UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ~~EXCHANGEACT~~EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ~~ACTOF~~ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION FROM _______ TO ________.

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-27159

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		26-1650042
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

Daqing Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone, Daqing, Heilongjiang, People’s Republic of China, 163316

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone Number: 86-10-~~61779332~~51905986

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~November~~May 1620, ~~2012~~2013, there were 18,499,736 outstanding shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $0.0000001 par value.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I
Item 1.	Financial Statements	F-1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	3
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	107
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	107
	PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	118
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	11
Item 1A	Risk Factors	8
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	118
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	118
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	118
Item 5.	Other Information	118
Item 6.	Exhibits	118
SIGNATURES		129

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONTENTS		PAGES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		F2F-31- F-2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME		F4F-54
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		F6F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		F7F-86- F-7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F9F-348 F-29

F-1

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS AT ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars)

	Notes	~~Notes~~		March 31,2013		~~September 30,2012 (Unaudited)~~		December 31,2012		~~December 31, 2011 (Audited)~~
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	2	(k)	2	~~(k)~~$	141,268	$	~~401,934~~	$	352,457	$	~~1,550,911~~
Trade receivables, net	5		5		8,793,586		~~7,922,194~~		8,595,793		~~6,883,677~~
Notes receivables							-		-		~~283,362~~
Inventories	8		8		4,490,489		~~4,406,577~~		3,336,188		~~2,764,560~~
Advances to suppliers					1, 485,143		~~1,670,653~~		1,495,841		~~837,170~~
Prepayments					550,114		~~506,410~~		435,173		~~852,017~~
Tender deposits					459,113		~~469,930~~		460,471		~~176,860~~
Travel advances to shareholders	6		6		577		~~42,303~~		41,837		~~10,639~~
Advances to employees	7		7		751,331		~~643,602~~		500,387		~~455,666~~
Deferred tax assets					1,345,913		~~1,154,981~~		1,345,913		~~600,835~~
Total current assets				$	18,017,534	$	~~17,218,584~~	$	16,564,060	$	~~14,415,697~~
Restricted cash	2	(l)	2	~~(l)~~	1,094		~~1,094~~		1,094		~~1,094~~
Amount due from a related company	4		4		128,338		~~127,282~~		127,792		~~126,769~~
Property, plant and equipment, net	9		9		5,028,499		~~5,566,401~~		5,279,698		~~6,855,505~~
Intangibles, net	10		10		12,298,153		~~13,204,903~~		12,755,576		~~14,644,804~~
Deposit for technology-based designed					3,444,956		~~3,416,423~~		3,430,195		~~3,402,547~~
TOTAL ASSETS				$	38,918,574	$	~~39,534,687~~	$	38,158,415	$	~~39,446,416~~
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short term bank loans	11		11	$	701,296	$	~~663,874~~	$	698,291	$	-
Accounts payable					2,168,178		~~1,100,774~~		1,211,450		~~621,997~~
Income tax payable					3,692		~~5,925~~		8,135		~~4,307~~
Turnover and other taxes					32,434		~~23,818~~		143,703		~~77,512~~
Expected warranty liabilities	12		12		21,813		~~21,081~~		21,720		~~20,995~~
Customer deposits					2,784,776		~~3,192,157~~		2,563,499		~~1,748,881~~
Accrued liabilities					1,654,368		~~1,066,345~~		1,061,298		~~627,211~~
Total current liabilities				$	7,366,557	$	~~6,073,974~~	$	5,708,096	$	~~3,100,903~~
Warrants liabilities	13		13		-		-		-		~~1,165,692~~
TOTAL LIABILITIES				$	7,366,557	$	~~6,073,974~~	$	5,708,096	$	~~4,266,595~~

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-2

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)

AS AT ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars)

	Notes	~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012 (Unaudited)~~2013		December 31, ~~2011 (Audited)~~2012
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock $0.0000001 par value; 400,000 shares authorized; 160,494 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	13	$	1	$	1
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock $0.0000001 par value; 400,000 shares authorized; 160,494 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012	13	$	1	$	1
Common stock at $0.0000001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,499,736 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011			2		2
Common stock at $0.0000001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,499,736 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012			2		2
Additional paid-in capital			13,833,383		13,833,383
Statutory reserves			4,~~267~~279,~~115~~756		4,~~267~~279,~~115~~756
Retained earnings			85,~~330~~906,~~977~~675		107,~~331~~220,~~224~~138
Accumulated other comprehensive income			7,~~029~~532,~~235~~200		67,~~748~~117,~~096~~039
		$	3331,~~460~~552,~~713~~017	$	3532,~~179~~450,~~821~~319
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	3938,~~534~~918,~~687~~574	$	3938,~~446~~158,~~416~~415

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

	Notes		The ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,
			2012			2011
			2013			2012
Net revenues		17	$	52,~~898~~017,~~300~~554		$	52,~~774~~010,~~391~~575
Cost of net revenues		17		(21,~~596~~ 206,~~144)~~223	)		(2949,~~103,228)~~675	)
Gross profit			$	3811,~~302,156~~331		$	31,~~671~~060,~~163~~900
Selling expenses				(2765,~~251,579)~~371	)		(1542,~~135,426)~~548	)
General and administrative expenses				(41,~~744~~347,~~885)~~743	)		(41,~~784~~732,~~578)~~917	)
(Loss)/Income from operations			$	(3,694,308)		$	(2,248,841)
(Loss) / Income from operations			$	(1, 301,783	)	$	(1,214,565	)
Interest income				~~2,741~~892			291,~~185~~524
Interest expenses				(512,~~801)~~572	)		~~(329,002)~~-
Compensation for product quality and overdue delivery				-			(6,048,513)
Changes in fair value of warrants				-			967,868
Changes in fair value of warrants				1,165,692			7,229,509
(Loss)/Income before tax			$	(1,313,463	)	$	(245,173	)
(Loss)/Income before income tax			$	(2,531,676)		$	(1,367,662)
Income tax		14		-			36,675
Income tax expense		14		531,429			312,752
Net (Loss)/income			$	(1,313,463	)	$	(208,498	)
Net (loss)/income			$	(2,000,247)		$	(1,054,910)
Net income per share:
Net income/(loss) per share:
-Basic		15	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.01	)
-Basic		15	$	(0.11)		$	(0.06)
-Diluted		15	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
-Diluted		15	$	(0.09)		$	(0.05)
Weighted average number of common stock
-Basic		15		18,499,736			18,499,736
-Diluted		15		23,314,556			23,314,556

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

	Notes		The three months ended September 30,
			2012		2011
Net revenues		17	$	1,666,269	$	2,370,644
Cost of net revenues		17		(528,553)		(873,061)
Gross profit			$	1,137,716	$	1,497,583
Selling expenses				(891,794)		(576,971)
General and administrative expenses				(1,468,400)		(1,651,826)
(Loss)/Income from operations			$	(1,222,478)	$	(731,214)
Interest income				525		9,216
Interest expenses				(5,794)		-
Compensation for product quality				-		(6,127,737)
Changes in fair value of warrants				-		4,163,755
(Loss)/Income before income tax			$	(1,227,747)	$	(2,685,980)
Income tax expense		14		359,302		109,454
Net (loss)/income			$	(868,445)	$	(2,576,526)
Net income/(loss) per share:
-Basic		15	$	(0.05)	$	(0.14)
-Diluted		15	$	(0.04)	$	(0.11)
Weighted average number of common stock
-Basic		15		18,499,736		18,499,736
-Diluted		15		23,314,556		23,314,556

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AS AT ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars)

									Additional				Retained		Accumulated
	Preferred		Preferred		No. of				paid				earnings/		other
	Series		Series		shares		Common		in		Statutory		(Accumulated		comprehensive
	A		B		outstanding		stock		capital		reserves		deficit)		income		Total
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,267,115	$	8,542,065	$	4,907,103	$	31,549,669
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,789,159		-		1,789,159
Appropriations to statutory
Reserves		-		-		-		-		-						-		-
Foreign currency translation																1,840,993		1,840,993
Adjustment		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,267,115	$	10,331,224	$	6,748,096	$	35,179,821
Balance, January 1, 2012	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,267,115	$	10,331,224	$	6,748,096	$	35,179,821
Net income/(loss)		-		-		-		-		-		-		(23,~~000~~098,~~247~~445)		-		(23,~~000~~098,~~247~~445	)
Appropriations to statutory
Reserves		-		-		-		-		-		12,641		(12,641)		-		-
Foreign currency translation
Adjustment		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		~~281~~368,~~138~~943		~~281~~368,~~138~~943
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,267,115	$	8,330,977	$	7,029,235	$	33,460,713
Balance, December 31,2012	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,279,756	$	7,220,138	$	7,117,039	$	32,450,319
Balance, January 1, 2013	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,279,756	$	7,220,138	$	7,117,039	$	32,450,319
Net income/(loss)		-		-		-		-		-		-		(1,313,463)		-		(1,313,463	)
Appropriations to statutory
Reserves		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Foreign currency translation
Adjustment		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		415,161		415,161
Balance, March 31, 2013	$	-	$	1		18,499,736	$	2	$	13,833,383	$	4,279,756	$	5,906,675	$	7,532,200	$	31,552,017

