UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~June~~ September 30, 2014

o TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transitional period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number: 000-54729

INTELLICELL BIOSCIENCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

91-1966948

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

460 Park Avenue, 17th Floor

New York, New York 10022

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(212) 249-3050

(Registrant's telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o
		Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No ý

Number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of ~~October~~November 919, 2014 is 37,~~655~~894,~~052~~037,~~841~~082.

1Table of Contents

INTELLICELL BIOSCIENCES, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements.	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	4344
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	5455
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	5455
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	5556
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	5758
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	57
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	58
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	57
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	58
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	57
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	60
Item 5.	Other Information.	57
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	60
Item 6.	Exhibits.	58
Item 5.	Other Information.	60
Signatures		59
Item 6.	Exhibits.	60
Signatures		61

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Intellicell BioSciences, Inc. and Subsidiary CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2013

				(Restated)
	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	—19,306		$	—-
Cash, restricted		~~321~~28,~~404~~774			—-
Other current assets		—			9,000
Prepaid expenses		111,687			-
Total Current Assets		321,404			9,000
Other current assets		-			9,000
Property and equipment, net		2,494,651			2,670,499
Total Current Assets		159,767			9,000
Property and equipment, net		2,423,643			2,670,499
OTHER ASSETS:
Financing fees, net		~~1,274~~-			8,712
Security deposit		525,453			525,453
Total Other Assets		~~526~~525,~~727~~453			534,165
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,~~342~~108,~~782~~863		$	3,213,664
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Convertible debentures, net of discounts	$	12,~~178~~051,~~135~~873		$	452,607
Convertible promissory notes, net of discounts		12,~~928~~093,~~583~~460			2,755,986
Notes payable		277,100			727,545
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,005,~~243~~967			2,609,254
Accrued interest		~~478~~592,~~814~~824			388,302
License fee payable		922,500			922,500
Deferred rent liability		~~373~~375,~~893~~397			372,378
Accrued liabilities, related party, net		~~381~~508,~~261~~644			307,621
Derivative liabilities		9,~~095~~707,~~410~~766			6,958,822
Total Current Liabilities		1517,~~640~~535,~~939~~531			15,495,015
TOTAL LIABILITIES		17,535,531			15,495,015
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 21,000 shares authorized, 15,057 and 15,057 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		151			151
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 21,000 shares authorized, 15,057 and 15,057 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		151			151
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 13,000 shares authorized, 7,250 and 7,250 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		73			73
Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 13,000 shares authorized, 7,250 and 7,250 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		73			73
Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 56,500 and 56,500 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		565			565
Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 56,500 and 56,500 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		565			565
Series F convertible preferred stock, no par value, 51 shares authorized, 51 and 0 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		—			—
Series F convertible preferred stock, no par value, 51 shares authorized, 51 and 0 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 3,500,000,000 and 1,500,000,000 shares authorized, 2,580,182,042 and 922,722,023 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		258,018			92,272
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000,000 and 1,500,000,000 shares authorized, 3,717,753,280 and 922,722,023 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		371,775			92,272
Additional paid in capital		4849,~~607~~843,~~989~~968			41,256,261
Accumulated deficit		(6164,~~164~~643,~~953~~200	)		(53,630,673	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(1214,~~298~~426,~~157~~668	)		(12,281,351	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	3,~~342~~108,~~782~~863		$	3,213,664

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

Intellicell BioSciences, Inc. and Subsidiary
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	For The Three Months Ended						For The Six Months Ended
	June 30			June 30			June 30			June 30
	2014			2013			2014			2013
REVENUES:
Revenues - related party	$	32,500		$	—		$	65,000		$	—
TOTAL REVENUES		32,500			—			65,000			—
COST OF GOODS SOLD:
Cost of goods sold		2,926			—			7,545			—
TOTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD		2,926			—			7,545			—
GROSS PROFIT		29,574			—			57,455			—
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development		90,500			344,725			270,500			501,803
Sales and marketing		26,380			—			34,530			4,828
General and administrative		811,613			547,473			1,792,851			1,263,119
Employee stock based compensation		342,135			342,135			684,270			702,495
Non-employee stock based compensation		—			—			93,333			300,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		1,270,628			1,234,333			2,875,484			2,772,245
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,241,054	)		(1,234,333	)		(2,818,029	)		(2,772,245	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Income/(Loss) on conversion of debt to equity		32,929			(2,845,458	)		432,691			(2,845,458	)
Interest expense		(93,446	)		(48,749	)		(377,376	)		(93,645	)
Other income (expense)		—			—			(135,258	)		—
Financing costs		(1,334,460	)		(37,100	)		(18,454,450	)		(167,750	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		5,342,086			249,565			13,818,141			904,563
TOTAL OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME		3,947,109			(2,681,742	)		(4,716,252	)		(2,202,290	)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		2,706,055			(3,916,075	)		(7,534,281	)		(4,974,535	)
Provision for income taxes		—			—			—			—
NET INCOME (LOSS)		2,706,055			(3,916,075	)	$	(7,534,281	)	$	(4,974,535	)
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.06	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.08	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.06	)	$	(0.00	)	$	0.08
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		2,237,459,605			65,540,474			1,830,159,998			62,920,596
Diluted		23,779,489,866			65,540,474			1,830,159,998			62,920,596

Table of Contents

~~The~~Intellicell ~~accompanying~~BioSciences, ~~notes~~Inc. ~~are~~and anSubsidiary ~~integral~~UNAUDITED ~~part~~CONDENSED ofCONSOLIDATED ~~these condensed~~STATEMENTS ~~consolidated~~OF ~~financial statements~~OPERATIONS

	For The Three Months Ended						For The Nine Months Ended
		September 30			September 30			September 30			September 30
		2014			2013			2014			2013

REVENUES:
Revenues - related party	$	55,000		$	-		$	120,000		$	-
TOTAL REVENUES		55,000			-			120,000			-

COST OF GOODS SOLD:
Cost of goods sold		5,341			-			12,886			-
TOTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD		5,341			-			12,886			-

GROSS PROFIT		49,659			-			107,114			-

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development		117,137			14,587			387,637			516,390
Sales and marketing		39,377			1,096			73,907			5,924
General and administrative		616,494			907,111			2,409,567			2,170,230
Employee stock based compensation		732,135			342,135			1,416,405			1,044,630
Non-employee stock based compensation		-			-			93,333			300,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		1,505,143			1,264,929			4,380,849			4,037,174

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,455,484	)		(1,264,929	)		(4,273,735	)		(4,037,174	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense		(136,233	)		(54,903	)		(513,607	)		(148,548	)
Other income (expense)		-			-			(135,258	)		-
Financing costs		(1,535,745	)		(2,308,478	)		(19,990,196	)		(2,476,228	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(350,562	)		(851,517	)		13,900,270			(2,792,412	)
TOTAL OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME		(2,022,540	)		(3,214,898	)		(6,738,791	)		(5,417,188	)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(3,478,024	)		(4,479,827	)		(11,012,526	)		(9,454,362	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-

NET INCOME (LOSS)		(3,478,024	)		(4,479,827	)	$	(11,012,526	)	$	(9,454,362	)

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.12	)
Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.12	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic		3,001,685,610			107,883,264			2,845,436,013			77,951,031
Diluted		3,001,685,610			107,883,264			2,845,436,013			77,951,031

~~Intellicell~~ The ~~BioSciences,~~accompanying ~~Inc.~~notes ~~and~~are ~~Subsidiary~~an ~~UNAUDITED~~integral ~~CONDENSED~~part ~~CONSOLIDATED~~of ~~STATEMENTS~~these condensed OFconsolidated ~~CASH~~financial ~~FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013~~statements

	June 30,			June 30,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(7,534,281	)	$	(4,974,535	)
Adjustment to reconcile change in net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Common stock issued for consulting services		—			—
Income recognized on conversion of debt to common equity		(432,691	)		—
Employee stock compensation		684,270			702,495
Loss on conversion of accounts payable to common stock		—			2,845,458
Depreciation and amortization expense		206,405			181,453
Amortization of financing costs		7,438			92,750
Amortization of Debt Discounts		1,902,727
Financing costs		16,014,149			75,000
Interest from original issue discount on convertible debentures		100,000			1,126
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(13,818,141	)		(904,563	)
Guaranteed interest on convertible promissory notes		46,430			—
Promissory notes issued for services rendered		115,783			—
Stock compensation issued for services in excess of proceeds		328,459			300,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Other current assets		9,000			—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(201,459	)		825,682
Accrued interest		325,717			77,519
License fee payable		—			—
Deferred income		—			—
Deferred rent		1,515			—
Accrued liabilities, related party		73,640			251,940
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(2,171,039	)		(525,675	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(30,557	)		(4,271	)
NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(30,557	)		(4,271	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures		2,587,000			—
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable, net		30,000			225,000
Principal payments towards notes payable		(94,000	)		—
Proceeds from related party advances		—			274,893
Proceeds from sale of common stock		—			20,000
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		2,523,000			519,893
Net increase (decrease) in cash		321,404			(10,053	)
Cash, beginning of the period		—			10,159
Cash, end of the period	$	321,404		$	106
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest	$	—		$	15,000
Cash paid for taxes	$	524		$	—
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
Conversion of principal of convertible debentures to common stock	$	666,472		$	—
Conversion of principal of convertible promissory notes to common stock	$	1,052,716		$	—
Conversion of accrued interest to common stock	$	218,847		$	—
Return and re-issuance of common stock for related party liabilities	$	79,227		$	—
Common stock mistakenly returned	$	28		$	—
Issuance of convertible promissory notes in lieu of accrued salaries, related parties	$	80,000		$	—
Assignment of convertible promissory note to convertible debenture	$	500,000		$	—
Conversion of Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses to Common Stock		—			567,542
Conversion of note payable to common stock		—			500,000
Original Issue discount attributed with a note payable		—			11,111
Issuance of convertible debentures in lieu of accounts payable	$	1,427,877		$	—

~~The~~Table ~~accompanying notes are an integral part~~ of ~~these condensed consolidated financial statements~~Contents

5Intellicell BioSciences, Inc. and Subsidiary UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013

IntelliCell BioSciences Inc. and Subsidiary


	September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(11,012,526	)	$	(9,454,362	)
Adjustment to reconcile change in net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Common stock issued for consulting services		30,000
Common stock issued for financing fees		122,496
Employee stock compensation		1,416,405			1,044,630
Loss on conversion of accounts payable to common stock		-			2,562,284
Depreciation and amortization expense		313,920			300,433
Amortization of financing costs		8,712			86,133
Amortization of Debt Discounts		3,219,778			-
Financing costs		15,967,764			1,613,495
Interest from original issue discount on convertible debentures		100,000			-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(13,900,270	)		230,127
Guaranteed interest on convertible promissory notes		46,430			-
Promissory notes issued for services rendered		115,783			265,000
Stock compensation issued for services		328,459			300,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Other current assets		9,000			-
Prepaid expenses		(111,687	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(84,276	)		2,122,335
Accrued interest		494,508			148,548
Deferred rent		3,019
Accrued liabilities, related party		201,023			341,250

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(2,731,462	)		(440,126	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds From related party		-			227,937
Purchase of property and equipment		(67,064	)		(279,156	)

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(67,064	)		(51,219	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures		2,607,000			-
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable, net		42,000			425,000
Principal payments towards notes payable		(97,586	)		-
Proceeds from related party advances		-			56,186
Proceeds from sale of common stock		295,192			-

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		2,846,606			481,186

Net increase (decrease) in cash		48,080			(10,159	)

Cash, beginning of the period		-			10,159

Cash, end of the period	$	48,080		$	-

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest	$	1,414		$	-
Cash paid for taxes	$	524		$	-

NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
Conversion of principal of convertible debentures to common stock	$	814,187		$	-
Conversion of principal of convertible promissory notes to common stock	$	1,041,569		$	-
Conversion of accrued interest to common stock	$	225,531		$	-
Return and re-issuance of common stock for related party liabilities	$	79,227		$	-
Common stock mistakenly returned	$	28		$	-
Issuance of convertible promissory notes in lieu of accrued salaries, related parties	$	80,000		$	-
Assignment of convertible promissory note to convertible debenture	$	500,000		$	-
Conversion of Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses to Common Stock					587,542
Issuance of convertible debentures in lieu of accounts payable	$	1,427,877		$	-
Reclassification of warrants to liabilities	$	500,170			-

~~NOTES~~The TOaccompanying ~~CONDENSED~~notes ~~CONSOLIDATED~~are ~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

~~(Unaudited)~~5

1.Table ~~Description~~ of ~~Business~~Contents

~~Formation~~IntelliCell BioSciences Inc. and Subsidiary

~~IntelliCell~~NOTES ~~Biosciences~~TO ~~Inc., a New~~CONDENSED ~~York~~CONSOLIDATED ~~corporation,~~FINANCIAL was formed under the name Regen Biosciences, Inc. on August 13, 2010 as a pioneering regenerative medicine company to develop and commercialize regenerative medical technologies in large markets with unmet clinical needs. On February 17, 2011, Regen Biosciences, Inc. changed its name to IntelliCell BioSciences Inc. (“IntelliCell”). To date, IntelliCell has developed proprietary technologies that allow for the efficient and reproducible separation of stromal vascular fraction (branded “IntelliCell™”) containing adipose stem cells that can be performed in tissue processing centers and in doctors’ offices.STATEMENTS

~~In conjunction with the formation of IntelliCell~~ (~~formerly Regen Biosciences, Inc.~~Unaudited), a shareholder contributed, as part of his initial capital contribution, one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding stock of Tech Stem Inc., a New York corporation (“Tech Stem”) originally formed on May 24, 2010. Tech Stem’s business is the sourcing, sales and distribution of laboratory equipment and supplies utilized in tissue processing related to IntelliCell’s technologies.

~~Reverse~~1. ~~Merger~~Description of Business

On April 27, 2011, IntelliCell and Media Exchange Group, Inc. (“MEG”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger which was amended on June 3, 2011 (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, a subsidiary of MEG (“Merger Sub”) merged into IntelliCell. The Merger Sub ceased to exist as a corporation and IntelliCell continued as the surviving corporate entity. As a result of the merger, MEG’s former shareholders acquired majority of IntelliCell’s outstanding common stock and all of IntelliCell’s Series B preferred stock. The recapitalized IntelliCell Biosciences, Inc. is hereafter referred to as “IntelliCell” or the “Company”. As consideration for the Merger, the holders of an aggregate of 7,975,768 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock exchanged their shares of common stock for an aggregate of 15,476,978 shares of the Company’s common stock and Dr. Steven Victor, the principal shareholder of IntelliCell and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), exchanged an aggregate of 10,575,482 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock for an aggregate of 20,521 shares of the Company’s series B preferred stock. Each share of series B preferred stock is convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the holders of the series B preferred stock are entitled to notice of stockholders’ meetings and to vote as a single class with the holders of the Common Stock on any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and are entitled to the number of votes equal to the product of (a) the number of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is convertible into on the record date of the vote multiplied by (b) ten (10). The closing of the Merger took place on June 3, 2011 (the “Closing Date”).Formation

~~Prior~~IntelliCell toBiosciences ~~the~~Inc., ~~consummation~~a ofNew York ~~the Merger~~corporation, ~~the~~ ~~Company~~was ~~entered~~formed ~~into~~under ~~agreements with~~ the ~~holders~~name ofRegen anBiosciences, ~~aggregate~~Inc. ofon $1August 13,~~619,606~~ of2010 ~~indebtedness~~as toa ~~the~~pioneering ~~Company,~~regenerative ~~comprised~~medicine ofcompany ~~accrued~~to ~~compensation~~develop inand ~~the~~commercialize ~~amount~~regenerative ofmedical ~~$1,201,551,~~technologies ~~promissory notes~~ in ~~the~~large ~~principal~~markets ~~amount~~with ofunmet ~~$263,707~~clinical ~~plus~~needs. On ~~accrued interest of~~February $917,~~398~~ ~~less unamortized debt discounts of $83~~2011,~~264~~ ~~and~~Regen ~~accrued expenses totaling $228~~Biosciences,~~414~~ inInc. ~~exchange~~changed ~~for~~its ~~the~~name ~~issuance~~to ofIntelliCell anBioSciences ~~aggregate of~~Inc. ~~12,123 shares of series C preferred stock~~(“IntelliCell”). ~~Each~~To ~~share of series C preferred stock shall be convertible into 1~~date,~~000~~ ~~shares~~IntelliCell ofhas ~~the~~developed ~~Company’s~~proprietary ~~common~~technologies ~~stock.~~that ~~Certain~~allow ~~holders~~for of the ~~Company’s~~efficient ~~series~~and Creproducible ~~preferred~~separation ~~stock~~of ~~have~~stromal ~~contractually~~vascular ~~agreed~~fraction to(branded ~~restrict~~“IntelliCell™”) ~~their~~containing ~~ability~~adipose tostem ~~convert~~cells ~~the series C preferred stock such~~ that ~~the~~can ~~number~~be ofperformed ~~shares~~in oftissue ~~the~~processing ~~Company common stock~~centers ~~held by each of holder~~ and ~~its~~in ~~affiliates after such conversion shall not exceed 4.99% of the Company~~doctors’s ~~then issued and outstanding shares of common stock~~offices.

~~Furthermore,~~In ~~prior~~conjunction towith the ~~consummation~~ formation of IntelliCell ~~the~~(formerly ~~Merger~~Regen Biosciences, ~~the~~Inc.), ~~Company~~a ~~entered~~shareholder ~~into~~contributed, ~~agreements~~as ~~with~~part ~~the~~of ~~holders~~his ofinitial ancapital ~~aggregate~~contribution, one hundred percent (100%) of ~~$250,000~~the outstanding stock of ~~accrued~~Tech ~~compensation~~Stem Inc., ~~pursuant to~~a ~~which~~New ~~such~~York ~~persons~~corporation ~~agreed~~(“Tech toStem”) ~~forgive~~originally ~~all~~formed ~~amounts~~on May ~~owed~~24, by2010. Tech Stem’s business is the ~~Company~~sourcing, sales and distribution of laboratory equipment and supplies utilized in tissue processing related to IntelliCell’s technologies.

6Reverse Merger

2On April 27, 2011, IntelliCell and Media Exchange Group, Inc. ~~Restatement~~(“MEG”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of ~~Previously~~Merger ~~Issued~~which ~~Financial~~was ~~Statements~~amended on June 3, 2011 (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, a subsidiary of MEG (“Merger Sub”) merged into IntelliCell. The Merger Sub ceased to exist as a corporation and IntelliCell continued as the surviving corporate entity. As a result of the merger, MEG’s former shareholders acquired majority of IntelliCell’s outstanding common stock and all of IntelliCell’s Series B preferred stock. The recapitalized IntelliCell Biosciences, Inc. is hereafter referred to as “IntelliCell” or the “Company”. As consideration for the Merger, the holders of an aggregate of 7,975,768 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock exchanged their shares of common stock for an aggregate of 15,476,978 shares of the Company’s common stock and Dr. Steven Victor, the principal shareholder of IntelliCell and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), exchanged an aggregate of 10,575,482 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock for an aggregate of 20,521 shares of the Company’s series B preferred stock. Each share of series B preferred stock is convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the holders of the series B preferred stock are entitled to notice of stockholders’ meetings and to vote as a single class with the holders of the Common Stock on any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and are entitled to the number of votes equal to the product of (a) the number of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is convertible into on the record date of the vote multiplied by (b) ten (10). The closing of the Merger took place on June 3, 2011 (the “Closing Date”).

Prior to the ~~filing~~consummation of ~~our~~the ~~Form 10-Q~~Merger, ~~for~~the Company entered into agreements with the ~~quarter~~holders ~~ended~~of ~~June~~an ~~30,~~aggregate ~~2014~~of $1,619,606 of indebtedness to the Company, ~~identified~~comprised ~~errors~~of accrued compensation in ~~accounting~~the ~~for~~amount ~~application~~of $1,201,551, promissory notes in the principal amount of ~~fair~~$263,707 ~~value~~plus ~~assessment~~accrued ~~for~~interest ~~transactions~~of ~~involving~~$9,398 ~~derivative~~less ~~obligations~~unamortized debt discounts of $83,264 ~~including~~and ~~derivative~~accrued ~~valuation~~expenses attotaling ~~inception~~$228,414 ~~conversion,~~in ~~assignment~~exchange ~~and~~for ~~period~~the ~~end.~~issuance ~~The~~of ~~Company~~an aggregate ~~also~~of ~~detected~~12,123 ~~errors~~shares inof ~~the~~series ~~recording~~C preferred stock. Each share of ~~debt~~series ~~discounts.~~C ~~The~~preferred ~~Company~~stock ~~has~~shall ~~assessed~~be convertible into 1,000 shares of the ~~impact~~Company’s common stock. Certain holders of the ~~accounting~~Company’s ~~errors~~series onC ~~its~~preferred ~~3rd~~stock have contractually ~~quarter~~agreed ~~2013~~to ~~financial~~restrict ~~statements,~~their ~~year-end~~ability ~~December~~to ~~31,~~convert ~~2013~~the ~~financial~~series ~~statements~~C ~~and~~preferred ~~1st~~stock ~~quarter~~such ~~2014~~that ~~financial~~the ~~statements,~~number of shares of the Company common stock held by each of holder and ~~concluded~~its ~~that,~~affiliates ~~although~~after ~~there~~such ~~was~~conversion noshall ~~impact~~not onexceed 4.99% of the Company’s ~~cash~~then ~~position,~~issued ~~the~~and ~~effect~~outstanding shares onof ~~its~~common ~~financial statements was material~~stock.

~~The~~Furthermore, ~~impact~~prior onto the ~~Company’s balance~~consummation ~~sheets~~of ~~was~~the toMerger, ~~restate~~ the ~~balance~~Company ~~sheet~~entered ~~items~~into ofagreements ~~Notes~~with ~~Payables,~~the ~~Convertible~~holders ~~Notes~~of ~~Payable~~an ~~Convertible~~aggregate ~~Debentures~~of ~~Payable~~$250,000 ~~additional paid~~of inaccrued ~~capital~~compensation, ~~and~~pursuant to ~~accumulated~~which ~~deficit~~such ~~for~~persons ~~the~~agreed ~~three~~to ~~periods~~forgive ofall ~~September~~amounts ~~30,~~owed ~~2013,~~by ~~December~~the ~~31, 2013 and March 31, 2014~~Company.

~~In addition, the items restated on the statements of income (loss) were financing costs, gain/(loss) on conversions of debt to equity, and change in fair value of derivative liabilities.~~6

~~The~~Table ~~tables below summarize the impact~~ of ~~the restatement from amounts previously reported on the Company’s Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2014 and Form 10k for the period ended December 31, 2013.~~Contents

	September 30, 2013
Balance Sheet	As Filed			As Restated
Convertible Debentures	$	1,725,719		$	1,481,595
Derivative Instruments (long term)		6,876			2,913,730
Accumulated deficit	$	(44,554,265	)	$	(47,216,995	)

2.	Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

	Three months ended September 30, 2013						Nine months ended September 30, 2013
Statement of Operations	As Filed			As Restated			As Filed			As Restated
Changes in fair value of derivative instruments	$	75,581		$	(1,134,691	)	$	980,144		$	(230,128	)
Financing Costs		(856,019	)		(2,302,602	)		(1,023,769	)		(2,470,352	)
Net Loss		(1,817,096	)		(4,479,827	)		(6,791,631	)		(9,454,362	)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.12	)

Prior to the filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company identified errors in accounting for application of fair value assessment for transactions involving derivative obligations, including derivative valuation at inception, conversion, assignment and period end. The Company also detected errors in the recording of debt discounts. The Company has assessed the impact of the accounting errors on its 3^rd quarter 2013 financial statements, year-end December 31, 2013 financial statements and 1^st quarter 2014 financial statements, and concluded that, although there was no impact on the Company’s cash position, the effect on its financial statements was material.

	December 31, 2013
Balance Sheet	As Filed			As Restated
Convertible Debentures	$	840,900		$	452,607
Notes Payable		341,100			727,545
Convertible Promissory Notes		3,505,883			2,755,986
Derivative Instruments (long term)		3,774,790			6,958,822
Additional paid-in-capital		38,961,322			41,256,261
Accumulated deficit	$	(48,903,450	)	$	(53,630,673	)

The impact on the Company’s balance sheets was to restate the balance sheet items of Notes Payables, Convertible Notes Payable Convertible Debentures Payable, additional paid in capital and accumulated deficit for the three periods of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014.

7In addition, the items restated on the statements of operations were financing costs, gain/(loss) on conversions of debt to equity, and change in fair value of derivative liabilities.

	Year ended December 31, 2013
Statement of Operations	As Filed			As Restated
Changes in fair value of derivative instruments	$	(2,787,770	)	$	(2,944,352	)
Financing Costs		(305,112	)		(4,606,010	)
Income (Loss) on Conversion of Debt		(2,137,266	)		(2,272,409	)
Net Loss		(11,140,817	)		(15,868,039	)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.10	)

The tables below summarize the impact of the restatement from amounts previously reported on the Company’s Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2014 and Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2013.

	March 31, 2014
	September 30, 2013
Balance Sheet	As Filed			As Restated
Convertible Debentures	$	51,~~311~~725,~~892~~719		$	~~502~~1,~~872~~481,595
Convertible Promissory Notes		2,316,271			1,749,793
Derivative Instruments (long term)		6,876			2,913,730
Derivative Instruments (long term)		14,055,788			15,128,073
Accumulated deficit	$	(44,554,265	)	$	(47,216,995	)
Additional paid-in-capital		40,535,612			46,807,939
Accumulated deficit	$	(61,908,223	)	$	(63,871,00	6)

	Three months ended March 31, 2014
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Statement of Operations	As Filed			As Restated			As Filed			As Restated
Changes in fair value of derivative instruments	$	~~(10~~75,~~280,997~~581	)	$	8(1,~~476~~134,~~056~~691	)	$	980,144		$	(230,128	)
Financing Costs		(~~715~~856,~~614~~019	)		(172,~~119~~302,~~990~~602	)		(1,023,769	)		(2,470,352	)
Income (Loss) on Conversion of Debt		-0-			399,762
Net Loss		(1,817,096	)		(4,479,827	)		(6,791,631	)		(9,454,362	)
Net Loss		(13,004,773	)		(10,240,334	)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.12	)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

The Company anticipates filing its amended Form 10Q’s for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and three months ended March 31, 2014 and its amended Form 10K for year ended December 31, 2013 on October 7, 2014.

	December 31, 2013
Balance Sheet	As Filed			As Restated

Convertible Debentures	$	840,900		$	452,607
Notes Payable		341,100			727,545
Convertible Promissory Notes		3,505,883			2,755,986
Derivative Instruments (long term)		3,774,790			6,958,822
Additional paid-in-capital		38,961,322			41,256,261
Accumulated deficit	$	(48,903,450	)	$	(53,630,673	)

~~3. Going Concern~~7

~~The~~Table ~~condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course~~ of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $61,164,954 and a working capital deficit of $15,319,535 as of June 30, 2014, respectively. Further losses are anticipated in the continued development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and a private placement of common stock or other debt or equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain further financing, do so on reasonable terms, or do so on terms that would not substantially dilute our current stockholders’ equity interests in us. If we are unable to raise additional funds on a timely basis, or at all, we probably will not be able to continue as a going concern.Contents

	Year Ended December 31, 2013
Statement of Operations	As Filed			As Restated
Changes in fair value of derivative instruments	$	(2,787,770	)	$	(2,944,352	)
Financing Costs		(305,112	)		(4,606,010	)
Income (Loss) on Conversion of Debt		(2,137,266	)		(2,272,409	)
Net Loss		(11,140,817	)		(15,868,039	)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.10	)

43. ~~Summary~~Going ~~of Significant Accounting Policies~~Concern

~~Basis~~The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of ~~Presentation~~business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $64,643,200 and a working capital deficit of $17,375,764 as of September 30, 2014, respectively. Further losses are anticipated in the continued development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and a private placement of common stock or other debt or equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain further financing, do so on reasonable terms, or do so on terms that would not substantially dilute our current stockholders’ equity interests in us. If we are unable to raise additional funds on a timely basis, or at all, we probably will not be able to continue as a going concern.

The condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2013 was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The other information in these condensed financial statements is unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods covered. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These condensed financial statements, including notes, have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and additional information as contained in our 2013 Annual Report. Results of operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.8

AsTable ~~disclosed~~of ~~in Note 2, the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, periods ending September 31, 2013, and March 31, 2014 have been restated.~~Contents

Prior to the filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company identified errors in accounting for application of fair value assessment for transactions involving derivative obligations, including derivative valuation at inception, conversion, assignment and period end4. ~~The~~Summary ~~Company also detected errors in the recording~~ of ~~debt~~Significant ~~discounts.~~Accounting The Company has assessed the impact of the accounting errors on its 3rd quarter 2013 financial statements, year-end December 31, 2013 financial statements and 1st quarter 2014 financial statements, and concluded that, although there was no impact on the Company’s cash position, the effect on its financial statements was material.Policies

~~Principles~~Basis of ~~Consolidation~~Presentation

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~accounts~~United States of ~~IntelliCell~~America. ~~and~~The ~~those~~other information in these condensed consolidated financial statements is unaudited but, in the opinion of ~~Tech~~management, ~~Stem~~reflects ~~Inc~~all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods covered. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These condensed financial statements, including notes, have been prepared in accordance with the ~~Company’s~~applicable ~~wholly~~rules ~~owned~~of ~~subsidiary~~the ~~(collectively~~Securities and Exchange Commission (the “~~Company~~SEC”) and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. ~~All~~ ~~significant~~These ~~inter-company~~condensed ~~transactions~~financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and additional ~~balances~~information ~~have~~as ~~been~~contained ~~eliminated~~in our 2013 Annual Report. Results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.

~~Management’s~~As ~~Use~~disclosed ofin ~~Estimates~~Note 2, the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and ~~Assumptions~~the nine months ended September 30, 2013 have been restated.

~~The~~Prior ~~preparation~~to the filing of ~~consolidated~~our ~~financial~~Form 10-Q ~~statements~~for inthe ~~conformity~~quarter ~~with~~ended ~~GAAP~~June ~~requires~~30, ~~management~~2014, tothe ~~make~~Company ~~estimates~~identified ~~and~~errors ~~assumptions~~in ~~affecting~~accounting ~~the~~for ~~reported~~application ~~amounts~~ of ~~assets~~fair value assessment for transactions ~~and~~involving ~~liabilities~~derivative ~~and~~obligations, ~~disclosure~~including ofderivative ~~contingent~~valuation ~~assets~~at inception, conversion, assignment and ~~liabilities~~period atend. The Company also detected errors in the ~~date~~recording of ~~the~~debt ~~consolidated~~discounts. ~~financial~~The ~~statements,~~Company ~~and~~has assessed the ~~reported~~ ~~amounts~~impact of ~~revenue~~the ~~and~~accounting ~~expenses~~errors ~~during~~on ~~the~~its ~~reporting~~3rd quarter ~~period. Actual~~2013 ~~results~~financial ~~could~~statements, ~~differ~~year-end ~~from~~December ~~these~~31, ~~estimates. Management’s estimates~~2013 financial statements and ~~assumptions~~1st ~~are~~quarter ~~reviewed~~2014 ~~periodically,~~financial statements, and ~~the~~concluded ~~effects~~that, ofalthough ~~revisions~~there ~~are~~was ~~reflected~~no inimpact on the ~~consolidated~~Company’s ~~financial~~cash ~~statements in~~position, the ~~periods~~effect ~~they~~on ~~are~~its ~~determined~~financial tostatements ~~be necessary~~was material.

~~Financial~~Principles ~~Instruments~~of ~~and Fair Value Measurements~~Consolidation

~~GAAP~~The ~~requires~~consolidated ~~certain~~financial ~~disclosures regarding~~statements include the ~~fair~~accounts ~~value~~ of ~~financial~~IntelliCell ~~instruments.~~and ~~The~~those ~~fair value~~ of ~~financial~~Tech ~~instruments~~Stem ~~is made as of a specific point in time~~Inc., ~~based on~~the ~~relevant~~Company’s ~~information~~wholly ~~about~~owned ~~financial~~subsidiary ~~markets~~(collectively ~~and specific financial instruments~~the “Company”). All Assignificant ~~these~~inter-company ~~estimates~~transactions ~~are subjective in nature, involving uncertainties~~ and ~~matters~~balances ofhave ~~significant~~been ~~judgment, they cannot be determined with precision~~eliminated. ~~Changes in assumptions can significantly affect estimated fair values.~~

9Management’s Use of Estimates and Assumptions

~~GAAP~~The ~~defines~~preparation ~~fair~~of ~~value~~consolidated ~~as the price~~financial ~~that~~statements ~~would~~in beconformity ~~received~~with ~~from~~GAAP ~~selling~~requires anmanagement ~~asset~~to ormake ~~paid~~estimates toand ~~transfer~~assumptions aaffecting ~~liability~~the inreported anamounts ~~orderly~~of ~~transaction~~assets and ~~between~~liabilities ~~market~~and ~~participants at~~disclosure ~~the~~of ~~measurement~~contingent ~~date.~~assets ~~When~~and ~~determining~~liabilities at the ~~fair~~date ~~value~~of ~~measurements~~the ~~for~~consolidated ~~assets~~financial statements, and ~~liabilities~~the reported ~~required~~amounts orof ~~permitted~~revenue toand beexpenses ~~recorded at~~during ~~fair value,~~ the ~~Company~~reporting ~~considers~~period. Actual ~~the~~results ~~principal,~~could ordiffer ~~most~~from ~~advantageous~~these ~~market~~estimates. Management’s estimates inand ~~which~~assumptions itare ~~would~~reviewed ~~transact~~periodically, and itthe ~~considers~~effects ~~assumptions that~~of ~~market~~revisions ~~participants~~are ~~would~~reflected ~~use~~in ~~when~~the ~~pricing~~consolidated financial statements in the ~~asset~~periods orthey ~~liability~~are determined to be necessary.

~~GAAP~~Financial ~~establishes~~Instruments ~~a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs~~ and ~~minimize~~Fair ~~the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair~~Value value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the degree of subjectivity that is necessary to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument. GAAP establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:Measurements

~~For~~GAAP ~~cash,~~requires ~~cash~~certain ~~equivalents,~~disclosures ~~and trade~~regarding ~~payables,~~ the ~~carrying~~fair value ~~approximates~~of ~~cost~~financial instruments. ~~For~~The ~~debt~~fair ~~obligations~~value ~~with~~of ~~conversion~~financial ~~features,~~instruments ~~the~~is ~~Company~~made ~~records~~as of a ~~derivative~~specific point in time, based ~~liability~~on ~~using~~relevant ~~the~~information ~~Black-Scholes~~about ~~method~~financial markets and specific financial instruments. As these estimates are subjective in nature, involving uncertainties and matters of ~~valuation~~significant judgment, they cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect estimated fair values.

~~Fair Value Measurements – The fair value of financial instruments are classified into one of the following categories:~~9

~~Level~~Table 1of ~~– Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~Contents

~~Level~~GAAP 2defines -fair ~~Level~~value 2as ~~applies~~the ~~to assets~~price orthat ~~liabilities~~would ~~for~~be ~~which~~received ~~there~~from ~~are~~selling ~~inputs~~an ~~other~~asset ~~than~~or ~~quoted~~paid ~~prices~~to ~~included~~transfer ~~within~~a ~~Level~~liability 1in ~~that~~an ~~are~~orderly ~~observable~~transaction ~~for~~between ~~the~~market ~~asset or~~participants ~~liability~~at ~~such~~the asmeasurement ~~quoted~~date. ~~prices~~When ~~for~~determining ~~similar~~the ~~assets~~fair orvalue ~~liabilities~~measurements infor ~~active~~assets ~~markets;~~and ~~quoted~~liabilities ~~prices~~required ~~for~~or ~~identical~~permitted ~~assets~~to orbe ~~liabilities~~recorded inat ~~markets~~fair ~~with~~value, ~~insufficient~~the ~~volume~~Company orconsiders ~~infrequent~~the ~~transactions~~principal, ~~(less active markets);~~ or ~~model-derived~~most ~~valuations~~advantageous market in which ~~significant inputs~~it ~~are~~would ~~observable~~transact, orand ~~can~~it beconsiders ~~derived~~assumptions that ~~principally~~market ~~from,~~participants orwould ~~corroborated~~use ~~by,~~when ~~observable~~pricing ~~market~~the ~~data~~asset or liability.

