UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission File No. 333-186330

APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

99-0382426

IRS Employer Identification Number

Apptigo International, Inc.

1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402

Miami, FL 33129

(844) 277-8446

(Address and telephone number of registrant's executive office)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ _] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ _] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant as required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ _]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such ~~shorter~~ shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ _]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of ~~delinquent~~ delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [ _] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer"” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ _] Accelerated filer [ _] Non-accelerated filer [ _] Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [ _] No [X]

~~State~~The ~~the~~ aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the ~~registrant~~Company’s most recently complete second quarter was: $13469,~~403,250~~755.

~~Indicate~~As ~~the number~~ of ~~shares~~May ~~outstanding of~~12, ~~each~~2016 ofthere ~~the~~were ~~registrant’s~~1,239,428,192 shares ~~classes~~ of common stock, asissued ofand ~~the latest practicable date~~outstanding.

As of May 8, 2015 there were 29,225,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Part I
Item 1	Description of Business	34
Item 1A	Risk Factors	109
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	109
Item 2	Properties	109
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	109
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	109
Part II
Item 5	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	1110
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	1412
Item 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis or Results of Operations	1412
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	1813
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1813
Item 9	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	1813
Item 9A (T)	Controls and Procedures	18
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	14
Item 9B	Other Information	22
PART III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	2015
Item 11	Executive Compensation	2116
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2317
Item 13	Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence	2317
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	2417
PART IV
Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	2519

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and “believes,” among others, generally identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our management's expectations and assumptions about future events as of the date of this annual report, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding our product offerings, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies or prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and reflect our views as of the date they are made with respect to future events and financial performance. We undertake no obligation to update, and we do not have a policy of updating or revising, these forward-looking statements.

* * * * *

Except where the context otherwise requires, the terms, “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to the business of Apptigo International, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, Apptigo Inc. “Apptigo” refers to Apptigo Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary. Apptigo is our sole operating subsidiary and commenced its current business operations in 2012.

Item 1.

Business.

Historical Background

WeApptigo ~~were initially incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 23~~International, ~~2012 as Balius Corp. On April 14, 2014, Balius Corp. entered into a reverse acquisition transaction (the “Transaction”) with Apptigo,~~ Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its shareholders, pursuant to an agreement and plan of reorganization agreement dated April 14, 2014 (the “Agreement”) by between the Company, its principal shareholders, Apptigo and its shareholders. Under the terms of the Agreement the shareholders of Apptigo agreed to exchange all the outstanding common and preferred shares of Apptigo for common and preferred shares of the Company.

InWe ~~connection~~were ~~with~~initially ~~the~~incorporated ~~Closing,~~in ~~we ceased our~~the ~~principal~~State ~~business~~of ~~operations,~~Nevada ~~terminated~~on ~~our~~October ~~sole lease~~23, ~~and~~2012 ~~liquidated~~as ~~our~~Balius ~~assets~~Corp. ~~associated~~On ~~with~~April ~~these~~14, ~~former~~2014, ~~business~~Balius ~~operations~~Corp. ~~Upon~~ ~~completion~~entered ofinto a reverse acquisition transaction (the “Transaction,”) wewith ~~acquired~~ Apptigo, ~~(which~~Inc., isa ~~now~~Nevada ~~our~~corporation, ~~wholly-owned subsidiary)~~ and ~~became~~its ashareholders, ~~media~~pursuant ~~company~~to ~~focused on~~an ~~designing,~~agreement ~~developing~~ and ~~bringing~~plan of toreorganization ~~market~~agreement ~~mobile~~dated ~~applications.~~April ~~Apptigo~~14, ~~was~~2014 ~~incorporated~~by inbetween the ~~State~~Company, ofits ~~Nevada~~principal ~~on October 31~~shareholders, ~~2012,~~Apptigo and ~~commenced~~ its ~~operations in 2012~~shareholders. Under ~~In connection with~~ the ~~Closing~~terms of the ~~Transaction,~~Agreement the ~~Company~~shareholders ~~filed Amended and Restated Articles~~ of ~~Incorporation~~Apptigo ~~and~~agreed ~~changed~~to ~~the~~exchange ~~name~~all of the ~~Company~~outstanding tocommon ~~Apptigo~~and ~~International,~~preferred ~~Inc. All references to business~~shares of ~~the~~Apptigo ~~Company~~for ~~after~~common ~~the~~and ~~Closing~~preferred shares of the ~~Transaction shall refer to Apptigo International, Inc~~Company. ~~and Apptigo Inc., collectively.~~

3In connection with the closing of the Transaction, we ceased our principal business operations, terminated our sole lease, and liquidated our assets associated with these former business operations. As a result of the Transaction, we acquired Apptigo (which is now our wholly-owned subsidiary) and we became a media company focused on designing, developing and bringing to market mobile applications.

Apptigo, Inc.

Apptigo was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 31, 2012, and commenced its operations in 2012. In connection with the closing of the Transaction, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and changed the name of the Company from Balius Corp. to Apptigo International, Inc. All references to business of the Company after the Closing of the Transaction shall refer to Apptigo International, Inc. and Apptigo Inc., collectively.

General

We are a media company focused on designing, developing and bringing to market mobile applications. The first application developed by Apptigo iswas SCORE, which management introduced to market in October 2014. SCORE is an interactive dating game that allows people to determine their compatibility through answering online questions. Users of the application can choose to invite anyone to play by:

· Entering a queue that shows other active players and sending invitations through the queue; · Using the interactive map that shows pins of all the people who are available to play in a specific geographic region; and · Inviting friends through email, phone number or social media contact lists.

·SCORE ~~Using~~has over 800 questions in 20 different categories. From “True or False” to “Have You Ever...,” the ~~interactive~~categories ~~map~~are ~~that~~intended ~~shows~~to ~~pins~~span all areas of interest. ~~all~~Once a play is fully completed, users can generate a percentage-based score derived from how many questions they answered the ~~people~~same ~~who~~way. ~~are~~Moments ~~available~~after receiving this score, users have access to ~~play~~a infive second viewing of the other’s profile picture, which then fades to a ~~specific~~screen ~~geographic~~giving ~~region;~~them options to chat, play SCORE again, save the SCORE or quit. SCORE has been designed exclusively for use on smart mobile devices and utilized in both the Apple iOS platform And Google Play Store for Android.

·We ~~Inviting~~believe ~~friends~~that ~~through~~SCORE’s ~~email,~~approach to ~~phone~~matchmaking ~~number~~is ornot only novel and capable of creating a social-fueled ~~media~~movement, ~~contact~~but ~~lists~~will also prove to be fun and effective for users. Generally, there are three primary paths to monetizing applications: premium model, freemium model, and ad network model. They are defined as follows:

~~SCORE~~· ~~has~~Premium ~~over~~Model ~~800~~- ~~questions~~Using inan 20upfront ~~different categories.~~download ~~From~~fee, ~~“True~~this oris ~~False”~~the tomost ~~“Have~~straightforward ~~You~~and ~~Ever...,”~~obvious ~~the~~way ~~categories are intended~~ to ~~span~~monetize ~~all~~a ~~areas~~mobile ~~of interest~~application. ~~Once~~· aFreemium ~~play~~Model is- ~~fully~~The ~~completed,~~application ~~users~~is ~~can generate~~ a ~~percentage-based~~free ~~score~~download ~~derived~~and ~~from~~contains ~~how~~content ~~many~~for ~~questions~~purchase ~~they~~inside ~~answered~~ the ~~same~~application ~~way.~~(aka ~~Moments~~in-app ~~after~~purchases) ~~receiving~~or ~~this~~an ~~score,~~upgrade ~~users~~option ~~have access~~ to a ~~five~~premium ~~second viewing of the other’s profile picture, which then fades to a screen giving them options to chat, play SCORE again, save the SCORE or quit~~version. ~~SCORE~~· ~~has~~Ad ~~been~~Networks ~~designed~~- ~~exclusively for~~The ~~use~~application onand ~~smart~~all ~~mobile~~its ~~devices,~~content ~~initially~~can ~~utilizing~~be ~~the~~completely ~~Apple~~free ~~platform,~~and ~~with~~still ~~future~~generate ~~plans~~revenue tothrough ~~quickly port Score onto Android software~~advertising.

~~Management~~We ~~believes~~have ~~that~~decided to market SCORE’s ~~approach~~via a freemium model, providing for the SCORE application to ~~matchmaking~~be isdownloadable ~~not~~by ~~only~~users ~~novel~~at ~~and~~no ~~capable~~charge ofthrough ~~creating~~application astores, ~~social-fueled~~including ~~movement~~Google Play, ~~but~~the ~~will~~Apple ~~also~~App ~~prove~~Store, and iTunes, among others. We intend initially to begenerate ~~fun~~revenues ~~and~~by ~~effective for~~offering our users in-app purchases of special features and package upgrades. InThereafter, ~~general~~assuming ~~there~~we ~~are~~have ~~three~~succeeded ~~primary~~in ~~paths~~building tonotable ~~monetizing~~brand ~~applications:~~equity ~~premium~~and ~~model~~a significant user base, ~~freemium~~we ~~model~~will then seek corporate event sponsors and/or adnational ~~network~~advertisers ~~model. They~~to ~~are~~further ~~defined~~enhance asour ~~follows:~~revenue and earnings growth.

· Premium Model - Using an upfront download fee, this is the most straightforward and obvious way to monetize a mobile application.

· Freemium Model - The application is a free download and contains content for purchase inside the application (aka in-app purchases) or an upgrade option to a premium version.

· Ad Networks - The application and all its content can be completely free and still generate revenue through advertising.

Management has decided to market SCORE via a freemium model, providing for the SCORE application to be downloadable by users at no charge through application stores, including Google Play, Apple App Store and iTunes, among others. We intend initially to generate revenues by offering our users in-app purchases of special features and package upgrades. Thereafter, assuming we have succeeded in building notable brand equity and a significant user base, we will then seek corporate event sponsors and/or national advertisers to further enhance our revenue and earnings growth.

Currently, in-app purchases built into the SCORE platform include:

· Categories of Score questions for purchase. · The ability to purchase the entire app for one flat fee. · The ability to buy categories in bulk rather than individually. · The ability in the future to enable a multi-player function. · The ability in the future to purchase emoticons and gifts to send to others.

· The ability to purchase the entire app for one flat fee.

· The ability to buy categories in bulk rather than individually.

· The ability in the future to enable a multi-player function.

· The ability in the future to purchase emoticons and gifts to send to others.

Features of the app include:

· Map view of available players · Chat · Anonymous play · Score queue list view of available players

· Chat

· Anonymous play

· Score queue list view of available players

Overall Market

~~Management~~We ~~believes~~believe that data growth is currently being driven by the increased penetration of smartphones, in particular in emerging markets –- and by increased data consumption per subscriber due to the faster download speeds and the uptake of data-hungry applications like video made possible by new technology, such as 4G. Management further believes that advancement of network technologies, restructuring of revenue-sharing models, lowering of mobile data usage cost, growing adoption of smartphones and the increase in application usability will give rise to a global industry that it expects will continue to swell. In addition, management anticipates that in-app mobile ad-spend will continue to rise.

As more people meet online and through ~~dating~~ dating applications, they are also obliterating the stigma once associated with it. In a study conducted by the Pew Research Internet Project (http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/), researchers found that one in ten Americans have used an online dating site or mobile dating application themselves; and many people now know someone else who uses online dating or who has found a spouse or long-term partner via online dating. Moreover, 7% of smartphone applications users (representing 3% of all adults) say they currently have a dating application on their mobile phone. In fact, online daters now spend more time on dating applications than they do on the websites themselves. And, by 2018, it is estimated that more than 80% of the population will own a smartphone –- up from 46% in 2012.

In 1970, just 28% of American adults were single; today the share is 47%, according to the Census Bureau, which supports an expanding target market for the online dating industry. Management believes that the trend for online dating migrating from desktop and laptop to mobile devices should continue.

