year ending September 30. For convenience in this Annual Report, we refer to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as fiscal 2007, the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as fiscal 2008 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as fiscal 2009. We also refer to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 as fiscal 2010.

ActivIdentity offers four product lines, which are the foundation for its Employer-to-Employee, Business-to-Customer, and Government-to-Citizen solutions.

Credential Management

ActivIdentity Credential Management products enable organizations to securely deploy and manage smart cards and USB tokens containing a variety of credentials, including public key infrastructure (PKI) certificates, one-time passwords (OTPs), static passwords, biometrics, demographic data, and virtually any other application. The ActivIdentity ActivID™ Card Management System is highly scalable, reliable, proven, and extensible solution that enables organizations to securely issue and manage the complete life cycle of digital credentials on devices, as well as securely update applications and credentials on devices after they have been issued to end users. Together with its Security Client software, Strong Authentication platform, and Authentication Device offering, ActivIdentity can provide organizations with a complete "Smart Employee ID Solution" that can be leveraged for both physical and logical access control.

Strong Authentication

Prominently featured in several Gartner research reports, including "MarketScope for Enterprise Broad-Portfolio Authentication Vendors," published in April 2009 and "Market Overview: Authentication," published in September 2008, ActivIdentity offers two distinct strong authentication platforms for organizations that are seeking to implement a cost-effective, flexible, and scalable solution. ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ AAA Server for Remote Access addresses the security risks associated with a mobile workforce accessing systems and data remotely. ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ Authentication Server is targeted for large infrastructures and offers support for multi-channel and multi-factor authentication methods (e.g., user name and password, knowledge-based authentication, one-time password, PKI certificates) and diverse audiences across a variety of service channels, making it the preferred versatile authentication platform for customer-facing transactions.

Security Clients

ActivIdentity Security Clients protect against unauthorized access by providing easy-to-manage enterprise single sign-on capabilities, strong authentication, and an enforcement point for corporate security policy. Using the proven, market-leading ActivIdentity Security Clients, organizations not only can address regulatory requirements by replacing static passwords with two-factor authentication, but also eliminate the need for users to remember multiple static passwords.

Whether using ActivIdentity ActivClient™ to secure workstations with smart cards and smart USB tokens, ActivIdentity SecureLogin™ Single Sign-On to provide comprehensive enterprise single sign-on and password management capabilities, or ActivIdentity™ Authentication Client to offer additional authentication, user, and management services, ActivIdentity delivers a complete solution to meet the requirements of any organization.

Table of Contents

Authentication Devices

ActivIdentity Authentication Devices provide organizations with a one-stop shop experience. ActivIdentity Authentication Devices range from Smart Cards, Smart Card Readers, Smart USB Tokens, OTP Tokens, DisplayCard Tokens, and Soft Tokens to Hardware Security Modules. ActivIdentity Authentication Devices provide the flexibility to deploy any combination of devices to best meet an organization's specific business needs, security requirements, and budget.

BUSINESS VIEW

Our Strategy: In 2009, management started to implement a multi-pronged business transformation plan. Management is realigning the Company to increase the organizational and operational efficiencies through its initiatives to optimize cost and improve key operation processes that are expected to create a foundation for future growth strategies. This plan is expected to deliver modest revenue growth and reduced operational expenses. Management has initiated a global growth strategy that is intended to capture a global market leadership position for ActivIdentity by leveraging the Company's existing core assets and customer base to issue and manage identity credentials (and devices), authenticate using these credentials, enforce access control rules and enable the credential usage. As part of this strategy, ActivIdentity intends to realign its products and solutions to better address customer requirements, and to create and penetrate new and existing markets.

Industry Outlook: We believe that the identity management market (covering credential management solutions and strong authentication) is a rapidly emerging global industry that despite the economic downturn offers opportunity for growth. Main business drivers are tightening of government regulations, growing awareness of the risks of identity theft (especially in light of the increased internal threat from disgruntled ex-employees), and the growth in electronic commerce. While the industry is still in the early stage of development, industry-wide standards are evolving. Combining the essential back-end infrastructure components (a versatile strong authentication platform and a credential management system) of an identity management system with a variety of authentication devices as well as security clients to enable a secure, end-to-end solution is essential for protecting an organization's assets, including network infrastructures, employees, customers, and confidential data. Issues driving industry growth and standardization are often unique across our target customer base, especially in international locations. We continue to monitor the evolution of the digital identity market and adapt products and services to best position the Company to realize competitive advantages. Additional challenges and risks that our product lines face include, but are not limited to: price and product feature competition, evolving technological change in the network security market, and risk of bugs and other errors in the software.

Financial Performance Indicators: We have a long and often complicated sales cycle and are dependent on a relatively small number of large deals, which can result in significant revenue fluctuations between periods. The typical sales cycle is six to nine months for an enterprise customer and over 12 months for a network service provider or government agency. As a result, in addition to monitoring financial performance based on reported revenue, management analyzes the probability of future transactions in the open deal pipeline when assessing financial condition and operating performance. Trends in deferred revenue, maintenance renewal contracts, and customer, geographic, or product mix are also integral to management's decision making process.

Strategic Initiatives: We are currently realigning our product and solutions strategy to address current and future market trends. As part of these efforts, we are conducting market studies to analyze vertical market segments in which the information technology (IT) spending and adoption rates favor strong authentication and credential management system solutions. These verticals include, but are not limited to the Banking and Financial Services Industry (BFSI), Government, Enterprise (especially high-tech and pharmaceuticals), as well as Aerospace and Defense. We are also developing financial

Table of Contents

performance benchmarks to quantify the financial impacts of the revised strategic alignment and provide additional tools to assist management in assessing our financial condition. Restructuring and related cost cutting plans implemented to date have helped to streamline the Company and management will continue to identify areas for strategic improvement, in both revenue growth and cost containment.

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

~~Restructurings: As~~ The offollowing ~~September 30,~~significant ~~2009,~~events weoccurred ~~were~~during ~~still~~fiscal ~~obligated~~2010: ~~to pay $0.8 million (net of sub-lease income) for the vacated Fremont, California facility over the remaining lease term ending February 2011.~~

•: On December 14, 2009, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of CoreStreet for total purchase consideration of $20.3 million, which included cash, common stock, and warrants to purchase common stock. The preliminary purchase price allocation can be found in Note 3—Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements. The CoreStreet results of operation have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition on December 14, 2009.
•: On February 9, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the lease agreement for our headquarters office building in Fremont, California. The amendment extends the lease term to 10 years from the date of amendment, reduces the office space from 41,000 square feet to 29,000 square feet beginning December 1, 2010, suspends the monthly cash portion of the rent payments for the first eight months of the new term and significantly reduces the annual rent expense. The amendment also provides that we may terminate the lease at any point from the date of amendment, subject to a $1.2 million penalty if terminated within the first 5 years.

~~Significant or Unusual Items: During fiscal 2009 the following items impacted our net loss.~~ 28

Table of Contents

•: On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that authorized the repurchase up to $10 million or approximately 8% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock in the open market from time to time over the subsequent twelve months. Shares of common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $2.4 million were repurchased under the program during the year ended September 30, 2010. For further information regarding the stock repurchase program, see Note 16—Stock Repurchase Program to consolidated financial statements.
•: We incurred $1.1 million in legal and related expenses in pursuit of an intellectual property infringement case. The case was settled in March 2010 upon mutual agreement of both parties involved whereby we issued a patent license to the other party on mutually acceptable terms. For further information regarding this case, see Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies to consolidated financial statements.
•: During fiscal 2010, we sold or redeemed ARS with a net book value of $10.8 million and received $14.9 million in cash upon settlement that resulted in a gain of $4.1 million.
•: We recorded $1.8 million in severance expense, primarily through operating expenses, for fiscal 2010 as we continue to realign our business in accordance with the Company's revised strategic initiatives.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

•: Our revenue for fiscal 2010 was $57.7 million, a decrease of $4.6 million, or 7%, compared to revenue of $62.3 million for fiscal 2009.
•: Our gross profit remained unchanged for fiscal 2010 at $40.5 million compared to gross profit of $40.3 million for fiscal 2009. Gross margin increased by approximately 6% in fiscal 2010 compared to 2009.
•: Our net loss for fiscal 2010 was $5.7 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 3%, compared to net loss of $5.5 million for fiscal 2009.

Comparison of Fiscal Years ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

Certain prior periods' revenue and cost of revenue have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. See further discussion of reclassified amounts in Note 1—Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

REVENUE

Total revenue, mix by type, and period-over-period changes are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,						Change from Prior Fiscal Year
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,						Change from Prior Fiscal Years
	2009		2008		2007		2009 vs. 2008					2008 vs. 2007
	2010		2009		2008		2010 vs. 2009					2009 vs. 2008
Software	$	2321,~~975~~533	$	1923,~~589~~975	$	19,~~363~~589	$	4(2,~~386~~442	)	22-10	%	$	~~226~~4,386		122	%
Hardware		1513,~~784~~578		15,~~078~~784		1615,~~894~~078		~~706~~(2,206	)	5-14	%		~~(1,816~~706	)	~~-11~~5	%
Service		22,~~562~~595		2422,~~342~~562		2324,~~296~~342		~~(1,780~~33	)	-7	%		(1,~~046~~780	)	4-7	%
Total revenue	$	6257,~~321~~706	$	5962,~~009~~321	$	59,~~553~~009	$	3(4,~~312~~615	)	6-7	%	$	~~(544~~3,312	)	-16	%

We have several revenue streams, each of which is unique in terms of its recurring nature, transactional pricing, and volume characteristics. Our ~~Software~~software revenues are driven by orders of significant size that are dependent on the closing of the transactions for revenue recognition purposes and can result in significant variances from period to period. As hardware revenue is generally derived from the sale of software products, the variability in software revenue is the driving factor in the fluctuations of ~~this~~the hardware revenue stream, although timing of hardware revenue may lag the initial sale of related software. Maintenance revenue, the most significant component of service revenue, is tied directly to the installed base of customers, which fluctuates with our ability to attract new customers and the level of renewal activity with existing customers. The timing of closure of software transactions is the single most relevant factor for the Company's recorded revenue in any given period.

Table of Contents

sale of related software. Maintenance revenue, the most significant component of service revenue, is tied directly to the installed base of customers, which fluctuates with our ability to attract new customers and the level of renewal activity with existing customers. The timing of closure of software transactions is the single most relevant factor for the Company's recorded revenue in any given period.

Software Revenue

Our software revenue is comprised of software license revenue and professional services revenue essential to the functionality of our software. ~~The~~Software revenue decreased 10%, or $42.4 million, orto ~~22%,~~$21.5 million ~~increase~~in fiscal 2010 from $24.0 million in fiscal 2009. ~~was~~The ~~primarily~~decrease ~~driven~~in ~~by: (i)~~ software ~~customization,~~ revenue ofwas ~~our ActivClient™~~primarily due to the decline in software ~~linked~~revenue toin ~~personal~~the ~~identity verification~~EMEA ~~("PIV")~~region and ~~PIVi~~completion ~~Card~~of ~~rollouts,~~a ascustomized ~~well~~software asproject ~~revenue~~in of2009, ~~our~~partially ~~authentication products;~~offset ~~and~~by ~~(ii) a~~an ~~change~~increase in ~~our~~revenue ~~licensing~~from ~~arrangement~~products ~~for~~sales through our ~~Single~~acquisition ~~Sign-On~~of CoreStreet. ~~product~~For ~~with~~further ~~Novell~~information ~~resulting~~regarding inthe anacquisition ~~increase~~of ~~in software~~CoreStreet, ~~revenue~~see ~~and~~Note 3—Business aCombinations ~~decrease~~to inconsolidated financial ~~service revenue~~statements.

~~While~~Software ~~total software~~ revenue ~~remained~~increased ~~essentially~~$4.4 million, ~~flat~~or 22%, in fiscal ~~2008~~2009 compared to fiscal ~~2007, authentication software revenue increased $2~~2008.~~7 million,~~ orThe ~~85%,~~increase ~~and~~was ~~client middleware~~primarily ~~revenue~~driven ~~increased~~by: ~~$1.6~~(i) ~~million,~~software ~~or 96%~~customization, ~~offset~~revenue byof ~~decreases~~our ActivClient™ insoftware linked ~~card~~to ~~management~~PIV ~~software~~and ofPIVi ~~$2.6 million~~Card rollouts, oras ~~39%,~~well ~~and~~as ~~single~~revenue ~~sign~~of onour ~~software~~authentication ofproducts; ~~$1.4~~and (ii) ~~million,~~a orchange ~~24%.~~in ~~Fluctuations~~our inlicensing ~~software~~arrangement ~~revenue~~for ~~are~~our ~~driven primarily~~Single bySign-On ~~the~~product ~~timing~~with ofa ~~the~~customer ~~closure~~resulting ofin ~~relatively~~an ~~large~~increase ~~transactions~~in ~~and~~software ~~are~~revenue ~~not~~and ~~indicative of~~ a ~~long-term~~decrease ~~trend~~ in service ~~the business~~revenue.

Hardware Revenue

Hardware revenue is comprised of tokens, readers, smart cards, and related equipment, generally to complement revenue of related software products. Hardware revenue ~~increased~~decreased by 514%, or $02.72 million, ~~compared~~ to $13.6 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2010 tofrom $15.8 million in fiscal 2009. The ~~increase~~decrease in hardware revenue was primarily driven by ana ~~increase~~ decrease in our token ~~revenue~~sales toin ~~European~~Asia Pacific and ~~Asia~~smart ~~Pacific~~card ~~banking~~and ~~customers~~reader sales in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa ("EMEA") and North America.

Hardware revenue ~~decreased~~increased by $10.87 million, or 115%, incompared to fiscal 2008 ~~compared~~ to ~~the prior year. Increased revenue of~~ $015.8 million ~~(to~~in ~~$10.2 million for~~ fiscal ~~2008),~~2009. ~~or 8%,~~The onincrease ~~token~~in revenue was ~~offset~~primarily driven by aan ~~$1.7 million,~~increase ~~or 38%, decrease~~ in token ~~smart cards and a $0.9 million, or 40%, decrease in readers. Decreases in card management software~~ revenue ~~were~~to ~~a significant~~European ~~driver in the decrease of smart card~~ and ~~reader~~Asia ~~revenue~~Pacific ~~during~~banking ~~the year~~customers.

Table of Contents

Service Revenue

Service revenue is comprised of post-contract customer support and professional services not essential to the functionality of software, including installation, training, and consulting. Service revenue ~~decreased~~was byunchanged 7%at or $~~1.8 million from fiscal 2008 to $~~22.6 million ~~in fiscal 2009. The decrease in revenue was due primarily to a change in our licensing arrangement~~ for ~~our~~each ~~Single~~of ~~Sign-On~~fiscal ~~product~~2010 ~~with Novell resulting in a decrease in service revenue~~ and anfiscal ~~increase in software revenue~~2009. ~~Service revenue not including Novell increased by $0.8 million compared to the prior year.~~

~~Fiscal~~Service ~~2008~~revenue ~~post-contract~~decreased ~~customer~~by ~~support~~7% ~~revenue~~or ~~increased~~ $01.68 million, from fiscal 2008 to $1922.86 million, orin ~~3%, over~~ fiscal ~~2007~~2009. onThe adecrease ~~growing~~in ~~installed customer base. Professional service~~ revenue onwas ~~projects~~due ~~not~~primarily ~~essential~~ to ~~the~~a ~~functionality~~change ofin ~~software~~our ~~increased~~licensing arrangement ~~$0.5 million,~~for toour ~~$4.5 million,~~Single orSign-On ~~14%,~~product ~~over~~with ~~the~~a ~~prior~~customer ~~fiscal~~resulting ~~year.~~in ~~While~~a decrease in service revenue ~~continued~~ toand ~~trend~~an ~~upward,~~increase ~~the~~in ~~year-over-year~~software ~~rate~~revenue. Service ofrevenue, ~~growth~~not ~~was~~including ~~down~~our inlicensing ~~fiscal~~arrangement ~~2008~~for ~~compared~~our toSingle ~~fiscal~~Sign-On ~~2007~~product aswith ~~revenue~~a ~~spiked~~customer, inincreased ~~2007~~by on$0.8 million compared to the ~~renewal~~prior ~~of several significant expired maintenance contracts~~year.

Table of Contents

Revenue Concentration

By geography was as follows:

	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,						Change from Prior Fiscal Years

	2010		2009		2008		2010 vs. 2009					2009 vs. 2008
North America	$	31,232	$	29,435	$	24,891	$	1,797		6	%	$	4,544		18	%
EMEA		23,664		26,838		29,244		(3,174	)	-12	%		(2,406	)	-8	%
Asia Pacific		2,810		6,048		4,874		(3,238	)	-54	%		1,174		24	%

Total revenue	$	57,706	$	62,321	$	59,009	$	(4,615	)	-7	%	$	3,312		6	%

By geography, as a percentage of total revenue, was as follows:

		Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
		Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
		2009			2008			2007
		2010			2009			2008
North America			4754	%		4247	%		4142	%
Europe			43	%		50	%		54	%
EMEA			41	%		43	%		50	%
Asia Pacific			105	%		810	%		58	%
	Total Revenue		100	%		100	%		100	%

North America revenue is primarily derived from deployments of our smart card-based software products, such as ActivClient™, the ActivIdentity ActivID™ Card Management System and ActivIdentity Secure Login™ Single Sign On to various departments of the U.S. federal government and our enterprise customers. Revenue in North America increased $1.8 million to 54% of total revenue in fiscal 2010 from 47% in fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily driven by our software revenue contributed in part by new software product offerings as a result of our acquisition of CoreStreet. For further information regarding the acquisition of CoreStreet, see Note 3—Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements. Revenue in North America increased $4.5 million to 47% of total revenue in fiscal 2009 compared to 42% of total revenue in fiscal 2008. The ~~increased~~increase is due primarily to government and enterprise investments in ~~personal identity verification ("~~PIV") and PIVi Card rollouts, as well as increased revenue offrom our authentication products. ~~North America revenue in 2008 and 2007 were relatively flat.~~

~~Europe~~EMEA revenue is primarily derived from European deployments of our strong authentication suite of products, such as ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ AAA Server ~~for~~ for Remote Access and ActivIdentity 4TRESS™ Authentication Server and authentication devices to various enterprise ~~and~~ and financial customers. Revenue is also derived from deployments of our smart card-based software products to various government and enterprise customers. Revenue in ~~Europe~~EMEA decreased $3.2 million to 41% of total revenue in fiscal 2010 from 43% in fiscal 2009. The decrease was primarily due to decreased spending by financial services and enterprise customers for our products. Revenue in EMEA decreased $2.4 million to 43% of total revenue in fiscal 2009 compared to 50% of total revenue in fiscal 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of decreased spending by and the consolidation of financial institutions. The loss of a significant customer in ~~Europe~~EMEA during fiscal 2007 due to consolidation in the banking industry negatively impacted fiscal 2008 ~~European revenue. Total revenue in Europe was down $2.8 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, from 54% to~~ ~~50%~~EMEAan ~~of total~~ revenue~~, driven primarily by decreased hardware revenue~~.

Asia Pacific revenue is primarily derived from deployments of our strong authentication suite of products, authentication devices, and our smart card-based software products to various government, enterprise and financial customers. Revenue in Asia Pacific ~~increased~~decreased by $13.2 million to 105% of total revenue in fiscal ~~2009~~2010 ~~compared~~from ~~to 8~~10% ~~of total revenue~~ in fiscal ~~2008~~ 2009. The ~~increase~~decrease was driven primarily by a decrease in software customization revenue as a project related to the issuance of smart card ~~management.~~driver's ~~Asia~~licenses ~~Pacific~~was ~~revenue~~significantly asrecognized in fiscal 2009 and a decrease in token sales to the Asian banking sector.

2831

Table of Contents

~~percentage~~Revenue ofin ~~total~~Asia ~~revenue~~Pacific increased ~~from~~by 5$1.2 million to 10% of total revenue in fiscal ~~2007~~2009 compared to 8% of total revenue in fiscal 2008. ~~primarily~~The ~~resulting~~increase ~~from~~was ~~increased~~driven ~~software~~primarily ~~revenue~~by ina ~~Australia~~software customization ~~and~~project ~~hardware~~related ~~revenue~~to incard ~~Singapore~~management.

Hardware and software revenue (product revenue) by customer category as a percentage of total hardware revenue and software revenue was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
Enterprise		66	%		62	%		55	%
Government		19	%		20	%		27	%
Financial		15	%		18	%		18	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%

Total product revenue increased $5.1 million in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Enterprise revenue increased $4.6 million year-over-year on increasing software revenue primarily from North American customers. Growth in our United States enterprise software revenue are linked to PIVi as United States government contractors and infrastructure vendors are leveraging the PIV standard and the availability of compliant software to start SmartCard deployment projects.

Total product revenue decreased $1.6 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Enterprise sector revenue increased $1.2 million for fiscal 2008, driven by increased hardware revenue. Financial sector revenue was flat year-over-year. Government sector revenue decreased $2.8 million for fiscal 2008 on weaker hardware revenue of $2.3 million and weaker software revenue of $0.5 million. Total government revenue suffered on general fiscal concerns as spending was curtailed throughout the sector.

COST OF REVENUE

Total cost of revenue, costs as a percentage of corresponding revenue, and period-over-period changes was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Twelve Months Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007			2009 vs. 2008					2008 vs. 2007
	2010			2009			2008			2010 vs. 2009					2009 vs. 2008
Software	$	41,~~179~~229		$	~~963~~4,179		$	~~1,303~~963		$	3(2,~~216~~950	)	~~334~~-71	%	$	~~(340~~3,216	)	~~-26~~334	%
As a percentage of software revenue		176	%		517	%		75	%
Hardware		76,~~954~~887			97,~~551~~954			9,~~036~~551			(1,~~597~~067	)	-1713	%		~~515~~(1,597	)	6-17	%
As a percentage of hardware revenue		5051	%		6350	%		5363	%
Service		78,~~677~~071			107,~~779~~677			710,~~267~~779			~~(3,102~~394	)	~~-29~~5	%		(3,~~512~~102	)	48-29	%
As a percentage of service revenue		3436	%		4434	%		3144	%
Amortization of acquired developed technology and patents		~~2,168~~972			2,~~380~~168			2,~~949~~380			(~~212~~1,196	)	-955	%		(~~569~~212	)	-199	%
Total cost of revenue	$	2117,~~978~~159		$	2321,~~673~~978		$	2023,~~555~~673		$	(14,~~695~~819	)	-722	%	$	3(1,~~118~~695	)	15-7	%

Cost of Software Revenue

Cost of software revenue includes the cost of professional services associated with customization essential to the functionality of software. ~~The~~Cost of software revenue decreased by $3.0 million, or 71%, to $1.2 million ~~increase~~in fiscal 2010 from $4.2 million in fiscal 2009. The decrease in software cost ~~of revenue~~ was primarily due ~~driven~~to bydecreasing ~~increased~~ engineering service costs ~~incurred~~as ona result of a large software customization project for the issuance of smart card driver's licenses. ~~Margins~~that ~~were~~was ~~adversely~~largely ~~impacted~~recognized in fiscal 2009.

29 The $3.2 million increase in fiscal 2009 in software cost of revenue from fiscal 2008 was primarily driven by increased engineering service costs incurred on a large software customization project for the issuance of smart card driver's licenses. Margins were adversely impacted as these professional services revenue have significantly more direct costs than traditional product software revenue.

Table of Contents

as these professional services revenue have significantly more direct costs than traditional product software revenue.

Cost of software revenue was down in fiscal 2008 on a $0.3 million decrease in professional services revenue on customized software arrangements. Margins on customized software deals improved slightly in fiscal 2008 over the prior year. Cost of software revenue decreased in fiscal 2007 on a $0.5 million decrease in professional service revenue on customized software arrangements.

Cost of Hardware Revenue

Cost of hardware revenue includes costs associated with the manufacturing and shipping of product, logistics, operations, warranty costs and charges related to excess and obsolete inventory. Hardware product margins are influenced by numerous factors including hardware product mix, inventory adjustments, pricing, geographic mix and foreign currency exchange rates. Many of these factors influence, or are interrelated with, other factors. As a result, it is difficult to precisely quantify the impact of each item individually to our hardware margins. The majority of our smart card and reader revenue reflects products manufactured for us by original equipment manufacturers that accordingly have lower margins compared to tokens, which are manufactured for us by contract manufacturers and yield higher gross margins.

~~The~~Cost ~~cost~~ of hardware revenue decreased $1.6 1, million or 1713%, ~~in fiscal 2009 compared~~ to ~~fiscal 2008~~$6.9 million ~~The decrease~~ in ~~cost~~fiscal ~~resulted~~2010 ~~primarily~~ from ~~decreases in four areas: (i) a~~ $08.70 million ~~decrease~~ in ~~salary and related costs from a reduction in headcount made late in~~ fiscal ~~2008; (ii) a $0~~2009.~~5 million~~ The decrease in ~~the~~hardware cost ofwas ~~freight~~primarily ~~and~~the ~~inventory~~result ~~costs~~of ~~from~~lower ~~improved~~sales ~~inventory~~volume ~~management;~~ and ~~(iii) a~~lower ~~$0.4 million~~excess ~~decrease~~and inobsolete ~~the~~inventory ~~cost of raw materials related to the mix of hardware revenue~~charges.

~~In fiscal 2008, cost of hardware revenue increased $0.5 million as margins were adversely impacted due to competitive pressures, especially in emerging markets in the Asia Pacific sector.~~ 32

Cost of Service Revenue

Cost of service revenue consists of personnel costs and expenses incurred in providing post-contract customer support and professional services not essential to software such as installation, training, and consulting. Cost of service revenue decreased for fiscal 2009 by $3.1 million as resources during the current year were reallocated to software customization contracts as well as a decline in service revenue projects.

Cost of service revenue increased $3.5 million in fiscal 2008. Increased sustaining engineering costs incurred by the development team on a growing installed customer base resulted in a $2.9 million increase in costs over fiscal 2007. Costs associated with providing professional services increased approximately $0.6 million on increased professional service revenue not essential to the functionality of software. The allocation of additional sustaining engineering costs adversely impacted margins.

Amortization of Acquired Developed Technology and Patents

Amortization of acquired developed technology and patents includes amortization of technology capitalized in our acquisitions and purchase of certain patents and related intellectual property from third parties. Decreases in amortization expense in fiscal 2009 and 2008 were consistent with the scheduled amortization of acquired developed technology and patents, as certain items become fully amortized.

Table of Contents

The cost of hardware revenue decreased $1.6 million or 17%, to $8.0 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to $9.6 million in fiscal 2008. The decrease in hardware cost resulted primarily from decreases in: (i) salary and related costs from a reduction in headcount made late in fiscal 2008; (ii) freight and inventory costs from improved inventory management; and (iii) cost of raw materials related to the mix of hardware revenue.

