~~FORM~~ United ~~10-Q~~States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

~~[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES~~ ~~EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.~~FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002


(Mark One)
þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-29075

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

IDAHO		82-0438135
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)
601 W. 1st AVENUE, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON		99201
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Idaho (State of incorporation) 601 West First Avenue Spokane, WA (Address of Principal executive offices)		82-0438135 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 99201-5015 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (509) 838-3111

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/ A.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of ~~1934~~ 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ~~[X]~~ x No ~~[ ]~~ o

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant~~registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ~~[ ]~~ o No ~~[X]~~ x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS: N/A.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ] No [ ] N/A.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common: 10,000 shares at ~~January~~July 31, 2003.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Item 1. Financial Statements
		CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
PART II--OTHER INFORMATION
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
		NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS
EX-31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
EX-31.2 Certification- Principal Financial Officer
EX-32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Sec. 1350
EX-32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 USC Sec. 1350

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. ~~INDEX~~

INDEX

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Consolidated Balance Sheets As of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Operations Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity Three Months Ended December 31, 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 1. Financial Statements


Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002			3

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002			4
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002			4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002			5
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002			5

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003			6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002			7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			8

~~PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~2

ITEMTable 1.of FINANCIAL STATEMENTSContents

~~SUMMIT~~ PART ~~SECURITIES,~~I— ~~INC.~~FINANCIAL ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~INFORMATION ~~CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS~~

					December 31,			September 30,
					2002			2002
					(unaudited)
Assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	21,182,062		$	30,725,256
	Investments in affiliated companies					3,022,425			3,022,425
	Investments:
		Available-for-sale securities, at fair value				152,098,157			163,500,373
		Held-to maturity securities, at amortized cost				28,876,780			5,883,021
		Accrued interest on investments				1,216,150			903,196
			Total investments			182,191,087			170,286,590
	Receivables:
		Real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivables, net of discounts and origination fees				395,983,956			354,882,860
		Allowance for losses on receivables				(7,846,014	)		(4,715,489	)
			Net receivables			388,137,942			350,167,371
	Other assets:
		Real estate held for sale and development at the lower of cost or market, net of allowances of $2,785,474 and $2,316,093				44,429,406			45,957,758
		Deferred costs, net				20,133,928			19,095,640
		Deferred income tax benefit				1,392,274			619,811
		Current income taxes receivable				73,969			73,968
		Other assets, net				4,390,580			2,490,947
			Total other assets			70,420,157			68,238,124
				Total assets	$	664,953,673		$	622,439,766
Liabilities:
	Annuity reserves				$	463,539,609		$	420,284,849
	Investment certificates					122,029,958			113,677,625
	Debt payable					38,611,989			40,888,591
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including payable to affiliates					8,884,501			12,072,292
		Total liabilities				633,066,057			586,923,357
Stockholders’ equity:
	Preferred stock, $10 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized:
		Series S, R and T, $10 par, 82,666 shares and 83,729 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference $8,266,550 and $8,372,890)				826,655			837,289
		Series S-3, $2.50 par, 937,100 shares and 987,518 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference $23,427,510 and $24,687,957)				2,342,750			2,468,795
	Common stock, $10 par value, authorized 2,000,000 shares, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding					100,000			100,000
	Additional paid-in capital					25,550,630			26,810,732
	Accumulated other comprehensive income					2,517,597			2,865,893
	Retained earnings					549,984			2,433,700
			Total stockholders’ equity			31,887,616			35,516,409
			Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	664,953,673		$	622,439,766

Item 1. Financial Statements

~~The~~ SUMMIT ~~accompanying~~SECURITIES, ~~notes~~INC. ~~are an integral part of the consolidated financial~~AND ~~statements.~~SUBSIDIARIES

~~Table~~ CONSOLIDATED ofBALANCE ~~Contents~~SHEETS

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)


					June 30,			September 30,
					2003			2002

					(unaudited)
ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents					$	23,851,187		$	30,725,256
Investments in affiliated companies						3,022,425			3,022,425
Investments:
	Available-for-sale securities, at fair value					149,631,553			163,500,373
	Held-to maturity securities, at amortized cost					18,508,968			5,883,021
	Accrued interest on investments					1,006,691			903,196

			Total investments			169,147,212			170,286,590

Receivables:
	Real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivables, net of discounts and origination fees, including $11,271,107 and $3,197,355 due from affiliates					420,129,081			354,882,860
	Allowance for losses on receivables					(7,970,113	)		(4,715,489	)

			Net receivables			412,158,968			350,167,371

Other assets:
	Real estate held for sale and development at the lower of cost or market, net of allowances of $4,113,963 and $2,316,093					71,995,544			45,957,758
	Deferred costs, net					21,018,756			19,095,640
	Deferred income tax benefit					3,013,212			619,811
	Current income taxes receivable					73,969			73,968
	Other assets, net					2,236,359			2,490,947

			Total other assets			98,337,840			68,238,124

				Total assets	$	706,517,632		$	622,439,766

LIABILITIES:
Annuity reserves					$	496,670,684		$	420,284,849
Investment certificates						122,087,278			113,677,625
Debt payable, including $27,695,014 and $13,246,825 due to affiliates						45,359,516			40,888,591
Due to affiliates						11,319,453			8,487,140
Accounts payable and accrued expenses						5,779,165			3,585,152

	Total liabilities					681,216,096			586,923,357

Stockholders’ equity:
	Preferred stock, $10 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized:
		Series S, R and T, $10 par, 80,057 shares and 83,729 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference $8,005,723 and $8,372,890)				800,572			837,289
		Series S-3, $2.50 par, 858,121 shares and 987,518 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference $21,453,039 and $24,687,957)				2,145,304			2,468,795
	Common stock, $10 par value, authorized 2,000,000 shares, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding					100,000			100,000
	Additional paid-in capital					22,889,950			26,810,732
	Accumulated other comprehensive income					1,326,041			2,865,893
	Retained earnings (deficit)					(1,960,331	)		2,433,700

			Total stockholders’ equity			25,301,536			35,516,409

			Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	706,517,632		$	622,439,766

			Three Months Ended
			December 31,
			2002			2001
Revenues:
	Interest on receivables		$	8,964,530		$	7,487,535
	Earned discount on receivables and investments			3,460,586			3,029,948
	Other investment income			2,878,623			2,082,810
	Real estate sales			2,654,196			1,164,328
	Fees, commissions, service and other income			3,710,494			2,602,615
	Net gains on investments			167,108			419,701
	Net gains on sales of receivables			5,550			169,919
		Total revenues		21,841,087			16,956,856
Expenses:
	Annuity benefits			6,455,075			4,477,424
	Interest expense			3,149,838			2,512,919
	Cost of real estate sold			2,288,194			1,152,733
	Provision for losses			3,720,410			1,441,244
	Salaries and employee benefits			1,476,136			1,224,181
	Commissions to agents			5,518,810			3,324,860
	Other operating and underwriting expenses			2,125,049			1,693,090
	Capitalized deferred policy acquisition costs, net of amortization			(987,177	)		507,034
		Total expenses		23,746,335			16,333,485
Income (loss) before income taxes				(1,905,248	)		623,371
Income tax (provision) benefit				651,723			(139,557	)
Net income (loss)				(1,253,525	)		483,814
Preferred stock dividends				(630,191	)		(662,040	)
Loss applicable to common stockholders			$	(1,883,716	)	$	(178,226	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial~~3 ~~statements.~~

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)~~ ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

			Three Months Ended
			December 31,
			2002			2001
Net income (loss)			$	(1,253,525	)	$	483,814
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
	Unrealized gains (losses) on investments:
		Unrealized holding losses arising during period(1)		(239,676	)		(1,661,347	)
		Less reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income(2)		(108,620	)		(91,814	)
	Net other comprehensive loss			(348,296	)		(1,753,161	)
Comprehensive loss			$	(1,601,821	)	$	(1,269,347	)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(1)		Net of related tax of ($62,253) and ($855,845) during the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(2)		Net of related tax of ($58,487) and ($47,298) during the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			June 30,						June 30,

			2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenues:
	Interest on receivables		$	9,097,518		$	8,500,331		$	27,223,872		$	24,130,279
	Earned discount on receivables and investments			3,191,958			4,587,282			9,628,352			11,051,647
	Other investment income, including $208,254, $96,852, $592,624 and $312,211 from affiliates			2,469,775			2,215,961			8,103,501			6,490,072
	Real estate sales			1,669,536			255,000			6,433,389			1,831,892
	Fees, commissions, service and other income, including $1,858,311, $1,620,939, $7,377,277 and $5,339,041 from affiliates			2,926,178			2,690,886			9,919,033			8,039,536
	Net gains on investments, including gains of $0, $0, $0 and $825,945 from affiliates			1,959,603			(554,379	)		2,159,366			(2,306,753	)
		Net gains on sales of receivables		2,500			79,868			11,045			257,598

		Total revenues		21,317,068			17,774,949			63,478,558			49,494,271

Expenses:
	Annuity benefits			6,650,670			4,763,259			19,547,173			13,724,186
	Interest expense, including $564,892, $316,599, $1,399,986 and $828,940 to affiliates			3,477,223			2,831,945			10,055,184			7,889,809
	Cost of real estate sold			1,081,787			255,037			5,203,701			1,787,535
	Provision for losses			4,411,813			75,088			10,646,814			2,047,857
	Salaries and employee benefits			1,947,251			1,446,511			5,087,011			4,012,147
	Commissions to agents, net of $370,621, $1,743,228, $384,146 and $2,034,746 ceded to affiliates			3,779,068			6,710,116			14,256,418			13,354,434
	Other operating and underwriting expenses, net of capitalization of contracts acquisition costs (includes $1,594,652, $2,662,835, $5,454,620 and $6,159,276 to affiliates)			2,640,344			1,292,231			5,776,123			4,129,885
	Capitalized deferred policy acquisition costs, net of amortization			(1,699,283	)		(2,451,399	)		(2,296,641	)		(1,889,151	)

		Total expenses		22,288,873			14,922,788			68,275,783			45,056,702

Income (loss) before income taxes				(971,805	)		2,852,161			(4,797,225	)		4,437,569
Income tax (provision) benefit				326,430			(995,579	)		1,631,055			(1,356,001	)

Net income (loss)				(645,375	)		1,856,582			(3,166,170	)		3,081,568
Preferred stock dividends				(577,951	)		(686,243	)		(1,805,812	)		(2,033,809	)

Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders			$	(1,223,326	)	$	1,170,339		$	(4,971,982	)	$	1,047,759

~~Table~~ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the ~~Contents~~consolidated financial statements.

~~SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~4 ~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~ ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

									Accumulated
						Additional			Other
	Preferred			Common		Paid-in			Comprehensive			Retained
	Stock			Stock		Capital			Income			Earnings			Total
Balance, October 1, 2002	$	3,306,084		$	100,000	$	26,810,732		$	2,865,893		$	2,433,700		$	35,516,409
Net loss													(1,253,525	)		(1,253,525	)
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $120,740										(348,296	)					(348,296	)
Cash dividends, preferred (variable rate)													(630,191	)		(630,191	)
Redemption and retirement of variable rate preferred stock (63,425 shares)		(176,010	)				(1,584,086	)								(1,760,096	)
Sale of variable rate preferred stock, net (11,944 shares)		39,331					323,984									363,315
Balance, December 31, 2002	$	3,169,405		$	100,000	$	25,550,630		$	2,517,597		$	549,984		$	31,887,616

~~The~~ SUMMIT ~~accompanying~~SECURITIES, ~~notes~~INC. ~~are an integral part of the consolidated financial~~AND ~~statements.~~SUBSIDIARIES

~~Table~~ CONSOLIDATED ofSTATEMENTS ~~Contents~~OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

~~SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~ ~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~ (UNAUDITED)

				Three Months Ended		~~Three Months Ended~~						Nine Months Ended
						December 31,
				June 30,								June 30,
						2002				2001
				2003				2002				2003			2002
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss)				$	(645,375	)		$	1,856,582			$	(3,166,170	)	$	3,081,568
	Net income (loss)					$	(1,253,525	)		$	483,814
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
	Unrealized gains (losses) on investments:
			Proceeds from sales of trading securities				—				7,729,039
		Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period(1)			552,372				1,068,173				(136,263	)		(669,195	)
			Acquisition of trading securities				—				(1,789,429	)
		Less reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income(2)			(1,273,743	)			530,337				(1,403,589	)		2,252,769
			Earned discount on receivables and investments				(3,460,586	)			(3,029,948	)
	Net other comprehensive income (loss)				(721,371	)			1,598,510				(1,539,852	)		1,583,574
			Gains on investments, net				(167,108	)			(419,701	)
Comprehensive income (loss)				$	(1,366,746	)		$	3,455,092			$	(4,706,022	)	$	4,665,142
			Gains on sales of receivables, net				(5,550	)			(169,919	)
			Gains on sales of real estate				(366,002	)			(11,595	)
			Provision for losses				3,720,410				1,441,244
			Depreciation and amortization				31,541				14,858
			Deferred income tax benefit				(772,463	)			(903,143	)
			Changes in assets and liabilities:
				Deferred cost, net			(1,038,288	)			372,761
				Annuity reserves			5,027,844				4,474,717
				Compound and accrued interest on investment certificates and debt payable			883,936				218,794
				Accrued interest on receivables and investments			(4,598,982	)			(2,895,898	)
				Accounts payable including affiliates			(3,187,791	)			(3,552,498	)
				Other assets including receivable from affiliates			(1,810,435	)			6,204,274
				Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities			(6,996,999	)			8,167,370
Cash flow from investing activities:
	Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities						1,864,749				2,481,165
	Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities						11,390,621				5,319,161
	Purchases of available-for-sale securities						(26,551,954	)			(26,855,930	)
	Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities						1,286,713				—
	Principal payments received on real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments						14,101,721				23,018,817
	Proceeds from sales of real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments						3,881,178				5,636,107
	Purchases and originations of real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments						(50,962,733	)			(44,291,925	)
	Proceeds from sales of real estate						1,404,196				1,164,328
	Additions to real estate held for sale and development						(352,425	)			(173,777	)
			Net cash used in investing activities				(43,937,934	)			(33,702,054	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
	Receipts from annuity products						48,233,030				11,435,377
	Withdrawals of annuity products						(7,575,220	)			(6,364,721	)
	Reinsurance of annuity products to reinsurers						—				—
	Reinsurance of annuity products from reinsurers						(2,430,894	)			(3,217,219	)
	Proceeds from issuance of investment certificates						9,264,653				6,153,875
	Repayments of investment certificates						(1,793,994	)			(3,053,943	)
	Increase (decrease) in debt payable						(2,278,864	)			6,360,999
	Issuance of preferred stock						363,315				362,662
	Redemption and retirement of preferred stock						(1,760,096	)			(138,870	)
	Cash dividends						(630,191	)			(662,040	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities					41,391,739				10,876,120
Net change in cash and cash equivalents							(9,543,194	)			(14,658,564	)
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Beginning of period						30,725,256				37,986,345
	End of period					$	21,182,062			$	23,327,781
Non-cash investing and financing activities of Company:
	Real estate held for sale and development acquired through foreclosure						802,827				8,172,673
	Transfers between annuity products						1,170,346				203,218
	Loans to facilitate the sale of real estate						1,250,000				840,000
	Transfer of investments from available-for-sale portfolio to held-to-maturity portfolio						24,010,954				—
	Transfer of investments from trading portfolio to available-for-sale portfolio						—				16,599,912

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


(1)	Net of related tax of $297,432 and $550,269 during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and ($6,568) and ($344,735) during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(2)	Net of related tax of ($685,861) and $273,204 during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and ($755,778) and $1,160,518 during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

~~Table~~ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the ~~Contents~~consolidated financial statements.

~~SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~5 ~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

1. BasisTable of Presentation Contents

~~The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been~~ ~~prepared~~SUMMIT ~~in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly~~SECURITIES, ~~they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements~~INC. ~~In the~~AND ~~opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)~~ necessary to present fairly the financial position of Summit Securities, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2002, the results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements including notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 2002 Form 10-K.

~~Certain amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements have~~ ~~been~~CONSOLIDATED ~~reclassified~~STATEMENT toOF ~~conform to the current year~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~s presentation. These~~ ~~reclassifications had no effect on net income or retained earnings as~~EQUITY ~~previously reported.~~

~~2. Segment Reporting~~ (UNAUDITED)

The Company principally operates in four industry segments which encompasses: (1) investing in real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable, other receivables and investment securities with funds generated from the issuance of investment certificates and preferred stock (“Investing”); (2) annuity operations; (3) a property development division, which provides services related to the selling, marketing, designing, subdividing and coordinating of real estate development properties; and (4) broker/dealer activities.