~~Level~~GAAP 3establishes -a ~~Level~~fair 3value ~~applies~~hierarchy that requires an entity to ~~assets or~~maximize ~~liabilities~~the ~~for~~use ~~which~~of ~~there~~observable ~~are~~inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs towhen measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the ~~valuation~~fair ~~methodology~~value ~~that~~hierarchy ~~are~~is ~~significant~~based toupon the ~~measurement~~degree of subjectivity that is necessary to estimate the fair value of ~~the~~a ~~assets~~financial ~~or liabilities~~instrument. GAAP establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

~~Stock~~For ~~Based~~cash, ~~Compensation~~cash equivalents, and trade payables, the carrying value approximates cost. For debt obligations with conversion features, the Company records a derivative liability using the Black-Scholes method of valuation.

~~The~~Fair ~~Company~~Value ~~recognizes~~Measurements ~~the cost of employee~~– ~~services~~The ~~received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, such as stock options and restricted stock, based on the~~ fair value of ~~those awards at the date~~ of ~~grant~~financial ~~over~~instruments ~~the~~are ~~requisite~~classified ~~service~~into ~~period.~~one ~~The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model to determine the fair value~~ of ~~stock option awards. Stock-based compensation plans, related expenses and assumptions used in~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~following ~~option pricing model are more fully described in Note 15.~~categories:

~~Revenue~~Level ~~Recognition~~1 – Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

~~The~~Level ~~Company~~2 ~~licenses~~- ~~independent~~Level ~~third parties~~2 toapplies ~~use the Company’s technology in order~~ to ~~enable~~assets or ~~them~~liabilities tofor ~~establish~~which ~~tissue~~there ~~processing~~are ~~centers~~inputs inother ~~major~~than ~~metropolitan markets,~~quoted asprices ~~well~~included aswithin ~~establishing~~Level ~~centers~~1 itthat ~~will~~are ~~operate. Each~~observable ~~center~~for ~~will utilize~~ the ~~Company’s~~asset ~~proprietary technology~~or inliability ~~conjunction~~such ~~with~~as aquoted ~~suite~~prices offor ~~laboratory~~similar ~~equipment~~assets ~~selected~~or byliabilities ~~the~~in ~~Company~~active ~~that~~markets; ~~will~~quoted ~~enable~~prices ~~the~~for ~~lab~~identical toassets ~~process~~or ~~adipose tissue~~liabilities ~~into~~in ~~stromal~~markets ~~vascular~~with ~~fraction~~insufficient ~~containing~~volume ~~adipose~~or ~~stem~~infrequent ~~cells~~transactions ~~using~~(less ~~the~~active ~~Company’s~~markets); ~~technology~~or ~~and~~model-derived ~~protocols. In certain~~valuations ~~centers, the Company will maintain ownership of the laboratory equipment and~~ in ~~other~~which ~~cases the laboratory equipment will~~significant beinputs ~~sold to an independent party. These license fees~~ are ~~payable~~observable ~~upon~~or ~~signing~~can ofbe aderived ~~license~~principally ~~agreement~~from, ~~and~~or ~~are~~corroborated ~~recognized as~~by, ~~revenue~~observable ~~ratably~~market ~~over the license term~~data.

~~Certain~~Level ~~Risks~~3 ~~and~~- ~~Uncertainties~~Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

~~The~~Stock ~~Company~~Based has a limited operating history and its prospects are subject to the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in the early stages of development and commercialization, especially those companies in rapidly evolving and technologically advanced industries such as the biotech / medical device field. The future viability of the Company largely depends on its ability to complete development of new products and processes and maintain and/or receive regulatory approval for those products and processes. No assurance can be given that the Company’s new processes and products will be successfully developed, regulatory approvals will be maintained or granted, or acceptance of these processes and products by the medical and patient communities will be achieved.Compensation

10The Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, such as stock options and restricted stock, based on the fair value of those awards at the date of grant over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards. Stock-based compensation plans, related expenses and assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model are more fully described in Note 15.

~~Restricted~~Revenue ~~Cash and Cash Equivalents~~Recognition

~~Restricted~~The ~~cash~~Company ~~and~~licenses ~~cash~~independent ~~equivalents~~third ~~consist~~parties ~~primarily~~to ofuse ~~funds~~the ~~received~~Company’s ~~that~~technology ~~are~~in ~~restricted~~order ~~for~~to ~~specific~~enable ~~purposes~~them orto ~~cash~~establish ~~set~~tissue ~~aside~~processing ~~and~~centers ~~restricted~~in ~~for~~major ~~specific payments.~~metropolitan ~~As of June 30~~markets, ~~2014~~as ~~and~~well ~~December~~as ~~31,~~establishing ~~2013,~~centers ~~the~~it ~~Company~~will ~~has restricted cash of $321,404 and $0, respectively~~operate. Each ~~Cash~~center ~~escrow~~will ~~agreements were~~utilize ~~executed under~~ the YACompany’s ~~Global~~proprietary ~~financing agreement. Funds of $260,362 were placed~~ technology in ~~escrow~~conjunction ~~for~~with ~~payment~~a suite of ~~taxes~~laboratory ~~owed~~equipment toselected ~~Internal Revenue~~by ~~Service and~~ the ~~State~~Company ofthat ~~New~~will ~~York.~~enable ~~Funds~~the oflab ~~$450,000~~to ~~were~~process ~~placed~~adipose intissue into ~~escrow~~stromal ~~for~~vascular ~~which~~fraction ~~$200,000~~containing isadipose tostem becells ~~used~~using ~~for~~ the ~~Dr. James~~Company’s ~~Andrews~~technology ~~Consulting agreement payments~~ and ~~$250~~protocols. In certain centers,~~000~~ ~~to be used solely for~~ the ~~legal~~Company ~~and~~will ~~accounting~~maintain ~~costs~~ownership ~~associated~~of ~~with~~ the ~~Company’s~~ ~~2013~~laboratory ~~and~~equipment ~~2014 review~~ and ~~filings~~in ofother ~~forms~~cases ~~10K and 10Q. During~~ the ~~six~~laboratory ~~months~~equipment ~~ended~~will be ~~June~~sold ~~30,~~to ~~$343,622~~an ~~was~~independent ~~paid~~party. These ~~from the~~license ~~$450,000~~fees ~~escrow~~are ~~for~~payable ~~accounting~~upon ~~fees~~signing ~~and~~of ~~Dr.~~a ~~Andrews~~license ~~Consulting~~ agreement and ~~$45,336~~are ~~was~~recognized as ~~paid~~revenue toratably ~~the~~over ~~State of New York from~~ the ~~$260,362~~license ~~tax escrow~~term.

~~Accounts~~Certain ~~Receivable~~Risks and Uncertainties

The Company ~~extends~~has ~~credit~~a tolimited ~~customers~~operating ~~without~~history ~~requiring~~and ~~collateral.~~its ~~The~~prospects ~~Company~~are ~~provides~~subject ~~for~~to ~~doubtful~~the ~~accounts~~risks ~~based~~and onuncertainties ~~management’s~~frequently ~~evaluations~~encountered ofby companies in the ~~collectability~~ early stages of development ~~accounts~~and ~~receivable.~~commercialization, ~~Management’s~~especially ~~evaluation~~those iscompanies ~~based~~in onrapidly evolving and technologically advanced industries such as the biotech / medical device field. The future viability of the Company’s ~~historical~~largely ~~collection~~depends ~~experience~~on ~~and~~its aability ~~review~~to complete development of ~~past-due~~new ~~amounts~~products and processes and maintain and/or receive regulatory approval for those products and processes. No assurance ~~The~~can be given that the Company’s ~~determines~~new ~~accounts~~processes ~~receivable~~and toproducts will be ~~delinquent~~successfully ~~when~~developed, ~~collection is~~regulatory ~~past~~approvals will ~~due~~be ~~under~~maintained ~~the agreed upon~~or ~~terms.~~granted, ~~Accounts~~or ~~receivable~~acceptance ~~are~~of ~~written~~these ~~off~~processes ~~when~~and itproducts isby ~~determined~~the ~~that~~medical ~~amounts~~and ~~are~~patient ~~uncollectible~~communities will be achieved.

~~Property and equipment, net~~10

~~Property~~Table ~~and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives~~ of ~~the related asset and, for leasehold improvements, the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life.~~Contents

~~Maintenance~~Restricted ~~and~~Cash ~~repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of renewals and betterments are capitalized.~~

~~Research~~Restricted cash consists primarily of funds received that are restricted for specific purposes or cash set aside and ~~Development~~restricted ~~Costs~~for specific payments. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has restricted cash of $28,774 and $0, respectively. Cash escrow agreements were executed under the YA Global financing agreement. Funds of $260,362 were placed in escrow for payment of taxes owed to Internal Revenue Service and the State of New York. Funds of $450,000 were placed in escrow for which $200,000 is to be used for the Dr. James Andrews Consulting agreement payments and $250,000 to be used solely for the legal and accounting costs associated with the Company’s 2013 and 2014 review and filings of forms 10K and 10Q. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $422,245 was paid from the $450,000 escrow for accounting fees and Dr. Andrews Consulting agreement and $259,343 was paid to the State of New York and the United States Treasury from the $260,362 tax escrow.

~~Research~~Accounts and development (“R&D”) expenses include supplies, salaries, and other headcount related costs, contract and other outside service, and facilities and overhead costs. The Company expenses the costs associated with research and development activities when incurred.Receivable

~~Derivative~~The ~~Instruments~~Company extends credit to customers without requiring collateral. The Company provides for doubtful accounts based on management’s evaluations of the collectability of accounts receivable. Management’s evaluation is based on the Company’s historical collection experience and a review of past-due amounts. The Company determines accounts receivable to be delinquent when collection is past due under the agreed upon terms. Accounts receivable are written off when it is determined that amounts are uncollectible.

~~Derivative~~Property ~~instruments~~and ~~consist of common stock warrants~~equipment, and certain instruments embedded in certain convertible debentures and promissory notes which meet the criteria for bifurcation from their host contract. These derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheets at fair value as liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the period of change.net

IfProperty ~~the~~and ~~Company~~equipment ~~were~~is ~~required~~recorded ~~to settle~~at ~~its~~cost. Depreciation ~~outstanding warrants~~ and ~~convertible~~amortization ~~debt~~are ascomputed ofusing ~~June~~the ~~30,~~straight-line ~~2014,~~method weover ~~would be required to issue 18,222,083,126 common shares for~~ the ~~settlement~~estimated ofuseful ~~warrants~~lives ~~and 3,297,639,134 for the settlement~~ of ~~outstanding convertible debt. The Company determined that~~ the ~~settlement~~related ofasset ~~these outstanding financial instruments would exceed our authorized shares of 3~~and,~~500,000,000~~ atfor ~~June~~leasehold 30improvements, ~~2014 by 18,019,722,261. Pursuant to FASB ASC 815-40,~~ the ~~Company~~shorter would be required to reclassify these contracts from equity to liabilities. As permitted by FASB ASC 815-40, the Company’s policy with regard to settling outstanding financial instruments is to settle those with the earliest inception date first which essentially sets the order of ~~preference for settling~~ the ~~financial~~lease ~~instruments.~~term Asor aestimated ~~result of~~useful ~~the Company’s policy settlement it was determined that reclassification of financial instruments initially recorded in equity was not required~~life.

~~Income~~Maintenance ~~Taxes~~and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of renewals and betterments are capitalized.

~~The~~Research Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. The liability method requires recognition of future tax benefits, measured by enacted rates, attributable to deductible temporary differences between financial statement and ~~income~~Development tax bases of assets and liabilities to the extent that realization of such benefits is “more likely than not.” The Company’s temporary differences between financial statement and income tax reporting relate primarily to receivable reserves, depreciation expense, and operating loss carryforwards. This standard also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim periods and income tax disclosures.Costs

~~GAAP~~Research ~~requires~~and ~~that,~~development ~~in applying the~~(“R&D”) ~~liability~~expenses ~~method~~include supplies, salaries, ~~the~~and ~~financial~~other ~~statement~~headcount ~~effects~~related ofcosts, ancontract ~~uncertain~~and ~~tax~~other ~~position~~outside beservice, ~~recognized~~and ~~based on the outcome that is more~~facilities ~~likely than not to occur. Under this criterion the most likely resolution of an uncertain tax position should be analyzed base on technical merits~~ and onoverhead ~~the outcome that will likely be sustained under examination~~costs. The Company ~~recognizes~~expenses ~~accrued~~the ~~penalties, and~~costs ~~interest~~ associated with ~~uncertain~~research ~~tax~~and ~~positions,~~development asactivities ~~part~~when ~~of the income tax provision~~incurred.

11Derivative Instruments

~~Net~~Derivative ~~Loss~~instruments ~~per~~consist ~~Share~~ of common stock warrants, and certain instruments embedded in certain convertible debentures and promissory notes which meet the criteria for bifurcation from their host contract. These derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheets at fair value as liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the period of change.

~~Basic~~If ~~net~~the ~~loss~~Company ~~per~~were ~~share~~required isto ~~calculated~~settle byits ~~dividing~~outstanding ~~the~~warrants ~~net~~and ~~loss~~convertible ~~for~~debt ~~the~~as ~~period~~of bySeptember ~~the~~30, ~~weighted-average~~2014, ~~number~~we ofwould be required to issue 934,021,481 common shares for ~~outstanding~~the ~~during~~settlement ~~the~~of ~~period.~~warrants ~~Diluted net~~and ~~loss~~12,190,347,336 ~~per~~for ~~share~~the issettlement ~~calculated~~of byoutstanding ~~dividing~~convertible ~~loss~~debt. ~~for~~The Company determined that the ~~period~~settlement byof ~~the~~these ~~weighted-average~~outstanding ~~number~~financial ofinstruments ~~common~~would exceed our authorized shares ~~outstanding~~of ~~during~~10,000,000,000 at September 30, ~~the~~2014 ~~period~~by 6,842,122,097. ~~increased~~Pursuant byto ~~potentially~~FASB ~~dilutive~~ASC ~~common~~815-40, ~~shares~~the ~~("dilutive~~Company ~~securities")~~would ~~that~~be ~~were~~required ~~outstanding~~to ~~during~~reclassify ~~the period.~~these ~~Dilutive~~contracts ~~securities~~from ~~include~~equity ~~stock~~to liabilities. ~~options~~As ~~and~~permitted ~~warrants~~by ~~granted~~FASB ~~and~~ASC ~~convertible~~815-40, ~~debt. The~~the Company’s ~~loss~~policy ~~attributable~~ with regard to ~~common~~settling ~~stockholders,~~outstanding ~~along~~financial instruments is to settle those with the ~~dilutive~~earliest ~~effect~~inception ofdate ~~potentially~~first ~~issuable~~which ~~common~~essentially ~~stock~~sets ~~due~~the toorder ~~outstanding~~of ~~options~~preference ~~warrants and~~for ~~convertible~~settling ~~securities~~the ~~cause~~financial instruments. ~~the~~As ~~normal~~a ~~computation~~result of ~~diluted~~the ~~loss~~Company’s ~~per~~policy ~~share~~it towas bedetermined ~~smaller~~that ~~than~~a ~~the~~classification ~~basic~~of ~~loss~~financial ~~per~~instruments, ~~share;~~namely ~~thereby~~warrants ~~yielding~~to apurchase ~~result~~shares ~~that~~of iscommon ~~counterintuitive. Consequently~~stock, ~~the~~initially ~~diluted~~recorded ~~loss~~as ~~per~~equity, ~~share~~was ~~amount~~required ~~presented~~at ~~does~~September ~~not~~30, ~~differ~~2014. ~~from basic~~$500,171 ~~loss~~was ~~per~~reclassified from ~~share~~Equity ~~due~~ to ~~this~~Derivative ~~“anti-dilutive” effect~~Liability.

~~Net~~Income ~~Earnings per Share~~ Taxes

~~Basic~~The ~~net~~Company ~~earnings~~accounts ~~per~~for ~~share~~income ~~is calculated~~taxes byusing ~~dividing~~ the ~~net~~liability ~~earnings~~method. The ~~for~~liability ~~the~~method ~~period~~requires byrecognition ~~the~~of ~~weighted-average~~future ~~number~~tax ofbenefits, ~~common~~measured ~~shares~~by ~~outstanding~~enacted ~~during~~rates, attributable ~~the~~to ~~period.~~deductible ~~Diluted net~~temporary ~~earnings~~differences ~~per~~between ~~share~~financial isstatement ~~calculated~~and byincome ~~dividing~~tax ~~earnings~~bases ~~for~~of ~~the~~assets ~~period~~and byliabilities to the ~~weighted-average~~extent ~~number~~that realization of ~~common~~such ~~shares~~benefits ~~outstanding during~~is ~~the~~“more ~~period,~~likely ~~increased~~than bynot.” The ~~potentially~~Company’s ~~dilutive~~temporary ~~common~~differences between ~~shares~~financial ~~("dilutive~~statement ~~securities")~~and ~~that~~income ~~could~~tax bereporting ~~issued.~~relate ~~Dilutive securities~~primarily ~~include~~to ~~stock~~receivable ~~options~~reserves, ~~and~~depreciation ~~warrants~~expense, ~~granted~~ and ~~convertible~~operating loss ~~debt~~carryforwards. ~~The~~ ~~Company’s~~This ~~earnings~~standard ~~attributable~~also ~~to common~~provides ~~stockholders,~~guidance ~~along~~on ~~with~~derecognition ~~the~~of ~~dilutive~~income ~~effect~~tax ofassets ~~potentially~~and ~~issuable~~liabilities, ~~common~~classification of ~~stock~~current ~~due~~and todeferred ~~outstanding~~income ~~options~~tax ~~warrants~~assets and ~~convertible~~ ~~securities~~liabilities, ~~cause~~accounting ~~the~~for ~~normal~~interest ~~computation~~and ofpenalties ~~diluted~~associated ~~earnings~~with ~~per~~tax ~~share~~positions, accounting tofor beincome ~~smaller~~taxes ~~than~~in ~~the~~interim ~~basic~~periods ~~earnings~~and ~~per~~income ~~share~~tax disclosures.

~~Reclassifications~~GAAP requires that, in applying the liability method, the financial statement effects of an uncertain tax position be recognized based on the outcome that is more likely than not to occur. Under this criterion the most likely resolution of an uncertain tax position should be analyzed base on technical merits and on the outcome that will likely be sustained under examination. The Company recognizes accrued penalties, and interest associated with uncertain tax positions, as part of the income tax provision.

~~Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform with current year presentation.~~11

5.Table ~~Property~~of ~~and Equipment, net~~Contents

~~The~~Net ~~Company’s~~Loss ~~property~~per ~~and equipment at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consists of the following:~~Share

	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Lab equipment	$	218,291	$	206,089
Leasehold Improvements		2,227,078		2,226,181
Furniture & Fixtures		465,041		463,769
Computer Equipment		433,001		416,816
		3,343,411		3,312,855
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization		848,760		642,356
Property and Equipment, net	$	2,494,651	$	2,670,499

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, increased by potentially dilutive common shares ("dilutive securities") that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive securities include stock options and warrants granted and convertible debt. The Company’s loss attributable to common stockholders, along with the dilutive effect of potentially issuable common stock due to outstanding options warrants and convertible securities cause the normal computation of diluted loss per share to be smaller than the basic loss per share; thereby yielding a result that is counterintuitive. Consequently, the diluted loss per share amount presented does not differ from basic loss per share due to this “anti-dilutive” effect.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $206,405 and $181,453, respectively and is included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. Reclassifications

12Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

65. ~~Accounts~~Property ~~Payable~~ and ~~Accrued~~Equipment, ~~Liabilities~~net

~~Accounts~~The ~~payable~~Company’s property and ~~accrued liabilities~~equipment at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ~~are~~consists asof ~~follows~~the following:

	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Accounts payable	$	645,779	$	2,020,971
Lab equipment	$	213,291	$	206,089
Accrued liabilities		63,896		154,040
Lab equipment – Licensee		41,508		-
Accrued payroll		295,568		434,243
Leasehold Improvements		2,227,078		2,226,181
Total	$	1,005,243	$	2,609,254
Furniture & Fixtures		465,041		463,769
Computer Equipment		433,001		416,816
		3,379,919		3,312,855
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization		956,276		642,356
Property and Equipment, net	$	2,423,643	$	2,670,499

7.Depreciation ~~License~~and ~~Fees~~amortization ~~Payable~~expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $313,920 and $300,430, respectively and is included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company executed various license agreements and collected an aggregate of $1,222,500 in license fees for six centers which never commenced operations. Recognition of such revenue had been deferred pending commencement of operations. The Company was unable to perform its obligations in regards to the licensing agreements and, accordingly, the agreements were cancelled. The Company has classified the amounts to be returned to the former licensees as Licensee Fees Payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.12

InTable ~~2013, the Company converted three different license fees outstanding into convertible debentures totaling $300,000, bringing the total balance as~~ of ~~June 30, 2014 to $922,500.~~Contents

86. ~~Notes~~Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

~~Consorteum~~Accounts ~~Notes~~payable ~~Payable~~and accrued liabilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:

In conjunction with the Merger, the Company assumed notes payable in the principal amount of $2,463,652 plus accrued interest of $369,898.

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Accounts payable	$	847,620	$	2,020,971
Accrued liabilities		36,522		154,040
Accrued payroll		121,825		434,243
Total	$	1,005,967	$	2,609,254

~~Following completion of the Merger, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Consorteum Purchase Agreement”) with Consorteum Holdings, Inc~~7. ~~(“Consorteum”),~~License anFees unrelated company, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell, transfer and assign to Consorteum all of the Company’s rights, title and interests to, and agreements relating to, its digital trading card business and platform in exchange for Consorteum assuming an aggregate principal amount of $1,864,152 of indebtedness of the Company (the “Consorteum Notes”). Such rights include, but are not limited to, the Company’s name, phone number and listing, reputation, relationships and other intangible assets (including its rights to any intellectual property or proprietary technology), as well as the Company’s rights under certain licensing agreements (“Digital Trading Assets”).Payable

~~Also~~During onthe ~~June~~years 6ended December 31, 2013 ~~2011~~and 2012, the Company ~~and Consorteum~~executed ~~entered~~various ~~into~~license anagreements ~~amendment~~and ~~agreement~~collected ~~(the~~an ~~“Amendment~~aggregate ~~Agreement”)~~of to$1,222,500 ~~the~~in ~~Consorteum~~license ~~Purchase~~fees ~~Agreement~~for ~~pursuant~~six tocenters which ~~the~~never ~~parties~~commenced ~~agreed,~~operations. ~~among~~Recognition ~~other things, that the obligations~~ of ~~the~~such ~~Parties~~revenue had tobeen deferred ~~consummate~~pending ~~the~~commencement ~~transactions~~of ~~contemplated~~operations. byThe ~~the~~Company ~~Purchase~~was ~~Agreement~~unable ~~are~~to ~~subject~~perform toits ~~(i)~~obligations ~~the~~in ~~approval~~regards ofto the ~~Board~~licensing ofagreements ~~Directors~~and, ~~of each of the parties~~accordingly, ~~and (ii)~~ the ~~completion~~agreements were ofcancelled. The ~~the~~Company ~~assignment~~has ofclassified the ~~Assumed~~amounts ~~Liabilities~~to ~~(including~~be ~~receipt~~returned ofto ~~all~~ the ~~necessary~~former ~~consents~~licensees ofas ~~the~~Licensee ~~holders~~Fees ofPayable ~~all outstanding~~on ~~indebtedness~~the ofcondensed ~~the~~consolidated ~~Buyer)~~balance sheet.

13In 2013, the Company converted three different license fees outstanding into convertible debentures totaling $300,000, bringing the total balance as of September 30, 2014 to $922,500.

On June 30, 2011, the Company and Consorteum agreed to waive the requirement that the conditions precedent set forth in the Consorteum Purchase Agreement as amended be satisfied on or before closing and each party agreed that as of the date of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement, Consorteum would assume an aggregate of $1,477,052 of principal indebtedness plus accrued interest from the Company totaling $250,695 less unamortized note discounts of $9,8908. ~~Upon~~Notes completion of the requirements of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement and the Amendment Agreement, the note holders who consented to the assumption of their obligations by Consorteum received shares of Consorteum common stock in satisfaction of their notes. Included in the notes assumed by Consorteum were notes payable to former officers and directors of the Company prior to the Merger totaling $450,000 in principal plus accrued interest of $74,935. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consorteum agreed to provide the Company a guarantee, whereby Consorteum agrees to unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee to the Company the prompt and complete payment, as and when due and payable (whether at stated maturity or by required prepayment, acceleration, demand or otherwise), of any remaining notes payable for which the Company had not received the necessary consent as of the date of the waiver. As a result of the foregoing, the transactions contemplated by the Consorteum Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2011.Payable

~~Upon completion of the~~ Consorteum ~~Purchase Agreement,~~Notes ~~the Company had notes payable totaling $986,600 that were not assumed in the agreement.~~Payable

~~During~~In ~~the~~conjunction ~~period~~with ~~ending~~the ~~June 30~~Merger, ~~2012,~~the ~~$375,000~~Company ofassumed ~~the~~notes ~~principal~~payable ~~balance~~in of the ~~Consorteum~~principal ~~Notes~~amount ~~and accrued interest~~ of $~~152~~2,~~549~~463,652 ~~was~~plus ~~converted~~accrued tointerest ~~common stock and warrants as part~~ of ~~the February 2012 private placement. Furthermore, in the year ended December 31, 2012, another~~ $~~375~~369,~~000 of the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes was converted to common stock and warrants~~898.

AsFollowing completion of ~~June~~the 30Merger, the ~~2014~~Company ~~and~~entered ~~December~~into 31an asset purchase agreement (the “Consorteum Purchase Agreement”) with Consorteum Holdings, ~~2013~~Inc. (“Consorteum”), an unrelated company, pursuant to which the ~~principal~~Company ~~balance~~agreed to sell, transfer and assign to Consorteum all of the ~~Consorteum~~Company’s ~~Notes~~rights, ~~amounted~~title and interests to, ~~$236~~and agreements relating to,~~600~~ its digital trading card business and platform in exchange for Consorteum assuming an aggregate principal amount of $~~236~~1,~~600~~864,152 ~~and~~of ~~accrued~~indebtedness ~~interest~~of ~~amounted~~the Company (the “Consorteum Notes”). Such rights include, but are not limited to, ~~$62~~the Company’s name,~~648~~ phone number and ~~$55~~listing,~~688~~ reputation, ~~respectively.~~relationships and ~~These~~other ~~Consorteum~~intangible ~~Notes~~assets ~~are~~(including ~~currently~~its inrights ~~default~~to any intellectual property or proprietary technology), as well as the Company’s rights under certain licensing agreements (“Digital Trading Assets”).

~~JJK~~Also ~~Notes~~on ~~Payable~~June 6, 2011, the Company and Consorteum entered into an amendment agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) to the Consorteum Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the parties agreed, among other things, that the obligations of the Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement are subject to (i) the approval of the Board of Directors of each of the parties, and (ii) the completion of the assignment of the Assumed Liabilities (including receipt of all the necessary consents of the holders of all outstanding indebtedness of the Buyer).

On May 29, 2013 and June 26, 2013, the Company issued promissory notes in the amount of $50,000 and $75,000, respectively, for advances from JJK, LLC (the “JJK Notes”). The terms of the JJK Notes required repayment in 30 days and an annual interest rate of 10%. The notes are currently due and payable.13

InTable ~~August 2013 the Company was advised that the JJK Notes and accrued interest~~ of ~~$28,442 were assigned to Redwood as part of Redwood Deal #4 (see Note 10).~~Contents

~~May~~On ~~Davis~~June ~~Partners~~30, ~~Note~~2011, ~~Payable~~the Company and Consorteum agreed to waive the requirement that the conditions precedent set forth in the Consorteum Purchase Agreement as amended be satisfied on or before closing and each party agreed that as of the date of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement, Consorteum would assume an aggregate of $1,477,052 of principal indebtedness plus accrued interest from the Company totaling $250,695 less unamortized note discounts of $9,890. Upon completion of the requirements of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement and the Amendment Agreement, the note holders who consented to the assumption of their obligations by Consorteum received shares of Consorteum common stock in satisfaction of their notes. Included in the notes assumed by Consorteum were notes payable to former officers and directors of the Company prior to the Merger totaling $450,000 in principal plus accrued interest of $74,935. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consorteum agreed to provide the Company a guarantee, whereby Consorteum agrees to unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee to the Company the prompt and complete payment, as and when due and payable (whether at stated maturity or by required prepayment, acceleration, demand or otherwise), of any remaining notes payable for which the Company had not received the necessary consent as of the date of the waiver. As a result of the foregoing, the transactions contemplated by the Consorteum Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2011.

OnUpon ~~September~~completion 4,of ~~2013,~~ the ~~Company~~Consorteum ~~issued~~Purchase aAgreement, ~~promissory note in~~ the ~~amount~~Company ofhad ~~$75,000,~~notes ~~for~~payable ~~$75,000~~totaling ~~cash, of which~~ $72986,~~000~~600 ~~went~~that ~~to pay accrued expenses for accounting fees and $3,000~~ were ~~expensed~~not asassumed ~~legal fees, to May Davis Partners (the “May Davis Note”). The terms of the May Davis Note require repayment~~ in ~~21 days and 10% compounded interest effective upon~~ the ~~maturity date of September 25, 2013~~agreement. ~~The May Davis Note was paid in full in January 2014. Accrued interest of $2,842 is still outstanding at June 30, 2014.~~

~~Sichenzia~~During ~~Ross~~the period ending June 30, 2012, $375,000 of the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes ~~Payable~~and accrued interest of $152,549 was converted to common stock and warrants as part of the February 2012 private placement. Furthermore, in the year ended December 31, 2012, another $375,000 of the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes was converted to common stock and warrants.

OnAs of September 1630, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the ~~Company~~principal ~~issued a~~balance ~~promissory~~of ~~note~~the inConsorteum ~~the~~Notes ~~amount~~amounted ofto $~~386~~236,~~445~~600 toand ~~Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LP~~$236,600, ~~for~~and ~~outstanding~~accrued ~~legal~~interest ~~fees~~amounted ~~due~~to ~~(the “Sichenzia~~$66,128 ~~Note”).~~and ~~The terms of the Sichenzia Note required repayment by December 31~~$55, ~~2013~~688, ~~and~~respectively. ~~annual~~These ~~simple~~Consorteum ~~interest~~Notes ofare ~~10%~~currently in default.

OnMay ~~January~~Davis 9,Partners ~~2014 the Company was advised that the Sichenzia Notes were assigned to Redwood as part of Redwood Deal #3 (see~~ Note ~~10).~~Payable

InOn ~~March~~September of4, ~~2014~~2013, the Company ~~was~~issued a ~~advised~~promissory note in the amount of $75,000, for $75,000 cash, of which $72,000 went to pay accrued expenses for accounting fees ~~that~~and $~~193~~3,~~223~~000 was expensed as legal fees, to May Davis Partners (the “May Davis Note”). The terms of the ~~note~~May Davis Note require repayment in 21 days and 10% compounded interest effective upon the maturity date of September 25, 2013. The May Davis Note was ~~re-assigned~~paid ~~from~~in ~~Redwood~~full toin ~~Dominion~~January ~~Capital~~2014. Accrued interest of $2,482 is still outstanding at September 30, 2014.

14Sichenzia Ross Notes Payable

MDOn ~~Global~~September ~~Partners~~16, ~~LLC~~2013, ~~Notes~~the ~~Payable~~Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $386,445 to Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LP, for outstanding legal fees due (the “Sichenzia Note”). The terms of the Sichenzia Note required repayment by December 31, 2013, and annual simple interest of 10%.

On ~~October~~January 119, ~~2013~~2014 ~~and November 6, 2013,~~ the Company ~~issued~~was ~~promissory~~advised that ~~notes in~~ the ~~amount~~Sichenzia ofNotes ~~$15,000~~were ~~and~~assigned ~~$4,000, respectively for compensation due~~ to MDRedwood ~~Global~~as ~~Partners for~~part ~~services~~ of ~~raising~~Redwood ~~capital~~Deal ~~for~~#3 ~~the Company~~ (~~the~~see ~~“MD~~Note ~~Global Notes”~~10). The terms of the MD Global Notes require repayment on demand and 10% interest compounded annually. The MD Global Notes were paid in full in January 2014. Accrued interest of $456 is outstanding at June 30, 2014.

~~Highland~~In ~~Capital~~March ~~Notes~~of ~~Payable~~2014, the Company was advised that $193,223 of the note was re-assigned from Redwood to Dominion Capital.

On December 11, 2013 and December 20, 2013, the Company issued promissory notes to Highland Capital (the “Highland Notes”) in the amount of $5,500 for money owed to a stock transfer agent and $5,000 for legal expenses owed, respectively. The Highland Notes were due June 25, 2014 and July 1, 2014, respectively. The interest rate on the Highland Notes is not specified. The Highland Notes are currently due and payable.14

AsTable of ~~June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Highland Notes were $10,500.~~Contents

~~Sherb~~MD ~~Note~~Global Partners, LLC Notes Payable

On ~~January~~October 611, ~~2014~~2013 and November 6, 2013, the Company issued a promissory ~~note~~notes in the amount of $15,000 and $4,000, respectively for compensation due to ~~Sherb~~MD &Global ~~Co.~~Partners for services of raising capital for the Company (the “~~Sherb~~MD ~~Note~~Global Notes”). inThe ~~the~~terms ~~amount~~ of ~~$115,785~~the ~~for~~MD ~~money~~Global ~~owed~~Notes ~~for~~require ~~accounting services~~repayment ~~prior~~on todemand ~~the~~and ~~Reverse~~10% ~~Merger~~interest ofcompounded ~~April 2011~~annually. The ~~Sherb~~MD ~~Note~~Global isNotes ~~due~~were ~~December~~paid ~~31,~~in ~~2014~~full ~~and~~in ~~has~~January ~~simple~~2014. Accrued interest of ~~10%~~$456 is ~~per~~outstanding ~~annum.~~at September 30, 2014.

OnHighland ~~April~~Capital ~~14,~~Notes 2014, the Company was advised that the note was assigned to May Davis Partners Acquisition Company, LLC. As part of the assignment the Company issued a convertible note to May Davis Partners Acquisition.Payable

~~Kaplan~~On ~~Note~~December ~~Payable~~11, 2013 and December 20, 2013, the Company issued promissory notes to Highland Capital (the “Highland Notes”) in the amount of $5,500 for money owed to a stock transfer agent and $5,000 for legal expenses owed, respectively. The Highland Notes were due June 25, 2014 and July 1, 2014, respectively. The interest rate on the Highland Notes is not specified. The Highland Notes are currently due and payable.

OnAs ~~March~~of 5September 30, 2014, ~~the~~and ~~Company~~December ~~issued a~~31, ~~promissory~~2013, ~~note to Jeffrey Kaplan (~~the ~~“Kaplan~~principal balance ~~Note”)~~of in the ~~amount~~Highland ofNotes ~~$30,000~~were ~~for working capital advance. The Kaplan Note was due on March~~ $10, ~~2014 and has simple interest of 10% per annum~~500.

~~At June 30, 2014, the principal balance on the~~ Kaplan Note ~~was $30,000 and accrued interest was $975.~~Payable

AsOn ofMarch ~~June 30~~5, 2014, ~~and~~the ~~December~~Company ~~31,~~issued ~~2013,~~a promissory note to Jeffrey Kaplan (the ~~principal~~“Kaplan ~~balance~~Note”) ofin the ~~Company's~~amount ~~notes~~of ~~payable~~$30,000 ~~were~~for asworking ~~follows:~~capital advance. The Kaplan Note was due on March 10, 2014 and has simple interest of 10% per annum.

			(Restated)
	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Consorteum Notes	$	236,600	$	236,600
May Davis Notes		—		75,000
MD Global Notes		—		19,000
Highland Notes		10,500		10,500
Sichenzia Ross		—		386,445
Kaplan Note		30,000		—
Total	$	277,100	$	727,545

At September 30, 2014, the principal balance on the Kaplan Note was $30,000 and accrued interest was $1,725.

