UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xS QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012

o£ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 0-50813

EdgeWave, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	20-0996152
(State or other Jurisdiction of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

15333 Avenue of Science, Suite 100, San Diego, California	92128
(Address of Principal Executive Office)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 676-2277

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller Reporting Company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No þ ~~The registrant had 17,023,933 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at March 31, 2012.~~

As The ofregistrant ~~May~~had ~~14, 2012, a total of~~ 17,025,242 shares of its ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock, ~~were~~par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at June 30, 2012.

As of August 14, 2012, a total of 17,025,242 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.

EDGEWAVE, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1	1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2012 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2011	1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2011		1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND MARCH 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)	2
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND JUNE 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED)		2
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 (UNAUDITED)	3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 (UNAUDITED)		3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND MARCH 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)	4
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND JUNE 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED)		4
	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)	5	5
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	12	13
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	17	22
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	18	23
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	18	23
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	18	23
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	18	23
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	18	23
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	18	23
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	18	23
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	19	24

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~ITEM~~Item 1. ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~STATEMENTS~~Statements

EdgeWave, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,~~821~~932,000		$	2,609,000
Accounts receivable - net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $20,000 and $25,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		3,460,000			4,097,000
Accounts receivable - net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,000 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		4,073,000			4,097,000
Inventories - net		~~582~~629,000			647,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		~~771~~852,000			755,000
Total current assets		7,~~634~~486,000			8,108,000
Fixed Assets - Net		~~677~~648,000			660,000
Prepaid Expenses, Net of Current Portion		~~289~~361,000			-–
Goodwill		8,279,000			8,279,000
Other Intangible Assets - Net		~~427~~395,000			459,000
Other Assets		~~797~~447,000			97,000
Total Assets	$	1817,~~103~~616,000		$	17,603,000
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current Liabilities
Line of credit	$	1,~~500~~700,000		$	1,700,000
Term loan, current portion		~~637~~908,000			158,000
Accounts payable		1,~~015~~014,000			1,370,000
Accrued compensation		1,~~236~~272,000			1,169,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		~~672~~610,000			560,000
Warranty liability		~~178~~176,000			186,000
Capitalized lease obligations, current portion		3738,000			37,000
Deferred revenue, current portion		1011,~~725~~044,000			10,547,000
Total current liabilities		16,~~000~~762,000			15,727,000
Convertible Notes Payable		5,~~221~~312,000			4,836,000
Term Loan, Net of Current Portion		1883,~~329,~~000			400,000
Deferred Rent		~~336~~314,000			302,000
Capitalized Lease Obligations, Net of Current Portion		~~137~~127,000			146,000
Deferred Revenue, Net of Current Portion		1112,~~892~~146,000			11,651,000
Total liabilities		3435,~~915~~544,000			33,062,000
Stockholders’ Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-–			-–
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 17,023,933 and 17,019,736 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		166,000			166,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 17,025,242 and 17,019,736 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		166,000			166,000
Additional paid-in capital		42,~~274~~321,000			42,228,000
Accumulated deficit		(5960,~~252~~415,000	)		(57,853,000	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1617,~~812~~928,000	)		(15,459,000	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	1817,~~103~~616,000		$	17,603,000

See accompanying notes

EdgeWave, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	~~2012~~	2012		2011		2012	2011
Revenues
Subscription	$	3,~~501~~516,000		$3,644,000	~~3,670,000~~	$7,017,000	$7,314,000
Appliance		~~795~~787,000		1,159,000	~~708,000~~	1,582,000	1,867,000
License		-–		2,000	~~2,000~~	–	4,000
Total Revenues		4,~~296~~303,000		4,805,000	~~4,380,000~~	8,599,000	9,185,000
Cost of Revenues
Subscription		~~702~~750,000		719,000	~~790,000~~	1,452,000	1,509,000
Appliance		~~463~~601,000		802,000	~~453,000~~	1,064,000	1,255,000
License		-–		–	~~2,000~~	–	2,000
Total Cost of Revenues		1,~~165~~351,000		1,521,000	~~1,245,000~~	2,516,000	2,766,000
Gross Profit		32,~~131~~952,000		3,284,000	~~3,135,000~~	6,083,000	6,419,000
Operating Expenses
Sales and marketing		21,~~209~~970,000		2,277,000	~~2,443,000~~	4,179,000	4,720,000
Research and development		1,~~190~~167,000		1,267,000	~~1,464,000~~	2,357,000	2,731,000
General and administrative		1831,~~014,~~000		1,029,000	~~906,000~~	1,845,000	1,935,000
Total Operating Expenses		43,~~413~~968,000		4,573,000	~~4,813,000~~	8,381,000	9,386,000
Loss from Operations		(1,~~282~~016,000	)	(1,289,000)	~~(1,678,000~~	(2,298,000)	(2,967,000)
Other Expense (Income)
Interest expense - net		~~123~~156,000		61,000	~~44,000~~	279,000	105,000
Other income		(1511,000	)	(66,000)	~~(20,000~~	(26,000)	(86,000)
Total Other Expense		108,000			24,000
Total Other Expense (Income)		145,000		(5,000)		253,000	19,000
Loss Before Income Taxes		(1,~~390~~161,000	)	(1,284,000)	~~(1,702,000~~	(2,551,000)	(2,986,000)
Income tax expense		92,000		–	-	11,000	–
Net Loss	$	(1,~~399~~163,000	)	$(1,284,000)	~~(1,702,000~~	$(2,562,000)	$(2,986,000)
Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.0807	)	$(0.08)	~~(0.11~~	$(0.15)	$(0.18)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted		17,~~022~~212,~~721~~025		16,390,811	~~16,191,701~~	17,023,831	16,382,363

See accompanying notes

EdgeWave, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit (Unaudited)

					Additional
		Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated
		Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated
		Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Total
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit				Total
Balance at December 31, 2011		17,019,736	$	166,000	$	42,228,000	$	(57,853,000	)	$	(15,459,000	)
Common stock issued for the exercise of employee stock options		45,~~197~~506		-–		1,000		-–			1,000
Stock-based compensation expense		-–		-–		4390,000		-–			4390,000
Warrants issued in connection with Partners for Growth III, L.P loan agreement		-–		-–		2,000		-–			2,000
Net loss		-–		-–		-–		(12,~~399~~562,000	)		(12,~~399~~562,000	)
Balance at March 31, 2012		17,023,933	$	166,000	$	42,274,000	$	(59,252,000	)	$	(16,812,000	)
Balance at June 30, 2012		17,025,242	$	166,000	$	42,321,000	$	(60,415,000	)	$	(17,928,000	)

See accompanying notes

EdgeWave, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(12,~~399~~562,000	)	$	(12,~~702~~986,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~114~~218,000			~~177~~358,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts		~~(9,000~~–	)		~~(10~~44,000	)
Loss on change in fair value of warrant derivative liability		(15,000	)		(20,000	)
Gain on change in fair value of warrant derivative liability		(26,000	)		(85,000	)
Stock-based compensation expense		4390,000			40100,000
Noncash interest expense		85176,000			2447,000
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		~~(53~~24,000	)		~~412~~41,000
Inventories		6518,000			~~254~~113,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(~~305~~809,000	)		~~400~~661,000
Accounts payable		(~~355~~356,000	)		~~(345~~629,000	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		~~110~~55,000			22(182,000	)
Accrued compensation		67103,000			(~~129~~122,000	)
Warranty liability		(79,000	)		(87,000	)
Deferred rent		4832,000			-187,000
Deferred revenue		~~419~~992,000			(~~482~~318,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(12,~~192~~054,000	)		(1,~~367~~520,000	)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of fixed assets		(99142,000	)		(~~259~~297,000	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(99142,000	)		(~~259~~297,000	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from convertible notes issued		300,000			-–
Proceeds from stock option exercises		1,000			35,000
Warrants issued in connection with Partners for Growth III, L.P loan agreement		2,000			-–
Proceeds from the sales of stock under the employee stock purchase plan		-–			44,000
Principal payments on capitalized lease obligations		(918,000	)		(817,000	)
Principal payments on term loans		(91265,000	)		(2550,000	)
Proceeds from term loans		1,500,000			-–
Net (decrease) increase on line of credit		(~~200~~1,000	)		1,200,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,~~503~~519,000			1,~~246~~212,000
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		212,000			(380,000	)
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(677,000	)		(605,000	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		2,609,000			2,610,000
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	21,~~821~~932,000		$	2,~~230~~005,000
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1535,000		$	1037,000
Income taxes	$	9,000		$	-–
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Furniture acquired pursuant to capital lease	$	-–		$	217,000

See accompanying notes

EdgeWave, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Description of business

EdgeWave, Inc., a a Delaware corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” “EdgeWave,” or the “Company”) develops and markets on demand, ~~on-premises~~appliance, and hybrid Secure Content Management (“SCM”) solutions to the mid-~~enterprise~~market enterprise and service provider markets. Customers can purchase our solutions directly from us, through a Managed Service Provider, or via one of our Value-Added Resellers around the world. On-premises purchases typically consist of an initial hardware purchase (appliance) and maintenance subscription, whereas our on-demand purchases contain only a subscription. Our primary customers are enterprise IT executives, managers and administrators as well as Managed Service Providers and Internet Service Providers.

OnBasis ~~June 15, 2011, the shareholders~~ of ~~the~~presentation ~~Company~~and ~~approved the amendment of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change our corporate name from St. Bernard Software, Inc. to EdgeWave, Inc.~~consolidation

~~Basis~~The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ~~presentation~~America for interim financial information and ~~consolidation~~the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable sections of Regulation S-X. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to make the financial statements not misleading. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2012.

~~The~~Use ~~condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~ of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable sections of Regulation S-X. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to make the financial statements not misleading. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2012.estimates

~~Use~~The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements include those assumed in computing revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty liability, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, testing goodwill for impairment, stock-based compensation and the estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments.

~~The~~Basic ~~preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates~~ and ~~assumptions~~diluted ~~that~~loss ~~affect certain~~per ~~reported~~common amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements include those assumed in computing revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty liability, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, testing goodwill for impairment, stock-based compensation and the estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments.share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible debt using the if-converted method. In computing diluted loss per common share, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted loss per common share excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had 5,335,893 and 4,876,228, respectively, potentially dilutive securities outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the calculation of dilutive loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible debt using the if-converted method. In computing diluted loss per common share, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted loss per common share excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had 5,455,194 and 5,203,796, respectively, potentially dilutive securities outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the calculation of dilutive loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Adopted accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” (“ASU 2011-04”), to provide consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements, particularly for level 3 fair value measurement. ASU 2011-04 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material effect on our fair value measures and disclosures.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies for which future adoption is pending are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5Reclassifications

~~Reclassifications~~Certain prior year reclassifications have been made for consistent presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or stockholders’ deficit.

~~Certain~~Subsequent ~~prior year reclassifications have been made for consistent presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or stockholders’ deficit.~~events

~~Subsequent~~Management has evaluated events subsequent to June 30, 2012 through the date the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for transactions and other events that may require adjustment of and/or disclosure in such financial statements.

Management has evaluated events subsequent to March 31, 2012 through the date the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for transactions and other events that may require adjustment of and/or disclosure in such financial statements2. Liquidity

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $1.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital deficit of $9.3 million. Approximately $11.0 million of our current liability balance at June 30, 2012 consisted of deferred revenue, which represents amounts that are expected to be amortized into revenue as they are earned in future periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred a net loss of $1.2 million and $2. ~~Liquidity~~6 million, respectively, and as of June 30, 2012 has incurred a cumulative net loss of $60.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 cash used by operating activities was $2.1 million.

