UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[√X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~May~~August 31, 2009

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-52959

Sterling Oil & Gas Company

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada	20-8999059
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Nevada

20-8999059

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

121 W. Merino St.

PO Box 500

Upton , WY 82730

(Address of principal executive offices)

(307) 468-9368

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes~~ ~~[√] No [ ]~~

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

~~[ ]~~ Large accelerated filer ~~[ ]~~ Accelerated filer

~~[ ]~~ Non-accelerated filer [√X] Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [√X]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 15,925,000 shares of common stock, $.00001 par value and 0 shares of preferred stock, $.00001 par value as of ~~July~~October 15, 2009.

STERLING OIL & GAS COMPANY

INDEX

			Page
PART 1.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
		Condensed Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and February 28, 2009	3
		Condensed Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and February 28, 2009	3
		Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 and from Inception (May 1, 2007) through May 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	4
		Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the six months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the cumulative period from May 1, 2007 (Inception ) through August 31, 2009(Unaudited)	4
		Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 and from Inception (May 1, 2007) through May 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	5
		Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the cumulative period from May 1, 2007( Inception) through August 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	5
		Condensed Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and the cumulative period from Inception (May 1, 2007) to May 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	6
		Condensed Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and for the cumulative period from May 1, 2007 (Inception) through August 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	6
		Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements	7
	ITEM 2.	~~MANAGEMENT~~Management’Ss ~~DISCUSSION~~Discussion ~~AND~~and ~~ANALYSIS~~Analysis OFof ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~CONDITION~~Condition ~~AND~~and ~~RESULTS~~Results OFof ~~OPERATIONS~~Operations	13
	ITEM 4T.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	1617
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION		17
	ITEM 1.	~~LEGAL~~Legal ~~PROCEEDINGS~~Proceedings	1617
	ITEM 2.	~~UNREGISTERED~~Unregistered ~~SALES~~Sales OFof ~~EQUITY~~Equity ~~SECURITIES~~Securities ~~AND~~and ~~USE~~Use OFof ~~PROCEEDS~~Proceeds	1617
	ITEM 3.	~~DEFAULT~~Default ~~UPON~~Upon ~~SENIOR~~Senior ~~SECURITIES~~Securities	17
	ITEM 4.	~~SUBMISSION~~Submission OFof ~~MATTERS~~Matters TOto Aa ~~VOTE~~Vote OFof ~~SECURITY~~Security ~~HOLDERS~~Holders	17
	ITEM 5.	~~OTHER~~Other ~~INFORMATION~~Information	17
	ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	1718
	SIGNATURES		1819

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

~~Sterling Oil & Gas Company~~	Sterling Oil & Gas Company
~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~	(An Exploration Stage Company)
~~Condensed Balance Sheets~~	Condensed Balance Sheets
					May 31, 2009		February 28, 2009
				August 31, 2009			February 28,
Assets				(Unaudited)	~~(Unaudited)~~		2009
Current assets:
~~Cash and cash equivalents~~	Cash and cash equivalents			$187,139	~~228,945~~	$	$66,321
			Total current assets	187,139	~~228,945~~		66,321
Oil and Gas Properties-Unevaluated Properties, full cost method (less $405,745 and $483,855 impairment, respectively)					531,571		713,619
Oil and Gas Properties-Unevaluated Properties, full cost method (less $256,424 and $483,855 impairment, respectively)				310,241			713,619
Total Assets				$497,380	~~760,516~~	$	$779,940
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
~~Accounts payable~~	Accounts payable			$2,895	~~12,042~~	$	$2,585
Commitment and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 8)
Shareholders’ equity:
~~Preferred stock, $.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares~~	Preferred stock, $.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares
~~issued and outstanding~~	issued and outstanding			--	--		--
~~Common stock, $.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,~~	Common stock, $.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
	~~15,925,000 shares issued and outstanding~~	15,925,000 shares issued and outstanding
	at May 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009, respectively.				159		159
		at August 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009, respectively.		159			159
~~Additional paid-in capital~~	Additional paid-in capital			2,280,932	~~2,279,832~~		2,267,782
~~Deficit accumulated during development stage~~	Deficit accumulated during development stage			(1,786,606)	~~(1,531,517)~~		(1,490,586)
			Total shareholders’ equity	494,485	~~748,474~~		777,355
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity				$497,380	~~760,516~~	$	$779,940

