UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-13255

SOLUTIA INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		43-1781797
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

575 MARYVILLE CENTRE DRIVE, P.O. BOX 66760, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI		63166-6760
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(314) 674-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer X Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer Smaller Reporting Company ___ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by Court. Yes X No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		122,~~102~~734,~~743~~778

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SOLUTIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Sales	$	519		$	511		$	1,571		$	1,461
Cost of goods sold		370			353			1,090			996
Gross Profit		149			158			481			465
Selling, general and administrative expenses		65			62			187			194
Research and development expenses		6			5			17			13
Other operating expense (income), net		(30	)		3			(43	)		2
Operating Income		108			88			320			256
Interest expense		(24	)		(35	)		(78	)		(109	)
Other income (loss), net		-			2			(1	)		15
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		(2	)		-			(4	)		(89	)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		82			55			237			73
Income tax expense		6			7			25			26
Income from Continuing Operations		76			48			212			47
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax		-			2			-			(13	)
Net Income		76			50			212			34
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		1			2			4			3
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	75		$	48		$	208		$	31
Basic Income (Loss) per Share attributable to Solutia:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.62		$	0.38		$	1.74		$	0.37
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations		-			0.02			-			(0.11	)
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	0.62		$	0.40		$	1.74		$	0.26
Diluted Income (Loss) per Share attributable to Solutia:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.62		$	0.38		$	1.71		$	0.37
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations		-			0.02			-			(0.11	)
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	0.62		$	0.40		$	1.71		$	0.26

SOLUTIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
		Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)
		March 31,
(Unaudited)
		2012				2011
	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
Net Sales		$	498			$	509
	September 30,								September 30,
Cost of goods sold			340				347
	2011				2010				2011				2010
Gross Profit			158				162
Net Income		$	76			$	50			$	212			$	34
Selling, general and administrative expenses			75				62
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Research and development expenses			8				6
Accumulated currency adjustments			(79	)			92				2				3
Other operating income, net			(1	)			(11	)
Postretirement adjustments			2				-				5				3
Operating Income			76				105
Hedging activity adjustments			(4	)			(2	)			(6	)			-
Interest expense			(23	)			(28	)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)			(5	)			140				213				40
Other loss, net			-				(1	)
Comprehensive Income attributable to noncontrolling interest			1				2				4				3
Loss on debt modification			-				(2	)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) attributable to Solutia		$	(6	)		$	138			$	209			$	37
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense			53				74
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income tax expense (benefit)			(1	)			8
Net Income			54				66
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest			1				1
Net Income attributable to Solutia		$	53			$	65
Basic and Diluted Income per Share attributable to Solutia:
Basic Net Income		$	0.44			$	0.54
Diluted Net Income		$	0.43			$	0.54

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,

	2012			2011

Net Income		$	54		$	66
Other Comprehensive Income:
Accumulated currency adjustments			27			57
Postretirement adjustments			3			1
Hedging activity adjustments			1			2
Comprehensive Income			85			126
Comprehensive Income attributable to noncontrolling interest			2			1
Comprehensive Income attributable to Solutia		$	83		$	125

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLUTIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~170~~108		$	~~191~~113
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $4 in 2011 and 2010		240			228
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $6 in 2012 and 2011		221			236
Miscellaneous receivables		7174			75
Inventories		~~356~~384			~~275~~335
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3228			27
Current assets of discontinued operations		1			51
Total Current Assets		~~870~~816			~~801~~787
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		~~917~~953			~~911~~945
Goodwill		~~742~~789			~~740~~783
Net Identified Intangible Assets		~~912~~916			~~938~~916
Other Assets		~~134~~90			~~147~~95
Total Assets	$	3,~~575~~564		$	3,~~537~~526
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~193~~181		$	~~173~~186
Accrued liabilities		~~231~~210			~~235~~227
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		5			158
Total Current Liabilities		~~429~~396			~~423~~421
Long-Term Debt		1,~~337~~338			1,~~463~~337
Postretirement Liabilities		~~270~~287			308
Environmental Remediation Liabilities		~~230~~219			~~244~~227
Deferred Tax Liabilities		~~226~~183			~~238~~190
Non-current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		2218			2518
Other Liabilities		~~101~~96			9798
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Equity:
Common stock at $0.01 par value; (500,000,000 shares authorized, 123,316,852 and
Common stock at $0.01 par value; (500,000,000 shares authorized, 124,245,832 and
122,655,811 shares issued in 2011and 2010, respectively)		1			1
123,316,852 shares issued in 2012 and 2011, respectively)		1			1
Additional contributed capital		1,~~653~~672			1,~~634~~651
Treasury shares, at cost (1,214,109 in 2011 and 772,686 in 2010)		(13	)		(6	)
Treasury shares, at cost (1,511,054 in 2012 and 1,247,183 in 2011)		(20	)		(13	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(~~193~~248	)		(~~194~~279	)
Accumulated deficit		(~~495~~388	)		(~~703~~441	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity attributable to Solutia		~~953~~1,017			~~732~~919
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest		710			78
Total Equity		~~960~~1,027			~~739~~927
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,~~575~~564		$	3,~~537~~526
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLUTIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
	Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	March 31,
	2011			2010
	2012			2011
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	~~212~~54		$	3466
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		-			13
Depreciation and amortization		30			32
Depreciation and amortization		94			84
Pension contributions in excess of expense		(18	)		-
Pension contributions in excess of expense		(28	)		(51	)
Other postretirement benefit contributions in excess of expense		-			(4	)
Other postretirement benefit contributions in excess of expense		(6	)		(13	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount		1			1
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount		3			7
Deferred income taxes		(6	)		6
Deferred income taxes		(8	)		(13	)
Share-based compensation expense		6			5
Share-based compensation expense		13			15
Other charges:
Non-cash loss on deferred debt issuance cost and debt discount write-off		-			80
Other (gains) charges, including restructuring expenses		15			(3	)
Other (gains) charges, including restructuring expenses		(21	)		27
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Income taxes payable		(3	)		11(3	)
Trade receivables		~~(17~~15	)		7(37	)
Inventories		(8551	)		(2423	)
Accounts payable		186			~~(22~~16	)
Environmental remediation liabilities		(148	)		(101	)
Other assets and liabilities		(1428	)		66(6	)
Cash Provided by Operations – Continuing Operations		~~144~~19			~~211~~49
Cash Used in Operations – Discontinued Operations		(10	)		(26	)
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations – Discontinued Operations		(3	)		3
Cash Provided by Operations		~~134~~16			~~185~~52
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment purchases		(7027	)		(2817	)
Acquisition related payments, net of cash acquired		(9	)		(371	)
Restricted cash		-			(5	)
Asset disposals and investment sales		60-			329
Other		1-			-1
Cash Used in Investing Activities – Continuing Operations		(18	)		(396	)
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		(27	)		8
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities – Discontinued Operations		1			(3	)
Cash Used in Investing Activities		(17	)		(399	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt obligations		-			1,144
Payment of long-term debt obligations		-			(77	)
Payment of long-term debt obligations		(127	)		(908	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(7	)		(2	)
Payment of short-term debt obligations		-			(16	)
Stock option exercises		15			2
Debt issuance costs		-			(27	)
Other, net		(4	)		(3	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(7	)		(4	)
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		4			(80	)
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest		(4	)		(4	)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		2			2
Other, net		(2	)		(9	)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(5	)		(18	)
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		(140	)		176
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		2			(24	)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(21	)		(62	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period		~~191~~113			~~243~~191
End of period	$	~~170~~108		$	~~181~~173
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments for interest	$	7821		$	7526
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds	$	379		$	2814
Cash payments related to the pending merger with Eastman Chemical Company	$	9		$	-
Non-Cash Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable	$	128		$	7
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLUTIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
	Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia
								Accumulated						Equity
			Additional					Other						Attributable to
	Common		Contributed		Treasury			Comprehensive			Accumulated			Noncontrolling			Total
	Stock		Capital		Stock			Loss			Decifit			Interest			Equity
Beginning Balance – January 1, 2010	$	1	$	1,612	$	(2	)	$	(237	)	$	(781	)	$	7		$	600
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		-			-			31			3			34
Accumulated currency adjustments		-		-		-			3			-			-			3
Postretirement adjustments		-		-		-			3			-			-			3
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest		-		-		-			-			-			(4	)		(4	)
Treasury stock purchases		-		-		(4	)		-			-			-			(4	)
Share-based compensation expense		-		15		-			-			-			-			15
Ending Balance – September 30, 2010	$	1	$	1,627	$	(6	)	$	(231	)	$	(750	)	$	6		$	647
Beginning Balance – January 1, 2011	$	1	$	1,634	$	(6	)	$	(194	)	$	(703	)	$	7		$	739
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		-		-		-			-			208			4			212
Accumulated currency adjustments		-		-		-			2			-			-			2
Postretirement adjustments		-		-		-			5			-			-			5
Hedging activity adjustments		-		-		-			(6	)		-			-			(6	)
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest		-		-		-			-			-			(4	)		(4	)
Treasury stock purchases		-		-		(7	)		-			-			-			(7	)
Stock option exercises		-		4		-			-			-			-			4
Share-based compensation expense		-		15		-			-			-			-			15
Ending Balance – September 30, 2011	$	1	$	1,653	$	(13	)	$	(193	)	$	(495	)	$	7		$	960
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLUTIA INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(Dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)

	Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia
								Accumulated						Equity
			Additional					Other						Attributable to
	Common		Contributed		Treasury			Comprehensive			Accumulated			Noncontrolling		Total
	Stock		Capital		Stock			Loss			Decifit			Interest		Equity
Beginning Balance – January 1, 2011	$	1	$	1,634	$	(6	)	$	(194	)	$	(703	)	$	7	$	739
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		-			-			65			1		66
Accumulated currency adjustments		-		-		-			57			-			-		57
Postretirement adjustments		-		-		-			1			-			-		1
Hedging activity adjustments		-		-		-			2			-			-		2
Treasury stock purchases		-		-		(2	)		-			-			-		(2	)
Stock option exercises		-		2		-			-			-			-		2
Share-based compensation expense		-		5		-			-			-			-		5
Ending Balance – March 31, 2011	$	1	$	1,641	$	(8	)	$	(134	)	$	(638	)	$	8	$	870

Beginning Balance – January 1, 2012	$	1	$	1,651	$	(13	)	$	(279	)	$	(441	)	$	8	$	927
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-		-		-			-			53			1		54
Accumulated currency adjustments		-		-		-			27			-			1		28
Postretirement adjustments		-		-		-			3			-			-		3
Hedging activity adjustments		-		-		-			1			-			-		1
Treasury stock purchases		-		-		(7	)		-			-			-		(7	)
Stock option exercises		-		15		-			-			-			-		15
Share-based compensation expense		-		6		-			-			-			-		6
Ending Balance – March 31, 2012	$	1	$	1,672	$	(20	)	$	(248	)	$	(388	)	$	10	$	1,027

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “Solutia”, “Company”, “we” and “our” in this report refer to Solutia Inc. and its subsidiaries. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have not been audited but have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, this Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Solutia’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods reported. Financial information for the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal year ~~2011~~2012 should not be annualized due to the seasonality of our business.

2. Merger, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Discontinued Operations

Merger

On January 26, 2012, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Eastman Chemical Company (“Eastman”) and Eagle Merger Sub Corporation (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastman. The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Solutia, with Solutia surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastman (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Solutia will be converted into the right to receive (i) $22.00 in cash, without interest, and (ii) 0.12 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of Eastman.

The closing of the merger is subject to a number of conditions precedent described in the Merger Agreement, including (i) approval of the Merger by the stockholders of the Company, (ii) expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the receipt of foreign antitrust clearances, (iii) absence of any law or regulation that prohibits the consummation of the Merger, (iv) effectiveness of the registration on Form S-4 to be filed by Eastman with the Securities and Exchange Commission related to the Merger and (v) approval of the shares of Eastman common stock to be issued in the Merger for listing on the New York Stock Exchange. Each party’s obligation to close the Merger is also subject to the material accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party in the Merger Agreement and the compliance in all material respects with covenants of the other party in the Merger Agreement and the absence of a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement) on the other party.

The Merger Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants of the parties. The Merger Agreement contains termination rights of Solutia and Eastman and further provides that we will be required to pay Eastman a termination fee of $102 million under certain specified circumstances of termination of the Merger Agreement.

In conjunction with the Merger Agreement, we incurred $11 of merger-related expenses, including legal, financial advisor and accounting fees, during the three months ended March 31, 2012. These costs were recorded to Unallocated and Other selling, general and administrative expenses.

Acquisitions

On ~~March~~November 2423, 2011, we ~~entered~~purchased ~~into~~100 anpercent ~~agreement~~of tothe ~~acquire~~shares ~~select~~of ~~assets~~Southwall ~~from~~Technologies aInc. ~~leading~~(“Southwall”) ~~conductive film manufacturing firm based in Taiwan~~ for $~~7 with an option to purchase additional assets for $3, which was subsequently exercised~~113. ~~The~~Southwall ~~combined~~is ~~purchase~~a ~~price~~leading innovator of ~~$10,~~energy-saving ~~which~~films ~~was~~and ~~paid~~glass ~~during~~products for the ~~nine~~automotive ~~months ended September 30, 2011~~ and ~~classified~~architectural asmarkets. The aSouthwall ~~component~~acquisition ofwill ~~property,~~enable ~~plant~~us ~~and~~to ~~equipment,~~combine ~~represents~~Southwall’s state-of-the ~~estimated~~art ~~fair value of~~ manufacturing ~~capacity used in the production of conductive film used in touch screens~~facilities, ~~solar~~proprietary ~~applications~~technologies and ~~e-readers. Results~~innovative ~~from~~products ~~the~~with ~~operations~~Solutia’s ofglobal ~~these~~capabilities ~~assets~~and ~~are~~diverse ~~included~~market ~~in our Performance Films reportable segment~~scope.

OnThe ~~April~~Southwall ~~30,~~acquisition ~~2010,~~was weaccounted ~~purchased~~for ~~100~~as ~~percent~~a ofbusiness ~~the~~combination, ~~shares~~and ofaccordingly, ~~Novomatrix~~its ~~Pte.~~assets ~~Ltd.~~and ~~(“Novomatrix”)~~liabilities ~~for~~were ~~$73,~~recorded ~~which~~at ~~was~~their ~~subsequently~~estimated ~~adjusted~~fair ~~down~~value. The $1purchase ~~pursuant~~price toallocation afor ~~working~~Southwall ~~capital adjustment. Novomatrix~~ is asubject ~~leader~~to inadditional ~~branding,~~adjustments ~~marketing~~to ~~and~~recorded ~~distributing~~fair ~~performance~~value ~~window~~relating ~~films catering~~ to ~~the~~(i) ~~premium~~completion ~~segment~~of invaluation ~~the~~reports ~~automotive~~associated ~~and~~with ~~architectural~~fixed ~~markets. The~~assets ~~Novomatrix~~and ~~acquisition~~identified ~~allows~~intangible usassets, to(ii) ~~support~~deferred ~~our~~tax ~~growth~~assets ~~strategy~~and ~~for~~liabilities ~~our~~and ~~Performance~~(iii) ~~Films~~adjustments ~~reportable~~to ~~segment~~the byamount ~~expanding~~of ~~our~~recorded ~~product~~goodwill. The ~~offerings~~following ~~and~~table ~~global~~summarizes ~~footprint~~the ~~into~~fair ~~key~~values ~~emerging~~of ~~regions~~the ~~through Novomatrix’s~~assets ~~well-established~~acquired ~~network~~and inliabilities ~~Southeast~~assumed ~~Asia~~at ~~and~~ the ~~Middle~~date ~~East.~~of acquisition:

On June 1, 2010, we purchased 100 percent of the shares of Etimex Solar GmbH (“Vistasolar”) for $294 and $3 of incremental working capital. Vistasolar is a leading supplier of EVA encapsulants to the photovoltaic market and enables us to expand our Advanced Interlayers product portfolio into each of the dominant photovoltaic encapsulant technologies.

The Novomatrix and Vistasolar acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities were recorded at their estimated fair value. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of both acquisitions:

	Novomatrix		Vistasolar
	April 30, 2010		June 1, 2010
Assets:
Trade receivables	$	2	$	10
Miscellaneous receivables		1		-
Inventories		9		3
Property, plant and equipment		-		16
Identified intangible assets		50		119
Goodwill		25		187
Total assets acquired	$	87	$	335
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4	$	2
Accrued liabilities		3		1
Postretirement liabilities		-		1
Deferred tax liabilities		8		34
Total liabilities assumed	$	15	$	38

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Goodwill largely consists of expected growth synergies through the application of each company’s innovative technologies and expansion of distribution channels in emerging markets in addition to cost synergies resulting from manufacturing and supply chain work process improvements. Goodwill resulting from both acquisitions is not deductible for tax purposes.

	Southwall
	November 23, 2011
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8
Trade receivables		3
Intercompany receivables		6
Miscellaneous receivables		2
Inventories		12
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1
Property, plant and equipment		21
Identified intangible assets		24
Goodwill		52
Total assets acquired	$	129

Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4
Accrued liabilities		5
Long-term debt		4
Deferred tax liabilities		2
Other liabilities		1
Total liabilities assumed	$	16

~~The~~Goodwill ~~following~~largely ~~table~~consists ~~presents the weighted average life in years and the gross carrying value~~ of ~~the~~expected ~~identified~~growth ~~intangible~~synergies ~~assets~~through ~~included in net identified intangible assets within~~ the ~~Consolidated~~application ~~Statement~~ of ~~Financial Position on~~ the ~~date~~acquired ofcompany’s ~~acquisition~~innovative ~~for~~technologies ~~the Novomatrix~~ and ~~Vistasolar~~cost ~~acquisitions. The~~synergies ~~fair~~resulting ~~value~~from ofmanufacturing ~~the~~and ~~identified~~supply ~~intangible~~chain ~~assets~~work ~~was~~process ~~determined using Level 3 inputs as defined by U~~improvements.S. Goodwill ~~GAAP~~resulting ~~under~~from the ~~fair~~Southwall ~~value~~acquisition ~~hierarchy,~~is ~~which~~not ~~included~~deductible ~~valuation~~for ~~reports~~tax ~~prepared by third party appraisal firms~~purposes.

	Novomatrix			Vistasolar
	April 30, 2010			June 1, 2010
	Weighted			Weighted
	Average	Carrying		Average	Carrying
	Life in Years	Value		Life in Years	Value
Technology	-	$	-	20	$	25
Customer relationships	17		29	25		81
Other	5		1	3		5
Trademarks	N/A		20	N/A		8
Total identified intangible assets	17	$	50	23	$	119
Total weighted average life in years	22

The following table presents the weighted average life in years and the gross carrying value of the identified intangible assets included in net identified intangible assets within the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position on the date of acquisition for the Southwall acquisition. The fair value of the identified intangible assets was determined using Level 3 inputs as defined by U.S. GAAP under the fair value hierarchy, which included valuation reports prepared by third party appraisal firms.

Effective May 1, 2010 and June 1, 2010, results from the operations of Novomatrix and Vistasolar, respectively, have been included in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. In conjunction with these acquisitions, we incurred $7 of costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 that were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.

	Southwall
	November 23, 2011
	Weighted Average		Carrying
	Life in Years		Value
Technology		12		$	11
Customer relationships		14			11
Trademarks		N/A			2
Total identified intangible assets		13		$	24

~~The~~Effective ~~following~~November ~~pro~~23, ~~forma~~2011, ~~financial~~results ~~information~~from ~~presents~~ the ~~combined results of~~ operations of ~~Solutia~~Southwall ~~for~~have ~~the~~been ~~prior~~included ~~year~~in ~~presented~~our asConsolidated ifStatement ~~the Novomatrix and Vistasolar acquisitions had occurred at the beginning~~ of ~~2010~~ Operations. ~~The~~Financial ~~pro forma~~ results ~~below~~in ~~are~~the ~~not~~current ~~necessarily~~period ~~indicative~~and ofpro ~~what~~forma ~~actually~~information ~~would~~related ~~have~~to ~~occurred had~~ the ~~acquisitions~~Southwall ~~been~~acquisition are innot ~~effect~~presented ~~for~~because the ~~periods~~impact ~~presented~~on ~~and~~the ~~should~~Company’s ~~not be taken as representation of our future~~ consolidated results of operations~~. Pro~~ ~~forma~~is ~~results~~not ~~are~~considered asto ~~follows:~~be significant.

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010		September 30, 2010
Net sales	$	511	$	1,516
Net income	$	50	$	45
Net income per basic and dilutive share	$	0.42	$	0.38
Net income attributable to Solutia	$	48	$	42
Net income attributable to Solutia per basic and dilutive share	$	0.40	$	0.35

Divestitures

~~Certain~~In ~~Other~~the ~~Rubber~~first ~~Chemicals~~quarter ~~Businesses~~2011, we sold certain businesses and selected assets previously included in our Technical Specialties reportable segment whereby we recognized a gain of $17 in other operating income, net.

In the first quarter 2011, we sold certain businesses and selected assets previously included in our Technical Specialties reportable segment whereby we recognized a gain of $17 in other operating expense (income), net during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Our decision to exit these businesses is consistent with our strategy of focusing on businesses that are leaders in their global markets and that have sustainable competitive advantages.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Plastic Products

On September 1, 2010, we sold the remaining portion of our former plastic products business, which was based in Europe, for $3. We recognized a loss of $5 in other operating expense (income), net related to this sale in Unallocated and Other.

Discontinued Operations

On April 22, 2010, due to overcapacity within the industry, a disadvantaged cost position and increasing pressure from Far Eastern producers, we made the decision to exit our Primary Accelerators business and to cease manufacturing of SANTOCURE® primary accelerator products at the Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”) facility in Antwerp, Belgium, where we operated as a guest. Our decision to exit this business is consistent with our strategy of focusing on businesses that are leaders in their global markets and that have sustainable competitive advantages. Manufacturing of these products, the financial results of which had previously been included in our Technical Specialties reportable segment, ceased in the third quarter 2010.

OnThe ~~April~~assets ~~22, 2010, due to overcapacity within the industry, a disadvantaged cost position~~ and ~~increasing~~liabilities ~~pressure~~of ~~from Far Eastern producers, we made the decision to exit~~ our former Primary Accelerators business ~~and to cease manufacturing of SANTOCURE® primary accelerator products at the Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”) facility in Antwerp~~, ~~Belgium,~~classified ~~where we operated~~ as adiscontinued guest. Our decision to exit this business is consistent with our strategy of focusing on businesses that are leaders in their global markets and that have sustainable competitive advantages. Manufacturing of these productsoperations, ~~the~~consist ~~financial results~~ of ~~which had previously been included in our Technical Specialties reportable segment, ceased in~~ the ~~third quarter 2010. Accordingly, we have reported the results of Primary Accelerators as a discontinued operation.~~following:

A summary of the net sales and income (loss) from discontinued operations related to our Primary Accelerators business is as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Assets:
Trade and miscellaneous receivables, net	$	1	$	1
Current assets of discontinued operations	$	1	$	1

Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	5	$	8
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	$	5	$	8

Other liabilities	$	18	$	18
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations	$	18	$	18

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Primary Accelerators:
Operating results:
Net sales	$	-	$	12		$	-	$	46
Loss before income taxes	$	-	$	(5	)	$	-	$	(46	)
Income tax benefit		-		(7	)		-		(16	)
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	-	$	2		$	-	$	(30	)

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Included in the results of discontinued operations are $6 and $44 of pre-tax expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to the shutdown of this business. The shutdown expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 include $6 for the impairment of long-lived assets determined using a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined by U.S. GAAP under the fair value hierarchy.