Cost of Service Revenue

Cost of service revenue consists of personnel costs and expenses incurred in providing post-contract customer support and professional services not essential to software such as installation, training, and consulting. Cost of service revenue increased $0.4 million, or 5%, to $8.1 million in fiscal 2010 from $7.7 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was primarily due to increases in engineering expenses for customer sustaining work associated with maintenance and support, partially offset by lower professional services expenses.

Cost of service revenue decreased by $3.1 million, or 48%, to $7.7 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to $10.8 million in fiscal 2008, as resources during the current year were reallocated to software customization contracts as well as a decline in service revenue projects.

Amortization of Developed Technology and Patents

Amortization of acquired developed technology and patents includes amortization of technology acquired as part of our acquisitions and purchase of certain patents and related intellectual property from third parties. Amortization expense in fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $1.0 million, $2.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively and consistent with the scheduled amortization of acquired developed technology and patents, as certain items were acquired and others become fully amortized.

OPERATING EXPENSES

A substantial proportion of our operating expenses are fixed in the short term. Accordingly, a small variation in the timing for recognition of revenue can cause significant variations in operating results across periods.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses and period-over-period changes were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Sales and marketing	$	1917,~~572~~516		$	2519,~~602~~572		$	25,~~282~~602
Percentage change from comparable prior period		-2411	%		1-24	%		1	%
As a percentage of total revenue		3130	%		4331	%		4243	%
Headcount, end of period (includes professional services employees)		69			90			110
Headcount, end of period		70			69			90

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other payroll expenses, as well as stock-based compensation expense, commissions, travel, depreciation, costs associated with marketing programs, promotions, trade shows, and allocations of facilities and information technology costs.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased 24$2.1 million, or 11%, ~~from~~to $17.5 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2010 tofrom $19.6 million ~~for~~in fiscal 2009. The decrease in ~~expense~~sales ~~was~~and ~~driven~~marketing expenses was primarily bydue ato ~~23%~~lower ~~reduction~~salaries inand ~~headcount~~related ~~during the~~benefits, ~~year~~lower ~~and~~severance ~~the~~cost, ~~related~~lower ~~expenses~~commission asresulting ~~well~~from as a ~~decrease~~decline in ~~spending~~total onrevenue, partially offset by an increase in marketing ~~programs~~to support sales efforts and brand recognition.

Sales and marketing expenses remained relatively flat in fiscal 2008 from the prior year. Headcount reductions were concentrated in the final half of fiscal 2008 and related year cost savings were offset by increased severance expense. 33

Table of Contents

Sales and marketing expenses decreased $6.0 million, or 24%, to $19.6 million in fiscal 2009 from $25.6 million in fiscal 2008. The decrease in expense was driven primarily by a 23% reduction in headcount during the year and the related expenses as well as a decrease in spending on marketing programs.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses and period-over-period changes were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Research and development	$	15,~~053~~892		$	1815,~~867~~053		$	1918,~~935~~867
Percentage change from comparable prior period		~~-20~~6	%		-520	%		-5	%
As a percentage of total revenue		2428	%		3224	%		3332	%
Headcount, end of period		9796			~~115~~97			~~137~~115

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, costs of components used in research, and development activities, travel, depreciation, and allocations of facilities and information technology costs.

Research and development expenses ~~decreased~~increased 20$0.8 million, or 6%, ~~from~~to $15.9 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2010 tofrom $15.1 million ~~for~~in fiscal 2009. The ~~decrease~~increase in research and development expenses was primarily ~~the~~due ~~result~~to ofsalaries ~~reducing~~and ~~headcount~~benefits byfor ~~16% during~~engineers ~~the~~that ~~year~~in ~~and~~fiscal ~~the~~2009 ~~associated~~were ~~expenses~~assigned asto ~~well~~a software customization project, and as ~~outside~~a ~~consulting~~result, ~~expenses~~such costs were recorded in cost of revenue. ~~Research~~The ~~and~~remaining ~~development~~increase was due to higher consulting expenses ~~were~~driven ~~also~~by ~~reduced~~intellectual inproperty ~~2009~~consulting asand ~~costs~~engineering ~~were~~outsourcing, ~~classified~~higher asoffice ~~cost~~expenses, ofpartially ~~software~~offset ~~revenue~~by ~~for~~lower ~~work~~salaries and related tobenefits aand ~~software~~lower ~~customization~~severance ~~project~~expenses.

Research and development expenses decreased 5$3.8 million, or 20%, ~~from~~to $15.1 million in fiscal ~~2007~~2009 tofrom $18.9 million ~~for~~in fiscal 2008. The decrease in expenses was primarily the result of anreducing ~~increase~~headcount by 16% during the year and the associated expenses as well as outside consulting expenses. Research and development expenses were also reduced in ~~costs~~2009 as ~~associated~~costs ~~with~~were ~~sustaining~~classified as cost of software revenue for work related to a software customization project.

Table of Contents

engineering projects which was allocated to the cost of service revenue offset by increased spending on outsourced services, severance expenses associated with headcount reductions, and an increase in costs outside of the United States due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar during the first three quarters of the year.

General and Administration

General and administration expenses and period-over-period changes were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
General and administration	$	1215,~~769~~785		$	1112,~~380~~769		$	1211,~~124~~380
Percentage change from comparable prior period		1224	%		-612	%		-6	%
As a percentage of total revenue		2027	%		1920	%		2019	%
Headcount, end of period		3937			3439			4634

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources, and legal, as well as professional fees related to legal, audit and accounting, costs associated with SOX compliance, and an allocation of facilities and information technology costs.

General and administration expenses increased $1.4 million for fiscal 2009 over the same period in the prior year primarily as a result of a change in the manner that executive officer and board of directors' costs were allocated. All amounts were allocated to general and administration instead of other departments during fiscal 2009. Management believes these costs are properly reported as general and administration expenses. 34

The $0.7 million decrease in general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008, was primarily related to a one-time expense for the Protocom earn-out settlement recorded in fiscal 2007 of $0.9 million. Cost savings associated with the reduced headcount were offset by severance expenses recorded during the year.

Restructuring Expenses

Restructuring expenses consist of severance and other costs associated with the reduction of headcount and facility exit costs. Facility exit costs consist primarily of future minimum lease payments net of estimated sub-lease income, if any. For a discussion of restructuring plans, see Note 11—Restructuring Liability to the consolidated financial statements.

During fiscal 2009, the Company had $0.6 million in cash payments related to facility exit costs.

Although the Company does not expect to incur significant additional charges related to previous restructurings, a change in the estimated sublease income from, or time required to sublease exited facilities, or any other changes could result in future charges to the statement of operations. Future restructuring activity could result in additional charges.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets

Amortization of acquired intangible assets includes amortization of customer contracts, trademark, and trade name intangibles capitalized in acquisitions. The expense decreased to $0.1 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $0.2 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.

Table of Contents

General and administration expenses increased $3.0 million, or 24%, to $15.7 million in fiscal 2010 from $12.8 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to higher legal and professional service expenses related to intellectual property litigation with Intercede, the acquisition of CoreStreet and pending acquisition of the Company by ASSA ABLOY Inc.

General and administration expenses increased $1.4 million, or 12%, to $12.8 million in fiscal 2009 from $11.4 million in fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of a change in the manner that executive officer and board of directors' costs were allocated. All amounts were allocated to general and administration instead of other departments during fiscal 2009. Management believes these costs are properly reported as general and administration expenses.

Restructuring Expenses

Restructuring expenses consist of severance and other costs associated with the reduction of headcount and facility exit costs. Facility exit costs consist primarily of future minimum lease payments net of estimated sub-lease income, if any on buildings we have vacated. For a discussion of restructuring plans, see Note 11—Restructuring Liability to consolidated financial statements.

There was an adjustment of $0.4 million made to the restructuring expense during fiscal 2010, as a result of an amendment of a facilities lease agreement and future termination of the sublease for a portion of the office building for which the restructuring reserve was recorded in prior periods.

There were no adjustments made to the restructuring expense during fiscal 2009.

There was an adjustment of $70,000 made to the restructuring expense during fiscal 2008.

Although the Company does not expect to incur significant additional charges related to previous restructurings, future restructuring activity could result in additional charges.

Amortization of Other Intangible Assets

Amortization of other intangible assets includes amortization of customer contracts, trademark, and trade name intangibles capitalized in acquisitions.

Amortization of other intangible assets for fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $1.0 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million, respectively.

The amortization expense for fiscal 2010 increased $0.9 million compared to fiscal 2009. The increase is primarily due to recently acquired amortizable intangible assets from the acquisition of CoreStreet during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, partially offset by certain items becoming fully amortized. For a discussion of other intangible assets, see Note—8 Other Intangible Assets, net to consolidated financial statements and for a discussion of CoreStreets acquisition, see Note—3 Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements.

Write-down of Goodwill

In accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350 20 35-1, ~~(formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets),~~ we test recorded goodwill ~~and intangibles with indefinite lives~~ for impairment at at least annually. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, based on indicators of potential impairment, we performed an impairment review of goodwill and determined the carrying value of goodwill of $35.9 million was fully impaired. As a result, goodwill of $35.9 million was written off as a non-cash charge to profit and loss. At September 30, 2008 and as of September 30, 2009, there is no remaining balance in goodwill.

At September 30, 2010, goodwill recorded on our balance sheet was $9.4 million as a result of our acquisition of CoreStreet. We performed our annual review for impairment of goodwill as of September 30, 2010 and concluded that our goodwill balance was not impaired.

At September 30, 2009 and 2008, there was no (zero) goodwill recorded on our balance sheet. During fiscal 2008, based on indicators of potential impairment, we performed an interim impairment test of goodwill and determined the carrying value of goodwill of $35.9 million was fully impaired. As a

Table of Contents

result, goodwill of $35.9 million was written off as a non-cash charge to the Statement of Operations during fiscal 2008.

INTEREST INCOME

Interest income and period-over-period changes were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Interest income	$	~~1,710~~564		$	41,~~659~~710		$	64,~~208~~659
Percentage change from comparable prior period		-6367	%		-2563	%		-25	%
As a percentage of total revenue		31	%		83	%		108	%

Interest income consists of interest income on the Company's cash, cash equivalents, and investments. InInterest ~~fiscal~~income ~~2009~~decreased $1.2 million, ~~interest~~or ~~income~~67%, ~~was~~to ~~reduced~~$0.6 million byin fiscal 2010 from $21.97 million in fiscal 2009. The ~~decrease~~reduction in of interest income was due primarily to lower average cash invested ~~in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008~~ and lower average prevailing market interest rates induring fiscal 2010 ~~2009~~ compared to fiscal ~~2008~~2009.

Interest income decreased $12.59 million, or 2563%, to $1.7 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2009 asfrom ~~prevailing~~$4.7 million ~~market~~in ~~interest~~fiscal ~~rates~~2008. ~~fell~~The ~~during~~decrease ~~the~~in ~~year~~interest ~~combined~~income ~~with~~was ~~moving~~due ato ~~significant portion of the Company's~~lower ~~investment~~average ~~portfolio into lower yield~~ cash ~~and~~invested ~~cash~~in ~~equivalents~~fiscal ~~from~~2009 ~~short-term~~compared ~~investments.~~to Infiscal ~~addition,~~2008 ~~total~~and ~~cash~~lower ~~and~~average ~~equivalents~~prevailing ~~decreased~~market ~~$8.1 million~~interest asrates ain ~~result~~fiscal of2009 ~~cash~~compared ~~used in~~to ~~operating~~fiscal ~~activities~~2008.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

Other income (expense) and period-over-period changes were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Other income (expense), net	$	~~(508~~3,169	)	$	(~~25,190~~508	)	$	3(25,~~440~~190	)
Percentage change from comparable prior period		-98724	%		-~~832~~98	%		-832	%
As a percentage of total revenue		15	%		431	%		643	%

Other income (expense), net, consists of foreign exchange gains and losses, primarily caused by the revaluation of inter-company balances, and other-than-temporary impairment of investments.

In fiscal ~~2009~~2010, other income (expense) consisted of:

•: $4.1 million of realized gain on the sale of long-term investments in auction rate securities.
•: ($0.7) million of net foreign exchange losses.
•: ($0.3) million of impairment of marketable securities.

In fiscal ~~2008~~2009, other income (expense) consisted of:

•: ($1.2) million of net foreign exchange losses.
•: $0.4 million of realized gains on the settlement of foreign invoices.
•: $0.3 million of other miscellaneous items.

33 In fiscal 2008, other income (expense) consisted of:

•: Other-than-temporary impairment of auction rate security holdings of ($21.2) million (for additional discussion, see Note 4—Investments to consolidated financial statements).

Table of Contents

•: A ($1.9) million loss associated with the reclassification of accumulated translation adjustment losses on the liquidation of an inactive Australian subsidiary.
•: ($2.0) million of net foreign exchange losses.

~~In fiscal~~ ~~2007,~~INCOME ~~foreign~~TAX ~~exchange~~PROVISION ~~gains totaled $3.4 million, primarily due to a weakening U.S. Dollar during the period.~~ (BENEFIT)

The ~~INCOME~~income ~~TAX~~tax ~~BENEFIT~~provision (~~PROVISION~~benefit) was $0.2 million, $(0.3) million and $(0.5) million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The fiscal 2010 tax provision consists of tax expense in various foreign jurisdictions of $0.4 million offset by a tax benefit of $(0.2) million related to research and development tax credits generated in France that are refundable within three years if not used to offset income. The fiscal 2009 tax benefit is related to research and development tax credits generated in France that are refundable within three years if not used to offset income. The fiscal 2008 tax benefit consists of tax expense in various foreign jurisdictions of $0.4 million, offset by a tax benefit of $(0.9) million related to research and development tax credits generated in France that are refundable within three years if not used to offset income. Generally, the Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory rates due to the fact that we have recorded a valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets as we do not consider the generation of taxable income necessary to realize their benefits to be more likely than not.

Income tax provision in all periods represents taxes payable in certain domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Income tax benefit (provision) was $0.3 million, $0.5 million, and ($0.4) million in fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Fiscal 2009 and 2008 tax benefit is related to research and development tax credits generated in France that are refundable within three years if not used to offset income. We recorded a tax benefit of $0.3 million in fiscal 2009 and a $0.9 million benefit in fiscal 2008 based on our estimates of these refundable tax credits. Generally, the Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory rates as we have recorded a valuation allowance related to the Company's deferred tax assets as we do not consider the generation of taxable income to realize their benefits to be more likely than not.

MINORITY INTEREST

In February 2003, we completed the change in domicile of the publicly listed company, ActivIdentity Europe S.A. (formerly known as ActivCard S.A) from the Republic of France to the United States by acquiring 94.8% of the outstanding securities of ActivIdentity Europe S.A. In July 2003, we completed a follow-on exchange offer in which we acquired approximately an additional 4.6% of the outstanding securities of ActivIdentity Europe S.A. During fiscal 2006, we purchased an additional 173,736 outstanding securities of ActivIdentity Europe S.A. No additional shares were acquired during fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008. The ~~minority~~non-controlling interest in ~~ActivIdentity~~ ActivIdentity Europe S.A. at September 30, ~~2009~~2010, was approximately 0.2%, representing outstanding ordinary shares and ADS of ActivIdentity Europe S.A. that were not exchanged or sold to us as of that date. ~~Minority~~The change in non-controlling interest was $99(1,000), $5099,000, and $1250,000 in fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008, respectively.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following sections discuss the effect of changes in the Company's balance sheet and cash flows and contractual obligations on our liquidity and capital resources.

Table of Contents

Balance Sheet and Cash Flows

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, MARKETABLE SECURITIES, AND INVESTMENTS

The following table summarizes the Company's cash, cash equivalents, ~~and~~marketable securities, long-term investments, and restricted cash (in thousands):

	September 30, 2009		September 30, 2008		Increase (Decrease)
	September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		Increase (Decrease)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7572,~~624~~519	$	7075,~~173~~624	$	5(3,~~451~~105	)
Short-term investments		3,100		9,656		(6,556	)
Marketable securities		3,780		3,100		680
Long-term investments		~~11,752~~—		11,752		—(11,752	)
Restricted cash		1,~~746~~940		—1,746		~~1,746~~194
	$	9278,~~222~~239	$	9192,~~581~~222	$	~~641~~(13,983	)

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $5.5 million due to the liquidation of $6.0 million in short-term investments in corporate notes and bonds and the settlement at par of $0.6 million in closed-end mutual fund auction rate securities ("ARS") during the year. The $3.1 million in short-term investments is holdings in closed-end mutual fund ARS. Long-term investments represent the estimated fair market value, as of September 30, 2009 and as of September 30, 2008, of ARS holdings with a cost basis of $33.0 million. As a result of market liquidity issues, during fiscal 2008 we reclassified $33.0 million at cost, or $11.8 million at the estimated fair value as of September 30, 2008, of our ARS holdings to long-term investments. At September 30, 2008, short-term investments included $6.0 million invested in corporate notes and bonds, and $3.7 million invested in closed-end mutual fund ARS. As a result of a contractual obligation, the Company reclassified $1.7 million (2.0 million Australian Dollars) to restricted cash. 37

~~We believe~~Table that our cash and cash equivalent and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we may evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses, products, or technologies. A portion of our cash may be used to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, or to acquire products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies. Contents

The portfolio of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash is managed by several financial institutions. Our investments portfolio decreased by $14.0 million, or 15%, to $78.2 million as of September 30, 2010 from $92.2 million as of September 30, 2009 primarily due to $12.8 million of cash paid, net of cash acquired, as consideration for the CoreStreet acquisition. For additional information regarding the details of our investment portfolio, see Note—4 Investments to consolidated financial statements.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we may evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses, products, or technologies. A portion of our cash may be used to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, or to acquire products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies.

The following table summarizes the Company's cash inflows/outflows by category (dollars in thousands):

	Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007			2009 vs. 2008					2008 vs. 2007
	2010			2009			2008			2010 vs. 2009					2009 vs. 2008
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities	$	674		$	(8,129	)	$	(5,603	)	$	8,803		-108	%	$	(2,526	)	45	%
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(2,571	)	$	674		$	(8,129	)	$	(3,245	)	-481	%	$	8,803		-108	%
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		4,332			47,749			23,892			(43,417	)	-91	%		23,857		100	%
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,662			4,332			47,749			(2,670	)	-62	%		(43,417	)	-91	%
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		—			25			191			(25	)	-100	%		(166	)	-87	%
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,078	)		—			25			(2,078	)	nm			(25	)	nm

nm = not meaningful

Operating Activities

~~The~~Net cash used in operating activities was $82.86 million ~~variance~~for fiscal 2010, which resulted from ~~fiscal~~net ~~2009~~loss ~~compared~~of to$5.7 million adjusted ~~fiscal~~for ~~2008~~non-cash ~~was~~items, ~~primarily~~including depreciation and amortization charges of $3.1 million, stock-based compensation of $3.4 million, and unrealized foreign exchange loss of $0.6 million, partially offset by $4.1 million from the ~~result~~gain on sale of: investments.

35 Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.7 million for fiscal 2009, which resulted from non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization of $3.6 million, stock-based compensation of $3.1 million, and unrealized foreign exchange loss of $1.6 million, partially offset by a net loss of $5.5 million, and net changes in assets and liabilities of $1.9 million.

~~Table~~ Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million for fiscal 2008, which resulted from a net loss of ~~Contents~~$76.5 million adjusted for non cash items, including goodwill impairment charge of $35.9 million, impairment of investments of $21.2 million, depreciation and amortization of $4.1 million, stock-based compensation of $2.9 million, currency translation loss of $1.9 million, and unrealized foreign exchange loss of $1.8 million, and net changes in assets and liabilities of $0.6 million.

lower interest income during the fiscal year as a result of lower average cash investments and lower average prevailing market rates for investments.

The $2.5 million unfavorable variance between fiscal 2008 and 2007 was primarily the result of:

Investing Activities

~~Cash~~Net cash provided by investing activities was $41.37 million for fiscal ~~2009~~2010 and ~~decreased~~was (primarily due to $4315.4)0 million from sales and maturities of investments and marketable securities, principally the sales and maturities of ARS, partially offset by $12.8 million ~~compared~~used to ~~the~~acquire ~~prior~~CoreStreet ~~year~~and $0.5 million ~~The~~paid ~~decrease~~for ~~from~~purchases ~~fiscal~~of ~~2008~~property ~~was~~and ~~primarily~~equipment. For additional information regarding the ~~result~~details of: our investment portfolio, see Note—4 Investments to consolidated financial statements. For additional

3638

Table of Contents

~~Cash~~information ~~provided~~regarding bythe ~~investing~~details ~~activities~~of ~~was~~our ~~$23.9 million~~acquisition ~~more~~of inCoreStreet, ~~fiscal~~see ~~2008~~Note—3 ~~than~~Business inCombinations ~~the~~to ~~prior~~consolidated ~~year.~~financial ~~The $23~~statements.~~9 million~~ ~~favorable variance between fiscal 2008 and 2007 was primarily the result of:~~

Net cash provided by investing activities was $4.3 million for fiscal 2009 and was primarily due to $6.5 million from sales and maturities of investments and marketable securities, partially offset by $1.5 million from the reclassification of a deposit to restricted cash and $0.8 million paid for purchases of property and equipment.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $47.7 million for fiscal 2008 and was primarily due to $85.2 million from sales and maturities of investments and marketable securities, partially offset by $37.2 million in purchases of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.1 million for fiscal 2010 and was due to repurchases of common stock of $2.4 million, offset partially by proceeds from exercise of employee stock options of $0.3 million. For additional information regarding the stock repurchase program, see Note 16—Stock Repurchase Program to consolidated financial statements.

There were no cash flows from financing activities for fiscal 2009.

~~Issuance~~Net ofcash ~~stock upon the exercise of warrants and stock options~~ provided ~~cash~~by ~~from~~ financing activities ofwas $25,000 ~~and~~for ~~$191,000 in~~ fiscal 2008 and ~~2007,~~was ~~respectively~~due to proceeds from exercise of employee stock options.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

The following table summarizes the Company's accounts receivable, net (in thousands):

		September 30, 2009			September 30, 2008			Increase (Decrease)
		September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009			Increase (Decrease)
Accounts receivable, net		$	1312,~~983~~247		$	1113,~~792~~983		$	2(1,~~191~~736	)

The $21.27 million ~~increase~~decrease in accounts receivable is primarily driven by the timing of an invoice associated with a $2.0 million annual maintenance renewal contract which was ~~billed~~not inissued until the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2009~~2011. ~~This~~A similar invoice for ~~this~~annual ~~same~~maintenance renewal contract was ~~not~~issued ~~billed~~in ~~until~~ the ~~first~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 ~~during the prior year renewal cycle~~. Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 were 7583 days and 8275 days respectively. The percentage of outstanding receivables less than ~~thirty~~ 30 days past due was 9187% of ~~the~~ the outstanding balance as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 compared to 9491% at September 30, ~~2008~~2009.

DEFERRED REVENUE, NET

The following table summarizes the Company's deferred revenue (in thousands):

			September 30, 2009		September 30, 2008		Increase (Decrease)
			September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		Increase (Decrease)
	Service		$	1011,~~510~~123	$	910,~~589~~510	$	~~921~~613
	Product			~~3,304~~693		23,~~560~~304		~~744~~(2,611	)
		Total	$	1311,~~814~~816	$	1213,~~149~~814	$	(1,~~665~~998	)
Reported as:
	Current		$	129,~~574~~520	$	1112,~~024~~574	$	1(3,~~550~~054	)
	Noncurrent			12,~~240~~296		1,~~125~~240		~~115~~1,056
		Total	$	1311,~~814~~816	$	1213,~~149~~814	$	(1,~~665~~998	)

The $0.9 million increase in service deferred revenue is primarily due to the timing of closing a large maintanence contract that had been received in fiscal 2009 but not in fiscal 2008 offset by a decrease in deferred revenue as a result of modifying a licensening agreement with one of our value added resellers which is also the main driver for the $0.7 million increase in product deferred 39

Table of Contents

~~revenue.~~ The $12.60 million ~~increase~~decrease in ~~current~~ deferred revenue at September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009, is ~~primarily~~due ~~related~~ to ~~the renewal of~~ a ~~large~~decline ~~maintenance~~in ~~contract~~deferred ~~that~~product ~~had~~revenue, ~~been~~partially ~~received as of~~offset ~~fiscal~~by ~~2009~~an ~~but~~increase ~~not~~in atdeferred ~~the~~service ~~end of fiscal 2008~~revenue.

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes ~~the~~our ~~Company's~~ contractual obligations under facility leases which are inclusive of amounts identified as part of our restructuring plans and exclusive of expected sublease income, at September 30, ~~2009~~2010, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):

		Total			Less than 1 Year			1 to 3 Years			3 to 5 Years			More than 5 years
Operating leases		$	610,~~021~~097		$	31,~~450~~736		$	2,~~571~~755		$	—2,535		$	—3,071

Subsequent Events

Sale of Auction Rate Securities

On November 22, 2009, the Company liquidated a position held in an ARS security classified as a long-term investment at September 30, 2009 resulting in a gain of $1.2 million. Net proceeds from the transaction were $1.5 million. The estimated fair market value of the security as recorded at September 30, 2009 was $0.3 million. The security had an original cost of $2.8 million.

CoreStreet Acquisition

On December 13, 2009, the Company, and one of its subsidiaries, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") to acquire CoreStreet Ltd., a Delaware corporation ("CoreStreet"). CoreStreet is a leader in distributed identity credential validation solutions. With the addition of CoreStreet's Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certification technology, distributed identity credential validation system, and physical access control products, the Company believes the acquisition will strengthen its strong authentication and credential management product portfolio to confidently establish a person's identity when interacting digitally.

The acquisition of CoreStreet is intended to support the Company's global vision of making every digital interaction trustworthy by adding distributed identity credential validation solutions and physical access control products to the company's broad portfolio of strong authentication and credential management offerings. CoreStreet's PKI certificate validation technology is deployed by public and private organizations around the world to validate the credentials of individuals as they interact with their secure IT applications, including digitally signed email and secure forms. Additionally, CoreStreet's PIVMAN system allows authorized personnel the ability to control access to any site with confidence by quickly authenticating and validating the roles and identities of individuals wishing to enter an area.

The Company entered into the Merger Agreement with Terrapin Holding Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("Holding") and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Terrapin Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Holding ("Merger Sub"), CoreStreet Ltd., a Delaware corporation ("CoreStreet"), and John F. Burton, acting solely as the stockholder representative. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into CoreStreet, with CoreStreet continuing as the surviving corporation and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Merger"). The Merger was completed on December 14, 2009.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, upon consummation of the Merger, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of CoreStreet for (i) $14 million in cash (subject to adjustment for

Table of Contents

cancellation of indebtedness and other specified expenses), (ii) approximately 2.2 million shares of the Company's common stock (of which approximately 1.5 million shares are subject to an escrow to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of the stockholders of CoreStreet), (iii) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with per share exercise price of $4.25 expiring December 31, 2011, (iv) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with per share exercise price $5.00 expiring December 31, 2012 and (v) a certain amount of cash to be equal to 50% of CoreStreet's cash and cash equivalents less certain of its liabilities as of the effective time of the merger. The former holders of CoreStreet capital stock who received the shares of Company common stock or warrants in the Merger agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares for a period of one year after the effective time of the Merger. The Company common stock issuable in connection with the transaction and upon exercise of the warrants was issued in a private placement.