15As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Company's notes payable were as follows:

9. Related Party Transactions

			(Restated)
	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Consorteum Notes	$	236,600	$	236,600
May Davis Notes		—		75,000
MD Global Notes		—		19,000
Highland Notes		10,500		10,500
Sichenzia Ross		—		386,445
Kaplan Note		30,000		—
Total	$	277,100	$	727,545

~~Rent~~15

~~The~~Table Company is provided office and lab facilities and related services by a company owned by the Company’s CEO, a significant shareholder (Note 15, Commitments). The Company has recorded rent and utilities expenses of ~~$215,350 and $193,800, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.~~Contents

~~Officer~~9. ~~Salary~~Related Party Transactions

The Company has recorded a salary expense of $68,750 and $68,750 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $137,500 and $137,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively for the Company’s CEO, and a shareholder and a salary expense totaling approximately $45,000 and $45,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $90,000 and $90,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, recorded for the Company’s Executive Vice President, a shareholder and the spouse of the Company's CEO.Rent

~~Officer~~The ~~Advance~~Company is provided office and lab facilities and related services by a company owned by the Company’s CEO, a significant shareholder (Note 15, Commitments). The Company has recorded rent and utilities expenses of $320,076 and $290,700, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

~~From~~Officer ~~time to time, the Company has received advances from certain of its officers to meet short term working capital needs. These advances may not have formal repayment terms or arrangements.~~Salary

~~Advances~~The ~~due~~Company has recorded a salary expense of $68,750 and $68,750 for ~~working~~the ~~capital~~three ~~purposes~~months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and $206,250 and $206,250 for the nine months ended ~~amounted~~September to30, 2014 and 2013, respectively for the Company’s CEO, and a shareholder and a salary expense totaling approximately $-045,000 asand of$45,000 ~~June~~for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and ~~December~~2013 31and $135,000 and $135,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, recorded for the Company’s Executive Vice President, a shareholder and the spouse of the Company's CEO.

~~Regen Agreement~~Officer Advance

OnFrom ~~April~~time ~~16,~~to ~~2012~~time, the Company ~~entered into~~has ~~a technology license and administrative services agreement (the “Agreement”) with Regen Medical P.C., the medical~~received ~~practice~~advances ~~which~~from iscertain ~~owned by, and through which, the Company CEO, Dr. Steven Victor, engages in the practice~~ of Cosmetic Dermatology (“Regen Medical”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company, among other things, (i) granted Regen Medical the non-exclusive and non-assignable license to utilize the Company's proprietary process and technology for its ~~patients,~~officers ~~(ii) granted Regen Medical a license~~ to ~~use~~meet ashort ~~laboratory~~term ~~which~~working ~~can~~capital be used by Regen Medical for use of the Company’s proprietary process and (iii) was appointed as the exclusive manager and administrator of Regen Medical’s operations which relates to the implementation of the Company's proprietary process as well as Regen Medical’s cosmetic dermatology practice, and (iv) was appointed the sole provider of non-medical managerial, administrative and business functions for Regen Medical’s cosmetic dermatology practiceneeds. ~~The~~ ~~Agreement~~These ~~became~~advances ~~effective~~may asnot ofhave ~~April~~formal ~~16,~~repayment ~~2012 and was to continue until April 16, 2017. Thereafter,~~terms ~~the~~or ~~Agreement was to be automatically renewed for successive five year periods unless either party notifies the other in writing of its intention not to renew the Agreement~~arrangements.

InAdvances ~~consideration~~due for ~~the~~working ~~services~~capital topurposes beamounted ~~provided under the Agreement, Regen Medical was~~ to ~~pay the Company (i) an annual administrative fee of~~ $~~600,000,~~-0- payable in equal monthly installments during the term of the agreement (subject to an annual increase of up to a maximum of ten percent (10%) beginning on the second anniversary of the effective date), (ii) an annual technology license fee of $120,000, payable in equal monthly installments during the term of the agreement, for the use of our proprietary process (including the laboratory and the laboratory technician) and (iii) a processing fee of $1,000 for each tissue processing case that utilizes our proprietary process. The Company is also entitled to a an annual performance fee during the term of either (i) $150,000, in the event total income to Regen Medical exceeds $5,500,000 or (ii) $200,000, in the event that total income to Regen Medical exceeds $7,000,000. In addition, beginning on October 16, 2013 and on each six month anniversary thereafter during the term, the Company is entitled to a share of Regen Medical’s Savings (as ~~defined below), minus its share~~ of ~~any~~September ~~Loss (as defined below”)~~30, ~~based~~2014 upon an agreed upon base burden percentage for Regen Medical (the “Base Burden Percentage”). The Base Burden Percentage is to be calculated by dividing (a) the aggregate actual costs of Regen Medical paid by the Company during the period ending on December 31, 2011 by (b) the aggregate revenue of Regen Medical collected by the Company during the period ending on December 31, 2011; provided , however , that the Base Burden Percentage shall be recalculated on January 1, 2013 and every 12 months thereafter during the term by dividing (i) the aggregate actual costs for the Regen Medical paid by the Company during the preceding three six-month periods by (ii) the aggregate Savings or Loss is to be calculated by subtracting (a) the aggregate actual costs for the Regen Medical paid by the Company during the preceding Period from (b) an amount equal to (I) the Base Burden Percentage multiplied by (ii) the aggregate revenue of the Regen Medical collected by the Company during the preceding Period (the “Burden Amount”). If the Burden Amount exceeds the Period Actual Costs (the “Savings”) or the Period Actual Costs exceed the Burden Amount (the “Loss”), Regen Medical and the Company shall share such Savings or Loss 65% for the account of the Regen Medical and 35% for the account of the Company. The Company recognized revenue of $0 and $514,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 ~~and 2012~~, respectively~~, under the agreements~~.

16Regen Agreement

On ~~August~~ 26April 16, ~~2013~~2012, the Company ~~and~~ ~~Regen Medical~~ entered into a ~~termination~~technology license and ~~general~~administrative ~~release~~services agreement (the “~~Termination~~ Agreement”), ~~effective December~~with ~~31,~~Regen ~~2012~~Medical (P.C., the ~~“Effective~~medical practice ~~Date”)~~which is owned by, ~~pursuant~~and tothrough which, the Company ~~and Regen Medical agreed~~CEO, ~~among~~Dr. ~~other~~Steven ~~things~~Victor, ~~that~~ asengages ofin the ~~Effective~~practice ~~Date,~~of Cosmetic Dermatology (i“Regen Medical”) ~~the~~. ~~Company~~Pursuant ~~shall~~to ~~forgive~~ the ~~$514~~Agreement,~~000~~ ~~owed to~~ the Company, byamong ~~Regen~~other ~~Medical~~things, ~~under~~(i) ~~the~~ granted Regen Medical ~~Agreement in exchange for~~ the non-exclusive and ~~right~~non-assignable license to ~~certain~~utilize the ~~open~~Company's proprietary ~~label~~process ~~data~~ and ~~other~~technology ~~data~~for ~~which~~its ~~the~~patients, ~~Company~~(ii) ~~would like~~granted toRegen ~~have~~Medical ~~the~~a ~~rights~~license to use asa ~~empirical~~laboratory ~~data~~which orcan ~~evidence~~be ofused ~~the~~by ~~efficacy~~Regen Medical for use of the Company’s proprietary process ~~(the “Clinical~~ ~~Data”),~~and (iiiii) was ~~the~~appointed ~~parties~~as ~~will~~the ~~take~~exclusive ~~all~~manager ~~necessary~~and ~~steps~~administrator toof ~~enter~~Regen ~~into~~Medical’s anoperations ~~agreement~~which ~~for~~relates ~~the grant of a license~~ to ~~Regen Medical~~the ~~for~~implementation of the Company’'s proprietary process as well as aRegen ~~license~~Medical’s ofcosmetic ~~the~~dermatology ~~Clinical Data~~practice, and (~~iii~~iv) was appointed the ~~Regen~~sole ~~Medical~~provider ~~Agreement~~of isnon-medical ~~terminated in~~managerial, ~~its~~administrative ~~entirety~~ and ~~shall~~business befunctions ~~deemed~~for ~~null~~Regen ~~and~~Medical’s ~~void~~cosmetic dermatology ~~and~~practice. The ofAgreement nobecame ~~further~~effective ~~force~~as orof ~~effect~~April ~~and~~16, ~~(iii)~~2012 ~~neither~~and ~~Company~~was ~~nor~~to ~~Regen~~continue ~~Medical shall~~until ~~have~~April ~~any~~16, ~~further~~2017. Thereafter, the ~~rights~~Agreement orwas ~~obligations~~to ~~under~~be ~~the~~automatically ~~Regen~~renewed ~~Medical~~for ~~Agreement. Each~~successive ~~party~~five ~~also~~year ~~provided~~periods aunless ~~general~~either ~~release to the other~~ party ~~with~~notifies ~~respect to~~ the ~~Regen~~other ~~Medical~~in ~~Agreement~~writing of ~~and~~its ~~all~~intention ~~transactions~~not ~~contemplated~~to byrenew the ~~Regen Medical~~ Agreement.

~~Revenue~~In consideration for the services to be provided under the Agreement, Regen Medical was to pay the Company (i) an annual administrative fee of $600,000, payable in equal monthly installments during the term of the agreement (subject to an annual increase of up to a maximum of ten percent (10%) beginning on the second anniversary of the effective date), (ii) an annual technology license fee of $120,000, payable in equal monthly installments during the term of the agreement, for the use of our proprietary process (including the laboratory and the laboratory technician) and (iii) a processing fee of $1,000 for each tissue processing case that utilizes our proprietary process. The Company is also entitled to an annual performance fee during the term of either (i) $150,000, in the event total income to Regen Medical exceeds $5,500,000 or (ii) $200,000, in the event that total income to Regen Medical exceeds $7,000,000. In addition, beginning on October 16, 2013 and on each six month anniversary thereafter during the term, the Company is entitled to a share of Regen Medical’s Savings (as defined below), minus its share of any Loss (as defined below”), based upon an agreed upon base burden percentage for Regen Medical (the “Base Burden Percentage”). The Base Burden Percentage is to be calculated by dividing (a) the aggregate actual costs of Regen Medical paid by the Company during the period ending on December 31, 2011 by (b) the aggregate revenue of Regen Medical collected by the Company during the period ending on December 31, 2011; provided, however , that the Base Burden Percentage shall be recalculated on January 1, 2013 and every 12 months thereafter during the term by dividing (i) the aggregate actual costs for the Regen Medical paid by the Company during the preceding three six-month periods by (ii) the aggregate Savings or Loss is to be calculated by subtracting (a) the aggregate actual costs for the Regen Medical paid by the Company during the preceding Period from (b) an amount equal to (I) the Base Burden Percentage multiplied by (ii) the aggregate revenue of the Regen Medical collected by the Company during the preceding Period (the “Burden Amount”). If the Burden Amount exceeds the Period Actual Costs (the “Savings”) or the Period Actual Costs exceed the Burden Amount (the “Loss”), Regen Medical and the Company shall share such Savings or Loss 65% for the account of the Regen Medical and 35% for the account of the Company. The Company recognized revenue of $0 and $514,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, under the agreements.

Intellicell charges Regen Medical a processing fee of $2,500 for each tissue processing case that uses Intellicell’s proprietary process. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, Intellicell completed 26 cases for a total revenue of $65,000. All cases were performed for Regen Medical patients.16

~~Research~~Table ~~and~~of ~~Development~~Contents

~~Research~~On August 26, 2013, the Company and ~~development~~Regen ~~costs~~Medical ~~for~~entered into a termination and general release agreement (the “Termination Agreement”), effective ~~six~~December ~~months~~31, ~~ended~~2012 ~~June~~(the 30“Effective Date”), ~~2014~~pursuant to which the Company and ~~2013~~Regen ~~were~~Medical ~~$270~~agreed,~~500~~ ~~and~~among ~~$501~~other things,~~803~~ that ~~respectively.~~as ~~These~~of ~~fees~~the ~~were~~Effective ~~accrued~~Date, ~~and~~(i) the ~~paid~~Company shall forgive the $514,000 owed to the Company by Regen Medical under the Regen Medical Agreement in exchange for ~~services~~the exclusive right to certain open label data and other data which the Company would like to have the rights to use as empirical data or evidence of the ~~attending~~efficacy ~~physician~~of inthe ~~twenty~~Company’s ~~six~~proprietary process (26the “Clinical Data”), ~~and~~(ii) ~~thirty~~the ~~eight~~parties ~~(38)~~will ~~patient~~take ~~cases~~all ~~respectively.~~necessary ~~These~~steps ~~cases~~to ~~are~~enter ~~included as~~into ~~part~~an agreement for the grant of a license to Regen Medical for the Company’s ~~ongoing~~proprietary ~~research~~process as well as a license of the Clinical Data, (iii) the Regen Medical Agreement is terminated in its ~~technologies~~entirety and ~~processes~~shall be deemed null and void and of no further force or effect and (iii) neither Company nor Regen Medical shall have any further rights or obligations under the Regen Medical Agreement. Each party also provided a general release to the other party with respect to the Regen Medical Agreement and all transactions contemplated by the Regen Medical Agreement.

~~As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accrued research fees totaled $0 and $361,000, respectively.~~Revenue

~~Accrued~~Intellicell ~~liabilities~~charges Regen Medical a processing fee of $2,500 ~~related~~for ~~parties~~each tissue processing case that uses Intellicell’s proprietary process. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, Intellicell completed 48 cases for a total revenue of $120,000. All cases were performed for Regen Medical ~~net~~patients.

~~The~~Research ~~Company~~and ~~has ongoing transactions with related parties. These parties extend credit on behalf of the Company.~~Development

AsResearch ofand ~~June~~development costs to related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and ~~December~~2013 31were $353, ~~2013~~500 and $287,000 respectively. These fees were accrued and paid to Regen Medical for services as the ~~following~~attending ~~related~~physician ~~party~~in ~~amounts~~thirty ~~were~~eight ~~due~~(38) ~~from~~and twenty three (to23) patient cases respectively. These cases are included as part of the Company:’s ongoing research of its technologies and processes.

		6/30/14			12/31/2013
Fees Receivable From Regen for Processing of adipose tissues for Regen patients	$	(32,500	)	$	—
Advances to Dr. Steven Victor, CEO		-0-			(530,534	)
Credit card payables		2,072			176,940
Accrued research fees, Due to Regen Medical, net of Advances of $93,174 as December 31, 2013		-0-			267,826
Accrued payroll		411,689			393,389
Totals	$	381,261		$	307,621

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accrued research fees totaled $85,500 (and is included in Accounts Payable) and $361,000, respectively.

17Accrued liabilities, related parties, net

10The Company has ongoing transactions with related parties. ~~Convertible~~These ~~Debentures~~parties extend credit on behalf of the Company.

~~May~~As ~~2011~~of ~~Convertible~~September ~~Debenture~~30, ~~Offering~~2014 and December 31, 2013, the following related party amounts were due from (to) the Company:

In May 2011, IntelliCell completed a convertible debt offering aggregating $1,385,000. The units offered consist of a $50,000 subordinated convertible debenture payable one year from the date of issue with interest at a rate of 6% and convertible, at the option of the holder, into the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $1.72 per share (the “May 2011 Debentures”). Each unit also included a detachable five (5) year warrant to purchase 57,143 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.72 per share. The proceeds from the issuance of convertible debt securities with detachable warrants were allocated between the warrants and the debt security. The discount is being amortized over the life of the debt. As of December 31, 2011, the Company recorded an original issue discount of $288,564 related to the value of the warrants that will be amortized as interest expense over the initial one year term of the May 2011 Debentures.

		9/30/14			12/31/ 2013
Fees Receivable From Regen Medical for Processing of adipose tissues for Regen Medical patients	$	(85,000	)	$	—
Advances to Dr. Steven Victor, CEO		110			(530,534	)
Credit card payables		—			176,940
Due to Regen Medical		68,095			267,826
Accrued payroll		525,439			393,389
Totals	$	508,644		$	307,621

As a result of the Company’s Merger, and the effect of recapitalization, the exercise price of the May 2011 Debentures and warrants was decreased from $1.72 to $.88. The subordinated convertible debentures are convertible into an aggregate of 1,561,443 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,071,542 shares of common stock.17

OnTable ~~May 17, 2012, the holder~~ of an aggregate of $500,000 principal amount of IntelliCell Notes informed the Company that it is in default and demanded repayment under the IntelliCell Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the IntelliCell Notes, upon the occurrence, after the expiration of a cure period of fifteen (15) days with respect to monetary defaults, following the receipt by the Company of written notice from a holder of a default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest, or any part thereof, when due, a holder, at its election may accelerate the unpaid balance of the principal and all accrued interest due under this Note and declare the same payable at once without further notice or demand. Upon an event of default under the IntelliCell Notes, the holders of the IntelliCell Notes shall be entitled to, among other things (i) the principal amount of the IntelliCell Notes along with any interest accrued but unpaid thereon and (ii) costs and expenses in connection with the collection and enforcement under the IntelliCell Notes, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. As a result of the notice of default, the IntelliCell Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,360,000 were immediately due and payable. In conjunction with the agreement arrangements with the note holders, $77,744 of accrued interest was converted to 89,358 shares of the Company's common stock in May 2012. Furthermore, a $25,000 convertible debenture and related accrued interest of $904 was converted to 29,436 shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2012.Contents

~~During~~10. ~~the~~Convertible ~~year ended December 31, 2013, Redwood Management, LLC (“Redwood”) assumed $1,030,000 of the May 2011~~ Debentures~~, which included $600,000 of principal and $60,781 of accrued interest as part of Redwood Deal #1, and $430,000 as part of Redwood Deal #2 (see Note 10).~~

~~During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the remaining $330,000 balance of the~~ May 2011 ~~notes~~Convertible ~~were~~Debenture ~~assigned by the holders to various investors. As of March 31, 2014, the May 2011 Debentures were paid in full to the original holders.~~Offering

~~Hudson~~In ~~Street~~May 2011, ~~LLC~~IntelliCell ~~Convertible~~completed a convertible debt offering aggregating $1,385,000. The units offered consist of a $50,000 subordinated convertible debenture payable one year from the date of issue with interest at a rate of 6% and convertible, at the option of the holder, into the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $1.72 per share (the “May 2011 Debentures”). Each unit also included a detachable five (5) year warrant to purchase 57,143 shares of IntelliCell’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.72 per share. The proceeds from the issuance of convertible debt securities with detachable warrants were allocated between the warrants and the debt security. The discount is being amortized over the life of the debt. As of December 31, 2011, the Company recorded an original issue discount of $288,564 related to the value of the warrants that will be amortized as interest expense over the initial one year term of the May 2011 Debentures.

OnAs ~~October 7, 2013, Hudson Street LLC (“Hudson”), assumed~~ a ~~total~~result of ~~$300,000 of convertible notes from Redwood as part of their total convertible debentures. On October 31, 2013,~~ the Company’s ~~issued a secured convertible debenture with Hudson for $100~~Merger,~~000 (combined, the~~ ~~“Hudson~~and ~~Debentures”). Under~~ the ~~terms~~effect of ~~the agreement~~recapitalization, ~~Hudson has~~ the ~~rights~~exercise ofprice ~~first refusal for a period~~ of ~~eighteen~~ ~~months from~~ the ~~issuance~~May of2011 ~~the~~Debentures ~~debenture~~and onwarrants ~~any~~was ~~issuance~~decreased orfrom ~~sale~~$1.72 ~~of capital stock that the Company issues~~ to ~~raise additional capital~~$. 88. The ~~terms of the Hudson Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple~~ ~~annual~~subordinated ~~interest~~convertible ~~rate.~~debentures ~~The Hudson Debentures~~ are convertible into ~~shares~~an ofaggregate ~~the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5%~~ of ~~the~~1,561,443 ~~average~~shares ~~3 lowest trades (not on the same day)~~ of ~~the~~ common stock ~~of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract~~ and ~~accounted~~warrants ~~for~~to ~~separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt~~purchase ~~discount~~an ~~which~~aggregate ~~reduced the book value~~ of ~~the $100~~ 3,~~000~~071,542 ~~debenture~~shares ~~and increases prospectively the amount~~ of ~~interest~~common ~~expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture~~stock.

~~During~~On May 17, 2012, the ~~six~~holder ~~months~~of ~~ended~~an ~~June~~aggregate of 30$500,000 principal amount of IntelliCell Notes informed the Company that it is in default and demanded repayment under the IntelliCell ~~2014~~Notes. Pursuant to the terms of the IntelliCell Notes, ~~$210~~upon the occurrence,~~900~~ after the expiration of a cure period of fifteen (15) days with respect to monetary defaults, following the receipt by the Company of written notice from a holder of a default in the payment of any installment of principal or interest, or any part thereof, when due, a holder, at its election may accelerate the unpaid balance of the ~~Hudson~~principal ~~debentures~~and all accrued interest due under this Note and $6declare the same payable at once without further notice or demand. Upon an event of default under the IntelliCell Notes,~~417~~ the holders of the ~~accrued~~IntelliCell Notes shall be entitled to, among other things (i) the principal amount of the IntelliCell Notes along with any interest accrued but unpaid thereon and (ii) costs and expenses in connection with the collection and enforcement under the IntelliCell Notes, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. As a result of the notice of default, the IntelliCell Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,360,000 were immediately due and payable. In conjunction with the agreement arrangements with the note holders, $77,744 of accrued interest was converted to ~~240~~89,~~949~~358 shares of the Company's common stock in May 2012. Furthermore,~~354~~ a $25,000 convertible debenture and related accrued interest of $904 was converted to 29,436 shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2012.

AsDuring ofthe ~~June~~year ~~30,~~ended ~~2014 and~~ December 31, 2013, Redwood ~~the~~Management, ~~Hudson~~LLC ~~Debentures~~(“Redwood”) ~~had~~assumed a$1,030,000 ~~principal~~of ~~balance~~the ~~totaling~~May 2011 Debentures, which included $~~-0-~~600,000 of principal and $~~210~~60,~~900,~~781 ~~and~~of accrued interest as part of $3Redwood Deal #1,~~303~~ and $4430,~~527,~~000 ~~respectively~~as part of Redwood Deal #2 (see Note 10).

18During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the remaining $330,000 balance of the May 2011 notes were assigned by the holders to various investors. As of March 31, 2014, the May 2011 Debentures were paid in full to the original holders.

~~Burrington~~Hudson ~~Capital~~Street, LLC Convertible Debentures

On ~~January~~October 27, ~~2014 and on February 5~~2013, ~~2014,~~ ~~Burrington~~Hudson ~~Capital,~~Street LLC (“~~Burrington~~Hudson”), ~~was assigned and~~ assumed a total of $~~200~~300,000 of convertible notes from ~~holders~~Redwood as part of ~~the~~their ~~May~~total ~~2011 offering~~convertible debentures. On InOctober ~~addition~~31, ~~on January 7~~2013, ~~2014~~ the Company issued a ~~secure~~secured convertible debenture with Hudson for $100,000 (combined, the “~~Burrington~~ Hudson Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, ~~Burrington~~Hudson has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the ~~Burrington~~ Hudson Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The ~~Burrington~~ Hudson Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, $~~200~~210,~~000~~900 of the ~~principle~~principal balance of the ~~Burrington~~Hudson ~~Debentures~~debentures and $136,~~050~~417 of the accrued interest ~~were~~was converted to ~~234~~240,~~135~~949,~~918~~354 shares of common stock.

AtAs ~~June~~of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the ~~Burrington~~Hudson Debentures had a principal balance totaling $~~100~~-0- and $210,~~000~~900, and accrued interest of $143,~~903~~303 and $4,527, respectively.

~~KesselBrenner Convertible Debentures~~18

OnTable ~~January 10, 2014, Dr. Michael KesselBrenner was assigned and assumed a total~~ of $25,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 31, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $25,000 (combined, the “KesselBrenner Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Dr. Michael KesselBrenner has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the KesselBrenner Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The KesselBrenner Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $25,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.Contents

~~During~~Burrington ~~the six months ended June 30~~Capital, ~~2014,~~ ~~$25,000~~LLC ~~of the principal balance of the KesselBrenner~~ Convertible Debentures ~~was converted into 27,203,482 shares of common stock.~~

19On January 2, 2014 and on February 5, 2014, Burrington Capital, LLC (“Burrington”) was assigned and assumed a total of $200,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 7, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $100,000 (combined, the “Burrington Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Burrington has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Burrington Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Burrington Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtDuring ~~June~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $274,000 of the ~~KesselBrenner Debentures~~principle ~~had~~balance aof ~~principal~~the ~~balance~~Burrington ~~totaling~~Debentures and $2513,~~000~~050 ~~and~~of the accrued interest ofwere $3converted to 351,~~756~~503,086 shares of common stock.

~~Liben~~At ~~Convertible~~September 30, 2014, the Burrington Debentures had a principal balance totaling $26,000 and accrued interest of $16,250.

OnKesselBrenner ~~January~~Convertible 27, 2014, Barry Liben was assigned and assumed a total of $65,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 27, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $70,000 (combined, the “Liben Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Barry Liben has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Liben Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Liben Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $70,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~During~~On January 10, 2014, Dr. Michael KesselBrenner was assigned and assumed a total of $25,000 from holders of the ~~six~~May ~~months~~2011 ~~ended~~offering. ~~June~~In 30addition, ~~2014~~ on January 31, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $5825,~~286~~000 (combined, the “KesselBrenner Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, ~~principal~~Dr. ~~balance~~Michael KesselBrenner has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the ~~Liben~~issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the KesselBrenner Debentures require ~~was~~repayment ~~converted~~on ~~into~~the ~~63,422,742~~date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The KesselBrenner Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $25,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtOn ~~June~~July 301, 2014, Dr. Michael KesselBrenner was assigned and assumed a total of $80,000 from holder of the ~~Liben~~Kozar ~~Debentures~~license debenture. In addition, on July 1, 2014 the Company ~~had~~issued a ~~principal~~secured ~~balance~~convertible ~~totaling~~debenture for $7620,~~715~~000 (combined, the “KesselBrenner Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Dr. Michael Kesselbrenner has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Kesselbrenner Debentures require repayment on January 1, 2015 and ~~accrued~~bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Kesselbrenner Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of both the $980,~~264~~000 and the $25,000 debentures and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~Brother~~During ~~Capital,~~the ~~LLC~~nine ~~Convertible~~months ended September 30, 2014, $25,000 of the principal balance of the Kesselbrenner Debentures was converted into 27,203,482 shares of common stock.

On January 13, 2014, Brother Capital, LLC (“Brother”) was assigned and assumed a total of $75,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 21, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $75,000 (combined, the “Brother Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Brother has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Brother Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Brother Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $75,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.19

~~During~~Table ~~the six months ended June 30, 2014, $42,286~~ of ~~the principal balance of the Brother Debentures was converted into 68,836,230 shares of common stock.~~Contents

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the ~~Brother Debentures~~Kesselbrenner Debentures had a principal balance totaling $~~107~~125,~~714~~000 and accrued interest of $1220,~~809~~121.

~~Patrick~~Liben ~~Tuohy,~~ Convertible Debentures

On January 3027, 2014, ~~Patrick~~Barry ~~Tuohy~~Liben was assigned and assumed a total of $1065,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 27, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $70,000 (combined, the “~~Tuohy~~Liben Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, ~~Patrick~~Barry Liben ~~Tuohy~~ has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the ~~Tuohy~~Liben Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 610% simple annual interest rate. The ~~Tuohy~~Liben Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to ~~48.5~~52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the ~~debenture~~debentures ~~has~~have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $70,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, $1065,000 of the principal balance of the ~~Tuohy~~Liben Debentures was converted into 1069,~~881~~117,~~392~~822 shares of common stock.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the ~~Tuohy~~Liben Debentures had a principal balance totaling $070,000 and accrued interest of $~~969~~11,059.

~~Redwood~~Brother ~~Management~~Capital, LLC Convertible Debentures

On January 1713, 2014, Brother Capital, LLC (“Brother”) was assigned and onassumed ~~January~~a 31total of $75,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on ~~2014~~January 21, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible ~~debentures~~debenture ~~to Redwood Management, LLC~~ for $~~67,000 and $~~75,000, ~~respectively~~ (combined, the “~~Redwood~~Brother Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, ~~Redwood~~Brother ~~Management, LLC~~ has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the ~~Redwood~~ Brother Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 1210% simple annual interest rate. The ~~Redwood~~Brother Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52 48.5% of the ~~lowest~~average ~~traded~~3 ~~price~~lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $75,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

20During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $42,286 of the principal balance of the Brother Debentures was converted into 68,836,230 shares of common stock.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the ~~Redwood~~Brother Debentures had a principal balance totaling $~~142~~107,~~000~~714 and accrued interest of $715,~~189~~665.

MDPatrick ~~Global~~Tuohy, Convertible Debentures

On January 930, 2014, ~~the~~Patrick ~~Company~~Tuohy ~~issued~~was aassigned ~~secure~~and ~~convertible~~assumed ~~debenture~~a tototal MDof ~~Global for~~ $5010,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering (the “Tuohy Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, MDPatrick ~~Global~~Tuohy has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the MDTuohy ~~Global~~ Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 106% simple annual interest rate. The MDTuohy ~~Global~~ Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the ~~180~~20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the ~~debentures~~debenture ~~have~~has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $50,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtDuring ~~June~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $10,000 of the MDprincipal ~~Global~~balance ~~Debentures had~~of athe ~~principal~~Tuohy ~~balance~~Debentures ~~totaling~~was ~~$50,000~~converted ~~and~~into ~~accrued~~10,881,392 ~~interest~~shares of ~~$2,403~~common stock.

~~May~~On ~~Davis~~July ~~Partners~~1, ~~Convertible~~2014, Patrick Tuohy was assigned and assumed a total of $30,000 from the holder of the Kozar License Debenture. Under the terms of the agreement, Patrick Tuohy has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Tuohy Debentures require repayment on January 1, 2015 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Tuohy Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debenture has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

On At ~~March~~September 530, 2014 ~~the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to May Davis Partners for $25~~,~~000~~ (the ~~“May Davis Debenture”). Under the terms of the~~Tuohy ~~agreement,~~Debentures ~~May~~had ~~Davis Partners has the rights of first refusal for~~ a ~~period~~principal ofbalance ~~eighteen~~totaling months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the May Davis Debenture require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The May Davis Debenture are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 180 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $2530,000 ~~debenture~~ and ~~increases~~accrued ~~prospectively the amount of~~ interest ~~expense to be recognized over the life~~ of ~~the debenture.~~$6,699

~~During the six months ended June 30,~~ Redwood ~~2014~~Management, ~~May~~LLC ~~Davis~~Convertible ~~Partners converted $20,000 of a convertible debenture issued for financing fees into 9,157,509 shares of the Company’s common stock.~~Debentures

AtOn ~~June~~January 3017, 2014 and on January 31, 2014, the ~~May~~Company ~~Davis~~issued ~~Debenture had~~secure aconvertible ~~principal~~debentures ~~balance~~to ~~totaling~~Redwood Management, LLC for $2567,000 and ~~accrued~~$75,000, respectively (combined, the “Redwood Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Redwood Management, LLC has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Redwood Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 12% simple annual interest rate. The Redwood Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the lowest traded price (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $175,~~163~~000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~Empire~~During ~~Equity~~the ~~Convertible~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, $67,000 of the principal balance of the Redwood Management Debentures and $6,684 of accrued interest was converted into 109,000,000 shares of common stock.

On February 5, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to Empire Equity for $100,000 (the “Empire Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Empire Equity has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Empire Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Empire Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~During~~Table ~~the six months ended June 30, 2014, $100,000~~ of ~~the principal balance of the Empire Equity Debentures and $704 of the accrued interest was converted into 63,011,684 shares of common stock.~~Contents

21At September 30, 2014, the Redwood Debentures had a principal balance totaling $75,000 and accrued interest of $3,537.

AtMD ~~June~~Global ~~30,~~Convertible ~~2014, the Empire Equity~~ Debentures ~~had a principal balance totaling $-0- and accrued interest of $1,330.~~

~~License~~On ~~Fee~~January ~~Conversions~~9, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to MD Global for $50,000. Under the terms of the agreement, MD Global has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the MD Global Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The MD Global Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 180 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $50,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

OnAt ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Company issued three separate secured convertible debentures totaling $300,000 to convert license fees due certain third parties. Bill Hess, POBD Holding Co. was issued a convertible debenture for $80,000. Patty Dixon, Allwin Scientific Corp. was issued a convertible debenture for $60,000. Brian Kozer, MD ~~was issued a convertible debenture for $160,000. The terms of these convertible debentures were the~~Global ~~same:~~Debentures ahad ~~maturity date of January 1, 2014, 10% simple interest calculated on~~ a ~~360~~principal ~~day~~balance ~~year,~~totaling and a conversion rate equal to 48.5% of the average of the three lowest traded prices (not the same day) of the common Stock, determined on the then current trading market for the Common Stock for 20 trading days immediately preceding the Conversion Date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~300~~50,000 ~~debenture~~ and ~~increases~~accrued ~~prospectively the amount of~~ interest ~~expense to be recognized over the life~~ of ~~the debenture~~$3,653.

AsMay ofDavis ~~June~~Partners ~~30,~~Convertible 2014 and December 31, 2013, the three convertible debentures from license fees had a balance due of $300,000, respectively, and had accrued interest of $45,000 and $30,000, respectively. These debentures are currently in default.Debentures

YAOn ~~Global~~March ~~Investments~~5, LP2014 ~~Convertible~~the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to May Davis Partners for $25,000 (the “May Davis Debenture”). Under the terms of the agreement, May Davis Partners has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the May Davis Debenture require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The May Davis Debenture are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 180 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $25,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

OnDuring ~~March 11, 2014,~~ the ~~Company~~nine ~~entered into~~months aended ~~Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell a secured convertible debenture to YA Global Investments~~September 30, ~~L.P.~~2014, inMay ~~the~~Davis ~~principal amount~~Partners ofconverted $220,~~100,~~000 ~~(the~~of ~~“YA~~a ~~Global~~convertible ~~Debenture”). In~~debenture ~~addition~~issued tofor ~~the~~financing YAfees ~~Global~~into ~~Debenture~~9, ~~the Company also agreed to issue a warrant to purchase up to 400~~157,~~000,000~~509 shares of the Company’s common stock ~~at an exercise price of $0~~.~~005 per share.~~

~~The YA Global Debenture matures on March 11, 2015 and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to 7.5%.~~ At ~~any~~September ~~time~~30, ~~and at its sole option~~2014, ~~YA Global can to convert a portion or all amounts of principal and interest due and outstanding under~~ the YAMay ~~Global~~ Davis Debenture ~~into~~had ~~shares of common stock at~~ a ~~price~~principal ~~equal~~balance tototaling 48.5% of the average of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock on the OTC Markets or on the exchange which the common stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $225,~~100,~~000 ~~debenture~~ and ~~increases~~accrued ~~prospectively the amount of~~ interest ~~expense to be recognized over the life~~ of ~~the debenture~~$1,787.

AsEmpire ofEquity ~~June~~Convertible ~~30, 2014, the YA Global Debenture had a principal balance of $2,100,000 and accrued interest of $48,125.~~Debentures

~~Dominion~~On ~~Capital~~February ~~Debenture~~5, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to Empire Equity for $100,000 (the “Empire Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Empire Equity has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Empire Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Empire Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

OnDuring ~~March~~the ~~24,~~nine ~~2014,~~months ~~Ironridge~~ended ~~Global~~September ~~sold~~30, ~~the~~2014, ~~TCA~~$100,000 ~~Note~~of ~~to Dominion Capital under~~ the ~~security~~principal ~~settlement~~balance ~~agreement~~of ~~executed between~~ the ~~Company~~Empire ~~and~~Equity ~~Dominion~~Debentures ~~Capital,~~ and ~~the~~$704 ~~Company~~of ~~issued a convertible debenture to Dominion Capital in~~ the ~~amount~~accrued ofinterest ~~$746,092~~was ~~(the~~converted ~~“Dominion Debenture”).~~into ~~The $746~~63,~~092 principal balance included the original TCA Note of $500~~011,~~000,~~684 ~~accrued~~shares ~~interest and pre-payment penalties~~ of ~~$246,092~~common stock.