									Accumulated
						Additional			Other			Retained
	Preferred			Common		Paid-in			Comprehensive			Earnings
	Stock			Stock		Capital			Income			(Deficit)			Total

Balance, October 1, 2002	$	3,306,084		$	100,000	$	26,810,732		$	2,865,893		$	2,433,700		$	35,516,409
Net loss													(3,166,170	)		(3,166,170	)
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $762,346										(1,539,852	)					(1,539,852	)
Cash dividends, preferred (variable rate)							(577,951	)					(1,227,861	)		(1,805,812	)
Redemption and retirement of variable rate preferred stock (162,220 shares)		(451,958	)				(4,068,032	)								(4,519,990	)
Sale of variable rate preferred stock, net (29,152 shares)		91,750					725,201									816,951

Balance, June 30, 2003	$	2,945,876		$	100,000	$	22,889,950		$	1,326,041		$	(1,960,331	)	$	25,301,536

~~Information~~ The ~~about~~accompanying ~~the~~notes ~~Company’s~~are ~~separate~~an ~~business~~integral ~~segments~~part ~~and in total as~~ of ~~and for~~ the ~~three-month~~consolidated ~~period~~financial ~~ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 is as~~statements. ~~follows:~~

	As of and for the three month period ended December 31, 2002
						Property
				Annuity		Development		Broker/
	Investing			Operations		Operations		Dealer		Total
Revenues	$	1,793,300		$	16,573,916	$	1,298,053	$	2,175,818	$	21,841,087
Income (loss) from operations		(2,666,465	)		331,106		353,874		76,237		(1,905,248	)
Identifiable assets, net		66,908,910			595,389,874		658,159		1,996,730		664,953,673
Depreciation and amortization		1,372			14,032		5,507		10,630		31,541
Capital expenditures		1,924			22,654		17,911		281,900		324,389

	As of and for the three month period ended December 31, 2001
						Property
				Annuity		Development		Broker/
	Investing			Operations		Operations		Dealer		Total
Revenues	$	1,787,989		$	12,704,093	$	438,316	$	2,026,458	$	16,956,856
Income (loss) from operations		(3,063,566	)		3,582,645		22,695		81,597		623,371
Identifiable assets, net		72,340,118			372,797,056		566,996		1,555,534		447,259,704
Depreciation and amortization		44			8,616		3,488		2,710		14,858
Capital expenditures		—			101,856		1,212		—		103,068

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~ITEM~~ CONSOLIDATED 2.STATEMENTS ~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS~~ OF ~~FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~CASH FLOWS

~~These discussions may contain some forward-looking statements. A~~ ~~forward-looking statement may contain words such as “will continue to be,”~~(UNAUDITED) “will be,” “continue to,” “expect to,” “anticipates that,” “to be,” or “can impact.” Management cautions that forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements.

General



					Nine Months Ended
					June 30,

					2003			2002

Cash flow from operating activities:
	Net income (loss)				$	(3,166,170	)	$	3,081,568
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
		Proceeds from sales of trading securities				—			7,729,039
		Acquisition of trading securities				—			(1,789,429	)
		Earned discount on receivables and investments				(9,628,352	)		(11,051,647	)
		(Gains) losses on investments, net, including gains of $0 and $825,945 from affiliates				(2,159,366	)		2,306,753
		Gains on sales of receivables, net				(11,045	)		(257,598	)
		Gains on sales of real estate				(1,229,688	)		(44,357	)
		Provision for losses				10,646,814			2,047,857
		Depreciation and amortization				100,144			50,638
		Deferred income tax provision (benefit)				(2,393,401	)		815,783
		Changes in assets and liabilities:
			Deferred cost, net			(1,923,116	)		(2,155,593	)
			Annuity reserves			17,657,164			13,581,748
			Compound and accrued interest on investment certificates and debt payable			2,287,141			975,558
			Accrued interest on receivables and investments			(3,426,484	)		(9,678,318	)
			Accounts payable including affiliates			5,026,326			16,860,860
			Other assets including receivable from affiliates			916,789			2,326,971

				Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		12,696,756			24,799,833

Cash flow from investing activities:
	Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities					18,586,323			4,594,405
	Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities, including $0 and $2,325,945 from affiliates					109,010,383			37,463,696
	Purchases of available-for-sale securities					(138,512,881	)		(73,195,032	)
	Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities					11,512,879			—
	Purchases of held-to-maturity securities					—			(5,963,245	)
	Principal payments received on real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments, including $3,226,248 and $1,093,738 from affiliates					47,049,681			63,326,486
	Proceeds from sales of real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments, including $3,797,431 and $1,404,024 from affiliates					3,958,278			15,229,211
	Purchases and originations of real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivable investments, including $12,323,333 and $16,038,118 from affiliates					(126,408,339	)		(137,164,127	)
	Proceeds from sales of real estate, including $247,042 and $0 from affiliates					4,869,539			1,832,828
	Additions to real estate held for sale and development					(13,449,945	)		(638,687	)

				Net cash used in investing activities		(83,384,082	)		(94,514,465	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
	Receipts from annuity products					86,541,979			47,677,773
	Withdrawals of annuity products					(26,052,865	)		(18,310,974	)
	Reinsurance of annuity products to affiliated reinsurers					7,453,067			46,805,192
	Reinsurance of annuity products from affiliated reinsurers					(9,213,510	)		(20,120,303	)
	Proceeds from issuance of investment certificates					21,025,672			19,810,103
	Repayments of investment certificates					(14,896,326	)		(9,220,351	)
	Increase (decrease) in debt payable, including $7,544,383 and $2,346,025 from affiliates					4,464,091			9,312,061
	Issuance of preferred stock					816,951			689,001
	Redemption and retirement of preferred stock					(4,519,990	)		(514,837	)
	Cash dividends					(1,805,812	)		(3,653,809	)

				Net cash provided by financing activities		63,813,257			72,473,856

Net change in cash and cash equivalents						(6,874,069	)		2,759,224
Cash and cash equivalents:
	Beginning of period					30,725,256			37,986,345

	End of period				$	23,851,187		$	40,745,569

Non-cash investing and financing activities of Company:
	Real estate held for sale and development acquired through foreclosure					20,055,954			20,755,797
	Transfers between annuity products					1,379,373			4,633,241
	Loans to facilitate the sale of real estate					1,563,850			840,000
	Transfer of investments from available-for-sale portfolio to held-to-maturity portfolio (1)					24,010,954			—
	Transfer of investments from trading portfolio to available-for-sale portfolio					—			16,599,912
	Timing difference on settlements of securities sales								1,008,750
	Timing difference on settlements of securities purchases								10,142,188

~~The~~(1) ~~Consolidated~~During ~~Group~~the ~~consists~~nine ofmonths ~~Summit~~ended ~~Securities~~June 30, ~~Inc~~2003, the Consolidated Group transferred $24.0 ~~(“Summit”)~~million ~~and several~~of ~~subsidiaries,~~securities ~~including~~from ~~two~~its ~~insurance~~available-for-sale ~~companies,~~portfolio ~~Old~~to ~~Standard~~its ~~Life Insurance~~held-to-maturity ~~Company~~portfolio. ~~(“Old~~The ~~Standard”)~~securities ~~and~~transferred ~~Old~~included ~~West~~those ~~Annuity~~securities &pledged ~~Life~~as ~~Insurance Company~~collateral ~~(“Old~~to ~~West”),~~secure athe ~~securities~~FHLB ~~broker/dealer,~~line ~~Metropolitan~~of ~~Investment Securities,~~credit ~~Inc~~agreement. ~~(“MIS”)~~The ~~and~~Consolidated aGroup ~~property~~has ~~development~~the ~~services~~intent ~~company,~~and ~~Summit Property~~ability ~~Development,~~to ~~Inc~~hold these securities until maturity.

~~Summit, Old Standard and Old West are engaged in the business of investing~~ in cash flowing assets, consisting of obligations collateralized by real estate, structured settlements, annuities, lottery prizes and other investments (“Receivables”), investment securities and other assets through funds provided by annuity sales, receivable cash flow, investment certificate (debt obligation) sales, preferred stock sales, earnings and sales of investments, sales of Receivables, and the resale of repossessed real estate. Currently, the Consolidated Group is focusing its Receivable investing activities on loans collateralized by commercial real estate. The ~~Consolidated~~accompanying ~~Group~~notes ~~(principally Old Standard) originates commercial loans collateralized by various types of commercial properties. These commercial loans~~ are ~~generally~~an ~~small~~integral topart mid-sized loans that are originated for less than $15 million. The Consolidated Group obtains leads for such loans through mortgage brokers. The borrowers submit loan applications directly to the Consolidated Group. The Consolidated Group’s goal is to achieve a positive spread between the return on its Receivable and other investments and its cost of ~~funds. Summit may also engage in other~~ ~~businesses or activities without restriction in accordance with~~ the ~~provisions of~~consolidated ~~its~~financial ~~Articles of Incorporation~~statements. ~~Summit is affiliated, due to the common~~ ~~control by C. Paul Sandifur, Jr., with Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co.,~~ ~~Inc. (“Metropolitan”), which has as its principal subsidiaries Metwest Mortgage~~ Services, Inc. (“Metwest”) and Western United Life Assurance Company (“Western Life”). These affiliates provide services to the Consolidated Group for a fee and engage in various business transactions with the Consolidated Group.

~~Critical Accounting Policies~~7

TheTable accounting policies described below are those that the Consolidated Group considers critical in preparing its financial statements. These policies include significant estimates the Consolidated Group makes using information available at the time the estimates are made. However, the estimates could change materially if different information or assumptions are used. The descriptions below are summarized and have been simplified for clarity. A more detailed description of the significant accounting policies used by the Consolidated Group in preparing its financial statements is included in the Consolidated Group’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2002. Contents

~~Table~~ SUMMIT ofSECURITIES, ~~Contents~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Asset~~ NOTES ~~Valuations~~TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Investments~~ 1. Basis of Presentation

The ~~Consolidated~~accompanying ~~Group~~unaudited ~~classifies~~consolidated ~~its~~financial statements ~~investments~~have been prepared in ~~debt~~accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and ~~equity~~footnotes required by ~~securities~~generally asaccepted ~~“available-~~accounting principles for~~-sale~~ complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Summit Securities, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “~~held-to-maturity~~Consolidated Group”) as of June 30, 2003, the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and the cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. The ~~significant~~results of ~~accounting~~operations ~~policies~~for ~~related~~the tothree ~~these~~months ~~investment~~and ~~classifications~~nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are asnot ~~follows:~~necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements including notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 2002 Form 10-K.

~~Available-for-Sale~~ Certain ~~Securities.~~amounts Available-for-sale securities, consisting primarily of mortgage- and asset-backed securities, government-backed bonds, corporate bonds and equity securities, are carried at quoted and estimated fair values. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and presented as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of related deferred income taxes, as a component of stockholders’ equity. The Consolidated Group continually monitors its investment portfolio for other than temporary impairment of securities. When an other than a temporary decline in the ~~value~~prior below cost or amortized cost is identified, the investment is reduced to its fair value, which becomes the new cost basis of the investment. The amount of the reduction is reported as a realized loss in the statement of operations. Any recovery of value in excess of the investmentyear’s consolidated ~~new~~financial ~~cost~~statements ~~basis~~have isbeen ~~recognized~~reclassified as a realized gain only on sale, maturity or other disposition of the investment. Factors that the Consolidated Group evaluates in determining the existence of an other than temporary decline in value include (1) the length of time and extent to conform ~~which the fair value has been less than cost or carrying value, (2) the circumstances contributing~~ to the ~~decline~~current inyear’s ~~fair~~presentation ~~value~~ (~~including~~See ~~a change in interest rates or spreads to benchmarks), (~~Note 3 following) recent performance of the security, (4) the financial strength of the issuer, and (5) the intent and ability of the Consolidated Group to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery. ~~Additionally,~~These ~~for~~reclassifications ~~asset-backed~~had ~~securities,~~no ~~the~~effect ~~Consolidated~~on ~~Group~~net ~~considers~~income or ~~the~~retained ~~security~~earnings ~~rating~~as ~~and~~previously ~~the amount of credit support available for the security~~reported.

~~Held-to-Maturity Securities: Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost~~ 2. ~~Premiums and discounts on these securities are amortized on a specific-identification basis using the interest method. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until maturity.~~ Segment Reporting

~~Allowances~~ The ~~for~~Company ~~Losses~~principally operates in four industry segments which encompasses: (1) annuity operations, including investing in receivables with funds generated from the issuance of annuity products and parent company capital contributions; (2) a property development division, which has historically generated its revenues from services provided to affiliates related to the selling, marketing, designing, subdividing and coordinating activities of real estate development properties; (3) broker/ dealer activities, including marketing securities offered by Summit Securities, Inc. and affiliates in addition to selling other mutual funds and general securities and (4) investing activities (consisting primarily of the assets and operations of Summit Securities, Inc., the parent company) using funds generated from the issuance of investment certificates and preferred stock that have not been used as capital contributions to the annuity segment. Historically, a portion of the proceeds generated from the sale of debt and equity securities have been contributed by the parent to its insurance subsidiaries to provide capital. Therefore, the identifiable assets of the investing segment, which excludes investments in subsidiaries, are less than the total outstanding investment certificates and preferred stock of the parent. Interest costs associated with the investing segment activities are not allocated to the annuity operations segment.

~~Allowance~~ Information ~~for~~about ~~Losses~~the onCompany’s ~~Receivables.~~separate business ~~Commercial~~segments ~~Loans are individually monitored for impairment. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information~~ and ~~events,~~in ittotal isas ~~probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms~~ of ~~the~~and ~~loan agreement. Probable is defined as “future events are likely to occur”. When a loan has been identified as impaired, the Consolidated Group determines the allowance~~ for ~~loss based on~~ the ~~estimated~~three-month ~~fair~~and nine-month ~~market~~periods ~~value,~~ended ~~less estimated liquidation expenses~~June 30, of2003 the collateral compared to the carrying value of the receivable. The estimated fair market value is based on the most recent appraisal of the collateral. If the most recent appraisal is more than one year old, a new appraisal is ordered. In the interim, estimated fair market value is established through a review of the most recent appraisal in addition to a review of other relevant market information. When reviewing the most recent appraisal, the Consolidated Group considers the type of property, changes in the economic factors of the region and ~~the~~2002 ~~underlying appraisal assumptions. If the estimated fair market value of the collateral~~ is ~~less~~as follows ~~than~~(see ~~the~~MD&A ~~carrying value, an allowance~~ for ~~loss~~discussion isof ~~recognized.~~significant items):

The remaining real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable portfolio is made up of a large group of smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Consolidated Group establishes an allowance for inherent losses on the receivables based primarily on current delinquencies and recent foreclosure and loss experience. To the extent actual experience differs from assumptions, such adjustments would be included in the statement of operations.



	As of and for the nine month period ended June 30, 2003

			Property
	Annuity		Development
	Operations		Operations			Broker/Dealer			Investing			Total

Revenues	$	51,617,373	$	1,907,243		$	6,856,127		$	3,097,815		$	63,478,558
Income (loss) from operations		4,250,655		(218,154	)		(453,805	)		(8,375,921	)		(4,797,225	)
Identifiable assets, net		624,534,413		445,276			1,525,428			80,012,515			706,517,632
Depreciation and amortization		41,063		16,288			38,449			4,344			100,144
Capital expenditures		28,596		23,620			272,384			5,303			329,903

~~Table of Contents~~8

AllowancesTable for losses on real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable are based on the carrying value of the receivable, including accrued interest. Accordingly, the Company accrues interest on delinquent receivables until foreclosure.Contents

~~Allowance~~ SUMMIT for Losses on Real Estate Held for Sale and Development. The allowance for losses on real estate held for sale and development includes amounts for estimated losses as a result of impairment in value. The Consolidated Group reviews its real estate properties for impairment in value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may exceed its fair market value. The carrying value of a repossessed property is determined as of the date of repossession of the property and is based on the lower of fair market value less selling costs or carrying value at the time the property was repossessed. For non-commercial propertiesSECURITIES, ~~an appraisal is obtained on the foreclosed property to determine its fair market value at time of repossession~~INC. For commercial properties, an appraisal is obtained on the foreclosed property to determine the fair market value only if the most recent appraisal is more than one year old, otherwise the existing appraisal is used. Periodically, the Consolidated Group may not order an updated appraisal in accordance with its established policies if current negotiations with a potential purchaser establishes an indication of value.AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Subsequent~~ NOTES toTO ~~repossession~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(~~or acquisition in the case of development properties~~Continued), if the value of the property declines such that the fair market value, less selling costs, from the disposition of the asset is less than its carrying value, an impairment is recognized in the statement of operations.

~~Deferred~~ 2. Segment Reporting ~~Policy Acquisition Costs~~(continued)

Deferred policy acquisition costs, consisting of commissions and other insurance underwriting and annuity policy costs, are deferred and amortized over the lives of the contracts in proportion to the present value of estimated future gross profits. To the extent actual experience differs from assumptions, and to the extent estimates of future gross profits require revision, the unamortized balance of deferred policy acquisition costs is adjusted accordingly; these adjustments would be included in the statement of operations.



	As of and for the three month period ended June 30, 2003

			Property
	Annuity		Development
	Operations		Operations		Broker/Dealer			Investing			Total

Revenues	$	18,650,513	$	615,482	$	1,803,917		$	247,156		$	21,317,068
Income (loss) from operations		3,374,120		29,968		(668,983	)		(3,706,910	)		(971,805	)
Identifiable assets, net		624,534,413		445,276		1,525,428			80,012,515			706,517,632
Depreciation and amortization		12,076		5,014		13,403			1,610			32,103
Capital expenditures		1,150		—		64			4,060			5,274

Annuity Reserves



	As of and for the nine month period ended June 30, 2002

			Property
	Annuity		Development
	Operations		Operations			Broker/Dealer		Investing			Total

Revenues	$	39,960,904	$	1,420,716		$	5,367,292	$	2,745,359		$	49,494,271
Income (loss) from operations		14,015,295		(320,971	)		136,754		(9,393,509	)		4,437,569
Identifiable assets, net		472,567,356		675,815			1,595,521		77,683,063			552,521,755
Depreciation and amortization		30,676		11,467			8,131		364			50,638
Capital expenditures		164,048		13,587			—		34,205			211,840

Premiums for annuities are reported as annuity reserves under the deposit method. Reserves for annuities are equal to the sum of the account balances, including credited interest and deferred service charges. Based on past experience, consideration is given in actuarial calculations to the number of policyholder and annuitant deaths that might be expected, policy lapses, surrenders and terminations. As a result of changes in the factors considered in the actuarial calculations, it is reasonably possible that the reserves for annuities could change in the near future.