CoreStreet made customary representations, warranties and covenants, including, among others, covenants (i) to conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between execution of the Merger Agreement and consummation of the Merger; (ii) not to engage in certain kinds of transactions during such period; (iii) not to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions and (iv) to obtain required stockholder approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger.

The completion of the Merger was subject to various closing conditions, including (i) obtaining the approval of the stockholders of CoreStreet; (ii) no legal or regulatory restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the Merger; (iii) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of the representations and warranties; (iv) receipt of required consents from third parties; and (v) absence of any material adverse change on CoreStreet.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The above discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with ~~accounting~~U.S. ~~principles~~ generally accepted inaccounting ~~the~~principles ~~United States of America~~ ("GAAP"). We believe there are ~~several~~ accounting policies that are critical to understanding our consolidated financial statements, as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses and involve management's judgment regarding significant estimates. We have reviewed our critical accounting policies and their application in the preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures with our Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described below.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as set forth in:

•: ASC 985-605 (formerly known as and comprised of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition", as amended by SOP 98-9, "Modification of SOP 97-2", "Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions" and EITF 03-05, "Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software)",
•: ASC 605-25 (formerly known as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. (EITF) 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables)",
•: ASC 605-35 (formerly known as and comprised of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 45 (ARB 45), "Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts", SOP 81-1, "Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts)",
•: SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, "Revenue Recognition", and
•: Technical Practice Aid (TPA) interpretations of ASC 985-605 (SOP 97-2) issued by the AICPA (TPAs 5100.38 - 5100.76).

Table of Contents

The application of the appropriate accounting principles to revenue is dependent upon the specific transaction and whether the sale includes hardware products, software products, post contract customer support ("PCS"), other professional services, or a combination of some or all of these products and/or services.

Subject to the additional conditions described below, the Company does not recognize revenue until: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the fee is fixed or determinable; (3) delivery has occurred; and (4) collection of the corresponding receivable is reasonably assured.

Table of Contents

For multiple element arrangements that contain one or more deliverables for which the functionality is not dependent on the software, the arrangement fee is allocated between the "non-software" and software deliverables in accordance with ASC 605-25 when the following criteria are met:

•: The delivered item has stand alone value;
•: There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements as demonstrated by vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of fair value or third party evidence; and
•: If the arrangement includes a general return right relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in the control of the vendor.

If the above criteria are met, we allocate the arrangement fee to the delivered items using the residual value method. Revenue for the elements whose functionality is not dependent upon the delivered software is recognized in accordance with SAB 104, and revenue for software elements is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. If the above criteria are not met, all deliverables are considered a single unit of accounting and revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605 upon delivery of all elements of the arrangement.

For multiple element arrangements that contain one or more deliverables for which the functionality is dependent on the software, the arrangement fee is subject to the provisions of ASC 985-605, and is allocated among each element, based on VSOE of fair value of each element if VSOE of each element exists. We determine VSOE of an element based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately. For an element not yet sold separately, VSOE may be established by management having the relevant authority as long as it is probable that the price, once established, will not change before separate introduction of the element in the marketplace. When arrangements contain multiple elements and VSOE exists for all undelivered elements only, we recognize revenue for the delivered elements based on the residual value method. For arrangements containing multiple elements wherein VSOE does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the delivered and undelivered elements is deferred until VSOE exists or all elements have been delivered. Additionally, where VSOE does not exist to allocate the fee to the separate elements and the only undelivered element is PCS, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the contractual PCS period. For all other transactions not involving software, fair value is determined using the price when sold separately or other methods allowable under ASC 605-25.

Professional service revenue is recognized separately from the software element when the services are performed and when VSOE exists to allocate the revenue to the various elements in a multi-element arrangement, the services are not essential to the functionality of any other element of the arrangement, and the total price of the contract would vary with the inclusion or exclusion of the services. Revenue under these arrangements is presented as a component of service revenue on the statement of operations.

Table of Contents

services. Revenue under these arrangements is presented as a component of service revenue on the statement of operations.

PCS contracts are typically priced as a percentage of the product license fee and generally have a one-year term. Services provided to customers under PCS contracts include technical product support and unspecified product upgrades, on a when and if available basis. Revenue from advance payments for PCS contracts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract and are classified as service revenue.

Even though delivery of PCS and services has started, if all of the criteria in ASC 985-605 for revenue recognition have not yet been met, PCS and service revenue recognition may not commence. At the time all the criteria in ASC 985-605 are met, the portion of the deferred amount based on the proportion of the service period that has already expired to the total service period is immediately recognized and the residual amount is recognized ratably over the longer of the remaining PCS or service period.

Except in arrangements where acceptance is considered perfunctory, where we have provided acceptance rights to certain customers, no products or services revenue is recognized until the earlier of the customer formal acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period granted to the customer.

For arrangements that involve some customization, modification or production services that are considered essential to the functionality of the software element, and separate accounting for these services is not permitted, revenue from the license and professional services essential to the functionality of the software is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with ASC 605-35. The percentage-of-completion method is applied when we have the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates of the total cost of effort required for completion using the cost of labor hours incurred as the measure of progress towards completion. The progress toward completion is measured based on the date when the essential product functionality has been delivered or the application enters into a production environment or the point at which no significant additional professional service resources are required for the functionality of the software. Estimates are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion and these changes are accounted for as changes in accounting estimates when the information becomes known. Revenue under these arrangements is presented as a component of software revenue on the statement of operations as the related project revenue, including both the license and service components, are less than 10% of total net revenue. Where VSOE exists for professional services not essential to the functionality of the software, revenue is recorded as service revenue. Forecasted losses on contracts are accrued to cost of revenue in the period in which a forecasted loss is deemed probable and estimable. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. Unbilled work-in-process is recorded as a receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the balances of unbilled work-in-process were $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

We had one ongoing reseller arrangement under which we received a fixed percentage of license and service revenue earned by the reseller. For this arrangement, we have no control over the pricing established by the reseller, including what is charged for service renewals. Since we cannot determine if sufficient amounts of PCS renewals are priced at consistent percentages of license fees, we are unable to establish VSOE for service renewals in this arrangement. Accordingly, for the bundled sales of license and service, the Company recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the service period. For statement of operations presentation purposes only, we allocate revenue for this arrangement between software and PCS in a ratio consistent with our standard end-user pricing model. For fiscal 2008, $3.5 million or 18% of total software revenue and $4.0 million, or 16% of total service revenue, was allocated for this arrangement. We modified this ongoing customer arrangement in February 2009 and all future revenues will recognized as software revenue through the remainder of

Table of Contents

~~this~~proportion ~~arrangement.~~of ~~For~~the ~~fiscal~~service ~~2009,~~period ~~$4.9 million~~that orhas ~~20%~~already ofexpired to the total ~~software~~service ~~revenue~~period ~~and~~is ~~$1.4 million~~immediately orrecognized 6%and ofthe ~~total~~residual ~~service~~amount ~~revenue~~is ~~was~~recognized ~~allocated~~ratably ~~between~~over ~~these~~the ~~two~~remaining ~~arrangements~~service period.

For arrangements that involve some customization, modification or production services that are considered essential to the functionality of the software element, and separate accounting for these services is not permitted, revenue from the license and professional services essential to the functionality of the software is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with ASC 605-35. The percentage-of-completion method is applied when we have the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates of the total cost of effort required for completion using the cost of labor hours incurred as the measure of progress towards completion. The progress toward completion is measured based on the date when the essential product functionality has been delivered or the application enters into a production environment or the point at which no significant additional professional service resources are required for the functionality of the software. Estimates are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion and these changes are accounted for as changes in accounting estimates when the information becomes known. Revenue under these arrangements is presented as software revenue on the statement of operations. Where VSOE exists for professional services not essential to the functionality of the software, revenue is recorded as service revenue. Forecasted losses on contracts are accrued to cost of revenue in the period in which a forecasted loss is deemed probable and estimable. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. Unbilled work-in-process is recorded as a receivable in the consolidated balance sheets.

For single element arrangements, revenue from stand alone product sales is recognized upon shipment (unless shipping terms determine otherwise), net of estimated returns and/or certain estimated future price changes. Our practice is not to ship product to a reseller or distributor unless the reseller or distributor has a history of selling the products or the end-user is known and has been qualified. In certain specific and limited circumstances, we provide product return and price protection rights to certain distributors and resellers. We have established a reasonable basis through historical experience for estimating future returns and price changes. Actual returns and price protection claims have not been material to date.

Loss Contingencies

We record loss contingencies in accordance with ~~ASC~~Accounting ~~450~~Standards 10Codification ~~5-1,~~Topic ~~(formerly known as SFAS~~ No. 5,450 ~~Accounting~~("ASC ~~for Contingencies~~450"). ~~This~~ASC ~~Statement~~450 10 5 establishes standards of financial accounting and reporting for loss contingencies. It requires accrual by a charge to ~~profit~~operating ~~and~~expenses ~~loss~~ and disclosure for an estimated loss from a loss contingency if two conditions are met: (a) information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and (b) the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for general or unspecified business risks ("reserves for general contingencies") are not permitted.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with ~~accounting~~GAAP ~~principles generally accepted in the United States~~ requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under current circumstances. Future events, however, are subject to change and estimates and judgments routinely require adjustments, actual results could therefore differ from our current estimates. Significant estimates made in the accompanying financial statements are:

Table of Contents

however, are subject to change and estimates and judgments routinely require adjustments, actual results could therefore differ from our current estimates. Significant estimates made in the accompanying financial statements are:

•: Fair Value of Investments—The Company's investments are recorded at our best estimate of fair market value, with unrealized gains or losses classified as temporary in nature included in other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet. Impairments considered other-than-temporary are recorded in other income. We use a variety of valuation techniques to access the fair value of investments, including quoted prices in active markets and other observable market indicators. If the relevant assumptions, estimates, or methodologies prove incorrect or, if due to additional information received in the future, our conclusions would change, we may be required to change the recorded value of our investments and record additional impairments.
•: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on account aging, historical bad debt experience, and ongoing evaluations of customer creditworthiness. Changes in the allowance are included as a component of general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations. If actual collections differ significantly from our estimates, it may result in a decrease or increase in our general and administrative expenses.
•: Inventory Valuation—We provide for slow moving and obsolete inventories based on historical experience and forecasts of product demand. A change in the value of the inventory is included as a component of cost of hardware revenue. If sales of inventory on-hand are less than our current projections or if there is a change in technology making certain inventory obsolete, we may be required to record additional charges which may adversely affect our margins and results of operations.
•: Long-Lived Assets—As events or circumstances indicate, we perform a review of the valuation of long-lived assets, including property and equipment. We also assess the recoverability of long-lived assets on an interim basis whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable based on an analysis of estimated expected future undiscounted net cash flows to be generated by the assets over their estimated useful lives. If the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets over their estimated useful lives, we record an impairment charge in the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value. Should conditions prove to be different than management's current assessment, material write downs of long-lived assets may be required, adversely affecting our results of operations.
•: Other Intangible Assets—We generally record intangible assets when we acquire companies. The cost of the acquisition is allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired, including identifiable intangible assets based on those assets and liabilities estimated fair values. Certain identifiable intangible assets such as purchased technology, customer lists, trademarks, and trade names are amortized over time. Accordingly, the allocation of the acquisition cost to identifiable intangible assets has a significant impact on our future operating results. The allocation process requires extensive use of estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets. If impairment indicators are identified with respect to other intangible assets, the fair value of other intangible assets is re-assessed using valuation techniques that require significant management judgment. Should conditions prove to be different than our original assessment, material write downs of the fair value of intangible assets may be required. We periodically review the estimated remaining useful lives of our intangible assets. A reduction in the estimate of remaining useful life could result in accelerated

Table of Contents

~~warranty~~amortization ~~reserve~~or ~~are~~an ~~included~~impairment ascharge ain ~~component~~future ofperiods ~~cost~~and ~~of hardware revenue. If actual returns under warranty differ significantly from our estimates, it~~ may ~~result~~adversely inaffect ~~a decrease or increase in~~ our ~~cost~~ results of ~~hardware revenue~~operations.

•: Goodwill—In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 350 ("ASC 350") "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other", goodwill is not amortized. Instead, goodwill is tested, at least annually, for impairment at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. Accordingly, we periodically assess goodwill for impairment. Goodwill recorded in business combinations may significantly affect our future operating results to the extent impaired, but the magnitude and timing of any such impairment is uncertain. When we conduct our annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or if impairment indicators are identified in the interim with respect to goodwill, the fair value of goodwill is re-assessed using valuation techniques that require significant management judgment. The key judgments include analysis of future cash flow which management believes to be an important factor in determination of the fair value of the Company's sole reporting unit. This analysis takes into consideration certain revenue growth and operating expense forecasts. Should conditions be different than our last assessment, significant write-downs of goodwill may be required which will adversely affect our results of operations. We conducted our first annual impairment test of goodwill recorded in connection with our acquisition of CoreStreet in December 2009 in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The first step (Step 1) in this analysis was to compare the carrying value of the Company's sole reporting unit, which approximates the Company's total stockholders' equity balance, to its fair value based on the market value of the Company's common stock. If the carrying value exceeded the fair value as a result of Step 1, the Company would have needed to complete Step 2 of the impairment test, which requires the Company to estimate the implied fair value of goodwill and compare that implied fair value to the carrying value of goodwill. As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of the Company's common stock exceeded stockholders' equity by approximately 13%. Consequently, Step 2 of the analysis was not deemed necessary and the Company concluded there was no indication of impairment to the carrying value of goodwill as of September 30, 2010.
•: Restructuring Expense—We accrue restructuring liabilities associated with vacating facilities that will no longer be used in operations. Recording of costs associated with vacating facilities require us to estimate future sub-lease income. If the actual future lease payments, net of any sub-lease income, differ from our estimates, it may result in an increase or decrease in our restructuring charge, and could adversely affect our results of operations. In fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2008, we recorded adjustments associated with changes in our estimates for future lease payments. There was no such adjustment recorded in fiscal 2009.
•: Hardware Sales Warranty Reserve—We accrue expenses associated with potential warranty claims at the time of sale, based on historical experience. The warranty we provide is in excess of warranty coverage provided by our product assembly contractors. Our standard warranty period is ninety days for software products and one year for hardware products. Changes in the warranty reserve are included as a component of cost of hardware revenue. If actual returns under warranty differ significantly from our estimates, it may result in a decrease or increase in our cost of hardware revenue.
•: Provision for Income Taxes—The provision for income taxes includes taxes currently payable and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We record deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. If we do not generate sufficient taxable income, the realization of deferred tax assets could be impaired resulting in additional income tax expense. As a result, we record a valuation allowance to reduce net deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be recognized. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of deductible temporary differences, net operating

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ASC 820 10 5-1 was previously issued in September 2006 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820 10 5-1 replaces the different definitions of fair value in the accounting literature with a single definition. It defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We adopted ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157) on October 1, 2008, for financial assets and liabilities. We have elected to adopt ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157) for non-financial assets and liabilities on October 1, 2009, in accordance with FASB ASC 820 10 65-1 (FSP No. 157-2). We are currently evaluating the impact of applying the deferred portion of ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157) to the nonrecurring fair value measurements of its nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

Table of Contents

~~comparisons~~loss ~~between~~carry ~~companies~~forwards, ~~that~~and ~~choose~~research ~~different measurement attributes for similar types of assets~~ and ~~liabilities.~~development ~~The~~tax ~~provisions of ASC 825 10 10 (SFAS No~~credits. ~~159)~~ ~~become~~We ~~effective~~have ~~for fiscal~~established ~~years~~a ~~beginning~~valuation ~~after~~allowance ~~November 15,~~to ~~2007.~~reserve ~~Management~~these ~~adopted~~deferred ~~this~~tax ~~standard~~assets ondue ~~October 1,~~to ~~2008.~~uncertainty ~~The~~regarding ~~adoption~~their ~~of ASC 825 10 10 (SFAS No~~realization. ~~159)~~ ~~did not have a material effect on our financial statements.~~

•: Stock Based Compensation—We estimate the value of employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Merton model. The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using this option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock price. For awards that carry a market based vesting aspect, the fair value of the award is based on the results of a market simulation model (the simulation model) that evaluates the probability that the requisite market conditions needed for vesting will be achieved. The simulation model uses multiple iterations of simulated daily stock prices of the Company between the grant date and the future vesting date. The inputs to the simulation model include the Company's stock price on the grant date, the historical volatility of the Company's stock price over a period of time corresponding to the vesting period of the unit award as of the grant date, and the risk free interest rate, based on relevant U.S. Treasury Note rates, as of the grant date. Based on whether the requisite market conditions are achieved during the multiple simulations the simulation model produces an expected future value of the stock on the vesting date. This future value is discounted back to the grant date and used as the requisite fair value of the unit award.

~~ASC 805~~ 10RECENT 10ACCOUNTING was previously issued in December 2007 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 141 (revised), Business Combinations. The standard changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer's income tax valuation allowance. ASC 805 10 10 (SFAS No. 141(R)) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We will evaluate the impact of the provisions of ASC 805 10 10 (SFAS No. 141(R)) and adopt this standard on October 1, 2009. PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~ASC 810~~See ~~10 65-~~Note 1—Nature ~~was~~of ~~previously~~Business ~~issued~~and inSummary ~~December~~of ~~2007~~Significant byAccounting Policies ~~the~~to ~~FASB under~~ the ~~title SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in~~ Consolidated Financial Statements, ancontained ~~Amendment~~herein ~~of ARB No. 51. The standard changes the accounting~~ for ~~non-controlling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify non-controlling interests as~~ a ~~component~~full ofdescription ~~consolidated stockholders' equity, and the elimination~~ of ~~"minority~~recent ~~interest"~~ accounting inpronouncements ~~results~~including ofthe ~~operations~~respective ~~with~~expected ~~earnings~~dates ~~attributable to non-controlling interests reported as part~~ of ~~consolidated earnings. Additionally, ASC 810 10 65-1 (SFAS~~ ~~No. 160)~~adoption ~~revises the accounting for both increases~~ and ~~decreases~~effects inon aresults ~~parent's controlling ownership interest. ASC 810 10 65-1 (SFAS No. 160) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We will evaluate the impact~~ of ~~the~~our ~~provisions~~operations ~~of ASC 810 10 65-1 (SFAS No. 160)~~ and ~~adopt~~financial ~~this standard on October 1, 2009~~condition.

ASC 815 10 65 was previously issued in March 2008 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ASC 815 10 65 (SFAS No. 161) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We evaluated the impact of the provisions of ASC 815 10 65 (SFAS No. 161) and adopted this standard on October 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 815 10 65 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

ASC 820 10 65-4 was previously issued in April 2009 by the FASB under the title FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. ASC 820 10 65-4 (FSP SFAS No. 157-4) provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements). The standard relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157) states the objective of fair value measurement—to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. The provisions of ASC 820 10 65-4 (FSP 157-4) are effective for the Company's interim reporting for the period ending on June 30, 2009. The Company has adopted this standard in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and there was no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ASC 825 10 65-1 was previously issued in April 2009 by the FASB under the title FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 825 10 65-1 (FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1) enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. This standard relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected within a Company's balance sheet at fair value. Prior to the effective date of this standard, fair values for these assets and liabilities have only been disclosed once a year. The FSP will now require these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The disclosure requirements under this standard are effective for the Company's interim reporting period ending on June 30, 2009. The Company adopted this standard in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. There was no impact on the consolidated financial statements as it relates only to additional disclosures.

ASC 855 10 50-1 was previously issued in May 2009 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. This Statement sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated financial results.

ASC 105 10 65-1 was previously issued in June 2009 by the FASB under the title Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (the Codification). The Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP. All other literature is considered non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has adopted this Statement for fiscal 2009. There was no change to the results of the Company's consolidated financial statements as it relates to additional disclosures.

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2009-13, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" and ASU 2009-14, "Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software." These ASU's revise and clarify accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables, including how to separate deliverables into units of accounting determining the allocation of revenue to the units of accounting and the application of these provisions to tangible products containing software components. There are also expanded disclosures for significant judgments made in the application of these standards, if material. These pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010 and earlier application is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of these pronouncements to have a significant effect on its financial statements and will early adopt both pronouncements effective October 1, 2009.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks, specifically with respect to foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate volatility, and concentration of credit risk, especially on auction rate security investments. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio and have no foreign exchange contracts.

Table of Contents

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We are exposed to currency exchange fluctuations as we sell our products and incur expenses globally. We manage the sensitivity of our international revenue by denominating transactions in U.S. Dollars, Euros, Australian Dollars and British Pounds. A natural hedge exists in some local currencies, to a limited extent, as local currency denominated operating expenses offset some of the local currency denominated revenue. Due to fluctuations in foreign currencies we recorded a loss of $0.87 million in fiscal ~~2009~~2010, a loss of $2.0.8 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2009, and a ~~gain~~loss of $32.40 million in fiscal ~~2007~~2008, on our consolidated statements of operations on the revaluation of assets and liabilities and settlement of of current period transactions.

During fiscal ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008, of total revenue, approximately 6564%, 6265%, and 5862%, respectively, were invoiced in U.S. ~~Dollars~~dollars. Although we ~~purchase~~incur ~~many~~a majority of ~~our~~expenses ~~components~~ in U.S. ~~Dollars~~dollars, approximately 37%, 44%, ofand ~~our~~50% ~~operating~~were ~~expenses are~~ denominated in other currencies, primarily in Euros, Australian ~~Dollars~~dollars and British Pounds during fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Because more

Table of Contents

revenue is U.S. dollars denominated than expenses, a decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar could adversely affect operating results.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our significant cash, cash equivalents and investment holdings. The rate of return that we may be able to obtain on investment securities will depend on market conditions at the time we make these investments and may differ from the rates we have secured in the past.

At September 30, ~~2009~~2010, we held $7572.65 million of cash and cash equivalents, $3.18 million in ~~short-term~~marketable ~~investments~~securities, ~~$11.8 million in long-term investments,~~ and $1.79 million in restricted cash, for a total of $9278.2 million. Our cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash and money- market funds. Our ~~short-term~~ ~~investments~~marketable securities are primarily comprised of ~~U.S.~~closed-end ~~government~~mutual funds and ~~government~~a ~~agency~~student ~~securities,~~loan ~~corporate notes and bonds, auction rate securities, and certificates of deposit~~agency. ~~Our long-term investments consist of auction rate securities.~~ Based on our cash, cash equivalents and investments at September 30, ~~2009~~2010, a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates would increase or decrease our annual interest income and cash flows by approximately $~~171~~56,000.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to a concentration of credit risk ~~include~~consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, ~~investments~~restricted cash, marketable securities and accounts receivable. ~~Cash~~The ~~and~~Company maintains cash, cash equivalents, ~~are~~and ~~held~~restricted cash with high credit quality financial institutions., ~~Short-~~term deposits ~~investments~~and ~~consist~~ARS ~~primarily~~consisting of ~~U.S.~~closed-end ~~government~~mutual funds and ~~government~~ a student loan agency. ~~backed~~Refer ~~corporate~~to ~~notes~~Management's Discussion and ~~bonds,~~Analysis ~~commercial~~of ~~paper,~~Financial Condition and ~~auction~~Results ~~rate~~of ~~securities~~Operations in this Form 10-K for further discussion.

~~During~~The ~~fiscal~~Company ~~2008,~~believes weit ~~reclassified~~has ~~$33.0 million~~made atreasonable ~~cost~~judgments ofin ~~our~~its ~~investments~~valuation inof ~~ARS~~marketable ~~from~~securities. ~~short-term~~However, toif ~~long-term~~the ~~investments~~relevant ~~and~~assumptions, ~~recorded~~estimates, ~~an other-than-temporary~~or ~~impairment~~the onrelated ~~these~~analyses ~~holdings~~prove ~~of $21.2 million~~incorrect or, ~~resulting~~if indue ato ~~carrying~~additional ~~value~~information ofreceived ~~$11.8 million~~in atthe ~~September 30~~future, ~~2008~~management's ~~and~~conclusions ~~at September 30~~would change, ~~2009.~~the WeCompany ~~hold~~may anbe ~~additional~~required ~~$3.1 million~~to ofchange ~~ARS~~the inrecorded ~~short-term~~value ~~investments,~~of ~~valued~~the ~~approximately~~marketable atsecurities ~~par~~ as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010.

~~ARS~~The ~~are~~Company ~~structured~~sells ~~to provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets~~ the ~~interest~~majority ~~rates~~of ~~paid~~its atproducts ~~pre-determined~~and ~~intervals,~~services ~~generally~~to ~~every 28 days. The auctions have historically provided~~ a ~~liquid~~limited ~~market~~number ~~for~~of ~~these securities~~customers. ~~Our~~If ~~investments~~the infinancial ~~ARS~~conditions ~~represent~~or ~~interests~~results inof ~~CDO,~~operations ~~derivative~~of ~~product~~any ~~companies,~~one ~~student~~of ~~loans,~~the ~~and~~large ~~closed-end~~customers ~~mutual~~deteriorate ~~funds.~~substantially, ~~Uncertainty~~operating inresults ~~the~~could ~~financial~~be ~~markets~~adversely ~~has~~ affected. ~~the~~To ~~liquidity~~reduce ofcredit ~~our~~risk, ~~ARS~~management ~~holdings~~performs ~~and~~ongoing ~~resulted~~credit inevaluations aof ~~significant increase in~~ the ~~risks~~financial ~~related~~condition toof ~~the~~significant ~~ARS~~customers. ~~investments classified as~~The ~~long-term,~~Company ~~specifically~~does ~~the~~not ~~CDO~~generally ~~and~~require ~~derivative~~collateral ~~product company securities,~~ and tomaintains areserves ~~lesser~~for ~~degree,~~estimated ~~the~~credit ~~student~~losses ~~loan~~on ~~holdings.~~customer ~~During~~accounts ~~fiscal~~when ~~2009,~~considered $0necessary.~~6 million of ARS, specifically the closed-end mutual funds and taxable municipal securities, were called at par. Based on~~

Table of Contents

the liquidity provided by these holdings during the year, we continue to classify our remaining closed-end mutual funds holdings as short-term. However, future changes in the market regarding these securities may result in reclassifications in future periods.

Historically, the fair value of ARS approximated par value due to the frequent auction events. However, failed auctions that began in August 2007 have resulted, in most cases, in revised estimates of fair value that are less than par. We have reviewed those investments classified as long-term and have valued the holdings accordingly using a discounted cash flow methodology.