Competition

The mobile application industry is characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Other companies of various sizes engage in activities similar to ours. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources available to them. Although there is a collective 3,900+ online dating sites and mobile applications available to consumers to choose from, management believes the following represent the most ~~series~~serious competition to the Company’s product:

Coffee Meets Bagel

Similar to timed shopping sites, this free application sends one match to each user every day at noon. Users can see that person’s picture and profile and have only 24 hours to decide if they want to go on a date with them or not by clicking “yes” or “pass.”

eHarmony Mobile

One of the largest dating sites, eHarmony has provided services in this industry for more than 10 years. Upon downloading the free mobile app, members can complete a relationship questionnaire at no charge, receive a detailed personality profile for free, receive daily matches, send icebreakers, communicate with matches for free during free communication events, and when subscribed, freely communicate with matches. Unlike other dating applications, eHarmony takes into account things like common personality traits, interests, values and beliefs to make its matches.

HowAboutWe

With a similar interface to Twitter, How About We offers users the ability to post statuses such as, “How About We...hook up tonight!” Users can message other How About We users by upgrading to one of How About We’s messaging packages. By doing this, users are able to read messages from other users, ask users “out,” and respond when someone is intrigued. Although its subscription based, How About We lets users remain in charge by choosing the type of date they want to go on.

Match.com Mobile

Launched on the Web in April of 1995, Match.com is one of the largest online dating companies in the world. It is credited for pioneering the online dating industry and now serves 24 countries and territories and hosts Web sites in 15 different languages. Its mobile app, Match.com Mobile, was introduced in 2003 and offers users a profile that can be perused by other users through various search options. Eighty percent of its five million application users are under the age of 35. Searching other users’ profiles is free of charge, however only paying members may email or text each other.

OKCupid- Blind Dating App

Launched in 2004 and acquired by Match.com for $50 million in 2010, OKCupid’s free mobile application calculates match percentages using a patent pending algorithm that is based on how users respond to questions, such as “how messy are you?” and “have you ever cheated in a relationship?” The application requires that users reveal a few basic details, including first name, age, whether the user prefers men or women, and a profile picture, which the application will scramble. Next, the application prompts the user to create a date. Alternatively, the user can peruse other scrambled profile pictures and date offers from their matches.

PlentyOfFish

Founded in 2003 in Vancouver, PlentyOfFish has over 70 million registered users across the globe and 50,000 new members every day –- 70% of its usage takes place solely ~~via~~ via its mobile app. While it is free to use, the application offers premium services as part of their upgraded membership, such as as seeing when a user profile was viewed, and allowing users to see whether a message has been read and/or deleted.

Skout

Skout is one of the largest online dating platforms with over five million users using the free app. Skout’s “Meet Me” feature allows users to flip through and see who’s nearby and ready to hook up. Users can see who’s checked them out, send messages and send wink bombs. Wink bombs give users the opportunity to reach out to over 500 other members and say, “Hey, what’s up?” Feeling adventurous? Shake your device and Skout will find someone nearby to chat with in 30 seconds or less.

Tinder

Introduced in mid-2012, Tinder uses Facebook profiles to gather users’ basic information and analyzes users’ social graph to match potential candidates that are most likely to be compatible, based on geographical location, number of mutual friends and common interests. Only after two users “like” each other are they free to chat within the app. Users have control over who they want to connect with so that they are not bombarded with messages or approached by people they don’t want to match with. Tinder is anonymous in that it does not post users activity within the application on Facebook or reveal their matches and interactions.

Apptigo believes it is well-positioned to acquire market share and compete with such Apps due to the unique concept of the Score App, the diverse marketing and advertising backgrounds of its principals, Mr. Cordes and Mr. Steinberg, and the timing of entry into the market place, as the shelf life on several of the most popular dating Apps appears to be expiring, or at the very least decreasing in popularity.

Intellectual Property

Apptigo intends to register the following trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office:

· SCORE · SCORE. Everyone wants to now anybody can

· SCORE. Everyone wants to… now anybody can

We plan to obtain additional trademarks for future products, proprietary service offerings and themes and slogans used in our marketing activities. Moreover, Apptigo has secured domain names relevant to its business, including www.apptigo.com, www.score.singles and www.everyonewantstoscore.com.

Marketing and Sales

We intend to focus our social marketing tactics to ensure that SCORE is being ranked high in the application market so that it can be organically discovered; to fuel and optimize opportunities to generate downloads of SCORE; and to effectively target and effectively speak to the broad demographic universe of users that we believe will greatly enjoy the SCORE experience. We intend to create a multi-channel online presence capable of optimizing the viral nature of social marketing to promote the SCORE brand and attract new users. Our plan provides for:

· Target Twitter users. · Use social video outlets to showcase informative animated video we have created to describe the SCORE experience. · Continue to use Facebook within their restrictive dating app rules so we can actively engage our users and drive downloads of the SCORE app. · Create engagement mechanisms for our SCORE application to reconnect with consumers and remind them of SCORE’s presence on their device. · Stage events that will generate national human interest buzz for our product.

· Use social video outlets to showcase informative animated video we have created to describe the SCORE experience.

· Create a basic Tumblr or like blog.

· Use Facebook through the creation of a Facebook page where we can actively engage our users and drive downloads of the SCORE app.

· Create engagement mechanisms for our SCORE application to reconnect with consumers and remind them of SCORE’s presence on their device.

· Stage events that will generate national human interest buzz for our product.

We intend to lend ongoing online support to all of our marketing efforts through Google keyword search optimization and banner advertisement placement. And as social media continues to evolve, we intend to adopt emerging new social channels and technologies that demonstrate capabilities to further enhance and extend our efforts in the most cost efficient manner possible.

8The second application developed by Apptigo was RATE MY PUSSYCAT (RMPC), which management introduced to market in December 2015. RMPC is like an Instagram feed for cats that allows users to:

·	Upload pictures and videos from their phone
·	Decorate their pictures with stickers in the app
·	Use filters to enhance their photos
·	Share their photos and videos on the social media platforms Twitter and Facebook
·	Rate other user’s photos and videos
·	Have their own photos and videos be rated and shared
·	Follow their favorite users and shelters
·	Be followed
·	Comment on pictures and videos
·	Receive purring notifications and meowing when they are rated, commented on or followed
·	Adopt cats from our adoption platform built into the app that works with local shelters in their area.

We believe that RMPC isn’t only a great resource for cat lovers but will also prove to be a valuable resource for rescue groups around the nation, and even world, moving forward. Generally, there are three primary paths to monetizing this application: advertising, in-app purchases and a sponsorship model. They are defined as follows:

·	Sponsorship: As a critical mass is reached, opportunities for both large scale and local sponsorship will emerge.

·	In-App Purchases - The application is a free download and contains sticker content for purchase inside the application (aka in-app purchases).

·	Ad Networks - The application and all its content can be completely free and still generate revenue through advertising.

We have decided to market RMPC via a freemium model, providing for the RMPC application to be downloadable by users at no charge through application stores, including Google Play, the Apple App Store, and iTunes, among others. We intend initially to generate revenues by offering our users in-app purchases of special features and package upgrades. Thereafter, assuming we have succeeded in building notable brand equity and a significant user base, we will then seek corporate event sponsors and/or national advertisers to further enhance our revenue and earnings growth.

Currently, in-app purchases built into the RMPC platform include:

·	450 different sticker decorations for purchase.

The third application developed by Apptigo was RATE MY POOCH (RMP), which management introduced to market in February 2016. RMP is like an Instagram feed for dogs that allows users to:

·	Upload pictures and videos from their phone
·	Decorate their pictures with stickers in the app
·	Use filters to enhance their photos
·	Share their photos and videos on the social media platforms Twitter and Facebook
·	Rate other user’s photos and videos
·	Have their own photos and videos be rated and shared
·	Follow their favorite users and shelters
·	Be followed
·	Comment on pictures and videos
·	Receive purring notifications and barking when they are rated, commented on or followed
·	Adopt dog from our adoption platform built into the app that works with local shelters in their area.

We believe that RMP isn’t only a great resource for dog lovers but will also prove to be a valuable resource for rescue groups around the nation, and even world, moving forward. Generally, there are three primary paths to monetizing this application: advertising, in-app purchases and a sponsorship model. They are defined as follows:

·	Sponsorship: As a critical mass is reached, opportunities for both large scale and local sponsorship will emerge.

·	In-App Purchases - The application is a free download and contains sticker content for purchase inside the application (aka in-app purchases).

·	Ad Networks - The application and all its content can be completely free and still generate revenue through advertising.

We have decided to market RMP via a freemium model, providing for the RMP application to be downloadable by users at no charge through application stores, including Google Play, the Apple App Store, and iTunes, among others. We intend initially to generate revenues by offering our users in-app purchases of special features and package upgrades. Thereafter, assuming we have succeeded in building notable brand equity and a significant user base, we will then seek corporate event sponsors and/or national advertisers to further enhance our revenue and earnings growth. Currently, in-app purchases built into the RMP platform include:

·	450 different sticker decorations for purchase.

Subsequent Application Development

In August 2014, we entered into an intellectual property purchase agreement with the Company’s former head designer and acquired certain intellectual property assets and ~~rights~~ rights used in connection with our games developed by the designer prior to his employment with the Company.

These application concepts have advanced through the Company’s vigorous evaluation process and are currently in various stages of developments. We are working on a strategy with our programmers for converting them for use on mobile devices, redesigning and improving the games and any design issues and modifying and upgrading the games. The Company will beta test the games and if warranted eventually launch and market the games. The beta testing normally involves use of the application by approximately 100 or more users and based on feedback on the usage, the Company releases updates created by our programmers until we believe the application is functioning properly. At that state, the Company would commence the advertising about the game and launch the application to the public.

The Company has been developing two additional applications for market. The first application is an animal lovers application to capitalize on the popularity of liking and sharing certain animal pictures and video. This application is being built to also include a charitable element as well as to further enhance the user experience and help generate a positive image from the application. This application has cleared the main design stage and is currently in the development stage. The second application is a sports related social application built for enhancing connections and educating places about the area they are in. This application has cleared the concept stage and is presently in the design stage. The Company cannot predict if and when these applications will come to market.

Government Regulation

As part of our business, we will receive, transmit and store a large volume of personal information and other user data (including credit card data) in connection with the provision of online products and services, transactions with users and customers and advertising on our websites. The sharing, use, disclosure and protection of this information are determined by the respective privacy and data security policy of our business. These policies are, in turn, subject to federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, as well as evolving industry standards and practices, regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personal information and user data (for example, various state regulations concerning minimum data security standards, industry self-regulating principles that become standard practice and more stringent contractual protections regarding privacy and data security (and related compliance obligations)).

InIf ~~addition, if~~ an online service provider fails to comply with its privacy policy, it could become subject to an investigation and proceeding for unfair or deceptive practices ~~brought~~ brought by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act (and/or brought by a state attorney general ~~pursuant~~ pursuant to a similar state law), as well as a private lawsuit under various U.S. federal and state laws. In general, personal ~~information~~ information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulation in numerous jurisdictions around the world, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction.

9In addition, U.S. legislators and regulators may enact new laws and regulations regarding privacy and data security. In February 2012, the White House released a proposed Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights, which is intended to serve as a framework for new privacy legislation. In March 2012, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission released a staff report making recommendations for businesses and policy makers in the area of consumer privacy. Similarly, new privacy laws and regulations at the state level, as well as new laws and directives abroad (particularly in Europe), are being proposed and implemented. For example, new legislation in the state of California that became effective on January 1, 2014 requires companies that collect personal information to disclose how they respond to web browser “Do Not Track” signals. Furthermore, existing privacy laws that were intended for brick-and-mortar businesses could be interpreted in a manner that would extend their reach to our business.

U.S. legislators and regulators may enact new laws and regulations regarding privacy and data security. In February 2012, the White House released a proposed Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights, which is intended to serve as a framework for new privacy legislation. In March 2012, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission released a staff report making recommendations for businesses and policy makers in the area of consumer privacy. Similarly, new privacy laws and regulations at the state level, as well as new laws and directives abroad (particularly in Europe), are being proposed and implemented. For example, new legislation in the state of California that became effective on January 1, 2014 requires companies that collect personal information to disclose how they respond to web browser “Do Not Track” signals. In addition, existing privacy laws that were intended for brick-and-mortar businesses could be interpreted in a manner that would extend their reach to our business.

Employees

As of May 6, ~~2015~~2016, we employed ~~four~~two full-time employees. We also engage freelance contract workers on an as-needed basis as programmers. None of our employees have employment contracts.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide the disclosure pursuant to this item.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.

Properties.

