UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010
	FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2010
OR
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-53836

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

17505 N 79th Ave

Suite #309

Glendale, Arizona 85308

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code.)

(623) 776-3200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.

YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]

Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [X] NO [ ]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 66,800,000 as of ~~March~~June 1918, 2010.

-1-

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

Index

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Balance Sheets ...............................................................................................................................~~.....................~~F–1

Statements of Operations .............................................................................................................~~.....................~~F–2

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) .....................................................................~~.....................~~F–3

Statements of Cash Flows ............................................................................................................~~.....................~~F–4

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ..................................................................................~~.....................~~F–5

-2-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation
(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(Expressed in US Dollars)
	January 31,			July 31,
	April 30,			July 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	9137,~~841~~064		$	6,256
Prepaid expenses		1711,~~727~~245			-
Total current assets		~~109~~48,~~568~~309			6,256
License agreement costs, net of accumulated amortization of $15,866 (July 31, 2009 - $5,402)		384,134			394,598
License agreement costs, net of accumulated amortization of $20,927 (July 31, 2009 - $5,402)		379,073			394,598
Patent, net of accumulated amortization of $107 (July 31, 2009 - $0)		12,458			-
Patent, net of accumulated amortization of $260 (July 31, 2009 - $0)		12,305			-
Total Assets	$	~~506~~439,~~160~~687		$	400,854
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	~~142~~152,~~081~~943		$	33,219
Unearned revenue		1,997			-
Due to related party		~~616~~740,~~422~~514			167,805
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock due Assignor of license agreement (Note 3)		-			400,000
Common Stock due Licensor of license agreement (Note 3)		-			10,000
Total current liabilities		~~760~~895,~~500~~454			611,024
Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)
Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value;
authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 2,000,000 shares (July 31, 2009 – 0 shares)		20			-
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value;
authorized 200,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 66,800,000 shares (July 31, 2009 - 65,800,000 shares) (Note 7)		668			658
Additional paid-in capital		~~504~~573,~~680~~593			52,642
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(~~759~~1,~~708~~030,048	)		(263,470	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)		(~~254~~455,~~340~~767	)		(210,170	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)	$	~~506~~439,~~160~~687		$	400,854

See notes to financial statements

F-1

-3-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation
(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
(Expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)
			Three months ended January 31, 2010		Three months ended January 31, 2009		Six months ended January 31, 2010		Six months ended January 31, 2009		Cumulative from June 2, 2008 (inception) to January 31, 2010
Sales		$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	309
Total Revenue			-		-		-		-		309
Costs and expenses
	Cost of sales		-		-		-		-		51
	General and administrative		204,732		16,013		360,792		26,178		576,074
	Selling and marketing		26,168		-		52,093		-		67,092
	Research and development		37,823		-		64,322		-		80,272
	Interest expense		4,230		-		8,460		-		8,460
	Donated services		-		900		-		1,800		3,300
	Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-		-		-		5,500		5,500
	Exploration costs		-		-		-		295		3,295
	Amortization of patent (Note 4)		107		-		107		-		107
	Amortization of license agreement costs (Note 3)		5,232		-		10,464		-		15,866
Total Costs and Expenses			278,292		16,913		496,238		33,773		760,017
Net Loss		$	(278,292)	$	(16,913)	$	(496,238)	$	(33,773)	$	(759,708)
Net loss per share
	Basic and diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.00)
Number of common shares used to compute net loss per share
	Basic and diluted		66,800,000		72,800,000		66,610,000		72,800,000

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

(Expressed in US Dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended April 30, 2010			Three months ended April 30, 2009			Nine months ended April 30, 2010			Nine months ended April 30, 2009			Cumulative from June 2, 2008 (inception) to April 30, 2010

Sales	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	309

Total Revenue		-			-			-			-			309

Costs and expenses
Cost of sales		-			-			-			-			51
General and administrative		215,805			8,099			576,596			34,277			791,878
Selling and marketing		609			-			52,703			-			67,702
Research and development		44,620			-			108,942			-			124,892
Interest expense		4,092			-			12,552			-			12,552
Donated services		-			900			-			2,700			3,300
Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-			-			-			5,500			5,500
Exploration costs		-			-			-			295			3,295
Amortization of patent (Note 4)		153			-			260			-			260
Amortization of license agreement costs (Note 3)		5,061			171			15,525			171			20,927

Total Costs and Expenses		270,340			9,170			766,578			42,943			1,030,357

Net Loss	$	(270,340	)	$	(9,170	)	$	(766,578	)	$	(42,943	)	$	(1,030,048	)

Net loss per share
Basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)

Number of common shares used to compute net loss per share
Basic and diluted		66,800,000			72,249,000			66,672,000			72,621,000

See notes to financial statements

F-2

-4-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation (formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)
(A Development Stage Company) Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) For the Period June 2, 2008 (Inception) to January 31, 2010
(Expressed in US Dollars)
	Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value				Common Stock, $0.00001 par value						Additional Paid- in		Deficit Accumulated During the
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital		Development Stage			Total
Sale of common stock:
- June 4, 2008 at $0.00014 per share		-	$	-		42,000,000		$	420		$	5,580	$	-		$	6,000
- July 18, 2008 at $0.00143 per share		-		-		30,800,000			308			43,692		-			44,000
Donated services		-		-		-			-			600		-			600
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(19,424	)		(19,424	)
Balance - July 31, 2008		-		-		72,800,000			728			49,872		(19,424	)		31,176
Cancellation of common stock on April 23, 2009		-		-		(7,000,000	)		(70	)		70		-			-
Donated services		-		-		-			-			2,700		-			2,700
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(244,046	)		(244,046	)
Balance – July 31, 2009		-		-		65,800,000			658			52,642		(263,470	)		(210,170	)
Unaudited:
Issuance of common stock to Licensor of license agreement on September 4, 2009		-		-		1,000,000			10			9,900		-			10,000
Issuance of preferred stock to Assignor of license agreement on December 2, 2009		2,000,000		20		-			-			399,980		-			400,000
Compensation cost recognized relating to common stock grants subject to vesting conditions		-		-		-			-			42,068		-			42,068
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(496,238	)		(496,238	)
Balance – January 31, 2010		2,000,000	$	20	$	66,800,000		$	668		$	504,680	$	(759,708	)	$	(254,340	)

