SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.20549

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 1-5210

~~No.~~AMERISTEEL ~~1-5210~~CORPORATION

~~AmeriSteel~~Incorporated ~~Corporation~~inState of Florida

~~Incorporated~~Employer inIdentification No. 59-0792436

~~State~~5100 ofW. Lemon StreetTampa, Florida 33609

~~Employer~~Mailing ~~Identification~~Address:P. O. Box 31328Tampa, Florida 33631-3328Telephone No. (813)286-8383

No. 59-0792436

5100 W. Lemon Street

Tampa, Florida 33609

Mailing Address:

P. O. Box 31328

Tampa, Florida 33631-3328

Telephone No. (813)286-8383

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨ o

As of ~~July~~October 31, 2002 the registrant had 10,~~336~~395,~~372~~078 shares, $.01 par value, Common Stock outstanding.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Item~~ITEM I. ~~Financial~~ ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(US$ in thousands)

	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)				December 31, 2001
	September 30,2002			December 31,2001
ASSETS
	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,595			$	5,087
CURRENT ASSETS
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,982 and $1,682 at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively, for estimated losses		87,746				62,399
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,487		$	5,087
Inventories		137,366				142,895
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,132 and $1,682 at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively		85,281			62,399
Deferred tax assets		4,980				4,980
Inventories		140,435			142,895
Other current assets		835				940
Deferred tax assets		4,980			4,980
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		238,522				216,301
Other current assets		2,075			940
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		241,258			216,301
Property, plant & equipment held for future sale		6,550				6,550
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Land and improvements		23,223				21,988
Property, plant & equipment held for future sale		6,550			6,550
Building and improvements		58,416				51,915
Land and improvements		23,244			21,988
Machinery and equipment		387,499				374,401
Building and improvements		58,768			51,915
Construction in progress		7,559				12,725
Machinery and equipment		389,180			374,401
		483,247				461,029
Construction in progress		9,898			12,725
Less allowances for depreciation		(168,001	)			(157,879	)
		487,640			467,579
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET		315,246				303,150
Less accumulated depreciation		(174,253	)		(157,879	)
GOODWILL		77,731				77,731
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET		313,387			309,700
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS		1,536				1,760
GOODWILL		77,731			77,731
OTHER ASSETS		42				41
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS		1,425			1,760
TOTAL ASSETS	$	633,077			$	605,533
OTHER ASSETS		423			41
TOTAL ASSETS	$	634,224		$	605,533

See notes to consolidated financial statements

2AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION — continued

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION—(Continued)

(US$ in thousands, except share data)

	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)				December 31, 2001
	September 30,2002			December 31,2001
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
	(Unaudited)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Trade accounts payable	$	68,582			$	61,709
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits		18,828				16,826
Trade accounts payable	$	68,887		$	61,709
Environmental remediation		978				1,120
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits		19,900			16,826
Other current liabilities		11,902				4,655
Environmental remediation		913			1,120
Interest payable		1,079				1,647
Other current liabilities		12,816			4,655
Current maturities of long-term borrowings		25,568				25,598
Interest payable		841			1,647
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		126,937				111,555
Current maturities of long-term borrowings		25,604			25,598
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES		196,967				186,344
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		128,961			111,555
OTHER LIABILITIES		21,273				26,548
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES		191,120			186,344
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES		43,940				44,516
OTHER LIABILITIES		25,416			26,548
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES		42,841			44,516
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 authorized; 10,336,522 and 10,338,816 shares outstanding at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively		103				103
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Redeemable Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding		—				—
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 authorized; 10,395,078 and and 10,338,816 shares outstanding at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively		104			103
Capital in excess of par		157,012				157,051
Redeemable Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Retained earnings		87,873				79,579
Capital in excess of par		157,831			157,051
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,028	)			(163	)
Retained earnings		90,628			79,579
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		243,960				236,570
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,677	)		(163	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	633,077			$	605,533
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		245,886			236,570
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	634,224		$	605,533

See notes to consolidated financial statements

3AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(US$ in thousands except per share data)

	Six Months Ended								Three Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)				June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)				June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)				June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)
	September 30,2002			September 30,2001			September 30,2002			September 30,2001
GROSS SALES	$	369,584			$	333,192			$	198,005			$	174,012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Operating Expenses:
GROSS SALES	$	561,976		$	501,848		$	192,392		$	168,656
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation		316,166				284,475				168,040				143,219
Operating Expenses:
Selling and administrative		19,394				16,807				10,018				9,418
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation		483,641			424,178			167,475			139,704
Depreciation		13,770				13,789				6,803				6,952
Selling and administrative		29,794			26,017			10,400			9,210
Amortization of goodwill		—				2,270				—				1,159
Depreciation		20,789			20,784			7,019			6,994
Other operating expense (income)		913				(667	)			133				(667	)
Amortization of goodwill		—			3,429			—			1,159
		350,243				316,674				184,994				160,081
Other operating expense (income)		1,007			(308	)		95			358
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		19,341				16,518				13,011				13,931
		535,231			474,100			184,989			157,425
Other Expenses:
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		26,745			27,748			7,404			11,231
Interest		5,294				6,761				2,689				2,921
Other Expenses:
Amortization of deferred financing costs		224				222				112				112
Interest		7,994			9,515			2,700			2754
		5,518				6,983				2,801				3,033
Amortization of deferred financing costs		335			333			111			111
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		13,823				9,535				10,210				10,898
		8,329			9,848			2,811			2,865
Income taxes		5,529				4,713				4,084				4,814
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		18,416			17,900			4,593			8,366
NET INCOME	$	8,294			$	4,822			$	6,126			$	6,084
Income taxes		7,366			8,523			1,837			3,810
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS		—				(238	)			—				(238	)
NET INCOME		11,050			9,377			2,756			4,556
NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK	$	8,294			$	4,584			$	6,126			$	5,846
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS		—			(475	)		—			(238	)
PER COMMON SHARE—BASIC	$	.80			$	.41			$	.59			$	.51
NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK	$	11,050		$	8,902		$	2,756		$	4,318
PER COMMON SHARE—DILUTED	$	.80			$	.41			$	.59			$	.51
PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$	1.07		$	.81		$	.27		$	.40
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		10,338				11,111				10,337				11,478
PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED	$	1.07		$	.81		$	.27		$	.40
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		10,365				11,112				10,364				11,479
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		10,338			11,023			10,338			10,851
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		10,361			11,024			10,361			10,852
Net income	$	8,294			$	4,584			$	6,126			$	5,846
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Other comprehensive loss:
Net income	$	11,050		$	8,902		$	2,756		$	4,318
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		—				(1,023	)			—				—
Other comprehensive loss
Derivative loss		(865	)			—				(1,183	)			—
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		—			(1,023	)		—			—
Comprehensive income	$	7,429			$	3,561			$	4,943			$	5,846
Derivative loss		(2,514	)		(811	)		(1,183	)		(811	)
Comprehensive income	$	8,536		$	7,068		$	1,573		$	3,507

See notes to consolidated financial statements

4AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~AMERISTEEL~~ (US$in ~~CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY~~ thousands)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Nine Months Ended

	September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2001 (Unaudited)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	11,050		$	9,377
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		21,124			24,546
Other		158			46
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(22,773	)		(9,071	)
Inventories		3,696			17,387
Other assets		(1,349	)		(98	)
Current and other liabilities		11,802			32,777

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		23,708			74,964

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(17,648	)		(16,655	)
Purchase price for acquisitions		(8,356	)		(9,468	)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		134			106
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale		—			510

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(20,686	)		(25,507	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from (payments of) short term and long term borrowings, net		4,782			(66,785	)
Additions to deferred financing costs		—			(3	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		—			10,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		857			15,150
Redemption of common stock		(77	)		(10,371	)
Dividends declared		—			(475	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		5,562			(52,484	)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		3,400			(3,027	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5,087			5,956


