10-Q 1 d01245e10vq.txt FORM 10-Q SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ Commission file number 0-16487 ------- INLAND RESOURCES INC. --------------------- (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Washington 91-1307042 ------------------------------- ---------- (State or Other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 410 17th Street, Suite 700, Denver, Colorado 80202 -------------------------------------------- ----- (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (ZIP Code) Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (303) 893-0102 -------------- (Former name, address and fiscal year, if changed, since last report) --------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- ---- Number of shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding as of November 11, 2002: 2,897,732 --------- PART 1. ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION INLAND RESOURCES INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001 (In thousands) (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements 1 INLAND RESOURCES INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001 (In thousands except earnings per share) (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements 2 INLAND RESOURCES INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001 (In thousands) (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements 3 INLAND RESOURCES INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ---------- 1. COMPANY ORGANIZATION: Inland Resources Inc. (the "Company") is an independent energy company with substantially all of its producing and nonproducing oil and gas property interests located in the Monument Butte Field within the Uinta Basin of Northeastern Utah (the "Field"). 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION: The preceding financial information is unaudited and has been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and, in the opinion of the Company, includes all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of each period shown. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Management believes the disclosures made are adequate to ensure that the financial information is not misleading, and suggests that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Partial year results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be obtained for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior period to the current period presentation. 3. RESTATEMENT OF PRIOR PERIODS: In 2001 and prior years, the Company entered into certain commodity derivative contracts with Enron North America Corp. ("ENAC"), a subsidiary of Enron Corp. ("Enron"). On December 2, 2001, Enron and ENAC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and the Company determined that the ENAC contracts no longer qualified for cash flow hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS No. 133"). Consequently, the Company recorded a loss of $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 and deferred a corresponding amount in accumulated other comprehensive income, based on the estimated fair value of the derivative contracts based on future commodity prices at November 28, 2001. The Company subsequently determined, based on the financial difficulties of ENAC, it should have ceased accounting for the derivative contracts as hedges at an earlier date, corresponding to the deterioration in the credit of ENAC and Enron in mid October 2001. At this date, changes in the fair value of the derivatives no longer were considered effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged production. Accordingly, the Company adjusted the loss and the corresponding amount deferred in other comprehensive income previously recorded to reflect the estimated fair value of the derivative contracts at that date in the amount of $2.2 million. An adjustment was also recorded to reclassify to earnings $480,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001, representing the portion of the fair value of the derivative attributable to the originally scheduled settlements in 2001. As a result, the Company has restated the accumulated other comprehensive income and accumulated deficit balances included in the accompanying December 31, 2001 balance sheet to reflect the adjustments discussed above. In addition, the Company intends to file an amended 2001 annual report on Form 10-K and an amended March 31, 2002 Form 10-Q to reflect the adjustments discussed above. The table below details the adjustments and restated balances for the respective periods: 4

The Company's independent accountants have been engaged to re-audit the Company's financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001. The amount deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2002 will be reclassified to earnings during the remainder of 2002 and 2003 based on the originally scheduled settlement periods of the contracts. Amounts expected to be reclassified to earnings in the fourth quarter of 2002 and in 2003 are $132,000 and $231,000, respectively. Oil and gas sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 include $157,000 and $1,313,000, respectively, of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. 4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): Comprehensive income (loss) for the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

5. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: In June 2001, SFAS No. 141 "Business Combination" and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" were issued, which requires all business combinations to be accounted for using the purchase method and also changes the treatment of goodwill created in a business combination to discontinue amortization of goodwill. The adoption of these two statements did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. 5 Additionally, SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" was issued in July 2001. This standard requires entities to record the discounted fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation as a liability. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The carrying amount of the liability is accreted to its full liability as operating expense, and the asset previously recorded is then depreciated over its estimated useful life. The present value of the retirement obligation is adjusted each reporting period. The Company has not yet determined the impact of adopting this statement, which will be required to be adopted on January 1, 2003. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of". SFAS No. 121 did not address the accounting for a segment of a business accounted for as a discontinued operation which resulted in two accounting models for long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and requires that those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company's adoption of SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002, had no impact on its financial position or results of operations In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. Management does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 146 to have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. 6. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: Periodically, the Company enters into commodity contracts to hedge or otherwise reduce the impact of oil price fluctuations. The amortization of the cost of the contracts, if any, and the monthly settlement gain or losses are reported as adjustments to revenue in the period in which the related oil is sold. Hedging activities do not affect the actual sales price for the Company's crude oil. The Company is subject to the creditworthiness of its counterparties since the contracts are not collateralized. In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133") was issued. This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activity. SFAS No. 133 requires recognition of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in the derivative's fair value are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Gains and losses on derivative hedging instruments must be recorded in either other comprehensive income or current earnings, depending on the nature and designation of the instrument. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001 resulted in recording a current liability of $1,927,000 and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as accumulated comprehensive loss in the equity section of $1,972,000 and income recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $45,000. On March 11, 2002, the Company hedged 30,000 net barrels per month with a third party counterparty for the April 2002 to December 2002 period using a swap with a settlement amount of $23.90 per barrel. Subsequent to March 11, 2002 the Company hedged 60,000 net barrels per month for the January 2003 to August 2003 period with the same third party counterparty using a swap with various settlement amounts that average $24.78. The counterparty has the right to require the Company to post collateral for the difference between the mid market estimate of the cost of liquidating and terminating the above mentioned hedging position and $500,000. As of September 30, 2002, Fortis Capital Corp. has issued a letter of credit of $1.4 million to cover any deficiencies between the $500,000 credit margin and the mid market estimate from the counterparty. As of September 30, 2002, there were no requirements to post collateral in additional to the $1.4 million letter of credit issued by Fortis Capital Corp. for the above mentioned hedging contracts. 