UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xS QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2014

£ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT For the ~~quarterly~~transition period ~~ended~~from ~~September 30,~~____________ ~~2014~~to ____________

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-53167

~~AMERICAN~~American ~~SANDS~~sands ~~ENERGY~~energy ~~CORP~~Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	87-0405708
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

201 S. Main St. Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 (Address of principal executive offices)

~~Suite~~(801) ~~1800~~536-6140 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

~~Salt~~Indicate by ~~Lake~~check ~~City~~mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), ~~UT 84111~~and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (~~Address~~§232.405 of ~~principal~~this ~~executive~~chapter) ~~offices~~during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

(801) 536-6140

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer o¨ Accelerated Filer o¨ Non-Accelerated Filer o¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o ¨ No x

The issuer had 33,~~119~~393,~~763~~828 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of ~~November~~February 1110, ~~2014~~2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	21
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	21
Item 6. Exhibits	21
SIGNATURES	22

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Financial Statements	3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	22
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	22
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	22
Item 6. Exhibits	22
SIGNATURES	23

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

American Sands Energy Corp.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

	September 30,			March 31,
	December 31,			March 31,
	2014			2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	1912,~~529,573~~513		$	2,006,007
Prepaid and other current assets		~~157~~110,~~414~~988			255,498
Total current assets		1,~~686~~023,~~987~~501			2,261,505
Property and equipment, net		~~104~~–			518
Other assets		202,840			38,200
Total assets	$	1,~~889~~226,~~931~~341		$	2,300,223
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~403~~206,~~374~~014		$	177,799
Accrued expenses		~~185~~93,~~416~~562			108,370
Note payable		–			2,228
Total current liabilities		~~588~~299,~~790~~576			288,397
Derivative liability		~~302~~377,~~382~~378			109,421
Total liabilities		~~891~~676,~~172~~954			397,818
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4 and 10)
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 4 and 10)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,750,000 shares designated as Series A preferred stock; 4,254,299 and 4,412,120 Series A preferred shares outstanding, respectively		4,254			4,412
Preferred stock, $.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,750,000 shares designated as Series A preferred stock; 4,118,210 and 4,412,120 Series A preferred shares outstanding, respectively		4,118			4,412
Common stock, $.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 32,663,560 and 30,935,467 shares outstanding, respectively		32,664			30,935
Common stock, $.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 33,393,828 and 30,935,467 shares outstanding, respectively		33,394			30,935
Additional paid-in capital		17,~~331~~512,~~089~~947			16,421,288
Accumulated deficit		(1617,~~369~~001,~~248~~072	)		(14,554,230	)
Total stockholders' equity		~~998~~549,~~759~~387			1,902,405
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,~~889~~226,~~931~~341		$	2,300,223

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Revenues	$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		~~563~~346,~~547~~736			~~591~~315,~~614~~085			1,~~131~~478,~~371~~107			~~829~~1,~~229~~144,314
Mineral lease		69,220			53,136			138,440			106,271
Research and development		134,452			325,096			472,126			374,138
Research and development		233,346			–			337,674			49,042
Mineral lease		69,220			53,134			207,660			159,405
Total operating expenses		~~866~~550,~~113~~408			~~644~~693,~~750~~315			12,~~607~~157,~~485~~893			~~984~~1,~~542~~677,857
Loss from operations		(~~866~~550,~~113~~408	)		(~~644~~693,~~750~~315	)		(12,~~607~~157,~~485~~893	)		(~~984~~1,~~542~~677,857	)
Other expense:
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense		–			147,061			–			290,146
(Gain) loss on derivative		74,996			(13,698	)		264,202			(13,698	)
Loss on derivative		42,904			–			189,206			–
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(1,700	)		209,360			(1,700	)		209,360
Total other expense		42,904			147,061			189,206			290,146
Interest expense		–			84,224			–			374,370
Loss before provision for income taxes		(909,017	)		(791,811	)		(1,796,691	)		(1,274,688	)
Total other (income) expense		73,296			279,886			262,502			570,032
Provision for income taxes		–			(100	)		(100	)		(300	)
Loss before provision for income taxes		(623,704	)		(973,201	)		(2,420,395	)		(2,247,889	)
Net loss		(909,017	)		(791,911	)		(1,796,791	)		(1,274,988	)
Provision for income taxes		(406	)		(100	)		(506	)		(400	)
Less: cumulative preferred stock dividends		(73,319	)		–			(170,077	)		–
Net loss		(624,110	)		(973,301	)		(2,420,901	)		(2,248,289	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(982,336	)	$	(791,911	)	$	(1,966,868	)	$	(1,274,988	)
Less: cumulative preferred stock dividends		(106,137	)		–			(276,214	)		–
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.04	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(730,247	)	$	(973,301	)	$	(2,697,115	)	$	(2,248,289	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		32,373,391			29,308,023			31,699,092			29,149,369
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		33,153,840			29,863,547			32,188,545			29,387,348

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014

	Series A preferred						Common stock				Additional						Total
											paid-in			Accumulated			stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		capital			deficit			equity
Balance as of March 31, 2014		4,412,120		$	4,412			30,935,467	$	30,935	$	16,421,288		$	(14,554,230	)	$	1,902,405
Stock-based compensation		–			–			–		–		~~522~~614,~~864~~304			–			~~522~~614,~~864~~304
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock units at $1.40 per unit		250,000			250			–		–		349,750			–			350,000
Warrants exercised for cash at $0.50 per share		–			–			50,143		50		24,950			–			25,000
Warrants exercised for cash at $0.45 per share		–			–			17,857		18		8,017			–			8,035
Series A preferred stock offering costs		–			–			–		–		(89,~~999~~001	)		–			(89,~~999~~001	)
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock		(~~407~~543,~~821~~910	)		(~~408~~544	)		12,~~631~~175,~~284~~641		12,~~631~~176		(1,~~223~~632	)		–			–
Preferred stock dividends paid with common stock		–			–			2844,~~809~~720		3045		1825,~~197~~896			(1825,~~227~~941	)		–
Common stock issued for accounts payable		–			–			170,000		170		83,130			–			83,300
Derivative relating to preferred stock down-round protection rights		–			–			–		–		(3,755	)		–			(3,755	)
Net loss		–			–			–		–		–			(12,~~796~~420,~~791~~901	)		(12,~~796~~420,~~791~~901	)
Balance as of September 30, 2014		4,254,299		$	4,254			32,663,560	$	32,664	$	17,331,089		$	(16,369,248	)	$	998,759
Balance as of December 31, 2014		4,118,210		$	4,118			33,393,828	$	33,394	$	17,512,947		$	(17,001,072	)	$	549,387

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended
	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(12,~~796~~420,~~791~~901	)	$	(12,~~274~~248,~~988~~289	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		~~414~~518			~~167~~251
Loss on derivative liability		189,206			–
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(1,700	)		209,360
Accretion of debt discount		–			208,243
Loss (gain) on derivative liability		264,202			(13,698	)
Straight-line of mineral lease payable		–			(9,759	)
Accretion of debt discount		–			264,024
Straight-line of mineral lease payable		–			(14,640	)
Stock offering costs		–			227,143
Stock-based compensation expense		~~522~~614,~~864~~304			~~191~~299,~~434~~561
Warrants issued for research and development		–			201,250
Stock issued for services		–			10,500
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Receivables		–			207,046
Prepaid and other current assets		98144,~~084~~510			13(195,~~489~~860	)
Related-party receivable		–			22,324
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable		~~225~~113,~~575~~215			~~166~~77,~~208~~022
Accrued expenses		77(14,~~046~~808	)		(80124,~~858~~269	)
Accrued interest on convertible debt and note payable		–			81109,~~623~~997
Net cash used in operating activities		(~~683~~1,~~602~~300,660	)		(~~247~~968,~~928~~278	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Mine permitting costs		(164,640	)		–
Net cash used in investing activities		(164,640	)		–
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock units, net		340,999			1,079,838
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		33,035			–
Principal and interest payments on notes payable		(2,228	)		(11,183	)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		–			19,610
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable		–			53,000
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock units, net		341,001			–
Proceeds from issuance of related-party notes payable		–			150,000
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		33,035			–
Net cash provided by financing activities		371,806			1,291,265
Principal and interest payments on notes payable		(2,228	)		(2,228	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(1,093,494	)		322,987
Net cash provided by financing activities		371,808			220,382
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(476,434	)		(27,546	)
Cash, beginning of the period		2,006,007			59,981
Cash, end of the period	$	1912,~~529,573~~513		$	32382,~~435~~968
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	–			–
Income taxes paid	$	~~200~~1,309		$	–200
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock	$	1,631		$	–
Accounts payable obligations settled with common stock	$	85,000		$	–
Preferred stock dividends paid with common stock	$	1825,~~227~~941		$	–
Embedded derivative resulting from issuance of preferred stock units	$	3,755		$	–
Common stock issued for stock offering costs	$	–		$	131,250
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock	$	2,176		$	–
Conversion of convertible note payable to preferred stock units	$	–		$	1,906,677
Related-party convertible note payable exchanged for warrants	$	–		$	1,462,651
Warrants issued to satisfy payroll liabilities	$	–		$	1,049,350
Conversion of related-party notes payable to common stock	$	–		$	227,319
Common stock issued for stock offering costs	$	–		$	131,250
Conversion of related-party convertible note payable to preferred stock units	$	–		$	131,100

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 - Description of Business and Nature of Operations

American Sands Energy Corp. (“AMSE” or the “Company”) is a pre-production oil company with oil sands resources located near Sunnyside, Utah that has not commenced planned principal operations. The Company’s activities since inception have consisted principally of acquiring lease rights, raising capital, performing research and development activities with regard to its oil sands extraction technology, obtaining the required permits necessary to mine the oil sands, and developing the plans to construct a refining facility. The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including failing to secure the additional funding required to ~~operationalize~~commercialize the Company’s technology.