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	8,487		$	2,930

(US$ in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	8,294		$	4,822
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,994			16,281
Other		(442	)		118
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(25,347	)		(12,818	)
Inventories		6,765			15,489
Other assets		271			389
Current and other liabilities		9,105			18,006
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		12,640			42,287
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(12,449	)		(11,943	)
Purchase price for acquisitions		(8,356	)		(9,468	)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		119			4
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale		—			510
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(20,686	)		(20,897	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from (payments of) short term and long term borrowings, net		10,593			(44,851	)
Additions to deferred financing costs		—			(4	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		—			10,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		32			15,150
Redemption of common stock		(71	)		(5,367	)
Dividends declared		—			(238	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		10,554			(25,310	)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		2,508			(3,920	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5,087			5,956
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	7,595		$	2,036

See notes to consolidated financial statements

5AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~AMERISTEEL~~NOTE ~~CORPORATION~~A – ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS & ~~SUBSIDIARY~~BASIS OF PRESENTATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A—ORGANIZATION, BUSINESS & BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriSteel Corporation (“AmeriSteel”), a Florida corporation, and its majority owned subsidiary, AmeriSteel Bright Bar, Inc. (“ABB”), a Florida corporation (together, the “Company”) after elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions. The Company operates in the steel production and fabrication industry. Its headquarters are located in Tampa, Florida, and its operations are located throughout the eastern half of the United States.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~October is23, a2002, ~~majority-owned~~the ~~subsidiary~~sole owner (Gerdau U.S.A., Inc., or “GUSA1”) of the Company’s parent (FLS Holdings, Inc., (or “FLS”) was merged into FLS, which then changed its name to Gerdau, U.S.A., Inc. (“GUSA”). As a result, the Company is a majority-owned subsidiary of GUSA whose only business is to own common stock of the Company. ~~FLS~~GUSA, which owns 87% of the common stock of the Company, is aan ~~wholly-~~indirect majority owned subsidiary of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, a Canadian corporation. The ultimate majority owner of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation is a Brazilian steel manufacturer, Gerdau S.A. (“The Gerdau~~”),~~ ~~through~~family ~~one~~of companies acquired majority ownership of Gerdau~~’s subsidiaries,~~ ~~Gerdau~~Ameristeel ~~U.S.A.,~~Corporation ~~Inc.~~in ~~(“GUSA”)~~October 2002. ~~GUSA~~GUSA1 acquired 88% of FLS in September 1999, resulting in a change of control, and the remaining 12% in September 2000, in each instance from Kyoei Steel Ltd. An institutional investor owns approximately 4% of the common stock of the Company. Executives, ~~and~~ other employees and related persons own the remaining 9% of the Company’s common stock. Push-down accounting has not been applied to the financial statements of the Company as a result of a change of control in September 1999. Accordingly, ~~therefore~~ the historical cost basis of the Company’s assets have not been changed.

On March 13, 2001, AmeriSteel formed ABB. On April 2, 2001, ABB merged with American Bright Bar of Orrville, Ohio, a producer of cold drawn flat bars. ABB acquired all of American Bright Bar’s assets.

On December 28, 2001, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Cartersville, Georgia mill (“Cartersville”), a producer of structural steel products, from Birmingham Steel Corporation. In a separate transaction on the same date, the Company acquired certain assets that were being leased by Cartersville from the existing lessor group for cash and negotiated a new operating lease. The transactions are accounted for as a business combination.

Unaudited proforma consolidated results of operations for the quarter and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2001 reflecting the business combination of the Cartersville mill are presented in the table below. The proforma results assume the Cartersville acquisition was completed on the first day of the respective periods. Interest expense, which is not directly charged to the mill, is based on projected capital employed and actual average interest rates for the respective periods.

	Six Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2001
	September 30, 2001
	(US$ in thousands, unaudited)
Net sales	$	~~388~~587,~~963~~915	$	~~203~~207,~~724~~289
Income before income taxes		28,~~021~~539		76,~~246~~518
Net income		~~314~~3,761		3,~~893~~447

Management believes that the results of operations of Cartersville in the proforma periods are not reflective of those which would have been achieved under current management and operating conditions. For the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002, Cartersville operating income was $1(.1) million and $1.1 0 million, respectively.

OnAMERISTEEL ~~June~~CORPORATION ~~24,~~& ~~2002,~~SUBSIDIARYNOTES ~~the~~TO ~~Company~~CONSOLIDATED ~~acquired~~FINANCIAL ~~certain~~STATEMENTS ~~assets~~– and assumed certain liabilities of Republic Technologies’ cold drawn plant in Cartersville, Georgia, to complement the operations of ABB. The purchase price was $8.4 million and the transaction is accounted for as a business combination. The plant was reopened and commenced operations on July 2, 2002. (CONTINUED)

6On June 24, 2002, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Republic Technologies’ cold drawn plant in Cartersville, Georgia, to complement the operations of ABB. The purchase price was $8.4 million and the transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The plant was reopened and commenced operations on July 2, 2002.

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all the information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. However all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Such adjustments consisted of only normally recurring items.

These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. The results of the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods.

NOTE B— – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Property Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Maintenance and repair expenses are charged against operating expenses as incurred; however, as is typical in the industry, certain major maintenance requires occasional shutdown and production curtailment. The Company accrues for planned periodic major maintenance activities and the estimated cost of these shutdowns. The Company has accrued $1.3 million ~~and~~ ~~$1.2 million~~ as of ~~June~~September 30, 2002 and ~~June 30,~~ 2001, ~~respectively.~~for maintenance.

Earnings per Common Share: Basic earnings per common share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and the diluted earnings per common share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares plus the dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations shown on the face of the accompanying consolidated statements of income (in thousands, except per share data):

	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,				Three Months EndedSeptember 30,
	June 30,				June 30,
	2002(unaudited)		2001(unaudited)		2002(unaudited)		2001(unaudited)
	2002		2001		2002		2001
Net income applicable to common stock	$	11,050	$	8,902	$	2,756	$	4,318
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Weighted average number of common shares
Net income applicable to common stock	$	8,294	$	4,584	$	6,126	$	5,846
Outstanding		10,338		11,023		10,338		10,851
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		10,338		11,111		10,337		11,478
Dilutive effect of stock option plans		24		1		24		1
Dilutive effect of stock option plans		27		1		27		1
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		10,361		11,024		10,361		10,852
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		10,365		11,112		10,364		11,479
Basic EPS:
Basic EPS:
Net income applicable to common stock	$	1.07	$	.81	$	.27	$	.40
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	.80	$	.41	$	.59	$	.51
Diluted EPS:
Diluted EPS:
Net income applicable to common stock	$	1.07	$	.81	$	.27	$	.40
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	.80	$	.41	$	.59	$	.51

Other comprehensive income: Other comprehensive income represents the unrealized loss on marketable securities held for sale and the unrealized gain on hedging financial instruments. The derivative loss represents the after tax change in the mark-to-market valuation of the interest rate swaps. The change from period to period is indicative of current interest rate expectations over the remaining life of the swaps (swap yield curves) relative to the swap yield curve at the time the swaps were entered into.

7AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

~~AMERISTEEL~~Recent accounting ~~CORPORATION~~pronouncements: &In ~~SUBSIDIARY~~July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 provides that goodwill and intangible assets which have indefinite useful lives will not be amortized but rather will be tested at least annually for impairment. The provisions of SFAS 142 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. At June 30, 2002, the Company did not have indefinite lived intangible assets other than goodwill and did not have any intangible assets with definite lives. The Company has adopted SFAS 142 and no longer amortizes goodwill resulting in improved income from operations of approximately $1.1 million per quarter and $4.4 million annually, or $.43 per basic common share, in 2002. SFAS 142 prescribes a two-phase process for impairment testing of goodwill. The Company completed its first phase impairment analysis and found no impairment of its recorded goodwill; accordingly, the second phase, absent future indications of impairment, was not necessary during 2002.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Recent accounting pronouncements: In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). SFAS 142 provides that goodwill and intangible assets which have indefinite useful lives will not be amortized but rather will be tested at least annually for impairment. The provisions of SFAS 142 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. At June 30, 2002, the Company did not have indefinite lived intangible assets other than goodwill and did not have any intangible assets with definite lives. The Company has adopted SFAS 142 and no longer amortizes goodwill resulting in improved income from operations of approximately $1.1 million per quarter and $4.4 million annually, or $.43 per basic common share, in 2002. SFAS 142 prescribes a two-phase process for impairment testing of goodwill. The Company completed its first phase impairment analysis and found no instances of impairment of its recorded goodwill; accordingly, the second phase, absent future indications of impairment, is not necessary during 2002.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144), that addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS 144 requires that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. The implementation of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company.