6 On April 11, 2002, the Company hedged another 30,000 net barrels per month with another third party counterparty for the May 2002 to December 2002 period using a swap with a settlement amount of $24.90 per barrel. The counterparty has the right to require the Company to post collateral for the difference between the mid market estimate of the cost of liquidating and terminating the above mentioned hedging position and $1,000,000. As of September 30, 2002, there were no requirements to post collateral for the above mentioned hedging contracts. The Company recognized a reduction in revenues of $697,000 and $989,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, the Company recognized a reduction in revenues of $874,000 and $3,166,000, respectively. 7. CHANGE OF CONTROL AND RECAPITALIZATION: In January 2002, the Company announced that it had hired Lehman Brothers Inc. and Petroleum Place Energy Advisors to advise the Company regarding its review of strategic alternatives, which may include a potential sale or merger of the Company. At this time, no such transactions are contemplated by the Company. The engagement expired June 30, 2002. 1999 Exchange Agreement - On September 21, 1999, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") with Trust Company of the West, as Sub-Custodian for Mellon Bank for the benefit of Account No. CPFF 873-3032 ("Fund V"), TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. ("Portfolio") (Portfolio and Fund V collectively being referred to as "TCW"), Inland Holdings LLC ("Holdings") and Joint Energy Development Investments II Limited Partnership ("JEDI"). Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Fund V agreed to exchange $75 million in principal amount of subordinated indebtedness of IPC plus accrued interest of $5.7 million and Portfolio agreed to exchange warrants to purchase 15,852 shares of Common Stock for the following securities of Inland issued to Holdings, whose members are Fund V and Portfolio: (1) 10,757,747 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, (2) 5,882,901 shares of Series Z Preferred Stock, which automatically converted into 588,291 shares of Common Stock on December 14, 1999, and (3) 1,164,295 shares of Common Stock. JEDI agreed to exchange the 100,000 shares of Inland's Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock") owned by JEDI, together with $2.2 million of accumulated dividends thereon, for (A) 121,973 shares of Series E Preferred Stock and (B) 292,098 shares of Common Stock (the "Recapitalization"). The Series C Preferred Stock bore dividends at a rate of $10 per share, had a liquidation preference of $100 per share and was required to be redeemed at a price of $100 per share not later than January 21, 2008. March 2001 Transaction - On March 20, 2001, Hampton Investments LLC ("Hampton"), an affiliate of Smith Management LLC, ("Smith") purchased from JEDI the 121,973 shares of Series E Preferred Stock and 292,098 shares of Common Stock acquired by JEDI in the Exchange Agreement. Following closing of the Exchange Agreement and the purchase by Hampton of JEDI's shares, Holdings owned 1,752,586 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 60.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 20, 2001. Hampton owned 292,098 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 10.1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 20, 2001. TCW Asset Management Company has the power to vote and dispose of the securities owned by Holdings. August 2001 Transaction - On August 2, 2001, the Company closed two subordinated debt transactions totaling $10 million in aggregate with SOLVation Inc. ("SOLVation"), a company affiliated with Smith, and entered into other restructuring transactions as described below. The first of the two debt transactions with SOLVation was the issuance of a $5 million unsecured senior subordinated note to SOLVation due July 1, 2007. The interest rate is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. The interest payment is payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the senior bank group and accumulates if not paid in cash. The Company is not required to make any principal payments prior to the July 1, 2007 maturity date. However, the Company is required to make payments of principal and interest in the same amounts as any principal payment or interest payments on the TCW Subordinated Note (described below). Prior to the July 1, 2007 maturity date, subject to the bank subordination agreement, the Company may prepay the senior subordinated note in whole or in part with no penalty. The Company also issued a second $5 million unsecured junior subordinated note to SOLVation. The interest rate is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. The maturity date is the earlier of (i) 120 days after payment in 7 full of the TCW subordinated debt or (ii) March 31, 2010. Interest is payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the senior bank group and accumulates if not paid in cash. The Company is not required to make any principal payments prior to the March 31, 2010 maturity date. Prior to the March 31, 2010 maturity date, subject to both bank and subordination agreements, the Company may prepay the junior subordinated note in whole or in part with no penalty. A portion of the proceeds from the senior and junior subordinated notes was used to fund a $2 million payment to Holdings and other Company working capital needs. In conjunction with the issuance of the two subordinated notes to SOLVation, the shares of the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock held by Holdings were exchanged for an unsecured subordinated note (the "TCW Subordinated Note") due September 30, 2009 and $2 million in cash from the Company. Holdings had previously purchased the Series E Preferred Stock from Hampton. The TCW Subordinated Note amount was for $98,968,964 that represented the face value plus accrued dividends of the Series D Preferred Stock as of August 2, 2001. The interest rate on this debt is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. Interest is payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the Senior Lenders and accumulates if not paid in cash. Interest payments will be made quarterly, commencing on the earlier of September 30, 2005 or the end of the first calendar quarter after the senior bank debt has been reduced to $40 million or less, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements. Beginning the earlier of two years prior to the maturity date or the first December 30 after the repayment in full of the senior bank debt, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements, the Company will make equal annual principal payments of one third of the aggregate principal amount of the TCW Subordinated Note. Any unpaid principal or interest amounts are due in full on the September 30, 2009 maturity date. Prior to the September 30, 2009 maturity date, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements, the Company may prepay the TCW Subordinated Note in whole or in part with no penalty. As a result of the exchange, the Company retired both the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock. Due to the related party nature of this transaction, the difference between the aggregate subordinated note balance and $2 million cash paid to Holdings and the aggregate liquidation value of the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock plus accrued dividends of $13,083,000 was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. As part of this restructuring, Holdings also sold to Hampton, 1,455,390 shares of their common stock in the Company. Consequently, Hampton now controls approximately 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. Holdings also terminated any existing option rights to the Company's common stock, and relinquished the right to elect four persons to the Company's Board of Directors to Hampton. However, Holdings has the right to nominate one person to the Company's Board. Remaining board members will be nominated by the Board of Directors and elected by the Company's shareholders. As long as Hampton or its affiliates own at least a majority of the common stock of the Company, Hampton has agreed with Holdings that Hampton will have the right to appoint at least two members to the board. 