2221

~~The~~Table ~~Dominion Capital Debenture matures on March 24, 2015 and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to 7.5%. At any time, and at its sole option, Dominion Capital can to convert a portion or all amounts~~ of principal and interest due and outstanding under the Dominion Debenture into shares of common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock on the OTC Markets or on the exchange which the common stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $746,092 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.Contents

AsAt ofSeptember ~~June~~ 30, 2014, the ~~Dominion~~Empire ~~Debenture~~Equity Debentures had a principal balance oftotaling $~~746,092,~~-0- and accrued interest of $151,~~077~~330.

~~Issuance~~License ofFee ~~Convertible Debentures – Vendor Services~~Conversions

On ~~January~~December 131, ~~2014~~2013, the Company issued athree separate secured convertible ~~debenture~~debentures ~~with~~totaling ~~The Roth Firm for~~ $~~196~~300,~~612~~000 to ~~memorialize~~convert ~~outstanding~~license ~~accounts~~fees ~~payable.~~due ~~Under~~certain ~~the~~third ~~terms~~parties. ~~of the~~Bill ~~agreement~~Hess, ~~The~~POBD Holding ~~Roth~~Co. ~~Firm~~was ~~has~~issued ~~the~~a ~~rights~~convertible ofdebenture ~~first refusal~~ for a$80,000. ~~period~~Patty ofDixon, ~~eighteen~~Allwin ~~months~~Scientific ~~from~~Corp. ~~the~~was ~~issuance~~issued ofa ~~the~~convertible debenture onfor ~~any~~$60,000. ~~issuance~~Brian orKozer, ~~sale~~MD ofwas ~~capital~~issued ~~stock~~a ~~that~~convertible ~~the~~debenture ~~Company~~for ~~issues to raise additional capital~~$160,000. The terms of ~~the~~these convertible ~~debenture require~~debentures ~~repayment~~were onthe same: ~~December~~a ~~31,~~maturity ~~2014~~date ~~and~~of ~~bears~~January a1, 2014, 10% simple ~~annual~~ interest ~~rate.~~calculated ~~The~~on ~~convertible~~a ~~debenture~~360 isday ~~convertible~~year, ~~into shares~~and ~~of the Company’s common stock at~~ a ~~price~~conversion rate equal to 48.5% of the average 3of the three lowest ~~trades~~traded prices (not on the same day) of the ~~Common~~ common Stock, ofdetermined on the then current trading market for the Common Stock for 20 trading days immediately preceding the ~~conversion~~Conversion ~~date~~Date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion ~~feature~~ feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~196~~300,~~612~~000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtDuring ~~June~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014, ~~The~~$140,000 ~~Roth~~of ~~Firm~~the ~~had a~~ principal balance of ~~$196~~the Brian Kozer,~~612~~ ~~and~~MD ~~accrued~~Debentures ~~interest~~were ofassigned ~~$9,831~~to various investors.

OnAs ~~January~~of 1September 30, 2014, ~~the~~and ~~Company issued~~December ~~a secured convertible debenture with Mintz Levin for $25~~31,~~382~~ ~~to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement~~2013, ~~Mintz Levin has~~ the ~~rights~~three ofconvertible ~~first~~debentures ~~refusal for a period of eighteen months~~ from ~~the~~license ~~issuance~~fees ofhad ~~the~~a ~~debenture~~balance ondue ~~any issuance or sale~~ of ~~capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31~~$160,000 ~~2014~~ and ~~bears~~$300,000, a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloombergrespectively, ~~LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract~~ and ~~accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded~~had ~~derivative~~accrued ~~created~~interest ~~a debt discount which reduced the book value~~ of ~~the~~ $2526,~~382~~000 ~~debenture~~ and ~~increases~~$30,000, ~~prospectively~~respectively. ~~the~~These ~~amount of~~debentures ~~interest~~are ~~expense~~currently toin ~~be recognized over the life of the debenture~~default.

AtYA ~~June~~Global ~~30,~~Investments ~~2014,~~LP ~~Mintz Levin had a~~Convertible ~~principal balance of $25,382 and accrued interest of $1,269.~~Debenture

23On March 11, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to issue and sell a secured convertible debenture to YA Global Investments, L.P., in the principal amount of $2,100,000 (the “YA Global Debenture”). In addition to the YA Global Debenture, the Company also agreed to issue a warrant to purchase up to 400,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.005 per share.

OnThe ~~January~~YA 1,Global ~~2014,~~Debenture ~~the~~matures ~~Company~~on ~~issued~~March a11, ~~secured~~2015 ~~convertible~~and ~~debenture~~accrues ~~with~~interest ~~Biologics~~at ~~Consulting~~an ~~Group~~annual ~~for~~rate ~~$93,006~~equal to ~~memorialize outstanding accounts payable~~7.5%. ~~Under the~~At ~~terms~~any ~~of the agreement~~time, ~~Biologics~~and ~~Consulting~~at ~~Group~~its ~~has~~sole ~~the~~option, ~~rights~~YA ofGlobal ~~first~~can convert ~~refusal for~~ a ~~period of eighteen months from the~~ ~~issuance~~portion ~~of the debenture on any issuance~~ or ~~sale~~all ofamounts ~~capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms~~ of ~~the~~principal ~~convertible~~and ~~debenture~~interest ~~require~~due ~~repayment on December 31, 2014~~ and ~~bears~~outstanding aunder ~~10%~~the ~~simple~~YA ~~annual~~Global ~~interest~~Debenture ~~rate. The convertible debenture is convertible~~ into shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock ofon the 20OTC ~~trading~~Markets ~~days~~or ~~immediately~~on ~~preceding~~the exchange which the ~~conversion~~common ~~date~~stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $932,~~006~~100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtAs ~~June~~of September 30, 2014, ~~Biologics~~the ~~Consulting~~YA Global ~~Group~~Debenture had a principal balance of $932,~~006~~100,000 and accrued interest of $487,~~650~~500.

OnDominion ~~January~~Capital 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with Michael Friedman for $200,000 to memorialize outstanding compensation. Under the terms of the agreement, Michael Friedman has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $200,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.Debenture

AtOn ~~June~~March 3024, 2014, ~~Michael~~Ironridge ~~Friedman~~Global sold ~~had~~the TCA Note to Dominion Capital under the security settlement agreement executed between the Company and Dominion Capital, and the Company issued a convertible debenture to Dominion Capital in the amount of $746,092 (the “Dominion Debenture”). The $746,092 principal balance included the original TCA Note of $~~200~~500,000, ~~and~~ accrued interest and pre-payment penalties of $10246,~~000~~092.

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with University of Florida, Department of Materials Sciences & Engineering for $33,781 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, University of Florida, Department of Materials Sciences & Engineering has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $33,781 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.22

24Table of Contents

The Dominion Capital Debenture matures on March 24, 2015 and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to 7.5%. At ~~June~~any 30time, ~~2014~~and at its sole option, ~~University~~Dominion Capital can to convert a portion or all amounts of ~~Florida~~principal and interest due and outstanding under the Dominion Debenture into shares of common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock on the OTC Markets or on the exchange which the common stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during ~~Department~~the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of ~~Materials~~the ~~Sciences~~debentures &have ~~Engineering~~been ~~had~~bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a ~~principal~~derivative. ~~balance~~The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $33746,~~781~~092 debenture and ~~accrued~~increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of ~~$1,689~~the debenture.

OnAs ~~January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with Hunton & Williams, LLP for $187,107 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms~~ of ~~the~~September ~~agreement~~30, Hunton & Williams, LLP has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, ~~LP.~~ ~~The conversion feature of~~ the ~~debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.~~Dominion ~~The~~Debenture ~~bifurcation~~had ~~of the embedded derivative created~~ a ~~debt~~principal ~~discount~~balance ~~which reduced the book value~~ of ~~the~~ $~~187~~746,~~107~~092, ~~debenture~~ and ~~increases prospectively~~accrued ~~the amount of~~ interest ~~expense to be recognized over the life~~ of ~~the debenture~~$29,066.

AtIssuance ~~June 30, 2014, Hunton & Williams, LLP had a principal balance~~ of ~~$187,107~~Convertible ~~and~~Debentures ~~accrued~~– ~~interest~~Vendor ~~of $9,355.~~Services

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with ~~Lucosky~~The ~~Brookman,~~Roth ~~LLP~~Firm for $~~124~~196,~~812~~612 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, ~~Lucosky~~The ~~Brookman,~~Roth ~~LLP~~Firm has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the Common ~~common~~Stock ~~stock~~ of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~124~~196,~~812~~612 debenture and increases ~~prospectively~~ prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, ~~Lucosky~~The ~~Brookman, LLP~~Roth Firm had a principal balance of $~~124~~196,~~812~~612 and accrued interest of $614,~~241~~746.

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with ~~Buchanan~~Mintz ~~Ingersoll~~Levin ~~& Rooney~~ for $~~525~~25,~~583~~382 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, ~~Buchanan~~Mintz ~~Ingersoll~~Levin ~~& Rooney~~ has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~525~~25,~~583~~ 382 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, ~~Buchanan~~Mintz ~~Ingersoll &~~Levin ~~Rooney~~ had a principal balance of $~~525~~25,~~583~~382 and accrued interest of $261,~~279~~904.

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with Charles River for $6,229 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement Charles River has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $6,229 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.23

25Table of Contents

AtOn ~~June~~January 301, 2014, ~~Charles~~the ~~River~~Company ~~had~~issued a ~~principal~~secured ~~balance~~convertible ofdebenture with Biologics Consulting Group for $693,~~229~~006 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, Biologics Consulting Group has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and ~~accrued~~bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~311~~93,006 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

OnAt ~~January~~September 130, 2014, ~~the~~Biologics ~~Company issued~~Consulting aGroup ~~secured~~had ~~convertible debenture with Heilscher for $8,522 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement Heilscher has the rights of first refusal for~~ a ~~period~~principal ofbalance ~~eighteen months from the issuance~~ of ~~the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31~~$93,006 ~~2014~~ and ~~bears~~accrued ~~a 10% simple annual~~ interest ~~rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares~~ of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $86,~~522 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture~~975.

On ~~June~~January 301, 2014, ~~Heilscher~~the ~~had~~Company issued a ~~principal~~secured convertible debenture with Michael Friedman for $200,000 to memorialize outstanding compensation. Under the terms of ~~balance~~the agreement, Michael Friedman has the rights of $8first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31,~~522~~ 2014 and ~~accrued~~bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~426~~200,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

OnAt ~~January~~September 130, 2014, ~~the~~Michael ~~Company issued~~Friedman ahad ~~secured convertible debenture with Millipore for $13,611 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement Millipore has the rights of first refusal for~~ a ~~period~~principal ofbalance ~~eighteen months from the issuance~~ of ~~the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31~~$200,000 ~~2014~~ and ~~bears~~accrued ~~a 10% simple annual~~ interest ~~rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares~~ of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $1315,~~611 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture~~000.

On ~~June~~January 301, 2014, ~~Millipore~~the ~~had~~Company issued a ~~principal balance~~secured convertible debenture with University of Florida, Department of Materials Sciences & Engineering for $1333,~~611~~781 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, University of Florida, Department of Materials Sciences & Engineering has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and ~~accrued~~bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~681~~33,781 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with The Shore Group for $13,234 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement The Shore Group has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $13,234 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.24

OnTable ~~June 30, 2014, The Shore Group had a principal balance~~ of ~~$13,234 and accrued interest of $662.~~Contents

AsAt ofSeptember ~~June~~ 30, 2014, ~~and~~University ~~December 31,~~of ~~2013~~Florida, ~~the~~Department of Materials Sciences & Engineering had a principal balance of ~~the~~$33,781 ~~Company's~~and ~~convertible~~accrued ~~debentures~~interest ~~were~~of ~~as follows:~~$2,534.

	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
May 2011 Convertible Debentures	$	—	$	330,000
Hudson Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $88,293		—		122,607
Hess Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $48,532 and $80,000		31,468		-0-
Dixon Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $36,400 and $60,000		23,600		-0-
Kozer Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $97,820 and $160,000		62,180		-0-
Burrington Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $23,604 and $-0-		76.396		—
YA Global Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $1,900,661 and $-0-		199,339		—
Kesselbrenner Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $5,901 and $-0-		19,099		—
Liben Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $17,170 and $-0-		59,545		—
Brother Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $43,460 and $-0-		64,254		—
Redwood Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $18,823 and $-0-		123,177		—
MD Global Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $11,802 and $-0-		38,198		—
May Davis Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $19,727 and $-0-		5,273		—
Dominion Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $681,392 and $-0-		64,700		—
Roth Firm Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $141,294 and $-0-		55,318		—
Mintz Levin Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $16,243 and $-0-		9,139		—
Biologic Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $61,203 and $-0-		31,803		—
Friedman Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $133,233 and $-0-		66,767		—
Univ. of Fla Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $21,860 and $-0-		11,921		—
Hunton Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $133,521 and $-0-		53,586		—
Lucosky Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $83,689 and $-0-		41,123		—
Buchanan Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $401,469 and $-0-		124,114		—
Charles River Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $3,719 and $-0-		2,510		—
Heilscher Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $5,172 and $-0-		3,350		—
Millipore Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $7,916 and $-0-		5,695		—
Shore Group Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $7,652 and $-0-		5,580		—
	$	1,178,135	$	452,607

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with Hunton & Williams, LLP for $187,107 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement, Hunton & Williams, LLP has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $187,107 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

26At September 30, 2014, Hunton & Williams, LLP had a principal balance of $187,107 and accrued interest of $14,033.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~January ~~accounted~~1, ~~for~~2014, the ~~conversion~~Company issued ~~features~~a ~~underlying~~secured ~~the~~ convertible ~~debentures~~debenture ~~and~~with ~~issued~~Lucosky inBrookman, ~~accordance~~LLP ~~with~~for ~~GAAP~~$124,812 asto memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms ~~conversion~~of ~~feature~~the ~~embedded~~agreement, inLucosky Brookman, LLP has the ~~convertible debentures~~rights ~~could~~of ~~result~~first inrefusal for a period of eighteen months from the ~~debentures~~issuance of ~~being~~the ~~converted~~debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a ~~variable~~10% ~~number~~simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common ~~shares~~stock at a price equal to 48.5% ~~The~~of ~~Company~~the average 3 lowest trades (not on ~~determined~~the same day) of the ~~value~~common stock of the ~~derivate~~20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion ~~features~~date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of ~~these~~the debentures athave been bifurcated from the ~~relevant~~host ~~commitment~~contract ~~dates~~and ~~utilizing~~accounted for separately as a ~~Black-Scholes~~derivative. ~~valuation~~The ~~model~~bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $124,812 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~The~~At ~~Company~~September ~~accounted~~30, ~~for the detachable warrants included with the convertible debentures as liabilities in accordance with GAAP~~2014, asLucosky ~~the warrants are subject to anti-dilution~~Brookman, ~~protection~~LLP ~~and~~had ~~could result in them being converted to~~ a ~~variable~~principal ~~number~~balance of ~~the~~$124,812 ~~Company’s~~and ~~common~~accrued ~~shares.~~interest ~~The Company determined the value~~ of ~~the derivate feature of the warrants at the relevant commitment dates utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model~~$9,361.

11On January 1, 2014, the Company issued a secured convertible debenture with Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney for $525,583 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under ~~Convertible~~the ~~Notes~~terms ~~Payable~~of the agreement Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $525,583 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~TCA~~At ~~Convertible~~September ~~Promissory~~30, ~~Note~~2014, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney had a principal balance of $525,583 and accrued interest of $39,419.

On ~~June~~January 71, ~~2012~~2014, the Company issued a secured convertible ~~promissory~~debenture ~~note~~with toCharles ~~TCA~~River ~~Global~~for ~~Master Fund~~$6,229 Lto memorialize outstanding accounts payable.P. ~~("TCA")~~Under the terms of the agreement Charles River has the rights of first refusal for ~~$500,000~~a (period of eighteen months from the ~~“TCA~~issuance ~~Note”). The~~of the debenture on any ~~maturity~~issuance ~~date~~or sale of capital stock that the ~~TCA~~Company ~~Note~~issues isto ~~June~~raise 7,additional ~~2013,~~capital. ~~and~~The terms of the ~~Convertible~~convertible ~~Note~~debenture ~~bears~~require repayment ~~interest~~on atOctober a21, ~~rate~~2014 ofand ~~twelve~~bears ~~percent~~a ~~(12~~10%) ~~per~~simple ~~annum~~annual interest rate. The ~~TCA~~ ~~Note~~convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to ~~ninety-five percent (95~~48.5%) of the average of ~~the~~3 lowest ~~daily~~trades ~~volume~~(not ~~weighted~~on ~~average~~the ~~price~~same day) of the common stock ~~during~~of the ~~five~~20 ~~(5)~~ trading days immediately ~~prior~~preceding to the conversion date ofas quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The ~~TCA~~bifurcation ~~Note~~of ~~may~~the beembedded derivative ~~prepaid~~created ina ~~whole~~debt ordiscount inwhich ~~part~~reduced atthe book value of the ~~Company’s~~$6,229 ~~option~~debenture ~~without~~and ~~penalty~~increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~Pursuant~~During to the ~~terms~~nine ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~Equity~~September ~~Agreement~~30, ~~for a period of twenty-four months commencing on the effective date of a registration statement~~2014, ~~TCA is to commit to purchase up to~~ $26,~~000,000~~229 of the ~~Company’s~~principal ~~common~~balance ~~stock, pursuant to Advances, covering the Registerable Securities. The purchase price~~ of the ~~Shares~~Charles ~~under~~River ~~the~~Debenture ~~Equity~~was ~~Agreement~~assigned ~~is equal~~ to ~~ninety-five~~Gene ~~percent~~R. (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock during the five (5) consecutive trading days after the Company delivers to TCA an Advance notice in writing requiring TCA to advance funds (an “Advance”) to the Company, subject to the terms of the Equity AgreementKazlow.

~~As further consideration for TCA entering into and structuring the Equity Facility, on June 14, 2012, the Company paid TCA a fee by issuing 275,000 shares of its common stock that equal to $110,000.~~25

InTable ~~July~~of ~~2013, the Company was advised that the TCA Note was sold to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd.~~Contents

On ~~March~~January 241, 2014, ~~Ironridge~~the ~~Global~~Company issued ~~sold~~a ~~the~~secured ~~TCA~~convertible ~~Note~~debenture with Heilscher for $8,522 to ~~Dominion~~memorialize ~~Capital~~outstanding ~~under~~accounts payable. Under the ~~security~~terms ~~settlement~~of the agreement Heilscher ~~executed~~has ~~between~~the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the ~~Company~~issuance ~~and~~of ~~Dominion~~the ~~Capital,~~debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company ~~issued~~issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on October 21, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to ~~Dominion~~48.5% ~~Capital~~of inthe average 3 lowest trades (not on the ~~amount~~same day) of ~~$746~~the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg,~~092~~ LP. The ~~$746,092~~conversion ~~principal~~feature ~~balance~~of ~~included~~the debentures have been bifurcated from the ~~original~~host ~~TCA~~contract ~~Note~~and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~500~~8,~~000,~~522 ~~accrued~~debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest ~~and~~expense ~~pre-payment~~to ~~penalties~~be recognized over the life of ~~$246,092~~the debenture.

~~Ludlow~~During ~~Capital~~the ~~Convertible~~nine ~~Promissory~~months ended September ~~Note~~30, 2014, $8,522 of the principal balance of the Heilscher Debenture was assigned to Gene R. Kazlow.

On ~~April~~January 301, ~~2013~~2014, the Company issued a secured convertible ~~promissory~~debenture ~~note~~with toMillipore ~~Ludlow~~for ~~Capital~~$13,611 ~~LLC,~~to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of the agreement Millipore has the rights of first refusal for ~~$15,000~~a inperiod ~~professional~~of ~~services~~eighteen (months from the ~~“Ludlow~~issuance ~~Note”)~~of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the ~~Ludlow~~convertible ~~Note~~debenture require repayment on ~~immediately~~October 21, 2014 and ~~bear~~bears a 010% simple annual interest rate. The ~~Ludlow~~convertible ~~Note~~debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price ~~that~~equal ~~shall~~to ~~be 10~~48.5% ~~below~~of the ~~closing~~average ~~bid~~3 ~~upon~~lowest ~~notice~~trades (not on the same day) of ~~conversion.~~the ~~The~~common ~~Ludlow~~stock ~~Note~~of the 20 trading isdays ~~currently~~immediately ~~due~~preceding ~~and~~the ~~payable~~conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the ~~note~~debentures ~~has~~have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $13,611 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

~~Steven~~During ~~Victor~~the ~~Convertible~~nine ~~Promissory~~months ended September ~~Notes~~30, 2014, $3,586 of the principal balance and $825 of accrued interest was paid to Millipore and the remaining principal balance of $10,025 of the Millipore Debenture was assigned to Gene R. Kazlow.

On ~~October~~January 1, ~~2013~~2014, the Company issued a ~~$1,000,000~~secured convertible ~~promissory~~debenture ~~note~~with The Shore Group for $13,234 to Drmemorialize outstanding accounts payable. ~~Steven~~Under ~~Victor,~~the terms of the ~~Company’s~~agreement ~~CEO,~~The toShore ~~convert~~Group ~~$585,794~~has the rights of ~~accrued~~first ~~salary~~refusal ~~and $414,206~~for a period of ~~personal~~eighteen ~~loans~~months ~~due~~from tothe ~~Dr.~~issuance ~~Steven~~of ~~Victor~~the (debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the ~~“Victor~~Company ~~Note”)~~issues to raise additional capital. The ~~Victor~~terms ~~Note~~of isthe ~~payable~~convertible debenture require repayment on ~~demand~~October 21, 2014 and bears an ~~annual~~a 1210% simple annual interest rate. The ~~Victor~~convertible ~~Note~~debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average ~~five~~3 ~~trading~~lowest trades (not on the same day) ~~closing~~of ~~bid~~the common ~~price~~stock ~~during~~of the ~~five~~20 trading days immediately ~~prior~~preceding to the conversion date ~~multiplied~~as quoted by ~~one and~~Bloomberg, ~~a half~~LP. The conversion feature of the ~~note~~debentures ~~has~~have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $13,234 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

27During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $13,234 of the principal balance of the Shore Group Debenture was assigned to Gene R. Kazlow.

OnChristopher ~~October 1~~Mattes, ~~2013,~~Convertible ~~the Company was advised that the Victor Note was assigned to Redwood as part of Redwood Deal #5.~~Debentures

On ~~January~~July 1, 2014, ~~the~~Christopher ~~Company issued~~Mattes anwas assigned and assumed a total of $8030,000 ~~convertible~~from ~~promissory~~the ~~note~~holder toof Drthe Kozar License Debenture. ~~Steven~~Under ~~Victor~~the terms of the agreement, Mattes has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company’s ~~CEO,~~issues to ~~convert~~raise ~~$80,000~~additional capital. The terms of ~~accrued~~the ~~salary~~Mattes Debenture requires repayment on January 1, ~~and~~2015 and bears ~~simples~~a ~~interest~~10% ofsimple ~~12%~~annual ~~per~~interest ~~annum~~rate. OnThe ~~March~~Mattes ~~26,~~Debenture ~~2014,~~is convertible into shares of the ~~$80,000~~Company’s ~~convertible~~common ~~promissory~~stock at ~~note~~a ~~was~~price ~~assigned~~equal to ~~Gene~~48.5% ~~Kaslow~~ of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the ~~“Kaslow~~same ~~Note”~~day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debenture has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

OnAt ~~March~~September 1930, 2014, ~~Kaslow~~the ~~converted~~Mattes ~~the~~Debenture ~~full~~had ~~$80,000~~a of principal ~~into~~balance 31totaling $30,~~720,856~~000 ~~shares~~and ofaccrued ~~the~~interest ~~Company’s~~of ~~common stock~~$5,730.

AsIn September 2014, Gene Kazlow assumed the convertible debentures issued by the Company to the following 4 vendors: Charles River ($6,229), Heilscher ($8,522), Millipore ($10,025) and Shore Group ($13,234). All terms of ~~June~~repayment 30and conversion the remain the same. The terms of the convertible debentures require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bear a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the ~~Kaslow~~debentures ~~Note~~have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation ~~had~~of the embedded derivative created a ~~principal~~debt ~~balance~~discount which reduced the book value of the $~~-0-~~38,009 of debentures and ~~accrued~~increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of ~~$2,400~~the debentures.

~~Anna~~As ~~Rhodes~~of ~~Convertible~~September ~~Promissory~~30, 2014 and December ~~Note~~31, 2013, the principal balance of the Company's convertible debentures were as follows:

On October 1, 2013, the Company issued a $389,711 convertible promissory note to Anna Rhodes, the Company’s Executive Vice President, to convert $229,464 of accrued salary and $160,247 of personal loans due to Anna Rhodes (the “Rhodes Note”). The Rhodes Note is payable on demand and bears an annual 12% simple interest rate. The Rhodes Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the average five trading day closing bid price during the five days immediately prior to the conversion date multiplied by one and a half. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
May 2011 Convertible Debentures	$	—	$	330,000
Hudson Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $88,293		—		122,607
Hess Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $12,202 and $80,000		67,798		-0-
Dixon Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $9,151 and $60,000		50,849		-0-
Kozer Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $3,093 and $160,00		16,907		-0-
Burrington Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $-0-		26,000		—
YA Global Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $1,561,300 and $-0-		538,700		—
Kesselbrenner Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $-0-		25,000		—
Liben Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $-0-		70,000		—
Brother Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $12,928 and $-0-		94,786		—
Redwood Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $-0-		75,000		—
MD Global Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $-0-		50,000		—
May Davis Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $12,786 and $-0-		12,214		—
Dominion Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $566,485 and $-0-		179,607		—
Roth Firm Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $86,789 and $-0-		109,823		—
Mintz Levin Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $9,267 and $-0-		16,115		—
Biologic Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $35,512 and $-0-		57,494		—
Friedman Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $77,893 and $-0-		122,107		—
Univ. of Fla Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $12,556 and $-0-		21,225		—
Hunton Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $81,622 and $-0-		105,485		—
Lucosky Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $49,128 and $-0-		75,684		—
Buchanan Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $257,667 and $-0-		267,916		—
Kesselbrenner Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $12,989 and $-0-		7,011		----
Kazlow Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $5,810 and $-0-		32,200		—
Mattes Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $23,564 and $-0-		6,437		—
Tuohy Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $23,564 and $-0-		6,437		—
Kesselbrenner Convertible Debentures, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $62,923 and $-0-		17,077		—
	$	2,051,873	$	452,607

~~On October 1, 2013, the Company was advised that the Rhodes Note was assigned to Redwood as part of Redwood Deal #5.~~26

~~WHC~~Table ~~Capital~~of ~~Convertible Promissory Notes~~Contents

OnThe ~~November~~Company ~~11,~~accounted ~~2013,~~for ~~WHC~~the ~~Capital, LLC~~conversion ~~(“WHC”)~~features ~~assumed~~underlying ~~$100,000 of convertible notes from Redwood as part of their total convertible notes. On November 15, 2013,~~ the ~~Company issued a $75,000~~ convertible ~~promissory~~debentures in ~~note~~accordance towith ~~WHC (combined~~GAAP, as the ~~“WHC~~conversion ~~Notes”).~~feature ~~The~~embedded ~~terms~~in of the ~~WHC~~ ~~Notes require repayment on November 15, 2014 and bear an interest rate of 12% per annum. The WHC Notes are~~ convertible ~~into~~ ~~shares~~debentures ofcould result in the ~~Company’s~~debentures ~~common~~being ~~stock~~converted atto a ~~price~~variable ~~equal~~number ~~to 48%~~ of the ~~lowest intra-day trading price for the~~ Company’s common ~~stock during the fifteen trading days immediately preceding the conversion date~~shares. The ~~conversion feature of the notes have~~Company ~~been~~determined ~~bifurcated from~~ the ~~host~~value ~~contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation~~ of the ~~embedded~~ derivative ~~created~~ aconversion ~~debt~~features ~~discount~~of ~~which~~these ~~reduced~~debentures ~~the~~at ~~book value of~~ the ~~$75,000~~relevant ~~note~~commitment ~~and~~dates ~~increases~~utilizing ~~prospectively~~a ~~the amount of interest expense~~Black-Scholes tovaluation ~~be recognized over the life of the note~~model.

~~During~~The Company accounted for the ~~six~~detachable warrants ~~months~~included ~~ended~~with ~~June~~the ~~30, 2014,~~convertible ~~$21~~debentures as liabilities in accordance with GAAP,~~880~~ ofas the ~~principal~~warrants ofare ~~the~~subject ~~WHC~~to ~~Notes~~anti-dilution protection ~~were~~and could result in them being converted ~~into~~to ~~31,250,000~~a ~~shares~~variable number of the Company’s common ~~stock~~shares. The Company determined the value of the derivate feature of the warrants at the relevant commitment dates utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

As11. ofConvertible ~~June~~Notes ~~30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the WHC Note had a principal balance of $113,503 and $135,383, respectively and accrued interest of $9,941 and $2,582, respectively.~~Payable

LGTCA ~~Capital (Crowning Capital)~~ Convertible Promissory ~~Notes~~Note

On ~~January~~June 107, ~~2013~~2012, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~ a convertible promissory note ~~with~~to ~~Crowning~~TCA ~~Capital~~Global Master Fund, ~~LLC~~L.P. ("TCA") for $500,000 (the “~~Crowning~~TCA Note”). The maturity ~~pursuant~~date toof ~~which~~the ~~Crowning~~TCA ~~Capital~~Note ~~performed services~~is inJune 7, 2013, and the ~~amount~~Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of ~~$250,000.~~twelve percent (12%) per annum. The TCA ~~promissory~~Note ~~note~~is ~~has~~convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a ~~due~~price equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the average of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately prior to the date of ~~July~~conversion. The ~~31,~~TCA ~~2013,~~Note ~~and~~may 0%be ~~interest~~prepaid ~~rate~~in whole or in part at the Company’s option without penalty.

InPursuant ~~December~~to ~~2013,~~the LGterms ~~Capital~~of ~~executed~~the Equity ~~two~~Agreement, ~~debt~~for ~~purchase~~a ~~agreements~~period of twenty-four months commencing on the effective date of a registration statement, TCA is to commit to purchase aup to $~~156~~2,~~250~~000,000 ~~portion~~of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to Advances, covering the Registerable Securities. The purchase price of the ~~Crowning~~Shares ~~Capital~~under ~~convertible~~the ~~promissory~~Equity ~~$250~~Agreement is equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock during the five (5) consecutive trading days after the Company delivers to TCA an Advance notice in writing requiring TCA to advance funds (an “Advance”) to the Company,~~000~~ ~~face~~subject ~~value~~to the terms of ~~note~~the Equity Agreement.

OnAs ~~January~~further ~~14,~~consideration ~~2014~~for LGTCA ~~Capital executed~~entering ainto ~~third~~and ~~Debt~~structuring ~~Purchase~~the ~~Agreement~~Equity toFacility, ~~assume~~on June 14, 2012, the ~~Crowning~~Company ~~Capital~~paid ~~Convertible~~TCA ~~Promissory~~a ~~Note~~fee inby ~~the~~issuing ~~amount~~275,000 shares of its common stock that equal to $93110,~~750~~000.

28In July 2013, the Company was advised that the TCA Note was sold to Ironridge Global IV, Ltd.

~~The~~On ~~terms~~March of24, 2014, Ironridge Global sold the ~~convertible~~TCA ~~notes~~Note ~~issued by~~to Dominion Capital under the security settlement agreement executed between the Company and Dominion Capital, the Company issued a convertible debenture to LGDominion Capital onin the ~~assignment~~amount ~~from~~of ~~Crowning~~$746,092. ~~require~~The ~~repayment~~$746,092 inprincipal 9balance ~~months~~included the ~~and~~original ~~bear~~TCA noNote of $500,000, accrued interest and pre-payment penalties of $246,092.

~~The~~Ludlow LG Capital ~~Notes~~Convertible ~~are convertible~~Promissory into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 65% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the ten prior trading days upon notice of conversion. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $250,000 of notes and increased prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.Note

~~During~~On ~~January~~April ~~2014~~30, ~~$87~~2013,~~102~~ of the Company ~~principal~~issued ofa ~~the~~convertible LGpromissory note to Ludlow Capital, LLC, for $15,000 for professional services (~~Crowning~~the “Ludlow Note”). The terms of the Ludlow Note ~~was~~require ~~converted~~repayment ~~into~~immediately ~~91,523,674~~and bear a 0% interest rate. The Ludlow Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price that shall be 10% below the closing bid upon notice of conversion. The Ludlow Note is currently due and payable. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

AsSteven ofVictor ~~June~~Convertible ~~30, 2014, the LG Capital~~Promissory Notes ~~had a principal balance of $64,053.~~

~~JMJ~~On ~~Financial~~October ~~Promissory~~1, 2013, the Company issued a $1,000,000 convertible promissory note to Dr. Steven Victor, the Company’s CEO, to convert $585,794 of accrued salary and $414,206 of personal loans due to Dr. Steven Victor (the “Victor Note”). The Victor Note is payable on demand and bears an annual 12% simple interest rate. The Victor Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the average five trading day closing bid price during the five days immediately prior to the conversion date multiplied by one and a half. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

On February 20, 2013 (the "Effective Date"), the Company entered into promissory note, as amended (the “JMJ Note”) with JMJ Financial (“JMJ”), pursuant to which JMJ agreed to lend the Company up to an aggregate principal amount of $500,000 (the “Principal Sum”) for an aggregate purchase price of $450,000. JMJ provided $100,000 to the Company on the Effective Date. The JMJ Note matures one year from the date of each payment by JMJ to the Company (the “Maturity Date”).27

~~The~~Table Company may repay the JMJ Note at any time on or before the 90th day after the Effective Date, after which the Company may not make further payments on the Note prior to the Maturity Date without written approval from the Investor. If the Company repays the JMJ Note on or before the 90th day after the Effective Date, the interest rate under the JMJ Note shall be zero percent (0%). If the Company does not repay the JMJ Note on or before the 90th day after the Effective Date, a one-time interest payment of ~~12% shall be applied to the Principal Sum.~~Contents

~~JMJ~~On ~~may~~October ~~convert~~1, ~~beginning on the six month anniversary of the Effective Date~~2013, the ~~outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Note into shares of the~~ Company~~’s common~~ ~~stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) $0.16 or (ii) 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading~~was ~~days~~advised ~~prior~~that to the ~~date~~Victor ofNote ~~conversion~~was ~~(the~~assigned ~~“Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price will be subject~~ to ~~adjustment~~Redwood for, among other things, the Company’s failure to be DTC eligible and only being clearing deposit eligible. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as apart ~~derivative. The bifurcation~~ of ~~the~~Redwood ~~embedded derivative~~Deal ~~created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $125,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note~~#5.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~January ~~shall~~1, ~~include~~2014, on the ~~next registration statement the~~ Company ~~files with Securities and Exchange Commission (or on the subsequent registration statement if~~issued ~~such~~an ~~registration~~$80,000 ~~statement~~convertible ispromissory ~~withdrawn)~~note ~~all~~to ~~shares~~Dr. ~~issuable~~Steven ~~upon~~Victor, ~~conversion of~~ the ~~JMJ~~Company’s ~~Note.~~CEO, ~~Failure~~ to ~~include~~convert ~~such~~$80,000 ~~securities on~~of ~~the~~accrued ~~next~~salary, ~~registration~~and bears ~~statement~~simples ~~will~~interest ~~result in liquidated damages~~ of 2512% ofper ~~the~~annum. ~~outstanding~~On ~~principal~~March ~~balance~~26, of2014, the ~~Note, but not less than~~ $2580,000, ~~being~~convertible ~~immediately~~promissory ~~due~~note ~~and~~was ~~payable~~assigned to ~~JMJ~~Gene ~~at its election in the form of cash or added to the Principal Sum~~Kaslow of (the ~~JMJ~~“Kaslow Note”).

~~JMJ~~On ~~has~~March ~~contractually~~19, ~~agreed~~2014, toKaslow ~~restrict~~converted ~~its ability to convert~~ the ~~JMJ~~full ~~Note~~$80,000 ~~such~~of ~~that~~principal ~~the~~into ~~number~~31,720,856 of shares of the Company ~~common stock held by the Investor and its affiliates after such conversion does not exceed 4.99% of the Company~~’s ~~then issued and outstanding shares of~~ common stock.