	As of and for the three month period ended June 30, 2002

			Property
	Annuity		Development
	Operations		Operations			Broker/Dealer			Investing			Total

Revenues	$	14,379,473	$	515,701		$	1,684,927		$	1,194,848		$	17,774,949
Income (loss) from operations		5,882,776		(295,236	)		(23,150	)		(2,712,229	)		2,852,161
Identifiable assets, net		472,567,356		675,815			1,595,521			77,683,063			552,521,755
Depreciation and amortization		11,373		4,411			2,710			277			18,771
Capital expenditures		28,205		36,462			—			34,205			98,872

~~Table~~ 3. Reclassification— Interest ofon ~~Contents~~Receivables and Provision for losses

~~Results~~ Historically, the Company has accrued interest income on delinquent commercial loans until foreclosure. However, once the delinquent commercial loan achieved a net realizable value of ~~Operations~~80% of the underlying collateral, increases in interest income were offset through a similar increase in the provision for losses on receivables. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company ceased recording simultaneous increases in both interest income and provision for losses on delinquent commercial loans that achieved a net realizable value of 80% of the underlying collateral. Furthermore, and for comparative purposes, the Company reclassified approximately $1.9 million of provision for losses on receivables against interest income during the six months ended March 31, 2003. The reclassification resulted in a reduction in interest income with a corresponding reduction in provision for losses on receivables. For comparability purposes, the Company is providing the following information to quantify the impact of the reclassification adjustments for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2003. Prior year information, both quarterly and year to date, have not been reclassified as amounts are not deemed material.

~~Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended December~~9 ~~31, 2001~~

TheTable following table presents the components of the results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001: Contents

		Three Months Ended
		December 31,
		2002			2001
Net interest income		$	5,698,826		$	5,609,950
Provision for losses on Receivables			(3,325,000	)		(573,755	)
	Net interest spread		2,373,826			5,036,195
Net non-interest expense			(5,409,501	)		(3,639,516	)
Capitalized deferred costs, net of amortization			987,177			(507,034	)
	Income (loss) before gains (losses) on assets		(2,048,498	)		889,645
Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables			172,658			589,620
Provision for losses on real estate held for sale			(395,410	)		(867,489	)
Gains (losses) on sales of real estate			366,002			11,595
Income (loss) before income taxes			(1,905,248	)		623,371
Income tax benefit (provision)			651,723			(139,557	)
Net income (loss)			(1,253,525	)		483,814
Preferred stock dividends			(630,191	)		(662,040	)
Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders		$	(1,883,716	)	$	(178,226	)

SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Net~~ NOTES ~~Interest~~TO ~~Income~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

3. ~~The following table presents the components of net interest income during~~Reclassification— ~~the~~Interest ~~three~~on ~~months~~Receivables ~~ended~~and ~~December 31,~~Provision ~~2002~~for ~~and 2001:~~losses (continued)

				Three Months Ended
		As reported				As reclassified
				December 31,
As of December 31, 2002
				2002				2001
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivables		$	395,983,956			$	395,045,376
Interest income:
Allowance for losses on receivables			(7,846,014	)			(6,907,434	)
	Interest on receivables			$	8,964,530			$	7,487,535
Net receivables			388,137,942				388,137,942
	Earned discount on receivables and investments				3,460,586				3,029,948
For the three months ended December 31, 2002
	Other investment income				2,878,623				2,082,810
Interest on receivables			8,964,530				8,025,950
		Total interest income			15,303,739				12,600,293
Total revenues			21,841,087				20,902,507
Interest expense:
Provision for losses			3,720,410				2,781,830
	Annuity benefits				6,455,075				4,477,424
Total expenses			23,746,335				22,807,755
	Interest, net				3,149,838				2,512,919
Net loss			(1,253,525	)			(1,253,525	)
		Total interest expense			9,604,913				6,990,343
Net interest income				$	5,698,826			$	5,609,950


	As reported			As reclassified

As of March 31, 2003
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes and other receivables	$	422,004,504		$	420,135,449
Allowance for losses on receivables		(8,589,668	)		(6,720,613	)
Net receivables		413,414,836			413,414,836
For the six months ended March 31, 2003
Interest on receivables		19,995,409			18,126,354
Total revenues		44,030,545			42,161,490
Provision for losses		8,104,056			6,235,001
Total expenses		47,855,965			45,986,910
Net loss		(2,520,795	)		(2,520,795	)
For the three months ended March 31, 2003
Interest on receivables		11,030,879			10,100,404
Total revenues		22,189,458			21,258,983
Provision for losses		4,383,646			3,453,171
Total expenses		24,109,630			23,179,155
Net loss		(1,267,270	)		(1,267,270	)

~~The following table summarizes the rate/volume change in total interest~~ ~~income between the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 by interest sensitive asset class~~4. Subsequent Event

	Three months ended December 31, 2002 vs.
	Three months ended December 31, 2001
	Increase (Decrease)
	Due to
	Volume		Rate			Total Change
Interest sensitive assets:
Investments (including cash)	$	1,074,348	$	(366,404	)	$	707,944
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable		2,100,395		(725,238	)		1,375,157
Other receivables		829,155		(208,810	)		620,345
	$	4,003,898	$	(1,300,452	)	$	2,703,446

Metropolitan Investment Securities, Inc. (“MIS”), a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) member firm and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole broker dealer responsible for the offer and sale of the Company’s preferred stock and debt securities. MIS has received a “Wells” letter from the NASD stating that the staff of the NASD has made a preliminary determination to recommend that a disciplinary action be brought against MIS. Under the Wells process adopted by the NASD, MIS has been provided an opportunity to respond before the NASD staff makes a formal recommendation to the NASD regarding any such action. MIS is cooperating with the NASD to resolve this matter. The Company is unable to fully determine at this time the impact on the Company of the ultimate resolution of the pending matters. The ultimate resolution of the pending matters could have an adverse affect on MIS’s ability to continue selling the Company’s securities, could result in monetary fines being imposed against MIS by the NASD and could require MIS to spend additional funds to settle the pending matters. If MIS is unable to continue selling the Company’s securities, it could have an adverse affect on the Company. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had recorded a contingent liability of $0.3 million for potential fines that may be assessed against MIS by the NASD. The actual amount of the fines required to settle the pending matters could be greater or less than $0.3 million.

~~The following table presents the average net yields realized by the~~10 ~~Consolidated Group on interest sensitive assets and liabilities during the~~ ~~three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 based on the average monthly~~ ~~ending asset/liability balances:~~

		December 31,			December 31,
		2002 Average			2001 Average
Interest sensitive assets:
Investments (including cash)		$	202,513,360		$	133,600,182
	Yield		5.51	%		6.24	%
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable		$	271,944,656		$	223,799,351
	Yield		16.38	%		17.45	%
Other receivables		$	90,057,913		$	42,890,642
	Yield		6.10	%		7.03	%
Interest sensitive liabilities:
Annuity reserves		$	443,073,357		$	294,280,710
	Yield		5.83	%		6.09	%
Investment certificates		$	117,841,942		$	94,436,375
	Yield		9.32	%		9.42	%
Debt payable		$	37,079,390		$	15,830,604
	Yield		5.36	%		7.63	%

~~The~~Item ~~increase~~2. inManagement’s ~~net~~Discussion ~~interest~~and ~~income~~Analysis ~~from~~of ~~2001~~Financial toCondition ~~2002~~and ~~was~~Results ~~primarily due to an increase in the commercial lending activities~~ of the Consolidated Group. The increase in the commercial loan portfolio was partially offset by a reduction in the portfolio yield due to a reduction in exit fees earned on its commercial loans during the three month period ended December 31, 2002 compared to the similar period ended December 31, 2001. Operations

~~The~~ These ~~Company~~discussions ~~has~~may ~~experienced~~contain asome forward-looking ~~decrease~~statements. inA ~~the~~forward-looking ~~yields~~statement onmay contain ~~its~~words ~~investment portfolio~~such as ~~the~~“will ~~5-year~~continue ~~constant~~to ~~maturity~~be,” “will ~~U.S.~~be,” ~~Treasury~~“continue ~~rate~~to,” ~~which is similar~~“expect to,” ~~the~~“anticipates ~~average~~that,” ~~maturity~~“to ~~of the Consolidated Group’s fixed income portfolio~~be,” ~~has~~or ~~decreased~~“can impact.” ~~During~~We ~~the~~caution ~~twelve-month~~you ~~period~~that ~~ended~~forward-looking statements ~~December 31,~~are ~~2002~~subject ~~proceeds~~to ~~from the~~risks ~~sale~~ and ~~maturities~~uncertainties ofthat ~~the investment portfolio totaled $84.3 million. As~~could ~~proceeds~~cause ~~from~~our ~~the~~actual ~~sales~~results ~~and~~to ~~maturities~~differ ~~were~~materially ~~reinvested~~from ~~back into a lower~~those ~~interest~~projected ~~rate~~in ~~market,~~forward-looking ~~the overall portfolio yield was reduced~~statements.

~~Table of Contents~~ General

~~The~~ In ~~reduction~~addition into the ~~interest~~parent ~~rate~~company ~~environment~~Summit Securities, ~~during~~Inc., ~~the~~we ~~last~~also ~~twelve~~have several subsidiaries, including ~~months~~two ~~has~~insurance ~~allowed~~companies, ~~the~~Old ~~Consolidated~~Standard ~~Group~~Life toInsurance ~~borrow~~Company ~~funds~~and Old onWest ~~its~~Annuity ~~secured~~& ~~line~~Life Insurance Company, a securities ofbroker/dealer, ~~credit~~Metropolitan ~~with~~Investment ~~the~~Securities, ~~Federal~~Inc. (“MIS”) ~~Home~~and ~~Loan~~a ~~Bank~~property ofdevelopment ~~Seattle~~services atcompany, Summit ~~lower~~Property ~~interest~~Development, ~~rates~~Inc. ~~This~~ ~~borrowing~~The ~~facility~~terms ~~has~~“we,” “our” ~~led~~and “us” refer to aSummit ~~reduction~~and inour subsidiaries collectively, while the ~~current~~term ~~year~~Summit ~~debt~~refers ~~payable~~solely ~~cost~~to ofthe ~~funds~~parent company.

~~Net~~ We ~~Non~~are engaged in the business of investing in cash flowing assets, consisting of obligations secured by real estate, structured settlements, annuities, lottery prizes and other investments, which we refer to collectively as “receivables,” investment securities and other assets through funds provided by annuity sales, receivable cash flow, investment certificate (debt securities) sales, preferred stock sales, earnings and sales of investments, sales of receivables, and the resale of repossessed real estate. Currently, we are focusing our receivable investing activities on loans secured by commercial real estate. We originate commercial loans secured by various types of commercial properties. These commercial loans are generally small to mid-~~Interest~~sized ~~Expense~~loans that are originated for less than $15 million. We obtain leads for commercial loans through mortgage brokers. The borrowers submit loan applications directly to us. Our goal is to achieve a positive spread between the return on our receivable and other investments and our cost of funds. We may also engage in other businesses or activities without restriction in accordance with the provisions of our articles of incorporation.

~~The~~ We ~~following~~are ~~table~~affiliated, ~~presents~~due to the ~~components~~common ofcontrol ~~net~~by C. ~~non-interest~~Paul ~~expense~~Sandifur, Jr., with Metropolitan Mortgage & ~~during~~Securities ~~the~~Co., ~~three~~Inc., ~~months~~which ~~ended~~has ~~December 31~~as its principal subsidiaries Metwest Mortgage Services, ~~2002~~Inc. and ~~2001:~~Western United Life Assurance Company. We refer to Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co., Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively as “Metropolitan.” These affiliates provide services to us for a fee and engage in various business transactions with us. We also provide services to Metropolitan for a fee.

			Three Months Ended
			December 31,
			2002		2001
Non-interest income:
	Fees, commissions, service and other income		$	3,710,494	$	2,602,615
		Total non-interest income		3,710,494		2,602,615
Non-interest expense:
	Salaries and employee benefits			1,476,136		1,224,181
	Commissions to agents			5,518,810		3,324,860
	Other operating and underwriting expenses			2,125,049		1,693,090
		Total non-interest expense		9,119,995		6,242,131
		Net non-interest expense	$	5,409,501	$	3,639,516

Historically, Summit has generally funded its investing activities through the sale of investment certificates and preferred stock. Furthermore, Summit has relied on new offerings to re-finance previously issued debt as it matures. Currently, Summit has two public offerings under regulatory review and as such, are not currently available to the public. While Summit maintains sufficient short term liquidity (generally up to twelve months) to pay maturing investment certificates and preferred stock dividends during periods in which its securities offerings are not available for sale to the public, Summit does not anticipate that it will generate sufficient after tax cash earnings that would permit it to fully pay its maturing debt obligations on a continual basis without the sale of additional debt securities to re-finance that debt as it matures. Summit’s short-term liquidity is primarily comprised of cash, a secured line of credit agreement with Metropolitan and other assets including investments and receivables that can be converted to cash through the sale of those assets. To the extent Summit is unable to sell additional securities or re-finance investment certificates as they mature from another source, and to the extent that existing short-term liquidity is not sufficient, our business would be harmed.

~~Fees, commissions, service and other income consist primarily of~~ ~~commission~~Critical ~~earned~~Accounting ~~by the Consolidated Group’s broker/dealer subsidiary, MIS,~~Policies ~~and service fees earned by Summit’s property development subsidiary, Summit~~ Property Development, Inc. MIS and Summit Property Development, Inc. earned approximately $3.5 million, and $2.5 million in commissions (after eliminating commissions received by MIS from Summit), during the three month periods ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. The $0.9 million increase during 2002 resulted primarily from a $0.1 million increase in commissions earned by MIS as a result of an increase in the sales of the securities of Metropolitan, a $0.9 million increase in property development consulting fees charged to Metropolitan and $0.1 million increase in late charge fees related to commercial lending activity. These increases were partially offset by a $0.1 million reduction in other MIS sales activity.

Of The ~~the~~accounting ~~$3.5 million~~policies ~~and~~described ~~$2.5 million~~below ofare ~~fees, commissions, service and~~those ~~other income~~ that ~~was~~we ~~earned~~consider bycritical ~~Summit~~in ~~Property~~preparing ~~Development~~our ~~and~~financial ~~MIS during the three month periods ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, approximately $3~~statements.0 ~~million,~~These ~~and~~policies ~~$2.0 million~~include ~~were~~significant ~~fees~~estimates ~~received~~we ~~from~~make ~~Metropolitan and its~~using ~~subsidiary~~information ~~Western~~available ~~Life~~at ~~(affiliated~~the ~~companies).~~time ~~During~~ the ~~three-month~~estimates ~~periods ended~~are ~~December 31~~made. However, ~~2002~~the ~~and~~estimates ~~2001,~~could ~~Summit~~change ~~Property~~materially ~~Development~~if ~~generated~~different ~~approximately~~information ~~$1.3 million~~or ~~and~~assumptions ~~$0.4 million~~are ~~in fees from Metropolitan while MIS generated approximately $1~~used.~~7 million~~ ~~and $1.6 million in fees from Metropolitan.~~ The ~~Summit~~descriptions ~~Property~~below ~~Development fees generated from Metropolitan~~ are summarized ~~calculated~~and byhave ~~multiplying~~been ~~the~~simplified ~~actual~~for ~~payroll~~clarity. ~~expense~~A ormore ~~commissions paid as~~detailed adescription ~~result~~ of ~~consulting,~~the ~~developing~~significant oraccounting ~~selling~~policies ~~Metropolitan’s~~we ~~development property~~use ~~by a predetermined profit override rate~~ in ~~accordance with established~~ ~~inter-company~~preparing ~~agreements.~~our ~~The~~financial ~~MIS~~statements ~~fees~~is ~~generated~~included ~~from~~in ~~Metropolitan~~our ~~are~~audited ~~calculated~~financial bystatements ~~multiplying~~for the ~~actual~~year ~~commissions~~ended ~~paid~~September 30, ~~as a result of selling Metropolitan’s investment securities by a predetermined profit override rate in accordance with an established inter-company agreement~~2002.

~~Salaries and employee benefits increased by approximately $0.3 million~~11 ~~during the three month period ended December 31, 2002 compared to the similar~~ ~~period ended December 31, 2001. The increase was due primarily to an increase~~ ~~in full time equivalent employees from 76 at December 31, 2001 to 104 at~~ ~~December 31, 2002. The increase in employees is due primarily to an increase in the commercial lending operations of the Consolidated Group.~~

~~Metropolitan provides servicing, accounting, data processing and other~~ ~~administrative~~Asset ~~services to the~~Valuations ~~Consolidated Group. In addition, the Consolidated Group is charged rent~~ for the space that the it occupies in Metropolitan’s headquarters. Expenses allocated and rent charged to the Consolidated Group were approximately $2.3 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2002 compared to $1.8 million for the three-month period ended December 31, 2001. Of the $0.5 million increase in charges during the three month period ended December 31, 2002, $0.1 million is related to an increase in loans serviced by Metropolitan, a $0.2 million increase in expense allocations to the Consolidated Group in accordance with an established inter-company cost sharing agreement and a $0.1 million increase in rent.

