10-Q 1 e10q0206-glc.txt GLC 10Q @ 6/30/02 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-Q (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 333-59545 GREAT LAKES CARBON CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 13-3637043 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3600, New York, New York 10176 (Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code) (212) 370-5770 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Not Applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]. 1 of 20 GREAT LAKES CARBON CORPORATION FORM 10-Q June 30, 2002 CONTENTS

2 of 20 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except share and per share data)

3 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

4 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

5 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)

6 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

7 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation Great Lakes Carbon Corporation (the "Company") is a producer of calcined petroleum coke ("CPC") principally for customers in the aluminum industry. The Company is a wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. ("GLAC"), a holding company formed by American Industrial Capital Fund II, L.P. ("AIP"), a private investment fund, which acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on May 22, 1998. The accompanying financial statements as of June 30, 2002 do not reflect the principal amount related to 13 1/8% Senior Discount Debentures issued by GLAC as the Company has not guaranteed or otherwise pledged its assets as collateral for the Debentures. Certain prior year amounts may have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The information furnished reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair summary of the results of operations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K, File No. 333-59541. 2. Accounting Pronouncements Business Combinations In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". SFAS No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements. Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", which is effective January 2003. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of a liability for and asset retirement obligation and associated asset retirement cost. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial statements. Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets In August 2001, the FASB SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which is effective January 2002. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of", and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions", for the disposal of a business (as defined in that Opinion). This statement also amends Account Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements", to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. 8 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." This Statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt", and an amendment of that Statement, FASB Statement No. 64, "Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." This Statement also rescinds FASB Statement No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers." This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases", to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company will adopt the provisions of this Statement upon its effective date and restate its financial statements accordingly. Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. This statement also established that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 146 on its consolidated financial statements. 3. Restricted Cash Funds that are legally restricted as to withdrawal or usage are shown as restricted cash. At December 31, 2001, $10,414,000 were set aside under an escrow agreement with AIP to settle a finders fee claim arising from the acquisition of the Company in 1998. On March 22, 2002, a payment in the amount of approximately $10,300,000 was made to settle the claim. 4. Inventories Inventories are as follows: December 31, June 30, 2001 2002 --------- --------- (In thousands) Raw materials $ 24,696 $ 46,991 Finished goods 14,307 17,978 Supplies and spare parts 7,611 8,069 --------- --------- $ 46,614 $ 73,038 ========= ========= 5. Accrued Expenses Accrued expenses included interest payable and employee profit sharing payable of $177,000 and $1,390,000 at December 31, 2001 and $646,000 and $245,000 at June 30, 2002, respectively. 6. Goodwill In accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", the Company completed the impairment test of the valuation of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 and based upon the results, there was no impairment. The Company intends to perform its annual review of goodwill on December 31, 2002. The carry value of goodwill was $162,799,000 at December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2002. Net income results reflecting goodwill that is no longer being amortized to selling, general and administrative expense is as follows: Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- (In thousands) Reported net income $ 8,118 $ 5,327 $ 2,215 $ 2,140 Goodwill amortization 2,237 - 1,119 - --------- --------- --------- --------- Adjusted net income $ 10,355 $ 5,327 $ 3,334 $ 2,140 ========= ========= ========= ========= 9 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 7. Financial Information Relating to Segments The Company has three reportable business segments. Anode Grade CPC-is produced and marketed directly to primary aluminum smelters worldwide for use as the principal raw material in the production of carbon anodes, a key component in the aluminum smelting process. Industrial Grade CPC-is produced and marketed for use in a variety of non- aluminum, industrial applications, including as a raw material in the production of titanium dioxide, as a recarburizer (carbon additive) in the manufacture of steel and foundry products and for use in other specialty materials and chemicals markets. RPC Trading-involves the worldwide marketing of raw petroleum coke ("RPC") for use as the raw material in the production of CPC and as a fuel source in a variety of other industrial applications. The production and distribution of CPC, which is the focus of the first two units, is accomplished utilizing the same process, plant facilities and operating assets. The RPC trading business, as conducted by the Company, generally involves the use of such assets on a limited basis. Accordingly, the Company does not segregate, or otherwise account for, the assets by segments. 