UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED May 31, ~~2006~~2007

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-15045

INTERVOICE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TEXAS (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 75-1927578 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


TEXAS (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		75-1927578 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

17811 WATERVIEW PARKWAY, DALLAS, TX (Address of principal executive offices)		75252 (Zip Code)

17811 WATERVIEW PARKWAY, DALLAS, TX 75252 (Address of principal executive offices)

972-454-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ

The Registrant had 38,~~542~~907,~~645~~646 shares of common stock, no par value per share, outstanding as of June 2825, ~~2006~~2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 1A. Risk Factors
	Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Index to Exhibits
Employment Agreement - Craig E. Holmes
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Employment Agreement - James A. Milton
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
1st Amendment to Employment Agreement - Robert E. Ritchey
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

INTERVOICE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
	May 31, 2006			February 28, 2006
	May 31, 2007			February 28, 2007
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4140,~~462~~754		$	4228,~~076~~215
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,363 in fiscal 2007 and $1,701 in fiscal 2006		25,623			25,745
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,345 in fiscal 2008 and $1,476 in fiscal 2007		28,508			36,837
Inventory		1016,~~237~~892			913,~~439~~751
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		43,~~925~~662			43,~~406~~909
Deferred income taxes		3,047			3,047
Income taxes receivable		624			1,098
		85,294			84,713
Deferred income taxes		4,480			3,880
Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $61,245 in fiscal 2007 and $59,002 in fiscal 2006		31,382			28,893
		94,920			87,690
Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $64,753 in fiscal 2008 and $62,419 in fiscal 2007		34,162			34,429
Other Assets
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $17,959 in fiscal 2007 and $17,343 in fiscal 2006		9,668			10,284
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $20,789 in fiscal 2008 and $20,040 in fiscal 2007		8,924			9,505
Goodwill		32,~~461~~193			32,~~461~~193
Long term deferred income taxes		12,~~718~~688			14,~~330~~613
Other assets		~~484~~142			~~454~~135
	$	~~161~~173,~~007~~029		$	~~158~~168,~~135~~565
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	1015,~~813~~762		$	1012,~~154~~881
Accrued expenses		1413,~~494~~176			15,~~176~~571
Customer deposits		54,~~437~~306			64,~~157~~365
Deferred income		3337,~~818~~951			32,~~172~~368
Income taxes payable		—			484
Deferred income taxes		322			196
Deferred income taxes		692			270
		71,517			65,381
		65,254			64,413
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $100 par value—2,000,000 shares authorized: none issued
Common stock, no par value, at nominal assigned value—62,000,000 shares authorized: 38,519,536 issued and outstanding in fiscal 2007 and 38,470,087 issued and outstanding in fiscal 2006		19			19
Common stock, no par value, at nominal assigned value—62,000,000 shares authorized: 38,866,893 issued and outstanding in fiscal 2008 and 38,727,628 issued and outstanding in fiscal 2007		19			19
Additional capital		93103,~~580~~217			92101,~~050~~608
Retained earnings		3,153			3,558
Retained earnings (deficit)		(1,559	)		1,861
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(~~999~~165	)		(~~1,905~~304	)
		95,753			93,722
		101,512			103,184
	$	~~161~~173,~~007~~029		$	~~158~~168,~~135~~565

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

INTERVOICE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2006			May 31, 2005
	May 31, 2007			May 31, 2006
Sales
Solutions	$	1921,~~469~~702		$	2119,~~370~~469
Recurring services		26,~~199~~029			2126,~~893~~199
		45,668			43,263
		47,731			45,668
Cost of goods sold
Solutions		1215,~~304~~182			12,~~804~~304
Recurring services		7,~~474~~291			67,~~112~~474
		19,778			18,916
		22,473			19,778
Gross margin
Solutions		76,~~165~~520			87,~~566~~165
Recurring services		18,~~725~~738			1518,~~781~~725
		25,890			24,347
		25,258			25,890
Research and development expenses		5,~~782~~317			45,~~195~~782
Selling, general and administrative expenses		20,~~800~~693			1520,~~433~~800
Amortization of acquisition related intangible assets		~~581~~695			~~252~~581
Income (loss) from operations		(1,~~273~~447	)		4(1,~~467~~273	)
Interest income		~~499~~590			~~497~~499
Interest expense		—			(25	)
Other income (expense)		(144	)		207
Other income		207			126
Income (loss) before taxes		(1,001	)		(567	)
Income (loss) before taxes		(567	)		5,065
Income taxes (benefit)		(128	)		(162	)
Income taxes (benefit)		(162	)		1,146
Net income (loss)	$	(873	)	$	(405	)
Net income (loss)	$	(405	)	$	3,919
Net income (loss) per share — basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per share — basic	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10
Shares used in basic per share computation		38,807			38,504
Shares used in basic per share computation		38,504			37,530
Net income (loss) per share — diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per share — diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10
Shares used in diluted per share computation		38,807			38,504
Shares used in diluted per share computation		38,504			39,103

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

INTERVOICE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	(In Thousands)
	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2006			May 31, 2005
	May 31, 2007			May 31, 2006
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(~~405~~873	)	$	~~3,919~~(405	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		23,~~678~~035			12,~~722~~678
Non-cash compensation expense		1,~~381~~008			—1,381
Other changes in operating activities		373			(2,669	)
Change in accounts receivable		8,337			59
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,027			2,972
Other changes in operating activities		2,573			314
Net cash provided by operating activities		14,080			4,027
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(42,~~407~~142	)		(34,~~132~~407	)
Purchase of Edify Corporation		~~(836~~—	)		—(836	)
Other		—			(300	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,142	)		(5,243	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(5,243	)		(3,432	)
Financing activities
Paydown of debt		—			(1,733	)
Exercise of stock options		601			149
Exercise of stock options		149			1,493
Net cash provided by financing activities		601			149
Exercise of warrants		—			2,500
Effect of exchange rates on cash		—			453
Net cash provided by financing activities		149			2,260
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		12,539			(614	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash		453			(626	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		28,215			42,076
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(614	)		1,174
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	40,754		$	41,462
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		42,076			60,242
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	41,462		$	61,416

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

INTERVOICE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

										Accumulated Other
	Common Stock				Additional		Retained			Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings (Deficit)			Loss			Total
Balance at February 28, 2006		38,470,087	$	19	$	92,050	$	3,558		$	(1,905	)	$	93,722
Balance at February 28, 2007		38,727,628	$	19	$	101,608	$	1,861		$	(304	)	$	103,184
Net income (loss)		—		—		—		(~~405~~873	)		—			(~~405~~873	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			~~906~~139			~~906~~139
Comprehensive income														~~501~~(734	)
Exercise of stock options		49,449		—		149		—			—			149
Cumulative effect of adopting FIN48		—		—		—		(2,547	)		—			(2,547	)
Non-cash compensation		—		—		1,381		—			—			1,381
Exercise of stock options		139,265		—		601		—			—			601
Balance at May 31, 2006		38,519,536	$	19	$	93,580	$	3,153		$	(999	)	$	95,753
Non-cash compensation		—		—		1,008		—			—			1,008
Balance at May 31, 2007		38,866,893	$	19	$	103,217	$	(1,559	)	$	(165	)	$	101,512

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, ~~2006~~2007

Note A —– Basis of Presentation

We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. The consolidated balance sheet at February 28, ~~2006~~2007 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date. We believe we have included all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited May 31, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 consolidated financial statements. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes for the three years ended February 28, ~~2006~~2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report is available on our website at www.intervoice.com. Our operating results for the three-month period ended May 31, ~~2006~~2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for our fiscal year ending February 2829, ~~2007~~2008, as our results may be affected by a number of factors including the timing and ultimate receipt of orders from significant customers which continue to constitute a large portion of our sales, the sales channel mix of products and services sold, and changes in general economic conditions, any of which could have an adverse effect on our operations.

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intervoice, Inc. and our subsidiaries, all of which are directly or indirectly 100% owned by Intervoice, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars at current and average exchange rates. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded in stockholders’ equity as a part of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Any foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Our total comprehensive ~~income~~loss for the first quarter of fiscal ~~2007~~2008 ~~and 2006~~ was $0.57 million and our total comprehensive income for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $20.8 5 million~~, respectively~~. Total comprehensive income/loss is comprised of net income/loss and foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note B – ~~Acquisition of Edify Corporation~~Inventory

As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, we acquired Edify Corporation (Edify), a former competitor in the enterprise market, from S1 Corporation. Results of operations for Edify were consolidated with ours beginning December 31, 2005; therefore, our results of operations presented for the three months ended May 31, 2005 do not include those of Edify.

The following unaudited pro forma information represents our results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005 as if the Edify acquisition had occurred at March 1, 2005. The pro forma information has been prepared by combining the results of operations of Intervoice and Edify, adjusted for additional amortization expense of identified intangibles, a reduction in interest income as a result of our use of cash to acquire Edify and pay transaction costs, and the resulting impact on the provision for income taxes. The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the Edify acquisition occurred as of the date assumed or of results of operations which may occur in the future (in thousands, except per share data):

	Quarter Ended
	May 31, 2005
	(unaudited)
Sales	$	50,779
Income before income taxes		4,688
Net income		3,435
Net income per share – diluted		0.09

Note C — Inventory

Our inventory consists of the following (in thousands):

	May 31, 2006		February 28, 2006
	May 31, 2007		February 28, 2007
Purchased parts	$	34,~~799~~424	$	34,~~908~~475
Work in progress		612,~~438~~468		59,~~531~~276
	$	1016,~~237~~892	$	913,~~439~~751

Note C – Property & Equipment

Our property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):


	May 31, 2007		February 28, 2007
Land and buildings	$	17,411	$	17,385
Computer equipment and software		53,925		52,364
Furniture and fixtures		3,438		3,344
Managed services equipment		16,998		16,481
Maintenance services equipment		7,143		7,274

		98,915		96,848
Less allowance for accumulated depreciation		64,753		62,419

Property and equipment, net	$	34,162	$	34,429

Note D – ~~Property~~Stock-based ~~& Equipment~~Compensation

Our ~~property~~stock-based ~~and~~employee ~~equipment~~compensation ~~consisted~~plans ofare ~~the~~fully described in Note J in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following is the effect of adopting SFAS 123R as of March 1, 2006 (in thousands):

	May 31, 2006		February 28, 2006
	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
Land and buildings	$	17,287	$	16,932
	May 31, 2007		May 31, 2006
Computer equipment and software		46,731		42,817
Cost of Goods Sold	$	201	$	263
Furniture and fixtures		3,299		3,165
R&D		130		150
Managed services equipment		16,517		16,331
SG&A		677		926
Maintenance services equipment		8,793		8,650
Total	$	1,008	$	1,339
		92,627		87,895
Related deferred income tax benefit		342		389
Less allowance for accumulated depreciation		61,245		59,002
Decrease in net income	$	666	$	950
Property and equipment, net	$	31,382	$	28,893
Decrease in earning per share — basic	$	0.02	$	0.02

AtNote ~~May 31,~~E ~~2006~~– ~~the~~Special ~~balance in our computer equipment and software account included~~Charges approximately $10.5 million in capitalized costs associated with our SAP implementation. At February 28, 2006, approximately $8.0 million of such costs were included in our computer equipment and software account. Such costs will be depreciated over a five year estimated life. Depreciation on approximately $2.6 million of the total began during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as certain elements of the SAP project were placed into service. Depreciation on the remaining balance will begin in fiscal 2007 as additional components of the system are placed in service.

~~Note~~ Fiscal ~~E – Stock-based Compensation~~2008

~~Our~~During ~~stock-based~~the ~~employee~~first ~~compensation~~quarter ~~plans~~of ~~are~~fiscal ~~fully~~2008, ~~described~~we inincurred ~~Note~~approximately ~~J in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K~~$1. ~~Prior to March~~8 1,million ~~2006, we accounted for awards granted under our stock-based~~associated ~~employee~~with ~~compensation~~severance ~~plans following the recognition~~ and ~~measurement~~organizational ~~principles~~changes ofaffecting ~~Accounting Principles~~approximately ~~Board~~45 ~~(APB) Opinion No~~positions. ~~25,~~ ~~“Accounting~~In ~~for~~addition, ~~Stock~~we ~~Issued~~reversed toa ~~Employees,”~~facilities ~~and~~ related ~~interpretations.~~ Nocharge ~~compensation~~of ~~cost~~approximately ~~was~~$0.3 ~~reflected~~million. inThe ~~net income for stock options, as all~~following ~~options~~table ~~granted~~summarizes ~~under~~ the ~~plans~~effect ~~have~~on anreported ~~exercise~~operating ~~price~~results ~~equal~~by tofinancial ~~the~~statement ~~market~~category ~~value~~ of ~~the underlying~~this ~~common~~restructuring ~~stock~~charge onactivity ~~the date of grant. Compensation cost has previously been recognized~~ for ~~restricted stock~~fiscal ~~units~~2008 (~~RSUs~~in thousands).:

Effective March 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized for the three months ended May 31, 2006 includes compensation expense for stock-based awards vesting during the period related to: (a) stock-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of March 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and previously presented in pro forma footnote disclosures), and (b) stock-based payments granted subsequent to February 28, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the new provisions of SFAS No. 123R).


	Cost of Goods		Research and		Selling, General
	Sold		Development		and Administrative		Total
Severance payments and related benefits	$	396	$	451	$	957	$	1,804

~~The~~Of ~~following is~~ the ~~effect~~severance ofand ~~adopting~~related ~~SFAS~~benefits, ~~123R~~$1.7 million asremained ofaccrued ~~March~~at May 131, ~~2006 (in thousands):~~2007.

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2006
Cost of Goods Sold	$	263
R&D		150
SG&A		926
Total	$	1,339
Related deferred income tax benefit		389
Decrease in net income	$	950
Decrease in earning per share – basic	$	0.02

Fiscal 2007

~~Under~~Accrued ~~the~~expenses ~~modified~~at ~~prospective application method~~February 28, ~~results~~2007 ~~for~~included ~~periods~~amounts ~~prior~~associated towith ~~March 1,~~three ~~2006~~severance and ~~have~~organizational ~~not~~changes ~~been~~affecting ~~restated~~approximately to55 ~~reflect~~positions ~~the~~as ~~effects~~well ofas ~~implementing~~special ~~SFAS~~charges ~~No. 123R.~~incurred ~~The following pro~~in ~~forma~~connection ~~information,~~with asthe ~~required~~elimination byof ~~SFAS~~redundant Nooffice leases. ~~148,~~ ~~“Accounting~~Activity ~~for~~during ~~Stock-Based~~the ~~Compensation-Transition and~~first ~~Disclosure,~~quarter ~~an amendment~~ of fiscal ~~FASB~~2008 ~~Statement~~related ~~No. 123,”~~to issuch ~~presented~~accruals ~~for~~was ~~comparative~~as ~~purposes~~follows ~~and illustrates~~(in ~~the pro forma~~thousands):


	Accrued Balance					Accrued Balance
	February 28, 2007		Payments			May 31, 2007
Severance payments and related benefits	$	886	$	(469	)	$	417
Facility costs		134					134

Total	$	1,020	$	(469	)	$	551

Note F – Income Taxes

For the three months ended May 31, 2007 our quarterly effective tax rate of 13% varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to certain non-deductible expenditures, an increase in the valuation allowance associated with our U.K. deferred tax assets and the effect of non-U.S. income tax rates. Our U.K. deferred tax assets remain fully reserved accordingly, we did not recognize the tax benefit associated with our first quarter U.K. loss.