~~Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Net of Costs Capitalized~~ Investments

~~Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, net of costs~~ ~~capitalized,~~We isclassify ~~comprised~~our ofinvestments ~~the~~in ~~capitalization~~debt ofand ~~expenses incurred to sell~~equity ~~and~~securities ~~underwrite~~as ~~annuity~~“available-for-sale” ~~policies, offset by the amortization of previously~~or ~~capitalized expenses~~“held-to-maturity.” The ~~following~~significant ~~table reflects the components of the net~~accounting ~~expense~~policies ~~reported~~related byto ~~the~~these ~~Consolidated~~investment ~~Group~~classifications ~~for~~are ~~the three months ended December~~as ~~31, 2002 and 2001.~~follows:

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2002			2001
Current period costs capitalized	$	(2,037,177	)	$	(542,966	)
Amortization of previously capitalized expenses		1,050,000			1,050,000
Net amortization (capitalization) of deferred policy acquisition costs	$	(987,177	)	$	507,034


	*Available-for-Sale Securities.* Available-for-sale securities, consisting primarily of mortgage- and asset-backed securities, government-backed bonds, corporate bonds and equity securities, are carried at quoted and estimated fair values. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and presented as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of related deferred income taxes, as a component of stockholders’ equity. We regularly monitor our investment portfolio for other than temporary declines in the value of securities. When an other than a temporary decline in the value below cost or amortized cost is identified, the investment is reduced to its fair value, which becomes the new cost basis of the investment. The amount of the reduction is reported as a realized loss in the statement of operations. Any recovery of value in excess of the investment’s new cost basis is recognized as a realized gain only on sale, maturity or other disposition of the investment. Factors that we evaluate in determining the existence of an other than temporary decline in value include (1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or carrying value, (2) the circumstances contributing to the decline in fair value (including a change in interest rates or spreads to benchmarks), (3) recent performance of the security, (4) the financial strength of the issuer, and (5) our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery. Additionally, for asset-backed securities, we consider the security rating and the amount of credit support available for the security.

	*Held-to-Maturity Securities:* Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Premiums and discounts on these securities are amortized on a specific-identification basis using the interest method. We have the ability and intent to hold these investments until maturity.

~~The increase in current period costs capitalized is due primarily to a~~ ~~$1.3~~Allowances ~~increase~~for ~~in commissions paid on its annuity business. Annuity business~~Losses ~~production during the three-month period ended December 31, 2002 was~~ ~~approximately $48.2 million compared to approximately $11.4 million during the similar period ended December 31, 2001.~~

~~Net~~ We ~~Gains~~maintain ~~(Losses)~~various onallowances ~~Investments~~for ~~and~~losses. ~~Receivables~~The significant accounting policies related to the allowances are as follows:

~~The~~Allowance ~~following~~for ~~table~~Losses ~~presents~~on Receivables. Commercial loans are individually evaluated for impairment. A commercial loan is considered impaired when, based on specific facts and circumstances, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the ~~components~~contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a commercial loan has been identified as impaired, we determine the allowance for losses based on the estimated net ~~gains~~realizable value of the collateral compared to the carrying value of the receivable (~~losses~~including accrued interest and fees) . When determining the estimated net realizable value of the collateral, we have historically taken into consideration the most recent third party appraisal and other relevant market information. When reviewing the most recent third party appraisal, we consider the type of property, changes in the economic factors of the region since the most recent appraisal and the various underlying appraisal assumptions. In-house licensed appraisers that assist in the commercial origination process also assist in this review. Furthermore, we may also perform additional on ~~investments~~-site collateral visits to update our historical assessments and ~~Receivables~~gain ~~during~~additional information. If the ~~three~~estimated ~~months~~net ~~ended~~realizable ~~December 31~~value of the collateral is less than the carrying value, ~~2002~~an allowance for losses is recognized for the amount at which the carrying value exceeds the estimated net realizable value. The remaining real estate contracts and ~~2001:~~ mortgage notes receivable portfolio is made up of a large group of smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. We establish an allowance for inherent losses on these receivables based primarily on current delinquencies and recent foreclosure and loss experience. To the extent actual experience differs from assumptions, the adjustments would be included in the statement of operations.

		Three Months Ended
		December 31,
		2002			2001
Other than temporary declines in value:
	Equity securities	$	(29,070	)	$	89,477
	Other securities		(4,124	)		—
Realized gains (losses):
	Securities investments		200,302			110,851
	Receivables		5,550			169,919
Realized gains (losses) on trading securities			—			219,373
Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables		$	172,658		$	589,620

~~Unrealized~~Allowance for Losses on ~~Investments~~ Real Estate Held for Sale and Development. The allowance for losses on real estate held for sale and development includes amounts for estimated losses as a result of impairment in value. We review our real estate held for sale and development properties for impairment in value whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may exceed its estimated net realizable value. The carrying value of a repossessed property is determined as of the date of repossession of the property and is based on the lower of the estimated net realizable value or carrying value at the time the property was repossessed. For non-commercial properties, an appraisal is obtained on the foreclosed property to determine its estimated net realizable value at the time of repossession. For commercial properties, an appraisal is obtained on the foreclosed property to determine the estimated net realizable value only if the most recent appraisal is more than one year old, otherwise the existing appraisal is used. Periodically, we may not order an updated appraisal in accordance with our established policies if current negotiations with a potential purchaser establishes an indication of value. Subsequent to repossession (or acquisition in the case of development properties), if the value of the property declines such that the estimated net realizable value from the disposition of the asset is less than its carrying value, an impairment is recognized in the statement of operations.

~~Temporary declines in the fair value of investments that are~~ ~~“available-for-sale”~~Income ~~are~~Recognition ~~excluded~~on ~~from~~Delinquent ~~earnings and presented as accumulated~~Commercial ~~other~~Real ~~comprehensive~~Estate ~~income or loss, net of related income taxes, as a component~~Receivables ~~of stockholders’ equity. The Consolidated Group continually monitors its~~ investment portfolio for other than temporary impairments of its securities. When an other than temporary decline in value below cost or amortized cost is identified, the investment is reduced to its fair value, which becomes the new cost basis of the investment. The amount of reduction is reported as a realized loss in the statement of operations. In determining whether the losses are temporary or other than temporary, the Consolidated Group considers (1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or carrying value, (2) the circumstances contributing to the decline in fair value (including a change in interest rates or spreads to benchmarks), (3) recent performance of the security, (4) the financial strength of the issuer, and (5) the intent and ability of the Consolidated Group to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery. Additionally, for asset-backed investments, the Consolidated Group also considers the credit rating and determines the amount of credit support available for the security. At December 31, 2002, the Consolidated Group’s investment portfolio had approximately $0.8 million in unrealized losses that were deemed to be temporary. To the extent that any losses currently deemed as temporary are determined to be other than temporary in the future, the unrealized losses will be reported as realized losses in future statements of operations.

~~The~~ We ~~following~~generally ~~table~~accrue ~~stratifies~~interest on delinquent commercial real estate receivables unless the ~~unrealized~~receivable ~~losses~~is asnot considered well secured or in the process of ~~December 31,~~collection. We ~~2002~~consider bycommercial ~~investment~~loans ~~category:~~with carrying values less than 80% of the estimated value of the collateral (estimated net realizable value) to be well secured. We cease accruing interest and other related loan fees when the carrying value of a commercial loan reaches its estimated net realizable value. A nonaccrual receivable may be restored to accrual status when delinquent principal and interest payments are brought current and the receivable is paying in accordance with its payment terms or when an increase in the collateral value has occurred such that the carrying value is less than its estimated net realizable value.

		Carrying Value		Unrealized Losses
Government-backed bonds		$	301,419	$	(2,285	)
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities			19,855,176		(540,044	)
	Total fixed income maturities		20,156,595		(542,329	)
Common stocks			59,041		(14,504	)
Preferred stocks			1,845,663		(52,695	)
Venture Capital/Limited Partnerships			3,117,754		(223,351	)
	Totals	$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

~~The~~ Deferred ~~following~~policy ~~table~~acquisition ~~stratifies~~costs, consisting of commissions and other insurance underwriting and annuity policy costs, are deferred and amortized over the ~~unrealized~~lives ~~losses~~of asthe annuity contracts in proportion to the present value of ~~December 31~~estimated future gross profits. To the extent actual experience differs from assumptions, and to the extent estimates of future gross profits ~~2002~~require byrevision, ~~market~~the ~~sector:~~unamortized balance of deferred policy acquisition costs is adjusted accordingly; these adjustments would be included in the statement of operations.

			Carrying Value		Unrealized Losses
Municipals			$	301,419	$	(2,285	)
	Government-backed bonds			301,419		(2,285	)
Collateralized mortgage obligation				8,515,338		(40,375	)
Other asset-backed				4,648,502		(328,813	)
Home equity				2,875,633		(0	)
Manufactured housing				3,815,703		(170,856	)
	Mortgage- and asset-backed securities			19,855,176		(540,044	)
Common stocks				59,041		(14,504	)
Preferred stocks				1,845,663		(52,695	)
Venture Capital/Limited Partnerships				3,117,754		(223,351	)
		Totals	$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)

Annuity Reserves

~~The~~ Premiums ~~following~~for ~~table~~annuities ~~stratifies~~are reported as annuity reserves under the ~~unrealized~~deposit ~~losses~~method. asReserves for annuities are equal to the sum of ~~December 31~~the account balances, including credited ~~2002~~interest byand ~~credit~~deferred ~~rating:~~service charges. Based on past experience, consideration is given in actuarial calculations to the number of policyholder and annuitant deaths that might be expected, policy lapses, surrenders and terminations. As a result of changes in the factors considered in the actuarial calculations, it is reasonably possible that the reserves for annuities could change in the near future.

		Carrying Value		Unrealized Losses
AAA		$	9,368,206	$	(64,869	)
AA			4,393,095		(332,108	)
A			6,592,256		(173,782	)
BBB			909,000		(15,750	)
BB			739,701		(8,515	)
Common stocks			59,041		(14,504	)
Venture Capital/Limited Partnerships			3,117,754		(223,351	)
	Totals	$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)

~~Unrealized losses relating to the investment grade assets (BBB and higher)~~ ~~are~~Results ~~generally due to changes in interest rates which may include changes in spreads to benchmarks for a particular sector~~ of ~~the market. To the extent that~~Operations ~~unrealized losses in the Consolidated Group’s investment grade portfolio are~~ the result of issues other than interest rate changes, the investments are evaluated for other than temporary impairment. At December 31, 2002, approximately $0.3 million in unrealized losses in the Consolidated Group’s investment grade assets and approximately $9,000 in non-investment grade assets were due to investments in airline- related asset-backed securities. In determining whether these losses were temporary or other than temporary, the Consolidated Group considered (1) recent performance of the security, (2) the credit rating of the security, (3) the amount of credit support available for the security, (4) circumstances contributing to the decline in value, (5) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or carrying value, and (6) the intent and ability of the Consolidated Group to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery.

~~The~~ Nine ~~following~~Months ~~table~~Ended ~~stratifies~~June 30, ~~the~~2003 ~~unrealized~~Compared to ~~losses~~Nine asMonths ofEnded ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2002~~ ~~by trading class:~~2002

		Carrying Value		Unrealized Losses
Traded		$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)
Non-Traded			—		—
	Totals	$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)

The following table presents the components of the results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

The following table stratifies the unrealized losses as of December 31, 2002 by length of time the securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position:



		Nine Months Ended
		June 30,

		2003			2002

Net interest income		$	15,353,368		$	20,058,003
Provision for losses on receivables			(8,382,402	)		(891,051	)

	Net interest spread		6,970,966			19,166,952
Net non-interest expense			(15,200,519	)		(13,456,930	)
Capitalized deferred policy acquisition costs, net of amortization			2,296,641			1,889,151

	Income (loss) before gains (losses) on assets		(5,932,912	)		7,599,173
Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables			2,170,411			(2,049,155	)
Provision for losses on real estate held for sale			(2,264,412	)		(1,156,806	)
Gains on sales of real estate			1,229,688			44,357

Income (loss) before income taxes			(4,797,225	)		4,437,569
Income tax benefit (provision)			1,631,055			(1,356,001	)

Net income (loss)			(3,166,170	)		3,081,568
Preferred stock dividends			(1,805,812	)		(2,033,809	)

Loss applicable to common stockholders		$	(4,971,982	)	$	1,047,759

			Carrying Value		Unrealized Losses
Fixed Income Securities:
	Investment Grade
		0-6 months	$	16,247,795	$	(222,031	)
		7-12 months		1,613,672		(144,943	)
		13-18 months		2,295,128		(175,355	)
Preferred Stocks:
		0-6 months		936,663		(36,945	)
		7-12 months		909,000		(15,750	)
Common Stocks:
		0-6 months		59,041		(14,504	)
Venture Capital/Limited Partnerships 0-6 months				3,117,754		(223,351	)
		Total	$	25,179,053	$	(832,879	)

Net Interest Income

The ~~maturities~~following oftable ~~fixed~~presents ~~income~~the ~~investments~~components ~~that~~of net ~~are~~interest inincome anduring ~~unrealized~~the ~~loss position~~nine atmonths ~~December~~ended June 3130, 2003 ~~2002~~and ~~are as follows~~2002:

			Carrying Value			Unrealized Losses
				Nine Months Ended
Due after ten years			$	301,419		$	(2,285	)
				June 30,
	Total non-mortgage- and asset-backed securities			301,419			(2,285	)
				2003			2002
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities				19,855,176			(540,044	)
Interest income:
	Total fixed income securities		$	20,156,595		$	(542,329	)
	Interest on receivables			$	27,223,872		$	24,130,279
	Earned discount on receivables and investments				9,628,352			11,051,647
	Other investment income				8,103,501			6,490,072
		Total interest income			44,955,725			41,671,998
Interest expense:
	Annuity benefits				19,547,173			13,724,186
	Interest, net				10,055,184			7,889,809
		Total interest expense			29,602,357			21,613,995
Net interest income				$	15,353,368		$	20,058,003

~~The Consolidated Group is authorized by their respective investment~~14 ~~policies to use financial futures instruments for the purpose of hedging~~ ~~interest rate risk relative to the securities portfolio or potential trading~~ ~~situations. In both cases, the futures transaction is intended to reduce the~~ risk associated with price movements for a balance sheet asset. Securities may be sold “short” (the sale of securities which are not currently in the portfolio and therefore must be purchased to close out the sale agreement) as another means of hedging interest rate risk, to benefit from an anticipated movement in the financial markets. At December 31, 2002, the Consolidated Group had no outstanding hedge transactions or open short sales positions.

~~Asset~~ The ~~Quality~~following table summarizes the rate/volume change in total interest income between the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 by interest sensitive asset class.

Servicing, Collection and Delinquency Experience



	Nine months ended June 30, 2003 vs.
	Nine months ended June 30, 2002


	Increase (Decrease)
	Due to

	Volume		Rate			Total Change

Interest sensitive assets:
Investments (including cash)	$	2,779,620	$	(1,758,909	)	$	1,020,711
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable		8,188,194		(7,839,240	)		348,954
Other receivables		2,238,205		(324,143	)		1,914,062

	$	13,206,019	$	(9,922,292	)	$	3,283,727

The ~~principal~~following ~~amount~~table ofpresents the ~~Consolidated~~average ~~Group’s~~net yields ~~Commercial~~we ~~Loans~~realized ~~(as~~on ~~a percentage~~interest ofsensitive ~~total~~assets ~~outstanding~~and ~~Commercial~~liabilities during ~~Loans)~~the ~~that~~nine ~~were~~months inended ~~arrears~~June 30, ~~for~~2003 ~~more than~~and ~~90 days~~2002 asbased on of the ~~following~~average ~~dates~~monthly ~~were~~ending asasset/liability ~~follows~~balances:

		Total				Commercial
			June 30,				June 30, 2002
		Commercial				Loans				Percentage
			2003 Average				Average
		Loans				in arrears				in arrears
Interest sensitive assets:
December 31, 2002		$	237,830,812			$	65,683,337				27.62	%
Investments (including cash)			$	195,686,967			$	113,991,815
September 30, 2002		$	221,246,934			$	62,679,596				28.33	%
	Yield			5.12	%			7.22	%
December 31, 2001		$	204,744,655			$	41,318,476				20.18	%
Real estate contracts and mortgage notes receivable			$	313,197,256			$	250,562,481
September 30, 2001		$	187,859,448			$	32,162,791				17.12	%
	Yield			14.89	%			17.43	%
Other receivables			$	89,508,200			$	46,525,143
	Yield			6.46	%			6.94	%
Interest sensitive liabilities:
Annuity reserves			$	468,156,384			$	308,151,501
	Yield			5.57	%			5.97	%
Investment certificates			$	122,726,390			$	97,518,099
	Yield			9.14	%			9.52	%
Debt payable			$	39,919,735			$	19,583,945
	Yield			5.87	%			7.39	%

In The ~~addition~~increase toin ~~the~~interest ~~amounts~~income ~~included~~for in the ~~table~~nine months ~~above~~ended ~~at December~~June 3130, ~~2002,~~ ~~there~~2003 ~~were~~as ~~approximately~~compared ~~$13.2 million~~to ~~in additional delinquent loans that~~ the ~~Consolidated~~nine ~~Group had serious doubts that the borrowers had the~~months ~~ability~~ended ~~to comply with present loan repayment terms, and therefore may become 90~~June ~~days delinquent. As of December 31~~30, 2002, ~~these~~was ~~loans~~primarily ~~accounted~~due ~~for~~to ~~5.5%~~an ofincrease in ~~the~~income ~~total~~from ~~outstanding~~an ~~Commercial~~increase ~~Loans, but were not included~~ in ~~the~~our ~~table above~~investment ~~because~~and ~~they~~other ~~were less than 90 days delinquent~~receivable portfolio.