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

Sterling Oil & Gas Company
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
											From Inception
	For the Three Months ended August 31,		For the Six Months ended August 31,				May 1, 2007 (Inception) Through August 31,
											(May 1, 2007)
	2009	2008		2009		2008	2009
											through
Revenues	$--	$--		$--		$--		$--
							For the Three Months ended May 31,				May 31,
Costs and expenses
							2009		2008		2009
Personnel costs	19,726	69,542		27,278		175,602		268,756
Revenues						$	--	$	--	$	--
Professional fees	4,940	67,887		37,568		108,188		266,450
Costs and expenses:
Impairment and abandonment of unproved properties	228,482	--		228,482		--		1,228,337
	Personnel costs						7,552		106,060		249,030
Other general and administrative	2,362	1,669		3,228		14,164		32,312
	Professional fees						32,627		40,300		261,510
Operating loss	(255,510)	(139,098)		(296,556)		(297,954)		(1,795,855)
	Impairment expense						--		--		999,855
Other income (expense)
	Other general and administrative expenses						866		12,496		29,950
Interest income	421	565		536		2,665		9,249
					Operating Loss		(41,045)		(158,856)		(1,540,345)
Net loss	$ (255,089)	$ (138,533)		$ (296,020)		$ (295,289)		$ (1,786,606)
Other Income (Expense)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$(0.02)	$(0.01)		$(0.02)		$(0.02)
Interest income							114		2,100		8,828
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	15,925,000	15,070,652		15,925,000		15,035,326
Net Loss						$	(40,931)	$	(156,756)	$	(1,531,517)
Basic and diluted loss per share							(0.00)		(0.01)
Weighted average common shares outstanding							15,925,000		15,000,000

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

Sterling Oil & Gas Company
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
										From
					For the Six Months ended August 31,	For the Six Months ended August 31,		From May 1, 2007 (Inception) Through August 31,
										Inception
					2009	2008		2009
					For the Three			For the Three		(May 1, 2007)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
					Months ended			Months ended		through
Net Loss					$(296,020)	$(295,289)		$(1,786,606)
					May 31,			May 31,		May 31,
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
					2009			2008		2009
Contributed services					13,150	--		52,650
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Impairment and abandonment of unproved properties					228,482	--		1,228,337
Net Loss				$	(40,931)		$	(156,756)	$	(1,531,517)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Trading securities					--	260,392		--
Contributed services					12,050			--		51,550
Accounts payable					310	25,553		2,895
Impairment expense					--			--		999,855
		Net cash(used in)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			operating activities		(54,078)	(9,344)		(502,724)
Trading securities					--			150,422		--
Cash flows from investing activities:
Accounts payable					9,457			8,518		12,042
	Unevaluated oil and gas properties-purchases				(8,104)	(35,803)		(216,436)
		Net cash(used in), provided by
	Refund of purchase deposit				--	--		80,856
			operating activities		(19,424)			2,184		(468,070)
	Undeveloped oil and gas properties-sales				183,000	--		391,233
Cash flows from investing activities:
		Net cash provided by, (used in)
	Unevaluated oil and gas properties-purchases				(952)			(6,540)		(209,284)
			investing activities		174,896	(35,803)		255,653
	Refund of purchase deposit				--			--		80,856
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Undeveloped oil and gas properties-sales				183,000			--		391,233
	Proceeds from the sale of common stock				--	65,000		435,000
		Net cash (used in), provided by
	Payments for offering costs				--	--		(790)
			investing activities		182,048			(6,540)		262,805
		Net cash provided by
Cash flows from financing activities:
			financing activities		--	65,000		434,210
	Proceeds from the sale of common stock				--			--		435,000
		Net Increase in cash and
	Payments for offering costs				--			--		(790)
			cash equivalents		120,818	19,853		187,139
		Net cash provided by
Cash and cash equivalents:
			financing activities		--			--		434,210
	Beginning of period				66,321	6,426		--
		Net Increase (Decrease) in cash and
	End of period				$187,139	$26,279		$187,139
			cash equivalents		162,624			(4,356)		228,945
	Noncash investing and financing transaction:
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Transfer of oil and gas properties from Big Cat				$--	$--		$1,794,231
	Beginning of period				66,321			6,426		--
	End of period			$	228,945		$	2,070	$	228,945
	Noncash investing and financing transaction:
	Transfer of oil and gas properties from Big Cat			$	--		$	--	$	1,794,231