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-65

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

	The nine months ended September 30,
	The three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss)/income	$	(2,000,247)		$	(1,054,910	)
Net (loss) / income	$	(1,313,463	)	$	(208,498	)
Depreciation		1280,~~414,494~~686			1526,~~443,346~~112
Amortization		1511,~~482,698~~721			1493,~~774,337~~266
Changes in fair value of warrants		~~(1,165,692)~~-			(7967,~~229,509)~~868	)
Impairment of fixed assets		-			329,002
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) / income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Trade receivables, net		(1160,~~011,804)~~615	)		2(574,~~648,285~~035	)
Inventories		(1,547,506)			(1,062,499	)
Note receivables		-			206,428
Note receivables		284,900			-
Inventories		(844,643	)		(650,643	)
Advances to suppliers		~~(831~~17,~~185)~~116			(~~205~~895,~~105)~~321	)
Prepayments		~~349~~(112,~~551~~936	)		~~(393~~235,~~541~~225	)
Tender deposits		~~(292~~3,~~742)~~336			97(40,~~379~~298	)
Travel advances to shareholders		~~(31~~41,~~663)~~392			2(31,~~673~~766	)
Advances to employees		(~~186~~248,~~328)~~501	)		(~~340~~17,~~794)~~682	)
Deferred tax assets		~~(554,146)~~-			~~337~~(36,~~947~~776	)
Receivables from relationship		(126,452)			-
Amounts due from related companies		-			(24,753	)
Accounts payable		~~476~~950,~~881~~409			65477,~~094~~350
Income tax payable		1(4,~~603~~472	)		(~~383,655)~~564	)
Turnover and other taxes		(54111,~~083)~~757	)		(~~279~~48,~~020)~~431	)
Customer deposits		1210,~~438,076~~001			1313,~~552,059~~628
Accrued liabilities		~~437~~587,~~163~~818			49189,~~878~~990
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities	$	(1,916,482)		$	(2,649,033)
Net cash (used in) / provided by operating activities	$	(193,908	)	$	(1,054,636	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Decrease in restricted cash	$	-		$	~~65,997~~
Purchase of plant and equipment		(~~111~~7,~~775)~~086	)		(~~242~~19,~~382~~419	)
Purchase of intangibles		-			(1,990,086	)
Net cash provided by / (used in)investing activities	$	(7,086	)	$	(19,419	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(111,775)		$	(2,166,471	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Bank borrowings	$	664,767		$	-
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	664,767		$	-

~~See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements~~F-6

F-7

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

FOR THE ~~NINEMONTHS~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

	The nine months ended September 30,
	The three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	2013		2012
Net in cash and cash equivalents (used)/sourced	$	(1200,~~363,490~~994)	$	(41,~~815~~074,~~504~~055)
Effect of foreign currency translation on
cash and cash equivalents		~~214~~(10,~~513~~195)		~~(119~~70,~~188)~~441
Cash and cash equivalents–beginning period		1352,~~550,911~~457		91,~~587~~550,~~765~~911
Cash and cash equivalents–end period	$	~~401~~141,~~934~~268	$	4547,~~653,073~~297

	The nine months ended September 30,
	The three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	2013		2012
Supplementary cash flow information:
Tax paid	$	214,~~114~~472	$	~~408,901~~101
Interest received		~~2,741~~892		291,~~185~~524
Interest paid		512,~~801~~572		-

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH DISCLOSURES:

1. During the ninemonths ended September 30, 2012and 2011, an amount of nil and $1,342,184 were transferred from “Deposit for technology-based designed” to “property, plant and equipment”, respectively.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-87

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

1.	ORGANIZATION AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on October 18, 1971. Prior to June 6, 2007 the company has only nominal operations and assets.

On June 6, 2007, the Company executed a reverse-merger with Rise Elite International Limited (“Rise Elite (BVI)”) by an exchange of shares whereby the Company issued 210,886 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0000001 per share in exchange for all shares in World Through Limited, a British Virgin Islands corporation (“World Through (BVI)”).

World Through (BVI) holds Sunway World Through Technology (Daqing) Co Ltd (“SWT” or “WFOE”), which entered into a series of agreements with Daqing Sunway Technology Co., Ltd (“Sunway”) including but not limited to management, loan, purchase option, consignment, trademark licensing, non-competition, etc. As a result of entering the abovementioned agreements, WFOE deems to control Sunway as a Variable Interest Entity as required by Accounting Standards Codification ASC 810-10-05 to 10-65 which codified FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) Consolidated of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 since SWT was the primary beneficiary. On March 16, 2008, SWT acquired Beijing Sunway New-force Medical Treatment Tech Co., Ltd (“Beijing Sunway”) as its wholly-owned subsidiary. Beijing Sunway was incorporated in Beijing, PRC on May 24, 2007.

On January 16, 2009, World Through (BVI) acquired Qingdao ~~Liheng~~Sunway ~~Textiles~~New-force mechatronics Co., Ltd (“~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway”) as its wholly-owned subsidiary. ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway was incorporated in PRC on June 6, 2003.

The Company, through its subsidiaries and Sunway, (hereinafter, collectively referred to as “the Group”), is now in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling logistic transport systems and medicine dispensing systems and equipment.

2.	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a)	Method of accounting

The Company maintains its general ledger and journals with the accrual method accounting for financial reporting purposes. The financial statements and notes are representations of management. Accounting policies adopted by the Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the presentation of financial statements.

F-98

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(b)	Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements, which include the Company and its subsidiaries, are compiled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements include 100% of assets, liabilities, and net income or loss of those wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The Company owned five subsidiaries since its reverse-merger on June 6, 2007. The detailed identities of the consolidating subsidiaries would have been as follows:

Name of subsidiaries	Place of incorporation	Attributable interest
World Through Ltd	British Virgin Islands		100	%
Sunway World Through Technology (Daqing) Co Ltd	PRC		100	%
Sunway World Through Technology (Daqing) Co., Ltd	PRC		100	%
*Daqing Sunway Technology Co Ltd	PRC		100	%
*(1)Daqing Sunway Technology Co., Ltd	PRC		100	%
Beijing Sunway New-force Medical Treatment Tech Co., Ltd	PRC		100	%
Qingdao Liheng Textiles Co Ltd	PRC		100	%
* Qingdao Sunway New-force mechatronics Co., Ltd	PRC		100	%
*Note: Deemed variable interest entity
*Note: Deemed variable interest entity..

(c)	Use of estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made; however actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

(d)	Economic and political risks

The Group’s operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environment in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC economy.

The Group’s operations in the PRC are subject to special considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Group’s results may be adversely affected by changes in the political and social conditions in the PRC, and by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion, remittances abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.

F-109

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(e)	Intangibles

Intangibles are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided over the respective useful lives, using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives of the intangibles are as follows:

Land use rights	Over the lease terms
Technology-based design	10 years

(f)	Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided over their estimated useful lives, using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment are as follows:

Buildings	20 years
Machinery and equipment	6 years
Moldings	10 years
Computer software	3 - 10 years
Office equipment and motor vehicles	6 - 10 years

The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise retired are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the statement of income.

(g)	Maintenance and repairs

The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to income as incurred, whereas significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.

(h)	Accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets

The Group periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, including intangible assets subject to amortization, when events and circumstances warrant such a review, pursuant to the guidelines established in FASB ASC 360. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost to dispose.

F-1110

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(i)	Inventories

Inventories consist of finished goods and raw materials, and stated at the lower of cost or market value. Substantially all inventory costs are determined using the weighted average basis. Finished goods are comprised of direct materials, direct labor and an appropriate proportion of overhead. The management regularly evaluates the composition of its inventory to identify slow-moving and obsolete inventories to determine if additional write-downs are required.

(j)	Trade receivables

Trade receivables are recognized and carried at the original invoice amount less allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant one-time events and historical experience. Bad debts are written off as incurred. There were bad debts of ~~nil~~$340,127 and $~~294~~41,~~869~~332 for ~~theninemonthsendedSeptember~~the ~~30,~~three ~~2012~~months ~~and~~ended ~~the~~March ~~years~~31,2013 ~~ended~~and ~~December~~2012 ~~2011~~ respectively.

Outstanding accounts balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The Company dodoes not charge any interest income on trade receivables. Accounts balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. To date, the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection.

(k)	Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains bank accounts in the PRC and Hong Kong. The Company does not maintain any bank accounts in the United States of America.

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Bank of Communications, Branch of Daqing
City Economic Zone		2517,~~072~~389	$	~~198~~176,~~988~~739
China Construction Bank, Beijing Branch		~~241~~86,~~050~~201		1106,~~209,771~~987
Qingdao bank		1,~~692~~160		~~1,461~~650
Agricultural Bank of China		4116,~~771~~947		~~122~~50,~~803~~162
HSBC		961		1,186
Bank of China, Qingdao Branch		433		1,337
Cash on hand		91,388		16,702
China Construction Bank, Beijing Shengmingyuan Branch		419		2,859
		401,934	$	1,550,911
HSBC		875		875
Cash on hand		17,844		12,848
		141,268	$	352,457

(l)	Restricted cash

Restricted cash are pledged deposits in an escrow account for investor relations purpose.

(m)	Revenue recognition

Revenue represents the invoiced value of goods sold recognized upon the delivery of goods to customers. Revenues from services recognizes when the agreed services have been performed, provided, completed or virtual completed at an agreed period(s) of time, and are measurable.

Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met:

- Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

- Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;

- The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and

- Collection is reasonably assured.

F-1211

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(m)	Revenue recognition (Continued)

Contract revenues are recognized when the manufacturing and installation of the medical equipment is completed. Generally, the company receives total contract sum from clients in 4 installments. Deposit of 30% is received from client when the contract is signed. Second payment of 30% is received when the project commenced. Third payment of 30% is received after the construction is completed within 4 months. The final sum of the remaining portion is received after the construction is completed until one year.

(n)	Expected warranty liabilities

The Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials, and workmanship generally for one year. A provision for estimated future costs relating to warranty expense are recorded when products are shipped, and the provision is based upon our own historical claim experience.

(o)	Cost of sales

Cost of sales consists primarily of material costs, employee compensation, depreciation and related expenses, which are directly attributable to the production of products. All inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs, and the other costs of distribution network are also included. Write-down of inventory to lower of cost or market is also recorded in cost of revenues.

(p)

Leases

The Group did not have lease which met the criteria of capital lease. Leases ~~which~~that do not qualify as capital lease are classified as operating lease. Operating lease rental payment included in general and administrative expenses and selling expenses were $7048,~~723~~827 and $6831,~~480~~487 and cost of sales were ~~39,516~~nil and ~~$21,980~~nil for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

(q)	Advertising

The Group expensed all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses included in selling expenses were 35$3,~~982~~216 and $1415,~~856~~257 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

(r)	Shipping and handling

All shipping and handling are expensed as incurred. Shipping and handling expenses included in selling expenses and cost of sales were $5711,~~707~~263 and $~~107~~9,~~084~~ 005 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

(s)	Research and development

All research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The research and development costs included in general and administrative expenses were $~~141~~34,~~699~~338 and $3370,~~181~~941 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

F-1312

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(t)	Retirement benefits

Retirement benefits in the form of contributions under defined contribution retirement plans to the relevant authorities are charged to the statements of income as incurred. The retirement benefit expenses included in general and administrative expenses were $~~130~~65,~~207~~902 and $~~164~~35,~~516~~369 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

(u)	Income taxes

The Group accounts for income tax using an asset and liability approach and allows for recognition of deferred tax benefits in future years. Under the asset and liability approach, deferred taxes are provided for the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Group is able to realize their benefits, or that future realization is uncertain.