Derivatives: The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS No. 133), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138 ~~(“SFAS 133”)~~. SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial instruments and requires that derivative instruments be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at their fair value. SFAS 133 allows that changes in the derivative fair values that are designated effective and qualify as cash flow hedges can be deferred and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged transactions occur and are recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedging derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments that do not qualify as cash flow hedges, SFAS 133 requires that changes in the derivative fair values be recognized in earnings in the period of change.

In order to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements in August and September 2001 that are considered cash flow hedges. The interest rate swaps have a notional value of $55 million with the Company paying a fixed interest rate (ranging between 4.75% and 5.28%) and receiving a variable interest rate based on three-month LIBOR. The underlying hedged instruments are specific tranches of LIBOR based revolving credit and term loan borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Agreement. The Company tests effectiveness of the swaps on a quarterly basis using the “hypothetical derivative” method prescribed by SFAS 133. Each period, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is recorded on the balance sheet. The effective portion of the swap agreements is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged transaction occurs and is recognized in income. The ineffective portion of the swap agreements is recognized in income immediately.

Reclassifications: Certain accounts in prior periods have been restated to conform to current accounting treatment.

8AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

~~AMERISTEEL~~NOTE ~~CORPORATION~~C — ~~& SUBSIDIARY~~ INVENTORIES

~~NOTES~~Inventories TOconsist ~~CONSOLIDATED~~of ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS –~~ following: (~~Continued)~~US$ in thousands)

NOTE C—INVENTORIES

	September 30, 2002		December 31, 2001

	(Unaudited)

Finished goods	$	87,304	$	89,798
Work-in-process		11,800		11,839
Raw materials and operating supplies		41,331		41,258

	$	140,435	$	142,895

~~Inventories~~NOTE ~~consist~~D of— ~~the following:~~ BORROWINGS

(US$ in thousands)	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)		December 31, 2001
Finished goods	$	81,484	$	89,798
Work-in-process		14,208		11,839
Raw materials and operating supplies		41,674		41,258
	$	137,366	$	142,895

Long-term borrowings consist of the following:
(US$ in thousands)

NOTE D—BORROWINGS

	September 30, 2002			December 31, 2001

	(Unaudited)
Term Loan	$	75,000		$	93,750
Revolving Loan		100,400			80,000
Industrial Revenue Bonds		36,795			33,195
Subsidiary Debt		3,652			3,867
TVA Loan		853			1,009
Capital Lease		24			121

Total Borrowings		216,724			211,942
Less Current Maturities		(25,604	)		(25,598	)

Total long-term borrowings	$	191,120		$	186,344

~~Long-~~The Company’s primary financial obligation outstanding as of September 30, 2002 was under its $285 million credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) that includes a $100 million term ~~borrowings~~loan ~~consist~~that began amortizing at the rate of 25% per year in December 2001 and a $185 million revolving loan due in 2005. The Revolving Credit Agreement is collateralized by first priority security interests in substantially all accounts receivable and inventory of the ~~following:~~Company as well as a lien on the Company’s Charlotte Mill property, plant and equipment. Loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a per annum rate equal to one of several rate options (LIBOR, Fed Funds, or Prime Rate) based on the facility chosen at the time of borrowing plus an applicable margin determined by tests of performance from time to time. The rate options for the tranches being hedged are always the same. The effective interest rate on the Revolving Credit Agreement at September 30, 2002 was approximately 4.0%.

(US$ in thousands)	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2001
Term Loan	$	81,250		$	93,750
Revolving Loan		99,800			80,000
Industrial Revenue Bonds		36,795			33,195
Subsidiary Debt		3,727			3,867
TVA Loan		905			1,009
Capital Lease		58			121
Total Borrowings		222,535			211,942
Less Current Maturities		(25,568	)		(25,598	)
Total long-term borrowings	$	196,967		$	186,344

The Company’s primary financial obligation outstanding as of June 30, 2002 was a $285 million credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) that includes a $100 million term loan that began amortizing at the rate of 25% per year in December 2001 and a $185 million revolving loan. The Revolving Credit Agreement is collateralized by first priority security interests in substantially all accounts receivable and inventory of the Company as well as a lien on the Company’s Charlotte Mill property, plant and equipment. Loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a per annum rate equal to one of several rate options (LIBOR, Fed Funds, or Prime Rate) based on the facility chosen at the time of borrowing plus an applicable margin determined by tests of performance from time to time. The rate options for the tranches being hedged are always the same. The effective interest rate on the Revolving Credit Agreement at June 30, 2002 was approximately 4.1%.

As part of the acquisition of the Cartersville, Georgia cold drawn operation, the Company assumed an Industrial Revenue Bond in the amount of $3.6 million that matures in 2018.

Subsidiary Debt represents a bank loan of ABB secured by its machinery and equipment. The loan matures in 2011 with amortization payments that began in July 2001. The loan currently bears interest at the rate of approximately 7.2% per year with the rate scheduled to reset June 2005 and every three years thereafter based on prime plus 1%. The Company is a guarantor of the loan.

9AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

~~AMERISTEEL~~NOTE ~~CORPORATION~~E — &ENVIRONMENTAL ~~SUBSIDIARY~~ MATTERS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

NOTE E—ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

As the Company is involved in the manufacture of steel, it produces and uses certain substances that may pose environmental hazards. The principal hazardous waste generated by current and past operations is Emission Control (“EC”) dust, a residual from the production of steel in electric arc furnaces. Environmental legislation and regulation at both the federal and state level over EC dust is subject to change, which may change the cost of compliance. While EC dust is generated in current production processes, such EC dust is being collected, handled and disposed of in a manner that management believes meets all current federal and state environmental regulations. The costs of collection and disposal of EC dust are being expensed as operating costs when incurred. In addition, the Company has handled and disposed of EC dust in other manners in previous years, and is responsible for the remediation of certain sites where such EC dust was generated and/or disposed.

In general, the Company’s estimate of remediation costs is based on its review of each site and the nature of the anticipated ~~remediation~~ remediation activities to be undertaken. The Company’s process for estimating such remediation costs includes determining for each site the expected remediation methods, and the estimated cost for each step of the remediation. In such determinations, the Company may employ outside consultants and providers of such remedial services to assist in making such determinations. Although the ultimate costs associated with the remediation are not known precisely, the Company estimated the total remaining costs to be approximately $2.7 million with these costs recorded as a liability at ~~June~~September 30, 2002, of which the Company expects to pay approximately $1.09 million within one year.

Based on past use of certain technologies and remediation methods by third parties, evaluation of those technologies and methods by the Company’s consultants and third-party estimates of costs of remediation-related services provided to the Company or which the Company and its consultants are aware, the Company and its consultants believe that the Company’s cost estimates are reasonable. Considering the uncertainties inherent in determining the costs associated with the clean-up of such contamination, including the time periods over which such costs must be paid, the extent of contribution by parties which are jointly and severally liable, and the nature and timing of payments to be made under cost sharing arrangements, there can be no assurance the ultimate costs of remediation may not be greater or less than the estimated remediation costs.

In April 2001, the Company was notified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) of an investigation that may identify the Company as a potential responsible party (“PRP”) in a Superfund Site in Pelham, Georgia. The Pelham site was a fertilizer manufacturer in operation from 1910 through 1992, lastly operated by Stoller Chemical Company, a now bankrupt corporation. The EPA ~~recently~~ offered a settlement to the named PRPs under which the Company’s allocation was approximately $1.8 million. The Company objects to its inclusion as a PRP in this site and is pursuing legal alternatives, including the addition of larger third parties to the allocation which the Company feels were incorrectly excluded from the original settlement offer. The EPA has filed suit with the Company named as a defendant. As the ultimate exposure to the Company, if any, is uncertain, no liability has been established for this site.

10AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARYNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

~~AMERISTEEL~~NOTE ~~CORPORATION~~F – &SEGMENT ~~SUBSIDIARY~~ INFORMATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

NOTE F—SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company is organized into two primary business segments: (a) Mill Operations and (b) Steel Fabrication. Steel products sold to the fabricating divisions are sold at market prices with intracompany transactions eliminated upon consolidation. Performance is evaluated and resources allocated based on specific segment requirements and measurable factors. Segment assets are those assets that are specifically identified with the operations in each operational segment. Corporate assets include primarily cash, assets held for sale, some property, plant and equipment, deferred income taxes and deferred financing costs. Corporate expense includes corporate headquarters staff, including executive management, human resources, finance and accounting, procurement and environmental, and management information systems. Included in these respective areas are payroll costs, travel and entertainment, professional fees and other costs that may not be directly attributable to either specific segment.

Operational results and other financial data for the two manufacturing segments for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2001 and ~~June~~September 30, 2002, are presented below:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2001	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		TotalSegments
	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	9893,~~079~~912	$	7574,~~933~~744	$	~~174~~168,~~012~~656
Intracompany revenues		4755,~~164~~929		—		4755,~~164~~929
Segment profit		8,~~485~~370		53,~~634~~037		1411,~~119~~407
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments
	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	126,351	$	71,654	$	198,005
Intracompany revenues		39,256		—		39,256
Segment profit		9,637		4,071		13,708
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments
	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	194,079	$	139,113	$	333,192
Intracompany revenues		91,235		—		91,235
Segment profit		6,284		10,422		16,706
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments
	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	233,522	$	136,062	$	369,584
Intracompany revenues		76,102		—		76,102
Segment profit		15,269		5,326		20,595

Three Months Ended September 30, 2002	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments

	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	122,602	$	69,790	$	192,392
Intracompany revenues		44,588		—		44,588
Segment profit		3,538		3,741		7,279

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments

	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	288,022	$	213,826	$	501,848
Intracompany revenues		147,164		—		147,164
Segment profit		14,654		13,458		28,112

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002	Mill Operations		Steel Fabrication		Total Segments

	(US$ in thousands)
Revenue from external customers	$	356,175	$	205,801	$	561,976
Intracompany revenues		120,690		—		120,690
Segment profit		18,807		9,068		27,875

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

Reconciliation of reportable segments to consolidated total:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2002				Six Months Ended June 30, 2001				Three Months Ended June 30, 2002				Three Months Ended June 30, 2001
	Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2002			Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2001			Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2002			Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2001
	(US$ in thousands)
Revenues
Total segments revenues	$	~~445~~682,~~686~~666		$	$649,012	~~424,427~~	$	236,980	$	~~237,261~~$	224,585		$	~~221,176~~
Elimination of intersegment revenues		(76120,~~102~~690	)		(147,164	~~(91,235~~)	)	(44,588	)	~~(39,256~~	)(55,929	)		~~(47,164~~	)
Consolidated revenues	$	~~369~~561,~~584~~976		$	$501,848	~~333,192~~	$	192,392	$	~~198,005~~$	168,656		$	~~174,012~~
Profit
Total segments profit	$	2027,~~595~~875		$	$28,112	~~16,706~~	$	7,279	$	~~13,708~~$	11,407		$	~~14,119~~
Other profit or loss		~~913~~(1,007	)		308	~~(667~~	)	(95	)	~~133~~	(358	)		~~(667~~	)
Elimination of intersegment profits		~~287~~1,205			(170	~~(354~~)	)	920		~~251~~	182			~~(120~~	)
Unallocated amounts:
Other corporate expense (income)		(2,454	)			833				(1,081	)			599
Other corporate expense		(1,328	)		(502	)		(700	)		—
Unallocated interest expense		(58,~~518~~329	)		(9,848	~~(6,983~~)	)	(2,811	)	~~(2,801~~	)(2,865	)		~~(3,033~~	)
Consolidated income before income taxes	$	1318,~~823~~416		$	$17,900	~~9,535~~	$	4,593	$	~~10,210~~$	8,366		$	~~10,898~~

~~Item~~ITEM 2. ~~Management~~ MANAGEMENT’sS ~~Discussion~~DISCUSSION ~~and~~AND ~~Analysis~~ANALYSIS ~~of Financial~~OF ~~Condition~~FINANCIAL CONDITION & ~~Results~~RESULTS ofOF ~~Operations~~ OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations are based on AmeriSteel’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company reviews the accounting policies used in reporting its financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and judgments under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following critical accounting policies, among others discussed throughout the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, involve the more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of AmeriSteel’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition And Allowance For Doubtful Accounts

AmeriSteel recognizes revenues in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Generally, AmeriSteel recognizes revenues when earned, and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer.

The Company generally recognizes revenues from sales and the allowance for estimated costs associated with returns from these sales when the product is shipped. Provisions are made for estimated product returns and customer claims based on estimates and actual historical experience. If the historical data used in the estimates does not reflect future returns and claims trends, additional

12provisions may be necessary. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in the impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowance may be required.

~~provisions~~Allowance ~~may~~For beUncollectible necessary. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of customers was to deteriorate, resulting in the impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowance may be required. Receivables

~~Allowance~~The ~~For~~allowance ~~Uncollectible~~for ~~Receivables~~all potentially uncollectible receivables is based on a combination of historical data, cash payment trends, specific customer issues, write off trends, general economic conditions and other factors. These factors are continuously monitored by management to arrive at the estimate for the amount of accounts receivable that may be ultimately uncollectible. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the allowance for uncollectible receivables.

~~The~~Impairment ~~allowance~~Of for all potentially uncollectible receivables is based on a combination of historical data, cash payment trends, specific customer issues, write off trends, general economic conditions and other factors. These factors are continuously monitored by management to arrive at the estimate for the amount of accounts receivable that may be ultimately uncollectible. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the allowance for uncollectible receivables. Goodwill

~~Impairment~~The OfCompany periodically evaluates acquired ~~Goodwill~~businesses for potential impairment indicators. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and operational performance of acquired businesses. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on financial condition and results of operations.

~~The~~Impairments ~~Company~~Of ~~periodically~~Long-Lived evaluates acquired businesses for potential impairment indicators. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and operational performance of acquired businesses. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on financial condition and results of operations. Assets

~~Impairments~~In Ofaccordance with the methodology described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment losses would be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment were present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.

InDeferred ~~accordance~~Tax ~~with the methodology described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived~~ Assets”, ~~the~~And Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment losses would be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment were present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. Liabilities

~~Deferred~~The ~~Tax~~Company ~~Assets~~recognizes ~~And~~deferred ~~Liabilities~~tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. AmeriSteel regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If the Company was to operate at a loss for a continued period, or was unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there were a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, the Company could be required to establish a valuation allowance against all or a significant portion of our deferred tax assets resulting in a substantial increase in its effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on its operating results.

~~The~~Accident ~~Company~~Claims recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. AmeriSteel regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If the Company was to operate at a loss for a continued period, or was unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there were a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, the Company could be required to establish a valuation allowance against all or a significant portion of our deferred tax assets resulting in a substantial increase in its effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on its operating results. Reserves

~~Accident~~The ~~Claims~~Company ~~Reserves~~is self-insured up to the respective stop-loss limits for general, auto and product and workers’ compensation liability claims. In developing liability reserves, the Company relies on professional third party claims administrators, insurance company estimates and the judgment of its own safety department personnel. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the accident claims reserves.

~~The~~Environmental Company is self-insured up to the respective stop-loss limits for general, auto and product and workers’ compensation liability claims. In developing liability reserves, the Company relies on professional third party claims administrators, insurance company estimates and the judgment of its own safety department personnel. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the accident claims reserves. Liabilities

13The Company has reserved for potential environmental liabilities based on the best estimates of potential clean-up and remediation estimates for known environmental sites. The Company employs a staff of environmental experts to administer all phases of its environmental programs, and uses outside experts where needed. These professionals develop estimates of potential liabilities at these sites based on projected and known remediation costs. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the environmental accrual.

