OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: Expires:	3235-0060 March 31, 2009
Estimated average burden hours per response …28.0

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT ~~Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~

~~Date~~Pursuant ofto ~~Report~~Section 13 OR 15(~~Date~~d) of ~~earliest~~The ~~event~~Securities ~~reported)~~Exchange ~~July~~Act 5,of ~~2006~~1934

~~BIG~~ Date ~~SKY~~of ~~ENERGY~~Report ~~CORPORATION~~ (~~Exact~~Date ~~name~~ of ~~registrant~~earliest asevent ~~specified~~reported) September in14, ~~its charter)~~2007

Nevada	0-28345	72-1381282
		BIG SKY ENERGY CORPORATION
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
		(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada		0-28345	72-1381282
(State or other jurisdiction		(Commission	(IRS Employer
of incorporation)		File Number)	Identification No.)
Ste 6, 8 Shepherd Market, Mayfair, London, UK			W1J 7JY
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)
		403.234.8885
		Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

750, ~~440~~ 444- 2 Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 5E9 (~~Address~~Former ofname ~~principal~~or ~~executive~~former ~~offices)~~address, ~~(Zip~~if ~~Code~~changed since last report.)

403.234.8885 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

X Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a -12)

~~Soliciting~~ Pre-commencement ~~material~~communications pursuant to Rule ~~14a~~14d-122(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.~~14a~~14d -122(b)) Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e -4(c))

~~Pre-commencement~~ Section ~~communications~~7 ~~pursuant~~Item to7.01. ~~Rule~~Regulation ~~14d-2(b)~~FD ~~under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240~~Disclosure.~~14d -2(b))~~

~~Pre-commencement~~ Contained ~~communications~~herein ~~pursuant~~is certain supplemental historical information relative to ~~Rule~~the ~~13e-4(c)~~Company’s ~~under~~subsidiaries, Vector Energy West LLP and KoZhaN LLP, and continuing disclosures regarding the ~~Exchange~~Company’s ~~Act~~ongoing ~~(17~~litigation ~~CFR~~matters ~~240.13e~~which were first made in its annual report on Form 10-~~4(c))~~KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 and bringing disclosure on these matters to current date.

~~Item~~ Vectro ~~3.02~~Energy ~~Unregistered~~West ~~Sales~~Atyrau ~~of Equity Securities.~~Block

On Proceedings ~~July~~Against 5,Ligostrade ~~2006,~~Services Big Sky Energy Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“Big Sky”), announced the closing of the private placement of a US$15,000,000 6.0% convertible note due June 30, 2008 (the “Note”). The Note is automatically convertible into common shares of the Company at a conversion price of US$1.22 (subject to certain adjustments) and under certain specific terms and conditions. Under certain circumstances, the Note is also redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time after June 30, 2007, at par plus accrued and unpaid interest. Interest on the Note is payable in cash on a semi-annual basis. Shakirov

~~The~~ As ~~use~~previously reported in the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, Vector Energy West LLP prepared an appeal the Almaty Specialised Inter-District Economic Court’s decision requiring VEW to transfer all geological and other data to Ligostrade. On July 26, 2007, this appeal to re-open the supervisory proceedings was rejected by the Supervisory Board of ~~proceeds~~the ~~from~~Republic of Kazakhstan Supreme Court. This concludes the official court proceedings within Kazakhstan. The Company is currently pursuing other actions in respect of this ~~financing~~matter, ~~will~~including bebut ~~used~~not limited to, ~~drill~~co-operation ~~additional~~with ~~wells~~the Kazakh authorities in ~~its~~respect ~~Morskoe~~to ~~Block~~criminal ~~(principally~~proceedings against the ~~Ogai~~perpetrators ~~Field)~~of ~~and~~the fraudulent activities underlying the ~~Dauletaly~~transfer ~~Block,~~of asthese ~~well~~licences. asMatters ~~for~~in ~~working~~the ~~capital~~Nevada Courts will also be progressed at the appropriate time.

~~Westwind~~ Kozhan ~~Partners (UK) Limited acted as sole agent to the Company in connection with the private placement of the Convertible Notes~~LLP.