The Company’s principal corporate ~~office~~ office is located at 1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402, Miami, Florida, and consists of 1,342 square feet of office space. The lease on on this space expires in May ~~2015,~~2016. ~~and~~Our monthly lease payments are $2,880.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

~~None~~Not Applicable.

109

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity; Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the ~~OTCQB~~OTC ~~under~~PINK under the trading symbol “APPG”. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for each quarter within the last two fiscal years. ~~The prices have been addressed to reflect the Company’s 3.5 – 1 forward stock-split.~~

	2013 Fiscal Year
	2015 Fiscal Year
	High Bid		Low Bid
First Quarter	$	*0.2000	$	*0.1780
Second Quarter	$	*0.0365	$	*0.0355
Third Quarter	$	*0.0039	$	*0.0024
Fourth Quarter	$	*0.0011	$	*0.0007

	2014 Fiscal Year
	High Bid		Low Bid
First Quarter	$	*	$	*
Second Quarter	$	1.111100	$	10.059500
Third Quarter	$	1.898700	$	0.252700
Fourth Quarter	$	0.403800	$	0.030420

The above quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

* The Company’s common stock did not begin trading until the second quarter of fiscal year 2014.

Penny Stock Considerations

Our shares of common stock are “penny stocks.” asThat ~~that~~ term is generally defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Our shares are subject to rules that impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on broker-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a penny stock.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling a penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor” must make a special suitability determination regarding the purchaser and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together with his or her spouse is considered an accredited investor.

In addition, under the penny stock regulations the broker-dealer is required to:

· Deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt; · Disclose commission payable to the broker-dealer and its registered representatives and current bid and offer quotations for the securities; · Send monthly statements disclosing recent price information pertaining to the penny stock held in a customer's account, the account's value and information regarding the limited market in penny stocks; and · Make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction, prior to conducting any penny stock transaction in the customer's account.

· Disclose commission payable to the broker-dealer and its registered representatives and current bid and offer quotations for the securities;

· Send monthly statements disclosing recent price information pertaining to the penny stock held in a customer's account, the account's value and information regarding the limited market in penny stocks; and

· Make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction, prior to conducting any penny stock transaction in the customer's account.

Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares in the secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our securities. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may be adversely affected, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our securities. Our shares are subject to such penny stock rules and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their securities.

Holders

As of ~~December~~May 3112, ~~2014~~2016, based upon records obtained from our transfer agent, there were 3435 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Any decisions as to future payment of dividends will depend on our earnings and financial position and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. There are no restrictions contained in our bylaws or otherwise pertaining to our issuing dividends.

Equity Compensation Plans

In June 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved and adopted the Apptigo International 2014 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). Rewards may be made under the Plan for up to 4,500,000 shares of common stock. All the Company’s employees, officers, directors, consultants, advisors are eligible to be granted awards under the Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

4,500,000

1.08

3,950,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

–

Total

4,500,000

1.08

3,950,000

Board Committees

The Company does not have a standing nominating committee, an audit committee, or any committee to perform similar functions.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and persons who beneficially own ten percent or more of their class securities to register under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).

Based solely upon our review of certain ~~reports~~ reports files with the Securities and Exchange Commission with reserve to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act the reports ~~that~~ that were required to be filed with respect to transactions in our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014 were~~2015 were timely except each of the ~~Messer’s~~Messers. Cordes and Steinberg failed to timely file an initial Form 3. ~~The~~Messrs. ~~Company,~~ Cordes and Steinberg both ~~are~~filed ~~working~~a toForm ~~complete~~3 ~~such~~on ~~filing~~May 7, 2015.

1311

Code of Ethics

We ~~did~~do not currently have a code of ethics. We intend to adopt a code of ethics that would be appropriate for our business as soon as practicable.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

OnThe ~~November~~Company ~~21,~~has ~~2014,~~previously wedisclosed ~~issued a $225,000,~~all ~~10%~~recent ~~convertible~~sales ~~debenture maturing in February 2016 and provides up to an aggregate~~ of ~~$200,000~~unregistered insecurities ~~net~~on ~~proceeds~~Current ~~after~~Reports ~~taking~~on ~~into consideration~~Form ~~an Original Issued Discount (“OID”) of $20,000~~8-K. ~~The~~There ~~note~~have isbeen tono berecent ~~received~~sales ~~in 4 tranches~~ of ~~which~~unregistered ~~$50,000~~securities ~~has~~that have not been ~~received~~previously disclosed.

On December 2, 2014, we issued a $200,000, 7% convertible debenture due November 2017, of which $100,000 was received for in 2014 and the remainder in 2015.

On November 18, 2014 the Company entered into a 12% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a one month term. The debenture was issued in the amount of $50,000. Upon maturity of the Note, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $55,000 to cover the balance of the note and included an Original Issue Discount (OID) of $5,000. The conversion feature of the note did not change. The new note has a term of one year.

With respect to the securities issuances described above, no solicitations were made and no underwriting discounts were given or paid in connection with these transactions. The Company believes that the issuance of these securities as described below were exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

As a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide information required by Item 6.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events, however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and assumptions. While there are a number of significant accounting policies affecting our consolidated financial statements; we believe the following critical accounting policy involves the most complex, difficult and subjective estimates and judgments:

Stock-based Compensation

The Company recognizes share-based compensation, including stock option grants, warrants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights, at their fair value on the grant date. Share based payment awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable. Compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period.

~~Recent~~Results ~~Accounting~~of ~~Pronouncement~~Operations--Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2014

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) 2014-15 requiring an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

On June 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting statement that reduces some of disclosures and reporting requirements for development stage companies. The change will be in effect for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. As of such date, among other things development stage entities will no longer be required to report inception-to-date information. The Company has elected early adoption of this pronouncement and will no longer be reporting inception-to-date information.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, an update to ASC 310, "Receivables." The ASU clarifies that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs upon either the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property or the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The amendments may be adopted using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. Early adoption of the guidance is permitted. The impact of this guidance is currently being evaluated by the Company, but is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

Overview

Effective April 15, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), Apptigo International, Inc., formerly known as Balius Corp., a Nevada corporation (“the “Company,” “we”, “our” or “us”), consummated its acquisition (the “Transaction”) of all the outstanding shares of common and preferred stock of Apptigo Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Apptigo”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated April 14, 2014, (the “Agreement”) by, between, and among the Company, its principal shareholder, Apptigo, and its shareholders. Upon completion of the Transaction, the Company acquired Apptigo (which is now our wholly-owned subsidiary) and became a media company focused on designing, developing and marketing mobile applications. Apptigo was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 31, 2012. All references to the Company after the closing of the Transaction shall refer to Apptigo International, Inc. and Apptigo, collectively.

Results of Operations--Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.

During the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we we incurred $~~887~~1,~~236~~159,219 in general and administrative expenses compared to $29887,~~395~~236 in general and administrative expenses incurred ~~during~~ during the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014. General and administrative and professional fee expenses incurred during the year ended ~~December~~ December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were generally related to corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, such as legal and accounting, ~~developmental~~ ~~costs,~~ and marketing expenses. ~~In addition, the increase is due to increased business activity in connection with the launch of our first mobile application and change in business.~~

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs for the ~~year~~ year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 ~~was~~were $~~857~~34,~~503~~116 compared to $0857,503 for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014. The majority of the expense , $644,000 , during 2014 was from the acquisition of 6K games described in Note 2 of the financial notes. The ~~company~~Company expenses costs associated with the planning and development of application programs.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense for the years ended ~~December~~ December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 totaled $46,~~019~~027 and $04,019, respectively. The increase in depreciation was due to purchase of assets in connection with our new mobile application business.

~~Derivative~~Loss ~~Expense~~on change in fair value of derivative liabilities

~~Derivative~~Loss ~~expense~~on the change in the fair value of derivative liabilities for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 totaled $~~324~~6,~~826~~652,841 and $0324,826, respectively. ~~Derivate~~The ~~expense~~derivate liability is in relation to convertible debentures ~~entered into in November and December 2014~~, see Note 4.

~~Interest Expense.~~12

Interest ~~expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, was $1,132 and $0, respectively. The interest expense was related to two convertible debentures.~~Expense

16Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, was $941,657 and $6,218, respectively. The interest expense was related to convertible debentures.

Interest expense related party for the ~~year~~ year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, was $~~819~~39,687 and $0819 ~~respective~~respectively. The interest expense was related to a note ~~payable~~payables from a significant shareholder.

~~Interest~~Net ~~expense for the expensing of Original Issue Discount related to convertible notes for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $1,069 and $0, respectively.~~Loss

~~Interest~~For ~~expense~~the ~~for~~reasons ~~change~~stated inabove, ~~discount~~our net loss for ~~warrants~~the year ~~associated~~ended ~~with~~December ~~the~~31, ~~issuance~~2015 ofwas a$8,833,547 ~~convertible~~or ~~debenture~~($0.17) ~~amounted~~per share compared to a net loss of $12,~~917~~080,621, ~~and~~or ($0.10) ~~for~~per share, during the year ended December 31, 2014. The significant change is directly related to the increase in the loss ~~and~~on ~~2013,~~the ~~respectively~~change in the fair value of derivative liabilities.

Interest expense associated with stock subscription at the time of the merger amounted to $2,100 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2013

Net Loss.

For the reasons stated above, our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2,080,621 or $0.07 per share compared to a net loss of $29,395, or $0.00 per share, during the year ended December 31, 2013. The significant change is directly related to the reverse merger and forward stock split, research and development and derivative expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had cash of of $9334,~~513~~227 and net negative working capital of $~~421~~9,~~103~~360,157. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. We anticipate that over the next 12 months we will require a minimum of $1-2 million to meet our cash flow requirements and accomplish our current business plan, including the re-launching and advertising of one or more of the Facebook games acquired in August 2014 and launching and advertising new games we are currently creating.

We intend to seek this additional funding from the sale of equity interests but have not determined the specific terms of any such offering. We currently have no agreements or arrangements in place for such financing. If we are unable to secure additional funding, we may be required to reduce our advertising plans or reduce the number of applications we develop or launch.

The accompanying financial statements ~~have~~ have been prepared ~~contemplating~~assuming our continuation as a going concern. We reported a net loss of $28,~~080~~833,~~621~~547 for the year ended December 31, 2015 ~~2014~~ and had an accumulated deficit of $210,~~139~~973,~~914~~461.

We have not generated positive cash ~~flows~~ flows from operating activities. The primary source of capital has been from the sale of equity securities. During the year ended ~~December~~ December 31, ~~2014~~2015, our primary use of capital was for the development and testing of the SCORE mobile application, professional fees, and general and administrative costs. Our working capital requirements are expected to increase in line with the growth of our business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

None.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The information required by this Item begins on page F-1 and is attached hereto. The index to our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, and ~~2013~~2014 can be found under Item 15.

Item 9.

Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Risk Closure.

~~None~~As previously reported in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 6, 2016, the Company dismissed RBSM LLP, its independent registered public accounting firm, on February 9, 2016. There were (i) no disagreements between the Company and RBSM LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RBSM, would have caused RBSM to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on the Company’s financial statements; and (ii) there were no reportable events as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K.

~~Item~~Also ~~9A.~~previously ~~Controls~~reported ~~and~~in ~~Procedures~~the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 6, 2016, the Company engaged MaloneBailey LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm on February 22, 2016.

~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~13

~~Under~~Report ~~the PCAOB standards, a control deficiency exists when the design or operation~~ of aIndependent ~~control~~Registered ~~does~~Public ~~not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their~~Accounting assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit the attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.Firm

~~Under~~To the ~~supervision~~Board ~~and with the participation~~ of ~~our~~Directors ~~management, including our principal executive officer~~ and ~~principal~~Stockholders ~~financial officer, we conducted an evaluation~~ of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2014. Our management has determined that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective.

18Apptigo International, Inc.

~~Management~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Apptigo International, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operation, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the entity’s management. ~~Report~~Our responsibility is to express an opinion on ~~Internal Control~~these ~~over~~financial ~~Financial~~statements ~~Reporting~~based on our audit.