~~Environmental~~Factors ~~Liabilities~~That May Affect Operating Results

~~The~~This ~~Company~~report ~~has~~contains ~~reserved~~certain ~~for~~forward-looking ~~potential~~statements ~~environmental~~that ~~liabilities~~are based on the ~~best~~beliefs ~~estimates~~ of ~~potential~~the ~~clean-up~~Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by, and ~~remediation~~information ~~estimates~~currently ~~for~~available ~~known~~to, ~~environmental~~the ~~sites~~Company’s management. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Such ~~employs~~statements ainclude, ~~staff~~among others, (i) the highly cyclical nature and seasonality of ~~environmental~~the ~~experts~~steel toindustry, ~~administer~~(ii) ~~all~~the ~~phases~~fluctuations in the cost and availability of ~~its~~raw ~~environmental~~materials, ~~programs~~(iii) the possibility of excess production capacity, (iv) global econometrics and ~~uses~~the ~~outside~~potential ~~experts~~for ~~where~~unfair ~~needed.~~dumping ~~These~~of ~~professionals~~imports, ~~develop~~(v) ~~estimates~~the risks associated with potential acquisitions, (vi) further opportunities for industry consolidation, (vii) the impact of inflation, (viii) the potential ~~liabilities~~costs atof ~~these~~environmental ~~sites~~compliance, ~~based~~and on(ix) ~~projected~~the fluctuations in the cost of electricity. Because such statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual ~~known~~actions ~~remediation~~and ~~costs~~strategies and the timing and expected results thereof may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. ~~This~~The following presentation of management’s discussion and analysis ~~requires~~of the Company’s tofinancial ~~make~~condition ~~significant~~and ~~estimates,~~results ~~and~~of ~~changes~~operations should be read in ~~facts~~conjunction ~~and~~with ~~circumstances~~the ~~could~~Company’s ~~result~~Annual inReport ~~material~~on ~~changes~~Form in10-K as filed with the ~~environmental~~Securities ~~accrual.~~and Exchange Commission.

~~Factors That May Affect Operating Results~~ General

~~This~~The ~~report~~results ~~contains~~of ~~certain~~operations ~~forward-looking~~of ~~statements~~the ~~that~~Company are ~~based~~largely dependent on the ~~beliefs~~level of ~~the~~construction ~~Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by,~~ and ~~information~~general ~~currently~~economic ~~available~~activity ~~to,~~in the U.S. The Company’s ~~management. Such~~sales ~~statements~~are ~~include,~~seasonal ~~among~~with ~~others,~~sales ~~(i) the highly cyclical nature and seasonality of the steel industry, (ii) the fluctuations~~ in the ~~cost~~June and ~~availability~~September ofquarters ~~raw~~generally ~~materials,~~stronger ~~(iii)~~than the ~~possibility~~rest of ~~excess production capacity, (iv) global econometrics and~~ the ~~potential~~year. ~~for~~The ~~unfair~~Company’s ~~dumping~~cost of ~~imports,~~sales ~~(v)~~includes the ~~risks~~cost ~~associated~~of ~~with~~its ~~potential~~primary ~~acquisitions~~raw material, ~~(vi)~~steel ~~further opportunities for industry consolidation~~scrap, ~~(vii)~~ the ~~impact~~cost of ~~inflation,~~converting ~~(viii)~~scrap ~~the~~to ~~potential~~finished ~~costs~~steel ~~of environmental compliance~~products, ~~and (ix)~~ the ~~fluctuations in the~~ cost of warehousing ~~electricity. Because such statements involve risks~~ and ~~uncertainties,~~handling ~~actual~~finished ~~actions~~steel ~~and~~products ~~strategies~~ and ~~the~~freight ~~timing and expected results thereof may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements~~costs. The following ~~presentation~~table ofsets ~~management’s~~forth ~~discussion~~information ~~and~~regarding ~~analysis~~recent ~~of the Company’s financial condition and~~ results of operations ~~should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission~~.

~~General~~AMERISTEEL CORPORATION RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) (in thousands, except per to and per share data)

The results of operations of the Company are largely dependent on the level of construction and general economic activity in the U.S. The Company’s sales are seasonal with sales in the June and September quarters generally stronger than the rest of the year. The Company’s cost of sales includes the cost of its primary raw material, steel scrap, the cost of converting scrap to finished steel products, the cost of warehousing and handling finished steel products and freight costs. The following table sets forth information regarding recent results of operations.

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended

	September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2001 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2001 (Unaudited)


Gross Sales	$	561,976		$	501,848		$	192,392		$	168,656

Cost of sales		483,641			424,178			167,475			139,704
Cost of sales as percent of sales		86.1	%		84.5	%		87.0	%		82.8	%
Selling and administrative		29,794			26,017			10,400			9,210
Depreciation		20,789			20,784			7,019			5,994
Amortization of goodwill		—			3,429			—			1,159
Other operating expense (income)		1,007			(308	)		95			358

		535,231			474,100			184,989			157,425

Income from operations		26,745			27,748			7,404			11,231
Other Expenses:
Interest		7,994			9,515			2,700			2,754
Amortization of deferred financing costs		335			333			111			111

Income before income taxes		18,416			17,900			4,593			8,366
Income taxes		7,366			8,523			1,837			3,810

Net income	$	11,050		$	9,377		$	2,756		$	4,556


EPS – Basic applicable to common stock	$	1.07		$	.81		$	.27		$	.40
EPS - Diluted applicable to common stock	$	1.07		$	.81		$	.27		$	.40
EBITDA*	$	47,849		$	52,113		$	14,462		$	19,413
EBITDA margin		8.5	%		10.4	%		6.0	%		11.5	%
Capital expenditures		17,648			16,655			5,199			4,709
Ratio of EBITDA to interest expense		6.0	x		5.5	x		5.4	x		7.0	x
EBITDA – (ttm)**	$	62,375		$	62,298
Ratio of total debt to EBITDA (ttm)		3.60	x		2.72	x
Shipped Tons
Stock rebar		519			533			169			158
Merchant bar		695			467			241			163
Rods		97			77			28			28

Subtotal mill finished goods		1,311			1,077			438			349
Fabricated rebar		344			377			120			132
Billets		55			21			15			4

Total shipped tons		1,710			1,475			573			485

Average Selling Prices ($ Per Ton)
Mill finished goods
Stock rebar	$	268		$	274		$	274		$	281
Merchant bar		294			291			305			291
Rods		295			288			310			289

Average mill finished goods		283			282			292			286
Fabricated rebar		415			426			427			425
Billets		202			202			214			207
Average mill finished goods prices (per ton)	$	283		$	282		$	292		$	286
Average yielded scrap cost (per ton)		97			90			108			94

Average metal spread (per ton)	$	186		$	192		$	184		$	192

Average mill conversion costs (per ton)	$	129		$	127		$	134		$	128

14AMERISTEEL CORPORATIONSUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONT.)

AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

	September 30, 2002			September 30, 2001

(US$000s)	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Total current assets	$	241,258		$	217,507
Net property, plant & equipment		313,387			283,139
Total assets		634,224			581,441
Current maturities of LT borrowings		25,604			25,572
Total current liabilities		128,961			125,294
Long term borrowings		191,120			138,269
Total liabilities		388,338			332,064
Shareholders’ equity		245,886			249,377

Current ratio		1.9	x		1.7	x
Debt to capital ratio		46.8	%		39.7	%

~~SUMMARY~~* ~~CONSOLIDATED~~EBITDA ~~STATEMENTS~~(earnings OFbefore ~~CASH~~interest ~~FLOWS~~taxes depreciation and amortization) excludes non-cash charges.