As ofdescribed ~~March~~in 31Note 4, ~~2012, the~~ the Company ~~had~~has ~~approximately~~an ~~$2.8~~existing ~~million~~credit infacility ~~cash~~with ~~and~~Silicon ~~cash~~Valley ~~equivalents~~Bank ~~and~~(“SVB”) aunder ~~working~~which ~~capital~~there ~~deficit~~is borrowing availability of $~~8.4~~842,000 ~~million. Approximately $10.7~~as ~~million~~ of ~~our~~June ~~current liability balance at March 31~~30, 2012. In ~~consisted of deferred revenue~~addition, ~~which~~the ~~represents~~Company ~~amounts~~entered ~~that~~into ~~are expected~~a toLoan beand ~~amortized~~Security ~~into~~Agreement ~~revenue~~with asPartners ~~they~~for Growth ~~are~~III, ~~earned in future periods~~L. ~~For~~P. ~~the~~(“PFG”), ~~three~~pursuant ~~months~~to ~~ended~~which ~~March~~PFG ~~31,~~provided ~~2012, the~~EdgeWave ~~Company~~with ~~incurred~~ a ~~net~~loan ~~loss~~in the amount of $1.45 million ~~and~~in ~~as of March 31,~~ January 2012 ~~has~~(See ~~incurred~~Note a4). ~~cumulative~~As ~~net loss~~ of ~~$59.3~~June ~~million. For the three months ended March 31~~30, 2012, ~~cash~~the ~~used~~principal bybalance ~~operating~~on ~~activities~~the Loan was approximately $1.23 million.

AsIn ~~described~~the inopinion ~~Note 4~~of management, ~~the~~its ~~Company has an~~ existing ~~credit~~cash ~~facility~~resources ~~with~~as ~~Silicon~~of ~~Valley~~June ~~Bank~~30, ~~(“SVB”)~~2012, ~~under~~collections ~~which~~on ~~there~~future isbillings, and borrowing availability of ~~$682,000~~under asexisting ofcredit facilities ~~March~~will ~~31,~~provide ~~2012. In~~sufficient ~~addition,~~liquidity for the Company ~~entered~~to ~~into~~meet aits ~~Loan~~continuing ~~and~~obligations ~~Security~~for ~~Agreement~~the ~~with~~next ~~Partners for~~twelve ~~Growth~~months. ~~III~~However, there ~~L.P.~~can ~~(“PFG”),~~be ~~pursuant~~no toassurances ~~which~~that ~~PFG~~projected ~~provided~~collections ~~EdgeWave~~will ~~with~~be arealized ~~loan~~or inthat the ~~amount~~Company ofwill $1improve operating results so that positive cash flow from operating activities will be achieved.5 The ~~million~~Company inbelieves that if necessary, they will be ~~January~~able ~~2012~~to ~~(See~~raise ~~Note~~additional 4)needed capital through subsequent debt or equity financing transactions.

In the opinion of management, its existing cash resources as of March 31, 2012, projected improved operating results, collections on future billings, and borrowing availability under existing credit facilities, will provide sufficient liquidity for the Company to meet its continuing obligations for the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurances that projected collections will be realized or that the Company will improve operating results so that positive cash flow from operating activities will be achieved. The Company believes that if necessary, they will be able to raise additional needed capital through subsequent debt or equity financing transactions, and in this regard, has current Board of Director authorization to issue additional convertible notes payable in the principal amount of $1.9 million on the same terms as those issued pursuant to the 2011 Purchase Agreement.6

3. Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Share option plans

The Company has three share-based compensation plans (collectively, the “Plans”), which provide for the issuance of options, stock grants, and stock-based awards to employees and others as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors. Terms of options issued under the Plans generally include an exercise price equal to the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant, vesting periods generally between three and five years, and expiration dates not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company had 3,~~616~~596,~~233~~932 option shares outstanding, of which ~~932~~700,~~687~~000 shares of restricted stock are outstanding but unvested under the Plans, and ~~393~~1,~~628~~644,307 option shares available for issuance. Stock-based compensation expenses of approximately $4390,000 and $40100,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were charged to operating expenses. The effect on loss per share as a result of the stock based compensation expense was approximately $0.0001 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011. The tax effect was immaterial.

Calculating stock-based compensation expense requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock options granted, the expected stock price volatility factor, and the pre-vesting option forfeiture rate. The fair value of options granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model (“Black-Scholes”) using the valuation assumptions in the table below. The Company estimates the expected life of stock options granted based upon management’s consideration of the historical life of the options and the vesting and contractual period of the options granted. The Company estimates the expected volatility factor based on the weighted average of the historical volatility of three publicly traded surrogates of the Company and the Company’s implied volatility from its common stock price. The Company applies its risk-free interest rate based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant. The Company has no history or expectation of paying any cash dividends on its common stock. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012			Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012			Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Average expected life (years)		6.5			6.5
Average expected volatility		5659.95%	%		55.58%	%
Average risk-free interest rate		2.0%	%		3.53%	%
Average expected dividend yield		0			0
Forfeiture rate		25.9%			25.9%

6The following is a summary of stock option activity under the Plans as of June 30, 2012:

The following is a summary of stock option activity under the Plans as of March 31, 2012:

	Number of Shares Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011		3,470,351		$	0.26		7.87	$	205,638		–
Granted		471,281		$	0.36		–		–	$	0.30
Exercised		(5,506	)	$	0.23		–		–		–
Forfeited/Expired		(339,194	)	$	0.31		–		–		–
Options outstanding at June 30, 2012		3,596,932		$	0.27		7.62	$	18,358		–
Options vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2012		3,223,550		$	0.27		7.42	$	17,797		–
Options exercisable at June 30, 2012		2,210,421		$	0.24		6.75	$	15,334		–

	Number of Shares Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011		3,470,351		$	0.26	7.87	$	205,638		—
Granted		357,281		$	0.39	—		—	$	0.39
Exercised		(4,197	)	$	0.25	—		—		—
Forfeited/Expired		(207,202	)	$	0.31	—		—		—
Options outstanding at March 31, 2012		3,616,233		$	0.27	7.67	$	70,794		—
Options vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2012		3,215,071		$	0.27	7.45	$	67,960		—
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012		2,096,757		$	0.24	6.64	$	53,297		—

Additional information regarding options outstanding as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 is as follows:

Range of Exercise Prices				Number of Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.15	$	0.1620		~~388~~870,~~340~~066		7.0545	$	0.1618		~~332~~701,~~752~~694	$	0.1618
$	0.1722	$	0.1924		71452,000		97.2491	$	0.1723		10331,~~671~~229	$	0.1823
$	0.2025	$	0.2025		~~396~~751,~~875~~545		75.5405	$	0.2025		~~318~~738,~~403~~190	$	0.2025
$	0.2226	$	0.2434		~~452~~745,~~000~~031		89.1610	$	0.2327		~~297~~217,~~285~~568	$	0.2327
$	0.2535	$	0.2582		~~794~~778,~~405~~290		58.2769	$	0.2542		~~781~~221,~~405~~740	$	0.2543
$	0.2615	$	0.2682		~~584~~3,~~000~~596,932		97.3462	$	0.2627		922,~~494~~210,421	$	0.2624
$	0.30	$	0.35		430,759		7.77	$	0.35		196,293	$	0.35
$	0.40	$	0.50		380,250		9.73	$	0.41		19,228	$	0.47
$	0.52	$	0.73		88,604		7.97	$	0.56		38,226	$	0.56
$	0.82	$	0.82		30,000		8.62	$	0.82		10,000	$	0.82
$	0.15	$	0.82		3,616,233		7.67	$	0.27		2,096,757	$	0.24

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was approximately $7118,000 and $5315,000, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total intrinsic value based upon the stock price of $0.2520 at ~~March~~June 30, 2012. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 was approximately $~~801~~68,000 and $~~394~~39,000, respectively.

Cash received from ~~stock~~ stock option exercises during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was $1,000. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, there was approximately $~~445~~406,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the option plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7387 years.

The following is a ~~summary~~ summary of restricted stock activity as of the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012:

	Number of Shares Outstanding*			Weighted Average Fair Value
Restricted stock unreleased at December 31, 2011		252,687		$	0.64
Awarded		700,000		$	0.39
Released		—–		$	—–
Cancelled		—(252,687	)	$	—0.63
Restricted stock unreleased at March 31, 2012		952,687		$	0.45
Restricted stock unreleased at June 30, 2012		700,000		$	0.39

* Represents the total amount of restricted stock outstanding ~~but~~ but unvested.

74. Credit Facility and Debt Agreements

~~4. Credit~~Silicon ~~Facility~~Valley ~~and~~Bank ~~Debt Agreements~~(“SVB”)

~~Silicon~~In 2007, ~~Valley~~the ~~Bank~~Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB (the “SVB Loan Agreement”). The Company borrows and makes repayments under the revolving credit facility depending on its liquidity position. Most recently, the SVB Loan Agreement was amended on September 8, 2011 and April 30, 2012. The primary revisions incorporated by the latest amendment include (i) modifying the availability amount on the revolving line balance to the lesser of the revolving line or the borrowing base, minus the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C, minus the outstanding principal balance of any advances and (ii) revising the SVB Loan Agreement’s financial covenant calculation, which replaces the tangible net worth calculation, to include that the Company maintain at all times, on a year to date basis for 2012, a modified cumulative net income of at least negative three million dollars (-$3,000,000), on a trailing three (3) month basis from January 2013 through March 2013, an amount equal to at least eighty percent (80%) of the Company’s projected modified cumulative net income for the applicable period and on a trailing three (3) month basis at all times thereafter, one dollar ($1.00).

In 2007, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB (the “SVB Loan Agreement”). The Company borrows and makes repayments under the revolving credit facility depending on its liquidity position. Most recently, the SVB Loan Agreement was amended on September 8, 2011 and April 30, 2012. The primary revisions incorporated by the latest amendment include (i) modifying the availability amount on the revolving line balance to the lesser of the revolving line or the borrowing base, minus the aggregate outstanding principal amount of Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C, minus the outstanding principal balance of any advances and (ii) revising the SVB Loan Agreement’s financial covenant calculation, which replaces the tangible net worth calculation, to include that the Company maintain at all times, on a year to date basis for 2012, a modified cumulative net income of at least negative three million dollars (-$3,000,000), on a trailing three (3) month basis from January 2013 through March 2013, an amount equal to at least eighty percent (80%) of the Company’s projected modified cumulative net income for the applicable period and on a trailing three (3) month basis at all times thereafter, one dollar ($1.00).

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the total amount outstanding under the Revolving Line was $1.57 million and the Company had a remaining borrowing availability of $~~682~~842,000. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the applicable interest rate for the Revolving Line was 6.00% and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2012 interest expense relating to the revolving line was approximately $7312,000 and $19,000, respectively. At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2012, the total amount outstanding under Term Loans A, B, and C was $~~558~~458,000, which represents the total amount available pursuant to these loans. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the applicable interest rates for Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C were 6.00%, 7.50%, and 7.00%, respectively, and the total interest expense for these loans for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was approximately $8,000 and $16,000, respectively.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ~~the~~ the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the SVB Loan and Security Agreement, as amended.

Convertible Notes Payable

On December 5, 2011, the Company entered into the 2011 Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company issued convertible notes payable in the amount of $4.5 million (“2011 Convertible Notes”) to certain holders of the convertible notes payable issued by the Company in 2010 (“2010 Convertible Notes”). Approximately $3.0 million of the total gross proceeds from the 2011 Convertible Notes was used to retire the 2010 Convertible Notes. 2011 Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $1.7 million were issued to a venture capital fund, which is controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

The 2011 Convertible ~~Notes~~ Notes bear interest at the rate of 7.00% per annum with accrued interest and principal due and payable on the maturity date of ~~December~~ December 4, 2015. The note holders may convert the 2011 Convertible Notes in whole or in part at any time prior to the ~~maturity~~ maturity date into shares of Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.70. Following the occurrence of any period of 60 consecutive trading days where the average closing price of the Common Stock of the Company is equal to or greater than $1.00 per share, the entire unpaid principal amount of the 2011 Convertible Notes together with any unpaid interest shall be converted into Common Stock of the Company at the conversion price of $0.70.