For the three months ended May 31, 2006, our quarterly effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to expected benefits to be realized from the use of state net operating losses and certain foreign deferred tax assets for which we had not previously realized a benefit due to our uncertainty related to the utilization of those tax assets, and the effect of non-U.S. income tax rates.

~~effect~~ In onJune 2006, ~~income~~the ~~from~~Financial ~~continuing~~Accounting ~~operations~~Standards ~~and~~Board ~~related~~(“FASB”) ~~earnings~~issued ~~per~~Interpretation ~~common~~No. 48, Accounting ~~share~~ for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in enterprises’ ~~period~~financial ~~ended~~statements ~~May~~in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 31109, Accounting ~~2005,~~for asIncome ifTaxes we(“SFAS ~~had~~109”). ~~applied~~The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the ~~fair~~financial ~~value~~statement recognition ~~provisions~~and measurement of ~~SFAS~~a ~~No.~~tax position ~~123~~taken or expected to ~~stock~~be taken in a tax return. Also, the interpretation provides guidance on de-~~based~~recognition, ~~compensation~~classification, ~~for~~interest ~~that~~and ~~period~~penalties, (accounting in ~~thousands~~interim periods, ~~except~~disclosure and ~~per~~transition. ~~share~~FIN ~~amounts):~~48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and we adopted the interpretation in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

	Three Months Ended
	May 31, 2005
Net income, as reported	$	3,919
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards		(1,233	)
Pro forma net income	$	2,686
Net income per share:
Basic – as reported	$	0.10
Basic – pro forma	$	0.07
Diluted – as reported	$	0.10
Diluted – pro forma	$	0.07

As a result of our adoption of FIN 48, we recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $2.5 million, increasing our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and related penalties and interest by $0.3 million, decreasing our non-current deferred tax assets by $2.2 million, and reducing the March 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings by $2.5 million. As of the date of adoption, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $3.6 million, of which $0.7 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. We do not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.

~~Note~~ We Fconduct –business ~~Special~~globally ~~Charges~~and, as a result, we, or one or more of our subsidiaries, files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as the U.K., Germany, Canada and the United States. Although we believe our tax estimates and our tax positions are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits could be materially different, both favorable and unfavorable. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for years before fiscal 2005, and state and local income tax examinations for years before fiscal 2004. With respect to our U.S. federal, state and local net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, we have years open under statutes of limitations back to fiscal year 2002, where tax authorities may not adjust income tax liabilities for these years, but can reduce NOL carryforwards and other tax attribute carryforwards to future open tax years.

~~Accrued~~We ~~expenses~~recognize atpotential ~~February 28,~~interest ~~2006~~and ~~included~~penalties ~~amounts~~related ~~associated~~to ~~with~~unrecognized ~~severance~~tax ~~and organizational~~benefits ~~changes~~as ~~affecting~~interest expense ~~approximately~~and 50penalties ~~persons~~expense, ~~made~~respectively. atAs ~~the~~of ~~time~~May 31, of2007, we ~~the~~have ~~acquisition~~accrued ~~of Edify~~less ~~Corporation~~than $0.1 million ~~Activity~~for ~~during~~ the ~~first~~potential ~~quarter~~ payment of ~~fiscal~~interest ~~2007~~and penalties related to ~~such~~uncertain ~~accruals~~tax ~~was~~positions. ~~as follows (in thousands):~~

	Accrued Balance					Accrued Balance
	February 28, 2006		Payments			May 31, 2006
Severance payments and related benefits	$	1,748	$	(319	)	$	1,429

Note G – Earnings Per Share

We expect to pay the balance of accrued severance and related charges during fiscal 2007.


	Three Months Ended May 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2007			2006
Numerator:

Net income (loss)	$	(873	)	$	(405	)


Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings per share		38,807			38,504

Dilutive potential common shares:
Employee stock options		—			—


Denominator for diluted earnings per share		38,807			38,504


Net income per share:
Basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)

~~Note~~ Options Gto –purchase ~~Income~~7,532,240 ~~Taxes~~and 4,611,008 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $8.19 and $10.04 per share were outstanding at May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive given our loss for the quarters.

For the three months ended May 31, 2006, our quarterly effective tax rate of 29% varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the expected benefits to be realized from the use of state net operating losses and certain foreign deferred tax assets for which we have not previously realized a benefit due to our uncertainty related to the utilization of those tax assets, and the effect of non-U.S. tax rates.

Given our three year history of profitability and the belief that we will continue to generate sufficient taxable income in the future to realize the benefits of certain of our remaining U.S. federal deferred tax assets, in February 2006 we reversed the valuation allowance associated with our U.S. federal deferred tax assets. Accordingly, for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we are recognizing U.S. federal tax benefits only from our first quarter U.S. loss.

For the three months ended May 31, 2005, our quarterly effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to expected benefits to be realized in the U.S. from previously reserved deferred tax assets, the effect of non-U.S. tax rates, and a reduction of $0.2 million as a result of the favorable settlement of certain foreign tax issues.

Note H —– ~~Earnings~~Operating ~~Per~~Segment ~~Share~~Information and Major Customers

	Three Months Ended May 31
(in thousands, except per share data)	2006			2005
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(405	)	$	3,919
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share		38,504			37,530
Dilutive potential common shares:
Employee stock options		—			1,344
Warrants		—			229
Denominator for diluted earnings per share		38,504			39,103
Net income per share:
Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10
Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10

We operate as a single, integrated business unit. Our chief operating decision maker assesses performance and allocates resources on an enterprise wide basis. Our product line includes voice portal solutions, messaging solutions, payment solutions, maintenance and related services, and hosted solutions provided for customers on an outsourced or hosted solutions provider basis. We believe that product line distinction provides the most meaningful breakdown of quarterly and annual sales activity. Our net sales by product line for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

Options to purchase 4,611,008 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $10.04 per share were outstanding at May 31, 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive given our loss for the quarter. Options to purchase 1,194,667 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $13.95 per share were outstanding at May 31, 2005, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercises prices were greater than the average market price of our common shares during the applicable period and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive.


	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2007		2006
Voice portal solution sales	$	13,249	$	13,744
Messaging solution sales		6,526		3,718
Payment solution sales		1,927		2,007

Total solution sales		21,702		19,469


Maintenance and related services revenues		21,275		20,185
Hosted solutions revenues		4,754		6,014

Total recurring services revenues		26,029		26,199


Total sales	$	47,731	$	45,668

Note I — Operating Segment Information and Major Customers

We operate as a single, integrated business unit. Our chief operating decision maker assesses performance and allocates resources on an enterprise wide basis. Our product line includes voice automation/IVR solutions, network portal solutions, messaging solutions, payment solutions, maintenance and support services, and managed services provided for customers on an outsourced or managed service provider basis. We believe that product line distinction provides the most meaningful breakdown of quarterly and annual sales activity. Our net sales by product line for the three months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended May 31
	2006		2005
Voice automation/IVR solution sales	$	12,723	$	10,708
Network portal solution sales		1,021		3,484
Messaging solution sales		3,718		4,848
Payment solution sales		2,007		2,330
Total solution sales		19,469		21,370
Maintenance and support services revenues		20,185		15,435
Managed service revenues		6,014		6,458
Total recurring services revenues		26,199		21,893
Total sales	$	45,668	$	43,263

Geographic Operations

We assign revenues to geographic areas based on the locations of our customers. Our net sales by geographic area for the three-month periods ended May 31, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2007		2006
North America	$	31,164	$	27,041
Europe		8,251		8,736
Middle East and Africa		4,931		3,077
Central and South America		1,036		4,726
Pacific Rim		2,349		2,088


Total	$	47,731	$	45,668

	Three Months Ended May 31
	2006		2005
North America	$	27,041	$	23,080
Europe		8,736		10,880
Middle East and Africa		3,077		7,055
Central and South America		4,726		1,351
Pacific Rim		2,088		897
Total	$	45,668	$	43,263

Concentration of Revenue

~~One~~No customer, ~~O2,~~ accounted for ~~approximately~~ 10% or more of our revenue for the ~~quarters~~quarter ended May 31, ~~2006 and 2005~~2007. ~~Sales under one long term managed services contract with O2 totaled~~One ~~approximately $1.9 million and $2.5 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006~~customer, ~~respectively.~~ ~~This contract expires in July 2006. At current exchange rates~~O2, ~~this~~accounted ~~contract~~for ~~is expected~~approximately to10% ~~yield managed services revenues~~ of ~~approximately~~our ~~$1.0 million~~revenue ~~during~~for the ~~second~~ quarter of ~~fiscal~~ended ~~2007~~May 31, 2006.

Note JI – Contingencies

Intellectual Property Matters

We generally provide our customers a qualified indemnity against the infringement of third ~~party~~ party intellectual property rights. From time to time, various owners of patents and copyrighted ~~works~~ works send us or our customers letters alleging that our products do or might infringe upon the owner’s intellectual property rights, and/or suggesting that we or our customers should negotiate a ~~license~~ license or cross-license agreement with the owner. Our policy is to never knowingly infringe upon any third party’s intellectual property rights. Accordingly, we forward any such allegation or ~~licensing~~ licensing request to our outside legal counsel for their review, analysis and, where appropriate, opinion. We generally attempt to resolve any such matter by informing the owner of our position concerning non-infringement or invalidity, and/or, if appropriate, negotiating a license or cross-license agreement. Even though we attempt to resolve these matters without litigation, it is always possible that the owner of a patent or copyrighted work will sue us. ~~Although~~Other nothan ~~such~~the current litigation iswith ~~currently~~a ~~pending~~patent ~~against~~holder ~~us,~~discussed ~~owners of~~in ~~patents~~“Pending ~~and/or~~Litigation” ~~copyrighted~~in ~~works~~this ~~have~~Note ~~previously~~I, ~~sued~~no ussuch litigation ~~alleging~~is ~~infringement~~currently ofpending ~~their intellectual~~against ~~property rights~~us. We currently have a portfolio of 8386 United States patents, and we have applied for and will continue to apply for and receive ~~a number of additional patents to protect our~~ technological innovations. We believe our patent portfolio could allow us to assert counterclaims for infringement against certain owners of intellectual property rights if those owners were to sue us for infringement.

a number of additional patents to protect our technological innovations. We believe our patent portfolio could allow us to assert counterclaims for infringement against certain owners of intellectual property rights if those owners were to sue us for infringement.

From time to time Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing L.P. (“RAKTL”) has sent letters to certain of our customers suggesting that the customer should negotiate a license agreement to cover the practice of certain patents owned by RAKTL. In the letters, RAKTL has alleged that certain of its patents pertain to certain enhanced services offered by network providers, including prepaid card and wireless services and postpaid card services. RAKTL has further alleged that certain of its patents pertain to certain call processing applications, including applications for call centers that route calls using a called party’s DNIS identification number. As a result of the correspondence, many of Intervoice’s customers have had discussions, or are in discussions, with RAKTL.

We offer certain products that can be programmed and configured to provide enhanced services to network providers and call processing applications for call centers. Our contracts with customers usually include a qualified obligation to indemnify and defend customers against claims that products as delivered by Intervoice infringe a third party’s patent. None of our customers ~~has~~ has notified us that RAKTL has claimed that any specific product provided by us infringes any claims of ~~any~~ any RAKTL patent. Accordingly, we have not been required to defend any customers against a claim of infringement under a RAKTL patent. We have, however, received letters from customers notifying us of the efforts by RAKTL to license its patent portfolio and reminding us of our potential obligations under the indemnification provisions of our agreements in the event that a claim is asserted. ~~In response to correspondence from RAKTL, a few customers have attempted to tender to us~~ ~~the defense of our products under contractual indemnity provisions. We have informed these customers that while~~

Some of our customers have licensed certain rights under the RAKTL patent portfolio. Two such customers who had previously attempted to tender the defense of their products to us informed us that they had entered into agreements to license certain rights under the RAKTL patents and demanded we indemnify them for unspecified amounts, including attorney’s fees, paid in connection with the license agreements. We notified these customers that we believe we do not have any indemnity obligation in connection with the license agreements. We have received no further response from either customer.

A number of customers, including customers of ours and our Edify Corporation subsidiary (“Edify”) have been sued as defendants in several lawsuits brought by RAKTL in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Several of these defendants who are also customers have notified us or Edify of the lawsuits pursuant to the indemnity paragraphs of their respective sales agreements and have indicated to us that the lawsuits could potentially impact the defense and indemnity paragraphs of their respective sales agreements. Neither we nor Edify believe that we have a current obligation to defend or indemnify these customers in connection with the current allegations made in the RAKTL lawsuits and when contacted we have requested that the customers provide additional information concerning the assertions made by RAKTL.

In response to the correspondence from, and litigation initiated by, RAKTL, a few of our customers and customers of Edify have attempted to tender to us the defense of our products under contractual indemnity provisions. We have informed these customers that, while we fully intend to honor any contractual indemnity provisions, we do not believe we currently have any obligation to provide such a defense because RAKTL does not appear to have made a claim, either in the correspondence or litigation, that any Intervoice product infringes a RAKTL patent. Some of these customers have disagreed with us and stated that they believe that the statements and allegations contained within correspondence and/or litigation pleadings filed by RAKTL can be construed as a claim against Intervoice products.

Even though no claims have been made by RAKTL that a specific product offered by Intervoice infringes any claim under the RAKTL patent portfolio, we have received opinions from our outside patent counsel that certain products and applications we offer do not infringe certain claims of the RAKTL patents. We have also received opinions from our outside counsel that certain claims under the RAKTL patent portfolio are invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, based on the reviews by outside counsel, we are not aware of any valid and enforceable claims under the RAKTL portfolio that are infringed by our products. If we do become involved in litigation in connection with the RAKTL patent portfolio, under a contractual indemnity or any other legal theory, we intend to vigorously contest the claims and to assert appropriate defenses.

wediscussions ~~fully~~with ~~intend~~Parus. toWe ~~honor~~have ~~any contractual indemnity provisions, we do~~ not ~~believe~~had ~~we currently have~~ any ~~obligation~~recent todiscussions ~~provide~~with ~~such~~Parus. aBased ~~defense~~on ~~because RAKTL does not appear to have made a claim~~reviews ~~that~~by anour ~~Intervoice~~outside ~~product~~counsel, ~~infringes~~we aare ~~patent.~~not ~~Some~~aware of ~~these~~any ~~customers~~valid ~~have~~and ~~disagreed~~enforceable ~~with~~claims usunder ~~and~~the Webley ~~believe~~patents that ~~the~~are ~~correspondence~~infringed ~~from~~by ~~RAKTL~~our ~~can~~products beor ~~construed as a claim against Intervoice products~~services.

A customer of ours is one of several companies sued on July 19, 2005 by RAKTL in the case of Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Citibank, et al.; No. 505CV 142, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division. The customer has not asserted that we are obligated to indemnify and defend the customer in the lawsuit, but the customer has notified us under the indemnity paragraph of its sales agreement with us that the lawsuit could potentially impact one or more of its agreements with us. A customer of our recently acquired subsidiary, Edify, is also a defendant in the lawsuit and has asserted that Edify is obligated to indemnify the customer under the indemnity paragraph of its sales agreement. Edify told the customer that it does not believe it has an obligation to indemnify the customer in connection with the lawsuit.