8. FORTIS CAPITAL AGREEMENT AND DEFAULTS ON LOAN AGREEMENTS: Effective September 21, 1999, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the "Fortis Credit Agreement"). The current participants are Fortis Capital Corp., as agent, and U.S. Bank National Association (the "Senior Lenders"). At September 30, 2002, the Company had borrowed all funds under its current borrowing base of $83.5 million. In addition, Fortis Capital Corp. has issued a letter of credit of $1.4 million to cover any deficiencies between the $500,000 credit margin and the mid market estimate from the counterparty as described in above Note 6. The borrowing base is calculated as the collateral value of proved reserves and was subject to an initial redetermination on or before March 31, 2002, with subsequent determinations to be made on each subsequent October 1 and April 1. If the borrowing base is lower than the outstanding principal balance then drawn, the Company must immediately pay the difference. The borrowing base was redetermined to be $83.5 million at March 26, 2002. The Company has not received confirmation from its Senior Lenders of the redetermined borrowing base for October 1, 2002. In conjunction with SOLVation financing, the Fortis Credit Agreement with the Senior Lenders was amended to change the maturity date to June 30, 2007 from April 1, 2002, or potentially earlier if the borrowing base is determined to be insufficient. Interest accrues under the Fortis Credit Agreement, at the Company's option, at either (i) 2% above the prime rate or (ii) at various rates above the LIBOR rate. The LIBOR rates are determined by the senior debt to EBITDA ratios. As amended on June 6, 2002, if the senior debt to EBITDA 8 ratio is greater than 4.00 to 1.00, the rate is 3.75% above the LIBOR rate; if the senior debt to EBITDA ratio is equal to or less than 4.00 to 1.00 but greater than 3.00 to 1.00, the rate is 2.75% above the LIBOR rate; if the senior debt to EBITDA ratio is less than 3.00 to 1.00, the rate is 2.25% above the LIBOR rate. As of September 30, 2002, $83 million and $500,000 were borrowed under the LIBOR option at interest rates of 5.86% and 5.84%, respectively. The revolving termination date is June 30, 2004 at which time the loan converts into a term loan payable in 12 equal quarterly installments of principal, with accrued interest, beginning September 30, 2004. The Fortis Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien on substantially all assets of the Company. The Fortis Credit Agreement has covenants that restrict the payment of cash dividends, borrowings, sale of assets, loans to others, investments, merger activity and hedging contracts without the prior consent of the lenders and requires the Company to maintain certain net worth, interest coverage and working capital ratios. As of March 31, 2002, the covenant that required the senior debt to EBITDA to be no greater than 3.75 to 1.00 was actually 4.48 to 1.00. No default was asserted by the Senior Lenders, but under the terms of the Fortis Credit Agreement, no notice or period of time to cure the default was required, therefore, the Company was in default as of March 31, 2002. On June 6, 2002 the Fortis Credit Agreement was amended to require that the senior debt to EBITDA ratio be equal to or less than 4.75 to 1.00 for the four prior fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2002, 4.35 to 1.00 for the four prior fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2002 and 3.75 to 1.00 for any four fiscal quarters ending after September 30, 2002. The Senior Lenders waived the compliance with the original March 31, 2002 senior debt to EBITDA ratio. The Company was in compliance with its bank covenants as of June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002 except for the senior debt to EBITDA ratios, which were 4.80 to 1.00 rather than the required 4.75 to 1.00 and 5.23 to 1.00 rather than the required 4.35 to 1.00, respectively. Under the terms of the Fortis Credit Agreement, no notice or period of time to cure the default is required, and therefore the Company was in default. As a result of the noncompliance with such covenant and the ability of the Senior Lenders to call the amount payable immediately, the entire amount payable to the Senior Lenders of $83.5 million has been reclassified as a current liability. Also, since the subordinated debt has cross default provisions in their agreements, the Company has reclassified the aggregated subordinated debt balance of $123.6 million as a current liability. As a result of these defaults, and in an attempt to achieve a stronger financial position, the Company is reviewing its capital structure and considering various alternatives that may be available. These could include an amendment to the Fortis Loan Agreement to ease certain financial covenants and to redefine the events of default, and a restructuring of other long term debt. There is no assurance the Company will be able to achieve any such restructuring, and in the event the Senior Lenders were to exercise their remedies, the Company would be forced to seek protection. The Fortis Credit Agreement has been amended on five previous occasions, however, there can be no assurance that the Senior Lenders will agree to a future amendment to the Fortis Credit Agreement or that they will not assert their rights to foreclose on their collateral. Foreclosure by the Senior Lenders on their collateral would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations. Should Fortis attempt to foreclose, the Company would immediately seek alternative financing and/or the potential sale of a portion or all of its oil and gas properties, although there can be no assurance that it would be successful. If the Company is unable to obtain a waiver, negotiate an amendment to the Fortis Credit Agreement, otherwise refinance its debt, or sell sufficient assets to repay the secured debt, its inability to do so would raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. . The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 9. CUSTOM ENERGY CONSTRUCTION INC.: The Company has contracted Custom Energy Construction, Inc. ("Custom") for the installation of a gas liquids processing facility located in the Field. As of September 30, 2002, the total cost of the facility was recorded as $1,363,730, which is financed primarily through a non-recourse promissory note with Custom. Principal and interest payments at 7% per annum will be made out of hydrocarbon liquid proceeds generated by the plant over a 5-year period. Completion of the gas plant and operations started in late August 2002. Custom's collateral for the promissory note is a first lien on the plant. 9 ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation: RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Three Month Periods Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001: Oil and Gas Sales. Crude oil sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 decreased $611,000 or 8.3% from the previous year. Natural gas sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 decreased $736,000 or 45% from the previous year. As shown in the table below, decreased crude volumes of 16% offset by higher average crude prices of 9.2% resulted in a reduction in crude sales of $611,000. Decreased natural gas volumes of 13% and lower average natural gas prices of 37% resulted in a reduction in natural gas sales of $736,000. Crude oil sales as a percentage of total oil and gas sales were 88 % and 82% in the third quarter of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Crude oil has been and is expected to continue to be the predominant product produced from the Field. The Company has entered into crude oil price protection agreements to reduce its exposure to market price fluctuations. Although hedging activities do not affect the Company's actual sales price for crude oil in the Field, the financial impact of hedging transactions is reported as an adjustment to crude oil revenue in the period in which the related oil is sold. As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, crude oil sales were increased by $157,000 in the third quarter 2002 to reflect the reclass of non-cash gains from accumulated other comprehensive income recorded in 2001 relating to certain derivative contracts. Crude oil sales were decreased by $697,000 and $874,000 during the third quarters of 2002 and 2001, respectively, to recognize hedging contract settlement losses. See Item 3 "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 increased $632,000 or 30% from the previous year third quarter. Lease operating expense per BOE increased from $4.87 per BOE sold in the third quarter of 2001 to $7.44 per BOE sold in 2002. The increase in lease operating expenses is due to an increase in well count resulting from the drilling of 23 new wells and returning 32 shut in wells to production and higher costs of materials and labor and due to increased demand for products, services and employees in the Monument Butte region and neighboring areas. On a monthly per well basis, the lease operating expenses increased 12% to $1,763 per well for the average three months ended September 30, 2002 from $1,572 per well for the same period of 2001. Certain reclassifications to lease operating expenses were made to the three month period ending September 30, 2001 to reflect the allocation of the Company's overhead expenses to lease operating expenses directly rather than using COPAS overhead fees as the method for allocating overhead to lease operating expense. Lease operating expenses were decreased $151,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and general and administrative expenses were increased by the same amount. 10 Production Taxes. Production taxes as a percentage of sales were 1.5% and 2.2% during the third quarter of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Production tax expense consists of estimates of the Company's yearly effective tax rate for Utah State severance tax and production ad valorem tax. Changes in sales prices, tax rates, tax exemptions and the timing, location and results of drilling activities can all affect the Company's actual effective tax rate. Exploration. Exploration expense represents the Company's cost to retain unproved acreage including delay rentals. Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization. Depletion, depreciation and amortization for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 decreased $266,000 or 11% from the previous year third quarter. The decrease resulted from decreased sales volumes offset by a higher average depletion rate. Depletion, which is based on the units-of-production method, comprises the majority of the total charge. The depletion rate is a function of capitalized costs and related underlying proved reserves in the periods presented. The Company's depletion rate was an average of $5.56 per BOE sold during the third quarter of 2002, compared to $5.32 per BOE sold during the third quarter of 2001. General and Administrative, Net. General and administrative expense, net for the third quarter ended September 30, 2002, decreased $64,000 or 13% from the previous year third quarter. The decrease in general and administrative expense, net for the third quarter ended September 30, 2002, is primarily due to receiving higher operating reimbursements for direct labor and field vehicles of $141,000. Gross general and administrative expenses were $2.6 million for the third quarter of 2002 compared to $2.3 million in 2001. General and Administrative expense is reported net of operator fees and reimbursements, which were $2.2 million and $1.8 million during the third quarters of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the third quarter ended September 30, 2002 increased $961,000 or 27% from the previous year third quarter. The increase was the result of the issuance on August 2, 2001 of $109 million of subordinated debt at an interest rate of 11% per annum in connection with a recapitalization (see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). Accrued interest on the subordinated debt for the third quarter of 2002 was $3.3 million compared to $1.9 million for 2001. Interest on the senior bank debt decreased $456,000 or 29% from the previous year third quarter. Total interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs, during the third quarter of 2002 and 2001 were recorded at effective interest rates of 8.8% and 10.4%, respectively. Other Income. Other income primarily represents interest earned on cash balances. Income Taxes. During the third quarter of 2002 and 2001, no income tax provision or benefit was recognized due to net operating losses incurred and the establishment of a full valuation allowance. Series D Preferred Stock Dividends. The Company's Series D Preferred Stock was cancelled in exchange for the TCW subordinated notes and $2 million on August 2, 2001. Series E Preferred Stock Dividends. The Company's Series E Preferred Stock was cancelled on August 2, 2001. Series D Preferred Stock Discount. Inland's Series D Preferred Stock was initially recorded on the financial statements at a discount of $20.2 million and was being accreted to face value ($80.7 million) over the minimum mandatory redemption period, that started on April 1, 2002 and ended on April 1, 2004. The Company's Series D Preferred Stock was cancelled in exchange the TCW Subordinated Note and $2 million on August 2, 2001. Series E Preferred Stock Discount. Inland's Series E Preferred Stock was initially recorded on the financial statements at a discount of $4.2 million and was being accreted to face value ($12.2 million) over the period to the minimum mandatory redemption date of April 1, 2004. The Company's Series E Preferred Stock was cancelled on August 2, 2001. 11 Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001: Oil and Gas Sales. Crude oil sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $3.1 million or 14% from the previous year. Natural gas sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $3.2 million or 52% from the previous year. As shown in the table below, decreased crude volumes of 7% and lower average crude prices of 8% resulted in a reduction in crude sales of $3.1 million. Decreased natural gas volumes of 11% and lower average natural gas prices of 46% resulted in a reduction in natural gas sales of $3.2 million. Lower natural gas sales volumes were primarily caused by a pipeline curtailment for a 48 day period in April and May 2002. The total estimated loss of natural gas sales volumes to the Company was 164,000 mcfs for the 48 day period or $302,000. Currently, there is no such curtailment of natural gas sales volumes in the Monument Butte Field. Crude oil sales as a percentage of total oil and gas sales were 86% and 78% in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Crude oil has been and is expected to continue to be the predominant product produced from the Field. The Company has entered into crude oil price protection agreements to reduce its exposure to market price fluctuations. Although hedging activities do not affect the Company's actual sales price for crude oil in the Field, the financial impact of hedging transactions is reported as an adjustment to crude oil revenue in the period in which the related oil is sold. As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, crude oil sales were increased by $ 1,313,000 in the first nine months of 2002 to reflect the reclass of non-cash gains from accumulated other comprehensive income recorded in 2001 relating to certain derivative contracts. Crude oil sales were decreased by $989,000 and $3.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively to recognize hedging contract settlement losses. See Item 3 "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $1.7 million or 27% from the previous year period. Lease operating expenses per BOE increased from $5.35 per BOE sold for the nine months of year 2001 to $7.36 per BOE for the same period in 2002. The increase in lease operating expenses are due to an increase in well count resulting from the drilling of 23 new wells and returning 32 shut in wells to production and substantially higher labor costs, overhead fees and other field operating expenses such as repairs and maintenance and fuel. On a monthly per well basis, the lease operating expenses increased 14% to $1,872 per well for the average nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $1,649 per well for the same period of 2001. Certain reclassifications to lease operating expenses were made to the nine month period ending September 30, 2001 to reflect the allocation of the Company's overhead expenses to lease operating expenses directly rather than using COPAS overhead fees as the method for allocating the Company's portion of overhead to lease operating expense. Lease operating expenses were decreased $420,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, and general and administrative expenses were increased by the same amount. Production Taxes. Production taxes as a percentage of sales were 1.6% and 2.2% during the initial nine months of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Production tax expense consists of estimates of the Company's yearly 12 effective tax rate for Utah State severance tax and production ad valorem tax. Changes in sales prices, tax rates, tax exemptions and the timing, location and results of drilling activities can all affect the Company's actual effective tax rate. Exploration. Exploration expense represents the Company's cost to retain unproved acreage including delay rentals. Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization. Depletion, depreciation and amortization for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 decreased $337,000 or 5% from the comparable previous year period. The decrease resulted from decreased 2002 sales volumes offset by a slightly higher average depletion rate in 2002. Depletion, which is based on the units-of-production method, comprises the majority of the total charge. The depletion rate is a function of capitalized costs and related underlying proved reserves in the periods presented. The Company's depletion rate was an average of $5.36 per BOE sold during the initial nine months of 2002 compared to a depletion rate of $5.32 per BOE sold during the same period in 2001. General and Administrative, Net. General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $656,000 or 47% from the comparable previous year period. The $656,000 decrease in general and administrative expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 is primarily due to receiving increased reimbursements for direct labor and field vehicles in the amount of $459,000. Gross general and administrative expense was $7 million during for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and $6.3 million for the same period in 2001. The higher gross general and administrative expenses are primarily due to increased corporate salary and benefit expenses. General and administrative expense is reported net of operator fees and reimbursements, which were $6.3 million and $4.9 million during the nine months for 2002 and 2001, respectively. Interest Expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $6 million or 80% from the previous year period. The increase was the result of the issuance on August 2, 2001 of $109 million of subordinated debt at an interest rate of 11% per annum in connection with a recapitalization (see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements) . Accrued interest on the subordinated debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $9.7 million compared to $1.9 million in 2001. Interest on the senior bank debt decreased $1.7 million or 33% from the previous year period. Total interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs, during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 were recorded at effective interest rates of 8.9% and 7.2%, respectively. Other Income. Other income primarily represents interest earned on cash balances. Income Taxes. During the first nine months of 2002, the Company generated net operating losses for which no tax benefit was recognized. During the first nine months of 2001, the Company generated pre tax income and reversed a portion of its previously established deferred tax valuation allowance. Series D Preferred Stock Dividends. Series D Preferred Stock accrued dividends at 11.25% compounded quarterly for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The Company's Series D Preferred Stock was cancelled in exchange for the TCW subordinated notes and $2 million on August 2, 2001. Series E Preferred Stock Dividends. Inland's Series E Preferred Stock accrued dividends at 11.5% compounded quarterly for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The Company's Series E Preferred Stock was cancelled on August 2, 2001. Series D Preferred Stock Discount. Inland's Series D Preferred Stock was initially recorded on the financial statements at a discount of $20.2 million and was being accreted to face value ($80.7 million) over the minimum mandatory redemption period, that started on April 1, 2002 and ended on April 1, 2004. The Company's Series D Preferred Stock was cancelled in exchange the TCW Subordinated Note and $2 million on August 2, 2001. Series E Preferred Stock Discount. Inland's Series E Preferred Stock was initially recorded on the financial statements at a discount of $4.2 million and was being accreted to face value ($12.2 million) over the period to the minimum mandatory redemption date of April 1, 2004. The Company's Series E Preferred Stock was cancelled on August 2, 2001. 