While we have used what we believe to be an appropriate valuation model for these securities and have attempted to incorporate all known and significant risk factors into the analysis, we still must make certain estimates and assumptions when assessing the value of the investment portfolio. These estimates are based on market conditions, which are currently in a state of heightened uncertainty. As a result, there is much independent judgment required in deriving these valuation conclusions. Accordingly, assumptions regarding cash flows, liquidity, default and other risks were made as part of management's analysis and valuation of our ARS holdings as of September 30, 2009.

We believe we have made reasonable judgments in our valuation exercise. If the relevant assumptions, estimates, or the related analyses prove incorrect or, if due to additional information received in the future, management's conclusions would change, we may be required to change the recorded value of these securities, or other securities that make up the investment portfolio.

We sell the majority of our products and services to a limited number of customers. If the financial conditions or results of operations of any one of the large customers deteriorates substantially, our operating results could be adversely affected. To reduce credit risk, management performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of significant customers and maintains reserves for estimated credit losses on customers as necessary. We generally do not require collateral from customers.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by this item are presented in Item 15 and follow the signature page.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Table of Contents

~~Based~~periods onand ~~this~~accumulated ~~evaluation, the Company's CEO~~ and ~~CFO~~communicated ~~have~~to ~~concluded~~our ~~that~~management, asincluding ofour ~~the~~principal ~~end~~executive ofofficer ~~the~~and ~~period~~principal ~~covered~~financial byofficer, ~~this~~as ~~report~~appropriate ~~the~~to ~~Company's~~allow ~~disclosure~~timely ~~controls~~decisions ~~and~~regarding ~~procedures were effective at a~~required ~~reasonable assurance level~~disclosure.

The Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) (Disclosure Controls) as of the end of the period covered by this Report required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b). The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the chief executive officer ("CEO") and chief financial officer ("CFO"). Based on this evaluation, the Company's CEO and CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Definition of Disclosure Controls

Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's Disclosure Controls include components of its internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. To the extent that components of the Company's internal control over financial reporting are included within its Disclosure Controls, they are included in the scope of the Company's annual controls evaluation.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Company's management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010.

The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 has been audited by ~~BDO~~Ernst & ~~Seidman~~Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their ~~attestation~~ report ~~set~~presented ~~forth~~in ~~below~~Item 15 and following the signature page.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company's Disclosure Controls or internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

4947

Table of Contents

~~Remediation~~mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and ~~Changes~~there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in ~~Internal~~achieving ~~Control~~its ~~over~~stated ~~Financial~~goals ~~Reporting~~under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

We have taken and are continuing to take actions to improve our internal control over financial reporting, including actions to address previously identified material weaknesses that no longer exist as of September 30, 2009.

Our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K identified material weaknesses because we did not maintain adequate procedures over the accounting for revenue recognition. The Company had controls in place to review significant revenue transactions and ensure revenue accounting was in accordance with the Company's revenue recognition policy. These controls were not effective during the year and failed to identify material adjustments necessary to defer revenue to future periods during quarters one, three, and four of fiscal 2008. In all cases, the adjustments were identified post-close and adjusting entries were recorded prior to issuance of the quarterly or annual reports. Since September 30, 2008, we have completed the following remedial actions: (i) a reorganization of the revenue accounting and order management departments to consolidate related operations under a newly created Director of Sales Management and Analysis; (ii) a new Revenue Recognition Manager with extensive software industry background was hired; and (iii) data flows in the order to cash process have been streamlined to enhance the review and approval process for sales transactions. Based on the foregoing and the results of our testing of the effectiveness of these controls, we now believe that it is no longer reasonably possible that our consolidated financial statements will be materially misstated as it relates to accounting for revenue recognition and, as such, believe that the previously reported material weaknesses no longer exist as of September 30, 2009.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fourth quarter ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

5048

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders ActivIdentity Corporation Fremont, California

We have audited ActivIdentity Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). ActivIdentity Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting". Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ActivIdentity Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of ActivIdentity Corporation as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2009 and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California December 14, 2009

Table of Contents

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item will be included under the captions "~~Board~~Election of Directors," in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, ~~and~~ is also incorporated herein by reference. Information on Executive Officers is included in Item 1 of this report.

We have adopted a code of ethics for directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller), and employees. This code of ethics is available on our website at www.actividentity.com and any waivers from or amendments to the code of ethics, if any, will be posted on our website.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be included under the caption "Executive Compensation" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be included under the captions "Security Ownership by Certain Beneficial Holders" and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our ~~2009~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item will be included under the caption "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Director Independence" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be included under the caption "~~Ratification of~~ Independent Registered Public ~~Accountants~~Accounting Firm" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

5249

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a): The following documents are filed as part of this report.

1. Financial Statements

The following are included in ~~Item 8 and are filed as part of~~ this Report on Form 10-K:

		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		58
Reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		55
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008		59
Report of BDO USA, LLP (Formerly BDO Seidman LLP), Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		57
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007		60
Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2010 and 2009		58
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007		61
Consolidated Statements of Operations—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008		59
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007		62
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008		60
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		63
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008		61
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		62

2. Financial Statement Schedule

All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either not required, not applicable, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

3. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description
2.1(16)		Agreement and Plan of Merger among ActivIdentity Corp., Terrapin Holding Corp., Terrapin Acquisition Corp., CoreStreet Ltd. and John F. Burton
3.1(1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ActivIdentity Corporation
3.2(2)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of ActivIdentity Corporation
3.3(12)		Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock of ActivIdentity Corporation
4.1(1)		Specimen common stock certificate (front and reverse)
4.2(1)		Form of ActivCard Corp. Director Common Stock Warrant
4.3(3)		Form of ActivCard Corp. Common Stock Warrant
4.4(12)		Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008 between ActivIdentity Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent
4.4.1(17)		Amendment No. 1 dated October 11, 2010, to the Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated July 25, 2008, between ActivIdentity Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC
10.1(1)		2002 Stock Option Plan of ActivCard Corp.
10.2(1)		Lease Agreement, as amended, between the John Arrillaga Survivor's Trust and the Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust, as Landlord, and ActivCard, Inc. dated April 11, 2000
10.3(9)		Facility Lease dated January 22, 2008—Suresnes, France
10.4+(4)		Agreement between Samsung Semiconductor Europe GmbH and ActivCard S.A. dated June 9, 1996
10.5(1)		SEWP III Subcontract Agreement between Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. and ActivCard, Inc. effective July 25, 2002
10.6(5)		Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Shares in Aspace Solutions Ltd., dated July 31, 2003

5350

Table of Contents

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description
10.4+(4)		Agreement between Samsung Semiconductor Europe GmbH and ActivCard S.A. dated June 9, 1996
10.5(1)		SEWP III Subcontract Agreement between Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. and ActivCard, Inc. effective July 25, 2002
10.6(5)		Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Shares in Aspace Solutions Ltd., dated July 31, 2003
10.7(6)		Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among, Jason Hart, Michael Smith, Equity Partners Two Pty Ltd and Peter Johnson, as Sellers' and ActivCard Corp. dated July 26, 2005
10.8(7)		2004 Equity Incentive Plan of ActivCard Corp.
10.9(8)		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Director Grant Agreement
10.10(3)		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement
10.11(9)		Employment Agreement between Grant Evans and ActivIdentity dated April 23, 2008
10.12(10)		Employment Agreement between Jacques Kerrest and ActivIdentity dated August 1, 2008
10.13(11)		Patent Purchase and Assignment Agreement dated July 6, 2006
10.14(9)		Mutual Release and Waiver Agreement with Former Protocom Stockholders dated July 19, 2007
10.15(13)		Severance Agreement and Release, dated November 1, 2007, by and between ActivIdentity and Jason Hart
10.16(9)		Separation Agreement with Mark Lustig dated April 11, 2008
10.17(9)		Severance Agreement and Release with Thomas Jahn effective April 11, 2008
10.18(9)		Facility Lease—Canberra, Australia
10.19(15)		Employment Agreement between Michael Sotnick and ActivIdentity, effective December 7, 2008
10.20(14)		First Amendment to 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of ActivIdentity Corp.
10.21(14)		ActivIdentity Corp. Non-Employee Directors' Equity Compensation Program
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.2		Consent of BDO USA LLP (formerly known as BDO Seidman LLP), Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24.1		Power of Attorney (contained on signature page)
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Filed Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Filed Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Filed Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

+Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. (1)Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed September 25, 2002 (File No. 333-100067). (2)Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 24, 2007. (3)Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KT, filed December 14, 2004. (4)Incorporated by reference from ActivCard S.A.'s Registration Statement on Form F-1, filed on March 6, 2000 (File No. 333-11540). (5)Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report of Form 10-K, filed March 15, 2004. ~~(6)Incorporated by~~ ~~reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 27, 2005.~~ ~~(7)Incorporated by~~ reference from the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed July 12, 2004. (8)Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 5, 2004.

5451

Table of Contents

(6): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 27, 2005.
(7): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed July 12, 2004.
(8): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 5, 2004.
(9): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2008.
(10): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 8-K, filed August 4, 2008.
(11): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed December 20, 2007.
(12): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on July 25, 2008.
(13): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed December 14, 2007.
(14): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2008.
(15): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008.
(16): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 14, 2009.
(17): Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-A/A, filed October 12, 2010.

5552

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Fremont, State of California, on the ~~14th~~10th day of December, ~~2009~~2010.

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION By: /s/ GRANT EVANS Grant Evans Chief Executive Officer ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION By: /s/ JACQUES KERREST Jacques Kerrest Chief Financial Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Grant Evans and Jacques Kerrest, jointly and severally, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection herewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might do or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/ GRANT EVANS Grant Evans	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)	December 1410, ~~2009~~2010
/s/ JACQUES KERREST Jacques Kerrest	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	December 1410, ~~2009~~2010
/s/ ROBERT BRANDEWIE Robert Brandewie	Director	December 14, 2009
/s/ BRAD BOSTON Brad Boston	Director	December 10, 2010
/s/ JIM FRANKOLA Jim Frankola	Director	December 14, 2009
/s/ STEVEN HUMPHREYS Steven Humphreys	Director	December 14, 2009

5653

Table of Contents

Name	Title	Date
/s/ JAMES OUSLEY James Ousley	Director	December 14, 2009
/s/ ROBERT BRANDEWIE Robert Brandewie	Director	December 10, 2010
/s/ DAVID B. WRIGHT David B. Wright	Director	December 14, 2009
/s/ JIM FRANKOLA Jim Frankola	Director	December 10, 2010
/s/ STEVEN HUMPHREYS Steven Humphreys	Director	December 10, 2010
/s/ JAMES OUSLEY James Ousley	Director	December 10, 2010
/s/ DAVID B. WRIGHT David B. Wright	Director	December 10, 2010

5754

Table of Contents

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of ActivIdentity Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ActivIdentity Corporation as of September 30, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ActivIdentity Corporation at September 30, 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, ActivIdentity changed the presentation of the non-controlling interest in its consolidated financial statements effective October 1, 2009.

We also have audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ActivIdentity Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated December 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
December 10, 2010

Table of Contents

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of ActivIdentity Corporation

We have audited Actividentity Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Actividentity Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Actividentity Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Actividentity Corporation as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for year then ended of Actividentity Corporation and our report dated December 10, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
December 10, 2010

Table of Contents

REPORT OF BDO USA LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
ActivIdentity Corporation
Fremont, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of ActivIdentity Corporation as of September 30, 2009 and ~~2008 and~~ the related consolidated statements of operations ~~and comprehensive loss~~, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the ~~three~~two years in the period ended September 30, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ActivIdentity Corporation at September 30, 2009 ~~and 2008~~, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the ~~three~~two years in the period ended September 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting ~~principles~~ principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ActivIdentity Corporation'~~/s ~~internal control over financial~~/ ~~reporting~~BDO ~~as of September~~USA ~~30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway~~LLP ~~Commission~~ (~~COSO)~~formerly ~~and~~known ~~our~~as ~~report~~BDO ~~dated December~~Seidman ~~14,~~LLP) ~~2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.~~

BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
December 14, 2009

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

			September 30,

			2010			2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	72,519		$	75,624
	Marketable securities			3,780			3,100
	Accounts receivable, net			12,247			13,983
	Inventories			883			701
	Prepaid and other current assets			1,569			556
	Restricted cash			1,940			—

		Total current assets		92,938			93,964
Restricted cash				—			1,746
Investments				—			11,752
Property and equipment, net				1,637			2,353
Intangible assets, net				9,075			1,842
Goodwill				9,416			—
Other long-term assets				660			2,920

		Total assets	$	113,726		$	114,577

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable		$	1,731		$	1,853
	Accrued compensation and related benefits			4,693			5,507
	Accrued restructuring liability			148			642
	Accrued and other current liabilities			3,914			3,493
	Current portion of deferred revenue			9,520			12,574

		Total current liabilities		20,006			24,069
Long-term portion of deferred revenue				2,296			1,240
Accrued restructuring liability				—			325
Deferred rent				502			114
Other long-term liabilities				460			582

		Total liabilities		23,264			26,330

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders' equity:
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and 2009			—			—
	Common stock, $0.001 par value: 75,000,000 shares authorized; 47,249,335 and 45,866,110 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and 2009			47			46
	Additional paid-in capital			436,167			429,105
	Accumulated deficit			(334,314	)		(328,599	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(11,750	)		(12,616	)

		Total ActivIdentity stockholders' equity		90,150			87,936
	Non-controlling interest			312			311

		Total stockholders' equity		90,462			88,247

		Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	113,726		$	114,577

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED ~~BALANCE~~STATEMENTS ~~SHEETS~~OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share amounts)

			as of September 30,
			Years Ended September 30,
			2009			2008
			2010			2009			2008
ASSETS
Revenue:
Current assets:
	Software		$	21,533		$	23,975		$	19,589
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	75,624		$	70,173
	Hardware			13,578			15,784			15,078
	Short-term investments			3,100			9,656
	Service			22,595			22,562			24,342
	Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $261 and $317			13,983			11,792
		Total revenue		57,706			62,321			59,009
	Inventories, net			701			1,760
Cost of revenue:
	Prepaid and other current assets			556			1,696
	Software			1,229			4,179			963
		Total current assets		93,964			95,077
	Hardware			6,887			7,954			9,551
Restricted cash				1,746			—
	Service			8,071			7,677			10,779
Investments				11,752			11,752
	Amortization of developed technology and patents			972			2,168			2,380
Property and equipment, net				2,353			2,877
		Total cost of revenue		17,159			21,978			23,673
Other intangible assets, net				1,842			4,150
Gross profit				40,547			40,343			35,336
Other long-term assets				2,920			3,745
Operating expenses:
		Total assets	$	114,577		$	117,601
	Sales and marketing			17,516			19,572			25,602
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Research and development			15,892			15,053			18,867
Current liabilities:
	General and administration			15,785			12,769			11,380
	Accounts payable		$	1,853		$	1,652
	Restructuring expense (net of recoveries)			(356	)		—			(70	)
	Accrued compensation and related benefits			5,507			5,935
	Amortization of other intangible assets			985			140			165
	Current portion of accrued restructuring liability			642			616
	Write-down of goodwill			—			—			35,874
	Accrued and other current liabilities			3,493			3,682
		Total operating expenses		49,822			47,534			91,818
	Current portion of deferred revenue			12,574			11,024
Loss from operations				(9,275	)		(7,191	)		(56,482	)
		Total current liabilities		24,069			22,909
Other income (expense):
Deferred revenue, net of current portion				1,240			1,125
	Interest income, net			564			1,710			4,659
Accrued restructuring liability, net of current portion				325			962
	Other income (expense), net			3,169			(508	)		(25,190	)
Long-term deferred rent				114			430
		Total other income (expense), net		3,733			1,202			(20,531	)
Other long-term liabilities				582			2,517
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest				(5,542	)		(5,989	)		(77,013	)
		Total liabilities		26,330			27,943
Income tax benefit (provision)				(172	)		344			506
Minority interest				311			304
Net loss				(5,714	)		(5,645	)		(76,507	)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)				—			—
	Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest			1			(99	)		(50	)
Stockholders' equity:
Net loss attributable to ActivIdentity stockholders			$	(5,715	)	$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding			—			—
Basic and diluted net loss per share			$	(0.12	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)
	Common stock, $0.001 par value: 75,000,000 shares authorized, 45,866,110 and 45,786,184 issued and outstanding			46			46
Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share				47,317			45,814			45,770
	Additional paid-in capital			429,105			426,141
	Accumulated deficit			(328,599	)		(323,053	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(12,616	)		(13,780	)
		Total stockholders' equity		87,936			89,354
		Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	114,577		$	117,601

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS~~STOCKHOLDERS' ~~AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS~~EQUITY (In thousands, except ~~per share amounts~~shares)

				Year ended September 30,
			Common Shares												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
				2009			2008			2007
									Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit						Non- controlling Interest			Total Stockholders' Equity
Revenue:
			Shares			Amount
	Software			$	23,975		$	19,589		$	19,363
Balances, September 30, 2007				45,732,623		$	46		$	423,242		$	(246,501	)	$	(17,344	)	$	354		$	159,797
	Hardware				15,784			15,078			16,894
Exercise of options				6,843			—			25			—			—			—			25
	Service				22,562			24,342			23,296
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				46,718			—			—			—			—			—			—
		Total revenue			62,321			59,009			59,553
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			2,874			—			—			—			2,874
Cost of revenue:
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 740 10 05 (FIN 48)				—			—			—			(95	)		—			—			(95	)
	Software				4,179			963			1,303
Components of comprehensive loss:
	Hardware				7,954			9,551			9,036
	Net loss			—			—			—			(76,457	)		—			(50	)		(76,507	)
	Service				7,677			10,779			7,267
	Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			(130	)		—			(130	)
	Amortization of acquired developed technology and patents				2,168			2,380			2,949
	Foreign currency translation, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			3,694			—			3,694
		Total cost of revenue			21,978			23,673			20,555
	Total comprehensive loss			—			—			—			—			—			—			(72,943	)
Gross profit					40,343			35,336			38,998
Balances, September 30, 2008				45,786,184			46			426,141			(323,053	)		(13,780	)		304			89,658
Operating expenses:
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				79,926			—			—			—			—			—			—
	Sales and marketing				19,572			25,602			25,282
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			3,074			—			—			—			3,074
	Research and development				15,053			18,867			19,935
Minority interest adjustment				—			—			(110	)		—			—			110			—
	General and administration				12,769			11,380			12,124
Components of comprehensive loss:
	Restructuring expense (net of adjustments)				—			(70	)		—
	Net loss			—			—			—			(5,546	)		—			(99	)		(5,545	)
	Amortization of acquired intangible assets				140			165			186
	Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			152			—			152
	Write-down of goodwill				—			35,874			—
	Foreign currency translation, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			1,012			(4	)		1,008
		Total operating expenses			47,534			91,818			57,527
	Total comprehensive loss			—			—			—			—			—			—			(4,485	)
Loss from operations					(7,191	)		(56,482	)		(18,529	)
Balances, September 30, 2009				45,866,110			46			429,105			(328,599	)		(12,616	)		311			88,247
Other income (expense):
Exercise of options				225,956			—			335			—			—			—			335
	Interest income, net				1,710			4,659			6,208
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				26,250			—			—			—			—			—			—
	Other income (expense), net				(508	)		(25,190	)		3,440
Retirement of stock through repurchase				(1,085,293	)		(1	)		(2,412	)		—			—			—			(2,413	)
		Total other income (expense), net			1,202			(20,531	)		9,648
Issuance of stock in CoreStreet acquisition				2,216,312			2			5,708			—			—			—			5,710
Loss before income tax and minority interest					(5,989	)		(77,013	)		(8,881	)
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			3,431			—			—			—			3,431
Income tax benefit (provision)					344			506			(429	)
Components of comprehensive loss:
Minority interest					99			50			12
	Net loss			—			—			—			(5,715	)		—			1			(5,714	)
Net loss				$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)	$	(9,298	)
	Foreign currency translation, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			866			—			866
Net loss per share				$	(0.12	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(0.20	)
	Total comprehensive loss			—			—			—			—			—			—			(4,848	)
Shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share					45,814			45,770			45,694
Balances, September 30, 2010				47,249,335		$	47		$	436,167		$	(334,314	)	$	(11,750	)	$	312		$	90,462
Other comprehensive income (loss):
	Net loss			$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)	$	(9,298	)
	Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term investment, net				152			(1,075	)		394
	Reclassification of unrealized loss on short-term investments				—			945			—
	Foreign currency translation gain (loss)				1,012			1,748			(3,321	)
	Reclassification of currency translation loss on liquidation of investments in foreign entity				—			1,946			—
Comprehensive loss				$	(4,382	)	$	(72,893	)	$	(12,225	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~STOCKHOLDERS'~~CASH ~~EQUITY~~FLOWS (In thousands~~, except shares~~)

			Common Shares												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
					Years Ended September 30,
									Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit						Total Stockholders' Equity
					2010			2009			2008
			Shares			Amount
Cash flows from operating activities:
Balances, September 30, 2006				45,673,252		$	46		$	420,527		$	(237,203	)	$	(14,417	)	$	168,953
	Net loss				$	(5,714	)	$	(5,645	)	$	(76,507	)
Exercise of options				33,134			—			191			—			—			191
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				26,237			—			—			—			—			—
		Gain on sale of investments and marketable securities				(4,121	)		—			—
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			2,518			—			—			2,518
		Stock-based compensation				3,431			3,074			2,874
Minority interest				—			—			6			—			—			6
		Depreciation of property and equipment				1,121			1,243			1,566
Components of comprehensive loss:
		Amortization of other intangible assets				985			140			165
	Net loss			—			—			—			(9,298	)		—			(9,298	)
		Amortization of developed technology and patents				972			2,168			2,380
	Unrealized gains on short-term investments			—			—			—			—			394			394
		Unrealized foreign exchange loss				639			1,558			1,782
	Foreign currency translation			—			—			—			—			(3,321	)		(3,321	)
		Impairment of investments				294			—			21,209
Balances, September 30, 2007				45,732,623			46			423,242			(246,501	)		(17,344	)		159,443
		Loss on disposal of property and equipment				—			45			24
Exercise of options				6,843			—			25			—			—			25
		Goodwill impairment charge				—			—			35,874
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				46,718			—			—			—			—			—
		Currency translation loss on liquidation of investments in foreign entity				—			—			1,946
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			2,874			—			—			2,874
		Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination:
Minority interest				—			—			—			—			—			—
			Accounts receivable			2,434			(1,854	)		2,643
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 740 10 05 (FIN 48)				—			—			—			(95	)		—			(95	)
			Inventories			(227	)		1,044			402
Components of comprehensive loss:
			Prepaid and other current assets			1,051			(1,542	)		872
	Net loss			—			—			—			(76,457	)		—			(76,457	)
			Other assets			151			2,428			(3,074	)
	Unrealized loss on short-term investments, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			(130	)		(130	)
			Accounts payable			(245	)		163			(444	)
	Foreign currency translation, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			3,694			3,694
			Accrued compensation and related benefits			(961	)		(485	)		(838	)
Balances, September 30, 2008				45,786,184			46			426,141			(323,053	)		(13,780	)		89,354
			Accrued restructuring liability			(819	)		(611	)		(729	)
Issuance of restricted stock units net of cancellations				79,926			—			—			—			—			—
			Accrued and other current liabilities			621			(2,447	)		2,598
Stock-based compensation expense				—			—			3,074			—			—			3,074
			Deferred revenue			(2,183	)		1,395			(872	)
Minority interest				—			—			(110	)		—			—			(110	)
		Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities				(2,571	)		674			(8,129	)
Components of comprehensive loss:				—			—			—			—			—			—
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Net loss			—			—			—			(5,546	)		—			(5,546	)
	Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments and marketable securities					14,898			6,525			85,165
	Unrealized gain on short-term investments, net of reclassifications			—			—			—			—			152			152
	Acquisition, net of cash acquired					(12,769	)		—			—
Foreign currency translation, net of reclassifications				—			—			—			—			1,012			1,012
	Purchases of property and equipment					(467	)		(760	)		(307	)
Balances, September 30, 2009				45,866,110		$	46		$	429,105		$	(328,599	)	$	(12,616	)	$	87,936
	Other long-term assets					—			25			136
	Restricted cash					—			(1,458	)		—
	Purchases of marketable securities					—			—			(37,245	)
		Net cash provided by investing activities				1,662			4,332			47,749
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options					335			—			25
	Repurchase of stock					(2,413	)		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities						(2,078	)		—			25
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents						(118	)		445			(111	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents						(3,105	)		5,451			39,534
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year						75,624			70,173			30,639
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year					$	72,519		$	75,624		$	70,173
Supplemental disclosures:
	Refund received (cash paid) for income taxes, net				$	1,140		$	(186	)	$	11
Non-cash investing transactions:
	Fair value of common stock issued in connection with acquisition				$	4,995			—			—
	Fair value of warrants issued in connection with acquisition				$	716			—			—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years OFEnded ~~CASH~~September 30, ~~FLOWS (In~~2010, ~~thousands)~~2009, and 2008

				Year ended September 30,
				2009			2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss			$	(5,546	)	$	(76,457	)	$	(9,298	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets			1,243			1,566			1,576
		Amortization of acquired developed technology and patents			2,168			2,380			2,949
		Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss			1,558			1,782			(3,610	)
		Amortization of acquired intangible assets			140			165			186
		Stock-based compensation expense			3,074			2,874			2,518
		Loss on disposal of property and equipment			45			24			25
		Currency translation loss on liquidation of investments in foreign entity			—			1,946			—
		Goodwill impairment charge			—			35,874			—
		Investment impairment charge			—			21,209			—
		Minority interest in ActivIdentity Europe S.A			(99	)		(50	)		(12	)
		Changes in:
			Accounts receivable		(1,854	)		2,643			4,254
			Inventories		1,044			402			(313	)
			Prepaid and other current assets		(1,542	)		872			924
			Long-term income taxes receivable		2,428			(3,074	)		—
			Accounts payable		163			(444	)		(135	)
			Accrued compensation and related benefits		(485	)		(838	)		4
			Accrued restructuring liability		(611	)		(729	)		(710	)
			Accrued and other liabilities		(2,447	)		2,598			(1,896	)
			Deferred revenue		1,395			(872	)		(2,065	)
		Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			674			(8,129	)		(5,603	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchases of property and equipment (net)				(760	)		(307	)		(2,099	)
	Purchases of short-term investments				—			(37,245	)		(156,721	)
	Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments				6,525			85,165			182,795
	Restricted cash long term				(1,458	)		—			—
	Other long-term assets				25			136			(83	)
		Net cash provided by investing activities			4,332			47,749			23,892
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from exercise of options, rights and warrants				—			25			191
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					445			(111	)		682
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					5,451			39,534			19,162
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period					70,173			30,639			11,477
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period				$	75,624		$	70,173		$	30,639
Supplemental disclosures:
	Cash paid (refund received) for income taxes, net			$	186		$	(11	)	$	360

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

ActivIdentity Corporation (the "Company", "ActivIdentity", "we" or "~~ActivIdentity~~us"), is a global leader in ~~identity~~strong ~~assurance~~authentication and credential management. Our strategy inis ~~providing~~to ~~smart~~provide ~~identity~~ solutions ~~addresses the key ID 360 market-driving sectors: Employer~~ to ~~Employee,~~confidently ~~Business~~establish toa ~~Customer,~~person's ~~and~~identity ~~Government~~when tointeracting ~~Citizen~~digitally.