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

Sterling Oil & Gas Company
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Statement of Shareholder’s Equity
							Deficit
							Incurred
	Common Stock				Additional		During
			Par value		Paid-in		Exploration
	Shares		$.00001		Capital		Stage		Total
Balance, at Inception (May 1, 2007)	--	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--
Stock issued for properties transferred from Big Cat at inception, 5/1/2007, $0.1794 per share	10,000,000		100		1,794,131		–		1,794,231
Private placement June 2007, $0.05 per share	5,000,000		50		249,950		–		250,000
Other-contributed services	–		–		30,800		–		30,800
Other costs-issuance fees					(790)				(790)
Net loss	–		–		–		(740,320)		(740,320)
Balance, February 29, 2008	15,000,000		150		2,074,091		(740,320)		1,333,921
Public offering August 2008, $0.20 per share	325,000		3		64,997		–		65,000
Public offering October 2008, $0.20 per share	600,000		6		119,994		--		120,000
Other-contributed services	--		--		8,700		--		8,700
Net loss	–		–		–		(750,266)		(750,266)
Balance, February 28, 2009	15,925,000		159		2,267,782		(1,490,586)		777,355
Other-contributed services	--		--		12,050		--		12,050
Net loss	--		--		--		(40,931)		(40,931)
Balance, May 31, 2009 (Unaudited)	15,925,000	$	159	$	2,279,832	$	(1,531,517)	$	748,474

Sterling Oil & Gas Company

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Condensed Statement of Shareholder’s Equity

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital	Deficit Incurred During Exploration Stage	Total
	Shares	Par value $.00001	Additional Paid-in Capital	Deficit Incurred During Exploration Stage	Total

Balance, at May 1, 2007( Inception)	--	$--	$--	$--	$--
Stock issued for properties transferred from Big Cat at inception, 5/1/2007, $0.1794 per share	10,000,000	100	1,794,131	–	1,794,231
Private placement June 2007, $0.05 per share	5,000,000	50	249,950	–	250,000
Other-contributed services	–	–	30,800	–	30,800
Other costs-issuance fees			(790)		(790)
Net loss	–	–	–	(740,320)	(740,320)

Balance, February 29, 2008	15,000,000	150	2,074,091	(740,320)	1,333,921
Public offering August 2008, $0.20 per share	325,000	3	64,997	–	65,000
Public offering October 2008, $0.20 per share	600,000	6	119,994	--	120,000
Other-contributed services	--	--	8,700	--	8,700
Net loss	–	–	–	(750,266)	(750,266)

Balance, February 28, 2009	15,925,000	159	2,267,782	(1,490,586)	777,355
Other-contributed services	--	--	13,150	--	13,150
Net loss	--	--	--	(296,020)	(296,020)
Balance, August 31, 2009	15,925,000	$159	$2,280,932	$(1,786,606)	$494,485

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

1.	Presentation, Organization and Nature of Operations:

Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Sterling Oil & Gas Company (the “Company”) at ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements pursuant to instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009. In management’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation to make the Company’s financial statements not misleading have been included. The results of operations for the period ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and 2008 presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The February 28, 2009 balance sheet has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009.

Description of Operations

Sterling Oil & Gas Company (“Sterling”) is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration and acquisition of natural gas and crude oil prospects in the western United States. On May 1, 2007, Big Cat Energy Corporation (“Big Cat”) formed Sterling as a wholly owned subsidiary and transferred its unevaluated oil and gas properties, consisting of various mineral leases and related costs, to Sterling in return for 10 million shares of Sterling restricted common stock. On April 2, 2008, Big Cat spun off Sterling by distributing the 10 million shares it held pro rata to the Big Cat shareholders.

The Company is in the exploration stage in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘SFAS”) No. 7. The Company has been in the exploration stage since inception and has yet to enter revenue-producing operations. Activities since its inception have primarily involved organization and development of the Company.

2.	Liquidity:

Going Concern

As of ~~May~~ August 31, 2009, the Company had working capital of $~~216~~184,~~903~~244 and shareholders’ equity of $~~748~~494,~~474~~485. Sterling has relied upon outside investor funds to maintain its operations and develop its business. Sterling’s plan for continuation anticipates continued funding from investors. This funding would be used for operations, for working capital, as well as business expansion during the upcoming fiscal year. The Company can provide no assurance that additional investor funds will be available on terms acceptable to the Company and there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Sterling’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising capital through debt or equity financing and ultimately by producing revenue and achieving profitable operations. The Company can offer no assurance that it will be successful in its efforts to raise additional proceeds or achieve profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business, and no adjustments have been made as a result of this uncertainty.

3.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of any oil and gas reserves, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable.

expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts held in banks and highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company’s cash equivalents and short-term investments are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. The Company manages and controls this risk by investing these funds with major financial institutions.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting whereby all costs related to the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas properties are capitalized into a single cost center (“full cost pool”). Such costs include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, overhead directly related to exploration activities and costs of drilling both productive and non-productive wells. Proceeds from property sales are generally credited to the full cost pool without gain or loss recognition unless such a sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and the proved reserves attributable to these costs. A significant alteration would typically involve a sale of 25% or more of the proved reserves related to a single full cost pool. Generally, any such sale of unevaluated properties will also be recognized on a cost recovery basis with no gain or loss.