10 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Six months ended June 30, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anode Industrial Grade Grade RPC CPC CPC Trading Other Total ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In thousands) Net sales $ 93,641 $ 25,410 $ 8,817 $ 1,262 $ 129,130 Cost of goods sold (70,493) (18,475) (8,003) (3,405) (100,376) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Segment Profit $ 23,148 $ 6,935 $ 814 $ (2,143) 28,754 ========== ========== ========== ========= Selling, general and administrative expenses (9,612) Interest expense, net (12,299) Other income (expense) 985 ---------- Income before income taxes and extraordinary item $ 7,828 ========== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Six Months ended June 30, 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anode Industrial Grade Grade RPC CPC CPC Trading Other Total ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In thousands) Net sales $ 108,989 $ 18,319 $ 5,389 $ 788 $ 133,485 Cost of goods sold (88,303) (13,715) (3,890) (4,073) (109,981) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Segment Profit $ 20,686 $ 4,604 $ 1,499 $ (3,285) 23,504 ========== ========== ========== ========= Selling, general and administrative expenses (5,653) Interest expense, net (12,897) Other income (expense) 7,167 ---------- Income before income taxes $ 12,121 ========== 11 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quarter ended June 30, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anode Industrial Grade Grade RPC CPC CPC Trading Other Total ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In thousands) Net sales $ 47,340 $ 11,909 $ 3,584 $ 535 $ 63,368 Cost of goods sold (35,515) (8,604) (3,221) (1,675) (49,015) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Segment Profit $ 11,825 $ 3,305 $ 363 $ (1,140) 14,353 ========== ========== ========== ========= Selling, general and administrative expenses (5,052) Interest expense, net (6,086) Other income (expense) 737 ---------- Income before income taxes $ 3,952 ========== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quarter ended June 30, 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anode Industrial Grade Grade RPC CPC CPC Trading Other Total ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In thousands) Net sales $ 69,498 $ 9,892 $ 857 $ 304 $ 80,551 Cost of goods sold (57,857) (7,025) (541) (1,987) (67,410) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- Segment Profit $ 11,641 $ 2,867 $ 316 $ (1,683) 13,141 ========== ========== ========== ========= Selling, general and administrative expenses (2,709) Interest expense, net (6,856) Other income (expense) 1,621 ---------- Income before income taxes $ 5,197 ========== 12 of 20 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 8. Acquisition On March 27, 2002, the Company purchased a calcining facility located in Baton Rouge, LA (the "Baton Rouge Plant") from Alcoa, Inc. ("Alcoa") for $43 million, subject to a purchase price adjustment based upon a $23 million working capital guarantee. On June 28, 2002, Alcoa paid GLC approximately $11.4 million (including accrued interest of $137,000) to satisfy the working capital guarantee. The transaction was financed by two $10 million promissory notes bearing interest at 5% per annum payable to Alcoa in November 2002 and May 2003, incremental term loan borrowings under the Company's existing syndicated senior secured credit facility of $12 million and cash on-hand of $11 million. The addition of the Baton Rouge Plant, which can produce up to 700,000 tons per year of CPC, will increase the Company's total operating capacity from 1.6 million tons to 2.3 million tons, thereby solidifying its position as CPC industry leader. Results for the Baton Rouge Plant were included in the statement of operations commencing on April 1, 2002. The purchase price, net of the working capital adjustment, was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company is in the process of obtaining an independent appraisal of the fair values in question, therefore, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement. No goodwill was established in connection with this acquisition since the estimated fair value of the assets acquired exceeded the purchase price. The unaudited pro forma information set forth below, developed as though the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the years shown, reflects adjustments to interest expense (for borrowings required to finance the acquisition and certain changes to the terms of existing debt arrangements), depreciation and amortization expense (set to reflect the new accounting base of the assets recorded) and income tax effect based upon the Company's historical effective rates. Six Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- (In thousands) Net sales $ 177,100 $ 159,232 $ 85,625 $ 80,551 Income before income taxes and extraordinary item 9,799 11,705 5,332 5,197 Net income 9,204 5,136 2,988 2,140 The pro forma information, as presented here, is not indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the transaction occurred on January 1, 2001 or 2002, nor should it be considered indicative of future results. It gives effect only to the adjustments noted above, and does not reflect management's estimate of potential cost savings or other benefits arising from the acquisition. 