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)

For the Period June 2, 2008 (Inception) to April 30, 2010

(Expressed in US Dollars)


	Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value				Common Stock, $0.00001 par value						Additional Paid- in		Deficit Accumulated During the
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital		Development Stage			Total

Sale of common stock:
- June 4, 2008 at $0.00014 per share		-	$	-		42,000,000		$	420		$	5,580	$	-		$	6,000
- July 18, 2008 at $0.00143 per share		-		-		30,800,000			308			43,692		-			44,000
Donated services		-		-		-			-			600		-			600
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(19,424	)		(19,424	)
Balance - July 31, 2008		-		-		72,800,000			728			49,872		(19,424	)		31,176

Cancellation of common stock on April 23, 2009		-		-		(7,000,000	)		(70	)		70		-			-
Donated services		-		-		-			-			2,700		-			2,700
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(244,046	)		(244,046	)
Balance – July 31, 2009		-		-		65,800,000			658			52,642		(263,470	)		(210,170	)

Unaudited:
Issuance of common stock to Licensor of license agreement on September 4, 2009		-		-		1,000,000			10			9,990		-			10,000
Issuance of preferred stock to Assignor of license agreement on December 2, 2009		2,000,000		20		-			-			399,980		-			400,000
Compensation cost recognized relating to common stock grants subject to vesting conditions		-		-		-			-			110,981		-			110,981
Net Loss		-		-		-			-			-		(766,578	)		(766,578	)
Balance – April 30, 2010		2,000,000	$	20	$	66,800,000		$	668		$	573,593	$	(1,030,048	)	$	(455,767	)

See notes to financial statements

F-3

-5-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation
(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited)
				Six months ended January 31, 2010		Six months ended January 31, 2009		Period from June 2, 2008 (Inception) to January 31, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
	Net loss		$	(496,238)	$	(33,773)	$	(759,708)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
		Stock-based compensation		42,068		-		52,068
		Donated services		-		1,800		3,300
		Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-		5,500		5,500
		Amortization of license agreement costs and patent		10,571		-		15,973
	Change in operating assets and liabilities:
		Prepaid expenses		(17,727)		(1,761)		(17,727)
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		108,862		(4,841)		142,081
		Unearned revenue		1,997		-		1,997
Net cash used for operating activities				(350,467)		(33,075)		(556,516)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
	Patent acquisition costs			(12,565)		-		(12,565)
	Mineral property acquisition costs			-		-		(5,500)
Net cash used for investing activities				(12,565)		-		(18,065)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
	Increase in due to related parties			448,617		59		616,422
	Proceeds from sales of common stock			-		-		50,000
Net cash provided by financing activities				448,617		59		666,422
(Decrease) increase in cash				85,585		(33,016)		91,841
Cash - beginning of period				6,256		34,096		-
Cash - end of period			$	91,841	$	1,080	$	91,841
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
	Income taxes paid		$	-	$	-	$	-
Non-cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
	Acquisition of license agreement in exchange for Class A Convertible Preferred Stock		$	-	$	-	$	400,000

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cas Flows

(Expressed in US Dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended April 30, 2010			Nine months ended April 30, 2009			Period from June 2, 2008 (Inception) to April 30, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(766,578	)	$	(42,943	)	$	(1,030,048	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		110,981			-			120,981
Donated services		-			2,700			3,300
Impairment of mineral property acquisition costs		-			5,500			5,500
Amortization of license agreement costs and patent		15,785			171			21,187
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(11,245	)		(2,578	)		(11,245	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		119,724			(1,459	)		152,943
Unearned revenue		1,997			-			1,997
Net cash used for operating activities		(529,336	)		(38,609	)		(735,385	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Patent acquisition costs		(12,565	)		-			(12,565	)
Mineral property acquisition costs		-			-			(5,500	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(12,565	)		-			(18,065	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Increase in due to related parties		572,709			5,059			740,514
Proceeds from sales of common stock		-			-			50,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		572,709			5,059			790,514

(Decrease) increase in cash		30,808			(33,550	)		37,064

Cash - beginning of period		6,256			34,096			-

Cash - end of period	$	37,064		$	546		$	37,064
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

Non-cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
Acquisition of license agreement in exchange for Class A Convertible Preferred Stock	$	-		$	-		$	400,000

See notes to financial statements

F-4

-6-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Organization and Business Operations

Terrasol Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 2, 2008 and changed its name to Alternative Energy Development Corporation on May 4, 2009. From inception to April 28, 2009, the Company’s principal business was the acquisition and exploration of mineral resources. On April 28, 2009 (see Note 3), the Company acquired rights to a certain Technology License and Distribution Agreement dated August 1, 2008 (the “Technology Agreement”) and to a certain Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 (the “Manufacturing Agreement”) and a change in control of the Company occurred. The Company plans to develop the related technology and manufacture products to reduce fuel use.