The Company intends to mine the oil sands ore using conventional mining techniques and use a proprietary solvent to extract oil from the oil sands ore. The proprietary water-free process produces high quality bitumen, recovers nearly 100% of the solvent, requires no tailings ponds, and its only by-product is reclamation ready sand. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in the business of acquiring and developing oil sands assets and technologies used to separate the oil contained in oil sands. The Company anticipates that its primary operations will include the mining of oil sands, the separation of oil products therefrom and the sale of oil and oil by-products.

The Company has acquired rights to approximately 1,760 acres of prime oil sands deposits in the Sunnyside area of Utah through its mineral leases as more fully described in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 24, 2012, the Company entered into a License, Development and Engineering Agreement with Universal Oil Recovery Corp. and SRS International (the “License Agreement”) whereby the Company was granted an exclusive non-transferable license to use certain technology in its proposed business to extract bitumen from oil sands. The territory covered by the agreement includes the State of Utah and any other geographic location in which a future designated project is commenced by or through the Company. In conjunction with the License Agreement, the Company terminated its operating agreement with Bleeding Rock. On November 18, 2013, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated License, Development and Engineering Agreement (“Amendment”) with Universal Oil Recovery LLC (“UOR”). The Amendment amends and restates the License Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment, the previous royalties of 75% on projects outside of Utah and the minimum royalty of $1,000,000 per year on such agreements have been eliminated. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Company will now pay royalties on projects outside of Utah of 15% of the net fees (net of all costs other than general and administrative expenses) collected by the Company on any license of the technology. In addition, the $25,000 per month management fee is eliminated until a permanent financing is closed (minimum of $25,000,000), at which time the payment will be reinstated. In consideration of the amendment, the Company issued to UOR, 575,000 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company for $0.01 per share, exercisable for ten years (see Note 8). The term of the License Agreement is 20 years and thereafter so long as production of products using the technology is commercially and economically feasible.

Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies

These financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

a) Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of American Sands Energy Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary Green River Resources Inc. (“GRI”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

b) Mineral Leases

In certain cases, the Company capitalizes costs related to investments in mineral lease interests. Such costs include mineral lease acquisition costs. Costs are deferred until such time as the extent of proved developed reserves has been determined and mineral lease interests are either developed, the property sold or the mineral lease rights are allowed to lapse. To date, all exploration and lease costs have been expensed.

c) Research and Development

The Company continues to develop additional technology related to its proprietary bitumen extraction process. To date, the Company has expensed costs associated with developing its technology as research and development costs. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred costs of $~~337~~472,~~674~~126 and $49374,~~042~~138, respectively, for research and development of its technologies.

d) Stock-based Compensation

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options and warrants granted. For employee stock options, the Company records the grant-date fair value as expense over the period in which it is earned, typically the vesting period. For consultants, the fair value of the stock-based award is recorded as expense over the term of the service period, and unvested amounts are revalued using the Black-Scholes model at each reporting period. For warrants issued to lenders, the Company records the grant-date fair value of the warrants, and any resulting beneficial conversion feature for convertible debt, as a debt discount. The discount is then amortized over the term of the convertible debt as non-cash interest expense.

e) Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic earnings or loss per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings or loss per common share is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of dilutive common share equivalents during the period. Common share equivalents include preferred stock, outstanding stock options and warrants and convertible debt instruments. For periods in which a net loss is reported, common share equivalents are excluded because they are antidilutive. Therefore, basic loss per common share is the same as diluted loss per common share for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the Company had cumulative, undeclared, dividends that had not been accrued related to its preferred stock of $~~243~~323,~~677~~617 and $0, respectively. For the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the Company had accrued preferred stock dividends of $73106,~~319~~137 and $0, respectively, which were added to net loss in the consolidated statements of operations in order to calculate net loss per common share ~~based on the Company’s net loss~~ attributable to common stockholders. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the Company had accrued preferred stock dividends of $~~170~~276,~~077~~ 214 and $0, respectively, which were added to net loss in the consolidated statements of operations in order to calculate net loss per common share ~~based on the Company’s net loss~~ attributable to common stockholders.

f) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~ASU~~ 2014-10, Development Stage Entities. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove the definition of a development stage entity from Topic 915, Development Stage Entities, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from US GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations. ASU 2014-10 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein, but early adoption ~~was~~is permitted.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company adopted ASU 2014-10 effective April 1, 2014. ~~The~~As ~~Company’s~~a ~~financial~~result, ~~statements have been impacted by~~ the ~~adoption~~Company ofhas ~~this~~removed ~~ASU mainly by the removal of~~ inception-to-date information in the Company’s statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affect any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). ASU 2014-09 will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance, and creates a Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. Until the Company begins to recognize revenue, its financial statements will not be affected by the adoption of ASU 2014-09.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared using the going concern assumption which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Company has incurred substantial losses from operations and has negative cash flows from operating activities, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company sustained a net loss for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 of $12,~~796~~420,~~791~~901 and has an accumulated deficit of $1617,~~369~~001,~~248~~072 as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. In addition, the Company estimates it will require approximately $150,000,000 in capital to commence principal operations.

The Company intends to continue its research and development efforts, but does not have any revenues in order to finance these activities internally. As a result, the Company intends to seek financing ~~in order~~ to fund its operations.

The Company has been able to meet its short-term needs primarily through loans from third parties, private placements of equity and debt securities, and deferring certain payment obligations to related parties. The Company raised net proceeds of approximately $4,000,000 from the sale of Series A preferred stock units and has $1912,~~529,573~~513 of cash on hand as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. The Company plans to ~~continue to~~ obtain ~~additional~~ additional financing through the sale of equity or debt securities in order to finance operations until it can generate positive cash flows from operating activities. The equity private placements are expected to provide the needed funds for continued operations ~~and~~ and further research and development of the Company’s proprietary oil sands refining methods. There is no assurance that ~~the~~ the Company will be able to obtain the additional financing that it needs to develop its technology and alleviate doubt about its ~~ability~~ ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company is able to obtain sufficient additional financing proceeds, the Company cannot be certain that this additional financing will be available on acceptable terms. To the extent the Company raises additional ~~funds~~ funds by issuing equity securities, the Company’s stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that impact the Company’s ability to conduct business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 4 – Mineral Leases

During 2005, the Company acquired three oil sands mineral leases: (1) an undivided 40% interest in a 1,120-acre parcel, (2) an undivided 20% interest in the same 1,120-acre parcel, and (3) an undivided 16.666% interest in a 640-acre parcel. These leases are located in Carbon County, Utah. Effective September 5, 2014, the first lease was extended through December 31, 2020 and, effective September 26, 2014, the lease terms on the second and third leases were extended through December 31, 2019. The minimum annual lease payments on the leases are $268,915.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In 2009, a fourth lease was entered into with William G. Gibbs, a relative of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for an additional undivided 5% interest in the 640-acre parcel (for a total 21.666% undivided interest in the 640-acre parcel). This lease is located in Carbon County, Utah, adjacent to the 1,120-acre parcel. This lease has a 6-year life with a minimum yearly lease payment of $7,965 and, pursuant to an Addendum dated September 28, 2014, is scheduled to terminate by December 31, 2020, if the property has not reached commercial production.

The Company’s interest in these leases is conditioned upon the payments of royalties, minimum yearly investment in development, tax payments, and other obligations to the owners of the leases. Two of the four leases are conditioned upon reaching the production stage by December 31, 2020, while one of the other leases requires production by December 31, 2019. If the Company does not attain average productivity of at least 500 barrels per day (“bbl/d”) by these dates, the interest in these leases may be terminated.

Upon commencement of operations, each lease requires a production royalty of 10% of the market value of the minerals sold, net of applicable costs and expenses. The Company has the right, but not the obligation, to pool or unitize the leases, such that the ore mined is allocated between, and the royalties paid, on their proportionate interests. If not pooled, the owners will be paid royalties only to the extent the oil sands ore is mined on their respective properties. Through ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, no production royalties were accrued or paid because production on these properties had not commenced. After three consecutive calendar years of production on the 1,120-acre parcel, the production royalty on the 1,120-acre parcel shall be the greater of the 10% royalty or $1,000,000 annually. Once production begins, all rents paid count towards the Company’s production royalty commitments.

Future minimum lease payments are as follows for the years ending:

September 30,
2015	$	276,880
2016		276,880
2017		276,880
2018		276,880
2019		276,880
2020		7,965

Total future minimum lease payments	$	1,392,365

Note 5 – Derivative Liability

In connection with the Company issuing its Series A preferred stock units described in Note 6, the Company recorded a derivative liability related to down-round protection provided to the preferred stockholders in the event that the Company sells its common stock at a price below $0.35 per share. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, the Company valued the derivative liability based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1		Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2		Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or market corroborated inputs.
Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would value the assets or liabilities.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosure each quarter. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and March 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:

Fair Value as of September 30, 2014

Fair Value as of December 31, 2014

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Liabilities

Embedded derivative

–

~~302~~377,~~382~~378

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Fair Value as of March 31, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Embedded derivative	$	–	$	–	$	109,421	$	109,421

The following table presents the fair value reconciliation of Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September 30~~December 31, 2014:

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)
	Embedded Derivative
Beginning balance, March 31, 2014	$	109,421
Issuances:
Embedded derivatives issued in conjunction with Series A preferred stock units		3,755
Total losses included in earnings		~~189~~264,~~206~~202
Ending balance, September 30, 2014	$	302,382
Ending balance, December 31, 2014	$	377,378

Given the nature of the derivative liability, the carrying amounts of $~~302~~377,~~382~~378 and $109,421 reported in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively, were derived from Level 3 inputs and represent management’s best estimate of fair value.