8. Extraordinary Item The six month period ended June 30, 2001 reflects an extraordinary gain related to the repurchase of the Company's debt of approximately $3,850,000 (net of income tax expenses of $2,073,000). 13 of 20 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations General This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning the Company's future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, believe, should, plans or continue, or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, the factors discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. The Company is the world's largest producer of calcined petroleum coke ("CPC"). The Company produces anode grade CPC, which is the principal raw material used in the production of carbon anodes used in primary aluminum production, and industrial grade CPC, which is used in a variety of specialty metals and materials applications. CPC is produced from raw petroleum coke ("RPC") utilizing a high temperature, rotary kiln process developed by the Company in the 1930's. RPC is a by-product of the petroleum refining process and constitutes the largest single component of the Company's cost of goods sold. The Company's principal source of revenues and profits are sales of anode grade CPC to the aluminum industry. Historically, the Company's profitability has been primarily a function of its CPC sales volumes, CPC pricing and the cost of RPC. On March 27, 2002, the Company purchased a calcining facility located in Baton Rouge, LA (the "Baton Rouge Plant") from Alcoa, Inc. ("Alcoa") for $43 million, subject to a purchase price adjustment based upon a $23 million working capital guarantee. On June 28, 2002, Alcoa paid GLC approximately $11.4 million (including accrued interest of $137,000) to satisfy the working capital guarantee. The transaction was financed by two $10 million promissory notes bearing interest at 5% per annum payable to Alcoa in November 2002 and May 2003, incremental term loan borrowings under the Company's existing syndicated senior secured credit facility of $12 million and cash on-hand of $11 million. The addition of the Baton Rouge Plant, which can produce up to 700,000 tons per year of CPC, will increase the Company's total operating capacity from 1.6 million tons to 2.3 million tons. The Baton Rouge Plant, situated on 55 acres of owned property, has four kilns and can receive and ship material by truck or rail and has ready access to barge or ocean-going vessel transportation. It is operated by a workforce numbering 64 at June 30, 2002, including 44 hourly employees covered by an interim collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America which expires on September 30, 2002. While the Company anticipates that a new agreement will be successfully negotiated by the expiry date, it is prepared to operate the facility without interruption under any eventuality. As used in this document, Adjusted EBITDA represents operating income before depreciation and AIP fees and expenses. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income, cash flow from operating activities or other cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA is presented here only to provide additional information with respect to the Company's ability to satisfy debt service. While Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by management as a measure of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. 14 of 20 Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2001 The Company's net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 increased 27.1% to $80.6 million from $63.4 million in the comparable 2001 period. Net sales of anode grade CPC increased 46.8% to $69.5 million, net sales of industrial grade CPC decreased 16.9% to $9.9 million and net sales of RPC decreased 76.1% to $0.9 million. The increase in anode grade CPC net sales was primarily the result of a 48.4% increase in sales volume to 461,468 tons only slightly offset by a 1.1% decrease in average per ton selling prices. The increase in sales volume was almost completely attributable to shipments from the newly purchased Baton Rouge Plant. The decrease in industrial grade CPC net sales was the result of an 11.6% decrease in sales volume to 77,005 coupled with a 6.1% decline in average per ton selling prices. Lower shipments to the titanium dioxide and chemical markets and reduced prices across most product lines were the main factors contributing to the decline. The decrease in RPC net sales was primarily the result of a 48.0% decrease in sales volume to 31,263 tons. Because the Baton Rouge plant is a large consumer of the RPC product, the quantity available for resale to third parties decreased. Increased internal consumption is expected to significantly reduce the level of future RPC trading. The Company's gross profit for the second quarter decreased by 8.4% to $13.1 million from $14.4 million in 2001. The decrease in gross profit was due to a 37.5% increase in cost of goods sold only partially offset by the 27.1% increase in sales discussed above. The increase in cost of goods sold was the result of higher sales volume augmented by higher average per ton costs. The per ton cost increase was principally due to higher raw material prices and relatively greater logistical costs at the newly acquired Baton Rouge facility. Tight anode grade RPC supply, particularly in the United States Gulf coast, continued to impact RPC costs. Operating income increased 12.2% to $10.4 million from $9.3 million in the prior year quarter. The increase in operating income was due to a 46.4% decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses offset partially by the decrease in gross profit discussed above. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of the elimination of goodwill amortization expense (in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets") and lower commission, compensation and travel and entertainment expenses. Income before income taxes increased 31.5% to $5.2 million from $4.0 million in the comparable 2001 period. The improvement was due to the increase in operating income discussed above and a slight decrease in other expense. The decrease in other expense was due mainly to foreign currency exchange gains arising from the devaluation of the Argentine peso almost completely offset by an increase in interest expense related to the additional debt (at higher base rates) incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Baton Rouge Plant. The Company's effective tax rate increased to 58.8% from 44.0% in the 2001 period mainly as a result of the tax effect of foreign currency gains in the tax provision of foreign operations. As a result of the factors discussed above, net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 decreased 3.4% to $2.1 million from $2.2 million in 2001. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter increased 2.7% to $15.8 million from $15.4 million in 2001 due to the increase in operating income discussed above and a decrease to the add-back adjustment for depreciation/amortization of $0.6 million (mainly due to the elimination of goodwill amortization as previously noted). 15 of 20 Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 The Company's net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 increased 3.4% to $133.5 million from $129.1 million in the comparable 2001 period. Net sales of anode grade CPC increased 16.4% to $109.0 million, net sales of industrial grade CPC decreased 27.9% to $18.3 million and net sales of RPC decreased 38.9% to $5.4 million. The increase in anode grade CPC net sales was primarily the result of a 16.6% increase in sales volume to 722,305 tons barely offset by a 0.2% decrease in average per ton selling prices. The increase in sales volume was attributable to shipments, beginning April 2002, from the newly purchased Baton Rouge Plant which mitigated the dual effects, especially pronounced in the first quarter, of reduced aluminum demand and a back-heavy shipments schedule in 2002. The decrease in industrial grade CPC net sales was the result of a 25.6% decrease in sales volume to 141,039 tons coupled with a 3.1% decrease in average selling prices. Lower shipments to the titanium dioxide and chemical markets and reduced prices across most product lines were the main factors contributing to the decline. The decrease in RPC net sales was primarily the result of a 31.0% decrease in sales volume to 97,527 tons and an 11.4% decrease in average per ton selling prices. Because the Baton Rouge plant is a large consumer of the RPC product, the quantity available for resale to third parties decreased in the period subsequent to the purchase of the plant. Increased internal consumption is expected to significantly reduce the level of future RPC trading. The Company's gross profit for the year-to-date period decreased by 18.3% to $23.5 million from $28.8 million in 2001. The decrease in gross profit was due to a 9.6% increase in cost of goods sold that was only partially offset by the 3.4% increase in sales discussed above. The increase in cost of goods sold was due mainly to higher average per ton costs augmented slightly by the volume increase. The per ton cost increase was principally due to higher raw material prices and relatively greater logistical costs at the newly acquired Baton Rouge facility. Tight anode grade RPC supply, particularly in the United States Gulf coast, was the major factor impacting raw material costs. Operating income decreased 6.7% to $17.9 million from $19.1 million in the prior year period. The decrease in operating income was due to the decrease in gross profit discussed above offset by a decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of the elimination of goodwill amortization expense (in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets") and lower commission, compensation and travel and entertainment expenses. Income before income taxes and extraordinary item increased 54.8% to $12.1 million from $7.8 million in the comparable 2001 period. The improvement was due to an increase in other income offset by the decline in operating income discussed above. The increase in other income was due mainly to a gain on the sale of certain lease rights to a storage shed (which had been sub-let to the buyer since the 1980's) and foreign currency exchange gains related to devaluation of the Argentine peso offset by an increase in interest expense related to the additional debt (at higher base rates) incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Baton Rouge Plant. The Company's effective tax rate increased to 56.1% in 2002 from 45.5% in the corresponding 2001 mainly as a result of the tax effect of foreign currency gains in the tax provision of foreign operations. An extraordinary gain related to the repurchase of debt of approximately $3,850,000 (net of income tax expense of $2,073,000) was recognized in the prior year period. As a result of the factors discussed above, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2002 decreased 34.4% to $5.3 million from $8.1 million in 2001. Adjusted EBITDA for the year-to-date period decreased by 9.4% to $28.3 million from $31.3 million in 2001 due to the decrease in operating income discussed above and a decrease to the add-back adjustment for depreciation/ amortization of $1.6 million (mainly due to the elimination of goodwill amortization as previously noted). 