The assets and liabilities of our Primary Accelerators business, classified as discontinued operations, consist of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Assets:
Trade and miscellaneous receivables, net	$	1	$	5
Current assets of discontinued operations	$	1	$	5
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	5	$	15
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	$	5	$	15
Other liabilities	$	22	$	25
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations	$	22	$	25
Total liabilities	$	27	$	40

Integrated Nylon

On June 1, 2009, we sold substantially all the assets and certain liabilities, including environmental remediation liabilities and pension liabilities of active employees, of our Integrated Nylon business to S.K. Capital Partners II, L.P. (the “Buyer”). As part of the sale agreement, we retained an ownership interest in the Integrated Nylon business of approximately 2 percent. At the time of sale, we agreed to reimburse the Buyer for indirect residual costs incurred by them resulting from a disputed contractual matter with a guest at the Integrated Nylon plant in Alvin, Texas. Accordingly, our estimate of the loss associated with the damages and cost reimbursements associated with this contingent liability was accrued in 2009. On April 30, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement that resolved all outstanding matters with the guest in exchange for payment by us of $17. Separately, we entered into an agreement with the Buyer whereby our liability for indirect residual costs at the plant was settled in exchange for a payment by us of $4. Each settlement became effective and was paid in 2010. Based on the terms of the settlements, we recognized a gain of $17 in the second quarter 2010 in the results from discontinued operations.

A summary of the income from discontinued operations related to our Integrated Nylon business is as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Integrated Nylon:
Operating results:
Income before income taxes		$	-		$	17
Income tax expense			-			-
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		$	-		$	17

In the third quarter 2011, we sold our remaining 2% ownership interest in Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc., previously our Integrated Nylon business, for $31, resulting in a gain of $29 being recorded in other operating expense (income), net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

3. Share-Based Compensation

Stock Options

We ~~granted~~did ~~options~~not togrant ~~purchase~~any aoptions ~~total of 905,617 shares of common stock to eligible employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2011~~ under our 2007 Management Long-Term Incentive Plan (“or 2007 ~~Management~~Non-Employee ~~Plan”). The~~Director ~~options~~Stock ~~granted~~Compensation ~~(i)~~Plan ~~have~~during anthe ~~exercise~~three ~~price~~months ~~equal~~ended toMarch ~~the~~31, ~~quoted~~2012. A ~~market~~summary ~~price~~ of ~~the common~~ stock onoption ~~the~~information ~~grant~~as ~~date, (ii) become exercisable in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries~~ of ~~the~~March ~~grant date~~31, ~~subject~~2012 tois ~~the~~as employee’s continued employment and (iii) expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. We did not grant any options under our 2007 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan (“2007 Director Plan”) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.follows:

	Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (a)
Vested or Expected to Vest at March 31, 2012	2,215,771	$	18.93	7.5	$	20
Exercisable at March 31, 2012	1,093,121	$	18.07	6.6	$	11

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

We determine the fair value of stock options at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model, which requires us to make several assumptions including risk-free interest rate, expected dividends and volatility. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect for the expected term of the options at the time of grant. The dividend yield on our common stock is assumed to be zero since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so. Due to our emergence from bankruptcy in 2008, our historical volatility data and employee stock option exercise patterns were not considered in determining the volatility data and expected life assumptions. Instead, volatility assumptions were based on (i) historical volatilities of the stock of comparable chemical companies whose shares are traded using daily stock price returns over a term equivalent to the expected term of the options and (ii) implied volatility. The expected life of an option was determined based on a simplified assumption that the option will be exercised evenly from the time it becomes exercisable to expiration.

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was determined based on the following weighted average assumptions:

	September 30, 2011
Expected volatility		38.56	%
Expected term (in years)		6.3
Risk-free rate		2.84	%
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	9.77

A summary of stock option information as of September 30, 2011 is as follows:

	Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (a)
Vested or Expected to Vest at September 30, 2011	3,163,930	$	18.59	7.8	$	-
Exercisable at September 30, 2011	1,826,724	$	17.41	6.8	$	-

(a) Intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted market price of our common stock as of the reporting date.

During each of the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~for~~March ~~both September 30~~31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, we recognized $21 ~~and $4~~ of compensation expense related to our stock options~~, respectively~~. Pre-tax unrecognized compensation expense for stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, was $108 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 which will be recognized as expense over a remaining weighted-average period of 2 years.

~~Restricted Stock Awards~~8

We granted 440,180 shares of restricted stock awards with a weighted average grant date fair value of $25.16 per share to certain employees under our 2007 Management Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Half of the 2007 Management Plan shares vest upon completion of a service condition and the remaining half of the shares vest based upon the attainment of certain performance and market conditions (“Performance Shares”). The service condition shares vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date and the Performance Shares vest in 2014 if attainment of the performance and market conditions is achieved. The actual vesting of the Performance Shares could range from zero to 175 percent of the targeted number of shares depending upon actual performance.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

WeRestricted ~~granted~~Stock 25,048 shares of restricted stock awards as an annual equity retainer with a weighted average grant date fair value of $24.41 per share to our non-employee directors under the 2007 Director Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The shares vest in three equal installments, with the first installment vesting as of the date of the grant and the remaining vesting equally on the first and second anniversary of the grant date.Awards

~~During~~We ~~the~~did ~~three~~not ~~and~~grant ~~nine~~any restricted stock awards under our 2007 Management Plan or 2007 Director Plan during the three months ended ~~for~~March ~~both~~31, ~~September~~2012. During 30the three months ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, we recognized $45 and $114 of compensation expense, ~~respectively,~~ related to our restricted stock awards, respectively. Pre-tax unrecognized compensation expense for restricted stock awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was $1611 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 which will be recognized as expense over a remaining weighted average period of 21.5 years.

Phantom Stock Awards

We granted 486,598 phantom stock unit awards with a weighted average grant date fair value of $28.15 per unit to certain employees under our 2007 Management Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2012. These vest upon completion of a service condition in four equal installments upon the first, second, third, and fourth anniversary of the grant date. Upon that anniversary, the holder is entitled to cash equal to the fair market value of the vested awards at the time vesting occurs. Therefore the grant has been accounted for as a liability award. During the three months ended March, 31, 2012, the expense recognized on these awards was less than $1. Pre-tax unrecognized compensation expense for phantom stock awards was $13 as of March 31, 2012 which will be recognized as expense over a remaining weighted average period of 2.5 years.

4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill by reportable segment is as follows:

	Advanced			Performance				Technical
	Interlayers			Films				Specialties			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010		$	407		$	186			$	147		$	740
Balance at December 31, 2011		$	402		$	234			$	147		$	783
Currency fluctuations			36			(1-	)			-			26
Balance at September 30, 2011		$	410		$	185			$	147		$	742
Balance at March 31, 2012		$	408		$	234			$	147		$	789

We do not have any goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes.

Identified Intangible Assets

Identified intangible assets are comprised of (i) amortizable customer relationships, unpatented technology, contract-based intangible assets, trade names and patents and (ii) indefinite-lived trademarks not subject to amortization. These intangible assets are summarized in aggregate as follows:

	September 30, 2011											December 31, 2010
	March 31, 2012											December 31, 2011
	Estimated											Estimated
	Useful	Gross							Net			Useful	Gross							Net
	Life in	Carrying			Accumulated				Carrying			Life in	Carrying			Accumulated				Carrying
	Years	Value			Amortization				Value			Years	Value			Amortization				Value
Amortizable intangible assets:
Customer relationships	1310 to 27		$	~~609~~621		$	(7487	)		$	~~535~~534	1310 to 27		$	~~606~~614		$	(5679	)		$	~~550~~535
Technology	5 to 26			~~226~~236			(3743	)			~~189~~193	5 to 26			~~225~~233			(2940	)			~~196~~193
Trade names	105 to 25			19			(2	)			17	105 to 25			2019			(12	)			1917
Patents	13			5			(2	)			3	13			5			(12	)			43
Other	31 to 5			6			(34	)			32	31 to 5			6			(13	)			53
Non-amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks				~~165~~167			-				~~165~~167				~~164~~165			-				~~164~~165
Total identified intangible assets			$	1,~~030~~054		$	(~~118~~138	)		$	~~912~~916			$	1,~~026~~042		$	(88126	)		$	~~938~~916

119

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Amortization expense for intangible assets and its allocation to cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows:

	Three Months Ended						~~Nine Months Ended~~
	September 30,						September 30,
	March 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	2012			2011
Cost of goods sold		$	3		$	3		$	9		$	8
Selling, general and administrative expenses			7			7			21			17
Total		$	10		$	10		$	30		$	25

We expect toannual ~~recognize~~ amortization expense for intangible assets ofto be approximately $3941 ~~for~~in ~~each~~2012 ofand ~~the~~$38 ~~years~~each ~~ending~~year ~~December~~from ~~31,~~2013 ~~2011~~ through ~~2015~~2016.

5. Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

Components of inventories are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,
Inventories	~~2011~~2012		~~2010~~2011
Finished goods	$	~~211~~220	$	~~163~~190
Goods in process		4563		3651
Raw materials and supplies		~~100~~101		7694
Inventories	$	~~356~~384	$	~~275~~335

On January 1, 2010 we changed our method of accounting for inventories in the United States, excluding supplies, from determining cost using the LIFO method to determining cost using the FIFO method, consistent with all of our other operations. We believe this change is preferable as the FIFO method better reflects the current value of inventories on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and provides a uniform costing method across our global operations. Prior financial statements were not retroactively adjusted due to immateriality. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $1 was recorded as an increase to cost of goods sold as of January 1, 2010.

Components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
Property, Plant and Equipment	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011
Land	$	35		$	35
Leasehold improvements		1011			108
Buildings		216			~~214~~209
Machinery and equipment		~~835~~874			~~796~~852
Construction in progress		85103			54101
Total property, plant and equipment		1,~~181~~239			1,~~109~~205
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(~~264~~286	)		(~~198~~260	)
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment	$	~~917~~953		$	~~911~~945

1210

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Components of accrued liabilities are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,
Accrued Liabilities	~~2011~~2012		~~2010~~2011
Wages and benefits	$	4132	$	4544
Foreign currency and interest rate derivative agreements		2520		1722
Restructuring reserves		43		53
Environmental remediation liabilities		29		29
Accrued income taxes payable		710		1910
Accrued taxes other than income		1612		2710
Accrued selling expenses		1514		1715
Accrued interest		1516		13
Other		7974		6381
Accrued Liabilities	$	~~231~~210	$	~~235~~227

6. Income Taxes

Income Tax Expense

We recorded net income tax ~~expense~~benefit of $61 and ~~$25 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and~~ net income tax expense of $78 ~~and $26~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2012 and 2011, respectively. Our income tax expense is affected by changes in unrecognized tax benefits and the mix of income and losses in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. For the three ~~and~~months ~~nine month periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2012 and 2011, discrete tax benefits of $512 and $92, respectively, were recognized. Most ~~while~~of ~~for~~ the ~~three~~discrete ~~and~~tax ~~nine~~benefit ~~month~~recognized ~~periods~~in the period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010,~~2012 ~~discrete~~was due to the reversal of a deferred tax ~~benefits~~liability related to the extension of $4the ~~and~~Company's ~~$10,~~tax ~~respectively,~~holiday ~~were~~in ~~recognized~~Malaysia. ~~Income~~ The ~~tax~~remaining ~~expense~~discrete ~~recorded~~items in ~~the~~both ~~three~~periods ~~and~~were ~~nine~~primarily ~~months~~due ~~ended~~to ~~September~~the ~~30,~~expiration ~~2011~~of ~~relates~~certain ~~only~~foreign toaudit ~~foreign~~periods ~~jurisdictions~~and ~~because~~the were-measurement ~~have~~of aother ~~U.S.~~uncertain ~~net~~tax ~~operating~~positions ~~loss~~due ~~deferred~~to ~~tax~~events ~~asset,~~in ~~against~~the ~~which~~current aperiod. Income ~~full~~tax ~~valuation~~expense ~~allowance~~recorded ~~has~~during ~~been~~both ~~provided. For~~periods ~~the~~of ~~three~~2012 and ~~nine~~2011 ~~months~~relates ~~ended~~only ~~September~~to ~~30,~~foreign ~~2010,~~jurisdictions because we ~~experienced~~have a ~~loss from~~ U.S. ~~operations~~net ~~but~~operating noloss ~~income~~deferred tax ~~benefit~~asset, ~~was~~against ~~recognized~~which as a full valuation allowance has been provided ~~against the U~~.~~S. deferred tax assets.~~

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, inclusive of interest and penalties, at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was $~~168~~150 and $~~167~~148, respectively. Included in the ~~balance~~balances at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 were $6949 ~~and $68, respectively,~~ of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The increase in the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits is mainly the effect of tax positions with respect to events in the current year ~~offset~~and bycurrency ~~the~~exchange ~~reevaluation~~rate offluctuations, ~~tax~~partially ~~positions~~offset ~~not~~by ~~yet~~statute ~~settled, the closure~~ of ~~tax~~limitation ~~audits and currency exchange rate fluctuations~~expirations.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002~~. With~~ ~~few~~or ~~exceptions, we are no longer subject to~~ foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006. It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months as a result of the resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations and appeals, and the expiration of various statutes of limitation that the unrecognized tax benefits that would ~~affect~~impact the effective tax rate will decrease by a range of zero to $24 and the unrecognized tax benefits that would not ~~affect~~impact the effective tax rate will decrease by a range of zero to $153.

7. Restructuring Reserves

In an effort to maintain competitiveness across our businesses and the geographic areas in which we operate and to enhance the efficiency and cost effectiveness of our support operations, we periodically initiate certain restructuring activities which result in charges for costs associated with exit or disposal activities, severance and/or impairment of long-lived assets. Many of these activities are associated with certain strategic divestitures or plant shut-downs executed in order to eliminate non-core products that lack a sustainable competitive advantage. The region that has historically been most significantly impacted by these actions has been Europe.

13To right-size our support structure in Europe and lower our operating costs in the region, we relocated our European regional headquarters in 2011 from a building located in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (“LLN”), which we own, to a multi-tenant building in which we lease office space in Zaventem, Belgium. Accordingly, in the first quarter 2011, we initiated a process to sell the LLN building and have reclassified this asset as held for sale. In conjunction with this reclassification, we were required to perform an impairment test of this asset group. For purposes of testing for impairment and using all available evidence, we estimated the fair value of this asset group by weighting estimated sales proceeds and discounted cash flows that the asset group could be expected to generate through the time of an assumed sale using a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined by U.S. GAAP under the fair value hierarchy. Our test concluded impairment existed on March 31, 2011 and, accordingly, we recorded a charge of $8 to other operating income, net to reduce the carrying value of this asset to its estimated fair value and reclassified the asset to prepaid expenses and other current assets. Further and in addition to the above, we initiated a reduction in support personnel in this region which resulted in charges of $4 to selling, general and administrative for the three months ended March 31, 2011. These charges related to this restructuring action were recorded to Unallocated and Other. There was no change in our restructuring liability in the three months ended March 31, 2012.

We expect $3 of restructuring liabilities as of March 31, 2012 to be utilized within the next twelve months.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

To right-size our support structure in Europe and lower our operating costs in the region, we relocated our European regional headquarters in the second quarter 2011 from a building located in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (“LLN”), which we own, to a multi-tenant building in which we lease office space in Zaventem, Belgium. Accordingly, we have initiated a process to sell the LLN building and have reclassified this asset as held for sale. In conjunction with this reclassification, we were required to perform an impairment test of this asset group. For purposes of testing for impairment and using all available evidence, we estimated the fair value of this asset group by weighting estimated sales proceeds and discounted cash flows that the asset group could be expected to generate through the time of an assumed sale using a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined by U.S. GAAP under the fair value hierarchy. Our test concluded impairment existed on March 31, 2011 and, accordingly, we recorded a charge of $8 to other operating expense (income), net in the first quarter 2011 to reduce the carrying value of this asset to its estimated fair value and reclassified the asset to prepaid expenses and other current assets. Further and in addition to the above, we initiated a reduction in support personnel in this region which resulted in charges of $4 to selling, general and administrative for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There were no charges related to this project during the third quarter. A summary of the charges recorded to Unallocated and Other related to this restructuring action for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:

				Impairment of
	Employment			Long-Lived
	Reductions			Assets			Total
Nine Months Ended and cumulative through September 30, 2011:
Selling, general and administrative expenses		$	4		$	-		$	4
Other operating expense (income), net			-			8			8
Total		$	4		$	8		$	12

A summary of all activity on the restructuring liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:

	Contract					Impairment of
	Termination		Employment			Long-Lived
	Payments		Reductions			Assets			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	2	$	5		$	-		$	7
Charges taken		-		4			8			12
Amounts utilized		-		(6	)		-			(6	)
Non-cash reductions		-		-			(8	)		(8	)
Currency fluctuations		-		1			-			1
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2	$	4		$	-		$	6

We expect $4 of restructuring liabilities as of September 30, 2011 to be utilized within the next twelve months.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

We are a party to legal proceedings, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business and involve claims for monetary damages. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, we had accrued approximately $2 ~~and $3, respectively,~~ for legal costs to defend ourselves in legal matters.

Except for the potential effect of an unfavorable outcome with respect to our legacy tort claims litigation (“Legacy Tort Claims ~~Litigation~~”), it is our opinion that the aggregate of all claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.

14Legacy Tort Claims Litigation

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement effective February 28, 2008, entered into by us and Monsanto in connection with our emergence from Chapter 11 (the “Monsanto Settlement Agreement”), Monsanto is responsible to defend and indemnify us for any Legacy Tort Claims as that term is defined in the Monsanto Settlement Agreement, while we retain responsibility for certain tort claims, if any, which may arise out of our conduct after our spinoff from Pharmacia Corporation (“Pharmacia”), which occurred on September 1, 1997 (“Solutia Spinoff”). There is no maximum amount or other limit with respect to Monsanto’s liability regarding any Legacy Tort Claims. We or our fully owned subsidiary, Flexsys, have been named as defendants in the following actions, and have submitted the matters to Monsanto as Legacy Tort Claims. However, to the extent these matters relate to post Solutia Spinoff conduct or such matters are not within the meaning of Legacy Tort Claims as defined in the Monsanto Settlement Agreement, we could potentially be liable.

Putnam County, West Virginia Litigation. In December 2004, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Putnam County, West Virginia against Flexsys, Pharmacia, Monsanto and Akzo Nobel (Solutia is not a named defendant) alleging exposure to dioxin from Flexsys’ Nitro, West Virginia facility, which is now closed. The relevant production activities at the facility occurred during Pharmacia’s ownership and operation of the facility and well prior to the creation of the Flexsys joint venture between Pharmacia (whose interest was subsequently transferred to us in the Solutia Spinoff) and Akzo Nobel. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for loss of property value, medical monitoring and other equitable relief. In May 2011, the West Virginia circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of Flexsys in the class action litigation, and dismissed Flexsys with prejudice from the case. Specifically, the court held that plaintiffs had presented no evidence of contamination or distribution of dioxin by Flexsys during its ownership of the Nitro Facility.

Beginning in February 2008, Flexsys, Monsanto, Pharmacia, Akzo Nobel and another third party were named as defendants in approximately seventy-five individual lawsuits, and Solutia was named in two individual lawsuits, filed in various state court jurisdictions by residents or former residents of Putnam County, West Virginia. The largely identical complaints allege that the residents were exposed to potentially harmful levels of dioxin particles from the Nitro facility. Plaintiffs did not specify the amount of their alleged damages in their complaints. In 2009, over fifty additional nearly identical complaints were filed by individual plaintiffs in the Putnam County area, which named Solutia and Flexsys as defendants, and one additional complaint was filed in January 2011.

In February 2012, Monsanto reached a tentative global resolution with the plaintiffs in the class action and the individual lawsuits. The court has given tentative approval to the settlement terms, but a fairness hearing has been scheduled for June 2012 for final approval of the settlement. Pursuant to the terms of the Monsanto Settlement Agreement, Solutia and Flexsys will have no obligations under the terms of the settlement of these litigation matters.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

~~Legacy~~Escambia ~~Tort~~County, ~~Claims~~Florida Litigation. In June 2008, a group of approximately fifty property owners and business owners in the Pensacola, Florida area filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida against Monsanto, Pharmacia, Solutia and the plant manager at Solutia's former Pensacola plant, an Integrated Nylon asset that was included in the divestiture of our Integrated Nylon business. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants are responsible for elevated levels of PCBs in the Escambia River and Escambia Bay due to past and continuing releases of PCBs from the Pensacola plant. The plaintiffs seek: (1) damages associated with alleged decreased property values caused by the alleged contamination and (2) remediation of the alleged contamination in the waterways. Plaintiffs did not specify the amount of their alleged damages in their complaint. Plaintiffs have subsequently amended their complaint to add additional plaintiffs to the litigation, such that approximately 150 property and business owners are now named as plaintiffs.

~~Pursuant~~St. toClair ~~the~~County, ~~Amended~~Illinois and ~~Restated~~Related ~~Settlement~~Litigation. In ~~Agreement effective~~ February 282009, ~~2008,~~a ~~entered~~purported ~~into~~class byaction uslawsuit ~~and~~was ~~Monsanto~~filed in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~Circuit ~~our~~Court ~~emergence~~of ~~from~~St. ~~Chapter~~Clair 11County, ~~(the~~Illinois ~~“Monsanto~~against ~~Settlement~~Solutia, ~~Agreement”)~~Pharmacia, Monsanto ~~is responsible to defend~~ and ~~indemnify~~two usother ~~for~~unrelated ~~any~~defendants ~~Legacy~~alleging ~~Tort~~the ~~Claims~~contamination asof ~~that~~the ~~term~~plaintiff’s isproperty ~~defined~~from inPCBs, ~~the~~dioxins, ~~Monsanto~~furans ~~Settlement~~and ~~Agreement,~~other ~~while~~hazardous wesubstances ~~retain~~emanating ~~responsibility~~from ~~for~~the ~~tort~~defendants’ ~~claims,~~facilities ifin ~~any~~Sauget, ~~which~~Illinois ~~may~~(including ~~arise~~our ~~out~~W.G. ofKrummrich ~~our~~site ~~conduct~~in ~~after~~Sauget, ~~our~~Illinois). The ~~spinoff~~proposed ~~from~~class ~~Pharmacia,~~action ~~which~~is ~~occurred~~comprised onof ~~September~~residents 1,who ~~1997. We~~live orwithin ~~our~~a ~~fully~~two-mile ~~owned~~radius ~~subsidiary,~~of ~~Flexsys,~~the ~~have~~Sauget ~~been~~facilities. The ~~named~~plaintiffs asare ~~defendants~~seeking indamages ~~the~~for ~~following~~medical ~~actions,~~monitoring and ~~have~~ ~~submitted~~ the ~~matters~~costs toassociated ~~Monsanto~~with asremediation ~~Legacy~~and ~~Tort~~removal ~~Claims. However,~~of toalleged ~~the~~contaminants ~~extent~~from ~~these~~their ~~matters~~property. This ~~relate~~action tois ~~post~~one ~~Solutia~~of ~~Spinoff~~several ~~conduct~~lawsuits or(primarily ~~such~~filed ~~matters~~by ~~are not within~~ the ~~meaning~~same ofplaintiffs’ ~~Legacy~~counsel) ~~Tort~~filed ~~Claims~~in as2009 ~~defined~~and in2010 ~~the~~regarding ~~Monsanto~~alleged ~~Settlement~~historical ~~Agreement,~~contamination wefrom ~~could~~the ~~potentially~~W.G. beKrummrich ~~liable~~site.