Key assumptions used in the valuation of the embedded derivatives using a Monte Carlo analysis methodology are as follows:

	September 30,		March 31,
	December 31,		March 31,
	2014		2014
Threshold barrier	$	0.35	$	0.35
Average price below $0.35 per share	$	0.1311	$	0.22
Probability of offer below $0.35 per share		3%		3%
Preferred share conversion price	$	1.40	$	1.40
Conversion ratio		1012.7773		6.36

Note 6 – Preferred Stock

In October 2013, the Company initiated a preferred stock unit offering to raise up to $2,000,000 with an option to increase the offering by an additional $500,000 based on market conditions and investor interest. On March 20, 2014, the board of directors authorized an increase in the preferred stock unit raise from $2,500,000 to $6,650,000. Each unit of the offering sells for $1.40 and entitles the holder to receive one share of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Stock”) along with one warrant to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock at $0.45 and one warrant to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.70 per share (hereafter, referred to as “Series A preferred stock units”).

InSeries ~~November~~A ~~2013,~~preferred ~~the~~stockholders ~~board~~are ~~of directors~~entitled ~~adopted~~to ~~resolutions~~receive ~~approving~~dividends ~~a series~~ of ~~preferred~~6% ~~stock~~and ~~designated~~have asa ~~the~~liquidation ~~“Series~~preference Aequal ~~Preferred~~to ~~Stock,”~~$1.40 ~~and~~per ashare ~~Certificate of~~for ~~Designation~~each ~~was~~outstanding ~~filed~~share ~~with~~of ~~the~~Series ~~state~~A ofStock (as ~~Delaware.~~adjusted Onfor ~~March~~stock 4splits, ~~2014,~~stock ~~the~~dividends ~~board~~and ofrecapitalizations) ~~directors~~plus ~~approved~~an aamount ~~resolution~~equal ~~increasing the~~to ~~total~~declared ~~number~~but ofunpaid ~~authorized~~dividends ~~shares~~thereon. As of ~~Series~~December ~~A Stock from 3~~31,~~250,000~~ to2014 ~~4,750,000.~~and On March 531, 2014, the ~~Company~~liquidation ~~filed~~preference ~~with~~for the ~~state~~ ~~of Delaware a Certificate of Designation of~~ Series A ~~Preferred Shares to effectuate the increase in authorized shares of Series A~~ Stock. ~~There~~ was ~~no change to the original rights~~$5, ~~privileges~~765,494 and ~~preferences~~$6,176,968, ~~of the Series A Stock~~respectively.

Series A preferred stockholders are entitled to receive dividends of 6% and have a liquidation preference equal to $1.40 per share for each outstanding share of Series A Stock (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations) plus an amount equal to declared but unpaid dividends thereon. As of September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, the liquidation preference for the Series A Stock was $5,956,019 and $6,176,968, respectively.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Holders of Series A Stock have the right at any time after the date of issuance to convert their Series A Stock to common stock based on a ratio determined by dividing $1.40 by the Conversion Price in effect at the time for such shares. The Conversion Price is the lower of $0.35 per share or the lowest price that any additional shares of common stock were issued after the initial purchase date. Common shares issued in transactions such as granting of employee incentive options pursuant to the Company’s 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, shares issued in certain financings, and shares issued to acquire technology or assets do not reduce the Conversion Price. The Series A Stock automatically converts upon the Company completing a financing transaction of $10,000,000 or more.

The offering was closed for new commitments on March 31, 2014. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company had issued a total of 4,662,120 Series A preferred stock units. The Company received net cash proceeds of $3,701,615 from selling 2,846,054 Series A preferred stock units and issued an additional 1,532,382 Series A preferred stock units in connection with conversions of convertible debt and accrued interest totaling $1,925,647 and conversions of related-party debt and accrued interest of $131,101. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to complete required test drilling at its Sunnyside, Utah site location in connection with its project permitting process and for general corporate purposes.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, ~~407~~543,~~821~~910 shares of Series A Stock were converted into 12,~~631~~175,~~284~~641 shares of common stock and, as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, there were 4,~~254~~118,~~299~~210 shares of Series A Stock outstanding.

Note 7 – Common Stock

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, ~~407~~543,~~821~~910 shares of Series A Stock were converted into 12,~~631~~175,~~284~~641 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company issued an additional 2844,~~809~~720 shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends for the shares of Series A Stock that were converted.

On November 30, 2014, the Company issued 170,000 shares of common stock to LIFE Power & Fuels LLC in lieu of amounts owed under the LIFE Management Services Agreement, which contract was terminated simultaneous with the issuance of common shares.

Note 8 – Warrants

The Company has issued various classes of warrants as described below:

a) Convertible Debt Warrants Prior to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued convertible notes and warrants in a private placement that were exchanged as of March 31, 2014 for Series A preferred stock units, except for 174,485 warrants. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, 50,143 of these warrants were exercised at $0.50 per common share and the remaining 124,342 warrants expired. b) Private Placement Warrants In connection with the Company’s private placement of common stock initiated in 2012, the Company granted warrants to the stock purchasers. These warrants give the holders the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.15 per share for a 2-year period. In March 2014, the Company issued 121,259 3-year warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.15 per share to certain of the expiring warrant holders. As of September 30, 2014, all 121,259 of the newly issued private placement warrants were outstanding. Also, as of September 30, 2014, all the initial warrants issued in the private placement had expired. c) Debt Exchange Warrants On September 30, 2013, the Company exchanged warrants to purchase 3,260,000 shares of common stock of the Company for a related-party convertible note payable and simultaneously canceled the note. On September 30, 2013, the Company exchanged warrants to purchase 2,260,000 shares of common stock of the Company for the outstanding payroll obligation owed to the Company’s CEO in the amount of $1,049,350. The warrants give the holders the right to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.01 for a 10-year period. The fair value of the warrants issued in satisfaction of these liabilities was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Based on the fair value calculation, the amount of the related-party convertible note payable and the amount of the outstanding payroll obligation exceeded the fair value of the warrants issued in satisfaction of these obligations. Due to the related-party nature of the transaction, the Company did not record a gain on forgiveness of debt, but instead recorded the transaction as an equity transaction. As of September 30, 2014, all of the 5,520,000 warrants described above remained outstanding.

Prior to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued convertible notes and warrants in a private placement that were exchanged as of March 31, 2014 for Series A preferred stock units, except for 174,485 warrants. During the nine months ended December 31, 2014, 50,143 of these warrants were exercised at $0.50 per common share and the remaining 124,342 warrants expired.

Private Placement Warrants

In connection with the Company’s private placement of common stock initiated in 2012, the Company granted warrants to the stock purchasers. These warrants give the holders the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.15 per share for a 2-year period. In March 2014, the Company issued 121,259 3-year warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.15 per share to certain of the expiring warrant holders. As of December 31, 2014, all 121,259 of the newly issued private placement warrants were outstanding. Also, as of December 31, 2014, all the initial warrants issued in the private placement had expired.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

dc) ~~Series~~Debt AExchange ~~Preferred Stock~~ Warrants In connection with the Company’s offering of its Series A preferred stock units (see Note 6) through September 30, 2014, the Company issued 4,447,835 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.45 and 4,447,835 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.70 per share. The warrants have a 5-year term and a cashless exercise provision. As of September 30, 2014, there were 4,429,978 warrants at $0.45 outstanding and 4,447,835 warrants at $0.70 outstanding.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~September 30, 2013, the Company issued ~~214~~warrants to purchase 3,~~285~~260,000 shares of ~~Series~~common Astock ~~preferred~~of ~~stock~~the ~~units~~Company ~~for~~in ~~research~~settlement ~~and~~of ~~development~~a ~~expenses~~related-party convertible note payable. On ~~The~~September ~~issuance~~30, ~~included~~2013, the Company ~~issuing~~issued ~~214,285~~ warrants to purchase 2,260,000 shares of common stock of the Company in settlement of an outstanding payroll obligation owed to the Company’s ~~common~~CEO ~~stock~~in atthe ~~$0.45~~amount ~~and~~of ~~214~~$1,~~285~~049,350. The warrants give the holders the right to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.7001 per share for a 10-year period. AsThe fair value of ~~September~~the ~~30,~~warrants ~~2014,~~issued in ~~all~~satisfaction of these ~~warrants~~liabilities ~~remained~~was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Based on the fair value calculation, the amount of the related-party convertible note payable and the amount of the outstanding payroll obligation exceeded the fair value of the warrants issued in satisfaction of these obligations.

e)	Broker Warrants In connection with the Company’s offering of its Series A preferred stock units, the Company issued 675,292 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.35 per share for a 5-year period. The warrants were issued to brokers associated with the Series A transactions. All of these warrants remained outstanding as of September 30, 2014.
f)	Other Common Stock Warrants In connection with the amended License Agreement described in Note 1, the Company issued 575,000 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.01 per share. All of these warrants remained outstanding as of September 30, 2014.

Due to the related-party nature of the transaction, the Company did not record a gain on forgiveness of debt, but instead recorded the transaction as an equity transaction. As of December 31, 2014, all of the 5,520,000 warrants described above remained outstanding.

~~Note~~d) 9Series –A Preferred Stock ~~Option Plan~~Warrants

In ~~April~~connection ~~2011,~~with the Company’s ~~adopted~~offering ~~the~~of ~~2011~~its ~~Long-Term~~Series ~~Incentive~~A ~~Plan~~preferred stock units (~~the~~see ~~“2011~~Note ~~Plan”~~6) ~~which~~through ~~reserves~~December ~~for~~31, 2014, the ~~issuance~~Company ofissued ~~up to 7~~4,~~000~~447,~~000~~835 ~~shares~~warrants ofto ~~the~~purchase the Company’s common stock. ~~During~~at ~~the~~$0.45 ~~six~~and ~~months~~4,447,835 ~~ended~~warrants ~~September~~to ~~30,~~purchase ~~2014,~~ the Company’s ~~issued~~common ~~1,400,000~~stock ~~options~~at ~~under~~$0.70 ~~the~~per ~~2011 Plan~~share. The ~~weighted~~warrants ~~average~~have ~~grant~~a 5-~~date~~year ~~fair~~term ~~value~~and a cashless exercise provision. As of ~~options~~December ~~granted~~31, ~~during~~2014, ~~the~~there ~~six~~were ~~months~~4,429,978 ~~ended~~warrants ~~September~~at 30$0.45 outstanding and 4,447,835 ~~2014~~warrants ~~was~~at $0.6670 outstanding.