Even though no claims have been made that a specific product offered by Intervoice infringes any claim under the RAKTL patent portfolio, we have received opinions from our outside patent counsel that certain products and applications we offer do not infringe certain claims of the RAKTL patents. We have also received opinions from our outside counsel that certain claims under the RAKTL patent portfolio are invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, based on the reviews by outside counsel, we are not aware of any valid and enforceable claims under the RAKTL portfolio that are infringed by our products. If we do become involved in litigation in connection with the RAKTL patent portfolio, under a contractual indemnity or any other legal theory, we intend to vigorously contest the claims and to assert appropriate defenses.

We have received letters from Webley Systems (“Webley”), a division of Parus Holdings, Inc. (“Parus”), and its counsel alleging that certain Webley patents cover one or more of our products and services. In the letters, Parus offers a license to the Webley patents. As a result of the correspondence, we conducted discussions with Parus. Based on reviews by our outside counsel, we are not aware of any valid and enforceable claims under the Webley patents that are infringed by our products or services.

Pending Litigation

David Barrie, et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. InterVoice-Brite, Inc., et al.;, No. 3-01CV1071-D, pending in the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division:

Several related class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Intervoice during the period from October 12, 1999 through June 6, 2000 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiffs have filed claims, which were consolidated into one proceeding, under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 against us as well as certain named current and former officers and directors of Intervoice on behalf of the alleged class members. In the complaint, Plaintiffs claim that we and the named current and former officers and directors issued false and misleading statements during the Class Period concerning the financial condition of Intervoice, the results of the merger with Brite ~~Voice Systems, Inc.~~ and the alleged future business projections of Intervoice. Plaintiffs have asserted that these alleged statements resulted in artificially inflated stock prices.

WeThe ~~requested that the United States~~ District Court ~~for~~dismissed the ~~Northern~~Plaintiffs’ ~~District of Texas dismiss the~~ complaint ~~in its entirety~~ because ~~the~~it ~~complaint~~ lacked the degree of specificity and factual support to meet the pleading standards applicable to federal securities litigation. OnThe ~~August 8, 2002,~~Plaintiffs’ appealed the ~~Court~~dismissal ~~entered~~to anthe ~~order~~United ~~granting~~States ~~our~~Court ~~motion~~of toAppeals ~~dismiss~~for the Fifth ~~class~~Circuit, ~~action~~which ~~lawsuit.~~affirmed In the ~~order~~ ~~dismissing~~dismissal ~~the~~in ~~lawsuit,~~part ~~the~~and ~~Court~~reversed ~~granted~~in ~~Plaintiffs~~part. anThe ~~opportunity~~Fifth toCircuit remanded ~~reinstate~~a ~~the~~limited ~~lawsuit by~~number ~~filing~~of anissues ~~amended~~for ~~complaint~~further proceedings in the District Court.

~~Plaintiffs~~On ~~filed~~September 26, an2006, ~~amended~~the ~~complaint~~District ~~which~~Court granted the ~~Court~~Plaintiffs’ ~~dismissed~~motion onto ~~September~~certify a class of people who purchased Intervoice stock during the Class 15Period. On November 14, ~~2003.~~2006, the Fifth ~~Plaintiffs~~Circuit ~~appealed~~granted our petition to appeal the District Court’s decision to grant Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class. The briefing on the merits of our appeal is now complete, and we are currently waiting for the Fifth Circuit to either schedule oral argument or issue a ruling on the merits. We filed a motion to stay further discovery pending the Fifth Circuit’s decision on the merits of our appeal, but the District Court denied our motion. We are in the process of ~~Appeals~~continuing to produce documents in response to the Plaintiffs’ requests for production. OnWe ~~January~~believe that we and our ~~12,~~officers ~~2005,~~and directors complied with the ~~Fifth~~applicable ~~Circuit~~securities laws and will continue to vigorously defend the case.

Phoenix Solutions, Inc. vs. Sony Electronics, Inc., Case No. C07-2112 (EMC), pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division: On December 13, 2006, Phoenix Solutions, Inc. (“Phoenix”) filed suit against Sony Electronics, Inc. (“Sony”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,615,172, 6,633,846, 6,665,640 and 7,050,977. On February 9, 2007, Sony filed its answer to Phoenix’s claims of infringement, denied any liability and filed a counterclaim alleging that the patents were neither valid nor infringed by Sony. On February 26, 2007, Sony filed a third party complaint against the Company for alleged breach of warranty of title and the warranty against infringement related to the claims of infringement made by Phoenix against Sony. In its third party complaint, Sony seeks to recover actual damages suffered by it in the event a final judgment is entered against Sony or it is otherwise liable for any damages, fees or costs arising out of the claims of patent infringement made by Phoenix against the Sony interactive voice response system. On April 9, 2007, the Company filed its motion to dismiss the third party complaint. The trial court recently transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, and the case is now styled Phoenix Solutions, Inc. vs. Sony Electronics, Inc., Case No. C07-2112 (EMC). The Court will hold a hearing on September 10, 2007 with respect to our motion. In the event that the court does not grant the pending motion to dismiss, the Company intends to vigorously defend itself against any and all claims made against it.

Audit Committee Investigation

~~Court~~information about the transactions, and several of ~~Appeals~~our ~~issued~~current anand ~~opinion~~former inofficers ~~which~~and non-officer itemployees ~~affirmed,~~have inprovided ~~part,~~testimony to the ~~District~~SEC. ~~Court’s~~Our ~~order~~Audit Committee and its counsel are ofcontinuing ~~dismissal.~~to ~~The~~monitor ~~Court~~our ofresponse ~~Appeals’~~to ~~opinion~~the SEC, and they also ~~reversed~~have conducted a ~~limited~~review ~~number~~ of ~~issues~~certain documents inprovided to the ~~District~~ ~~Court~~SEC which we located after the Audit Committee’s ~~proceedings~~original investigation. Intervoice Onis ~~February 25,~~presently ~~2005,~~in ~~Intervoice~~discussions ~~filed~~with the SEC about a ~~motion~~possible ~~for~~settlement ~~rehearing~~of ~~with~~the matters covered by the ~~Fifth~~Audit ~~Circuit~~Committee ~~Court~~investigation, ofbut ~~Appeals~~there ~~requesting~~is ~~the~~no ~~Court~~assurance tothat ~~modify~~agreement ~~its~~on ~~opinion~~any settlement will be reached. OnBased ~~May 12,~~upon ~~2005~~the current status of such settlement discussions, we recorded expense of approximately $0.9 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. We are also honoring our obligation to indemnify, to the ~~Fifth~~extent appropriate, ~~Circuit~~certain ~~Court~~current and former officers and other employees of ~~Appeals~~Intervoice, ~~denied~~including our Chief ~~petition~~Executive ~~for~~Officer, ~~rehearing~~who ~~but~~received ~~modified~~subpoenas ~~its~~to ~~opinion~~produce documents and provide testimony to ~~clarify~~ the SEC ~~Court’s~~in ~~decision~~connection with the investigation. ~~The~~Furthermore, ~~case~~we ~~has~~are ~~been~~honoring ~~remanded~~our obligation to reimburse legal fees incurred by certain recipients of the ~~District~~subpoenas. ~~Court~~We ~~for~~understand ~~further~~that one of our former ~~proceedings~~officers ~~consistent~~recently entered into an agreement in connection with this investigation pursuant to which he agreed to pay certain amounts in settlement of claims asserted by the ~~Fifth~~SEC. ~~Circuit’s~~We ~~opinion~~have not, and do not, intend to pay or reimburse any amounts paid in settlement by this officer.

Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification on February 3, 2006 and we filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion on March 20, 2006. Plaintiffs filed a reply in further support of their motion for class certification on April 10, 2006 and we petitioned the Court for a hearing on the motion. Both parties are also in the process of producing documents in response to requests for discovery. We believe that we and our officers and directors complied with the applicable securities laws and will continue to vigorously defend the portions of the case that have been remanded to the District Court.

Daniel Wardiman, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, Intervoice-Brite, Inc. v. Daniel D. Hammond et.al.; No. 3-05CV2114-N, filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division:

One of our shareholders filed a shareholder derivative suit against certain current and former directors and officers on October 27, 2005. The suit alleged that these individuals breached their fiduciary duties to Intervoice during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2000 and during the first quarter of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2001. The alleged conduct is largely the same conduct that is the subject of the Barrie class action lawsuit discussed above. The shareholder filed the derivative suit after sending a letter demanding that Intervoice file suit against the defendants.

We and defendants filed a motion on January 17, 2006 to dismiss the suit because we believe the case is barred under the applicable statutes of limitations. The District Court granted our motion to dismiss the suit and issued a final judgment on July 6, 2006. The plaintiff may, if he chooses, appeal the District Court's judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Audit Committee Investigation

During fiscal 2005, our Audit Committee conducted an investigation of certain transactions that occurred during our fiscal years 2000 through 2002. The Audit Committee was assisted in its investigation by separate independent legal counsel and a national accounting firm. The Audit Committee reported the results of its investigation to the SEC, and we are cooperating with the SEC as it makes its own inquiries regarding the transactions. We are currently providing documents to the SEC in response to a subpoena and informal requests for information about the transactions, and several of our current and former officers and non-officer employees have provided or are scheduled to provide testimony to the SEC. Our Audit Committee and its counsel are continuing to monitor our response to the SEC, and they also have conducted a review of certain documents provided to the SEC which we located after the Committee’s original investigation. Intervoice is also honoring our obligation to indemnify certain current and former officers and other employees of Intervoice, including our Chief Executive Officer and another executive officer, who received subpoenas to produce documents and provide testimony to the SEC in connection with the investigation. Furthermore, we are honoring our obligation to reimburse legal fees incurred by certain recipients of the subpoenas.

The Audit Committee investigation found that we accounted for certain transactions incorrectly during our fiscal years 2000 through 2002. The Audit Committee investigation concluded that a $0.9 million payment made by Intervoice to a publicly held supplier purportedly for certain prepaid licenses was linked to an agreement to amend a 1997 warrant issued to us by the supplier to permit our cashless exercise of the warrant. As a result, we believe the $0.9 million payment should have been recorded as a reduction in the $21.4 million gain we recognized on the sale of the shares underlying the warrant during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 and should not have been recorded as prepaid license inventory. Our payment to the supplier may have rendered unavailable a nonexclusive registration exemption for the sale of the shares underlying the warrant. The Audit Committee investigation also found that we intentionally provided the same supplier false or misleading documents for such supplier to use to support such supplier’s improper recognition of revenue in calendar 2001.

The Audit Committee investigation and review further found that six of the seven customer sales transactions the Committee investigated were accounted for incorrectly and that there was intentional misconduct in at least one of those sales transactions. These six transactions occurred at the end of quarters in which we just met analysts’ expectations with respect to earnings per share. The Audit Committee found that we improperly recognized revenue in a quarter-end barter transaction involving approximately 0.4% of annual revenues for fiscal 2000, and that we improperly accelerated the recognition of revenue in five quarter-end transactions totaling approximately 0.4% and 0.3% of annual revenues in fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2002, respectively. We, and certain of our current and former officers and the SEC have agreed that Intervoice and the officers will not assert any defenses based on a statute of limitations with respect to any action or proceeding against us or such officers brought, by or on behalf of the SEC arising out of the SEC investigation for the time periods set forth in the agreements. As a result of work performed in responding to the SEC subpoena, the Audit Committee has concluded that Intervoice also improperly recognized approximately $5.4 million of revenue in two sales transactions during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2002 because the transactions were subject to oral side agreements that gave our customer expanded rights of return. We subsequently reversed the $5.4 million of revenue during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 in connection with a return of the related systems. We also provided documents to the SEC concerning these two additional sales transactions pursuant to a separate subpoena. Separately, the Audit Committee determined that in September 2001 one of our current executive officers improperly communicated Intervoice information to a shareholder.

Our management has concluded, with the concurrence of the Audit Committee and our external auditors, that restatement of our prior period financial statements to adjust for the findings of the Audit Committee investigation and review is not necessary. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the impact of the incorrect accounting on each of the periods affected, the ages of the affected financial statements and the lack of any material changes in prior period trends as a result of the incorrect accounting. In addition, we noted that since the date of the most recent transaction reviewed in the investigation, we have restructured our business, made significant management changes, consolidated our physical operations, significantly reduced our fixed operating costs and refinanced and repaid all of our major debt obligations. We cannot predict whether we may have future losses relating to the matters investigated by the Audit Committee as a result of future claims, if any, including any claims by the government.

Other Matters

~~The~~there ~~Audit~~can ~~Committee~~be ~~investigation~~no ~~and~~assurance ~~review further found~~ that ~~six~~future ofcosts ~~the~~related seven customer sales transactions the Committee investigated were accounted for incorrectly and that there was intentional misconduct in at least one of those sales transactions. These six transactions occurred at the end of quarters in which we just met analysts’ expectations with respect to ~~earnings~~such ~~per~~matters ~~share. The~~would Audit Committee found that we improperly recognized revenue in a quarter-end barter transaction involving approximately 0.4% of annual revenues for fiscal 2000, and that we improperly accelerated the recognition of revenue in five quarter-end transactions totaling approximately 0.4% and 0.3% of annual revenues in fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2002, respectively. We, two of our former officers and the SEC have agreed that Intervoice and the officers will not ~~assert~~be ~~any~~material ~~defenses based on a statute of limitations with respect~~ to ~~any action or proceeding against Intervoice~~ brought by or on behalf of the SEC arising out of the SEC investigation. As a result of work performed in responding to the SEC subpoena, the Committee has concluded that Intervoice also improperly recognized approximately $5.4 million of revenue in two sales transactions during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2002 because the transactions were subject to oral side agreements that gave our ~~customer~~financial ~~expanded~~position ~~rights~~or ofresults ~~return. We subsequently reversed the $5.4 million~~ of ~~revenue during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 in connection with a return of the related systems~~operations. ~~We are providing documents to the SEC concerning these two additional sales~~ transactions pursuant to a separate subpoena. Separately, the Audit Committee determined that in September 2001 one of our current executive officers improperly communicated Intervoice information to a shareholder.

Intervoice’s management has concluded, with the concurrence of the Audit Committee and our external auditors, that restatement of our prior period financial statements to adjust for the findings of the Audit Committee investigation and review is not necessary. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the impact of the incorrect accounting on each of the periods affected, the ages of the affected financial statements and the lack of any material changes in prior period trends as a result of the incorrect accounting. In addition, we noted that since the date of the most recent transaction reviewed in the investigation, we have restructured our business, made significant management changes, consolidated our physical operations, significantly reduced our fixed operating costs and refinanced and repaid all of our major debt obligations. We cannot predict whether we may have future losses relating to the matters investigated by the Audit Committee as a result of future claims, if any, including any claims by the government.

Other Matters

We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to our business. Based on currently available information, we believe that resolution of the lawsuits and other matters described above is uncertain, and there can be no assurance that future costs related to such matters would not be material to our financial position or results of operations.

We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities and warranties in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. These indemnities and warranties are discussed in the following paragraphs. Except in specific circumstances where we have determined that the likelihood of loss is probable and the amount of the loss quantifiable, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities. In general, we are not able to estimate the potential amount of any liability relating to these indemnities and warranties.