As of ~~May~~ August 31, 2009, the Company does not have any proven oil and gas reserves and all of its properties are unevaluated. The costs of unevaluated properties will be withheld from the depletion base until such time as they are either developed or abandoned. Unevaluated properties are assessed at least annually by the Company for impairment. Impairment is estimated by the Company by applying factors based on historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of the properties, average holding periods of unproved properties, and geographic and geologic data of groupings of individually insignificant properties and projects. Therefore, any impairment of said unevaluated properties would result in an expense to the Company.

During the year ended February 28, 2009, the Company reviewed its oil and gas leaseholds and based on the sale of its interest in Cedar Resources and additional information, the Company recorded an impairment of $428,855 on its leasehold interests.

During the three months ended August 31, 2009, the Company completed a review of its oil and gas leaseholds and elected not to pay delay rentals on certain leases in the Powder River Basin of Montana and therefore abandoned the leases. The effect of abandonment of these leases was a reduction of 9,991net mineral acres to an ending 11,701 net mineral acres, which is considered a significant reduction in our oil and gas properties. As a result, the Company wrote off $152,321 against its impairment reserve and recorded an abandonment of unproved properties expense of $228,482 to reflect the reduction in acreage.

Depletion of exploration and development costs and depreciation of production equipment is computed using the units of production method based upon estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Total well costs, if and when drilled, will be transferred to the depletable pool even when multiple targeted zones have not been fully evaluated. For depletion and depreciation purposes, relative volumes of oil and gas production and reserves are converted at the energy equivalent rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil.

Under the full cost method of accounting, capitalized oil and gas property costs, less accumulated depletion and net of deferred income taxes (full cost pool), may not exceed an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net revenues from proved oil and gas reserves less the future cash outflows associated with the asset retirement obligations that have been accrued in the balance sheet plus the cost, or estimated fair value, if lower of unproved properties and the costs of any properties not being amortized. Should the full cost pool exceed this ceiling, an impairment is recognized. The present value of estimated future net revenues is computed by applying current oil and gas prices to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of period end, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves assuming the continuation of existing economic conditions. However, subsequent commodity price increases may be utilized to reduce or eliminate any impairment.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company will follow the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement (ARO) Obligations at such time it acquires or drills oil and gas wells. The estimated fair value of the future costs associated with dismantlement, abandonment and restoration of oil and gas properties will be recorded when incurred, generally upon acquisition or completion of a well. The net estimated costs will be discounted to present values using a risk adjusted rate over the estimated economic life of the oil and gas properties. Such costs will be capitalized as part of the related asset. The asset will be depleted on the units-of-production method on a field-by-field basis. The associated liability will be classified in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets. The liability will be periodically adjusted to reflect (1) new liabilities incurred, (2) liabilities settled during the period, (3) accretion expense, and (4) revisions to estimated future cash flow requirements. The accretion expense will be recorded as a component of depreciation, depletion and amortization expense in the accompanying statements of operations. As of ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009, the Company has no ARO obligation.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for by recognizing deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences, based on enacted tax laws, of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets, liabilities and carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future effects of all deductible temporary differences, loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are then reduced, if deemed necessary, by a valuation allowance for the amount of any tax benefit which, more likely than not, are not expected to be realized.

On March 1, 2008 we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No.48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -- An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48. FIN 48 provides detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No.109. Tax positions must meet a "more-likely-than-not" recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. We have identified no significant uncertain tax positions as of ~~May~~August 31, 2009. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 has resulted in no FIN 48 liability on the balance sheet. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption was zero.

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued as of ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009.

Risks and Uncertainties

Historically, oil and gas prices have experienced significant fluctuations and have been particularly volatile in recent years. Price fluctuations can result from variations in weather, levels of regional or national production and demand, availability of transportation capacity to other regions of the country and various other factors. Increases or decreases in prices received could have a significant impact on future results.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The fair market value of these financial instruments approximates or is equal to the book value.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Contingently issuable shares are included in the computation of basic net income (loss) per share when the related conditions are satisfied. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.

As of ~~May~~ August 31, 2009 the Company had 15,925,000 shares of common stock outstanding and warrants for the purchase of 3,425,000 shares. As of ~~May~~August 31, 2008 the Company had 15,~~000~~325,000 shares of common stock outstanding and warrants for the purchase of 2,~~500~~825,000 shares. The warrants were excluded from the calculation of diluted ~~earnings~~ earnings per share for both years, due to the fact that they were anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts for the period from Inception (May 1, 2007) to ~~May~~August 31, 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the ~~May~~August 31, 2009 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net loss.