~~Putnam County, West Virginia Litigation.~~ In ~~December~~addition ~~2004,~~to athe purported class action lawsuit, ~~was~~twenty additional individual lawsuits have been filed insince February 2009 against the ~~Circuit~~same ~~Court~~defendants (including Solutia) comprised of ~~Putnam~~claims ~~County,~~from ~~West~~over ~~Virginia~~one ~~against~~thousand ~~Flexsys,~~individual ~~Pharmacia,~~residents ~~Monsanto~~of Illinois who claim they suffered illnesses and/or ~~Akzo~~injuries ~~Nobel~~as ~~(Solutia~~well isas ~~not~~property damages as a ~~named~~result ~~defendant)~~of ~~alleging~~the ~~exposure~~same toPCBs, ~~dioxin~~dioxins, furans and other hazardous substances allegedly emanating from ~~Flexsys~~the defendants’ ~~Nitro~~facilities in Sauget. In June 2010, ~~West~~a ~~Virginia~~group ~~facility~~of approximately 1,200 ~~which~~plaintiffs isalso ~~now~~filed ~~closed. The~~wrongful ~~relevant~~death ~~production~~claims ~~activities~~in ata lawsuit in the ~~facility~~Circuit ~~occurred~~Court ~~during~~of ~~Pharmacia’s~~St. ~~ownership~~Clair ~~and~~County ~~operation~~arising out of alleged contamination from the ~~facility~~defendants’ ~~and~~facilities. Moreover, ~~well~~four ~~prior~~additional toindividual ~~the~~lawsuits ~~creation~~comprised of ~~the~~claims ~~Flexsys~~from ~~joint~~twelve ~~venture~~plaintiffs ~~between~~were ~~Pharmacia~~filed ~~(whose~~between ~~interest~~January ~~was subsequently~~and ~~transferred~~April to2010 us in the ~~Solutia~~Circuit ~~Spinoff)~~Court ~~and~~of ~~Akzo~~Madison ~~Nobel. The~~County, Illinois, alleging that plaintiffs ~~are~~suffered ~~seeking~~illnesses ~~damages~~resulting ~~for~~from ~~loss~~exposure ofto ~~property~~benzene, ~~value~~PCBs, ~~medical~~dioxins, ~~monitoring~~furans and other ~~equitable~~hazardous ~~relief~~substances. InLastly, ~~May~~in ~~2011~~June 2010, ~~the~~a ~~West~~second ~~Virginia~~purported ~~circuit~~class ~~court~~action ~~entered~~lawsuit ~~summary~~was ~~judgment~~filed in ~~favor~~the Circuit Court of ~~Flexsys~~St. inLouis City, Missouri against the ~~class~~same ~~action~~defendants ~~litigation~~alleging the contamination of the plaintiffs’ property from PCBs, dioxins, furans and ~~dismissed~~other ~~Flexsys~~hazardous ~~with~~substances ~~prejudice~~emanating from the ~~case. Specifically~~defendants’ facilities in Sauget, ~~the~~Illinois ~~court~~and ~~held~~from ~~that~~our now-closed Queeny plant in St. Louis. The plaintiffs ~~had~~are ~~presented~~seeking nodamages ~~evidence~~for ofmedical ~~contamination~~monitoring orand ~~distribution~~the costs associated with remediation and removal of ~~dioxin~~alleged bycontaminants ~~Flexsys~~from ~~during~~their ~~its~~property. The ~~ownership~~proposed ofclass members include residents exclusively within the ~~Nitro~~state ~~facility~~of Missouri.

~~Beginning~~Upon inassessment ~~February~~of ~~2008,~~the ~~Flexsys,~~terms of the Monsanto Settlement Agreement and other defenses available to us, ~~Pharmacia~~we believe the probability of an unfavorable outcome to us on the Putnam County, ~~Akzo~~West ~~Nobel~~Virginia; Escambia County, Florida; and ~~another~~St. ~~third~~Clair ~~party~~County, ~~were~~Illinois ~~named~~and asrelated ~~defendants~~litigation inagainst ~~approximately~~us ~~seventy-five~~is ~~individual~~remote ~~lawsuits~~and, ~~and~~accordingly, ~~Solutia~~we ~~was~~have ~~named~~not inrecorded ~~two~~a ~~individual~~loss ~~lawsuits~~contingency. Nonetheless, ~~filed~~if init ~~various~~were ~~state~~subsequently ~~court~~determined ~~jurisdictions~~these bymatters ~~residents~~are ornot ~~former~~within ~~residents~~the meaning of ~~Putnam~~Legacy ~~County~~Tort Claims, ~~West~~as ~~Virginia. The~~defined ~~largely~~in ~~identical~~the ~~complaints~~Monsanto ~~allege~~Settlement ~~that~~Agreement, ~~the~~or ~~residents~~other defenses to us were ~~exposed~~unsuccessful, towe ~~potentially~~could ~~harmful~~be ~~levels~~liable offor ~~dioxin~~an ~~particles~~amount ~~from~~which ~~the~~could ~~Nitro~~have ~~facility~~a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. ~~Plaintiffs~~We ~~did~~are ~~not~~unable ~~specify~~to estimate the amount or range of ~~their~~potential ~~alleged~~losses ~~damages~~associated inwith ~~their~~these ~~complaints. In~~claims ~~2009,~~i) ~~over~~because ~~fifty~~no ~~additional~~portion ~~nearly~~of ~~identical~~the ~~complaints~~claims ~~were~~have ~~filed~~been bydetermined ~~individual~~to ~~plaintiffs~~be inoutside the ~~Putnam~~definition ~~County~~of ~~area,~~Legacy ~~which named~~Tort ~~Solutia~~Claims; ~~and~~ii) ~~Flexsys~~because asa ~~defendants,~~claim value has not been asserted in any of these matters and ~~one~~iii) ~~additional~~because ~~complaint~~we ~~was~~are ~~filed~~not directly involved in ~~January~~these ~~2011~~matters due to the fact that Monsanto has accepted the tenders of defense associated with Legacy Tort Claims.

~~The~~Environmental claims in this matter concern alleged conduct occurring while Flexsys was a joint venture between us and Akzo Nobel, and any potential damages in these cases would be evenly apportioned between us and Akzo Nobel to the extent such claims are determined not to be Legacy Tort Claims.Liabilities

~~Escambia~~In ~~County,~~the ~~Florida~~ordinary ~~Litigation. In~~course ~~June~~of ~~2008~~business, awe ~~group~~are ofsubject ~~approximately~~to ~~fifty~~numerous ~~property~~environmental ~~owners~~laws and ~~business~~regulations ~~owners~~covering incompliance ~~the~~matters ~~Pensacola,~~or ~~Florida~~imposing ~~area~~liability ~~filed~~for ~~a lawsuit in~~ the ~~Circuit~~costs ~~Court~~of, ~~for~~and ~~Escambia~~damages ~~County~~resulting from, ~~Florida~~cleaning ~~against~~up ~~Monsanto~~sites, ~~Pharmacia~~past spills, ~~Solutia~~disposals and ~~the~~other ~~plant~~releases ~~manager~~of athazardous ~~Solutia's~~substances. We ~~former~~have ~~Pensacola plant~~incurred, anand ~~Integrated~~we ~~Nylon~~may ~~asset that was included~~ in the ~~divestiture~~future ofincur, ~~our~~liabilities ~~Integrated~~to ~~Nylon~~investigate ~~business. The~~and ~~lawsuit,~~clean ~~entitled~~up ~~John~~waste ~~Allen,~~or etcontamination ~~al.~~at v.our ~~Monsanto~~current ~~Company~~facilities, etproperties ~~al.,~~adjacent ~~alleges~~to ~~that~~our ~~the~~current ~~defendants~~facilities ~~are responsible~~or ~~for~~facilities ~~elevated~~operated ~~levels~~by ofthird ~~PCBs~~parties inat ~~the~~where ~~Escambia~~we ~~River~~may ~~and~~have ~~Escambia~~disposed ~~Bay~~of ~~due~~waste toor ~~past~~other ~~and~~materials. Under ~~continuing~~some ~~releases~~circumstances, ofthe ~~PCBs~~scope ~~from~~of ~~the~~our ~~Pensacola~~liability ~~plant. The~~may ~~plaintiffs~~extend ~~seek:~~to ~~(1)~~ damages ~~associated~~to ~~with~~natural ~~alleged~~resources ~~decreased~~for ~~property~~which ~~values~~we ~~caused~~have byaccrued ~~the~~$2 ~~alleged~~as ~~contamination~~of ~~and~~March ~~(2) remediation~~31, of2012 ~~the~~and ~~alleged~~December ~~contamination~~31, in2011, ~~the~~which ~~waterways. Plaintiffs~~is ~~did~~exclusive ~~not~~of ~~specify~~ the ~~amount~~balances ofnoted ~~their~~below. In ~~alleged~~almost ~~damages~~all incases, ~~their~~our ~~complaint. Plaintiffs~~potential ~~have~~liability ~~subsequently~~arising ~~amended~~from ~~their~~historical ~~complaint~~contamination ~~twice~~is tobased ~~add~~on ~~additional~~operations ~~plaintiffs~~and toother ~~the~~events ~~litigation,~~occurring ~~such~~at ~~that~~our ~~approximately~~facilities ~~150~~or ~~property~~as ~~and~~a ~~business~~result ~~owners~~of ~~are~~their ~~now~~operation ~~named~~prior asto ~~plaintiffs~~the Solutia Spinoff.

St. Clair County, Illinois and Related Litigation. In February 2009, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Illinois against Solutia, Pharmacia, Monsanto and two other unrelated defendants alleging the contamination of the plaintiff’s property from PCBs, dioxins, furans and other hazardous substances emanating from the defendants’ facilities in Sauget, Illinois (including our W.G. Krummrich site in Sauget, Illinois). The proposed class action is comprised of residents who live within a two-mile radius of the Sauget facilities. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for medical monitoring and the costs associated with remediation and removal of contaminants from their property. This action is one of several lawsuits (primarily filed by the same plaintiffs’ counsel) over the past year regarding alleged historical contamination from the W.G. Krummrich site.13

In addition to the purported class action lawsuit, twenty additional individual lawsuits have been filed since February 2009 against the same defendants (including Solutia) comprised of claims from over one thousand individual residents of Illinois who claim they suffered illnesses and/or injuries as well as property damages as a result of the same PCBs, dioxins, furans and other hazardous substances allegedly emanating from the defendants’ facilities in Sauget. In June 2010, a group of approximately 1,200 plaintiffs also filed wrongful death claims in a lawsuit in St. Clair County arising out of alleged contamination from the defendants’ facilities. Moreover, four additional individual lawsuits comprised of claims from twelve plaintiffs were filed between January and April 2010 in Madison County, Illinois, alleging that plaintiffs suffered illnesses resulting from exposure to benzene, PCBs, dioxins, furans and other hazardous substances. Lastly, in June 2010, a second purported class action lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Missouri against the same defendants alleging the contamination of the plaintiffs’ property from PCBs, dioxins, furans and other hazardous substances emanating from the defendants’ facilities in Sauget, Illinois and from our now-closed Queeny plant in St. Louis. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for medical monitoring and the costs associated with remediation and removal of alleged contaminants from their property. The proposed class members include residents exclusively within the state of Missouri.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

~~Upon~~Further, ~~assessment~~under ~~of the~~ terms of the Monsanto Settlement Agreement, ~~and~~we ~~other~~have ~~defenses~~agreed ~~available~~ to ~~us,~~share weresponsibility ~~believe~~with Monsanto for the ~~probability~~environmental ofremediation anat ~~unfavorable~~certain ~~outcome~~locations tooutside usour onplant ~~the~~boundaries ~~Putnam~~in ~~County~~Anniston, ~~West~~Alabama ~~Virginia;~~and ~~Escambia County~~Sauget, ~~Florida;~~Illinois ~~and~~which ~~St.~~were ~~Clair~~also ~~County,~~incurred ~~Illinois~~prior ~~and~~to ~~related~~the ~~litigation~~Solutia ~~against~~Spinoff us(the is“Shared ~~remote~~Sites”). Under ~~and,~~this ~~accordingly~~cost-sharing arrangement, we ~~have~~are ~~not~~responsible ~~recorded~~for athe ~~loss~~funding ~~contingency. Nonetheless,~~of ifenvironmental itliabilities ~~were~~at ~~subsequently~~the ~~determined~~Shared ~~these~~Sites ~~matters~~from ~~are~~February 28, ~~not~~2008 ~~within~~ (the ~~meaning~~“Effective ofDate”) ~~Legacy~~up ~~Tort~~to ~~Claims~~a total of $325. Thereafter, asif ~~defined~~needed, inwe ~~the~~and Monsanto ~~Settlement~~will ~~Agreement,~~share orresponsibility ~~other~~equally. From ~~defenses~~the toEffective usDate ~~were~~through ~~unsuccessful~~March 31, it2012, iswe ~~reasonably~~have ~~possible~~made wecash ~~would~~payments beof ~~liable~~$37 ~~for~~toward anremediation ~~amount~~of ~~which~~the ~~cannot~~Shared beSites ~~estimated~~and ~~but~~have ~~which~~accrued ~~could~~an ~~have~~additional a$157 ~~material~~to ~~adverse~~be ~~effect~~paid onover ~~our consolidated~~the ~~financial~~life ~~statements~~of the Shared Sites remediation activity.

Resolution of Tax Indemnification

During the second quarter 2010, we received a favorable settlement in a tax indemnification case related to income taxes we paid on a business for periods prior to our acquisition. The settlement resulted in an $8 gain recorded in other income (loss), net within Unallocated and Other during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Environmental Liabilities

In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations covering compliance matters or imposing liability for the costs of, and damages resulting from, cleaning up sites, past spills, disposals and other releases of hazardous substances. We have incurred, and we may in the future incur, liabilities to investigate and clean up waste or contamination at our current facilities, properties adjacent to our current facilities or facilities operated by third parties at where we may have disposed of waste or other materials. Under some circumstances, the scope of our liability may extend to damages to natural resources for which we have accrued $2 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is exclusive of the balances noted below. In almost all cases, our potential liability arising from historical contamination is based on operations and other events occurring at our facilities or as a result of their operation prior to the Solutia Spinoff.

Further, under terms of the Monsanto Settlement Agreement, we have agreed to share responsibility with Monsanto for the environmental remediation at certain locations outside our plant boundaries in Anniston, Alabama and Sauget, Illinois which were also incurred prior to the Solutia Spinoff (the “Shared Sites”). Under this cost-sharing arrangement, we are responsible for the funding of environmental liabilities at the Shared Sites from February 28, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) up to a total of $325. Thereafter, if needed, we and Monsanto will share responsibility equally. From the Effective Date through September 30, 2011, we have made cash payments of $33 toward remediation of the Shared Sites and have accrued an additional $161 to be paid over the life of the Shared Sites remediation activity.

Reserves for environmental remediation that we believe to be probable and estimable are recorded appropriately as current and long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. These reserves include liabilities expected to be paid out within fifteen years. The amounts charged to pre-tax earnings for environmental remediation and related charges are included in cost of goods sold and are summarized below:

	Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	273
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	256
Net charges taken		42
Amounts utilized		(~~19)~~10	)
Currency fluctuations		1
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	248
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	259

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Environmental Remediation Liabilities, current	$	29	$	29
Environmental Remediation Liabilities, long-term		~~230~~219		~~244~~227
Total	$	~~259~~248	$	~~273~~256

16In addition to accrued environmental liabilities, there are costs which have not met the definition of probable, and accordingly, are not recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. These loss contingencies are monitored regularly for a change in fact or circumstance that would require an accrual adjustment. These matters involve significant unresolved issues, including the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations, the outcome of negotiations with regulatory authorities and alternative methods of remediation. Because of these uncertainties, the potential liability for existing environmental remediation may range up to two times the amount recorded, which would be settled through cash payment over an extended period of time.

Although the resolution of these uncertainties, which may be over an extended period of time, may have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period recognized, management does not believe these uncertainties will have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Cash Flows or our liquidity.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

InOur ~~addition~~significant tosites ~~accrued environmental liabilities, there~~ are ~~costs~~described ~~which have not met the definition of probable, and accordingly, are not recorded~~ in ~~the~~more ~~Consolidated~~detail Statement of Financial Position. These loss contingencies are monitored regularly for a change in fact or circumstance that would require an accrual adjustment. These matters involve significant unresolved issues, including the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations, the outcome of negotiations with regulatory authorities and alternative methods of remediation. Because of these uncertainties, the potential liability for existing environmental remediation may range up to two times the amount recorded, which would be settled through cash payment over an extended period of time.below:

~~Except~~Anniston, asAlabama. On ~~noted~~Aug. ~~below~~4, we2003, ~~believe~~the ~~that~~U.S. ~~these~~District ~~matters~~Court for the Northern District of Alabama approved a Revised Partial Consent Decree (“RPCD”), ~~when~~pursuant ~~ultimately~~to ~~resolved~~which Pharmacia and Solutia are obligated to perform, among other things, residential cleanup work and a remedial investigation/feasibility study (“RI/FS”) as a result of PCB contamination from our Anniston plant, which ~~may~~occurred prior to the Solutia Spinoff. The residential cleanup of available properties was completed in 2010. Additional residences have become available and will be ~~over~~cleaned-up in 2012. Any future identified residential properties requiring cleanup will be handled under an ~~extended~~institutional ~~period~~control program. Furthermore, in 2010 the Anniston Plant Site RI/FS was completed and approved. On September 29, 2011 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) issued its interim Record of ~~time~~Decision (“ROD”) setting out the required remedies associated with the plant, which were mainly as the Company proposed in the FS. Upon negotiation of a Consent Decree with USEPA, Solutia will ~~not~~implement ~~have~~this interim ROD over the next few years and a ~~material~~final ~~adverse~~ROD ~~effect~~will onbe issued some time after the interim ROD is completed. The RI/FS for the non-residential properties and the creeks/floodplain are ongoing but it is probable that some level of remediation and/or sediment removal will be required in the future. We have accrued for this liability based upon our ~~Consolidated~~understanding ~~Statement~~of the level and extent of ~~Financial~~contamination ~~Position~~in these areas, the remedial effort likely to be required by various governmental organizations and estimated costs associated with similar remediation projects. We may recover some of our investigation and remediation costs from parties, against whom we filed a cost recovery action in July 2003 but ~~could~~because the eventual outcome of these proceedings is uncertain, our environmental liability at March 31, 2012 does not incorporate this potential reimbursement. State and Federal Natural Resource Damage Trustees have asserted a ~~material~~claim ~~adverse~~for ~~effect~~potential onnatural ~~our~~resource ~~Consolidated~~damage ~~Statement~~and ofadvised ~~Operations~~us inthat ~~any~~they ~~given~~are ~~period~~preparing to undertake an assessment as to the nature and extent of such damages. ~~Our~~These ~~significant~~Trustees ~~sites~~have requested we consider entering into a cooperative agreement to perform a damage assessment and discussions to resolve these damages are ~~described~~ongoing. As of March 31, 2012, we have accrued $104 for all environmental remediation projects in ~~more~~the ~~detail~~Anniston, ~~below:~~Alabama area which represents our best estimate of the ultimate liability. Timing of the remediation will not be established until we complete the RI/FS work, a ROD covering the off-plant areas is issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”), and a consent decree for each of these RODS is negotiated and entered by the court to cover the selected remediation, which will take several years.

~~Anniston~~Sauget, ~~Alabama~~Illinois. OnA ~~Aug.~~number 4,of ~~2003~~industries, ~~the~~including Uour W.SG. ~~District~~Krummrich ~~Court~~Plant, ~~for~~have ~~the~~operated ~~Northern~~and ~~District~~disposed of ~~Alabama~~wastes ~~approved~~in aSauget, ~~Revised~~Illinois. Areas ~~Partial~~of ~~Consent~~contamination ~~Decree,~~from ~~pursuant~~these toindustrial operations, which ~~Pharmacia~~for ~~and~~our ~~Solutia~~W.G. ~~are~~Krummrich ~~obligated~~Plant occurred prior to ~~perform~~the Solutia Spinoff, ~~among~~have ~~other~~been ~~things,~~classified ~~residential~~as ~~cleanup~~part ~~work~~of ~~and~~either athe ~~remedial~~Sauget ~~investigation/feasibility~~Area ~~study~~1 (“Sites or the Sauget Area 2 Sites. We conducted a RI/FS”) asfor athe ~~result~~Sauget ofArea ~~PCB~~1 ~~contamination~~Sites ~~from~~under ~~our~~an ~~Anniston~~Administrative ~~plant,~~Order ~~which~~on ~~occurred~~Consent ~~prior~~issued toon ~~the~~January ~~Solutia~~21, ~~Spinoff~~1999. ~~The~~Although ~~residential~~an ~~cleanup~~extensive removal action for one of ~~available~~the ~~properties~~Sauget Area 1 Sites was ~~completed~~conducted inunder ~~2010. Furthermore,~~a inUnilateral ~~2010~~Administrative ~~the~~Order ~~Anniston~~issued ~~Plant~~on ~~Site~~May ~~RI/FS~~31, ~~was~~2000, ~~completed~~the cost and ~~approved. On~~timing ~~September~~of ~~29,~~any ~~2011~~additional ~~the United~~required ~~States~~remedial ~~Environmental~~actions ~~Protection~~will ~~Agency~~be ~~(“USEPA”)~~established ~~issued~~only ~~its~~after ~~interim~~a Record of Decision ~~(“ROD”)~~is ~~setting~~issued ~~out~~by the ~~required~~USEPA, ~~remedies~~and ~~associated~~a ~~with~~consent ~~the~~decree ~~plant,~~is ~~which~~negotiated ~~were~~and ~~mainly~~entered asby the ~~Company~~court ~~proposed~~to incover the FSselected remediation. ~~Upon~~We ~~negotiation~~have ofan aagreement ~~Consent Decree~~ with ~~USEPA,~~two ~~Solutia~~other ~~will~~potentially ~~implement~~responsible ~~this~~parties ~~interim~~(“PRPs”) ~~ROD~~to ~~over~~enter ~~the~~into ~~next~~an ~~few~~allocation ~~years~~proceeding ~~and~~upon aissuance ~~final~~of the ROD ~~will~~to beresolve ~~issued~~our ~~some~~respective ~~time~~shares ~~after~~of the ~~interim~~liability ~~ROD~~for isthe ~~completed~~Sauget Area 1 Sites. ~~The~~With ~~RI/FS~~respect ~~for~~to the ~~non-residential~~Sauget ~~properties~~Area ~~and~~2 ~~the~~Sites, ~~creeks/floodplain~~we, ~~are~~in ~~ongoing~~coordination ~~but~~with it19 isother ~~probable~~PRPs, ~~that~~are ~~some~~also ~~level~~required ofto ~~remediation~~conduct ~~and~~a RI/orFS ~~sediment~~for ~~removal~~the ~~will~~Sauget beArea ~~required~~2 inSites ~~the~~under ~~future~~an Administrative Order on Consent issued effective November 24, 2000. We ~~have~~are ~~accrued~~preparing ~~for~~a ~~this~~revised ~~liability~~RI/FS ~~based~~report ~~upon~~to ~~our~~address ~~understanding~~agency ofcomments ~~the~~with ~~level~~these ~~and~~PRPs ~~extent~~based ofon ~~contamination~~interim inallocations ~~these~~and ~~areas~~have agreed, ~~the~~upon ~~remedial~~issuance ~~effort~~of ~~likely~~the ROD, to beparticipate ~~required~~in byan ~~various~~allocation ~~governmental~~proceeding ~~organizations~~to ~~and~~fully ~~estimated~~resolve ~~costs~~each ~~associated~~PRP’s ~~with~~share ~~similar remediation~~of ~~projects. We~~the ~~may~~liability ~~recover~~for ~~some~~the ~~of our~~ investigation and remediation costs. For ~~from~~each ~~parties,~~of ~~against~~the ~~whom~~Sauget Area 1 and 2 Sites, we ~~filed~~anticipate athe ~~cost~~USEPA ~~recovery~~and ~~action~~Illinois inEnvironmental ~~July~~Protection ~~2003~~Agency ~~but~~(“IEPA”) ~~because~~to ~~the~~issue ~~eventual~~a ~~outcome~~Record of ~~these~~Decision ~~proceedings~~with isfinal ~~uncertain,~~action ~~our~~for ~~environmental~~the ~~liability~~landfill/impoundment atcovers ~~September~~within ~~30,~~the ~~2011~~next ~~does~~year ~~not~~to ~~incorporate~~eighteen ~~this~~months. However, ~~potential~~although ~~reimbursement. State~~an ~~and~~interim ~~Federal~~groundwater ~~Natural~~remedy ~~Resource~~has ~~Damage~~been ~~Trustees~~installed ~~have~~pursuant ~~asserted~~to a ~~claim~~Unilateral ~~for~~Administrative ~~potential~~Order ~~natural~~issued ~~resource~~on ~~damage~~October ~~and~~3, ~~advised~~2002, usit ~~that~~is ~~they~~uncertain ~~are~~when ~~preparing~~the toUSEPA ~~undertake~~and anIEPA ~~assessment~~will asissue toa ~~the~~final ~~nature~~remedy ~~and~~for ~~extent~~the ofgroundwater ~~such~~operable ~~damages~~unit. ~~These~~Our ~~Trustees~~ultimate ~~have~~exposure ~~requested~~at wethese ~~consider~~sites ~~entering~~will ~~into~~depend aon ~~cooperative~~the ~~agreement~~final toremedial ~~perform~~actions ato ~~damage~~be ~~assessment~~taken and ~~discussions~~ on ~~potential~~the ~~settlement~~level of ~~the~~contribution ~~Trustees~~from ~~claims~~other ~~are ongoing~~PRPs. AsIn ofaddition, ~~September~~several 30PRPs, ~~2011,~~including weSolutia ~~have~~and ~~accrued~~Pharmacia, ~~$107~~received ~~for~~in ~~all~~June ~~environmental~~2009 ~~remediation~~from ~~projects in~~ the ~~Anniston,~~U.S. ~~Alabama~~Department ~~area which~~of ~~represents~~the ~~our~~Interior, ~~best~~on ~~estimate~~behalf of ~~the~~various ~~ultimate~~federal ~~liability. Timing~~and ofstate ~~the~~natural ~~remediation~~resource ~~will~~trustees, ~~not~~a benotice ~~established~~of ~~until~~intent weto ~~complete~~perform ~~the~~and ~~remaining~~an ~~RI/FS~~invitation ~~work,~~to acooperate ~~ROD~~in ~~covering~~a ~~the~~natural ~~off-plant~~resource ~~areas is~~damage ~~issued~~assessment byfor the ~~United~~Sauget ~~States~~Industrial ~~Environmental~~Corridor. Our ~~Protection~~best ~~Agency~~estimate ~~(“USEPA”),~~of ~~and~~the aultimate ~~consent~~cost ~~decree for each~~ of ~~these~~all ~~RODS~~remedial ismeasures ~~negotiated~~that ~~and~~will ~~entered~~be byrequired at the ~~court~~Sauget, toIllinois ~~cover~~area ~~the~~sites ~~selected~~is ~~remediation,~~$68 which ~~will~~we ~~take~~have ~~several~~accrued ~~years~~as of March 31, 2012.