On May 5, 2009, the Company effected a 7 for 1 forward stock split, increasing the issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 9,400,000 shares to 65,800,000 shares. All share amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect this stock split.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. As at ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the Company had cash of $9137,~~841~~064 and negative working capital of $~~650~~847,~~932~~145. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the Company had no revenues and incurred a net loss of $~~496~~766,~~238~~578. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

F-5

-7-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)	Interim Financial Information

The unaudited financial statements as of ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and 2009. The financial data and other information disclosed in these notes to the interim financial statements related to these periods are unaudited. The results for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter of the entire year ending July 31, 2010. The balance sheet at July 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended July 31, 2009 as included in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2009.

b)	Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ~~section~~Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements”, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

F-6

-8-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

b) Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures (continued)

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of cash equivalents is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

c) ~~Reclassifications~~Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

~~Certain~~The ~~reclassifications~~Company ~~have~~computes ~~been~~net ~~made~~income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.” ASC Topic 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the ~~prior~~weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period’s. Diluted ~~financial~~EPS ~~statements~~gives effect to ~~conform~~all todilutive potential common shares outstanding during the ~~current~~period using the treasury stock method and convertible securities using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period’s ~~presentation~~is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. For the nine months ended April 30, 2010, the diluted net loss per share computation excludes 40,000,000 common shares attributable to the 2,000,000 shares of Class A Convertible Preferred stock which are each convertible into 20 shares of common stock.

F-7

-9-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 3. License Agreement Costs, Net

License agreement costs, net, consists of:

			January 31, 2010		July 31, 2009
	April 30, 2010				July 31, 2009
Class A Convertible Preferred Stock issued to Assignor	$	$400,000	~~400,000~~	$	~~400,000~~$	400,000
Less accumulated amortization		(20,927	~~(15,866~~)		~~(5,402)~~	(5,402	)
License agreement costs, net	$	$379,073	~~384,134~~	$	~~394,598~~$	394,598

On April 28, 2009, the Company entered into two Assignment Agreements to acquire the right, title and interest to a technology license and distribution agreement (the “Technology Agreement”) and to an exclusive manufacturing agreement (the “Manufacturing Agreement”) in consideration for 2,000,000 shares of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (see Note 6) and a $10 royalty obligation to Assignor for each unit sold. The stated purchase price in the Assignment Agreement is $1,220,000 payable in the form of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Convertible Preferred Stock. However, the Company recorded the acquisition at the $400,000 estimated fair value of the 2,000,000 shares of Class A Convertible Preferred Stock at April 28, 2009.

The license agreement costs are being amortized using the straight line method over the approximately 19.25 years term, including options terms, of the Technology Agreement. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and 2009, amortization expense was $1015,~~464~~525 and $0171, respectively.

Pursuant to the Technology Agreement, the Company has the exclusive rights to manufacture, sell and distribute products embodied in United States Patent No. 7117859 until August 1, 2013. The Company has three options to extend the term by 5 years per option upon the same terms and conditions as the initial term. In the original terms of the Technology Agreement, the Company had a $40 royalty obligation to Fuel Concepts LLC (the initial licensor) for each unit sold over 6,000 units per year. On June 18, 2009, an amendment to the Technology Agreement was signed which provided for the $40 royalty obligation on all units sold (not on only those over 6,000 units per year) commencing in the second year of the agreement. Also, the amendment provided for the delivery of 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock to Fuel Concepts LLC which occurred September 4, 2009. The Company has included the $10,000 estimated fair value of the shares at June 18, 2009 in general and administrative expenses in the three months ended July 31, 2009.

Pursuant to the Manufacturing Agreement, Fuel Concepts LLC has the exclusive world-wide non-assignable right to manufacture products for the Company at a specified price per unit for 5 years.

F-8

-10-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 4. Patent

Patent, net, consists of:

			January 31, 2010		July 31, 2009
	April 30, 2010				July 31, 2009
Patent acquisition costs	$	$12,565	~~12,565~~	$	-$	-
Less accumulated amortization		(260	~~(107~~)		-	-
License agreement costs, net	$	$12,305	~~12,458~~	$	-$	-

On December 1, 2009, the Company and its then Chief Executive Officer filed for a certain patent application, 12/628,378 titled Fuel Vaporizing Device for Motor Vehicles and Method Therefore, relating to its second generation fuel saving device, the e3 Fuel Saver Pro. Additionally, the Company received an assignment and agreement from its then Chief Executive Officer for the rights, title and interest for the same patent for good and valuable consideration.

The patent costs are being amortized using the straight line method over the 20 years estimated economic life of the patent. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 and 2009, amortization expense was $~~107~~260 and $0, respectively.

Note 5. Related Party Transactions

On June 4, 2008, the Company issued 6,000,000 (42,000,000 post forward stock split) shares of common stock at $0.001 ($0.00014 post forward stock split) per share to the then president of the Company for cash proceeds of $6,000. On April 23, 2009, 1,000,000 (7,000,000 post forward stock split) shares were returned to the Company and cancelled.

On July 31, 2009, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~ a promissory note to the controlling stockholder of the Company in the amount of $167,805. The promissory note carries a simple interest rate of 10% and is due in full, principal and interest, on July 30, 2010. The promissory note was issued in consideration of the stockholder’s payments of advances to the Company ($62,300), costs incurred prior to the Company’s acquisition of the Technology Agreement and Manufacturing Agreement ($100,455), and costs incurred subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of the Technology Agreement and Manufacturing Agreement ($5,050).

