UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-28234

Mexican Restaurants, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas	76-0493269
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

1135 Edgebrook, Houston, Texas	77034-1899
12000 Aerospace Ave., Suite 400, Houston, Texas	77034
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~713~~832-~~943~~300-~~7574~~5858

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ý Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of ~~November~~ 10May 14, ~~2009~~2010: 3,~~288~~413,~~141~~099 shares, par value $.01.

Table of Contents

Part I – Financial Information

		Page No.
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	98
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	1311
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	1412

Part II – Other Information

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	1412
Item 6.	Exhibits	14
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	12
Signatures		15
Item 6.	Exhibits	13
Signatures		14
Exhibit 10.1	Agreement and Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement made as of May 17, 2010, by and between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. amending the Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo dated June 29, 2007
Exhibit 31.1	Section 302 CEO Certification
Exhibit 31.2	Section 302 CFO Certification
Exhibit 32.1	Section 906 CEO Certification
Exhibit 32.2	Section 906 CFO Certification

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets
	(Unaudited)			~~12/28/2008 (1)~~
ASSETS	94/274/~~2009~~2010		1/3/2010	~~(As adjusted)~~
Current assets:
Cash	$	~~189~~694,~~684~~071		$	$719,944	~~879,206~~
Royalties receivable		9096,~~583~~354			61,194	~~144,196~~
Other receivables		~~821~~572,~~362~~997			639,019	~~1,117,815~~
Inventory		~~569~~584,~~798~~966			562,682	~~597,237~~
Income taxes receivable		~~255~~216,~~308~~219			284,724	~~194,856~~
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1798,~~133,408~~642			1,065,056	~~902,340~~
Assets related to discontinued operations		~~145~~173,~~098~~708			161,523	~~196,465~~
Assets held for sale		--				1,111,513
Total current assets		3,136,957			3,494,142
Total current assets		3,205,241				5,143,628
Property and equipment, net		17,155,625			17,491,335
Property and equipment, net		17,726,315				17,866,902
Goodwill		5,017,243			5,017,243
Goodwill		5,017,243				6,273,705
Deferred tax assets		1,902,785			1,542,999
Deferred tax assets		1,948,763				1,976,427
Other assets		134,837			147,667
Other assets		175,020				208,325
Other assets related to discontinued operations		33,878			33,878
Other assets related to discontinued operations		33,878				34,178
Total Assets	$	27,381,325		$	27,727,264
Total Assets	$	28,106,460			$	31,503,165
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,603,969		$	1,929,864
Accounts payable	$	1,994,563			$	2,288,698
Accrued sales, liquor, and payroll taxes		981,030			979,735
Accrued sales, liquor, and payroll taxes		862,701				1,054,078
Accrued expenses		693,954			1,104,185
Accrued expenses		989,569				1,191,740
Current liabilities related to discontinued operations		7,437			39,554
Liabilities related to assets held for sale		--				195,740
Current portion of liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities		149,286			107,381
Current portion of liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities		352,623				325,625
Total current liabilities		4,435,676			4,160,719
Total current liabilities		4,199,456				5,055,881
Long-term debt		4,550,000			5,150,000
Long-term debt		5,150,000				7,500,000
Liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities, net of current portion		706,864			611,392
Liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities, net of current portion		636,631				567,445
Deferred gain		676,464			728,500
Deferred gain		780,535				936,642
Deferred rent and other liabilities		2,161,237			2,149,313
Other liabilities		1,962,476				1,956,921
Total Liabilities		12,530,241			12,799,924
Total Liabilities		12,729,098				16,016,889
Commitments & Contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		--			--	--
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized, 4,732,705 shares issued		47,327				47,327
authorized, 4,732,705 shares issued, 3,413,099 and 3,290,041		47,327			47,327
Additional paid-in capital		19,270,442				19,442,049
shares outstanding at 4/4/2010 and 1/3/2010, respectively
Retained earnings		8,860,188				9,120,885
Additional paid-in capital		18,624,185			19,390,702
Treasury stock at cost of 1,444,564 and 1,481,064 common shares at 9/27/09 and 12/28/08, respectively		(12,800,595	)			(13,123,985	)
Retained earnings		7,873,039			8,272,186
Total stockholders' equity		15,377,362				15,486,276
Treasury stock at cost of 1,319,606 and 1,442,564 common shares at 4/4/10 and 1/3/10, respectively		(11,693,467	)		(12,782,875	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	28,106,460			$	31,503,165
Total stockholders' equity		14,851,084			14,927,340
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	27,381,325		$	27,727,264

(1) December 28, 2008 balances have been reclassified for discontinued operations. See Note 7.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	13-Week Period Ended 9/27/2009			13-Week Period Ended 9/28/2008			39-Week Period Ended 9/27/2009			39-Week Period Ended 9/28/2008
	13-Week Period Ended 4/4/2010			13-Week Period Ended 3/29/2009
Revenues:
Restaurant sales	$	1716,~~096~~853,~~233~~074		$	1719,~~451~~013,~~128~~557		$	~~54,217,484~~		$	~~54,565,676~~
Franchise fees, royalties and other		~~128~~123,~~962~~912			~~135~~138,~~496~~289			~~393,829~~			~~406,252~~
Business interruption		107,318			127,525			210,846			248,717
		16,976,986			19,151,846
		17,332,513			17,714,149			54,822,159			55,220,645
Costs and expenses:
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		4,944,913			5,250,244
Cost of sales		4,961,965			5,073,611			15,475,502			15,711,467
Labor		5,817,086			6,122,989
Labor		5,835,840			5,765,679			18,008,937			17,746,704
Restaurant operating expenses		4,384,888			4,782,338
Restaurant operating expenses		4,419,617			4,698,151			13,724,614			13,748,135
General and administrative		1,448,500			1,686,730
General and administrative		1,530,024			1,754,122			4,848,791			5,450,463
Depreciation and amortization		858,366			867,957
Depreciation and amortization		891,681			805,218			2,644,651			2,414,883
Impairment and restaurant closure expense		5,221			22,453
Pre-opening costs		21,745			43,810			21,745			91,121
Gain on involuntary disposals		--			(7,231	)
Impairment and restaurant closure costs		116,937			67,597			354,168			122,426
Loss on sale of property and equipment		3,715			36,762
Loss (gain) on involuntary disposals		18,330			140,938			26,127			(134,771	)
		17,462,689			18,762,242
Loss on sale of other property and equipment		46,430			131,509			120,126			173,179
Operating income (loss)		(485,703	)		389,604
		17,842,569			18,480,635			55,224,661			55,323,607
Other income (expense):
Operating loss		(510,056	)		(766,486	)		(402,502	)		(102,962	)
Interest income		11,783			980
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(61,769	)		(62,194	)
Interest income		815			1,242			2,678			4,152
Other, net		18,568			10,501
Interest expense		(39,870	)		(92,003	)		(144,981	)		(325,215	)
		(31,418	)		(50,713	)
Other, net		6,742			10,500			26,844			27,958
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(517,121	)		338,891
		(32,313	)		(80,261	)		(115,459	)		(293,105	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		221,690			(65,808	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(542,369	)		(846,747	)		(517,961	)		(396,067	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(295,431	)		273,083
Income tax benefit		309,755			362,961			306,772			260,198
Discontinued Operations:
Loss from continuing operations		(232,614	)		(483,786	)		(211,189	)		(135,869	)
Income from discontinued operations		--			75,456
Discontinued Operations:
Restaurant closure expense		(181,543	)		(190,572	)
Income from discontinued operations		-			76,807			36,021			138,846
Loss on sale of assets		--			(581	)
Restaurant closure income (expense)		-			(6,062	)		(190,941	)		46,227
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(181,543	)		(115,697	)
Gain (loss) on sale of assets		-			-			386,502			(2,075	)
Income tax benefit		77,827			22,467
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes		-			70,745			231,582			182,998
Loss from discontinued operations		(103,716	)		(93,230	)
Income tax expense		-			(91,518	)		(281,090	)		(117,112	)
Net income (loss)	$	(399,147	)	$	179,853
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-			(20,773	)		(49,508	)		65,886
Basic income (loss) per common share
Net loss	$	(232,614	)	$	(504,559	)	$	(260,697	)	$	(69,983	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.09	)	$	0.08
Basic income (loss) per common share
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.03	)		(0.03	)
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.04	)
Net income (loss)	$	(0.12	)	$	0.05
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-			(0.01	)		(0.02	)		0.02
Diluted income (loss) per common share
Net loss	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.02	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.09	)	$	0.08
Diluted income (loss) per common share
Loss from discontinued operations		(0.03	)		(0.03	)
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.04	)
Net income (loss)	$	(0.12	)	$	0.05
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-			(0.01	)		(0.02	)		0.02
Weighted average number of common shares (basic)		3,309,628			3,269,341
Net loss	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average number of common shares (diluted)		3,309,628			3,270,057
Weighted average number of common shares (basic)		3,286,201			3,259,087			3,276,306			3,252,858
Weighted average number of common shares (diluted)		3,286,201			3,259,087			3,276,306			3,252,858