The 2011 Convertible ~~Notes~~ Notes may be prepaid in whole or in part from time to time and at any time prior to maturity without penalty or premium subject to the Investors’ right to convert the Notes upon receipt of notice of such prepayment. The obligations ~~represented~~ represented by the 2011 Convertible Notes are secured by a security interest in the assets of the Company, subordinated to the SVB and PFG loan agreements. Upon the occurrence of any event of default, the holders of the 2011 Convertible Notes may elect to call the principal amount, plus all accrued but unpaid interest on the 2011 Convertible Notes then outstanding immediately ~~due~~ due and payable.

The terms of the 2011 ~~Convertible~~ Convertible Notes also provided that in the event that prior to December 5, 2012, the Company issued a new Note (or Notes) for an aggregate consideration in excess of $25,000 with a conversion price less than the current conversion price of the 2011 ~~Convertible~~ Convertible Notes, then going forward the conversion price of the portion of the 2011 Convertible Notes that had not previously ~~been~~ been converted into equity securities would automatically be reduced to the new Note conversion rate. In March 2012, the ~~terms~~ terms of the 2011 Convertible Notes were amended, effective as of the original issuance date of the 2011 Convertible Notes, to ~~eliminate~~ eliminate the above referenced conversion price adjustment provision and to include a provision that restricts that Company from ~~issuing~~ issuing a new convertible note or series of new convertible notes with a conversion rate less than the then current conversion rate of the 2011 Convertible Notes prior to December 5, 2012.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~principal~~ principal and accrued interest on the 2011 Convertible Notes totaled $45.90 million.

One of the 2010 Convertible Notes in the original principal amount of $300,000 was not repaid in connection with the issuance of the 2011 Convertible Notes and remain outstanding at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. The interest on the outstanding principal balance on these 2010 Notes accrues at a rate of three percent (3.0%) per annum and accrued interest is added to the balance of the 2010 Note. All unpaid principal and interest is due and payable at maturity, which is July 30, 2014, and may be converted at any time into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $1.10. Following the occurrence of any period of 60 consecutive trading days where the average closing price of the Company’s common stock is equal to or greater than $1.25 per share, the entire unpaid principal amount together with any unpaid interest shall be converted into the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.10.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~and~~ and December 31, 2011 principal and accrued interest on the 2010 ~~Notes~~Note totaled $~~315~~322,000 and $313,000, respectively. ~~Interest~~ The combined interest expense recognized during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 on both of the 2010 and 2011 Convertible Notes totaled approximately $8592,000 and $24,000, respectively. The combined interest expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 on both of the 2010 and 2011 Convertible Notes totaled approximately $176,000 and $48,000, respectively.

On January 4, 2012 ~~the~~ the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued secured subordinated convertible notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $100,000 on terms identical to the 2011 Convertible Notes, as amended. Also, on March 2, 2012 the Company received a principal amount of $200,000 with an original investor of the 2010 Convertible Note for which the Company has yet to receive a Purchase Agreement with that investor. The Company has been accruing interest on $200,000, which is being added to the principal amount, at a rate of seven percent (7.0%) which is consistent with interest rate terms on the 2011 Convertible Notes, as amended.

Partners for Growth III, L.P. (“PFG”)

Effective January 30, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “PFG Loan Agreement”) with Partners for Growth III, L.P., pursuant to which PFG provided EdgeWave with a loan in the amount of $1.5 million (the “Loan”).

The Loan will be repaid in 36 monthly principal payments of approximately $42,000 each, plus interest, commencing on March 1, 2012. The principal of the Loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part during the first year. During the second year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to three percent (3%) of the amount prepaid. During the third year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to two percent (2%) of the amount prepaid. The annual interest rate on the Loan is 9.75%, fixed. The obligations under the PFG Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of EdgeWave’s assets, subordinated to the SVB Loan Agreements.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ~~the~~ the principal balance on the Loan was approximately $1.53 million. Interest expense recognized during the three ~~months~~and ~~ended~~six ~~March~~months 31ended June 30, 2012 totaled $2135,000 and $44,000, respectively.

The PFG Loan Agreement contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for credit facilities of this type, including, among other things, limitations on indebtedness, liens, sales of assets, mergers, investments, and dividends. The PFG Loan Agreement also requires that EdgeWave maintain a Cumulative Modified Net Income / Loss (as defined in the PFG Loan Agreement) of not less than ($3.0 million) during the calendar year 2012 (with dollar figures in parentheses denoting a negative number). The PFG Loan Agreement requires for each month during the first calendar quarter of 2013, on a rolling three-month basis, that EdgeWave maintain a Modified Net Income / (Loss) of at least eighty percent (80%) of EdgeWave’s Board-approved forecast/financial plan for Modified Net Income / (Loss) for such period. In addition, the PFG Loan Agreement contains events of default provisions customary for credit facilities of this type (with grace or cure periods, as applicable).

In connection with ~~the~~ the execution of the PFG Loan Agreement, EdgeWave issued warrants (the “Warrants”) to PFG and its designees which allow PFG and its designees to purchase up to 450,000 shares of EdgeWave common stock at an exercise of $0.35 per share. The Warrants expire on January 30, 2017.

5. Other Assets

Other assets consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Long term accounts receivable	$	~~700~~350,000	$	-–
Security deposits		97,000		97,000
Total other assets	$	~~797~~447,000	$	97,000

At March 31, 2012, other assets consisted of $700,000 in long term accounts receivable for amounts in which payments are not due within one year and $97,000 in security deposits mostly related to our operating lease for our corporate headquarters in San Diego.10

~~6. Stockholders’~~At ~~Deficit~~June 30, 2012, other assets consisted of $350,000 in long term accounts receivable for amounts in which payments are not due within one year and $97,000 in security deposits mostly related to our operating lease for our corporate headquarters in San Diego.

~~Warrants~~6. Stockholders’ Deficit

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, a total of 1,838,961 and 1,363,961 shares of common stock, respectively, were reserved for issuance for the exercise of warrants at exercise prices ranging from $0.35 to $1.60 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 475,000 warrants were issued. There were no warrants exercised or cancelled during these three months.Warrants

9As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, a total of 1,738,961 and 1,363,961 shares of common stock, respectively, were reserved for issuance for the exercise of warrants at exercise prices ranging from $0.35 to $1.25 per share. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 475,000 warrants were issued and 100,000 warrants were cancelled. There were no warrants exercised during these six months.

The detail of the warrants outstanding and exercisable as of June ~~March 31~~30, 2012 is as follows:

Exercise Price		Number Outstanding		Remaining Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.35		450,000		4.8459	$	0.35
$	0.46		450,000		1.3005	$	0.46
$	0.57		603,850		2.8257	$	0.57
$	1.10		210,111		2.3308	$	1.10
$	1.25		25,000		3.3409	$	1.25
$	1.60		100,000		0.13	$	1.60
			1,738,961			$	0.56
			1,838,961			$	0.62

7. Warrant Derivative Liability

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, there were 463,500 warrants classified as a derivative liability with an estimated fair value of $4736,000 due to an exercise price re-set provision included in the underlying warrant agreement. The estimated fair value was determined using the binomial lattice pricing model (“binomial lattice model”). Key assumptions of the binomial lattice model include the market price of our stock, the exercise price of the warrants, applicable volatility rates, risk-free interest rates, expected dividends, probability of future financing, and the instrument's remaining term. These assumptions require significant management judgment. In addition, changes in any of these variables during a period can result in material changes in the fair value (gains or losses) of these derivative instruments. The decrease in the estimated fair value of the warrant derivative liability for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 of $1526,000 is included in other expense in the accompanying statement of operations. (See Note 8).

8. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value hierarchy

Fair value is defined in in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are to be considered from the perspective of a market participant that holds the assets or owes the liability. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets and liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets and liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

~~Financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis~~11

~~ASC~~Financial ~~820~~instruments ~~requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy used by the Company to value financial assets and liabilities that are~~ measured at ~~fair~~ fair value on a recurring basis. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase common shares of our stock that are classified as warrant derivative liabilities with a fair value of $47,000 and $62,000, respectively. The warrants were valued using the binomial lattice pricing model, which utilizes significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), using the valuation assumptions in the table below.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012			Year Ended December 31, 2011
Average expected life (years)		2.8			3.0
Average expected volatility		70.0	%		70.0	%
Average risk-free interest rate		0.5	%		0.4	%
Expected dividend yield		0			0
Stock price	$	0.25		$	0.30

ASC 820 requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy used by the Company to value financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase common shares of our stock that are classified as warrant derivative liabilities with a fair value of $36,000 and $62,000, respectively. The warrants were valued using the binomial lattice pricing model, which utilizes significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), using the valuation assumptions in the table below.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012		Year Ended December 31, 2011
Average expected life (years)		2.6		3.0
Average expected volatility		70.0%		70.0%
Average risk-free interest rate		0.4%		0.4%
Expected dividend yield		0		0
Stock price	$	0.20	$	0.30

The following table ~~reconciles~~ reconciles the warrant derivative liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012:

Balance at December 31, 2011		62,000
Gain on change in fair value included in other expense (income)		(1526,000	)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	47,000
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	36,000

9. Commitment and Contingencies

Litigation

In the normal course of of business, the Company is occasionally named as a defendant in various lawsuits. There are currently no material pending legal ~~proceedings~~ proceedings which the Company is a party of or which any of the Company’s property is the subject of .

Operating leases

The Company leases ~~approximately~~ approximately 37,000 square feet of office space in San Diego, CA pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in May 31, 2016. Pursuant to the terms of this lease agreement, the Company issued a Letter of Credit for the benefit of the lessor in the amount of $250,000.

The Company also leases approximately 12,000 square feet of office space in Rohnert Park, CA which is used primarily for technical support and research and development relating to its ePrism product line. The Rohnert Park lease was renewed during March 2012 which extends the lease until May 31, 2014.

~~Capital~~10. ~~lease~~Related Party Transactions

As A adirector ~~component~~ of ~~its lease~~ ~~agreement for its office space in San Diego, CA,~~ the Company ~~received~~is ~~an allowance of approximately $217,000 that the Company used to purchase office cubicles and other furniture during January 2011. Accordingly,~~ a ~~capital~~managing ~~lease~~member ~~has~~of ~~been recorded for this amount and~~ a ~~pro-rata~~venture ~~portion of the monthly lease payment is allocated to the~~ capital ~~lease~~firm ~~principal~~that ~~balance~~as ~~and interest based upon a term~~ of ~~sixty-five~~June ~~(65) months at an annual interest rate of 7.0%. As of March 31~~30, 2012 ~~current~~has ~~and~~loaned ~~long~~approximately ~~term capital lease obligations included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet were~~ $~~37,000~~1.8 ~~and $137~~million,~~000,~~ ~~respectively, and for the~~which ~~three~~includes ~~months~~accrued ~~ended~~interest ~~March~~added ~~31,~~to ~~2012,~~the ~~approximately~~ $~~9,000~~1.7 ~~and~~million ~~$3,000 were allocated to reduce the~~ principal balance, onto the ~~capital lease~~Company ~~and~~pursuant to ~~record~~the ~~related~~2011 ~~interest~~Convertible ~~expense,~~Notes ~~respectively~~(See Note 4).