~~Sauget, Illinois. A number of industries, including our~~ W. G. Krummrich ~~Plant, have operated and disposed of wastes in Sauget, Illinois~~Site. ~~Areas~~We ofentered ~~contamination~~into ~~from~~a ~~these~~Consent ~~industrial~~Order ~~operations,~~under ~~which~~the ~~for our W~~U.GS. ~~Krummrich~~Resource ~~Plant~~Conservation ~~occurred~~and ~~prior~~Recovery toAct ~~the~~of ~~Solutia Spinoff~~1976, ~~have been classified~~ as ~~part of either the Sauget Area 1 Sites or the Sauget Area 2 Sites. We conducted a RI/FS for the Sauget Area 1 Sites under an Administrative Order on Consent issued on January 21~~amended, ~~1999. Although~~effective ~~an extensive removal action for one of the Sauget Area 1 Sites was conducted under a Unilateral Administrative Order issued on~~ May 313, 2000, ~~the~~to ~~cost~~investigate and ~~timing~~remediate ofsoil ~~any additional required remedial actions will be established only after a ROD is issued by the USEPA,~~ and agroundwater ~~consent~~contamination ~~decree~~from is negotiated and entered by the court to cover the selected remediation. We have an agreement with two other potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) to enter into an allocation proceeding upon issuance of the ROD to resolve our ~~respective~~manufacturing ~~shares~~operations ofat the ~~liability for the Sauget Area 1 Sites~~W. ~~With~~G. ~~respect~~Krummrich ~~to the Sauget Area 2 Sites~~Plant, ~~we,~~which inoccurred ~~coordination~~prior ~~with 19 other PRPs, are also required~~ to ~~conduct a RI/FS for~~ the ~~Sauget~~Solutia ~~Area 2 Sites under an Administrative Order on Consent issued effective November 24, 2000~~Spinoff. We ~~submitted~~conducted ~~the~~an ~~revised~~extensive ~~RI/FS~~corrective ~~report~~measures ~~with~~study ~~these~~and ~~PRPs~~a ~~based~~Final onDecision ~~interim~~was ~~allocations~~issued ~~and have~~by ~~agreed, upon issuance of~~ the ~~ROD,~~USEPA ~~to participate~~ in anFebruary ~~allocation~~2008 ~~proceeding~~setting toout ~~fully resolve each PRP’s share of~~ the ~~liability~~required ~~for~~corrective ~~the~~measures ~~investigation~~to ~~and~~be ~~remediation costs~~completed. ~~For~~Due ~~each of the Sauget Area 1 and 2 Sites, we anticipate the USEPA and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“IEPA”)~~ to ~~issue a ROD with final action for~~ the ~~landfill/impoundment~~complexity ~~covers~~of ~~within~~ the ~~next~~contamination ~~two~~issues ~~years. However,~~at ~~although~~this ~~an interim groundwater remedy has been installed pursuant to a Unilateral Administrative Order issued on October 3~~site, ~~2002,~~certain itof ~~is uncertain when~~ the ~~USEPA~~corrective ~~and~~measures ~~IEPA~~ will ~~issue~~be aperformed ~~final~~in ~~remedy for the groundwater operable unit~~phases. ~~Our~~ ~~ultimate~~Required ~~exposure~~pilot attesting ~~these~~has ~~sites~~been ~~will~~completed ~~depend on the final remedial actions to be taken~~ and on the ~~level~~design/implementation of ~~contribution~~full ~~from~~scale ~~other~~remediation ~~PRPs. In~~systems ~~addition,~~has ~~several~~commenced ~~PRPs,~~with ~~including~~operation ~~Solutia~~of ~~and Pharmacia,~~these ~~received~~systems inexpected ~~June~~until ~~2009~~at ~~from~~least ~~the U~~2015.S. ~~Department~~Our ofbest ~~the~~estimate ~~Interior, on behalf~~ of ~~various~~the ~~federal~~remaining ~~and~~cost ~~state natural resource trustees, a notice of intent~~ to perform ~~and~~all ~~an invitation to cooperate in a natural resource damage assessment for the Sauget Industrial Corridor. Our best estimate~~ of the ~~ultimate~~remaining ~~cost~~corrective ~~of all remedial~~ measures that will be required at the ~~Sauget,~~W.G. ~~Illinois~~Krummrich ~~area~~Site ~~sites~~ is $6813, which we have accrued as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

17We also have accruals for remedial obligations at several of our current or former manufacturing sites which we have owned or operated since the Solutia Spinoff. Our best estimate of the ultimate cost of all corrective measures that will be required at these sites is $63 which we have accrued as of March 31, 2012.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

W. G. Krummrich Site. We entered into a Consent Order under the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, effective May 3, 2000, to investigate and remediate soil and groundwater contamination from our manufacturing operations at the W.G. Krummrich Plant, which occurred prior to the Solutia Spinoff. We conducted an extensive corrective measures study and a Final Decision was issued by the USEPA in February 2008 setting out the required corrective measures to be completed. Due to the complexity of the contamination issues at this site, certain of the corrective measures will be performed in phases. Required pilot testing has been completed and the design/implementation of full scale remediation systems has commenced with operation of these systems expected until at least 2015. Our best estimate of the remaining cost to perform all corrective measures that will be required at the W.G. Krummrich Site is $22, which we have accrued as of September 30, 2011.

We also have accruals for remedial obligations at several of our current or former manufacturing sites which we have owned or operated since the Solutia Spinoff. Our best estimate of the ultimate cost of all corrective measures that will be required at these sites is $62 which we have accrued as of September 30, 2011.

9. Debt Obligations

InOur ~~the~~debt ~~first~~obligations ~~quarter~~currently consist of ~~2010,~~a wesenior ~~issued~~secured credit facility (“Credit Facility”) which consists of a $700 term loan maturing in 2017 (“2017 Term Loan”) and a $300 ofrevolving credit facility maturing in 2015 (“2015 Revolver”). Also outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were senior unsecured notes with a par value of $300 that were originally issued at 99.5 percent of par ~~bearing~~and bear interest at 7.875 percent (“7.875% Notes”), ~~which~~and ~~resulted~~senior inunsecured ~~net~~notes ~~proceeds~~with a par value of $~~292~~400 ~~after~~that ~~deducting~~were ~~underwriting~~originally ~~fees~~issued at par and ~~discounts~~bear interest at 8.75 percent (“8.75% Notes”). The 7.875% Notes and 8.75% Notes each require semi-annual interest payments and are due in 2020 and 2017, respectively.

~~Also~~In in the first quarter 2011, we paid $77 of ~~2010~~principal payments on our 2017 Term Loan. In the same quarter, we ~~extinguished~~amended ~~our~~the ~~previous~~2017 ~~term~~Term ~~loan~~Loan, ~~and~~which ~~revolving~~resulted ~~credit~~in ~~facility~~the maturity being extended to August 2017, ~~replacing~~a ~~them~~reduction in the interest rate of 100 basis points, greater strategic flexibility and the replacement of previous financial covenants with a single senior secured ~~credit~~leverage ~~facility~~ratio. In ~~(“Credit~~connection ~~Facility”)~~with ~~which~~the ~~consisted~~amendment, ofwe anincurred $~~850~~2 ~~term~~of ~~loan~~fees, ~~maturing~~which were recorded in loss on debt modification during the three months ended March ~~2017~~31, (“2011. The 2017 Term Loan”) ~~and~~bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 2.75 percent with a ~~$300~~0.75 ~~revolving~~percent ~~credit~~LIBOR ~~facility~~floor. We ~~maturing~~are inrequired to pay 1 percent of principal annually via quarterly payments, which have been prepaid through the third quarter of 2015 (“through voluntary principal payments. The 2015 Revolver”) bears interest, at our option, at LIBOR plus 3.25 percent, with no LIBOR floor, or at the prime rate plus 2.25 percent. ~~Early~~LIBOR-based ~~extinguishment~~interest for the 2017 Term Loan is payable each month while interest on the 2015 Revolver is payable on the last day of ~~our~~each ~~previous~~relevant ~~term~~interest ~~loan~~period ~~and~~(defined ~~revolving~~as ~~credit~~one ~~facility~~month, ~~resulted~~two, three or six months or other periods available to all lenders) and, in the ~~write-off~~case of ~~deferred~~any ~~debt~~interest ~~issuance~~period ~~costs~~longer ~~associated~~than ~~with~~three ~~this~~months, ~~debt~~on ineach successive date three months after the ~~amount~~first day of ~~$80~~ ~~along~~such ~~with~~interest period. Prime-based interest for the ~~expense~~2015 Revolver is payable quarterly in arrears. CPFilms Inc., Flexsys America L.P., Flexsys America Co., Monchem International, Inc., Solutia Overseas, Inc., Southwall Technologies Inc. and future subsidiaries, as defined by the Credit Facility, subject to certain exceptions (the “Credit Facility Guarantors”), are guarantors of aour $9obligations ~~prepayment~~under ~~penalty~~the Credit Facility. ~~These~~The ~~amounts~~Credit ~~were~~Facility ~~recorded~~and inthe ~~loss~~related guarantees are secured by liens on ~~debt~~substantially ~~extinguishment~~all orof ~~modification~~our ~~for~~and the ~~nine~~Credit ~~months~~Facility ~~ended~~Guarantors’ ~~September~~present ~~30,~~and ~~2010~~future assets.

In the first quarter of 2011, we amended the 2017 Term Loan which resulted in the maturity being extended to August 2017, a reduction in the interest rate of 100 basis points, greater strategic flexibility and the replacement of previous financial covenants with a single senior secured leverage ratio. In connection with the amendment, we incurred $2 of fees which were recorded in loss on debt extinguishment or modification in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. After the amendment, the principal amount was $700, which bears interest at one month LIBOR plus 2.75 percent with a 0.75 percent LIBOR floor. We ~~are~~had ~~required to pay 1 percent of principal annually via quarterly payments. The 2015 Revolver bears interest, at our option, at LIBOR plus 3.25 percent, with~~ no ~~LIBOR~~short-term ~~floor,~~borrowings or at ~~the~~March prime rate plus 2.25 percent. LIBOR-based interest for the 2017 Term Loan is payable each month while interest on the 2015 Revolver is payable on the last day of each relevant interest period (defined as one month31, ~~two,~~2012 ~~three or six months or other periods available to all lenders)~~ and, inDecember ~~the case of any interest period longer than three months~~31, ~~on each successive date three months after the first day of such interest period~~2011. ~~Prime-based~~Components interest for the 2015 Revolver is payable quarterly in arrears. CPFilms Inc., Flexsys America L.P., Flexsys America Co., Monchem International, Inc., Solutia Overseas, Inc. and future subsidiaries, as defined by the Credit Facility, subject to certain exceptions (the “Credit Facility Guarantors”), are guarantors of ~~our~~long-term ~~obligations~~debt ~~under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility and the related guarantees~~ are ~~secured~~as ~~by liens on substantially all of our and the Credit Facility Guarantors’ present and future assets.~~follows:

Also outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were senior unsecured notes, originally issued at par in exchange for $400, bearing interest at 8.75 percent (“8.75% Notes”), which require semi-annual interest payments and are due in 2017.

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
2017 Term Loan	$	666		$	666
8.75% Notes		389			389
7.875% Notes		286			286
Total principal amount		1,341			1,341
Less: Unamortized debt discount		(3	)		(4	)
Total	$	1,338		$	1,337

InThe ~~the~~weighted ~~nine~~average ~~months~~interest ~~ended~~rate ~~September 30, 2011, we made $102 of principal payments~~ on our ~~2017~~total ~~Term~~debt ~~Loan~~outstanding ~~and~~was ~~$25~~6 ~~million~~percent infor ~~combined~~both ~~open~~March ~~market repurchases on our 7.875% Notes and 8.75% Notes. In conjunction with these open market repurchases~~31, we2012 ~~paid a premium of $2, which was recorded in loss on debt extinguishment or modification for the three~~ and ~~nine~~December ~~months ended September 30~~31, 2011.

18The Credit Facility, the 7.875% Notes and the 8.75% Notes include a number of customary covenants and events of default that restrict our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt; make certain investments; pay dividends; repurchase stock; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies; enter into new lines of business and prepay, redeem or exchange our debt. The Credit Facility also includes the maintenance of a maximum senior secured indebtedness financial covenant as defined by the Credit Facility. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants as of March 31, 2012. The 7.875% Notes and the 8.75% Notes are redeemable at our option for the entire principal amount plus the Applicable Premium, as that term is defined in the indenture agreements, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if redeemed prior to March 15, 2015, with respect to the 7.875% Notes, and November 1, 2013, with respect to the 8.75% Notes. Thereafter, we may redeem the notes at declining redemption prices, as stated in the respective indenture agreements. Additionally, at any time on or prior to March 15, 2013, with respect to the 7.875% Notes, and November 1, 2012, with respect to the 8.75% Notes, we are allowed at our option, on any one or more occasions, to redeem up to 35 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 107.875 percent and 108.75 percent of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest with the net cash proceeds of one or more equity issuances.

Our current subsidiaries CPFilms Inc., Flexsys America L.P., Flexsys America Co., Monchem International, Inc., Solutia Overseas, Inc., S E Investment LLC, Southwall Technologies Inc. and future subsidiaries as defined by the notes, subject to certain exceptions, are guarantors (“Note Guarantors”) of the 7.875% Notes and the 8.75% Notes as of March 31, 2012.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

We had no short-term borrowings at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Components of long-term debt are as follows:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
2017 Term Loan	$	666		$	768
8.75% Notes		389			400
7.875% Notes		286			300
Total principal amount		1,341			1,468
Less: Unamortized debt discount		(4	)		(5	)
Total	$	1,337		$	1,463

The weighted average interest rate on our total debt outstanding was 6 percent and 6.4 percent at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The Credit Facility, the 7.875% Notes and the 8.75% Notes include a number of customary covenants and events of default that restrict our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt; make certain investments; pay dividends; repurchase stock; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies; enter into new lines of business and prepay, redeem or exchange our debt. The Credit Facility also includes the maintenance of a maximum senior secured indebtedness financial covenant as defined by the Credit Facility. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants as of September 30, 2011.

Our current subsidiaries CPFilms Inc., Flexsys America L.P., Flexsys America Co., Monchem International, Inc., Solutia Overseas, Inc., S E Investment LLC and future subsidiaries as defined by the notes, subject to certain exceptions, are guarantors (“Note Guarantors”) of the 7.875% Notes and the 8.75% Notes as of September 30, 2011.

10. Derivatives and Risk Management

Our business operations give rise to market risk exposures that result from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and certain commodity prices. To manage the volatility relating to these exposures, we periodically enter into various derivative transactions that enable us to mitigate the adverse effects of financial market risk. We evaluate hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis. If a derivative is no longer expected to be effective or if the hedged transaction is no longer probable of occurring, hedge accounting is discontinued. Hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded into earnings.

Our approved policies and procedures do not permit the purchase or holding of any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Management of counterparty credit risk is achieved through diversification and credit rating reviews of the firms with whom we transact.

Interest Rate Risk

We occasionally enter into interest rate swap and cap agreements to manage interest rate exposures. In 2008, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $800 (“2008 Swaps”) in order to secure a fixed interest rate on a portion of our then existing floating interest rate term debt. The 2008 Swaps have declining total notional amounts of $800 to $150 which are operational from the second quarter of 2010 through the first quarter of 2014. Through the first quarter 2009, we designated the 2008 Swaps as cash flow hedges and any changes in fair value were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of equity. Thereafter, we discontinued hedge accounting on the 2008 Swaps because these derivatives were no longer expected to be effective and all subsequent changes in fair value are recognized as interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. To neutralize the impact to earnings on these changes in fair value, and after assessing existing interest rate market conditions, in the third quarter of 2010, we entered into interest rate swap agreements that offset the 2008 Swaps (“Offsetting Swaps”). The Offsetting Swaps ~~are~~were operational beginning in the third quarter of 2010 with total notional amounts, operational dates and other terms that effectively mirror the 2008 Swaps.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Also in the third quarter of 2010, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $600 (“2010 Swaps”) that were operational beginning in the third quarter of 2010 in order to secure a fixed interest rate on a portion of the floating interest rate term debt associated with the 2017 Term Loan. The total notional amount of the 2010 Swaps declines to $200 through the fourth quarter of 2015. The 2010 Swaps were designated as cash flow hedges and therefore any changes in fair value were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss. In the first quarter 2011, we terminated the 2010 Swaps in conjunction with the debt modification discussed in Note 9 – Debt Obligations and purchased interest rate cap agreements to protect cash flows on a portion of the variable rate term loan against adverse interest rate changes (“2011 Caps”).

The 2011 Caps became operative in the first quarter 2011 and have notional amounts of $500 in 2011, $400 in 2012 and 2013, $300 in 2014 and $200 in 2015. Under the 2011 Caps, when the one-month LIBOR rate exceeds 0.75%, we will receive payments from the cap providers. The combination of the 0.75% LIBOR floor on our 2017 Term Loan along with cash payment on the 2011 Caps results in total payments at a fixed rate of 2.21%, plus the margin of 2.75%, for a total of 4.96% on the notional amounts hedged through 2015. The 2011 Caps were designated as cash flow hedges and therefore any changes in fair value are recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We use foreign currency derivative instruments to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency changes in assets and liabilities created in the normal course of business and to protect against exposure related to intercompany financing transactions. These risks are hedged primarily through the use of forward contracts and purchased options with maturities of less than 18 months. We have chosen not to designate these instruments as hedges to allow the changes in the fair value of these instruments to largely offset the remeasurement of the underlying assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We had currency forward contracts not designated as hedges to purchase and sell $~~163~~205 and $~~104~~191 of currencies comprised principally of the Euro, U.S. Dollar and Malaysian Ringgit as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

We also use foreign currency derivative instruments to manage the volatility associated with cash flows related to sales or purchases denominated in foreign currencies. These risks are hedged primarily through the use of forward contracts with maturities of less than 18 months. These forward contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges and therefore any changes in fair value are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. We had currency forward contracts designated as hedges to purchase and sell $5046 and $63 of currencies comprised principally of the Euro and Brazilian Real as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 ~~while~~and ~~none were outstanding as of~~ December 31, ~~2010. The fair value of these contracts was zero as of September 30,~~ 2011.

~~Commodity Price Risk~~17

We periodically enter into a limited number of commodity forward contracts in order to reduce cash flow exposure to changes in the price of certain raw materials and energy resources. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no such contracts outstanding requiring fair value treatment.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Our derivatives recorded at their respective fair values at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2011
	March 31, 2012
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value			Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	-	Accrued Liabilities		$	42
	Other Assets			-	Other Liabilities			65
Total Interest rate contracts			$	-			$	107
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	1	Accrued Liabilities		$	-
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	2	Accrued Liabilities		$	13
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments:
	Other Assets			7	Other Liabilities			14
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	8	Accrued Liabilities		$	16
Total Interest rate contracts				9				27
	Other Assets			3	Other Liabilities			6
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables			1	Accrued Liabilities			8
Total Interest rate contracts				11				22
Total Derivatives			$	10			$	45
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	1	Accrued Liabilities		$	2
	December 31, 2010
Total Derivatives			$	13			$	31
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value			Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	-	Accrued Liabilities		$	3
	Other Assets			6	Other Liabilities			-
Total Interest rate contracts			$	6			$	3
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	-	Accrued Liabilities		$	13
	Other Assets			5	Other Liabilities			20
Total Interest rate contracts				5				33
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables			1	Accrued Liabilities			1
Total Derivatives			$	12			$	37

	December 31, 2011
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value			Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Presentation	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	-	Accrued Liabilities		$	3
	Other Assets			-	Other Liabilities			5
Total Interest rate contracts			$	-			$	8
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	2	Accrued Liabilities		$	-

Derivative not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	5	Accrued Liabilities		$	15
	Other Assets			5	Other Liabilities			10
Total Interest rate contracts			$	10			$	25
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous Receivables		$	1	Accrued Liabilities		$	4
Total Derivatives			$	13			$	37

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

A summary of the effect of our derivative instruments for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Consolidated Statement of Financial Position is as follows:

	Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	~~Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss~~							Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income	~~Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income~~							Consolidated Statement of Operations Presentation
		Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012				2011				2012				2011
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts		$	(6-	)		$	(4-	)		$	-			$	-		Interest expense
Foreign exchange contracts		$	-			$	-			$	1			$	-		Net sales (a)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts		$	-			$	-			$	(2	)		$	(52	)	Interest expense (ab)
Foreign exchange contracts		$	-			$	-			$	(73	)		$	31		Other income (loss), net
Total Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	-			$	-			$	(9	)		$	(2	)
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	-			$	-			$	1			$	(1	)
Total Derivatives		$	(6-	)		$	(4-	)		$	(92	)		$	(21	)

(a) We reclassified $2 of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense during each of the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 related to the 2008 and 2010 Swaps.