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
	39-Week			39-Week
	13-Week			13-Week
	Period Ended			Period Ended
	9/27/2009			9/28/2008
	4/4/2010			3/29/2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(260,697	)	$	(69,983	)
Net income (loss)	$	(399,147	)	$	179,853
(Income) loss from discontinued operations		49,508			(65,886	)
Loss from discontinued operations		103,716			93,230
Loss from continuing operations		(211,189	)		(135,869	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(295,431	)		273,083
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2858,~~644,651~~366			2867,~~414,883~~957
Deferred gain amortization		(~~156~~52,~~107~~035	)		(~~156~~52,~~107~~035	)
Impairment and restaurant closure costs		354,168			122,426
Impairment and restaurant closure expense		5,221			22,453
(Gain) loss on involuntary disposals		26,127			(134,771	)
Other non-cash income		(16,454	)		--
Loss on sale of other property & equipment		120,126			173,179
Gain on involuntary disposals		--			(7,231	)
Stock based compensation expense		232,827			141,785
Loss on sale of property & equipment		3,715			36,762
Excess tax expense (benefit) – stock based compensation expense, net		39,751			(485	)
Stock based compensation expense		44,919			52,805
Deferred income tax benefit		(13359,~~629~~786	)		(~~190~~65,~~753~~992	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions:
Royalties receivable		53(35,~~613~~160	)		~~(71~~57,~~082~~058	)
Other receivables		~~296~~66,~~453~~022			(6321,~~884~~700	)
Inventory		27(22,~~440~~284	)		~~(123~~26,~~389~~017	)
Income taxes receivable		~~(100~~146,~~203~~332	)		~~(43~~109,~~144~~333	)
Prepaid and other current assets		~~(231~~266,~~068~~414	)		~~(182~~171,~~346~~908	)
Other assets		12,~~392~~192			42(22,~~421~~428	)
Accounts payable		~~(374~~674,~~993~~105	)		(32236,~~472~~735	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(~~577~~408,~~674~~936	)		(~~611~~355,~~787~~042	)
Liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities		~~180~~(44,~~088~~166	)		(~~102~~22,~~357~~113	)
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities		~~(65~~11,~~488~~924	)		(916,~~856~~061	)
Total adjustments		21,~~457~~140,~~474~~389			1544,~~172,261~~956
Net cash provided by continuing operations		2844,~~246,285~~958			1818,~~036,392~~039
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations		(455,820	)		147,437
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(44,302	)		(62,073	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1800,~~790,465~~656			1755,~~183,829~~966
Cash flows from investing activities:
Insurance proceeds received from involuntary disposals		~~54,731~~--			~~385~~54,~~770~~731
Purchase of property and equipment		(2511,~~762,320~~525	)		(2716,~~953,593~~618	)
Proceeds from landlord for lease buildout		75,000			99,144
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		7,024			--
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		-			24,071
Net cash used in continuing operations		(504,501	)		(661,887	)
Net cash used in continuing operations		(2,632,589	)		(2,444,608	)
Net cash used in discontinued operations		--			(5,980	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(15,250	)		(478,566	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(504,501	)		(667,867	)
Cash received from sale of La Senorita		2,557,603			-
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations		2,542,353			(478,566	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(90,236	)		(2,923,174	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under line of credit agreement		~~900~~650,000			2600,~~260,~~000
Payments under line of credit agreement		(31,250,000	)		(1500,~~160,~~000	)
Excess tax benefit – stock based compensation expense, net		(39,751	)		485
Issuance of common stock from treasury		277,972			--
Exercise of stock options		-			15,755
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(322,028	)		100,000
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,389,751	)		1,116,240
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(25,873	)		188,099
Net decrease in cash		(689,522	)		(623,105	)
Cash at beginning of period		719,944			879,206
Cash at beginning of period		879,206			1,154,629
Cash at end of period	$	694,071		$	1,067,305
Cash at end of period	$	189,684		$	531,524
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period:
Interest	$	~~138~~59,~~762~~042		$	~~354~~71,~~413~~081
Income taxes	$	~~88,150~~--		$	~~92,771~~--

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MEXICAN RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”), the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position as of ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010, and the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the 13-week ~~and 39-week~~ periods ended ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~September~~ 28March 29, ~~2008~~2009. The consolidated ~~statements~~statement of operations for the 13-week ~~and~~period ~~39-week periods~~ ended ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010 ~~and September 28,~~is ~~2008 are~~ not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other interim period. During the interim periods, we follow the accounting policies described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended ~~December~~January 283, ~~2008~~2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~March~~April 261, ~~2009~~2010. Reference should be made to such consolidated financial statements for information on such accounting policies and further financial detail.

The Company classifies as discontinued operations for all periods presented any component of the Company’s business that the Company believes is probable of being sold within the next 12 months and that has operations and cash flows that are clearly distinguishable operationally and for financial reporting purposes. For those components, the Company has no significant continuing involvement after disposal, and their operations and cash flows are eliminated from ongoing operations. Sales of significant components of the Company’s business not classified as discontinued operations are reported as a component of income from continuing operations.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On September 27, 2009, the Company adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) to the authoritative hierarchy of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). These changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”). The ASU will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is referenced, the adoption of these changes had no impact on our consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB amended FASB ASC Subtopic 350-30 “General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill.” FASB ASC Subtopic 350-30 defines the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset to improve consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset. The requirement for determining the useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FASB ASC Subtopic 350-30 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Such adoption has not had a material effect on our consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2008, the FASB amended FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. As required by FASB ASC 260, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Such adoption has not had a material effect on our consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, which establishes guidance for the accounting for and the disclosure of events that happen after the date of the balance sheet but before the release of the consolidated financial statements, otherwise known as “subsequent events”. FASB ASC 855 requires us to disclose the date through which we have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date corresponds with the release of our financial statements. The guidance is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC 855 resulted in additional quarterly and annual disclosures only.

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, an update to FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This update provides amendments to reduce potential ambiguity in financial reporting when measuring the fair value of liabilities. Among other provisions, this update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the valuation techniques described in ASU 2009-05. ASU 2009-05 will become effective for the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended January 3, 2010. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2009-05 will have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

2. Income Taxes

In 2006, the State of Texas enacted a business tax that is imposed on gross margin to replace the State’s then-current franchise tax regime. The legislation’s effective date was January 1, 2007, and as a result our first Texas margins tax (“TMT”) return in 2008 was based on our 2007 operations. Although the TMT is imposed on an entity’s gross margin rather than on its net income, certain aspects of the tax make it similar to an income tax. We have properly determined the impact of the legislation in the determination of our reported state current and deferred income tax liability.