Other Comprehensive Income

The Company does not have any material items of other comprehensive income for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 or ~~May~~August 31, 2008. Therefore, total comprehensive income (loss) is the same as net income (loss) for these periods.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

~~The Company~~In ~~has~~July ~~reviewed~~2009, ~~all~~the ~~recently~~FASB issued SFAS 168, ~~but~~“The ~~not~~FASB ~~yet~~Accounting ~~effective,~~Standards ~~accounting pronouncements~~Codification and ~~does~~Hierarchy ~~not~~of ~~believe~~Generally ~~the~~Accepted ~~future~~Accounting ~~adoption~~Principles-A Replacement of ~~any~~FASB ~~such~~Statement No. 162”. The objective of SFAS 168 is to replace SFAS 162 and to establish the ~~pronouncements~~Codification ~~may~~as bethe ~~expected~~source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to ~~cause~~be aapplied ~~material~~by ~~impact~~nongovernmental onentities ~~its~~in the preparation of financial ~~condition~~ statements. The Codification is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do not anticipate the ~~results~~adoption of ~~its~~SFAS ~~operations~~168 will have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, the Board’s objective in issuing this Statement is to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The Board undertook this project to address (1) the effects on certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2) constituent concerns about the application of of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. WeSFAS ~~are~~167 ~~currently~~is ~~assessing~~effective for the ~~potential~~first ~~impact,~~annual ifreporting ~~any~~period that begins after November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate the adoption of SFAS 167 will have a significant impact on our ~~condensed~~ financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets”, the Board’s objective in issuing this Statement is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The Board undertook this project to address (1) practices that have developed since the issuance of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, that are not consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that Statement and (2) concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial statements of transferors. SFAS 166 is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. We do not anticipate the adoption of SFAS 166 will have a significant impact on our financial statements.

Subsequent Events

~~Servicing~~The ofCompany ~~Financial~~has ~~Assets~~evaluated ~~and Extinguishments~~subsequent ofevents ~~Liabilities,~~through ~~that~~October ~~are~~15, ~~not~~2009, ~~consistent with~~ the ~~original intent~~date ~~and~~which ~~key requirements of that Statement and (2) concerns of financial statement users that many of~~ the financial ~~assets~~statements ~~(and~~were ~~related~~available ~~obligations) that have been derecognized should continue~~ to be ~~reported in the financial statements of transferors~~issued. ~~We are currently assessing the potential impact, if any, on our condensed financial statements.~~

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, “ Subsequent Events” the objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth: 1. the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, 2. the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and 3. the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. In accordance with this Statement, an entity should apply the requirements to interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We do not anticipate the adoption of of SFAS 165 will have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

4.	Oil and Gas Property Acquisitions:

During the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 the Company paid delay rentals on its Montana leases in the amount of $~~952. The Company also sold its interest in its joint venture with Cedar Resources for $183~~7,~~000~~152. ~~The effect of this sale reduced the Company’s leasehold net mineral acres from 22,511 to 21,047.~~

During the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2008, the Company paid delay rentals and title work expenses on our ~~Wyoming~~ joint venture in the amount of $629,~~540~~262.

During the six months ended August 31, 2009, the Company paid joint venture title work costs, and delay rentals of $8,104compared to $35,803 for the six months ended August 31, 2008.

5.	Related Party Transactions:

During the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009, certain officers of Big Cat Energy Corporation, an affiliated public company, performed part time management duties for the Company. The Company did not pay cash for these services, however, the Company recorded the services at a fair market value as consulting fees and additional paid-in capital. Contributed services were $121,~~050~~100 for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 compared to no contributed services for the same period in 2008.

The amount of contributed services for the six months ended August 31, 2009 were $13,150 compared to no contributed services for the same period in 2008.

6.	Shareholders’ Equity:

There were no equity transactions during the ~~period~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 ~~or May 31, 2008~~.

7. Income Taxes:

The federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforward of approximately $1,009,000 as of May 31, 2009 begins to expire in 2028. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the amount of taxable income which can be offset by NOL carryforwards after a change in control (generally greater than 50% change in ownership) of a loss corporation. Generally, after a change in control, a loss corporation cannot deduct NOL carryforwards in excess of the Section 382 limitation. Due to these “change in ownership” provisions, utilization of NOL carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation regarding their utilization against taxable income in future periods. We have not performed a Section 382 analysis. However, if performed, Section 382 may be found to limit potential future utilization of our NOL carryforwards.

During the three months ended August 31, 2008 the Company sold 325,000 units for $.20 per unit, each unit consisting of one free trading share of its common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of free trading common stock exercisable at $.50 per share. The Company received proceeds of $65,000 from the sale of units. The offering was made as part of the Form S-1 Post Effective Amendment 3 which became effective on July 14, 2008. Following the above sale, the Company’s outstanding common stock increased to 15,325,000 shares.