~~When a payment becomes delinquent on a Commercial Loan, either Ocwen’s or~~ ~~the~~The ~~Consolidated~~average ~~Group’s~~monthly ~~collection~~investment ~~unit~~portfolio ~~(depending~~for ~~on which entity is acting as servicer) will begin making collection calls immediately. If~~ the ~~defaulted~~ ~~payment~~nine ismonths ~~not~~ended ~~received by the next payment due date~~June 30, a2003 ~~notice~~increased ~~of default is sent~~ to ~~the borrower and the account is assigned to a Consolidated Group~~approximately ~~workout manager according to property type, size of loan and complexity of transaction~~$195.7 million ~~The~~compared ~~workout manager will review the file and related documentation and attempt~~ to ~~contact the borrower to negotiate with the borrower to cure the~~approximately ~~default~~$114.0 million ~~If,~~for ~~upon~~ the ~~expiration~~similar ofperiod ~~the~~ended ~~notice of default~~June 30, ~~the default is not~~ ~~cured,~~2002. ~~foreclosure~~The isincrease ~~begun~~in ~~immediately~~interest byincome ~~counsel.~~as ~~Concurrent~~a ~~with~~result ~~the notice~~ of ~~default period and the foreclosure process, the assigned workout manager~~an ~~will~~increased ~~continue~~investment toportfolio ~~contact~~has ~~and~~been ~~attempt~~partially tooffset ~~negotiate~~by a decrease ~~full~~in ~~reinstatement with~~ the ~~borrower.~~ ~~During~~yields ~~this~~earned ~~same~~on ~~period,~~ the ~~workout~~portfolio ~~manager~~due ~~will also develop a workout program and make recommendations~~ to ~~the Consolidated Group’s Problem Loan Review Committee for approval. As~~ a ~~part of formulating this workout plan,~~decrease ~~the workout manager will typically visit the collateral property, talk with local experts and make an assessment of the condition of the collateral and its marketability~~ in the ~~event~~5-year ofconstant amaturity ~~potential foreclosure~~U.S. ~~The~~Treasury ~~final~~rate, ~~workout~~which ~~plan~~ is similar ~~presented~~ to the ~~Problem~~average ~~Loan~~maturity ~~Review~~of ~~Committee~~our ~~with~~fixed ~~all~~income ~~relevant information~~portfolio. ~~regarding~~During ~~contact with~~ the ~~borrower,~~twelve-month ~~condition~~period ~~and~~ended ~~marketability~~June 30, ~~of collateral~~2003, ~~and~~proceeds anfrom ~~assessment of~~ the ~~likelihood~~sale ofand ~~default~~maturities ~~cure or recovery~~ of the ~~loan~~investment ~~balance~~portfolio iftotaled ~~the default continues through foreclosure~~$174.4 million. ~~Any~~As ~~actions~~proceeds ~~undertaken~~from by the sales ~~workout~~and ~~manager~~maturities ~~with~~of ~~the~~investments ~~borrower~~were ~~that~~reinvested ~~would~~back ~~result~~into ~~in other than full~~a ~~reinstatement~~lower ~~are~~interest ~~subject~~rate tomarket, ~~prior approval by~~ the ~~Problem~~overall ~~Loan~~portfolio ~~Review~~yield was ~~Committee~~reduced.

The ~~Problem~~average ~~Loan~~monthly ~~Review~~other ~~Committee~~receivable isportfolio for ~~composed~~the ofnine ~~representatives~~months ~~from underwriting~~ended June 30, ~~risk~~2003 ~~management,~~increased ~~operations,~~to approximately ~~commercial~~$89.5 million ~~lending,~~compared ~~legal~~to ~~and~~approximately $46.5 ~~property~~million ~~development~~for the similar period ended June 30, 2002. The increase ~~committee~~in ~~meets~~interest ~~weekly~~income ~~and~~as ~~reviews~~a ~~all~~result ~~newly~~of an increased other ~~defaulted~~receivable ~~loans,~~portfolio ~~continuing~~has ~~defaulted~~been ~~loans,~~partially ~~loans~~offset inby ~~foreclosure,~~a ~~loans~~decrease in ~~bankruptcy~~the ~~and~~yields ~~progress~~earned on ~~approved~~the ~~workout~~portfolio ~~plans.~~due to the acquisition of lottery trust investments from

~~Table of Contents~~15

TheTable principal amount of the Consolidated Group’s residential and other real estate Receivables (as a percentage of total residential and other real estate Receivables) that were in arrears for more than 90 days as of the following dates were as follows: Contents

			Residential and
	Total Residential		Other Real Estate
	and Other Real		Receivables		Percentage
	Estate Receivables		in arrears		in arrears
December 31, 2002	$	45,096,939	$	1,447,851		3.21	%
September 30, 2002	$	31,126,969	$	1,305,034		4.19	%
December 31, 2001	$	27,252,190	$	1,884,654		6.92	%
September 30, 2001	$	28,872,336	$	1,855,129		6.43	%

Metropolitan at market yields that ranged from 5.5% to 7.0%. Investment diversification was the primary purpose for acquiring the investments.

~~The~~ While ~~carrying~~the ~~values~~average monthly ending balance of ~~the~~real estate ~~Consolidated~~contracts ~~Group’s~~and ~~other~~mortgage ~~receivables~~notes ~~(as~~receivable aincreased from ~~percentage~~$250.6 million offor ~~total~~the ~~other~~nine ~~receivables)~~months ~~that~~ended ~~were~~June 30, in2002 compared ~~arrears~~to $313.2 million for ~~more~~the ~~than~~nine 90months ended June ~~days~~2003 asdue ofto an increase in our commercial lending activities, the ~~following~~effective ~~dates~~yields ~~were~~realized asdecreased ~~follows:~~from 17.43% at June 30, 2002 to 14.89% at June 30, 2003. A reduction in exit fee income resulted in a 1.65% yield reduction during the nine months ended June 2003 compared to the similar period ended June 2002.

	Total Other		Other Receivables		Percentage
	Receivables		in arrears		in arrears
December 31, 2002	$	89,860,577	$	19,164,386		21.33	%
September 30, 2002	$	90,060,257	$	16,581,374		18.41	%
December 31, 2001	$	39,130,139	$	16,981,194		43.40	%
September 30, 2001	$	44,317,237	$	16,700,000		37.68	%

The increase in interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2002 was primarily due to an increase in the average outstanding balances of debt payable, investment certificates and annuity reserves. However, this increase in interest expense was offset by a reduction in the interest rate environment during the last twelve months, which has allowed us to borrow funds on our secured line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle at lower interest rates. This borrowing facility has led to a reduction in the current year debt payable cost of funds. Additionally, the reduction in the interest rate environment during the last twelve months has also contributed to a lower cost of funds on our annuity reserves.

~~Of the $19.2 million in delinquencies at December 31, 2002, approximately~~ ~~$14.5~~Provision is primarily attributable to a single Receivable, the Koa Timber Project, secured by harvest timber rights. The Koa Timber Project is located in the District of South Hilo, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. The Koa Timber Project consists of approximately 16,924 acres of natural forest containing a very unique timber commonly referred to as Koa timber. Koa timber is a unique hardwood utilized in the manufacturing of specialty wood products. Generally, the end uses of Koa timber are for ~~custom~~Losses ~~architectural~~on ~~millwork,~~Receivables ~~custom furniture and millwork, musical instruments, veneer products, and art~~ ~~and craft items that generally demand a higher market price than comparable specialty wood products of a similar nature.~~

~~Old~~ Commercial ~~Standard~~loans ~~and Summit~~ are ~~finance~~individually ~~lenders~~evaluated ~~and~~for impairment. ~~mortgagees~~A ~~for~~commercial ~~the underlying~~loan ~~real~~is ~~property~~considered ~~containing~~impaired ~~the~~when, ~~Koa~~based on ~~timber.~~specific Infacts ~~addition~~and circumstances, ~~Summit~~it is ~~also~~probable that we will ~~the~~be ~~owner~~unable ~~of,~~to ~~and~~collect ~~holds~~all ~~the~~amounts ~~right~~due according to ~~harvest,~~the contractual terms of the ~~Koa~~loan ~~timber~~agreement. ~~Summit~~When ~~entered into~~ a ~~Timber~~commercial ~~Harvesting~~loan has ~~Agreement~~been ~~with~~identified ~~Hawaii~~as ~~Forest~~impaired, ~~Preservation~~we ~~LLC~~determine ~~(“HFP”),~~the allowance for alosses ~~Hawaii~~based ~~limited~~on ~~liability~~the ~~company~~estimated ~~who~~net ~~has~~realizable ~~substantial~~value ~~experience~~of inthe collateral ~~harvesting~~compared to the carrying value of the receivable ~~Koa~~(including ~~timber~~accrued interest and fees).

~~Under~~ When determining the ~~Timber~~estimated ~~Harvesting~~net ~~Agreement,~~realizable value ~~Summit~~of ~~granted~~ the ~~right~~collateral, towe ~~harvest~~have historically taken into consideration the ~~Koa~~most ~~timber~~recent ~~owned~~third byparty ~~Summit~~appraisal toand ~~HFP,~~other relevant ~~and~~market ~~Summit~~information. isWhen toreviewing ~~receive~~the ~~certain~~most recent ~~scheduled~~third ~~monthly~~party ~~payments.~~appraisal, ~~Under~~we consider the ~~terms~~type of property, changes in the ~~Timber~~economic ~~Harvesting~~factors ~~Agreement, HFP~~of isthe ~~currently~~region insince ~~default~~the ~~for~~most ~~amounts~~recent appraisal ~~due~~and tothe ~~Summit.~~various underlying appraisal assumptions. In-house ~~August~~licensed ofappraisers ~~2001, Summit~~that ~~filed~~assist ~~litigation~~in ~~against~~the ~~HFP~~commercial origination ~~and~~process ~~related~~also ~~parties~~assist in ~~the~~this ~~State~~review. ofFurthermore, ~~Hawaii~~we ~~where~~may ~~Summit~~also ~~seeks~~perform ~~recovery~~additional ofon-site ~~amounts~~collateral ~~due~~visits ~~under~~to ~~the~~update our ~~Timber~~historical ~~Harvesting Agreement~~assessments and gain additional information. ~~Until~~If the ~~substantive~~estimated ~~discovery~~net isrealizable ~~completed,~~value itof isthe ~~not~~collateral ~~possible~~is ~~for~~less ~~Summit~~than tothe ~~estimate~~carrying ~~either~~value, ~~the~~an ~~probability~~allowance offor ~~success~~losses inis recognized for the ~~litigation~~amount orat ~~a range~~which ofthe ~~possible~~carrying ~~loss,~~value ifexceeds ~~any~~the estimated net realizable value.

~~Table~~ During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, we provided provisions for losses on our commercial loan portfolio of ~~Contents~~approximately $7.3 million. The current year provisions resulted from a review of the most recent appraisals and other relevant market information on loans that we deemed impaired during the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Loans that we considered impaired at June 30, 2003 were approximately $76.5 million compared to $70.5 million at September 30, 2002. Fluctuations in the provision for losses result from using the specific impairment methodology.

~~Provision~~ In addition to the commercial loan provision, we also recorded provisions for losses on our residential and ~~Allowance~~other real estate loans of approximately $0.6 million and approximately $0.5 million on our other receivables during the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The residential and other real estate receivable portfolio is made up of a large group of smaller-balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for ~~Losses~~impairment. We establish an allowance for inherent losses on ~~Receivables~~these receivables based primarily on current delinquencies and recent foreclosure and loss experience.

~~Changes~~ Provision ~~in the allowance~~ for ~~losses~~Losses on ~~Receivables~~Real ~~were~~Estate asHeld ~~follows:~~for Sale

		December 31,
		2002			2001
Beginning balance		$	4,715,489		$	5,146,119
Provisions			3,325,000			573,755
Charge offs:
	Commercial Loans		(103,499	)		—
	Residential and other real estate loans		(85,102	)		(43,411	)
	Other receivables		(5,874	)		—
Ending balance		$	7,846,014		$	5,676,463
Charge offs as a percent of average Receivables			0.05	%		0.02	%
Allowance as a percentage of total Receivables			2.10	%		2.09	%

Real estate held for sale is periodically evaluated for impairment. Loss provisions for real estate held for sale are calculated as the difference between the estimated net realizable value and the carrying value at the measurement date. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003 we provided for a $2.3 million provision for losses primarily due to a reduction in sales prices on some of our real estate held for sale portfolio and a

~~An analysis of the allowance for losses on Receivables was as follows:~~16

			Allocated
			Allowance
	Allocated		as a % of			Loan Category
	Allowance for		Receivable			as a % of
	Receivable Losses		Category			Total Receivables
December 31, 2002
Commercial Loans	$	6,421,084		2.70	%		63.81	%
Residential and other real estate loans		478,991		1.06	%		12.10	%
Other receivables		323,498		0.36	%		24.10	%
Unallocated		622,441		0.22	%		0.00	%
	$	7,846,014		2.10	%		100.01	%
December 31, 2001
Commercial Loans	$	3,608,164		1.76	%		75.52	%
Residential and other real estate loans		525,967		1.93	%		10.05	%
Other receivables		1,031,939		2.64	%		14.43	%
Unallocated		510,393		0.22	%		0.00	%
	$	5,676,463		2.09	%		100.00	%

~~The allowance for losses on Receivables represents management’s estimate~~ ~~of credit losses inherent in the portfolios as of the balance sheet dates~~$1. ~~Management~~7 million ~~performs~~provision ~~regular~~for ~~reviews in order to identify these inherent~~ losses ~~and~~ tobased ~~assess the overall collection probability of the portfolios. This~~on ~~process~~new ~~provides~~appraisals ~~an allowance~~ that ~~consists~~we ofobtained on two ~~components:~~properties ~~allocated~~that ~~and~~we ~~unallocated.~~previously Toacquired ~~arrive~~through atforeclosure ~~the~~proceedings ~~allocated component, the Consolidated Group combines estimates~~ of ~~the allowance needed for loans that are evaluated~~defaulted ~~collectively~~commercial ~~and those that are evaluated individually~~loans.

~~Commercial Loans are individually monitored for impairment. When a loan~~ ~~has~~Net ~~been~~Non-Interest ~~identified as impaired, the Consolidated Group determines the~~Expense ~~allowance for loss based on the estimated fair market value, less estimated~~ liquidation expenses, of the collateral compared to the carrying value of the Receivable, including accrued interest. The estimated fair value is based on the most recent appraisal of the collateral. If the most recent appraisal is more than one year old, a new appraisal is ordered. In the interim, estimated fair value is established through a review of the most recent appraisal in addition to a review of other relevant market information. When reviewing the most recent appraisal, management considers several factors. Some of those factors include the type of property, changes in regional economic factors, the underlying appraisal assumptions, and any recent communication with local real estate brokers. If the estimated fair market value of the collateral is less than the carrying value, including accrued interest, an allowance for loss is recorded. Fluctuations in the provision for losses and/or percentage of allowance to outstanding principal result from using the specific impairment methodology.

~~Table~~ The following table presents the components of net ~~Contents~~non-interest expense during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

The Consolidated Group establishes an allowance for losses on residential and other real estate Receivables, including accrued interest, inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based primarily on current delinquencies and recent foreclosure and loss experience. The residential and other Receivable portfolio is comprised of a large group of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. The reduction in the allocated allowance for losses on residential and other real estate Receivables at December 31, 2002 compared to December 31, 2001 was primarily due to portfolio seasoning that has resulted in a reduction in 90 day delinquencies.



			Nine Months Ended
			June 30,

			2003		2002

Non-interest income:
	Fees, commissions, service and other income		$	9,919,033	$	8,039,536

		Total non-interest income		9,919,033		8,039,536

Non-interest expense:
	Salaries and employee benefits			5,087,011		4,012,147
	Commissions to agents			14,256,418		13,354,434
	Other operating and underwriting expenses			5,776,123		4,129,885

		Total non-interest expense		25,119,552		21,496,466

		Net non-interest expense	$	15,200,519	$	13,456,930

~~The~~ Fees, ~~reduction~~commissions, inservice ~~ending~~and ~~allocated~~other ~~allowance~~income consist ~~for~~primarily ~~losses~~of oncommissions ~~other receivables~~earned atby ~~December 31,~~MIS ~~2002~~and ~~compared~~Summit Property ~~to December 31~~Development, ~~2001~~Inc. ~~was~~MIS ~~due~~and toSummit aProperty Development ~~positive~~earned ~~change~~approximately $8.8 million and $6.8 million in commissions ~~the~~(after ~~federal~~eliminating ~~tax~~commissions ~~law~~received ~~effecting~~by ~~structured~~MIS ~~settlement~~from ~~transfers~~Summit), ~~and~~during the ~~consequential~~nine-month ~~cooperation~~periods byended ~~certain~~June 30, ~~annuity~~2003 and ~~issuers~~2002. ~~with~~The $2.0 million increase resulted primarily from ~~respect~~a to$1.5 million increase in commissions earned by MIS as a result of an increase in the ~~payment~~sales of ~~defaulted,~~the securities of Metropolitan and ina ~~some~~$0.5 million ~~cases~~increase ~~current,~~in ~~structured~~property ~~settlements~~development consulting fees charged to Metropolitan.