In determining the provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate based on forecasted annual income and permanent items, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The impact of significant discrete items is separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur.

3.	Stock-Based Compensation

At ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010, we had one equity-based compensation plan from which stock-based compensation awards can be granted to eligible employees, officers or directors, known as the 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan. On May 28, 2008, the shareholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan to increase from 350,000 to 425,000 shares ~~the number of shares~~ authorized for issuance under this plan. The Company’s 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan, its Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and its 1996 Manager’s Stock Option Plan have each terminated in accordance with its terms, but there are still options which remain exercisable under these plans until the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or no more than 90 days after the optionee ceases to be an employee of the Company. These Company plans are described in more detail in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~December~~January 283, ~~2008~~ 2010.

On May 28 22, ~~2008~~2009, ~~our Board of Directors approved~~ restricted stock grants toin ~~one~~the ~~Board member~~amount ~~for~~of 310,000 shares, ~~vesting~~to inthe ~~equal~~Company’s ~~increments~~President ~~over~~were ~~three~~granted ~~years,~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~one consultant~~a ~~for~~May 222,~~000~~ ~~shares~~2007 agreement, ~~vesting~~with insuch ~~equal~~shares ~~increments~~vesting over ~~two years~~a four-year period.

On ~~May 28~~December 15, ~~2008~~2009, ~~our~~restricted ~~shareholders~~stock ~~approved~~grants in the ~~grant~~amount of 6010,000 ~~long-term~~shares ~~performance units~~to ~~under~~one ~~the~~employee ~~2005~~were ~~Long~~granted ~~Term~~pursuant ~~Incentive~~to ~~Plan~~a toDecember ~~Mr.~~15, ~~Glowacki~~2006 agreement, with such shares vesting over a five-year period.

~~In accordance~~We ~~with~~receive a tax deduction for certain stock option exercises during the ~~May~~period ~~22,~~in ~~2007~~which ~~Board~~the ~~approved~~options ~~grant,~~are ~~10,000~~exercised. These ~~shares~~deductions are generally for the excess of ~~restricted~~ ~~stock~~the price for which the options were ~~granted~~sold toover ~~Mr.~~the ~~Glowacki~~exercise onprices ~~May~~of ~~22,~~the ~~2009~~options. ~~The shares~~No ~~will~~stock ~~vest~~options ~~over~~were aexercised ~~four~~during ~~year~~the ~~period~~13-week atperiods aended ~~rate~~April of4, ~~25%~~2010 ~~per~~and ~~year~~March 29, 2009.

We receive a tax deduction for certain stock option exercises during the period in which the options are exercised. These deductions are generally for the excess of the price for which the options were sold over the exercise prices of the options. No stock options were exercised during the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009 and we received $5,865 for the exercise of options for 1,750 shares during the 13-week period ended September 28, 2008. No stock options were exercised during the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 and we received $15,755 for the exercise of options for 4,625 shares during the 39-week period ended September 28, 2008.

4. Income (Loss) per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average shares outstanding without any dilutive effects considered. Diluted income (loss) per share is calculated using the treasury stock method, which considers unrecognized compensation expense as well as the potential excess tax benefits that reflect the current market price and total compensation expense to be recognized. If the sum of the assumed proceeds, including the unrecognized compensation costs calculated under the treasury stock method, exceeds the average stock price, those options would be considered antidilutive and therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share. For the 13-week ~~and~~period ~~39-week periods~~ ended ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010, weighted-average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of ~~2,975 and~~ 1,~~938~~089 common stock equivalents, respectively, due to our net loss position in ~~those~~the ~~periods~~period. For the 13-week ~~and 39-week~~period ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 2829, ~~2008~~2009, weighted-average shares outstanding~~, assuming~~ ~~dilution,~~included ~~excludes~~716 ~~the impact of 60,783 and 59,178~~ common stock equivalents, ~~respectively,~~in ~~due~~the tocalculation ~~our~~of ~~net~~diluted ~~loss~~income ~~position~~per ~~in those periods~~share.

5. Long-term Debt

We entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) in June 2007 (as amended, the “Wells Fargo Agreement”). ~~Originally,~~The ~~the~~ Wells Fargo Agreement ~~provided~~provides for a revolving loan of up to approximately $107.3 million, ~~but~~and has a maturity date of June 29, 2012. Effective January 3, 2010, the Wells Fargo Agreement was amended ~~effective~~ ~~December~~primarily ~~28,~~to ~~2008,~~allow ~~reducing~~for the ~~revolving~~add-back ~~loan~~of byseverance expense of $190,000 that the ~~amount~~Company incurred as part of ~~the net~~its ~~proceeds~~reduction ~~received~~in ~~from~~general and administrative expense to the ~~sale~~Company’s calculation of Larolling ~~Senorita~~twelve-month cash flow. The January 3, ~~which~~2010 amendment also reduced the revolver availability to ~~approximately~~ $76.30 million oneffective ~~April~~July 74, ~~2009~~ 2010. Effective ~~June~~April 284, ~~2009~~2010, the Wells Fargo Agreement was further amended ~~primarily~~ to ~~extend~~reduce the ~~maturity~~fixed ~~date~~charge ~~from~~coverage ~~June~~ratio ~~29,~~from ~~2010~~1.20 to ~~June 29, 2012~~1. ~~The~~10 ~~June~~through ~~2009~~the ~~amendment~~first toquarter ~~the~~of ~~Wells~~fiscal ~~Fargo~~year ~~Agreement~~2011 ~~also increased~~and to increase the ~~stipulated~~interest ~~percentages~~rate ~~payable~~50 inbasis ~~connection~~points ~~with~~to ~~London~~LIBOR ~~Interbank Offered~~plus ~~Rate~~325. ~~(“LIBOR”)~~For ~~loans~~the ~~and~~second ~~letters~~quarter of ~~credit~~fiscal year 2011 and ~~changed~~thereafter ~~total~~the ~~leverage ratio~~fixed ~~limits~~charge ascoverage aratio ~~condition~~is ~~precedent~~increased to ~~loans for growth capital expenditures~~1. ~~Under~~20 and the ~~Wells~~interest ~~Fargo~~rate ~~Agreement,~~reamins weat ~~are~~LIBOR ~~required~~plus ~~to maintain~~325. As ~~certain~~amended, ~~leverage~~we ~~ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios. We~~ were in compliance with all debt covenants ~~under~~of the Wells Fargo Agreement at ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010.

At our option, the revolving loan bears an interest rate equal to the Wells Fargo Base Rate plus a stipulated percentage or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Accordingly, we are impacted by changes in the Base Rate and LIBOR. We are subject to a non-use fee of 0.50% on the unused portion of the revolver from the date of the Wells Fargo Agreement. The Wells Fargo Agreement also allows up to $2.0 million in annual stock repurchases. We have pledged the stock of our subsidiaries, our leasehold interests, our patents and trademarks and our furniture, fixtures and equipment as collateral for our credit facility with Wells Fargo.

6. Related Party Transactions

Our Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors owns a Casa Olé franchise restaurant for which the Company receives royalties. For the 13-week periods ended ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~September~~March 2829, ~~2008~~2009, the Company recognized royalty income of $5,~~660~~582 and $56,~~426~~110, respectively, related to this restaurant. ~~For the 39-week periods ended September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008, the Company recognized royalty income of $17,908 and $17,126, respectively, related to this restaurant.~~

On March 31, 2010 we sold 113,458 shares of common stock from our treasury shares to Michael D. Domec, a director of the Company and our largest shareholder, for $277,972 or $2.45 per share. The per share price was based upon a weighted average based on 30 days, and the transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. We used the proceeds to pay down on our line of credit under the Wells Fargo Agreement.