~~Management~~We ~~Responsibility~~conducted ~~for~~our ~~Internal~~audit ~~Control over~~in ~~Financial~~accordance ~~Reporting.~~with ~~Management~~the standards isof ~~responsible~~the ~~for~~Public ~~establishing~~Company ~~and~~Accounting ~~maintaining~~Oversight ~~effective~~Board ~~internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15~~(f)United ~~under the Exchange Act~~States). ~~The~~Those ~~Company’s~~standards ~~internal~~require ~~control~~that ~~over~~we ~~financial~~plan ~~reporting~~and isperform the ~~designed~~audit to ~~provide~~obtain reasonable assurance toabout ~~the~~whether ~~Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding~~ the ~~preparation and fair presentation of published~~ financial statements inare ~~accordance~~free ~~with~~of ~~the~~material ~~United~~misstatement. ~~States’~~The ~~generally~~Company ~~accepted~~is ~~accounting principles~~not ~~(US~~required ~~GAAP)~~to have, ~~including~~nor ~~those~~were ~~policies~~we ~~and~~engaged ~~procedures that: (i) pertain~~ to ~~the maintenance of records that~~perform, inan ~~reasonable~~audit ~~detail, accurately~~of ~~and~~its ~~fairly~~internal ~~reflect~~control ~~the~~over ~~transactions~~financial ~~and~~reporting. ~~disposition~~Our ofaudit ~~the~~included consideration ~~assets~~ of ~~the~~internal ~~Company;~~control ~~(ii)~~over ~~provide~~financial ~~reasonable~~reporting ~~assurance that~~as ~~transactions~~a ~~are~~basis ~~recorded~~for asdesigning ~~necessary~~audit toprocedures ~~permit~~that ~~preparation~~are ofappropriate ~~financial statements~~ in ~~accordance with US GAAP and that receipts~~the ~~and~~circumstances, ~~expenditures~~but ~~are~~not ~~being~~for ~~made~~the ~~only~~purpose inof ~~accordance~~expressing ~~with~~an ~~authorizations~~opinion ofon ~~management~~the ~~and~~effectiveness ~~directors~~ of the Company;’s ~~and~~internal ~~(iii)~~control ~~provide~~over ~~reasonable~~financial ~~assurance~~reporting. ~~regarding~~Accordingly, ~~prevention~~we orexpress ~~timely~~no ~~detection~~such ofopinion. ~~unauthorized~~An ~~acquisition~~audit includes examining, ~~use~~on ora ~~disposition~~test ofbasis, ~~the~~evidence ~~Company’s~~supporting ~~assets~~the ~~that~~amounts ~~could~~and ~~have~~disclosures ain ~~material effect on~~ the financial statements. ~~Because~~An ofaudit ~~its~~also ~~inherent~~includes ~~limitations,~~assessing ~~internal~~the ~~control~~accounting ~~over financial~~principles ~~reporting~~used ~~may~~and ~~not~~significant estimates ~~prevent~~made orby ~~detect misstatements. Therefore~~management, ~~even~~as ~~those~~well ~~systems~~as ~~determined~~evaluating tothe beoverall ~~effective~~financial ~~can~~statement ~~provide only~~presentation. ~~reasonable~~We ~~assurance~~believe ~~with~~that ~~respect~~our toaudit ~~financial~~provide a ~~statement~~reasonable ~~preparation~~basis ~~and~~for ~~presentation~~our opinion.

~~Management’s~~In ~~Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management evaluated~~ our ~~internal~~opinion, ~~control~~the ~~over~~consolidated financial statements ~~reporting~~referred asto ofabove ~~December~~present 31fairly, ~~2014. In~~in ~~making~~all ~~this~~material ~~assessment~~respects, ~~management used~~ the ~~criteria~~financial ~~set~~position ~~forth by the Committee~~ of ~~Sponsoring~~Apptigo ~~Organizations~~International, ofInc. ~~the Treadway~~as ~~Commission~~of inDecember ~~Internal~~31, ~~Control~~2014, —and ~~Integrated~~the ~~Framework.~~results ~~As a result~~ of ~~this~~its ~~assessment~~operation and ~~based~~its oncash ~~the~~flow ~~criteria~~for ~~in this~~the ~~framework,~~year ~~management~~ended ~~has concluded that, as of~~ December 31, 2014, ~~our~~in ~~internal~~conformity ~~control~~with accounting ~~over~~principles ~~financial~~generally ~~reporting~~accepted ~~was~~in ~~ineffective~~the United States of America.

~~Material~~The ~~Weaknesses~~accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the entity will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the entity has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

A/s/ ~~material~~RBSM weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.LLP

~~Management~~May ~~identified~~13, ~~the following material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting:~~2015

·Las ~~Lack of sufficient qualified personnel to design~~Vegas, implement, and maintain an effective control environment as it relates to financial reporting. Given the expansion of the business and all of our operations, we did not yet integrate an effective control environment with the sufficient complement of personnel with the appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in U.S. GAAP to assess the completeness and accuracy of certain accounting and reporting matters.Nevada

· Period-end financial reporting process. Given the expansion of the business and all of our operations we did not design or maintain effective controls over the period-end financial reporting process, including controls with respect to the preparation, review, supervision, and monitoring of accounting operations and financial reporting. More specifically, due to the expansion of our business, we did not yet prepare timely accounting reconciliations nor did we have adequate financial reporting personnel to prepare timely and accurate financial statements, including related disclosures.

The material weaknesses described above could result in misstatements that would result in a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements in a future annual or interim period that would not be prevented or detected.

Remediation Plans

We have initiated several steps and plan to continue to evaluate and implement measures designed to improve our internal control over financial reporting in order to remediate the material weaknesses, noted specifically above.

While our evaluation of the appropriate remediation plans is still ongoing, efforts to date have included recruiting additional experienced accounting personnel at our business and improving certain processes. The Company also engages third party consultants with expertise in the preparation of financial reporting and other financial aspects of the business.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Except for the activities described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2014, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers.

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers and directors:

Name	Age	Title
Casey Cordes	39	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
David Steinberg	38	Director, President, Treasurer, and Secretary

The Board believes that each director named below is highly qualified and has the skills and experience required for effective service on the Board. The directors’ individual biographies below contain information about their experience, qualifications and skills that led the Board to appoint them.

Casey Cordes

Mr. Cordes has worked as a Creative Director, Social Media Strategist and Senior Copywriter with extensive experience in creating solutions across multiple platforms for a wide range of Fortune 500 clients, from start-ups to multinationals. He received his undergraduate education in Advertising from Michigan State University, and followed it with a Masters-Equivalent specialty degree in Copywriting from the Miami Ad School. His client portfolio includes Absolut Vodka, Carnival Cruise Lines, Citibank, Cigna, Chrysler, Dodge, Renault, The Florida Lottery, NBC/Telemundo, Kaplan University, Florida Power & Light, Listerine, Travelers Insurance, Zumba Fitness, Tampico and Coca-Cola. Prior to creating Apptigo, Casey worked at several top agencies in Miami, including Sapient (from September of 2010 to April of 2012), LGD Communications (from 2005 to 2007), Macias Advertising (from March of 2012 to April of 2014), and BGT (now PWC) (from October of 2009 to August of 2010). Leveraging his international experience, Mr. Cordes wrote a pilot for a television show in Amsterdam. He also served as Creative Consultant and Copywriter for the three major safari companies in Tanzania, Africa, producing websites and brochures. At Steinberg Advertising (from 2003 to 2004) and Branding Forces (from 2004 to 2008) Mr. Cordes was Creative Director for clients including the Versace Mansion and The Setai Hotel. He then became a founding member of “Ruthless & Toothless” children’s line in collaboration with the tattoo artists from TV’s Miami Ink.

David Steinberg

Mr. Steinberg is an accomplished Creative/Design Director with a strong background in brand development for the advertising and marketing industry. During his career he has been in charge of developing intelligent marketing campaigns and strategies, creating innovative brand identities, establishing creative timeframes, building efficient high-level teams and pitching complete branding concepts to various clients. He actively takes the reigns of all projects as the lead architect of the brand and design development, and always looks to create a positive growing experience for his teams that allow each member to utilize their talents while pushing their potential. Prior to co-founding Apptigo, he was CEO and CCO of both Steinberg Advertising & Design (from 2001 to 2008) and Branding Forces (from 2006 to 2008), boutique agencies at the forefront of Internet design. His exclusive clientele included: The Setai; Miami Beach Polo World Cup; Casa Casuarina (former Versace Mansion); Mix My Granola (successful web-based granola company); the Kitzbuehl (Austria) Polo World Cup; Related Companies, real estate developers; the Monarchy Collection, an adult fashion label; Smith & Wesson, a licensed fragrance; and the Miami Ad School. In 2008 he created new brands for the television show, Miami Ink. Ideas, resulting in the children’s lifestyle line “Ruthless & Toothless” and the new “Ruthless Collective.” Mr. Steinberg received a diploma in Marketing and Communication in 1999 from the Institute for Marketing and Communication in Berlin, Germany. He received his Master’s Degree in Communication and Advertising in 2001 from the Miami Ad School.

Terms of Office

Our directors are appointed for one-year terms to hold office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders of our common stock or until removed from office in accordance with our by-laws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until they resign or are removed by our board of directors.

None of the directors or officers is related to any other director or officer of the Company.

To the knowledge of the Company, none of the officers or directors has been personally involved in any bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. To the knowledge of the Company, none of the directors or officers have been convicted in any criminal proceedings (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses) or are the subject of a criminal proceeding which is presently pending, nor have such persons been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining them from acting as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or insurance company, or from engaging in or continuing in any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, nor were any of such persons the subject of a federal or state authority barring or suspending, for more than 60 days, the right of such person to be engaged in any such activity, which order has not been reversed or suspended.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following table summarizes compensation information for the last two fiscal years for (i) our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer (ii) the four most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as our executive officers at the end of the fiscal year (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

The following executive compensation disclosure reflects all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the executive officers below, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal Position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)

Stock Awards ($)

Option Awards ($)

Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)

All Other Compensation ($)

Total ($)

David Steinberg, CEO

2014

81,037

–

(1)

81 037

2013

–

(1)

–

Casey Cordes

2014

69,686

–

(1)

69,686

2013

–

(1)

–

(1) Compensation is the amount paid since April 14, 2014. There was no compensation prior to the reverse acquisition transaction.

None of our executive officers have employment agreements and no options were granted to any executive officer in 2014.

Director Compensation

There was no director compensation paid for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

The following table sets forth certain information furnished by current management and others, concerning the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of completion of the Transaction effective December 31, 2014, of (i) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our Common Stock; (ii) all directors and named executive officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)	Percent of Class(1)
David Steinberg 1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402 Miami, FL	8,575,000	29.34%
Casey Cordes 1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402 Miami, FL	8,575,000	29.34%
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (2 Persons)	17,150,000	58.68%

(1) This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and is believed to be accurate. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants, or other conversion privileges currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of the date of this table, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option, warrant, or other convertible instrument but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Where more than one person has a beneficial ownership interest in the same shares, the sharing of beneficial ownership of these shares is designated in the footnotes to this table. Effective as of December 31, 2014, we had 29,225,000 shares outstanding.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

None

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us for fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by auditors, RBSM LLP., and L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC were approximately $18,325 and $0, respectively, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and other services related to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees represent services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, and the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees. No such fees were paid in 2014 or 2013.

Tax Fees

No such fees were paid 2014 or 2013.

All Other Fees

No such fees were paid in 2014 or 2013.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company did not have a formal documented pre-approval policy for the fees of the principal accountant. The Company does not have an audit committee to review any fees paid to the principal accountant. The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees was 0%.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following Financial Statements are filed as part of this report under Item 7.

Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Formerly known as BALIUS CORP.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

	December 31,			December 31
	2014			2013
Assets
Cash	$	9,513		$	3,714
Prepaid expenses		–			6,000
Total current assets		9,513			9,714
Furniture and Fixtures net accumulated depreciation $4,019 and $0		45,702			–
Application design		–			92,500
Deposits		5,592			–
Total assets	$	60,807		$	102,214
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	36,987		$	2,424
Payroll liabilities		29,925			–
Convertible debenture - related party - net of discount $4,411 and $0		16,408			–
Convertible debenture - net of discount $38,105 and $0		22,470			–
Derivative liability		324,826			–
Total current liabilities		430,616			2,424
Long term convertible debenture		100,556
Total liabilities		531,172			2,424
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 1,000,000 authorized 145,000 and 145,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively		1,450			1,450
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 100,000,000 authorized; 29,225,000 and 7,450,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively		29,225			7,450
Common stock - unissued		1,033			–
Stock subscription receivable		–			(22,100	)
Additional paid in capital		1,637,841			172,283
Accumulated deficit		(2,139,914	)		(59,293	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(470,365	)		99,790
Total liability and stockholders' deficit	$	60,807		$	102,214

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Apptigo International, Inc.