16 of 20 Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company's liquidity requirements are primarily for debt service, capital expenditures and general working capital needs. The timing of inventory receipts and product shipments, all of which are essentially U.S. dollar-denominated transactions, can have a substantial impact on the Company's working capital requirements. Capital investments generally relate to facility maintenance and projects to improve plant throughput and product quality. It is anticipated that capital investments for 2002 will be approximately $5.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the 10 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture the Company may, at its option, through May 15, 2003, make up to four semiannual interest payments through the issuance of additional notes in an amount equal to the interest that would be payable if the rate per annum of the Notes were equal to 11 3/4%. Thus far, the Company has exercised its pay-in- kind option in connection with the November 15, 2001, May 15, 2002 and November 15, 2002 payments, and, as a condition to obtaining incremental term loan financing for the Baton Rouge Plant acquisition under its existing credit agreement, further discussed below, has committed to make the May 15, 2003 interest payment through the issuance of additional notes. On March 27, 2002, the Company secured incremental term loans under each of its three existing single tranche loans maturing on May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 in the amount of $9.0 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in order to finance the acquisition of the Baton Rouge Plant. The incremental loans amortize and mature in conformity with the terms of the tranches to which they were added. At the close of the Baton Rouge Plant transaction, the amount payable under each such tranche was $30.8 million, $25.1 million and $24.3 million, respectively. In consideration for the issuance of the incremental term loans, credit facility interest rate margins were increased between 1.25% to 1.50%. The Company expects to meet its liquidity needs, including debt service, through cash from operations, its revolving credit facility and the issuance of additional pay-in-kind notes. The revolving credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $25.0 million, including a $10.0 million sub- limit for letters of credit. As of August 9, 2002, no funds had been drawn down, and approximately $0.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility. The Company or its affiliates may, from time to time, depending on liquidity and market and economic conditions, purchase in open-market transactions its 10 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes or the 13 1/8% Senior Discount Debentures issued by GLAC. 17 of 20 New Accounting Pronouncements In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". SFAS No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of- interests method. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", which is effective January 2003. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of a liability for and asset retirement obligation and associated asset retirement cost. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its financial statements. In August 2001, the FASB SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which is effective January 2002. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of", and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions", for the disposal of a business (as defined in that Opinion). This statement also amends Account Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements", to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." This Statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt", and an amendment of that Statement, FASB Statement No. 64, "Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." This Statement also rescinds FASB Statement No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers." This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases", to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company will adopt the provisions of this Statement upon its effective date and restate its financial statements accordingly. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. This statement also established that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 146 on its consolidated financial statements. 18 of 20 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings Refer to the Company's annual report on form 10K dated April 1, 2002. Item 2. Change in Securities Not applicable. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities Not applicable. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Not applicable. Item 5. Other Information Not applicable. Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) List of Exhibits: Not applicable. (b) Reports on Form 8-K The Company filed no reports on Form 8-K with the Commission during the three months ended June 30, 2002. 19 of 20 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation Date: 8/9/02 By: /s/JAMES D. MCKENZIE ----------------------------- James D. McKenzie, President and Chief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in their capacity as an officer of Great Lakes Carbon Corporation (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period. Date: 8/9/02 /s/JAMES D. MCKENZIE ----------------------------- President and Chief Executive Officer Date: 8/9/02 /s/ADELA I. ROBLES ----------------------------- Controller and Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer 20 of 20

GREAT LAKES CARBON CORP 10-Q