SoAs ~~long~~of asSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~JMJ Note is outstanding~~2014, ~~upon~~ ~~any issuance by~~ the ~~Company or any of its subsidiaries of any security with any term more favorable to the holder of such~~Kaslow ~~security~~Note orhad ~~with~~ a ~~term~~principal inbalance ~~favor~~ of ~~the~~$-0- ~~holder of such security that was not similarly provided to JMJ in the JMJ Note, then the Company shall notify the Borrower of such additional or more favorable term~~ and ~~such~~accrued ~~term,~~interest ~~at JMJ’s option, shall become a part~~ of ~~the transaction documents with JMJ~~$2,400.

InAnna ~~January~~Rhodes ~~2014,~~Convertible ~~$7,200 of principal~~Promissory ~~was converted into 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.~~Note

AsOn ofOctober ~~June~~1, 302013, ~~2014~~the ~~and~~Company ~~December~~issued a 31$389, ~~2013,~~711 ~~the~~convertible ~~principal~~promissory ~~balance~~note ofto Anna Rhodes, the ~~JMJ~~Company’s ~~Note~~Executive ~~was~~Vice President, to convert $46229,~~130~~464 of accrued salary and $53160,~~330,~~247 ~~respectively~~of personal loans due to Anna Rhodes (the “Rhodes Note”). The Rhodes Note is payable on demand and ~~accrued~~bears an annual 12% simple interest ~~was~~rate. ~~$27,284~~The Rhodes Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the average five trading day closing bid price during the five days immediately prior to the conversion date multiplied by one and ~~$24,444,~~a half. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as ~~respectively~~a derivative.

29On October 1, 2013, the Company was advised that the Rhodes Note was assigned to Redwood as part of Redwood Deal #5.

~~Redwood~~WHC ~~Deal~~Capital #1Convertible Promissory Notes

On ~~August~~November 511, 2013, ~~Redwood~~WHC Capital, LLC (“WHC”) assumed $~~600~~100,000 of ~~principal~~convertible ~~and~~notes ~~$60,781~~from Redwood as part of ~~accrued~~their ~~interest~~total convertible notes. On November 15, 2013, ~~which~~the ~~was~~Company ~~converted~~issued a $75,000 convertible promissory note to ~~principal~~WHC (combined, ~~from~~the ~~two~~“WHC ~~debenture~~Notes”). ~~holders~~The ~~from~~terms of the WHC ~~May~~Notes ~~2011~~require ~~Offering~~repayment on November 15, 2014 and ~~$199,167~~bear an interest rate of ~~principal~~12% ~~and~~per ~~$18,697~~annum. The WHC Notes are convertible into shares of ~~accrued~~the ~~interest,~~Company’s ~~which~~common ~~was~~stock ~~converted~~at a price equal to ~~principal,~~48% ~~from~~of the ~~Frank~~lowest ~~Note~~intra-day astrading ~~part~~price offor ~~Redwood~~the Company’s ~~Deal~~common ~~#1.~~stock ~~The~~during ~~terms~~the offifteen ~~the~~trading ~~assumed~~days ~~debt~~immediately ~~remained~~preceding the ~~same~~conversion date. The conversion feature of the ~~note~~notes ~~has~~ have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $75,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

OnDuring ~~October~~the 7,nine ~~2013,~~months ~~Redwood~~ended ~~assigned~~September a30, ~~total~~2014, of $~~300~~21,~~000~~880 inof the principal ~~debt~~of ~~from~~the ~~Redwood~~WHC ~~Deal~~Notes #1were toconverted ~~Hudson~~into 31,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

OnAs ~~November~~of 11September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, ~~Redwood~~the ~~assigned~~ WHC Note had a principal balance of $~~100~~113,~~000~~503 inand ~~principal~~$135,383, ~~debt~~respectively ~~from~~and ~~Redwood~~accrued ~~Deal~~interest #1of to$9,941 ~~WHC~~and $2,582, respectively.

~~During the six months ended June 30,~~LG ~~2014,~~Capital ~~Redwood~~(Crowning ~~converted~~Capital) aConvertible ~~total~~Promissory ~~of $155,204 in principal and $105,437 in accrued interest into 118,708,027 shares of the Company’s common stock.~~Notes

AsOn ofJanuary ~~June~~10, 302013, ~~2014~~the ~~all~~Company ~~principal~~entered into ~~and~~a promissory note with Crowning Capital, LLC (the “Crowning Note”) pursuant to which Crowning Capital performed ~~accrued~~services ~~interest~~in ~~for~~the ~~Redwood~~amount ~~Deal~~of #1$250,000. The promissory note has ~~been~~a ~~paid~~due indate ~~full~~of July 31, 2013, and 0% interest rate.

~~Redwood~~In ~~Deal~~December #22013, LG Capital executed two debt purchase agreements to purchase a $156,250 portion of the Crowning Capital convertible promissory $250,000 face value note.

On ~~August~~January 514, ~~2013,~~2014 ~~Redwood~~LG ~~assumed~~Capital ~~$430,000~~executed ofa ~~total~~third ~~principal~~Debt ~~from~~Purchase ~~seven~~Agreement ~~debenture~~to ~~holders~~assume ~~from~~ the ~~May~~Crowning ~~2011~~Capital ~~Offering~~Convertible asPromissory ~~part~~Note ofin ~~Redwood Deal #2. The terms of~~ the ~~assumed debt~~amount ~~remained the same. The conversion feature~~ of ~~the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative~~$93,750.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, Redwood converted a total of $316,213 in principal and $46,860 of accrued interest from the outstanding debt in Redwood Deal #2 into 333,154,640 shares of the Company’s common stock.28

AsTable of ~~June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Redwood Deal #2 was $-0- and $316,213, respectively and accrued interest was $4,740 and $41,044, respectively.~~Contents

~~Redwood~~The ~~Deal~~terms #3of the convertible notes issued by the Company to LG Capital on the assignment from Crowning require repayment in 9 months and bear no interest.

OnThe ~~January~~LG 9,Capital ~~2014,~~Notes ~~Redwood~~are ~~assumed~~convertible ~~$386,445~~into shares of ~~total~~the ~~principal~~Company’s ~~from~~common ~~the~~stock ~~Sichenzia~~at ~~Note~~a asprice ~~part~~equal to 65% of ~~Redwood~~the ~~Deal~~lowest ~~#3.~~closing ~~The~~bid ~~terms~~price of the ~~assumed~~common ~~debt~~stock ~~remained~~ for the ~~same~~ten prior trading days upon notice of conversion. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $~~386~~250,~~445~~000 ~~note~~of notes and ~~increases~~ increased prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

OnDuring ~~March~~January 142014, ~~2014~~$87,102 ~~Redwood~~of ~~assigned~~the ~~$193,223~~principal of ~~Redwood~~the ~~Deal~~LG #3Capital to(Crowning) ~~Dominion~~Note ~~Capital~~was converted into 91,523,674 shares of the Company’s common stock.

~~During~~As ~~the~~of ~~six~~September ~~months ended June~~ 30, 2014, ~~Redwood converted $124,563 from~~ the ~~outstanding~~LG ~~debt, $68,710 of principal and $46,379 of accrued interest into 106,470,996~~Capital ~~shares~~Notes ofhad ~~the~~a ~~Company’s common stock. During this same period the total guaranteed accrued interest from Redwood Deal #3 was converted to~~ principal ~~and~~balance ~~the Company recorded additional interest~~ of $3264,~~530 in connection with this conversion~~053.

AsJMJ ofFinancial ~~June~~Promissory ~~30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of Redwood Deal #3 was $-0- and $0, respectively and accrued interest was $-0- and $0, respectively.~~Note

~~Redwood~~On ~~Deal~~February #420, 2013 (the "Effective Date"), the Company entered into promissory note, as amended (the “JMJ Note”) with JMJ Financial (“JMJ”), pursuant to which JMJ agreed to lend the Company up to an aggregate principal amount of $500,000 (the “Principal Sum”) for an aggregate purchase price of $450,000. JMJ provided $100,000 to the Company on the Effective Date. The JMJ Note matures one year from the date of each payment by JMJ to the Company (the “Maturity Date”).

OnThe ~~August~~Company 5,may ~~2013,~~repay the ~~Company~~JMJ ~~issued~~Note at aany ~~convertible~~time ~~promissory~~on ~~note~~or tobefore ~~Redwood~~the ~~for~~90th ~~$250,000~~day asafter ~~part~~the ofEffective ~~Redwood Deal #4. The Company received $125~~Date,~~000~~ ~~cash,~~after of which ~~$15,000~~ ~~is being amortized as financing fees over~~ the ~~term~~Company ofmay ~~the~~not ~~convertible~~make ~~promissory~~further ~~note,~~payments on ~~August~~the ~~7, 2013 as a partial payment~~Note ~~for~~prior to the ~~convertible~~Maturity ~~promissory~~Date ~~note.~~without ~~The~~written ~~remaining~~approval ~~$125,000~~from ~~was paid in October 2013. The terms of~~ the ~~convertible promissory note require repayment in one year and bears a 12% simple annual interest rate~~Investor. ~~The~~If ~~convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common~~repays ~~stock at a price that shall be~~ the ~~lesser~~JMJ ofNote ~~$0.05~~on ~~per share~~ or ~~48%~~before of the ~~average of the~~90th ~~lowest~~day ~~traded~~after ~~price of~~ the ~~Common~~Effective ~~Stock as quoted by Bloomberg~~Date, ~~L.P. on any three trading days during~~ the ~~twenty~~interest ~~trading~~rate ~~days~~under ~~immediately preceding~~ the ~~conversion~~JMJ ~~date.~~Note ~~The~~shall ~~convertible promissory note may~~ be ~~prepaid~~zero inpercent ~~whole~~(0%). orIf ~~in part at~~ the Company’s ~~option without~~does ~~penalty.~~not ~~The~~repay ~~conversion feature of~~ the ~~notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as~~ aJMJ ~~derivative.~~Note ~~The~~on ~~bifurcation~~or ofbefore the ~~embedded~~90th ~~derivative~~day ~~created~~after ~~a debt discount which reduced~~ the ~~book~~Effective ~~value of the $250~~Date,~~000~~ ~~note and~~a ~~increases~~one-time ~~prospectively~~interest ~~the~~payment ~~amount~~ of ~~interest~~12% ~~expense~~shall to be ~~recognized~~applied ~~over~~to the ~~life of the note~~Principal Sum.

OnJMJ ~~October~~may 23convert, ~~2013,~~beginning ~~Redwood~~on ~~assumed~~the six ~~$125,000~~month anniversary of the Effective Date, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) $~~28,442~~0.16 or (ii) 60% of ~~accrued~~the ~~interest,~~lowest ~~which~~trade ~~was~~price ~~converted~~in the 25 trading days prior to ~~principal~~the date of conversion (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price will be subject to adjustment for, among ~~from~~other things, the ~~JJK~~Company’s ~~Notes~~failure asto ~~part~~be ofDTC ~~Redwood~~eligible and only being clearing deposit eligible. The conversion feature ~~Deal~~of #4the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The ~~terms~~bifurcation of the ~~assumed~~embedded derivative created a debt ~~remained~~discount which reduced the ~~same~~book value of the $125,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

AsThe ofCompany ~~June~~shall ~~30,~~include ~~2014~~on ~~and~~the ~~December 31,~~next ~~2013,~~registration statement the ~~principal~~Company ~~balance~~files ofwith ~~Redwood~~Securities ~~Deal~~and #4Exchange ~~was~~Commission ~~$403,442~~(or ~~and~~on ~~$403,442,~~the ~~and~~subsequent ~~accrued~~registration ~~interest~~statement ~~was~~if such ~~$40,088~~registration ~~and~~statement ~~$17,336,~~is ~~respectively~~withdrawn) all shares issuable upon conversion of the JMJ Note. ~~The~~ ~~related~~Failure ~~amortizable~~to ~~financing~~include ~~fees~~such ~~had~~securities on athe ~~balance~~next ofregistration ~~$1,274~~statement ~~and~~will ~~$8,712~~result asin ofliquidated ~~June~~damages ~~30,~~of ~~2014~~25% ~~and~~of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~outstanding ~~2013,~~principal balance of ~~which~~the ~~$3720~~Note, but ~~and~~not less than $725,~~439~~000, ~~were~~being ~~expensed~~immediately asdue ~~financing~~and ~~fees~~payable onto ~~the~~JMJ ~~statement~~at ofits ~~operations~~election ~~for~~in the ~~three~~form ~~months~~of ~~and~~cash ~~the~~or ~~six~~added ~~months~~to ~~ended~~the ~~June~~Principal ~~30,~~Sum ~~2014,~~of ~~respectively~~the JMJ Note.

30JMJ has contractually agreed to restrict its ability to convert the JMJ Note such that the number of shares of the Company common stock held by the Investor and its affiliates after such conversion does not exceed 4.99% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

~~Redwood~~So ~~Deal~~long #5as the JMJ Note is outstanding, upon any issuance by the Company or any of its subsidiaries of any security with any term more favorable to the holder of such security or with a term in favor of the holder of such security that was not similarly provided to JMJ in the JMJ Note, then the Company shall notify the Borrower of such additional or more favorable term and such term, at JMJ’s option, shall become a part of the transaction documents with JMJ.

OnIn ~~October~~January 12014, ~~2013, Redwood assumed~~ $~~389~~7,~~711~~200 of ~~total~~ principal was ~~from~~converted ~~the~~into ~~Rhodes Note~~7, ~~and $1~~500,000~~,000~~ ofshares ~~total principal from the Victor Note, as part~~ of ~~Redwood Deal #5. The terms of~~ the ~~assumed~~Company’s ~~debt~~common ~~remained the same~~stock. ~~The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.~~

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of ~~Redwood~~the ~~Deal~~JMJ #5Note was $146,~~389~~130 and $53,~~711~~330, respectively and accrued interest was $1928,~~637~~668 and $4124,~~691~~444, respectively.

~~Dominion Capital Convertible Promissory Note~~29

OnTable ~~March 14, 2014, Redwood assigned $193,223~~ of principal from Redwood Deal #3 to Dominion Capital (the “Dominion Note”). Interest is payable at 10%. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.Contents

~~During~~Redwood ~~the~~Deal ~~six months ended June 30, 2014, $145,465 of the principal on the Dominion Note was converted into 85,166,666 shares of the Company’s common stock.~~#1

AtOn ~~June~~August 305, ~~2014~~2013, ~~the~~Redwood ~~principal~~assumed ~~balance~~$600,000 onof ~~the~~principal ~~Dominion~~and ~~Note~~$60,781 of accrued interest, which was converted to principal, from two debenture holders from the May 2011 Offering, and $47199,~~757~~167 of principal and $18,697 of accrued interest, which was ~~$17~~converted to principal,~~803~~ from the Frank Note as part of Redwood Deal #1. The terms of the assumed debt remained the same. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~October ~~accounted~~7, ~~for~~2013, ~~the~~Redwood ~~conversion~~assigned ~~features~~a ~~underlying~~total ~~the~~of ~~convertible promissory notes and issued in accordance with GAAP~~$300,000 ~~as the conversion feature embedded~~ in ~~the~~ ~~convertible~~principal ~~promissory~~debt ~~notes~~from ~~could~~Redwood ~~result~~Deal in#1 ~~the convertible promissory notes being converted~~ to ~~a variable number of the Company’s common shares~~Hudson. The Company determined the value of the derivate conversion features of these convertible promissory notes at the relevant commitment dates as of June 30, 2014, utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

~~May~~On ~~Davis~~November ~~Partners~~11, ~~Acquisition Company~~2013, Redwood assigned ~~LLC~~$100,000 ~~Promissory~~in ~~Note~~principal debt from Redwood Deal #1 to WHC.

OnDuring ~~April~~the ~~14,~~nine ~~2014,~~months ~~Sherb~~ended ~~& Company~~September ~~LLP~~30, ~~assigned its promissory note payable to May Davis Partners Acquisition Company LLC. Under the Securities Settlement agreement executed between the Company and May Davis~~2014, ~~the~~Redwood ~~Company~~converted ~~allows May Davis to assume the Sherb & Co LLP Note Payable. Interest shall be payable at 12% per annum with~~ a ~~maturity~~total ~~date~~ of ~~July 6~~$155,204 ~~2014.~~in ~~Any outstanding amount of~~ principal and ~~interest~~$105,437 ~~may~~in ~~be converted~~accrued interest into 118,708,027 shares of ~~common stock at 52% of~~ the ~~average of the three lowest traded prices of the~~ Company ’s common stock ~~for 20 trading days prior to conversion~~. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $115,783 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 ~~and~~all ~~December 31,~~principal ~~2013~~and ~~the~~accrued ~~principal~~interest ~~balance~~for ofRedwood ~~the~~Deal ~~May~~#1 ~~Davis~~has ~~(Sherb)~~been ~~note~~paid ~~was~~in ~~$115,783 and $-0- respectively~~full. ~~Accrued interest was $5,661 and $-0- respectively.~~

AsRedwood ofDeal ~~June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the Company's convertible notes payable was as follows:~~#2

	June 30, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
TCA Note	$	—	$	500,000
Ludlow Note		15,000		15,000
WHC Notes, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $49,162 and $72,891		64,341		62,492
Crowning Note, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $59,459 and $36,345		4,594		114,810
JMJ Note, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $36,283		46,130		17,046
Redwood Deal #1		—		155,204
Redwood Deal #2		—		316,213
Redwood Deal #3, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $386,445 and $-0-		—		—
Redwood Deal #4, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $88,530 and $217,932		314,912		185,510
Redwood Deal #5		1,389,711		1,389,711
May Davis Partners Acquisition Co. LLC, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $69,645 and $-0-		46,138		—
Dominion Capital		47,757		—
Total	$	1,928,583	$	2,755,986

On August 5, 2013, Redwood assumed $430,000 of total principal from seven debenture holders from the May 2011 Offering as part of Redwood Deal #2. The terms of the assumed debt remained the same. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~accounted~~nine ~~for~~months ~~the~~ended ~~conversion~~September ~~features~~30, ~~underlying~~2014, ~~the~~Redwood ~~convertible~~converted ~~promissory~~a ~~notes~~total ~~and~~of ~~issued~~$316,213 in ~~accordance~~principal ~~with~~and ~~GAAP~~$46,860 asof ~~the~~accrued ~~conversion~~interest ~~feature~~from ~~embedded in~~ the ~~convertible~~outstanding ~~promissory~~debt ~~notes could result~~ in ~~the~~Redwood Deal ~~convertible~~#2 ~~promissory~~into ~~notes~~333,154,640 ~~being~~shares ~~converted to a variable number~~ of the Company’s common ~~shares~~stock. The Company determined the value of the derivate conversion features of these convertible promissory notes at the relevant commitment dates as of June 30, 2014, utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Redwood Deal #2 was $-0- and $316,213, respectively and accrued interest was $4,740 and $41,044, respectively.

~~12.~~Redwood ~~Derivative~~Deal ~~Liabilities~~#3

On January 9, 2014, Redwood assumed $386,445 of total principal from the Sichenzia Note as part of Redwood Deal #3. The ~~following~~terms ~~table~~of ~~sets~~the ~~forth~~assumed debt remained the ~~Company’s~~same. ~~estimate~~The conversion feature of the ~~fair~~notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the ~~financial~~$386,445 ~~instruments~~note ~~that~~and ~~are~~increases prospectively ~~classified~~the asamount ~~liabilities~~of asinterest expense to be recognized over the life of: the note.

	June 30, 2014								Restated December 31, 2013
		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level) 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Embedded Detachable Warrants	$	—	$	—	$	699,857	$	699,857	$	—	$	—	$	6,735	$	6,735
Embedded Conversion Option Features	$	—	$	—	$	8,395,553	$	8,395,553	$	—	$	—	$	6,952,087	$	6,952,087
Totals	$	—	$	—	$	9,095,410	$	9,095,410	$	—	$	—	$	6,958,822	$	6,958,822

On March 14, 2014, Redwood assigned $193,223 of Redwood Deal #3 to Dominion Capital.

~~The~~During ~~following~~the ~~table~~nine ~~sets~~months ~~forth~~ended ~~a summary~~September 30, 2014, Redwood converted $124,563 from the outstanding debt, $68,710 of ~~changes~~principal inand ~~fair~~$46,379 ~~value~~of accrued interest into 106,470,996 shares of ~~our~~the ~~derivative~~Company’s ~~liabilities~~common ~~for~~stock. During this same period the ~~periods~~total ~~ended:~~guaranteed accrued interest from Redwood Deal #3 was converted to principal and the Company recorded additional interest of $32,530 in connection with this conversion.

	Warrant Derivatives			Hybrid Instruments Derivatives			Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2013 (restated)	$	6,735		$	6,952,087		$	6,958,822
Fair Value adjustments:
Warrant derivatives (Gain)/Loss		(2,330,965	)		—			(2,330,965	)
Hybrid instruments (Gain)/Loss		—			(11,487,176	)		(11,487,176	)
Issuance of Warrants attached to debt financing		3,024,087						3,024,087
(Gain)/Loss on Conversions:
Hybrid convertible notes and derivatives		—			(5,503,582	)		(5,503,582	)
FairValue of Embedded conversion Feature on issuance of convertible promissory notes and debentures		—			18,434,224			18,434,224
Ending balance, June 30, 2014	$	699,857		$	8,395,553		$	9,095,410

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of Redwood Deal #3 was $-0- and $0, respectively and accrued interest was $-0- and $0, respectively.

32Redwood Deal #4

~~The~~On ~~following~~August ~~tables~~5, ~~set~~2013, ~~forth~~the aCompany ~~description~~issued ofa ~~the~~convertible ~~financial~~promissory ~~instruments~~note ~~classified~~to Redwood for $250,000 as ~~derivate~~part ~~liabilities~~of Redwood Deal #4. The Company received $125,000 cash, of which $15,000 is being amortized as financing fees over the term of ~~June~~the 30convertible promissory note, ~~2014~~on ~~and~~August ~~December~~7, 312013 as a partial payment for the convertible promissory note. The remaining $125,000 was paid in October 2013. The terms of the convertible promissory note require repayment in one year and bears a 12% simple annual interest rate. The convertible promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price that shall be the lesser of $0.05 per share or 48% of the average of the lowest traded price of the Common Stock as quoted by Bloomberg, L.P. on any three trading days during the twenty trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. The convertible promissory note may be prepaid in whole or in part at the Company’s option without penalty. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the ~~assumption~~embedded ~~used~~derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $250,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to ~~value~~be recognized over the ~~instruments~~life of the note.

~~Convertible~~On ~~Debt~~October 23, 2013, Redwood assumed $125,000 of principal and $28,442 of accrued interest, which was converted to principal, from the JJK Notes as part of Redwood Deal #4. The terms of the assumed debt remained the same.

~~The~~As ~~derivative~~of ~~liabilities~~September ~~related~~30, to2014 and December 31, 2013, the ~~embedded~~principal ~~conversion~~balance ~~option~~of ~~feature~~Redwood Deal #4 was $403,442 and ~~the~~$403,442, ~~outstanding~~and ~~warrants~~accrued ~~were~~interest ~~valued~~was ~~using~~$51,344 ~~the~~and ~~Black~~$17,336, respectively. The related amortizable financing fees had a balance of $-~~Scholes~~0- ~~option~~and ~~valuation~~$8,712 ~~model~~as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, of which $1,274 and ~~the~~$8,712 ~~following~~were ~~assumptions~~expensed as financing fees on the ~~following~~statement ~~dates:~~of operations for the three months and the nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

	June 30, 2014						(Restated) December 31, 2013
	Embedded Detachable Warrants			Embedded Conversion Option Features			Embedded Detachable Warrants			Embedded Conversion Option Features
Risk free interest rate		1.62	%		0.11	%		1.750	%		0.13	%
Expected volatility		256.12	%		135.9% - 295.4	%		289.2%-371.3	%		289.2%-371.3	%
Expected life (in years)		2.70			1.0-.31			2.25			0.58-1.0
Expected dividend yield		-			-			-			-
Number outstanding		443,071,542			6,212,493,400			3,071,542			1,592,259,716
Fair value at issue date	$	3,356,488		$	18,434,224		$	332,401		$	3,042,327
Accumulated change in derivative liability as of the period ended	$	(2,656,631	)	$	(10,038,671	)	$	(326,147	)	$	3,909,760
Fair value at end of period	$	699,857		$	8,395,553		$	6,254		$	6,952,087

~~Private~~Table ~~Placement~~of ~~Offering~~Contents

~~The~~Redwood ~~derivative~~Deal ~~liabilities related to the warrants issued as part of the private placement offering were valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following assumptions on the following dates:~~#5

	June 30, 2014			Dec. 31, 2013
Risk free interest rate		1.62	%		1.75	%
Expected volatility		254.27	%		316.09	%
Expected life (in years)		2.59			3.25
Expected dividend yield		—			—
Number outstanding		200,000			200,000
Fair value at issue date	$	19,036,312		$	19,036,312
Accumulated change in derivative liability	$	(19,036,140	)	$	(19,035,831	)
Fair value at Period End	$	172		$	481

On October 1, 2013, Redwood assumed $389,711 of total principal from the Rhodes Note, and $1,000,000 of total principal from the Victor Note, as part of Redwood Deal #5. The terms of the assumed debt remained the same. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

~~13.~~As ~~Concentrations~~of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of Redwood Deal #5 was $1,389,711, and accrued interest was $61,328 and $41,691, respectively.

~~The~~Dominion ~~Company~~Capital ~~maintains~~Convertible ~~its cash in bank~~Promissory deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. This potentially subjects the Company to a concentration of credit risk; however the Company believes the risk is negligible. The Company’s carrying amounts of deposits in financial institutions did not exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000 as of June 30, 2014. The Company’s carrying amount of deposits in financial institutions did not exceed federally insured limits as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.Note

33On March 14, 2014, Redwood assigned $193,223 of principal from Redwood Deal #3 to Dominion Capital (the “Dominion Note”). Interest is payable at 10%. The conversion feature of the note has been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative.

~~14.~~During ~~Capital~~the ~~Stock~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, $145,465 of the principal on the Dominion Note was converted into 85,166,666 shares of the Company’s common stock.

~~The~~At ~~principal~~September ~~features~~30, of2014 the ~~Company's~~principal ~~capital~~balance ~~stock~~on ~~are~~the asDominion ~~follows:~~Note was $47,757 and accrued interest was $18,997.

~~Series~~The BCompany ~~Preferred~~accounted ~~Stock~~for the conversion features underlying the convertible promissory notes and issued in accordance with GAAP, as the conversion feature embedded in the convertible promissory notes could result in the convertible promissory notes being converted to a variable number of the Company’s common shares. The Company determined the value of the derivate conversion features of these convertible promissory notes at the relevant commitment dates as of September 30, 2014, utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

AsMay ofDavis ~~June~~Partners ~~30,~~Acquisition ~~2014 and December 31, 2013, the~~ Company ~~has designated 21~~,~~000 shares of preferred stock as Series B preferred stock, with a par value of $.01 per share,~~ ofLLC ~~which~~Promissory 15,058 shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of series B preferred stock shall be convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the holders of the series B preferred stock shall be entitled to notice of stockholders’ meeting and to vote as a single class with the holders of the Common Stock upon any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and shall be entitled to such number of votes as shall equal the product of (a) the number of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is convertible into on the record date of such vote multiplied by (b) ten (10). Note

~~Series~~On CApril ~~Preferred~~14, ~~Stock~~2014, Sherb & Company LLP assigned its promissory note payable to May Davis Partners Acquisition Company LLC. Under the Securities Settlement agreement executed between the Company and May Davis, the Company allows May Davis to assume the Sherb & Co LLP Note Payable. Interest shall be payable at 12% per annum with a maturity date of July 6, 2014. Any outstanding amount of principal and interest may be converted into shares of common stock at 52% of the average of the three lowest traded prices of the Company common stock for 20 trading days prior to conversion. The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $115,783 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

AsDuring ~~of June~~the ~~30,~~nine ~~2014~~months ~~and~~ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, ~~the~~May ~~Company~~Davis ~~has~~(Sherb) ~~designated~~converted ~~13,000 shares of preferred stock as Series C preferred stock, with a par value of~~ $~~.01 per share~~35,233 of ~~which 7,250~~principal ~~shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of Series C preferred stock shall be convertible~~ into 150,~~000~~817,308 shares of the Company’s common stock. . In addition, the holders of the series B preferred stock shall be entitled to notice of stockholders’ meeting and to vote as a single class with the holders of the Common Stock upon any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and shall be entitled to such number of votes as shall equal to the number of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is convertible into on the record date.

~~Certain~~As ~~holders~~ of ~~the~~September ~~Company’s Series~~30, C2014 ~~preferred~~and ~~stock~~December 31, ~~have~~2013 ~~contractually agreed to restrict their ability to convert~~ the ~~Series~~principal Cbalance ~~preferred stock such that the number~~ of ~~shares of~~ the ~~Company~~May ~~common~~Davis ~~stock~~(Sherb) ~~held~~note bywas ~~each~~$80,550 ~~of holder~~ and ~~its~~$-0- ~~affiliates after such conversion shall not exceed 4~~respectively.~~99%~~ ofAccrued ~~the~~interest ~~Company’s~~was ~~then~~$8,119 ~~issued~~ and $-0- ~~outstanding shares of common stock~~respectively.

~~Series~~May DDavis ~~Preferred~~Partners ~~Stock~~Acquisition Company, LLC Promissory Note

AsOn ofAugust ~~June 30~~7, 2014 ~~and~~(the ~~December 31,~~“Effective ~~2013~~Date”), the Company ~~has~~issued ~~designated 500,000 shares of preferred stock as Series D preferred stock, with~~ a ~~par value of $.01 per share, of which 56,500 shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of series D~~ convertible ~~preferred~~promissory ~~stock~~note ~~is convertible at any time at an initial conversion price equal~~ to ~~$2.00~~May ~~per~~Davis ~~share,~~Partners ~~subject~~Acquisitions ~~to adjustment under certain circumstances. As long as the series D preferred stock is outstanding~~Company, ~~the~~LLC ~~conversion~~for ~~price of the series D convertible preferred stock in effect shall be reduced by~~ $~~0.05~~12,000 ~~for every 180 day period a share of series D preferred stock is held by~~ (the ~~investor. The~~ ~~series~~“May DDavis ~~convertible preferred stock automatically converts into shares of the Company’s common stock after three years~~Note”). ~~Each share~~ ~~of Series D convertible preferred stock was issued with a warrant to purchase 10 shares of the Company’s common stock.~~ The ~~warrants~~ ~~are~~maturity ~~exercisable for a period of five years from the~~ date of ~~issuance at an initial exercise price of $2.00, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The exercise price of~~ the ~~warrants~~May ~~and~~Davis ~~the~~Note ~~conversion~~is ~~price~~June ~~of the series D convertible preferred stock are subject to full ratchet and anti-dilution adjustment for subsequent lower price issuances by the Company~~7, ~~as well as customary adjustments provisions for stock splits~~2015, ~~stock dividends, recapitalizations~~ and the ~~like.~~Convertible ~~However, no~~Note ~~adjustment~~bears ~~made~~interest at ~~shall~~a ~~cause~~rate ~~the exercise price~~ of ~~the~~ten ~~series~~percent D(10%) ~~convertible~~per ~~preferred stock and warrants to be less than $1~~annum.~~00. The holders of Series D preferred stock have no voting rights.~~

~~Series~~The FCompany ~~Preferred~~may ~~Stock~~prepay the May Davis Note at any time in whole or in part at the Company’s option without penalty. Any amount of principal or interest on the May Davis Note not paid on or before the due date shall bear interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum until paid in full.

OnMay ~~January~~Davis ~~17,~~may ~~2014~~convert, ~~Intellicell Biosciences,~~beginning ~~Inc.~~on (the ~~“Corporation”)~~six ~~filed~~month aanniversary ~~certificate~~ of ~~designations, rights and preferences (~~the ~~“Certificate~~Effective ofDate, ~~Designation”) with~~ the ~~Secretary~~outstanding ofprincipal ~~State of the State of Nevada pursuant to which the Corporation set forth the designation, powers, rights, privileges, preferences~~ and ~~restrictions~~accrued ofinterest ~~the~~on ~~Series E Preferred Stock. On January 22, 2014~~ the ~~Corporation~~Note ~~filed~~into a certificate of correction (the “Certificate of Correction”) with the Secretary of State of Nevada to change the name of the designation from “Series E Preferred Stock” to “Series F Preferred Stock.” By unanimous written consent of the Board, the Board issued an aggregate of fifty one (51) shares of ~~Series F Preferred to five individuals. The five individuals include~~ the Company’s ~~CEO~~common ~~and~~stock ~~Chairman~~at ~~and four members of the Board of Directors. As~~ a ~~result~~conversion ofprice ~~the~~per ~~voting~~share ~~rights~~equal ~~granted~~ to the ~~Series~~ Flesser ~~Preferred, the Series F Stockholders hold, in the aggregate, approximately 50.95%~~ of ~~the~~(i) ~~total voting power of all issued and outstanding voting capital of the Company~~$0.05 ~~Each~~or ~~one~~ (1ii) ~~share~~52% of the ~~Series F Preferred Stock shall have voting rights equal~~average toof ~~(x) 0.019607 multiplied by~~ the ~~total~~lowest ~~issued~~trade ~~and~~price ~~outstanding~~in ~~shares~~the of180 ~~Common~~trading ~~Stock~~days ~~eligible~~prior to ~~vote at~~ the ~~time~~date of ~~the respective~~conversion ~~vote~~ (the “~~Numerator~~Conversion Price”)~~, divided by (y) 0~~.~~49,~~ ~~minus (z) the Numerator. For purposes~~The ofConversion ~~illustration~~Price ~~only,~~will ifbe ~~the~~subject ~~total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock eligible~~ to ~~vote~~adjustment atfor, ~~the~~among ~~time~~other ~~of the respective vote is 5~~things,~~000,000,~~ the ~~voting~~Company’s ~~rights~~failure ofto ~~one share of the Series F Preferred shall~~ be ~~equal~~DTC toeligible ~~102,036 (0.019607 x 5,000,000) /~~and ~~0.49)~~only –being ~~(0.019607~~clearing xdeposit ~~5,000,000) = 102,036)~~eligible.