~~Our~~The ~~solutions~~Company's strategy leverages ~~our~~its identity assurance platform and credential management system to apply a common approach to registration / enrollment, authentication, authorization, auditing, credential issuance / management, and use of credentials ~~across each of the ID 360 market segments~~. ~~Our~~This approach takes into account that organizations ~~in all ID 360 market segments~~ require the assurance of a trusted chain of identity that allows them to conduct their day-to-day business in the digital age with the same level of confidence as face-to-face transactions.

Though identities may be repeatedly captured, verified, enrolled, used, and tracked by disparate systems with little interaction, ~~our~~the Company's identity assurance platform allows organizations to leverage the relative trust levels of the credentials and use the same security infrastructure across diverse user communities (such as citizens, employees, contractors, partners, suppliers, and customers) and applications (such as driver's license, employee identification badge, remote access token, and supplier procurement access portal).

ActivIdentity has been a pioneer of the identity assurance market and is a key supporter and driver of standards in this technology area, engaging with global standards bodies such as GlobalPlatform, ISO, and ANSI. ~~Our~~The Company's approach to identity assurance embraces a wide variety of authentication devices and authentication methods. Smart cards, soft tokens, hard tokens, USB tokens, or mobile phones can be enrolled, issued a certificate, and managed through their life-cycle via ActivIdentity's identity assurance platform.

ActivIdentity was incorporated in the State of Delaware in August 2002 for the purpose of changing the domicile of the publicly listed company in the ActivIdentity group of companies, previously ActivCard S.A., from the Republic of France to the United States. ActivCard S.A. was organized as a Société Anonyme, or limited liability corporation, under the laws of the Republic of France. In 2003, ActivIdentity completed registered public exchange offers in which holders of ActivCard S.A. securities exchanged 41,730,958 common shares and American depositary shares (ADS) of ActivCard S.A. for 41,635,741 common shares of ActivIdentity. Following completion of the exchange offers, ActivIdentity held approximately 99.4% of the outstanding securities of ActivCard S.A. During fiscal 2006, the Company purchased additional ActivCard S.A securities and currently holds approximately 99.8% of the outstanding securities of ActivCard S.A. The common shares and ADS of ActivCard S.A. not exchanged or sold have been recorded as a ~~minority~~non-controlling interest on the consolidated balance sheets. ~~In March 2005, ActivCard S.A. changed its name to ActivCard Europe S.A. and in December 2005 to ActivIdentity Europe S.A.~~

We operate on a fiscal year ending September 30. For convenience in ~~this~~these ~~Annual Report~~Notes, we refer to the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2007 as fiscal 2007, the fiscal year ended September 30,~~ 2008 as fiscal 2008, ~~and~~ the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as fiscal 2009. Weand ~~also refer to~~ the fiscal year ~~ending~~ended September 30, 2010 as fiscal 2010.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries ~~at September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007~~. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under current circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and best estimates and judgments may require further adjustments; therefore, actual results could differ from current estimates. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the fair value of investments, the provision for doubtful accounts, the provision for obsolete and excess inventories, depreciation and amortization, valuation of other intangible assets and goodwill, sales warranty reserve, income taxes, restructuring liability, valuation of stock-based compensation, and contingencies. 62

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments—The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments consist of investments acquired with maturities exceeding three months and are classified as available-for-sale. Short-term investments are reported at market value, based on quoted market prices, with unrealized gains or losses included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. Certain investments have been reclassified to long-term based on issues in the credit market affecting the liquidity of the securities. Long-term investments are reported at fair value, based on the application of valuation models. If the impairment on long-term securities is determined to be other-than-temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded through other income. The gain or loss from sale of securities sold is recognized on the specific identification method.

Concentration of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments with high credit quality financial institutions and investments consist of U.S. government and government agency securities, corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, and auction rate securities. Long-term investments consist of auction rate securities (see Note 4—Investments for a complete discussion of credit risk associated with the long-term investment holdings). The Company sells the majority of its products and services to a limited number of customers. If the financial conditions or results of operations of any one of the large customers deteriorate substantially, the Company's operating results could be adversely affected. To reduce credit risk, management performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of significant customers. The Company does not generally require collateral and maintains reserves for estimated credit losses on customer accounts when considered necessary.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to pay outstanding amounts. The provision is based on factors that include account aging, historical bad debt experience, customer creditworthiness,

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions ~~other~~that ~~known~~affect ~~factors.~~the ~~Account~~reported ~~balances~~amount ~~are~~of ~~charged~~assets ~~off~~and ~~against~~liabilities at the ~~allowance~~date ~~only~~of ~~when~~the financial statements, reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the ~~Company~~reporting ~~considers~~period, itand isdisclosure ~~probable~~of ~~that~~contingent assets aand ~~receivable~~liabilities ~~will~~at ~~not~~the bedate ~~recovered~~of the consolidated financial statements. ~~The~~Estimates are based on historical experience and on various assumptions that the Company ~~does~~believes ~~not~~are ~~have~~reasonable ~~any~~under ~~off-balance~~current ~~sheet~~circumstances. ~~credit~~However, ~~exposure~~future ~~related~~events are subject to ~~its~~change ~~customers~~and best estimates and judgments may require further adjustments; therefore, actual results could differ from current estimates. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the fair value of investments, the provision for doubtful accounts, obsolete and excess inventories, depreciation and amortization, valuation of intangible assets and goodwill, sales warranty reserve, income taxes, restructuring liability, valuation of stock-based compensation, and contingencies.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Marketable Securities, and Investments—The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Marketable securities consist of investments acquired with original maturities exceeding three months and are classified as available-for-sale. Marketable securities are reported at market value, based on quoted market prices or the application of valuation models, with unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. Long-term investments are reported at fair value, based on the application of valuation models. If the impairment on long-term securities is determined to be other-than-temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded through other income (expense), net. The gain or loss from sale of securities sold is recognized on the specific identification method.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to pay outstanding amounts. The provision is based on factors that include account aging, historical bad debt experience, customer creditworthiness, and other known factors. Account balances are charged off against the allowance only when the Company considers it is probable that a receivable will not be recovered. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

Inventories—Inventories consists of finished goods and components and are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.

Property and Equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvement of up to 10 years.

~~Software included~~ Intangible inAssets—Intangible ~~property~~assets include the fair value of agreements and ~~equipment~~contracts, ~~includes~~developed ~~amounts~~technology, ~~paid~~and ~~for~~trademarks ~~purchased~~acquired ~~software~~in business combinations and ~~implementation~~acquired ~~services~~patents. ~~for~~Finite-lived ~~software~~intangible ~~used~~assets ~~internally~~are ~~that~~amortized ~~has~~over ~~been~~one ~~capitalized~~to inten ~~accordance with~~years, ~~ASC 350 40 05-1~~which ~~(formerly~~approximates ~~known~~their ~~under~~estimated ~~the~~useful ~~American~~lives. ~~Institute~~The Company, each reporting period, reviews for indicators of ~~Certified~~potential ~~Public~~impairment ~~Accountants~~to ~~(AICPA)~~the ~~Statement~~carrying value of ~~Position~~finite-lived ~~(SOP)~~intangible Noassets. ~~98-1, Accounting~~ ~~for~~During the ~~Costs~~year ofended ~~Computer~~September 30, ~~Software~~2010, ~~Developed~~no ~~or Obtained~~indicators ~~for~~of ~~Internal Use)~~impairment.

Goodwill ~~and Other Intangible Assets~~—~~Goodwill~~In represents the excess of the purchase price of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in business combinations over their estimated fair value. Goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with ~~the~~Accounting ~~provisions~~Standards ofCodification ~~ASC~~Topic No. 350 ~~20 35-1~~ (~~formerly~~ASC ~~known as Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS~~350) ~~No. 142,~~ "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other ~~Intangible Assets). As of September 30~~", ~~2009,~~goodwill ~~there were no intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. Other intangible~~is ~~assets~~not ~~include the fair value of agreements and contracts, developed technology, and trademarks acquired in business combinations and acquired patents~~amortized. ~~Other intangible assets are amortized over one to six years~~Instead, ~~which~~goodwill ~~approximates~~is ~~their~~tested ~~estimated~~for ~~useful lives.~~

Long-Lived Assets—The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360 10 15 (formerly known as SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets). The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the sum of the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount, impairment may exist. To determine the amount of impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference is recognized. 63

Research and Development and Capitalized Software Development Costs—Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes eligible software costs upon achievement of technological feasibility subject to net realizable value considerations in accordance with ASC 985 20 05-1 (formerly known as SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed). To date, the period between technological feasibility of a solution and the general availability of such software has been short. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any costs and charged all such costs to research and development expenses.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

impairment at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. Accordingly, we perform an annual assessment of goodwill, or more frequently if there are indicators of potential impairment. Goodwill recorded in business combinations may significantly affect our future operating results to the extent impaired, but the magnitude and timing of any such impairment is uncertain. When we conduct our annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or if impairment indicators are identified in the interim with respect to goodwill, the fair value of goodwill is re-assessed using valuation techniques that require significant management judgment. The key judgments include analysis of future cash flow which management believes to be an important factor in determination of the fair value of the Company's sole reporting unit. This analysis takes into consideration certain revenue growth and operating expense forecasts. Should conditions be different than our last assessment, significant write-downs of goodwill may be required which will adversely affect our results of operations. The Company conducted its first annual impairment assessment of goodwill, recorded in connection with its acquisition of CoreStreet in December 2009, in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. The first step (Step 1) in this analysis was to compare the carrying value of the Company's sole reporting unit, which approximates the Company's total stockholders' equity balance, to its fair value based on the market value of the Company's common stock. If the carrying value exceeded the fair value as a result of Step 1, the Company would have had to complete Step 2 of the impairment test, which requires the Company to estimate the implied fair value of goodwill and compare that implied fair value to the carrying value of goodwill. As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of the Company's common stock exceeded stockholders' equity by approximately 13%.

Long-Lived Assets, Excluding Intangible Assets—The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360 10 15. The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To determine the amount of impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference is recognized.

Restricted Cash—Under the terms of a software development contract with a customer, the Company provide a performance guarantee in the form of a financial security agreement that extends through September 30, 2011.

Research and Development—Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Sales Warranty Reserve—Expenses associated with potential warranty claims are accrued at the time of sale, based on historical experience. The Company provides for the costs of warranty in excess of warranty coverage provided by product assembly contractors. The Company's standard warranty period is one year for hardware products and ninety days for software products.

Deferred Revenue—The Company's deferred revenue consists of customer arrangements related to products and services billings in excess of revenue recognized, which the Company is legally entitled to invoice and collect. The revenue from deferred revenue is recognized into earnings when the revenue recognition criteria are met.

Advertising Costs—The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred, and the amounts were not material for all periods presented.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

WeThe ~~recognize~~Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the~~ U.S. GAAP, as set forth in:

•: ASC 985-605 (formerly known as and comprised of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition", as amended by SOP 98-9, "Modification of SOP 97-2", "Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions" and EITF 03-05, "Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software)",
•: ASC 605-25 (formerly known as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. (EITF) 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables)",
•: ASC 605-35 (formerly known as and comprised of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 45 (ARB 45), "Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts", SOP 81-1, "Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts)",
•: SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, "Revenue Recognition", and
•: Technical Practice Aid (TPA) interpretations of ASC 985-605 (SOP 97-2) issued by the AICPA (TPAs 5100.38 - 5100.76).

The application of the appropriate accounting principles to revenue is dependent upon the specific transaction and whether the sale includes hardware products, software products, post contract customer support (PCS), other professional services, or a combination of some or all of these products and/or services.

•: The delivered item has stand alone value;
•: There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered elements as demonstrated by vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value or third party evidence; and
•: If the arrangement includes a general return right relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in the control of the vendor.

66 If the above criteria are met, the Company allocates the arrangement fee to the delivered items using the residual value method. Revenue for the elements whose functionality is not dependent upon the delivered software is recognized in accordance with SAB 104, and revenue for software elements is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. If the above criteria are not met, all deliverables are

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

~~"non-software"~~considered a single unit of accounting and ~~software~~revenue ~~deliverables~~is recognized in accordance with ASC ~~605~~985-25605 ~~when~~upon ~~the~~delivery ~~following~~of ~~criteria~~all ~~are~~elements ~~met:~~of the arrangement.

IfFor multiple element arrangements that contain one or more deliverables for which the ~~above~~functionality ~~criteria~~is ~~are~~dependent ~~met,~~on wethe ~~allocate~~software, the arrangement fee is subject to the ~~delivered~~provisions ~~items~~of ~~using~~ASC 985-605, ~~the~~and ~~residual~~is allocated among each element, based on VSOE of fair value ~~method~~of each element if VSOE of each element exists. ~~Revenue~~The ~~for~~Company determines VSOE of an element based on the ~~elements~~price charged ~~whose~~when ~~functionality~~the same element is sold separately. For an element not ~~dependent~~yet ~~upon~~ sold separately, VSOE may be established by management having the ~~delivered~~relevant ~~software~~authority as long as it is ~~recognized~~probable inthat ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~price, once ~~SAB 104~~established, will not change before separate introduction of the element in the marketplace. When arrangements contain multiple elements and ~~revenue~~VSOE exists for ~~software~~all undelivered elements isonly, ~~recognized~~the Company inrecognizes ~~accordance~~revenue ~~with~~for ~~ASC~~the ~~985-605.~~delivered Ifelements based on the ~~above~~residual ~~criteria~~value ~~are~~method. For arrangements containing multiple elements wherein VSOE does not ~~met~~exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the delivered and undelivered elements is deferred until VSOE exists or all ~~deliverables~~elements ~~are~~have ~~considered~~been adelivered. ~~single~~Additionally, ~~unit~~where ofVSOE ~~accounting~~does not exist to allocate the fee to the separate elements and ~~revenue~~the only undelivered element is ~~recognized~~PCS, inthe ~~accordance~~entire ~~with~~arrangement ~~ASC~~fee ~~985-605~~is ~~upon~~recognized ~~delivery~~ratably ofover the contractual PCS period. For all ~~elements~~other oftransactions not involving software, fair value is determined using the ~~arrangement~~price when sold separately or other methods allowable under ASC 605-25.

67 Even though delivery of PCS and services has started, if all of the criteria in ASC 985-605 for revenue recognition have not yet been met, PCS and service revenue recognition may not commence. At the time all the criteria in ASC 985-605 are met, the portion of the deferred amount based on the proportion of the service period that has already expired to the total service period is immediately recognized and the residual amount is recognized ratably over the remaining service period.

Except in arrangements where acceptance is considered perfunctory, where the Company has provided acceptance rights to certain customers, no products or services revenue is recognized until the earlier of the customer formal acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period granted to the customer.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

~~for~~with ~~PCS~~ASC ~~contracts~~605-35. ~~are~~The ~~recognized~~percentage-of-completion method is applied when the Company has the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates of the total cost of effort required for completion using the cost of labor hours incurred as the measure of progress towards completion. The progress toward completion is measured based on the date when the essential product functionality has been delivered or the application enters into a ~~straight-line~~production ~~basis~~environment ~~over~~or the ~~term~~point at which no significant additional professional service resources are required for the functionality of the software. Estimates are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion and these changes are ~~classified~~accounted for as changes in accounting estimates when the information becomes known. Revenue under these arrangements is presented as software revenue on the statement of operations. Where VSOE exists for professional services not essential to the functionality of the software, revenue is recorded as service revenue. Forecasted losses on contracts are accrued to cost of revenue in the period in which a forecasted loss is deemed probable and estimable. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. Unbilled work-in-process is recorded as a receivable in the consolidated balance sheets.

~~Even~~For ~~though~~single ~~delivery~~element ofarrangements, ~~PCS~~revenue ~~and~~from ~~services~~stand ~~has~~alone ~~started,~~product ifsales ~~all~~is ofrecognized ~~the~~upon ~~criteria~~shipment in(unless ~~ASC~~shipping ~~985-605~~terms ~~for~~determine ~~revenue~~otherwise), ~~recognition~~net ~~have~~of ~~not~~estimated ~~yet~~returns ~~been~~and/or ~~met,~~certain estimated ~~PCS~~future ~~and~~price ~~service~~changes. ~~revenue~~The ~~recognition may~~Company's does not ~~commence.~~ship Atproduct ~~the~~to ~~time~~a ~~all~~reseller or distributor unless the ~~criteria~~reseller inor ~~ASC~~distributor ~~985-605~~has ~~are~~a ~~met,~~history of selling the ~~portion~~products ofor the ~~deferred~~end-user ~~amount~~is known ~~based~~and onhas ~~the~~been ~~proportion~~qualified. ofIn certain specific and limited circumstances, the ~~service~~Company ~~period~~provides ~~that~~product ~~has~~return ~~already~~and ~~expired~~price protection rights to ~~the~~certain distributors and resellers. The Company has ~~total~~established ~~service~~a ~~period~~reasonable isbasis ~~immediately~~through ~~recognized~~historical ~~and~~experience ~~the~~for ~~residual~~estimating ~~amount~~future isreturns ~~recognized~~and ~~ratably~~price ~~over~~changes. ~~the~~Actual ~~longer~~returns ofand ~~the~~price ~~remaining~~protection ~~PCS~~claims orhave ~~service~~not ~~period~~been material to date.

~~Except in~~Stock-Based ~~arrangements~~Compensation—ASC ~~where~~718 ~~acceptance~~30 is30 ~~considered~~Share-based ~~perfunctory~~Payment), ~~where~~requires wecompanies ~~have~~to measure ~~provided~~the ~~acceptance~~cost ~~rights~~of toemployee ~~certain~~services ~~customers,~~received noin ~~products~~exchange orfor ~~services~~an ~~revenue~~award isof ~~recognized~~equity ~~until~~instruments, including stock options, based on the ~~earlier~~ grant-date fair value of the ~~customer~~award ~~formal~~and ~~acceptance~~to orrecognize ~~the~~it as ~~expiration~~compensation ofexpense over the ~~acceptance~~ period ~~granted~~the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the ~~customer~~award, usually the vesting period.

~~For~~ASC ~~arrangements~~718 ~~that~~30 ~~involve~~30-1 ~~some~~requires ~~customization,~~companies ~~modification or production services that are considered essential~~ to ~~the~~estimate ~~functionality of~~ the ~~software~~fair ~~element,~~value ~~and~~of ~~separate~~share-based ~~accounting for~~payment ~~these~~awards ~~services~~on ~~is not permitted, revenue from~~ the ~~license~~date ~~and professional services essential to the functionality~~ of ~~the~~grant ~~software is recognized~~ using ~~the percentage-of-completion~~an ~~method in accordance with ASC 605~~option-35pricing model. The ~~percentage-of-completion~~value ~~method is applied when we have the ability to make reasonably dependable estimates~~ of the ~~total~~portion ~~cost~~ of ~~effort required for completion using~~ the ~~cost~~award ofthat ~~labor~~is ~~hours~~ultimately ~~incurred~~expected asto ~~the~~vest ~~measure~~(less ofestimated ~~progress~~forfeitures) ~~towards completion. The progress toward completion~~ is ~~measured~~recognized ~~based~~as onexpense ~~the~~over ~~date when~~ the ~~essential~~requisite ~~product~~service ~~functionality~~periods ~~has~~in ~~been delivered or~~ the ~~application~~Company's ~~enters~~consolidated ~~into~~statement aof ~~production environment or the point at which no significant~~operations. ~~additional~~Forfeitures ~~professional service resources~~ are ~~required~~estimated ~~for~~at the ~~functionality~~time of ~~the~~grant ~~software. Estimates are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion~~ and ~~these~~revised, ~~changes are accounted for~~ as ~~changes~~necessary, in ~~accounting~~subsequent ~~estimates~~periods ~~when~~if ~~the~~actual ~~information~~forfeitures ~~becomes known~~differ. ~~Revenue~~Different ~~under~~forfeiture ~~these~~rates ~~arrangements~~are isestimated ~~presented~~and asapplied ~~a component of software revenue on the statement of operations as~~to ~~the related project revenue~~(1) executives, ~~including~~(2) non-executive ~~both~~employees ~~the~~not ~~license~~located ~~and~~in ~~service components~~France, isand ~~less~~(3) employees ~~than~~located ~~10%~~in ~~of total net revenue~~France. ~~Where~~Cash ~~VSOE~~flows ~~exists~~generated ~~for~~from ~~professional~~potential ~~services~~tax ~~not~~benefits ~~essential~~arising ~~to the functionality of~~from ~~the~~tax ~~software,~~deductions ~~revenue~~in isexcess ~~recorded as service revenue. Forecasted losses on contracts are accrued to cost~~ of ~~revenue in~~ the ~~period~~compensation incost ~~which~~recognized afor ~~forecasted~~options ~~loss~~granted ~~is deemed probable and estimable. Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized~~ are ~~recorded~~classified as ~~deferred~~financing ~~revenue~~cash inflows. ~~the~~Due ~~consolidated~~to ~~balance~~the ~~sheets.~~Company's ~~Unbilled~~loss ~~work-in-process~~position, isthere ~~recorded~~were asno asuch ~~receivable~~tax inbenefits ~~the~~during ~~consolidated~~fiscal ~~balance sheets. At September 30~~2010, 2009 ~~and September 30~~, ~~2008,~~or ~~the balances of unbilled work-in-process were $0~~2008.~~9 million~~ ~~and $0.4 million, respectively.~~

WeThe ~~had~~fair ~~one~~value ~~ongoing reseller arrangement under which we received a fixed percentage~~ of ~~license~~stock-based ~~and~~awards ~~service~~to ~~revenue~~employees ~~earned~~that bydo ~~the~~not ~~reseller. For this arrangement, we~~ have noa ~~control~~market ~~over the~~or ~~pricing~~performance ~~established~~vesting bycondition ~~the reseller, including what~~ is ~~charged~~calculated ~~for~~using ~~service~~the ~~renewals.~~Black-Scholes-Merton ~~Since~~option wepricing ~~cannot~~model ~~determine if sufficient amounts of PCS renewals are priced at consistent percentages of license~~(the ~~fees,~~"model"). weThe ~~are~~model ~~unable~~was developed to ~~establish~~estimate ~~VSOE for service renewals in this arrangement. Accordingly, for~~ the ~~bundled~~fair ~~sales~~value of ~~license~~freely ~~and service~~tradable, ~~the~~fully ~~Company~~transferable ~~recognizes~~options ~~revenue~~without onvesting arestrictions, ~~straight-line basis~~which ~~over~~differ ~~the~~significantly ~~term~~from of the ~~service~~Company's ~~period.~~stock ~~For statement of operations presentation purposes only, we allocate revenue for this arrangement between software and PCS in a ratio consistent with our~~options. ~~standard~~The ~~end-user pricing~~ model. ~~For~~also ~~fiscal~~requires ~~2008~~subjective assumptions, ~~$3.5 million~~including orfuture ~~18%~~stock ofprice ~~total~~volatility ~~software revenue~~ and ~~$4.0 million,~~expected ortime ~~16%~~to ~~of total service revenue~~exercise, ~~was allocated for this arrangement. We modified this ongoing customer arrangement in~~

6867

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

~~February~~which ~~2009~~greatly ~~and~~affect ~~all~~the ~~future~~calculated ~~revenues~~values. ~~will~~The ~~recognized~~expected asterm ~~software~~of ~~revenue~~options ~~through~~granted ~~the~~is ~~remainder~~derived offrom ~~this~~historical ~~arrangement~~data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. ~~For~~The risk-free ~~fiscal~~rate ~~2009,~~is $4based on relevant U.~~9 million~~S. orTreasury ~~20%~~rates in effect during the corresponding period of ~~total~~grant. ~~software~~The ~~revenue~~expected ~~and~~volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's $1stock price.~~4 million~~ orThese 6%factors ofcould ~~total~~change ~~service~~in ~~revenue~~the ~~was~~future, ~~allocated~~which ~~between~~would ~~these~~affect ~~two~~the ~~arrangements~~stock-based compensation expense in future periods.

For single element arrangements, revenue from stand alone product revenue is recognized upon shipment (unless shipping terms determine otherwise), net of estimated returns and/or certain estimated future price changes. Our practice is not to ship product to a reseller or distributor unless the reseller or distributor has a history of selling the products or the end-user is known and has been qualified. In certain specific and limited circumstances, we provide product return and price protection rights to certain distributors and resellers. We have established a reasonable basis through historical experience for estimating future returns and price changes. Actual returns and price protection claims have not been material to date.

Stock-Based Compensation—ASC 718 30 30 (formerly known as SFAS 123(R) Share-based Payment), requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant-date fair value of the award and to recognize it as compensation expense over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period.

ASC 718 30 30-1 (SFAS 123(R)) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest (less estimated forfeitures) is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company's consolidated statement of operations. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ. Different forfeiture rates are estimated and applied to (1) executives, (2) non-executive employees not located in France, and (3) employees located in France. Cash flows generated from potential tax benefits arising from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for options granted are classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company's loss position, there were no such tax benefits during fiscal 2009, 2008, or 2007.

The fair value of stock-based awards to employees that do not have a market or performance vesting condition is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model (the model). The model was developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which differ significantly from the Company's stock options. The model also requires subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. The risk-free rate is based on relevant U.S. Treasury rates in effect during the corresponding period of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock price. These factors could change in the future, which would affect the stock-based compensation expense in future periods.

For restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, compensation is based on the intrinsic value of the stock on the actual grant date.

For awards that carry a market based vesting aspect, the fair value of the award is based on the results of a market simulation model (the simulation model) that evaluates the probability that the requisite market conditions needed for vesting will be achieved. The simulation model uses multiple iterations of simulated daily stock prices of the Company between the grant date and the future vesting date. The inputs to the simulation model include the Company's stock price on the grant date, the historical volatility of the Company's stock price over a period of time corresponding to the vesting period of the unit award as of the grant date, and the risk free interest rate, based on relevant U.S. Treasury note rates, as of the grant date. Based on whether the requisite market conditions are achieved during the multiple simulations, the simulation model produces an expected future value of the stock on the vesting date. This future value is discounted back to the grant date and used as the requisite fair value of the unit award.

69 Foreign Currency Transactions—The reporting currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is the U.S. Dollar. The functional currency of all of the subsidiaries is their local currency. Assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated into the U.S. Dollar at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates during the period. Translation adjustments arising upon the consolidation of non-U.S. Dollar financial statements are accumulated in stockholders' equity as translation adjustments within other comprehensive income.