~~(in~~** ~~thousands,~~ttm ~~except~~= ~~per~~trailing totwelve ~~and per share data)~~ months

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2002 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2001 (Unaudited)
Gross Sales	$	369,584		$	333,192		$	198,005		$	174,012
Cost of sales		316,166			284,475			168,040			143,219
Cost of sales as percent of sales		85.5	%		85.4	%		84.9	%		82.3	%
Selling and administrative		19,394			16,807			10,018			9,418
Depreciation		13,770			13,789			6,803			6,952
Amortization of goodwill		—			2,270			—			1,159
Other operating expense (income)		913			(667	)		133			(667	)
		350,243			316,674			184,994			160,081
Income from operations		19,341			16,518			13,011			13,931
Other Expenses:
Interest		5,294			6,761			2,689			2,921
Amortization of deferred financing costs		224			222			112			112
Income before income taxes		13,823			9,535			10,210			10,898
Income taxes		5,529			4,713			4,084			4,814
Net income	$	8,294		$	4,822		$	6,126		$	6,084
EPS—Basic applicable to common stock	$	.80		$	.41		$	.59		$	.51
EPS—Diluted applicable to common stock	$	.80		$	.41		$	.59		$	.51
EBITDA*	$	33,388		$	32,701		$	19,848		$	22,098
EBITDA margin		9.0	%		9.8	%		10.0	%		12.7	%
Capital expenditures	$	12,449		$	11,943		$	3,744		$	3,513
Ratio of EBITDA to interest expense		6.3x			4.8x			7.4x			7.6x
EBITDA—(ttm)**	$	67,327		$	55,007
Ratio of total debt to EBITDA (ttm)		3.31x			3.38x
Shipped Tons
Stock rebar		350			375			176			192
Merchant bar		454			303			243			152
Rods		69			49			40			26
Subtotal mill finished goods		873			727			459			370
Fabricated rebar		224			245			119			132
Billets		40			18			29			3
Total shipped tons		1,137			990			607			505
Average Selling Prices ($ Per Ton)
Mill finished goods
Stock rebar	$	266		$	271		$	270		$	278
Merchant bar		288			293			292			294
Rods		289			288			290			289
Average mill finished goods		279			281			283			285
Fabricated rebar		418			427			413			423
Billets		197			201			198			211
Average mill finished goods prices (per ton)	$	279		$	281		$	283		$	285
Average yielded scrap cost (per ton)		91			88			97			89
Average metal spread (per ton)	$	188		$	193		$	186		$	196
Average mill conversion costs (per ton)	$	127		$	127		$	126		$	127

The above summary financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the current year.

Gross Sales: Revenues increased $23.7 million and $60.1 million in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 2001. The acquisition of the Cartersville mill in December 2001 resulted in additional revenues of $24.7 million and $68.4 million during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, primarily from the sale of merchant bars (inlcuding structurals). Excluding Cartersville, finished tons shipped remained relatively flat in the three month and nine month periods compared to the same periods last year, however product mix shifted in response to market conditions. For the quarter ended September 30, 2002 rebar shipments increased offsetting merchant bar shipment decreases. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased rod shipments offset lower rebar shipments. While overall average pricing improved sequentially from the June 30, 2002 quarter, average mill finished goods selling prices remained about the same for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared with the same period last year, while prices increased approximately 2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 over the same period last year. However due to the changes in product mix, price changes resulted in a $600,000 increase in revenues for the three month periods ended September 30, 2002, and $4.7 million decrease in revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Average selling prices for rebar and merchant products have come off recent 15 year lows. Implementation of Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 has resulted in tariffs of 15% on rebar and 30% for merchant bar. The Cartersville cold drawn facility acquired in July 2002 contributed $1.3 million in revenue during the quarter.

~~AMERISTEEL~~Cost ~~CORPORATION~~of Sales: Yielded scrap costs, which comprise approximately 35% to 40% of the Company’s cost of sales, averaged $108 per ton and $94 per ton in the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, respectively. Prices have increased as a result of higher demand for scrap in other domestic steel markets as the Section 201 relief has resulted in increased production at domestic mills, primarily in the flat rolled market. Mill conversion costs have remained flat relative to the same prior year periods, with the higher costs associated with Cartersville being offset by reductions in the other mills. Excluding Cartersville, conversion costs were approximately $128 per ton and $124 per ton for the three months ended and the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $127 per ton and $129 per ton in the same prior year periods, respectively.

~~SUMMARY~~Selling ~~CONSOLIDATED~~and ~~FINANCIAL~~Administrative: ~~INFORMATION—(Continued)~~Selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2002 were approximately $1.2 million higher than the same period last year due primarily to increased professional fees and the incremental costs associated with the acquired businesses, ABB and Cartersville. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, selling and administrative costs were approximately $3.7 million higher than the same period last year due to higher professional fees, improved performance incentive pay, severance pay and the incremental costs associated with ABB and Cartersville. The increased professional fees relate primarily to consulting engagements for strategic development initiatives.

(US$000s)	June 30, 2002 (unaudited)			June 30, 2001 (unaudited)
Total current assets	$	238,522		$	214,360
Net property, plant & equipment		315,246			303,150
Total assets		633,077			603,592
Current maturities of LT borrowings		25,568			25,598
Total current liabilities		126,937			109,614
Long term borrowings		196,967			186,344
Total liabilities		389,117			367,022
Shareholders’ equity		243,960			236,570
Current ratio		1.9x			2.0x
Debt to capital ratio		47.7	%		47.3	%

Other Operating Expense: Other operating expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 relates to the closing of the Wilmington and St. Albans fabricating plants. Other operating income in the three months ended September 30, 2001 relates to an insurance deductible charge associated with the cesium melt at the Jacksonville mill in July 2001. Other operating income in the nine months ended September 30, 2001 relates to prior year tax refunds less the insurance deductible.

*EBITDAInterest ~~(earnings~~Expense: ~~before~~Interest ~~interest~~expense ~~taxes~~decreased ~~depreciation~~in the three and ~~amortization)~~nine ~~excludes~~months ~~non-cash charges.~~ended ~~Non-cash~~September ~~charges~~30, ~~included~~2002 ~~property~~from ~~disposals~~the ofsame ~~$34,000,~~prior ~~$277,000~~year ~~and~~periods ~~$296,000~~due into ~~the~~lower ~~three~~interest ~~months~~rates, ~~six~~which ~~months~~more ~~and~~than ~~twelve~~offset ~~months~~higher ~~ended~~average ~~June~~borrowing. ~~30,~~Higher ~~2002,~~average ~~respectively,~~borrowing ~~and~~resulted ~~$2,005~~from ~~investment write-down in~~ the ~~December~~Cartersville ~~31,~~mill ~~2001~~and ~~quarter.~~cold Indrawn ~~the~~acquisitions, and ~~prior~~last year’s ~~periods,~~issuance ~~non-cash~~of ~~charges~~common ~~included~~and ~~property~~preferred ~~disposals~~stock ofwhich ~~$30,000,~~reduced ~~$74,000~~debt ~~and $280,000~~ in the ~~three~~comparable ~~months,~~prior ~~six~~year ~~months~~periods. ~~and~~The ~~twelve~~Company’s ~~months~~debt ~~ended~~is ~~June~~primarily ~~30,~~variable ~~2001,~~based ~~respectively~~LIBOR, ~~and~~some ~~start-up costs~~ of ~~$2.5~~which ~~million~~is inhedged ~~the~~via ~~September~~a ~~30,~~fixed ~~2000 quarter~~rate ~~relating~~interest ~~to the Knoxville meltshop~~swap.

**Liquidity ~~ttm~~and =Capital ~~trailing twelve months~~ Resources

~~The~~Net ~~above~~cash ~~summary~~provided ~~financial~~by ~~data~~operating ~~should~~activities befor ~~read~~the innine ~~conjunction~~months ~~with~~ended September 30, 2002 was $23.7 million compared to $75.0 for the ~~Company’s~~same period ~~Annual~~in ~~Report~~the onprior ~~Form~~year due primarily to incremental working capital. Cartersville operations added approximately $10-K asmillion ~~filed~~in ~~with~~accounts receivable and $7 million in inventories during the ~~Securities~~nine ~~and~~months ~~Exchange~~ended ~~Commission~~September 30, 2002, while gradual price increases have resulted in increased accounts receivable from existing operations. ~~Historical~~In ~~results~~the ~~are~~nine ~~not~~months ~~necessarily~~ended ~~indicative~~September of30, 2002, the ~~results~~Company spent a combined $26.0 million related to capital projects, including $5.2 million to purchase fabricating facilities in the northeast that had been leased, and $8.4 million related to bethe ~~expected~~acquisition ~~for~~of the ~~current~~Cartersville cold drawn facility from Republic Technologies in June 2002. This compared to $26.1 million spent in the same prior year period, of which $9.5 million related to the acquisition of ABB.