(a)

We reclassified $1 of gains from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net sales during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

(b)

We reclassified $2 of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 related to the 2008 and 2010 Swaps.

	Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss						Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income						Consolidated Statement of Operations Presentation
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	(12	)	$	(4	)	$	-		$	-		Interest expense
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	-		$	-		$	(6	)	$	(21	)	Interest expense (a)
Foreign exchange contracts		-			-			(5	)		7		Other income (loss), net
Total Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	$	-		$	-		$	(11	)	$	(14	)
Total Derivatives	$	(12	)	$	(4	)	$	(11	)	$	(14	)

As of March 31, 2012, deferred losses of $7 related to our interest rate derivatives and deferred gains of $2 related to our foreign currency forward contracts, each designated as hedges and currently classified in accumulated other comprehensive loss, are expected to be reclassified into earnings as interest expense and net sales, respectively, over the next twelve months.

(a) We reclassified $6 and $4 of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the 2008 and 2010 Swaps.19

As of September 30, 2011, deferred losses of $8 related to our interest rate derivatives are expected to be reclassified into earnings as interest expense over the next twelve months.

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011
	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets			Significant Other Observable Inputs			Significant Unobservable Inputs
				(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash Equivalents (a)		$	70		$	70		$	-		$	-
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)			1			-			1			-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			9			-			9			-
Total		$	80		$	70		$	10		$	-
Liabilities:
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)		$	8		$	-		$	8		$	-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			37			-			37			-
Total		$	45		$	-		$	45		$	-
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010
		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets			Significant Other Observable Inputs			Significant Unobservable Inputs
				(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash Equivalents (a)		$	60		$	60		$	-		$	-
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)			1			-			1			-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			11			-			11			-
Total		$	72		$	60		$	12		$	-
Liabilities:
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)		$	1		$	-		$	1		$	-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			36			-			36			-
Total		$	37		$	-		$	37		$	-

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.

	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012
	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets			Significant Other Observable Inputs			Significant Unobservable Inputs
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Assets:
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)		$	2		$	-		$	2		$	-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			11			-			11			-
Total		$	13		$	-		$	13		$	-

Liabilities:
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)		$	2		$	-		$	2		$	-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			29			-			29			-
Total		$	31		$	-		$	31		$	-

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011
		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets			Significant Other Observable Inputs			Significant Unobservable Inputs
		Total		(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash Equivalents (a)		$	4		$	4		$	-		$	-
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)			3			-			3			-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			10			-			10			-
Total		$	17		$	4		$	13		$	-

Liabilities:
Derivatives – Foreign Exchange (b)		$	4		$	-		$	4		$	-
Derivatives – Interest Rates (c)			33			-			33			-
Total		$	37		$	-		$	37		$	-

(a)	Includes cash invested in money market funds.
(b)	Includes foreign currency forward and options contracts which are valued using an income approach based on the present value of the forward rate less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount.
(c)	Includes interest rate cap and swap agreements which are valued using counterparty quotes, which use discounted cash flows and the then-applicable forward interest rates.

The recorded amounts of cash, trade receivables and accounts payable approximate their fair values at both ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, due to the short maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 is $1,~~366~~442 compared to the recorded amount of $1,~~337~~338. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt at December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was $1,~~530~~394 compared to the recorded amount of $1,~~463~~337. The fair values are estimated by various banks based upon trading levels on the date of measurement using a Level 2 fair value measurement as defined by U.S. GAAP under the fair value hierarchy.

2320

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

12. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, our pension and healthcare and other benefit costs for continuing operations ~~are~~were as follows:

	Pension Benefits	~~Pension Benefits~~							Healthcare and Other Benefits
		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,								Three Months Ended March 31,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
	2012				2011				2012				2011
Service costs for benefits earned		$	-1			$	1			$	2-			$	21
Interest costs on benefit obligation			1311				1512				372				382
Assumed return on plan assets			(1312	)			(1513	)			(391	)			(402	)
Amortization of actuarial net loss			3				3				9				8
Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)			4				3				(1	)			(2	)
Settlement Charges			-				-				1				1
Total		$	4			$	3			$	-			$	(1	)
Total		$	3			$	4			$	10			$	9

	Healthcare and Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service costs for benefits earned	$	-		$	-		$	2		$	2
Interest costs on benefit obligation		2			2			6			7
Assumed return on plan assets		(2	)		(1	)		(5	)		(4	)
Amortization of actuarial net gain		(2	)		(3	)		(6	)		(6	)
Total	$	(2	)	$	(2	)	$	(3	)	$	(1	)

Settlements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 we recorded a settlement charge of $1 for each period, resulting from the significant amount of lump sum distributions in Belgium associated with a reduction of personnel prior to September 30, 2011 and 2010. These reductions were driven by restructuring activities.

Employer Contributions

According to the applicable funding rules, we are required to contribute approximately $4780 to our pension plans, collectively, in ~~2011~~2012. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, we contributed $3722.

2413. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the balances of related after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive loss. There was no tax impact related to the items presented below for any period presented.

	Accumulated Currency Adjustments			Postretirement Adjustments			Hedging Activity Adjustments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Beginning Balance - January 1, 2011	$	(66	)	$	(117	)	$	(11	)	$	(194	)
Currency translation adjustments		57			-			-			57
Amortization of net actuarial loss		-			1			-			1
Realized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			2			2
Ending Balance - March 31, 2011	$	(9	)	$	(116	)	$	(9	)	$	(134	)

Beginning Balance - January 1, 2012	$	(90	)	$	(177	)	$	(12	)	$	(279	)
Currency translation adjustments		27			-			-			27
Amortization of net actuarial loss		-			3			-			3
Net realized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			1			1
Ending Balance - March 31, 2012	$	(63	)	$	(174	)	$	(11	)	$	(248	)

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the balances of related after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

	Accumulated Currency Adjustments			Postretirement Adjustments			Hedging Activity Adjustments			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Beginning Balance - January 1, 2010	$	(56	)	$	(160	)	$	(21	)	$	(237	)
Currency translation adjustments		3			-			-			3
Pension settlement charge		-			1			-			1
Amortization of net actuarial loss		-			2			-			2
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			(4	)		(4	)
Realized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			4			4
Ending Balance - September 30, 2010	$	(53	)	$	(157	)	$	(21	)	$	(231	)
Beginning Balance - January 1, 2011	$	(66	)	$	(117	)	$	(11	)	$	(194	)
Currency translation adjustments		2			-			-			2
Pension settlement charge		-			1			-			1
Amortization of net actuarial loss		-			4			-			4
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			(12	)		(12	)
Realized loss on derivative instruments		-			-			6			6
Ending Balance - September 30, 2011	$	(64	)	$	(112	)	$	(17	)	$	(193	)

14. Segment Data

~~We are a global manufacturer and marketer of a variety of high-performance chemical-based materials that are used across automotive, construction, industrial and consumer applications.~~ Our operations are reported in three reportable segments consisting of Advanced Interlayers, Performance Films and Technical Specialties. These reportable segments are organized based upon a combination of the products and services offered and the end markets that are served. Included in our Advanced Interlayers reportable segment are the Saflex and Photovoltaic operating segments that have been aggregated.

The Advanced Interlayers reportable segment is a global manufacturer of interlayers for laminated glass and encapsulants for the photovoltaic market. The Performance Films reportable segment is a manufacturer of performance films for after-market applications which add functionality to glass. The Technical Specialties reportable segment is a global manufacturer of specialty chemicals for the rubber, solar energy, process manufacturing and aviation industries. The major products by reportable segment are as follows:

Reportable Segment Products Advanced Interlayers ● SAFLEX® plastic interlayer ● VISTASOLAR® ethyl vinyl acetate encapsulants ● Specialty intermediate polyvinyl butyral resin and plasticizer Performance Films ● LLUMAR®, VISTA®, GILA®, V-KOOL®, HUPER OPTIK®, XIR® and FORMULAONE® professional and retail window films ● FLEXVUE™ precision coated films and other enhanced polymer films for industrial customers Technical Specialties ● CRYSTEX® insoluable sulfur ● SANTOFLEX® antidegradants ● THERMINOL® heat transfer fluids ● SKYDROL® aviation hydraulic fluids

26The performance of our operating segments is evaluated based on Segment Profit, defined as income from continuing operations attributable to Solutia before interest expense, loss on debt modification, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Segment Profit includes selling, general and administrative, research and development expenses, other operating income or expenses, gains and losses from asset dispositions and restructuring charges, the reduction for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and other income and expense items that can be directly attributable to the segment. Certain operations, expenses and other items that are managed outside the reportable segments are reported as Unallocated and Other. Unallocated and Other is comprised of corporate expenses, adjustments to our environmental liabilities, other income and expense items including currency gains/losses, gains and losses from asset dispositions and restructuring charges that are not directly attributable to the reportable segments. There were no inter-segment sales in the periods presented below.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012					2011
	Net		Profit			Net		Profit
	Sales		(Loss)			Sales		(Loss)
Reportable Segments:
Advanced Interlayers	$	203	$	40		$	213	$	49
Performance Films		85		12			76		19
Technical Specialties		210		84			220		98
Reportable Segment Totals		498		136			509		166
Unallocated and Other		-		(31	)		-		(31	)
Total		498		105			509		135

Reconciliation to Consolidated Totals:
Depreciation and amortization				(30	)				(32	)
Interest expense				(23	)				(28	)
Loss on debt modification				-					(2	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest				1					1
Consolidated Totals
Net Sales	$	498				$	509

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes			$	53				$	74

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

The performance of our operating segments is evaluated based on Segment Profit, defined as income from continuing operations attributable to Solutia before interest expense, loss on debt extinguishment or modification, income taxes, depreciation and amortization15. Segment Profit includes selling, general and administrative, research and development expenses, other operating income or expenses, gains and losses from asset dispositions and restructuring charges, the reduction for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and other income and expense items that can be directly attributable to the segment. ~~Certain~~Earnings ~~operations,~~Per expenses and other items that are managed outside the reportable segments are reported as Unallocated and Other. Unallocated and Other is comprised of corporate expenses, adjustments to our LIFO valuation reserve, adjustments to our environmental liabilities, other income and expense items including currency gains/losses, gains and losses from asset dispositions and restructuring charges that are not directly attributable to the reportable segments in addition to non-core operations that do not meet the quantitative threshold for determining reportable segments. There were no inter-segment sales in the periods presented below.Share

	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	September 30,										September 30,
	2011					2010					2011					2010
	Net		Profit			Net		Profit			Net		Profit			Net		Profit
	Sales		(Loss)			Sales		(Loss)			Sales		(Loss)			Sales		(Loss)
Reportable Segment
Advanced Interlayers	$	227	$	47		$	212	$	48		$	672	$	148		$	606	$	139
Performance Films		74		10			73		13			236		48			198		40
Technical Specialties		218		75			224		80			663		255			647		237
Reportable Segment Totals		519		132			509		141			1,571		451			1,451		416
Unallocated and Other		-		6			2		(24	)		-		(42	)		10		(64	)
Total		519		138			511		117			1,571		409			1,461		352
Reconciliation to Consolidated Totals:
Depreciation and amortization				(31	)				(29	)				(94	)				(84	)
Interest expense				(24	)				(35	)				(78	)				(109	)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification				(2	)				-					(4	)				(89	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest				1					2					4					3
Consolidated Totals:
Net Sales	$	519				$	511				$	1,571				$	1,461
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes			$	82				$	55				$	237				$	73

The following table presents the net income used in basic and diluted earnings per share and reconciles weighted average number of shares used in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share.

15. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

(Shares in millions)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011

Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Net Income	$	54	$	66
Less: Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		1		1
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	53	$	65

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding used for basic earnings per share		121.2		119.4
Non-vested restricted shares		0.9		1.3
Stock options		0.5		0.5
Weighted average number of shares outstanding and common equivalent shares used for diluted earnings per share		122.6		121.2

~~The~~During ~~following table presents~~ the ~~net~~three ~~income~~months ~~(loss)~~ended ~~used~~March in31, ~~basic~~2012 and ~~diluted~~2011, ~~earnings~~the ~~(loss)~~following ~~per~~shares ~~share~~were ~~and~~not ~~reconciles~~included ~~weighted~~in ~~average~~the ~~number~~computation of ~~shares~~earnings ~~used~~per inshare since the ~~calculations~~result ofwould ~~basic~~have ~~and~~been ~~diluted earnings (loss) per share~~anti-dilutive.

(Shares in millions)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
(Shares in millions)	2012		2011
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Non-vested restricted shares		-		0.1
Income from continuing operations	$	76	$	48	$	212	$	47
Stock options		0.6		1.1
Less: Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		1		2		4		3
Warrants (a)		4.5		4.5
Income from continuing operations attributable to Solutia		75		46		208		44
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		-		2		-		(13	)
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	75	$	48	$	208	$	31
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used for basic earnings (loss) per share		120.1		119.1		119.7		118.8
Non-vested restricted shares		1.0		0.9		1.2		1.0
Stock options		0.2		-		0.4		-
Weighted average number of shares outstanding and common equivalent shares used for diluted earnings (loss) per share
		121.3		120.0		121.3		119.8

(a) On February 28. 2008, the date we emerged from bankruptcy, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4.5 shares to certain of the holders of our stock based on such holder's pre-petition stock ownership. These warrants have an exercise price of $29.70 and expire on February 27, 2013.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

~~During~~16. Condensed ~~the~~Consolidating ~~three~~Financial ~~and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the following shares were not included in the computation of earnings (loss) per share since the result would have been anti-dilutive.~~Statements

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Shares in millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Non-vested restricted shares		0.2		0.3		0.1		0.2
Stock options		1.5		2.8		1.4		2.4
Warrants (a)		4.5		4.5		4.5		4.5

In accordance with SEC regulation S-X Rule 3-10 “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered,” we are providing condensed consolidating financial statements as the 8.75% Notes and 7.875% Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis. As other comprehensive income is held by the parent, no Statement of Comprehensive Income has been presented below.

The following consolidating financial statements present, in separate columns, financial information for: (ai) OnSolutia, ~~February~~on ~~28,~~a ~~2008~~parent-only basis, carrying its investment in subsidiaries under the ~~date~~equity wemethod; ~~emerged~~(ii) ~~from~~Note ~~bankruptcy,~~Guarantors weon ~~issued~~a ~~warrants~~combined tobasis ~~purchase~~(“Guarantors”), ancarrying ~~aggregate~~investments ofin ~~4.5~~subsidiaries ~~shares~~which todo ~~certain~~not ofguarantee the ~~holders~~debt of(the ~~our~~“Non-Guarantors”) ~~stock~~under ~~based~~the onequity ~~such~~method; ~~holder's~~(iii) ~~pre~~Non-~~petition~~Guarantors ~~stock~~on ~~ownership.~~a ~~These~~combined ~~warrants~~basis; ~~have~~(iv) aneliminating ~~exercise~~entries ~~price~~and (v) consolidated totals as of ~~$29~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.70 The eliminating entries primarily reflect intercompany transactions, such as interest income and ~~expire~~expense, onaccounts ~~February~~receivable 27and payable, ~~2013~~advances, short and long-term debt, royalties and profit in inventory eliminations.

16. Subsequent Events

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

	Parent-Only					Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors		Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia

Net Sales	$	153		$	115	$	460		$	(230	)	$	498
Cost of goods sold		131			77		367			(235	)		340
Gross Profit		22			38		93			5			158

Selling, general and administrative expenses		40			15		20			-			75
Research and development expenses and other operating expense, net		2			4		1			-			7

Operating Income		(20	)		19		72			5			76

Equity earnings from affiliates		81			50		-			(131	)		-
Interest expense		(28	)		-		(50	)		55			(23	)
Other income, net		21			14		31			(66	)		-

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		54			83		53			(137	)		53
Income tax benefit		-			-		(1	)		-			(1	)
Net Income		54			83		54			(137	)		54
Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-		1			-			1
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	54		$	83	$	53		$	(137	)	$	53

On October 6, 2011, Solutia entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the “Agreement”) to acquire Southwall Technologies Inc. (“Southwall”) for approximately $113 million or $13.60 per share, without interest. Southwall is a leading innovator of energy-saving films and glass products for the automotive and architectural markets. The Southwall acquisition will enable us to combine Southwall’s state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, proprietary technologies and innovative products with Solutia’s global capabilities and diverse market scope.24

On October 25, 2011, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Solutia commenced a tender offer to purchase all the outstanding shares of Southwall's common stock (the “Shares”) for $13.60 net per share in cash, without interest (the “Offer”). Completion of the Offer is subject to customary terms and conditions, including, among other things (i) it having been validly tendered in accordance with the terms of the Offer and not properly withdrawn, at least a majority of the sum of (a) the number of Shares issued and outstanding plus (b) all Shares that the Company may be required to issue on or prior to Closing (as defined in the Agreement) as a result of the vesting, conversion or exercise of Southwall options and other derivative securities, including warrants, options (other than the Top-Up Option (as defined in the Agreement)) convertible or exchangeable securities or other rights to acquire Shares (including any shares of Preferred Stock remaining outstanding) and (ii) the required approvals under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and any other comparable applicable foreign antitrust laws, shall have been obtained, waived or made, as applicable, and the respective waiting periods required in connection with such laws shall have expired or been terminated. If the Offer is successfully completed, then following receipt of approval of Southwall’s stockholders, if required, we expect to consummate a merger that would result in all Southwall Shares remaining outstanding immediately prior to the merger being cancelled and converted into the right to receive $13.60 net per Share in cash, without interest. The tender offer is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2011.

17. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

The following consolidating financial statements present, in separate columns, financial information for: (i) Solutia, on a parent-only basis, carrying its investment in subsidiaries under the equity method; (ii) Note Guarantors on a combined basis (“Guarantors”), carrying investments in subsidiaries which do not guarantee the debt (the “Non-Guarantors”) under the equity method; (iii) Non-Guarantors on a combined basis; (iv) eliminating entries and (v) consolidated totals as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The eliminating entries primarily reflect intercompany transactions, such as interest income and expense, accounts receivable and payable, advances, short and long-term debt, royalties and profit in inventory eliminations.

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Parent-Only						Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia
Net Sales	$	~~145~~135		$	~~102~~107		$	~~494~~465		$	(~~222~~198	)	$	~~519~~509
Cost of goods sold		~~125~~118			69			~~408~~366			(~~232~~206	)		~~370~~347
Gross Profit		2017			3338			8699			108			~~149~~162
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2627			13			2622			-			6562
Research and development expenses and other operating expense (income), net		~~(27~~7	)		3(1	)		-(11	)		-			(245	)
Operating Income		21			17			60			10			108
Operating Income (Loss)		(17	)		26			88			8			105
Equity earnings from affiliates		6598			4559			-			(~~110~~157	)		-
Interest expense		(2832	)		-			(5446	)		5850			(2428	)
Other income, net		21			8			46			(75	)		-
Other income (loss), net		18			13			26			(58	)		(1	)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		(2	)		-			-			-			(2	)
Loss on debt extinguishment		(2	)		-			-			-			(2	)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		7765			7098			5268			(~~117~~157	)		8274
Income tax expense		2-			1-			47			(1	)		68
Net Income		7565			6998			4861			(~~116~~158	)		7666
Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			1			-			1
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	7565		$	6998		$	4760		$	(~~116~~158	)	$	7565

2925

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
March 31, 2012
	Parent-Only						Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia
Net Sales	$	122		$	108		$	447		$	(166	)	$	511
ASSETS
Cost of goods sold		107			71			346			(171	)		353
Current Assets:
Gross Profit		15			37			101			5			158
Cash and cash equivalents	$	30		$	4		$	74		$	-		$	108
Selling, general and administrative expenses		19			14			29			-			62
Trade receivables, net		33			50			138			-			221
Research and development expenses and other operating expense (income), net		3			1			4			-			8
Intercompany receivables		79			697			495			(1,271	)		-
Operating Income (Loss)		(7	)		22			68			5			88
Miscellaneous receivables		19			1			54			-			74
Equity earnings from affiliates		73			39			-			(112	)		-
Inventories		77			69			285			(47	)		384
Interest expense		(35	)		(1	)		(43	)		44			(35	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3			2			11			12			28
Other income, net		17			15			21			(51	)		2
Current assets of discontinued operations		-			-			1			-			1
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		48			75			46			(114	)		55
Total Current Assets		241			823			1,058			(1,306	)		816
Income tax expense		-			-			7			-			7
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		176			148			629			-			953
Income from Continuing Operations		48			75			39			(114	)		48
Investments in Affiliates		2,703			751			1,239			(4,693	)		-
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		-			-			2			-			2
Goodwill		150			243			396			-			789
Net Income		48			75			41			(114	)		50
Net Identified Intangible Assets		177			312			427			-			916
Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			2			-			2
Intercompany Advances		439			527			2,013			(2,979	)		-
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	48		$	75		$	39		$	(114	)	$	48
Other Assets		44			2			44			-			90
Total Assets	$	3,930		$	2,806		$	5,806		$	(8,978	)	$	3,564
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	52		$	28		$	101		$	-		$	181
Intercompany payables		755			19			497			(1,271	)		-
Accrued liabilities		102			8			100			-			210
Intercompany short-term debt		69			1			430			(500	)		-
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		-			-			5			-			5
Total Current Liabilities		978			56			1,133			(1,771	)		396
Long-Term Debt		1,338			-			-			-			1,338
Intercompany Long-Term Debt		130			23			2,326			(2,479	)		-
Postretirement Liabilities		210			2			75			-			287
Environmental Remediation Liabilities		202			3			14			-			219
Deferred Tax Liabilities		18			11			154			-			183
Non-Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		-			-			18			-			18
Other Liabilities		37			7			52			-			96
Equity:
Common stock		1			-			-			-			1
Additional contributed capital		1,672			2,704			2,024			(4,728	)		1,672
Treasury stock		(20	)		-			-			-			(20	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(248	)		-			-			-			(248	)
Accumulated deficit		(388	)		-			-			-			(388	)
Total Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia		1,017			2,704			2,024			(4,728	)		1,017
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			10			-			10
Total Equity		1,017			2,704			2,034			(4,728	)		1,027
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,930		$	2,806		$	5,806		$	(8,978	)	$	3,564

3026

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
December 31, 2011
	Parent-Only						Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia
Net Sales	$	417		$	329		$	1,445		$	(620	)	$	1,571
ASSETS
Cost of goods sold		351			215			1,172			(648	)		1,090
Current Assets:
Gross Profit		66			114			273			28			481
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32		$	7		$	74		$	-		$	113
Selling, general and administrative expenses		76			38			73			-			187
Trade receivables, net		32			41			163			-			236
Research and development expenses and other operating expense (income), net		(24	)		4			(6	)		-			(26	)
Intercompany receivables		46			669			476			(1,191	)		-
Operating Income		14			72			206			28			320
Miscellaneous receivables		18			3			54			-			75
Equity earnings from affiliates		232			129			-			(361	)		-
Inventories		84			57			234			(40	)		335
Interest expense		(88	)		(1	)		(155	)		166			(78	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7			1			9			10			27
Other income (loss), net		56			37			105			(199	)		(1	)
Current assets of discontinued operations		-			-			1			-			1
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		(4	)		-			-			-			(4	)
Total Current Assets		219			778			1,011			(1,221	)		787
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		210			237			156			(366	)		237
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		177			149			619			-			945
Income tax expense		2			1			22			-			25
Investments in Affiliates		2,606			703			1,323			(4,632	)		-
Net Income		208			236			134			(366	)		212
Goodwill		150			243			390			-			783
Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			4			-			4
Net Identified Intangible Assets		179			316			421			-			916
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	208		$	236		$	130		$	(366	)	$	208
Intercompany Advances		440			512			2,027			(2,979	)		-
Other Assets		47			2			46			-			95
Total Assets	$	3,818		$	2,703		$	5,837		$	(8,832	)	$	3,526
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	59		$	20		$	107		$	-		$	186
Intercompany payables		718			17			456			(1,191	)		-
Accrued liabilities		116			12			99			-			227
Intercompany short-term debt		43			-			564			(607	)		-
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		-			-			8			-			8
Total Current Liabilities		936			49			1,234			(1,798	)		421
Long-Term Debt		1,337			-			-			-			1,337
Intercompany Long-Term Debt		131			23			2,218			(2,372	)		-
Postretirement Liabilities		224			2			82			-			308
Environmental Remediation Liabilities		210			4			13			-			227
Deferred Tax Liabilities		19			11			160			-			190
Non-Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		-			-			18			-			18
Other Liabilities		42			7			49			-			98
Equity:
Common stock		1			-			-			-			1
Additional contributed capital		1,651			2,607			2,055			(4,662	)		1,651
Treasury stock		(13	)		-			-			-			(13	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(279	)		-			-			-			(279	)
Accumulated deficit		(441	)		-			-			-			(441	)
Total Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia		919			2,607			2,055			(4,662	)		919
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			8			-			8
Total Equity		919			2,607			2,063			(4,662	)		927
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,818		$	2,703		$	5,837		$	(8,832	)	$	3,526