In Of ~~estimating~~ the ~~amount~~$8.8 million and $6.8 million of fees, ~~credit~~commissions, ~~losses~~service ~~inherent~~and inother income that was earned by Summit Property Development and MIS during the ~~Receivable~~nine month ~~portfolios~~periods ended June 30, ~~management~~2003 ~~utilizes~~and ~~various~~2002, ~~judgments~~approximately $7.2 million and ~~assumptions~~$5.2 million ~~For~~were fees received from ~~Receivables~~Metropolitan. ~~that~~During ~~are~~the ~~collateral~~nine-~~dependent~~month periods ended June 30, 2003 ~~the~~and ~~estimated~~2002, ~~fair~~Summit ~~market~~Property ~~value~~Development ofreceived ~~the~~approximately ~~collateral~~$1.9 million ~~may~~and ~~deviate~~$1.4 million ~~significantly~~in fees from ~~the~~Metropolitan ~~proceeds~~while MIS received ~~when the~~approximately ~~collateral~~$5.3 million isand ~~sold~~$3.8 million Toin ~~mitigate~~fees from Metropolitan. The Summit Property Development fees received from Metropolitan are calculated by multiplying the ~~imprecision~~actual ~~inherent~~payroll expense inor ~~most~~commissions ~~estimates~~paid as a result of consulting, ~~expected~~developing ~~credit~~or ~~losses,~~selling ~~the~~Metropolitan’s ~~allowance~~development ~~has~~property by ana ~~unallocated~~predetermined ~~component~~override rate in accordance with established inter-company agreements. The override rate reimburses Summit ~~unallocated~~Property ~~component~~Development ~~reflects~~for ~~management~~other indirect expenses (in addition to the actual payroll or commissions paid) that were paid on Metropolitan’s ~~judgmental~~behalf. ~~assessment~~The ofMIS fees received from Metropolitan are calculated by multiplying the ~~impact~~actual commissions paid as a result of selling Metropolitan’s investment securities by a predetermined override rate in accordance with an established inter-company agreement. To the extent that ~~various~~Metropolitan ~~quantitative~~does ~~factors~~not have onan ~~the~~effective ~~overall~~registration available ~~measurement~~for MIS to sell Metropolitan’s securities, MIS’ revenues associated with sales of ~~credit~~Metropolitan’s ~~losses~~securities will be reduced.

~~Allowance~~ Salaries ~~for~~and ~~Losses~~employee onbenefits ~~Real~~increased ~~Estate~~by approximately ~~Held~~$1.1 million ~~for~~during ~~Sale~~the nine months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the similar period ended June 30, 2002. The increase was due primarily to an increase in the average number of full time equivalent employees of our commercial lending operations.

The ~~following~~increase ~~table~~in ~~summarizes~~commissions ~~changes~~to inagents ~~the~~was primarily ~~Consolidated~~due ~~Group’s~~to a $1.2 million increase in commissions ~~allowance~~paid ~~for~~by ~~losses~~MIS and a $0.2 million increase in commissions paid on the sale of real estate ~~held~~offset ~~for~~by ~~sale:~~a $0.3 million decrease in commissions paid on annuity business.

	December 31,
	2002		2001
Beginning balance	$	2,316,093	$	2,626,303
Provisions		395,410		867,489
Recoveries (charge-offs)		73,971		(262,627	)
Ending balance	$	2,785,474	$	3,231,165

The increase in other operating and underwriting expenses was primarily the result of a $1.2 million increase in holding costs associated with our properties held for sale and development and a $0.3 million accrual of a

~~Real estate held for sale is periodically evaluated for impairment. Loss~~17 ~~provisions for real estate held for sale are calculated as the difference~~ ~~between the estimated net realizable value and the carrying value at the~~ ~~measurement date. Any loss on liquidation or subsequent reduction in the~~ ~~carrying value is charged to operations through provision for losses.~~

LiquidityTable andof Capital Resources Contents

~~The objective of liquidity management is to provide funds at an acceptable~~ ~~cost~~contingent toliability ~~service~~associated ~~liabilities~~with asthe ~~they become due and to meet demands for~~NASD ~~additional~~Wells ~~Commercial~~letter ~~Loans~~offset ~~and~~by ~~Receivable~~a ~~purchases~~$0.6 ~~Managing~~million ~~liquidity~~decrease ~~also enables~~in ~~the Consolidated Group to take advantage of opportunities for business~~ceding ~~expansion.~~allowances ~~The~~associated ~~Consolidated~~with ~~Group~~new ~~finances~~annuity ~~its~~ business ~~operations~~reinsured ~~and growth~~from ~~primarily~~Metropolitan ~~through~~under ~~the~~our ~~sale of~~ annuity ~~products,~~reinsurance ~~the sale of debt securities and preferred stock and a secured line of credit~~ agreement ~~in addition to the maturity of the current Receivable portfolio~~.

~~Table~~ Metropolitan ofprovides ~~Contents~~servicing, accounting, data processing and other administrative services to us. In addition, we are charged rent for the space that we occupy in Metropolitan’s headquarters. Expenses allocated and rent charged to us were approximately $5.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $5.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Of the $0.3 million increase in charges during the nine months ended June 30, 2003, $0.2 million is related to an increase in loans serviced by Metropolitan and a $0.4 million increase in rent offset by a $0.3 million decrease in expense allocations to us in accordance with an established inter-company cost sharing agreement.

~~The annuity business is highly competitive. Old Standard and Old West~~ ~~compete~~Amortization with other financial institutions, including ones with greater resources and greater name recognition. Annuity yields and commissions to agents are particularly sensitive to competitive forces. Additionally, management believes that the primary competitive factors among life insurance companies for investment-oriented insurance products, like annuities, include product flexibility, net return after fees, innovation in product design, the claims-paying ability rating and the name recognition of ~~the~~Deferred ~~issuing~~Policy ~~company,~~Acquisition ~~the availability of distribution channels and service rendered to the customer before and after a policy is issued. Other factors affecting the annuity business include the benefits~~Costs, ~~including~~Net before-tax and after tax investment returns, and guarantees provided to the customer and the commissions paid to the agent. If the Consolidated Group is unable to effectively price its annuities, offer competitive commissions and effectively compete in general for the sale of ~~its~~Costs ~~annuity products, its liquidity could be adversely affected.~~Capitalized

~~The States of Idaho and Arizona’s Risk Based Capital Model Laws require an~~ ~~insurance~~Amortization ~~company to maintain specified amounts~~ of ~~capital~~deferred ~~and~~policy ~~surplus based on~~acquisition ~~complex~~costs, ~~calculations~~net of ~~risk~~costs ~~factors~~capitalized, ~~that~~is ~~encompass~~comprised ~~the invested assets and business activities~~ of the ~~insurance company. Compliance with the Risk-Based~~ ~~Capital~~capitalization ~~Model Law requirements is tested annually as~~ of aexpenses ~~calendar~~incurred ~~year-end.~~to ~~At the~~sell ~~last annual review at their statutory reporting period ended December 31, 2002, the Consolidated Group’s insurance subsidiaries’ capital~~ and ~~surplus~~underwrite ~~levels~~annuity ~~exceeded the calculated specified requirements. Historically~~policies, ~~Old Standard~~offset ~~and~~by ~~Old~~the ~~West~~amortization ~~have maintained adequate levels~~ of ~~capital through the~~previously ~~sale~~capitalized ~~of common stock to Summit~~expenses. ToThe ~~the~~following ~~extent~~table ~~that~~reflects ~~Summit does not maintain~~the ~~adequate~~components ~~levels~~ of ~~liquidity~~the ~~permitting~~net itexpense towe ~~make~~reported ~~further~~for ~~capital~~the ~~investments in~~nine ~~its insurance subsidiaries, Old Standard and Old West’s ability to generate~~months ~~capital~~ended ~~could be adversely affected~~June 30, ~~which~~2003 ~~in turn could negatively affect their ability to increase their investments in higher risk-adjusted assets such as Commercial Loans, real estate~~ and ~~equity investments~~2002.

Old Standard has a secured line of credit agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”). When an institution becomes a stockholder in the FHLB, it can borrow from the FHLB at a stock to borrowing ratio of 1 to 20. At December 31, 2002, Old Standard had a stock investment in the FHLB of approximately $1.2 million. The collateral eligible to be used to secure the borrowing is predefined by the FHLB and generally consists of high quality collateralized mortgage obligations. Each type of collateral has a minimum requirement that ranges from 100% to 125% of borrowings. At December 31, 2002, Old Standard had $60.6 million in eligible collateral with a market value of $60.0 million and had a borrowing capacity of $43.3 million, subject to the purchase of additional stock. Approximately $27.7 million in securities having a market value of $27.4 million were pledged to collateralize the outstanding borrowings to the FHLB at December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2002, Old Standard had approximately $18.5 million in outstanding borrowings to the FHLB leaving an unused borrowing capacity of approximately $23.5 million, subject to the purchase of additional stock. During the three months ended December 31, 2002, Old Standard’s outstanding borrowings on the secured line of credit decreased $9.0 million. In order to increase the unused borrowing capacity, Old Standard would be required to purchase approximately $0.4 million in additional FHLB stock.



	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,

	2003			2002

Current period costs capitalized	$	(3,826,573	)	$	(5,039,151	)
Amortization of previously capitalized expenses		1,529,932			3,150,000

Net amortization (capitalization) of deferred policy acquisition costs	$	(2,296,641	)	$	(1,889,151	)

~~During~~ The ~~the~~decrease ~~three~~in ~~months~~current ~~ended~~period ~~December 31,~~costs ~~2002,~~capitalized is ~~the~~due ~~Consolidated~~primarily ~~Group transferred~~to a $~~24.~~0.3 million ofdecrease ~~securities~~in ~~from~~commissions paid ~~its~~on ~~available-for-sale~~our ~~portfolio to~~annuity ~~its~~business ~~held-to-maturity~~and ~~portfolio~~a $0.6 ~~The~~million ~~securities~~reduction ~~transferred~~in ceding ~~included~~allowances ~~those securities~~associated ~~pledged~~with asnew ~~collateral~~annuity tobusiness ~~secure~~reinsured from ~~the~~Metropolitan ~~FHLB~~under ~~line~~our ofannuity ~~credit~~reinsurance agreement. ~~The~~Annuity ~~Consolidated~~business ~~Group~~production ~~has~~during the ~~intent~~nine ~~and~~months ~~ability~~ended June 30, 2003 was approximately $94.0 million compared to ~~hold~~approximately ~~these~~$94.5 million ~~securities~~during the similar period ~~until~~ended ~~maturity~~June 30, 2002.

~~During~~ According ~~the~~to ~~three~~Statement ~~months~~of ~~ended~~Financial ~~December~~Accounting Standards No. 3197 (“SFAS No. 97”), ~~2002~~policy acquisition costs, ~~Summit~~such ~~entered~~as ~~into~~commissions, anare to be deferred and ~~unsecured~~amortized ~~line~~over the life of ~~credit~~a ~~agreement~~group ~~with~~of ~~Metropolitan,~~policies anin ~~affiliate~~relation to the present value of the estimated future gross profits related to that group of policies. AtFor purposes of amortizing deferred ~~December 31,~~policy ~~2002~~acquisition costs, ~~Summit~~the ~~had~~estimated ~~approximately~~gross $6profits consist of estimated future earnings based on investment of policy account balances less estimated future interest to be credited to account balances; estimated future policy expense charges less estimated future policy administration expenses; and estimated future surrender charges.7 These estimated gross profits are to be based on our “best estimate” without provision for adverse deviation. Further, SFAS No. ~~million~~97 inrequires ~~outstanding~~that ~~advances~~estimates ~~having~~of anexpected ~~interest~~gross ~~rate~~profit used as a basis of ~~11.5%~~deferred policy ~~related~~acquisition cost amortization are to ~~this~~be ~~agreement~~evaluated regularly, and the total amortization recorded to date is to be adjusted by a charge or credit to the statement of operations if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier estimates should be revised.

~~Old~~ Our ~~Standard~~future ~~has~~estimated angross ~~annuity~~profits ~~reinsurance~~on ~~agreement~~the ~~with~~assets that ~~Western~~support ~~Life,~~the ~~which~~annuity business over the remaining estimated ~~became~~life ~~effective~~of ~~July~~ the annuity business is expected to range from 1,.8% ~~1998~~to 4.8%. ~~Under~~The ~~this~~range ~~agreement,~~of ~~Western~~future ~~Life~~estimated ~~may~~gross ~~reinsure~~profits at ~~with~~June 30, ~~Old~~2003 ~~Standard~~is ~~75%~~lower ofthan the ~~risk~~range onat 15March 31, 2003, ~~different~~which ~~annuity~~was ~~products~~from 2.9% ~~During~~to 6.8%. The change in future estimated gross profit rates was affected primarily by the ~~three~~future ~~months~~estimated ~~ended~~yields ~~December 31,~~and ~~2002,~~asset nomix ~~additional~~of commercial loans that support the annuity ~~premiums~~business. ~~were~~Since ~~ceded~~real estate receivables torepresent ~~Old~~the ~~Standard~~highest ~~under~~yielding ~~this~~category, ~~agreement.~~a ~~Old~~shift ~~Standard~~in ~~also~~assets between ~~pays~~real aestate ~~fee~~receivables toand ~~Western~~lower yielding fixed income ~~Life~~securities ~~for~~and ~~servicing~~other receivables supporting the ~~reinsured~~annuity ~~policies~~business can ofaffect ~~approximately~~the ~~0.40%~~earning ~~annually~~rates we realize on the ~~cash~~assets ~~value~~that support of the ~~reinsured~~annuity ~~policies~~business.

~~Table~~ After giving consideration to the asset mix and corresponding yields realized on the assets supporting the annuity business, we believe that a future estimated earnings rate of ~~Contents~~3.2% at June 30, 2003 is a reasonable

~~Summit engages in public offerings of debt securities and preferred stock.~~18 ~~These investments are typically offered to the public on a continuous best~~ ~~efforts basis through MIS. At December 31, 2002, Summit had registered for sale~~ ~~up to $50.0 million of Series B and B-1 Investment Certificates. This~~ investment certificate registration expired on January 31, 2003. Additionally, Summit had registered for sale up to 500,000 shares of Series S-3 preferred stock that carry a $100.00 issue price for a total preferred stock offering amount of $50.0 million. This preferred stock registration expired on January 31, 2003. On October 4, 2002, the Company filed with the SEC a registration statement for the sale of up to $50.0 million of Series B and B-1 Investment Certificates. This registration statement is currently under regulatory review. Also on October 4, 2002, the Company filed with the SEC a registration statement for the sale of up to 2,000,000 shares of its Variable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series S-3 for $25.00 per share, for a total preferred stock offering amount of $50.0 million. This registration statement is also currently under regulatory review.

AnotherTable source of liquidity is derived from payments received on Receivables and the sale of real estate. A decrease in the prepayment rate on Receivables or in the ability to sell real estate would reduce future cash flows from Receivables. Additionally, to increase liquidity, the Consolidated Group may occasionally sell securities to a broker-dealer under the provision that the Consolidated Group will buy them back by a predetermined date for a specific price, often called a reverse repurchase agreement. At December 31, 2002, the Consolidated Group had no outstanding reverse repurchase agreements. Contents

~~While~~ expectation ~~there are no specific regulatory limitations imposed by the state~~ of ~~Idaho~~ or the ~~state~~yields ofto ~~Arizona~~be realized on the ~~percent of~~ assets that ~~Old~~support ~~Standard~~the orannuity ~~Old West~~business ~~may~~over ~~invest in Receivables collateralized by real estate, management monitors and manages~~ the ~~percent of statutory assets that Old Standard or Old~~estimated ~~West~~remaining ~~holds in Receivables collateralized by real estate~~life. ~~Old~~The ~~Standard~~future ~~and~~estimated ~~Old West’s~~earnings ~~ability~~rate toof ~~sell~~3.2% ~~available-for-sale investments for liquidity purposes~~ is ~~partially~~ ~~affected by this internally regulated policy. Management may restrict~~a ~~the~~reduction ~~selling~~from ~~of non-real estate related assets if, after~~ the ~~sale,~~3.5% ~~Old~~that ~~Standard or~~was ~~Old~~estimated ~~West’s~~as ~~real estate assets would exceed acceptable levels~~ of ~~statutory~~ ~~assets~~September 30, 2002.

~~For statutory purposes, Old Standard and Old West perform cash flow~~ ~~testing~~Net ~~under~~Gains ~~seven~~(Losses) ~~different~~on ~~rate~~Investments ~~scenarios. An annual opinion regarding the adequacy of the cash flow testing is filed with the insurance departments in the states where Old Standard~~ and ~~Old West are licensed as an insurance~~ ~~company. At the last annual review at its statutory reporting period ended~~Receivables ~~December 31, 2002, the results of this cash flow testing process were~~ ~~satisfactory.~~

The ~~Consolidated~~following ~~Group~~table ~~had~~presents ~~approximately~~the ~~$12.9 million~~components of ~~outstanding~~ ~~commitments~~net togains ~~extend~~(losses) on ~~credit~~investments toand ~~commercial~~receivables ~~borrowers~~during the atnine ~~December~~months ended June 3130, 2003 and 2002.:

For the three month period ended December 31, 2002, $91.8 million in funds provided by the Consolidated Group’s various liquidity sources were used to (1) invest $77.9 million primarily in Receivables and investments, (2) fund $16.5 million in debt maturities, annuity product withdrawals and surrenders, and the payment of dividends and (3) fund $7.0 million in operating activities.