~~10. Related Party Transactions~~12

APART director of the Company is a managing member of a venture capital firm that as of March 31, 2012 has loaned $1.7 million, which includes accrued interest added to the principal balance, to the Company pursuant to the 2011 Convertible Notes (See Note 4).I

11Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

~~PART~~The following Idiscussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. For additional information concerning these factors, see the information under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2012 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

~~Item~~Our ~~2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~Business

~~The following~~We ~~discussion~~develop and ~~analysis~~market on ofdemand, ~~our~~appliance, ~~financial condition~~ and ~~results~~hybrid ofSCM ~~operations~~solutions ~~should~~to bethe ~~read~~mid-market inenterprise ~~conjunction with our consolidated financial statements~~ and ~~related~~service ~~notes~~provider ~~that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~markets. InThe ~~addition~~EdgeWave ~~to historical consolidated~~portfolio ~~financial~~of ~~information~~web, ~~the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans~~messaging, ~~estimates~~ and ~~beliefs. Our~~social ~~actual~~media ~~results~~security ~~could~~technologies ~~differ~~deliver ~~materially~~SCM ~~from~~with ~~those~~ease ~~discussed~~of ~~in the forward-looking statements~~deployment. ~~Factors~~The ~~that~~Company’s ~~could cause or~~award-winning ~~contribute~~iPrism toWeb ~~these~~Security ~~differences~~appliance ~~include~~and ~~those~~ePrism ~~discussed~~Messaging ~~below~~Security Suite and ~~elsewhere~~iPrism inSocial ~~this~~Media ~~Quarterly~~Security ~~Report~~solutions oncan ~~Form~~be ~~10-Q.~~delivered ~~For additional~~as ~~information~~hosted, ~~concerning these factors~~on-premises, ~~see~~and ~~the~~hybrid ~~information~~services. ~~under~~With ~~the~~approximately ~~caption~~6,500 ~~“Risk~~customers ~~Factors”~~and inover ~~our~~200 ~~Annual~~partners ~~Report~~worldwide, onEdgeWave strives ~~Form~~to ~~10-K~~deliver ~~filed~~high ~~on March 30~~performance, ~~2012~~easy-to-use ~~for~~solutions ~~the~~that ~~year~~offer ~~ended~~excellent ~~December 31, 2011~~value.

Customers can purchase EdgeWave solutions directly from us, or through our network of distributors, Value-Added Resellers and Managed Service Providers. On-premises purchases typically consist of an initial hardware purchase (appliance) and filtering subscription, whereas our hosted services only require a subscription. Our ~~Business~~primary customers are enterprise IT executives, managers and administrators as well as Managed Service Providers and Internet Service Providers.

OnOverview ~~June 15, 2011, the shareholders~~ of ~~the~~Our ~~Company~~Financial ~~approved~~Results ~~the~~and ~~amendment~~Financial ~~of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change our corporate name from St. Bernard Software, Inc. to EdgeWave, Inc.~~Position

We ~~develop~~reported ~~and~~revenues of ~~market~~$4.3 ~~on demand,~~million ~~on-premises,~~for ~~and~~the ~~hybrid~~three ~~SCM~~months ~~solutions~~ended June 30, 2012, compared to ~~the~~$4.8 ~~mid-enterprise~~million ~~and~~in ~~service~~the ~~provider~~same ~~markets.~~period ~~The~~in ~~EdgeWave~~2011, ~~portfolio~~a decrease of ~~web~~10.4%; ~~and~~a ~~email~~net ~~security~~loss ~~technologies~~for ~~delivers~~the ~~SCM~~three ~~with~~months ~~ease~~ended ofJune ~~deployment~~30, ~~and~~2012 ~~the~~of ~~lowest~~$1.2 ~~Total~~million, ~~Cost~~compared ofto ~~Ownership~~a ~~(“TCO”) on~~net ~~the~~loss ~~market~~of $1.3 ~~The~~million ~~Company’s~~in ~~award-winning~~the ~~iPrism~~same ~~Web~~period in ~~Security~~2011; ~~appliance~~ and ~~ePrism~~net ~~hosted~~basic ~~Email~~and ~~Security~~diluted ~~Suite~~loss ~~can~~per beshare ~~delivered as~~for ~~hosted,~~the ~~on-premises,~~three ~~and~~months ~~hybrid~~ended ~~services.~~June ~~With~~30, ~~approximately~~2012 6of $0.07,~~500~~ ~~customers~~compared ~~and~~to ~~over~~a ~~200~~net ~~partners~~basic ~~worldwide,~~and diluted ~~EdgeWave~~loss ~~strives to~~per ~~deliver~~share ~~simple,~~of ~~high~~$0.08 ~~performance~~reported ~~solutions~~in ~~that~~the ~~offer~~same ~~excellent~~period ~~value~~in 2011.

~~Customers~~Cash ~~can purchase~~used ~~EdgeWave~~by ~~solutions~~operations was ~~directly~~$2.1 ~~from~~million ~~us, or through our network of distributors, Value-Added Resellers~~ and ~~Managed Service Providers~~$1.5 ~~On-premises~~million ~~purchases~~for ~~typically~~the ~~consist~~six ofmonths anended ~~initial~~June ~~hardware~~30, ~~purchase~~2012 ~~(appliance)~~ and ~~filtering subscription~~2011, ~~whereas~~respectively. ~~our~~The ~~hosted~~net ~~services~~increase ~~only~~in ~~require~~the acash ~~subscription.~~used by ~~Our~~operating ~~primary~~activities ~~customers~~resulted ~~are~~primarily ITfrom ~~executives,~~changes ~~managers~~in ~~and administrators~~operating asassets ~~well~~and asliabilities ~~Managed~~during ~~Service~~the first ~~Providers~~six ~~and~~months ~~Internet~~of ~~Service Providers~~2012.

~~Overview~~As of ~~Our~~June ~~Financial~~30, ~~Results~~2012, we had cash and ~~Financial~~cash ~~Position~~equivalents of $1.9 million and availability under an existing credit facility with SVB of $842,000. In January 2012, we received proceeds of $1.5 million in connection with a loan with PFG. In the opinion of management, our existing cash resources as of June 30, 2012, collections on future billings, and borrowing availability under existing credit facilities will provide sufficient liquidity for the Company to meet its continuing obligations for the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurances that projected collections will be realized or that the Company will improve operating results so that positive cash flow from operating activities will be achieved.

WeCritical ~~reported~~Accounting ~~revenues~~Policies of $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to $4.4 million in the same period in 2011, a decrease of 1.9%; a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $1.4 million, compared to a net loss of $1.7 million in the same period in 2011; and ~~net basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $0.08, compared to a net basic and diluted loss per share of $0.11 reported in the same period in 2011.~~Estimates

~~Cash~~There ~~used~~are byseveral ~~operations~~accounting ~~was~~policies ~~$1.2~~that ~~million~~are ~~and~~critical ~~$1.4~~to ~~million~~understanding ~~for~~our ~~the~~historical ~~three~~and ~~months~~future ~~ended~~performance ~~March~~because ~~31,~~these ~~2012~~policies ~~and~~affect ~~2011,~~the ~~respectively.~~reported ~~The~~amounts of ~~net~~revenue ~~decrease~~and other significant areas in ~~the~~our ~~cash used~~reported byfinancial ~~operating~~statements ~~activities~~and ~~was~~involve ~~mainly~~management’s ~~the~~judgments ~~result~~and ofestimates. These ~~reductions~~critical inaccounting ~~salaries~~policies and ~~related~~estimates ~~expenses.~~include:

As● ofrevenue ~~March~~recognition; ~~31,~~● ~~2012,~~allowance ~~we had~~for ~~cash~~doubtful ~~and~~accounts; ~~cash~~● ~~equivalents~~impairment of ~~$2.8~~goodwill ~~million~~ and ~~availability~~long-lived ~~under~~assets; an● ~~existing~~accounting ~~credit~~for ~~facility~~income ~~with~~taxes; ~~SVB~~● ofwarranty ~~$682,000. In January~~obligation; 2012, we received proceeds of $1.5 million in connection with a loan with PFG. In the opinion of management, our existing cash resources as of March 31, 2012, proceeds from the January 2012 loan with PFG, projected improvements in operating results, collections on future billings and ~~borrowing~~● ~~availability~~accounting ~~under existing credit facilities will provide sufficient liquidity~~ for ~~the~~stock ~~Company~~based ~~to meet its continuing obligations for the next twelve months~~compensation. However, there can be no assurances that projected collections will be realized or that the Company will improve operating results so that positive cash flow from operating activities will be achieved.

~~Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates~~13

~~There~~Please ~~are~~refer ~~several~~to ~~accounting~~the ~~policies~~“Management’s ~~that~~Discussion ~~are~~and ~~critical~~Analysis toof ~~understanding~~Financial ~~our~~Condition ~~historical~~ and ~~future~~Results ~~performance~~of ~~because~~Operation” ~~these~~located ~~policies~~within ~~affect~~our 10-K filed on March 30, 2012 for the ~~reported~~year ~~amounts of~~ended ~~revenue~~December ~~and~~31, ~~other~~2011 ~~significant~~for ~~areas~~further indiscussion of our “Summary ~~reported~~of ~~financial~~Significant Accounting ~~statements~~Policies and ~~involve~~Estimates”. ~~management’s~~There ~~judgments~~have ~~and~~been ~~estimates. These~~no ~~critical~~material changes to these accounting policies ~~and~~during ~~estimates~~the ~~include:~~six months ended June 30, 2012.

●Results ~~revenue~~of ~~recognition;~~Operations ~~● allowance for doubtful accounts; ● impairment~~ of ~~goodwill~~EdgeWave, ~~and long-lived assets; ● accounting for income taxes; ● warranty obligation; and ● accounting for stock based compensation~~Inc.

~~Please~~Comparison ~~refer to~~ of the ~~“Management’s Discussion~~Three ~~and~~Months ~~Analysis~~Ended ofJune ~~Financial Condition and Results of Operation” located within our 10-K filed on March~~ 30, 2012 ~~for~~ ~~the~~and ~~year ended December 31,~~ 2011 ~~for~~(amounts ~~further~~in ~~discussion~~tables ofpresented in ~~our “Summary~~thousands, ofexcept ~~Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates”. There have been no material changes to these accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2012.~~percentages)

*Revenues*	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total revenues	$	4,303	$	4,805		(10.	4)%

~~Results~~Revenues ofdecreased $502,000 ~~Operations~~for ofthe ~~EdgeWave~~three months ended June 30, ~~Inc~~2012, compared to the same period in 2011. See the discussion of changes in subscription and appliance revenues below.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in tables presented in thousands, except percentages)

*Subscription Revenues*	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Subscription revenues	$	3,516	$	3,644		(3.5%	)
As a percentage of revenues		81.7%		75.8%

Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total revenues	$	4,296	$	4,380		(1.9	)%

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 our subscription revenues decreased approximately $128,000 compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of pricing pressures to discount our subscription products in order to remain competitive. The subscription renewal rates for our products range from 75% to 85%.

Revenues decreased $84,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. See the discussion of changes in subscription and appliance revenues below.

Appliance Revenues	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Appliance revenues	$	787	$	1,159		(32.1%	)
As a percentage of revenues		18.3%		24.1%

Subscription Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Subscription revenues	$	3,501		$	3,670			(4.6	)%
As a percentage of revenues		81.5	%		83.8	%

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, appliance revenues decreased approximately $372,000 compared with the respective period in 2011 due mainly to the shipping of fewer appliances coupled with discounts applied to the appliance in order to stay competitive.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 our subscription revenues decreased approximately $169,000 compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of pricing pressures to discount our subscription products in order to remain competitive with our competitors. The subscription renewal rates for our products range from 75% to 85%.

*Cost of Revenues*	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total cost of revenues	$	1,351	$	1,521		(11.2%	)
Gross margin percent		68.6%		68.3%

Appliance Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Appliance revenues	$	795		$	708			12.3	%
As a percentage of revenues		18.5	%		16.2	%

Cost of revenues consists primarily of the cost of contract manufactured hardware, technical support salaries, royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements, packaging costs, fee-based technical support costs and freight. Total cost of revenues decreased $170,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. See the discussion of changes in the cost of subscription and appliance revenues below.