In accordance with EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed To, and Potentially Settled In a Company’s Own Stock,” (EITF 00-19) and the terms of the warrants and the transaction documents, the warrants were determined to represent an equity transaction and therefore the fair value of the warrants are contained within the equity section and not separately recorded apart from the common shares issued as part of the private placement.

7.	Income Taxes:

The federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforward of approximately $1,497,000 as of August 31, 2009 begins to expire in 2028. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the amount of taxable income which can be offset by NOL carryforwards after a change in control (generally greater than 50% change in ownership) of a loss corporation. Generally, after a change in control, a loss corporation cannot deduct NOL carryforwards in excess of the Section 382 limitation. Due to these “change in ownership” provisions, utilization of NOL carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation regarding their utilization against taxable income in future periods. We have not performed a Section 382 analysis. However, if performed, Section 382 may be found to limit potential future utilization of our NOL carryforwards.

We have established a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets because, based on the weight of available evidence including our continued operating losses, it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Because of the full valuation allowance, no income tax expense or benefit is reflected on the statement of operations.

On March 1, 2008 we adopted FASB Interpretation No.48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -- An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48. FIN 48 provides detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No.109. Tax positions must meet a "more-likely-than-not" recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. We have identified no significant uncertain tax positions as of ~~May~~August 31, 2009. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 has resulted in no FIN 48 liability on the balance sheet. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption was zero.

No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued at ~~May~~ August 31, 2009.

8.	Commitments and Contingencies:

Environmental Issues– The Company is engaged in oil and gas exploration and production and may become subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental clean up of well sites or other environmental restoration procedures as they relate to the drilling of oil and gas wells and the operation thereof. If the Company acquires existing or previously drilled well bores, the Company may not be aware of what environmental safeguards were taken at the time such wells were drilled or during such time the wells were operated. Should it be determined that a liability exists with respect to any environmental clean up or restoration, the liability to cure such a violation could fall upon the Company. Management believes its properties, all of which are currently unevaluated, are operated in conformity with local, state and federal regulations. No claim has been made, nor is the Company aware of any uninsured liability which the Company may have, as it relates to any environmental clean up, restoration or the violation of any rules or regulations relating thereto.

ITEM 2. ~~MANAGEMENT~~ Management’Ss ~~DISCUSSION~~Discussion ~~AND~~and ~~ANALYSIS~~Analysis OFof ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~CONDITION~~Condition ~~AND~~and ~~RESULTS~~Results OFof ~~OPERATIONS.~~Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. All statements included in this Quarterly Report, other than statements of historical facts, address matters that we reasonably expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things:

our future financial position, including working capital and anticipated cash flow;

the risks of the oil and gas industry, such as operational risks in exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas;

market demand;

risks and uncertainties involving geology of oil and gas deposits;

the uncertainty of any reserve estimates and reserves life;

the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to any production, costs and expenses;

potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures;

fluctuations in oil and gas prices;

health, safety and environmental risks;

uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing; and

the possibility that government policies or laws may change or governmental approvals may be delayed or withheld.

Other sections of this Quarterly Report may include discussion of additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Our forward looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are made as of the respective dates set forth in this Quarterly Report. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date the statements are made. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Plan of Operations

~~more~~Plan of ~~our~~ properties in Montana to determine the appropriate structure for possible development. There is limited historical financial information about our current operations upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are in development stage operations and have not generated any revenues from current operations. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, the current lack of product production, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services and products. Further, we have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms to enable us to develop the business of the Company. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.Operations

For the fiscal year ending February 28, 2010, the Company’s plan of operation is to evaluate new oil and gas projects that are available to the Company and evaluate utilization of the Company’s existing Montana leasehold interests. The Company presently has 11,701 leasehold net mineral acres. Our ability to explore and develop our acreage or to acquire other acreage for development and to maintain existing acreage depends upon our ability to raise additional capital through equity fundraising and/or borrowing. Depending upon available funds, we may conduct our own field tests or exploration on one or more of our properties in Montana to determine the appropriate structure for possible development. There is limited historical financial information about our current operations upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are in development stage operations and have not generated any revenues from current operations. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, the current lack of product production, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services and products. Further, we have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms to enable us to develop the business of the Company. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 compared to the Three Months Ended ~~May~~August 31, 2008.