34The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $12,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

~~Common~~As ~~Stock~~of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the Company's convertible notes payable was as follows:

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
TCA Note	$	—	$	500,000
Ludlow Note		15,000		15,000
WHC Notes, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $24,685 and $72,891		88,818		62,492
Crowning Note, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $19,513 and $36,345		44,540		114,810
JMJ Note, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $36,283		46,130		17,046
Redwood Deal #1		—		155,204
Redwood Deal #2		—		316,213
Redwood Deal #3, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $386,445 and $-0-		—		—
Redwood Deal #4, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $-0- and $217,932		403,442		185,510
Redwood Deal #5		1,389,711		1,389,711
May Davis Partners Acquisition Co, LLC, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $11,580		420		—
May Davis Partners Acquisition Co. LLC, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount of $22,908 and $-0-		57,642		—
Dominion Capital		47,757		—
Total	$	2,093,460	$	2,755,986

OnThe ~~March~~Company 7,accounted ~~2014,~~for ~~Intellicell~~the ~~Biosciences,~~conversion ~~Inc.~~features ~~filed~~underlying anthe ~~amendment~~convertible topromissory ~~the~~notes ~~Company’s~~and ~~articles~~issued ofin ~~incorporation~~accordance with ~~the~~GAAP, ~~Secretary~~as ofthe ~~State~~conversion offeature embedded in the ~~State~~convertible ofpromissory ~~Nevada~~notes ~~(the “Amendment”),~~could toresult ~~increase~~in the ~~Company’s~~convertible ~~authorized~~promissory ~~common~~notes ~~stock~~being ~~from~~converted ~~one~~to ~~billion~~a ~~five~~variable ~~hundred~~number ~~million~~of ~~(1,500,000,000)~~the Company’s common shares. ofThe ~~common~~Company ~~stock~~determined tothe ~~three~~value ~~billion~~of ~~five~~the ~~hundred~~derivate ~~million~~conversion ~~(3,500,000,000)~~features ~~shares~~ of ~~common~~these ~~stock.~~convertible ~~The~~promissory ~~Amendment~~notes ~~also~~at ~~changed~~ the relevant ~~par~~commitment ~~value~~dates as of ~~the~~September ~~Company’s~~30, ~~authorized~~2014, ~~common~~utilizing ~~stock~~a ~~from~~Black-Scholes ~~$0.001~~valuation ~~per share to $0~~model.~~0001 per share.~~

On June 24, 2014, the Company received a unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting of the holders of its Series F Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), created by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), as permitted by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended and which may be amended from time to time (“Amended Articles”). Each share of Series F Preferred Stock has the equivalent of 51,133,625 votes of Common Stock (based upon the 2,355,075,373 outstanding number of shares of Common Stock issued at the time hereof). Currently, there are five (5) holders of Series F Preferred Stock (the “Series F Stockholders” or the “Majority Stockholders”), holding fifty-one (51) shares of Series F Preferred Stock, resulting in the Series F Stockholders holding in the aggregate approximately 50.99% of the total voting power of all issued and outstanding voting capital of the Company.31

OnTable ~~June 24, 2014, the Board approved an increase in the number~~ of authorized shares of Common Stock from Three Billion Five Hundred Million (3,500,000,000) shares of Common Stock to Ten Billion (10,000,000,000) shares of Common Stock (the “Authorized Share Increase”) and recommended to the Majority Stockholders that they approve the Authorized Share Increase.Contents

~~On June 24, 2014 (the “Record Date”), the Majority Stockholders approved the Authorized Share Increase by written consent in lieu of a meeting in accordance with the Nevada Revised Statutes~~12. ~~Accordingly,~~Derivative ~~consent of common shareholders are not required and will not being solicited in connection with the approval of the Authorized Share Increase.~~Liabilities

~~During~~The ~~the~~following ~~six~~table ~~months~~sets ~~ended~~forth ~~June~~the ~~30,~~Company’s ~~2014,~~estimate of the ~~Company~~fair ~~issued~~value of the ~~following~~financial ~~equity~~ instruments that are classified as liabilities as of:

· The Company issued a total of 1,522,793,354 shares of common stock for debt conversions.

	September 30, 2014								Restated December 31, 2013
		(Level) 1		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
Embedded Detachable Warrants	$	—	$	—	$	942,688	$	942,688	$	—	$	—	$	6,735	$	6,735

Embedded Conversion Option Features	$	—	$	—	$	8,765,078	$	8,765,098	$	—	$	—	$	6,952,087	$	6,952,087

Totals	$	—	$	—	$	9,707,766	$	9,707,766	$	—	$	—	$	6,958,822	$	6,958,822

·The Infollowing ~~April~~table ofsets ~~2014,~~forth ~~the Company issued~~ a ~~total~~ summary of ~~5,000,000~~changes ~~shares~~in offair ~~common~~value ~~stock~~of ~~for~~our ~~compensation~~derivative ~~under~~liabilities afor ~~financial~~the ~~services~~periods ~~agreement executed in October, 2013 with MD Global Partners, LLC.~~ended:

· In May of 2014, the Company issued a total of 18,666,665 shares of common stock for compensation under a research consulting services agreement with Dr. James Andrews. See note 16

	Warrant Derivatives			Hybrid Instruments Derivatives			Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2013 (restated)	$	6,735		$	6,952,087		$	6,958,822

Fair Value adjustments:
Warrant derivatives (Gain)/Loss		(2,588,304	)		—			(2,588,304	)
Hybrid instruments (Gain)/Loss		—			(11,311,965	)		(11,311,965	)

Issuance of Warrants attached to debt financing		3,024,087						3,024,087

FairValue of Embedded conversion Feature on issuance of convertible promissory notes and debentures		—			18,676,299			18,676,299
Reclassification of derivative to APIC due to conversions of debt		—		$	(5,551,343	)	$	(5,551,343	)
Reclassification of Warrants to Liabilities		500,170			-			500,170
Ending balance, September 30, 2014	$	942,688		$	8,765,078		$	9,707,766

~~· In May of 2014, the Company issued a total of 111,000,000 shares of common stock for compensation under 3 financial and marketing consulting services agreements.~~32

AsTable of ~~June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had 2,580,182,042 and 922,722,023 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.~~Contents

35The following tables set forth a description of the financial instruments classified as derivate liabilities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the assumption used to value the instruments.

~~15.~~Convertible ~~Stock Options and Warrants~~Debt

~~Employee~~The ~~Stock~~derivative ~~Options~~liabilities related to the embedded conversion option feature and the outstanding warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following assumptions on the following dates:

The following table summarizes the changes in the options outstanding at June 30, 2014, and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees of the Company under a non-qualified employee stock option plan.

	September 30, 2014						(Restated) December 31, 2013
	Embedded Detachable Warrants			Embedded Conversion Option Features			Embedded Detachable Warrants			Embedded Conversion Option Features
Risk free interest rate		1.62	%		0.11	%		1.750	%		0.13	%
Expected volatility		240%-280	%		148.1% - 255.57	%		289.2%-371.3	%		289.2%-371.3	%
Expected life (in years)		1.59-9.61			1.0-.31			2.25			0.58-1.0
Expected dividend yield		-			-			-			-
Number outstanding		934,021,481			12,190,347,336			3,071,542			1,592,259,716
Fair value at issue date	$	3,356,488		$	18,676,299		$	332,401		$	3,042,327
Accumulated change in derivative liability as of the period ended	$	(2,413,800	)	$	(9,911,221	)	$	(326,147	)	$	3,909,760

Fair value at end of period	$	942,688		$	8,765,078		$	6,254		$	6,952,087

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.01 – 0.25		1,775,000	$	0.15		8.07		1,762,500	$	0.15
	4.00		2,347,926		4.00		7.50		1,879,173		4.00
			4,122,926				7.74		3,641,673

Private Placement Offering

~~A summary~~The ofderivative ~~the~~liabilities ~~Company’s~~related ~~stock~~to the ~~awards~~warrants ~~for~~issued ~~options~~ as part of ~~June~~the ~~30,~~private ~~2014~~placement ~~and~~offering ~~changes~~were ~~for~~valued using the ~~period~~Black-Scholes ~~ended~~option ~~June~~valuation ~~30,~~model ~~2014~~and isthe ~~presented~~following ~~below~~assumptions on the following dates:

				Stock Options				Weighted Average Exercise Price
		September 30, 2014				Dec. 31, 2013
	Outstanding, December 31, 2013				4,122,926			$	2.34
Risk free interest rate			1.62	%			1.75	%
	Granted				—				—
Expected volatility			259.68	%			316.09	%
	Exercised				—				—
Expected life (in years)			2.34				3.25
	Expired/Cancelled				—
Expected dividend yield			—				—
	Outstanding, June 30, 2014				4,122,926			$	2.34
Number outstanding			200,000				200,000
	Exercisable, June 30, 2014				3,641,673			$	2.14
Fair value at issue date		$	19,036,312			$	19,036,312
Accumulated change in derivative liability		$	(19,036,220	)		$	(19,035,831	)
Fair value at Period End		$	92			$	481

~~The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding~~13. The Company has no historical experience with which to establish a basis for determining an expected life of these awards. Therefore, the Company only gave consideration to the contractual terms and did not consider the vesting schedules, exercise patterns and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures significant to the expected life of the option award.Concentrations

WeThe ~~estimate~~Company ~~the~~maintains ~~volatility~~its ofcash ~~our~~in ~~common~~bank ~~stock~~deposit ~~based~~accounts, onwhich, ~~the~~at ~~calculated~~times, ~~historical~~may ~~volatility~~exceed offederally ~~similar~~insured ~~entities~~limits. This inpotentially ~~industry,~~subjects inthe ~~size~~Company ~~and~~to ina ~~financial leverage whose share~~concentration ~~prices~~of ~~are~~credit ~~publicly available. We base the~~ risk~~-free~~; ~~interest~~however ~~rate used in~~ the ~~Black-Scholes-Merton~~Company ~~option~~believes ~~valuation model on~~ the ~~implied~~ ~~yield~~risk ~~currently~~is ~~available on U~~negligible.S. ~~Treasury~~The ~~zero-coupon~~Company’s ~~issues~~carrying ~~with~~amounts anof ~~equivalent~~deposits ~~remaining~~in ~~term equal to the expected life~~financial ofinstitutions ~~the~~did ~~award. We have~~ not ~~paid~~exceed ~~any~~the ~~cash~~federally ~~dividends~~insured onlimit ~~our~~of ~~common~~$250,000 ~~stock~~as ~~and~~of doSeptember ~~not~~30, ~~anticipate~~2014. The ~~paying~~Company’s ~~any~~carrying amount ~~cash~~of ~~dividends~~deposits in ~~the~~financial ~~foreseeable future.~~institutions ~~Consequently,~~did wenot ~~use~~exceed anfederally ~~expected~~insured ~~dividend~~limits ~~yield~~as of ~~zero~~September in30, ~~the~~2014 ~~Black-Scholes-Merton~~and ~~option~~December ~~valuation model~~31, 2013.

Total stock-based compensation expense in connection with options granted to employees recognized in the consolidated statement of operations was $342,135 and $342,135 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and was $684,270 and $702,495 for the six months ended June 30,2014, respectively, net of tax effect. There was no stock-based compensation expense in connection with options granted to non-employees recognized for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Additionally, none of the options outstanding and unvested as of June 30, 2014, and 2013 had any intrinsic value.33

36Table of Contents

~~Warrants~~14. Capital Stock

The ~~following~~principal ~~table~~features ~~summarizes the changes in the warrants outstanding at June 30, 2014, and the related prices for the shares~~ of the Company’'s capital ~~common~~ stock ~~issued to~~are ~~non-employees~~as ~~of the Company. These warrants were issued in lieu of cash compensation for services performed or financing expenses and in connection with the private placements and merger.~~follows:

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	.005		400,000,000	$	.005		4.63		400,000,000	$	.005
	.0055		40,000,000		.0055		4.70		40,000,000		.0055
	1.72		3,071,542		1.72		1.85		3,071,542		0.33
	.045		2,566,664		0.45		3.41		2,566,664		0.45
	0.75 - 0.86		11,580,000		0.75		2.61		11,580,000		0.75
	1.00		42,500		1.00		2.48		42,500		1.00
	1.58		45,000		1.58		7.75		45,000		1.58
	2.00		2,529,200		2.00		2.60		2,529,200		2.00
	2.45 - 2.60		800,000		2.51		2.51		800,000		2.51
	3.00		750,000		3.00		2.24		750,000		3.00
	3.20		350,000		3.20		2.43		350,000		3.20
	3.75		100,000		3.75		2.87		100,000		3.75
			461,834,906				4.59		461,834,906

Series B Preferred Stock

AAs ~~summary~~of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has designated 21,000 shares of preferred stock as Series B preferred stock, with a par value of $.01 per share, of which 15,058 shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of series B preferred stock shall be convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the holders of the series ~~awards~~B ~~for~~preferred ~~warrants~~stock shall be entitled to notice of stockholders’ meeting and to vote as a single class with the holders of the ~~June~~Common ~~30,~~Stock ~~2014~~upon ~~and~~any ~~changes~~matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and shall be entitled to such number of votes as shall equal the ~~six~~product ~~months~~of ~~ended~~(a) ~~June~~the ~~30,~~number ~~2014~~of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is ~~presented~~convertible ~~below:~~into on the record date of such vote multiplied by (b) ten (10).

	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, January 1, 2014		21,834,906	$	3.09
Granted		440,000,000		.0050
Exercised		—		—
Expired/Cancelled		—		—
Outstanding, June 30, 2014		461,834,906	$	4.84
Exercisable, June 30, 2014		461,834,906	$	4.84

Series C Preferred Stock

~~The~~As ~~Company~~of September ~~issued 440~~30,~~000,000~~ 2014 and ~~-0-~~December ~~compensatory~~31, ~~warrants~~2013, tothe ~~non-employees~~Company ~~during~~has ~~the~~designated ~~six~~13,000 ~~months~~shares ~~ended~~of ~~June~~preferred ~~30,~~stock ~~2014~~as ~~and~~Series ~~2013,~~C ~~respectively.~~preferred ~~The~~stock, ~~Company~~with ~~estimates the~~a ~~fair~~par value of ~~each~~$.01 ~~stock~~per share, ~~award~~of atwhich 7,250 ~~the~~shares ~~grant~~of ~~date~~preferred bystock ~~using~~are ~~the~~issued ~~Black-Scholes~~and ~~option~~outstanding. ~~pricing~~Each ~~model~~share ~~with~~of ~~the~~Series ~~following~~C ~~weighted average~~preferred ~~assumptions~~stock ~~used~~shall ~~for~~be convertible ~~the~~into ~~grants~~1,000 ~~respectively;~~shares ~~dividend yield~~ of ~~zero~~the ~~percent~~Company’s ~~for~~common ~~all~~stock. . In ~~periods;~~addition, ~~expected~~the ~~volatility~~holders isof ~~329.73%;~~the series ~~risk-free~~B ~~interest~~preferred ~~rate~~stock ~~from~~shall abe ~~range~~entitled to notice of ~~.71%~~ stockholders’ meeting and to ~~.79%;~~vote ~~expected~~as ~~lives~~a ofsingle ~~three~~class ~~years. Total~~with ~~non-employee~~the ~~stock-based~~holders of ~~compensation~~the ~~expensed~~Common inStock ~~connection~~upon ~~with~~any ~~warrants~~matter ~~recognized~~submitted into the ~~condensed~~stockholders ~~consolidated~~for ~~statement~~a vote, and shall be entitled to such number of ~~operations~~votes ~~for~~as shall equal to the ~~six months~~number ~~ended~~of ~~June~~shares ~~30,~~of ~~2014~~Common ~~and~~Stock ~~2013~~into ~~was~~which $0the ~~and~~series ~~$75,000,~~B ~~respectively,~~preferred ~~net~~stock ofis ~~tax~~convertible ~~effect~~into on the record date.

37Certain holders of the Company’s Series C preferred stock have contractually agreed to restrict their ability to convert the Series C preferred stock such that the number of shares of the Company common stock held by each of holder and its affiliates after such conversion shall not exceed 4.99% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

~~16.~~Series ~~Income~~D ~~(Loss)~~Preferred ~~per Share~~Stock

~~The~~As ~~following~~of ~~table~~September ~~presents~~30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the ~~computations~~Company has designated 500,000 shares of ~~basic~~preferred stock as Series D preferred stock, with a par value of $.01 per share, of which 56,500 shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of series D convertible preferred ~~dilutive~~stock ~~income~~is ~~(loss)~~convertible at any time at an initial conversion price equal to $2.00 per share:, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. As long as the series D preferred stock is outstanding, the conversion price of the series D convertible preferred stock in effect shall be reduced by $0.05 for every 180 day period a share of series D preferred stock is held by the investor. The series D convertible preferred stock automatically converts into shares of the Company’s common stock after three years. Each share of Series D convertible preferred stock was issued with a warrant to purchase 10 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $2.00, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The exercise price of the warrants and the conversion price of the series D convertible preferred stock are subject to full ratchet and anti-dilution adjustment for subsequent lower price issuances by the Company, as well as customary adjustments provisions for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and the like. However, no adjustment made shall cause the exercise price of the series D convertible preferred stock and warrants to be less than $1.00. The holders of Series D preferred stock have no voting rights.

	For the 3 Months Ended June 30, 2014		For the 6 Months Ended June 30, 2014
Net Income (Loss)	$	2,706,055	$	(7,534,281	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) per share – basic	$	.00	$	(.00	)
Net income (loss) per share – diluted	$	.00	$	(.00	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		2,237,459,605		1,830,159,988
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		23,779,489,866		1,830,159,988

Series F Preferred Stock

~~For~~On January 17, 2014, Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. (the ~~six~~“Corporation”) ~~months~~filed ~~ended~~a ~~June~~certificate 30of designations, ~~2014~~rights and preferences (the “Certificate of Designation”) ~~common~~with ~~stock~~the ~~equivalents~~Secretary ~~totaling~~of 25State of the State of Nevada pursuant to which the Corporation set forth the designation,~~393~~ powers,~~234~~ rights,~~345~~ privileges, ~~related~~preferences and restrictions of the Series E Preferred Stock. On January 22, 2014 the Corporation filed a certificate of correction (the “Certificate of Correction”) with the Secretary of State of Nevada to ~~warrants~~ change the name of the designation from “Series E Preferred Stock” to “Series F Preferred Stock.” By unanimous written consent of the Board, ~~convertible~~ the ~~debt~~Board issued an aggregate of fifty one (51) shares of Series F Preferred to five individuals. The five individuals include the Company’s CEO and ~~preferred~~Chairman ~~stock~~and ~~were~~four ~~excluded~~members of the Board of Directors. As a result of the voting rights granted to the ~~from~~Series F Preferred, the ~~calculation~~Series F Stockholders hold, in the aggregate, approximately 50.95% of the ~~diluted~~total ~~net~~voting ~~loss~~power ~~per~~of all issued and outstanding voting capital of the Company. Each one (1) share asof ~~their~~the ~~effect~~Series ~~would~~F Preferred Stock shall have ~~been~~voting ~~antidilutive~~rights equal to (x) 0.019607 multiplied by the total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock eligible to vote at the time of the respective vote (the “Numerator”), divided by (y) 0.49, minus (z) the Numerator. For purposes of illustration only, if the total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock eligible to vote at the time of the respective vote is 5,000,000, the voting rights of one share of the Series F Preferred shall be equal to 102,036 (0.019607 x 5,000,000) / 0.49) – (0.019607 x 5,000,000) = 102,036).

For the three months ended June 30, 2014 common stock equivalents totaling 25,597,324,522 related to warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock were included in the calculation of the diluted net income per share.34

	For the 3 Months Ended June 30, 2013			For the 6 Months Ended June 30, 2013
Net Income (Loss)	$	(3,916,075	)	$	(4,974,435	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) per share – basic	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.08	)
Net income (loss) per share – diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.08	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		65,450,474			62,920,596
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		65,450,474			62,920,596

Table of Contents

~~For~~Common the three months and six months ending June 30, 2013 common stock equivalents of 73,186,072 and 77,478,331 related to warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share as their effect would have been antidulitive.Stock

~~17.~~Amendment ~~Commitments~~to Articles of Incorporation

~~Non-cancellable~~On ~~lease~~ March 7, 2014, Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. filed an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada (the “Amendment”), to increase the Company’s authorized common stock from one billion five hundred million (1,500,000,000) shares of common stock to three billion five hundred million (3,500,000,000) shares of common stock. The Amendment also changed the par value of the Company’s authorized common stock from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share.

On June 124, ~~2011~~2014, the Company ~~entered~~received ~~into~~ a 13unanimous ~~year~~written ~~lease~~consent ~~for~~in ~~office~~lieu ~~space~~of ~~with~~ a ~~related~~meeting ~~company,~~of ~~for~~the ~~which~~holders ~~the~~of ~~Company~~its ~~unconditionally~~Series ~~guaranteed~~F ~~any~~Preferred ~~and~~Stock, ~~all~~$0.01 ~~obligations owed~~par ~~under~~value per share (the “Series ~~lease~~F toPreferred ~~the~~Stock”), ~~landlord.~~created Inby ~~connection~~unanimous ~~with~~written consent of the ~~execution~~Board of Directors of the ~~lease~~Company (the “Board”), as permitted by the Company’s ~~was~~Articles ~~required~~of Incorporation, as amended and which may be amended from time to ~~establish~~time a(“Amended ~~restricted~~Articles”). Each share of Series F Preferred Stock has the equivalent of 51,133,625 ~~cash~~votes ~~account~~of inCommon Stock (based upon the ~~amount~~2,355,075,373 outstanding number of ~~approximately~~shares ~~$650~~of Common Stock issued at the time hereof). Currently,~~000~~ there toare ~~secure~~five a(5) ~~line~~holders of ~~credit~~Series toF bePreferred ~~used~~Stock as(the a“Series ~~security~~F ~~deposit~~Stockholders” ~~under~~or the ~~lease.~~“Majority ~~The~~Stockholders”), ~~landlord~~holding ~~released~~fifty-one ~~$124,577~~(51) shares of Series F Preferred Stock, resulting in the ~~restricted~~Series ~~cash~~F Stockholders holding in ~~2013~~the ~~that~~aggregate ~~was~~approximately ~~applied~~50.99% toof ~~current~~the ~~rent~~total voting power of all issued and outstanding voting capital of the Company.

38On June 24, 2014, the Board approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from Three Billion Five Hundred Million (3,500,000,000) shares of Common Stock to Ten Billion (10,000,000,000) shares of Common Stock (the “Authorized Share Increase”) and recommended to the Majority Stockholders that they approve the Authorized Share Increase.

~~The~~On ~~lease~~June ~~commenced~~24, on2014 ~~June~~(the 1,“Record ~~2012~~Date”), ~~and~~the ~~expires~~Majority onStockholders ~~May~~approved ~~31,~~the ~~2025.~~Authorized ~~Upon~~Share ~~commencement,~~Increase ~~the~~by ~~aggregate~~written ~~minimum~~consent ~~annual~~in ~~lease~~lieu ~~payments~~of ~~under~~a meeting in accordance with the Nevada ~~operating~~Revised ~~lease~~Statutes. ~~guarantee~~Accordingly, consent of common shareholders was not required and was not solicited in connection with ~~are~~the asapproval ~~follows:~~of the Authorized Share Increase.

2014 (Remainder of Year)	$	323,031
2015		665,555
2016		679,479
2017		679,479
2018		679,479
Thereafter		5,440,474
Total	$	8,467,497

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued the following equity instruments:

~~Laboratory~~· ~~Services~~The ~~and~~Company ~~License~~issued ~~Agreement~~a total of 1,805,672,910 shares of common stock for debt conversions, including interest.

On· ~~March~~In ~~11,~~April ~~2014~~of ~~(the “Effective Date”)~~2014, ~~Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., (~~the “Company~~”),~~ ~~executed~~issued a ~~Laboratory~~total ~~Services~~of ~~and License Agreement (the “License Agreement”)~~5, ~~effective March 7~~000,000 ~~2014,~~shares ~~with~~of ~~The~~common ~~Andrews~~stock ~~Research~~for ~~and~~compensation ~~Education~~under ~~Foundation, Inc.~~a ~~(“AREF”)~~financial ~~pursuant~~services toagreement ~~which~~executed ~~the~~in ~~Company~~October, ~~agreed~~2013 towith ~~grant~~MD ~~certain~~Global ~~technology~~Partners, ~~and trademark licenses to AREF~~LLC.

~~The~~· ~~term~~In May of 2014, the ~~License~~Company ~~Agreement~~issued ~~shall be for~~ a ~~period~~total of ~~three (3) years commencing on March 7~~18,666,665 ~~2014~~shares ~~and~~of ~~shall~~common ~~automatically~~stock ~~renew~~ for ~~subsequent~~compensation ~~periods~~under ofa ~~three~~research ~~(3) years~~consulting ~~unless~~services ~~either~~agreement ~~party~~with toDr. ~~the~~James ~~License~~Andrews. ~~Agreement~~See ~~provides~~note ~~notice of its intention not to renew at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of any three (3) year term.~~16

~~Subject~~· toIn ~~the~~May ~~terms and conditions~~ of ~~the License Agreement~~2014, the Company ~~agreed~~issued ~~to grant AREF~~ a ~~non-exclusive~~total ~~(except for the Pensacola, Florida area and a surrounding radius~~ of ~~150 miles)~~111, ~~non-assignable~~000,000 ~~non-transferrable,~~shares ~~non-sublicensable license to market the use~~ of ~~and~~common ~~practice~~stock ~~the Technology (as such term is defined in the License Agreement) at AREF’s premises~~ for ~~restricted~~compensation ~~purposes~~under as3 ~~provided~~financial inand ~~the~~marketing ~~License Agreement.~~consulting ~~The~~services ~~Company~~agreements ~~also~~with ~~agreed~~Highland ~~to grant AREF a non-exclusive~~Capital, ~~non-assignable,~~Copper ~~non-sublicensable,~~Bay ~~license to the Trademarks (as such term is defined in the Agreement). Furthermore, the Company reserved the perpetual worldwide right to license~~ and ~~use the~~Gene ~~Patent (as defined in the License Agreement), Trademarks and the Technology licensed under the License Agreement for any purpose~~Kazlow.

~~Except~~· ~~for~~In ~~when~~July ~~performed for research purposes~~2014, ~~AREF shall pay to~~ the ~~Company~~company aissued ~~fee equal to $2~~48,~~500~~608,787 ~~per~~shares ~~Tissue~~of ~~Processing~~common ~~(as~~stock ~~such term is defined in the License Agreement) case processed. The parties~~ to ~~the~~Iron ~~License~~Ridge ~~Agreement~~Global ~~have mutually agreed not to disclose any Confidential Information (as such term is defined in the License Agreement)~~IV, ~~whether~~LTD ~~verbal~~for orfull ~~written,~~and ~~conveyed~~final tosettlement ~~them~~of ~~prior~~all ~~to,~~claims ~~during~~for orfees ~~subsequent~~under toconcluded ~~the term of the License Agreement~~litigation.

39· In July 2014, the company issued 43,896,321 shares of common stock to May Davis Acquisition Company, LLC for compensation under a financing agreement executed in October, 2013.

~~Consulting~~· ~~Agreements~~In September of 2014, the company issued 300,000,000 shares of common stock to the CEO, Dr. Steven Victor. The Board of Directors authorized the issuance of these shares as compensation to Dr. Victor for the successful closing of the YA Yorkville financing transaction and the execution of the Andrews Laboratory Licensing agreement.

On· ~~March~~In ~~11,~~September of 2014, the ~~Company~~company ~~executed a~~issued ~~Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Dr. James Andrews~~10, ~~effective March 7~~000,000 ~~2014,~~shares ~~pursuant to which Dr. Andrews shall serve as Chairman~~ of ~~the~~common ~~Intellicell~~stock Orthopedic Cellular Therapy Advisory Board. The initial term of the Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years unless extended as provided in the Agreement or unless terminated by either party with thirty (30) days advance written notice to ~~the~~Alliance ~~other~~Advisors party. In consideration for Consultant’s services, the Consultant shall be paid a monthly fee and make a monthly charitable contribution to the Andrews Foundation after the Company closes a Capital Raise (as defined in ~~the~~lieu ~~Consulting Agreement), and the amount~~ of ~~such~~financing ~~monthly~~advisory ~~fee~~fees and monthly charitable contribution shall be determined based on the amount raised in the Capital Raise. Based upon the capital raise transaction in March 2014 with YA Global Investments, LP in the amount of $230,~~100,~~000, ~~the~~due ~~monthly fee payable to the Consultant thereafter shall be equal to $40,000, which includes a $6,000 payment to Dr. Michael Immel~~ and aowing ~~charitable~~as ~~contribution~~ of ~~$10~~September 23,~~000~~ ~~payable to the Andrews Foundation~~2013. ~~These payments will continue for the term of the Consulting Agreement.~~

~~Furthermore,~~· ~~commencing~~During onthe ~~March~~quarter ~~1, 2014~~ended ~~and ending on May 1~~September, ~~2017,~~the oncompany ~~each~~directly ofissued ~~March 1~~452, ~~June 1~~186,574 ~~October 1 and January 1 during such period, the Company shall issue and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive non-qualified stock options to purchase a number of~~ shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock ~~equal~~ to ~~750,000~~23 ~~divided~~qualified byinvestors ~~the~~at ~~average~~market ~~of the closing bid~~ price ~~per share of such common stock for the ten (10) trading days immediately prior to the date of issuance, subject to certain adjustments as set forth in the Consulting Agreement~~. ~~The options~~ ~~have~~Each ~~a strike price of $0.0058 per~~ share ~~and are exercisable for ten (10) years. A portion (13.33%) of such options will be~~ issued tohas ~~the~~attached ~~Andrews~~a ~~Foundation~~warrant ~~(and Dr. Immel shall receive 20% of such options). In addition, The Company shall issue~~ to ~~the~~purchase ~~Consultant~~1 ~~6,666,666~~share ~~shares~~ of ~~its~~ common stock ~~based~~within on3 ~~the~~years ~~market price~~ at ~~the~~a ~~date~~price oftwo ~~the~~times ~~execution of~~ the ~~License~~price ~~Agreement~~paid ~~(see~~at ~~description~~issuance above), as well as 2,000,000 shares to Dr. Immel and 7,999,999 shares to the Andrews Foundation. Additionally, 1,000,000 shares shall be issued to the Consultant, 200,000 shares shall be issued to Dr. Immel and 133,333 shares shall be issued to the Andrews Foundation upon FDA approval of the ~~Company’s~~original ~~Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell injection for treatment of osteoarthritis.~~shares

~~18.~~As ~~Litigation~~of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had 3,717,753,280 and 922,722,023 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

~~TCA Default Notice~~35

OnTable ~~July 15, 2013, while the Company was finalizing an amendment and waiver to that certain Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) issued by the Company in favor~~ of TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA”) on June 7, 2012 in the principal amount of $500,000, the Company was advised that Ironridge Global IV, LTD (“Ironridge”), led by Mr. John C. Kirkland, Esq., purportedly purchased the Note from TCA. The Complaint and Motion alleged that Ironridge and TCA each served the Company with a Notice of Foreclosure and Sale, both claiming to be the “Secured Party” of the same assets.Contents

On August 8, 2013, a Summons and Complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed along with a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (the “Motion”) before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “Court”) under the caption Intellicell Biosciences, Inc15. vStock ~~Ironridge~~Options ~~Global IV, LTD.,~~ and ~~TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, Index No. 652800/13. The Motion sought to restrain the sale of the Company’s assets.~~Warrants

~~Given~~Employee ~~that~~Stock Ironridge and TCA asserted that they would sell the secured assets of the Company at auction on August 12, 2013, the Motion sought to temporarily restrain both parties from so doing. On August 12, 2013, Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, issued a written Order granting the relief requested, thereby restraining any sale of assets (the “Temporary Restraining Order”).Options

OnThe ~~August~~following ~~26,~~table ~~2013,~~summarizes ~~despite~~ the ~~Company’s~~changes ~~best~~in ~~efforts to amicably resolve~~ the ~~dispute~~options ~~related~~outstanding toat ~~the~~September ~~Note~~30, ~~a subsequent hearing on the Motion was held~~2014, ~~at which time the Company voluntarily brought with it to Court: (i) a certified check in the amount of $535,833.33 constituting payment of all principal~~ and ~~interest owed under~~ the ~~Note;~~related ~~and~~prices ~~(ii)~~for ~~a stock certificate constituting~~ the ~~facility fee~~ shares ~~owed~~of to the ~~Secured~~Company’s ~~Party~~common pursuant to that certain Equity Facility Agreement. Since TCA admitted in prior court filings that it has no remaining interest in the that certain Note and Equity Facility Agreement, both the check and the stock ~~certificate were tendered to Ironridge in~~issued ~~open court, and counsel for Ironridge confirmed receipt thereof~~ to ~~the~~employees ~~judge directly. The company's attorneys argued in court that with the exception~~ of ~~possible attorney’s fees owed,~~ the Company's ~~obligations~~ under ~~the~~a ~~transaction~~non-qualified ~~documents~~employee ~~have now~~stock ~~been~~option ~~satisfied in full~~plan.

In addition, the Court found Ironridge’s jurisdictional argument to be unavailing and held that the case shall remain in New York and directed all parties to file submissions with the Court on September 10, 2013, indicating why any other monies are or are not owed under those certain transaction documents. The Judge further directed that the Temporary Restraining Order restraining the sale of the Company’s assets shall remain in place indefinitely until further order of the Court and that the auction shall not be rescheduled and that Ironridge shall not make, post or distribute any further advertisements, internet postings, blogs or otherwise in relation thereto. Finally, the Judge held that the balance of the $680,000 that was being held in escrow be immediately released.

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.16 – 0.25		1,775,000	$	0.15		7.82		1,762,500	$	0.15
	4.00		2,347,926		4.00		7.25		1,879,173		4.00
			4,122,926				7.50		3,641,673

40A summary of the Company’s stock awards for options as of September 30, 2014 and changes for the period ended September 30, 2014 is presented below:

On January 28, 2014, a Judicial Hearing Officer, in a decision on each of Ironridge’s claims against the Company, fully justified IntelliCell’s position by ruling against each of Ironridge’s and TCA’s demands for monetary damages. The Court made it clear that Ironridge and TCA are not entitled to monetary damages and had no right to inappropriately broadcast to the world that it could sell IntelliCell’s assets.

	Stock Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, December 31, 2013		4,122,926	$	2.34
Granted		—		—
Exercised		—		—
Expired/Cancelled		—
Outstanding, September 30, 2014		4,122,926	$	2.34
Exercisable, September 30, 2014		3,641,673	$	2.14

~~Additional~~The ~~litigations~~expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The Company has no historical experience with which to establish a basis for determining an expected life of these awards. Therefore, the Company only gave consideration to the contractual terms and did not consider the vesting schedules, exercise patterns and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures significant to the expected life of the option award.

OnWe ~~March~~estimate ~~17, 2014, Dean E. Miller, as representative shareholder, on behalf of~~ the ~~nominal~~volatility defendant Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., filed a shareholder’s derivative action against Steven Victor, MD, in his capacity as Chairman - CEO and individually, Anna Rhodes as former Executive Vice President and individually, Leonard L. Mazur as interim Chief Operating Officer and individually, Myron Holubiak as a Director and individually, Michael Hershman, as Chairman of ~~the~~our ~~Board of Directors and individually,~~common ~~Stuart~~stock ~~Goldfarb~~based as a former Director and individually, Victor Dermatology & Rejuvenation, P.C., Victor Cosmeceuticals, Inc., Lasersculpt, Inc., and the Doe Entities 1-5, as defendants, and Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., as nominal-defendant. The complaint, which was filed on the ~~aforementioned~~calculated ~~date~~historical ~~with~~volatility ~~the United States District Court Southern District~~ of ~~New~~similar ~~York,~~entities ~~alleges that the Company has failed to comply with US Food and Drug Administration and United States Patent and Trade Office regulations. The allegations~~ in ~~the complaint include~~industry, ~~but~~in ~~are~~size ~~not limited to, allegations involving fraud, negligence, false reporting,~~ and ~~mismanagement~~ ~~of laboratory facilities. Pursuant to the complaint, the amount~~ in ~~controversy~~financial ~~exceeds~~leverage ~~$75,000.~~whose ~~Furthermore, the~~share ~~complaint~~prices asare ~~filed~~publicly ~~lists the following counts: 1~~available. ~~Against~~We ~~the~~base ~~individual defendants for breach of their fiduciary duties in connection with their management of~~ the ~~Company;~~risk-free 2.interest ~~Against~~rate ~~the~~used ~~individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty~~ in ~~connection with disseminating false information; 3. Against~~ the ~~individual~~Black-Scholes-Merton ~~defendants~~option ~~for~~valuation ~~breach~~model ofon ~~fiduciary duty for failing to design and implement adequate~~the ~~internal~~implied ~~controls;~~yield 4.currently ~~Request~~available ~~for~~on ~~injunctive relief; 5~~U. ~~Imposition of constructive trust/accounting; and 6~~S. ~~Appointment~~Treasury ofzero-coupon ~~referee injunctive~~issues ~~relief.~~with ~~The~~an ~~Company~~equivalent ~~believes~~remaining ~~that~~term ~~such~~equal ~~allegations and claims are without merit and intends~~ to ~~vigorously defend such allegations and claims. On July 24,~~ the ~~Company~~expected ~~filed a motion to order the plaintiff to give security for defendant’s costs.~~life ~~On August 1, 2014, the Company requested~~ of the ~~judge permission to file for dismissal~~award. ~~Plaintiff~~We ~~did~~have not ~~respond~~paid ~~and~~any ~~the~~cash ~~judge has~~dividends ~~granted~~on ~~the~~our ~~Company~~common ~~permission~~stock toand ~~file~~do ~~the dismissal motion by September 2, 2014. The Company is~~ not ~~currently~~anticipate ~~able~~paying ~~to predict the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome, or the amount of~~ any ~~possible~~cash ~~loss~~dividends in the ~~event of an unfavorable outcome.~~foreseeable future. Consequently, nowe ~~material~~use ~~provision~~an orexpected ~~liability~~dividend ~~has~~yield ~~been recorded for such allegations and claims as~~ of ~~June~~zero ~~30, 2014. However, management is confident~~ in ~~its~~the ~~defenses~~Black-Scholes-Merton tooption ~~such~~valuation ~~allegations and claims~~model.