Many of our contracts, particularly for ~~managed~~hosted ~~services~~solutions, foreign contracts and contracts with telecommunication companies, include provisions for the assessment of damages for delayed project completion and/or for our failure to achieve certain minimum service levels. We have had to pay damages in the past and may have to pay additional damages in the future. Any such future damages could be significant.

Our contracts with our customers generally contain qualified indemnifications against third party claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property as described in “Intellectual Property Matters” above.

Our contracts with our customers also generally contain warranties and, in some cases, general indemnifications against other unspecified third party and general liability claims. We have liability insurance protecting us against certain obligations, primarily certain claims related to property damage, that result from these indemnities.

We are obligated under letters of credit totaling approximately $0.25 million issued by a bank to guarantee our performance under a long-term international managed services contract and related proposals. These letters of credit expire during fiscal ~~2007~~2008 and fiscal ~~2008~~2009.

We had ~~have~~ employment agreements with our three ~~executive~~most senior executive officers (President and ~~two~~Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer), three other officers and eight senior vice presidents at May 31, 2007. One agreement with ana senior executive officer requires us to make termination payments to the officer of one and one-half times the officer’s annual base compensation in the event the officer’s services are terminated without cause or payments of up to 2.99 times the officer’s annual compensation including bonuses in connection with a termination of the officer’s services within a two year period following a change in ownership of Intervoice, as defined in the agreement. If the officer with such agreement were terminated for one of the preceding reasons during fiscal 2008, we would incur costs ranging from $0.6 million to $1.2 million. The agreements with two other senior executive officers require us to make termination payments of one and one-half times the officer’s annual base compensation in the event the officer’s services are terminated without cause or payments of up to two times the officer’s annual base compensation including bonuses in connection with a termination of the officer’s services within an 18 month period following a change in ownership of Intervoice, as defined in the agreements. If both of these officers were terminated for one of the preceding reasons during fiscal 2008, we would incur costs ranging from $0.9 million to $1.2 million. The remaining agreements with other officers provide for their employment through December 2007 for one of the officers and through August 2008 with respect to the remaining two officers. If we terminated these officers prior to the expiration of their contracts, we would owe them the greater of their compensation for the unexpired term of the contracts or one-half of their annual compensation under the contract. If these three other officers were terminated during fiscal 2008, we would incur costs ranging from $0.5 million to $0.6 million. The eight agreements with senior vice presidents were effective March 1, 2007 with two year initial terms. In the event of a Corporate Change as defined in the agreement, for any executive that has less than one year remaining in the employment term, the employment term would be automatically be extended to be effective through the date that is one year following the effective date of the Corporate Change. In the event that these agreements were terminated without cause, the executive would be entitled to his or her base salary for a period of 12 months following the termination date. One such senior vice president was terminated without cause on April 26, 2007 with an effective termination date of July 27, 2007. We incurred costs of $0.2 million related to this termination during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. If the remaining seven senior vice presidents were terminated during fiscal 2008, we would incur costs of approximately $1.5 million.

Under the terms of our Articles of Incorporation, we indemnify our directors, officers, employees or agents or any other person serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation in connection with a derivative suit if he or she (1) is successful on the merits or otherwise or (2) acted in good faith, and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. We will not provide indemnification, however, for any claim as to which the person was adjudged liable for negligence or misconduct unless the court determines that under the circumstances the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification. We provide the same category of persons with indemnification in a non-derivative suit only if such person (1) is successful on the merits or otherwise or (2) acted in good faith, and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation,

~~payments~~and ofwith uprespect to ~~2.99~~any ~~times~~criminal ~~the~~action ~~officer’s~~or ~~annual~~proceeding, ~~compensation~~had ~~including~~no ~~bonuses~~reason into ~~connection with~~believe ahis ~~termination~~or ~~of the officer’s services within a two year period following a change in~~her ~~ownership~~conduct ofwas ~~Intervoice, as defined in the agreement~~unlawful. IfUnder the ~~officer~~terms ~~with which we have such an agreement were terminated for one~~ of ~~the~~our ~~preceding reasons during fiscal 2007~~Bylaws, we ~~would~~also ~~incur~~indemnify ~~costs ranging~~our ~~from~~current ~~$0.6 million~~and ~~to $1.2 million. The agreements with the other two executive officers~~former ~~require~~officers ~~us to make termination payments of one~~ and ~~one-half~~directors ~~times~~to the ~~officer’s~~fullest ~~annual~~extent ~~base compensation~~permitted ~~in the event the officer’s services are terminated without cause~~ or ~~payments~~required ofunder ~~up to two times the officer’s annual base compensation including bonuses in connection with a termination of the officer’s services within an 18~~Article ~~month period following a change in ownership of Intervoice, as defined in the agreements~~2.02-1 ~~If both~~ of ~~these officers were terminated for one of~~ the ~~preceding~~ ~~reasons~~Texas ~~during~~Business ~~fiscal~~Corporation ~~2007,~~Act ~~we would incur costs ranging from $0.9~~(“Article ~~million to $1.~~2 ~~million~~. The remaining agreements with two officers provide for their employment through December 2007. If we terminated these officers prior to the expiration of their contracts, we would owe them the greater of their compensation for the unexpired term of the contracts or one02-~~half of their annual compensation under the contracts~~1”). ~~If these officers were terminated during fiscal 2007, we would~~ ~~incur costs ranging from $0.3 million to $0.7 million.~~

~~Under~~In ~~the~~connection ~~terms~~with ofcertain ~~our~~lawsuits ~~Articles~~filed ofagainst ~~Incorporation,~~us weand ~~indemnify~~certain ~~our~~of ~~directors, officers, employees or agents or any other person serving at~~ our ~~request~~present asand ~~a director, officer, employee or~~former ~~agent~~officers ofand ~~another~~directors ~~corporation in connection with a derivative suit if he or she~~ (~~1) is~~see ~~successful~~“Pending ~~on the~~Litigation” ~~merits or otherwise or (2~~above) ~~acted in good faith~~, ~~and~~we inhave aagreed ~~manner he or she reasonably believed~~ to bepay in oradvance ~~not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. We will not provide~~any ~~indemnification~~expenses, ~~however,~~including ~~for~~attorneys’ ~~any~~fees, ~~claim~~incurred asby tosuch ~~which~~present ~~the~~and ~~person~~former ~~was~~officers ~~adjudged~~and ~~liable~~directors ~~for negligence~~in ordefending ~~misconduct~~such ~~unless~~litigation, ~~the~~in ~~court~~accordance ~~determines that under the circumstances the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification. We provide the same category of persons~~ with ~~indemnification~~ ~~in a non~~Article 2.02-~~derivative suit only if such person (~~1~~) is~~ ~~successful on the merits or otherwise or (2) acted in good faith,~~ and inour aArticles ~~manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests~~ of ~~the~~Incorporation ~~corporation,~~ and ~~with respect to any criminal action or~~ ~~proceeding, had no reason to believe his or her conduct was unlawful~~Bylaws. ~~Under~~Each ~~the terms~~ of ~~our Bylaws,~~these weparties ~~also~~has ~~indemnify~~provided ~~our~~us ~~current~~with ~~and~~a ~~former~~written ~~officers~~undertaking ~~and~~to ~~directors~~repay tous the ~~fullest extent~~expenses ~~permitted~~advanced orif ~~required~~the ~~under~~person ~~Article 2.02-1~~is ofultimately ~~the~~not ~~Texas~~entitled ~~Business~~to ~~Corporation Act~~indemnification.

In connection with certain lawsuits filed against us and certain of our present and former officers and directors (see “Pending Litigation” above), we have agreed to pay in advance any expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by such present and former officers and directors in defending such litigation, in accordance with Article 2.02-1 of the Texas Business Corporation Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Each of these parties has provided us with a written undertaking to repay us the expenses advanced if the person is ultimately not entitled to indemnification.

We have a qualified obligation to indemnify certain current and former officers and other employees of Intervoice in connection with activities resulting from the Audit Committee investigation and related SEC inquiries described in “Audit Committee Investigation” above.

Texas corporations are authorized to obtain insurance to protect officers and directors from certain liabilities, including liabilities against which the corporation cannot indemnify its officers and directors. We have obtained liability insurance for our officers and directors as permitted by Article 2.02-1 ~~of the Texas Business Corporation Act~~. Our insurance policies provide coverage for losses and expenses incurred by us and our current and former directors and officers in connection with claims made under the federal securities laws. These policies, however, exclude losses and expenses related to the Barrie class action lawsuit, or to other litigation based on claims that are substantially the same as those in the Barrie class action, and contain other customary provisions to limit or exclude coverage for certain losses and expenses.

Note J – Subsequent Event (Unaudited)

On May 31, 2007, we became aware of the intention of a shareholder to solicit proxies to elect an alternate slate of nominees to the seven-member Intervoice Board of Directors. Following a series of negotiations, effective June 22, 2007, three existing board members resigned at the request of the Company to accommodate resolution of the proxy contest, and these vacancies on the Board were filled by the election of three of the nominees from the alternate slate put forth by the shareholder. We have agreed to reimburse the shareholder up to $0.5 million for expenses incurred. In addition, we expect to incur additional expense related to this proxy action totaling up to another $0.5 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies. In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use estimates and projections that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures and that may vary from actual results. ~~Effective~~Our ~~March 1,~~critical ~~2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payments.” We consider our~~ accounting policies ~~related to SFAS 123R as important to the portrayal of our financial condition, and requiring subjective judgment. Other critical accounting policies~~ are discussed fully in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, ~~2006~~2007.

~~Stock-Based~~Sales. ~~Compensation~~We operate as a single, integrated business unit. Our chief operating decision maker assesses performance and allocates resources on an enterprise wide basis. Our product line includes voice portal solutions, messaging solutions, payment solutions, maintenance and related services, and hosted solutions provided for customers on an outsourced or hosted solution provider basis. We believe that product line distinction provides the most meaningful breakdown of quarterly and annual sales activity. Our net sales by product line for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

We adopted SFAS 123R effective March 1, 2006 using the modified prospective transition method, which resulted in recording $1.3 million of stock-based compensation expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as further detailed in Note E to the financial statements. Determining the amount and classification of expense for stock-based compensation, as well as the associated impact to the balance sheets and statements of cash flows, requires us to develop estimates of the fair value of stock-based compensation expenses using fair value models. The most significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value include the expected volatility, expected lives and estimated forfeiture rates for employee stock option grants.


	Three Months Ended May 31,
			% Change From
	2007		Prior Year			2006

Voice portal solution sales	$	13,249		(3.6	)%	$	13,744
Messaging solution sales		6,526		75.5	%		3,718
Payment solution sales		1,927		(4.0	)%		2,007

Total solution sales		21,702		11.5	%		19,469


Maintenance and related services revenues		21,275		5.4	%		20,185
Hosted solutions revenues		4,754		(21.0	)%		6,014

Total recurring services revenues		26,029		(0.6	)%		26,199

Total Sales	$	47,731		4.5	%	$	45,668

We ~~use~~assign arevenues ~~weighted average of the implied volatility, the most recent one-year volatility and the median volatility for the period of the expected life of the option~~ to ~~determine~~geographic ~~the~~areas ~~expected volatility to be used in our fair value calculation. We believe that this is the best available estimate of expected volatility. The expected lives of options are determined~~ based on ~~our historical share option exercise experience. We believe~~ the ~~historical~~locations ~~experience method is the best estimate~~ of ~~future~~our ~~exercise patterns currently available~~customers. ~~Estimated~~Our ~~forfeiture~~net ~~rates are~~sales ~~derived~~by ~~from~~geographic ~~historical~~area ~~forfeiture~~for ~~patterns. We believe~~ the ~~historical experience method is the best estimate of forfeitures currently available. Changes to these assumptions or changes to our Stock~~three-~~Based~~month ~~Compensation~~periods ~~plans,~~ended ~~including the number of awards granted~~May 31, ~~could~~2007 ~~impact~~and ~~our stock-based~~2006 ~~compensation~~were ~~expense~~as infollows ~~future periods.~~(in thousands):

Sales. We operate as a single, integrated business unit. Our chief operating decision maker assesses performance and allocates resources on an enterprise wide basis. Our product line includes voice automation/IVR solutions, network portal solutions, messaging solutions, payment solutions, maintenance and support services, and managed services provided for customers on an outsourced or managed service provider basis. We believe that product line distinction provides the most meaningful breakdown of quarterly and annual sales activity. Our net sales by product line for the three months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,
			% Change From
	2007		Prior Year			2006

North America	$	31,164		15.2	%	$	27,041
Europe		8,251		(5.6	)%		8,736
Middle East and Africa		4,931		60.3	%		3,077
Central and South America		1,036		(78.1	)%		4,726
Pacific Rim		2,349		12.5	%		2,088

Total	$	47,731		4.5	%	$	45,668

	Three Months Ended May 31
			% Change
			From
	2006		Prior Year			2005
Voice Automation/IVR solution sales	$	12,723		18.8	%	$	10,708
Network portal solution sales		1,021		(70.7	)%		3,484
Messaging solution sales		3,718		(23.3	)%		4,848
Payment solution sales		2,007		(13.9	)%		2,330
Total solution sales		19,469		(8.9	)%		21,370
Maintenance and related services revenues		20,185		30.8	%		15,435
Managed services revenues		6,014		(6.9	)%		6,458
Total recurring services revenues		26,199		19.7	%		21,893
Total Sales	$	45,668		5.6	%	$	43,263

International sales comprised 35% of our total sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, down from 40% during the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

Total sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 4.5% as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Messaging solution sales increased 75.5% as we began to recognize revenue on the significant projects booked at the end of fiscal 2007 including $3.3 million recognized under one $10.3 million media exchange contract entered into in February 2007. Messaging solution sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 included approximately $0.7 million of revenue under the first two contracts for our new media exchange product. Our sales of payment solutions continue to primarily reflect sales of capacity upgrades to existing customers.

The increase in our maintenance and related services revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 is comprised of increases of $0.8 million (4.4%) in maintenance

~~We assign~~ revenues ~~to geographic areas based~~ on ~~the~~voice ~~locations~~automation/IVR ofsolutions ~~our~~and ~~customers~~$0. ~~Our net sales by geographic area for the three-month periods ended May~~3 ~~31,~~million ~~2006~~(28.0%) ~~and~~in ~~2005~~maintenance ~~were~~revenues ason messaging ~~follows (in~~solutions. ~~thousands):~~

	Three Months Ended May 31
			% Change
			From
	2006		Prior Year			2005
North America	$	27,041		17.2	%	$	23,080
Europe		8,736		(19.7	)%		10,880
Middle East and Africa		3,077		(56.4	)%		7,055
Central and South America		4,726		249.8	%		1,351
Pacific Rim		2,088		132.8	%		897
Total	$	45,668		5.6	%	$	43,263

The 21.0% decrease in hosted solutions revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 resulted primarily from the July 2006 expiration of one international long term hosted solutions contract. Revenue under this contract totaled approximately $1.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. This decline was partially offset by growth in our voice portal hosted solutions sales.

~~International~~No ~~sales~~customer ~~comprised~~accounted 40for 10% or more of our ~~total~~revenue ~~sales~~ during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2007,~~2008. ~~down~~One ~~from~~customer, 47O2, accounted for approximately 10% of our revenue during the ~~first~~ quarter ofended ~~fiscal~~ May 31, 2006.