13 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES FORTIS CREDIT AGREEMENT AND DEFAULTS ON LOAN AGREEMENTS Effective September 21, 1999, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the "Fortis Credit Agreement"). The current participants are Fortis Capital Corp. and U.S. Bank National Association (the "Senior Lenders"). At June 30, 2002, the Company had borrowed all funds under its current borrowing base of $83.5 million. In addition, Fortis Capital Corp. has issued a letter of credit of $1.4 million to cover any deficiencies between the $500,000 credit margin and the mid market estimate from the counterparty as described in Note 6 to the Financial Statements. The borrowing base is calculated as the collateral value of proved reserves and was subject to an initial redetermination on or before March 31, 2002, with subsequent determinations to be made on each subsequent October 1 and April 1. If the borrowing base is lower than the outstanding principal balance then drawn, the Company must immediately pay the difference. The borrowing base was redetermined to be $83.5 million at March 26, 2002. In conjunction with the SOLVation financing, the Fortis Credit Agreement with the Senior Lenders was amended to change the maturity date to June 30, 2007 from April 1, 2002, or potentially earlier if the borrowing base is determined to be insufficient. Interest accrues under the Fortis Credit Agreement, at the Company's option, at either (i) 2% above the prime rate or (ii) at various rates above the LIBOR rate. The LIBOR rates are determined by the senior debt to EBITDA ratios. If the senior debt to EBITDA ratio is greater than 4.00 to 1.00, the rate is 3.75% above the LIBOR rate; if the senior debt to EBITDA ratio is equal to or less than 4.00 to 1.00 but greater than 3.00 to 1.00, the rate is 2.75% above the LIBOR rate; if the senior debt to EBITDA ratio is less than 3.00 to 1.00, the rate is 2.25% above the LIBOR rate. As of June 30, 2002, $83 million and $500,000 were borrowed under the LIBOR option at interest rates of 5.86% and 5.84 %, respectively. The revolving termination date is June 30, 2004 at which time the loan converts into a term loan payable in 12 equal quarterly installments of principal, with accrued interest, beginning September 30, 2004. The Fortis Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien on substantially all assets of the Company. The Fortis Credit Agreement has covenants that restrict the payment of cash dividends, borrowings, sale of assets, loans to others, investments, merger activity and hedging contracts without the prior consent of the lenders and requires the Company to maintain certain net worth, interest coverage and working capital ratios. As of March 31, 2002, the covenant that required the senior debt to EBITDA to be no greater than 3.75 to 1.00 was actually 4.48 to 1.00. No default was asserted by the Senior Lenders, but under the terms of the Fortis Credit Agreement, no notice or period of time to cure the default was required, therefore, the Company was in default as of March 31, 2002. On June 6, 2002 the Fortis Credit Agreement was amended to require that the senior debt to EBITDA ratio be equal to or less than 4.75 to 1.00 for the four prior fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2002, 4.35 to 1.00 for the four prior fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2002 and 3.75 to 1.00 for any four fiscal quarters ending after September 30, 2002. The Senior Lenders waived the compliance with the original March 31, 2002 senior debt to EBITDA ratio. The Company was in compliance with its bank covenants as of June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002 except for the senior debt to EBITDA ratios, which were 4.80 to 1.00 rather than the required 4.75 to 1.00 and 5.23 to 1.00 rather than the required 4.35 to 1.00, respectively. Under the terms of the Fortis Credit Agreement, no notice or period of time to cure the default is required, and therefore the Company was in default. As a result of the noncompliance with such covenant and the ability of the Senior Lenders to call the amount payable immediately, the entire amount payable to the Senior Lenders of $83.5 million has been reclassified as a current liability. Also, since the subordinated debt has cross default provisions in their agreements, the Company has reclassified the aggregate subordinated debt balance of $123.6 million as a current liability. As a result of these defaults, and in an attempt to achieve a stronger financial position, the Company is reviewing its capital structure and considering various alternatives that may be available. These could include an amendment to the Fortis Loan Agreement to ease certain financial covenants and to redefine the events of default, and a restructuring of other long term debt. There is no assurance the Company will be able to achieve any such restructuring, and in the event the Senior Lenders were to exercise their remedies, the Company would be forced to seek protection. The Fortis Credit Agreement has been amended on five previous occasions, however, there can be no assurance that the Senior Lenders will agree to a future amendment to the Fortis Credit Agreement or that they will not exercise their rights to foreclose on their collateral. Foreclosure by the Senior Lenders on their collateral would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations. Should Fortis attempt to foreclose, the Company would immediately seek alternative financing and/or the 14 potential sale of a portion or all of its oil and gas properties, although there can be no assurance that it would be successful. If the Company is unable to obtain a waiver, negotiate an amendment to the Fortis Credit Agreement, otherwise refinance its debt, or sell sufficient assets to repay the secured debt, its inability to do so would raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. SUBORDINATED UNSECURED DEBT TO SOLVATION INC. On August 2, 2001, the Company closed two subordinated debt transactions totaling $10 million in the aggregate with SOLVation Inc. The first of the two debt transactions with SOLVation was the issuance of a $5 million unsecured senior subordinated note to SOLVation due July 1, 2007. The interest rate is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. The interest payment is payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the Senior Lenders and accumulates if not paid in cash. The Company is not required to make any principal payments prior to the July 1, 2007 maturity date. However, the Company is required to make payments of principal and interest in the same amounts as any principal payment or interest payments on the TCW subordinated debt (described below). Prior to the July 1, 2007 maturity date, subject to the bank subordination agreement, the Company may prepay the senior subordinated note in whole or in part with no penalty. The Company also issued a second $5 million unsecured junior subordinated note to SOLVation. The interest rate is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. The maturity date is the earlier of (i) 120 days after payment in full of the TCW subordinated debt or (ii) March 31, 2010. Interest is payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the Senior Lenders and accumulates if not paid in cash. The Company is not required to make any principal payments prior to the March 31, 2010 maturity date. Prior to the March 31, 2010 maturity date, subject to both bank and subordination agreements, the Company may prepay the junior subordinated note in whole or in part with no penalty. A portion of the proceeds from the senior and junior subordinated notes was used to fund a $2 million payment to TCW and other Company working capital needs. SUBORDINATED UNSECURED DEBT TO TCW In conjunction with the issuance of the two subordinated notes to SOLVation, the shares of Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock held by Inland Holdings LLC, a company controlled by TCW, were exchanged for an unsecured subordinated note (the "TCW Subordinated Note") due September 30, 2009 and $2 million in cash from the Company. The TCW Subordinated Note amount was for $98,968,964, which represented the face value plus accrued dividends of the Series D Preferred stock as of August 2, 2001. The interest rate is 11% per annum compounded quarterly. Interest