(v)	Foreign currency translation

The accompanying financial statements are presented in United States dollars. The reporting currency of the Group is the U.S. dollar ($). SWT, Sunway, Beijing Sunway and ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway use its local currency, Renminbi (RMB), as its functional currency. Results of operations and cash flow are translated at average exchange rates during the period, and assets and liabilities are translated at the end of period exchange rates. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred.

The PRC government imposes significant exchange restrictions on fund transfers out of the PRC that are not related to business operations. These restrictions have not had a material impact on the Group because it has not engaged in any significant transactions that are subject to the restrictions.

The exchange rates used to translate amounts in RMB into USD for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011		September 30, 2011
	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		March 31, 2012
Twelve months ended
RMB:USD exchange rate		-		6.3523		-
RMB : USD exchange rate		-		6.3011		-
Average ninemonths ended
Three months ended
RMB: USD exchange rate		6.3180		-		6.4972
RMB : USD exchange rate		6.2741		-		6.3122
Average three months ended
RMB: USD exchange rate		6.3257				6.4132
RMB : USD exchange rate		6.2814		-		6.2976

The RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currency and all foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions. No representation is made that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into USD at the rates used in translation.

F-1413

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(w)	Statutory reserves

As stipulated by the PRC’s Company Law and as provided in the SWT, Sunway, Beijing Sunway and ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway’s Articles of Association, SWT, Sunway, Beijing Sunway and ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway’s net income after taxation can only be distributed as dividends after appropriation has been made for the following:

(i)

Making up cumulative prior years’ losses, if any;

(ii)

Allocations to the “Statutory surplus reserve” of at least 10% of income after tax, as determined under PRC accounting rules and regulations, until the fund amounts to 50% of the Company's registered capital, which is restricted for set off against losses, expansion of production and operation or increase in registered capital;

(iii)

Allocations of 5-10% of income after tax, as determined under PRC accounting rules and regulations, to the Company's “Statutory common welfare fund”, which is restricted for capital expenditure for the collective benefits of the Company's employees; and

(iv)

Allocations to the discretionary surplus reserve, if approved in the shareholders’ general meeting.

(x)	Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, all items ~~that~~ are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income are required to be reported in a financial statement that is presented with the same prominence as other financial statements. The Group’s current component of other comprehensive income is the foreign currency translation adjustment.

(y)	Warrant Liability

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815") (previously ElTF 07-5, "Determining Whether an instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock"). As a result of adopting ASC 815, the outstanding warrants of the Company previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment as there was a down-round protection (full-ratchet down round protection). As a result, the warrants are not considered indexed to the Company's own stock, and as such, all future changes in the fair value of these warrants will be recognized currently in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or expire.

As such, effective January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants from equity to liability, as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their issuance in June 2007. On January 1, 2009 the Company recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment by decreasing additional paid-in capital amounting to $3,990,942 and decreasing beginning retained earnings by the amount of $65,910,931 and recording $69,901,873 as a warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on January 1, 2009. The fair value of the warrants was nil and $1,165,692 on ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 respectively. The Company recognized ~~$1,165,692~~nil ~~as income~~ and $2967,~~329,880~~868 as ~~loss~~income from the change in fair value of warrants for ~~thenine~~the three months ~~endedSeptember~~ended 30March 31,2013 ~~2012and~~and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

F-1514

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(z)	Recent accounting pronouncements

In ~~January~~July ~~2011~~2012, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) ~~2011~~No. 2012-0102, ~~“Receivables~~Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic ~~310~~350): ~~Deferral~~Testing ofIndefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This ASU states that an entity has the ~~Effective~~option ~~Date~~first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of ~~Disclosures~~events ~~about~~and ~~Troubled~~circumstances ~~Debt~~indicates ~~Restructurings~~that init ~~Update~~is ~~No.~~more ~~2010-20”,~~likely ~~which~~than ~~temporarily~~not ~~delay~~that the ~~effective~~indefinite-lived ~~date~~intangible ofasset ~~the~~is ~~disclosures~~impaired. ~~about~~If, ~~troubled~~after ~~debt~~assessing ~~restructurings~~the intotality ~~ASU~~of ~~No.~~events ~~2010-20~~and circumstances, ~~Receivables~~an ~~(Topic~~entity ~~310):~~concludes ~~Disclosures~~that ~~about~~it ~~the~~is ~~Credit~~not ~~Quality~~more oflikely ~~Financing~~than ~~Receivables~~not ~~and~~that the ~~Allowance~~indefinite-lived ~~for~~intangible ~~Credit~~asset ~~Losses~~is impaired, ~~for~~then ~~public~~the ~~entities~~entity is not required to take further action. ~~The~~However, ~~delay~~if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is ~~intended~~required to ~~allow~~determine the ~~FASB~~fair ~~time~~value toof ~~complete~~the ~~its~~indefinite-lived ~~deliberations~~intangible onasset ~~what~~and ~~constitutes~~perform athe ~~troubled~~quantitative ~~debt~~impairment ~~restructuring.~~test ~~The~~by ~~effective~~comparing ~~date~~the offair value with the ~~new~~carrying ~~disclosures~~amount ~~about~~in ~~troubled~~accordance ~~debt~~with ~~restructurings~~Codification ~~for~~Subtopic ~~public~~350-30, ~~entities~~Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for ~~determining~~any ~~what~~indefinite-lived ~~constitutes~~intangible aasset ~~troubled~~in ~~debt~~any ~~restructuring~~period ~~will~~and ~~then~~proceed bedirectly ~~coordinated~~to performing the quantitative impairment test. ~~Currently,~~An ~~that~~entity ~~guidance~~will isbe ~~anticipated~~able to beresume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments in this ASU are effective for ~~interim~~annual and ~~annual~~interim ~~periods~~impairment ~~ending~~tests performed for fiscal years beginning after ~~June~~September 15, ~~2011~~2012. ~~The~~Early ~~deferral~~adoption inis ~~ASU~~permitted, ~~2011-01~~including isfor ~~effective~~annual ~~January~~and ~~19,~~interim ~~2011~~impairment ~~(date~~tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance).

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”, which clarifies when creditors should classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the year. The guidance on measuring the impairment of a receivable restructured in a troubled debt restructuring is effective on a prospective basis. A provision in ASU 2011-02 also ends the FASB’s deferral of the additional disclosures about troubled debt restructurings as required by ASU 2010-20. The adoption of ASU 2011-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Consideration of Effective Control on Repurchase Agreements, which deals with the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. ASU 2011-03 changes the rules for determining when these transactions should be accounted for as financings, as opposed to sales. The guidance in ASU 2011-03 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-03 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.

F-16

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(z) Recent accounting pronouncements (Continued)

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-05 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position. However, it will impact the presentation of comprehensive income.

In July 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-06, Other Expenses (Topic 720): Fees Paid to the Federal Government by Health Insurers. This ASU amends the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification) to provide guidance about how health insurers should recognize and classify in their income statements fees mandated by the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," as amended by the "Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act." ASU 2011-06 represents a consensus of the EITF on Issue No. 10-H, “Fees Paid to the Federal Government by Health Insurers.” ASU 2011-06 requires that the liability for the fee be estimated and recorded in full once the entity provides qualifying health insurance in the applicable calendar year in which the fee is payable with a corresponding deferred cost that is amortized to expense using a straight-line method of allocation unless another method better allocates the fee over the calendar year that it is payable. ASU 2011-06 is effective for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2013, when the fee initially becomes effective.

In September 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 is intended to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is "more likely than not" that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.

In September 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU 2011-09 is intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitments and risks involved with participating in multiemployer pension plans. The amendments in this ASU will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily to the historical contributions made to the plans. ASU 2011-09 applies to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For public entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09 should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented.

F-17

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(z) Recent accounting pronouncements (Continued)

ASC Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds. This update is to defer the effective date of certain amendments to the consolidation requirements of FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (Codification) Topic 810, Consolidation, resulting from the issuance of FASB Accounting Standard No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation 46(R). Specifically, the amendments to the consolidation requirements of Topic 810 resulting from the issuance of Statement 167 are deferred for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity:

•That has all the attributes of an investment company; or

•For which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies.

The ASU does not defer the disclosure requirements in the Statement 167 amendments to Topic 810. The amendments in this ASU are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity's first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009, and for interim for interim periods within that first annual reporting period. Early application is not permitted.

ASC Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-13, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. This update is to codify the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-J, “Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades.” The amendments to the Codification clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or services condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASC Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-21, Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules. This update amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification pursuant to SEC Final Rule, “Technical Amendments to Rules Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies”. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASC Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-22, Accounting for Various Topics. This update amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification based on external comments received and the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112 which amends or rescinds portion of certain SAB topics. SAB 112 was issued to bring existing SEC guidance into conformity with ASC 805 “Business Combination” and ASC 810 “Consolidation”. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

F-18

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(z) Recent accounting pronouncements (Continued)

In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification. ASU No. 2011-10 is intended to resolve the diversity in practice about whether the guidance in Subtopic 360-20, Property, Plant, and Equipment—Real Estate Sales, applies to a parent that ceases to have a controlling financial interest (as described in Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall) in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt. This Update does not address whether the guidance in Subtopic 360-20 would apply to other circumstances when a parent ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate. ASU 2011-10 should be applied on a prospective basis to deconsolidation events occurring after the effective date; with prior periods not adjusted even if the reporting entity has continuing involvement with previously derecognized in substance real estate entities. For public entities, ASU 2011-10 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-10 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2013, and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.