7.	Discontinued Operations

OnThe ~~April 7,~~results ~~2009, we sold substantially all~~ of ~~the~~operations, ~~operating~~ assets and liabilities ~~of our~~for Laall ~~Senorita~~units ~~restaurant~~that ~~chain~~have ~~(consisting~~been disposed of ~~five~~are ~~site~~reclassified ~~locations)~~to ~~located~~discontinued operations in ~~Michigan. On~~ ~~January~~the ~~24,~~consolidated ~~2009,~~statements ~~we closed one underperforming Mission Burrito restaurant. The results~~ of operations ~~for the current~~ and ~~prior~~ ~~periods~~balance sheets for ~~the~~all Laperiods ~~Senorita chain and the closed Mission Burrito restaurant have been reported as discontinued operations~~presented.

~~Also,~~Current ~~the~~ assets and liabilities related to ~~the~~discontinued ~~sale~~operations ofconsist ~~the~~primarily ~~La Senorita chain that were sold have been classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as~~ of ~~December~~rent ~~28,~~receivable ~~2008. The assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~property oftaxes ~~the~~for ~~Mission Burrito~~a closed restaurant ~~and~~for ~~certain~~which ~~assets~~we ~~and liabilities of La Senorita that were not sold~~ have ~~been~~subleased ~~classified as related to discontinued operations. Current liabilities related to discontinued operations of~~ the ~~closed Mission Burrito~~ restaurant ~~include estimated lease obligations and are included with current portion of liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities~~.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we recognized $181,543 of restaurant closure expense related to a subleased store that we have entered into negotiations with to reduce the aggregate future rent receipts under the terms of a proposed amendment to the sublease.

On April 7, 2009, we sold substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities of our La Senorita restaurant chain (consisting of five site locations) located in Michigan for $2,557,603 as adjusted under the terms of the purchase agreement. We recorded a gain on this sale of $387,083 in fiscal year 2009, net of allocated goodwill, in the second quarter of 2009. Proceeds from the sale were used to pay down long-term debt. On January 24, 2009, we closed one underperforming Mission Burrito restaurant. The results of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 for the La Senorita chain and the closed Mission Burrito restaurant have been reported as discontinued operations. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we recognized a net loss from discontinued operations of $93,230 from the sale of the chain and the closure of the Mission Burrito restaurant. Income from discontinued operations of $75,456 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 reflects operating income from the La Senorita restaurants, partially offset by operating losses from the closed Mission Burrito restaurant. Restaurant closure costs of $190,572, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, primarily reflect costs associated with the closure of the Mission Burrito restaurant. Neither the La Senorita restaurant chain nor the closed Mission Burrito restaurant had any operations during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

8.	Fair Value of Measurements

The carrying amount of receivables, accounts payables and accrued expenses approximates fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is determined using current applicable rates for similar instruments and approximates the carrying value of such debt.

9.	Subsequent Events

~~In connection~~We ~~with~~evaluated ~~preparation~~all ofsubsequent events and transactions through the issuance date of our consolidated financial statements,. No unrecognized ~~we evaluated~~ subsequent events ~~after~~or transactions were noted. Amendment No. 5 to the ~~consolidated~~Wells ~~balance~~Fargo ~~sheet~~Agreement ~~date~~was ~~of September~~signed 27on May 17, ~~2009~~2010 ~~through~~and ~~November~~was ~~12,~~effective ~~2009,~~for the ~~date~~first ~~the~~quarter ~~consolidated financial~~ended ~~statements~~April ~~were~~4, ~~issued~~2010.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: national, regional or local economic and real estate conditions; inflation; increased food, labor and benefit costs; growth strategy; dependence on executive officers; geographic concentration; increasing susceptibility to adverse conditions in the region; changes in consumer tastes and eating and discretionary spending habits; the risk of food-borne illness; demographic trends; inclement weather; traffic patterns; the type, number and location of competing restaurants; the availability of experienced management and hourly employees; seasonality and the timing of new restaurant openings; changes in governmental regulations; dram shop exposure; and other factors not yet experienced by the Company. The use of words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our most recently filed Annual Report and Form 10-K that attempt to advise readers of the risks and factors that may affect our business. We undertake no obligation to update any such statements or publicly announce any updates or revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements.

General

We operate and franchise Mexican-theme restaurants featuring various elements associated with the casual dining experience under the names Casa Olé, Monterey’s Little Mexico, Tortuga Coastal Cantina, and Crazy Jose’s ~~and Mission Burrito~~. OnWe ~~April~~also 7,operate ~~2009,~~fast wecasual ~~sold~~burrito ~~our~~restaurants Launder ~~Senorita~~the ~~chain~~name inMission ~~order to focus our resources on our other store brands~~Burrito. At ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~ 2010 we operated 55 restaurants, franchised 17 restaurants and licensed ~~two restaurants~~one restaurant in various communities in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma. During the second quarter of 2010 one franchise location will close.

Our primary source of revenues is the sale of food and beverages at Company-owned restaurants. We also derive revenues from franchise fees, royalties and other franchise-related activities with respect to our franchised restaurants. Franchise fee revenue from an individual franchise sale is recognized when all services relating to the sale have been performed and the restaurant has commenced operations. Initial franchise fees relating to area franchise sales are recognized ratably in proportion to the services that are required to be performed pursuant to the area franchise or development agreements and proportionately as the restaurants within the area are opened.

Over the last five years, we have focused our growth and development efforts primarily upon assimilating two significant acquisitions (13 restaurants purchased in 2004 from a franchisee and two Mission Burrito restaurants, and related concept rights, acquired in 2006), developing new prototypes for our Casa Olé, Monterey’s and Mission Burrito restaurant concepts and initiating a program whereby we remodel several of our existing restaurants each year.

On October 6, 2009, we implemented planned expense reductions to reduce general and administrative expenses to achieve a level of expense that management believes is sustainable through fiscal year 2010. In implementing the cost savings, severance pay of approximately $190,000 was incurred related to staff reductions at the corporate office. Total cost savings of approximately $1.1 million through fiscal year 2010 is expected from planned general and administrative expense reductions related to the decrease in corporate payroll costs as well as reduced marketing and other general and administrative costs.

Results of Operations

Revenues. Our restaurant revenues for the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal year ~~2009~~2010 decreased $~~381,636~~2.2 million or 211.24% to $17.30 million compared with $1719.72 million for the same quarter in fiscal year ~~2008~~ 2009. ~~Restaurant~~The ~~sales~~decrease ~~for~~in ~~third~~restaurant ~~quarter~~revenues ~~2009~~primarily ~~decreased~~reflects bya ~~$354,895 or~~decrease ~~2.0%~~in tosame-store ~~$17~~sales.1 For ~~million~~the ~~compared~~first ~~with~~quarter ~~$17.~~ended April 4, ~~million~~2010, ~~for~~Company-owned ~~the~~same-restaurant ~~third~~sales ~~quarter~~decreased ~~of 2008~~approximately 11.7%. Franchised-owned restaurant sales, as reported by franchisees, decreased approximately 311.40% over the same quarter in fiscal ~~2008~~ 2009. ~~The~~We ~~decrease~~believe insuch ~~restaurant~~decreases ~~revenues~~are ~~primarily reflects~~ a ~~decrease~~ inresult ~~same-store sales, partially offset by new restaurant revenues and revenues~~ of ~~restaurants~~the ~~that~~continued ~~were~~weakness ~~temporarily~~in ~~closed~~the ~~last~~economy ~~year due to Hurricanes Gustav~~ and ~~Ike. For~~its ~~the~~impact ~~third~~on ~~quarter~~consumers’ ~~ended~~dining ~~September 27, 2009, Company-owned same-restaurant sales decreased approximately 11~~habits.~~4%, caused by a weakened economy.~~