~~Total~~We ~~sales~~are ~~for~~prone ~~the first quarter of fiscal 2007 included the impact of a full quarter of activity related~~ to ~~the~~quarterly ~~acquisition of Edify~~fluctuations. ~~These~~Some ~~Edify~~of ~~sales~~our ~~were~~transactions ~~primarily~~are tocompleted ~~North American customers and were included~~ in the ~~voice~~same fiscal ~~automation/IVR~~quarter ~~product~~as ~~line~~ordered. ~~Sales~~The ofquantity ~~voice~~and ~~automation/IVR~~size ~~solutions for the first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~large ~~2007~~sales ~~also~~(sales ~~included~~valued ~~approximately~~at approximately $2.50 million ofor ~~revenue~~more) ~~from~~during aany ~~cash~~quarter ~~basis customer~~can ~~based~~cause inwide ~~the~~variations ~~Central~~in ~~and~~our ~~South~~quarterly ~~American~~sales ~~market.~~and earnings, ~~The~~as ~~majority~~such ofsales ~~our~~are ~~sales~~unevenly ofdistributed ~~network portal~~throughout ~~solutions~~the ~~continued~~fiscal toyear. ~~come~~We ~~from~~use a ~~single international telecommunications customer.~~system ~~Messaging~~combining ~~solution~~estimated sales ~~included~~from ~~approximately~~our ~~$0.7 million~~recurring ofservices ~~revenue under the first two~~ contracts, ~~for~~ our ~~new~~backlog ~~advanced~~of ~~messaging~~committed ~~product~~solutions orders –and ~~media~~our ~~exchange~~“pipeline” ~~for networks. We received a notice~~ of ~~acceptance~~solutions ~~under~~sales ~~one~~opportunities ofto ~~the~~estimate ~~contracts~~sales and ~~the~~trends ~~second~~in ~~contract is scheduled for acceptance~~our ~~during~~business. For the ~~second~~quarters ~~quarter~~ended ofMay 31, ~~fiscal~~ 2007. ~~Our~~and ~~sales~~2006, ~~of payment solutions continue to primarily reflect~~ sales ofwere ~~capacity~~sourced ~~upgrades~~as ~~to existing customers.~~follows:

The increase in our maintenance and related services revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 is comprised of increases of $5.7 million (46.0%) in maintenance revenues on voice automation/IVR solutions offset by decreases of $0.9 million (29.8%) in maintenance revenues on messaging and payment solutions.


	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2007			2006
Sales from recurring services and support contracts, including contracts for hosted solutions		55	%		58	%
Sales from beginning solutions backlog		33	%		29	%
Sales from the quarter’s pipeline		12	%		13	%

		100	%		100	%

~~The~~Our ~~6.9%~~service ~~decrease~~and insupport ~~managed~~contracts ~~service~~range ~~revenue~~ in ~~the~~original ~~first~~duration ~~quarter~~from ofone ~~fiscal~~month ~~2007~~to ~~compared~~five toyears, ~~the~~with ~~first~~most ~~quarter~~hosted ofsolutions ~~fiscal~~contracts ~~2006~~having ~~comprised~~initial ofterms ~~growth~~ of ~~$0.8 million~~two ~~(30.8%)~~to ~~from~~three ~~our~~years ~~North~~and most ~~American~~maintenance ~~enterprise~~and ~~customers~~related ~~offset~~contracts byhaving ~~net~~initial ~~reductions~~terms of ~~$1.2 million~~one ~~(32~~year.~~4%)~~ inBecause ~~revenues~~many ~~from~~of ~~our~~the longer ~~international~~duration ~~network~~contracts give customers. ~~The~~early ~~reduction~~cancellation inprivileges, ~~managed~~we ~~services~~do ~~revenues~~not ~~from~~consider our ~~international~~book of ~~network~~services ~~customers~~contracts ~~included~~to be reportable backlog, as a ~~$0.6 million~~portion ~~reduction~~of inthe potential revenue ~~from~~reflected anin ~~international~~the contract ~~managed~~values may never be realized. Nevertheless, it is easier for us to estimate service and ~~services~~support ~~customer~~revenues than to estimate solutions sales for ~~which~~the wenext ~~recognize~~quarter ~~revenue~~because onthe aservice ~~cash~~and support ~~basis~~contracts generally span multiple quarters and revenues recognized under each contract are generally similar from one quarter to the next.

~~One~~Our ~~customer,~~backlog ~~O2,~~is ~~accounted~~made ~~for~~up ~~approximately 10%~~ of ~~our~~customer ~~revenue~~orders ~~during~~for ~~the~~solutions ~~quarters~~for ~~ended~~which ~~May 31,~~we ~~2006~~have ~~and~~received ~~2005. Sales under one long term managed services contract with O2 totaled~~complete ~~approximately~~purchase $1orders.~~9 million~~ ~~and~~Backlog ~~$2.5 million~~as inof the ~~first~~end ~~quarters~~ of ~~fiscal~~our ~~2007~~last ~~and~~five ~~2006, respectively.~~fiscal ~~This~~quarters ~~contract~~was ~~expires~~as infollows ~~July 2006. At current exchange rates, this contract is~~(in ~~expected to yield managed services revenues of approximately $1.0 million during the second quarter~~thousands): ~~of fiscal 2007.~~

We are prone to quarterly fluctuations. Some of our transactions are completed in the same fiscal quarter as ordered. The quantity and size of large sales (sales valued at approximately $2.0 million or more) during any quarter can cause wide variations in our quarterly sales and earnings, as such sales are unevenly distributed throughout the fiscal year. We use a system combining estimated sales from our recurring services contracts, our backlog of committed solutions orders and our “pipeline” of solutions sales opportunities to estimate sales and trends in our business. For the quarters ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, sales were sourced as follows:


Quarter Ended	Backlog
May 31, 2007	$	60,411
February 28, 2007	$	54,115
November 30, 2006	$	46,345
August 31, 2006	$	41,639
May 31, 2006	$	41,221

We generally expect all projects in our existing backlog to be initiated within the next twelve months and most of such backlog to be recognized as revenue within twelve months. Approximately 20% of such backlog could convert to revenue subsequent to twelve months. The accuracy of any estimate of future sales is dependent, in part, on our ability to project the amount of revenue to be contributed from beginning solutions backlog during any fiscal quarter. Our ability to estimate the amount of backlog that will be converted to revenue in any fiscal quarter can be affected by factors outside our control, including changes in project timing requested by our customers and cash collections from certain international customers. Approximately 30% of our solutions backlog at May 31, 2007 is associated with customers for which revenue is recognized on a cash basis which impacts the time between project completion and revenue recognition.

Our pipeline of opportunities for solutions sales is the aggregation of our sales opportunities for which we have not received a purchase order, with each opportunity evaluated for the date the potential customer will make a purchase decision, competitive risks, and the potential amount of any resulting sale. No matter how promising a pipeline opportunity may appear, there is no assurance it will ever result in a sale. Accordingly, upward or downward trends in our total pipeline are not considered meaningful from a financial analysis

	Three Months Ended May 31
	2006			2005
Sales from recurring services and support contracts, including contracts for managed services		58	%		51	%
Sales from beginning solutions backlog		29	%		31	%
Sales from the quarter’s pipeline		13	%		18	%
		100	%		100	%

perspective. While we incorporate an estimate of sales from pipeline into our business planning and budgeting, pipeline estimates are necessarily speculative and may not consistently correlate to solutions sales in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time. While we know the amount of solutions backlog available at the beginning of a quarter, we must speculate on our pipeline of solutions opportunities for the quarter. Our accuracy in estimating total solutions sales for the next fiscal quarter is, therefore, highly dependent upon our ability to successfully estimate which pipeline opportunities will close during the quarter.

~~Our~~Cost ~~service and support contracts range in original duration from one month to five years, with most managed service contracts having initial terms~~ of ~~two~~Goods ~~to three years and most maintenance and related contracts having initial terms of one year~~Sold. ~~Because~~Cost ~~many~~ of ~~the~~goods ~~longer~~sold ~~duration contracts~~was ~~give~~comprised ~~customers early cancellation privileges, we do not consider our book~~ of ~~services contracts to be reportable backlog, as a portion of~~ the ~~potential~~following ~~revenue reflected in the contract values may never be realized. Nevertheless, it is easier~~ for ~~us to estimate service and support revenues than to estimate solutions sales for~~ the ~~next~~quarters ~~quarter because the service and support~~ended ~~contracts~~May 31, ~~generally~~2007 ~~span multiple quarters~~ and ~~revenues~~2006 ~~recognized~~(in ~~under each contract are~~thousands): ~~generally similar from one quarter to the next.~~

Our backlog is made up of customer orders for solutions for which we have received complete signed orders and which we generally expect to deliver within twelve months. Backlog as of the end of our last five fiscal quarters was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2007			2006
Solutions COGS	$	15,182		$	12,304
As percentage of solutions sales		70.0	%		63.2	%

Services COGS	$	7,291		$	7,474
As percentage of services revenues		28.0	%		28.5	%

Total COGS	$	22,473		$	19,778
As percentage of total sales		47.1	%		43.3	%

Quarter Ended	Backlog
May 31, 2006	$	41,221
February 28, 2006	$	33,867
November 30, 2005	$	29,915
August 31, 2005	$	30,265
May 31, 2005	$	28,473

The increase in solutions cost of goods sold as a percentage of solutions sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was negatively impacted by the work performed during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 on the $10.3 million media exchange contract entered into in February 2007. We realized no net margin on approximately $3.3 million of revenue recognized under this contract and provided an additional loss provision of approximately $0.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

~~The~~Research ~~accuracy~~and ofDevelopment ~~any~~Expenses. ~~estimate~~Research ofand ~~future~~development ~~sales~~expenses isfor ~~dependent, in part, on our ability to project~~ the ~~amount~~quarters ~~of revenue to be contributed from beginning solutions backlog during any fiscal quarter.~~ended ~~Our~~May 31, ~~ability~~2007 toand ~~estimate~~2006 ~~the~~were ~~amount~~as offollows ~~backlog that will be converted to revenue~~ (in ~~any fiscal~~thousands): ~~quarter can be affected by factors outside our control, including changes in project timing requested by our customers.~~

Our pipeline of opportunities for solutions sales is the aggregation of our sales opportunities for which we have not received a signed order, with each opportunity evaluated for the date the potential customer will make a purchase decision, competitive risks, and the potential amount of any resulting sale. No matter how promising a pipeline opportunity may appear, there is no assurance it will ever result in a sale. While this pipeline may provide us some sales guidance in our business planning and budgeting, pipeline estimates are necessarily speculative and may not consistently correlate to solutions sales in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time. While we know the amount of solutions backlog available at the beginning of a quarter, we must speculate on our pipeline of solutions opportunities for the quarter. Our accuracy in estimating total solutions sales for the next fiscal quarter is, therefore, highly dependent upon our ability to successfully estimate which pipeline opportunities will close during the quarter.


	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2007			2006
Research and development expenses	$	5,317		$	5,782
As percentage of total sales		11.1	%		12.7	%

~~Cost~~Research and development expenses are lower during the first quarter of ~~Goods~~fiscal ~~Sold~~2008 because the development effort of approximately $1.2 million ~~Cost~~related to the large media exchange contract we entered into during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 is charged to cost of goods sold ~~was~~rather than ~~comprised~~research ofand development expenses. This reduction is offset, in part, by increased resources required to support the ~~following~~technology ~~for~~acquired from Nuasis during the ~~quarters~~third ~~ended~~quarter of fiscal 2007. ~~May 31,~~Research ~~2006~~and development expenses include the design of new products and ~~2005~~the ~~(in~~enhancement ~~thousands):~~of existing products.

	Three Months Ended May 31
	2006			2005
Solutions COGS	$	12,304		$	12,804
As percentage of solutions sales		63.2	%		59.9	%
Services COGS	$	7,474		$	6,112
As percentage of services revenues		28.5	%		27.9	%
Total COGS	$	19,778		$	18,916
As percentage of total sales		43.3	%		43.7	%

Our research and development spending is focused in six key areas. First, we are developing software tools to aid in the development and deployment of customer applications incorporating speech recognition, text-to-speech, and other rich media technologies for enterprises and wireless and wireline providers. Next, we are developing server-based application software platforms for operations and management of contact center, speech and call completion applications. These software platforms are branded under the name Media Exchange. We will use these software platforms for deployment and management of enterprise, wireless and wireline network operator applications, which are designed to operate in both J2EE and Microsoft’s ^®.NET enterprise computing environments. Third, we are developing media servers, “voice browsers,” and call processing infrastructure based on open standards such as VoiceXML, CCXML, SCXML and SALT. These media servers are VoIP enabled, allowing operation in soft-switch and hybrid PSTN and VoIP networks. Fourth, we are developing packaged, speech enabled applications for the network operator and enterprise markets. These include a range of vertical and horizontal applications that are designed to greatly enhance customer return-on-investment by providing many commonly used configurable functions that can be deployed more quickly than custom applications. Fifth, we are developing software and tools designed to provide integration of live agent positions in a customer contact center setting. This software covers a broad range of functions including agent call-screen transfer, workflow management, full call recording, agent and supervisor management systems and reporting and various integration functions. Finally, we are developing modular productivity and communications applications for wireless and wireline applications

Aincluding ~~significant~~speech ~~portion~~driven ofvoice ~~our~~mail, ~~solutions~~voice ~~cost~~activated ofdialing, ~~goods sold is comprised of labor costs that are fixed over the near term as opposed to direct material~~ and ~~license/royalty~~enhanced ~~costs~~personal ~~that vary directly~~information ~~with sales volumes~~management. The ~~increase~~network inproducts ~~solutions~~are ~~cost~~also ofbranded ~~goods~~under ~~sold as a percentage of solutions sales in~~ the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was impacted by the work performed during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 on the first two contracts for our new advanced messaging product –name ~~media~~Media ~~exchange for networks~~Exchange. ~~We realized no net margin on~~ approximately $0.7 million of revenue recognized. One contract was completed during the quarter and the other is scheduled for completion during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Cost of goods sold for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 included approximately $0.3 million of stock compensation expense resulting from our adoption of SFAS 123R which requires us to include a compensation expense in our financials related to share-based awards.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses for the quarters ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended May 31
	2006			2005
Research and development expenses	$	5,782		$	4,195
As percentage of total sales		12.7	%		9.7	%

Expenses included the impact of a full quarter of expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Edify Corporation. Expenses were also up for the same timeframe due to stock compensation expense of approximately $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 due to our adoption of SFAS 123R which requires us to include a compensation expense in our financials related to share-based awards. Expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 also include increases in contract labor, depreciation and travel costs offset in part by more research and development resources being assigned to completion of customer projects as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Research and development expenses include the design of new products and the enhancement of existing products.

Our research and development spending is focused in five key areas. First, we are developing software tools to aid in the development and deployment of customer applications incorporating speech recognition, text-to-speech, and other rich media technologies for enterprises and wireless and wireline providers. Next, we are developing server-based application software platforms for operations and management of contact center, speech and call completion applications. These software platforms are branded under the name Media Exchange. We will use these software platforms for deployment and management of enterprise, wireless and wireline network operator applications which are designed to operate in both J2EE and Microsoft’sâ.NET enterprise computing environments. Third, we are developing media servers, “voice browsers,” and call processing infrastructure based on open standards such as VoiceXML, CCXML and SALT. These media servers are VoIP enabled, allowing operation in soft-switch and hybrid PSTN and VoIP networks. Fourth, we are developing packaged, speech enabled applications for the network operator and enterprise markets. These include a range of vertical and horizontal applications that are designed to greatly enhance customer return-on-investment by providing many commonly used configurable functions that can be deployed more quickly than custom applications. Finally, we are developing modular productivity and communications applications for wireless and wireline applications including speech driven voice mail, voice activated dialing, and enhanced personal information management. The network products are also branded under the product name Media Exchange.