In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU No. 2011-11 is intended to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities within the scope of this Update. The amendments require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented.

In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. ASU No. 2011-11 is intended to supersede certain pending paragraphs in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to effectively defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments will be temporary to allow the Board time to redeliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements for public, private, and non-profit entities. All other requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 are not affected by ASU No. 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities should begin applying these requirements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter.

F-19

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(z) Recent accounting pronouncements (Continued)

In July 2012, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2012-02, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill.Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.

In August 2012, the FASB has released Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22. This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs: (a) pursuant to the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 114; (b) pursuant to the issuance of the SEC’s Final Rule, Technical Amendments to Commission Rules and Forms Related to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification, Release Nos. 33-9250, 34-65052, and IC-29748 August 8, 2011; and (c) related to ASU No. 2010-22, Accounting for Various Topics.

FIn February 2013, FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-2004, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. This ASU provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this ASU is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2014, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU’s scope that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption. An entity may elect to use hindsight for the comparative periods (if it changed its accounting as a result of adopting the amendments in this ASU) and should disclose that fact. Early adoption is permitted.

In January 2013, FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and receivables are not in the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. Specifically, ASU 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (Codification) or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The FASB undertook this clarification project in response to concerns expressed by U.S. stakeholders about the standard’s broad definition of financial instruments. An entity is required to apply the amendments in ASU 2013-01 for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the required disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The effective date is the same as the effective date of ASU 2011-11.

In February 2013, FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU improves the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in this ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.

The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period.

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). A private company is required to meet the reporting requirements of the amended paragraphs about the roll forward of accumulated other comprehensive income for both interim and annual reporting periods. However, private companies are only required to provide the information about the effect of reclassifications on line items of net income for annual reporting periods, not for interim reporting periods. The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies and are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, for private companies. Early adoption is permitted.

In February 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-03, Financial Instruments (Topic 825). This ASU clarifies the scope and applicability of a disclosure exemption that resulted from the issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04,Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendment clarifies that the requirement to disclose"the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are categorized in their entirety (Level 1, 2, or 3)" does not apply to nonpublic entities for items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, but for which fair value is disclosed. This ASU is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2013-200—Financial Instruments (Topic 825) which has been deleted. The amendments are effective upon issuance.

In February 2013, FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. This ASU provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this ASU is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2014, and interim periods and annual periods thereafter. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU’s scope that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption. An entity may elect to use hindsight for the comparative periods (if it changed its accounting as a result of adopting the amendments in this ASU) and should disclose that fact. Early adoption is permitted.

In March 2013, FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830). This ASU resolve the diversity in practice about whether Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, or Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements, applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights)within a foreign entity. In addition, the amendments in this Update resolve the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages (sometimes also referred to as step acquisitions) involving a foreign entity. This ASU is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update EITF11Ar—Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830), which has been deleted. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. For nonpublic entities the amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments, it should apply them as of the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption.

F-15

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

3.	CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Financial instruments which potentially expose the Group to concentrations of credit risk, consists of cash and trade receivables as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The group performs ongoing evaluations of its cash position and credit evaluations to ensure collections and minimize losses.

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Group’s bank deposits were all placed with banks in the PRC and Hong Kong where there is currently no rule or regulation in place for obligatory insurance of bank accounts.

For the three months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2012, the group’s sales were generated from the PRC and Western Europe. Trade receivables as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 arose in the PRC and overseas.

The maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that the group would incur if the counter parties to the financial instruments failed to perform is represented the carrying amount of each financial asset in the balance sheet.

Normally the Group does not obtain collateral from customers or debtors.

Details of the customers accounting for 10% or more of the Group’s revenue are as follows:

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	2013			2012
Customer A	$	~~745~~130,~~014~~669		$	-887,468
Customer D		~~563,373~~-			-746,207
Customer F		~~486~~267,~~111~~289			-667,259
Customer K		262,986	-		~~216,848~~-
Customer L		194,610	-		~~211,718~~-

Details of customers accounting for 10% or more of the Group’s trade receivables are as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2012		December 31, 2012
Customer A	$	~~596~~401,~~961~~558	$	~~332~~442,~~386~~408
Customer B		~~352~~293,~~238~~163		~~256~~297,~~827~~319
Customer C		~~222~~134,~~185~~675		~~291~~165,~~466~~934
Customer D		~~228~~151,~~169~~739		~~261~~155,~~008~~959
Customer E		~~473~~379,~~108~~281		~~291~~381,~~256~~923
Customer F		~~325~~252,~~691~~862		~~417~~269,~~594~~236
Customer G		~~862~~869,~~504~~707		~~807~~865,~~578~~981

F-2116

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

4.	AMOUNT DUE FROM A RELATED COMPANY

The following table provides the details of amounts due from related companies:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Rise Elite International Ltd.	$	830	$	830
Daqing Sunway Software Tech Co., Ltd.		~~126~~127,~~452~~508		~~125~~126,~~939~~962
	$	~~127~~128,~~282~~338	$	~~126~~127,~~769~~792

Amount due from Rise Elite International Ltd. (Rise Elite) was $830, a related company where Mr. Liang Deli, the director of the Group is a shareholder. The amount is held by Rise Elite for the initial setup expenses. The amount was unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.

Amount due from Daqing Sunway Software Tech Co., Ltd. was $~~126~~127,~~452~~508, a related company where Mr. Zhao Qichao, the director of the Group is a shareholder. The amount was unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.

5.	TRADE RECEIVABLES, NET

Trade receivables comprise the followings:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Trade receivables, gross	$	79,~~963~~133,~~432~~713	$	78,~~219~~934,~~617~~463
Provision for doubtful debts		(41340,~~238~~127)		(~~335~~338,~~940~~670)
Trade receivables, net	$	78,~~922~~793,~~194~~586	$	68,~~883~~595,~~677~~793

All of the above trade receivables are due within one year of aging.

An analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the ~~ninemonths~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 is as follows:

	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	39338,~~579~~670	$	39335,~~579~~940
Addition of the provision		-		-
Foreign exchange adjustment		1,~~659~~457		12,~~216~~730
Balance at end of period	$	41340,~~238~~127	$	40338,~~795~~670

Allowance was made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Management reviews and adjusts this allowance periodically based on historical experience, current economic climate as well as its evaluation of the collectability of outstanding accounts. The Group evaluates the credit risks of its customers utilizing historical data and estimates of future performance.

F-2217

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

6.	TRAVEL ADVANCES TO SHAREHOLDERS

Travel advances were made to shareholders. These shareholders are also the management of the company and these advances are used to enable their execution of operational duties such as marketing and sales promotion. The following table provides the details of the outstanding accounts. They are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Deli Liang		~~42,303~~577		1041,~~639~~837
	$	~~42,303~~577	$	1041,~~639~~837

The following table provides the activity in the travel advances to shareholders:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Beginning balance	$	1041,~~639~~837	$	~~332~~10,~~709~~639
Add: Advanced during the period/year		~~41,457~~-		8541,~~345~~624
Less: Transferred to income statement		(941,~~793~~260)		(9410,~~333~~426)
Repayment by directors		-		~~(313,082)~~-
Ending balance	$	~~42,303~~577	$	1041,~~639~~837

7.	ADVANCES TO EMPLOYEES

Advances to employees are advances for purchases and travelling. They are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand. The following table provides the activity in the advances to employees:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013			December 31, 2012
Beginning balance	$	~~455~~500,~~666~~387		$	~~269~~455,~~303~~666
Add: Advanced during the period/year		1495,~~501,452~~451			1,~~415~~616,~~966~~887
Less: Transferred to income statement		(~~875~~172,~~019~~293	)		(~~925~~1,~~341~~001,756	)
Recollected from employees		(~~438~~72,~~497~~214	)		(~~304~~570,~~262~~410	)
Ending balance	$	~~643~~751,~~602~~331		$	~~455~~500,~~666~~387

INVENTORIES

Inventories comprise the followings:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Finished goods	$	~~263~~948,~~805~~080	$	2169,~~093,393~~872
Work in process		32,~~524~~861,~~957~~755		~~218~~2,~~788~~452,547
Raw materials		~~617~~680,~~815~~654		~~452~~713,~~379~~769
	$	4,~~406~~490,~~577~~489	$	23,~~764~~336,~~560~~188

F-2318

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

9.	PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property, plant and equipment, net comprise the followings:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013			December 31, 2012
At cost
Buildings	$	2,~~247~~266,~~128~~291		$	2,~~195~~256,~~166~~580
Machinery and equipment		~~971~~978,~~323~~754			~~953~~974,~~761~~560
Moldings		9,~~097~~771,~~402~~321			9,~~651~~729,~~031~~451
Computer software		2,~~293~~321,~~100~~379			2,~~283~~306,~~786~~006
Office equipment and motor vehicles		~~796~~807,~~050~~104			~~713~~802,~~585~~008
	$	1516,~~405~~144,~~003~~849		$	1516,~~797~~068,~~329~~605
Less: accumulateddepreciation		(9,838,602	)		(8,391,785	)
Less: accumulated depreciation		(10,518,410	)		(10,193,530	)
Less: accumulated impairment		-(597,940	)		(~~590~~595,~~579~~377	)
	$	5,~~566~~028,~~401~~499		$	65,~~814~~279,~~965~~698
Construction in progress		-			~~40,540~~-
	$	5,~~566~~028,~~401~~499		$	65,~~855~~279,~~505~~698

Construction in progress represents direct costs of construction incurred for factory infrastructure. Capitalization of these costs ceases and the construction in progress is transferred to property, plant and equipment when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use are completed. No depreciation is provided until it is completed and ready for intended use.

In 2011, the Company recorded an impairment loss of moldings in the amount of nil. The circumstances leading to the impairment are attributed to the forecasted results of the product - Sunway Automatic Medicament Emitting (“SAME”). The Company considered historical rates and current market conditions when determining the discount and growth rates to use in its analyses. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, it may be required to record further impairment charges.