3127

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Parent-Only						Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia
Net Sales	$	357		$	322		$	1,308		$	(526	)	$	1,461
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations	$	(45	)	$	24		$	37		$	-		$	16
Cost of goods sold		310			206			1,017			(537	)		996
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Gross Profit		47			116			291			11			465
Property, plant and equipment purchases		(3	)		(2	)		(22	)		-			(27	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		75			42			77			-			194
Cash Used in Investing Activities		(3	)		(2	)		(22	)		-			(27	)
Research and development expenses and other operating expense, net		8			3			4			-			15
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Operating Income (Loss)		(36	)		71			210			11			256
Purchase of treasury shares		(7	)		-			-			-			(7	)
Equity earnings from affiliates		209			106			-			(315	)		-
Stock Option Exercises		15			-			-			-			15
Interest expense		(109	)		(1	)		(114	)		115			(109	)
Other, net		(4	)		-			-			-			(4	)
Other income, net		38			38			76			(137	)		15
Changes in investments and advances from (to) affiliates		42			(25	)		(17	)		-			-
Loss on debt extinguishment		(88	)		-			(1	)		-			(89	)
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		46			(25	)		(17	)		-			4
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense		14			214			171			(326	)		73
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		-			-			2			-			2
Income tax expense		-			-			30			(4	)		26
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(2	)		(3	)		-			-			(5	)
Income from Continuing Operations		14			214			141			(322	)		47
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		17			-			(30	)		-			(13	)
Beginning of period		32			7			74			-			113
Net Income		31			214			111			(322	)		34
End of period	$	30		$	4		$	74		$	-		$	108
Net Income attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			3			-			3
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	31		$	214		$	108		$	(322	)	$	31

3228

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
September 30, 2011
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Parent-Only						Non-						Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Solutia
ASSETS
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations	$	(33	)	$	31		$	54		$	-		$	52
Current Assets:
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	120		$	3		$	47		$	-		$	170
Property, plant and equipment purchases		(4	)		(1	)		(12	)		-			(17	)
Trade receivables, net		33			43			164			-			240
Other		-			-			1			-			1
Intercompany receivables		69			610			512			(1,191	)		-
Restricted Cash		-			-			(5	)		-			(5	)
Miscellaneous receivables		13			1			57			-			71
Asset disposals		-			3			26			-			29
Inventories		79			60			260			(43	)		356
Cash Used in Investing Activities		(4	)		2			10			-			8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		5			1			16			10			32
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Current assets of discontinued operations		-			-			1			-			1
Payment of long-term debt obligations		(77	)		-			-			-			(77	)
Total Current Assets		319			718			1,057			(1,224	)		870
Purchase of treasury shares		(2	)		-			-			-			(2	)
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		179			145			593			-			917
Stock Option Exercises		2			-			-			-			2
Investments in Affiliates		2,500			711			1,237			(4,448	)		-
Other, net		(3	)		-			-			-			(3	)
Goodwill		149			192			401			-			742
Changes in investments and advances from (to) affiliates		99			(39	)		(60	)		-			-
Net Identified Intangible Assets		182			299			431			-			912
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		19			(39	)		(60	)		-			(80	)
Intercompany Advances		441			515			1,982			(2,938	)		-
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		-			-			2			-			2
Other Assets		63			2			69			-			134
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(18	)		(6	)		6			-			(18	)
Total Assets	$	3,833		$	2,582		$	5,770		$	(8,610	)	$	3,575
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Beginning of period		98			7			86			-			191
Current Liabilities:
End of period	$	80		$	1		$	92		$	-		$	173
Accounts payable	$	52		$	23		$	118		$	-		$	193
Intercompany payables		699			16			476			(1,191	)		-
Accrued liabilities		107			11			113			-			231
Intercompany short-term debt		84			-			538			(622	)		-
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		-			-			5			-			5
Total Current Liabilities		942			50			1,250			(1,813	)		429
Long-Term Debt		1,337			-			-			-			1,337
Intercompany Long-Term Debt		132			24			2,160			(2,316	)		-
Postretirement Liabilities		190			2			78			-			270
Environmental Remediation Liabilities		214			3			13			-			230
Deferred Tax Liabilities		19			11			196			-			226
Non-Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		-			-			22			-			22
Other Liabilities		46			6			49			-			101
Equity:
Common stock		1			-			-			-			1
Additional contributed capital		1,653			2,486			1,995			(4,481	)		1,653
Treasury stock		(13	)		-			-			-			(13	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(193	)		-			-			-			(193	)
Accumulated deficit		(495	)		-			-			-			(495	)
Total Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia		953			2,486			1,995			(4,481	)		953
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			7			-			7
Total Equity		953			2,486			2,002			(4,481	)		960
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,833		$	2,582		$	5,770		$	(8,610	)	$	3,575

3329

~~SOLUTIA~~Item ~~INC~~2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
	Parent-Only					Non-					Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors		Guarantors		Eliminations			Solutia
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	98		$	7	$	86	$	-		$	191
Trade receivables, net		26			40		162		-			228
Intercompany receivables		100			497		398		(995	)		-
Miscellaneous receivables		14			-		61		-			75
Inventories		69			47		199		(40	)		275
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7			2		9		9			27
Current assets of discontinued operations		-			-		5		-			5
Total Current Assets		314			593		920		(1,026	)		801
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		180			139		592		-			911
Investments in Affiliates		2,280			559		908		(3,747	)		-
Goodwill		149			192		399		-			740
Net Identified Intangible Assets		186			309		443		-			938
Intercompany Advances		439			514		1,693		(2,646	)		-
Other Assets		78			2		67		-			147
Total Assets	$	3,626		$	2,308	$	5,022	$	(7,419	)	$	3,537
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	53		$	21	$	99	$	-		$	173
Intercompany payables		630			11		354		(995	)		-
Accrued liabilities		103			10		123		(1	)		235
Intercompany short-term debt		17			-		479		(496	)		-
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		-			-		15		-			15
Total Current Liabilities		803			42		1,070		(1,492	)		423
Long-Term Debt		1,463			-		-		-			1,463
Intercompany Long-Term Debt		108			23		2,019		(2,150	)		-
Postretirement Liabilities		225			3		80		-			308
Environmental Remediation Liabilities		225			3		16		-			244
Deferred Tax Liabilities		21			11		206		-			238
Non-Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		-			-		25		-			25
Other Liabilities		49			6		42		-			97
Equity:
Common stock		1			-		-		-			1
Additional contributed capital		1,634			2,220		1,557		(3,777	)		1,634
Treasury stock		(6	)		-		-		-			(6	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(194	)		-		-		-			(194	)
Accumulated deficit		(703	)		-		-		-			(703	)
Total Shareholders' Equity attributable to Solutia		732			2,220		1,557		(3,777	)		732
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-		7		-			7
Total Equity		732			2,220		1,564		(3,777	)		739
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,626		$	2,308	$	5,022	$	(7,419	)	$	3,537

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Parent-Only						Non-					Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations		Solutia
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations	$	(71	)	$	103		$	102		$	-	$	134
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment purchases		(14	)		(7	)		(49	)		-		(70	)
Acquisition related payments, net of cash acquired		-			-			(9	)		-		(9	)
Asset disposals and investment sales		32			3			26			-		61
Other		-			-			1			-		1
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		18			(4	)		(31	)		-		(17	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of long-term debt obligations		(127	)		-			-			-		(127	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(7	)		-			-			-		(7	)
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			(4	)		-		(4	)
Other, net		-			-			(2	)		-		(2	)
Changes in investments and advances from (to) affiliates		209			(103	)		(106	)		-		-
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		75			(103	)		(112	)		-		(140	)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		-			-			2			-		2
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		22			(4	)		(39	)		-		(21	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year		98			7			86			-		191
End of year	$	120		$	3		$	47		$	-	$	170

SOLUTIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts or otherwise noted)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent-Only						Non-					Consolidated
	Solutia			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations		Solutia
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operations	$	(82	)	$	124		$	143		$	-	$	185
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment purchases		(5	)		(4	)		(19	)		-		(28	)
Acquisition related payments, net of cash acquired		-			(1	)		(370	)		-		(371	)
Asset disposals		(3	)		-			3			-		-
Cash Used in Investing Activities		(8	)		(5	)		(386	)		-		(399	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt obligations		1,144			-			-			-		1,144
Payment of long-term debt obligations		(908	)		-			-			-		(908	)
Payment of short-term debt obligations		-			-			(16	)		-		(16	)
Debt issuance costs		(27	)		-			-			-		(27	)
Purchase of treasury shares		(4	)		-			-			-		(4	)
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest		-			-			(4	)		-		(4	)
Other, net		(9	)		-			-			-		(9	)
Changes in investments and advances from (to) affiliates		(85	)		(115	)		200			-		-
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		111			(115	)		180			-		176
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		-			-			(24	)		-		(24	)
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		21			4			(87	)		-		(62	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period		104			1			138			-		243
End of period	$	125		$	5		$	51		$	-	$	181

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include all statements regarding expected future financial position, results of operations, profitability, cash flows and liquidity. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements herein include, among others, our ability to comply with the terms of our financing agreements; our ability to reduce our overall leveraged position; general economic, business and market conditions; customer acceptance of new products; raw material and energy costs or shortages; limited access to capital resources; currency and interest rate fluctuations; increased competitive and/or customer pressure; gain or loss of significant customers; compression of credit terms with suppliers; exposure to product liability and other litigation; changes in cost of environmental remediation obligations and other environmental liabilities; changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”); ability to implement cost reduction initiatives in a timely manner; geopolitical instability and changes in pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions.

Overview

We are a global manufacturer and marketer of a variety of high-performance chemical-based materials that are used across automotive, construction, industrial and consumer applications. We report ~~and manage~~ our operations in three reportable segments consisting of Advanced Interlayers, Performance Films and Technical Specialties. Through our Advanced Interlayers segment, we produce Polyvinyl Butyral (“PVB”) and Ethyl Vinyl Acetate (“EVA”) used in the manufacture of laminated glass for automotive, architectural and solar applications. Our Performance Films segment manufactures, markets and distributes custom-coated window films for aftermarket automotive and architectural applications in addition to the manufacture of specialized technical films for use in a wide variety of industrial applications. Technical Specialties is our specialty chemicals segment, which includes the manufacture and sale of specialty chemicals for the rubber, solar energy, process manufacturing and aviation industries. The major products by reportable segment are as follows:

Reportable Segment Products Advanced Interlayers ● ● ● SAFLEX® plastic interlayer VISTASOLAR® ethyl vinyl acetate encapsulants Specialty intermediate polyvinyl butyral resin and plasticizer Performance Films ● ● LLUMAR®, VISTA®, GILA®, V-KOOL®, HUPER OPTIK®, XIR® and FORMULAONE® professional and retail window films FLEXVUEÔ precision coated films and other enhanced polymer films for industrial customers Technical Specialties ● ● ● ● CRYSTEX® insoluble sulphur SANTOFLEX® antidegradants THERMINOL® heat transfer fluids SKYDROL® aviation hydraulic fluids

See Note 14 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our reportable segments and for the associated definition of segment profit.

37On January 26, 2012, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Eastman Chemical Company (“Eastman”) and Eagle Merger Sub Corporation (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastman. The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Solutia, with Solutia surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastman (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Solutia will be converted into the right to receive (i) $22.00 in cash, without interest, and (ii) 0.120 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of Eastman.

~~Consolidated Results of Operations - Third Quarter 2011 Compared to Third Quarter 2010~~30

	Three Months Ended
		September 30,				Increase			% Increase
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2011			2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales		$	519	$	511	$	8			2	%
Net Income attributable to Solutia		$	75	$	48	$	27			56	%
Adjusted EBITDA (a)		$	121	$	130	$	(9	)		(7	)%
Adjusted EPS (a)		$	0.45	$	0.42	$	0.03			7	%

The completion of the Eastman Chemical transaction remains subject to approval by Solutia’s shareholders and receipt of required regulatory approvals as well as other customary closing conditions. The waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act expired on March 28, 2012. The waiting period under the competition laws of South Korea expired on March 23, 2012, and we expect the Ukraine waiting period to expire on April 26, 2012. On April 16, 2012, the Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China granted clearance for this transaction. The parties also received notification from the European Commission that they formally accepted their filing on April 16, 2012, which will start the waiting period. The transaction is expected to close in mid-2012.

Consolidated Results of Operations - First Quarter 2012 Compared to First Quarter 2011

	Three Months Ended
		March 31,				Increase			% Increase
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2012			2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales		$	498	$	509	$	(11	)		(2	) %
Net Income attributable to Solutia		$	53	$	65	$	(12	)		(18	) %

Adjusted EBITDA (a)		$	126	$	135	$	(9	)		(7	) %
Adjusted EPS (a)		$	0.55	$	0.50	$	0.05			10	%

(a) Non-GAAP financial measure. See below for discussion and a reconciliation to GAAP measures

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012, we reported net sales of $~~519~~498 million, a 2 percent ~~increase~~decrease as compared to $~~511~~509 million reported in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010~~2011. The ~~increase~~decrease was driven by ~~higher~~lower ~~selling~~sales ~~prices~~volumes of $1822 million or 4 percent and ~~favorable~~unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $233 million or 41 percent, partially offset by ~~the~~higher ~~impact~~selling ofprices ~~divestitures~~ of $1614 million or 3 percent ~~and lower sales volumes of $17 million or 3 percent~~. Net income attributable to Solutia of $7553 million for ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 represents ana ~~improvement~~decrease of $2712 million as compared to net income of $4865 million reported in the same period in ~~2010~~2011. Significantly impacting our results are net ~~gains~~ charges of $2015 million and net ~~charges~~gains of $45 million for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively, which are more fully discussed within the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability section~~, along with income from discontinued operations of $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010~~. After consideration of these items, net income improved by $58 million on lower ~~Adjusted~~income ~~EBITDA of $9 million~~tax, ~~as further discussed below~~interest, ~~and higher~~ depreciation and amortization expense, ~~which~~partially ~~were more than~~ offset by lower ~~stock~~Adjusted ~~compensation,~~EBITDA ~~interest~~of $9 million, ~~and~~as ~~income~~further ~~tax~~discussed ~~expenses~~below.

Adjusted EBITDA for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 was $~~121~~126 million as compared to $~~130~~135 million for the same period in ~~2010~~2011, which represents a $9 million or a 7 percent decrease. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was driven by higher raw materials of $2920 million, ~~and~~as ~~the~~partially ~~divestiture~~recovered ofthrough ~~certain~~$14 ~~other~~million ~~rubber~~in ~~chemical~~higher ~~businesses~~selling ofprices, $3and ~~million~~lower assales ~~partially~~volumes, ~~offset~~which bynegatively ~~higher~~impacted ~~sales~~Adjusted ~~revenue,~~EBITDA asby ~~discussed~~$9 ~~above~~million, ~~which~~as ~~generated~~partially offset by $135 million ofin ~~incremental~~lower ~~Adjusted~~operating ~~EBITDA,~~expenses and $101 million ofin ~~lower~~favorable ~~operating~~currency ~~expenses~~exchange fluctuations. Lower operating expenses were predominantly driven by better raw material and utility yields, ~~and~~higher ~~lower~~fixed ~~expenses associated~~cost ~~with~~absorption ~~our~~as ~~annual~~partially ~~incentive~~offset ~~plan~~by higher R&D expenditures.

Adjusted Earnings Per Share for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 was $0.4555 as compared to $0.4250 for the same period in ~~2010~~2011, which represents a $0.0305 or a 710 percent improvement. The Adjusted Earnings Per Share impact from lower Adjusted EBITDA ~~and~~was ~~modestly higher depreciation and amortization expense were~~ more than offset by lower interest expense, resulting from ~~our~~the debt ~~paydown~~reduction ~~throughout~~achieved ~~2010~~in 2011, and ~~into~~a ~~2011~~lower income ~~and~~tax ~~our~~expense. The ~~2017~~lower ~~Term~~income ~~Loan~~tax expense ~~refinancing,~~was ~~and~~driven predominantly by the reversal of a ~~lower~~deferred ~~effective~~tax liability related to the extension of the Company's tax ~~rate~~holiday in Malaysia.

Consolidated Results of Operations - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

	Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				Increase		% Increase
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2011			2010		(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Net Sales		$	1,571	$	1,461	$	110		8	%
Net Income attributable to Solutia		$	208	$	31	$	177	N.M.
Adjusted EBITDA (a)		$	397	$	388	$	9		2	%
Adjusted EPS (a)		$	1.52	$	1.21	$	0.31		26	%

(a) Non-GAAP financial measure. See below for discussion and a reconciliation to GAAP measures

In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we reported net sales of $1,571 million, an 8 percent increase as compared to $1,461 million reported in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was driven by higher selling prices of $47 million or 3 percent, higher sales volumes of $33 million or 3 percent, the impact of the Vistasolar and Novomatrix acquired businesses of $43 million or 3 percent and favorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $40 million or 3 percent, partially offset by the impact of divestitures of $53 million or 4 percent. Net income attributable to Solutia of $208 million for nine months ended September 30, 2011 represents an improvement of $177 million as compared to a net income of $31 million as reported in the same period in 2010. Significantly impacting our results are net gains of $24 million and net charges of $101 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are more fully discussed in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability section, along with a loss from discontinued operations of $13 million in 2010. After consideration of these items, net income improved by $39 million as higher Adjusted EBITDA of $9 million, as further discussed below, lower stock-based compensation, interest and income tax expenses were partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization.

Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2011 was $397 million as compared to $388 million for the same period in 2010, which represents a $9 million or 2 percent increase. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was driven by higher revenue as discussed above, which generated $81 million of incremental Adjusted EBITDA and $18 million of lower operating expenses, partially offset by the negative impact from higher raw materials of $79 million and the divestiture of certain other rubber chemical businesses of $11 million. Lower operating expenses were predominantly driven by lower expenses associated with our annual incentive plan and higher fixed cost absorption.

Adjusted Earnings Per Share for the first nine months of 2011 was $1.52 as compared to $1.21 for the same period in 2010, which represents a $0.31 or a 26 percent increase. On an Adjusted Earnings Per Share basis, this increase was significantly higher than the increase in Adjusted EBITDA due to lower interest expense, resulting from our debt paydown throughout 2010 and into 2011 and our term debt refinancing, and a lower effective tax rate, which was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense, most significantly associated with assets purchased in the Vistasolar and Novomatrix acquisitions.

Outlook

~~For~~As ~~the~~previously ~~fourth quarter 2011~~announced, ~~we expect net sales to be near the levels experienced~~ in the third quarter as the effects from a modest European debt stabilization and resulting modest recovery within the automotive industry are substantially offset by normal seasonality combined with the negative impact of a stronger U.S. currency. For the fourth quarter 2011, we are premising an average Euro to U.S. dollar currency rate of 1.35. Architectural sales are expected to remain consistent with third quarter results while sales volumes on solar encapsulant products are now not premised to recover until 2012~~. Aggregating these premises~~, ~~together~~Solutia ~~with~~expects ~~average selling prices expected~~ to begenerate ~~consistent~~annual ~~with~~revenue ~~those~~between ~~realized in the third quarter, we expect full year net sales to be within the range of~~ $2.05125 billion and $2.1275 billion.

With respect to profitability, continued high raw material prices, which negatively impacted the first nine months of 2011 results by $79 million as compared to the same period in 2010, will continue in the fourth quarter of 2011 but are expected to be more than offset by corresponding year-over-year sales volume and sales price increases.31

Earnings premised in the fourth quarter 2011 along with reductions in required working capital will generate additional operating cash, which will be partially offset by continued product and growth related capital spending on previously announced projects. In summary, we are currently anticipating generating cash from continuing operations less capital spending in 2011 in the range of $120 million to $130 million.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) includes financial information prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as well as three other financial measures including Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per Share, that are considered “non-GAAP financial measures.” Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per Share are intended to supplement investors’ understanding of our operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be performance measures that should be regarded as an alternative to, or more meaningful than other GAAP measures and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as income from continuing operations attributable to Solutia before interest expense, loss on debt ~~extinguishment or~~ modification, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, certain gains and losses that affect comparability, ~~cost overhang associated with discontinued operations~~ and non-cash share-based compensation expense. Adjusted Earnings is defined as income from continuing operations attributable to Solutia excluding certain gains and losses, net of tax, that affect comparability. Adjusted Earnings per Share is defined as Adjusted Earnings divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. We believe Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per Share assist us in comparing our performance over various reporting periods and against our peers on a consistent basis because it removes from our operating results the impact of items that do not reflect our core operating performance. Further, we believe Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per Share are useful to investors. The compensation committee of our board of directors determines the annual incentive compensation for certain members of our management based, in part, using each of these financial measures.

See the Non-GAAP Reconciliations ~~sections~~section of this MD&A for reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There were no changes in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 with respect to our critical accounting policies, as presented in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K filed on February 2524, ~~2011~~2012.

Results of Operations - ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2011~~2012 Compared to ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2010~~2011

Advanced Interlayers

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	March 31,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	2012		2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	~~227~~203	$	~~212~~213	$	15(10	)		7(5	) %
Segment Profit	$	4740	$	4849	$	(19	)		(218	) %
Charges included in Segment Profit	$	-	$	-

The ~~increase~~decrease in net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 resulted from ~~higher~~lower ~~average~~sales ~~selling~~volumes ~~prices~~ of $59 million or 25 percent and ~~favorable~~unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $143 million or 71 percent, partially offset by ~~lower~~higher ~~sales~~average ~~volumes~~selling prices of $42 million or 21 percent. The increase in selling prices is the result of price increases inon ~~2011~~ annual customer contracts related to our SAFLEX® plastic interlayer, partially offset by price decreases on VISTASOLAR® EVA encapsulants. Lower sales volumes were most significantly experienced by sales of VISTASOLAR® EVA encapsulants and ~~specialty intermediates~~, ~~both predominately~~to ina ~~Europe~~lesser extent, ~~partially~~sales ~~offset~~of bySAFLEX® anplastic ~~increase~~interlayer in ~~volumes~~automotive onmarkets, ~~SAFLEX®~~predominantly ~~plastic~~Europe, ~~interlayer. The~~as ~~increase~~partially inoffset by higher sales volumes onof SAFLEX® plastic interlayer ~~was primarily due to improvements~~ in ~~the~~ architectural markets, ~~driven~~predominantly byAsia ~~Europe, while volumes in the automotive market were effectively flat~~Pacific. The ~~favorable~~unfavorable currency impact was driven most notably by the ~~increased~~weakening ~~strength~~ of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, in comparison to the same period in ~~2010~~2011, due to our strong market positions in Europe.