OnTotal ~~March~~stock-based ~~13,~~compensation ~~2014,~~expense in ~~Steven~~connection A.with ~~Victor (“Dr.~~options ~~Victor”),~~granted ~~Intellicell~~to ~~Biosciences,~~employees ~~Inc.,~~recognized ain ~~Nevada~~the ~~corporation,~~consolidated ~~Intellicell~~statement ~~Biosciences~~of ~~Inc.,~~operations awas ~~New~~$342,135 ~~York~~and ~~corporation~~$342,135 ~~and~~for ~~Regen~~the ~~Medical~~three ~~P.C.,~~months aended ~~New~~September ~~York corporation filed a complaint against Jonathan Schwartz (“Schwarz”)~~30, ~~Joseph~~2014 ~~P. Salvani (“Salvani”)~~ and ~~Douglas R. Dollinger (“Dollinger”)~~2013, inrespectively ~~the~~and ~~Supreme~~was ~~Court of the State of New York~~$1,026,405 ~~County of New York. Schwartz~~ and ~~Salvani~~$1,044,630 ~~both~~for ~~shareholders of~~ the ~~Company,~~nine ~~are~~months ~~represented by Dollinger in his capacity as legal counsel.~~ended ~~Pursuant~~September to30,2014, ~~the complaint~~respectively, ~~the~~net ~~plaintiffs’ first cause~~ of ~~action~~tax ~~alleges~~effect. ~~that~~There ~~the~~was ~~defendants~~no ~~conspired~~stock-based ~~together~~compensation ~~and~~expense ~~acted~~ in ~~concert,~~connection towith ~~defame~~options ~~Dr. Victor and the Company in an effort~~ granted to ~~take~~non-employees ~~control~~recognized offor the ~~Company~~periods ~~and~~ended toSeptember ~~reap~~30, ~~large~~2014 ~~profits~~and ~~by dumping their shares thereafter~~2013. ~~Furthermore~~Additionally, ~~the~~none ~~plaintiffs’ second cause~~ of ~~action~~the ~~alleges~~options ~~that~~outstanding ~~Salvani made false statements to~~and aunvested ~~potential~~as ~~investor,~~of ~~resulting~~September ~~in damages amounting to $250~~30,~~000.~~ ~~The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages~~2014, ~~together with punitive damages~~ and ~~interest~~2013 inhad ~~connection~~any ~~with~~intrinsic ~~the first cause of action, and compensatory damages in the amount of $250,000, together with punitive damages and interest, in connection with the second cause of action~~value.

In February 2014, John Cade and two other lenders to Intellicell’s predecessor entities filed suit, in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, for non-payment of certain promissory notes owed by predecessor company, Media Exchange Group. Company Counsel has retained separate counsel in Nevada to handle this matter.36

InTable ~~July 2014, a former Intellicell employee sued the Company, Dr. Steven Victor, Anna Rhodes, Leonard Mazur, and the City~~ of New York, for, among other things, false arrest, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and non-payment of salary. The Company appeared in the action, and filed an Answer with a Cross-Claim, on behalf of the Intellicell and the other defendants, on August 4, 2014. The New York District Attorney has sought permission to move for dismissal.Contents

41Warrants

19The following table summarizes the changes in the warrants outstanding at September 30, 2014, and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to non-employees of the Company. These ~~Subsequent~~warrants ~~Events~~were issued in lieu of cash compensation for services performed or financing expenses and in connection with the private placements and merger.

The Company has evaluated its subsequent events through October 5, 2014, the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Except as disclosed below, there were no additional significant subsequent events requiring disclosure.

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	.005		400,000,000	$	.005		4.63		400,000,000	$	.005
	.0055		40,000,000		.0055		4.70		40,000,000		.0055
	1.72		3,071,542		1.72		1.85		3,071,542		0.33
	.045		2,566,664		0.45		3.16		2,566,664		0.45
	0.75 - 0.86		11,580,000		0.75		2.35		11,580,000		0.75
	1.00		42,500		1.00		2.23		42,500		1.00
	1.58		45,000		1.58		7.50		45,000		1.58
	2.00		2,529,200		2.00		2.35		2,529,200		2.00
	2.45 - 2.60		800,000		2.51		2.26		800,000		2.51
	3.00		750,000		3.00		2.21		750,000		3.00
	3.20		350,000		3.20		2.18		350,000		3.20
	.0012		400,111,664		.0012		2.91		400,111,664		.0012
	.0014		7,142,857		.0014		2.87		7,142,857		.0014
	.0024		12,500,000		.0024		2.81		12,500,000		.0024
	.00164		9,146,340		.00164		2.85		9,146,340		.00164
	.00225		20,111,111		.00225		2.80		20,111,111		.00225
	.00315		3,174,603		.0315		2.84		3,174,603		.0315
	.005		20,000,000		.005		9.59		20,000,000		.005
	3.75		100,000		3.75		3.75		100,000		3.75
			934,021,481		.003		3.97		934,021,481		.003

InA ~~July~~summary ~~2014,~~of ~~Convertible~~the ~~Debenture~~Company’s stock ~~and~~awards ~~Note~~for ~~Holders~~warrants ~~converted~~as ~~$115~~of September 30,~~715~~ of2014 ~~principal~~and ~~into~~changes ~~167,228,569~~for ~~shares~~the ofnine ~~its~~months ~~Company’s~~ended ~~common~~September ~~stock.~~30, 2014 is presented below:

In August 2014, Convertible Debenture and Note Holders converted $108,917 of principal into 159,817,308 shares of its Company’s common stock.

	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, January 1, 2014		21,834,906	$	3.09
Granted		912,186,575		.0031
Exercised		—		—
Expired/Cancelled		—		—
Outstanding, September 30, 2014		934,021,481	$	0.003
Exercisable, September 30, 2014		934,021,481	$	0.003

OnThe ~~July~~Company 3issued 440,000,000 and -0- compensatory warrants to non-employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, ~~the~~respectively. The Company ~~issued~~estimates 53the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for the grants,~~568,400~~ ~~shares~~respectively; dividend yield of zero percent for all periods; expected volatility is 329.73%; risk-free interest rate from a range of .71% to ~~Iron~~.79%; ~~Ridge~~expected ~~Global~~lives IVof ~~LTD~~three years. Total non-employee stock-based compensation expensed in ~~final~~connection ~~settlement~~with warrants recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of ~~all~~operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $75,000, respectively, net of tax effect.

~~outstanding~~The ~~claims~~Company ~~under~~issued 472,186,575 and -0- warrants to purchasers of shares of common stock during the ~~TCA/Iron~~nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For ech ~~Ridge~~share ~~convertible~~of ~~promissory~~common ~~note~~stock purchased, the stockholder received 1 warrant to purchase 1 share of common stock at two times the market price of the common stock at date of issuance of the warrant. The warrant is exercisable for three years. The Company estimates the fair value of each warrant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for the grants, respectively; dividend yield of zero percent for all periods; expected volatility is 247%; risk-free interest rate of 1.07% : expected lives of three years.

The Company executed a financial consulting agreement with Highland Capital in January 2014. In the two months ended August 31, 2014, Highland earned fees of $258,700. These fees will be payable in 51,740,000 shares of common stock of the Company. The shares have not yet been issued as of September 25, 2014.37

42Table of Contents

16.

Income (Loss) per Share

The following table presents the computations of basic and dilutive income (loss) per share:

	For the 3 Months Ended September 30, 2014			For the 9 Months Ended September 30, 2014
Net Income (Loss)	$	(3,478,024	)	$	(11,012,526	)

Net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) per share – basic	$	(.00	)	$	(.00	)
Net income (loss) per share – diluted	$	(.00	)	$	(.00	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		3,001,685,610			2,845,436,013
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		3,001,685,610			2,845,436,013

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 common stock equivalents totaling 12,735,921,639 related to warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share as their effect would have been antidilutive.

For the three months ended September 30, 2014 common stock equivalents totaling 12,735,921,639 related to warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock were included in the calculation of the diluted net income per share.

	For the 3 Months Ended September 30, 2013			For the 9 Months Ended September 30, 2013
Net Income (Loss)	$	(4,479,827	)	$	(9,454,362	)

Net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) per share – basic	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)
Net income (loss) per share – diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		107,883,264			77,951,031
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		107,883,264			77,951,031

For the three months and nine months ending September 30, 2013 common stock equivalents of 60,195,950 and 60,195,950 related to warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share as their effect would have been antidulitive.

17. Commitments

Non-cancellable lease

On June 1, 2011, the Company entered into a 13 year lease for office space with a related company, for which the Company unconditionally guaranteed any and all obligations owed under the lease to the landlord. In connection with the execution of the lease, the Company was required to establish a restricted cash account in the amount of approximately $650,000 to secure a line of credit to be used as a security deposit under the lease. The landlord released $124,577 of the restricted cash in 2013 that was applied to current rent.

Table of Contents

The lease commenced on June 1, 2012 and expires on May 31, 2025. Upon commencement, the aggregate minimum annual lease payments under the operating lease guarantee are as follows:

2014 (Remainder of Year)	$	169,869
2015		679,479
2016		679,479
2017		696,187
2018		712,896
Thereafter		4,088,028
Total	$	7,025,938

Laboratory Services and License Agreement

On March 11, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., (the “Company”), executed a Laboratory Services and License Agreement (the “License Agreement”), effective March 7, 2014, with The Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Inc. (“AREF”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to grant certain technology and trademark licenses to AREF.

The term of the License Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing on March 7, 2014 and shall automatically renew for subsequent periods of three (3) years unless either party to the License Agreement provides notice of its intention not to renew at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of any three (3) year term.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the License Agreement, the Company agreed to grant AREF a non-exclusive (except for the Pensacola, Florida area and a surrounding radius of 150 miles), non-assignable, non-transferrable, non-sublicensable license to market the use of and practice the Technology (as such term is defined in the License Agreement) at AREF’s premises for restricted purposes as provided in the License Agreement. The Company also agreed to grant AREF a non-exclusive, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, license to the Trademarks (as such term is defined in the Agreement). Furthermore, the Company reserved the perpetual worldwide right to license and use the Patent (as defined in the License Agreement), Trademarks and the Technology licensed under the License Agreement for any purpose.

Except for when performed for research purposes, AREF shall pay to the Company a fee equal to $2,500 per Tissue Processing (as such term is defined in the License Agreement) case processed. The parties to the License Agreement have mutually agreed not to disclose any Confidential Information (as such term is defined in the License Agreement), whether verbal or written, conveyed to them prior to, during or subsequent to the term of the License Agreement. As of September 30, 2014, AREF has yet to perform any Tissue Processing cases and has yet to generate any revenue under the agreement payable to Intellicell.

Table of Contents

Consulting Agreements

On March 11, 2014, the Company executed a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Dr. James Andrews, effective March 7, 2014, pursuant to which Dr. Andrews shall serve as Chairman of the Intellicell Orthopedic Cellular Therapy Advisory Board. The initial term of the Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years unless extended as provided in the Agreement or unless terminated by either party with thirty (30) days advance written notice to the other party. In consideration for Consultant’s services, the Consultant shall be paid a monthly fee and make a monthly charitable contribution to the Andrews Foundation after the Company closes a Capital Raise (as defined in the Consulting Agreement), and the amount of such monthly fee and monthly charitable contribution shall be determined based on the amount raised in the Capital Raise. Based upon the capital raise transaction in March 2014 with YA Global Investments, LP in the amount of $2,100,000, the monthly fee payable to the Consultant thereafter shall be equal to $40,000, which includes a $6,000 payment to Dr. Michael Immel and a charitable contribution of $10,000 payable to the Andrews Foundation. These payments will continue for the term of the Consulting Agreement. These payments have been temporarily suspended due to the fact that the AREF laboratory has not yet commenced operation as contemplated in the original execution of the AREF License agreement.

Furthermore, commencing on March 1, 2014 and ending on May 1, 2017, on each of March 1, June 1, October 1 and January 1 during such period, the Company shall issue and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive non-qualified stock options to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 750,000 divided by the average of the closing bid price per share of such common stock for the ten (10) trading days immediately prior to the date of issuance, subject to certain adjustments as set forth in the Consulting Agreement. The options have a strike price of $0.0058 per share and are exercisable for ten (10) years. A portion (13.33%) of such options will be issued to the Andrews Foundation (and Dr. Immel shall receive 20% of such options). In addition, The Company shall issue to the Consultant 6,666,666 shares of its common stock based on the market price at the date of the execution of the License Agreement (see description above), as well as 2,000,000 shares to Dr. Immel and 7,999,999 shares to the Andrews Foundation. Additionally, 1,000,000 shares shall be issued to the Consultant, 200,000 shares shall be issued to Dr. Immel and 133,333 shares shall be issued to the Andrews Foundation upon FDA approval of the Company’s Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell injection for treatment of osteoarthritis.

18.

Litigation

TCA Default Notice

On July 15, 2013, while the Company was finalizing an amendment and waiver to that certain Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) issued by the Company in favor of TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA”) on June 7, 2012 in the principal amount of $500,000, the Company was advised that Ironridge Global IV, LTD (“Ironridge”), led by Mr. John C. Kirkland, Esq., purportedly purchased the Note from TCA. The Complaint and Motion alleged that Ironridge and TCA each served the Company with a Notice of Foreclosure and Sale, both claiming to be the “Secured Party” of the same assets.

On August 8, 2013, a Summons and Complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed along with a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (the “Motion”) before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “Court”) under the caption Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. v Ironridge Global IV, LTD., and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, Index No. 652800/13. The Motion sought to restrain the sale of the Company’s assets.

Given that Ironridge and TCA asserted that they would sell the secured assets of the Company at auction on August 12, 2013, the Motion sought to temporarily restrain both parties from so doing. On August 12, 2013, Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, issued a written Order granting the relief requested, thereby restraining any sale of assets (the “Temporary Restraining Order”).

On August 26, 2013, despite the Company’s best efforts to amicably resolve the dispute related to the Note, a subsequent hearing on the Motion was held, at which time the Company voluntarily brought with it to Court: (i) a certified check in the amount of $535,833.33 constituting payment of all principal and interest owed under the Note; and (ii) a stock certificate constituting the facility fee shares owed to the Secured Party pursuant to that certain Equity Facility Agreement. Since TCA admitted in prior court filings that it has no remaining interest in the that certain Note and Equity Facility Agreement, both the check and the stock certificate were tendered to Ironridge in open court, and counsel for Ironridge confirmed receipt thereof to the judge directly. The company's attorneys argued in court that with the exception of possible attorney’s fees owed, the Company's obligations under the transaction documents have now been satisfied in full.

Table of Contents

In July 2014, the case was settled by court order and 48,608,787 shares of common stock equal to $98,912 were issued to Iron Ridge Global IV, LTD for final payment.

Additional litigations

On March 17, 2014, Dean E. Miller, as representative shareholder, on behalf of the nominal defendant Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., filed a shareholder’s derivative action against Steven Victor, MD, in his capacity as Chairman - CEO and individually, Anna Rhodes as former Executive Vice President and individually, Leonard L. Mazur as interim Chief Operating Officer and individually, Myron Holubiak as a Director and individually, Michael Hershman, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and individually, Stuart Goldfarb as a former Director and individually, Victor Dermatology & Rejuvenation, P.C., Victor Cosmeceuticals, Inc., Lasersculpt, Inc., and the Doe Entities 1-5, as defendants, and Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., as nominal-defendant. The complaint, which was filed on the aforementioned date with the United States District Court Southern District of New York, alleges that the Company has failed to comply with US Food and Drug Administration and United States Patent and Trade Office regulations. The allegations in the complaint include, but are not limited to, allegations involving fraud, negligence, false reporting, and mismanagement of laboratory facilities. Pursuant to the complaint, the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Furthermore, the complaint as filed lists the following counts: 1. Against the individual defendants for breach of their fiduciary duties in connection with their management of the Company; 2. Against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with disseminating false information; 3. Against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty for failing to design and implement adequate internal controls; 4. Request for injunctive relief; 5. Imposition of constructive trust/accounting; and 6. Appointment of referee injunctive relief. The Company believes that such allegations and claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend such allegations and claims. On July 24, the Company filed a motion to order the plaintiff to give security for defendant’s costs. On August 1, 2014, the Company requested of the judge permission to file for dismissal. Plaintiff did not respond and the judge has granted the Company permission to file the dismissal motion by September 2, 2014. The Company is not currently able to predict the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome, or the amount of any possible loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome. Consequently, no material provision or liability has been recorded for such allegations and claims as of September 30, 2014. However, management is confident in its defenses to such allegations and claims.

At a November 17, 2014 conference, the judge granted Miller’s attorney one week to file a motion to extend the 120 day limitation on service of the summons and complaint.

On March 13, 2014, Steven A. Victor (“Dr. Victor”), Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Intellicell Biosciences Inc., a New York corporation, and Regen Medical P.C., a New York corporation filed a complaint against Jonathan Schwartz (“Schwarz”), Joseph P. Salvani (“Salvani”) and Douglas R. Dollinger (“Dollinger”), in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Schwartz and Salvani, both shareholders of the Company, are represented by Dollinger in his capacity as legal counsel. Pursuant to the complaint, the plaintiffs’ first cause of action alleges that the defendants conspired together and acted in concert, to defame Dr. Victor and the Company in an effort to take control of the Company and to reap large profits by dumping their shares thereafter. Furthermore, the plaintiffs’ second cause of action alleges that Salvani made false statements to a potential investor, resulting in damages amounting to $250,000. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, together with punitive damages and interest in connection with the first cause of action, and compensatory damages in the amount of $250,000, together with punitive damages and interest, in connection with the second cause of action. On or about October 20, 2014, after review of the Company’s case and discussion with counsel, the company has decided to dismiss the case and no longer pursue the matter.

In July 2014, a former Intellicell employee sued the Company, Dr. Steven Victor, Anna Rhodes, Leonard Mazur, and the City of New York, for, among other things, false arrest, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and non-payment of salary. The Company appeared in the action, and filed an Answer with a Cross-Claim, on behalf of the Intellicell and the other defendants, on August 4, 2014. The New York District Attorney has sought permission to move for dismissal. The New York District Attorney has sought permission to move for dismissal, which is still pending.

Table of Contents

19.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated its subsequent events through November 19, 2014, the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Except as disclosed below, there were no additional significant subsequent events requiring disclosure.

On October 20, 2014, the Company executed a letter agreement having an effective date of October 10, 2014 with Dinosaur Securities, LLC, pursuant to which Dinosaur and its subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, and assigns, shall act as the Company’s advisor and placement agent of investment capital through a private placement transaction. Futhermore, pursuant to the Agreement, Dinosaur agreed to introduce the Company to certain entities which may be interested in merging with, being acquired by, or acquiring the Company in exchange for consideration to be paid following a formula specifically described therein.

The Agreement provides that, in exchange for the services provided thereunder, Dinosaur shall be entitled to receive a cash fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of capital raised from Dinosaur Contacts (as such term is defined in the Agreement). In addition, at closing, the Company shall sell to Dinosaur, and Dinosaur shall purchase from the Company, for $0.001 per each share covered by the warrants, warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase then (10%) of the number of shares of common stock obtained and obtainable by Dinosaur Contacts. The Warrants shall be exercisable on a “cashless exercise” basis over a five (5) year term. In the event Dinosaur Contacts exercise warrants included the financing contemplated by the Agreement, Dinosaur shall be entitled to receive a cash fee of five percent (5%) on the amount of capital raised by the Company on each such occasion form the Dinosaur Contacts.

The Agreement further provides that the Company shall sell to Dinosaur, and Dinosaur shall purchase from the Company, for $0.001 each, a number of warrants equal to five (5%) of the fully diluted shares issued and outstanding for a total consideration of $1,000. Each such warrant shall have a term of five (5) years and shall be exercisable for one (1) share at an exercise price of $0.001.

Dinosaur shall have the right of first refusal in the event the Company, within a period of eighteen (18) months following the closing of the private placement, intends effectuate any public offering of the Company’s securities.

The Agreement provides that the Company will indemnify and hold harmless Dinosaur and any Indemnified Party (as such term is defined in the Agreement) against certain liabilities incurred. The Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time upon thirty (30) days prior written notice.

Table of Contents

On October 21, 2014, the Company executed an Advisory and Consulting Agreement having an effective date of October 7, 2014 with Dawson James Securities, Inc., pursuant to which Dawson James shall render consulting advice to the Company relating to capital markets and business advisory services as specifically set forth in the Agreement. Such services shall include, but not be limited to, services as placement agent as well as services related to merger/acquisition matters.

The Agreement provides that, in exchange for the services provided thereunder, the Company shall pay Dawson James a nonrefundable fee paid as preferred stock providing for a future conversion to the number of shares of Company common stock equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the then fully diluted stock of the Company at the time of conversion. The Company’s completion of a minimum of $15 million of new investor financing, or the acquisition of the Company, shall be the conversion trigger for such preferred stock. Furthermore, Dawson James shall be entitled to a Finder’s Closing Fee (as such term is defined in the Agreement) equal to eight percent (8%) of the aggregate purchase price paid in connection with any transaction consummated in whole or part during the term of the Agreement with any investor introduced to the Company by Dawson James. The Agreement further provides that the Company shall issue Dawson James warrants as additional compensation as more specifically provided therein.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agrees to retain, and Dawson James agrees to act, as the Company’s lead underwriter for the Company of registered securities to be issued by the Company, including shares, and if applicable, warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with a “best efforts” or “firm commitment” offering to be made pursuant to an effective registration statement to be filed by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, with said underwriting being completed concurrent with the listing of the Company’s stock on a national exchange.

The Agreement further provides that the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless Dawson James and certain other indemnified parties against certain liabilities incurred. The Agreement may be terminated by the Company only in the event of a material breach by Dawson James of its obligations thereunder, provided such a breach remains uncured for a period of fifteen (15) days after written notice of the breach and opportunity to cure having been provided to Dawson James.

On November 3, 2014, 217,481,338 common shares were issued to Redwood Fund II under Redwood’s conversion features of its outstanding convertible notes payable.

During October 2014, 985,062,669 common shares were issued to Dominion Capital LLC under Dominion’s conversion features of its outstanding debenture.

During October 2014, 746,202,572 common shares were issued to Redwood Fund II under the conversion features of Redwood’s outstanding convertible notes payable.

During October 2014, 88,328,366 common shares were issued to Brother Capital under the conversion features of Brother’s outstanding convertible debenture.

During October 2014, 247,787,611 common shares were issued to YA Global Investments, LP under the conversion features of YA’s outstanding convertible debenture.

During October 2014, 295,905,398 common shares were issued to May Davis Partners Acquistion Co., LLC under the conversion features of May Davis’s outstanding convertible note.

During October 2014, 3,313,000 common shares were issued to Hudson Street, LLC under the conversion feature of Hudson’s convertible debenture. These shares were issued to pay the accrued interest on the debenture as of October 31, 2014. All amounts due under the Hudson Street, LLC debenture are paid in full.

During October 2014, 181,818,181 common shares were issued to Christopher Mattes under the conversion features of Mattes’s convertible debenture assigned from Kozar in July 2014.

During October 2014, 181,818,181 common shares were issued to Patrick Touhy under the conversion features of Touhy’s convertible debenture assigned from Kozar in July 2014.

During October 2014, 181,553,398 common shares were issued to Michael Kesselbrenner under the conversion features of Kesselbrenner’s convertible debenture assigned from Kozar in July 2014.

During October 2014, 181,730,769 common shares were issued to Barry Libon’s under the conversion features of Libon’s outstanding convertible debenture.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statement of Forward Looking Information

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports (collectively, the “Filings”) filed by Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. (“Intellicell” or the “Company”) from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain or may contain forward-looking statements and information that are based upon beliefs of, and information currently available to, the Company’s management as well as estimates and assumptions made by Company’s management. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. When used in the Filings, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors, including the risks contained in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2014, ~~relating~~as amended October 9, 2014, relating to the Company’s industry, the Company’s operations and results of operations, and any businesses that the Company may acquire. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, or planned.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our financial statements would be affected to the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

History

We were incorporated in Nevada under the name AVL Systems International, Inc. on March 8, 1999. On March 9, 2000, we filed an amendment to our articles of incorporation to change our corporate name to I-Track, Inc. On March 21, 2003, we filed Articles of Exchange pursuant to which we acquired Strategic Communication Partners, Inc., and we filed an amendment to our articles of incorporation to change our corporate name to China Wireless Communications, Inc. On May 17, 2010, we filed an amendment to our articles of incorporation to change our corporate name to Media Exchange Group, Inc. On June 3, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., a New York corporation, pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 27, 2011. Thereafter, on June 30, 2011, we completed the sale of all of our rights, title and interests to, and agreements relating to, our digital trading card business and platform as well as all other intangible assets of the business, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement with Consorteum Holdings, Inc. As a result of the transactions with Intellicell and Consorteum, we terminated our digital trading card business and platform and succeeded to the business operations and research efforts of Intellicell in the field of Regenerative medicine. On June 27, 2011, we filed articles of merger to change our corporate name to Intellicell Biosciences, Inc.

Merger with Intellicell Biosciences, Inc.

On April 27, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Intellicell which was amended on June 3, 2011 (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”) merged into Intellicell. The Merger Sub ceased to exist as a corporation and Intellicell continued as the surviving corporate entity. As a result of the merger, Intellicell shareholders acquired the majority of our outstanding common stock and all of our Series B preferred stock. The recapitalized Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. is hereafter referred to as “Intellicell” or the “Company”. As consideration for the Merger, the holders of the an aggregate of 7,975,768 shares of Intellicell’s common stock exchanged their shares of common stock for an aggregate of 15,476,978 shares of the Company’s common stock and Dr. Steven Victor, the principal shareholder of Intellicell, exchanged an aggregate of 10,575,482 shares of Intellicell’s common stock for an aggregate of 20,521 shares of the Company ’s series B preferred stock. Each share of series B preferred stock is convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the holders of the series B preferred stock are entitled to notice of stockholders’ meetings and to vote as a single class with the holders of the Common Stock on any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and are entitled to the number of votes equal the product of (a) the number of shares of Common Stock into which the series B preferred stock is convertible into on the record date of the vote multiplied by (b) ten (10). The closing of the Merger took place on June 3, 2011 (the “Closing Date”).

4344

Table of Contents

In addition to the foregoing, in accordance with the Merger Agreement, all outstanding convertible notes issued by Intellicell (the “Intellicell Notes”) and warrants issued by Intellicell (the “Intellicell Warrants”) entitle the holder to convert or exercise, as the case may be, into and receive the same number of shares of the Company common stock as the holder of Intellicell Notes and Warrants would have been entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger had such holder exercised such Intellicell Notes and Warrants in full immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. Thus, remaining are an aggregate of $0 of Intellicell Notes outstanding and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,071,342 shares of common stock of the Company. We have not repaid any of the principal or accrued but unpaid interest that has become due and payable under the remaining Intellicell Notes. All amounts due under these convertible notes have been assigned and assumed by other qualified investors who have converted the notes into common stock of the company.

As a result of the Merger, Intellicell became our wholly-owned subsidiary, with Intellicell’s former shareholders acquiring a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, as well as all of the shares of our series B preferred stock.

Debt Conversions and Settlements

Prior to the consummation of the Merger, the Company entered into agreements the holders of an aggregate of $1,619,606 of indebtedness to the Company, comprised of accrued compensation in the amount of $1,201,551, promissory notes in the principal amount of $263,707 plus accrued interest of $9,398 less unamortized debt discounts of $83,264 and accrued expenses totaling $228,414 (the “Series C Debt”), which included $,1,201,551 of accrued compensation, $128,047 of notes payable held or made by affiliates of the Company, pursuant to which such persons agreed to settle and compromise such Series C Debt in exchange for the issuance of an aggregate of 12,123 shares of series C preferred stock. Each share of series C preferred stock shall be convertible into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Certain holders of the Company’s series C preferred stock have contractually agreed to restrict their ability to convert the series C preferred stock such that the number of shares of the Company common stock held by each of holder and its affiliates after such conversion shall not exceed 4.99% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

Furthermore, prior to the consummation of the Merger, the Company entered into agreements with the holders of an aggregate of $250,000 of accrued compensation, pursuant to which such persons agreed to forgive all amounts owed to the Company.

Asset Purchase Agreement with Consorteum Holdings, Inc.

On June 6, 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Consorteum Purchase Agreement”) with Consorteum Holdings, Inc. (“Consorteum”) pursuant to which we agreed to sell, transfer and assign to Consorteum, and Consorteum has agreed to purchase from us, all of our rights, title and interests to, and agreements relating to, our digital trading card business and platform as well as all other intangible assets of the business in exchange for Consorteum assuming an aggregate principal amount of $1,864,152 of our indebtedness (the “Assumed Indebtedness”) in accordance with the terms of that certain assignment and assumption agreement executed on June 6, 2011. Such rights include, but are not limited to, our former name, phone number and listing, goodwill and other intangible assets (including its rights to any intellectual property or proprietary technology), as well as our rights under certain licensing agreements.

On June 6, 2011, we and Consorteum entered into an amendment agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) to the Consorteum Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the parties agreed, among other things, that the obligations of the parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement was subject to (i) the approval of the Board of Directors of each of the parties, and (ii) the completion of the assignment of the Assumed Liabilities (including receipt of all the necessary consents of the holders of all outstanding indebtedness of the Buyer).

On June 30, 2011, we and Consorteum agreed to waive the requirement that the conditions precedent set forth in the Consorteum Purchase Agreement be satisfied on or before closing and each party agreed that as of the date of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement, Consorteum shall assume an aggregate of $1,477,052 of principal indebtedness from us plus accrued interest totaling $250,695 in accordance with the terms of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement. The foregoing included notes payable to certain of our former affiliates totaling $450,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consorteum agreed to provide us with a guaranty, whereby Consorteum agreed to unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee to us the prompt and complete payment, as and when due and payable (whether at stated maturity or by required prepayment, acceleration, demand or otherwise), of the Assumed Indebtedness, including any Assumed Indebtedness which we had not received the necessary consent for as of the date of the waiver. As a result of the foregoing, the transactions contemplated by the Consorteum Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2011.

Upon completion of the Consorteum Purchase Agreement, the Company had notes payable totaling $986,600 that were not assumed in the agreement.

During the period ending June 30, 2012, $375,000 of the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes and accrued interest of $152,549 was converted to common stock and warrants as part of the February 2012 private placement.

Furthermore, in the year ended December 31, 2012, another $375,000 of the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes was converted to common stock and warrants.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balance of the Consorteum Notes amounted to $236,600 and $236,600, and accrued interest amounted to $6266,~~648~~128 and $55,688, respectively. These Consorteum Notes are currently in default.

4445

Table of Contents

Corporate Structure

As a result of the foregoing transactions, we currently have a wholly-owned subsidiary, Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., a New York corporation, through which we engage in our principal business. We have also recently formed another wholly-owned subsidiary, ICBS Research, Inc., a New York corporation, for the purpose of engaging in clinical studies at prominent medical centers to obtain FDA approval for major clinical indications. In addition, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., a New York corporation, owns one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding stock of Tech Stem Inc., a New York corporation.

Results of Operations

Three Months and ~~Six~~Nine months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months and ~~Six~~Nine months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

Revenue

Revenue for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 were $3255,~~500~~000 and $65120,000 , as compared to $0 and $0 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2013, respectively. Revenues in 2014 were attributable to fees from 2648 cases processed by Regen Medical in the Company’s New York City Tissue Processing Center which were 100% related party revenue. The rate per case to process the cells was $2,500. We intend to engage in a multi-pronged approach with respect to the utilization and commercialization of our proprietary process that will involve entering into technology licensing agreements and related service agreements with physicians, physician practice groups, hospitals and ambulatory service centers located in the United States. We will also be seeking to enter into technology licensing agreements that cover a particular international territory or country. In addition, we will also be seeking to establish “Centers of Excellence” in conjunction with physicians under an arrangement whereby we are appointed the ~~exclusive~~ exclusive managing agent for the professional corporation in exchange for the grant of a license to the professional corporation to utilize our proprietary process. Depending upon the arrangement involved, we will be collecting some combination of fees from licensing, processing, service, and management, as well as up-front territorial licensing fees.

License fees will generally be payable upon signing of a license agreement and will be recognized as revenue ratably over the appropriate period of time to which the revenue item relates.

Cost of goods sold and Gross Margin

Cost of goods sold were $25,~~926~~341 and $712,~~545~~886 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to $0 and $0 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2013 respectively. These costs were the cost of supplies for cases processed in our tissue processing center in New York.

Gross margins were $2949,~~574~~659 and $57107,~~455~~ 114 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to $0 and $0 for the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2013, respectively. In the future, the cost of goods sold effecting gross margins will include costs for the supplies sold to licensees for the processing of each tissue processing case, and or the cost of equipment sold or provided directly to licensees~~, and the direct sales costs associated with license fees received~~.

Operating expenses

Research and development expenses were $90117,~~500~~137 and $~~270~~387,~~500~~637 for three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30,, 2014 as compared to $~~344~~14,~~725~~587 and $~~501~~516,~~803~~390 for the ~~three~~ three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 , respectively. The principal component of research and development costs consists of services as the attending physician in patient cases, for lab technicians, and for nursing staff employed by Dr. Victor’s medical practice included as part of the ongoing research of our technologies and processes.

The Company has decreased research and development costs in the current year periods. The principal component of research and development costs consists of fees payable to Regen Medical, a medical practice owned by Dr. Steven Victor, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and principal shareholder. The fees are for services as the attending physician in patient cases, for lab technicians, and for nursing staff employed by Dr. Victor’s medical practice included as part of the ongoing research of our technologies and processes. These fees totaled $9083,~~500~~000 and $~~270~~353,500 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to $~~227~~10,~~500~~000 and $~~277~~287,000 for the ~~three~~ three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively. The fees payable to Regen Medical for these cases range from $5,000 to $15,000 per case.

Sales and marketing expenses were $2639,~~380~~377 and $3473,~~530~~907 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to $01,096 and $45,~~828~~924 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses consist of costs associated with the development of our brochure and informational materials, our website, an informational video and travel expenses to attend professional meetings, as well as commissions on sales. The company will look to increase expenditures for Sales and Marketing for the remainder of 2014, as cash flow allows.

4546

~~General~~Table and administrative expenses were $811,613 and $1,792,851 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to $547,473 and $1,263,119 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 respectively. The following are the significant components of ~~the general and administrative costs:~~Contents

General and administrative expenses were $616,494 and $2,409,567 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $907,111 and $2,170,230 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 respectively. The following are the significant components of the general and administrative costs:

Salary Expense

General and administrative is comprised of salary expenses of $~~140~~133,~~335~~706 and $~~336~~470,~~613~~319 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to $~~188~~113,~~618 and~~750 and $~~434~~599,~~698~~068 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively. Included in the salary expense for each of the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $68,750 and $~~137~~206,~~500~~250 paid to a significant shareholder as a result of this individual serving in the capacity of our Chief Executive Officer, as compared to $68,750 and $~~137~~206,~~500~~250 for the three months ~~and~~ ~~six~~and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 In addition, the Company incurred administrative salary expense of $45,000 and $90135,000 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, to the spouse of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and majority shareholder.