Depreciation expenses are included in the statement of income as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30,
	March 31,2013		March 31,2012
	2012		2011
Cost of net revenues	$	246,983	$	391,992
Cost of net revenues	$	1,066,649	$	1,293,045
General and administrative expenses		12,926		16,866
General and administrative expenses		36,117		94,792
Selling expenses		20,777		117,254
Selling expenses		311,728		55,509
Total depreciation expenses	$	280,686	$	526,112
Total depreciation expenses	$	1,414,494	$	1,443,346

F-2419

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

10.	INTANGIBLES, NET

Details of intangibles are as follows:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013			December 31, 2012
Land use rights, at cost	$	1,~~348~~360,~~738~~003		$	1,~~343~~354,~~261~~175
Technology-based design, at cost		21,~~215~~393,~~917~~108			21,~~129~~301,~~748~~439
	$	22,~~564~~753,~~655~~111		$	22,~~473~~655,~~009~~614
Less: accumulated amortization		(78,~~464~~543,~~154~~528	)		(57,~~940~~996,~~306~~799	)
Less: accumulated impairment		(1,~~895~~911,~~598~~430	)		(1,~~887~~903,~~899~~239	)
Total intangibles, net	$	1312,~~204~~298,~~903~~153		$	1412,~~644~~755,~~804~~576

During the year of 2009, the Group acquired the rights to use a parcel of land totaling 9,082 square meters, for a consideration of $89,552 (RMB613,035), located at Qingdao Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone, Qingdao, Shandong in the People’s Republic of China for a term of 48 years from November 3, 2006 to July 24, 2053. The Group acquired secondly the rights to use a parcel of land totaling 10,841 square meters, for a consideration of $106,709 (RMB730,485), located at Qingdao Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone, Qingdao, Shandong in the People’s Republic of China for a term of 50 years from January 14, 2009 to January 13, 2059. Both lands have been used to build the ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway’s facility.

During the year of 2009, the Group acquired the design and internal device control of medicine dispensing and packing machine, for a consideration of $6,988,882 (RMB47,300,000).

Amortization expense included in the general and administrative expenses for ~~thenine~~the three months ended ~~2012~~March 31, 2013 and ~~2011~~2012 were $1511,~~482,698~~721 and $1493,~~774,337~~266 respectively.

In 2011, the Company recorded an impairment loss of technology-based design in the amount of $1,895,598. The circumstances leading to the impairment are attributed to the forecasted results of the product - Sunway Automatic Medicament Emitting (“SAME”). The Company considered historical rates and current market conditions when determining the discount and growth rates to use in its analyses. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, it may be required to record further impairment charges.

F-2520

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

11.	SHORT-TERM BANK LOANS

A short-term bank loan for the ~~ninemonths~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~the years ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Loans	$	~~663~~701,~~874~~296	$	~~303~~698,~~407~~291
Less: Repayment during the period		-		~~(303,407)~~-
	$	~~663~~701,~~874~~296	$	-698,291

12.	EXPECTED WARRANTY LIABILITIES

An analysis of the expected warranty liabilities for the ~~ninemonths~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013		December 31, 2012
Beginning balance	$	2021,~~995~~720	$	5320,~~308~~995
Warranty expense for the year		-		~~(33,780)~~-
Foreign currency difference		8693		~~1,467~~725
Ending balance	$	21,~~081~~813	$	2021,~~995~~720

F-2621

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

13.	SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND ASSOCIATED WARRANTS

On June 5, 2007, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, whereby the company agreed to sell 165,432 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred shares and various stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 18,686,054 shares of the Company’s common shares. The exercise price, expiration date and number of share eligible to be purchased with the warrants is summary in the following table:

	Investment Amount		Preferred B	A Warrant		B Warrant	J Warrant		C Warrant	D Warrant
Vision Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd.		6,500,000	160,494		4,814,815	2,407,407		4,362,416	4,362,416		2,181,208
Columbia China Capital Group, Inc.		200,000	4,938		148,148	74,074		134,228	134,228		67,114

Series of Warrant	Number of shares	Exercise Price		Expiry Date
Series A	4,962,963	$	1.76	6 /5 /2012
Series B	2,481,481		2.30	6 /5 /2012
Series J	4,496,644		1.49	6 /5 /2008
Series C	4,496,644		1.94	6 /5 /2012
Series D	2,248,322		2.53	6 /5 /2012

On June 6, 2007, we issued to Kuhns Brothers, Inc. and its designees an aggregate of 17,646 shares of Series A Preferred and a Series J warrant to purchase an aggregate of 496,296 shares of common stock of the Company at $1.62 per share in connection with the reverse merger transaction pursuant to the placement agent agreement with the Kuhns Brothers, Inc.

The Series B preferred stock has liquidation rights senior to common stock and Series A preferred stock. In the event of a liquidation of the Company, holders of Series B preferred stock are entitled to receive a distribution equal to $40.50 per share of Series B preferred stock prior to any distribution to the holders of common stock and Series A preferred stock. The Series B preferred stock is entitled to non-cumulative dividends only upon declaration of dividends by the Company. To date, no dividends have been declared or accrued. The Series B preferred stock will participate based on their respective as-if conversion rates if the Company declares any dividends. After the Amendment were filed effect the Reverse Split, each share of Series B preferred stock would be convertible into 30 shares of Common Stock for $1.35 each, which both may be adjusted from time to time pursuant to the conversion rate.

F-2722

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

13. SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND ASSOCIATED WARRANTS (Continued)

(Continued)

The holders of Series B preferred stock shall be entitled to voting rights by applicable law and the right to vote together with the holders of Common and Series A Preferred Stock.

The gross proceeds of the transaction were $6.7 million. The proceeds from the transaction were allocated to the Series B preferred stock, warrants and beneficial conversion feature based on the relative fair value of the securities. The value of the Preferred Series B was determined by reference to the market price of the common shares into which it converts, and the gross value of the warrants was calculated using the Black –Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected life of 1 year, volatility of 117% and an interest rate of 4.99%.

The Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature discount on the Series B preferred stock at its intrinsic value, which was the fair value of the common stock at the commitment date for the Series B preferred stock investment, less the effective conversion price but limited to the $6.7 million of proceeds received from the sale. The Company recognized the $6.7 million beneficial conversion feature as an increase in paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets on the date of issuance of the Series B preferred shares since the Series B preferred shares were convertible at the issuance date.

The agreement, also provided that if a Registration Statement is not effective within a certain period of time or the common shares are not listed on the NASDAQ or American exchange by December 31, 2008, the Company will pay the holders of the shares a penalty that can range from $67,000 to $670,000 and certain principal shareholders would issue up to 1,000,000 additional shares to the purchasers of the Preferred Series B shares. The company is accounting for these penalties in accordance with ASC 450 “Contingencies” which codified FAS 5 - Accounting for Contingencies, whereby the penalty will not be recorded as a liability until and if it is probable the penalty will be incurred. No penalty has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements for this contingency.

Under the agreement, Warrant J was expired on June 5, 2008. On that day, Vision Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. converted all the Warrant J, totally 4,362,416 shares into 4,362,416 of common stock.

On February 7, 2008, 12 shareholders of Preferred Series A converted 228,530 shares into 13,711,831 shares of common stock, in which Rise Elite International Limited, Vision Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd and Kuhns Brothers, Inc converted 210,886, 7,990 and 2,647 shares of Preferred Series A into 12,653,160, 479,400 and 158,820 shares of common stock respectively.

On June 18, 2008, Columbia China Capital Group, Inc. converted 4,938 shares of Preferred Series B into 148,140 shares of common stock.

On November 10, 2008, Columbia China Capital Group, Inc. converted the Warrant J, totally 53,691 shares into 53,691 of common stock.

~~On June 5, 2012, all of the Series A, Series B, Series C, and Series D were expired.~~F-23

On October 15, 2012, Vision Opportunity Master Fund Ltd and Vision Capital Advantage Fund, LP (the “Sellers”) entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Liang Deli, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Sunway Global, Inc. (the “Company”) and Zhao Qichao (together with Mr. Liang, the “Buyers”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Sellers agreed to sell and transfer 4,896,959 shares of common stock of the Company and 160,494 shares of Series B Preferred Shares of the Company (the “Shares”) to the Buyers for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000,000.

F-28

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR ~~THE~~YEARS ~~NINE MONTHS~~ ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~DECEMBER 3031, 2012 AND 2011

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

13. SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND ASSOCIATED WARRANTS (Continued)

(Continued)

As such, effective January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants from equity to liability, as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their issuance in June 2007. On January 1, 2009 the Company recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment by decreasing additional paid-in capital amounting to $3,990,942 and decreasing beginning retained earnings by the amount of $65,910,931 and recording $69,901,873 as a warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on January 1, 2009. The fair value of the warrants was nil and $1,165,692 on ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 respectively. The Company recognized ~~$1,165,692~~nil and $7967,~~229,509as~~868 as income from the change in fair value of warrants for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031,2013 ~~2012~~ and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

As of March 31, 2011, the Company adopts lattice model with Monte Carlo Simulations to measure the various outcome so as to calculate the most likely expected future value of the convertible shares at a define time period. The Company believes that the lattice model can improve the valuation of the existing warrants with consideration of early exercise rights and down ratchet exercise price reset provision. The change is accounted for as change in accounting estimates. As opposed to closed form model like Black Scholes which assumes warrants be exercised on expiry date, the lattice model assumes a low probability of early exercise due to declining stock prices and sample different price paths using Monte Carlo simulation.

~~F-29~~On June 5, 2012, all of the Series A, Series B, Series C, and Series D were expired.

F-24

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

14.	INCOME TAXES

The Company, being registered in the State of Nevada and which conducts all of its business through its subsidiaries incorporated in PRC, is not subject to federal income tax until the operating profits was rebounded back to Untied States. The subsidiaries are SWT, Sunway, Beijing Sunway, ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway (see note 1).

SWT, Sunway, Beijing Sunway and ~~Liheng~~Qingdao Sunway, being registered in the PRC, are subject to PRC’s Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”). Under applicable income tax laws and regulations, an enterprise located in PRC, including the district where our operations are located, is subject to a rate of 25% for the ~~nine~~years ~~months~~ ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2012 and 2011.