		Nine Months
		Ended June 30,

		2003			2002

Other than temporary declines in value:
	Subordinate and interest only certificates	$	(219,905	)	$	(256,413	)
	Equity securities		(66,294	)		(2,544,028	)
	Other securities		(514,463	)		(825,467	)
Realized gains:
	Securities investments		2,960,028			404,096
	Receivables		11,045			257,598
Realized gains on trading securities			—			915,059

Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables		$	2,170,411		$	(2,049,155	)

~~For~~ Three ~~the~~Months ~~three~~Ended ~~month period ended December~~June 3130, ~~2001,~~2003 ~~$70.1 million in funds~~Compared ~~provided by the Consolidated Group’s various liquidity sources were used~~ to ~~(1) invest~~Three ~~$71.3 million~~Months ~~primarily~~Ended ~~in Receivables and investments and (2)~~June ~~fund $13.4 million in debt maturities~~30, ~~annuity product withdrawals and surrenders,~~2002 ~~and the payment of dividends.~~

~~New~~ The ~~Accounting~~following ~~Rules~~table presents the components of the results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS No. 144 addresses accounting and reporting of long-lived assets, except goodwill, that are either held and used or disposed of through sale or other means. The implementation of this new statement on October 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Group’s financial statements.



		Three Months Ended
		June 30,

		2003			2002

Net interest income		$	4,631,358		$	7,708,370
Provision for losses on receivables			(2,554,129	)		(8,694	)

	Net interest spread		2,077,229			7,699,676
Net non-interest expense			(5,440,485	)		(6,757,972	)
Capitalized deferred policy acquisition costs, net of amortization			1,699,283			2,451,399

	Income (loss) before gains (losses) on assets		(1,663,973	)		3,393,103
Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables			1,962,103			(474,511	)
Provision for losses on real estate held for sale			(1,857,684	)		(66,394	)
Gains (losses) on sales of real estate			587,749			(37	)

Income before income taxes			(971,805	)		2,852,161
Income tax provision (benefit)			326,430			(995,579	)

Net income (loss)			(645,375	)		1,856,582
Preferred stock dividends			(577,951	)		(686,243	)

Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders		$	(1,223,326	)	$	1,170,339

~~Table of Contents~~19

ITEMTable 3.of QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKContents

~~Management monitors interest sensitive income and expenses as it manages~~ ~~the~~Net ~~objectives for the Company’s results of operations.~~ Interest ~~sensitive~~Income ~~income consists of interest and earned discounts on receivables, insurance~~ ~~revenues and other investment interest. Interest sensitive expense consists of interest expense on borrowed money and insurance policy and annuity benefits.~~

The ~~Company~~following ~~believes~~table ~~there~~presents ~~has~~the ~~not~~components ~~been~~of net ainterest ~~material~~income ~~change~~during ~~in its market risk since~~ the ~~end~~three ofmonths ~~its~~ended ~~last~~June 30, 2003 ~~fiscal~~and ~~year.~~2002:

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



			Three Months Ended
			June 30,

			2003		2002

Interest income:
	Interest on receivables		$	9,097,518	$	8,500,331
	Earned discount on receivables and investments			3,191,958		4,587,282
	Other investment income			2,469,775		2,215,961

		Total interest income		14,759,251		15,303,574

Interest expense:
	Annuity benefits			6,650,670		4,763,259
	Interest, net			3,477,223		2,831,945

		Total interest expense		10,127,893		7,595,204

Net interest income			$	4,631,358	$	7,708,370

~~Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have~~ ~~evaluated~~The ~~the~~decrease ~~effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that term is defined~~ in ~~Rule 15d-14(c)~~interest ofincome ~~the~~for ~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (~~the ~~“Exchange Act”), within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly~~three ~~Report~~months onended ~~Form~~June ~~10-Q. Based on their evaluation~~30, ~~the~~2003 ~~principal~~as ~~executive officer~~compared ~~and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective~~ to ~~ensure that information we are required to disclose in~~ the ~~reports~~three ~~we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,~~months ~~processed,~~ended ~~summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms~~June 30, ~~and~~2002 ~~include~~was ~~controls~~primarily ~~and~~due ~~procedures~~to ~~designed~~a to$1.4 ~~ensure~~million ~~that~~reduction ~~information required to be disclosed by us~~ in ~~those~~exit ~~reports~~fees isearned ~~accumulated and~~on ~~communicated to~~ our ~~management,~~commercial ~~including~~loans ~~our~~during ~~principal executive officer~~the ~~and~~three ~~principal~~months ~~financial~~ended ~~officer~~June 30, as2003 ~~appropriate~~compared to ~~allow~~the ~~timely decisions~~similar ~~regarding~~period ~~required~~ended ~~disclosure~~June 30, 2002.

~~There~~ The ~~were~~increase noin ~~significant~~interest ~~changes~~expense for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002 was primarily due to an increase in ~~our~~the average ~~internal~~outstanding ~~controls~~balances orof debt payable, investment certificates and annuity reserves. However, this increase in interest ~~other~~expense was offset by a reduction in the interest rate ~~factors~~environment ~~that~~during ~~could~~the ~~significantly~~last ~~affect~~twelve ~~these~~months, ~~controls~~which ~~subsequent~~has allowed us to borrow funds on our secured line of credit with the ~~date~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle at lower interest rates. This borrowing facility has led to a reduction in the ~~evaluation~~current year debt payable cost of funds. The reduction in the interest rate environment during the last twelve months has also contributed to the lower cost of funds on annuity reserves.

~~PART~~ Net IINon-~~OTHER~~Interest ~~INFORMATION~~Expense

~~ITEM~~ The 6.following ~~EXHIBITS~~table ~~AND~~presents ~~REPORTS~~the ONcomponents ~~FORM~~of net 8non-Kinterest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

	(a)		Exhibits
				Three Months Ended
			None.
				June 30,
	(b)		During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Registrant filed the following reports on Form 8-K:
				2003		2002
			None.
Non-interest income:
	Fees, commissions, service and other income			$	2,926,178	$	2,690,886
		Total non-interest income			2,926,178		2,690,886
Non-interest expense:
	Salaries and employee benefits				1,947,251		1,446,511
	Commissions to agents				3,779,068		6,710,116
	Other operating and underwriting expenses				2,640,344		1,292,231
		Total non-interest expense			8,366,663		9,448,858
		Net non-interest expense		$	5,440,485	$	6,757,972

~~Table~~ Fees, commissions, service and other income consist primarily of ~~Contents~~commissions earned by MIS and Summit Property Development. MIS and Summit Property Development earned approximately $2.4 million and

~~SIGNATURES~~20

PursuantTable to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed this 14th day of February 2003 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Contents

~~SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC~~ $2.2 million ~~/s/~~in ~~TOM~~commissions ~~TURNER~~(after eliminating ~~Tom~~commissions ~~Turner~~received ~~President~~by ~~and~~MIS ~~Director~~from ~~(Principal Executive Officer~~Summit), ~~/s/ROBERT~~during A.the three-month ~~NESS~~periods ~~Robert~~ended A.June 30, ~~Ness~~2003 ~~Principal~~and ~~Accounting Officer~~2002.

~~Table~~ Of the $2.4 million and $2.2 million of fees, ~~Contents~~commissions, service and other income that was earned by MIS and Summit Property Development during the three month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately $1.8 million and $1.6 million were fees received from Metropolitan. During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Summit Property Development received approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million in fees from Metropolitan while MIS received approximately $1.2 million and $1.1 million in fees from Metropolitan. To the extent that Metropolitan does not have an effective registration available for MIS to sell Metropolitan’s securities, MIS’ revenues associated with sales of Metropolitan’s securities will be reduced.

~~CERTIFICATIONS~~ Salaries and employee benefits increased by approximately $0.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the similar period ended June 30, 2002 primarily due to an increase in the average number of full time equivalent employees of our commercial lending operations.

I, The ~~Tom~~decrease ~~Turner~~in commissions to agents during the three months ended June 30, ~~President~~2003 ~~(Chief~~compared ~~Executive~~to ~~Officer)~~the ofsimilar ~~Summit~~period ended ~~Securities~~June 30, ~~Inc~~2002 was primarily due to a $1.8 million decrease in commissions paid on annuity business, a $0.9 million decrease in commissions paid on ~~certify~~commercial ~~that:~~loan originations and a $0.3 million decrease in commissions paid on the sale of real estate offset by a $0.1 million increase in commissions paid by MIS.

1. I The ~~have~~increase ~~reviewed~~in ~~this~~other ~~quarterly~~operating ~~report~~and onunderwriting expenses ~~Form~~was primarily the result of a $0.5 ~~10-Q~~million increase in holding costs associated with our properties held for sale and development and a $0.3 million accrual of ~~Summit~~a contingent ~~Securities,~~liability associated with the NASD Wells letter ~~Inc~~offset by a $0.;5 million decrease in ceding allowances associated with new annuity business reinsured from Metropolitan under our annuity reinsurance agreement and $0.9 million decrease in capitalized contract origination costs due to the decrease in commissions paid on commercial loan originations.

2. ~~Based~~ Metropolitan onprovides myservicing, ~~knowledge~~accounting, ~~this~~data processing ~~quarterly~~and ~~report~~other ~~does~~administrative ~~not~~services ~~contain~~to ~~any~~us. ~~untrue~~In addition, ~~statement~~we ofare acharged ~~material~~rent ~~fact~~for orthe ~~omit~~space that we occupy in Metropolitan’s headquarters. Expenses allocated and rent charged to ~~state~~us awere ~~material~~approximately ~~fact~~$2.1 million ~~necessary~~for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to ~~make~~$2.2 million for the ~~statements~~three ~~made~~months ended June 30, 2002. Of the $0.1 million decrease in ~~light~~charges ofduring the ~~circumstances~~three ~~under~~months ended ~~which~~June 30, ~~such~~2003, ~~statements~~$0.4 million is related to a ~~were~~decrease ~~made,~~in ~~not~~expense ~~misleading~~allocations to us in accordance with ~~respect~~an established tointer-company ~~the~~cost ~~period~~sharing ~~covered~~agreement offset by ~~this quarterly~~a ~~report;~~$0.1 million increase in loans serviced by Metropolitan and a $0.2 million increase in rent.

~~3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial~~ ~~information~~Amortization ~~included~~of inDeferred ~~this~~Policy ~~quarterly report, fairly present in all material~~Acquisition ~~respects the financial condition~~Costs, ~~results~~Net of ~~operations~~Costs ~~and cash flows of the~~Capitalized ~~registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.~~

4. ~~The~~ Amortization ~~registrant’s~~of ~~other~~deferred ~~certifying~~policy ~~officers~~acquisition costs, ~~and~~net Iof ~~are~~costs ~~responsible~~capitalized, ~~for~~is comprised of the ~~establishing~~capitalization ~~and~~of ~~maintaining~~expenses ~~disclosure~~incurred ~~controls~~to sell and ~~procedures~~underwrite annuity ~~(as~~policies, ~~defined~~offset inby the amortization of previously ~~Exchange~~capitalized ~~Act~~expenses. ~~Rules 13a-14~~The ~~and~~following ~~15d-14)~~table reflects the components of the net expense we reported for the ~~registrant~~three months ended June 30, 2003 and ~~have:~~2002.

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



	Three Months Ended
	June 30,

	2003			2002

Current period costs capitalized	$	(1,129,215	)	$	(3,501,399	)
Amortization of previously capitalized expenses		(570,068	)		1,050,000

Net amortization (capitalization) of deferred policy acquisition costs	$	(1,699,283	)	$	(2,451,399	)

b) The ~~evaluated~~decrease ~~the~~in ~~effectiveness~~current ofperiod ~~the~~costs ~~registrant’s~~capitalized is ~~disclosure~~due ~~controls~~primarily ~~and~~to a $1.8 million decrease in commissions ~~procedures~~paid ason ofour annuity business and a ~~date~~$0.5 ~~within~~million ~~90 days~~reduction ~~prior~~in ceding toallowances ~~the~~associated ~~filing~~with ~~date~~new annuity business reinsured from Metropolitan under our annuity reinsurance agreement. Annuity business production, net of ~~this~~ceding, during the three ~~quarterly~~months ~~report~~ended (June 30, 2003 was approximately $23.1 million compared to approximately $65.3 million during the ~~“Evaluation~~similar period ~~Date”);~~ended ~~and~~June 30, 2002.

~~c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness~~21 ~~of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the~~ ~~Evaluation Date;~~

5. TheTable registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): Contents

According to SFAS No. 97, policy acquisition costs, such as commissions, are to be deferred and amortized over the life of a) ~~all~~group ~~significant~~of ~~deficiencies~~policies in ~~the~~relation ~~design~~to orthe ~~operation~~present value of ~~internal~~the ~~controls~~estimated future gross profits related to that ~~which~~group ~~could~~of ~~adversely~~policies. ~~affect~~For purposes of amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs, the ~~registrant’s~~estimated ~~ability~~gross profits consist of estimated future earnings based on investment of policy account balances less estimated future interest to ~~record,~~be ~~process~~credited to account balances, estimated future policy expense charges less ~~summarize~~estimated ~~and~~future ~~report~~policy ~~financial~~administration ~~data~~expenses and ~~have~~estimated future ~~identified~~surrender charges. These estimated gross profits are to be based on our “best estimate” without provision for adverse ~~the~~deviation. ~~registrant’s~~Further, SFAS No. 97 requires that ~~auditors~~estimates ~~any~~of ~~material~~expected ~~weaknesses~~gross inprofit ~~internal~~used ~~controls;~~as a basis of deferred policy acquisition cost amortization are to be evaluated regularly, and the total amortization recorded to date is to be adjusted by a charge or credit to the statement of operations if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier estimates should be revised.

b) Our ~~any~~future ~~fraud~~estimated earnings rate on the assets that support the annuity business over the remaining estimated life of the annuity business is expected to range from 1.8% to 4.8%. The range of future estimated gross profits at June 30, ~~whether~~2003 oris ~~not~~lower ~~material~~than the range at March 31, 2003, which was from 2.9% to 6.8%. The change in future estimated gross profit rates was affected primarily by the future estimated yields and asset mix of commercial loans that support ~~involves~~the ~~management~~annuity orbusiness. ~~other~~Since real estate receivables ~~employees~~represent ~~who~~the ~~have~~highest ayielding ~~significant~~category, ~~role~~a shift in ~~the~~assets between ~~registrant’s~~real ~~internal~~estate ~~controls;~~receivables and lower yielding fixed income securities and other receivables supporting the annuity business can affect the earning rates we realize on the assets that support the annuity business.

6. ~~The~~ After ~~registrant’s~~giving ~~other~~consideration ~~certifying~~to ~~officers~~the asset mix and corresponding Iyields ~~have~~realized ~~indicated~~on inthe ~~this quarterly~~assets ~~report~~supporting ~~whether~~the annuity ~~there~~business, ~~were~~we ~~significant~~believe ~~changes~~that ina ~~internal~~future ~~controls~~estimated orearnings inrate ~~other~~of ~~factors~~3.2% ~~that~~at ~~could~~June 30, ~~significantly~~2003 ~~affect~~is ~~internal~~a ~~controls~~reasonable ~~subsequent~~expectation of the yields to be realized on the ~~date~~assets ofthat ~~our~~support ~~most~~the annuity ~~recent~~business ~~evaluation,~~over ~~including~~the ~~any~~estimated ~~corrective~~remaining ~~actions~~life. The future ~~with~~estimated ~~regard~~earnings torate ~~significant~~of ~~deficiencies~~3.2% ~~and~~is ~~material~~a ~~weaknesses~~reduction from the 3.5% that was estimated as of September 30, 2002.