Rent and office administrative expenses

Included in general and administrative expenses are $104,~~755~~727 and $~~215~~320,~~350~~076 of rent and related occupancy expenses for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, as compared to $103,800 and $~~207~~311,~~600~~400 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30 2013, respectively. Rent is for the office space and Tissue Processing Lab located at 460 Park Avenue, NY, NY

Professional fees

For the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 the company has incurred $~~245~~163,~~957and~~544 and $~~650~~814,~~466~~010 in legal, accounting, and professional fees primarily ~~related~~ related the FDA compliance, public company costs, and Company litigation, as compared to $~~165~~519,~~233~~788 and $~~397~~916,~~088~~876 for the three ~~months~~ months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense is included in general and administrative costs and amounted to $~~104~~107,~~442~~515 and $~~206~~313,~~405~~920 and $96118,~~901~~978 and $~~181~~300,~~453~~431 for the three months and ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Employee Stock Based Compensation. During the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred employee stock based compensation expenses of of $~~342~~732,135 and $~~684~~1,~~270~~416,405 and $342,135 and $~~702~~1,~~495~~044,630, respectively, for incentive stock options and common stock issued to employees. The incentive stock options were valued using the Black Scholes method.

Non-Employee Stock Based Compensation. During the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, non-employee stock based compensation of $0 and $93,333 and $0 and $300,000 were incurred as non-cash charges, respectively. Non-employee stock based compensation is comprised of the following:

· During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company issued 134,666,665 shares of common stock shares for medical advisory and professional services valued at $184,366 compared to 2,000,000 shares issued, valued at $300,000 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The shares for stock based compensation for the $195,333 were issued in May, 2014. However, $102,000 of the $195,333 value was previously accrued as of December 31, 2013, prior to issuance of the shares in May, 2014.

4647

Table of Contents

Changes in Fair Value of Derivative Liability

The Company has issued various instruments which are accounted for as derivative liabilities and are valued at fair value at the date of issuance and at each balance sheet date. The change in value of these instruments is recorded as a charge (or as income). During the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, the company recorded ana ~~income~~charge of $5350,~~342,086~~562 and during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 the company recorded an an income of $13,~~818~~900,~~141~~270, respectively, relating to the change in value of all its derivative liabilities. During the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the company recorded ana ~~income~~charge of $~~249~~851,~~565~~517 and $~~904~~2,~~563~~712,412, respectively, relating to the ~~change~~ change in value of all its derivative liabilities.

The Company accounted for the conversion features underlying the convertible debentures and issued in accordance with GAAP, as the conversion feature embedded in the convertible debentures could result in the debentures being converted to a variable number of the Company’s common shares. The Company determined the value of the derivate conversion features of these debentures at the relevant commitment dates utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

The Company accounted for the detachable warrants included with the convertible debentures as liabilities in accordance with GAAP, as the warrants are subject to anti-dilution protection and could result in them being converted to a variable number of the Company’s common shares. The Company determined the value of the derivate feature of the warrants at the relevant commitment dates utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Derivative instruments consist of common stock warrants, and certain instruments embedded in certain convertible debentures and promissory notes which meet the criteria for bifurcation from their host contract. These derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheets at fair value as liabilities. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the period of change.

If the Company were required to ~~settle~~ settle its outstanding warrants and convertible debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we would be required to issue 18934,~~222~~021,~~083,127~~ 481 common shares for the settlement of warrants and 312,~~297~~190,~~639~~347,~~134~~336 for the settlement of outstanding convertible debt. The Company determined that the settlement of these outstanding financial instruments would exceed our authorized shares of 3 10,~~500~~000,000,000 at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 by 186,~~019~~842,~~722~~122,~~261~~097. Pursuant to FASB ASC 815-40, the Company would be required to reclassify these contracts from equity to liabilities. As permitted by FASB ASC 815-40, the Company’s policy with regard to settling outstanding financial instruments is to settle those with the earliest inception date first which essentially sets the order of preference for settling the financial instruments. As a result of the Company’s policy settlement it was determined that reclassification of financial instruments initially recorded in equity was not required.

As disclosed in Note 2 of the financial statements, prior to the filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company identified errors in accounting for application of fair value assessment for transactions involving derivative obligations, including derivative valuation at inception, conversion, assignment and period end. The Company also detected errors in the recording of debt discounts. The Company has assessed the impact of the accounting errors on its 3^rd quarter 2013 financial statements, year-end December 31, 2013 financial statements and 1^st quarter 2014 financial statements, and concluded that, although there was no impact on the Company’s cash position, the effect on its financial statements was material.

4748

Table of Contents

Income (Loss) before income tax and Net Loss

~~Income~~Loss before income tax for the ~~three~~ three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $23,~~706~~478,~~055~~024, as compared to a loss before income tax of $34,~~916~~479,~~075~~827 for the three months ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2013. Loss before income tax for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $711,~~534~~012,~~281~~526 as compared to a loss of of $49,~~974~~454,~~535~~362 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The ~~income~~loss for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 includes ~~income~~a loss of $5350,~~342,086~~562 for the non-cash change in fair value of derivative liabilities, as compared to ~~income~~loss of $~~249~~851,~~565~~517 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the loss before income tax includes income of $13,~~818~~900,~~141~~270 for the non-cash change in fair value of derivative liabilities, as compared to ~~income~~a loss of $~~904~~2,~~563~~792,412 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The ~~income~~loss before income tax includes a charge of $1,~~334~~535,~~460~~745 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 for financing Costs, as compared to a charge of $372,~~100~~308,478 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The loss before income tax includes a charge of $1819,~~454~~990,~~450~~196 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 for financing Costs, as compared to a charge of $167,750 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Income before income tax for the three months ended June 30, 2014 includes non-cash income for gain on conversion of Debt to Equity in the amount of $32,929, as compared to a charge of $2,~~845~~476,~~458~~228 for ~~the~~ ~~three months ended June 30, 2013. Loss before income tax for~~ the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014 includes non-cash income for gain on conversion of Debt to Equity in the amount of $432,691, as compared to a charge of $2,845,458 for the six months ended June 30,~~ 2013. Furthermore, income (loss) before income tax for the three months ended and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 included non-cash expense for Employee Stock Compensation of $~~342~~732,135 and $~~684~~1,~~270~~416, 405, respectively. Loss before income tax for the three months ended and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 included non-cash expense for Employee Stock Compensation of $342,135 and $~~702~~1,~~495~~044,630, respectively. As the company is still implementing its business strategy we anticipate that we will continue to have operating losses for the next several calendar quarters until such time as we have been able to establish a sufficient number of licensees generating licensing, processing, service, and management fees to us, as well as up-front territorial licensing fees, sufficient to cover our operating costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had a working capital deficit as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 of $1517,~~319~~375,~~535~~764, compared to a working capital deficit at December 31, 2013 of $15,486,015.

Our cash and cash equivalents as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2014 was $~~321~~48,~~404~~080, compared to cash balances at December 31, 2013 of $0. We are in the early stages of the implementation of our business strategy and anticipate we will require additional cash to fund our operations for the next twelve months inclusive of costs associated with attracting, training and acquiring laboratory equipment for licensees, costs associated with the conducting of clinical research needed to establish and protect the therapeutic benefits of our technologies, costs associated with the development and marketing and promotional and educational materials relative to our services and costs associated with building out the infrastructure necessary to manage and control our business. In the near term, we plan to utilize our existing limited cash balances and proceeds from licensing, processing, service, and management fees to us, as well as up-front territorial licensing fees, and additional debt and equity based financings to maintain our operations.

Based on our current cash and cash equivalents levels and expected cash flow from operations, we believe our current cash position is not sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next twelve months, including operations and capital expenditures. We intend to license our proprietary technology and services or obtain equity and/or debt financing to support our current and proposed operations and capital expenditures. We cannot assure that continued funding will be available. Additional financing may not be available on satisfactory terms when required. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution. We currently have no firm commitments for any additional capital. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in raising the funds required. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

4849

Table of Contents

Net cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $2,~~171~~731,~~039~~463 and $~~525~~440,~~675~~126 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively. Cash was used primarily to to fund our operating losses exclusive of non-cash expenditures such as stock compensation for services financing costs, amortization and changes in the fair value of our derivative liabilities. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, operating activities ~~were~~ were impacted by an decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $~~201~~84,~~459~~276, an increase in accrued interest of $~~325~~494,~~717~~508, ~~and~~ and an increase in related party liability of $73201,~~640~~023. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, operating activities were impacted by an increase in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $~~825~~2,~~682~~122,335, accrued interest of $77148,~~519~~548, and accrued liabilities to related parties of $~~251~~341,~~940~~250.

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $3067,~~557~~064 and $451,~~271~~219 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,~~523~~846,~~000~~606 and $~~519~~481,~~893~~186 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of $0 295,192 and $~~20,000~~ 0 of net proceeds received from the sale of our common stock, and $2,~~617~~649,000 and $~~225~~425,000 of gross proceeds from our ~~convertible~~ convertible note and debenture issuances, respectively. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, $9497,~~000~~586 was paid toward balances in notes payable.

SIGNIFICANT LIQUIDITY EVENTS

The following financing events were transacted in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

Sherb Note Payable

On January 6, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to Sherb & Co. (the “Sherb Note”) in the amount of $115,785 for money owed for accounting services prior to the Reverse Merger of April 2011. The Sherb Note is due December 31, 2014 and has simple interest of 10% per annum. In April 2014, the Company was advised the note was assigned to May Davis Partners.

At June 30, 2014, the principal balance on the Sherb Note was $115,783 and accrued interest was $2,766.

Kaplan Note Payable

On March 5, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to Jeffrey Kaplan (the “Kaplan Note”) in the amount of $30,000 for working capital advance. The Kaplan Note was due on March 10, 2014 and has simple interest of 10% per annum.

~~At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had a total of Notes Payable of $277,100 and $727,545, respectively.~~50

49Table of Contents

YA Global

In March of 2014, external financing was provided by YA Global. We received a gross total of $2.1 million from YA Global through the issuance of a convertible debentures, and common stock warrants. The debentures bear interest at 7.5% per annum and mature on March 11, 2015. We paid cash fees to YA Global from the proceeds of the secured convertible debentures and warrants of $125,000. We also paid $240,000 in cash fees to MD Global. After payment of these fees, the Company received net proceeds of $1,735,000.

At any time, and at its sole option, YA Global can convert a portion or all amounts of principal and interest due and outstanding under the YA Global Debenture into shares of common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock on the OTC Markets or on the exchange which the common stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $2,100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

Through ~~June~~September 30, 2014, YA Global has not converted any portion of the debenture into common stock.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, YA Global had a principal balance of $2,100,000 and accrued interest of $4887,~~125~~500.

Burrington Capital, LLC Convertible Debentures

On January 2, 2014 and on February 5, 2014, Burrington Capital, LLC (“Burrington”) was assigned and assumed a total of $200,000 from holders of the May 2011 offering. In addition, on January 7, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture for $100,000 (combined, the “Burrington Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Burrington has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Burrington Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The Burrington Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

For the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, $73274,~~250~~000 of the principal balance and $13,050 of the Burrington Debentures was converted into 75351,~~437~~503,~~062~~086 shares of ~~common~~ common stock. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Burrington Debentures had a principal balance totaling $~~100~~26,000 and accrued interest of $1416,~~903~~250.

Dominion Capital Debenture

On March 24, 2014, Ironridge Global sold the TCA Note to Dominion Capital under the security settlement agreement executed between the Company and Dominion Capital, and the Company issued a convertible debenture to Dominion Capital in the amount of $746,092 (the “Dominion Debenture”). The $746,092 principal balance included the original TCA Note of $500,000, accrued interest and pre-payment penalties of $246,092.

The Dominion Capital Debenture matures on March 24, 2015 and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to 7.5%. At any time, and at its sole option, Dominion Capital can to convert a portion or all amounts of principal and interest due and outstanding under the Dominion Debenture into shares of common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average of the three lowest prices per share of reported trades (not on the same day) of the common stock on the OTC Markets or on the exchange which the common stock is then listed as quoted by Bloomberg, LP during the 20 trading days preceding the conversion date. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $746,092 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Dominion ~~Debenture~~ Debenture had a principal balance of $746,092, and accrued interest of $1529,~~077~~066.

5051

Table of Contents

Issuance of Convertible Debentures – Vendor Services

In the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued a total of secured convertible debentures in the amount of $1,427,878 to 12 vendors that were owed fees for services rendered through December 31, 2013. Under the terms of the agreements, the debenture holders have the right of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debentures require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bear a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the Common Stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the debentures and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the balance due on on the vendor debentures was principal of $1,~~427~~386,~~878~~283 and accrued interest of $71103,~~400~~742.

Redwood Management, LLC Convertible Debentures

On January 17, 2014 and on January 31, 2014, the Company issued secure convertible debentures to Redwood Management, LLC for $67,000 and $75,000, respectively (combined, the “Redwood Debentures”). Under the terms of the agreement, Redwood Management, LLC has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the Redwood Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 12% simple annual interest rate. The Redwood Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 5% of the lowest traded price (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $75,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtDuring ~~June~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014, ~~the~~$67,000 ~~Redwood~~of ~~Debentures had~~the a principal balance ~~totaling~~and $~~142~~6,~~000~~684 ~~and~~of ~~accrued~~ interest ofon $7the Redwood Management Debentures was converted into 109,~~189~~000,000 shares of common stock.

At September 30, 2014, the Redwood Debentures had a principal balance totaling $75,000 and accrued interest of $3,537.

MD Global Convertible Debentures

On January 9, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to MD Global for $50,000. Under the terms of the agreement, MD Global has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the MD Global Debentures require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The MD Global Debentures are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 180 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $50,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the MD Global ~~Debentures~~ Debentures had a principal balance totaling $50,000 and accrued interest of $23,~~403~~653.

May Davis Partners Convertible Debentures

On March 5, 2014 the Company issued a secure convertible debenture to May Davis Partners for $25,000 (the “May Davis Debenture”). Under the terms of the agreement, May Davis Partners has the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the May Davis Debenture require repayment on the date of the note and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The May Davis Debenture are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 52% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 180 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $25,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the May Davis ~~Debenture~~ Debenture had a principal balance totaling $25,000 and accrued interest of $1,~~163~~787.

On January 1, 2014, the Company issued secured convertible debentures with 12 vendors for $1,427,878 to memorialize outstanding accounts payable. Under the terms of ~~the~~ the agreements, the vendors ~~havethe~~have the rights of first refusal for a period of eighteen months from the issuance of the debenture on on any issuance or sale of capital stock that the Company issues to raise additional capital. The terms of the convertible debenture require repayment on December 31, 2014 and bears a 10% simple annual interest rate. The convertible debenture is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 48.5% of the average 3 lowest trades (not on the same day) of the common stock of the 20 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the debentures and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the vendor debentures had principal balances totaling $1,~~427~~424,~~878~~292 and accrued interest of $71103,~~394~~742.

5152

Table of Contents

Empire Equity Convertible Debentures

During February 2014, $61,756 of the principal balance of the Empire Equity Debentures was converted into 28,966,229 shares of common stock. In June 2014, $38,244 of of principal and $704 of accrued interest of the Empire Equity Debentures was converted into 34,045,455 shares of common stock. At September ~~June~~ 30, 2014, the Empire Equity Debentures had a principal balance totaling $0 and accrued interest of $1,~~329~~330. The conversion feature of the debentures have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $,100,000 debenture and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the debenture.

AtMay ~~June~~Davis ~~30,~~Partners ~~2014~~Acquisition ~~and December 31, 2013, the~~ Company ~~had a total principal balance of convertible debentures of $5~~,~~100,398 and $840,900. All amounts are net of debt discounts~~ ~~recorded~~LLC atPromissory ~~issuance.~~Note

~~During~~On August 7, 2014 (the ~~six~~“Effective Date”), ~~months~~the ~~ended~~Company ~~June~~issued 30a convertible promissory note to May Davis Partners Acquisitions Company, LLC for $12,000 (the ~~2014~~“May Davis Note”). The maturity date of the May Davis Note is June 7, ~~convertible~~2015, ~~debenture~~and ~~holders~~the ~~converted~~Convertible ~~their~~Note ~~debt~~bears ~~into~~interest at ~~common~~a ~~stock~~rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.

	Debt Converted		Common Stock Shares Acquired
Hudson Street	$	210,900		240,949,354
Burrington		200,000		234,135,918
KesselBrenner		25,000		27,203,482
Liben		58,286		63,422,742
Brother		42,286		68,836,230
Touhy		10,000		10,881,392
Dominion Capital		145,465		85,166,666
May Davis Partner		20,000		9,157,509
Empire Equity		100,000		63,011,684
WHC		21,880		31,250,000
LG Capital		87,102		91,523,674
Kazlow		80,000		31,720,856
JMJ		7,200		7,500,000
Redwood		664,690		490,491,369
	$	1,672,809	$	1,455,250,876

The Company may prepay the May Davis Note at any time in whole or in part at the Company’s option without penalty. Any amount of principal or interest on the May Davis Note not paid on or before the due date shall bear interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum until paid in full.

May Davis may convert, beginning on the six month anniversary of the Effective Date, the outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price per share equal to the lesser of (i) $0.05 or (ii) 52% of the average of the lowest trade price in the 180trading days prior to the date of conversion (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price will be subject to adjustment for, among other things, the Company’s failure to be DTC eligible and only being clearing deposit eligible.

The conversion feature of the notes have been bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately as a derivative. The bifurcation of the embedded derivative created a debt discount which reduced the book value of the $12,000 note and increases prospectively the amount of interest expense to be recognized over the life of the note.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, convertible debenture holders converted their debt into common stock.

	Debt Converted		Common Stock Shares Acquired
Hudson Street	$	210,900		240,949,354
Burrington		274,000		351,503,086
KesselBrenner		25,000		27,203,482
Liben		65,000		69,117,822
Brother		42,286		68,836,230
Touhy		10,000		10,881,392
Dominion Capital		145,465		85,166,666
May Davis Partners Acquisition Co.		55,233		59,974,817
Empire Equity		100,000		63,011,684
WHC		21,880		31,250,000
LG Capital		87,102		91,523,674
Kazlow		80,000		31,720,856
JMJ		7,200		7,500,000
Redwood Management, LLC		731,690		599,491,369
	$	1,855,756	$	1,738,130,432

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).

Contractual Obligation and Commitments

The following table is a summary of contractual cash obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of June 30, 2014, and is based on information appearing in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	Less than 1 Year		1-2 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Current Debt Obligations	$	7,572,877		-0-		-0-		-0-
Current Operating Lease Obligations	$	655,809		1,345,034		1,358,958		5,107,696
Total Obligations	$	8,238,432		1,345,034		1,358,958		5,107,696

~~Item 3.~~Table ~~Quantitative~~of ~~and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~Contents

WeContractual doObligation ~~not hold any derivative instruments~~ and ~~do not engage in any hedging activities.~~Commitments

~~Item~~The following table is a summary of 4.contractual ~~Controls~~cash obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of September 30, 2014, and ~~Procedures~~is based on information appearing in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

	Less than 1 Year		1-2 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Current Debt Obligations	$	7,418,345		-0-		-0-		-0-

Current Operating Lease Obligations	$	679,478		1,358,958		2,138,688		2,848,814

Total Obligations	$	8,238,432		1,345,034		1,358,958		5,107,696

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2014.

Management has identified control deficiencies regarding the lack of segregation of duties and the need for a stronger internal control environment. Management of the Company believes that these material weaknesses are due to the small size of the Company’s accounting staff. The small size of the Company’s accounting staff may prevent adequate controls in the future, such as segregation of duties, due to the cost/benefit of such remediation.

To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of external legal and accounting professionals. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework.

These control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analyses and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were fairly stated in accordance with US GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that despite our material weaknesses, our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with US GAAP.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~PART~~Table IIof Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

These control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analyses and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were fairly stated in accordance with US GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that despite our material weaknesses, our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with US GAAP.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm its business. Other than as stated below, the Company is currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that they believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or operating results.

Ironridge Litigation

On August 8, 2013, a Summons and Complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed along with a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (the “Motion”) before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “Court”) under the caption Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. v Ironridge Global IV, LTD., and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, Index No. 652800/13. The Motion sought to restrain the sale of the Company’s assets.

As previously reported, on July 15, 2013, while the Company was finalizing an amendment and waiver to that certain Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) issued by the Company in favor of TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA”) on June 7, 2012 in the principal amount of $500,000, the Company was advised that Ironridge Global IV, LTD (“Ironridge”), led by Mr. John C. Kirkland, Esq., purportedly purchased the Note from TCA. The Complaint and Motion alleged that Ironridge and TCA each served the Company with a Notice of Foreclosure and Sale, both claiming to be the “Secured Party” of the same assets.

Given that Ironridge and TCA asserted that they would sell the secured assets of the Company at auction on August 12, 2013, the Motion sought to temporarily restrain both parties from so doing. On August 12, 2013, the Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, issued a written Order granting the relief requested, thereby restraining any sale of assets (the “Temporary Restraining Order”).

On August 26, 2013, despite the Company’s best efforts to amicably resolve the dispute related to the Note, a subsequent hearing on the Motion was held, at which time the Company voluntarily brought with it to Court: (i) a certified check in the amount of $535,833.33 constituting payment of all principal and interest owed under the Note; and (ii) a stock certificate constituting the facility fee shares owed to the Secured Party pursuant to that certain Equity Facility Agreement. Since TCA admitted in prior court filings that it has no remaining interest in the that certain Note and Equity Facility Agreement, both the check and the stock certificate were tendered to Ironridge in open court, and counsel for Ironridge confirmed receipt thereof to the Justice directly. The company's attorneys argued in court that, with the exception of possible attorney’s fees owed, the Company's obligations under the transaction documents have now been satisfied in full.

In July 2014, the case was settled by court order and 48,608,787 shares of common stock equal to $98,912 were issued to Iron Ridge Global IV, LTD for final payment

Hanover Holdings Litigation

On May 21, 2013, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “Court”), entered an order (the “ Order ”) approving, among other things, the fairness of the terms and conditions of an exchange pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act ”), in accordance with a stipulation of settlement (the “ Settlement Agreement ”) between Intellicell Biosciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “ Company ”), and Hanover Holdings I, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“ Hanover ”), in the matter entitled Hanover Holdings I, LLC v. Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. , Case No. 651709/2013 (the “ Action ”). Hanover commenced the Action against the Company on May 10, 2013 to recover an aggregate of $706,765.38 of past-due accounts payable of the Company, plus fees and costs (the “Claim”). The Order provides for the full and final settlement of the Claim and the Action. The Settlement Agreement became effective and binding upon the Company and Hanover upon execution of the Order by the Court on May 21, 2013. On May 23, 2013, the Company issued and delivered to Hanover 8,500,000 shares (the “Initial Settlement Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Common Stock”).

The Settlement Agreement provides that the Initial Settlement Shares will be subject to adjustment on the trading day immediately following the Calculation Period (as defined below) to reflect the intention of the parties that the total number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to Hanover pursuant to the Settlement Agreement be based upon a specified discount to the trading volume weighted average price (the “VWAP”) of the Common Stock for a specified period of time subsequent to the Court’s entry of the Order. Specifically, the total number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to Hanover pursuant to the Settlement Agreement shall be equal to the sum of: (i) the quotient obtained by dividing (A) $706,765.38 by (B) 55% of the average of the lowest 10 VWAPs of the Common Stock over the 80-consecutive trading day period immediately following the date of issuance of the Initial Settlement Shares (or such shorter trading-day period as may be determined by Hanover in its sole discretion by delivery of written notice to the Company) (the “ Calculation Period ”); (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the total dollar amount of legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Action, which shall not exceed $57,500 (less $5,000 heretofore paid by the Company) by (B) the VWAP of the Common Stock over the Calculation Period; and (iii) the quotient obtained by dividing (A) agent fees of $35,338.27 by (B) the VWAP of the Common Stock over the Calculation Period, rounded up to the nearest whole share (the “VWAP Shares”). As a result, the Company ultimately may be required to issue to Hanover substantially more shares of Common Stock than the number of Initial Settlement Shares issued (subject to the limitations described below). The Settlement Agreement further provides that if, at any time and from time to time during the Calculation Period, Hanover reasonably believes that the total number of Settlement Shares previously issued to Hanover shall be less than the total number of VWAP Shares to be issued to Hanover or its designee in connection with the Settlement Agreement, Hanover may, in its sole discretion, deliver one or more written notices to the Company, at any time and from time to time during the Calculation Period, requesting that a specified number of additional shares of Common Stock promptly be issued and delivered to Hanover or its designee (subject to the limitations described below), and the Company will upon such request reserve and issue the number of additional shares of Common Stock requested to be so issued and delivered in the notice (all of such additional shares of Common Stock, “Additional Settlement Shares”). At the end of the Calculation Period, (i) if the number of VWAP Shares exceeds the number of Initial Settlement Shares and Additional Settlement Shares issued, then the Company will issue to Hanover or its designee additional shares of Common Stock equal to the difference between the number of VWAP Shares and the number of Initial Settlement Shares and Additional Settlement Shares, and (ii) if the number of VWAP Shares is less than the number of Initial Settlement Shares and Additional Settlement Shares issued, then Hanover or its designee will return to the Company for cancellation that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the difference between the number of VWAP Shares and the number of Initial Settlement Shares and Additional Settlement Shares. Hanover may sell the shares of Common Stock issued to it or its designee in connection with the Settlement Agreement at any time without restriction, even during the Calculation Period.

Table of Contents

Between May 23, 2013 and the date of this report, the Company issued and delivered to Hanover an aggregate of 68,766,171. Additional Settlement Shares pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement approved by the Order. As of November 18, 2014, all shares required to be issued pursuant to the settlement agreement have been issued.

Sherb Litigation

In February 2013, the Company was served with notice that on October 13, 2011, Sherb & Co. LLP (“Sherb”) filed a complaint (the “Sherb Complaint”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 11/111685, alleging, among other things, breach of contract, and debt owed against the Company, in connection with accounting and audit services performed from May 12, 2010 through May 31, 2011. Sherb is seeking, among other things, an amount not less than $88,508 plus interest. On January 6, 2014, the Company settled with Sherb by issuing a promissory note in the amount of $115,785 (the “Note”). In April of 2014, the Note was assigned and assumed by an investor in exchange for payment of the outstanding amount to Sherb.

Cragmont Litigation

On August 21, 2012, a complaint for damages was filed by Ethan Einwohner and Cragmont Capital, LLC (collectively, “Cragmont”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 652924/2012, alleging, among other things, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, fraud and breach of contract related to alleged services performed by Cragmont on behalf of the Company. The parties entered into a stipulation whereby Craigmont withdrew and dismissed the claim for fraud. The complaint was amended to add Recurrent Capital LLC as a plaintiff. Cragmont is seeking, among other things, damages of at least $100,400 plus interest, costs and disbursements. On March 31, 2014, the Company settled with Cragmont and Recurrent Capital, LLC for $18,750.

Table of Contents

Miller Litigation

Dollinger Litigation

Cade Litigation

Ex-Employee Litigation

The results of any litigation are inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in the litigation matter stated above or otherwise. We plan to pursue our claims and defenses vigorously and expect that the litigation matters discussed above will be protracted and costly.

Item 1A:. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2014.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~Unless~~On ~~otherwise~~July ~~noted~~9, ~~the issuances noted below are considered exempt~~ ~~from registration by reason of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933~~2014, asan ~~amended~~investor ~~(the~~purchased ~~“Securities Act”)~~8, ~~provided~~333, ~~however,~~334 ~~the issuance of any~~ shares of common stock ~~to Hanover Holdings is pursuant to the terms~~ of ~~a settlement agreement approved by a court order that is exempt from~~ the ~~registration~~Company ~~requirements~~for ~~of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 3(a)(~~$10~~) thereof~~, as000 anat ~~issuance~~$0.0012 ofper ~~securities~~share. inIn ~~exchange for bona fide outstanding claims~~addition, ~~where~~ the ~~terms and conditions of such issuance are~~ ~~approved~~investor bywas aissued ~~court after~~ a ~~hearing~~warrant ~~upon~~for ~~the~~8,333,334 ~~fairness~~shares of ~~such~~common ~~terms~~stock ~~and~~of ~~conditions~~the Company at ~~which~~an ~~all~~exercise ~~persons~~price toof ~~whom~~$0.0024 itper ~~is proposed to issue securities in such exchange shall have the right to appear~~share.

InOn ~~January~~July ~~2013~~14, ~~the~~2014, ~~Company~~an ~~issued~~investor 2purchased 4,~~000~~444,~~000~~ 444 shares of ~~its~~ common stock of the Company for $~~300~~5,000 at $0.001125 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 4,444,444 shares of ~~advisory~~common ~~services~~stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00225 per share.

InOn ~~February~~August ~~2013~~1, ~~the Company entered into securities purchase agreements~~2014, ~~pursuant to~~an ~~which~~investor ~~the~~purchased ~~Company sold 66~~4,~~666 units~~166,667 shares ~~each unit consisting~~ of ~~two~~common ~~(2)~~stock ~~shares~~ of the Company’s ~~common~~for ~~stock~~$5,000 ~~par~~at ~~value~~ $0.~~001~~0012 per share. ~~(133~~In addition,~~333~~ ~~shares~~the ~~issued)~~investor ~~and~~was issued a warrant tofor ~~purchase~~4,166,667 shares ~~a share~~ of common stock ~~(66,666~~of ~~warrants~~the ~~issued)~~Company ~~for~~at ~~aggregate gross~~an ~~proceeds~~exercise price of $~~20,000~~0.0024 per share.

In May 2013, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement approved by the Order, on May 23, 2013, the Company issued and delivered to Hanover Holdings, Inc. 8,500,000 Settlement Shares of the Company’s common stock.58

InTable ~~June 2013, pursuant to the terms~~ of ~~the Settlement Agreement approved by the Order, on May 23, 2013, the Company issued and delivered to Hanover Holdings, Inc. 9,850,000 Settlement Shares of the Company’s common stock.~~Contents

InOn ~~July~~August ~~2013~~20, ~~pursuant~~2014, toan ~~the~~investor purchased ~~terms~~8,333,333 shares of ~~the~~common ~~Settlement~~stock ~~Agreement~~of ~~approved~~the byCompany ~~the Order~~for $5,000 onat ~~May~~$0.0006 ~~23,~~per ~~2013~~share. In addition, the ~~Company~~investor was issued a ~~and~~warrant ~~delivered~~for to8,333,333 ~~Hanover~~shares ~~Holdings,~~of ~~Inc.~~common ~~21,316,171 Settlement~~stock ~~Shares~~ of the Company’s ~~common~~at ~~stock~~an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

In On August ~~2013~~19, ~~pursuant~~2014, toan ~~the~~investor ~~terms~~purchased 2,778,333 shares of ~~the~~common ~~Settlement~~stock ~~Agreement~~of ~~approved~~the byCompany ~~the~~for ~~Order~~$1,667 onat ~~May~~$0.0006 ~~23,~~per ~~2013~~share. In addition, the ~~Company~~investor was issued ~~and delivered~~a towarrant ~~Hanover~~for ~~Holdings~~2,778,333 shares ~~Inc.~~of ~~12,300,000 Settlement~~common ~~Shares~~ stock of the Company’s ~~common~~at ~~stock~~an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

InOn ~~August~~July ~~2013~~10, 2014, an investor purchased 2,222,222 shares of common stock of the Company ~~issued~~for ~~Ironridge~~$2,500 ~~Global~~at ~~IV,~~$0.001125 ~~Ltd~~per share. 4In addition,~~959,613~~ ~~shares~~the investor was issued a warrant for 2,222,222 shares of common stock asof ~~payment~~the ~~for~~Company aat ~~facility~~an ~~fee~~exercise ~~per~~price ~~their~~of ~~litigation~~$0.00225 ~~settlement~~per share.

InOn ~~September~~August ~~2013~~20, ~~pursuant~~2014, toan ~~the~~investor ~~terms~~purchased 18,000,000 shares of ~~the~~common ~~Settlement~~stock ~~Agreement~~of ~~approved by~~ the ~~Order~~Company for $10,800 onat ~~May~~$0.0006 ~~23,~~per ~~2013~~share. In addition, the ~~Company~~investor was issued ~~and~~a ~~delivered~~warrant tofor ~~Hanover Holdings~~18, ~~Inc. 6~~000,~~800,~~000 ~~Settlement~~ shares ~~Shares~~ of common stock of the Company’s ~~common~~at ~~stock~~an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

InOn ~~October~~August ~~2013~~27, ~~pursuant~~2014, toan ~~the~~investor ~~terms~~purchased 8,333,333 shares of ~~the~~common ~~Settlement~~stock ~~Agreement~~of ~~approved by~~ the ~~Order~~Company for $5,000 onat ~~May~~$0.0006 ~~23,~~per ~~2013~~share. In addition, the ~~Company~~investor was issued ~~and~~a ~~delivered~~warrant tofor ~~Hanover Holdings~~8,333,333 shares ~~Inc.~~of ~~10,000,000 Settlement~~common ~~Shares~~ stock of the Company’s ~~common~~at ~~stock~~an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

~~Item~~On 3August 22, 2014, an investor purchased 16,666,666 shares of common stock of the Company for $10,000 at $0.0006 ~~Defaults~~per ~~Upon~~share. ~~Senior~~In ~~Securities~~addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 16,666,666 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

~~There has~~On ~~been~~August no19, ~~default~~2014, inan ~~payment~~investor ofpurchased ~~principal~~83, ~~interest~~333,333 shares ~~sinking~~of orcommon ~~purchase~~stock ~~fund~~of ~~installment~~the Company for $50,000 orat ~~any~~$0.0006 ~~other~~per ~~material~~share. ~~default~~In addition, ~~with~~the investor was issued a warrant for 83,333,333 ~~respect~~shares toof ~~any~~common ~~indebtedness~~stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 25, 2014, an investor purchased 33,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $20,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 33,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 6, 2014, an investor purchased 3,048,780 shares of common stock of the Company for $2,500 at $0.00082 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 3,048,780 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00164 per share.

On July 30, 2014, an investor purchased 9,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company for $10,125 at $0.001125 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 9,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00225 per share.

On July 10, 2014, an investor purchased 4,444,444 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.001125 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 4,444,444 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00225 per share.

On August 5, 2014, an investor purchased 6,097,561 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.00082 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 6,097,561 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00164 per share.

On August 28, 2014, an investor purchased 16,666,667 shares of common stock of the Company for $10,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 16,666,667 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 29, 2014, an investor purchased 50,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company for $30,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 50,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 19, 2014, an investor purchased 46,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company for $27,600 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 46,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 12, 2014, an investor purchased 7,142,857 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.0007 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 7,142,857 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0014 per share.

On August 8, 2014, an investor purchased 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 27, 2014, an investor purchased 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On August 19, 2014, an investor purchased 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

Table of Contents

On August 4, 2014, an investor purchased 3,174,603 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.001575 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 3,174,603 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.00315 per share.

On September 11, 2014, an investor purchased 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $5,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 8,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

On September 3, 2014, an investor purchased 83,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for $50,000 at $0.0006 per share. In addition, the investor was issued a warrant for 83,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.0012 per share.

These securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). Such issuance of securities was exempt from registration under the safe harbor provided by Regulation D Rule 506 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. We made this determination in part based on the representations of investors, which included, in pertinent part, that such investors were sophisticated as defined in Rule 506(b)(2)(ii) of Regulation D, and upon such further representations from the investors that (a) the Investor is acquiring the securities for his, her or its own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act, (b) the Investor agrees not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased securities unless they are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such registration are available, (c) the Investor either alone or together with its representatives has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that he, she or it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in us, and (d) the Investor has no need for the liquidity in its investment in us and could afford the complete loss of such investment. Our determination is made based further upon our action of (a) making written disclosure to each Investor in the Subscription Agreement prior to the closing of sale that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and therefore cannot be resold unless they are registered or unless an exemption from registration is available, (b) making written descriptions of the securities being offered, the use of the proceeds from the offering and any material changes in the Company’s affairs that are not disclosed in the documents furnished, and (c) placement of a legend on the certificate that evidences the securities stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and setting forth the restrictions on transferability and sale of the securities, and upon such inaction of the Company of any general solicitation or advertising for securities herein issued in reliance upon Regulation D Rule 506 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There has been no default in payment of principal, interest, sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default, with respect to any indebtedness of the Company.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

There is no other information required to be disclosed under this item which was not previously disclosed.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of 2002*

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of 2002*

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

———————

* File herewith

** Furnished herewith

5860

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	INTELLICELL BIOSCIENCES, INC.
Date: October 9, 2014	By:	/s/ Steven A. Victor
Date: November 19, 2014	By:	/s/ Steven A. Victor
		Name: Steven A. Victor
		Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

5961

Filing Compare · Intellicell Biosciences, Inc.