shall be payable in arrears in cash subject to the approval from the senior bank group and accumulates if not paid in cash. Interest payments will be made quarterly, commencing on the earlier of September 30, 2005 or the end of the first calendar quarter after the senior bank debt has been reduced to $40 million or less, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements. Beginning the earlier of two years prior to the maturity date or the first December 30 after the repayment in full of the senior bank debt, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements, the Company will make equal annual principal payments of one third of the aggregate principal amount of the TCW Subordinated Note. Any unpaid principal or interest amounts are due in full on the September 30, 2009 maturity date. Prior to the September 30, 2009 maturity date, subject to both bank and senior subordination agreements, the Company may prepay the TCW Subordinated Note in whole or in part with no penalty. CASH FLOW AND CAPITAL PROJECTS During the first nine months of 2002, the Company increased its cash balance $181,000. The Company's cash flows provided by operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $8,163,000, consisting primarily of a $7,215,000 net loss offset by $6,445,000 of non-cash depletion, depreciation and amortization and $9,662,000 of accrued interest that was not paid and added to the principal of subordinated debt. Cash used in investing activities consisted entirely of $9,191,000 of development expenditures and equipment purchases. Cash flows from financing activities consisted of a net $1,209,000 proceeds from issuance of long term debt related to the gas liquids plant. Field development expenditures in the first nine months of 2002 consisted of the completion of 2 wells, which commenced drilling in 2001, the drilling and completion of 15 wells, recompletion of 23 existing wells and the continued extension of the gas gathering and water delivery infrastructures and the investment in a gas liquids plant, which commenced operations in August 2002 15 The Company's capital budget for development of the Field in year 2002 is $11 to $12 million net to the Company. The Company plans to drill 15 to 17 wells, convert 25 wells to water injection and recomplete approximately 45 existing wells. Because the Company has the ability, under its subordinated debt agreements to defer interest payments, cash flow from operations continue to fund a substantial portion of the Company's development expenditures. Although there can be no assurance, the Company believes that cash on hand along with future cash to be generated from operations will be sufficient to implement its development plans for the next year and service debt. The level of capital expenditures is largely discretionary, and the amount of funds devoted to any particular activity may increase or decrease significantly depending on available opportunities, commodity prices, operating cash flows and development results, among other items. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this report, including statements of the Company's and management's expectation, intentions, plans and beliefs, including those contained in or implied by Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, are forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are subject to certain events, risk and uncertainties that may be outside the Company's control. These forward-looking statements include statements of management's plans and objectives for the Company's future operations and statements of future economic performance, information regarding drilling schedules, expected or planned production or transportation capacity, future production levels of fields, marketing of crude oil and natural gas, the Company's capital budget and future capital requirements, credit facilities, the Company's meeting its future capital needs, the Company's realization of its deferred tax assets, the level of future expenditures for environmental costs and the outcome of regulatory and litigation matters, and the assumptions described in this report underlying such forward-looking statements. Actual results and developments could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, those described in the context of such forward-looking statements, fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas, the success rate of exploration efforts, timeliness of development activities, risk incident to the drilling and completion for oil and gas wells, future production and development costs, the strength and financial resources of the Company's competitors, the Company's ability to find and retain skilled personnel, climatic conditions, the results of financing efforts, the political and economic climate in which the Company conducts operations and the risk factors described from time to time in the Company's other documents and reports filed with the SEC. 16 PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED) ---------- ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk: Market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the value of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Interest Rate Risk. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk due to the floating interest rate under the Fortis Credit Agreement. See Item 2. - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources." All borrowings under the Fortis Credit Agreement are due and payable in 12 equal quarterly installments of principal with accrued interest, beginning September 30, 2004. As of September 30, 2002, the Fortis Credit Agreement had a principal balance of $83.5 million locked in at various interest rates as described below:

A 1% increase in interest rates increase annual interest expense on the secured note payable by $835,000. The fair value of the secured note payable to the Senior Lenders approximates the carrying value, since the notes bear interest at a variable rate. The interest rate on the Company's subordinated and other debt is fixed and therefore the Company is not subject to interest rate risk. The carrying value of the debt approximates the fair value of the debt. Commodity Risks. The Company hedges a portion of its crude oil production to reduce its exposure to market price fluctuations. The Company uses various financial instruments whereby monthly settlements are based on differences between the prices specified in the instruments and the settlement prices of certain futures contracts quoted on the NYMEX. Gains or losses on hedging activities are recognized as an adjustment to crude oil sales in the period in which the hedged production is sold. As of September 30, 2002, the Company had the following oil swaps in place:

(1) The counterparty has the right to require the Company to post collateral for the difference between the mid market estimate of the cost of liquidating and terminating the above mentioned hedging position and $500,000. As of September 30, 2002, a letter of credit was issued by Fortis Capital Corp. of $1.4 million to cover any deficiencies between the $500,000 credit margin and the mid market estimate from the counterparty as described in above Note 6. As of September 30, 2002, there were no requirements to post collateral in additional to the $1.4 million letter of credit issued by Fortis Capital Corp. for the above mentioned hedging contracts. (2) The counterparty has the right to require the Company to post collateral for the difference between the mid market estimate of the cost of liquidating and terminating the above mentioned hedging position and $1,000,000. As of September 30, 2002, there were no requirements to post collateral for the above mentioned hedging contracts. The potential gains or (losses) on these contracts, based on a hypothetical average market price of equivalent product for this period, are as follows:

17 ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures: (a) Within the 90-day period prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our Exchange Act filings. (b) There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors, which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out our evaluation. 18 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities. See note 8 to consolidated financial statements and, Item 2 of Part II, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. The following documents are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Exhibit Number Description of Exhibits ------- ----------------------- 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger between Inland Resources Inc. ("Inland"), IRI Acquisition Corp. and Lomax Exploration Company (exclusive of all exhibits) (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Inland's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 33-80392, and incorporated herein by this reference). 3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended through December 14, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 3.2 By-Laws of Inland (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Inland's Registration Statement on Form S-18, Registration No. 33-11870-F, and incorporated herein by reference). 3.2.1 Amendment to Article IV, Section 1 of the Bylaws of Inland adopted February 23, 1993 (filed as Exhibit 3.2.1 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference). 3.2.2 Amendment to the Bylaws of Inland adopted April 8, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 3.2.2 to Inland's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 33-80392, and incorporated herein by reference). 