We expect to maintain a strong commitment to research and development so that we can remain at the forefront of technology development in our markets.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarters ended May 31, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended May 31
	Three Months Ended May 31,
	2006			2005
	2007			2006
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	20,~~800~~693		$	1520,~~433~~800
As percentage of total sales		4543.54	%		3545.75	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal ~~2007~~2008 ~~included increases~~are ~~in sales and marketing expenses of approximately~~down ~~$3.9 million.~~slightly ~~These~~from ~~increases~~fiscal ~~included~~2007 ~~incremental salaries, commissions and related expenses primarily attributable to the addition of approximately 30 people following the acquisition of Edify~~levels. InStock ~~addition, stock~~ compensation expense ofwas $0.97 million ~~is included~~ in fiscal ~~2007~~2008 ~~due to our adoption of SFAS 123R~~as ~~which~~compared ~~requires us~~ to ~~include~~$0.9 million ~~a compensation expense~~ in ~~our~~fiscal ~~financials related to share-based awards~~2007.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets. We incurred expenses of approximately $0.7 million related to the amortization of acquisition related intangibles in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Such amortization related to intangible assets acquired in the purchase of certain assets from Nuasis, the acquisition of Edify and the merger with Brite Voice Systems.

Other Income/Expense. Other expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction losses. Other income during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was comprised of approximately $0.6 million primarily resulting from the sale of MetLife common stock acquired as a result of MetLife’s demutualization. This income was offset by approximately $0.4 million of foreign currency transaction losses.

Income Taxes. For the three months ended May 31, 2007 our quarterly effective tax rate of 13% varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to certain non-deductible expenditures, an increase in the valuation allowance associated with our U.K. deferred tax assets and the effect of non-U.S. income tax rates. Our U.K. deferred tax assets remain fully reserved accordingly, we did not recognize the tax benefit associated with our first quarter U.K. loss.

For the three months ended May 31, 2006, our quarterly effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to expected benefits to be realized from the use of state NOLs and certain foreign deferred tax assets for which we had not previously realized a benefit due to our uncertainty related to the utilization of those tax assets, and the effect of non-U.S. income tax rates.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FIN 48 which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in enterprises’ financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Also, the interpretation provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and we adopted the interpretation in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

We conduct business globally and, as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as the U.K., Germany, Canada and the United States. Although we believe our tax estimates and our tax positions are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits could be materially different, both favorable and unfavorable. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for

~~Amortization~~years ofbefore ~~Acquired~~fiscal ~~Intangible~~2005, ~~Assets.~~and Westate ~~incurred~~and ~~expenses~~local ofincome ~~approximately~~tax ~~$0.6 million~~examinations ~~related~~for toyears ~~the~~before ~~amortization~~fiscal 2004. ofWith ~~acquisition~~respect ~~related~~to ~~intangibles~~our inU.S. ~~the~~federal, ~~first~~state ~~quarter~~and oflocal NOL ~~fiscal~~carryforwards, ~~2007.~~we ~~Intangible~~have ~~assets~~years ~~acquired~~open inunder ~~the~~statutes ~~acquisition~~ of ~~Edify~~limitations ~~totaled~~back to ~~approximately~~fiscal ~~$6.8 million~~year ~~with~~2002, ~~useful~~where ~~lives~~tax ~~ranging~~authorities ~~from~~may ~~eighteen~~not ~~months~~adjust toincome ~~eight~~tax liabilities ~~years.~~for Inthese ~~addition~~years, ~~some~~but ~~of the~~can ~~intangible~~reduce ~~assets~~NOL ~~acquired~~carryforwards inand ~~the~~other ~~merger~~tax ~~with~~attribute ~~Brite~~carryforwards ~~Voice~~to future ~~Systems~~open intax ~~fiscal 2000 continue to be amortized~~years.

~~Other~~We ~~Income.~~recognize ~~Other~~potential ~~income~~interest ~~during~~and ~~the~~penalties ~~first~~related ~~quarter~~to ofunrecognized ~~fiscal~~tax ~~2007~~benefits ~~was~~as ~~comprised of~~interest ~~approximately~~expense ~~$0.6 million~~and ~~primarily~~penalties ~~resulting~~expense, ~~from~~respectively. ~~the~~As ~~sale~~ of ~~MetLife~~May 31, ~~common stock acquired as a~~2007, ~~result~~we ofhave ~~MetLife’s~~accrued ~~demutualization.~~less ~~This~~than ~~income was offset by approximately~~ $0.41 million offor ~~foreign~~the ~~currency~~potential ~~transaction~~payment ~~losses. Other income~~ of ~~approximately~~interest ~~$0.1 million~~and ~~during~~penalties ~~the first~~related ~~quarter~~to ofuncertain ~~fiscal~~tax ~~2006 was comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction gains~~positions.

~~Income~~Loss ~~Taxes.~~from ~~For~~Operations ~~the~~ and ~~three~~Net ~~months~~Loss. ~~ended~~We ~~May 31,~~generated ~~2006,~~an ~~our~~operating ~~quarterly~~loss ~~effective tax rate~~ of ~~29%~~ ~~varies from the U~~$1.S.4 million ~~federal~~and ~~statutory~~a ~~rate~~net loss ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~$0.9 million toduring the ~~expected~~first ~~benefits~~quarter ~~to be realized from the use~~ of ~~state~~fiscal ~~net~~2008. ~~operating~~During ~~losses~~the ~~and~~first ~~certain~~quarter ~~foreign~~of ~~deferred tax assets for~~fiscal ~~which~~2007, we ~~have~~generated ~~not~~an ~~previously~~operating ~~realized~~loss ~~a benefit due to our uncertainty related to the utilization~~ of ~~those~~$1.2 million ~~tax assets,~~ and ~~the~~a ~~effect~~net loss of ~~non-U~~$0.S4 million. ~~tax rates.~~

~~Given~~Liquidity ~~our three year history of profitability~~ and ~~the~~Capital ~~belief~~Resources. ~~that~~We wehad ~~will~~approximately ~~continue~~$40.8 million ~~to generate sufficient taxable income~~ in ~~the~~cash ~~future~~and tocash equivalents ~~realize~~at ~~the~~May 31, ~~benefits of certain of our remaining U~~2007.~~S. federal~~ ~~deferred~~Our ~~tax~~cash ~~assets,~~reserves inincreased ~~February~~$12.6 ~~2006~~million weduring ~~reversed~~ the ~~valuation~~three ~~allowance associated with~~months ~~our~~ended ~~U.S.~~May 31, ~~federal deferred tax assets. Accordingly~~2007, ~~for~~with ~~the~~operating ~~first~~activities ~~quarter~~providing $14.1 million of ~~fiscal 2007~~cash, wenet ~~are~~investing ~~recognizing~~activities Uusing $2.S.1 million ~~federal~~of ~~tax~~cash ~~benefits~~and ~~only~~net ~~from~~financing ~~our~~activities ~~first~~providing ~~quarter U~~$0.S.6 million ~~loss~~of cash.

~~For~~Operating ~~the~~cash ~~three~~flow ~~months~~for the quarter ended May 31, ~~2005,~~2007 ~~our~~resulted ~~quarterly~~from ~~effective~~our ~~tax~~continuing ~~rate~~focus ~~differs from the~~on ~~U.S.~~balance ~~federal~~sheet ~~statutory~~management ~~rate~~and ~~primarily~~collections ~~due~~related to ~~expected~~annual ~~benefits~~maintenance torenewals. beWe ~~realized~~improved inour days ~~the~~sales ~~U.S.~~outstanding ~~from previously~~of ~~reserved~~accounts ~~deferred~~receivable ~~tax~~to ~~assets~~54 days, ~~the~~down ~~effect~~from of70 days ~~non-U.S.~~at ~~tax rates~~February 28, ~~and~~2007. In aaddition, ~~reduction~~deferred ofrevenue increased $05.2 6 million asdue ato ~~result~~the timing of ~~the~~annual ~~favorable~~maintenance contract ~~settlement~~renewals, ofwhich ~~certain~~are ~~foreign~~paid ~~tax~~in ~~issues~~advance.

~~Loss~~For ~~from~~sales ~~Operations~~of ~~and~~certain ~~Net~~of ~~Loss.~~our Wemore ~~generated~~complex, ancustomized ~~operating~~systems ~~loss~~(generally ofones ~~$1.2 million~~with ~~and~~ a ~~net~~sales ~~loss~~price of $~~0.4 million~~500,000 ~~during~~or ~~the~~more), ~~first~~we ~~quarter~~recognize revenue based on a percentage of ~~fiscal~~completion ~~2007~~methodology. Unbilled ~~During~~receivables ~~the~~accrued ~~first~~under ~~quarter~~this methodology totaled $6.7 million (23.4% of ~~fiscal~~total net ~~2006,~~receivables) weat ~~generated~~May 31, ~~operating~~2007, ~~income~~down of $40.56 million from February 28, 2007. We expect to bill and collect ~~net~~unbilled ~~income~~receivables as of ~~$3.9~~May ~~million~~31, 2007 within the next twelve months.

Liquidity and Capital Resources. We had approximately $41.5 million in cash and cash equivalents at May 31, 2006. Our cash reserves decreased $0.6 million during the three months ended May 31, 2006, with operating activities providing $4.0 million of cash, net investing activities using $5.2 million of cash and net financing activities providing $0.1 million of cash.

Operating cash flow for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 resulted from our continuing focus on balance sheet management. We improved our days sales outstanding of accounts receivable to 50 days, down from 57 days at February 28, 2006.

For sales of certain of our more complex, customized systems (generally ones with a sales price of $500,000 or more), we recognize revenue based on a percentage of completion methodology. Unbilled receivables accrued under this methodology totaled $7.5 million (29.1% of total net receivables) at May 31, 2006, up $2.4 million from February 28, 2006. We expect to bill and collect unbilled receivables as of May 31, 2006 within the next twelve months.

While we continue to focus on the level of our investment in accounts receivable, we generate a significant percentage of our sales, particularly sales of enhanced telecommunications services systems, outside the United States. Customers in certain countries are subject to significant economic and political challenges that affect their cash flow, and many customers outside the United States are generally accustomed to vendor financing in the form of extended payment terms. To remain competitive in markets outside the United States, we may offer selected customers such payment terms. In all cases, however, we only recognize revenue at such time as our system or service fee is fixed or determinable, collectibility is probable and all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. In some limited cases, this policy may result in recognizing revenue on a “cash basis,” limiting revenue recognition on certain sales of systems and/or services to the actual cash received to date from the customer, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.

19 We used $2.1 million of cash on investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Of this amount, we used $0.4 million for costs in connection with our SAP implementation, $0.5 million to purchase equipment to expand our hosted solutions business and $1.2 million for replacement and expansion of our computing infrastructure and other capital purchases.

~~Table~~ During the quarter ended May 31, 2007, our financing activities provided $0.6 million in net cash flow. Our option holders exercised options for approximately 0.1 million shares of ~~Contents~~common stock and, in so doing, provided us with $0.6 million in cash.

We used $5.2 million of cash on investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Of this amount, we used $0.8 million for payment of acquisition related expenses, $2.4 million for costs in connection with our SAP implementation, $0.7 million to purchase equipment to expand our managed services business and $1.3 million for replacement and expansion of our computing infrastructure and other capital purchases.

During the quarter ended May 31, 2006, our financing activities provided $0.1 million in net cash flow. Our option holders exercised options for less than 0.1 million shares of common stock and, in so doing, provided us with $0.1 million in cash.

Adequacy of Cash Reserves

We believe our cash reserves and internally generated cash flow will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

Impact of Inflation

We do not expect any significant short-term impact of inflation on our financial condition. We presently are not bound by long-term fixed price sales contracts. The absence of such contracts reduces our exposure to inflationary effects.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, is subject to inherent limitations. These limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons or by management override of the control. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Based on the evaluation by our management (with the participation of our ~~chief~~Chief ~~executive~~Executive ~~officer~~Officer and ~~chief~~Chief ~~financial~~Financial ~~officer~~Officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our ~~chief~~Chief ~~executive~~Executive ~~officer~~Officer and ~~chief~~Chief ~~financial~~Financial ~~officer~~Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934~~ is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~Securities~~SEC ~~and Exchange Commission~~ rules and forms. Such officers also have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See “Pending Litigation” and “Audit Committee Investigation” in Note JI in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

This report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” located elsewhere in this report regarding our financial position, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations, future sales and industry conditions, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to important factors described elsewhere in this report, we caution current and potential investors that the following important risk factors, among others, sometimes have affected, and in the future could affect, our actual results and could cause such results during fiscal ~~2007~~2008, and beyond, to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Intervoice:

• WeOur ~~are~~operating ~~prone~~results tomay ~~quarterly~~fluctuate ~~sales~~significantly ~~fluctuations. The sales value of an individual order for our solutions and services can range~~ from aperiod ~~few thousand dollars~~ to ~~several~~period, ~~million dollars depending on the complexity of our customer’s business need~~ and ~~the~~this ~~size~~may ~~of its operations. The quantity and size of large sales (sales valued at approximately $2.0 million or more) during any quarter can~~ cause ~~wide variations in~~ our ~~quarterly~~stock ~~sales~~price ~~and~~to ~~earnings, as such sales are often unevenly distributed throughout the fiscal year~~decline. ~~In addition, some of our sales transactions are completed in the same fiscal quarter as ordered.~~ Our ~~accuracy~~revenue ~~in estimating future sales is largely dependent on our ability to successfully qualify, estimate~~ and ~~close~~operating ~~solution~~results ~~sales~~have ~~from~~fluctuated ~~our pipeline of sales opportunities during a quarter. No matter how promising a pipeline opportunity may appear, there is no assurance it will ever result~~ in ~~a sale. The accuracy of our estimate of future sales is also dependent on our ability to accurately estimate~~ the ~~amount~~past ~~of revenue to be contributed from beginning backlog~~ and ~~revenue~~we ~~from~~expect ~~cash~~further ~~basis~~fluctuations ~~customers during any fiscal quarter. This estimate can be affected by factors outside our control, including changes~~ in ~~project timing requested by our customers. Accordingly, our actual sales for any fiscal reporting period may be significantly different than any estimate of sales we make for such period. See~~ the ~~discussion entitled “Sales” in Item 2 of Part I for a discussion of our system for estimating sales and tracking sales trends in our business~~future. •Given Wethese are subject to potential and pending lawsuits and other claims. We are subject to certain potential and pending lawsuits and other claims discussed in Note J in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Furthermorefluctuations, we ~~may~~believe ~~become~~that ~~subject~~quarter to ~~claims,~~quarter ~~including~~comparisons ~~claims by the government, or other adverse consequences arising from the findings~~ of ~~the Audit Committee investigation and related SEC inquiries discussed in Note J. We, and certain of~~ our ~~current~~revenue and ~~former~~operating ~~officers~~results ~~and non-officer employees~~ are ~~currently~~not ~~responding~~necessarily tomeaningful or ~~have~~an ~~responded~~accurate toindicator ~~SEC subpoenas to produce documents and provide testimony about the transactions that were the subject~~ of ~~the~~our ~~investigation~~future performance. ~~Any~~As ~~adverse~~a ~~judgment~~result, ~~penalty or settlement related to any lawsuit or other such claim could have consequences that would be material to~~ our ~~financial position or~~ results of operations. We may benot ~~required~~meet tothe ~~indemnify~~expectations ~~certain~~ of ~~our~~securities ~~current~~analysts ~~and~~or ~~former~~investors ~~directors and officers under existing arrangements~~ in ~~connection with~~ the ~~shareholder’s~~future, ~~derivative~~which ~~suit~~could incause ~~addition~~our tostock ~~the~~price ~~indemnification we are currently providing~~ to ~~certain individuals in connection with the class action lawsuit and the SEC investigation~~decline. ~~Our~~Factors insurance policies provide coverage for losses and expenses incurred by us and our current and former directors and officers in connection with claims made under the federal securities laws. These policies, however, exclude losses and expenses related to the Barrie class action lawsuit discussed in Note J or to other litigation based on claims that ~~are~~contribute ~~substantially the same as the claims in the Barrie class action and contain other customary provisions~~ to ~~limit~~fluctuations ~~or exclude coverage for certain losses and expenses. • We may not be successful~~ in ~~integrating~~our ~~the~~operating ~~operations~~results and ~~products~~can ~~and~~preclude ~~retaining the customers of Edify, and this could negatively impact~~ our ~~business.~~ability ~~We believe we will be able~~ to ~~achieve~~accurately ~~certain~~forecast ~~cost~~our ~~savings~~results ~~and~~include ~~other~~the ~~synergies as a result of combining Intervoice and Edify, but there can be no~~following:

	§		variability in the time periods necessary to complete projects and achieve project milestones in order to recognize revenue, which may be influenced by volume, size, timing, contractual terms of new licenses and renewals of existing licenses and cash basis revenues;

	§		the components of our revenue that are deferred, including our subscription-based hosted solutions and that portion of our software licenses attributable to support and maintenance;

	§		volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders, particularly with respect to large orders (sales of approximately $2.0 million or more), some of which are completed in the same quarter in which they are ordered and some of which are completed over several quarters, and fluctuations in demand for our products and services;

	§		our ability to complete orders from our solutions backlog, subject to timing changes requested by our customers, and projects accounted for on a percentage of completion basis, including estimates based on a variety of factors and subject to revision;

	§		the use of low pricing to win important customers, and the possible recognition of loss contingencies for certain projects that we estimate will be delivered at a negative gross margin;

	§		the lengthy sales cycle for our products, which typically involve comprehensive solutions that may require detailed customer evaluations;

	§		the performance of our international business, which accounts for a significant portion of our consolidated revenues, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

	§		the mix of products we sell and services we offer and whether our products are sold through our direct sales force or through an intermediary;

	§		introduction of new products, product upgrades or updates by us or our competitors, and any resulting customer delays in purchasing products;

	§		any increased price sensitivity by our customers, particularly due to increased competition including open source or free software;

	§		periodic difficult economic conditions, particularly affecting the technology industry, as well as economic uncertainties;

	§		higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts with our customers;

	§		our ability to effectively manage our operating expense levels;

~~assurance~~§ ~~that~~timing ~~such synergies will be realized. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to integrate and operate Edify successfully with our business. Any inability to integrate the products~~ of ~~Intervoice~~significant ~~and~~marketing ~~Edify while maintaining or increasing the market share that such products had prior to the merger could decrease the revenues historically generated from these products. Customers of Intervoice~~ and ~~Edify~~sales may delay their purchase of products or services from one or both companies to consider any potential implications the acquisition may have for products and services offered by either company. In additionpromotions, the integration process will require the dedication of management resources, which may temporarily distract attention from our day-to-day business. Our future success will also depend in part on our ability to retain and ~~assimilate~~expenses ~~certain~~incurred ~~key~~pursuing ~~employees~~new ofproduct Edify. There can be no assurance that we will be able to efficiently integrate and operate Edify and its products with our business, maintain business relationships with Edify’s customers and retain and assimilate key employees of Edify. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or ~~our~~market ~~financial~~opportunities; ~~condition.~~§ Further, Edify provides products and services which are similar to our products and services and, accordingly, our Edify operations are generally subject to most of the other risk factors discussed in this Item 1A. • We face intense competition stock-based oncompensation ~~product capabilities~~expense, ~~and~~which we ~~experience~~began ~~ever~~recognizing ~~increasing demands from our actual and prospective customers~~ for our ~~products~~stock-based tocompensation beplans ~~compatible with a variety of rapidly proliferating computing, telephony and computer networking technologies and standards. Our success is dependent, to a large degree, on our effectiveness~~ in ~~allocating~~the ~~resources~~first toquarter developing and improving products compatible with those technologies, standards and functionalities that ultimately become widely accepted by our current and prospective customers. Our success is also dependent, to a large degree, on our ability to implement arrangements with vendors of ~~complementary~~fiscal ~~product~~2007; ~~offerings~~§ socosts ~~that we can provide our current~~ and ~~prospective~~charges ~~customers~~related greater functionality. Our principal competitors include Genesys, Avaya, Nortel, Nuance Communications, Comverse Technology, Unisys and Lucent Technologies. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technological and marketing resources than we have, as well as greater name recognition. Although we have committed substantial resources to ~~enhance~~certain ~~our existing products and to develop and market new products~~events, ~~there~~including is no assurance we will be successful. In addition, it is possible that new entrants to the market and strategic acquisitions and partnerships between existing companies could increase the competition in the markets in which we participate. An increase in such competition could materially adversely affect our ability to sell our products thereby adversely affecting our business, operating results and financial condition. • We may not be successful in transitioning our products and services to an open, standardsSarbanes-~~based~~Oxley ~~business~~compliance ~~model. Intervoice has historically provided complete~~efforts, ~~bundled~~matters ~~hardware~~relating ~~and software solutions using internally developed components~~ to ~~address~~ our ~~customers’~~Audit ~~total~~Committee ~~business~~investigation ~~needs. Increasingly, the markets for our products are requiring a shift to the development of products~~ and ~~services~~litigation; ~~based~~§ ~~on an open, standards-based architecture such as~~ the ~~J2EE and Microsoft’sâ.NET environments utilizing VoiceXML and/or SALT standards. Such an open~~structure, ~~standards-based~~timing ~~approach allows customers to independently purchase~~ and ~~combine hardware components, standardized software modules, and customization, installation and~~ integration ~~services from individual vendors deemed to offer the best value in the particular class~~ of ~~product~~acquisitions ~~or service. In such an environment, we believe we may sell less hardware and fewer bundled systems and may become increasingly dependent on our development and sale~~ of ~~software application packages~~businesses, ~~customized software and consulting and integration services. This shift will place new challenges on us to transition our~~ products and totechnologies ~~hire~~ and ~~retain~~related ~~the~~disruption ~~mix~~ of ~~personnel~~our ~~necessary~~current ~~to respond to this~~ business; ~~environment,~~§ tofactors ~~adapt to the changing expense structure~~ that ~~the~~lead ~~new environment may tend~~ to ~~foster,~~substantial ~~and~~declines toin ~~increase~~estimated ~~sales~~values of ~~services,~~long-lived ~~customized~~assets ~~software~~below ~~and~~their ~~application~~carrying ~~packages~~value; ~~to offset reduced sales of hardware~~ and ~~bundled~~§ ~~solutions.~~changes Failure to develop, enhance, acquire and introduce new products and services to respond to changing market conditions or customer requirements, or lack of customer acceptance of our products will materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. • We may not be able to retain our customer base, and, in particular, our more significant customers. Our success is heavily dependent on our ability to retain our significant customers, including those of Edify. The loss of one of our significant customers could negatively impact our operating results. Our installed base of customers generally isaccepted ~~not~~accounting ~~contractually obligated to place further solutions orders with us or to extend their services contracts with us at the expiration of their current contracts~~principles.

			Due to these and other factors, our revenue and operating results are difficult to forecast and are prone to fluctuate, which may cause a decline in our stock price. Our expense levels are based in significant part on our expectations of future revenue, and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our failure to meet revenue expectations could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. See the discussion entitled “Sales” in Item 2 of Part I for a discussion of our system for estimating sales and tracking sales trends in our business.

	•		We are subject to potential and pending lawsuits and other claims. We are subject to certain potential and pending lawsuits and other claims discussed in Note I in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Furthermore, we may become subject to claims, including claims by the government, or other adverse consequences arising from the findings of the Audit Committee investigation and related SEC investigation discussed in Note I. We and certain of our current and former officers and non-officer employees have responded to SEC subpoenas to produce documents and provide testimony about the transactions that were the subject of the investigation. Any adverse judgment, penalty or settlement related to any lawsuit or other such claim could have consequences that would be material to our financial position or results of operations. We may be required to indemnify certain of our current and former directors and officers under existing arrangements in connection with the defense, or advancement of defense-related expenses, we are currently providing to certain individuals in connection with the class action lawsuit and the SEC investigation. Our insurance policies provide coverage for certain losses and expenses incurred by us and our current and former directors and officers in connection with claims made under the federal securities laws. These policies, however, exclude losses and expenses related to the Barrie class action lawsuit discussed in Note I or to other litigation based on claims that are substantially the same as the claims in the Barrie class action and contain other customary provisions to limit or exclude coverage for certain losses and expenses.

	•		We face intense competition based on product capabilities and we experience ever increasing demands from our actual and prospective customers for our products to be compatible with a variety of rapidly proliferating computing, telephony and computer networking technologies and standards. Our success is dependent, to a large degree, on our effectiveness in allocating resources to developing and improving products compatible with those technologies, standards and functionalities that ultimately become widely accepted by our current and prospective customers. Our success is also dependent, to a large degree, on our ability to implement arrangements with vendors of complementary product offerings so that we can provide our current and prospective customers greater functionality. Our principal competitors include Avaya, Nortel, Nuance Communications, Comverse Technology, Unisys and Alcatel/Lucent. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technological and marketing resources than we have, as well as greater name recognition. Although we have committed substantial resources to enhance our existing products and to develop and market new products, there is no assurance we will be successful. In addition, it is possible that new entrants to the market and strategic acquisitions and partnerships between existing companies could increase the competition in the markets in which we participate. An increase in such competition could materially adversely affect our ability to sell our products, thereby adversely affecting our business, operating results and financial condition.

	•		We may not be successful in selling and implementing our products and services in the face of the new, standards-based market. Intervoice has historically provided complete, bundled hardware and

software solutions using internally developed components to address our customers’ total business needs. The markets for our products have required a shift to the development of products and services based on an open, standards-based architecture such as the J2EE and Microsoft’s â. NET environments utilizing VoiceXML and/or SALT standards. Such an open, standards-based approach allows customers to independently purchase and combine hardware components, standardized software modules, and customization, installation and integration services from individual vendors deemed to offer the best value in the particular class of product or service. In such an environment, we believe we may sell less hardware and fewer bundled systems and may become increasingly dependent on our development and sale of software application packages, customized software and consulting and integration services. This shift places new challenges on us to hire and retain the mix of personnel necessary to respond to this business environment, to adapt to the changing expense structure that the new environment may tend to foster, to respond to potentially different competitors, and to increase sales of services, customized software and application packages to offset reduced sales of hardware and bundled solutions. Failure to develop, enhance, acquire and introduce new products and services to respond to continually changing market conditions or customer requirements, or lack of customer acceptance of our products or services will materially adversely affect the value of our intellectual property, barriers to entry to our business, customer retention, gross margins, and the results of operations and financial condition. • We may not be able to retain our customer base, and, in particular, our more significant customers. Our success is heavily dependent on our ability to retain our significant customers. The loss of one of our significant customers could negatively impact our operating results. Our installed base of customers generally is not contractually obligated to place further solutions orders with us or to extend their services contracts with us at the expiration of their current contracts. • We will be harmed if we lose key business and technical personnel. We rely upon the services of a relatively small number of key technical, project management and senior management personnel, most of whom do not have employment contracts. If we were to lose any of our key personnel, replacing them could be difficult and costly. If we were unable to successfully and promptly replace such personnel, our business could be materially harmed. • Our reliance on significant vendor relationships could result in significant expense or an inability to serve our customers if we lose these relationships. Although we generally use standard parts and components in our products, some of our hardware components, ~~including semi-conductors and, in particular, digital signal processors manufactured by Texas Instruments,~~ are available only from a small number of vendors. Likewise, we license speech recognition technology primarily from ~~a small number of vendors. Two of these vendors, ScanSoft, Inc. and~~ Nuance Communications, Inc., ~~recently completed a merger of their organizations and now~~ the ~~combined~~dominant ~~company~~vendor ~~has~~for athis ~~dominant market position~~technology. As we continue to migrate to open, standards-based systems, we will become increasingly dependent on our component suppliers and software vendors. To date, we have been able to obtain adequate supplies of needed components and licenses in a timely manner, and we expect to continue to be able to do so. Nevertheless, if our significant vendors are unable to supply components or licenses at current levels, we may not be able to obtain these items from another source or at historical prices. In such instances, we would be unable to provide products and services to our customers or generate historical operating margins, and our business and operating results would suffer. • If third parties assert claims that our products or services infringe on their technology and related intellectual property rights, whether the claims are made directly against us or against our customers, we could incur substantial costs ~~in connection with these claims~~. We believe software and technology companies, including ~~Intervoice~~us and others in our industry, increasingly may become subject to infringement claims. Such claims may require us to enter into costly license agreements or result in even more costly litigation. To the extent a licensing arrangement is required, the arrangement may not be available at all, or, if available, may be very expensive or even prohibitively expensive. As with any legal proceeding, there is no guarantee we will prevail in any litigation instituted against us asserting infringement of intellectual property rights. To the extent we suffer an adverse judgment, we might have to pay substantial damages, discontinue the use and sale of infringing products, repurchase infringing products from our customers in accordance with indemnity obligations, expend significant resources to acquire non-infringing alternatives, and/or obtain licenses to the intellectual property that has been infringed upon. As with licensing arrangements, non-infringing substitute technologies may not be available and, if available, may be very expensive, or even prohibitively expensive, to implement. Accordingly, for all of the foregoing reasons, a claim of infringement could ultimately have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. • We are exposed to risks related to our international operations that could increase our costs and hurt our business. Our products are currently sold in more than 75 countries. Our international sales were 40% and 47% of total sales for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. International sales, personnel and property are subject to certain risks, including:

• terrorism; • fluctuations in currency exchange rates; • the difficulty and expense of maintaining foreign offices and distribution channels; • tariffs and other barriers to trade; • greater difficulty in protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights; • general economic and political conditions in each country; • loss of revenue, property and equipment from expropriation; • import and export licensing requirements; and • additional expenses and risks inherent in conducting operations in geographically distant locations, including risks arising from differences in language and cultural approaches to the conduct of business.

• Our inability to meet contracted performance targets could subject us to significant penalties. Many of our contracts, particularly for managed services, foreign contracts and contracts with telecommunication companies, include provisions for the assessment of damages for delayed project completion and/or for our failure to achieve certain minimum service levels. We have had to pay damages in the past and may have to pay additional damages in the future. Any such future damages could be significant.