~~For the three months ended March 31, 2012, appliance revenues increased approximately $87,000 compared with the respective period in 2011 due mainly to the shipping of additional appliances.~~14

Cost of Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Cost of Subscription Revenues	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total cost of revenues	$	1,165		$	1,245			(6.4	)%
Total cost of subscription revenues	$	750		$	719			4.3%
Gross margin percent		7278.97%	%		7180.23%	6%

~~Cost~~The cost of ~~revenues~~subscription ~~consists~~revenues primarily ofincludes the cost of ~~contract~~our ~~manufactured hardware,~~ technical support ~~salaries,~~group ~~royalties~~and ~~paid~~network tocolocation ~~third parties under technology licensing agreements, packaging~~ costs~~, fee-based technical support costs and freight~~. The ~~Total~~increase ~~cost~~ of ~~revenues decreased~~ $8031,000 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011~~. See~~ ~~the~~was ~~discussion~~mainly ofdue ~~changes in~~to the ~~cost~~increased costs of ~~subscription~~ improving and ~~appliance~~maintaining ~~revenues~~our ~~below~~ePrism email filtering product line.

Cost of Subscription Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Cost of Appliance Revenues	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total cost of subscription revenues	$	702		$	790			(11.1	)%
Total cost of appliance revenues	$	601		$	802			(25.1%	)
Gross margin percent		7923.96%	%		7830.58%	%

The cost of ~~subscription~~appliance revenues, ~~primarily~~which includes ~~the~~contract ~~cost~~manufactured ofequipment, ~~our~~warranty ~~technical~~expense, ~~support~~and ~~group~~packaging and ~~network~~freight ~~colocation~~decreased ~~costs. The~~approximately ~~decrease of~~ $88201,000 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This ~~was~~is ~~mainly~~the result of a decrease in the number of appliances sold during the current period as compared to the same period in 2011. Gross margin decreased 7.2% due to ~~decreases~~the discounting of our appliance products in order to ~~compensation~~remain ~~expenses~~competitive.

Cost of Appliance Revenues	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Sales and Marketing	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total cost of appliance revenues	$	463		$	453			2.2	%
Total sales and marketing	$	1,970		$	2,277			(13.5%	)
Gross margin percent		41.8	%		36.0	%
As a percentage of revenues		45.8%			47.4%

~~The~~Sales ~~cost~~and ~~of appliance revenues,~~marketing ~~which~~expense ~~includes~~consists ~~contract~~primarily ~~manufactured~~of ~~equipment~~salaries, ~~warranty~~related ~~expense~~benefits, ~~and~~commissions, ~~packaging~~consultant ~~and~~fees, ~~freight~~advertising, ~~increased~~lead ~~approximately~~generation ~~$10,000~~and ~~for~~other ~~the~~costs ~~three~~associated ~~months~~with ~~ended~~our ~~March~~sales ~~31,~~and ~~2012~~marketing ~~compared~~efforts. toFor the ~~same~~three ~~period~~months inended ~~2011. This~~June is30, ~~the~~2012 ~~result~~sales ofand anmarketing ~~increase~~expense ~~in the number~~decreased of13.5%, ~~appliances~~or ~~sold~~approximately ~~during~~$307,000, over the ~~current~~same period. ~~Gross~~in ~~margin~~2011 ~~increased~~primarily ~~5.8%~~ due to increased ~~sales~~efficiency ofand ~~our~~optimization ~~higher~~of ~~priced~~the ~~appliance~~lead to ~~units~~sales ~~which are more profitable~~process.

*Research and Development*	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total research and development	$	1,167	$	1,267		(7.9%	)
As a percentage of revenues		27.1%		26.4%

Sales and Marketing	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total sales and marketing	$	2,209		$	2,443			(9.6)	%
As a percentage of revenues		51.4	%		55.8	%

Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries, related benefits, third-party consultant fees and other engineering related costs. The net decrease of $100,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation costs for research and development engineers. Research and development is an important part of our business and we expect it to remain high as a percentage of revenues as we continue to invest in our development efforts.

~~Sales~~We ~~and~~currently ~~marketing~~have ~~expense~~research ~~consists~~and ~~primarily~~development offacilities ~~salaries,~~in ~~related~~San ~~benefits,~~Diego ~~commissions,~~and ~~consultant~~Rohnert ~~fees~~Park, ~~advertising,~~CA. ~~lead~~Management ~~generation~~believes ~~and~~that ~~other~~a ~~costs~~significant ~~associated with~~investment ~~our~~in ~~sales~~research and development ~~marketing~~is ~~efforts.~~required ~~For~~to ~~the~~remain ~~three~~competitive ~~months ended March 31, 2012 sales~~ and ~~marketing~~we ~~expense~~expect ~~decreased~~to ~~9.6%,~~continue ~~or approximately~~to ~~$234,000,~~invest ~~over the same period~~ in ~~2011~~research ~~primarily~~and ~~due~~development ~~to decreases in advertising expenses~~activities.

Research and Development	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total research and development	$	1,190		$	1,464			(18.7	)%
As a percentage of revenues		27.7	%		33.4	%

Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries, related benefits, third-party consultant fees and other engineering related costs. The net decrease of $274,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation costs for research and development engineers. Research and development is an important part of our business and we expect it to remain high as a percentage of revenues as we continue to invest in our development efforts.

General and Administrative	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total general and administrative	$	831	$	1,029		(19.2%	)
As a percentage of revenues		19.3%		21.4%

WeGeneral ~~currently~~and ~~have research~~administrative ~~and~~expenses, ~~development~~which ~~facilities~~consist inprimarily ~~San~~of ~~Diego~~salaries and ~~Rohnert~~related ~~Park~~benefits, fees ~~CA.~~for ~~Management~~professional ~~believes~~services, ~~that~~such aas ~~significant~~legal ~~investment~~and accounting inservices, ~~research~~stock-based compensation, and ~~development~~ isinsurance ~~required~~decreased toapproximately ~~remain~~$198,000 ~~competitive~~for ~~and~~the wethree ~~expect~~months toended ~~continue~~June 30, 2012, compared to ~~invest~~the same period in ~~research~~2011. The most significant decreases during the three months ended June 30, 2012 were in compensation, accounting, legal, and ~~development~~stock-based ~~activities~~compensation expenses.

General and Administrative	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total general and administrative	$	1,014		$	906			11.9	%
As a percentage of revenues		23.6	%		20.7	%

We expect our general and administrative expenses to remain flat for the remaining two quarters of 2012 as compared to the comparable quarters in 2011.

General and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, fees for professional services, such as legal and accounting services, stock-based compensation, and insurance increased approximately $108,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. The most significant increases during the three months ended March 31, 2012 was the result of increases in compensation and consulting expenses.

*Interest and Other Income, Net*	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011			% Change
Total interest and other income, net	$	145	$	(5	)		3000.0%
As a percentage of revenues		3.4%		(0.1%	)

Interest and Other Income, Net	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			% Change
Total interest and other income, net	$	108		$	24			350.0	%
As a percentage of revenues		2.5	%		0.5	%

Interest and other income, net, includes interest expense, interest income, and other income. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, interest and other income, net included interest expense of $156,000 due to outstanding borrowings (see Note 4), offset by a gain on the change in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $11,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, interest and other income, net included interest expense of $61,000 due to outstanding borrowings, offset by gain on the change in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $66,000.

~~Interest~~Comparison ~~and other income,~~of ~~net, includes interest expense, interest income, and other income. For~~ the ~~three~~Six ~~months~~Months ~~ended~~Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ~~interest~~ and ~~other income,~~2011 ~~net~~(amounts ~~included~~in ~~interest~~tables ~~expense due to borrowings outstanding of $123,000, offset by a~~presented ~~gain on the change~~ in ~~the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $15~~thousands,~~000. For~~ ~~the~~except three months ended March 31, 2011, interest and other income, net included interest expense due to borrowings outstanding of $44,000 and a gain on the change in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability of approximately $20,000.percentages)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

*Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total revenues	$	8,599	$	9,185		(6.4%	)

~~Cash~~Revenues ~~Flows~~decreased $586,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. See the discussion of changes in subscription and appliance revenues below.

Our largest source of operating cash flows is cash receipts from our customers from purchases of products, subscription, maintenance and technical support. Our standard payment terms for both subscription and support invoices are net 30 days from the date of invoice but from time to time we enter into payment terms that are greater than 30 days. The recurring subscription portion of our business provides predictable cash flow but new sales fluctuate due to seasonal buying behavior and sales and marketing effectiveness. Our primary uses of cash for operating activities include cost associated with appliance sales and appliance warranty, costs to maintain our subscription services, personnel, facilities, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expenses.

*Subscription Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Subscription revenues	$	7,017	$	7,314		(4.1%	)
As a percentage of revenues		81.6%		79.6%

14For the six months ended June 30, 2012 our subscription revenues decreased approximately $297,000 compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of pricing pressures to discount our subscription products in order to remain competitive. The subscription renewal rates for our products range from 75% to 85%.

Cash used by operations was $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The net decrease in the cash used by operating activities resulted primarily from reductions in salaries and related expenses.16

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, cash used by investing activities was $99,000 and $259,000, respectively. The net decrease in cash used by investing activities was attributed primarily to a decrease in fixed asset purchases during the first quarter of 2012.

*Appliance Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Appliance revenues	$	1,582	$	1,867		(15.3%	)
As a percentage of revenues		18.4%		20.3%

~~Cash~~For ~~flows provided by financing activities for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ~~and~~appliance ~~2011~~revenues ~~was~~decreased ~~$1.5~~approximately ~~million and~~ $~~1.2 million~~285,000 ~~respectively.~~compared ~~The~~with ~~net increase~~the inrespective ~~cash~~period ~~provided~~in by2011 ~~financing was primarily~~ due mainly to the ~~increase~~shipping ~~on the proceeds~~ of ~~the~~fewer ~~PFG~~appliances ~~Loan~~coupled ~~(See~~with ~~Note~~discounts 4)applied into the ~~amount of~~appliance ~~$1.5~~sales ~~million~~in ~~and~~order ~~term~~to ~~loans,~~stay ~~offset by a decrease on the line of credit~~competitive.

As a result of the foregoing, the net increase in cash and cash equivalents was $212,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012; the net decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $380,000.

*Cost of Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total cost of revenues	$	2,516	$	2,766		(9.0%	)
Gross margin percent		70.7%		69.9%

~~Credit~~Cost ~~Facility~~of revenues consists primarily of the cost of contract manufactured hardware, technical support salaries, royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements, packaging costs, fee-based technical support costs and ~~Debt~~freight. ~~Agreements~~Total cost of revenues decreased $250,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. See the discussion of changes in the cost of subscription and appliance revenues below.

Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”)

*Cost of Subscription Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total cost of subscription revenues	$	1,452	$	1,509		(3.8%	)
Gross margin percent		79.3%		79.4%

~~In 2007, the Company entered into the SVB Loan Agreement.~~ The ~~Company~~cost ~~borrows~~of ~~and makes repayments under the revolving credit facility~~subscription ~~depending~~revenues onprimarily ~~its~~includes ~~liquidity position. Most recently,~~ the ~~SVB~~cost ~~Loan~~of ~~Agreement~~our ~~was~~technical ~~amended~~support ongroup ~~September 8, 2011~~ and ~~April~~network ~~30,~~colocation ~~2012~~costs. The ~~primary~~decrease ~~revisions incorporated by the latest amendment include (i) modifying the availability amount on the revolving line balance to the lesser~~ of ~~the revolving line or the borrowing base~~$57, ~~minus the aggregate outstanding~~000 ~~principal~~for ~~amount of Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C, minus~~ the ~~outstanding~~six ~~principal~~months ~~balance~~ended ofJune ~~any advances and (ii) revising the SVB Loan Agreement’s financial covenant calculation~~30, ~~which~~2012 ~~replaces~~compared ~~the tangible net worth calculation,~~ to ~~include that~~ the ~~Company maintain~~same atperiod ~~all~~in ~~times,~~2011 onwas amainly ~~year~~due to ~~date~~decreases ~~basis~~to ~~for~~compensation ~~2012~~expenses, ~~a modified cumulative~~ ~~net~~offset ~~income~~by ofincreased atcosts ~~least negative three million dollars (-$3,000,000), on a trailing three (3) month basis from January 2013 through March 2013, an amount equal to at least eighty percent (80%)~~ of ~~the~~improving ~~Company’s projected modified cumulative net income for the applicable period~~ and onmaintaining aour ~~trailing~~ePrism ~~three~~email ~~(3)~~filtering ~~month~~product ~~basis at all times thereafter, one dollar ($1~~line.~~00).~~

At March 31, 2012, the total amount outstanding under the Revolving Line was $1.5 million and the Company had a remaining borrowing availability of $682,000. As of March 31, 2012, the applicable interest rate for the Revolving Line was 6.00% and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 interest expense relating to the revolving line was approximately $73,000. At March 31, 2012, the total amount outstanding under Term Loans A, B, and C was $558,000, which represents the total amount available pursuant to these loans. As of March 31, 2012, the applicable interest rates for Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C were 6.00%, 7.50%, and 7.00%, respectively, and the total interest expense for these loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was approximately $8,000.

*Cost of Appliance Revenues*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total cost of appliance revenues	$	1,064	$	1,255		(15.2%	)
Gross margin percent		32.7%		32.8%

AsThe cost of ~~March~~appliance revenues, 31which includes contract manufactured equipment, ~~2012~~warranty expense, ~~the~~and packaging and freight decreased approximately $191,000 ~~Company~~for ~~was~~the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in ~~compliance~~2011. This ~~with~~is the ~~covenants~~result ~~under~~of a decrease in the ~~SVB~~number of ~~Loan~~appliances sold during the current period. Gross margin decreased 0.1% due the decrease in overall appliances sold during the period and ~~Security~~the ~~Agreement~~discounting of our appliance products in order to remain competitive, asoffset ~~amended~~by the increased sales of our higher priced appliance units which are more profitable.

~~Convertible Notes Payable~~17

*Sales and Marketing*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total sales and marketing	$	4,179	$	4,720		(11.5%	)
As a percentage of revenues		48.6%		51.4%

~~The~~Sales ~~2011~~and ~~Convertible Notes~~marketing ~~bear~~expense ~~interest~~consists atprimarily ~~the rate~~ of ~~7.00%~~salaries, ~~per~~related ~~annum~~benefits, ~~with~~commissions, ~~accrued~~consultant ~~interest~~fees, ~~and~~advertising, ~~principal~~lead ~~due~~generation and ~~payable~~other costs onassociated ~~the~~with ~~maturity~~our ~~date~~sales ofand ~~December 4,~~marketing ~~2015~~efforts. ~~The~~ ~~note~~For ~~holders may convert~~ the ~~2011~~six ~~Convertible~~months ~~Notes~~ended inJune ~~whole~~30, or2012, insales ~~part~~and atmarketing ~~any~~expense ~~time prior to the maturity~~decreased ~~date into shares of Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0~~11.~~70. Following~~5%, ~~the occurrence of any period of 60 consecutive trading days where the average closing price of the Common Stock of the Company is equal to~~ or ~~greater~~approximately ~~than~~ $~~1.00 per share~~541,000, over the ~~entire~~same ~~unpaid~~period ~~principal~~in ~~amount of the~~ 2011 ~~Convertible~~primarily ~~Notes together~~due ~~with~~to ~~any~~increased ~~unpaid~~efficiency ~~interest~~and ~~shall~~optimization ~~be converted into Common Stock~~ of the ~~Company~~lead atto ~~the~~sales ~~conversion price of $0~~process.~~70.~~

The 2011 Convertible Notes may be prepaid in whole or in part from time to time and at any time prior to maturity without penalty or premium subject to the Investors’ right to convert the Notes upon receipt of notice of such prepayment. The obligations represented by the 2011 Convertible Notes are secured by a security interest in the assets of the Company, subordinated to the SVB and PFG loan agreements. Upon the occurrence of any event of default, the holders of the 2011 Convertible Notes may elect to call the principal amount, plus all accrued but unpaid interest on the 2011 Convertible Notes then outstanding immediately due and payable.

*Research and Development*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total research and development	$	2,357	$	2,731		(13.7%	)
As a percentage of revenues		27.4%		29.7%

15Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries, related benefits, third-party consultant fees and other engineering related costs. The net decrease of $374,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation costs for research and development engineers. Research and development is an important part of our business and we expect it to remain high as a percentage of revenues as we continue to invest in our development efforts.

~~The~~We ~~terms~~currently ofhave ~~the 2011 Convertible~~research ~~Notes~~and ~~also~~development ~~provided~~facilities ~~that~~ in ~~the~~San ~~event~~Diego ~~that~~and ~~prior~~Rohnert ~~to December 5~~Park, ~~2012,~~CA. ~~the~~Management ~~Company~~believes ~~issued~~that a ~~new~~significant ~~Note~~investment ~~(or Notes) for an aggregate consideration~~ in ~~excess~~research ~~of $25,000 with a conversion price less than the current conversion price of the 2011 Convertible~~and ~~Notes,~~development ~~then~~is ~~going~~required ~~forward~~to ~~the~~remain ~~conversion~~competitive ~~price~~and ofwe ~~the~~expect ~~portion of the 2011 Convertible Notes that had not previously been converted into equity securities would automatically be reduced~~ to ~~the~~continue ~~new Note conversion rate. In March 2012, the terms of the 2011 Convertible Notes were amended, effective as of the original issuance date of the 2011 Convertible Notes,~~ to ~~eliminate the~~invest ~~above~~in ~~referenced~~research ~~conversion price adjustment provision~~ and todevelopment include a provision that restricts that Company from issuing a new convertible note or series of new convertible notes with a conversion rate less than the then current conversion rate of the 2011 Convertible Notes prior to December 5, 2012activities.

As of March 31, 2012 principal and accrued interest on the 2011 Convertible Notes totaled $4.9 million.

General and Administrative	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total general and administrative	$	1,845	$	1,935		(4.6%	)
As a percentage of revenues		21.5%		21.1%

~~One of~~General ~~the 2010 Convertible Notes in the original principal amount of $300,000 was not repaid in connection with the issuance of the 2011 Convertible Notes~~ and ~~remain~~administrative ~~outstanding at March 31~~expenses, ~~2012. The~~which ~~interest~~consist ~~on the outstanding principal balance~~primarily ~~on these 2010 Notes accrues at a rate~~ of ~~three~~salaries ~~percent (3.0%) per annum~~ and ~~accrued~~ ~~interest~~related ~~is added to the balance of the 2010 Note.~~benefits, ~~All~~fees ~~unpaid~~for ~~principal~~professional ~~and~~services, ~~interest~~such isas ~~due~~legal and ~~payable~~accounting ~~at maturity~~services, ~~which is July 30~~stock-based compensation, ~~2014,~~ and ~~may~~insurance bedecreased ~~converted at~~approximately ~~any~~$90,000 ~~time~~for ~~into shares of~~ the ~~Company’s~~six ~~Common~~months ~~Stock~~ended atJune a30, ~~fixed~~2012, ~~conversion~~compared ~~price~~to ~~of $1.10. Following~~ the ~~occurrence~~same ~~of any~~ period in of2011. 60The ~~consecutive~~most ~~trading~~significant ~~days~~decreases ~~where~~during the ~~average~~six ~~closing~~months ~~price~~ended ofJune ~~the Company’s common stock is equal to or greater than $1.25 per share~~30, ~~the~~2012 ~~entire~~were ~~unpaid~~in ~~principal~~compensation ~~amount~~and ~~together~~legal ~~with any unpaid interest shall be converted into the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $1~~expenses.~~10.~~

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 principal and accrued interest on the 2010 Notes totaled $315,000 and $313,000, respectively. Interest expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 on the 2010 and 2011 Convertible Notes totaled approximately $85,000 and 24,000, respectively.

*Interest and Other Income, Net*	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Change
Total interest and other income, net	$	253	$	19		1,231.6%
As a percentage of revenues		2.9%		0.2%

OnInterest ~~January~~and 4other income, ~~2012~~net, ~~the Company~~includes ~~entered~~interest ~~into~~expense, ainterest ~~Purchase~~income, ~~Agreement~~and ~~with an~~other ~~investor~~income. ~~pursuant~~For tothe ~~which~~six ~~the~~months ~~Company issued secured~~ended ~~subordinated convertible~~June ~~notes~~30, in2012, ~~the~~interest ~~aggregate~~and other ~~original~~income, ~~principal~~net ~~amount~~included interest expense of $~~100~~279,000 ondue ~~terms identical~~ to ~~the~~outstanding ~~2011~~borrowings ~~Convertible~~(see ~~Notes~~Note 4), asoffset ~~amended. Also,~~by a gain on ~~March~~the change 2,in ~~2012~~ the ~~Company~~fair ~~received~~value aof ~~principal~~the ~~amount~~warrant derivative liability of approximately $~~200~~26,000. For ~~with an original investor of~~ the ~~2010~~six ~~Convertible~~months ~~Note~~ended ~~for~~June ~~which~~30, ~~the~~2011, ~~Company~~interest ~~has~~and ~~yet~~other toincome, ~~receive~~net aincluded ~~Purchase Agreement with that investor. The Company has been accruing~~ interest onexpense of $~~200~~105,000~~, which~~ isdue ~~being added~~ to ~~the~~outstanding ~~principal amount~~borrowings, atoffset by a gain ~~rate~~on ofthe ~~seven~~change ~~percent~~in ~~(7.0%)~~the ~~which~~fair isvalue ~~consistent~~of ~~with interest rate terms on~~ the ~~2011~~warrant ~~Convertible~~derivative ~~Notes,~~liability of asapproximately ~~amended~~$86,000.

~~Partners for Growth III, L.P. (“PFG”)~~18

~~Effective~~Liquidity ~~January~~and ~~30,~~Capital ~~2012, the Company entered into PFG Loan Agreement, pursuant to which PFG provided EdgeWave with a loan in the amount of $1.5 million (the “Loan”).~~Resources

~~The~~Cash Loan will be repaid in 36 monthly principal payments of approximately $42,000 each, plus interest, commencing on March 1, 2012. The principal of the Loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part during the first year. During the second year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to three percent (3%) of the amount prepaid. During the third year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to two percent (2%) of the amount prepaid. The annual interest rate on the Loan is 9.75%, fixed. The obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of EdgeWave’s assets, subordinated to the SVB Loan Agreements.Flows

AsOur largest source of ~~March~~operating 31cash flows is cash receipts from our customers from purchases of products, ~~2012~~subscription, ~~the~~maintenance and technical ~~principal~~support. Our ~~balance~~standard onpayment terms for both subscription and support invoices are net 30 days from the ~~Loan~~date ~~was~~of ~~approximately~~invoice but $1from time to time we enter into payment terms that are greater than 30 days.5 The ~~million~~recurring subscription portion of our business provides predictable cash flow but new sales fluctuate due to seasonal buying behavior and sales and marketing effectiveness. ~~Interest~~ Our ~~expense~~primary ~~recognized~~uses ~~during~~of ~~the~~cash ~~three~~for ~~months~~operating ~~ended~~activities ~~March~~include cost associated with appliance sales and appliance 31warranty, ~~2012~~costs ~~totaled~~to ~~$21~~maintain our subscription services,~~000~~ personnel, facilities, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expenses.