The ~~summary~~Company issued 214,285 of ~~option~~Series ~~activity~~A preferred stock units for research and development expenses. The issuance included the Company issuing 214,285 warrants to purchase the Company’s ~~six~~common ~~months~~stock ~~ended~~at ~~September~~$0.45 30and 214,285 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.70 per share. As of December 31, 2014, isall ~~presented~~of ~~below:~~these warrants remained outstanding.

Number of Shares

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Weighted Average Remaining Life (years)

Balance as of March 31, 2014

4,522,500

0.47

3.95

Granted

1,400,000

0.74

4.52

Exercised

–

Canceled

–

Expired

–

Balance as of September 30, 2014

5,922,500

0.53

3.70

Broker Warrants

In connection with the Company’s offering of its Series A preferred stock units, the Company issued 675,292 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.35 per share for a 5-year period. The warrants were issued to brokers associated with the Series A transactions. All of these warrants remained outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

Other Common Stock Warrants

In connection with the amended License Agreement described in Note 1, the Company issued 575,000 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.01 per share. All of these warrants remained outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

Note 9 – Long-Term Incentive Plan

In April 2011, the Company adopted the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) which provides for the issuance of up to 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. During the nine months ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 1,400,000 options under the 2011 Plan. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2014 was $0.66.

The summary of option activity for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 is presented below:

Number of Shares

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Weighted Average Remaining Life (years)

Balance as of March 31, 2014

4,522,500

0.47

3.95

Granted

1,400,000

0.74

4.31

Exercised

–

Canceled

–

Expired

–

Balance as of December 31, 2014

5,922,500

0.53

3.46

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Outstanding and exercisable options presented by price range as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 are as follows:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
			Weighted
			Average		Weighted				Weighted
	Number of		Remaining		Average		Number of		Average
Exercise	Options		Life		Exercise		Options		Exercise
Price	Outstanding		(Years)		Price		Exercisable		Price
$0.25		50,000		2.3813	$	0.25		37,500	$	0.25
0.35		860,000		3.8358		0.35		347,080		0.35
0.40		3,087,500		3.5025		0.40		3,087,500		0.40
0.50		75,000		1.9671		0.50		56,250		0.50
0.65		875,000		4.8964		0.65		291,667		0.65
0.72		325,000		4.7044		0.72		108,333		0.72
1.15		650,000		2.6136		1.15		500,000		1.15
$0.25-$1.15		5,922,500		3.7046		0.53		4,428,330		0.50

The estimated fair value of the Company’s stock options, less expected forfeitures, is amortized over the options’ vesting period on a straight-line basis. The Company recognized $~~522~~614,~~864~~304 and $~~191~~299,~~434~~561 of equity-based compensation expense during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, there was $~~562~~497,~~948~~758 of total unrecognized compensation cost with a weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1714 months.

The intrinsic values of outstanding and vested stock options were as follows:

	September 30,
	December 31,
	2014		2013
Intrinsic value - options outstanding	$	~~450~~32,~~250~~300	$	4170,~~000~~425
Intrinsic value - options exercisable		~~370~~15,~~188~~288		2124,~~000~~891
Intrinsic value - options exercised		–		–

Note 10 – Commitments

Effective January 1, 2013, the ~~Company~~ Company modified its employment contract with its Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Pursuant to the terms of the modification, the CEO’s salary was reduced from $400,000 per year to $276,000 per year. Upon completion of a $10,000,000 or more capital raise, the CEO’s salary will increase to $400,000. On September 30, 2013, the CEO’s unpaid salary from inception through 2011 totaling $1,049,350 was exchanged for 2,260,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock for $0.01 per share. The term of the employment agreement is in effect through December 31, 2015. On November 7, 2013, the board of directors voted that, the CEO’s outstanding salary would convert into common stock at $0.35 per share. On March 31, 2014, all of the CEO’s past wages totaling $184,000 were converted into 525,715 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the total accrued commitment for the CEO’s past wages was $0 and $1241,~~070~~213,~~788,~~ respectively.

American Sands Energy Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company entered into a new employment agreement with its Chief Operating Officer on June 1, 2014. Under the terms of the new agreement, the Chief Operating Officer is entitled to ~~pay of~~ $245,000 in annual compensation until such time as the Company completes a capital raise of at least $20,000,000 at at which time, the annual compensation will increase to $300,000.

The consulting agreement dated October 1, 2011, between the Company and C14 Strategies (“C-14”) (the “Consulting Agreement”), an entity controlled by the former President, ~~will~~ ~~remain~~provides infor ~~force~~C-14 ~~until a Financing Event occurs at which time it will be immediately terminated. Pursuant~~ to ~~the~~provide ~~Consulting Agreement, C14 Strategies provides~~ assistance with respect to strategic objectives of the Company. As ~~compensation for such services~~amended, ~~C14 Strategies is paid $10,000 per month. The contract is terminable any time on 60 days’ notice, or immediately by mutual consent. Effective March 15, 2014,~~ the Consulting Agreement ~~was~~calls ~~amended~~for ~~whereby the agreement was extended on a month~~C-~~to-month basis,~~14 ~~the Company paid $30,000~~ to ~~pay~~receive ~~amounts~~monthly ~~owed~~compensation as of ~~December 31~~$2, ~~2012 and issued 150,~~000 ~~shares of common stock valued at $133,500~~ for ~~services~~such ~~rendered from January 1, 2013 through March 1, 2014~~services. ~~Going forward, compensation pursuant to the agreement is $5,000 per month. Effective September 1, 2014, this agreement was further modified to reduce the monthly compensation to $2,000 per month.~~

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company modified the Chief Financial Officer’s (“CFO”) employment agreement. Under the terms of the agreement the CFO’s annual salary is $175,000. On November 7, 2013, the ~~Board~~board of directors voted that the CFO’s outstanding salary would convert into common stock at $0.35 per share. ~~As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the total accrued commitment for the CFO’s past wages was $0 and $131,250 respectively.~~

On November 30, 2014, the Company issued 170,000 shares of common stock to LIFE Power & Fuels LLC in lieu of accounts payable owed under the LIFE Management Services Agreement, which contract was terminated simultaneous with the issuance of common shares.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

~~Subsequent~~On toJanuary ~~September 30~~20, ~~2014~~2015, ~~three additional investors converted shares of Series A Stock into shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common~~entered ~~stock.~~into Ona ~~October~~one-year ~~2, 2014, 50,000~~agreement ~~shares~~with ofan ~~Series~~investment Abanking ~~Stock~~firm ~~were~~to ~~converted~~assist ~~into 200,000 shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common~~with ~~stock.~~raising ~~The Company issued an~~ additional ~~4,521~~ ~~shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends for the Series A shares that were converted~~capital. OnIn ~~October~~accordance 8,with ~~2014, 46,089 shares of Series A Stock were converted into 184,356 shares of~~ the ~~Company’s common stock. The Company issued an additional 5~~agreement,~~976~~ ~~shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends for~~ the ~~Series A shares that were converted. On October 13, 2014, 15,000~~investment ~~shares~~banking offirm ~~Series~~will Areceive ~~Stock were converted into 60~~$25,000 ~~shares~~per ofquarter ~~the~~for ~~Company’s~~advisory ~~common~~services ~~stock.~~and ~~The~~will ~~Company~~receive ~~issued~~agreed anupon ~~additional 1,350~~percentages ~~shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends~~ for ~~the~~any ~~Series~~proceeds ~~A shares that were converted~~raised.

In November 2014, the Company received the completed feasibility studies for the processing plant and for the mine.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, and with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that represent management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our current and future operations, business strategies, need for financing, competitive position, ability to retain and recruit personnel, and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “believes,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “could,” “plans,” or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy or trends. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot give any ~~assurance~~assurances that these expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such forward-looking statements.

~~Overview~~Among the factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this report. While it is not possible to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, our ability to secure adequate funding or to secure funding on favorable terms, scaling up facilities based on pilot plant testing, the cyclicality of the oil industry, global economic and political conditions, global productive capacity, customer inventory levels, changes in product pricing, changes in product costing, competitive technology positions and operating interruptions (including, but not limited to, labor disputes, leaks, fires, explosions, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, war and terrorist activities). Mining operations are subject to a variety of existing laws and regulations relating to exploration and development, permitting procedures, safety precautions, property reclamation, employee health and safety, air and water quality standards, pollution and other environmental protection controls, all of which are subject to change and are becoming more stringent and costly to comply with. Should one or more of these risks materialize (or the consequences of such a development worsen), or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those expected. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update publicly or revise such statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

American Sands Energy Corp. (“AMSE” or “the Company”) is a pre-production oil company with oil sands resources located near Sunnyside, Utah. We expect to mine the oil sands ore using conventional mining techniques and use a licensed proprietary solvent and process to extract oil from the oil sands ore. Our water-free process produces high quality heavy oil or bitumen, recovers nearly 100% of the solvent, requires no tailings ponds, and its only by-product is reclamation ready sand. Since the project’s inception, we have been engaged in the business of acquiring and developing oil sands assets and technologies used to separate the oil contained in oil sands. The Company anticipates that its primary operations will include the mining of oil sands, the separation of oil products therefrom and the sale of oil and oil by-products.Overview