Miami, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Apptigo International, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Apptigo International, Inc. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit and recurring net losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

May 12, 2016

F-1

APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

~~Formerly~~Consolidated ~~known~~Balance ~~as BALIUS CORP.~~Sheets

Consolidated Statement of Operations

	December 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
Assets
Cash	$	334,227		$	9,513
Total current assets		334,227			9,513

Furniture and Fixtures net accumulated depreciation $10,046 and $4,019		46,201			45,702
Deposits		5,592			5,592

Total assets	$	386,020		$	60,807

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	162,157		$	38,937
Payroll liabilities		142,743			29,925
Convertible debenture - related party, net of discounts of $625,154 and $4,411		384,051			15,589
Convertible debenture - current portion, net of discounts of $522,587 and $38,105		258,782			21,895
Derivative liability		8,746,651			324,826
Total current liabilities		9,694,384			431,172

Convertible debenture - long term, net of discounts of $82,845 and $0		137,119			100,000
Total liabilities		9,831,503			531,172

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 authorized 0 and 145,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		–			1,450
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 2,000,000,000 authorized;129,487,298 and 29,225,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		129,487			29,225
Common stock payable		–			1,033
Additional paid-in capital		1,398,491			1,637,841
Accumulated deficit		(10,973,461	)		(2,139,914	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(9,445,483	)		(470,365	)
Total liability and stockholders' deficit	$	386,020		$	60,807

Years Ended

	2014			2013
Revenue	$	–		$	–
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses		887,236			29,395
Research and development expense		857,503			–
Depreciation expense		4,019			–
Total operating expenses		1,748,758			29,395
Loss from operation		(1,748,758	)		(29,395	)
Other income/expense
Interest expense - related party		(819	)		–
Interest expense		(6,218	)		–
Derivative expense		(324,826	)		–
Loss before income tax		(2,080,621	)		(29,395	)
Provision for income tax		–			–
Net Loss	$	(2,080,621	)	$	(29,395	)
Net loss per share: basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted averages shares outstanding: basic and diluted.		29,225,000			7,450,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

~~Apptigo~~APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, ~~Inc~~INC.

~~Statement~~Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders' Deficit~~Operations

	Preferred			Preferred			Common		Common				CommonStock -
	For the year ended December 31, 2015			For the year ended December 31, 2014
	Stock			Stock			Stock		Stock				Unissued		Stock			Accumulated
Revenue	$	–		$	–
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		APIC		Amount		Subscription			Deficit			Total
Operating expenses
December 31, 2012		–		$	–			–	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–		$	–		$	–
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,159,219			887,236
																						–
Research and development expense		34,116			857,503
Shares issued in connection with merger		145,000			1,450			7,450,000		7,450		172,283		–		(22,100	)		–			159,083
Depreciation expense		6,027			4,019
																						–
Total operating expenses		1,199,362			1,748,758
Net Loss		–			–			–		–		–		–		–			(29,293	)		(29,293	)
Loss from operations		(1,199,362	)		(1,748,758	)
December 31, 2013		145,000			1,450			7,450,000		7,450		172,283		–		(22,100	)		(29,293	)		99,790
Other expense
																						–
Interest expense - related party		(428,149	)		(819	)
Shares issued for cash		–			–			21,775,000		21,775		577,625		600		–			–			600,000
Interest expense		(553,195	)		(6,218	)
Purchase of intellectual property		–			–			–		–		643,600		400		–			–			644,000
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(6,652,841	)		(324,826	)
Stock Options		–			–			–		–		200,531		–		–			–			200,531
Loss before income tax		(8,833,547	)		(2,080,621	)
Stock subscription receivable		–			–			–		–		–		–		22,100			–			22,100
Provision for income tax		–			–
Discount on Warrant and beneficial conversion feature		–			–			–		–		35,502		–		–			–			35,502
Net Loss	$	(8,833,547	)	$	(2,080,621	)
Stock to be issued for service		–			–			–		–		8,300		33		–			–			8,333
Net loss per share: basic	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.10	)
Net loss		–			–			–		–		–		–		–			(2,080,621	)		(2,080,621	)
Net loss per share: diluted	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.10	)
December 31, 2014		145,000		$	1,450			29,225,000	$	29,225	$	1,637,841	$	1,033	$	–		$	(2,139,914	)	$	(470,365	)
Weighted averages shares outstanding: basic		51,109,071			21,285,901
Weighted averages shares outstanding: diluted		51,109,071			21,285,901

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

~~APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL~~Apptigo, ~~INC~~Inc.

~~Formerly~~Consolidated Statement ~~known~~of asStockholders' ~~BALIUS~~Equity ~~CORP.~~(Deficit)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

	Preferred			Preferred			Common		Common		Additional
	Shares			Par			Shares		Par		Paid-in			Stock			Accumulated
	Outstanding			Amount			Outstanding		Amount		Capital			Subscription			Deficit			Total
December 31, 2013		145,000			1,450			7,450,000		7,450		172,283			(22,100	)		(59,293	)		99,790
																					–
Shares issued for cash								21,775,000		21,775		577,625			600						600,000
Purchase of intellectual property												643,600			400						644,000
Stock Options												200,531									200,531
Receipt of funds for stock subscription rec.															22,100						22,100
Discount on Warrant and beneficial conversion feature												35,502									35,502
Stock to be issued for service												8,300			33						8,333
Net loss																		(2,080,621	)		(2,080,621	)
Ending Balance																					–
December 31, 2014		145,000		$	1,450			29,225,000	$	29,225	$	1,637,841		$	1,033		$	(2,139,914	)	$	(470,365	)

Common stock issued for conversion of debt		–			–			96,367,715		96,368		44,456			–			–			140,824
Shares issued for services		–			–			2,861,250		2,861		98,955			–			–			101,816
Exchange of convertible note for preferred stock		(145,000	)		(1,450	)		–		–		(807,755	)		–			–			(809,205	)
Common stock issued for stock payable		–			–			1,033,333		1,033		–			(1,033	)		–			–
Derivative liability extinguished upon conversion of debt		–			–			–		–		176,030			–			–			176,030
Stock-based compensation		–			–			–		–		248,964			–			–			248,964
Net loss		–			–			–		–		–			–			(8,833,547	)		(8,833,547	)
December 31, 2015		–		$	–			129,487,298	$	129,487	$	1,398,491		$	–		$	(10,973,461	)	$	(9,445,483	)

Years Ended

	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(2,080,621	)	$	(29,395	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Discount on convertible note		(38,105	)		–
Discount on Warrant and BCF		35,502			–
Discount on convertible debenture - related party		589			–
Shares issued for R&D cost		644,000			–
Depreciation		4,019			–
Write off of application design		92,500			–
Shares issued for service		8,333			–
Stock-based compensation		200,531			–
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Interest expense - related party		819			–
Interest expense		1,131			–
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		34,563			2,424
Payroll liabilities		29,925			–
Deposit		(5,592	)		–
Derivative Liability		324,826			–
Prepaid expenses		6,000			(6,000	)
Net Cash used in operating activities		(741,580	)		(32,971	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Furniture and Fixtures		(49,721	)		–
Application design		–			(72,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(49,721	)		(72,500	)
Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds from convertible debenture - related party		50,000			–
Repayment of convertible debenture - related party		(35,000	)		–
Proceeds from convertible debenture		160,000			–
Proceeds from common and preferred stock sale		622,100			109,185
Net cash provided by financing activities		797,100			109,185
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,799			3,714
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,714			–
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	9,513		$	3,714
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during period for
Cash paid for interest	$	–		$	–
Cash paid for income taxes	$	–		$	–
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information for financing activities
Proceeds from convertible debenture - related party	$	5,000		$	–

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the			For the
	year ended			year ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(8,833,547	)	$	(2,080,621	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Discount on convertible note		–			(38,105	)
Discount on Warrants and BCF		–			35,502
Discount on convertible debenture - related party		–			589
Shares issued for R&D cost		–			644,000
Depreciation		6,027			4,019
Write off of application design		–			92,500
Amortization of loan discounts		792,043			–
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		6,652,841			324,826
True-up of convertible debt		56,201			–
Shares issued for services		101,816			8,333
Stock-based compensation		248,964			200,531
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		17,404			34,563
Accrued interest expense		111,623			1,950
Payroll liabilities		112,818			29,925
Prepaid expenses		–			6,000
Deposits		–			(5,592	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(733,810	)		(741,580	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Furniture and fixtures		(6,526	)		(49,721	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(6,526	)		(49,721	)

Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds from convertible debenture - related party		200,000			50,000
Repayment of convertible debenture - related party		(20,000	)		(35,000	)
Proceeds from convertible debenture		885,050			160,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		–			622,100
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,065,050			797,100

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		324,714			5,799
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		9,513			3,714
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	334,227		$	9,513
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during period for
Cash paid for interest	$	–		$	–
Cash paid for income taxes	$	–		$	–

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Conversion of convertible debenture and accrued interest into common stock	$	140,824		$	–
Common stock issued for intangible property	$	–		$	644,000
Convertible note - related party exchanged for preferred shares	$	809,205		$	–
Resolution of derivative liabilities	$	176,030		$	–
Discount from derivative liabilities	$	1,906,491		$	–
Discount from warrants	$	38,523		$	–
Common stock issued for stock payable	$	1,033		$	–

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Apptigo International, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (“collectively “Apptigo” or the “Company”) designs, develops, markets and sells software applications. The Company ~~sells~~intends to sell its products worldwide through online stores.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

The Company’s year ends on December 31.

Nature of Business Operations

Organization and Description of Business

The Company was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 23, 2012 under the name of “Balius Corp.” (“Inception”). Effective April 15, 2014, we acquired Apptigo Inc., a Nevada corporation incorporated on October 31, 2012 (“Apptigo”). Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization Agreement, dated April 14, 2014 by and between the Company, its principal shareholder, Apptigo, and its shareholders, Apptigo agreed to exchange all of the outstanding common and preferred shares of Apptigo for common and preferred shares of the Company. The closing of the acquisition transaction was completed effective April 15, 2014.

At closing of the acquisition transaction, Apptigo became the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary and the Company became Apptigo’s parent. Thereafter, the principal shareholder of the Company cancelled 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock owned by him. As a result of the closing of the acquisition transaction, the Company had 8,250,000 shares of common stock outstanding and 145,000 Series A Preferred Shares outstanding, which preferred shares are convertible into 4,550,000 common shares.

Following the acquisition transaction, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to change its name to “Apptigo International, Inc.,” increase the number of authorized common shares, authorize preferred shares, and approved a 3.5-for-1 forward split of the outstanding shares, including the shares issued at the closing of the acquisition transaction. The forward stock split was effective at the opening of business on April 30, 2014. The effect of the stock split has been applied retroactively. Also, in connection with the acquisition transaction the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights for Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has reported a net loss of $28,~~080~~833,~~621~~547 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. The Company has a net negative working capital of $~~421~~9,~~103~~360,157 as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The ~~operating losses raise substantial doubt about the~~ Company's ~~ability~~ ~~to continue as a going concern. The Company's~~ ability to obtain additional financing depends on the success of its growth strategy and its future performance, each of which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors beyond the Company's control.

F-5

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

~~· Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;~~F-6

· Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; · Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and · Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

·The ~~Level~~application 3:of ~~Unobservable~~the ~~inputs~~three inlevels ~~which~~of the ~~there~~fair isvalue ~~little~~hierarchy orunder noTopic ~~market~~820-10-35 ~~data,~~to ~~which~~our ~~require~~assets ~~the~~and ~~reporting~~liabilities ~~entity~~are todescribed ~~develop~~below ~~its~~as ~~own~~of ~~assumptions.~~December 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Fair Value Measurements
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3	Total
December 31, 2015:
Derivative liabilities	$		$		$	8,746,651	8,746,651
Total	$	–	$	–	$	8,746,651	8,746,651
December 31, 2014:
Derivative liabilities	$		$		$	324,826	324,826
Total	$	–	$	–	$	324,826	324,826

Derivative liability for convertible notes as of December 31, 2015 is $8,746,651, compared to $324,826 as of December 31, 2014.