However, Sunway is a high technology company, and in accordance with the relevant regulations regarding the favourable tax treatment for high technology companies, Sunway is entitled to a reduced tax rate of 15% as long as Sunway is physically located and registered in the high and advance technology development zone.

The Group uses the asset and liability method, where deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based in the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. There are temporary differences on deferred tax asset $1,~~154~~345,~~981~~913 on net operating loss as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2012 and ~~600~~1,~~835~~345,913 as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011~~2013.

F-3025

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

14.	INCOME TAXES (Continued)

A reconciliation between the income tax computed at the U.S. statutory rate and the Group’s provision for income tax is as follows:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013			December 31, 2012
U.S. statutory rate		34	%		34	%
Foreign income not recognized in the U.S.		(34	)%		(34	)%
PRC CIT		25	%		25	%
Tax holiday		(10	)%		(10	)%
Provision for income taxes		15	%		15	%

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013			December 31, 2012
Current tax- PRC CIT	$	~~21,114~~-		$	1521,~~670~~114
Deferred tax provision		~~(554,146~~-	)		(~~600~~738,~~835~~986	)
Income tax	$	~~(533,032~~-	)	$	(~~585~~717,~~165~~872	)

Reconciliation of these items is as follows:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	March 31,2013				December 31, 2012
(Loss) / Income before tax	$	~~(2,531,676~~-	)		$	1(3,~~203~~816,~~994~~317	)
Add: Impairment of fixed assets and intangible assets		-				~~2,439,271~~-
Loss on disposal of fixed assets and intangible assets		-				2,318,889
Other non-tax deductible items		-				5,122,769
Tax loss not deductible among subsidiaries		1,056,280				10,358,719
Less: Change in fair value of warrants		-				(1,165,692	)
Other non-tax deductible items		2,500,328				137,417
Taxable income (adjusted)	$	-			$	140,760
Less: Change in fair value of warrants		(1,165,692	)			(16,353,823	)
Taxable income (adjusted)	$	140,760			$	104,467

F-3126

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

15.	EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to the common stock holders is based on the following data:

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	March 31,2013			December 31,2012
	2012			2011
Income:
Income/(loss) for the purpose of basic earnings per share	$	(21,~~000~~313,~~247)~~463	)	$	(13,~~054~~098,~~910)~~445	)
Effect of dilutive potential common stock		-			-
Income for the purpose of dilutive earnings per share	$	(21,~~000~~313,~~247)~~463	)	$	(13,~~054~~098,~~910)~~445	)
Number of shares:
Weighted average number of common stock for the purpose of basic earnings per share		18,499,736			18,499,736
Effect of dilutive potential common stock
-conversion of Series A
convertible preferred stock		-			-
-conversion of Series B
convertible preferred stock		4,814,820			4,814,820
-conversion of Warrant Series A		-			-
-conversion of Warrant Series B		-			-
-conversion of Warrant Series J		-			-
-conversion of Warrant Series C		-			-
-conversion of Warrant Series D		-			-
Weighted average number of common stock for the purpose of dilutive earnings per share		23,314,556			23,314,556

F-3227

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

16.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Group has entered into a tenancy agreement for factory expiring through 2011. Total rental expenses for the months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $31,487 and $59,861 respectively.

As at ~~September~~December 3031, 2012, the Group’s commitments for minimum lease payments under these leases for the next one year are as follows:

September30,
March 31,
2012	$	63,218
2013	$	63,218
2013 and thereafter		-
March 31, 2013 and thereafter		-
	$	63,218

17.

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Group currently is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of logistic transport systems and categorized in one segment. The Group has contracted with customers with four types of product altogether, workstation type A, workstation type B, workstation type C and Sunway Automatic Dispensing and Packing (“SADP”) and ~~others~~ other. Workstation types A, B and C are of the same function but with different product design.

Net revenues and cost of revenues by product:

For thenine
	Workstation		Workstation		Workstation
months ended
Three ended March 31, 2013	Type A		Type B		Type C			SADP			Other			Consolidated
September 30,	Workstation		Workstation		Workstation
Net revenues	$	-	$	-	$	1,297,992		$	470,688			248,874			2,017,554
2012	Type A		Type B		Type C			SADP			Other			Consolidated
Cost of net		-		-		(718,204	)		(295,975	)		(192,044	)		(1,206,223	)
Net revenues	$	-	$	-	$	3,270,863		$	1,373,431			1,254,006			5,898,300
Revenues	$	-	$	-	$	579,788		$	174,713			56,830			811,331
Cost of net revenues		-		-		(1,092,165)			(796,870)			(707,109)			(2,596,144)
	$	-	$	-	$	2,178,698		$	576,561			546,897			3,302,156

	~~Workstation~~	Workstation		~~Workstation~~	Workstation		~~Workstation~~	Workstation
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011	Type A			Type B			Type C			SADP			Other			Consolidated
Three ended March 31, 2012		Type A			Type B			Type C			SADP			Others			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	~~96,990~~-		$	~~263,867~~-		$	31,~~010~~154,~~844~~139		$	1246,~~918,596~~147		$	~~484~~610,~~094~~289		$	52,~~774~~010,~~391~~575
Cost of net		-			-			(377,670	)		(152,842	)		(419,163	)		(949,675	)
revenues		(31,409	)		(106,897	)		(1,017,139	)		(628,336	)		(319,447	)		(2,103,228	)
Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	776,469		$	93,305			191,126			1,060,900
	$	65,581		$	156,970		$	1,993,705		$	1,290,260		$	164,647		$	3,671,163

The Group’s operations are located in the PRC. All revenues are derived from customers in the PRC and Europe. All of the Group’s assets are located in the PRC. Sales of workstations are carried out in the PRC. Accordingly, no analysis of the Group's sales and assets by geographical market is presented.

F-3328

Table of Contents

SUNWAY GLOBAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2012~~2013 AND ~~2011~~2012

(Stated in US Dollars) (Unaudited)

18.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company has adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820), establishes a framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB Statement No. 157 are described as follows:

Level 1	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2	Inputs to the valuation methodology include · quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets · quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets ·inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability ·inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

Warrant Liability: As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2012, the Company adopted the lattice valuation method to improve the valuation of the existing warrants with early exercise rights and down ratchet exercise price reset provision. The change is accounted for as change in accounting estimates. As opposed to closed

~~F-34~~19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluated subsequent events pursuant to ASC 855 and has determined there are no events to disclose.

F-29

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Forward-Looking Statements

The information in this report contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this report are forward looking. In particular, the statements herein regarding industry prospects and future results of operations or financial position are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "believes," "estimates," "could," "possibly," "probably," anticipates," "projects," "expects," "may," "will," or "should" or other variations or similar words. No assurances can be given that the future results anticipated by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from management's expectations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, included herewith. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment of our management.

Overview

Since June 27, 2007, the Company has operated as a holding company for entities that, through contractual relationships, control the business of Daqing Sunway Technology Co., Ltd. (“Daqing Sunway”), a company organized under the laws of the PRC that designs, manufactures and sells logistic transport systems and medicine dispensing systems and equipment that are principally used by hospitals and other medical facilities in the PRC. Currently our Company is the only producer of ~~these~~three ~~two~~products ~~systems~~ in the PRC~~: pneumatic transport systems (“PTS”) and Sunway Automatic Dispensing and Packing (“SADP”)~~. We have served approximately ~~330~~300 customers in the PRC from our facilities in ~~Daqing and~~ Qingdao. We generate our revenue from sales in ~~two~~three product categories: pneumatic transport systems (“PTS”), Sunway Automatic Dispensing and Packing (“SADP”), and automatic medicament emitting systems.

This discussion and analysis focuses on the business results of Sunway Group (consisting of Daqing Sunway, the Company’s primary operating entity, along with its other indirectly-owned subsidiaries Beijing Sunway New-~~Force~~force Medical Treatment Tech Co., Ltd. and Qingdao ~~Liheng~~Sunway ~~Textile~~New-force Mechanical Co., Ltd), comparing its results in the three ~~and nine~~ months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012.

~~Three-month~~This discussion and analysis focuses on the business results of Sunway Group, comparing its results in the three months period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 ~~and~~with ~~September~~the 30three months period ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012.

Results of Operations

In the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, the growth of the Company’s net revenue was ~~reduced~~slow as compared with the same period of ~~2011~~2012, but in the three months ended March 31, 2013, the gross profit had a sharp decline as compared with the same period of 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable ~~we increased~~ ~~test~~to ~~time~~a decline in the ~~factory~~ tosales ~~ensure~~prices ~~production~~of ~~quality~~spare ~~which caused~~part ~~delivery~~and ~~delays~~PTS inand ~~the~~an ~~three~~increase ~~months~~in ~~ended~~production ~~September 30, 2012~~costs.

The following table summarizes the results of our operations during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and provides information regarding the dollar and percentage increase (or (decrease) from the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31
	2012			2011			Change			Change rate
	2013			2012			Change			Change rate
Revenues	$	1,666,269		$	2,370,644		$	(704,375	)		(29.71	) %
Net Revenue	$	2,017,554		$	2,010,575		$	6,979			0.35	%
Cost of revenues	$	528,553		$	873,061		$	(344,508	)		(39.46	) %
Cost of net revenue	$	1,206,223		$	949,675		$	256,548			27.01	%
Gross Profit	$	1811,~~137,716~~331		$	1,~~497~~060,~~583~~900		$	(~~359~~249,~~867~~569	)		(2423.0352	) %
Gross Margin		6840.2821	%		6352.1777	%		-			5(12.1156	)%
Operating Income/(loss)	$	(1,222,478	)	$	(731,214	)	$	(491,264	)		67.18	%
Operating (loss)/ Income	$	(1,301,783	)	$	(1,214,565	)	$	(87,218	)		7.18	%
Changes in fair value of warrants	$	-		$	4967,~~163,755~~868		$	(4967,~~163,755~~868	)	~~(100.00） %~~	-	%
Net (Loss)/Income	$	(868,445	)	$	(2,576,526	)	$	(1,708,081	)		66.29	%
Net Income/(loss)	$	(1,313,463	)	$	(208,498)		$	(1,104,965	)		529.96	%
Net profit margin		(52.12	) %		(108.68	) %		-			56.57	%
Net (loss) / profit margin		(65.10	)%		(10.37	)%					(54.73	)%

Table of Contents

~~Revenue~~Net Revenues

~~Revenue~~Net revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, was $12,~~666~~017,~~269~~554, aan ~~decrease~~increase of 290.7135% as compared with net revenues of $2,~~370~~010,~~644~~575 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012. In the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, we sold ~~203~~198 workstations, a decrease of 275.7671% as compared with ~~281~~210 workstations ~~sold~~ in the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012. The decrease in ~~workstations~~PTS’ ~~was because~~sale ~~we increased~~is ~~test~~mainly ~~time~~because inthe ~~factory~~number toof newly ~~ensure~~established ~~production~~hospital ~~quality~~ decreased, which ~~caused~~led ~~delivery~~to ~~delays~~shrinking in of the ~~three months ended September 30, 2012~~ market. During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, we also sold 106 units of the SADP, an increase of 100.00% as compared with 43 units ofin ~~SADP for~~ the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012. The increase in the SADP was due primarily to a growth in the marketing effort.