WeAmerican ~~have~~Sands ~~obtained~~Energy aCorp. ~~license~~(“AMSE” or ~~for~~“the aCompany”) ~~hydrocarbon extraction~~is ~~process~~a ~~that~~pre-production ~~separates~~ oil ~~and~~company ~~other~~with ~~hydrocarbons~~oil ~~from~~sands ~~sand,~~resources ~~shale,~~located ~~dirt~~near ~~and other substances~~Sunnyside, ~~without leaving behind toxins or other contaminants~~Utah. We ~~are currently developing our first project on certain hydrocarbon and mineral leases which cover~~expect ~~approximately~~to ~~1,760~~mine ~~acres near Sunnyside, Utah (~~the ~~“Sunnyside~~oil ~~Project”).~~sands Onore ~~March~~using 6,conventional ~~2014,~~mining wetechniques ~~filed~~and anuse ~~application for~~ a ~~Large~~licensed ~~Mine~~proprietary ~~Plan~~solvent ~~with~~and ~~the~~process ~~Utah~~to ~~Department~~extract ofoil from ~~Oil, Gas & Mining, which, if granted, will allow~~ the ~~Company~~oil tosands ~~move~~ore. ~~forward with~~Our ~~development~~water-free ofprocess ~~operations~~produces onhigh ~~the~~quality ~~Sunnyside~~heavy ~~Project.~~oil ~~The~~or ~~application~~bitumen, ~~covers~~recovers ~~the~~nearly ~~construction~~100% ~~and operation~~ of the ~~mine~~solvent, ~~extraction~~ ~~facilities~~requires ~~and~~no ~~related~~tailings ~~infrastructure.~~ponds, Inand ~~accordance~~its ~~with~~only ~~the~~by-product ~~standards~~is ~~contained~~reclamation inready ~~Rule~~sand. ~~4-10(a)~~Since of the ~~SEC~~project’s ~~Regulation S-X~~inception, ~~these~~we ~~leases~~have ~~contain~~been engaged noin ~~proven~~the ~~reserves~~business of acquiring and developing oil orsands ~~gas.~~assets ~~However,~~and wetechnologies ~~have~~used ~~obtained~~to anseparate ~~independent~~the ~~Resource~~oil ~~Audit~~contained ~~and~~in ~~Classification~~oil ~~report~~sands. ~~dated~~The ~~May~~Company ~~29,~~anticipates ~~2009,~~that ~~from~~its aprimary ~~major~~operations ~~international~~will ~~geology~~include ~~and~~the mining ~~consulting~~of ~~firm~~oil ~~describing~~sands, the ~~quantity~~separation ~~and~~of ~~quality~~oil ofproducts ~~the~~therefrom ~~bitumen~~and ~~resource~~the ~~estimated~~sale toof beoil ~~located~~and onoil ~~our leases~~by-products.

ToWe ~~date,~~have weobtained ~~have~~a ~~acquired~~license ~~extensive~~for ~~bitumen~~a hydrocarbon ~~resources~~extraction process that separates oil and other hydrocarbons from sand, ~~have~~shale, ~~successfully~~dirt ~~operated~~and aother ~~pilot~~substances, ~~plant~~without ~~using~~leaving ~~our~~behind toxins ~~process~~or ~~technology~~other oncontaminants. ~~oil~~We ~~sands~~are ~~ore~~currently ~~from~~developing our ~~bitumen~~first ~~resources~~project on certain hydrocarbon and mineral leases which cover ~~have~~approximately ~~submitted~~1,760 ~~applications~~acres near Sunnyside, Utah (the “Sunnyside Project”). On March 6, 2014, we filed an application for ~~mining~~a Large Mine Plan with the Utah Department of Oil, ~~environmental~~Gas ~~and~~& ~~other~~Mining, ~~permits~~which, ~~required~~if granted, will allow the Company to ~~build~~move aforward with ~~commercial~~development ~~plant~~of (operations on the ~~“Commercial~~Sunnyside Project. The application covers the construction and operation of the mine, extraction ~~Facility”)~~facilities and related infrastructure. ~~Additional~~In ~~work~~accordance towith bethe ~~completed~~standards ascontained ~~part~~in Rule 4-10(a) of the ~~project~~SEC’s ~~development~~Regulation S-X, ~~phase~~these ~~includes:~~leases contain no proven reserves of oil or gas. However, we have obtained an independent Resource Audit and Classification report dated May 29, 2009, from a major international geology and mining consulting firm describing the quantity and quality of the bitumen resource estimated to be located on our leases.

1.To ~~Final~~date, ~~mine~~we ~~planning~~have ~~and~~acquired ~~civil~~extensive ~~engineering~~bitumen resources, ~~for~~have ~~the~~successfully ~~Sunnyside~~operated ~~Project.~~a 2.pilot ~~Acquisition~~plant ofusing ~~additional~~our ~~property~~process intechnology ~~areas~~on ofoil ~~interest~~sands inore ~~order~~from toour ~~block-up~~bitumen ~~properties~~resources ~~into~~and have ~~logical~~submitted ~~and~~applications ~~economical~~for mining, ~~units.~~environmental 3.and ~~Determination~~other ofpermits ~~technical~~required ~~and~~to ~~economic~~build ~~parameters~~a ~~for the~~ commercial ~~scale~~plant ~~use of~~ (the ~~process, including engineering~~“Commercial Facility”). 4.Additional ~~Receipt~~work ofto ~~federal~~be ~~and~~completed ~~state~~as ~~regulatory~~part ~~agency~~of ~~approval~~the ~~for~~project ~~the~~development ~~Commercial~~phase ~~Facility.~~includes:

Contemporaneously with the pursuit of the permitting of the project, we will also finalize engineering and equipment for a plant that will process up to 10,000 tons of oil sand ore per day and produce up to 9,000 barrels per day (“bbl/d”) of bitumen. We have retained a leading North American engineering firm, FLSmidth USA, Inc., to complete an engineering and feasibility study with respect to a commercial plant that will produce up to 9,000 bbl/d of bitumen. We also retained an engineering firm to demonstrate the technology through a pilot plant. The pilot test runs were successful, removing in excess of 99% of the bitumen from the sand and leaving less than the two parts per million (“ppm”) of solvent in the sand. This means that the sand is suitable to be put back into the environment without tailing ponds or other environmental restrictions. Based on additional findings from the recent pilot tests and recommendations from our mining engineers, we are moving forward with an initial Commercial Facility capable of producing up to 9,000 bbl/d of bitumen. We have also engaged a mining engineering firm to prepare a mine plan and feasibility study and we have also retained an environmental engineering and consulting firm to help us obtain the necessary mine and environmental permits to operate a large mine. On March 6, 2014, we filed a Notice of Intent to Commence Large Mine Operations (“Mine Permit”) with the Utah Department of Oil, Gas and Mining (“DOGM”). Based on the information from our consultants, we believe that additional financing of approximately $150,000,000 will be required to procure and install the necessary equipment to begin operations of a plant that we believe will produce up to approximately 9,000 bbl/d of bitumen.16

161. Final mine planning and civil engineering for the Sunnyside Project. 2. Acquisition of additional property in areas of interest in order to block-up properties into logical and economical mining units. 3. Determination of technical and economic parameters for the commercial scale use of the process, including engineering. 4. Receipt of federal and state regulatory agency approval for the Commercial Facility.

WeContemporaneously ~~have~~with ~~performed~~the ~~lab~~pursuit of the permitting of the project, we expect to finalize engineering and ~~pilot~~equipment ~~plant~~for ~~tests on~~a ~~oil~~plant ~~sands~~that ~~from~~will ~~the~~process ~~Utah~~up ~~Green~~to ~~River~~10,000 ~~Formation~~tons inof ~~which~~oil sand ~~the~~ore ~~Sunnyside~~per ~~Project~~day isand ~~located~~produce up to ~~prove~~9,000 ~~the~~barrels ~~viability~~per day (“bbl/d”) of ~~the~~bitumen. ~~technology~~We have retained a leading North American ~~and~~engineering firm, FLSmidth USA, Inc., to ~~understand~~complete ~~several~~an ~~key~~engineering ~~elements~~and infeasibility ~~the~~study ~~process.~~with ~~Initial~~respect ~~pilot~~to a commercial plant ~~test~~that will ~~runs~~produce ~~were~~up ~~conducted~~to in9,000 ~~2006-2007~~bbl/d of bitumen. We ~~hired~~also ~~AMEC BDR~~retained an engineering firm to ~~witness~~demonstrate the ~~initial~~technology through a pilot plant. The ~~tests~~pilot ~~and~~test toruns ~~manage~~were successful, removing in excess of 99% of the ~~lab~~bitumen ~~work~~from the sand and ~~review~~leaving less than two parts per million (“ppm”) of solvent in the ~~results~~sand. InThis ~~addition~~means that the sand is suitable to be put back into the ~~initial~~environment ~~pilot~~without ~~test,~~tailing weponds ~~have~~or ~~run~~other environmental restrictions. Based on additional findings from the recent pilot tests onand arecommendations from ~~new~~our ~~system~~mining engineers, ~~designed~~we byare ~~SRS~~moving ~~Engineering~~forward ~~International.~~with Inan ~~connection~~initial ~~with~~Commercial ~~those~~Facility ~~tests~~capable of producing up to 9,000 webbl/d ~~ran~~of ~~oil~~bitumen. ~~sands~~We ~~from~~have ~~Utah~~also engaged an environmental engineering and ~~Africa~~consulting firm to ~~acquire~~help ~~additional~~us ~~information~~obtain on the ~~efficiency~~necessary ofmine ~~the~~and ~~solvent~~environmental permits into ~~removing~~operate ~~the~~a ~~bitumen~~large ~~from the~~mine. ~~sand~~On March 6, ~~the~~2014, ~~recovery~~we filed a Notice of ~~solvent~~Intent ~~from~~to Commence Large Mine Operations (“Mine Permit”) with the ~~bitumen~~Utah ~~and~~Department ~~sand~~of Oil, Gas and Mining (“DOGM”). Based on the ~~overall~~information ~~efficiency~~from ~~and~~our ~~energy~~consultants, ~~use~~we believe that additional financing of approximately $150,000,000 will be required to procure and install the ~~system.~~necessary ~~The~~equipment ~~results~~to begin ~~are~~operations ~~summarized~~of asa ~~follows:~~plant that we believe will produce up to approximately 9,000 bbl/d of bitumen.