The table below presents the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2015:

Fair value as of December 31, 2014	$	324,826
Additions recognized as derivative expense		1,925,071
Additions recognized as debt discounts		1,945,014
Resolution upon conversion of debt		(176,030	)
Change in fair value		4,727,770
Fair value as of December 31, 2015	$	8,746,651

Share-based Compensation

The Company recognizes share-based compensation, to employees, including stock option grants, warrants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights, at their fair value on the grant date. Share based payment awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable upon the earlier of a commitment date or completion of services. Compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period.

Dividends

The payment of dividends by the Company in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, as well as other relevant factors. The Company does not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future but intend to retain all earnings, if any, for use in the business.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of these financial statements, cash and cash equivalents includes highly liquid debt instruments with maturity of less than three months.

F-7

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets that do not meet the criteria for recognition. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

F-6

The Company follows the accounting guidance which provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized initially and in subsequent periods. Also included is guidance on measurement, recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual property is stated at cost.

When retired or otherwise disposed, the related carrying value and accumulated amortization are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from disposition, is reflected in earnings. Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally, 3 to 15 years.

Software Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Development costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are subject to capitalization beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been established and ending when a product is available for general release to customers. In most instances, the Company’s products are released soon after technological feasibility has been established. Costs incurred for development are capitalized. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally, 5 years. For the year ~~ending~~ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 the ~~company~~Company expensed $34,116 compared to $857,503 for the year ended December 31, 2014, for research and development.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

F-7

Net Loss per Share

Basic ~~and~~loss ~~diluted~~per ~~loss~~share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share ~~amounts~~reflect ~~are~~the potential dilution ~~computed~~that ~~based~~could onoccur ~~net~~if ~~loss~~potentially ~~divided~~dilutive securities were exercised or converted to common stock. The dilutive effect of options and warrants and their equivalent is computed by application of the ~~weighted~~treasury ~~average~~stock ~~number~~method and the effect of convertible securities by the “if converted” method. During 2015 and 2014, all common ~~shares~~stock ~~outstanding~~equivalents were excluded as they would have been anti-dilutive.

Management Estimates

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant ~~and~~ and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by use of the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of ~~the~~ the assets, which for leasehold improvements is 15 years; 10 years for furniture and equipment; and 5 years for computer equipment. The Company capitalizes eligible costs to acquire or develop internal-use software that are incurred subsequent to the preliminary project stage. Capitalized costs related to internal-use software are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 5 to 7 years. Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $46,~~019~~027 and $04,019 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

2. INTANGIBLE PROPERTIES

On August 4, 2014, Apptigo entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement with the Company’s head designer and acquired certain intellectual property assets and rights used in connection with four games developed by him prior to his employment with the Company. The Company authorized to issue 400,000 shares of common stock as full consideration for the purchase of the assets. The closing stock price on August 4, 2014 was $1.61 per share resulting in a total price of $644,000. The total cost has been expensed. As of December 31, 2014, common shares have not been issued.

3. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

	December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	55,000
Original issue discount		(4,411	)
Less: Payment		(35,000	)
Accumulated interest		819
Convertible debenture, net of OID	$	16,408

F-8

OnImpairment ~~November 21, 2014 the Company entered into a 10% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a one year term. The debenture was issued in the amount~~ of ~~$225,000. The~~Long-lived company has receive one tranche from this convertible note in the amount of $60,000, which included $5,000 in fees and an OID of $5,000. The debenture has a conversion feature at a share price of 70% of the average of the three lowest closing prices in a 20 day period prior to the conversion. The Company recognized a discount on the note in relation to the warrants issued and a beneficial conversion feature. Interest expense on change in discount of the warrants and beneficial conversion amounted to $1,917 for the year ended December 31, 2014.Assets

	December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	60,000
Discount – Warrant		(17,364)
Discount – beneficial conversion feature		(16,221	)
Original issue discount		(4,520	)
Accumulated interest		575
Convertible debenture, net of OID	$	22,470

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. ASC 360-10 relates to assets that can be amortized and the life can be determinable. The Company reviews property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the asset’s carrying amount to future undiscounted net cash flows the assets are expected to generate. Cash flow forecasts are based on trends of historical performance and management's estimate of future performance, giving consideration to existing and anticipated competitive and economic conditions. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the projected discounted future cash flows arising from the assets or their fair values, whichever is more determinable.

OnRecently ~~December~~Issued 2,Accounting 2014 the Company entered into a 7% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a three year term. The debenture was issued in the amount of $200,000. As of December 31, 2014 the Company has received $100,000.Pronouncements

	December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	100,000
Accumulated interest		556
Convertible debenture, net of OID and BCF	$	100,556

None

42. ~~DERIVATIVE~~INTANGIBLE ~~LIABILITY~~PROPERTIES

InOn ~~connection~~August 4, 2014, Apptigo entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement with ~~two~~the ~~Secured~~Company’s ~~Convertible~~head designer and acquired certain intellectual property assets ~~Debentures~~and ~~entered~~rights ~~into~~used in ~~November~~connection ~~and~~with ~~December~~four ~~2014,~~games developed by him prior to his employment with the ~~convertible~~Company. ~~debentures~~The Company authorized to issue 400,000 ~~contain~~shares ~~ratchet~~of ~~provisions~~common ~~regarding~~stock as full consideration for the ~~conversion~~purchase of the assets. The closing stock price on August 4, 2014 was $1.61 per share resulting in a total price of ~~debt~~$644,000. ~~into~~The ~~shares~~total cost has been expensed.

~~The Company entered into a 10% Secured Convertible Debenture entered into on November 21, 2014, for a term of 15 months~~3. ~~The~~CONVERTIBLE debenture is in the amount of $225,000 with funding to be received in four tranches of $50,000. The note includes an Original Issue Discount in the amount of $20,000 and legal fees of $5,000. The original issue discount is prorated over the tranches and the legal fees are applied to the first tranche. The company has received one tranche as of the year ended December 31, 2014 which included $5,000 legal fees and other loan costs and $5,000 original issue discount for a total liability on the convertible note of $60,000 at year end plus accrued interest.DEBENTURES

~~Conversion~~On ofNovember ~~the~~18, ~~note~~2014, isthe ~~based~~Company ~~on a comparison~~entered ~~between~~into a ~~fixed~~12% ~~conversion~~Secured ~~price~~Convertible ~~and~~Debenture ~~the~~with ~~lesser~~a ofrelated ~~the variable conversion price~~party. The ~~conversion~~debenture ofis ~~outstanding~~convertible ~~debt~~into to shares of ~~common stock is based on the market capitalization~~ of the ~~company~~Company’s common stock. ~~The conversion price of the outstanding is fixed~~ at $0.2518 ~~unless~~per ~~the~~share. ~~market~~The ofdebenture ~~capitalization~~carries ofa ~~the~~one ~~company~~month isterm. ~~less~~The ~~than~~debenture ~~$3,000,000.~~was Inissued ~~the~~in ~~event~~ the ~~market~~amount ~~capitalization is~~of ~~less than~~ $350,000~~,000,~~. ~~the~~Upon maturity ~~conversion factor is 70%~~ of the ~~three~~Note, ~~lowest~~the ~~closing~~Company ~~prices~~issued in a ~~the~~promissory ~~previous~~note 20in ~~trading~~the ~~days.~~amount ~~The convertible~~of ~~debenture~~$55,000 ~~also~~to ~~includes~~cover athe ~~“True~~balance ~~up”~~of ~~feature, whereas~~ the ~~conversion~~note ~~price~~which isincluded an ~~recalculated~~Original 20Issue ~~trading~~Discount ~~days after~~(OID) ~~the~~of ~~conversion~~$5,000. IfThe ~~the~~ conversion ~~amount~~feature onof the ~~true~~note updid ~~date~~not ischange. ~~less~~The ~~than~~new ~~the~~note ~~conversion~~has ~~amount~~a onterm ~~the~~of ~~previous~~one ~~conversion,~~year. ~~then~~This ~~additional~~note ~~shares~~was ~~would~~paid beoff ~~issued~~on asSeptember if17, ~~the~~2015 ~~true~~with upfunds ~~conversion~~received ~~amount~~from ~~was~~a ~~applicable~~new onnote. ~~the~~See ~~original~~below ~~conversion~~for additional information.

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	20,000		$	55,000
Unamortized original issue discount		–			(4,411	)
Less: Payment		(20,000	)		(35,000	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	–		$	15,589

On November 21, 2014, the Company entered into a 10% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a term of 15 months. The debenture was issued in the amount of $225,000. The Company has received one tranche from this convertible note in the amount of $60,000, which included $5,000 in fees and an OID of $5,000. The debenture has a conversion feature at a share price of the lower of $0.25 or 70% of the average of the three lowest closing prices in a 20 day period prior to the conversion. During the year ended, December 31, 2015 the lender converted $90,288 of the convertible note and accrued interest of $4,178 in exchange for 29,002,687 shares of common stock. In addition, the lender exercised true up features on the debt for an additional $56,201 in non-cash borrowing.

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	60,000		$	60,000
Additional amount due to true-up feature		56,201			–
Conversion of debt to common stock		(90,288	)		–
Original issue discount		(137	)		(4,520	)
Discount – warrant		(2,345	)		(17,364	)
Discount – derivative		(19,026	)		(16,221	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	4,405		$	21,895

F-9

~~The~~On ~~Company~~December ~~assesses~~2, 2014, the ~~fair~~Company ~~value of the~~entered ~~convertible~~into ~~debenture~~a ~~using~~7% ~~the~~Secured ~~Black~~Convertible ~~Scholes~~Debenture. ~~pricing~~The ~~model~~debenture ~~and~~carries ~~records~~ a ~~derivative~~three ~~expense~~year ~~for the value~~term. The ~~Company~~debenture ~~then~~was ~~assesses the~~issued ~~fair~~in ~~value~~the amount of ~~the~~$200,000. As ~~warrants~~of ~~quarterly~~December ~~based~~31, on2014 the ~~Black~~Company ~~Scholes~~had ~~Model~~received ~~and~~$100,000, ~~increases~~with ~~or decreases~~ the ~~liability~~remaining ~~to the new value~~$100, ~~and~~000 ~~records~~received aon ~~corresponding~~January ~~gain~~7, ~~or loss~~2015. The ~~Company uses expected volatility based primarily on historical volatility using weekly~~conversion ~~pricing~~price ~~observations~~of ~~for~~the ~~recent~~outstanding ~~periods~~balance ~~that~~is ~~correspond to~~ the ~~expected~~lower ~~life~~ of ~~the warrants~~$0.15 ~~The~~or ~~risk-free~~60% ~~interest~~of ~~rate~~the is30 ~~based on~~day ~~U.S.~~trading ~~Treasury securities rates~~average.

Due to the ratchet provisions, the Company treats the convertible debenture as a derivative liability in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASC 815). ASC 815 applies to any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative and to any freestanding financial instruments that potentially settle in an entity’s own common stock.

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Convertible debenture	$	100,000		$	100,000
Additional amount received		100,000			–
Discount – derivative		(66,226	)		–
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	133,774		$	100,000

	December 31, 2014
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		.25	%
Expected stock price volatility		91.4	%
Expected dividend payout		–
Expected option in life-years		1.25

On February 9, 2015, the Company executed a $59,000 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has an 8% interest rate and a term of nine months. The conversion price for the amount to be converted of 58% of the average of the three lowest trading price for the previous 10 days at date of conversion. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the lender converted $30,340 of the convertible debt for 33,949,803 shares of common stock. There was an additional interest accrued as a default on the note in the amount of $29,500.

As of December 31, 2014, total derivative liability is $179,665 and the derivative expense for this convertible note is $179,665.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	59,000
Conversion of debt to common stock		(30,340	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	28,660

~~The~~On ~~Company~~March ~~entered~~4, ~~into~~2015, athe 7%Company ~~Secured~~executed a $50,000 Convertible ~~Debenture~~ ~~entered~~Promissory ~~into~~Note. onThe ~~December~~note 2,has ~~2014,~~a ~~for~~12% interest rate and a term of 3six ~~years~~months. ~~The~~Conversion ~~debenture~~of ~~is in~~ the ~~amount~~note ofis ~~$200,000~~based on ~~with~~a ~~funding~~comparison tobetween ~~be received~~the inlesser of two ~~tranches~~variable ofconversion ~~$100,000~~prices. ~~Conversion~~The conversion price of the ~~note~~outstanding balance is ~~based~~the onlower of a55% ~~comparison~~of ~~between~~the alowest ~~fixed~~trading ~~conversion~~ price ~~and~~for the ~~lesser~~ ofprevious ~~the~~20 ~~variable~~days ~~conversion~~at ~~price.~~date ~~The~~of conversion ~~price~~or 55% of the ~~outstanding~~lowest ~~balance~~trading isprice for the ~~lower~~previous 20 days before the effective date of $0the note.15 orDuring ~~40%~~the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company converted $8,204 of the 30convertible ~~day~~debt ~~trading~~for ~~average~~21,394,225 shares of common stock.