~~The~~Cash ~~PFG~~used ~~Loan~~by ~~Agreement~~operations ~~contains~~was ~~affirmative,~~$2.1 ~~negative~~million and ~~financial~~$1.5 ~~covenants~~million ~~customary~~ for ~~credit~~the ~~facilities~~six ofmonths ~~this~~ended ~~type,~~June ~~including~~30, ~~among~~2012 ~~other~~and ~~things~~2011, ~~limitations~~ ~~on indebtedness, liens, sales of assets, mergers, investments, and dividends~~respectively. The ~~PFG~~net ~~Loan~~increase ~~Agreement also requires that EdgeWave maintain a Cumulative Modified Net Income / Loss (as defined~~ in the ~~PFG Loan Agreement) of not less than ($3.0 million)~~cash ~~during~~used ~~the~~by ~~calendar~~operating ~~year~~activities ~~2012~~resulted ~~(with~~primarily ~~dollar~~from ~~figures~~changes in ~~parentheses~~operating ~~denoting~~assets aand ~~negative~~liabilities ~~number). The PFG Loan Agreement requires for each month~~ during the first ~~calendar~~six ~~quarter~~months of 2013, on a rolling three-month basis, that EdgeWave maintain a Modified Net Income / (Loss) of at least eighty percent (80%) of EdgeWave’s Board-approved forecast/financial plan for Modified Net Income / (Loss) for such period2012. ~~In addition, the PFG Loan Agreement contains events of default provisions customary for credit facilities of this type (with grace or cure periods, as applicable).~~

InFor ~~connection~~the ~~with~~six ~~the~~months ~~execution~~ended ofJune ~~the~~30, ~~PFG~~2012 ~~Loan~~and ~~Agreement~~2011, ~~EdgeWave~~cash ~~issued~~used ~~warrants~~by ~~(the~~investing ~~“Warrants”)~~activities towas ~~PFG~~$142,000 and ~~its~~$297,000, ~~designees~~respectively. ~~which~~The ~~allow PFG~~net ~~and~~decrease ~~its~~in ~~designees~~cash used toby ~~purchase~~investing upactivities towas ~~450,000~~attributed ~~shares~~primarily ofto ~~EdgeWave~~a ~~common~~decrease ~~stock~~in atfixed anasset ~~exercise~~purchases ofduring ~~$0.35~~the ~~per~~first ~~share.~~six ~~The~~months ~~Warrants expire~~of ~~on January 30, 2017~~2012.

~~Liquidity~~Cash flows provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The net increase in cash provided by financing was primarily due to the increase on the proceeds of the PFG Loan (See Note 4) in the amount of $1.5 million.

As ofa ~~March~~result ~~31,~~of ~~2012~~the foregoing, the ~~Company~~ ~~had~~net ~~approximately~~decrease ~~$2.8 million~~ in cash and cash equivalents ~~and~~was ~~a working capital deficit of~~ $~~8.4 million. Approximately $10.7 million of our current liability balance at March 31~~677,000 ~~2012~~for ~~consisted of deferred revenue, which represents amounts that are expected to be amortized into revenue as they are earned in future periods. For~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ; the ~~Company incurred a~~ net ~~loss~~decrease in ofcash ~~$1.4 million~~ and ascash ~~of March 31, 2012 has incurred a cumulative net loss of $59.3 million.~~equivalents ~~For~~for the ~~three~~six months ended June ~~March 31~~30, 2011 ~~2012 cash used by operating activities~~ was $1605,000.~~2 million.~~

16Credit Facility and Debt Agreements

~~As described in Note 4, the Company has an existing credit facility with~~ Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) under which there is borrowing availability of $682,000 as of March 31, 2012. In addition, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Partners for Growth III, L.P. (“PFG”), pursuant to which PFG provided EdgeWave with a loan in the amount of $1.5 million in January 2012 (See Note 4).

In 2007, the ~~opinion~~Company ofentered ~~management,~~into ~~its~~the ~~existing~~SVB ~~cash~~Loan ~~resources~~Agreement. asThe ofCompany ~~March~~borrows ~~31,~~and ~~2012,~~makes ~~projected~~repayments ~~improved~~under ~~operating~~the revolving credit facility ~~results~~depending on its liquidity position. Most recently, ~~collections~~the SVB Loan Agreement was amended on ~~future~~September ~~billings~~8, 2011 and ~~borrowing~~April ~~availability~~30, ~~under~~2012. The ~~existing~~primary ~~credit~~revisions ~~facilities,~~incorporated ~~will~~by ~~provide~~the ~~sufficient liquidity~~latest ~~for~~amendment include (i) modifying the ~~Company~~availability toamount ~~meet~~on ~~its~~the ~~continuing~~revolving ~~obligations~~line balance ~~for~~to the lesser of the ~~next~~revolving ~~twelve~~line ~~months.~~or ~~However,~~the ~~there~~borrowing ~~can~~base, beminus nothe ~~assurances~~aggregate ~~that~~outstanding ~~projected~~principal ~~collections~~amount ~~will~~of beTerm ~~realized~~Loan orA, ~~that~~Term ~~the~~Loan ~~Company~~B, ~~will~~and ~~improve~~Term ~~operating~~Loan ~~results~~C, sominus ~~that~~the ~~positive~~outstanding ~~cash~~principal ~~flow~~balance ~~from~~of ~~operating~~any advances and (ii) ~~activities~~revising ~~will~~the beSVB ~~achieved. The~~Loan ~~Company~~Agreement’s ~~believes~~financial ~~that~~covenant ifcalculation, ~~necessary~~which replaces the tangible net worth calculation, ~~they~~to ~~will~~include that bethe ~~able~~Company maintain at all times, on a year to ~~raise~~date ~~additional~~basis ~~needed~~for ~~capital~~2012, a modified cumulative ~~through~~net ~~subsequent~~income ~~debt~~of orat ~~equity~~least ~~financing~~negative ~~transactions~~three million dollars (-$3,000,000), ~~and~~on ina ~~this~~trailing ~~regard,~~three ~~has~~(3) ~~current~~month ~~Board~~basis offrom ~~Director~~January ~~authorization~~2013 through March 2013, an amount equal to ~~issue additional~~at ~~convertible~~least ~~notes~~eighty ~~payable~~percent in(80%) of the ~~principal~~Company’s ~~amount~~projected ofmodified ~~$1.9~~cumulative ~~million~~net onincome for the ~~same~~applicable ~~terms~~period asand ~~those~~on ~~issued~~a ~~pursuant~~trailing tothree ~~the 2011~~(3) ~~Purchase~~month ~~Agreement~~basis at all times thereafter, one dollar ($1.00).

~~Adopted~~At ~~Accounting~~June ~~Pronouncements~~30, 2012, the total amount outstanding under the Revolving Line was $1.7 million and the Company had a remaining borrowing availability of $842,000. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable interest rate for the Revolving Line was 6.00% and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 interest expense relating to the revolving line was approximately $12,000 and $19,000, respectively. At June 30, 2012, the total amount outstanding under Term Loans A, B, and C was $458,000, which represents the total amount available pursuant to these loans. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable interest rates for Term Loan A, Term Loan B, and Term Loan C were 6.00%, 7.50%, and 7.00%, respectively, and the total interest expense for these loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $8,000 and $16,000, respectively.

InAs ~~May~~of ~~2011,~~June ~~the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04~~30, ~~“Fair~~ ~~Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” (“ASU 2011-04”)~~2012, ~~to provide consistent definition of fair value~~ ~~and ensure that~~ the ~~fair~~Company ~~value~~was ~~measurement~~in ~~and~~compliance ~~disclosure~~with ~~requirements~~the ~~are~~covenants ~~similar~~under ~~between~~the ~~U.S. GAAP~~SVB ~~and~~Loan ~~International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles~~ and ~~enhances~~Security ~~the disclosure requirements~~Agreement, ~~particularly~~ ~~for~~as ~~level 3 fair value measurement~~amended. ~~ASU~~ 2011-04 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material effect on our fair value measures and disclosures.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~19

~~Other~~Convertible ~~accounting~~Notes standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies for which future adoption is pending are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.Payable

~~Off-Balance~~On December ~~Sheet~~5, ~~Arrangements~~2011, the Company entered into the 2011 Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company issued convertible notes payable in the amount of $4.5 million (“2011 Convertible Notes”) to certain holders of the convertible notes payable issued by the Company in 2010 (“2010 Convertible Notes”). Approximately $3.0 million of the total gross proceeds from the 2011 Convertible Notes was used to retire the 2010 Convertible Notes. 2011 Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $1.7 million were issued to a venture capital fund, which is controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

WeThe ~~have~~2011 ~~not~~Convertible Notes ~~entered~~bear ~~into~~interest at the rate of 7.00% per annum with accrued interest and principal due and payable on the maturity date of ~~any~~December ~~off-balance~~4, ~~sheet~~2015. The ~~arrangements~~note ~~that~~holders ~~have~~may convert the 2011 Convertible Notes in whole or ~~are~~in ~~reasonably~~part ~~likely~~at any time prior to ~~have~~the maturity adate ~~current~~into orshares ~~future~~of ~~effect~~Common onStock ~~our~~of ~~financial~~the ~~condition,~~Company at a conversion price of $0.70. Following the occurrence of ~~changes~~any inperiod ~~financial~~of ~~condition,~~60 ~~revenues~~consecutive ortrading ~~expenses,~~days ~~results~~where the average closing price of ~~operations,~~the ~~liquidity,~~Common ~~capital~~Stock ~~expenditures~~of the Company is equal to or ~~capital~~greater ~~resources~~than $1.00 per share, the entire unpaid principal amount of the 2011 Convertible Notes ~~that~~together ~~would~~with any unpaid interest shall be ~~considered~~converted ~~material~~into toCommon ~~investors~~Stock of the Company at the conversion price of $0.70.

~~Forward-Looking~~The ~~Statements~~2011 Convertible Notes may be prepaid in whole or in part from time to time and at any time prior to maturity without penalty or premium subject to the Investors’ right to convert the Notes upon receipt of notice of such prepayment. The obligations represented by the 2011 Convertible Notes are secured by a security interest in the assets of the Company, subordinated to the SVB and PFG loan agreements. Upon the occurrence of any event of default, the holders of the 2011 Convertible Notes may elect to call the principal amount, plus all accrued but unpaid interest on the 2011 Convertible Notes then outstanding immediately due and payable.

~~This~~The ~~Quarterly~~terms ~~Report~~of onthe 2011 ~~Form 10-Q~~Convertible ~~and~~Notes also provided that in the ~~information~~event ~~incorporated~~that ~~herein~~prior byto ~~reference~~December ~~contain~~5, ~~forward-looking~~2012, ~~statements~~the ~~that~~Company ~~involve~~issued a ~~number~~new ofNote (or Notes) for ~~risks~~an ~~and~~aggregate ~~uncertainties.~~consideration ~~Although~~in ~~our~~excess ~~forward-looking~~of ~~statements~~$25,000 ~~reflect~~with a conversion price less than the ~~good~~current ~~faith~~conversion ~~judgment~~price of ~~our~~the ~~management~~2011 Convertible Notes, ~~these~~then ~~statements can~~going ~~only~~forward bethe ~~based~~conversion onprice ~~facts~~of ~~and~~the ~~factors~~portion ~~currently~~of ~~known~~the by2011 ~~us.~~Convertible Notes ~~Consequently,~~that ~~these~~had ~~forward-looking~~not ~~statements~~previously been ~~are~~converted ~~inherently~~into ~~subject~~ equity securities would automatically be reduced to ~~risks~~the ~~and~~new ~~uncertainties~~Note conversion rate. In March 2012, ~~and~~the terms ~~actual~~of ~~results~~the ~~and~~2011 ~~outcomes~~Convertible ~~may~~Notes ~~differ~~were ~~materially~~amended, ~~from~~effective ~~results~~as ~~and~~of ~~outcomes~~the ~~discussed~~original inissuance date of the ~~forward-looking~~2011 Convertible Notes, to ~~statements.~~eliminate ~~For~~the aabove ~~summary~~referenced ofconversion ~~such~~price ~~risks~~adjustment provision and ~~uncertainties,~~to ~~please~~include ~~see~~a ~~Risk~~provision ~~Factors~~that ~~located~~restricts inthat ~~our~~Company ~~Annual~~from issuing ~~Report~~a onnew ~~Form~~convertible ~~10-K~~note ~~for the~~or ~~year~~series ~~ended~~of ~~December 31,~~new ~~2011~~convertible ~~filed~~notes with a conversion rate less than the ~~Securities~~then ~~and~~current ~~Exchange~~conversion rate ~~Commission~~of onthe ~~March~~2011 30Convertible Notes prior to December 5, 2012.