• ~~Increasing~~We ~~consolidation in the telecommunications and financial industries could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. The majority of our largest customers~~ are inexposed ~~the~~to ~~telecommunications~~risks ~~and~~related financial industries. These industries are undergoing significant consolidation as a result of merger and acquisition activity. This activity could result in a decrease in the number of customers purchasing our products and/or in delayed purchases of our products by customers that are reviewing their strategic alternatives in light of a pending merger or acquisition. If these results occur, our revenues and profitability could decline. • Our products are complex, and software defects could reduce our revenues and expose us to ~~litigation. The software products we offer are complex and may contain errors or defects, even after extensive testing and quality control, particularly in early versions. Furthermore, because~~ our ~~products~~international ~~increasingly~~operations are designed around an open standards based architecture incorporating elements developed by third parties, such errors or defects may be outside of our direct ability to control or correct. Our recently introduced Media Exchange offering is an example of a complex product which includes third party elements that ~~has and may continue to experience certain software errors in its initial customer deployments. Any defects or errors~~ could ~~potentially~~increase ~~result in loss of revenues, product returns or order cancellations, and could potentially hinder market acceptance of~~ our ~~products~~costs and ~~harm~~hurt our ~~reputation. Accordingly, any defects or errors could have a material adverse effect on our~~ business~~, results of operations and financial condition~~. Our ~~customer~~products ~~license agreements typically contain provisions to limit our product warranty obligations and exposure to potential liability claims. • We~~ are ~~implementing~~currently asold ~~new~~in ~~company-wide~~more ~~ERP~~than ~~system~~75 ~~during fiscal 2007~~countries. ~~During fiscal 2007, we expect to complete the implementation of a new, company-wide ERP system.~~ Our ~~new~~international ~~system~~sales ~~will~~were ~~affect~~35% ~~all facets of our business including our ability to quote, receive~~ and ~~process~~40% ~~orders, track inventory and work in process, ship and bill completed orders, process and apply cash receipts from our customers and summarize and report the results~~ of ~~our~~total ~~operations.~~sales Iffor ~~we encounter problems in~~ the ~~implementation~~quarters ofended ~~our~~May ~~new system~~31, ~~our~~2007 ~~ability to conduct our daily operations in an efficient, effective~~ and ~~properly controlled manner could be compromised~~2006, ~~and our operating results could suffer~~respectively. InInternational ~~addition~~sales, ~~any~~personnel ~~such implementation problems could cause us to expend significant time~~ and ~~other~~property ~~resources~~are insubject ~~an effort~~ to ~~resolve~~certain ~~such problems~~risks, ~~and this diversion of management and staff time could further adversely affect our ability to serve our customers and sustain our normal operations.~~including:

~~Item 6.~~§ ~~Exhibits~~ terrorism; § fluctuations in currency exchange rates; § ability to collect on accounts receivable; § the difficulty and expense of maintaining foreign offices and distribution channels; § tariffs and other barriers to trade; § greater difficulty in protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights; § general economic and political conditions in each country, including nationalization of customers or channel partners; § loss of revenue, property and equipment from expropriation; § import and export licensing requirements; and § additional expenses and risks inherent in conducting operations in geographically distant locations, including risks arising from differences in language and cultural approaches to the conduct of business.

(• Our inability to meet contracted performance targets could subject us to significant penalties. Many of our contracts, particularly for hosted solutions, foreign contracts and contracts with telecommunication companies, include provisions for the assessment of damages for delayed project completion and/or for our failure to achieve certain minimum service levels. We have had to pay damages in the past and may have to pay additional damages in the future. Any such future damages could be significant. • Increasing consolidation in the telecommunications and financial industries could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. The majority of our largest customers are in the telecommunications and financial industries. These industries are undergoing significant consolidation as a~~) Exhibits~~ result of merger and acquisition activity. This activity could result in a decrease in the number of customers purchasing our products and/or in delayed purchases of our products by customers that are reviewing their strategic alternatives in light of a pending merger or acquisition. If these results occur, our revenues and profitability could decline or our loss could increase. • Our products are complex, and software defects could reduce our revenues and expose us to litigation. The software products we offer are complex and may contain errors or defects, even after extensive testing and quality control, particularly in early versions. Furthermore, because our products increasingly are designed around an open standards based architecture incorporating elements developed by third parties, such errors or defects may be outside of our direct ability to control or correct. Any defects or errors could potentially result in loss of revenues, product returns or order cancellations, and could potentially hinder market acceptance of our products and harm our reputation. Accordingly, any defects or errors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our customer license agreements typically contain provisions to limit our product warranty obligations and exposure to potential liability claims. • We have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions, which could dilute our existing shareholders and could involve substantial acquisition risks. As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired, and expect to continue to acquire or make investments in, other businesses and technologies. We may issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would dilute our existing shareholders, and we may incur debt in connection with future acquisitions, which may include covenants or other restrictions that hinder our ability to operate our business. Furthermore, our prior acquisitions required substantial integration and management efforts. Acquisitions can involve a number of risks, including:

	2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 18, 2005 by and among S1 Corporation, Edify Corporation, Edify Holding Company, Inc., Intervoice, Inc. and Arrowhead I, Inc. (7)
	3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant. (1)
	3.2		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (2)
	3.3		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (3)
	3.4		Third Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (6)
	4.1		Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 1, 2001 between the Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (4)
	4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2002, between the Registrant and each of the Buyers under a Securities Purchase Agreement. (5)
	4.3		First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 29, 2002, between Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (5)
	10.1		Summary of the Fiscal Year 2007 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (8)
	10.2		Employment Agreement effective May 8, 2006 between Registrant and Craig E. Holmes (9)
	10.3		Employment Agreement effective May 8, 2006 between Registrant and James A. Milton (9)
	10.4		First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 1, 2004 between the Registrant and Robert E. Ritchey (9)
	31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (9)
	31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (9)
	32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (9)*
	32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (9)*

	§		difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations, facilities and personnel of the acquired businesses, including different and complex order processing, support and accounting and financial reporting systems;

	§		loss of key management, sales, research and development and other key employees of the acquired company;

	§		difficulty in integrating acquired products into our product portfolio, including engineering, sales and marketing integration;

	§		impairment of relationships with partners, suppliers and customers;

(1)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995, filed with the SEC on May 30, 1995.
(2)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1999, filed with the SEC on October 14, 1999.
(3)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2002.
(4)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to Form 8-A/A (Amendment 3) filed with the SEC on May 9, 2001.
(5)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 30, 2002.
(6)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2004.
(7)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 3, 2006.
(8)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006.
(9)		Filed herewith.

	§		difficulty in implementing and standardizing company-wide financial, accounting, billing, information and other systems and the internal controls surrounding those systems and processes;

	§		disruption of our ongoing operations and distraction of management and other employees;

	§		difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into our products and technology;

	§		unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired development projects and technology integration;

	§		difficulty in management of geographically remote operations in the United States and internationally;

	§		delay of sales to customers pending resolution of product integration between our existing and our newly acquired products; and

	§		difficulty entering new markets or businesses in which we have limited experience.

*As ~~The~~a ~~certifications~~result ~~attached~~of these and other risks, we may not realize anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies could result in a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. • Our stock price has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. Our stock price historically has been volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future. Various factors contribute to the volatility of our stock price, including business developments (such as ~~Exhibit~~new 32product introductions and acquisitions or dispositions), litigation developments, quarterly variations in our financial results, our ability to meet investors’ expectations, and general economic and market conditions.1 In addition, third-party announcements by our partners and 32competitors may contribute to our stock price volatility.2 ~~accompany~~Certain types of investors may choose not to invest in stocks with this level of stock price volatility. Fluctuations in our stock price could cause increased risk of shareholder litigation, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources. • We are exposed to risks related to our channel program that could decrease our revenues and hurt our business. Although we principally sell our products and services through our direct sales force, a significant amount of our sales are made through intermediaries such as distributors, system integrators and other strategic channel partners. We endeavor to increase the ~~Quarterly~~percentage ~~Report~~of sales through intermediaries as we continue to focus our sales efforts through the channel and other partners. We anticipate future revenue growth to depend in large part on ~~Form~~our ~~10-Q~~success ~~pursuant~~in expanding relationships, and establishing new relationships, with intermediaries. These intermediaries may sell their own products or other vendors’ products that compete with our products, and may compete with our own direct sales force in certain sales opportunities. While we have instituted programs designed to ~~Section~~increase ~~906~~sales of our products through intermediaries, certain intermediaries may give greater priority to products of other suppliers, including competitors. Our ability to grow sales through intermediaries depends on our investment in appropriate financial incentives, support and sales tools for intermediaries, while effectively alleviating conflict with our own sales force. Failure to effect this strategy appropriately may result in certain intermediaries choosing to cease or reduce the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~sales ~~Act~~of our products, resulting in a material adverse change in our business, results of ~~2002~~operations and ~~shall~~financial ~~not~~condition. be• ~~deemed~~Unanticipated ~~“filed”~~changes byin our effective tax rates or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could affect our profitability or increase our loss. We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. We are generally required to account for taxes in each jurisdiction in which we operate, including making assumptions, interpretations and judgments with respect to the ~~Company~~applicable tax requirements. Our provision for ~~purposes~~income taxes is calculated based on a mix of ~~Section~~earnings, 18statutory rates, and enacted tax rules by jurisdiction, including transfer pricing. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in evaluating our tax positions on a worldwide basis. It is possible that these positions may be challenged which may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate, which could affect our results of ~~the~~operations ~~Securities~~and ~~Exchange~~financial ~~Act~~condition. • Failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of ~~1934~~operations, financial condition, and our stock price. A failure to maintain adequate internal control procedures as ~~amended~~required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may preclude our management’s ability to conclude that we have effective internal controls over our financial reporting. These internal controls are also required for us to produce management financial information, make

			determinations on revenue recognition and other material accounting issues, and prevent financial fraud. If we are unable to produce reliable financial reports, make appropriate determinations on revenue recognition and material accounting policies or prevent fraud, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

	•		We have sustained operating losses in the past, and may incur additional losses in the future which may require us to raise additional capital on unfavorable terms. We cannot be certain that our revenue will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitable operations in the future. If we are unable to return to and maintain profitability, the market price for our stock may decline, perhaps substantially. If we continue to have operating losses, we may be required to raise additional capital to maintain or grow our operations. Such additional capital may only be available at unfavorable terms that could be dilutive to existing shareholders, have a high interest rate, contain restrictive covenants, or contain other unfavorable terms.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits


			3.1			Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant. (1)

			3.2			Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (2)

			3.3			Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (3)

			3.4			Third Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (6)

			4.1			Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 1, 2001 between the Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (4)

			4.2			Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2002, between the Registrant and each of the Buyers under a Securities Purchase Agreement. (5)

			4.3			First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 29, 2002, between Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (5)

			10.1			Employment Agreements effective March 1, 2007 between Registrant and Senior Vice Presidents. (7)

			10.2			Separation Agreement dated as of April 23, 2007 between Registrant and Marie Jackson. (8)

			10.3			Termination of Employment Agreement between Registrant and George T. Platt effective July 25, 2007. (8)

			10.4			Intervoice, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. (9)

			10.5			Resignation Agreement between the Company and Saj-nicole A. Joni dated June 22, 2007. (10)

			10.6			Resignation Agreement between the Company and Joseph J. Pietropaolo dated June 22, 2007. (10)

			10.7			Resignation Agreement between the Company and Jack P. Reily dated June 22, 2007. (10)

			10.8			Board Representation and Governance Agreement between the Company and David W. Brandenburg dated June 22, 2007. (10)

			10.9			Amendment No. 1 dated July 1, 2007 to the Board Representation and Governance Agreement. (11)

			31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (12)

			31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (12)

			32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (12)*

			32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (12)*


(1)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995, filed with the SEC on May 30, 1995.

(2)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1999, filed with the SEC on October 14, 1999.

(3)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2002.


(4)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to Form 8-A/A (Amendment 3) filed with the SEC on May 9, 2001.

(5)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 30, 2002.

(6)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2004.

(7)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2007.

(8)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2007.

(9)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2007.

(10)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 25, 2007.

(11)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 3, 2007.

(12)		Filed herewith.

*		The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	INTERVOICE, INC.	~~INTERVOICE, INC.~~
Date: July 10, 2006		By:	/s/ CRAIG E. HOLMES
Date: July 6, 2007	By:	/s/ CRAIG E. HOLMES
		Craig E. Holmes	~~Craig E. Holmes~~
			Executive Vice President and
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			Chief Financial Officer

2628

Index to Exhibits

~~Exhibit~~	Exhibit
~~No.~~	~~Description~~No.		Description
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 18, 2005 by and among S1 Corporation, Edify Corporation, Edify Holding Company, Inc., Intervoice, Inc. and Arrowhead I, Inc. (7)
		3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant. (1)
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant. (1)
		3.2	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (2)
3.2	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (2)
		3.3	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (3)
3.3	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (3)
		3.4	Third Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (6)
3.4	Third Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (6)
		4.1	Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 1, 2001 between the Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (4)
4.1	Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 1, 2001 between the Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (4)
		4.2	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2002, between the Registrant and each of the Buyers under a Securities Purchase Agreement. (5)
4.2	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2002, between the Registrant and each of the Buyers under a Securities Purchase Agreement. (5)
		4.3	First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 29, 2002, between Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (5)
4.3	First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of May 29, 2002, between Registrant and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent. (5)
		10.1	Employment Agreements effective March 1, 2007 between Registrant and Senior Vice Presidents. (7)
10.1	Summary of the Fiscal Year 2007 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (8)
		10.2	Separation Agreement dated as of April 23, 2007 between Registrant and Marie Jackson. (8)
10.2	Employment Agreement effective May 8, 2006 between Registrant and Craig E. Holmes (9)
		10.3	Termination of Employment Agreement between Registrant and George T. Platt effective July 25, 2007. (8)
10.3	Employment Agreement effective May 8, 2006 between Registrant and James A. Milton (9)
		10.4	Intervoice, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. (9)
10.4	First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated December 1, 2004 between the Registrant and Robert E. Ritchey (9)
		10.5	Resignation Agreement between the Company and Saj-nicole A. Joni dated June 22, 2007. (10)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (9)
		10.6	Resignation Agreement between the Company and Joseph J. Pietropaolo dated June 22, 2007. (10)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (9)
		10.7	Resignation Agreement between the Company and Jack P. Reily dated June 22, 2007. (10)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (9)*
		10.8	Board Representation and Governance Agreement between the Company and David W. Brandenburg dated June 22, 2007. (10)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (9)*
		10.9	Amendment No. 1 dated July 1, 2007 to the Board Representation and Governance Agreement. (11)
		31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (12)
		31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (12)
		32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (12*
		32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (12)*

(1)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995, filed with the SEC on May 30, 1995.
(2)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1999, filed with the SEC on October 14, 1999.
(3)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2002.
(4)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to Form 8-A/A (Amendment 3) filed with the SEC on May 9, 2001.
(5)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 30, 2002.
(6)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2004.
(7)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on ~~January~~March 37, ~~2006~~2007.
(8)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on ~~March~~April 1026, ~~2006~~2007.
(9)		~~Filed~~Incorporated ~~herewith~~by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2007.
*		The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(10)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 25, 2007.


(11)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 3, 2007.

(12)		Filed herewith.

*		The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · INTERVOICE INC