The Company assesses the fair value of the convertible debenture using the Black Scholes pricing model and records a derivative expense for the value. The Company then assesses the fair value of the warrants quarterly based on the Black Scholes Model and increases or decreases the liability to the new value, and records a corresponding gain or loss. The Company uses expected volatility based primarily on historical volatility using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected life of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities rates.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	50,000
Conversion of debt to common stock		(8,204	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	41,796

~~Due~~On toMarch ~~the~~25, ~~ratchet provisions~~2015, the Company executed ~~treats~~and ~~the~~sold ~~convertible~~a ~~debenture~~$250,000 asConvertible Promissory Note. The note has a ~~derivative~~one-time ~~liability~~12% ininterest ~~accordance~~rate ~~with~~and ~~the~~a ~~provisions~~term of ~~ASC~~one ~~815~~year. ~~“Derivatives~~The ~~and~~Company ~~Hedging”~~received ~~(ASC~~$25,000 ~~815).~~along ~~ASC~~with ~~815~~an ~~applies~~original toissue ~~any~~discount ~~freestanding~~of ~~financial~~$2,778 ~~instruments~~upon orclosing ~~embedded~~of ~~features~~the ~~that~~transaction. ~~have~~The conversion price of the ~~characteristics~~outstanding balance is the lower of a$0.087 ~~derivative~~or ~~and~~60% of the lowest trading price for the previous 25 days prior to ~~any~~conversion. ~~freestanding~~During ~~financial~~the ~~instruments~~year ended ~~that~~December ~~potentially~~31, ~~settle~~2015, inthe anCompany ~~entity’s~~converted ~~own~~$7,814 of the convertible debt for 12,021,000 share of common stock.

	December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2015
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		1.59	%
Convertible debenture	$	27,778
Expected stock price volatility		139.0	%
Conversion of debt to common stock		(7,814	)
Expected dividend payout		–
Original issue discount		(1,229	)
Expected option in life-years		3
Discount – derivative		(15,390	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	3,345

AsOn ofMay ~~December 31~~20, ~~2014~~2015, ~~total~~the ~~derivative~~Company ~~liability is~~executed a $~~145~~31,~~161~~500 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has an 8% interest rate and a term of one year. The Company received $30,000 upon closing of the ~~derivative~~transaction ~~expense~~with $1,500 paid to the lender for ~~this~~legal ~~convertible~~fees. ~~note~~The conversion price of the outstanding balance is ~~$145,161~~the 55% of the lowest trading price for the previous 18 days at date of conversion.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	31,500
Discount		(578	)
Discount – derivative		(11,557	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	19,365

F-10

On May 21, 2015, the Company executed a $55,000 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has a 10% interest rate and a term of nine months. The Company received $49,250 upon closing of the transaction with $5,750 paid to the lender for legal and service fees. ~~WARRANT~~The ~~AND~~conversion ~~OPTION~~price of the outstanding balance ~~LIABILITY~~is 50% of the average of the two lowest trading price for the previous 25 days at date of conversion.

As of December 31, 2014, these warrants include the following:

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	55,000
Discount		(1,083	)
Discount – derivative		(9,279	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	44,638

~~Warrants~~On ~~granted~~May on22, ~~November 18~~2015, ~~2014~~the inCompany ~~connection~~executed a ~~with~~$55,000 ~~the~~Convertible aPromissory 12Note. The note has an 8% ~~convertible~~interest ~~debenture~~rate and a term of one year. The note includes an original issue discount of $5,000 and the ~~right~~Company topaid ~~purchase~~$5,000 upin legal fees to ~~200,000~~the ~~shares~~lender upon execution of this loan. The conversion price of the ~~Company’s~~outstanding ~~common~~balance ~~stock~~is ~~with~~50% anof ~~original exercise~~the average of the three lowest trading price for the previous 20 days at date of $0conversion.~~05.~~

Warrants granted in connection with the convertible debenture entered into on November 21, 2014, the investor has the right to purchase up to 282,575 shares of the Company’s common stock with an initial conversion price of $0.32. The warrants carry a provision for the adjustment based on the terms of the contract. Fair value was determined using the following variables: A discount based on the fair value of the warrants as of December 31, 2014 amounted to $17,364.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	55,000
Original issue discount		(1,954	)
Discount		(1,953	)
Discount – derivative		(17,582	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	33,511

	Grant Date			December 31, 2014
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		1.63	%		1.63	%
Expected stock price volatility		139	%		139	%
Expected dividend payout		–			–
Expected option in life-years		5			4.88

On June 3, 2015, the Company executed a $43,500 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has an 8% interest rate and a term of nine months. As consideration for entering into this transaction, the Company granted 543,750 warrants to the lender. See Note 5. The conversion price of the outstanding balance is 51% of the average of the three lowest trading price for the previous 15 days at date of conversion.

	Number ofWarrants			Weighted-AveragePrice Per Share
	December 31, 2015
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		–			–
Convertible debenture	$	43,500
Granted		282,575			.21
Discount – warrants		(9,072	)
Exercised		–			–
Discount – derivative		(1,172	)
Canceled or expired		–			–
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	33,256
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		282,575		$	.21

On ~~June~~August 1710, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~issued~~executed a ~~550~~$809,~~000~~205 ~~options~~Convertible ~~for~~Debenture ~~services~~with bya ~~six~~related ~~employees~~party in exchange for ~~stock~~145,000 ~~based~~shares ~~compensation~~of inPreferred Stock held by the ~~amount~~related party lender. The note has a 10% interest rate and a term of ~~$200,531~~one year. As The conversion price of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~outstanding ~~2014,~~balance ~~200,839~~is ~~options~~45% ~~have~~of ~~vested~~the lowest trading price for the previous 10 days at date of conversion.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	809,205
Discount – derivative		(485,070	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	324,135

On August 10, 2015, the Company entered into a $50,000 Convertible Debenture with a related party. The note has a 10% interest rate and a term of one year. Additionally, the Company entered into three additional notes, each for principal of $50,000, consisting of two notes in September and one in October, with the same party and under the same terms as the note on August 10, 2015. The conversion price of the outstanding balance is 40% of the lowest trading price for the previous 10 days at date of conversion. A portion of the proceeds were used to repay in full the note dated December 18, 2014.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	200,000
Discount – derivative		(140,084	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	59,916

F-11

On November 18, 2015, the Company entered into a 10% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a one year term. The debenture was issued in the amount of $200,000. The conversion price of the outstanding balance is 50% of the lowest closing price in a 10 day period prior to conversion.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	200,000
Discount – derivative		(176,438	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	23,562

On November 25, 2015, the Company executed a $300,000 Convertible Debenture. The note has a 10% interest rate and a term of one year. The conversion price of the outstanding balance is 50% of the lowest trading price for the previous 10 days at date of conversion.

	December 31, 2015
Convertible debenture	$	300,000
Discount		(270,411	)
Convertible debenture, net of unamortized discount	$	29,589

4. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Due to the variable conversion prices in the convertible notes described above, the Company treats the convertible debenture and outstanding warrants as derivative liabilities in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASC 815). ASC 815 applies to any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative and to any freestanding financial instruments that potentially settle in an entity’s own common stock.

The Company assesses the fair value of the convertible debentures and warrants using the Black Scholes pricing model and records a derivative liability for the value. The Company then assesses the fair value quarterly based on the Black Scholes Model and increases or decreases the liability to the new value, and records a corresponding gain or loss. The Company uses expected volatility based primarily on historical volatility using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected life of the instruments. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities rates.

The following table describes the significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes pricing model:

	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		.08 - .65%		.25 – 1.59%
Expected stock price volatility		218 - 465%		139%
Expected dividend payout		–		–
Expected option in life-years		.1 - .65		1.25 - 3

The table below presents the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Fair Value as of December 31, 2013	$	–
Additions recognized as derivative expense		307,462
Additions recognized as debt discount		17,364
Change in fair value		–
Fair value as of December 31, 2014	$	324,826
Additions recognized as derivative expense		1,925,071
Additions recognized as debt discounts		1,945,014
Resolution upon conversion of debt		(176,030	)
Change in fair value		4,727,770
Fair value as of December 31, 2015	$	8,746,651

F-12

5. WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

As of December 31, 2015, these warrants include the following:

Warrants granted on November 21, 2014 in connection with the 12% convertible debenture, the right to purchase up to 282,575 shares of the Company’s common stock with an original exercise price of $0.0005. The warrants carry a provision for the adjustment based on the terms of the contract, wherein the number of warrants is adjusted to equal $30,000. As a result of this provision, the lender has the right to purchase up to 128,571,429 shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2015. A derivative liability on the fair value of the warrants as of December 31, 2015 amounted to $89,986. Fair value was determined using the following variables:

	Grant Date		December 31, 2015
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		1.63%		1.15%
Expected stock price volatility		139%		129%
Expected dividend payout		–		–
Expected option in life-years		5		4

The following table summarizes the warrant activity during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Number of Warrants		Weighted-Average Price Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2013	–		–
Granted		282,575	$	.11
Adjusted for variable conversion		721,889		–
Exercised
Canceled or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		1,004,464	$	.03
Granted		543,750		.08
Adjusted for variable conversion		127,566,965		–
Canceled or expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		128,571,429	$	.0006

On June 17, 2014, the Company granted 550,000 options to six employees for services. As of December 31, 2015, a total of 235,000 options have been vested for a total of 340,000 options vested. No options have been exercised and 140,000 options have been canceled due to termination of service contracts. Stock based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, amounted to $248,964 and $200,531, respectively.

The following table summarizes the option activity during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Number of Options			Option Price Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		–			–
Granted		550,000			1.00
Exercised		–			–
Canceled or expired		(100,000	)		1.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		450,000		$	1.00
Granted		–			–
Canceled or expired		(40,000	)		1.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		410,000		$	1.00

6. EQUITY

Common Stock

The Company was formed in the state of Nevada on October 31, 2012. The Company had authorized capital of 75,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01. On April 17, 2014, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the state of Nevada, increasing its authorized shares from 75,000,000 to 100,000,000 shares of common stock.

On April 14, 2014, the Company, entered ~~into~~ into an a reverse acquisition transaction with Apptigo Inc., a Nevada corporation incorporated on October 31, 2012, and its shareholders, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization Agreement, dated April 14, 2014 between the Company, its principal shareholder, and Apptigo and its shareholders. Under the terms of the Agreement the shareholders of Apptigo agreed to exchange all of the outstanding common and preferred shares of Apptigo for common and preferred shares of the Company. The closing of the Transaction was completed effective April 15, 2014 (the “ Closing Date ”).

F-1113

~~The~~A 3.5-for-1 forward stock split of the Company’s outstanding common shares became effective at the open of business on April 30, 2014. As a result of the forward stock split, the number of outstanding shares of common stock was increased from 8,250,000 to 29,225,000, and the 145,000 outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible into 15,925,000 rather than 4,550,000 in the event of conversion.

On October 6, 2015, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada an Amendment to Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company. The Amendment authorizes the Company to issue 2,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series, each series to be appropriately designated by a distinguishing letter or title, prior to the issuance of any shares thereof.

2014

In May 2014, the Company entered into an agreement for services which included the issuance of 50,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2014 the shares remain unissued.

On June 17, 2014, the Company issued 550,000 options for service by six employees for stock based compensation in the amount of $200,531. As of December 31, 2014, 105,000 options ~~200~~have vested. For the year ended December 31,~~839~~ 2015 an additional 235,000 options have vested for a total of 340,000 vested, additional compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $248,964.