The decrease in segment profit in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 resulted primarily from higher raw material costs of $118 million, partially offset by higher ~~net~~selling ~~sales~~prices, ~~as discussed above,~~ and lower ~~expenses~~sales ~~associated with our annual incentive plan~~volumes.

Performance Films

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase			% Increase
	March 31,					Increase			% Increase
	2011			2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	2012			2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	7485		$	7376	$	19			112	%
Segment Profit	$	1012		$	1319	$	(37	)		(2337	) %
Charges included in Segment Profit	$	(24	)	$	-

The increase in net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 resulted from ~~increased~~higher ~~selling~~sales ~~prices~~volumes of $19 million or 112 percent, ~~and~~as ~~favorable~~driven ~~currency~~by ~~exchange~~higher ~~rate~~window ~~fluctuations~~film ofsales $1volumes ~~million~~within orthe 1automotive ~~percent,~~market as partially offset by lower sales volumes of $1 million or 1 percent. The increase in selling price was a result of price increases put in place during 2011 on our window films in response to an improved demand profile coupled with higher raw material costs. Lower sales volumes were experienced ~~primarily~~ on precision coated films ~~while the window film market was effectively flat~~.

The decrease in segment profit in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 resulted primarily from higher raw material costs of $23 million, higher fixed manufacturing and selling costs, and higher charges as discussed in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability, as partially offset by ~~improved~~higher ~~fixed~~sales ~~cost absorption~~volumes.

Technical Specialties

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase			% Increase
	March 31,					Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010			(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	2012		2011			(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	~~218~~210	$	~~224~~220		$	(610	)		(35	) %
Segment Profit	$	7584	$	8098		$	(514	)		(614	) %
Charges included in Segment Profit	$	-	$	(1	)
Gains included in Segment Profit	$	-	$	17

The decrease in net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 resulted from lower sales volumes of $1222 million or 510 percent ~~and the divestiture of various other rubber chemical businesses of $14 million or 6 percent~~, partially offset by higher average selling prices of $12 million or 5 percent. Lower ~~and~~sales ~~favorable~~volumes ~~currency exchange rate fluctuations~~ of $86 million or 3 percent~~. Lower~~ ~~sales~~were ~~volumes~~due ofto ~~THERMINOL®~~the ~~heat~~impact ~~transfer~~of ~~fluids~~the ~~were~~divestiture aof ~~result~~various ofother ~~lower~~rubber ~~demand~~chemical inbusinesses ~~Asia~~with ~~Pacific~~the onremaining ~~project~~decrease ~~fills. Lower~~due ~~sales~~to ~~volumes~~lower ofdemand for CRYSTEX® insoluble sulfur ~~were~~and ~~due~~SANTOFLEX® toantidegradants, ~~lower~~particularly ~~demand~~within in the Asia Pacific ~~market,~~and ~~principally~~Europe ~~China~~markets, as partially offset by higher sales ~~volumes~~of ~~in all other world areas. Higher average selling prices were experienced most significantly in our~~ THERMINOL® heat transfer fluids ~~and CRYSTEX® insoluble sulfur products in response to a strong demand profile coupled with higher raw material costs~~. The favorable currency impact was driven most notably by the increased strength of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, in comparison to the same period in 2010, due to our strong market positions in Europe.

The decrease in segment profit in comparison to the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010~~2011 resulted primarily from higher raw material costs of $169 million, ~~partially~~lower ~~offset~~sales byvolumes ~~lower~~and ~~manufacturing~~higher ~~costs~~R&D expenditures, ~~lower~~as ~~compensation~~partially ~~costs~~offset ~~related~~by tohigher ~~our~~selling ~~annual~~prices, ~~incentive~~better ~~plan~~raw material and ~~improved~~utility yields and higher fixed cost absorption.

Unallocated and Other

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,						Increase		% Increase
	March 31,						Increase			% Increase
Components of Unallocated and Other	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011			(Decrease)		~~(Decrease)~~	(Decrease)
Other Operations Segment Profit (Loss)	$	-		$	(5	)
Corporate Expenses	$	(12	)	$	(15	)
Corporate Expenses		(14	)		(13	)
Share-based Compensation Expense		(6	)		(5	)
Share-based Compensation Expense		(6	)		(6	)
Other Unallocated Expense, net		(13	)		(11	)
Other Unallocated (Expense) Gain, net		26			-
Unallocated and Other results	$	(31	)	$	(31	)	$	-			-	%
Unallocated and Other results	$	6		$	(24	)	$	30	N.M. %
Charges Included in Unallocated and Other
Net (Charges) Gains Included in Unallocated and Other
Corporate Expenses	$	-		$	(4	)
Other Operations Segment Profit (Loss)	$	-		$	(5	)
Other Unallocated Expense, net		(11	)		(8	)
Corporate Expenses		(4	)		-
Charges Included in Unallocated and Other results	$	(11	)	$	(12	)
Share-based Compensation Expense		(2	)		-
Other Unallocated (Expense) Gain, net		29			-
Net (Charges) Gains Included in Unallocated and Other results	$	23		$	(5	)

~~Net gains on~~ Unallocated and Other results ~~increased~~were ~~$30~~unchanged ~~million~~ for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012 as compared to the same period in ~~2010 primarily due to higher net gains as described in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability. After taking into consideration the higher net gains in~~ 2011~~, corporate expenses decreased in 2011 due predominately to lower compensation expense, largely related to our annual incentive plan~~. Other unallocated expenses, net increased after taking into consideration the higher net gains in 2011 primarily due to the absence of dividend income resulting from our ownership interest in Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc., formerly our Integrated Nylon business. As more fully discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, in the third quarter 2011, we sold our approximately 2 percent interest in Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc.

4133

Interest Expense

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	March 31,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	2012		2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Interest expense	$	2423	$	3528	$	(115	)		(3118	) %

Interest expense decreased in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012, as compared to the same period in ~~2010~~2011, predominately due to ~~lower expense related to our interest rate derivative contracts combined with~~ a lower average debt balance and a lower average interest rate. We recognized losses of $2 million on our interest rate swap contracts in the third quarter 2011, as compared to $5 million in the same period in 2010. The 2010 losses relate primarily to mark-to-market changes while the 2011 losses are comprised of losses that were reclassified out of Other Comprehensive Loss into earnings. During the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, our average debt balance was $1.43 billion compared to $1.5 billion for the same period in ~~2010~~ 2011. Our average interest rate dropped from 6.41 percent for the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2010~~2011 to 6.0 percent for the same period in ~~2011~~2012 as a result of the modification to our debt facility as discussed in Note 9 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Loss on Debt ~~Extinguishment or~~ Modification

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase				% Increase
	March 31,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)				(Decrease)
	2012		2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification	$	2	$	-	$	2			N.M.
Loss on debt modification	$	-	$	2	$	(2	)		(100	) %

The ~~increase in the~~ loss on debt ~~extinguishment or~~ modification for the ~~third~~first quarter 2011 resulted from the ~~repurchase~~modification of ~~a portion of~~ our ~~8.75%~~$700 ~~Notes~~million ~~and~~senior ~~7.875%~~term ~~Notes~~loan atfacility ~~current~~(“2017 ~~market~~Term ~~prices,~~Loan”) ~~which~~as ~~was~~discussed ain ~~premium~~the toSummary ~~their~~of ~~issued~~Events ~~par~~Affecting ~~value~~Comparability. ~~See~~As ~~the~~a ~~Summary~~result of ~~Events~~the ~~Affecting~~modification, ~~Comparability~~we ~~for~~incurred ~~additional~~$2 ~~information~~million of fees.

Income Tax Expense

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase			% Increase
	March 31,					Increase			% Increase
	2011			2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
	2012			2011		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Income tax expense	$	6		$	7	$	(1	)		(14	)%
Income tax expense (benefit)	$	(1	)	$	8	$	(9	)		(113	) %

Income tax expense decreased in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2011~~2012, as compared to the same time period in ~~2010~~2011, due to an increase in discrete tax benefits and, to a lesser extent, the change in the mix of income and losses in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. In the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, discrete tax benefits of $512 million were recognized compared to $42 million in the same period in ~~2010~~2011. ~~Discrete~~Most of the discrete tax benefit recognized in the period ended March 31, 2012 was due to the reversal of a deferred tax liability due to the extension of a Malaysian tax holiday. The remaining discrete items in both periods were primarily due to the ~~closure~~expiration of certain foreign ~~audits~~audit periods and the re-measurement of other uncertain tax positions due to events in the current period. Also impacting our income tax expense for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2011 ~~and~~is ~~2010 are~~ income tax ~~benefits~~benefit of $~~1 million and $~~2 million, ~~respectively,~~ associated with certain unusual or infrequently occurring items, as described in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability section. After consideration of the discrete tax benefits and the income tax benefits on the events affecting comparability, tax expense was $1211 million and $1312 million in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense is the result of aan overall decrease in foreign earnings in the first quarter of 2012 from the same period in 2011, partially offset by an increase in earnings in jurisdictions with relatively high tax rates. Income tax expense recorded in both periods relates only to foreign jurisdictions.

~~Discontinued Operations~~34

(dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Income from Discontinued Operations, net of tax	$	-	$	2	$	(2	)		(100	)%

Income from discontinued operations consists of the results of Primary Accelerators, which ceased operations in the third quarter 2010. In the third quarter 2010, we recognized a $2 tax benefit related to the cessation of operations of our Primary Accelerators business.

Results of Operations - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Advanced Interlayers

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase		% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	672	$	606	$	66		11	%
Segment Profit	$	148	$	139	$	9		6	%
Charges included in Segment Profit	$	-	$	-

The increase in net sales for the first nine months of 2011 resulted from higher sales volumes of $29 million or 5 percent, including the impact of the Vistasolar acquisition, which was completed on June 1, 2010, higher average selling prices of $13 million or 2 percent and favorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $24 million or 4 percent. Higher sales volumes were most significantly driven by sales of VISTASOLAR® EVA encapsulants of which $23 million was due to the results of this acquisition being included for a full nine months of 2011 as compared to four months for the same period in 2010, and higher sales volumes on our SAFLEX® plastic interlayer in the architectural market, particularly in Europe, partially offset by a decrease in volumes on our specialty intermediates. The increase in selling prices is the result of price increases on 2011 annual customer contracts related to our SAFLEX® plastic interlayer as partially offset by price decreases of VISTASOLAR® EVA encapsulants due to an unfavorable demand profile. The favorable currency impact was driven most notably by the increased strength of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, in comparison to the same period in 2010, due to our strong market positions in Europe.

The increase in segment profit for the first nine months of 2011 resulted primarily from higher net sales, as discussed above, lower compensation expense related to our annual incentive plan and improved fixed cost absorption, partially offset by higher raw material costs of $31 million.

Performance Films

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						Increase		% Increase
	2011			2010			(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	236		$	198		$	38		19	%
Segment Profit	$	48		$	40		$	8		20	%
Charges included in Segment Profit	$	(2	)	$	(2	)

The increase in net sales for the first nine months of 2011 resulted from higher sales volumes of $35 million or 18 percent, including $20 million due to the results of the Novomatrix acquisition being included for a full nine months of 2011 as compared to five months for the same period in 2010, increased selling prices of $2 million or 1 percent and favorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $1 million. Higher sales volumes were experienced in window films, particularly in the Asia Pacific region driven by our acquisition of Novomatrix as well as improved demand in the automotive market within other regions, partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes on precision coated films. The increase in selling price was a result of price increases put in place during 2011 on our window films in response to an improved demand profile coupled with higher raw material costs.

The increase in segment profit in the first nine months of 2011 resulted primarily from higher net sales, as discussed above, partially offset by higher selling and manufacturing costs.

Technical Specialties

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase		% Increase
	2011		2010			(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	663	$	647		$	16		2	%
Segment Profit	$	255	$	237		$	18		8	%
Gains (Charges) included in Segment Profit	$	17	$	(10	)

The increase in net sales for the first nine months of 2011 resulted from higher average selling prices of $32 million or 5 percent, higher sales volumes of $12 million or 2 percent and favorable currency exchange rate fluctuations of $15 million or 2 percent, partially offset by lost sales on the divestiture of various other rubber chemical businesses of $43 million or 7 percent. Higher average selling prices were experienced across all of our products, with the exception of SANTOFLEX® antidegradants, in response to an improved demand profile coupled with higher raw material costs. Higher sales volumes were experienced most significantly by THERMINOL® heat transfer fluids, predominantly within the Asia Pacific region, partially offset by lower volumes of CRYSTEX® insoluble sulfur. The decline in CRYSTEX® insoluble sulfur was due to a decrease in sales volumes within the Asia Pacific region, partially offset by increases in all other world areas. The favorable currency impact was driven most notably by the increased strength of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, in comparison to the same period in 2010, due to our strong market positions in Europe.

The increase in segment profit in the first nine months of 2011 resulted primarily from higher net sales, as discussed above, higher gains as discussed in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability and lower compensation expense related to our annual incentive plan, partially offset by higher raw material costs of $47 million.

Unallocated and Other

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						Increase		% Increase
Components of Unallocated and Other	2011			2010			(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Other Operations Segment Profit (Loss)	$	-		$	(4	)
Corporate Expenses		(40	)		(43	)
Share-based Compensation Expense		(15	)		(15	)
Other Unallocated Expense, net		13			(2	)
Unallocated and Other results	$	(42	)	$	(64	)	$	22		34	%
Net Charges Included in Unallocated and Other
Other Operations Segment Profit (Loss)	$	-		$	(5	)
Corporate Expenses		(8	)		(1	)
Share-based Compensation Expense		(2	)		-
Other Unallocated Expense, net		20			-
Net Charges (Gains) Included in Unallocated and Other results	$	10		$	(6	)

Net losses on Unallocated and Other results decreased $22 million for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher net gains as described in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability. After taking into consideration the higher net gains in 2011, corporate expenses decreased in 2011 due predominately to lower compensation expense, largely related to our annual incentive plan, and the positive effects of previously completed restructuring events. Other unallocated expense, net increased, after taking into consideration the higher net gains in 2011, due to lower dividend income in 2011 from Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc. combined with the absence of foreign currency gains recorded in 2010, partially offset by decreased net charges related to environmental remediation projects. As more fully discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, in the third quarter 2011, we sold our approximately 2 percent interest in Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc.

Interest Expense

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Interest expense	$	78	$	109	$	(31	)		(28	)%

Interest expense decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, predominantly due to lower expense related to our interest rate derivative contracts combined with a lower average debt balance and a lower average interest rate. We recognized losses of $6 million on our interest rate derivative contracts for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to $21 million for the same period in 2010. The 2010 losses relate primarily to mark-to-market changes while the 2011 losses are comprised of losses that were reclassified out of Other Comprehensive Loss into earnings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our average debt balance was $1.4 billion compared to $1.5 billion for the same period in 2010. Our average interest rate dropped from 6.7 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to 6.0 percent for the same period in 2011 as a result of the restructurings and modifications to our debt facility as discussed in Note 9 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment or Modification

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification	$	4	$	89	$	(85	)		(96	)%

The decrease in the loss on debt extinguishment or modification for the first nine months of 2011 is the result of the early extinguishment of our 2014 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver in 2010 as compared to the modification of our 2017 Term Loan and the repurchase of a portion of our 8.75% Notes and 7.875% Notes in 2011. The partial repurchase of our 8.75% Notes and 7.875% Notes was transacted at current market prices, which was a premium to their issued par value. See the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability for additional discussion. As a result of the early retirement of our 2014 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver in 2010, we incurred a $9 million prepayment penalty and an $80 million non-cash charge related to the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs associated with these facilities while we incurred $2 million of fees related to the modification of the 2017 Term Loan and a $2 million premium on the open market repurchases of our 8.75% Notes and 7.875% Notes in 2011.

Income Tax Expense

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Increase			% Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Income tax expense	$	25	$	26	$	(1	)		(4	)%

Income tax expense decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same time period in 2010 due largely to the mix of income and losses in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate, partially offset by a decrease in discrete tax benefits recognized. In the nine months ended 2011 and 2010, discrete tax benefits of $9 and $10 million, respectively, were recorded. Discrete items in 2011 were primarily due to the closure of certain foreign audits and the re-measurement of uncertain tax positions due to events in the current period; discrete items in 2010 were primarily due to the closure of certain foreign audits, the closure of statues of limitations and the reversal of a valuation allowance in a forign jurisdiction, partially offset by the re-measurement of uncertain tax positions for events in the current period. Also impacting our income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are income tax benefits of $3 million and $6 million, respectively, associated with unusual or infrequently occurring items, as described in the Summary of Events Affecting Comparability section. After consideration of the discrete tax benefits and the income tax benefits on events affecting comparability, income tax expense was $37 and $42 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense is the result of a decrease in earnings in jurisdictions with relatively high tax rates. Income tax expense recorded in both periods relates only to foreign jurisdictions.

Discontinued Operations

(dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					Increase		% Increase
	2011		2010			(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Integrated Nylon business	$	-	$	17
Primary Accelerators business		-		(30	)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax	$	-	$	(13	)	$	13		100	%

Loss from discontinued operations consists of the results of Primary Accelerators and Integrated Nylon. The improvement is due to the absence of operations of Primary Accelerators in 2011 as a result of its shutdown in the third quarter of 2010. In the second quarter 2010, we recognized a $17 gain on the settlement of contingent liabilities associated with the Alvin, Texas plant included in the sale of our Integrated Nylon business which was completed on June 1, 2009.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, our total liquidity was $~~449~~387 million which was comprised of $279 million available under our $300 million revolving credit facility (“2015 Revolver”) and $~~170~~108 million in cash and cash equivalents. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, we had no draws against our 2015 Revolver but availability was reduced by letters of credit of $21 million.

WeFor ~~expect~~the ~~that~~remainder of 2012, our anticipated use of cash onincludes ~~hand~~fulfillment of our interest, ~~coupled~~postretirement, ~~with~~environmental, ~~future~~tax ~~cash~~and ~~flows~~restructuring ~~from~~obligations, ~~operations~~along ~~and~~with ~~other~~approximately ~~sources~~$125 ofmillion ~~liquidity,~~in ~~including~~capital ~~our~~expenditures ~~2015~~for ~~Revolver~~new initiatives, ~~will~~capacity ~~provide~~expansion ~~sufficient~~and ~~liquidity~~productivity toenhancement ~~allow~~along uswith tothose ~~meet~~for ~~our~~maintenance ~~projected~~and ~~cash~~safety requirements. ~~Our~~To ~~anticipated~~the ~~uses~~extent ofit ~~cash~~is ~~include~~necessary ~~fulfillment~~to offund ~~our~~growth ~~interest,~~initiatives ~~pension, environmental, restructuring~~ and/or ~~tax~~certain ~~obligations,~~seasonal indemands ~~addition~~of toour ~~certain~~operations, ~~capital~~an ~~expenditures~~additional asuse ~~well~~of ascash ~~any~~may ~~potential~~be ~~voluntary~~needed ~~debt~~for ~~reductions~~working capital. ~~During~~Finally, ~~the~~an ~~third~~additional ~~quarter~~use ~~2011,~~of wecash ~~repurchased~~will ~~from~~be ~~the~~on ~~open~~costs ~~market~~associated ~~$11~~with ~~million~~our agreement and ~~$14~~plan ~~million~~ of ~~our~~merger ~~8.75%~~with ~~Notes~~Eastman ~~and~~Chemical ~~our 7.875% Notes~~Company, ~~respectively. Another anticipated~~as ~~use~~more offully ~~cash~~described onin ~~hand~~Note is2 ~~the~~to ~~acquisition~~our ofConsolidated ~~Southwall~~Financial ~~Technologies Inc.~~Statements, ~~the terms of~~ which are ~~discussed~~estimated into ~~Note~~be 16$25 tomillion ~~our~~only ~~consolidated~~upon ~~financial~~closing ~~statements~~of the merger.

~~Our~~Cash ~~2015~~flows ~~Revolver,~~from ~~2017~~continuing ~~Term~~operations ~~Loan,~~are ~~8.75%~~estimated ~~Notes~~to ~~and~~be ~~7.875%~~our ~~Notes~~most ~~include~~significant asource ~~number~~ of ~~customary~~cash ~~covenants~~for ~~and~~2012. In ~~events~~summary, ofwe ~~default~~expect ~~that restrict~~ our ~~ability~~current ~~to,~~liquidity ~~among other things~~resources, ~~incur~~along ~~additional~~with ~~debt;~~future ~~make~~cash ~~certain~~flows ~~investments;~~from ~~pay~~continuing ~~dividends;~~operations, ~~repurchase~~will ~~stock;~~be ~~sell~~adequate ~~certain~~to ~~assets~~meet orprojected ~~merge~~cash ~~with or into other companies and enter into new lines of business~~requirements. ~~The~~Additional ~~2015~~liquidity, ~~Revolver~~if ~~and~~necessary, ~~2017~~would ~~Term Loan also~~ include ~~the~~additional ~~maintenance~~lines of ~~a maximum senior secured indebtedness financial covenant~~credit, asfinancing ~~defined~~of bycustomer ~~our~~receivables ~~Credit~~and/or ~~Facility. We~~other ~~were~~assets inand ~~compliance~~asset ~~with~~sales, all ~~applicable~~of ~~covenants~~which ~~at September~~are 30allowable, ~~2011. See~~with ~~Note~~certain 9limitations, tounder ~~the~~our ~~accompanying~~existing ~~consolidated~~credit ~~financial~~agreements ~~statements~~and ~~for~~our ~~additional~~Merger ~~information~~Agreement.

Cash Flows - Continuing Operations

Our cash flows from continuing operations attributable to operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, are summarized in the following table:

	Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended
Cash Flow Summary - Continuing Operations	~~September~~March 3031,						Increase
(dollars in millions)	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011			(Decrease)
Cash provided by operating activities	$	~~144~~19		$	~~211~~49		$	(6730	)
Cash used in investing activities		(18	)		(396	)		378
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(27	)		8			(35	)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		~~(140~~4	)		~~176~~(80	)		~~(316~~84	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		2			~~(24~~2	)		26-
Net change in cash for period attributable to continuing operations	$	(122	)	$	(3321	)	$	2119

Operating activities: In the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2011~~2012, we generated less cash from continuing operations than we did for the same period of ~~2010~~2011 ~~with~~primarily ~~approximately two-thirds of this difference~~ due to ~~increases~~lower inoperating ~~working capital. We have increased our working capital position as of September 30~~income, ~~2011 on~~ higher ~~raw~~payments ~~material~~on ~~costs, which are being significantly passed-through to~~ our ~~customers~~postretirement ~~via~~obligations ~~higher~~and ~~selling prices, combined with~~ higher ~~inventory~~working ~~levels~~capital inrequirements ~~our~~as ~~Advanced~~partially ~~Interlayers~~offset ~~and~~by ~~Technical~~lower ~~Specialties~~interest ~~segments. Higher~~payments ~~inventory levels are in anticipation of shutdowns scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2011~~ and ~~the~~lower ~~first~~tax ~~quarter of 2012 at certain locations for normal safety, maintenance and/or upgrades, combined with higher demand on our heat transfer fluids~~payments. Also negatively impacting our cash flow from ~~operations~~operating ~~during~~activities ~~the~~are ~~first~~payments ~~nine months~~ of ~~2011,~~$9 wemillion ~~paid~~related ~~the second~~to ~~half of~~ our ~~2010~~pending ~~cash~~merger ~~incentive~~with ~~plan. There~~Eastman ~~were~~Chemical ~~no incentive payments in the same period of 2010 as our 2009 employee incentive plan was temporarily suspended~~Company.