We reported a net loss for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 of $40255,~~931~~089 compared to net loss of $~~156~~138,~~756~~533 for the period three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2008. WeThe ~~had personnel~~net ~~expense~~loss ~~of $7,552~~ for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009 ~~compared~~included ~~to $106,060~~a for the three months ended May 31, 2008. Our other general and administrative costs were $866 during the three month period ended May 31, 2009 compared to $12,496 for the same period in 2008. We had $32,627 of professional fess, $12,050 of which were non-cash, ~~during~~loss ~~the~~on ~~three~~abandonment ~~months ended May 31, 2009, compared to $40,300 for the three months ended May 31, 2008. As~~ of ~~the~~leaseholds ~~date~~ of ~~this report~~$228, ~~we have yet to generate revenues from our current business operations~~482.

We had personnel expense of $19,726 for the three months ended August 31, 2009 compared to $69,542 for the three months ended August 31, 2008.

Our other general and administrative costs were $2,362 during the three month period ended August 31, 2009 compared to $1,669 for the same period in 2008.

We had $4,940 of professional fess, $1,100 of which were non-cash, during the three months ended August 31, 2009, compared to $67,887 for the three months ended August 31, 2008. The professional fees in 2009 and 2008 are for required SEC filings and legal fees associated with Company stock offerings.

Six Months Ended August 31, 2009 compared to the Six Months Ended August 31, 2008

We reported a net loss for the six months ended August 31, 2009 of $296,020 compared to net loss of $295,289 for the six months ended August 31, 2008.

We had personnel expense of $27,278 in the six months ended August 31, 2009 compare to $175,602 for the six months ended August 31, 2008. The difference is due to a reduction in salaries being paid in the six months ended August 31, 2009.

Our other general and administrative costs were $3,228 during the six month period ended August 31, 2009. There was $14,164 of general and administrative expense for the six months ended August 31, 2008.

We had $37,568 of professional fess during the six months ended August 31, 2009, compared to $108,188 of professional fees for the six months ended August 31, 2008. The professional fees in 2009 and 2008 are for required SEC filings and legal fees associated with Company stock offerings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~During the~~As ~~three months ended May 31, 2009, the Company sold its interest in the Cedar Resources joint venture and received proceeds~~ of ~~$183,000. As of~~August ~~May~~ 31, 2009, we had working capital of $~~216~~184,~~903~~244, and it is uncertain whether this amount will be sufficient to fund operations. Therefore, we may seek additional sources of capital for the coming year.

For the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009, we used net cash from operations of $1954,~~424~~078. Cash used in operations was primarily a result of our net loss offset by non cash ~~contributed~~loss ~~services~~on leaseholds, compared to cash ~~provided~~used byin operations of $29,~~184~~344 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2008 which was primarily due to our net loss offset by trading securities activity.

Cash provided by investing activities was $~~182~~174,~~048~~896 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009, primarily from the sale of the Company’s interest in Cedar Resources, compared to cash used of $635,~~540~~803 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2008, primarily from payment of delay rentals.

There were no net cash effects from financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~ August 31, 2009 orcompared to cash provided of $65,000 for the six months ended August 31, 2008.

Financial Instruments and Other Information

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009 we had cash, ~~marketable~~and ~~securities~~cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which are each carried at approximate fair value due to the short maturity date of those instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Critical Accounting Polices and Estimates

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of any oil and gas reserves, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable.

of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable.