~~Forward-looking~~As ~~statements can be identified by the use~~ of ~~forward-looking~~June ~~words such as “believes~~30,” ~~“expects,” “hopes,”~~2012 ~~“may,”~~principal ~~“will,”~~and ~~“plan,”~~accrued ~~“intends,”~~interest ~~“estimates,”~~on ~~“could,” “should,” “would,” “continue,” “seeks,” “pro forma,” or “anticipates,” or other similar words (including their use in~~ the ~~negative),~~2011 orConvertible byNotes ~~discussions~~totaled ~~of future matters such as the development of new products, technology enhancements, possible changes in legislation and other statements that are not historical~~$5.0 These statements include but are not limited to statements under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” as well as other sections in this reportmillion.

~~The~~One of ~~cautionary~~the ~~statements made~~2010 Convertible Notes in ~~this~~the ~~report~~original ~~are~~principal ~~intended~~amount toof be$300,000 ~~applicable~~was tonot ~~all~~repaid ~~related~~in ~~forward-looking~~connection ~~statements~~with ~~wherever~~the ~~they~~issuance ~~may~~of ~~appear~~the 2011 inConvertible ~~this~~Notes ~~report~~and remain outstanding at June 30, 2012. The interest on the outstanding principal balance Weon ~~urge~~these ~~you~~2010 ~~not~~Notes accrues at a rate of three percent (3.0%) per annum and accrued interest is added to ~~place~~the ~~undue~~balance ~~reliance~~of onthe 2010 ~~these~~Note. All ~~forward-looking~~unpaid ~~statements~~principal and interest is due and payable at maturity, which ~~speak~~is ~~only~~July as30, 2014, and may be converted at any time into shares of the ~~date~~Company’s ofCommon ~~this~~Stock ~~report~~at a fixed conversion price of $1.10. ~~Except~~Following the occurrence of any asperiod ~~required~~of by60 ~~law,~~consecutive wetrading ~~assume~~days nowhere ~~obligation~~the average closing price of the Company’s common stock is equal to ~~update~~or ~~our~~greater than ~~forward-looking~~$1.25 ~~statements~~per share, ~~even~~the ifentire ~~new~~unpaid ~~information~~principal ~~becomes~~amount ~~available in~~together with any unpaid interest shall be converted into the ~~future~~Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.10.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 principal and accrued interest on the 2010 Note totaled $322,000 and $313,000, respectively. The combined interest expense recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 on both of the 2010 and 2011 Convertible Notes totaled approximately $92,000 and $24,000, respectively. The combined interest expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 on both of the 2010 and 2011 Convertible Notes totaled approximately $176,000 and $48,000, respectively.

On January 4, 2012 the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued secured subordinated convertible notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $100,000 on terms identical to the 2011 Convertible Notes, as amended. Also, on March 2, 2012 the Company received a principal amount of $200,000 with an original investor of the 2010 Convertible Note for which the Company has yet to receive a Purchase Agreement with that investor. The Company has been accruing interest on $200,000, which is being added to the principal amount, at a rate of seven percent (7.0%) which is consistent with interest rate terms on the 2011 Convertible Notes, as amended.

Partners for Growth III, L.P. (“PFG”)

Effective January 30, 2012, the Company entered into PFG Loan Agreement, pursuant to which PFG provided EdgeWave with a loan in the amount of $1.5 million (the “Loan”).

The Loan will be repaid in 36 monthly principal payments of approximately $42,000 each, plus interest, commencing on March 1, 2012. The principal of the Loan may not be prepaid in whole or in part during the first year. During the second year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to three percent (3%) of the amount prepaid. During the third year, EdgeWave may prepay the Loan in whole or in part subject to payment of a prepayment fee equal to two percent (2%) of the amount prepaid. The annual interest rate on the Loan is 9.75%, fixed. The obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of EdgeWave’s assets, subordinated to the SVB Loan Agreements.

As of June 30, 2012, the principal balance on the Loan was approximately $1.3 million. Interest expense recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $35,000 and $44,000, respectively.

In connection with the execution of the PFG Loan Agreement, EdgeWave issued warrants (the “Warrants”) to PFG and its designees which allow PFG and its designees to purchase up to 450,000 shares of EdgeWave common stock at an exercise of $0.35 per share. The Warrants expire on January 30, 2017.

Liquidity

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $1.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital deficit of $9.3 million. Approximately $11.0 million of our current liability balance at June 30, 2012 consisted of deferred revenue, which represents amounts that are expected to be amortized into revenue as they are earned in future periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred a net loss of $1.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and as of June 30, 2012 has incurred a cumulative net loss of $60.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 cash used by operating activities was $1.2 million.

As described in Note 4, the Company has an existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) under which there is borrowing availability of $842,000 as of June 30, 2012. In addition, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Partners for Growth III, L.P. (“PFG”), pursuant to which PFG provided EdgeWave with a loan in the amount of $1.5 million in January 2012 (See Note 4). As of June 30, 2012, the principal balance on the Loan was approximately $1.3 million.

In the opinion of management, its existing cash resources as of June 30, 2012, collections on future billings, and borrowing availability under existing credit facilities will provide sufficient liquidity for the Company to meet its continuing obligations for the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurances that projected collections will be realized or that the Company will improve operating results so that positive cash flow from operating activities will be achieved. The Company believes that if necessary, they will be able to raise additional needed capital through subsequent debt or equity financing transactions.

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure in U.S. GAAP and IFRS” (“ASU 2011-04”), to provide consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements, particularly for level 3 fair value measurement. ASU 2011-04 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material effect on our fair value measures and disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that would be considered material to investors.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Although our forward-looking statements reflect the good faith judgment of our management, these statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, these forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, please see Risk Factors located in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2012.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “will,” “plan,” “intends,” “estimates,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “continue,” “seeks,” “pro forma,” or “anticipates,” or other similar words (including their use in the negative), or by discussions of future matters such as the development of new products, technology enhancements, possible changes in legislation and other statements that are not historical. These statements include but are not limited to statements under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” as well as other sections in this report.

The cautionary statements made in this report are intended to be applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they may appear in this report. We urge you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item.

1722

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls

We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

During the course of our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and VP of Finance have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the Company is occasionally named as a defendant in various lawsuits. There are currently no material pending legal proceedings which the Company is a party of or which any of the Company’s property is the subject of.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~None~~On March 1, 2012, EdgeWave issued warrants to Sonoma Mountain Village LLC (“Sonoma Mountain”) and KDRP which allows Sonoma Mountain and KDRP to purchase up to 25,000 shares of EdgeWave common stock at an exercise of $1.25 per share. The Warrants expire on August 1, 2015.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

1823

PART IV

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (formerly known as Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp.) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2005).
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (formerly known as Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp.) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2007).
3.3	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of EdgeWave, Inc. (formerly known as St. Bernard Software, Inc.) (incorporated herein by reference to Item 5.07 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2011).
4.1	Specimen Unit Certificate of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (formerly known as Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp.) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-114861) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2004).
4.2	Specimen Common Stock Certificate of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (formerly known as Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp.) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-114861) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2004).
4.3	Warrant issued by St. Bernard Software, Inc. on May 16, 2007 to Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2007).
4.4	Warrant issued by St. Bernard Software, Inc. on January 25, 2008 to Agility Capital, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).
4.5	Warrant issued by St. Bernard Software, Inc. on January 25, 2008 to Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).
4.6	Warrant Purchase Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and RWI Ventures II, L.P. dated July 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2010).
4.7	Convertible Note Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated July 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2010).
4.8	Convertible Note Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated December 5, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2011).
4.9	Warrant issued by EdgeWave, Inc. on January 30, 2012 to Partners for Growth III, L.P. and its designees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
4.10	First amendement to Convertible Note Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated March 29, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2012).

4.6	Warrant Purchase Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and RWI Ventures II, L.P. dated July 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2010).
4.7	Convertible Note Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated July 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2010).
4.8	Convertible Note Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated December 5, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2011).
4.9	Warrant issued by EdgeWave, Inc. on January 30, 2012 to Partners for Growth III, L.P. and its designees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
4.10	First amendement to Convertible Note Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and certain Noteholders dated March 29, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2012).
10.1	St. Bernard Software, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2008).
10.2	St. Bernard Software, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2006).

10.1	St. Bernard Software, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2008).

10.2	St. Bernard Software, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2006).

10.3	St. Bernard Software, Inc. 2006 Recruitment Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2006).

10.4	St. Bernard Software, Inc. 2010 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2010).

10.5	Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated May 11, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2007).

10.6	Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 25, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).

10.7	Intellectual Property Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 25, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).

10.8	Amended Employment Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Louis E. Ryan executed September 14, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2011).

10.9	Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated February 27, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2009).

10.10	Employment agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Thalia Gietzen executed September 15, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2009).

10.11	Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated March 23, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2010).

10.12	Lease Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Kilroy Realty, L.P., dated August 2, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2010).

10.13	Seventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 29, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2010).

10.14	Employment agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Dave Smith executed October 18, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2010).

10.3	St. Bernard Software, Inc. 2006 Recruitment Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2006).
10.4	Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated May 11, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2007).
10.5	Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 25, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).
10.6	Intellectual Property Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated January 25, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2008).
10.7	Amended Employment Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Louis E. Ryan executed September 14, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2011).
10.8	Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated February 27, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2009).
10.9	Employment agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Thalia Gietzen executed September 15, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2009).

10.10	Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated March 23, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2010).
10.15	Amended Employment Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Thalia Gietzen executed March 24, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2011).
10.11	Lease Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Kilroy Realty, L.P., dated August 2, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2010).
10.16	Eighth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated May 12, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2011).
10.12	Seventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 29, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2010).
10.17	Ninth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated June 30, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2011).
10.13	Employment agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Dave Smith executed October 18, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2010).
10.18	Tenth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 8, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2011).
10.14	Amended Employment Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Thalia Gietzen executed March 24, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2011).
10.19	Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and ATA Affiliates Fund II, L.P., ATA Investment Fund II, L.P., ATA Ventures Fund II, L.P., and RWI Ventures II, L.P. dated December 5, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2011).
10.15	Eighth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between St. Bernard Software, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated May 12, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2011).
10.20	Employment agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and David D. Maquera executed February 2, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2012).
10.16	Ninth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated June 30, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2011).
10.21	Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Partners for Growth III, L.P. dated January 30, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
10.17	Tenth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 8, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2011).
10.22	Intellectual Property Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Partners for Growth III, L.P dated January 30, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
10.18	Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and ATA Affiliates Fund II, L.P., ATA Investment Fund II, L.P., ATA Ventures Fund II, L.P., and RWI Ventures II, L.P. dated December 5, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2011).
10.23	Eleventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank dated April 30, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

2026

10.19	Employment agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and David D. Maquera executed February 2, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2012).
10.20	Loan and Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Partners for Growth III, L.P. dated January 30, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
10.21	Intellectual Property Security Agreement between EdgeWave, Inc. and Partners for Growth III, L.P dated January 30, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2012).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	EDGEWAVE, INC.
Dated: May 14, 2012	By:	/s/ Louis E. Ryan
Dated: August 14, 2012	By:	/s/ Louis E. Ryan
		Louis E. Ryan Chief Executive Officer

2227

Filing Compare · EdgeWave, Inc.