~~Table~~ Transactions involving a currency other than the functional currency generate a gain or loss from the fluctuation of ~~Contents~~the transactional currency relative to the functional currency and are recorded in the statement of operations during the respective period. Due to fluctuations in foreign currencies, the Company recorded a loss of $0.7 million in fiscal 2010, a loss of $0.8 million in fiscal 2009, and a loss of $2.0 million in fiscal 2008, in the consolidated statements of operations from the revaluation of assets and liabilities and the settlement of current period transactions.

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

iterations of simulated daily stock prices of the Company between the grant date and the future vesting date. The inputs to the simulation model include the Company's stock price on the grant date, the historical volatility of the Company's stock price over a period of time corresponding to the vesting period of the unit award as of the grant date, and the risk free interest rate, based on relevant U.S. Treasury note rates, as of the grant date. Based on whether the requisite market conditions are achieved during the multiple simulations, the simulation model produces an expected future value of the stock on the vesting date. This future value is discounted back to the grant date and used as the requisite fair value of the unit award.

Foreign Currency Transactions—The reporting currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is the U.S. Dollar. The functional currency of all of the subsidiaries is their local currency with the exception of the Irish subsidiary, which uses the U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. For those entities using their local currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated into the U.S. Dollar at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates during the period. Translation adjustments arising upon the consolidation of non-U.S. Dollar financial statements are accumulated in stockholders' equity as translation adjustments within other comprehensive income.

Transactions involving a currency other than the functional currency generate a gain or loss from the fluctuation of the transactional currency relative to the functional currency and are recorded in the statement of operations during the respective period. Due to fluctuations in foreign currencies, the Company recorded a loss of $0.8 million in fiscal 2009, a loss of $2.0 million in fiscal 2008, and a gain of $3.4 million in fiscal 2007, in the consolidated statements of operations from the revaluation of assets and liabilities and the settlement of current period transactions.

Income Taxes—The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences, utilizing enacted tax rates, of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of deductible temporary differences, net operating loss carry forwards, and research and development tax credits. The Company has provided a valuation allowance for net deferred income tax assets.

Loss Per Share—Basic and diluted loss per share are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Outstanding stock options, rights and warrants did not ~~have any effect on the computation of diluted loss per share in any of the periods presented since they were anti-dilutive.~~

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~ 68

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

~~Codification~~have ~~eliminates~~any ~~the~~effect ~~GAAP~~on ~~hierarchy~~the ~~contained~~computation inof ~~SFAS~~diluted ~~No. 162~~loss ~~and~~per ~~establishes~~share ~~one~~in ~~level~~any of ~~authoritative~~the ~~GAAP.~~periods ~~All~~presented ~~other~~since ~~literature~~they iswere ~~considered non~~anti-~~authoritative~~dilutive. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has adopted this Statement for fiscal 2009. There was no change to the Company's consolidated financial statements due to the implementation of this Statement.

~~ASC 855~~ 10Recently ~~50-1~~Adopted ~~was~~Accounting previously issued in May 2009 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. This Statement sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated financial results. Standards

Non-controlling Interest. ASC ~~825~~ 810 10 65-1 was previously issued in ~~April~~December ~~2009~~2007 by the FASB under the title ~~FSP~~ SFAS No. ~~107~~160, Non-1controlling ~~and~~Interests ~~APB 28-1, Interim~~in ~~Disclosures~~Consolidated ~~about~~Financial ~~Fair~~Statements, ~~Value~~an Amendment of ~~Financial~~ARB ~~Instruments~~No. 51. ~~ASC~~The ~~825~~standard 10changes ~~65-1~~the accounting ~~(FSP~~for ~~SFAS No. 107~~non-1controlling ~~and APB 28-1~~(minority) ~~enhances consistency~~interests in consolidated financial ~~reporting~~statements byincluding ~~increasing~~ the ~~frequency~~requirements ~~of fair value disclosures. This standard relates~~ to ~~fair~~classify ~~value~~non-controlling ~~disclosures~~interests ~~for~~as ~~any~~a ~~financial~~component ~~instruments that are not currently reflected~~of ~~within~~consolidated ~~a Company~~stockholders's ~~balance~~equity, ~~sheet~~and ~~at fair value. Prior to~~ the ~~effective~~elimination ~~date~~ of ~~this~~"minority ~~standard,~~interest" ~~fair~~accounting ~~values~~in ~~for~~results ~~these~~of ~~assets~~operations ~~and~~with ~~liabilities~~earnings ~~have~~attributable ~~only~~to ~~been~~non-controlling ~~disclosed~~interests ~~once~~reported aas ~~year. The FSP will now~~part ~~require~~of ~~these~~consolidated ~~disclosures~~earnings. ~~on a quarterly basis~~Additionally, ~~providing~~ASC ~~qualitative~~810 ~~and~~10 ~~quantitative~~65-1 ~~information~~(SFAS ~~about~~No. 160) ~~fair~~revises ~~value~~the ~~estimates~~accounting for ~~all~~both ~~those~~increases ~~financial~~and ~~instruments~~decreases ~~not~~in ~~measured~~a onparent's ~~the~~controlling ~~balance~~ownership ~~sheet at fair value~~interest. ~~The~~ASC ~~disclosure~~810 10 ~~requirements~~65-1 ~~under~~(SFAS ~~this~~No. 160) ~~standard~~is ~~were~~ effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~Company's~~years ~~interim~~beginning ~~reporting~~after ~~period~~December 15, ~~ending~~2008, onwith ~~June 30,~~early ~~2009~~adoption prohibited. The Company adopted this ~~standard~~guidance inat the ~~quarter~~beginning of ~~ended~~its ~~June 30,~~fiscal ~~2009~~year 2010. ~~There~~Amounts ~~was~~previously nopresented ~~impact~~as onminority ~~the~~interest in consolidated ~~financial~~subsidiaries ~~statements~~is asnow itpresented ~~relates~~in ~~only~~net income (loss) attributable to ~~additional~~non-controlling ~~disclosures~~interest in the statements of operations.

~~ASC 820~~ 10Recently ~~65-4~~Released ~~was~~Accounting previously issued in April 2009 by the FASB under the title FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. ASC 820 10 65-4 (FSP SFAS No. 157-4) provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157,Pronouncements Fair Value Measurements). The standard relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what ASC 820 10 5-1 (SFAS No. 157) states the objective of fair value measurement—to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. The provisions of ASC 820 10 65-4 (FSP 157-4) are effective for the Company's interim reporting for the period ending on June 30, 2009. The Company adopted this standard in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and there was no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

~~ASC 815~~In 10October ~~65-1~~2009, ~~was~~the ~~previously~~FASB issued inAccounting ~~March~~Standard ~~2008~~Update by(ASU) ~~the~~No. 2009-13 ~~FASB~~(ASU ~~under~~2009-13), "Revenue ~~the~~Arrangements ~~title~~with ~~SFAS~~Multiple Deliverables" and Accounting Standard Update No. ~~161~~2009-14 (ASU 2009-14), "Certain ~~Disclosures~~Revenue ~~about~~Arrangements ~~Derivative~~That ~~Instruments~~Include Software." These ASUs revise and clarify accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables, including ~~Hedging~~how ~~Activities~~to separate deliverables into units of accounting determining the allocation of revenue to the units of accounting and the application of these provisions to tangible products containing software components. ~~The~~There ~~new~~are ~~standard~~also expanded disclosures for significant judgments made in the application of these standards, if material. These pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010 and earlier application is ~~intended~~permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of applying this pronouncement to ~~improve~~its consolidated financial statements, and intends to implement the pronouncement during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

71 In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-06 (ASU 2010-06), "Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements" to add additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company implemented provisions of this update related to disclosure of valuation techniques in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and noted no significant impact in its consolidated financial statements. The Company intends to implement provisions related to additional disclosures in the Level 3 roll forward in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and does not expect a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. ASC 815 10 65-1 (SFAS No. 161) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company will evaluate the impact of the provisions of ASC 815 10 65-1 (SFAS No. 161) and adopt this standard on October 1, 2009.

ASC 810 10 65 was previously issued in December 2007 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51. The standard changes the accounting for non-controlling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify non-controlling interests as a component of consolidated stockholders' equity, and the elimination of "minority interest" accounting in results of operations with earnings attributable to non-controlling interests reported as part of consolidated earnings. Additionally, ASC 810 10 65 (SFAS No. 160) revises the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent's controlling ownership interest. ASC 810 10 65 (SFAS No. 160) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company will evaluate the impact of the provisions of ASC 810 10 65 (SFAS No. 160) and adopt this standard on October 1, 2009.

ASC 805 10 10 was previously issued in December 2007 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 141 (revised), Business Combinations. The standard changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer's income tax valuation allowance. ASC 805 10 10 (SFAS No. 141(R)) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company will evaluate the impact of the provisions of ASC 805 10 10 (SFAS No. 141(R)) and adopt this standard on October 1, 2009.

ASC 825 10 10 was previously issued in February 2007 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. ASC 825 10 10 (SFAS No. 159) permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of ASC 825 10 10 (SFAS No. 159) become effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and management adopted this standard on October 1, 2008. The adoption of ASC 825 10 10 (SFAS No. 159) did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

ASC 820 10 05-1 was previously issued in September 2006 by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820 10 05-1 (SFAS No. 157) replaces the different definitions of fair value in the accounting literature with a single definition. It defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 10 05-1 (SFAS No. 157) is effective for fair-value measurements already required or permitted by other standards for financial statements

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB agreed to a one-year deferral for the implementation of ASC 820 10 05-1 (SFAS No. 157) for non-financial assets and liabilities. The Company is required to adopt ASC 820 10 05-1 (SFAS No. 157) in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 for financial assets and liabilities and the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for all other assets and liabilities. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of adopting the provisions of ASC 820 10 05-1 (SFAS No. 157) on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

2. Stock-Based Compensation

Equity Compensation Plans

Warrants

~~Warrant~~Warrants issued toin ~~service~~connection ~~provider~~with the CoreStreet acquisition: In ~~August~~December ~~2004~~2009, the Company issued warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a ~~warrant~~per toshare ~~purchase~~exercise 50price of $4.25,~~000~~ ~~shares~~expiring December 31, 2011 and valued at an$0.4 million, and warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a per share exercise price of $65.6000, toexpiring aDecember 31, ~~service provider~~2012 and valued at $0.4 million ~~The~~in ~~warrant~~connection ~~was~~with ~~fully~~the ~~vested~~CoreStreet ~~and~~acquisition. ~~exercisable~~For further information regarding the acquisition of CoreStreet, see Note 3—Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements. These warrants were fully vested upon issuance and ~~expires~~remain inoutstanding ~~August~~as of September 30, 2010.

Stock Option Plans

The Company has several stockholder- approved stock option plans under which it grants or has granted options to purchase shares of its common stock to employees. As of September 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company ~~had~~continues anto ~~aggregate~~grant ~~of 12.6 million shares of its common~~ stock ~~reserved~~options ~~for issuance~~ under ~~its~~the ~~various~~2004 ~~equity~~Equity ~~plans~~Incentive ~~approved~~Plan by("2004 ~~the~~Plan"). ~~stockholders,~~As of ~~which 8.3~~September ~~million~~30, ~~shares~~2010, ~~were~~the Company ~~subject~~had ~~to outstanding awards and~~ 4.35 million shares ~~were~~ available for future grants under the Company's 2004 Plan.

~~Stock~~In ~~option~~August ~~plans~~2002, ~~prior~~the toCompany's ~~2002~~stockholders ~~were~~approved ~~established~~the by2002 ~~ActivIdentity~~Stock ~~Europe S.A.~~Option Plan (~~formerly~~"2002 ~~known~~Plan") asand ~~ActivCard~~reserved ~~Europe S~~8.A.6 million ~~and~~shares ~~ActivCard S.A.)~~for issuance under the ~~laws of France~~plan. Options granted under ~~these~~the 2002 ~~plans~~Plan vest over four years and have a maximum term of ~~seven~~ 10 years. ~~For~~The ~~these option plans, the~~ Board of Directors ~~established~~establishes the exercise price as the ~~weighted average~~ closing price quoted on the NASDAQ ~~Europe~~Global ~~during~~Market on the ~~twenty~~date ~~trading~~of grant. ~~days~~In ~~prior~~August to2004, the ~~date~~Company's ofstockholders ~~grant~~approved the 2004 Plan. The ~~difference~~2004 ~~between~~Plan replaces the ~~grant~~2002 ~~price~~Plan ~~and~~with substantially the ~~fair~~same ~~market~~terms ~~value~~as isthe ~~being~~2002 ~~amortized~~Plan. ~~over~~The remaining share reserve from the 2002 ~~options'~~Plan was ~~vesting~~transferred ~~period~~to the 2004 Plan. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~addition ~~has~~to ~~made~~stock nooptions, ~~grants~~the ~~under~~2004 Plan allows for the grant of restricted stock, ~~options~~restricted ~~plans~~stock ~~established~~units, ~~prior~~stock appreciation rights, and cash awards. In February 2007, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to ~~2002~~the ~~during~~2004 ~~any~~Plan, ofincreasing the ~~periods~~number ~~presented~~of shares reserved for issuance by 4.0 million shares.

73 The option plans prohibit residents of France employed by the Company from selling their shares prior to the fourth anniversary from the date of grant.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

2. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

In August 2002, the Company's stockholders approved the 2002 Stock Option Plan (2002 Plan) and reserved 8.6 million shares for issuance under the plan. Options granted under the 2002 Plan vest over four years and have a maximum term of 10 years. The Board of Directors establishes the exercise price as the closing price quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of grant. In August 2004, the Company's stockholders approved the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan replaces the 2002 Plan with substantially the same terms as the 2002 Plan. The remaining share reserve from the 2002 Plan was transferred to the 2004 Plan. In addition to stock options, the 2004 Plan allows for the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and cash awards. In February 2007, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment to the 2004 Plan, increasing the number of shares reserved for issuance by 4.0 million shares.

For options granted in 2000 and later, the option plans prohibit residents of France employed by the Company from selling their shares prior to the fourth anniversary from the date of grant.

In fiscal 2008, the Company issued equity inducement grants as permitted under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules to certain officers under a plan that had not been presented to the Company's stockholders for approval. Although the options were granted outside of the 2004 Plan, they are governed in all respects by the terms and conditions of that plan as if granted thereunder.

~~Activity under the Company's stock equity plans, including the inducement grants, was as follows:~~ 70

				Weighted Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		6,354,083		$	7.37	6.02	$	1,977
	Granted	2,151,060			4.65
	Exercised	(57,764	)		3.44
	Forfeited	(1,220,776	)		12.36
Outstanding at September 30, 2007		7,226,603		$	5.75	5.96	$	3,879
	Granted	6,353,500			2.58
	Exercised	(4,781	)		3.77
	Forfeited	(2,627,222	)		5.67
Outstanding at September 30, 2008		10,948,100		$	3.93	5.95	$	160
	Granted	1,322,500			1.73
	Exercised	—			—
	Forfeited	(2,233,830	)		4.52
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		10,036,770		$	3.51	5.29	$	3,255
Vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2009		7,470,667		$	3.48	5.34	$	2,131
Exercisable at September 30, 2009		4,269,371		$	4.80	4.75	$	381

As of September 30, 2009, outstanding stock options to purchase 1,090,189 shares of common stock granted to employees and directors were subject to French regulation. All remaining outstanding

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

2. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

~~stock~~ Activity ~~options~~under tothe ~~purchase~~Company's ~~10,036,770 shares of common~~ stock ~~granted~~equity toplans, ~~employees~~including ~~and~~the ~~directors~~inducement ~~were~~grants, ~~subject~~was toas ~~U.S.~~follows: ~~regulation.~~

Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2009 were as follows:

				Weighted Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)

Outstanding at September 30, 2007		7,226,603		$	5.75	5.96	$	3,879
	Granted	6,353,500			2.58
	Exercised	(4,781	)		3.77
	Forfeited	(2,627,222	)		5.67

Outstanding at September 30, 2008		10,948,100		$	3.93	5.95	$	160
	Granted	1,322,500			1.73
	Exercised	—			—
	Forfeited	(2,233,830	)		4.52

Outstanding at September 30, 2009		10,036,770		$	3.51	5.29	$	3,255
	Granted	2,212,500			2.35
	Exercised	(225,956	)		—
	Forfeited	(2,957,867	)		4.19

Outstanding at September 30, 2010		9,065,447		$	3.05	4.77	$	176

Exercisable at September 30, 2010		4,149,787		$	3.84	4.21	$	82

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price
1.45 - 2.18		3,145,000		5.79	$	1.98		354,165	$	2.18
2.19 - 2.92		2,993,479		5.86		2.52		695,117		2.53
2.93 - 4.35		1,346,936		4.83		3.91		1,161,560		3.89
4.36 - 6.42		1,073,447		4.61		4.80		680,621		4.92
6.43 - 9.99		1,477,908		3.98		7.45		1,377,908		7.34
Totals		10,036,770		5.29	$	3.51		4,269,371	$	4.80

Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2010 were as follows:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable

Range of Exercise Prices	Number		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price
1.45 - 2.17		473,076		5.35	$	1.80		194,704	$	1.75
2.18 - 2.95		6,371,928		5.14		2.37		1,875,892		2.40
2.96 - 4.45		876,000		3.56		3.99		853,443		4.00
4.46 - 6.45		651,326		3.70		4.73		532,631		4.77
6.46 - 9.99		693,117		3.47		7.43		693,117		7.43

Totals		9,065,447		4.77	$	3.05		4,149,787	$	3.84

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The Company periodically grants awards of restricted stock, which are issued but subject to vesting requirements, and restricted stock units, which result in the issuance of shares without an exercise price only upon the satisfaction of vesting requirements. Vesting may be time-based, performance-based, or a combination of the two. Compensation expense is generally recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award.

~~Activity for restricted stock and restricted stock units for fiscal 2009 was as follows:~~ 71

Unvested Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units				Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested at September 30, 2008		136,723		$	4.00
	Granted	210,000			2.38
	Vested	(174,643	)		3.16
	Cancelled	(55,824	)		4.46
Unvested at September 30, 2009		116,256		$	2.11

Unvested restricted stock units outstanding at September 30, 2009, included units granted as follows:

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

2. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

~~Stockholders~~ Activity onfor ~~March 25,~~restricted ~~2009~~stock and ~~vest monthly over one year, beginning on June 24, 2009. At September 30, 2009, 86,256~~ restricted stock units ~~under~~for ~~this~~fiscal ~~grant~~2010 ~~were~~was ~~unvested.~~as follows:

Unvested Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units				Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Unvested at September 30, 2009		116,256		$	2.11
	Granted	523,092			2.16
	Vested	(192,498	)		2.50
	Cancelled	—			—

Unvested at September 30, 2010		446,850		$	2.00

Unvested restricted stock units outstanding at September 30, 2010, included units granted as follows:

•: During the fiscal 2010, 140,000 restricted stock units valued at a total of $386,400 were granted at no cost to non-employee directors. These restricted stock units were granted subsequent to their election to the board of directors during the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on March 24, 2010 and vest monthly over one year, beginning on March 24, 2010. At September 30, 2010, 70,008 restricted stock units under this grant were unvested.
•: On August 25, 2010, the Company granted 358,092 restricted units valued at $695,000 to employees. These shares vest over 4 years from the date of grant. At September 30, 2010, all of the restricted stock units under this grant were unvested.
•: On August 25, 2010, the Company granted 25,000 restricted units valued at $48,500 to an outside consultant. These shares vest over 4 months from the date of grant. At September 30, 2010, 18,750 restricted stock units under this grant were unvested.

Valuation and Expense Information under ASC 718 10 50-2 (SFAS 123(R))

The weighted- average fair value of stock-based compensation to employees is generally based on the single option valuation approach. Forfeitures are estimated and it is assumed no dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards to employees is generally amortized using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the options. Below are the ~~ranges~~assumptions used in the calculation of ~~assumptions~~stock-based ~~used~~compensation for employee stock options during fiscal 2010, 2009, ~~2008,~~ and ~~2007~~2008:

	Year ended September 30,
	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008		2007
	2010		2009		2008
Risk-free interest rate	2.2%	~~1.5% - 2.6%~~	1.5% - 2.6%		2.4% - 4.2%		~~4.2% - 5.0%~~
Expected life (years)	4.3	~~4.2 - 6.1~~	4.2 - 6.1		4.8 - 6.1		~~4.8 - 6.1~~
Dividend yield	0.0%	~~0.0%~~	0.0%		0.0%		~~0.0%~~
Expected volatility		42.2% - 54.4%			39.7% - 41.5%		40.7% - 55.0%
Weighted average expected volatility	46.7%		45.0%		41.0%
Weighted average expected volatility		45.0%			41.0%		42.6%
Weighted average estimated forfeiture rate	33.1%		30.2%		33.0%
Weighted average estimated forfeiture rate		30.2%			33.0%		23.4%

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, warrants, restricted stock, and restricted stock units under ASC 718 10 25-2 (SFAS 123(R)) for fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 which was allocated as follows (in thousands): 72

		Year ended September 30,
		2009		2008		2007
Cost of revenue—hardware		$	26	$	44	$	45
Cost of revenue—service			122		189		197
	Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of revenue		148		233		242
Research and development			695		868		643
Sales and marketing			591		627		586
General and administrative			1,640		1,146		1,047
	Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses		2,926		2,641		2,276
Total Stock-based compensation expense		$	3,074	$	2,874	$	2,518

The weighted-average grant-date fair values of options and restricted stock units granted was $1.34, $1.22, and $2.15 during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 respectively. The total intrinsic value of options and restricted stock units exercised was approximately $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.4 million during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The total fair value of options, warrants and restricted stock units vested was approximately $3.7 million, $2.5 million, and $2.4 million, during fiscal 2009, 2008, and

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

2. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

~~2007,~~ The ~~respectively.~~following Astable ofsummarizes ~~September 30,~~stock-based ~~2009, total unrecognized~~ compensation ~~costs~~expense related to ~~unvested~~employee stock options, and restricted stock ~~was~~units ~~$3.5 million,~~under ~~net,~~ASC ~~which~~718 is10 ~~expected~~25-2 tofor ~~be recognized~~fiscal as2010, an2009, ~~expense~~and 2008 ~~over~~which awas ~~weighted~~allocated ~~average~~as ~~remaining~~follows ~~amortization~~(in ~~period~~thousands): ~~of approximately 1.8 years.~~

		Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

		2010		2009		2008
Cost of revenue—hardware		$	21	$	26	$	44
Cost of revenue—service			120		122		189

	Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of revenue		141		148		233

Research and development			614		695		868
Sales and marketing			447		591		627
General and administrative			2,229		1,640		1,146

	Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses		3,290		2,926		2,641

Total stock-based compensation expense		$	3,431	$	3,074	$	2,874

The weighted average grant-date fair values of options and restricted stock units granted was $0.95, $1.34, and $1.22 during fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008 respectively. Cash received as a result of options exercised were approximately $0.3 million, none and $25,000 during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised and restricted stock units vested was approximately $0.5 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, during fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The total fair value of options, warrants and restricted stock units vested was approximately $2.6 million, $3.7 million, and $2.5 million, during fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options and restricted stock was $2.2 million, net, which is expected to be recognized as an expense over a weighted average remaining amortization period of approximately 1.9 years.

3. Business Combinations

The Company ~~allocates~~accounts ~~the~~for ~~purchase price of its~~ business ~~acquisitions~~combinations tousing ~~tangible~~the ~~and~~purchase ~~intangible~~method ~~assets~~of ~~acquired~~accounting. ~~and~~Consideration ~~liabilities~~includes ~~assumed,~~the ascash ~~well as in-process research and development~~paid, ~~based~~value onof ~~their~~common ~~estimated~~stock ~~fair~~issued ~~values. The excess purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. The fair values assigned to tangible~~ and ~~intangible~~warrants ~~assets~~for ~~acquired~~common ~~and~~stock ~~liabilities~~as measured ~~assumed are based~~ on ~~valuations~~the ~~prepared~~acquisition atdate, ~~the~~less ~~time~~any ofcash ~~acquisition~~acquired. The ~~last~~common ~~acquisition~~stock ~~made~~and bywarrants ~~the~~were ~~Company~~issued ~~was~~in ~~the~~a ~~Protocom~~private ~~Development Systems Pty~~placement. ~~Ltd.~~ ~~acquisition on August 5th, 2005.~~

On December 14, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of CoreStreet for consideration of $18.5 million, net of cash acquired. Consideration consisted of (i) $12.8 million in cash, net of cash acquired, (ii) 2.2 million shares of the Company's common stock (of which approximately 1.5 million shares are subject to an escrow to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of the stockholders of CoreStreet), (iii) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a per share exercise price of $4.25 and expiring December 31, 2011 with a fair value of $0.4 million, and (iv) warrants for 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock with a per share exercise price $5.00 and expiring December 31, 2012 with a fair value of $0.4 million. CoreStreet is a provider of PKI certification technology, distributed identity credential validation systems, and physical access control products. Their products are used primarily by federal and state agencies in the United States.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008

3. Business Combinations (Continued)

The following table represents the purchase price allocation and summarizes the aggregate estimated fair values of the net assets acquired on December 14, 2009 (in thousands):

		Purchase Price Allocation

Cash		$	1,770
Other current assets			965
Intangibles:
	Customer relationships		6,620
	Developed technology		2,530
	Trade name		40
Non-current assets			16
Goodwill			9,416
Less liabilities assumed			(1,062	)

Total purchase price		$	20,295

The purchase price was allocated to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. The $9.4 million of goodwill was assigned to the Company's single reporting unit and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The acquisition is complementary to and the Company anticipates that it will strengthen its strong authentication and credential management product portfolio. The intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis in-line with expected cash flows. Customer relationships represent the fair values of the underlying relationships and agreements with CoreStreet's customers. Developed technology represents the fair values of CoreStreet products that have reached technological feasibility and are a part of CoreStreet's product lines. Trade name represents the fair value of brand and name recognition associated with the marketing of CoreStreet's products and services.

The results of the CoreStreet acquisition are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition on December 14, 2009.

Summary of the purchase price consideration (in thousands):

	Purchase Price Consideration

Cash paid	$	14,540
Cash payments owed		17	(1)
Potential cash value for stock		27	(2)
Warrants for common stock		716	(3)
Common stock		4,995	(4)

Total purchase price	$	20,295

(1): Cash payments owed and recorded in "Accrued and other current liabilities" at September 30, 2010.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years Ended September 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008

3. Business Combinations (Continued)

(2): Potential cash value of common stock and warrants for common stock to former CoreStreet stockholders who indicate that they are not accredited investors.
(3): Fair value of warrants issued to former CoreStreet stockholders who are accredited investors.
(4): Fair value of common stock issued to CoreStreet stockholders who are accredited investors. Common stock was valued at the closing price on the date of acquisition, December 14, 2009.

The information related to revenue and operating income (loss) of CoreStreet included in our consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date, December 14, 2010, to the year ended September 30, 2010, is not presented. The Company integrated CoreStreets operations with its one operating segment, Digital Identity Solutions, and as a result, the information is not available.