~~Neither~~ Claim ~~the~~by ~~Note~~Spouses ~~nor the shares~~ of ~~common~~Former ~~stock~~Partners ~~that may be issued upon conversion~~ of the Note have been registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), or the securities laws of any jurisdiction. Such securities may not be offered, sold, hypothecated, given, bequeathed, transferred, assigned pledged, encumbered, or otherwise disposed of ("transferred") except pursuant to (i) a registration statement with respect to such securities that is effective under the Act and applicable state securities law, or (ii) any exemption from registration under the Act, and applicable state securities law, relating to the disposition of such securities.KoZhaN

~~SIGNATURES~~ As previously reported in the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, the determinative trial court proceedings took place on November 22, 2006 at which time the judge found in favour of the Company.

~~Pursuant~~ On toDecember 11, 2006 the ~~requirements~~Plaintiffs ofappealed the ~~Securities~~trial ~~Exchange~~court decision of ~~1934~~November 22, 2006 to the ~~registrant~~Civil ~~has~~Collegium ~~caused~~of Almaty City Court (the “Appellate Court”) requesting a cancellation of this ~~report~~decision toand that the case be ~~signed~~sent onback ~~its~~for ~~behalf~~new bytrial for the ~~undersigned~~reason ~~hereunto~~that ~~duly~~the ~~authorized~~trial court wrongly applied material law and did not investigate all circumstances of substantial significance.

~~DATE: July~~ The 11Appellate Court hearing was held on February 6, 2007. Despite Kozhan's advocate filing a motion for postponement of the hearing due to non-appearance of all the other co-defendants, the Appellate Court issued a ruling to cancel the trial court decision of November 22, 2006 and send the case back for new trial to the trial court. As a matter of Kazakhstan procedural law, a Resolution of the Appellate Court comes into force immediately and can be appealed to the supervisory court within one year from the date of such Resolution.

~~BIG~~ In ~~SKY~~February, ~~ENERGY~~the ~~CORPORATION~~Company retained the Kazakh Law Firm of Grata to represent it in further proceedings.

~~By: /s/~~ On SFebruary 19, 2007 KoZhaN appealed the Appellate Court Resolution of February 6, 2007.A At the preliminary hearings both appeals were rejected for substantial considerations by the Supervisory Panel of the Almaty City Court. ~~Sehsuvaroglu~~KoZhaN then appealed all of March 7, 2007, March 15, 2007, and February 6, 2007 decisions to the RK Supreme Court. As a matter of Kazakh Law, the RK Supreme Court is entitled to consider both resolutions of appellate panels of city courts and resolutions of supervisory panels of city courts.

~~Name: S.A.~~ Between ~~Sehsuvaroglu~~February 19, 2007 and July 6, 2007, a substantial number of legal and court administrative matters were conducted and several hearings, determinations, appeals and filings took place, none of which were of a definitive nature

~~Title: Chief~~ On ~~Executive~~July ~~Officer~~6, 2007 the Appellate Court hearing was held. The Plaintiffs` withdrew their Private Appeal on Resolution of the trial court dated May 16, 2007, by which the Plaintiffs` motion to seize KoZhaN`s assets were declined. On the revocation of the Sale Purchase Agreement, the Appellate Court declined the appeal and ~~Director~~the decision of the trial court dated April 26, 2007 was upheld. Kozhan immediately submitted to the General Prosecutor its motion with a request to suspend any execution of this adverse court decision.

On July 27, 2007 the General Prosecutor issued its Resolution, by which the execution of the court decision dated April 26, 2007 was suspended until a full investigation of all court case materials is conducted.

To further promote and enhance the Company’s actions in defending itself against these unsubstantiated attacks, the Company has entered into an agreement with Prime Legal Agency LLP, a Kazakhstan company whose expertise lies in inter-governmental and legal dispute resolution and foreign company guidance within the cultural mores of that region.

The information in this Item 7.01 shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

DATE: September 14, 2007
BIG SKY ENERGY CORPORATION

By: _/s/ Servet Harunoglu__

Name: Servet Harunoglu

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Filing Compare · BIG SKY ENERGY CORP