As at ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the Company is indebted to the Assignor and controlling stockholder of the Company for a total of $~~616~~740,~~422~~514 (July 31, 2009 - $167,805). $167,805 is secured by the above promissory note executed on July 31, 2009 and the remainder, $~~448~~572,~~617~~709, is non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

F-9

-11-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 6. Preferred Stock

The preferred stock may be divided into and issued in series. The Board of Directors of the Company is authorized to divide the authorized shares of preferred stock into one or more series, each of which shall be so designated as to distinguish the shares thereof from the shares of all other series and classes.

On May 4, 2009, the Company designated 20,000,000 shares of its preferred stock as Class A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Class A Stock”). Each share of Class A Stock is convertible into 20 shares of common stock, has 100 votes, has no dividend rights except as may be declared by the Board of Directors, and has a liquidation preference of $1.00 per share.

On December 2, 2009, the Company caused the transfer agent to deliver 2,000,000 shares of its Class A Stock to its controlling stockholder pursuant to the assignment of the Technology License and Distribution Agreement dated April 28, 2009 (see Note 3).

Note 7. Common Stock

On July 18, 2008, the Company issued a total of 4,400,000 (30,800,000 post forward stock split) shares of common stock to 44 investors at $0.01 ($0.00143 post forward stock split) per share for cash proceeds of $44,000.

On November 25, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Company’s registration statement to register 4,400,000 (30,800,000 post forward stock split) shares of common stock held by certain stockholders (the “selling stockholders”) of the Company. The Company will not receive any proceeds from any sales of such shares.

On April 23, 2009, the former president of the Company returned 1,000,000 (7,000,000 post forward stock split) shares to the Company and these shares were cancelled.

On September 4, 2009, the Company issued Fuel Concepts, LLC 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to an amendment dated June 18, 2009 to the Technology License and Distribution Agreement dated August 1, 2008 and to a certain Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 (see Note 3).

At ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the Company had no stock option plan and there were no options or warrants outstanding.

F-10

-12-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 8. Common Stock Grants Subject to Vesting Conditions

A summary of common stock grants subject to vesting conditions follows:

	Number of common shares Granted and Not Issued			Unrecognized Compensation Costs	~~Number of common shares Granted and Not Issued~~			~~Unrecognized Compensation Costs~~
Outstanding at July 31, 2009		-		$	-	-	$		-
November 10, 2009 grant to Company Chief Financial Officer – vests November 9, 2010		1,000,000			185,000	~~1,000,000~~			~~185,000~~
January 11, 2010 grant to former (from January 11, 2010 to March 2, 2010) Company Chief Executive Officer – 2,000,000 shares to vest January 10, 2011, 1,000,000 shares to vest January 10, 2012, 1,000,000 shares to vest January 10, 2013, and 2,000,000 shares to vest January 10, 2014		6,000,000			900,000	~~6,000,000~~			~~900,000~~
Forfeiture of January 11, 2010 grant to former Company Chief Executive Officer as a result of failure to meet vesting conditions		(6,000,000	)		(900,000	~~(6,000,000~~)			~~(900,000)~~
Compensation cost recognized in the six months ended January 31, 2010						-			(42,068)
March 4, 2010 grant to Company Chief Executive Officer – 50% vests March 3, 2011 and 50% vests March 3, 2012		2,000,000			300,000
Outstanding at January 31, 2010, as adjusted for forfeiture						1,000,000	$		142,932
Compensation cost recognized in the nine months ended April 30, 2010		-			(110,981	)
Outstanding at April 30, 2010, as adjusted for forfeiture		3,000,000		$	142,932

OnThe ~~March~~compensation 4,cost ~~2010~~of $185,000 for the ~~Company~~November ~~approved~~10, a2009 ~~common~~ stock grant of 21,000,000 shares to ~~our~~the ~~current~~ Company’s Chief ~~Executive~~Financial Officer ~~which~~and ~~shall~~the ~~vest as follows: 1~~$300,000~~,000~~ ~~shares~~for onthe March 34, ~~2011~~2010 ~~and~~stock 1grant of 2,000,000 shares to the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer were determined based on ~~March~~the 3,closing ~~2012~~price of the Company common stock on the date of the grant less a 50% restricted stock discount. The compensation cost is being amortized evenly over the requisite service periods.

The compensation cost of $185,000 for the November 10, 2009 stock grant of 1,000,000 shares to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer in the six months ended January 31, 2010 was determined based on the closing price of the Company common stock on the date of the grant less a 50% restricted stock discount. The compensation cost is being amortized evenly over the one year requisite service period.

F-11

-13-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 9. Income Taxes

The provision for (benefit from) income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate of 35% to income (loss) before income taxes. The sources of the difference follow:

		Six Months Ended		Six Months Ended
		Nine Months Ended April 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended April 30, 2009
		January 31, 2010		January 31, 2009
Expected tax at 35%		$	(268,302	)	$	(15,030	)
Expected tax at 35%	$	(173,683)	$	(11,821)
License agreement costs			5,434			60
License agreement costs		3,662		-
Donated services			-			945
Donated services		-		630
Increase in valuation allowance			262,868			14,025
Increase in valuation allowance		170,021		11,191
Income tax provision		$	–		$	–
Income tax provision	$	–	$	–

The significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets are as follows:

		January 31,		July 31,
		April 30,			July 31,
		2010		~~2009~~	2009
Net operating loss carry forward	$	~~259,190~~$	$352,037	~~89,169~~	$	89,169
Valuation allowance		~~(259,190)~~	(352,037	~~(89,169~~)		(89,169	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	–$	$–	–	$	–

Based on management’s present assessment, the Company has not yet determined it to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset of $~~259~~352,~~190~~037 at ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 attributable to the future utilization of the net operating loss carry-forward of $~~740~~1,~~542~~005,821 will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% allowance against the deferred tax asset in the financial statements. The Company will continue to review this valuation allowance and make adjustments as appropriate. The net operating loss carry-forward expires $18,824 in 2028, $235,944 in 2029 and $~~485~~751,~~774~~053 in 2030.