OnCosts ~~a year-to-date~~and ~~basis,~~Expenses. Costs ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~sales, ~~revenue~~consisting ~~decreased~~of ~~$398~~food,~~486~~ tobeverage, ~~$54.8~~liquor, ~~million compared~~supplies toand ~~$55.2~~paper ~~million~~costs, ~~for~~was ~~the~~29.3% ~~same~~as ~~39-week~~a ~~period~~percentage inof ~~fiscal 2008. Restaurant~~restaurant sales for the ~~39-week~~first ~~period~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~September~~fiscal ~~27, 2009~~year ~~decreased~~2010 ~~$348,192~~compared towith ~~$54~~27.26% ~~million~~for ~~compared~~the tofirst ~~$54~~quarter of fiscal year 2009.6 The ~~million~~increase ~~for~~reflects ~~the~~higher ~~same 39-week~~comparative ~~period~~produce inand ~~fiscal~~soft ~~2008~~beverage costs. ~~Franchised-owned~~Further, ~~restaurant~~food ~~sales~~discounts, ~~as reported~~which byreduce ~~franchisees,~~cost ~~decreased~~of ~~approximately~~sales ~~2.9%~~by ~~over~~reclassing the ~~same~~cost ~~39-week period~~of infood ~~fiscal~~discounts ~~2008. The~~to ~~decrease~~controllable inexpense, ~~restaurant~~were ~~revenues~~approximately ~~primarily reflects~~$600,000 alower ~~decrease~~ in ~~same-store~~the ~~sales,~~first ~~partially~~quarter ~~offset~~ended byApril ~~new~~4, ~~restaurant revenues~~2010 ~~and~~compared ~~revenues~~with the first quarter of ~~restaurants~~fiscal ~~that~~year ~~were~~2009, ~~temporarily~~resulting ~~closed~~in ~~last~~a ~~year~~70 ~~due to~~basis ~~Hurricanes~~point ~~Gustav~~increase ~~and~~in ~~Ike~~cost of sales. ~~For~~In ~~the~~absolute ~~39-week~~dollars, ~~period~~cost ~~ended~~of ~~September 27,~~sales ~~2009~~decreased $305,331 ~~Company-owned~~compared ~~same-restaurant~~with ~~sales~~the ~~decreased~~first ~~approximately 5~~quarter of fiscal year 2009.~~6%.~~

~~Costs~~Labor and ~~Expenses. Costs~~ ofother ~~sales,~~related ~~consisting~~expenses offor ~~food,~~the ~~beverage, liquor,~~first ~~supplies~~quarter ~~and~~of ~~paper~~fiscal ~~costs,~~2010 ~~was~~increased ~~29.0%~~ as a percentage of restaurant sales ~~for~~ ~~the~~230 ~~third~~basis ~~quarter~~points ofto ~~fiscal~~34.5% ~~year~~as ~~2009~~ compared with 2932.12% ~~for~~in the ~~third~~ first quarter of fiscal year ~~2008~~2009. As The aincrease ~~percentage~~reflects oflabor ~~restaurant~~cost leverage that is lost when same-store sales decline. Management labor increased 50 basis points, ~~dairy,~~ ~~cheese~~hourly labor increased 120 basis points and ~~tortilla~~employee ~~costs~~taxes ~~declined~~increased ~~106~~60 basis points. The increase in ~~the~~hourly ~~third~~labor ~~quarter of~~also ~~fiscal~~reflects ~~year~~our ~~2009~~investment in the Starship Initiative, ~~but~~a ~~were~~program ~~offset~~designed byto retrain each restaurant’s staff to perform at a higher ~~costs~~level inof ~~all~~hospitality, service and food quality standards. In absolute dollars, labor and other ~~categories~~ related expenses decreased $305,903 compared with the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.

OnRestaurant ~~a year-to-date~~operating ~~basis~~expenses, ~~costs~~which ofprimarily ~~sales~~include ~~decreased~~rent, property taxes, utilities, repair and maintenance, liquor taxes, property insurance, general liability insurance and advertising, increased as a ~~percent~~percentage of restaurant sales 30 80 basis points to 2826.50% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared with 2825.82% ~~for~~in the ~~same~~first ~~39-week~~quarter ~~period~~ of fiscal year ~~2008~~2009. The ~~decrease~~increase ~~primarily~~ reflects cost ~~improvements~~leverage ~~for dairy~~that is lost when same-store sales decline. Offsetting some of the increase, first quarter utilities and ~~cheese~~advertising expenses were approximately $125,000 ~~which~~and ~~declined~~$200,000, asrespectively, alower ~~percentage~~than the first quarter of ~~restaurant~~fiscal ~~sales~~year by2009. In 90absolute ~~basis points~~dollars, ~~offset~~restaurant byoperating ~~increases~~expenses indecreased ~~all~~$397,450 ~~other~~compared ~~costs~~with ~~and~~the ~~expenses~~first ~~except~~quarter ~~for~~of ~~dry goods~~fiscal year 2009.

~~Labor~~General and ~~other~~ ~~related~~administrative expenses ~~increased~~consist asof expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support restaurant operations. As a percentage of ~~restaurant~~total ~~sales~~revenue, ~~110~~general and administrative expenses decreased 30 basis points to 348.15% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared with 338.08% infor the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal year ~~2008~~ 2009. ~~The~~ In ~~increase~~absolute ~~reflects~~dollars, ~~labor~~general ~~cost~~and ~~leverage~~administrative ~~that~~costs isdecreased ~~lost when same-store sales decline; for example~~$238,230 ~~both~~compared ~~management~~with ~~labor~~the ~~and~~first ~~back~~quarter of ~~the~~ ~~house~~fiscal ~~labor,~~year ~~which~~2009. General ~~are~~and ~~semi-fixed~~administrative inexpenses ~~nature,~~decreased ~~increased~~both as a percentage of ~~sales~~ total revenues and in absolute dollars due to the ~~decline~~planned reduction in ~~sales~~salaries, bonuses and most department expenses.

OnDepreciation ~~a year-to-date~~and ~~basis,~~amortization ~~labor~~expense include the depreciation of fixed assets and ~~other~~the ~~related~~amortization ~~expenses~~of intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a percentage of ~~restaurant~~total sales 7060 basis points to 335.21% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared with 324.5% ~~for~~ the ~~39-week period~~same ofquarter in fiscal year ~~2008~~2009. ~~Again,~~ Such expense for the ~~increase~~first ~~primarily reflects~~quarter ~~labor~~of ~~cost~~fiscal ~~leverage~~year ~~that~~2010 iswas ~~lost~~$9,591 ~~when~~lower ~~same-store~~than ~~sales decline~~the first quarter in fiscal year 2009.

~~Restaurant operating~~Impairment ~~expenses,~~and ~~which~~Restaurant ~~primarily~~Closure ~~include~~Expense. Long-lived ~~rent~~assets, such as property ~~taxes,~~and ~~utilities~~equipment, ~~repair~~ and ~~maintenance,~~purchased ~~liquor~~intangibles ~~taxes,~~subject ~~property~~to ~~insurance~~amortization, ~~general~~are ~~liability insurance~~reviewed ~~and~~for ~~advertising,~~impairment ~~decreased~~whenever asevents aor ~~percentage~~changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of ~~restaurant~~an ~~sales~~asset ~~100 basis~~may ~~points~~not tobe 25recoverable.9% Recoverability asof ~~compared~~assets ~~with~~to ~~26.9%~~be inheld and used is measured by a comparison of the ~~third~~carrying ~~quarter~~amount of ~~fiscal~~an ~~year 2008~~asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. ~~The~~If ~~decrease~~the ~~reflects~~carrying ~~lower~~amount ~~electric~~of ~~and~~an ~~gas~~asset ~~expenses~~exceeds ofits ~~150 basis~~estimated ~~points~~future cash flows, ~~lower~~an ~~marketing~~impairment ~~expenses~~charge ofis 80recognized ~~basis~~by ~~points,~~the ~~offset~~amount by ~~higher coupon,~~which ~~rent,~~the ~~insurance~~carrying ~~and~~amount ~~property~~of ~~tax~~the ~~expenses~~asset ~~for~~exceeds athe ~~combined~~fair ~~increase~~value of ~~124 basis~~the ~~points~~asset.