3.2.3 Amendment to the Bylaws of Inland adopted April 27, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 3.2.3 to Inland's Registration Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 33-80392, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1 Credit Agreement dated September 23, 1997 between Inland Production Company ("IPC"), Inland, ING (U.S.) Capital Corporation, as Agent, and Certain Financial Institutions, as banks (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1.1 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of April 22, 1998, amending Exhibit 4.1 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1.2 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 11, 1998 amending and restating Exhibit 4.1 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999 amending Exhibit 4.1.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.3 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1.4 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 15, 1999, but effective as of September 21, 1999, amending and restating Exhibit 4.1 (without exhibits or schedules) (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.1.5 Second amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 6, 2002 to Fortis Credit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.1.5 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2 Credit Agreement dated September 23, 1997, among IPC, Inland, Trust Company of the West, and TCW Asset Management Company, in the capacities described therein (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2.1 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement entered into as of April 22, 1998, amending Exhibit 4.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.2.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 19 4.2.2 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 11, 1998, amending and restating Exhibit 4.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.2.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999, amending Exhibit 4.2.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.2.3 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2.4 Exchange Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 by and between Inland, IPC, Refining, Trust Company of the West, a California trust company, as Sub-Custodian for Mellon Bank for the benefit of Account No. CPFF 873-3032, Inland Holdings LLC, TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. and Joint Energy Development Investments II Limited Partnership (without exhibits or schedules), terminating Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, as previously amended, and Exhibits 4.4, 4.5, 10.10 and 10.11 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3 Intercreditor Agreement dated September 23, 1997, between IPC, TCW Asset Management Company, Trust Company of the West and ING (U.S.) Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.1 Third Amendment to Intercreditor Agreement entered into as of April 22, 1998, amending Exhibit 4.3 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.2 Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated as of September 11, 1998, amending and restating Exhibit 4.3 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999, amending Exhibit 4.3.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.3 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.4 Warrant Agreement by and between Inland and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. dated September 23, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.5 Warrant issued by Inland pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, dated September 23, 1997, representing the right to purchase 100,000 shares of Inland's Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1 1988 Option Plan of Inland Gold and Silver Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10(15) to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1.1 Amended 1988 Option Plan of Inland Gold and Silver Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1.2 Amended 1988 Option Plan of Inland, as amended through August 29, 1994 (including amendments increasing the number of shares to 212,800 and changing "formula award") (filed as Exhibit 10.1.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1994, and (incorporated herein by reference). 20 10.1.3 Automatic Adjustment to Number of Shares Covered by Amended 1988 Option Plan executed effective June 3, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.2 Letter agreement dated October 30, 1996 between Inland and Johnson Water District (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.3 Interest Rate Cap Agreement dated April 30, 1998 between IPC and Enron Capital and Trade Resources Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.4 Farmout Agreement between Inland and Smith Management LLC dated effective as of June 1, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.5 Warrant Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999 between Inland Resources Inc. and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.6 Warrant Certificate dated March 5, 1999 between Inland and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. representing 5,852 shares (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.7 Shareholders Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 between Inland, Holdings, Fund V, JEDI and Pengo Securities Corp., Smith Energy Partnership, Randall D. Smith, Jeffrey A. Smith, Barbara Stovall Smith, John W. Adams and Arthur J. Pasmas (collectively, the "Smith Group") (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.8 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 between Inland, Holdings, Portfolio, JEDI and the Smith Group (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.9 Severance Agreement between Inland and John E. Dyer dated November 18, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.10 Employment Agreement between Inland and William T. War dated effective as of October 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.11 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and William T. War dated October 1, 1999 representing 25,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 21 10.12 Amendment to Employment Agreement between Inland and William T. War, amending the Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.10 (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.13 Employment Agreement between Inland and Michael J. Stevens dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.14 Employment Agreement between Inland and Marc MacAluso dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.15 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and Marc MacAluso dated effective as of February 1, 2001 representing 150,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.16 Employment Agreement between Inland and Bill I. Pennington dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.17 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and Bill I. Pennington dated effective as of February 1, 2001 representing 150,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.18 Oil Purchase and Delivery Agreement dated November 7, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.19 Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and between Inland Holdings, LLC ("Inland Holdings") and Hampton Investments LLC ("Hampton Investments")(without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.20 Contribution Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and among Park Hampton Holdings LLC ("Hampton Holdings"), Pengo Securities Corp. ("Pengo"), Smith Energy Partnership ("SEP"), the five individuals and Hampton Investments (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.21 Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and between Hampton Investments and 10.20 Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.22 Termination Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and between Hampton Investments and Inland (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.23 10.23 Exchange and Note Issuance Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.24 Termination Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland and Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 22 10.25 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Inland Holdings and Hampton Investments (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.26 Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Inland Holdings and Hampton Investments (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.27 Senior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and SOLVation (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.28 Junior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and SOLVation (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 99.1 Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission dated March 26, 2002 concerning Arthur Andersen LLP (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 99.2(b) Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission dated August 7, 2002 terminating Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company's auditors and employing KPMG LLP as its new auditors for December 31, 2002. *99.3 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 1350 as adopted pursuant to sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *99.4 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 1350 as adopted pursuant to sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ---------- (b) Reports on Form 8-K: Report to Securities and Exchange Commission dated August 7, 2002 terminating Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company's auditors and employing KPMG LLP as its new auditors. * Filed herewith. 23 INLAND RESOURCES INC. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. INLAND RESOURCES INC. --------------------- (Registrant) Date: November 12, 2002 By: /s/ Marc MacAluso ------------------ ------------------- Marc MacAluso Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer Date: November 12, 2002 By: /s/ Bill I. Pennington ------------------ ------------------------ Bill I. Pennington President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) 24 CERTIFICATION I, Marc MacAluso, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inland Resources Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 12, 2002 /s/ MarcMacAluso, ----------------- Marc MacAluso, Chief Executive Officer 25 CERTIFICATION I, Bill I. Pennington, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inland Resources Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 12, 2002 /s/ Bill I. Pennington ------------------------------------------- Bill I. Pennington, Chief Financial Officer 26 EXHIBIT INDEX