Pro forma results

The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of ActivIdentity and CoreStreet, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2009. The unaudited pro forma financial information for fiscal 2010 and 2009, include the historical results for CoreStreet from October 1, 2008 to December 14, 2009. The pro forma financial information presented below is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2009 (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Revenue	$	58,767		$	69,213
Net loss attributable to ActivIdentity stockholders	$	(6,601	)	$	(7,461	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.16	)
Shares used in computing pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share		47,317			45,814

4. Investments

~~Investments~~Marketable securities consist of corporate bonds and notes, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and various auction rate securities (ARS). All ~~investments~~marketable securities are classified as as available-for-sale and are recorded at the estimated fair value.

The following table presents the Company's investments that are measured at the estimated fair value, categorized in accordance with the fair value hierarchy provisions of ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157) (in thousands): 75

As of September 30, 2009				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Short-term:
		Cash		$	9,712	$	—	$	—	$	9,712
		Money market funds / U.S. Treasuries			65,912		—		—		65,912
			Total short-term cash and cash equivalents		75,624		—		—		75,624
	Long-term restricted cash (term deposits)				1,746		—		—		1,746
Short-term investments:
		Corporate notes and bonds			—		—		—		—
		Auction rate securities			—		—		3,100		3,100
			Total short-term investments		—		—		3,100		3,100
Long-term investments:
		Auction rate securities			—		—		11,752		11,752
Total financial assets under ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157)				$	77,370	$	—	$	14,852	$	92,222

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

4. Investments (Continued)

As of September 30, 2008				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Short-term:
		Cash		$	6,952	$	—	$	—	$	6,952
		Money market funds / U.S. Treasuries			63,221		—		—		63,221
			Total short-term cash and cash equivalents		70,173		—		—		70,173
Short-term investments:
		Corporate notes and bonds			—		5,970		—		5,970
		Auction rate securities			—		—		3,686		3,686
			Total short-term investments		—		5,970		3,686		9,656
Long-term investments:
		Auction rate securities			—		—		11,752		11,752
Total financial assets under ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157)				$	70,173	$	5,970	$	15,438	$	91,581

The following table presents the Company's marketable securities that are measured at the estimated fair value, categorized in accordance with the fair value hierarchy provisions of ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157) (in thousands):

Changes in the Company's Level 3 assets for fiscal 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

As of September 30, 2010				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total

Cash and cash equivalents:
	Short-term:
		Cash		$	3,924	$	—	$	—	$	3,924
		Money market funds / U.S. Treasuries			68,595		—		—		68,595

			Total cash and cash equivalents		72,519		—		—		72,519

	Short-term restricted cash (term deposits)				1,940		—		—		1,940

Marketable securities:
		Auction rate securities			—		—		3,780		3,780

			Total marketable securities		—		—		3,780		3,780

Total financial assets under ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157)				$	74,459	$	—	$	3,780	$	78,239

				Level 3
As of September 30, 2009					Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Aggregate estimated fair value of Level 3 assets at September 30, 2008				$	15,438
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Total realized and unrealized gain (loss):
	Short-term:
		Included in earnings			—
		Cash			$	9,712	$	—	$	—	$	9,712
		Included in other comprehensive income			—
		Money market funds / U.S. Treasuries				65,912		—		—		65,912
Settlements					(537	)
			Total cash and cash equivalents			75,624		—		—		75,624
Transfers in (out) of Level 3					(49	)
	Long-term restricted cash (term deposits)					1,746		—		—		1,746
Aggregate estimated fair value of Level 3 assets at September 30, 2009				$	14,852
Marketable securities:
		Auction rate securities				—		—		3,100		3,100
			Total marketable securities			—		—		3,100		3,100
Long-term investments:
		Auction rate securities				—		—		11,752		11,752
Total financial assets under ASC 820 10 50-2 (SFAS No. 157)					$	77,370	$	—	$	14,852	$	92,222

~~Short-term Investments~~ 76

Short-term investments consist of investments acquired with maturities exceeding three months and for which liquidity issues have not resulted in reclassification of the securities to long-term investments. Short-term investments are classified as available for sale and are reported at the estimated fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. Short-term investments are primarily comprised of U.S. government obligations, municipal government obligations, corporate securities, certificates of deposit, and ARS. Declines in value on available-for-sale securities judged to be other-than-temporary are recorded in other income (expense), net. None of the short-term marketable securities are deemed impaired as of September 30, 2009. The gain or loss from sales of securities is recognized on the specific identification method. There were no realized gains or losses in fiscal 2009, 2008, or 2007.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

4. Investments (Continued)

~~Short-term~~Changes ~~investments~~in ~~consist~~the ofCompany's ~~the~~Level 3 ~~following~~assets for fiscal 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

		September 30, 2009
				Level 3
		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Aggregate estimated fair value of Level 3 assets at September 30, 2009				$	14,852
Corporate notes and bonds			—			—		—		—
	Total realized and unrealized gain (loss):
Auction rate securities		$	3,100			—		—	$	3,100
		Included in earnings			3,826
		$	3,100			—		—	$	3,100
Settlements					(14,898	)
Aggregate estimated fair value of Level 3 assets at September 30, 2010				$	3,780

	September 30, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Corporate notes and bonds	$	6,122	$	14	$	(166	)	$	5,970
Auction rate securities		3,686		—		—			3,686
	$	9,808	$	14	$	(166	)	$	9,656

Marketable Securities

~~The contractual~~Marketable securities consist of investments acquired with maturities exceeding three months and for which liquidity issues have not resulted in reclassification of ~~short~~the securities to long-term investments. Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at the estimated fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. Marketable securities are ARS comprised of closed-end mutual funds and a student loan agency. Declines in value on available-for-sale securities judged to be other-than-temporary are recorded in other income (expense), net. None of the short-term marketable securities are deemed impaired as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010. The gain or loss from sales of securities is recognized on the specific identification method. The Company had realized gains of $4.1 million for fiscal 2010. There were asno ~~follows~~realized (gains or loss in ~~thousands):~~fiscal 2009, or 2008.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Within one year		—		—
Between one year and three years		—		—
More than three years	$	3,100	$	3,100
	$	3,100	$	3,100

During fiscal 2010, based on evidence of liquidity, the Company reclassified $11.8 million of long-term investments to marketable securities and sold or redeemed ARS with a net book value of $10.8 million for $14.9 million which resulted in a gain of $4.1 million. Also, during fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $0.3 million on these ARS. At September 30, 2010, the Company's carrying value of market securities was $3.8 million. Our portfolio of ARS has had a series of liquidity events in the past year. The Company monitors all of its ARS investments and evaluates changes as to impairment factors on a continual basis.

Marketable securities ~~Auction~~consisted ~~Rate~~of ~~Securities~~ the following (in thousands):

The Company held at par $3.1 million and $3.7 million of closed-end mutual fund ARS classified as short-term investments at September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 respectively. $0.6 million and $12.3 million of formerly held closed-end mutual fund and taxable municipal ARS investments were called at par during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Future changes in the market regarding these securities may result in impairment charges and classification to long-term investments.

	September 30, 2010

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Auction rate securities	$	3,780		—		—	$	3,780

During fiscal 2008, the Company reclassified $33.0 million at cost of investments in certain ARS from short-term to long-term investments and recorded an other-than-temporary impairment on these holdings of $21.2 million, resulting in a carrying value of $11.8 million at September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. Contractual maturity for these investments range from 2025 to 2052 and these investments are presently not liquid.

	September 30, 2009

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Auction rate securities	$	3,100		—		—	$	3,100

ARS are structured to provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the interest rates paid at pre-determined intervals, generally every 28 days. The auctions have historically provided a liquid market for these securities. The Company's investments in ARS represent interests in 77

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

4. Investments (Continued)

~~collateralized~~ The ~~debt~~contractual ~~obligations~~maturities ~~(CDO),~~of ~~closed~~short-~~end mutual funds~~term, ~~derivative~~available-for-sale ~~product~~marketable ~~companies,~~securities ~~and~~as ~~student loans. Uncertainty in the financial markets has affected the liquidity~~ of ~~the Company's~~September 30, ~~ARS~~2010 ~~holdings~~were ~~and~~as ~~resulted~~follows (in athousands): ~~significant increase in the risks related to the ARS investments classified as long-term.~~

Historically, the fair value of ARS approximated par value due to the frequent auction events. However, failed auctions since August of 2007 have, in most cases, resulted in revised estimates of fair value that are less than par. The Company reviewed those investments classified as long-term at September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008, and has valued the holdings accordingly using a discounted cash flow methodology.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value

Within one year		—		—
Between one year and three years		—		—
More than three years	$	3,780	$	3,780

	$	3,780	$	3,780

Auction Rate Securities

The Company held at par $3.8 million and $3.1 million of closed-end mutual fund ARS classified as marketable securities at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 respectively. $0.6 million and $12.3 million of formerly held closed-end mutual fund and taxable municipal ARS investments were called at par during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Future changes in the market regarding these securities may result in impairment charges and classification to long-term investments.

The Company reviews its impairments in accordance ASC 320 10 35-17 (SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities), and related guidance issued by the FASB and SEC in order to determine the classification of the impairment as either "temporary" or "other-than-temporary." A temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income (loss) section of stockholders equity in the balance sheet. This type of unrealized loss does not affect net income (loss) for the applicable accounting period. However, an other-than-temporary impairment charge is recorded as a realized loss in the consolidated statement of operations. The differentiating factors between temporary and other-than-temporary impairment are primarily the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost and the term of the illiquid position. In addition, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the composition of any underlying assets in the holdings, and the Company's intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time that would allow for a liquidity event to take place are also factors taken into consideration in the Company's valuation analysis.

~~The~~While the Company ~~uses~~has aused ~~discounted~~what ~~cash~~it ~~flow~~believes ~~analysis~~to ~~technique~~be inan ~~modeling~~appropriate ~~and~~valuation ~~valuing~~model for these securities. ~~Probabilities~~and ofhas anfully ~~eventual~~attempted ~~cleared~~to ~~auction~~incorporate orall aknown ~~par~~and ~~recovery~~significant ~~through~~risk ~~the~~factors ~~issuer~~into ~~refinancing~~ the ~~holding~~analysis, asthe ~~well~~Company asmakes ~~probabilities~~many ofestimates ~~default~~ and ~~potential~~assumptions ~~levels~~when ofassessing ~~recovery in default were all taken into consideration as well as~~ the ~~probability~~value of ~~the~~these ~~issuer to continue paying penalty interest payments while the instrument remains in an illiquid condition~~securities. These ~~various~~estimates ~~considerations~~are ~~were~~also ~~applied~~based toon ~~each~~market ~~projected~~and ~~cash~~economic ~~flow~~conditions, ~~through~~which ~~maturity~~are ofcurrently ~~each~~in ~~instrument to derive an~~a ~~expected~~state ~~cash~~of ~~flow~~crisis atand ~~each~~heightened ~~relevant period~~uncertainty. ~~This~~As ~~cash flow was then discounted to the present by using~~ a ~~discount~~result, ~~rate~~there ~~derived~~is ~~from~~much anindependent ~~evaluation~~judgment ofrequired ~~multiple~~in ~~sources~~deriving ~~including~~these ~~credit~~valuation ~~default swap spreads on securities with similar credit ratings as well as overall spreads on corporate debt~~conclusions.

While the Company has used what it believes to be an appropriate valuation model for these securities and has fully attempted to incorporate all known and significant risk factors into the analysis, the Company makes many estimates and assumptions when assessing the value of these securities. Accordingly, assumptions regarding expected cash flows, discount rates, liquidity risk, default risk and related recovery risk, interest rate risk, and other risk factors are all considerations in the analysis and valuation of the Company's ARS holdings. These estimates are also based on market and economic conditions, which are currently in a state of crisis and heightened uncertainty. As a result, there is much independent judgment required in deriving these valuation conclusions. 78

The Company believes it has made reasonable judgments in its valuation exercise. However, if the relevant assumptions, estimates, or the related analyses prove incorrect or, if due to additional

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

4. Investments (Continued)

~~information~~ The Company believes it has made reasonable judgments in its valuation exercise. However, if the relevant assumptions, estimates, or the related analyses prove incorrect or, if due to additional information received in the future, management's conclusions would change, the Company may be required to change the recorded value of these securities, or other securities that make up the ~~investment~~ investment portfolio.

5. Accounts Receivable, net and Customer Concentration

~~The~~Accounts ~~following~~receivable, ~~customers~~net ~~accounted~~consisted ~~for 10% or more~~ of ~~accounts~~the ~~receivable~~following at(in ~~year-end~~thousands):

		~~September 30,~~	September 30,
		2009			2008
			2010			2009
Customer A			20	%			*
Accounts receivable			$	12,307		$	14,244
Customer B			10	%			*
	Less: allowance for doubtful accounts			(60	)		(261	)
Customer C				*		11	%
Accounts receivable, net			$	12,247		$	13,983
			30	%		11	%

Accounts receivable *Customer accountedfrom ~~for~~significant ~~less~~customers ~~than~~in excess of 10% of total accounts receivable at ~~period-end.~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively are summarized as follows:

The following customers accounted for 10% or more of revenue for the years ended:

	September 30,

	2010			2009
Customer A		12	%		*
Customer B		*			20	%
Customer C		*			10	%

		12	%		30	%

	Year Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
Customer D			*			*		17	%
Customer E		10	%		13	%		12	%
		10	%		13	%		29	%

*: Customer accounted for less than 10% of the accounts receivable.

Management believes *Customer accountedthat ~~for~~the ~~less~~receivable ~~than~~balances ~~10%~~from ~~during~~these large customers are collectible based on the ~~period~~assessment of their creditworthiness, account aging and past collection experiences. However, these customers represent significant exposure if one or more of them were unable to pay.

Revenue from 6.significant ~~Inventories,~~customers ~~net~~ representing revenue in excess of 10% of total revenue for the respective periods is summarized below:

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

	2010			2009			2008
Customer D		10	%		10	%		13	%

		September 30,
		2009			2008
Components, gross		$	874		$	1,184
Reserve for excess and obsolete			(594	)		(438	)
	Components, net		280			746
Finished goods, gross			629			1,271
Reserve for excess and obsolete			(208	)		(257	)
	Finished goods, net		421			1,014
Total inventory, net		$	701		$	1,760

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

6. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,

	2010		2009
Components	$	287	$	280
Finished goods		596		421

Total inventories	$	883	$	701

7. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment ~~consist~~consisted of the following (in thousands):

		September 30,
		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Computers and equipment		$	42,~~887~~998		$	4,~~050~~887
Software			43,~~572~~358			4,~~353~~572
Furniture and fixtures			2,~~249~~834			2,~~564~~249
Leasehold improvements			21,~~016~~480			12,~~470~~016
	Property and equipment, at cost		1310,~~724~~670			1213,~~437~~724
	Less: accumulated depreciation		(119,~~371~~033	)		(911,~~560~~371	)
Property and equipment, net		$	21,~~353~~637		$	2,~~877~~353

8. ~~Other~~ Intangible Assets, net

~~Other~~Intangible ~~intangible~~ assets ~~consist~~consisted of the following (in thousands):

			September 30, 2008			Additions			September 30, 2009
			September 30, 2009			Additions			Write-off of Fully Amortized Intangibles			September 30, 2010
Gross carrying amount:
	Acquired developed technology and patents		$	15,294		$	—		$	15,294
	Developed technology and patents		$	15,294		$	2,570		$	(15,294	)	$	2,570
	Customer relationships			2,028			—6,620			(2,028	)		6,620
	Patents			3,999			—			~~3,999~~—			3,999
		Other intangible assets at cost		21,321						21,321
		Intangible assets at cost		21,321			9,190			(17,322	)		13,189
Accumulated amortization
	Acquired developed technology			(13,793	)		(1,501	)		(15,294	)
	Developed technology and patents			(15,294	)		(337	)		15,294			(337	)
	Customer relationships			(12,~~887~~028	)		(~~141~~953	)		(2,028	)		(953	)
	Patents			(12,~~491~~157	)		(~~666~~667	)		~~(2,157~~—	)		(2,824	)
		Total accumulated amortization		(1719,~~171~~479	)	$	(21,~~308~~957	)		~~(19~~17,~~479~~322	)		(4,114	)
Other intangible assets, net			$	4,150		$	(2,308	)	$	1,842
Intangible assets, net			$	1,842		$	7,233			—		$	9,075

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated economic or estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360 10 35, (formerly known as SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. At September 30, 2009, the Company performed an impairment review of intangible assets. It was determined that no impairment of the carrying value of intangible assets of $1.8 million existed as of that date. The Company will continue to evaluate its intangible assets when events and changes in circumstances indicate that there may be a potential impairment. 80

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

8. ~~Other~~ Intangible Assets, net (Continued)

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360 10 35, (formerly known as SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Each reporting period, the Company reviews for indicators of potential impairment to the carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets. During fiscal 2010, no indicators of impairment of intangible assets of $9.1 million were noted.

The Company, each reporting period, reviews for indicators of potential impairment to the carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets. During fiscal 2010, no indicators of impairment of finite-lived intangible assets were noted.

During fiscal 2010, in connection with the CoreStreet acquisition, the Company recorded $9.2 million in intangible assets. For additional information regarding the CoreStreet acquisition, see Note—3 Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements.

Estimated amortization of developed technology and patents and other intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal years ending September 30,	Acquired ~~developed~~Developed ~~technology~~Technology and ~~patents~~Patents
2010		666
2011	$	2,170
2011		666
2012		1,882
2012		510
2013		1,254
	$	1,842
2014		1,022
2015		873
Thereafter		1,873
	$	9,075

~~The~~Definite ~~useful~~lived ~~lives~~intangible ofassets which include developed technology, patents, and customer ~~contracts~~relationships ~~varies~~are ~~from~~amortized ~~one~~over totheir ~~six~~estimated ~~years.~~lives ~~The~~that ~~weighted~~varies ~~average~~from ~~remaining~~one ~~useful~~to ~~life~~ten ~~of intangible assets at September 30, 2009 was 2.8~~ years.

9. Goodwill

In accordance with ASC 350 20 35 ~~(SFAS No. 142~~, ~~Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets),~~ the Company tests ~~recorded~~ goodwill ~~and intangibles with indefinite lives~~ for impairment at least annually. As of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 ~~the~~and ~~Company's~~2009, ~~net~~no ~~book~~impairment ~~value~~ of goodwill was ~~zero~~recorded.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company's stock price declined approximately 36%, an event that indicated the potential impairment of the carrying value of goodwill. As a result, management undertook an impairment evaluation to estimate the fair value of the Company's single reporting unit in relation to the book value of the Company (ASC 350 20 35 SFAS 142—Step One Analysis). Fair value as used in ASC 350 20 35 (SFAS 142) is defined as the amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties that is other than a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value was determined based on the market value of the Company's stock at March 31, 2008. Based on the evaluation results, potential impairment was indicated, as the carrying value of the Company exceeded the fair value. An ASC 350 20 35 (SFAS 142)—Step Two Analysis was undertaken to quantify the impairment as of March 31, 2008. As a result of the analysis, the entire carrying value of goodwill was deemed fully impaired and written down to zero, as a non-cash charge to profit and loss.

		September 30,

		2010		2009
Balance, beginning of period		$	—	$	—
	Goodwill as a result of acquisition		9,416		—

Balance, end of period		$	9,416	$	—

~~Changes~~During fiscal 2010, in connection with the CoreStreet acquisition, the Company recorded $9.4 million of goodwill. ~~are~~For asadditional ~~follows~~information ~~(in~~regarding ~~thousands):~~the CoreStreet acquisition, see Note—3 Business Combinations to consolidated financial statements.

		September 30,
		2009		2008
Balance, beginning of period		$	—	$	35,874
	Impairment of goodwill		—		(35,874	)
Balance, end of period		$	—	$	—

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

10. Sales Warranty Reserve

Changes in sales warranty reserve were as follows (in thousands):

		September 30,
		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Balance, beginning of period		$	~~199~~48		$	78199
	Warranty costs incurred		(5132	)		(2951	)
	Additions related to current period sales (net of adjustments)		~~(108~~49	)		~~160~~(108	)
	Impact of exchange rates		8(3	)		~~(10~~8	)
Balance, end of period		$	4862		$	~~199~~48

The sales warranty reserve is included in accrued and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

11. Restructuring Liability

The Company accounted for its 2002 restructuring under ASC 420 10 05 previously released by FASB under Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity. Costs associated with restructuring activities initiated on or after January 1, 2003 are accounted for in accordance with ASC 420 10 10 formerly released by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, and ASC 712 10 25 formerly released by the FASB under the title SFAS 112, Employer's Accounting for Postemployment Benefits, when applicable. All restructurings subsequent to December 15, 2002 have been accounted for under ASC 420 10 10 (SFAS No. 146) which requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when a liability is incurred rather than when an exit or disposal plan is approved.

The following summarizes the restructuring liability activity (in thousands):

		2002 Restructuring			~~2004 Restructuring~~			~~2005 Restructuring~~
		Facility Exit Costs			~~Facility Exit Costs~~			~~Workforce Reduction~~			~~Totals~~
Balances, September 30, 2007		$	2,172			64		$	71		$	2,307
Balances, September 30, 2008		$	1,578
	Cash payments		(~~594~~611	)		~~(66~~	)		2			~~(658~~	)
	Adjustments to accruals for changes in estimates		—			3			~~(73~~	)		~~(70~~	)
	Impact of exchange rates		—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Balances, September 30, 2008			1,578			—			—			1,578
Balances, September 30, 2009		$	967
	Cash payments		(~~611~~463	)		—			—			~~(611~~	)
	Adjustments to accruals for changes in estimates		—(356	)		—			—			—
	Impact of exchange rates		—			—			—			—
Balances, September 30, 2009		$	967		$	—		$	—		$	967
Balances, September 30, 2010		$	148
	Less current portion	$	~~(642~~148	)	$	—		$	—		$	~~(642~~	)
	Long-term portion	$	~~325~~—		$	—		$	—		$	~~325~~

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

11. Restructuring Liability (Continued)

2002 Restructuring

In February 2002, the Company commenced a restructuring of its business towhich ~~enhance~~resulted ~~operational efficiency and reduce expenses. The plan included reduction~~ in ~~workforce~~restructuring ~~and~~reserve ~~excess facilities and other direct costs. Charges~~ for ~~the~~excess ~~reduction~~ facilities in ~~workforce~~its ~~consisted~~corporate ~~of severance, outplacement, and other termination costs~~headquarter. The charge for excess facilities was comprised primarily of future minimum lease payments payable over the remaining life of the lease ~~ending February 2011~~, net of total estimated sublease income. ~~Sublease income was estimated assuming then current market lease rates and vacancy periods.~~ In June 2005, the Company subleased the excess facilities. Cash payments for the remaining liability of $1.0.1 million as ofat September 30, ~~2009,~~2010 for facility exit activities, ~~will~~have be been made subsequently over the remaining life of the ~~lease~~excess ~~ending~~facilities ~~February~~which ~~2011~~ended on November 30, 2010.

~~2004 Restructuring~~ 82

In March 2004, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce operating costs, streamline and consolidate operations, and reallocate resources. The plan included a reduction in workforce that resulted in the termination of 109 employees, closure of five facilities, and termination of a non-strategic project under an existing agreement. Relating to the 2004 restructurings, the Company recorded a total charge of $3.8 million, consisting of $3.1 million for workforce reduction, $0.7 million for excess facilities, and $40,000 for the termination of the non-strategic project. Charges for the reduction in workforce consisted of severance, outplacement, and other termination costs. Cash payments related to the workforce reduction were completed in fiscal 2005. After adjustments for changes in estimates of $3,000, cash payments related to the facility exit activities were completed in the quarter ended June 30, 2008. At September 30, 2009 and at September 30, 2008, no liability related to the 2004 restructuring remained outstanding.

2005 Restructuring

In April 2005, the Company implemented an organizational restructuring to eliminate 18 employees, of whom 11 were in sales and marketing, 5 in research and development, and 2 in general and administration functions, and recorded a restructuring charge of $837,000 for severance, benefits and other costs related to the reduction. All employees have been terminated and the cash payments related to workforce reduction have been made. In July 2005, following the announcement of the Protocom acquisition, the Company implemented an organizational restructuring to take advantage of the complementary operating models and infrastructures. The restructuring included the elimination of excess facilities in four locations and termination of 31 employees, of whom 15 were in sales and marketing, 15 in research and development, and 1 in general and administrative functions. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of $206,000 for excess facilities, related to vacating part of one facility in London and $1.1 million for workforce reduction, for a total of $1.3 million. Charges for the reduction in workforce consisted of severance, outplacement, and other termination costs. Sublease income for the vacated premises was estimated assuming then current market lease rates and vacancy periods. When the final cash payments related to the facility exit costs were completed in fiscal 2006 the facility exit costs were reduced by $39,000. The term of the lease expired in August 2006 and at September 30, 2008; no liability exists for this facility. During 2006, the Company reduced the remaining liability for reduction in workforce by $10,000. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

11. Restructuring Liability (Continued)

Company eliminated the remaining workforce reduction liability of $73,000 following a favorable legal settlement. At September 30, 2009 and at September 30, 2008, no liability related to workforce reduction remained for this restructuring plan.

12. Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Income ~~taxes~~tax ~~consist~~expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):

		Year ended September 30,
		Years Ended September 30,
		2009			2008			2007
		2010			2009			2008
Federal:
	Current	$	~~(23~~8	)	$	(323	)	$	—(3	)
	Deferred		—			—			—
			(23	)		(3	)		—
			8			(23	)		(3	)
State:
	Current		2			42			174
	Deferred		—			—			—
			2			42			174
Foreign:
	Current		2492			~~(507~~24	)		~~412~~(507	)
	Deferred		~~(347~~70	)		—(347	)		—
			(323	)		(507	)		412
			162			(323	)		(507	)
	Income taxes	$	~~(344~~172	)	$	(~~506~~344	)	$	~~429~~(506	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and ~~minority~~non-controlling interest ~~consists~~consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Year ended September 30,
	Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Domestic	$	(126,~~548~~807	)	$	(9412,~~209~~548	)	$	(394,~~389~~209	)
Foreign		61,~~559~~265			176,~~196~~559			(517,~~492~~196	)
	$	(5,~~989~~542	)	$	(775,~~013~~989	)	$	(877,~~881~~013	)

8683

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

12. Income Taxes (Continued)

The difference between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate to income before taxes was as follows (in thousands):

	Year ended September 30,
	Years Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2007
	2010			2009			2008
Federal statutory tax benefit	$	(21,~~061~~937	)	$	(262,~~955~~061	)	$	(326,~~122~~955	)
State taxes		2			42			174
Federal change in valuation allowance		4(7,~~100~~561	)		174,~~343~~100			~~789~~17,343
Foreign losses not benefited		(2,620	)		(6,525	)		2,347
Foreign tax differential		(281	)		(2,620	)		(6,525	)
Federal R&D tax credit		(~~388~~13	)		(~~131~~388	)		(~~111~~131	)
Stock-based compensation		~~586~~373			~~611~~586			~~493~~611
Inter-company loan write-off		—			7,624			—
U.S. inclusion of foreign income		314			—			—
Impairment of goodwill		—			6,933			—
Reduction of prior year net operating losses		9,229			—			—
Other		37			590			16
Intercompany loan write-off		—			—			7,624
	$	(344	)	$	(506	)	$	429
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			6,933
Other		46			37			590
	$	172		$	(344	)	$	(506	)

Deferred tax assets consist of the following (in thousands):

		September 30,
		2009			2008
		2010			2009
Deferred tax assets:
	Net operating loss carry-forwards	$	7071,~~986~~270		$	7670,~~250~~986
	Tax credits		56,~~035~~055			45,~~410~~035
	Depreciation and amortization		~~934~~1,080			~~846~~934
	Accruals and reserves not currently deductible		1413,~~241~~735			1314,~~197~~241
	Total deferred tax assets		9192,~~196~~140			9491,~~703~~196
Deferred tax liability: Other intangible assets			—(3,481	)		~~(671~~—	)
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance			9188,~~196~~659			9491,~~032~~196
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets			(9088,~~849~~382	)		(9490,~~032~~849	)
Net deferred tax assets		$	~~347~~277		$	—347

Realization of ~~our~~the Company's deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Because of ~~our~~the Company's lack of earnings history in the U.S. and France, the net deferred tax assets from these jurisdictions have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. For all other jurisdictions, no valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that a tax benefit for deferred assets will be recognized based upon recent and forecasted earnings. The Company recorded a decrease in valuation allowance of $3.2.5 million in fiscal ~~2009~~2010, and ana ~~increase~~decrease in valuation allowance of $173.72 million in fiscal ~~2008~~2009. The decrease in the ~~2009~~ valuation allowance as of September 30, 2010 resulted primarily from a reduction in ~~NOL~~ ~~carry-forward~~prior ~~due~~year tonet ~~utilization~~operating asloss ~~well as an adjustment resulting from additional non~~carry-~~deductible~~forwards ~~expenses.~~that ~~The~~have ~~valuation~~now ~~allowance~~been atdetermined ~~September 30, 2009 includes $220,000 related~~ to ~~stock option~~not ~~deductions,~~meet the ~~benefit~~more oflikely ~~which will be credited to additional paid in capital when realized.~~

8784

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

12. Income Taxes (Continued)

than not standard and thus are included in the uncertain tax positions below as well as the utilization of net operating losses related to prior year foreign income inclusion, which is also offset by an increase in valuation allowance as a result of purchase price accounting related to the CoreStreet acquisition. The valuation allowance at September 30, 2010 includes $182,000 related to stock option deductions, the benefit of which will be credited to additional paid in capital when realized.

The Company has not provided for U.S income taxes on foreign subsidiary undistributed earnings as any earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. At the present time it is not practicable to estimate the amount of U.S. income taxes that might be payable if these earnings were repatriated.

As of September 30, ~~2009~~2010, approximate net operating loss carry-forwards and their corresponding expirations were as follows (in thousands):

	Amount		Expiration starting in
United States—Federal	$	~~103,805~~297	~~2011~~2012
United States—California		66,993	2012
United States—Federal	$	107,609	2018
United States—Other States		7,850	2011
United States—California	$	51,526	2012
France		88,246	No expiration
United States—Other States	$	23,428	2011
Other foreign—no expiration		58	No expiration
France	$	87,978	No expiration
Other foreign—with expiration		11	2015
Other foreign—no expiration	$	58	No expiration

As of September 30, ~~2009~~2010 the Company had federal and State of California research and development tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $2.17 million and $2.79 million, respectively. The federal research and development tax credits ~~will~~ expire at various dates beginning in 2012. The State of California research and development tax credits have no expiration date.

Net operating loss carry-forwards and credits can only be used by the ~~legal~~taxpayer ~~entity~~ generating the operating losses and credits. The extent to which loss carry-forwards and credits can be used to offset future taxable income may be limited, depending on the extent of any ownership changes as defined by federal and various state and foreign jurisdictions. These limitations may result in the expiration of net operating losses and tax credits before utilization. CoreStreet was acquired during the fiscal 2010 and included in the net operating loss and credit carry-forwards are federal losses of $21.8 million, state losses $14.9 million and credits of $0.8 million related to the CoreStreet acquisition. A change in ownership study relating to CoreStreet had not been performed prior to the acquisition. If ownership changes occurred prior to the acquisition, additional limitations relating to these pre acquisition items may apply.

On ~~September~~October 238, ~~2008~~2010, the ~~state~~State of California approved its budget for fiscal ~~2009~~year ended June 30, 2010, and made changes to the California tax law which substantially ~~limits~~limit the ~~our~~Company's ability to utilize available state net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards to reduce any California state income taxes payable, if the company has taxable income in fiscal ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2010~~2011. Under the new California tax law, the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards is suspended for tax years beginning in ~~2008~~2010 and ~~2009~~2011; however, the expiration date of the net operating loss carry forwards is extended for an equivalent two-year period. Additionally, for tax years beginning in 2008 and 2009, taxpayers may only utilize available tax credit carry forwards to reduce their current tax liability up to 50% of their net tax amount before application of such credits.

As of September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008 we had $0.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively of unrecognized tax benefits. If recognized, any amounts would be recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of operations and our effective tax rate would be reduced by these amounts if the Company is not in a full valuation allowance position at that time. The reduction in unrecognized tax benefits related to prior year's results from a R&D tax credit study in France completed after the September 30, 2008 year, and prior to the filing of the income tax return. The results of the study reduced qualifying costs subject to the French credit and reduced the credits claimed on the tax return. The net impact was a $0.2 million reduction in the benefit recognized. 85

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

12. Income Taxes (Continued)

ItAs of isSeptember 30, ~~reasonably~~2010, ~~possible~~and ~~that~~September 30, ~~certain~~2009, ~~unrecognized~~the ~~tax~~Company ~~benefits~~had ~~may~~$6.6 million ~~increase~~and or$0.4 million, ~~decrease~~respectively ~~within~~of ~~the~~unrecognized ~~next twelve months due to~~ tax ~~examination~~benefits. ~~changes,~~If ~~settlement activities~~recognized, ~~expirations~~any ofamounts ~~statute~~would ofbe ~~limitations,~~recorded oras ~~the~~an ~~impact~~income ontax ~~recognition~~benefit ~~and~~in ~~measurement considerations related to~~ the ~~results~~consolidated statement of ~~published~~operations ~~tax~~and ~~cases~~the orCompany's ~~other~~effective ~~similar~~tax ~~activities.~~rate Wewould dobe ~~not~~reduced ~~anticipate~~by ~~any~~these ~~significant changes~~amounts toif ~~the~~a ~~unrecognized~~valuation ~~tax~~allowance ~~benefits~~were ~~over the next 12 months~~not required.

~~Our~~It ~~policy~~ is toreasonably ~~include~~possible ~~interest~~that ~~and~~certain ~~penalties related to~~ unrecognized tax benefits, ifmay ~~any,~~increase or decrease within the ~~provision~~next ~~for~~twelve ~~taxes~~months indue ~~the~~to ~~consolidated~~tax ~~condensed~~examination ~~statements~~changes, ofsettlement ~~operations~~activities, ~~under~~expirations ~~the~~of ~~provisions~~statute of ~~FIN 48.~~limitations, Ator ~~September 30,~~the ~~2009,~~impact ~~and~~on ~~September 30,~~recognition ~~2008~~and wemeasurement ~~had~~considerations ~~$0.2 million~~related ~~and~~to ~~$0.2 million~~the ~~respectively~~results of ~~interest~~published ~~and~~tax ~~penalties~~cases ~~which~~or ~~are included~~other insimilar ~~long-term~~activities. ~~taxes~~The ~~payable,~~Company ofdoes ~~which~~not ~~$18,000~~anticipate ~~and~~any significant ~~$20,000~~changes ~~respectively, relate~~ to the ~~current~~unrecognized ~~fiscal~~tax ~~year~~benefits over the next 12 months.

WeThe ~~have~~Company's ~~the~~policy ~~following~~is ~~activity~~to ~~relating~~include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, ~~during~~if ~~fiscal~~any, within the provision for taxes in the consolidated condensed statements of operations under the provisions of ASC 740 10 05. At September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009 the Company had $176,000 and ~~2008~~$208,000 (respectively of interest and penalties which are included in ~~thousands):~~long-term taxes payable. During the current fiscal year a reduction of $32,000 to the accrued interest and penalties was booked as a result of a lapse in the statute of limitations.

			September 30,
			2009			2008
Beginning balance			$	2,328		$	310
	Tax positions taken in the current year:
		Additions		—			2,018
		Reductions		—			—
	Tax positions related to prior years:
		Additions		27			—
		Reductions		(1,982	)		—
	Settlements with taxing authorities			—			—
	Lapse of applicable statute of limitations			—			—
Ending balance			$	373		$	2,328

The Company had the following activity relating to unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

The Company or its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. and California, as well as various other foreign and domestic jurisdictions. The Company is currently not the subject of any income tax examinations. In general, the earliest open year subject to examination in a major tax jurisdiction is the year ended September 30, 2005, although depending upon jurisdiction, earlier tax years may remain open subject to limitations.

			September 30,

			2010			2009
Beginning Balance			$	373		$	2,328
	Tax positions taken in the current year:
		Additions		—			—
		Reductions		—			—
	Tax positions related to prior years:
		Additions		6,324			27
		Reductions		—			(1,982	)
	Settlements with taxing authorities			—			—
	Lapse of applicable statute of limitations			(105	)		—

Ending Balance			$	6,592		$	373

InThe ~~July~~Company ~~2006,~~or its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the ~~FASB~~U.S. ~~issued~~and ~~FIN 48~~California, ~~Accounting~~as ~~for~~well ~~Income~~as ~~Tax~~various ~~Uncertainties~~other ~~(ASC~~foreign ~~740~~and 10domestic ~~05)~~jurisdictions. ~~ASC~~The ~~740~~Company 10is 05currently ~~(FIN 48)~~under ~~defines~~examination ~~the~~in ~~threshold~~Germany for ~~recognizing~~ the ~~benefits~~fiscal of2005, 2006 and 2007 income tax ~~return~~returns. ~~positions~~The inCompany ~~the~~recently ~~financial~~concluded ~~statements~~an asexamination ~~"more-likely-than-not"~~from tothe beFrench ~~sustained~~tax byauthority covering the ~~taxing~~fiscal 2005, 2006, and 2007 ~~authority.~~income ~~ASC~~tax ~~740~~returns 10that 05resulted ~~(FIN 48)~~in ~~provides~~no ~~guidance~~significant ontax ~~the~~adjustments. ~~de-recognition,~~The ~~measurement~~Company ~~and~~is ~~classification~~currently not the subject of any additional income tax ~~uncertainties,~~examinations. ~~along~~In ~~with~~general, ~~any~~the ~~related~~earliest ~~interest~~open ~~and~~year ~~penalties.~~subject to ~~ASC~~examination ~~740~~in 10a 05major ~~FIN 48~~tax ~~includes~~jurisdiction ~~guidance~~is ~~concerning~~fiscal ~~accounting~~2006, ~~for~~although ~~income~~depending ~~tax~~upon ~~uncertainties~~jurisdiction, inearlier ~~interim~~tax ~~periods~~years ~~and~~may ~~increases~~remain open beyond the ~~level~~statute of ~~disclosures~~limitation ~~associated~~period ~~with~~due ~~any~~to ~~recorded income~~ tax attribute ~~uncertainties.~~carry-forwards ~~ASC~~from ~~740~~prior 10years 05subject ~~(FIN 48)~~to ~~was~~limitations ~~adopted~~of bymaking ~~the~~adjustments ~~Company~~to onthese ~~October 1,~~tax ~~2007~~attributes carry-forward items.

8986

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~ 2008

13. Net Loss per Share

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to determine basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

		Year ended September 30,
		Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
		2009			2008			2007
		2010			2009			2008
Numerator:
	Net loss	$	(5,~~546~~715	)	$	(765,~~457~~546	)	$	(976,~~298~~457	)
Denominator:
	Weighted average number of shares outstanding		4547,~~814~~317			45,~~770~~814			45,~~694~~770
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(0.12	)	$	(10.6712	)	$	(01.2067	)

For the above periods, the Company had securities outstanding that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, which were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share in the periods presented as their impact would have been anti-dilutive. For ~~the~~fiscal ~~years ended September 30~~2010, 2009, ~~2008,~~ and ~~2007~~2008, approximately 1011.29 million, 11 10.2 million, and 7 11.42 million potential common shares (prior to application of treasury method), respectively, consisting of options, restricted stock units and warrants, were excluded from the determination of diluted net loss per share, as the effect of such shares was anti-dilutive.

Stockholder Rights Agreement

The Board of Directors of the Company authorized and declared a dividend distribution of one preferred stock purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock, $0.001 par value, of the Company outstanding as of July 25, 2008. The description and terms of the rights are governed by the Stockholder Rights Agreement dated July 25, 2008, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one ten-thousandth of a share of the Company's Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, at a price of $11.00 per unit. If any acquiring person acquires 20% or more of ActivIdentity common stock, there would be a triggering event causing significant dilution in the voting power of such person or group. Until there is a triggering event, the rights trade with the Company's common stock. The Stockholder Rights Agreement will continue in effect until June 30, 2018, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged.

14. Employee Retirement Plans

The Company has agreed to a payment of a lump sum retirement indemnity to all employees located in France based upon years of service and compensation at retirement, though benefits do not vest prior to retirement. On September 30, 2007, the Company adopted certain provisions of ASC 720 20 65 formerly released by the FASB under the title SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). ASC 720 20 65 (SFAS No. 158) requires an employer to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit post retirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur

9087

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

14. Employee Retirement Plans (Continued)

through comprehensive income. At September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, the liability for the retirement benefit was $1310,000, $~~103~~13,000 and $59103,000, respectively. These amounts represent 100% of the projected liability.

The Company has a 401(k) plan for its eligible employees. Eligible employees can make voluntary contributions to the plan up to a fixed dollar amount specified by U.S. law. The Company is not required to make contributions and did not make any contributions to the plan in any of the periods presented.

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating leases

The Company has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for office space with original terms that range from three to ten years.

Future minimum lease payments, gross, under these leases are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal year ending September 30,
Fiscal years ending September 30,
	2010	$	3,450
	2011	$	1,736
	2011		1,947
	2012		1,423
	2012		624
	2013		1,332
	Thereafter		—
	2014		1,350
		$	6,021
	2015		1,185
	Thereafter		3,071
		$	10,097

~~The~~Operating ~~future~~lease ~~minimum~~obligations ~~lease~~include ~~payments~~management ~~above~~fees ~~include~~which ~~amounts~~cover ~~related~~common toarea amaintenance ~~non-cancelable~~charges. ~~operating~~Rent ~~lease~~expense, ~~that~~net isof ~~included~~sublease inrental ~~the~~income, ~~charge~~under ~~for~~all ~~restructuring~~operating ~~expenses~~leases ~~(see~~was ~~Note~~$1.7 ~~11)~~million, $2.8 million, ~~The~~and ~~Company anticipates receiving approximately~~ $03.51 million ~~sublease~~in ~~income~~fiscal ~~related~~2010, to2009 ~~this~~and ~~abandoned~~2008 ~~facility~~respectively.

~~Rent~~Starting ~~expense~~December 1, ~~net~~2010, ofthe ~~sublease~~Company's ~~rental~~lease ~~income~~space will be reduced from 41,000 ~~under~~square ~~all~~feet ~~operating~~to ~~leases~~29,000 ~~was~~square $2feet.~~8 million~~ During fiscal 2010, $3the Company entered into an amendment to the lease agreement covering our headquarters in Fremont, California.1 The amendment extends the lease term to 10 ~~million~~years from the date of amendment, reduces the office space from 41,000 square feet to 29,000 square feet beginning December 1, 2010, suspends the monthly cash portion of the rent payments for the first eight months of the new term and significantly reduces the annual rent expense. The amendment also provides that subject to a $31.02 million inpenalty ~~fiscal~~if ~~2009~~terminated within the first 5 years, ~~2008~~the ~~and~~Company ~~2007~~may ~~respectively~~terminate the lease at any point from the date of amendment.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company has been named as a defendant in legal actions arising from its normal business activities, which it believes will not have a material adverse effect on it or its business.

OnThe ~~October 1, 2008, the~~ Company ~~filed~~enters ainto ~~complaint~~standard inindemnification ~~the~~agreements ~~Northern~~with ~~District~~many of ~~California,~~its ~~asserting~~customers ~~U.S. Patent No. 6,575,360 against Intercede Group PLC~~ and ~~Intercede Ltd.~~ ~~(collectively,~~certain ~~"Intercede").~~other Onbusiness ~~January 16,~~partners ~~2009,~~in ~~Intercede filed their answers, including counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability. On February 9, 2009,~~ the ~~Company~~ordinary ~~filed~~course ~~a motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims and to strike certain~~ of ~~Intercede's defenses~~business. OnThese ~~March 26,~~agreements ~~2009,~~include ~~Intercede~~provisions filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, amending their previously-asserted defenses and counterclaims, and asserting additional counterclaims for monopolization, attempted monopolization, fraud, and unfair competition. On May 15, 2009, the Company filed a second motion to dismiss Intercede's counterclaims for monopolization, attempted monopolization, fraud and unfair competition. On September 11, 2009, the Court granted in part and

9188

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

15. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

~~denied~~for inindemnifying ~~part~~ the ~~Company's~~customer ~~motion~~against any claim brought by a third party to ~~dismiss.~~the Onextent ~~September 28,~~any ~~2009,~~such ~~Intercede~~claim ~~filed~~alleges that an ActivIdentity product infringes a ~~Second~~patent, ~~Amended~~copyright ~~Answer~~or ~~and~~trademark, ~~Counterclaims.~~or ~~The~~violates ~~Company~~any other ~~believes~~proprietary rights of that itthird ~~has~~party. ~~meritorious~~It ~~defenses~~is not possible to ~~Intercede's~~ ~~counterclaims.~~estimate Nothe ~~amounts~~maximum ~~related~~potential toamount of future payments the ~~Intercede~~Company ~~litigation~~could ~~have~~be ~~been~~required ~~recorded~~to inmake under these indemnification agreements. To date, the Company's ~~financial~~has ~~statements~~not ~~other~~incurred ~~than~~any ~~legal~~costs ~~fees~~to asdefend ~~part~~lawsuits ofor ~~normal~~settle ~~expenses~~claims related to these indemnification agreements. No liability for ~~fiscal~~these indemnification agreements has been recorded at September 30, 2010 or September 30, 2009.

~~The~~As ~~Company~~permitted ~~enters~~under ~~into~~Delaware ~~standard~~law, ~~indemnification agreements with many of its customers and certain other business partners in~~ the ~~ordinary~~Company ~~course~~has ~~of business. These~~ agreements ~~include provisions for~~ indemnifying ~~the~~its ~~customer~~executive ~~against~~officers ~~any~~and ~~claim~~directors ~~brought~~for bycertain aevents ~~third-party~~and tooccurrences while the ~~extent~~officer ~~any~~or ~~such~~director ~~claim alleges that an ActivIdentity product infringes a patent~~is, ~~copyright~~ or ~~trademark~~was, or ~~violates~~serving ~~any~~at ~~other~~the ~~proprietary~~Company's ~~rights~~request ofin ~~that~~such ~~third-party~~capacity. ItThe ~~is not possible to estimate the~~ maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements. Tois ~~date,~~not ~~the~~estimable. The Company ~~has~~maintains ~~not~~directors' ~~incurred~~and ~~any~~officers' ~~costs~~liability insurance designed to ~~defend~~enable ~~lawsuits~~it orto ~~settle~~recover ~~claims~~a ~~related~~portion toof ~~these~~any ~~indemnification~~future ~~agreements~~amounts paid. No liability for these indemnification agreements has been recorded at September 30, ~~2009~~2010 or September 30, ~~2008~~2009.

~~As permitted~~ under Delaware law, the Company has agreements indemnifying its executive officers and directors for certain events and occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company's request in such capacity16. ~~The~~Stock ~~maximum~~Repurchase potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is not estimable. The Company maintains directors and officers' liability insurance designed to enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. No liability for these indemnification agreements has been recorded at September 30, 2009 or September 30, 2008. Program

92 On February 18, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to $10 million or approximately 8% of its outstanding shares of common stock in the open market from time to time over the next twelve months. All share repurchases subject to this program will be retired upon purchase completion. The Company's Board of Directors has also authorized that purchases may be made under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A Rule 10b5-1 plan allows ActivIdentity to repurchase its shares during periods when the Company would normally not be active in the market due to its own internal trading blackout periods. During the fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased 1.1 million of shares through open market repurchases at an average cost of $2.22 per share for a total of approximately $2.4 million. As of September 30, 2010, the remaining balance available for future share repurchases was $7.6 million under the Company's stock repurchase program. On October 11, 2010, the Board of Directors terminated the stock repurchase program.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1617. Segment Information

The Company operates in one operating segment, Digital Identity Solutions, and accordingly is disclosing information by geographic area only. Transfers between geographic areas are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The following is a summary of ~~operations~~revenue and long-lived asset information by geographic region ~~(in thousands)~~:

			North America			Europe			Asia Pacific			Total
				Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
				2010			2009			2008
	Total revenue		$	29,435		$	26,838		$	6,048		$	62,321
Revenue:
	Capital expenditures			187			573			—			760
	United States				48	%		46	%		34	%
	Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets			840			307			96			1,243
	United Kingdom				15	%		12	%		13	%
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
	France*				6	%		9	%		15	%
	Total revenue			24,891			29,244			4,874			59,009
	Others*				31	%		33	%		38	%
	Capital expenditures			62			192			53			307
		Total revenue			100	%		100	%		100	%
	Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets			926			422			218			1,566
Property and equipment, net:
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
	United States			$	1,033		$	1,549		$	2,175
	Total revenue			24,276			32,055			3,222			59,553
	France				559			782			446
	Capital expenditures			1,432			529			138			2,099
	Others				45			22			256
	Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets			832			467			277			1,576
		Total property and equipment, net		$	1,637		$	2,353		$	2,877
September 30, 2009
	Goodwill			—			—			—			—
	Long-lived assets			4,262			1,095			12			5,369
	Total assets			95,283			12,357			6,937			114,577
September 30, 2008
	Goodwill			—			—			—			—
	Long-lived assets			5,221			3,680			1,871			10,772
	Total assets			98,986			14,215			4,400			117,601

~~For~~Revenue ~~fiscal~~is ~~2009,~~attributed ~~revenue~~to ~~for~~countries ~~the~~based ~~U.S~~on ~~and~~delivery ~~United Kingdom accounted for 46% and 12%, respectively~~locations. No other country was greater than 10% for the year. For fiscal 2008, the United States, United Kingdom, and France accounted for 34%, 13%, and 15% of net revenue, respectively. In fiscal 2007, the United States, United Kingdom and France accounted for 36%, 19% and 14% of net revenue, respectively.

*: France accounted for less than 10% of the Company's total revenue for two of the three periods presented. Other countries individually accounted for less than 10% of the Company's total net revenue for the periods presented.

1718. Related Party Transactions

On August 3, 2009, the Audit Committee of the Board approved the sale of certain immaterial assets and the licensing of other assets to idOnDemand, Inc., a privately held corporation of which ~~Mr.~~ Jason Hart is(Director of ActivIdentity on the date of transaction), was a stockholder, director and officer. Pursuant to an asset sale agreement between ActivIdentity and idOnDemand, upon closing of the transaction, idOnDemand issued 300,000 shares of its common stock to ActivIdentity. ActivIdentity held 10% of the shares of idOnDemand at closing. The carrying value of the idOnDemand shares for ~~fiscal~~as ~~year~~of September 30, 2010 and 2009, iswas zero.

OnThe ~~August 5~~Company paid rent of $256,000 ~~2005~~for fiscal 2008, ~~the~~respectively, ~~Company~~for ~~acquired~~office ~~Protocom~~facilities ~~Development~~in ~~Systems~~Australia ~~Pty~~to a company in which Mr. ~~Ltd.~~Hart ~~(Protocom)~~was ~~for~~a ~~cash~~major stockholder. As of September 30, ~~$21~~2008, the company in which Mr.0 ~~million~~Hart ~~and~~is ~~1,650,000~~a ~~shares~~major ofstockholder ~~Company~~no ~~common~~longer ~~stock,~~owned ~~and incurred~~the ~~direct~~property.

93 Subsequent to the resignation of Mr. Hart from the Company's Board of Director in August 2009, Mr. Hart is no longer a related party. At September 30, 2010, there were no balance sheet or income statement positions recorded in the consolidated financial statements relating to the above.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ~~ended~~Ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~2008~~2009, and ~~2007~~2008

1719. ~~Related~~Quarterly ~~Party~~Results ~~Transactions~~of Operations (~~Continued~~Unaudited)

acquisition-related costs of $625,000, for a total initial consideration of $29.2 million. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the Company agreed to issue up to an additional 2,100,000 shares of its common stock to the former Protocom stockholders, including Jason Hart, former CEO and current director of ActivIdentity, under an earn-out provision if revenue from products originally developed by Protocom prior to the acquisition achieved a revenue target between $13.6 million and $18.7 million during the one-year period ended June 30, 2006. Based on the Company's calculations of qualifying revenue credited to this earn-out right, it concluded that the revenue targets had not been met and no additional consideration was owed. The Company notified the Protocom stockholder representative in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 that none of the additional consideration would be paid. The Protocom stockholder representative objected to certain items in the Company's calculation and asserted that the Company breached certain covenants in accordance with the purchase agreement. In July 2007, the Company and the former Protocom stockholders executed a release and the Company agreed to pay $898,000 in connection therewith. Mr. Hart was entitled to receive approximately 68.7% of the additional earn-out payments. In May 2007, however, Mr. Hart irrevocably waived his right to receive 84% of his interest in any earn-out payments. Mr. Hart received a portion of the settlement payment in accordance with his interest in the payment (68.7%) less his waiver of 84% of that interest.

The Company paid rent of $256,000 and $221,000 for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, for office facilities in Australia to a company in which Mr. Hart is a major stockholder. As of September 30, 2008, the company in which Mr. Hart is a major stockholder no longer owns the property.

Table of Contents

ACTIVIDENTITY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007

18. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The Company believes that the following information reflects all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods presented. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. A summary of quarterly financial information for each of the last two fiscal years is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

	For the period ending
	For the Quarter Ended
For the fiscal years ending,	Sept. 30,			Jun. 30,		Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,
Fiscal Years Ended,	Sept. 30,			Jun. 30,		Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,
2010
Revenue	$	15,202		$	13,608	$	14,234	$	14,662
Cost of revenue		4,178			4,006		4,169		4,806
Gross margin		11,024			9,602		10,065		9,856
Loss from operations		(1,473	)

Filing Compare · ACTIVIDENTITY CORP