OnThe ~~a year~~consolidated statements of operations for the 13-~~to-date~~week ~~basis,~~period ~~restaurant~~ended ~~operating~~April ~~expenses~~4, ~~increased~~2010 10and ~~basis~~March ~~points~~29, ~~to 25.3%~~2009, ~~compared~~includes ~~with~~a ~~25.2%~~separate line item for ~~the~~impairment ~~39-week~~and ~~period~~restaurant inclosure ~~fiscal~~expense ~~year 2008~~of $5,221 and $22,453, respectively. The ~~increase~~impairment ~~primarily~~and ~~reflects~~restaurant ~~the~~closure ~~same~~expense ~~that~~primarily ~~was~~related ~~discussed~~to ~~in the~~two ~~previous~~under-performing ~~paragraph~~restaurants ~~except~~operating in the ~~offsetting~~Houston ~~items were proportionally higher~~area.

General and administrative expenses consist of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support restaurant operations. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased 110 basis points to 8.8% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared with 9.9% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. On a year-to-date basis, general and administrative expenses decreased 110 basis points to 8.8% compared with the 39-week period of fiscal 2008. In absolute dollars, general and administrative costs decreased $224,098 and $601,672 in the 13-week and 39-week periods of fiscal year 2009, respectively, compared with the same periods of fiscal year 2008. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased due to the planned reduction in salaries, bonuses and most department expenses, partially offset by higher legal and stock compensation expense, both related to the sale of La Senorita.

~~Depreciation and~~Loss ~~amortization~~on ~~expense~~Sale ~~include the depreciation~~ of ~~fixed~~Property ~~assets~~ and ~~the amortization~~Equipment. The ofconsolidated ~~intangible~~statements ~~assets. Depreciation~~of ~~and~~operations ~~amortization expense~~for ~~increased~~the as13-week aperiod ~~percentage~~ended ofApril ~~total~~4, ~~sales~~2010 60include ~~basis~~a ~~points~~separate toline ~~5.1%~~item for ~~the third~~a ~~quarter~~loss of ~~fiscal~~$3,715, ~~year~~primarily ~~2009~~related asto ~~compared with 4.5%~~ the ~~same~~routine ~~quarter~~disposal ~~in fiscal~~of ~~year~~restaurant ~~2008~~assets. ~~Such~~The ~~expense~~consolidated ~~for~~statements ~~the third quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~operations ~~year 2009~~for ~~was~~the ~~$86,463~~13-week ~~higher~~period ~~than~~ended ~~the~~March ~~third~~29, ~~quarter~~2009 inincludes ~~fiscal~~a ~~year 2008. The~~separate ~~increase~~line ~~reflects~~item ~~additional~~for ~~depreciation~~a ~~expense~~loss ~~for remodeled~~of ~~restaurants~~$36,762, ~~new~~primarily ~~restaurants,~~related ~~and~~to the ~~replacement~~disposal of ~~equipment~~restaurant ~~and leasehold improvements in various existing restaurants~~assets.

10Other Income (Expense). Net expense decreased $19,295 to $31,418 in the 13-week period ended April 4, 2010 compared with a net expense of $50,713 in the 13-week period ended March 29, 2009. Interest expense decreased $425 to $61,769 in the 13-week period ended April 4, 2010 compared with interest expense of $62,194 in the 13-week period ended March 29, 2009. Average quarterly debt was approximately $3.0 million lower in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared with first quarter 2009. The small decrease in interest expense reflects higher interest rates in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared with interest rates in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 offset by lower average debt outstanding for the first quarter 2010.

OnIncome ~~a year-to-date~~Taxes. Our ~~basis,~~effective ~~depreciation~~tax ~~and~~rate ~~amortization~~from ~~expenses~~continuing ~~increased~~and asdiscontinued ~~a percentage~~operations offor ~~total~~the ~~sales~~13-week 40period ~~basis~~ended ~~points~~April to 4~~.8%~~, ~~for~~2010 ~~the~~was ~~39-week~~a ~~period~~benefit of ~~fiscal~~ ~~year~~42.9% ~~2009~~ as compared ~~with~~to 4an expense of 19.4% for the ~~same 39~~13-week period ofended ~~fiscal~~March ~~year 2008~~29, or2009. The ~~$229,768~~increase ~~higher~~in ~~than~~the effective rate is attributed primarily to the ~~same~~net ~~39-week~~loss ~~period~~before ofincome ~~fiscal~~taxes ~~year 2008. The~~and an increase ~~was~~in ~~due~~permanent differences related to FICA tip credits for the ~~reasons~~13-week ~~discussed above~~period ended April 4, 2010.

Discontinued Operations. During the ~~third~~first quarter ~~ended~~of ~~September~~fiscal ~~27,~~year ~~2009~~2010, we ~~opened~~recognized a$181,543 ~~new~~of ~~Mission Burrito~~ restaurant, ~~incurring~~closure ~~$21,745~~expense inrelated ~~pre-opening~~to ~~costs. During~~a ~~the~~subleased ~~third quarter~~store ofthat ~~fiscal~~we ~~year~~have ~~2008,~~entered weinto ~~re-opened~~negotiations ~~one~~with ~~Casa~~to ~~Olé~~reduce ~~restaurant~~the ~~that~~aggregate ~~had~~future ~~been closed~~rent ~~for~~receipts ~~repairs~~under ~~due~~the toterms of a ~~fire,~~proposed ~~incurring~~amendment ~~$43,810~~to inthe ~~pre-opening costs~~sublease.

~~Impairment~~On April 7, 2009, we sold substantially all of the operating assets and ~~Restaurant~~ ~~Closure~~liabilities ~~Costs~~of our La Senorita restaurant chain (consisting of five site locations) located in Michigan for $2,557,603 as adjusted under the terms of the purchase agreement. ~~Long-lived~~We ~~assets~~recorded a gain on this sale of $387,083 ~~such~~in asfiscal ~~property and~~year ~~equipment~~2009, ~~and~~net ~~purchased~~of ~~intangibles~~allocated ~~subject~~goodwill, in the second quarter of 2009. Proceeds from the sale were used to ~~amortization~~pay down long-term debt. On January 24, ~~are~~2009, ~~reviewed for~~we ~~impairment~~closed ~~whenever~~one ~~events~~underperforming orMission ~~changes~~Burrito inrestaurant. The ~~circumstances~~results ~~indicate~~of ~~that~~operations for the ~~carrying~~ ~~amount~~first quarter of anfiscal ~~asset~~year ~~may~~2009 ~~not~~for bethe ~~recoverable~~La Senorita chain and the closed Mission Burrito restaurant have been reported as discontinued operations. ~~Recoverability~~During the first quarter of ~~assets~~ tofiscal beyear ~~held~~2009, we recognized a net loss from discontinued operations of $93,230 from the sale of the chain and ~~used~~the isclosure ~~measured~~of bythe aMission ~~comparison~~Burrito restaurant. Income from discontinued operations of $75,456 during the ~~carrying~~first ~~amount~~quarter of an ~~asset~~fiscal toyear ~~estimated~~2009 ~~undiscounted~~reflects ~~future~~operating ~~cash~~income ~~flows~~from ~~expected~~the toLa beSenorita ~~generated~~restaurants, partially offset by operating losses from the ~~asset~~closed Mission Burrito restaurant. IfRestaurant ~~the~~closure ~~carrying~~costs ~~amount~~ of an$190,572, ~~asset~~during ~~exceeds~~the ~~its~~first ~~estimated future~~quarter ~~cash~~of ~~flows~~fiscal year 2009, anprimarily ~~impairment~~reflect ~~charge~~costs isassociated ~~recognized~~with bythe closure of the ~~amount~~Mission byBurrito ~~which~~restaurant. Neither the ~~carrying~~ ~~amount~~La ofSenorita restaurant chain nor the ~~asset~~closed ~~exceeds~~Mission Burrito restaurant had any operations during the ~~fair~~first ~~value~~quarter of ~~the~~fiscal ~~asset~~year 2010.