4.2.2 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 11, 1998, amending and restating Exhibit 4.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.2.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999, amending Exhibit 4.2.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.2.3 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.2.4 Exchange Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 by and between Inland, IPC, Refining, Trust Company of the West, a California trust company, as Sub-Custodian for Mellon Bank for the benefit of Account No. CPFF 873-3032, Inland Holdings LLC, TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. and Joint Energy Development Investments II Limited Partnership (without exhibits or schedules), terminating Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3, as previously amended, and Exhibits 4.4, 4.5, 10.10 and 10.11 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3 Intercreditor Agreement dated September 23, 1997, between IPC, TCW Asset Management Company, Trust Company of the West and ING (U.S.) Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.1 Third Amendment to Intercreditor Agreement entered into as of April 22, 1998, amending Exhibit 4.3 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.2 Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated as of September 11, 1998, amending and restating Exhibit 4.3 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.3.3 First Amendment to Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999, amending Exhibit 4.3.2 (filed as Exhibit 4.3.3 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.4 Warrant Agreement by and between Inland and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. dated September 23, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 4.5 Warrant issued by Inland pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, dated September 23, 1997, representing the right to purchase 100,000 shares of Inland's Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1 1988 Option Plan of Inland Gold and Silver Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10(15) to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1.1 Amended 1988 Option Plan of Inland Gold and Silver Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.1.2 Amended 1988 Option Plan of Inland, as amended through August 29, 1994 (including amendments increasing the number of shares to 212,800 and changing "formula award") (filed as Exhibit 10.1.2 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1994, and (incorporated herein by reference).

10.1.3 Automatic Adjustment to Number of Shares Covered by Amended 1988 Option Plan executed effective June 3, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.2 Letter agreement dated October 30, 1996 between Inland and Johnson Water District (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.3 Interest Rate Cap Agreement dated April 30, 1998 between IPC and Enron Capital and Trade Resources Corp. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Inland's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.4 Farmout Agreement between Inland and Smith Management LLC dated effective as of June 1, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.5 Warrant Agreement dated as of March 5, 1999 between Inland Resources Inc. and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.6 Warrant Certificate dated March 5, 1999 between Inland and TCW Portfolio No. 1555 DR V Sub-Custody Partnership, L.P. representing 5,852 shares (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.7 Shareholders Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 between Inland, Holdings, Fund V, JEDI and Pengo Securities Corp., Smith Energy Partnership, Randall D. Smith, Jeffrey A. Smith, Barbara Stovall Smith, John W. Adams and Arthur J. Pasmas (collectively, the "Smith Group") (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.8 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 21, 1999 between Inland, Holdings, Portfolio, JEDI and the Smith Group (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Inland's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.9 Severance Agreement between Inland and John E. Dyer dated November 18, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.10 Employment Agreement between Inland and William T. War dated effective as of October 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.11 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and William T. War dated October 1, 1999 representing 25,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.12 Amendment to Employment Agreement between Inland and William T. War, amending the Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.10 (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.13 Employment Agreement between Inland and Michael J. Stevens dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.14 Employment Agreement between Inland and Marc MacAluso dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.15 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and Marc MacAluso dated effective as of February 1, 2001 representing 150,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.16 Employment Agreement between Inland and Bill I. Pennington dated effective as of February 1, 2001(filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.17 Stock Option Agreement between Inland and Bill I. Pennington dated effective as of February 1, 2001 representing 150,000 post-split shares of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.18 Oil Purchase and Delivery Agreement dated November 7, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.19 Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and between Inland Holdings, LLC ("Inland Holdings") and Hampton Investments LLC ("Hampton Investments")(without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.20 Contribution Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and among Park Hampton Holdings LLC ("Hampton Holdings"), Pengo Securities Corp. ("Pengo"), Smith Energy Partnership ("SEP"), the five individuals and Hampton Investments (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.21 Series E Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and between Hampton Investments and 10.20 Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.22 Termination Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and between Hampton Investments and Inland (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.23 10.23 Exchange and Note Issuance Agreement dated August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.24 Termination Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland and Inland Holdings (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.25 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Inland Holdings and Hampton Investments (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.26 Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Inland Holdings and Hampton Investments (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.27 Senior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and SOLVation (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.28 Junior Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2001 by and among Inland, Production and SOLVation (without exhibits or schedules)(filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 99.1 Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission dated March 26, 2002 concerning Arthur Andersen LLP (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Inland's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). 99.2(b) Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission dated August 7, 2002 terminating Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company's auditors and employing KPMG LLP as its new auditors for December 31, 2002. *99.3 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 1350 as adopted pursuant to sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *99.4 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 1350 as adopted pursuant to sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

---------- (b) Reports on Form 8-K: Report to Securities and Exchange Commission dated August 7, 2002 terminating Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company's auditors and employing KPMG LLP as its new auditors. * Filed herewith.

INLAND RESOURCES INC 10-Q