Oil and Gas Properties

Risks and Uncertainties

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In ~~June~~ July 2009, the FASB issued SFAS ~~167~~168, “~~Amendments~~The to FASB ~~Interpretation No.~~Accounting ~~46(R)”,~~Standards ~~the~~Codification ~~Board’s~~and ~~objective~~Hierarchy inof ~~issuing~~Generally ~~this~~Accepted ~~Statement~~Accounting isPrinciples-A toReplacement ~~improve financial~~of ~~reporting~~FASB byStatement ~~enterprises~~No. ~~involved with variable interest entities~~162”. The ~~Board~~ ~~undertook~~objective ~~this project to address (1) the effects on certain provisions~~ of ~~FASB~~ ~~Interpretation~~SFAS ~~No.~~168 46is ~~(revised~~to ~~December~~replace ~~2003),~~SFAS ~~Consolidation~~162 ofand ~~Variable~~to ~~Interest~~establish the ~~Entities,~~Codification as ~~a result of~~ the ~~elimination~~source of ~~the~~authoritative ~~qualifying special-purpose~~accounting ~~entity~~principles ~~concept~~recognized inby the FASB ~~Statement~~to ~~No.~~be ~~166,~~applied ~~Accounting~~by ~~for~~nongovernmental ~~Transfers~~entities ~~of Financial~~in ~~Assets,~~the ~~and~~preparation ~~(2)~~of ~~constituent~~financial ~~concerns~~statements. ~~about~~The ~~the~~Codification ~~application~~is ~~of certain~~effective ~~key~~for ~~provisions~~financial ofstatements ~~Interpretation~~for ~~46(R),~~interim ~~including~~or ~~those~~annual inreporting ~~which~~periods ~~the accounting~~ending ~~and~~after ~~disclosures~~September ~~under~~15, ~~the~~2009. ~~Interpretation~~We do not ~~always~~anticipate ~~provide~~the ~~timely and~~adoption ~~useful~~of ~~information~~SFAS ~~about~~168 anwill ~~enterprise’s~~have ~~involvement in~~ a ~~variable~~significant ~~interest entity. We are currently assessing the potential~~ impact, ~~if any,~~ on our ~~condensed~~ financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS ~~166~~167, “~~Accounting~~Amendments ~~for~~to ~~Transfers~~FASB ~~of Financial~~Interpretation ~~Assets~~No. 46(R)”, the Board’s objective in issuing this Statement is to improve ~~the~~financial ~~relevance,~~reporting ~~representational~~by ~~faithfulness,~~enterprises ~~and~~involved ~~comparability~~with ofvariable ~~the~~interest entities. ~~information~~The ~~that~~Board aundertook ~~reporting~~this ~~entity~~project ~~provides~~to inaddress ~~its~~(1) ~~financial statements about a transfer of financial assets;~~ the effects ~~of a transfer~~ on ~~its~~certain ~~financial position,~~provisions ~~financial~~of ~~performance,~~FASB ~~and~~Interpretation ~~cash~~No. ~~flows;~~46 ~~and~~(revised aDecember ~~transferor’s continuing involvement~~2003), ifConsolidation ~~any,~~of inVariable ~~transferred~~Interest ~~financial~~Entities, ~~assets. The~~as ~~Board~~a ~~undertook this~~result ~~project~~of tothe ~~address~~elimination ~~(1)~~of ~~practices~~the ~~that~~qualifying ~~have~~special-purpose ~~developed~~entity ~~since~~concept ~~the~~in ~~issuance of~~ FASB Statement No. ~~140~~166, Accounting for Transfers ~~and Servicing~~ of Financial Assets, and ~~Extinguishments~~(2) ofconstituent ~~Liabilities,~~concerns ~~that~~about ~~are not consistent with~~ the ~~original~~application ~~intent~~of ~~and~~certain key ~~requirements~~provisions of ~~that Statement~~Interpretation ~~and~~ 46(2R), ~~concerns~~including ofthose ~~financial~~in ~~statement~~which ~~users~~the ~~that~~accounting ~~many~~and ofdisclosures under the ~~financial~~ ~~assets~~Interpretation ~~(and~~do ~~related~~not ~~obligations)~~always ~~that~~provide ~~have~~timely ~~been~~and ~~derecognized~~useful ~~should continue~~information toabout bean ~~reported~~enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for the ~~financial~~first ~~statements~~annual ofreporting ~~transferors~~period that begins after November 15, 2009. We ~~are currently~~do ~~assessing~~not anticipate the ~~potential~~adoption ~~impact,~~of ifSFAS ~~any,~~167 will have a significant impact on our ~~condensed~~ financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time-to-time, we may enter into off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that can give rise to off-balance sheet obligations. As of ~~May~~August 31, 2009 and February 28, 2009, there were no off–balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Based on an evaluation required by paragraph (b) of §240.13a–15 of the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in §240.13a–15(e)), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of ~~May~~August 31, 2009, its disclosure ~~controls~~ controls and procedures are effective.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the ~~first~~ fiscal quarter ended ~~May~~August 31, 2009.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. ~~LEGAL~~ ~~PROCEEDINGS.~~ Legal Proceedings None

ITEM 2. ~~UNREGISTERED~~ ~~SALES~~Unregistered OFSales ~~EQUITY SECURITIES~~of ~~AND~~Equity ~~USE~~Securities OFand ~~PROCEEDS.~~ Use of Proceeds None

16ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None

ITEM 3 4. ~~DEFAULTS~~ ~~UPON~~Submission ~~SENIOR SECURITIES.~~ of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None

ITEM 5. Other Information None

~~ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. None~~17

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. None

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

Exhibits	Document Description
31.1	Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2	Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
32.1	Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 2nd day of July, 2009.

Sterling Oil & Gas Company BY: TIMOTHY BARRITT Timothy Barritt, President and Principal Executive Officer BY: RICHARD G. STIFEL Richard G. Stifel, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer

SIGNATURES

	Sterling Oil & Gas Company

	BY:	TIMOTHY BARRITT
		Timothy Barritt President and Principal Executive Officer

	BY:	RICHARD STIFEL
		Richard G. Stifel CFO and Principal Financial Officer

Filing Compare · Sterling Oil & Gas CO