Investing activities: ~~The~~Cash ~~decrease in cash~~ used in investing activities of $27 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, comprised entirely of capital expenditures, represents a $35 million change as compared to cash provided by investing activities of $8 million in the same period inof ~~2010,~~2011. This ~~was~~difference ~~primarily~~is predominantly due to ~~lower~~cash ~~acquisition~~proceeds ~~related~~of ~~payments~~$29 million received in 2011 ~~and~~on ~~higher~~the ~~proceeds~~sale ~~from~~of certain businesses and selected assets ~~disposals~~within asour ~~partially~~Technical ~~offset~~Specialties bysegment ~~higher~~along with an increase in capital expenditures in 2012. ~~See~~The ~~Note~~increase 2in tocapital ~~the~~expenditures ~~Consolidated~~in ~~Financial Statements~~2012 ~~for~~is ~~additional~~most ~~information~~significantly ondriven ~~acquisitions~~by certain expansions at our Ghent, Belgium and ~~asset~~Suzhou, ~~disposals~~China plants. ~~Higher~~Furthermore, ~~capital~~cash ~~expenditures~~used in the first three months of 2011 ~~were~~include ~~primarily~~the ~~associated~~payment ~~with~~of ~~PVB~~$5 ~~and~~million ~~EVA~~into ~~growth~~a restricted cash fund related ~~projects~~to incash ~~Suzhou,~~collateral ~~China~~required ~~and~~by ~~Ghent,~~our ~~Belgium~~foreign subsidiaries.

Financing activities: Cash ~~used~~provided inby financing activities inof ~~2011~~$4 ismillion ~~primarily~~in ~~related~~the tofirst ~~payments~~three onmonths ~~our~~of ~~long-term~~2012 ~~debt~~results ~~including~~primarily from $~~102~~15 million inof ~~repayments~~cash onreceived ~~our~~from ~~2017~~the ~~Term~~exercise ~~Loan~~of ~~and~~stock options, as partially offset by $257 million in ~~open~~treasury ~~market~~stock ~~repurchases~~purchases ofand $5 million in dividends paid on our ~~notes~~common stock. Cash ~~provided~~used by financing activities inof ~~2010~~$80 ~~resulted~~million ~~from~~in the ~~refinancing~~first three months of 2011 results primarily from $77 million in payments on our ~~2014~~then ~~Term~~existing ~~Loan~~senior ~~and~~term ~~2013~~loan ~~Revolver,~~ facility along with ~~the~~$2 ~~issuance~~million ofin fees associated with the ~~7.875%~~refinancing ~~Notes. These~~of ~~net~~this ~~proceeds~~debt ~~were~~completed ~~used~~in order to ~~partially~~lower ~~fund~~ our ~~acquisitions~~interest ofrate ~~Novomatrix~~ and ~~Vistasolar. See~~modify ~~footnote~~the 9terms ~~for~~allowing ~~additional~~the ~~information~~Company onadditional ~~our~~strategic ~~debt~~and ~~obligations~~financial flexibility.

4635

Working Capital – Continuing Operations

Working capital used for continuing operations is summarized as follows:

Working Capital - Continuing Operations	~~September~~March 3031,		December 31,			Increase
(dollars in millions)	~~2011~~2012		~~2010~~2011			(Decrease)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~170~~108	$	~~191~~113
Trade receivables, net		~~240~~221		~~228~~236
Inventories		~~356~~384		~~275~~335
Other current assets		~~103~~102		102
Total current assets	$	~~869~~815	$	~~796~~786
Accounts Payable	$	~~193~~181	$	~~173~~186
Accrued Liabilities		~~231~~210		~~235~~227
Total current liabilities	$	~~424~~391	$	~~408~~413
Working Capital	$	~~445~~424	$	~~388~~373	$	5751

Our working capital increased $5751 million in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2011 primarily~~ 2012 due to higher ~~raw~~inventory ~~material~~levels and ~~costs~~lower accrued liabilities, ~~which~~as ~~are~~partially ~~being~~offset ~~significantly~~by ~~passed-through~~lower totrade ~~our~~receivables ~~customers~~on ~~via~~improvements ~~higher~~in cash ~~selling~~collection. Higher ~~prices,~~inventory ~~combined~~levels ~~with~~were ~~higher~~driven ~~inventory~~by ~~levels~~a strategic increase in ~~our~~advance ~~Advanced~~of ~~Interlayers~~planned start-ups of the Saflex® Suzhou, China sheet expansion and ~~Technical~~the Ghent, ~~Specialties~~Belgium ~~segments~~Saflex® acoustic line in the second quarter of 2012. ~~Higher~~ In addition, inventory levels ~~are~~of Therminol in ~~anticipation~~Technical ofSpeccialties ~~shutdowns~~are ~~scheduled~~higher ~~for~~in ~~the~~preparation ~~fourth~~for ~~quarter~~delivery of ~~2011~~large ~~and~~concentrating ~~the~~solar ~~first~~projects ~~quarter~~starting in early 2013. The remainder of ~~2012~~the atincrease ~~certain~~in ~~locations~~inventory ~~for~~was due to normal ~~safety,~~seasonality. Lower ~~maintenance~~accrued ~~and/or~~liabilities ~~capacity~~were ~~additions~~predominantly due to bethe ~~brought~~payment ~~online,~~of ~~combined~~our ~~with~~2011 ~~higher~~annual ~~demand~~incentive onplan ~~our~~in ~~heat~~the ~~transfer~~first ~~fluids~~quarter of 2012.

From time to time we sell trade receivables without recourse to third parties. These trade receivables were removed from our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows at the time of sale to the third party. Uncollected trade receivables sold under these arrangements and removed from the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position were $415 million and $914 million at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, respectively. The average monthly amounts of trade receivables sold were $79 million for the ~~nine~~ three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

Cash Flows – Discontinued Operations

	Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended
Cash Flow Summary - Discontinued Operations	~~September~~March 3031,						Increase
(dollars in millions)	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011			(Decrease)
Cash used in operating activities	$	(10	)	$	(26	)	$	16
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(3	)	$	3		$	(6	)
Cash used in investing activities		1			(3	)		4
Net change in cash for period attributable to discontinued operations	$	(3	)	$	3		$	(6	)
Net change in cash for period attributable to discontinued operations	$	(9	)	$	(29	)	$	20

Cash used in discontinued operations of $3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 is ~~primarily~~ comprised of exit related payments associated with our Primary Accelerators shutdown, which ceased manufacturing in the third quarter 2010~~, partially offset by cash proceeds from the monetization of working capital~~. For the same period in ~~2010~~2011, cash ~~used~~provided by discontinued operations isof ~~primarily~~$3 ~~comprised~~million ~~settlement~~represents ~~payments~~cash ~~related~~proceeds tofrom ~~contingent liabilities associated with~~ the ~~sale~~monetization of ~~Integrated Nylon in addition to operating costs of~~ Primary Accelerators working capital.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures are projected to be inapproximately $150 million for the ~~range~~year ended December 31, 2012, of which $~~110~~90 million to $~~120~~100 million ~~during 2011, the majority~~ of ~~which~~this ~~are~~estimate is attributable to new products and expansion and productivity projects. The ~~while the~~ remainder is attributable to maintenance and right-to-operate projects.

Pension Funding

We sponsor several defined benefit pension plans into which we made cash contributions of $3722 million in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2011~~2012. We expect to contribute additional cash to these pension plans in the range of $1555 million to $2060 million during ~~2011~~2012. Actual contributions to the plans and satisfaction of these outstanding liabilities may differ and will depend on numerous variables, including future changes in actuarial assumptions, legislative changes to pension funding laws, ~~market conditions~~ and ~~whether~~market ~~we choose to make additional voluntary contributions or to contribute our common stock rather than cash to the plans~~conditions.

4736

Supplementary Information - ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2011~~2012 Compared to ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2010~~2011

Summary of Events Affecting Comparability

Charges and gains recorded in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 and other events affecting comparability have been summarized and described in the table and accompanying footnotes below (dollars in millions):

2012 Events

Increase/(Decrease)	Advanced Interlayers		Performance Films			Technical Specialties		Unallocated/ Other			Consolidated
Impact on:
Cost of goods sold	$	-	$	2		$	-	$	-		$	2		(a)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		-		2			-		11			13		(b)
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	(4	)	$	-	$	(11	)	$	(15	)
Income tax benefit												-		(c)
After-tax Income Statement Impact											$	(15	)

(a) Inventory step-up related to the Southwall acquisition ($2 million pre-tax and after-tax).

(b) Acquisition related expenses on the Southwall acquisition and the pending Eastman merger of $2 million and $11 million, respectively ($13 million pre-tax and after-tax).

(c) Income tax impact has been provided on gains and charges in the quarter recognized at the tax rate in the jurisdiction in which they have been or will be realized.

2011 Events

Increase/(Decrease)	Advanced Interlayers		Performance Films			Technical Specialties			Unallocated/ Other			Consolidated	~~Consolidated~~
Impact on:
Cost of goods sold	$	-	$	2		$	-		$	-			$	2		(a)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	4		$	4		(a)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		-		-			-			1				1		(a)
Other operating income, net		-		-			-			8			8		(a)
		-		-			-(17	)		5-			(17	5)	(b)	~~(b)~~
Other operating income		-		-			-			(29	)			(29	)	(c)
Operating Income Impact	$	-	$	-		$	17		$	(12	)	$	5
Operating Income Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	-		$	23			$	21
Loss on debt modification		-		-			-			(2	)		(2	)	(c)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		-		-			-			(2	)			(2	)	(d)
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	-		$	17		$	(14	)	$	3
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	-		$	21			$	19
Income tax benefit													(2	)	(d)
Income tax benefit														(1	)	(e)
After-tax Income Statement Impact												$	5
After-tax Income Statement Impact													$	20

(a) ~~Acquisition~~Severance and ~~start-up~~other ~~expenses~~charges onrelated ~~acquired~~to ~~businesses~~the relocation of our European regional headquarters ($312 million pre-tax and $28 million after-tax). (b) ~~Severance~~Gain ~~of $3 million and share-based compensation costs of $2 million~~ on ~~executive~~certain ~~officer~~other ~~separation~~rubber ~~agreement~~chemicals divestitures ($517 million pre-tax and ~~after-tax). (c) Gain related to the sale of our remaining 2% ownership interest in the Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (~~$2915 million ~~pre-tax and~~ after-tax). (dc) ~~Premium~~Charges ~~paid~~related onto the ~~repurchase~~modification of our ~~8.75%~~2017 ~~and~~Term ~~7.875%~~Loan ~~Notes~~ ($2 million pre-tax and after-tax). (ed) Income tax impact has been provided on gains and charges ~~in the quarter recognized~~ at the tax rate in the jurisdiction in which they have been or will be realized.

~~2010 Events~~37

Increase/(Decrease)	Advanced Interlayers		Performance Films		Technical Specialties			Unallocated/ Other			Consolidated
Impact on:
Cost of goods sold	$	-	$	-	$	1		$	-		$	1		(a)
Other operating income, net		-		-		-			5			5		(b)
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	-	$	(1	)	$	(5	)	$	(6	)
Income tax benefit												(2	)	(c)
After-tax Income Statement Impact											$	(4	)

(a) Restructuring costs related to the closure of our Cologne facility ($1 million pre-tax and after-tax). (b) Loss on the sale of our European Plastic Products business ($5 million pre-tax and $3 million after-tax). (c) Income tax impact has been provided on gains and charges at the tax rate in the jurisdiction in which they have been or will be realized.

Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures are included below. Amounts are stated in millions, except per share figures.

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	March 31,
Adjusted EBITDA	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	7553		$	4865
Less: Income from Discontinued Operations, net of tax		-			(2	)
Income from Continuing Operations attributable to Solutia	$	75		$	46
Plus:
Income tax expense	$	6		$	7
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1	)		8
Interest expense		2423			3528
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		2			-
Loss on debt modification		-			2
Depreciation and amortization		3130			2932
Subtotal	$	~~138~~105		$	~~117~~135
Plus:
Events affecting comparability (a)	$	~~(21~~15	)	$	6(5	)
Non-cash share-based compensation expense (b)		4			6
Non-cash share-based compensation expense		6			5
Primary Accelerators cost overhang (c)		-			1
Adjusted EBITDA	$	126		$	135
Adjusted EBITDA	$	121		$	130

(a) See Summary of Events Affecting Comparability for operating income impact. (b) Net of share-based compensation expense related to the separation agreement of an executive officer that was included in Events affecting comparability. (c) Costs incurred related to the shutdown of our Primary Accelerators business that is not reflective of costs of the ongoing operations.

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	March 31,
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EPS	~~2011~~2012			~~2010~~2011
Income from Continuing Operations attributable to Solutia	$	75		$	46
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	53		$	65
Plus: Events affecting comparability, net of tax (a)		~~(20~~15	)		4(5	)
Adjusted Earnings	$	5568		$	5060
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		~~121~~122.36			~~120~~121.02
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	0.4555		$	0.4250

(a) See ~~table~~Summary of Events Affecting Comparability.

Supplementary Information - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Summary of Events Affecting Comparability

Charges and gains recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and other events affecting comparability have been summarized and described in the table and accompanying footnotes below (dollars in millions):

2011 Events

Increase/(Decrease)	Advanced Interlayers		Performance Films			Technical Specialties			Unallocated/ Other			Consolidated
Impact on:
Cost of goods sold	$	-	$	2		$	-		$	-		$	2		(a)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		-		-			-			5			5		(b)
		-		-			-			5			5		(c)
										1			1		(a)
Other operating income		-		-			-			8			8		(b)
		-		-			(17	)		-			(17	)	(d)
		-		-			-			(29	)		(29	)	(e)
Operating Income Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	17		$	10		$	25
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		-		-			-			(4	)		(4	)	(f)
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	17		$	6		$	21
Income tax benefit													(3	)	(g)
After-tax Income Statement Impact												$	24

(a) Acquisition and start-up expenses on acquired businesses ($3 million pre-tax and $2 million after-tax). (b) Severance, pension settlement and other charges related to the relocation of our European regional headquarters ($13 million pre-tax and $9 million after-tax). (c) Severance of $3 million and share-based compensation costs of $2 million on executive officer separation agreement ($5 million pre-tax and after-tax). (d) Gain on certain other rubber chemicals divestitures ($17 million pre-tax and $15 million after-tax). (e) Gain related to the sale of our remaining 2% ownership interest in Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc. ($29 million pre-tax and after-tax). (f) Charges related to the modification of our 2017 Term Loan and premium paid in conjunction with the open market repurchase of our 8.75% and 7.875% Notes ($4 million pre-tax and after-tax). (g) Income tax impact has been provided on gains and charges in the quarter recognized at the tax rate in the jurisdiction in which they have been or will be realized.

2010 Events

Increase/(Decrease)	Advanced Interlayers		Performance Films			Technical Specialties			Unallocated/ Other			Consolidated
Impact on:
Cost of goods sold	$	-	$	1		$	-		$	-		$	1		(a)
		-		-			2			-			2		(b)
				-			6						6		(c)
		-		1			-			-			1		(d)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		-		-			1			2			3		(a)
		-		-			1			-			1		(c)
		-		-			-			7			7		(e)
Other operating income, net		-		-			-			5			5		(f)
Operating Income Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	(10	)	$	(14	)	$	(26	)
Other income (loss), net		-		-			-			8			8		(g)
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		-		-			-			(89	)		(89	)	(h)
Pre-tax Income Statement Impact	$	-	$	(2	)	$	(10	)	$	(95	)	$	(107	)
Income tax benefit													(6	)	(i)
After-tax Income Statement Impact												$	(101	)

(a) Severance, pension settlement and retraining costs related to the general corporate restructuring ($4 million pre-tax and after-tax). (b) Restructuring costs related to the closure of our Ruabon facility ($2 million pre-tax and after-tax). (c) Restructuring costs related to the closure of our Cologne facility ($7 million pre-tax and $5 million after-tax). (d) Inventory step-up related to the Novomatrix Acquisition ($1 million pre-tax and after- tax). (e) Acquisition expenses on acquired businesses ($7 million pre-tax and $6 million after-tax). (f) Loss on the sale of our European Plastic Products business ($5 million pre-tax and $3 million after-tax). (g) Gain on settlement of tax indemnification case ($8 million pre-tax and after-tax). (h) Charges related to the early extinguishment of our 2014 Term Loan and 2013 Revolver ($89 million pre-tax and $88 million after-tax). (i) Income tax impact has been provided on gains and charges at the tax rate in the jurisdiction in which they have been or will be realized.

Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures are included below. Amounts are stated in millions except for per share data.

		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,
Adjusted EBITDA		2011		2010
Net Income attributable to Solutia	$	208	$	31
Plus: Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax		-		13
Income from Continuing Operations attributable to Solutia	$	208	$	44
Plus:
Income tax expense	$	25	$	26
Interest expense		78		109
Loss on debt extinguishment or modification		4		89
Depreciation and amortization		94		84
Subtotal	$	409	$	352
Plus:
Events affecting comparability (a)	$	(25)	$	18
Non-cash share-based compensation expense (b)		13		15
Primary Accelerators cost overhang (c)		-		3
Adjusted EBITDA	$	397	$	388

		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EPS		2011		2010
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations attributable to Solutia	$	208	$	44
Plus: Events affecting comparability, net of tax (a)		(24)		101
Adjusted Earnings	$	184	$	145
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		121.3		119.8
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	1.52	$	1.21

(a) See table of Events Affecting Comparability.

Contingencies

See Note 8 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a summary of our contingencies as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in market risk exposures during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 that affect the disclosures presented in the information appearing under ~~“Derivative~~Item ~~Financial~~7a. ~~Instruments”~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk as presented in our ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Further, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

5238

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Our ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K describes a ~~suit~~purported ~~filed~~class byaction ~~the~~lawsuit ~~Department~~which ~~of Justice~~was ~~(“DOJ”)~~filed ~~on behalf of the United States government.~~ in the ~~United~~Circuit ~~States District~~ Court, ~~Northern District~~ of ~~Alabama~~Putnam ~~(in a case captioned United States of America v. Stricker~~County, etWest ~~al.),~~Virginia against ~~Monsanto~~Flexsys, Pharmacia, ~~Solutia~~Monsanto and ~~the~~Akzo ~~attorneys~~Nobel ~~and~~(Solutia ~~law~~is ~~firms~~not ~~who~~named ~~represented~~as ~~the~~a ~~plaintiffs in the Abernathy v. Solutia Inc, et al (“Abernathy”~~defendant) ~~lawsuit~~alleging ~~arising~~exposure ~~out~~to ofdioxin ~~PCB~~from ~~contamination~~Flexsys ~~in Anniston~~Nitro, ~~Alabama. The~~West ~~DOJ~~Virginia ~~alleged~~facility ~~the~~which ~~defendants~~is ~~failed~~now ~~to reimburse Medicare for medical expenses paid to Abernathy settlement recipients who were Medicare beneficiaries~~closed. In ~~September~~February ~~2010~~2012, ~~the~~Monsanto ~~district~~reached ~~court~~a ~~granted~~tentative ~~the~~global ~~defendants’~~resolution ~~motions~~with ~~to dismiss, finding~~ the ~~DOJ~~plaintiffs ~~failed~~in ~~to file~~ the class action ~~within~~and the ~~applicable~~individual ~~statute of limitations~~lawsuits. The ~~DOJ~~court ~~subsequently~~has ~~filed~~given atentative ~~motion~~approval to ~~reconsider~~ the ~~district~~settlement ~~court’s judgment~~terms, ~~asking~~but ~~the~~a ~~court~~fairness ~~to reinstate~~hearing ~~the~~has ~~case. On~~been ~~August~~scheduled ~~12,~~for ~~2011,~~June ~~the~~2012 ~~district~~for ~~court~~final ~~denied~~approval of the ~~motion,~~settlement. Pursuant ~~fully~~to ~~dismissing Solutia and~~ the ~~other~~terms ~~defendants~~of ~~from~~ the ~~case. On~~Monsanto-Solutia ~~October~~Settlement 11Agreement, ~~2011,~~Solutia ~~the~~and ~~DOJ~~Flexsys ~~filed~~will ahave ~~notice~~no ofobligations ~~appeal~~under ~~appealing~~ the ~~district~~terms ~~court’s dismissal~~ of the ~~case~~settlement ~~to the United States Court~~ of ~~Appeals~~these ~~for~~litigation ~~the Eleventh Circuit~~matters.

Our 2011 Form 10-K describes four purported stockholder class action complaints filed as a result of the announcement of our pending merger with Eastman Chemical Company. Three of the actions were filed in Delaware (collectively, the “Delaware Action”) and one was filed in Missouri (the “Missouri Action”). On March 5, 2012, the plaintiff in the Missouri Action agreed to stay the litigation in deference to the Delaware Action and agreed to dismiss the Missouri Action once there is a final resolution of the Delaware Action. On March 22, 2012, plaintiffs in the Delaware Action filed a consolidated amended complaint. The complaint names as defendants Solutia, the Individual Defendants, Eastman, and Merger Sub. The complaint generally alleges, among other things, that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to take steps to maximize the value of Solutia to its public shareholders, failing to properly value Solutia, agreeing to allegedly preclusive deal protection devices, and vesting themselves with benefits that are not shared with the public shareholders, and that Solutia, Eastman, and Merger Sub aided and abetted these purported breaches of fiduciary duties. Additionally, the complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duty of disclosure by allegedly omitting material information regarding the proposed Merger in the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 7, 2012. The relief sought includes, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, rescission of the Merger (to the extent the Merger has already been consummated), and attorneys’ fees and costs. Solutia believes the plaintiffs’ allegations lack merit and will vigorously contest them. On May 3, 2012, the parties to the Delaware Action reached an agreement to settle the Delaware Action, the terms of which are reflected in a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) entered into by the parties on that date. The MOU was filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery on May 7, 2012. Pursuant to the MOU, defendants have agreed to make certain additional disclosures in Eastman’s next filing of the Form S-4 Registration Statement. Consummation of the proposed settlement is subject to, among other things, the consummation of the proposed transaction with Eastman and the completion of reasonable good faith confirmatory discovery satisfactory to Plaintiffs’ counsel in the Delaware Action. Pursuant to the MOU, the parties to the Delaware Action will present the settlement to the Court for hearing and approval as soon as reasonably practicable following dissemination of appropriate notice to class members.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Our Credit Facility and our indentures for the 8.75% Notes and 7.875% Notes include restrictive covenants that limit our ability to repurchase stock and pay dividends.

(c ) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid Per Share (2)	~~Average Price Paid Per Share (2)~~		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value (in millions) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs	~~Approximate Dollar Value (in millions) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs~~
July 1-31, 2011		188,452		$	22.60		-		$	-
January 1-31, 2012		-		$	-		-		$	-
August 1-31, 2011		23,886		$	17.48		-		$	-
February 1-28, 2012		254,593		$	27.77		-		$	-
September 1-30, 2011		282		$	16.28		-		$	-
March 1-31, 2012		43		$	28.08		-		$	-
Total		~~212~~254,~~620~~636		$	2227.0277		-		$	-

(1)	Shares surrendered to the Company by an employee to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of previously issued shares of restricted common stock. Shares surrendered are held in treasury.
(2)	Average price paid per share reflects the closing price of Solutia common stock on the business date the shares were surrendered by the employee stockholder to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted common stock.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See the Exhibit Index at 55page 41 of this report.

5339

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SOLUTIA INC. (Registrant) /s/Christopher ~~CHRISTOPHER~~ J. ~~BRAY~~Bray (Vice President and Controller) (On behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated: May ~~October 28~~8, ~~2011~~2012

5440

EXHIBIT INDEX

These Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

EXHIBIT NUMBER		DESCRIPTION
10.1		Securities Transfer Agreement dated August 4, 2011 by and among Solutia Inc., Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc., APM Disc Holdings LLC and SK Titan Holdings LLC
10.2		Separation Agreement and Waiver and Release of Claims dated August 10, 2011 between Solutia Inc. and James R. Voss
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

5541

Filing Compare · SOLUTIA INC