The following table breaks down application categories as percentage of total revenue:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012					2011
	Sales		% of total sales			sales		% of total sales
PTS	$	821,695		49.31	%	$	1,796,341		75.77	%
SADP	$	311,817		18.71	%	$	529,724		22.35	%
Other	$	532,757		31.98	%		44,579		1.88	%
Total net revenue	$	1,666,269		100.00	%	$	2,370,644		100.00	%

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue decreased to $528,553 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a 39.46% decrease as compared with $873,061 for the same period of 2011. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in sales.

The table below presents information about our cost of revenue for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		Change
Cost of net revenues	$	528,553	$	873,061		39.46	%

Gross Profit

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012					2011
	US$		Gross profit margin			US$		Gross profit margin
Gross Profit	$	1,137,716		68.28	%	$	1,497,583		63.17	%

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $2,360,194 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, an increase as compared with $2,228,797 for the same period of 2011. The increased was primarily due to two factors: (i) selling expenses increased $314,823, or 54.56% to $891,794 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $576,971 for the same period of 2011; and (ii) general and administration expenses decreased $183,426, or 11.10% to $ 1,468,400 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $1,651,826 for the same period of 2011, due to increased marketing expenses.

The table below presents information about our operating expenses for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		Change
Selling expenses	$	891,794	$	576,971		54.56	%
General & Administrative expenses	$	1,468,400	$	1,651,826		(11.10)	%
Total operating expenses	$	2,360,194	$	2,228,797		5.90	%

Income from Operations

Operating loss was $1,222,478 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared with operating loss of $731,214 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the changes above.

Changes in fair value of warrants

Changes in fair value of warrants were $4,163,755 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This is recorded as a non-cash income, which resulted from the change in fair value of warrants issued to investors in conjunction with the Company’s issuance of warrants in June of 2007 pursuant to provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivative and Hedging” (ASC 815). The accounting treatment of the warrants resulted from a provision providing anti-dilution protection to the warrant holders. As of June 5, 2012, all warrants were expired.

Net Loss

Net loss was $868,445 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared with $2,576,526 net loss for the same period of 2011. The loss was due to sales decline.

Earnings per Share (“EPS”)

Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.05 and $0.04 compared with loss per share $0.14 and $0.11 for the same period of 2011. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate basic EPS was 18,499,736 and 18,499,736 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate diluted EPS was 23,314,556 and 23,314,556 for the three months ended September 30, 2012and Septembere 30, 2011.

Nine-month period ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011

Results of Operations

In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s revenues remained fairly flat with a slight increase as compared with the same period of 2011.

The following table summarizes the results of our operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and provides information regarding the dollar and percentage increase (or decrease) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012.

	The Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			Change		Change rate
Net Revenue	$	5,898,300		$	5,774,391		$	123,909	2.15	%
Cost of net revenue	$	2,596,144		$	2,103,228		$	492,916	23.44	%
Gross Profit	$	3,302,156		$	3,671,163		$	(369,007)	(10.05)	%
Gross Margin		55.98	%		63.58	%		-	(7.59)	%
Operating Income/(loss)	$	(3,694,308)		$	(2,248,841)		$	(1,445,467)	64.28	%
Change in fair value of warrants	$	1,165,692		$	7,229,509		$	(6,063,817)	(83.88)	%
Net Income/(loss)	$	(2,000,247)		$	(1,054,910)		$	(945,337)	89.61	%
Net profit margin		(33.91)	%		(18.27)	%		-	(15.64)	%

Table of Contents

Revenue

Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, which resulted entirely from increase in sale, was $5,898,300, an increase of 2.15% as compared with revenues of $5,774,391 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we sold 658 workstations, an increase of 21.40%, as compared with 542 workstations sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. During the same period of 2012, we also sold 17 units of SADP, a decrease of 15% compared with 20 units of SADP for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in SADP was due primarily to our Qingdao factory’s output capacity did not meet our customers needs.

The following table breaks down application categories as percentage of total net revenue.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012					2011
	2013						2012
	Sales		% of total sales			~~Sales~~	Sales		~~% of total sales~~	% of total sales
PTS	$	31,~~270~~297,~~863~~992	~~55.45~~	%64.33	%	$	~~3,371,701~~$	1,154,139		~~46.55~~	%57.40	%
SADP	$	1470,~~373,431~~688	~~23.29~~	%23.33	%	$	~~1,918,596~~$	246,147		~~40.64~~	%12.24	%
OTHER	$	1,254,006	21.26	%		$	484,094			12.81	%
Other	$	248,874		12.34	%		$	610,289			30.35	%
Total net revenue	$	52,~~898~~017,~~300~~554	~~100.00~~	%100.00	%	$	~~5,774,391~~$	2,010,575		~~100.00~~	%100.00	%

Cost of ~~Revenues~~Net Revenue

Cost of ~~revenues~~net revenue increased to $21,~~596~~206,~~144~~223 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, representing a 2327.4401% increase as compared with $2949,~~103,228~~675 for the same period of ~~2011~~2012. ~~The~~This increase ~~was~~is primarily due toan increase in ~~salaries~~the ininstalling ~~direct~~and ~~labors~~production ~~and~~costs ~~manufacturing~~of ~~management~~PTS.

The table below presents information about our cost of revenue for the periods indicated:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		Change
Cost of net revenue	$	2,596,144	$	2,103,228		23.44	%

Gross Profit

Gross profit ~~decreased~~decrease 1012.0556% to $3811,~~302,156~~331 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, as compared to $31,~~671~~060,~~163~~900 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011.~~2012, ~~Our~~our gross profit margin ~~decreased~~dropped 712.5956% from 6352.5877% ~~for~~as of the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 to 5540.9821% ~~for~~as of the same period of ~~2012~~2013, mainly ~~due~~because toour ~~an increase in the sales of~~ spare ~~parts~~part and ~~services,~~PTS’ ~~whose~~sale ~~gross~~prices ~~profit~~declined ~~was~~and ~~lower~~production ~~than~~costs ~~other product~~increased.

The table below presents information about our gross profit for the periods indicated:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012				2011
	2013							2012
	US$		~~Gross profit margin~~	Gross profit Margin	~~US$~~		~~Gross profit margin~~	US$		Gross profit Margin
Gross Profit	$	3811,~~302,156~~331	~~55.98~~	%	$40.21	~~3,671,163~~%	~~63.58~~	%$	1,060,900		52.77	%

6Income from Operations

Operating loss was $1,301,783 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to $1,214,565 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in loss was primarily due to decreases in our sale prices and the increases of our production costs.

Table of Contents

The table below presents information about our cost of net revenue for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013		2012		Change
Cost of net revenue	$	1,206,223	$	949,675		27.01	%

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses ~~was~~were $62,~~996~~113,~~464~~370 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, ana ~~increase~~decrease of 7.12% as compared with $52,~~920~~275,~~004~~465 for the same period of ~~2011~~2012. The ~~increase~~decrease was aprimarily ~~result~~due ofto two ~~factors~~reasons: (i) selling expenses increased $1222,~~116~~823,~~153,~~ or 9841.3007% to $2765,~~251,579~~371 ~~for~~in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 from $1542,~~135,426~~548 for the same period of ~~2011~~2012; and (ii) general and administration expenses decreased $39384,~~693~~918, or 022.8321% to $41,~~744~~347,~~885~~999 ~~for~~in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 from $41,~~784~~732,~~578~~917 for the same period of ~~2011~~2012. The increase in selling expenses ~~primary~~was mainly due to our salesperson’s salary which increased ~~marketing~~196.22% ~~expenses~~in the three months ended March 31, 2013 compare with the same period of 2012.

The table below presents information about our operating expenses for the periods indicated:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		Change
	2013		2012		Change
Selling expenses	$	2765,~~251,579~~371	$	1542,~~135,426~~548		9841.307	%
General & Administrative expenses	$	41,~~744~~347,~~885~~999	$	41,~~784~~732,~~578~~917		(022.8321)	%
Total operating expenses	$	62,~~996~~113,~~464~~370	$	52,~~920~~275,~~004~~465		18(7.1812)	%

Loss from Operations

Operating loss increased 64.27% to $3,694,308 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to an operating loss $2,248,841 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily because selling expenses and cost of revenues increased sharply.

Changes in fair value of warrants

Changes in fair value of warrants were $1967,~~165,692~~868 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2012. This is recorded as a non-cash ~~charges~~charge, which resulted from the change in fair value of warrants issued to investors in conjunction with the Company’s issuance of warrants in June of 2007 pursuant to provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivative and Hedging” (ASC 815). The accounting treatment of the warrants resulted from a provision providing anti-dilution protection to the warrant holders. ~~As of June 5, 2012, all of the warrants were expired according to the agreement item.~~

Net Income/Loss

Net loss was $21,~~000~~313,~~247~~463 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012, an increase as compared with $1,054,910 for the same period of 2011~~2013. In the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2012, our net loss was impacted by a non-cash charge of $1967,~~165,692~~868 of the changes in fair value of warrants unrelated to the Company’s operations. Excluding the changes in fair value of warrants in non-cash charge, the Company’s net loss from operations would have been $31,~~165~~176,~~939~~366 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2012, ~~and~~an ~~$2,235,906~~increase ~~for~~in loss compared with the ~~nine~~same ~~months~~period ~~ended~~of ~~September~~2013. ~~30,~~The ~~2011~~increase in loss was mainly due to our product prices decline and product costs rise.

Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted ~~losing~~loss per share for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 were $0.1107 and $0.0906 compared with ~~earning~~the ~~$0.06~~loss ~~and~~per ~~$0.05~~share for the same period of ~~2011~~2012 was $0.01 and $0.01. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate basic EPS was 18,499,736 and 18,499,736 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding to calculate diluted EPS was 23,314,556 and 23,314,556 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012 respectively.

Trade Receivables, ~~Nnet~~net

Trade receivables, net ~~increased15.09%~~increased to $78,~~922~~793,~~194~~586 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, compared with $68,~~883~~595,~~677~~793 as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. ~~The~~This increase in trade receivables was primarily attributable to increase in ~~sales~~sale.

~~Inventory~~5

Inventory consists of raw materials, finished goods and work in progress. As of September 30, 2012, the recorded value of our inventory has increased59.40% to $4,406,577 from $2,764,560 as of December 31, 2011. The increase was mainly due to an decrease of 87.40% in finished goods from $2,093,393 as of December 31, 2011 to $263,805 as of September 30, 2012; an increase of 36.57% in raw materials from $452,379 as of December 31, 2011 to $617,815 as of September 30, 2012, an increase of 1,511.13% in work in progress from $218,788 as of December 31, 2011 to $3,524,957 as of September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to our Qingdao factory’s augmented output of the SADP and PTS, so that we have adequate supply to meet our customers’ needs.

Table of Contents

Inventory

Inventory consists of raw materials, finished goods and work in progress. As of March 31, 2013, the recorded value of our inventory has increased 34.60% to $4,490,489 from $3,336,188 as of December 31, 2012. The increase was mainly due to an increase of 458.11% in finished goods from $169,872 as of December 31, 2012 to $ 948,080 as of March 31, 2013; a decrease of 4.64% in the raw material inventory from $713,769 as of December 31, 2012 to $680,654 as of March 31, 2013, an increase of 16.69% in work in progress inventory from $2,452,547 as of December 31, 2012 to $2,861,755 as of March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in orders received by our Qingdao factory. We increased output of the SADP and PTS, to make sure we had adequate supply to meet contract requests.

The table below presents information about our inventory for the periods indicated:

Item	~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013		December 31, ~~2011~~2012		Change
Finished goods	$	~~263~~948,~~805~~080	$	2169,~~093,393~~872		~~(87~~458.~~40)~~11	%
Work in progress	$	32,~~524~~861,~~957~~755	$	~~218~~2,~~788~~452,547		~~1,511~~16.1369	%
Raw material	$	~~617~~680,~~815~~654	$	~~452~~713,~~379~~769		36(4.5764	)%
Total	$	4,~~406~~490,~~577~~489	$	23,~~764~~336,~~560~~188		5934.4060	%

Accounts Payable

Accounts payable ~~was~~amounted to $12,~~100~~168,~~774~~178 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, an increase as compared with $~~621~~1,~~997~~211,450 as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~the~~produce ~~fact~~plan ~~that~~growth, ~~our Qingdao factory’s augmented output~~ which ~~caused~~resulted in an increase in ~~purchase volume of~~ raw ~~materials~~material purchases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures principally through private placements of debt and equity offerings and cash provided by operations.

The table below presents information about our cash flow for the periods indicated:

	nine months ended September 30,
	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			Change
	2013			2012			Change
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(1193,~~916,482)~~908	)	$	(21,~~649~~054,~~033)~~636	)	$	~~732,551~~(81.61	)%
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	(~~111~~7,~~775)~~086	)	$	(219,~~166,471)~~419	)	$	~~2,054,696~~(63.51	)%
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	~~664,767~~-		$	-		$	~~664,767~~-
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents	$	~~214~~(10,~~513~~195	)	$	~~(119~~70,~~188)~~441		$	~~333,701~~(114.47	)%
Beginning cash and cash equivalent	$	1352,~~550,911~~457		$	91,~~587~~550,~~765~~911		$	(~~8,036,854)~~77.28	)%
Ending cash and cash equivalent	$	~~401~~141,~~934~~268		$	4547,~~653,073~~297		$	(~~4,251,139)~~74.19	)%

Operating Activities

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, net cash used byin operating activities was $1193,~~916,482~~908. This was primarily attributable to our net loss of $21,~~000~~313,~~247~~463, adjusted by an add-back of non-cash ~~expenses~~charges mainly consisting of depreciation, ~~amortization~~ and ~~changes~~amortization ~~in fair value~~ of ~~warrants~~$280,686 and $1511,~~731~~721 respectively,~~500~~ offset by a $~~1,647,735~~327148 ~~decrease~~increase in working capital. Specifically, the increase in working capital ~~decrease~~ was primarily due to: (i) a $1160,~~011,804~~615 trade receivables increase driven by ~~increase in sale~~sales; (ii) a $1844,~~547,506~~643 increase ~~inventories~~in ~~increase~~inventories, principally inof ~~work in process and~~ finished goods, ~~due~~and towork ~~increase~~ in ~~work~~progress ~~process~~inventory; (iii) a $~~831~~17,~~185~~116 decrease ~~increase~~ in ~~advance~~advances to suppliers to ~~add~~buy ~~purchase volume of~~ raw materials ~~in Qingdao Liheng factory~~; (iv) a $~~831~~316,~~185~~709 increase in prepayments, travel advances to ~~directors~~ shareholders, tender deposits and advances to employees, consisting primarily of prepayments for raw materials and other supplies in advance of shipment, working capital for sales staff and payment of client deposits; partially offset by a $21,~~299~~631,~~640~~999 increase ~~decrease~~ in accounts payable, tax payable, ~~loans from unrelated parties, amount due from a director,~~ customer deposits, ~~and~~ accrued liabilities and other payables.

~~Investing Activities~~6

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $111,775. This was primarily attributable to an $111,775 capital expenditure for purchase of new plant and equipment.

Financing Activities

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash used in financing activities was $664,767. This was primarily attributable to borrowing a short-term bank loan.

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $7,086. This was primarily attributable to a $7,086 capital expenditure for purchase of new plant and equipment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our cash and cash equivalents as at ~~January~~the 1beginning of March 31, ~~2012~~2013, were $1352,~~550,911~~ 457 and decreased to $~~401~~141,~~934~~268 by the ~~September~~end ~~30,~~of ~~2012~~the period.

WeIn ~~believe~~the ~~that~~future, ~~our~~we ~~existing~~will ~~cash,~~need ~~cash~~extra ~~equivalents~~operating ~~and~~ cash ~~flows~~ from ~~operations~~commercial bank, combined with availability under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated future cash needs for at least the next ~~six~~9 months. ~~We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue.~~

Trends

We are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity.

Inflation

We believe that inflation has not had a material or significant impact on our revenue or our results of operations.

Obligations under Material Contracts

We do not have any material contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon Sunway’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Sunway’s financial statements reflect the selection and application of accounting policies which require management to make significant estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Sunway believes that the following reflect the more critical accounting policies that currently affect Sunway’s financial condition and results of operations.

Impairment of long-lived assets. We account for impairment of property, plant and equipment with ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” and amortizable intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350 “Intangibles- Goodwill and Other”. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost to dispose. During the reporting years, there was no impairment loss incurred. Competitive pricing pressure and changes in interest rates, could materially and adversely affect our estimates of future net cash flows to be generated by our long-lived assets.

Inventories. Inventories consist of finished goods and raw materials, and stated at the lower of cost or market value. Substantially all inventory costs are determined using the weighted average basis. Finished goods are comprised of direct materials, direct labor and an appropriate proportion of overhead. The management regularly evaluates the composition of its inventory to identify slow-moving and obsolete inventories to determine if additional write-downs are required.

Trade receivable. Trade receivables are recognized and carried at the original invoice amount less allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant one-time events and historical experience. Bad debts are written off as incurred. During the reporting years, there were no bad debts.

Outstanding accounts balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The Company do not charge any interest income on trade receivables. Accounts balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. To date, the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection.

Table of Contents

Revenue recognition. Revenue represents the invoiced value of goods sold recognized upon the delivery of goods to customers. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met:

- Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

- Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;

- The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and

- Collection is reasonably assured.

Contract revenues are recognized when the manufacturing and installation of the medical equipment is completed. Generally, the company receives total contract sum from clients in 4 instalments. Deposit of 20%-30% is received from client when the contract is signed. Second payment of 30% is received when the project commenced. Third payment of 30% is received after the construction is completed within 4 months. The final sum of the remaining portion is received after the construction is completed until one year.

Expected warranty liabilities. The Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials, and workmanship generally for one year. A provision for estimated future costs relating to warranty expense are recorded when products are shipped, and the provision is based upon our own historical claim experience.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2012.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2013. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that, as of the date of evaluation, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Based upon that evaluation and due to the material weaknesses existing in our internal controls as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 (as described in the Company's form 10-K) which have not been fully remediated as of March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2012~~2013, we have concluded that as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2012~~2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

107

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

To our knowledge, there is no material litigation pending or threatened against us.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

To our knowledge, there are no material defaults upon senior securities.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. - EXHIBITS.

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Section 302.
31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Section 302.
32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 906.
32.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 906.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document*
101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*
101. DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged as blocks of text. The XBRL-related information ~~inExhibit~~in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or ~~12of~~12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject ~~tothe~~to the liabilities of those sections.

118

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SUNWAY GLOBAL, INC.
Dated: November 20, 2012	By:	/s/ Liang Deli
Dated: May 20, 2013	By:	/s/ Liang Deli
		Name: Liang Deli
		Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 20, 2012	By:	/s/ Samuel Sheng
Dated: May 20, 2013	By:	/s/ Samuel Sheng
		Name: Samuel Sheng
		Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting officer)

129

Filing Compare · Sunway Global Inc.