Current United States income tax laws limit the amount of loss available to offset against future taxable income when a substantial change on ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.

F-12

-14-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies

Employment Agreements

On November 10, 2009, the Company entered into an exclusive employment agreement with its chief financial officer and director for a term of two years ending November 9, 2011. The agreement provides for a $10,000 signing bonus, annual compensation of $120,000 and the grant of 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock (all to vest in November 2010).

On January 11, 2010, we entered into an exclusive employment agreement with J. David Massey as president, chief executive officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. The agreement was for a term of five years beginning January 11, 2010 and ending January 10, 2015 and provided for annual compensation of $125,000 and the grant of 6,000,000 shares of Company stock (to vest in two to four years).

On March 2, 2010, the Board of Directors removed Mr. Massey from the offices of President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and terminated the employment agreement between Mr. Massey and the Company for cause.

On March 4, 2010, the Company entered into an exclusive employment agreement with Amy Gloyd as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors. The agreement is for a term of three years beginning March 4, 2010 and ending March 3, 2013. The agreement provides for annual compensation of $120,000 and the grant of 2,000,000 shares of common stock (50% to vest on March 3, 2011 and 50% to vest on March 3, 2012).

Advertising Agreement

On October 1, 2009, the Company entered into a $200,000 contract to buy advertising space and a “micro-site” on Oprah.com. The campaign, which was planned to run through February 28, 2010 but has been extended, required a $50,000 non-refundable down payment which was paid. The campaign is for the purchase of a minimum of 18,641,750 “impressions” and a co-branded “micro-site” featuring AEDC’s core product, the e3 Fuel Saver. Various banner ads featuring the Company and its product(s) as well as the micro-site are scheduled to run throughout the duration of the campaign. As of ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the Company has incurred $50,000 of marketing expenses under the contract.

Litigation

On October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against Defendant Rashad Patrick. No trial date has been set by the court.

F-13

-15-

Alternative Energy Development Corporation

(formerly Terrasol Holdings Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~January~~April 3130, 2010

(Unaudited)

Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Litigation

On October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against another defendant. On April 14, 2010, the Company reached a settlement agreement with this defendant whereby the Company paid $5,000 of alleged unpaid compensation and the defendant agreed to a Permanent Injunction and Order and acknowledged to have no right, title or interest in any of the Company’s intellectual property. Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin have not answered the complaint and are currently in default. No trial date has been set by the court.

Note 11. Subsequent Events

a)The OnCompany ~~March~~has 2,evaluated ~~2010,~~subsequent ~~the~~events ~~Board~~through ~~of Directors removed Mr. Massey from~~ the ~~offices~~filing date of ~~President,~~this ~~Chief~~Form ~~Executive~~10-Q ~~Officer,~~ and ~~Chairman~~has ofdetermined ~~the~~that ~~Board~~there ofwere ~~Directors,~~no ~~and~~subsequent ~~terminated~~events ~~the~~to ~~employment~~recognize ~~agreement~~or ~~between~~disclose ~~Mr.~~in ~~Massey~~these ~~and~~financial ~~the Company for cause~~statements.

b) On March 4, 2010, the Company entered into an exclusive employment agreement with Amy Gloyd as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors. The agreement is for a term of three years beginning March 4, 2010 and ending March 3, 2013. Mrs. Gloyd will be paid $120,000 per annum; receive 2,000,000 shares of common stock which shall vest as follows: 50% at the end of the first year and 50% at the end of the second year.

c) The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of this Form 10-Q and has determined that there were no additional subsequent events to recognize or disclose in these financial statements.

F-14

-16-

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

This section of the report includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.

As of April 28, 2009, we are no longer in the mineral exploration business. We are now engaged in the business of designing research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of cost-effective after-market fuel conservation technologies.

Currently our exclusive product is the e3 Fuel Saver 7000. The e3 Fuel Saver 7000 is unique in that its operation is unlike any other fuel saving device. The fuel saver was originally engineered in 1995 by an Ohio company called Fuel Concepts and manufacturing began in 2004. In October of 2006, the fuel saver 7000 was patented (US PATENT 7117859). With the combined efforts of Fuel Concepts and Alternative Energy Development Corporation (“AEDC”), production began and was completed creating a superior fuel saving device, the e3 Fuel Saver 7000.

Fuel saving devices currently being marketed can only be compared to the e3 Fuel Saver 7000 by their reference to reducing fuel consumption. Their process to create the end result verses AEDC’s is completely different. AEDC has the only device currently using vapor combustion which decreases the need for gas to be used thus creating the reduction in fuel usage. Unlike systems that use hydrogen or magnetic fields, the e3 Fuel Saver 7000 uses combustion to minimize a vehicles consumption of fuel. E3's 3-Stage Cold Vapor System can convert any carbureted and fuel injected gasoline based automobile into an extremely efficient, fuel saving machine. Normally, vehicles without the e3 Fuel Saver 7000 system installed rely on the injectors in order to create combustion. Unfortunately, the result is extremely inefficient. For every amount of fuel that is sprayed into each cylinder less than 30% is actually used to fire the cylinder and the rest is wasted into our environment.

The e3 Fuel Saver 7000 canister creates vapor, which is comparable to atomizing the fuel, and the car interprets the message that less fuel is needed while still maintaining the factory’s required air to fuel ratio. The result is less dependence on fuel with significantly fewer emissions. In extensive road testing conducted in the US and Australia, the e3 Fuel Saver system has been shown to significantly increase fuel mileage and reduce emissions. The e3 Fuel Saver has reported gas mileage increases between 20% - 50%. The average gas mileage boost for vehicles using e3's patented fuel system is over 30% on the highway.