The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2009, include a separate line item for impairment and restaurant closure costs of $116,937 and $354,168, respectively. The impairments and closure costs were primarily related to rent differential adjustments for two subleased restaurants located in Idaho, asset impairments for the corporate office, and to a lesser extent, two under-performing restaurants operating in the Houston area. The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 28, 2008, include a separate line item for impairment and restaurant closure costs of $67,597 and $122,426, respectively. The impairments and closure costs were primarily related to the same two under-performing restaurants operating in the Houston area and the two Idaho subleased restaurants.

Loss (Gain) on Involuntary Disposals. The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2009 include a separate line item for a loss of $18,330 and $26,127 respectively. The losses resulted from costs related to our Hurricane Ike insurance claim, partially offset by insurance proceeds received for the replacement of assets. We are currently working with our insurance company to finalize all insurance claims related to the property damage from last year’s hurricane. The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 28, 2008 includes a separate line item for a loss of $140,938 and a gain of $134,771, respectively, resulting from inventory losses caused by Hurricane Ike and the write-off of assets damaged by the February 2008 fire at the Company’s Casa Olé restaurant located in Vidor, Texas, net of insurance proceeds for the replacement of assets. The claim related to the Vidor fire has been fully settled with the insurance company.

Loss on Sale of Other Property and Equipment. The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2009 include a separate line item for a loss of $46,430 and $120,126, respectively, primarily related to the routine disposal of restaurant assets. The consolidated statements of operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended September 28, 2008 includes a separate line item for a loss of $131,509 and $173,179, respectively, primarily related to the disposal of restaurant assets during the conversion of an existing restaurant into a Mission Burrito restaurant.

Other Income (Expense). Net expense decreased $47,948 to $32,313 in the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009 compared with a net expense of $80,261 in the 13-week period ended September 28, 2008. Interest expense decreased $52,133 to $39,870 in the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009 compared with interest expense of $92,003 in the 13-week period ended September 28, 2008. The decrease in interest expense reflects lower interest rates and lower average debt balances during the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. Net expense decreased $177,647 to $115,459 in the 39-week period ending September 27, 2009 compared with a net expense of $293,105 in the 39-week period ended September 28, 2008. Interest expense decreased $180,234 to $144,981 in the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 compared with interest expense of $325,215 in the 39-week period ended September 28, 2008. The decrease in interest expense reflects lower interest rates and lower average debt balances during the 39-week period of fiscal year 2009 as compared to the 39-week period of fiscal year 2008.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009 was a benefit of 57.1% as compared to a benefit of 42.9% for the 13-week period ended September 28, 2008. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 was a benefit of 59.2% as compared to a benefit of 65.7% for the 39-week period ended September 28, 2008. The decrease in the year-to-date effective rate is attributed primarily to an increase in FICA tip credits and other permanent differences. We did not have any discontinued operations during the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009. Our effective tax rate from discontinued operations for the 13-week period ended September 28, 2008 was an expense of 129.4%. Our effective tax rate from discontinued operations for the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 was an expense of 121.4% as compared to an expense of 64.0% for the 39-week period ended September 28, 2008. The increase in the year-to-date effective rate is attributed to income tax expense related to the sale of our La Senorita chain in Michigan in addition to a capital loss related to the La Senorita sale that has been fully reserved.

Discontinued Operations. On April 7, 2009, we sold substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities of our La Senorita restaurant chain (consisting of five site locations) located in Michigan for $2,557,603 as adjusted under the terms of the purchase agreement. We recorded a gain on this sale of $387,083, net of allocated goodwill, in the second quarter of 2009. Proceeds from the sale were used to pay down long-term debt. On January 24, 2009, we closed one underperforming Mission Burrito restaurant. The results of operations for the current and prior periods for the La Senorita chain and the closed Mission Burrito restaurant have been reported as discontinued operations. For the 13-week period ended September 27, 2009, we did not have any discontinued operations. For the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009, we recognized net income from discontinued operations of $231,582 from the sale of the chain and the closure of the Mission Burrito restaurant. Income from discontinued operations of $36,021 during the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 reflects operating income from the La Senorita restaurants, partially offset by operating losses from the closed Mission Burrito restaurant. Restaurant closure costs of $190,941, for the 39-week period ending September 27, 2009, primarily reflect costs associated with the closure of the Mission Burrito restaurant. Gain on sale of assets of $386,502 during the 39-week period ended September 27, 2009 resulted primarily from the sale of La Senorita.

The assets and liabilities related to the sale of the La Senorita chain that were sold have been classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 28, 2008. The assets and liabilities of the Mission Burrito restaurant and certain assets and liabilities of La Senorita that were not sold have been classified as related to discontinued operations. We used the furniture and equipment from the closed Mission Burrito restaurant at our new Mission Burrito restaurant that we opened third quarter. Current liabilities related to discontinued operations of the closed Mission Burrito restaurant include estimated lease obligations and are included with current portion of liabilities associated with leasing and exit activities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We financed our capital expenditure requirements for the 3913-week period ended ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010 primarily from our operating cash flows. In the 39 13-week period of fiscal year ~~2009~~2010, we had cash flows provided by operating activities of approximately $~~1.8 million~~800,000, compared with cash flows provided by operating activities of approximately $~~1.2~~756,000 ~~million~~ in the comparable 3913-week period of fiscal year ~~2008~~2009. ~~The increase in cash flows from operating activities reflects the receipt of insurance receivables related to last year’s hurricanes and the Pasadena, Texas restaurant fire.~~ During the 39 13-week period ended ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010, we made draws of $~~900~~650,000 and payments of $31,250,000 on our line of credit. Proceeds from the sale of ~~La Senorita~~common stock from Treasury in the amount of $277,972 contributed to the amount paid on the line of credit. As of ~~September~~ 27April 4, ~~2009~~2010, we had a working capital deficit of approximately $~~994,215~~1.3 million compared with a working capital deficit ~~(excluding assets held for sale)~~ of approximately $1700,~~023,766~~000 at ~~December~~ 28January 3, ~~2008~~2010. A working capital deficit is common in the restaurant industry, since restaurant companies do not typically require a significant investment in either accounts receivable or inventory.

Our principal capital requirements are the funding of routine capital expenditures, new restaurant development or acquisitions and remodeling of older units. During the 3913-week period ended ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010, total cash used for capital requirements ~~was $2~~,~~777,570~~ ~~with~~net ~~$2,762,320~~of ~~used~~proceeds infrom ~~continuing~~sale ~~operations~~of property and equipment, was $15504,~~250~~501, all used ~~in discontinued~~for continuing operations. Total cash used for capital requirements included $1493,~~835,598~~331 spent for routine capital expenditures~~, $540,155~~ ~~for~~and ~~new restaurant development,~~ $7618,~~394~~194 for ~~replacement~~the remodel of ~~damaged assets~~the ~~and~~new ~~$325,422~~corporate ~~for~~office ~~remodels~~space. We ~~opened~~received ~~one~~$7,024 ~~new~~for ~~restaurant during~~ the ~~third~~sale ~~quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~miscellaneous ~~year~~restaurant ~~2009~~equipment. We do not plan to open any new restaurants during the remainder of fiscal year ~~2009~~2010. We anticipate that we will spend approximately $~~400,000~~1.5 million for capital expenditures on current facilities during the remainder of fiscal year ~~2009~~2010.

We entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) in June 2007 (the “Wells Fargo Agreement”). Originally, the Wells Fargo Agreement provided for a revolving loan of up to $10 million, but the Wells Fargo Agreement was amended effective December 28, 2008, reducing the revolving loan by the amount of the net proceeds received from the sale of La Senorita, which reduced the revolver availability to approximately $7.3 million on April 7, 2009. Effective June 28, 2009, the Wells Fargo Agreement was further amended primarily to extend the maturity date from June 29, 2010 to June 29, 2012. The June 2009 amendment to the Wells Fargo Agreement also increased the stipulated percentages payable in connection with London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) loans and letters of credit under the Wells Fargo Agreement, added as a condition precedent to loans made to the Company for growth capital expenditures that the Company’s total leverage ratio not exceed certain stated amounts, and amended certain financial covenants.

AtWe ~~our~~entered ~~option,~~into ~~the~~a ~~revolving~~Credit ~~loan~~Agreement ~~bears~~with anWells ~~interest~~Fargo ~~rate~~Bank, ~~equal~~N.A. to(“Wells Fargo”) in June 2007 (as amended, the “Wells Fargo ~~Base~~Agreement”). The ~~Rate~~Wells ~~plus~~Fargo Agreement provides for a ~~stipulated~~revolving ~~percentage~~loan orof ~~LIBOR~~up ~~plus~~to aapproximately ~~stipulated percentage~~$7. ~~Accordingly~~3 million, weand ~~are~~has ~~impacted~~a bymaturity ~~changes~~date inof ~~the~~June ~~Base~~29, ~~Rate and LIBOR~~2012. WeEffective ~~are~~January ~~subject~~3, 2010, the Wells Fargo Agreement was amended primarily to aallow ~~non~~for the add-~~use~~back ~~fee~~of severance expense of ~~0.50%~~$190,000 onthat the ~~unused portion~~Company incurred as part of ~~the~~its ~~revolver~~reduction ~~from~~in general and administrative expense to the ~~date~~Company’s calculation of ~~the~~rolling ~~Wells~~twelve-month ~~Fargo Agreement~~cash flow. The ~~Wells~~January ~~Fargo~~3, ~~Agreement~~2010 amendment also ~~allows~~reduced upthe revolver availability to $26.0 million in ~~annual~~effective ~~stock~~July ~~repurchases~~4, 2010. WeEffective ~~have~~April ~~pledged~~4, 2010, the ~~stock~~Wells ofFargo ~~our subsidiaries,~~Agreement ~~our~~was ~~leasehold~~further ~~interests,~~amended ~~our~~to ~~patents~~reduce the fixed charge coverage ratio from 1.20 to 1.10 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ~~trademarks~~to increase the interest rate 50 basis points to LIBOR plus 325. For the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ~~our furniture,~~thereafter ~~fixtures~~the fixed charge coverage ratio is increased to 1.20 and ~~equipment~~the asinterest ~~collateral~~rate ~~for~~remains ~~our~~at ~~credit~~LIBOR ~~facility~~plus 325. As amended, we were in compliance with all debt covenants of the Wells Fargo Agreement at April 4, 2010.

12 At our option, the revolving loan bears an interest rate equal to the Wells Fargo Base Rate plus a stipulated percentage or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage. Accordingly, we are impacted by changes in the Base Rate and LIBOR.

We are subject to a non-use fee of 0.50% on the unused portion of the revolver from the date of the Wells Fargo Agreement. The Wells Fargo Agreement also allows up to $2.0 million in annual stock repurchases. We have pledged the stock of our subsidiaries, our leasehold interests, our patents and trademarks and our furniture, fixtures and equipment as collateral for our credit facility with Wells Fargo.

Although the Wells Fargo Agreement permits us to implement a share repurchase program for up to $2.0 million annually under certain conditions, we currently have no repurchase programs in effect. Shares previously acquired are being held for general corporate purposes, including the offset of the dilutive effect on shareholders from the exercise of stock options.

On April 7, 2009, we sold substantially all of the operating assets and liabilities of our La Senorita restaurant chain (consisting of five site locations) located in Michigan for an adjusted price of $2.6 million. Proceeds from the sale were used to pay down long-term debt. We recorded a gain on the sale of La Senorita of $387,083 in the second quarter of 2009.

Our management believes that with our operating cash flows and our revolving line of credit under the Wells Fargo Agreement, funds will be sufficient to meet operating requirements and to finance routine capital expenditures ~~and new restaurant growth~~ through the next 12 months. Unless we violate a debt covenant, our credit facility with Wells Fargo, as amended, is not subject to triggering events that would cause the credit facility to become due sooner than the maturity date described in the previous paragraphs. As of ~~September~~April 274, ~~2009~~2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants and as of the date hereof expects to be in compliance with its debt covenants during the next 12 months, although we continue to closely monitor the impact of the continued deterioration of the casual dining market on our operating results.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on debt and changes in commodity prices. Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations is limited to outstanding bank debt. At ~~September 27~~April 4, ~~2009~~2010, there was $54.1555 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility which currently bears interest at 275 basis points (depending on leverage ratios) over LIBOR. Should interest rates based on these borrowings increase by one percentage point, estimated quarterly interest expense would increase by approximately $1211,~~875~~000.

Effects of Inflation

Components of our operations subject to inflation include food, beverage, lease and labor costs. Our leases require us to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and utilities, all of which are subject to inflationary increases. We believe inflation in the costs of various items has had a material impact on our results of operations in recent years.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, chicken, pork, dairy products, produce, tortillas and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of these product prices, this exposure can impact our food and beverage costs. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of these product purchases, we cannot quickly take into account changing costs. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in food product prices.

Interest Rates

We do not have, or participate in, any transactions involving derivative, financial and commodity instruments. Our long-term debt bears interest at floating market rates, based upon either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a stipulated percentage, and therefore we experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change.

The subprime mortgage crisis, subsequent disruptions to the financial markets, and continuing economic downturn may adversely impact the availability of credit already arranged and the availability and cost of credit in the future. The disruptions in the financial markets have had an adverse effect on the U.S. and world economy, and have negatively impacted recent consumer spending patterns. There can be no assurance that various U.S. and world government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets in the near future will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets, or increase liquidity or the availability of credit. Our future performance could be hindered by our accessibility to obtain financing.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our CEO and CFO, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the last quarterly period covered by this report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from the disclosure set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~December~~January 283, ~~2008~~2010.

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other information set forth in the Annual Report in Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should be aware that these risk factors and other information may not describe every risk facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 31, 2010 we sold 113,458 shares of common stock from our treasury shares to Michael D. Domec, a director of the Company and our largest shareholder for $277,972 or $2.45 per share. The per share price was based upon a weighted average based on 30 days, and the transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. We used the proceeds to pay down on our line of credit under the Wells Fargo Agreement.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Document Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
10.1	Agreement and Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement made as of May 17, 2010, between Mexican Restaurants, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. amending the Credit Agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo dated June 29, 2007
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Filed Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Filed Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Forwarded Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Forwarded Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this Part II are not applicable and have been omitted.

1413

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Mexican Restaurants, Inc.

Dated: November 12, 2009	By: /s/ Curt Glowacki
Dated: May 18, 2010	By: /s/ Curt Glowacki
Curt Glowacki
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 12, 2009	By: /s/ Andrew J. Dennard
Dated: May 18, 2010	By: /s/ Andrew J. Dennard
Andrew J. Dennard
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · MEXICAN RESTAURANTS INC