·We ~~Virtually~~have ~~all~~performed lab and pilot plant tests on oil sands from the Utah Green River Formation in which the Sunnyside Project is located to prove the viability of the ~~bitumen~~technology and ~~was~~to ~~separated~~understand several key elements in the process. Initial pilot plant test runs were conducted in 2006-2007. We hired AMEC BDR to witness the initial pilot plant tests and to manage the lab work and review the results. In addition to the initial pilot test, we have run pilot tests on a new system, designed by SRS Engineering International. In connection with those tests, we ran oil sands from Utah and Africa to acquire additional information on the efficiency of the solvent in removing the bitumen from the sand, ~~leaving~~the recovery of solvent from the bitumen and sand, ~~“oil”~~and ~~free~~the overall efficiency and energy use of the system. The results are summarized as follows:

· ~~The~~Virtually ~~compositional~~all ~~characteristics~~ of the bitumen ~~were~~was ~~not~~separated ~~altered~~from by the ~~process; therefore~~sand, ~~management~~leaving ~~believes~~ the ~~bitumen~~sand ~~will~~“oil” ~~be suitable for upgrading and refining to saleable products by conventional refining technology~~free.

· The ~~sand~~compositional ~~product~~characteristics ~~contained~~of ~~less~~the ~~than~~bitumen 2were ~~ppm~~not ofaltered ~~solvent~~by ~~residue,~~the ~~presents~~process; notherefore, ~~environmental~~management ~~liability,~~believes ~~and~~the ~~can~~bitumen will be ~~used~~suitable for ~~reclamation~~upgrading orand ~~sold~~refining to saleable products by conventional refining technology.

· ~~Solvent~~The ~~losses~~sand ~~to the bitumen~~ product ~~were~~contained ~~minimal.~~less ~~Consequently,~~than ~~because~~2 ~~the~~ppm of solvent isresidue, ~~recycled~~presents ~~with~~no ~~minimal~~environmental ~~loss~~liability, inand acan ~~closed~~be ~~loop~~used ~~system,~~for ~~make-up~~reclamation ~~solvent~~or ~~costs should be minimal~~sold.

· ~~The~~Solvent ~~composition~~losses ~~and~~to ~~properties of~~ the ~~solvent~~bitumen ~~recovered~~product ~~through the process~~ were ~~not~~minimal. ~~altered~~Consequently, bybecause the ~~process;~~solvent ~~therefore,~~is ~~the~~recycled ~~solvent~~with ~~can~~minimal beloss ~~recycled~~ in ~~the~~a ~~process~~closed ~~without~~loop ~~further~~system, ~~conditioning~~make-up orsolvent ~~processing~~costs should be minimal.

~~Based~~· onThe ~~the~~composition ~~pilot test results~~ and ~~recommendations from~~properties ~~our~~of ~~engineering consultants, we have evaluated~~ the ~~feasibility~~solvent ~~and~~recovered ~~costs~~through ~~of scaling~~ the process ~~into~~were anot ~~plant~~altered ~~that~~by ~~will~~the ~~initially~~ process; ~~up to 9~~therefore,~~000~~ ~~bbl/d~~the ofsolvent ~~bitumen,~~can ~~with~~be ~~possible~~recycled ~~future~~in ~~expansion of facilities, subject to market conditions, accessible resources, and~~ the ~~availability~~process ofwithout ~~financing~~further onconditioning ~~terms~~or ~~acceptable to us~~processing.

~~Our~~Based on the pilot test ~~also~~results ~~confirms~~and ~~lab tests~~recommendations ~~that~~from our ~~process~~engineering ~~works~~consultants, onwe ~~oil~~have ~~sands~~evaluated ~~from~~the ~~other~~feasibility ~~locations~~and incosts of scaling the ~~world.~~process ~~This~~into ~~may~~a ~~allow~~plant usthat will initially process up to ~~use~~9,000 ~~our~~bbl/d ~~process~~of inbitumen, ~~other~~with ~~locations~~possible future expansion of facilities, subject to market conditions, accessible ~~around~~resources, and the ~~world~~availability ~~where~~of ~~other~~financing ~~“oil~~on ~~wet”~~terms ~~oil~~acceptable ~~sands~~to ~~are located~~us.

WeOur ~~anticipate~~pilot ~~initially~~test ~~that~~also ~~our~~confirms ~~entire~~lab tests ~~estimated~~that ~~output~~our ofprocess ~~9,000~~works ~~bbl/d~~on ofoil ~~bitumen~~sands ~~could~~from beother ~~delivered~~locations ~~to refineries located~~ in the ~~Salt~~world. ~~Lake~~This ~~City~~may ~~area~~allow ~~via~~us ~~truck, with one~~ to ~~two~~use ~~refiners as~~ our ~~customer(s).~~process Ifin weother ~~develop new facilities with a view to expanding production, we will evaluate supplying~~locations ~~product~~around tothe ~~multiple~~world ~~refineries~~where ~~and~~other ~~more~~“oil ~~distant~~wet” ~~locations~~oil ~~via~~sands ~~rail,~~are ~~based on price and transportation costs~~located.

~~Business~~We ~~Developments~~anticipate initially that our entire estimated output of 9,000 bbl/d of bitumen could be delivered to refineries located in the Salt Lake City area via truck, with one to two refiners as our customer(s). If we develop new facilities with a view to expanding production, we will evaluate supplying product to multiple refineries and more distant locations via rail, based on price and transportation costs.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we continued testing our pilot facility. We ran oil sands ore from our site at Sunnyside and ore from other locations in the Green River formation. The results continue to be satisfactory and to validate our technology.17

WeBusiness have submitted a Notice of Intention to Commence Large Mining Operations (“NOI”) on March 5, 2014 to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas & Mining (“DOGM”). In October, we submitted an updated NOI to DOGM. We received comments from DOGM with respect to our NOI on April 16, 2014 and refiled the NOI in October 2014, in response to those comments.Developments

InDuring ~~November~~the ~~2014~~quarter ended June 30, 2014, we ~~received~~continued testing our ~~completed feasibility~~pilot ~~studies~~facility. ~~for~~We ~~the~~ran ~~processing~~oil ~~plant,~~sands ore from ~~FLSmidth~~our ~~USA,~~site ~~Inc.,~~at Sunnyside and ~~for~~ore from other locations in the ~~mine~~Green River ~~from~~formation. ~~Mine~~The ~~Engineers,~~results ~~Inc~~continue to be satisfactory and to validate our technology.

~~Critical~~We ~~Accounting~~have ~~Policies~~submitted a Notice of Intention to Commence Large Mining Operations (“NOI”) on March 5, 2014 to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas & Mining (“DOGM”). In October, we submitted an updated NOI to DOGM. We received comments from DOGM with respect to our NOI on April 16, 2014 and refiled ~~Estimates~~the NOI in October 2014, in response to those comments.

~~The~~In ~~selection~~November and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have changed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives2014, but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. Discussed below are the accounting policies that we ~~believe~~received ~~are critical to~~ our ~~financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions~~completed ~~involved~~feasibility ~~and~~studies ~~the~~for ~~magnitude of~~ the ~~asset,~~processing ~~liability~~plant, ~~revenue~~from orFLSmidth ~~expense~~USA, ~~being reported~~Inc. ~~See Notes 2~~, 3 and ~~4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q~~ for the ~~quarter~~mine ~~ended~~from ~~September~~Mine 30Engineers, ~~2014 for a discussion of those policies~~Inc.

17Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

~~Going~~The ~~Concern~~selection -and ~~The~~application ~~Company’s~~of accounting ~~financial~~policies ~~statements~~is ~~have~~an ~~been~~important ~~prepared~~process ~~assuming~~that ~~the~~has ~~Company~~developed ~~will~~as ~~continue~~our asbusiness aactivities ~~going~~have ~~concern,~~evolved. ~~which~~Accounting ~~contemplates~~rules ~~the~~generally ~~realization~~do not ofinvolve ~~assets~~a ~~and~~selection ~~the~~among ~~liquidation~~alternatives, ofbut ~~liabilities~~involve inan ~~the~~implementation ~~ordinary~~and ~~course~~interpretation of ~~business.~~existing ~~The~~rules, ~~Company~~and ~~has~~the ~~incurred~~use ~~substantial~~of ~~losses from~~judgment, ~~operations~~to ~~and~~the ~~negative~~specific ~~cash~~set ~~flows~~of ~~from~~circumstances ~~operating~~existing ~~activities,~~in ~~which~~our ~~raise~~business. ~~substantial~~Discussed ~~doubt~~below ~~about~~are the ~~Company’s~~accounting ~~ability~~policies tothat we believe are ~~continue~~critical asto aour ~~going~~financial ~~concern.~~statements ~~The~~due ~~Company~~to ~~sustained~~the adegree ~~net~~of ~~loss~~uncertainty ~~for~~regarding the ~~six~~estimates ~~months~~or ~~ended~~assumptions ~~September~~involved ~~30,~~and ~~2014~~the magnitude of $1the asset,~~796~~ liability,~~791~~ ~~and~~or ~~has an~~expense ~~accumulated~~being ~~deficit~~reported. ofSee ~~$16,369,248~~Notes as2 ofand ~~September~~3 ~~30,~~to ~~2014.~~our Inunaudited ~~addition,~~condensed ~~the~~consolidated ~~Company~~financial ~~will~~statements included ~~require~~in ~~approximately~~this ~~$150,000,000 to~~Form ~~fund~~10-Q ~~capital~~for ~~expenditures~~a todiscussion ~~commence~~of ~~principal~~those ~~operations~~policies.