-17-

On July 8, 2009 the company entered into a Dealer Agreement with Bennett Wholesale LLC of Colombia South Carolina to serve as Non-Exclusive reseller of the Company’s e3 Fuel Saver Product throughout South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia. The Agreement has a term of five (5) years and calls for Bennett to purchase from the Company a minimum of 5,000 e3 Fuel Saver units during the first twenty four months of the term, following the shipment and delivery of initial fifty (50) units. As of October 31, 2009, Bennett Wholesale LLC has failed to perform its obligations under the Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement it signed with the Company on July 8, 2009. The Company believes this breach is a direct result of the intentional interference perpetrated by Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Roy Martin, Rashad Patrick and Attorney Warren Markowitz. As a result of this interference, on October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against ~~Defendant~~another ~~Rashad~~defendant. On ~~Patrick~~April 14, 2010, the Company reached a settlement agreement with this defendant whereby the Company paid $5,000 of alleged unpaid compensation and the defendant agreed to a Permanent Injunction and Order and acknowledged to have no right, title or interest in any of the Company’s intellectual property. Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin have not answered the complaint and are currently in default. No trial date has been set by the court.

On July 14, 2009 the company entered into a binding Letter of Intent with Potts Advertising of Fort Lauderdale, Florida to be the Exclusive Marketing Agent for product sales to automobile dealers within North America. The Agreement calls for Potts to provide up to 835 dealer/ resellers by the end of June 2010. As of October 31, 2009, Potts Advertising has failed to perform its obligations under the binding letter of intent it signed with the Company on July 14, 2009. The Company believes this breach is a direct result of the intentional interference perpetrated by Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Roy Martin, Rashad Patrick and Attorney Warren Markowitz. As a result of this interference, on October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against ~~Defendant~~another ~~Rashad~~defendant. On ~~Patrick~~April 14, 2010, the Company reached a settlement agreement with this defendant whereby the Company paid $5,000 of alleged unpaid compensation and the defendant agreed to a Permanent Injunction and Order and acknowledged to have no right, title or interest in any of the Company’s intellectual property. Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin have not answered the complaint and are currently in default. No trial date has been set by the court.

On July 20, 2009 the company entered into a Dealer Agreement with Dandy Enterprises LLC of St. Paul Minnesota to serve as Non-Exclusive reseller of the Company’s e3 Fuel Saver Product throughout Minnesota. The Agreement has a term of five (5) years and calls for Dandy to purchase from the Company a minimum of 5,000 e3 Fuel Saver units during the first twenty four months of the term, following the shipment and delivery of initial fifty (50) units. As of October 31, 2009, Dandy Enterprises LLC has failed to perform its obligations under the Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement it signed with the Company on July 20, 2009. The Company believes this breach is a direct result of the intentional interference perpetrated by Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Roy Martin, Rashad Patrick and Attorney Warren Markowitz. As a result of this interference, on October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against Defendant Rashad Patrick. No trial date has been set by the court.

-18-

On ~~October~~July 120, 2009 the ~~Company~~company entered into a ~~$200,000~~Dealer ~~contract~~Agreement towith ~~buy~~Dandy ~~advertising~~Enterprises ~~space~~LLC ~~and~~of aSt. ~~"micro~~Paul Minnesota to serve as Non-~~site"~~Exclusive onreseller ~~Oprah~~of the Company’s e3 Fuel Saver Product throughout Minnesota.~~com.~~ The ~~campaign,~~Agreement ~~which~~has ~~was~~a ~~planned~~term of five (5) years and calls for Dandy to ~~run~~purchase ~~through~~from ~~February~~the 28Company a minimum of 5,000 ~~2010~~e3 ~~but~~Fuel ~~has~~Saver ~~been~~units ~~extended~~during the first twenty four months of the term, ~~required~~following athe $shipment and delivery of initial fifty (50) units. As of October 31,~~000~~ ~~non~~2009, Dandy Enterprises LLC has failed to perform its obligations under the Non-~~refundable~~Exclusive ~~down~~Dealer ~~payment~~Agreement ~~which~~it ~~was~~signed ~~paid~~with the Company on July 20, 2009. The ~~campaign~~Company believes this breach is ~~for~~a ~~the~~direct ~~purchase~~result of the intentional interference perpetrated by Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Roy Martin, Rashad Patrick and Attorney Warren Markowitz. As a ~~minimum~~result of 18this interference,~~641~~ on October 7,~~750~~ ~~"impressions" and~~2009, the Company filed a ~~co-branded~~lawsuit, ~~"micro~~Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-~~site"~~054477, ~~featuring~~in ~~AEDC's~~the ~~core~~Superior ~~product~~Court of the State of Arizona, in the e3County ~~Fuel~~of ~~Saver.~~Maricopa, ~~Various~~against ~~banner~~the ~~ads~~Defendants ~~featuring~~alleging conspiracy by the ~~company~~Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and ~~its~~Associates, ~~product(~~and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s) ascontractual ~~well~~and asbusiness relations, and misappropriation of the ~~micro-site~~Company’s ~~are~~website, ~~scheduled~~trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to ~~run~~its ~~through~~claims. On ~~out~~November 3, 2009, the ~~duration~~Superior ofCourt ~~the~~issued ~~campaign~~a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. AsOn ofDecember ~~January~~1, 312009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against another defendant. On April 14, 2010, the Company ~~has~~reached ~~incurred~~a settlement agreement with this defendant whereby the Company paid $505,000 of ~~marketing~~alleged ~~expenses~~unpaid ~~under~~compensation and the ~~contract~~defendant agreed to a Permanent Injunction and Order and acknowledged to have no right, title or interest in any of the Company’s intellectual property. Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin have not answered the complaint and are currently in default. No trial date has been set by the court.