~~Gross~~In ~~Sales: The~~February ~~acquisition~~2001, of the ~~Cartersville~~ ~~mill~~Company insold ~~December~~approximately ~~2001 resulted in additional revenues of~~ $~~27.0~~15 million ~~and~~of ~~$43.7~~common ~~million~~stock ~~during the three months~~ and ~~six~~in ~~months~~March ~~ended June 30~~2001, ~~2002,~~sold ~~respectively,~~approximately ~~primarily~~$10 ~~from~~million ~~the sale~~ of ~~merchant~~newly ~~bars~~authorized ~~(inlcuding~~Series ~~structurals).~~A ~~Excluding~~preferred ~~Cartersville~~stock, ~~finished~~in ~~tons~~each ~~shipped~~case ~~increased~~to ~~approximately 4~~GUSA.6% inThe ~~the~~funds ~~current~~received ~~quarter~~were ~~and~~used ~~remained~~for ~~relatively~~working ~~flat~~capital inpurposes, ~~the~~for ~~six month period. While pricing improved modestly from~~ the ~~March~~reduction ~~31,~~of ~~2002 quarter~~debt, ~~prices~~and ~~remain~~for ~~depressed~~the ~~from~~acquisition ~~the same~~of ~~periods~~ABB. ~~last~~The ~~year,~~Company ~~which~~bought ~~resulted~~back inat afair value $~~2.7~~5 million ~~decline~~ in ~~revenues due to pricing for the three month periods ended~~ June ~~30,~~2001 ~~2002,~~ and $5.9 million ~~less~~in ~~revenue~~July in2001 of the ~~six~~common ~~months~~stock ~~ended~~sold ~~June~~in ~~30,~~February ~~2002~~2001. ~~Average~~In ~~selling~~October ~~prices~~2001, ~~for~~the ~~rebar~~Company ~~and merchant~~bought ~~products~~back ~~have~~at ~~come~~fair ~~off~~value ~~recent 15 year lows. Recent implementation of Section 201 of~~ the ~~Trade~~remaining ~~Act~~shares ofissued ~~1974 has resulted~~ in ~~tariffs~~February ~~of 15% on rebar~~ and ~~30%~~March ~~for merchant bar and should help stabilize pricing in the coming quarters~~2001.

~~Cost~~The ofclosure ~~Sales: Yielded scrap costs, which comprise approximately 35% to 40%~~ of the ~~Company’s~~ ~~cost~~Wilmington ~~of sales, averaged $97 per ton~~ and ~~$89~~St. ~~per~~Albans ~~ton~~fabricating facilities indid ~~the~~not ~~three months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001, respectively. Prices~~ have ~~increased as~~ a ~~result~~material ofeffect ~~higher~~on ~~demand for scrap in other domestic steel markets as~~ the ~~Section 201~~cash ~~relief~~flows ~~has~~during ~~resulted in increased production at domestic mills, primarily in~~ the ~~flat rolled market~~quarter. ~~Mill~~Total ~~conversion~~charges ~~costs~~relating ~~have remained flat relative~~ to the ~~same~~closures ~~prior~~amounted ~~year periods, with the higher costs associated with Cartersville being offset by reductions in the other mills. Excluding Cartersville, conversion costs were down~~ to approximately $~~122~~1.0 ~~per~~million ~~ton~~which ~~and~~included ~~$123~~severance, ~~per~~lease ~~ton~~buyouts ~~for the three months ended~~ and ~~the~~non-cash ~~six~~charges ~~months~~relating ~~ended June 30, 2002, respectively, primarily due~~ to ~~lower utility costs~~equipment ~~which tend to fluctuate~~disposals.

~~Selling~~The ~~and~~Company ~~Administrative: Selling~~believes ~~and~~that ~~administrative expenses~~amounts ~~for~~available ~~the~~from ~~three~~operating ~~months~~cash ~~ended~~flows ~~June~~and ~~30,~~funds ~~2002~~available ~~were~~through ~~approximately~~its ~~$600,000~~Revolving ~~higher~~Credit ~~than~~Agreement ~~the~~will ~~same~~be ~~period~~sufficient ~~last~~to ~~year~~meet ~~due~~its ~~primarily~~expected tocash ~~increased~~needs ~~professional fees~~ and ~~the~~planned ~~incremental~~capital expenditures ~~costs~~through ~~associated with~~ the ~~acquired~~end ~~businesses,~~of ~~ABB and Cartersville~~2003. ~~For~~ ~~the~~The ~~six~~Company ~~months~~is ~~ended~~confident ~~June~~that ~~30,~~it ~~2002,~~will ~~selling~~be ~~and~~successful ~~administrative~~in ~~costs~~any ~~were~~potential ~~approximately~~refinancing ~~$2.6~~effort ~~million~~to ~~higher~~replace ~~than~~ the ~~same~~existing ~~period~~facility, ~~last~~if ~~year~~needed. ~~due~~The Company continues to ~~higher~~comply ~~professional~~with ~~fees,~~all ~~improved~~of ~~performance~~the ~~incentive~~covenants of its loan agreements.

16On October 23, 2002 AmeriSteel’s parent corporation, GUSA was part of a business combination involving GUSA, Gerdau Canadian mill operations MRM and Gerdau Courtice, and Co-Steel Inc. of Whitby, Ontario, a Canadian company publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Basically, Gerdau S. A., through one or more controlled entities, transferred its stock interests in the Gerdau companies to Co-Steel in exchange for majority ownership of Co-Steel. The name of Co-Steel was the changed to Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, the common shares of which are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol GNA.to. The business combination did not result in a change of control of AmeriSteel, however certain

~~pay~~executives of AmeriSteel, ~~severance~~most ~~pay~~notably Phillip Casey and Tom Landa, will assume similar executive roles for the ~~incremental~~new ~~costs~~entity, ~~associated~~in ~~with~~addition ~~ABB~~to ~~and~~retaining ~~Cartersville~~those positions for AmeriSteel. Management ~~The~~expects ~~increased~~AmeriSteel ~~professional~~will ~~fees~~benefit ~~relate~~from synergies to ~~consulting engagements~~be ~~for~~achieved ~~strategic~~by ~~development~~the ~~initiatives~~business combination, including savings in freight and sales, general and administrative costs.

~~Other~~ITEM ~~Operating Expense: Other operating expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 relate to the closing of the Wilmington and St~~3. ~~Albans~~QUANTITATIVE ~~fabricating~~& ~~plants.~~QUALITATIVE ~~Other~~DISCLOSURES ~~operating~~ABOUT ~~income~~MARKET ~~in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001 represents tax refunds from prior years.~~ RISK

~~Interest~~The ~~Expense: Interest~~interest ~~expense~~rates ~~decreased~~charged inon the ~~three~~Company’s ~~and~~debt ~~six months~~are ~~ended~~predominantly ~~June 30~~variable, ~~2002~~the ~~from~~majority ~~the~~of which ~~same~~is ~~prior~~based ~~year~~on ~~periods~~LIBOR ~~due~~(London toInterbank ~~lower~~Offered ~~interest~~Rate). ~~rates~~In late 2001, ~~which~~the ~~more~~Company ~~than~~hedged ~~offset~~$55 ~~higher~~million ~~average~~of ~~borrowing.~~its ~~Higher~~debt ~~average~~via ~~borrowing~~interest ~~resulted~~rate ~~from~~swaps ~~the~~that ~~Cartersville~~in ~~mill~~effect ~~and~~result ~~cold~~in ~~drawn~~a ~~acquisitions,~~fixed ~~and~~interest ~~last~~rate ~~year’s issuance~~on $55 million for a period of ~~common~~four ~~and~~to ~~preferred~~five ~~stock~~years. ~~which~~As a result, the Company has reduced ~~debt~~its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates with the ~~comparable~~result ~~prior~~being ~~year~~that ~~periods.~~approximately ~~The~~75% of the Company’s debt is ~~primarily~~subject ~~variable~~to ~~based~~changes ~~LIBOR,~~in ~~some~~interest expense due to fluctuations of ~~which~~interest isrates ~~hedged~~in ~~via~~the markets. A 10% change in interest rates would result in a ~~fixed~~change ~~rate~~in annual interest ~~swap.~~expense of approximately $650,000.