~~Since~~Going ~~inception,~~Concern ~~the~~- The Company’s financial ~~has~~statements ~~not~~have ~~generated any~~been ~~revenue~~prepared ~~and~~assuming ~~its~~the ~~financial~~Company ~~position~~will iscontinue ~~not~~as ~~sufficient~~a togoing ~~fund~~concern, ~~its~~which ~~planned~~contemplates ~~business~~the ~~objective~~realization of ~~for~~assets anand ~~extended~~the ~~period~~liquidation of ~~time~~liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Company ishas ~~dependent~~no onrevenues, ~~the~~has ~~sale~~incurred ofsubstantial losses ~~equity~~from oroperations, ~~debt~~and ~~securities~~has innegative ~~the~~cash ~~next~~flows ~~twelve~~from ~~months~~operating inactivities, ~~order~~which toraise ~~obtain~~substantial ~~the~~doubt ~~requisite~~about ~~capital~~the Company’s ability to continue toas ~~pursue~~a ~~its~~going ~~business objectives~~concern. IfThe ~~the~~ Company issustained ~~not~~a ~~able~~net toloss ~~obtain~~for ~~additional~~the ~~capital~~quarter ~~through~~ended ~~the~~December ~~sale~~31, 2014 of ~~equity~~$624,110 and orhas ~~debt~~an ~~securities~~accumulated deficit of $17,001,072 as of December 31, 2014. The Company estimates it will ~~not~~require beapproximately ~~able~~$150,000,000 to fund capital expenditures to commence ~~production~~principal operations.

~~Mineral~~Since ~~Leases~~inception –of ~~Due~~the development stage, the Company has not generated any revenue and its financial position is not sufficient to fund its planned business objective for an extended period of time. The Company is dependent on the sale of equity or debt securities in the next twelve months in order ~~uncertainty~~to ~~regarding~~obtain ~~their~~the ~~recoverability,~~requisite capital to ~~date~~continue ~~all~~to ~~costs~~pursue its business objectives. If the Company is not able to ~~acquire,~~obtain ~~maintain~~additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities, ~~and~~it ~~develop~~will ~~mineral~~not ~~leases~~be ~~have~~able ~~been~~to ~~expensed as~~commence ~~incurred~~production.

~~Stock-Based~~Mineral ~~Compensation~~Leases – ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Due ~~uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model~~ to ~~determine~~ the ~~fair value of stock options and warrants granted. For~~ ~~employee~~uncertainty ~~stock~~regarding ~~options,~~ the ~~Company~~recoverability ~~records~~of ~~the~~costs ~~grant-date~~to ~~fair value as expense over the period in which it is earned~~acquire, ~~typically the vesting period. For consultants~~maintain, ~~the~~and ~~fair~~develop ~~value~~mineral ~~of the stock-based award is recorded as expense over the term of the service period~~leases, ~~and~~all ~~unvested~~costs ~~amounts~~to ~~are~~date ~~revalued using the Black-Scholes model at each reporting period. For warrants issued~~ to ~~lenders~~acquire, ~~the~~maintain, ~~Company records the grant-date fair value of the warrants~~ and ~~any~~develop ~~resulting~~mineral ~~beneficial~~leases ~~conversion~~have ~~feature~~been ~~for~~expensed ~~convertible debt,~~ as ~~a note discount~~incurred. ~~The discount is then amortized over the estimated life of the warrant as non-cash interest expense.~~

~~Results~~Stock-Based Compensation – The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of ~~Operations~~stock options and warrants granted. For employee stock options, the Company records the grant-date fair value as expense over the period in which it is earned, typically the vesting period. For consultants, the fair value of the stock-based award is recorded as expense over the term of the service period, and unvested amounts are revalued using the Black-Scholes model at each reporting period. For warrants issued to lenders, the Company records the grant-date fair value of the warrants and any resulting beneficial conversion feature for convertible debt, as a debt discount. The discount is then amortized over the estimated life of the warrant as non-cash interest expense.

~~Three~~Results ~~Months~~of ~~Ended September 30, 2014 compared to September 30, 2013~~Operations

~~During~~Three ~~the~~Months ~~three~~Ended ~~months~~December ~~ended September 30~~31, 2014~~, the Company incurred a net loss of $909,017~~ compared to aDecember ~~net loss of $791~~31,~~911~~ ~~for the three months ended September 30,~~ 2013. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, operating expenses were $866,113, which represented a 34% increase, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013 when we incurred operating expenses of $644,750.

~~General~~During ~~and~~the ~~administrative~~three ~~expenses~~months ~~decreased~~ended December by31, 5%2014, ~~from~~the Company incurred a net loss of $~~591~~624,~~614~~110 ~~during~~compared to a net loss of $973,301 for the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013. toDuring ~~$563,547 during~~ the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014~~. The~~, ~~decrease~~operating inexpenses ~~general~~were ~~and~~$550,408, ~~administrative~~which ~~expenses~~represents ~~was~~a ~~mainly~~21.7% ~~due~~decrease, compared to ~~$239~~the three months ended December 31,~~352~~ of2013 ~~financing~~when ~~costs~~we ~~related~~incurred tooperating aexpenses ~~terminated~~of ~~offering~~$693,315. General and administrative expenses ~~that~~increased ~~were~~by ~~recognized~~10.0% to $346,736 during the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, ~~2013~~2014 ~~compared~~from to $4315,~~000~~085 ~~of such costs~~ during the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, ~~2014~~2013. Non-cash stock compensation expense increased by $~~112~~28,~~251~~233 from $~~140~~63,~~734~~207 for the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013 to to $~~252~~91,~~985~~439 for the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. ~~and~~Expenses ~~costs~~ for professional fees, ~~travel~~increased ~~expenses~~by $10,789 ~~and~~from ~~public~~$36,047 ~~company~~for the ~~expenses~~three ~~were~~months ~~$61,265,~~ended ~~$18~~December 31,~~925,~~ ~~and~~2013 to $2946,~~844~~836 ~~during~~for the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 asprimarily ~~compared~~due to ~~$42,824,~~increased ~~$182~~legal costs. Overall, general and ~~$6,452~~administrative expenses in the current period are higher because of increased costs for stock-based compensation ~~during~~and higher professional fees. Once the ~~quarter~~Company ~~ended~~is ~~September~~permitted 30and funded, ~~2013~~going forward, the Company believes that the obligations placed upon it as a result of growth coupled with its reporting requirements under SEC rules and regulations will result in operating expenses increasing.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $233,346 for research and development expenses as compared to $0 during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The Company increased its research and development activities due to its additional funding obtained through the sale of Series A preferred units. Research and development expenses incurred are for engineering and related expenses incurred to obtain the necessary licenses and permits for the Company to develop its mining assets. In addition, the Company incurred expenses to continue operating a pilot test unit to further develop and prove the viability of the Company’s proprietary technology to separate the bitumen from the sand. Research and development costs for the quarter increased as a result of the Company hiring its Chief Operating Officer (COO) on a full-time basis on June 1, 2014. Prior to that time, this individual was engaged by the Company on a part-time basis as a consultant.18

~~Interest~~During ~~expense~~the ~~decreased~~three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred $134,452 of research and development expenses compared to $0325,096 for the three months ended ~~September~~December 31, 302013. Research and development expenses incurred are for payroll costs, ~~2014~~engineering, asequipment ~~compared~~costs and test well drilling costs incurred to ~~$147~~assist the Company with further developing its mining assets. Through December 31,~~061~~ 2014, the Company has capitalized direct costs incurred for it to complete its applications for the ~~three~~permits needed to move forward with the project. During the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, engineering costs were $229,013 lower than they were during the three months ending December 31, 2013. The ~~decrease~~Company was heavily involved in ~~interest expense~~completing isits ~~due~~applications for the permits needed to move forward with development of its tar sand assets in the prior year. During the three months ending December 31, 2014, the Company ~~having~~was ~~repaid~~waiting orfor ~~converted~~governmental response to its ~~debt~~applications so costs were much lower. Costs for drilling a test well totaled $78,057 for the three months ended December 31, 2013 compared to ~~equity~~$0 ~~during~~for the ~~third~~three months ended December 31, 2014. In addition, the Company has incurred expenses to develop a pilot test unit to further develop and ~~fourth~~prove ~~quarters~~the viability of the Company’s proprietary technology to separate ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~bitumen ~~ended~~from ~~March~~the sand. Costs associated with the Company’s pilot test unit were $28,816 higher for the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2013. During the three months ending December 31, 2013, the Company incurred non-cash costs of $43,000 related to common stock granted to one of its consultants.

~~During~~Interest ~~the~~expense ~~year~~decreased ~~ended~~to ~~March~~$0 ~~31,~~for ~~2014,~~ the ~~Company~~three ~~issued~~months shares of its Series A convertible preferred stock. The preferred stock subscription agreement contains provisions that protect the investors from dilution as a result of the Company issuing shares of stock below certain pricing levels. The Company accounted for this down-round protection as an embedded derivative. During the quarter ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, ~~the Company recorded a $42,904 loss related to its embedded derivative~~ as ~~opposed~~compared to $084,224 ~~loss~~for ~~during~~ the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013.

18During the three months ended December 31, 2013, the Company incurred a loss of $209,360 related to extinguishment of debt compared to a gain of $1,700 for the three months ended December 31, 2014. The Company incurred a loss of $74,996 from a derivative liability that is associated with down-round protection on the conversion rate to common stock for its holders of Series A preferred stock for the three months ended December 31, 2014. The Company generated a gain of $13,698 for the three months ended December 31, 2013.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 compared to ~~September~~December 3031, 2013

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company incurred a net loss of $12,~~796~~420,~~791~~901 compared to a net loss of $12,~~274~~248,~~988~~289 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, our operating expenses were $12,~~607~~157,~~485~~893 which represented a 6328.6% increase, compared to operating expenses of $~~984~~1,~~542~~677,857 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013. Operating expenses included research and development costs of $472,126 for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 compared to $374,138 for the nine months ended December 31, 2013. These costs related to the Company developing its technology and mining plans. General and administrative expenses increased to $1,478,107 for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 from $1,144,314 for the nine months ended December 31, 2013.