On October 1, 2009 the Company entered into a $200,000 contract to buy advertising space and a "micro-site" on Oprah.com. The campaign, which was planned to run through February 28, 2010 but has been extended, required a $50,000 non-refundable down payment which was paid. The campaign is for the purchase of a minimum of 18,641,750 "impressions" and a co-branded "micro-site" featuring AEDC's core product, the e3 Fuel Saver. Various banner ads featuring the company and its product(s) as well as the micro-site are scheduled to run through out the duration of the campaign. As of April 30, 2010, the Company has incurred $50,000 of marketing expenses under the contract.

Performance Benefits of e3 Fuel Saver 7000

e3 Fuel Saver greatly enhances engine power and performance:

• 3 stage vapor based fuel saving system that gives the consumer a significant increase in gas mileage

• Boosts engine power and performance. Quicker pick up and acceleration in town and on the highway.

• Works on gasoline fuel injection or carbureted engines for cars, trucks, vans, RV's, boats, motorcycles, race cars, and other performance vehicles.

• Constructed from top quality anodized T-6 aircraft aluminum and polishedbrass fittings for long lasting protection.

-19-

• Works in addition to all other gas savers.

• No moving parts.

• Can be uninstalled and moved to any other gasoline powered car, truck, van or motor home.

• Easily installed in about an hour.

AEDC’s approach is to market our fuel conservation technology to consumers, business, and government agencies. There is a demand to protect our environment and the e3 Fuel Saver 7000 and e3 Diesel Purifier will provide a sizable contribution to the environment.

-19-

Our strategy for Consumer and Business to Business marketing is by advertising through National television, radio and internet commercials, fundraisers, and direct/indirect sales force teams.

Retail price is $300 USD. Wholesale is $200 USD.

Cost of Good Sold (COGS)

Unit costs is $22.50.

Shipping fees are $2.50.

Technology license and distribution agreement royalty is $40.

Assignment and assumption royalty is $10.

Research and Development

The automotive industry is characterized by continuous technological change, requiring a continuous effort to enhance our existing product and develop new products and technologies. Our research and development expenditures in the first six months of fiscal 2010 totaled approximately $64,322. Research and development expenditures were primarily related to enhancements to our e3 Pro Fuel Saver device, similar next generation devices and the expansion of our intellectual property portfolio.

Manufacturing and Operations Plan

Location and space requirements

The corporate office is located in Glendale, AZ. This location will be the hub for all operations, sales, and marketing.

Manufacturing

The product’s manufacturing and assembly iswas ~~currently~~originally planned to be performed in Ningbo, China. The facility is capable of producing up to 50,000 units every 30 days. ~~As the demand grows, the Company knows a secondary plant able to produce an additional 80,000 units per month.~~

The Company is of the opinion that Fuel Concepts LLC is in breach of its Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement as assigned. As a result, the Company has decided to move its entire product manufacturing and assembly from Ningbo, China to the US. Currently the Company is in the process of locating an appropriate facility within the United States.

Subcontractors and Suppliers

Our subcontractors will fall into two scenarios. First scenario will be to purchase our units for resale on a pricing structure determined by volume and footprint of targeted locations. Their commission is controlled by their own pricing adjustments in their direct sale. Subcontractor is accepting personal payment and liability from their customer.

The other scenario is that the subcontractor will purchase product on an “as needed” basis and payment is made for units directly to AEDC. Subcontractor receives a commission per unit. Subcontractor is accepting payments on behalf of AEDC.

-20-

The Company is of the opinion that Fuel Concepts LLC is in breach of its Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement as assigned. As a result, the Company has decided to move its entire product manufacturing and assembly from Ningbo, China to the United States. Currently the Company is in the process of locating an appropriate facility within the United States.

Distributors

Our distributors will fall into two scenarios. First scenario will be to purchase our units for resale on a pricing structure determined by volume and footprint of targeted locations. Their commission is controlled by their own pricing adjustments in their direct sale. The distributor will accept personal payment and liability from their customer.

The other scenario is that the distributor will purchase product on an “as needed” basis and payment is made for units directly to AEDC. Subcontractor receives a commission per unit. Subcontractor is accepting payments on behalf of AEDC.

Our dealer, distributer network consist of: Automotive dealerships and repair facilities as well as Retailers whose inventory tailor to after-market automotive products.

Warranty

The e3 Fuel saver 7000 has no movable parts which keeps potential repairs to a minimum. Proper installment (Install performed by a “Certified Installer”) is what determines if a warranty replacement is valid. There is a standard 1 year manufacturer’s warranty.

Labor requirements

Our labor force will consist of direct sales team members, marketing representatives, operational staff, and call center representatives. The Company anticipates an executive and administrative staff of 10-15 employees within twelve months.

Employees will be paid based upon position. All sales positions are 1099 contractors and are paid a commission per unit. Manufacturing Reps are also paid as sales people.

Marketing Plan

Target Audiences include: City and State Municipalities, Government Agencies, Fleet, Taxi Cabs Companies, Limousine Companies, Rental Car Companies, Auto Dealers, TV / Radio, Retailers, Internet, Print Ads, Direct Mail Community Outreach Campaigns.