~~Liquidity~~The value of the Company’s interest rate swaps changes from period to period due to changes in the swap yield curve relative to the swap yield curve at the swap’s inception, and ~~Capital~~adjusted ~~Resources~~for the shortening duration. Generally the market value of the swap instrument will decline as interest rates remain lower than previously forecasted and will increase in value as interest rates rise faster than previously anticipated. The Company recognizes the changes in these mark-to-market valuations through other comprehensive income in accordance with FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

~~Net~~ITEM cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $12.6 million compared to $42.3 for the same period in the prior year due primarily to the incremental working capital. Cartersville operations added approximately $12 million in accounts receivable and $6 million in inventories during the six months ended June 30, 2002, while gradual price increases have resulted in increased accounts receivable from existing operations. In the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company spent a combined $20.8 million related to capital projects, including $5.2 million to purchase fabricating facilities in the northeast that had been leased, and $8.4 ~~million related to the acquisition of the Cartersville cold drawn facility from Republic Technologies in June 2002~~. ~~This~~CONTROLS ~~compared~~AND ~~to $21.4 million spent in the same prior year period, of which $9.5 million related to the acquisition of ABB.~~ PROCEDURES

InWithin ~~February~~the ~~2001~~90-day period prior to the date of this report, the Company ~~sold~~carried ~~approximately~~out ~~$15~~an ~~million~~evaluation, ofunder ~~common~~the ~~stock~~supervision and inwith ~~March~~the participation ~~2001~~of the Company’s management, ~~sold~~including ~~approximately~~the ~~$10~~Company’s ~~million~~Chief ofExecutive ~~newly authorized~~Officer ~~Series~~and AChief ~~preferred~~Financial ~~stock~~Officer, inof ~~each~~the ~~case~~effectiveness toof ~~GUSA.~~the ~~The~~design ~~funds~~and ~~received~~operation ~~were~~of ~~used~~the ~~for~~Company’s ~~working~~disclosure ~~capital~~controls ~~purposes,~~and ~~for~~procedures ~~the~~pursuant ~~reduction~~to Rules of13a-14 ~~debt,~~ and ~~for~~15d-14 of the ~~acquisition~~Securities ofExchange ~~ABB.~~Act ~~The~~of ~~Company~~1934 ~~bought~~(the ~~back~~“Exchange atAct”). ~~fair~~Based ~~value~~upon $5the ~~million~~evaluation, inthe ~~June~~Chief ~~2001~~Executive Officer and ~~$5 million~~Chief inFinancial ~~July~~Officer ~~2001~~concluded ofthat the ~~common~~Company’s ~~stock~~disclosure ~~sold~~controls and procedures are effective in ~~February~~timely ~~2001.~~alerting Inthem ~~October~~to ~~2001,~~material information relating to the Company ~~bought~~(including ~~back~~its atconsolidated ~~fair~~subsidiary) ~~value~~required ~~the~~to ~~remaining~~be ~~shares~~included ~~issued~~ in ~~February~~the ~~and~~Company's ~~March~~Exchange ~~2001.~~Act filings.

~~The~~There ~~closure~~have ofbeen ~~the~~no ~~Wilmington~~significant changes ~~and~~in ~~St.~~the ~~Albans~~Company’s ~~fabricating~~internal ~~facilities~~controls ~~did~~or ~~not~~in ~~have~~other afactors ~~material~~which ~~effect~~could onsignificantly ~~the~~affect ~~cash~~internal ~~flows~~controls ~~during~~subsequent ~~the quarter. Total charges relating~~ to the ~~closures~~ ~~amounted~~date tothe ~~approximately~~Company ~~$915,000~~carried ~~which~~out ~~included~~its ~~severance, lease buyouts and non-cash charges relating to equipment disposals~~evaluation.

The Company believes that amounts available from operating cash flows and funds available through its Revolving Credit Agreement will be sufficient to meet its expected cash needs and planned capital expenditures through the end of 2003. The Company is confident that it will be successful in any potential refinancing effort to replace the existing facility, if needed. The Company continues to comply with all of the covenants of its loan agreements. 19

~~Item~~PART ~~3. Quantitative~~II &— ~~Qualitative~~OTHER ~~Disclosures About Market Risk~~ INFORMATION

~~The~~ITEM ~~interest rates charged on the Company’s debt are predominantly variable, the majority of which is based on LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate)~~6. InEXHIBITS ~~late~~AND ~~2001,~~REPORTS ~~the~~ON ~~Company~~FORM hedged $55 million of its debt via interest rate swaps that in effect result in a fixed interest rate on $55 million for a period of four to five years. As a result, the Company has reduced its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates with the result being that approximately 75% of the Company’s debt is subject to changes in interest expense due to fluctuations of interest rates in the markets. A 10% change in interest rates would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $650,000. 8-K

(a) The ~~value~~following ofdocuments ~~the~~are ~~Company’s~~filed ~~interest rate~~as ~~swaps~~exhibits ~~changes from period~~ to ~~period~~this ~~due~~Quarterly toReport ~~changes~~on inForm ~~the swap yield curve relative to the swap yield curve at the swap’s inception, and adjusted for the shortening duration. Generally the market value of the swap~~ 10-Q:

17Exhibit 99 - Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

~~instrument~~(b) ~~will~~Reports ~~decline~~on asForm ~~interest rates remain lower than previously forecasted and will increase in value as interest rates rise faster the previously anticipated. The Company recognizes the changes in these mark~~8-~~to-market valuations through other comprehensive income in accordance with FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”~~ K:

~~PART II—OTHER INFORMATION~~ None.

~~Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K~~ SIGNATURES

~~(a)~~Pursuant ~~The~~to ~~following~~the ~~documents~~requirements ~~are~~of ~~filed~~the asSecurities ~~exhibits~~Exchange toAct of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this ~~Quarterly~~report ~~Report~~to be signed on ~~Form~~its ~~10-Q:~~behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit 99—Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

			AMERISTEEL CORPORATION
Date: November 14, 2002			/s/ PHILLIP E. CASEY

			Phillip E. Casey, President and Chief Executive Officer

~~(b)~~Date: ~~Reports~~November on14, ~~Form~~2002 ~~8-K:~~/s/ TOM J. LANDA Tom J. Landa, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer); Director

~~During~~Date: ~~the~~November ~~quarter ended June 30~~14, 2002, ~~the~~/s/ ~~Company~~ROBERT ~~filed~~POWELL aRobert ~~current report on Form 8-K dated May 17~~Powell, ~~2002~~Corporate toController ~~report~~(Principal ~~changes~~Accounting ~~in the certifying accountant to PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP.~~ Officer)

~~SIGNATURES~~ 20

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~ CERTIFICATIONS

		AMERISTEEL CORPORATION
Date: August 9, 2002		/s/ PHILLIP E. CASEY
		Phillip E. Casey, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2002		/s/ TOM J. LANDA
		Tom J. Landa, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
		(Principal Financial Officer); Director
Date: August 9, 2002		/s/ ROBERT POWELL
		Robert Powell, Corporate Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

I, Phillip E. Casey, certify that:

18 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmeriSteel Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c)		presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2002


			/s/ PHILLIP E. CASEY

			Phillip E. Casey President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Tom J. Landa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmeriSteel Corporation;

	a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

	b)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c)		presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

	a)		all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

Date: November 14, 2002


			/s/ TOM J. LANDA

			Tom J. Landa Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary; Director

Filing Compare · AMERISTEEL CORP