General and administrative expenses increased to $1,~~131~~478,~~371~~107 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 from $~~829~~1,~~229~~144,314 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013. Non-cash stock compensation expense increased by $~~331~~366,~~430~~385 from $ ~~191~~247,~~434~~ 918 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013 to $~~522~~614,~~864~~304 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. Professional fees, travel expenses, and public company expenses increased by $~~136~~176,~~317~~ 144 from $90171,~~813~~624 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013 to $~~227~~347,~~130~~ 768 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. These increases were partially offset by a $~~220~~224,~~145~~473 decrease in financing fees for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 as compared to the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013.

Current year operating expenses included research and development costs of $~~337~~472,~~674~~126 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 compared to $49374,~~042~~138 for the ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~September~~ended 30December 31, 2013. These costs related to the Company developing its technology and mining plans as well as hiring a full-time Chief Operating Officer that had previously been providing services to the Company as a consultant on part-time basis.

~~Going~~Interest ~~forward,~~expense wedecreased ~~believe~~to ~~that~~$0 ~~the~~for ~~obligations~~the ~~placed~~nine ~~upon~~months usended asDecember a31, ~~result~~2014 ofas ~~our~~compared ~~reporting~~to ~~requirements~~$374,370 ~~under~~for the ~~Exchange~~nine ~~Act~~months ~~will~~ended ~~continue~~December to31, ~~result in our operating expenses increasing~~2013.

~~Interest~~During ~~expense~~the ~~decreased~~nine tomonths $0ended ~~for~~December ~~the~~31, ~~six~~2013, ~~months~~the ~~ended~~Company ~~September~~incurred 30a loss of $209,360 ~~2014~~related asto extinguishment of debt compared to a gain of $~~290~~1,~~146~~700 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~decrease~~Company inincurred ~~interest expense~~a loss of $264,202 from a derivative liability that is ~~due~~associated towith down-round protection on the ~~Company~~conversion ~~having~~rate ~~repaid~~to orcommon ~~converted~~for its ~~debt~~holders toof ~~equity~~Series ~~during~~A preferred stock for the ~~third~~nine ~~and~~months ~~fourth~~ended ~~quarters~~December 31, 2014. The Company generated a gain of $13,698 for the ~~Company’s fiscal~~three ~~year~~months ended ~~March~~December 31, ~~2014~~2013.

The Company recorded a loss of $189,206 for the six months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $0 for the six months ended September 30, 2013 related to the embedded derivative associated with the Company’s Series A Preferred stock.19

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company had cash of $1912,~~529,573~~513 and working capital of $1723,~~098,197~~925. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company had total liabilities of $~~891~~676,~~172~~954. Approximately $377,378 of the Company’s liabilities are non-cash as they relate to the derivative associated with the Company’s Series A preferred stock. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, the Company’s total assets were $1,~~889~~226,~~931~~341 consisting of cash, prepaid and other current assets, ~~property~~ and ~~equipment, and~~ other assets.

The Company has established a resource position, a working knowledge of the process technology and an initial list of environmental and other permits required to build a commercial plant. Additional work to be completed as part of the project development phase includes:

	1.	Final mine planning and civil engineering for the Sunnyside Project.
	2.	Acquisition of additional property in areas of interest in order to block-up properties into logical and economical mining units.
	3.	Determination of technical and economic parameters for the commercial scale use of the process, including engineering.
	4.	Completion of environmental and permitting work for the commercial facility.
	5.	Receipt of federal and state regulatory agency approval for the commercial facility.

The Company requires additional funding to complete these items. This funding is expected to be raised through a private or public offering of common stock. Upon completion of the financing, the Company will be in a position to initiate items 1 through 5 above. Further financing of approximately $150,000,000 will be required to open the mine and procure and install the necessary equipment to begin operations of a plant that the Company believes will produce approximately 9,000 bbl/d per day of bitumen. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, a significantly higher market supply of crude oil led to a dramatic fall in oil price, and we expect volatility in the market will likely continue in the foreseeable future. This drop in price has caused a drop in investment in oil and gas projects in response, which we believe will negatively impact oil production capacity and will delay supply additions. As a consequence of a reduction of investment in oil development, our effort to raise capital to advance our business plan will likely be adversely affected because the dollars available for investment are fewer and because our projected operating results at substantially lower oil prices are not appealing to investors. Although management believes that the price of oil will recover to a price that supports the profitable operations of the Company in accordance with its current business plan and projections, we cannot predict when this will occur or when we might obtain additional capital to advance our business objectives.

~~Management~~During ~~anticipates that~~ the ~~Company will~~quarter be dependent, for the near future, on raising additional capital to fund operating expenses and anticipated growth. The report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended ~~March~~December 31, 2014, ~~expressed substantial doubt~~ ~~about the Company’s ability to continue as~~ a ~~going~~significantly ~~concern.~~higher ~~The~~market ~~Company’s~~supply ~~operating~~of ~~losses~~crude ~~have~~oil ~~been~~led ~~funded~~to ~~through the~~a ~~issuance~~dramatic offall ~~equity~~in ~~securities~~oil ~~and borrowings~~price. ~~The~~This ~~Company~~has ~~will~~caused ~~need~~a ~~additional~~drop ~~funding~~ in ~~the~~investment ~~future~~ in oil ~~order~~and togas ~~continue~~projects ~~its business~~in ~~operations~~response. ~~While~~This ~~the~~decline ~~Company~~in ~~continually~~investment ~~looks~~will ~~for~~impact ~~additional~~oil ~~financing~~production ~~sources,~~capacity inand ~~the~~will ~~current~~delay ~~economic~~supply ~~environment,~~additions. ~~the~~This ~~procurement~~drop ofin ~~outside~~investment ~~funding~~could isalso ~~extremely~~have ~~difficult~~an ~~and~~impact ~~there~~on ~~can~~the beCompany’s noability ~~assurance~~to ~~that~~raise ~~such~~capital. ~~financing~~Although ~~will~~management ~~be available,~~believes ~~or,~~that ifthe ~~available,~~price ~~that~~of ~~such~~oil ~~financing~~ will berecover atto a price that ~~will~~supports bethe ~~acceptable~~profitable tooperations of the Company. ~~Failure~~in toaccordance ~~generate~~with ~~sufficient~~its current ~~revenue~~business orplan ~~raise~~and ~~additional~~projections, ~~capital~~there ~~would~~can ~~have~~be anno ~~adverse~~assurance ~~impact~~that, ongiven ~~the~~these ~~Company’s~~recent ~~ability to achieve its longer-term business objectives~~events, ~~and~~the ~~would~~Company ~~adversely~~will ~~affect~~be ~~its~~able ~~ability~~ to ~~continue~~obtain ~~operating as a going concern~~financing.

19Management anticipates that the Company will be dependent, for the near future, on raising additional capital to fund operating expenses and anticipated growth. The report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended March 31, 2014, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s operating losses have been funded through the issuance of equity securities and borrowings. The Company will need additional funding in the future in order to continue its business operations. While the Company continually looks for additional financing sources, in the current economic environment, the procurement of outside funding is extremely difficult and there can be no assurance that such financing will be available, or, if available, that such financing will be at a price that will be acceptable to the Company. Failure to generate sufficient revenue or raise additional capital would have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to achieve its longer-term business objectives, and would adversely affect its ability to continue operating as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosures required by this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions.

20Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item. Notwithstanding, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as filed with the SEC on August 1, 2014.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, ~~379~~136,~~250~~089 shares of Series A ~~Preferred~~preferred stock were converted into 1544,~~517,000~~356 shares of the Company’s common stock. ~~The~~ The Company issued an additional 2615,~~935~~911 shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends for the Series A shares that were converted.

~~Subsequent~~On toNovember ~~September~~ 30, 2014, ~~three additional investors converted shares of Series A Preferred stock into shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common stock. On October 2,~~issued ~~2014~~170, ~~50,~~000 shares of ~~Series A Preferred stock were converted into 200,000 shares of the Company’s~~ common stock. ~~The Company issued an additional 4,521 shares of common stock~~ to ~~settle~~LIFE ~~cumulative~~Power ~~dividends~~& ~~for~~Fuels ~~the~~LLC ~~Series~~in Alieu ~~shares that were converted. On October 8, 2014, 46,089 shares~~ of ~~Series~~amounts Aowed ~~Preferred~~under ~~stock were converted into 184,356 shares of~~ the ~~Company’s~~LIFE ~~common~~Management ~~stock. The~~Services ~~Company issued an additional 5~~Agreement,~~976 shares of common stock to settle cumulative dividends for the Series A shares stock that~~ ~~were~~which ~~converted.~~contract Onwas ~~October~~terminated ~~13,~~simultaneous ~~2014,~~with ~~15,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock were converted into 60,000 shares of~~ the ~~Company’s common~~issuance ~~stock. The Company issued an additional 1,350 shares~~ of common ~~stock to settle cumulative dividends for the Series A preferred~~ shares ~~that were converted~~.

Each of the transactions described above was ~~effectuated~~entered into in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

There are no reportable events required pursuant to this item.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are furnished with this report:

	31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive Officer
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive Officer
	31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Financial Officer
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Financial Officer
	32.1	Section 1350 Certification by Principal Executive Officer
32.1*	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
	32.2	Section 1350 Certification by Principal Financial Officer
32.2*	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
	10.1	Second Addendum to Will G. Gibbs Lease Agreement
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
	10.2	Seventh Addendum to Meany Land & Exploration, Inc. Hydrocarbon and Mineral Lease
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	10.3	Ninth Addendum to Utah Tar Sands, LLC Hydrocarbon and Mineral Lease
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

21* Furnished with this Form 10-Q

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	American Sands Energy Corp.
Date: November 18, 2014	By:	/s/ William C. Gibbs
Date: February 13, 2015	By:	/s/ William C. Gibbs
		William C. Gibbs, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 18, 2014	By:	/s/ Daniel F. Carlson
Date: February 13, 2015	By:	/s/ Daniel F. Carlson
		Daniel F. Carlson, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

2223

Filing Compare · American Sands Energy Corp.