Results of Operations

Three months ended January 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended January 31, 2009

Revenues. Total Revenues during the three months ended January 31, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the three months ended January 31, 2009. The lack of revenue in the three months ended January 31, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management team and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

Cost of Sales. Total Cost of Sales during the three months ended January 31, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the three months ended January 31, 2009. The lack of cost of sales in the three months ended January 31, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

Research and Development Expenses. Total Research and Development during the three months ended January 31, 2010 were $37,823 compared to $0 for the three months ended January 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies. Research and development expenditures were primarily related to enhancements to our e3 Pro Fuel Saver device, similar next generation devices and the expansion of our intellectual property portfolio.

-21-

~~Selling,~~Results General and Administrative Expenses. Total Selling, General and Administrative Expenses during the three months ended January 31, 2010 were $240,469 compared to $16,913 for the three months ended January 31, 2009. For the three months ended January 31, 2010, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $157,055 for compensation related expenses, $26,168 for selling and marketing, $5,232 for amortization of licensing agreement, $4,230 for interest expense and $47,784 for other general and administrative expenses. For the three months ended January 31, 2009, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $900 for donated services and $16,013 for general and administrative expenses. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies.Operations

~~Six~~Three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 compared to the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009

Revenues. Total Revenues during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009. The lack of revenue in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management team and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

Cost of Sales. Total Cost of Sales during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009. The lack of cost of sales in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management ~~team~~ and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

Research and Development Expenses. Total Research and Development during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 were $6444,~~322~~620 compared to $0 for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies. Research and development expenditures were primarily related to enhancements to our e3 Pro Fuel Saver device, similar next generation devices and the expansion of our intellectual property portfolio.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Total Selling, General and Administrative Expenses during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 were $~~431~~225,~~916~~720 compared to $339,~~773~~170 for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $~~223~~174,~~823~~308 for compensation related expenses, $~~52,093~~609 for selling and marketing, $105,~~464~~061 for amortization of licensing agreement, $84,~~460~~092 for interest expense and $~~137~~41,~~076~~650 for other general and administrative expenses. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $~~1,800~~900 for donated services, $~~5,500~~171 for ~~impairment~~amortization of ~~mineral~~licensing ~~property~~agreement ~~acquisition costs, $295 for exploration costs~~ and $268,~~178~~099 for general and administrative expenses. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies.

Nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended April 30, 2009

Revenues. Total Revenues during the nine months ended April 30, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the nine months ended April 30, 2009. The lack of revenue in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management team and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

-22-

Cost of Sales. Total Cost of Sales during the nine months ended April 30, 2010 were $0 compared to $0 for the nine months ended April 30, 2009. The lack of cost of sales in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 are due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies, the transition to a new management team and management’s focus on its ongoing litigation with the patent holder of its e3 fuel saver 7000 device and others.

Research and Development Expenses. Total Research and Development during the nine months ended April 30, 2010 were $108,942 compared to $0 for the nine months ended April 30, 2009. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies. Research and development expenditures were primarily related to enhancements to our e3 Pro Fuel Saver device, similar next generation devices and the expansion of our intellectual property portfolio.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Total Selling, General and Administrative Expenses during the nine months ended April 30, 2010 were $657,636 compared to $42,943 for the nine months ended April 30, 2009. For the nine months ended April 30, 2010, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $398,131 for compensation related expenses, $52,703 for selling and marketing, $15,525 for amortization of licensing agreement, $12,552 for interest expense and $178,725 for other general and administrative expenses. For the nine months ended April 30, 2009, the selling, general and administrative expenses were comprised of $2,700 for donated services, $5,500 for impairment of mineral property acquisition costs, $295 for exploration costs, $171 for amortization of licensing agreement and $34,277 for general and administrative expenses. The increase is primarily due to management’s decision to change its business operations from mineral exploration to business of research and development, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of its cost-effective after market fuel conservation technologies.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-23-

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On October 7, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit, Alternative Energy Development Corporation v. Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, Cary Lee Peterson, Roy Martin, et al, CV2009-054477, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, against the Defendants alleging conspiracy by the Defendants to circumvent the Technology Licensing Agreement dated August 1, 2008 between Morton Weisbrot, Smith Young and Associates, and Fuel Concepts, LLC, interfering with the Company’s contractual and business relations, and misappropriation of the Company’s website, trade secrets, and other confidential information. The Company is seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages related to its claims. On November 3, 2009, the Superior Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants Fuel Concepts, LLC, Smith Young and Associates, and Roy Martin. On December 1, 2009, the Superior Court issued a limited injunction against ~~Defendant~~another ~~Rashad Patrick~~defendant. On April 14, 2010, the Company reached a settlement agreement with this defendant whereby the Company paid $5,000 of alleged unpaid compensation and the defendant agreed to a Permanent Injunction and Order and acknowledged to have no right, title or interest in any of the Company’s intellectual property. No trial date has been set by the court.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

-23-

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

-24-

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

The following documents are included herein:

Exhibit No.	Document Description
10.1	Employment Agreement for JAmy ~~David~~Gloyd ~~Massey~~ (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on ~~January~~March 209, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
10.2	Employment Agreement for Amy Gloyd (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

* Filed herewith

-2425-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on this ~~19th~~ 21st day of ~~March~~June, 2010.

	ALTERNATIVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

	BY:	AMY GLOYD
		Amy Gloyd, President, Principal Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors.

	BY:	SAM MESSINA III
		Sam Messina III, Principal Financial Officer and a member of the Board of Directors.

-2526-

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Document Description
10.1	Employment Agreement for JAmy ~~David~~Gloyd ~~Massey~~ (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on ~~January~~March 209, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
10.2	Employment Agreement for Amy Gloyd (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

* Filed herewith

-2627-

Filing Compare · Alternative Energy Development Corp