During the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company sold 22,375,000 shares of common stock pursuant to stock purchase agreements in the amount of $600,000. ~~Of the 22,375,000 shares, 600,000 have not been issued as of September 30, 2014.~~ In addition, the Company purchased Intellectual Property from the Company’s head designer for 400,000 shares of common stock at a price of $644,000. ~~None of the 400,000 shares have been issued as of December 31, 2014.~~

During the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company received $22,100 from subscription receivable.

The Company issued warrant in connection with convertible debentures as described in Note 5.

2015

The Company issued 96,367,715 shares of common stock for the conversion of debt in the amount of $140,824, consisting of principal of $136,646 and accrued interest of $4,178.

The Company issued 2,861,250 shares of common stock to consultants and employees for their services totaling $101,816.

During 2015, the Company issued 1,033,333 common shares for a stock payable.

The Company issued warrants in connection with convertible debentures as described in Note 5.

Preferred Stock

On April 17, 2014, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the state of Nevada, authorizing 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001.

On April 17, 2014, the Company converted the outstanding balance of the Convertible Promissory Note of $80,000 including accrued interest of $4,933 and the balance of the stock purchase of $60,000 from the same note holder in exchange for 145,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The promissory note conversion was retrospectively recorded as of December 31, 2013 due to the reverse acquisition transaction with Apptigo.

On August 10, 2015, the Company and The Vantage Group, Ltd. entered into an Exchange Agreement. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement the Holder, who was the owner of a 145,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred stock, exchanged the Preferred Shares for a 10% Convertible Debenture in the amount of $809,205. The principal amount of the Debenture represented the principal price paid for the Preferred Shares and any dividends which the Holder was entitled under the terms of the Preferred Shares.

On October 6, 2015, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada an Amendment to Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company. The Amendment authorizes the Company to issue 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series, each series to be appropriately designated by a distinguishing letter or title, prior to the issuance of any shares thereof.

F-14

2014 Stock Incentive Plan

On June 19, 2014 (the “ Effective Date ”), the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “ Plan ”). Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 4,500,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company. All of the Company’s employees, officers and directors, as well as consultants and advisors to the Company are eligible to be granted awards under the Plan. No Awards can be granted under the Plan after the expiration of 10 years from the Effective Date, but awards previously granted may extend beyond that date. Awards may consist of both incentive and non-statutory options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock grants.

7. ~~RELATED~~INCOME ~~PARTY TRANSACTIONS~~TAXES

AtDeferred ~~Closing~~income oftaxes are determined using the ~~acquisition,~~liability method for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of the Company's ~~issued~~assets ~~2,450,000~~and ~~shares~~liabilities. ofDeferred ~~common~~income ~~stock,~~taxes ~~par~~are ~~value~~measured ~~$0.001~~based ~~per~~on ~~share,~~the ~~each~~tax torates ~~David~~expected ~~Steinberg~~to ~~and~~be ~~Casey~~in ~~Cordes,~~effect when the ~~sole~~temporary ~~common~~differences ~~shareholders~~are ofincluded ~~Apptigo,~~in the Company's tax return. Deferred tax assets and ~~145,000~~liabilities ~~shares~~are ofrecognized ~~Series~~based Aon ~~Convertible~~anticipated ~~Preferred~~future ~~Stock,~~tax ~~the~~consequences attributable ~~sole~~to ~~preferred~~differences ~~shareholder~~between financial statement carrying amounts of ~~Apptigo~~assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

~~F-12~~The Company is subject to US taxes. Historically, the Company has had no net taxable income, and therefore has paid no income tax.

8As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had cumulative net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately $2,640,000 and $1,520,000, respectively. ~~SUBSEQUENT~~The ~~EVENTS~~NOL carryforward begin to expire in 2032. Because management is unable to determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the tax benefit related to the NOL carryforward, by having future taxable income, a full valuation allowance has been established at December 31, 2015 to reduce the tax benefit asset value to zero.

~~On January~~Components 7,of ~~2015,~~net ~~the~~deferred ~~company~~tax ~~received~~assets, including ~~the~~a ~~remaining~~valuation ~~$100~~allowance,~~000~~ ~~from~~are ~~the~~as ~~$200,000~~follows ~~convertible~~at ~~debenture.~~December 31st:

On February 9, 2015, the Company executed a $59,000 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has an 8% interest rate and a term of 9 month.

	2015			2014
Deferred tax assets:
Federal deferred tax assets		898,687			595,834
Valuation allowance		(898,687	)		(595,834	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	–		$	–

OnThe ~~March~~valuation 9allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $898,687 and $595,834, respectively. In assessing the ~~Company~~recovery ~~executed~~of athe ~~$50~~deferred tax assets,~~000~~ management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. ~~12%~~The ~~Convertible~~ultimate ~~Promissory~~realization ~~Note~~of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. ~~The~~Management ~~note~~considers ~~has~~the ~~12%~~scheduled ~~interest~~reversals ~~rate~~of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a ~~term~~result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of 6December ~~months~~31, 2015 and 2014, and recorded a full valuation allowance.

~~On March 25, 2015, the Company executed and sold a $250,000 Convertible Promissory Note. The note has an~~ 8~~% interest rate and for a term of 1 year~~. ~~The~~RELATED ~~company received~~PARTY ~~$25,000 upon closing of the transaction.~~TRANSACTIONS

~~F-13~~On November 18, 2014, the Company entered into a 12% Secured Convertible Debenture with a related party in the principal amount of $50,000. The note was paid off in September 2015. See Note 3.

Between August and October 2015, the Company entered into four separate 10% Secured Convertible Debentures with a related party. The outstanding balance of these notes, net of unamortized discount, is $59,916 as of December 31, 2015. See Note 3.

The Company entered into an Exchange Agreement on August 10, 2015. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement the Holder, who was the owner of a 145,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred stock, exchanged the Preferred Shares for a 10% Convertible Debenture in the amount of $809,205. See Note 3.

9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During April 2016, the Company entered into a 10% Secured Convertible Debenture in the amount of $30,000 with a related party. The term of the note is 6 months. The conversion price of the outstanding balance is 40% of the lowest trading price for the previous 10 days at date of conversion.

Between January and May 2016, the Company has converted a total of $62,278 in convertible debt and accrued interest of $5,752 for 1,109,940,894 shares of common stock.

On January 7, 2016, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada an Amendment to Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company. The Amendment authorizes the Company to issue 5,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series, each series to be appropriately designated by a distinguishing letter or title, prior to the issuance of any shares thereof.

F-15

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the PCAOB standards, a control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit the attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2015. Our management has determined that, as of December 31, 2015, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management Responsibility for Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with the United States’ generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), including those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management’s Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management evaluated our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework . As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in this framework, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective.

Material Weaknesses

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management identified the following material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting:

·	Lack of sufficient qualified personnel to design, implement, and maintain an effective control environment as it relates to financial reporting . Given the expansion of the business and all of our operations, we did not yet integrate an effective control environment with the sufficient complement of personnel with the appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in U.S. GAAP to assess the completeness and accuracy of certain accounting and reporting matters. This results in a lack of segregation of duties and multiple levels of supervision and review.

·	Period-end financial reporting process. Given the expansion of the business and all of our operations we did not design or maintain effective controls over the period-end financial reporting process, including controls with respect to the preparation, review, supervision, and monitoring of accounting operations and financial reporting. More specifically, due to the expansion of our business, we did not yet prepare timely accounting reconciliations nor did we have adequate financial reporting personnel to prepare timely and accurate financial statements, including related disclosures.

Remediation Plans

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Except for the activities described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2015, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers.

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers and directors:

Name	Age		Title
Casey Cordes		41	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
David Steinberg		40	Director, President, Treasurer, and Secretary

Casey Cordes

David Steinberg

Mr. Steinberg is an accomplished Creative/Design Director with a strong background in brand development for the advertising and marketing industry. During his career he has been in charge of developing intelligent marketing campaigns and strategies, creating innovative brand identities, establishing creative timeframes, building efficient high-level teams and pitching complete branding concepts to various clients. He actively takes the reigns of all projects as the lead architect of the brand and design development, and always looks to create a positive growing experience for his teams that allow each member to utilize their talents while pushing their potential. Prior to co-founding Apptigo, he was CEO and CCO of both Steinberg Advertising & Design (from 2001 to 2008) and Branding Forces (from 2006 to 2008), boutique agencies at the forefront of Internet design. His exclusive clientele included: The Setai; Miami Beach Polo World Cup; Casa Casuarina (former Versace Mansion); Mix My Granola (successful web-based granola company); the Kitzbuehl (Austria) Polo World Cup; Related Companies, real estate developers; the Monarchy Collection, an adult fashion label; Smith & Wesson, a licensed fragrance; and the Miami Ad School. In 2008 he created new brands for the television show, Miami Ink . Ideas, resulting in the children’s lifestyle line “Ruthless & Toothless” and the new “Ruthless Collective.” Mr. Steinberg received a diploma in Marketing and Communication in 1999 from the Institute for Marketing and Communication in Berlin, Germany. He received his Master’s Degree in Communication and Advertising in 2001 from the Miami Ad School.

Terms of Office

None of the directors or officers is related to any other director or officer of the Company.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

The following executive compensation disclosure reflects all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the executive officers below, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non- Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

All Other

Compensation

($)

Total

($)

David Steinberg, CEO

2015

57,736

–

57,736

2014

81,037

–

(1)

81,037

Casey Cordes

2014

56,355

–

56,355

2014

69,686

–

(1)

69,686

⁽¹⁾ Compensation is the amount paid since April 14, 2014. There was no compensation prior to the reverse acquisition transaction.

None of our executive officers have employment agreements and no options were granted to any executive officer in 2015.

Director Compensation

There was no director compensation paid for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

The following table sets forth certain information furnished by current management and others, concerning the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of completion of the Transaction effective December 31, 2015, of (i) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our Common Stock; (ii) all directors and named executive officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership⁽¹⁾		Percent of Class⁽¹⁾

David Steinberg 1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402 Miami, FL		8,575,000		6.76%

Casey Cordes 1801 SW Third Avenue, Suite 402 Miami, FL		8,575,000		6.76%

Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (2 Persons)		17,150,000		13.52%

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

On November 18, 2014, the Company entered into a 12% Secured Convertible Debenture with a related party in the principal amount of $50,000. The note was paid off in September 2015. See Note 3.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us for fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 by auditors MaloneBailey, LLP were approximately $8,500 and 2014 by auditors, RBSM LLP., and L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC were approximately $18,325, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and other services related to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees

Tax Fees

No such fees were paid 2015 or 2014.

All Other Fees

No such fees were paid in 2015 or 2014.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company did not have a formal documented pre-approval policy for the fees of the principal accountant. The Company does not have an audit committee to review any fees paid to the principal accountant. The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees was 0%.

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following Financial Statements are filed as part of this report under Item 7.

Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

(d) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.		~~Description~~	Description
~~2.1~~	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated April 14, 2014*	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated April 14, 2014*
~~3.1~~	3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation*	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation*
~~3.2~~	3.2	Certificate of Designations for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock*	Certificate of Designations for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock*
~~3.3~~	3.3	By-Laws**	By-Laws**
~~10.1~~	10.1	2014 Stock Option Plan***	2014 Stock Option Plan**
~~21.1~~	21.1	Subsidiaries***	Subsidiaries***
~~31.1~~	31.1	~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)~~	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)
~~31.2~~	31.2	~~Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)~~	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)
~~32.1~~	32.1	~~Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)~~	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
	101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document***
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document***
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document***
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
	101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document***
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
	101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document***

* Filed in the Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated April 14, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein.

** Filed inas an attachment to the Company’s Annual SReport on Form 10-1K ~~Registration Statement~~for ~~dated~~the ~~January~~year 8ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 ~~and~~with ~~incorporated~~the bySEC ~~reference~~on ~~herein~~May 7, 2015.

*** Filed ~~hereinto~~herewith.

* * *

2619

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	Apptigo International, Inc.
	APPTIGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Date: May 7, 2015	By:	/s/ Casey Cordes
Date: May 13, 2016	By:	/s/ CASEY CORDES
		Casey Cordes, Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ ~~David~~DAVID ~~Steinberg~~STEINBERG
		David Steinberg, President and Principal Accounting Officer
		David Steinberg, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ David Steinberg	President, Principal Financial Officer,	May 713, ~~2015~~2016
	Principal Accounting Officer, Director
/s/ Casey Cordes	Chief Executive Officer, Director	May 713, ~~2015~~2016

2720

Filing Compare · Apptigo International, Inc.