~~Date:~~ Net ~~February~~Gains ~~14, 2003 /s/ TOM TURNER Tom Turner President~~ (~~Chief~~Losses) ~~Executive~~on ~~Officer)~~Investments and Receivables

~~Table~~ The following table presents the components of net ~~Contents~~gains (losses) on investments and receivables during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:

I, Robert A. Ness, Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of Summit Securities, Inc., certify that:



		Three Months Ended June
		30,

		2003			2002

Other than temporary declines in value:
	Subordinate and interest only certificates	$	(61,692	)	$	(6,020	)
	Equity securities		(20,688	)		(546,582	)
	Other securities		(179,125	)		(83,568	)
Realized gains:
	Securities investments		2,221,108			124,777
	Receivables		2,500			79,868
Realized gains on trading securities			—			(42,986	)

Net gains (losses) on investments and receivables		$	1,962,103		$	(474,511	)

~~1. I~~ Unrealized ~~have~~Losses ~~reviewed this quarterly report~~ on ~~Form 10-Q of Summit Securities,~~Investments ~~Inc.;~~

2. ~~Based~~ Temporary ondeclines myin ~~knowledge,~~the ~~this~~fair ~~quarterly~~value ~~report~~of investments ~~does~~that ~~not~~are ~~contain~~classified ~~any~~as “available-for-sale” ~~untrue~~are excluded from earnings and ~~statement~~presented ofas aaccumulated ~~material~~other ~~fact~~comprehensive income or ~~omit~~loss, tonet of ~~state~~related income taxes, as a ~~material~~component ~~fact~~of ~~necessary~~stockholders’ equity. toWe ~~make~~regularly monitor our investment portfolio for other ~~the~~than ~~statements~~temporary ~~made,~~impairments of our securities. When an other than temporary decline in ~~light~~value ofbelow cost or amortized cost is identified, the ~~circumstances~~investment ~~under~~is reduced to its fair value, which becomes ~~such~~the ~~statements~~new cost basis of the investment. The amount of ~~were~~reduction ~~made,~~is ~~not~~reported ~~misleading~~as ~~with~~a ~~respect~~realized toloss in the ~~period~~statement ~~covered~~of operations. byIn ~~this~~determining ~~quarterly~~whether the losses are temporary or ~~report;~~other than temporary, we consider (1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value

~~3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial~~22 ~~information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material~~ ~~respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the~~ ~~registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.~~

4. TheTable registrant’sof other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: Contents

a) has ~~designed~~been ~~such~~less ~~disclosure~~than ~~controls~~cost ~~and~~or ~~procedures~~carrying value, (2) the circumstances contributing to ~~ensure~~the ~~that~~decline ~~material~~in fair ~~information~~value ~~relating~~(including a change in interest rates or spreads to benchmarks), (3) recent performance of the ~~registrant~~security, (4) the ~~including~~financial ~~its~~strength ~~consolidated subsidiaries~~of the issuer, isand ~~made~~(5) our intent ~~known~~and ability to usretain bythe ~~others~~investment ~~within~~for ~~those~~a ~~entities~~period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery. Additionally, ~~particularly~~for ~~during~~asset-backed investments, we also consider the ~~period~~credit rating and determine the amount of credit support available for the security. At June 30, 2003, our investment portfolio had approximately $1.4 million in ~~which~~unrealized ~~this~~losses ~~quarterly~~that ~~report~~were deemed isto ~~being~~be ~~prepared;~~temporary. To the extent that any losses currently deemed temporary are determined to be other than temporary in the future, the unrealized losses will be reported as realized losses in future statements of operations.

b) The ~~evaluated~~following ~~the~~table ~~effectiveness~~stratifies of the ~~registrant’s disclosure controls and~~unrealized ~~procedures~~losses as of ~~a date within 90~~June ~~days~~30, ~~prior~~2003 toby ~~the~~investment ~~filing date of this~~category: ~~quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and~~

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


			Carrying		Unrealized
			Value		Losses

Fixed income maturities:
	Government-backed bonds		$	12,588,263	$	(245,325	)
	Mortgage- and asset-backed securities			46,204,533		(926,551	)

		Total fixed income maturities		58,792,796		(1,171,876	)
Common stocks				65,677		(8,716	)
Preferred stocks				3,912,000		(88,000	)
Venture Capital/ Limited Partnerships				357,117		(92,954	)

	Totals		$	63,127,590	$	(1,361,546	)

5. The ~~registrant’s~~following ~~other~~table ~~certifying~~stratifies ~~officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to~~ the ~~registrant’s auditors and the audit~~unrealized ~~committee~~losses ofas ~~registrant’s board~~ of ~~directors~~June 30, ~~(or~~2003 ~~persons~~by ~~performing~~market ~~the equivalent functions)~~sector:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


			Carrying		Unrealized
			Value		Losses

Government-backed bonds:
	Agency		$	11,416,700	$	(235,630	)
	US Treasury Note			1,171,563		(9,695	)

		Total government-backed bonds		12,588,263		(245,325	)
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:
	Collateralized mortgage obligation			32,228,353		(344,209	)
	Other asset-backed			2,581,614		(123,557	)
	Home equity			9,484,176		(369,867	)
	Manufactured housing			1,910,390		(88,918	)

		Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities		46,204,533		(926,551	)
Common stocks				65,677		(8,716	)
Preferred stocks				3,912,000		(88,000	)
Venture Capital/ Limited Partnerships				357,117		(92,954	)

	Totals		$	63,127,590	$	(1,361,546	)

~~b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other~~23 ~~employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;~~ ~~and~~

6. TheTable registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Contents

~~Date:~~ The ~~February~~following ~~14,~~table ~~2003~~stratifies ~~/s/~~the ~~ROBERT~~unrealized losses A.as ~~NESS~~of ~~Robert~~June 30, A.2003 ~~Ness~~by ~~Principal~~credit ~~Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)~~rating:


		Carrying		Unrealized
		Value		Losses

AAA		$	44,816,615	$	(589,534	)
AA			7,308,829		(115,919	)
A			5,571,971		(125,878	)
BBB			1,669,201		(87,853	)
BB			3,338,180		(340,692	)
Common stocks			65,677		(8,716	)
Venture Capital/ Limited Partnerships			357,117		(92,954	)

	Totals	$	63,127,590	$	(1,361,546	)

Unrealized losses relating to the investment grade assets (BBB and higher) are generally due to changes in interest rates, which may include changes in spreads to benchmarks for a particular sector of the market. To the extent that unrealized losses in our investment grade portfolio are the result of issues other than interest rate changes, the investments are evaluated for other than temporary impairment. In determining whether these losses were temporary or other than temporary, we considered (1) recent performance of the security, (2) the credit rating of the security, (3) the amount of credit support available for the security, (4) circumstances contributing to the decline in value, (5) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost or carrying value, and (6) our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery.

The following table stratifies the unrealized losses as of June 30, 2003 by trading class:


		Carrying		Unrealized
		Value		Losses

Traded		$	62,770,473	$	(1,268,592	)
Non-Traded			357,117		(92,954	)

	Totals	$	63,127,590	$	(1,361,546	)

The following table stratifies the unrealized losses as of June 30, 2003 by length of time the securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position:


			Carrying		Unrealized
			Value		Losses

Fixed Income Securities:
	Investment Grade
		0-6 months	$	50,962,611	$	(618,708	)
		7-12 months		3,579,592		(176,771	)
		25-30 months		912,413		(35,705	)
	Non-Investment Grade
		0-6 months		3,338,180		(340,692	)
Preferred Stocks:
		0-6 months		3,912,000		(88,000	)
Common Stocks:
		0-6 months		65,677		(8,716	)
Venture Capital/ Limited Partnerships:
		0-6 months		357,117		(92,954	)

		Total	$	63,127,590	$	(1,361,546	)

The maturities of fixed income investments that are in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2003 are as follows:


		Carrying		Unrealized
		Value		Losses

Due after five years through ten years		$	12,588,263	$	(245,325	)

	Total non-mortgage- and asset-backed securities		12,588,263		(245,325	)
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities			46,204,533		(926,551	)

	Total fixed income securities	$	58,792,796	$	(1,171,876	)

We are authorized by our investment policies to use financial futures instruments for the purpose of hedging interest rate risk relative to the securities portfolio or potential trading situations. In both cases, the futures transaction is intended to reduce the risk associated with price movements for a balance sheet asset. Securities may be sold “short” (the sale of securities which are not currently in the portfolio and therefore must be purchased to close out the sale agreement) as another means of hedging interest rate risk, to benefit from an anticipated movement in the financial markets. As of and during the nine months ended June 30, 2003, we had no outstanding hedge transactions or open short sales positions.

Asset Quality

Servicing, Collection and Delinquency Experience

The principal amount of our commercial loans (as a percentage of total outstanding commercial loans) that were in arrears for more than 90 days as of the following dates were as follows:


	Total		Commercial
	Commercial		Loans in		Percentage
	Loans		Arrears		in Arrears

June 30, 2003	$	257,696,986	$	63,880,934		24.79	%
September 30, 2002	$	221,246,934	$	62,679,596		28.33	%

June 30, 2002	$	215,611,052	$	47,230,413		21.91	%
September 30, 2001	$	187,859,448	$	32,162,791		17.12	%

In addition to the amounts included in the table above at June 30, 2003, there were approximately $12.6 million in additional delinquent loans that we had serious doubts that the borrowers had the ability to comply with present loan repayment terms, and therefore may become 90 days delinquent. As of June 30, 2003, these loans accounted for less than 5.0% of the total outstanding commercial loans, but were not included in the table above because they were less than 90 days delinquent.

The following is information regarding the five largest delinquent commercial loans at June 30, 2003:


	Date of		Initial						Fees and				Estimated Net		Date of		Delinquent
Commercial	Initial		Loan		Principal		Accrued		Servicer		Carrying		Realizable Value		Last		Payment		Allocated
Loan	Loan		Amount		Balance		Interest		Advances(1)		Value		of Collateral		Appraisal		Date		Reserve

A		2/6/2002	$	6,890,000	$	6,884,026	$	1,695,359	$	15,678	$	8,595,063	$	11,684,000		1/30/2002		6/1/2002	$	—
B		7/27/2000		3,487,000		4,518,379		1,126,700		529,631		6,174,710		7,280,000		2/22/2002		2/1/2002		—
C		12/22/1999		4,280,000		4,583,472		1,064,906		24,503		5,672,881		5,440,000		9/29/1999		7/1/2000		232,881
D		6/28/2002		4,620,000		4,620,000		689,428		50,572		5,360,000		5,360,000		6/13/2002		10/1/2002		—
E		1/24/2002		6,838,385		6,068,264		324,305		44,631		6,437,200		7,416,000		1/16/2002		12/1/2002		—


(1)	Fees and servicer advances includes late charges, discount, amortized exit fees and advances to the servicer for property taxes and other servicer advances.


	Commercial Loan A—The collateral consists of 8,660 acres of land, consisting of 23 contiguous parcels of varying size, located in Hamalua, Hawaii. The property is currently zoned AG-40 which allows 40-acre lots. Foreclosure proceedings began September 3, 2002. At June 30, 2003, we were proceeding with foreclosure action.


	Commercial Loan B—The collateral consists of 16,267 acres of land, located in Hilo, Hawaii. At June 30, 2003, we were proceeding with foreclosure action.

	Commercial Loan C—The primary collateral consists of approximately 318 acres of residential development land currently proposed for a residential golf course subdivision. The original loan for $4,280,000 was modified on April 12, 2000, which increased the loan amount to $4,605,000. The interest rate terms on the modification remained the same as the original loan. The borrower filed for bankruptcy on September 17, 2001. At June 30, 2003, this receivable was in bankruptcy. This receivable was paid in full by the borrower on July 16, 2003. We received payment for all principal, interest and fees related to this receivable.

	Commercial Loan D—The primary collateral consists of a first position mortgage on a 6,170 square foot single-family residence on a 28,048 square foot lot located in Pacific Palisades, California. Foreclosure proceedings began December 30, 2002. At June 30, 2003, we were proceeding with foreclosure action.

	Commercial Loan E—The collateral consists of twenty condo units, located in Park City, Utah. Foreclosure proceedings began March 3, 2003. At June 30, 2003, we were proceeding with foreclosure action.

The estimated net realizable value of the collateral is estimated at 80% of the estimated market value of the collateral based on current appraisal/sales information. Based on management’s review, to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated net realizable value, an allowance for losses is recognized for the amount at which the carrying value exceeds the estimated net realizable value. To the extent that the estimated net realizable value exceeds the carrying value, an allowance for losses is not recognized. We believe that in the event of foreclosure, proceeds from the sale of the collateral will be sufficient to satisfy the net carrying value of the receivables.

When a payment becomes delinquent on a commercial loan, either Ocwen’s, our third party servicer, or our own collection unit (depending on which entity is acting as servicer) will begin making collection calls immediately. If the defaulted payment is not received by the next payment due date, a notice of default is sent to the borrower and the account is assigned to one of our workout managers according to property type, size of loan and complexity of transaction. The workout manager will review the file and related documentation and attempt to contact the borrower to negotiate with the borrower to cure the default. If, after the expiration of the notice of default, the default is not cured, foreclosure is begun immediately by counsel. Concurrent with the notice of default period and the foreclosure process, the assigned workout manager will continue to contact and attempt to negotiate a full reinstatement with the borrower. During this same period, the workout manager will also develop a workout program and make recommendations to our problem loan review committee for approval. As a part of formulating this workout plan, the workout manager will typically visit the collateral property, talk with local experts and make an assessment of the condition of the collateral and its marketability in the event of a potential foreclosure. The final workout plan is presented to the problem loan review committee with all relevant information regarding contact with the borrower, condition and marketability of collateral and an assessment of the likelihood of default cure or recovery of the loan balance if the default continues through foreclosure. Any actions undertaken by the workout manager with the borrower that would result in other than full reinstatement are subject to advance approval by the problem loan review committee.

The problem loan review committee is composed of representatives from underwriting, risk management, operations, commercial lending, legal and property development departments. The committee meets weekly and reviews all newly defaulted loans, continuing defaulted loans, loans in foreclosure, loans in bankruptcy and progress on approved workout plans.

The principal amount of our residential and other real estate receivables (as a percentage of total residential and other real estate receivables) that were in arrears for more than 90 days as of the following dates were as follows:


			Residential and
	Total Residential		Other Real Estate
	and Other Real		Receivables in		Percentage
	Estate Receivables		Arrears		in Arrears

June 30, 2003	$	47,374,030	$	2,045,131		4.32	%
September 30, 2002	$	31,126,969	$	1,305,034		4.19	%

June 30, 2002	$	32,727,846	$	2,105,088		6.43	%
September 30, 2001	$	28,872,336	$	1,855,129		6.43	%

The carrying values of our other receivables (as a percentage of total other receivables) that were in arrears for more than 90 days as of the following dates were as follows:


	Total Other		Other Receivables		Percentage
	Receivables		in Arrears		in Arrears

June 30, 2003	$	83,171,410	$	20,223,091		24.31	%
September 30, 2002	$	90,060,257	$	19,147,121		21.26	%

June 30, 2002	$	53,754,616	$	19,193,980		35.71	%
September 30, 2001	$	44,317,237	$	16,700,000		37.68	%

Of the $20.2 million in delinquencies at June 30, 2003, approximately $14.7 million is attributable to a single receivable, the Koa Timber Project, secured by harvest timber rights. The Koa Timber Project is located in the District of South Hilo, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. The Koa Timber Project consists of approximately 16,924 acres of natural forest containing a very unique timber commonly referred to as Koa timber. Koa timber is a unique hardwood utilized in the manufacturing of specialty wood products. Generally, the end uses of Koa timber are for custom architectural millwork, custom furniture and millwork, musical instruments, veneer products, and art and craft items that generally demand a higher market price than comparable specialty wood products of a similar nature.

We are a finance lender and mortgagee for the underlying real property containing the Koa timber. In addition, we are also the owner of, and hold the right to harvest, the Koa timber. We entered into a Timber Harvesting Agreement with Hawaii Forest Preservation LLC (“HFP”), a Hawaii limited liability company who has substantial experience in harvesting Koa timber.

Under the Timber Harvesting Agreement, we granted the right to harvest the Koa timber we owned to HFP, and we are to receive scheduled monthly payments. Under the terms of the Timber Harvesting Agreement, HFP is currently in default for amounts due to us. In August of 2001, we filed litigation against HFP and related parties in the State of Hawaii where we seek recovery of amounts due under the Timber Harvesting Agreement. Until substantive discovery is completed, it is not possible for us to estimate either the probability of success in the litigation or a range of possible loss, if any.

Provision and Allowance for Losses on Receivables

Changes in the allowance for losses on receivables were as follows:



		Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,

		2003			2002			2003			2002

Beginning balance		$	6,720,613		$	6,016,440		$	4,715,489		$	5,146,119
Provisions			2,554,129			8,694			8,382,402			891,051
Charge offs:
	Commercial loans		(1,218,273	)		—			(4,889,779	)		—
	Residential and other real estate loans		(79,668	)		(63,650	)		(212,434	)		(75,686	)
	Other receivables		(6,688	)		(49,996	)		(25,565	)		(49,996	)

Ending balance		$	7,970,113		$	5,911,488		$	7,970,113		$	5,911,488

Charge offs as a percent of average receivables			0.33	%		0.04	%		1.37	%		0.04	%
Allowance as a percentage of total receivables			2.05	%		1.96	%		2.05	%		1.96	%

An analysis of the allowance for losses on receivables was as follows:


			Allocated			Loan
	Allocated		Allowance			Category
	Allowance for		as a % of			as a % of
	Receivable		Receivable			Total
	Losses		Category			Receivables

June 30, 2003
Commercial loans	$	5,769,757		2.24	%		66.38	%
Residential and other real estate loans		697,486		1.47	%		12.20	%
Other receivables		831,714		1.00	%		21.42	%
Unallocated		671,156		0.22	%

	$	7,970,113		2.05	%		100.00	%

June 30, 2002
Commercial loans	$	4,463,406		2.07	%		71.38	%
Residential and other real estate loans		546,555		1.67	%		10.83	%
Other receivables		355,181		0.66	%		17.79	%
Unallocated		546,346		0.22	%

	$	5,911,488		1.96	%		100.00	%

The allowance for losses on receivables represents our estimate of credit losses inherent in the portfolios as of the balance sheet dates. We perform regular reviews in order to identify these inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability of the portfolios. This process provides an allowance that consists of two components: allocated and unallocated. To arrive at the allocated component, we combine estimates of the allowance needed for loans that are evaluated collectively and those that are evaluated individually.

Commercial loans are individually evaluated for impairment. A commercial loan is considered impaired when, based on specific facts and circumstances, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a commercial loan has been identified as impaired, we determine the allowance for losses based on the estimated net realizable value of the collateral compared to the carrying value of the receivable (including accrued interest and fees).

When determining the estimated value of collateral, we have historically taken into consideration the most recent third party appraisal and other relevant market information. When reviewing the most recent third party

appraisal, we consider the type of property, changes in the economic factors of the region since the most recent appraisal and the various underlying appraisal assumptions. In-house licensed appraisers that assist in the commercial origination process also assist in this review. Furthermore, we may also perform additional on-site collateral visits to update our historical assessments and gain additional information. If the estimated net realizable value of the collateral is less than the carrying value, an allowance for losses is recognized for the amount at which the carrying value exceeds the estimated net realizable value.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, we recorded provisions for losses on our commercial loan portfolio of approximately $7.3 million. The current year provisions resulted from a review of the most recent appraisals and other relevant market information on loans that we deemed impaired during the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Loans that we considered impaired at June 30, 2003 were approximately $76.5 million compared to $70.5 million at September 30, 2002.

We establish an allowance for losses on residential and other real estate receivables, including accrued interest, inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date based primarily on current delinquencies and recent foreclosure and loss experience. The residential and other real estate receivable portfolio is comprised of a large group of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment.

In estimating the amount of credit losses inherent in the receivable portfolios, we utilize various judgments and assumptions. For receivables that are collateral-dependent, the estimated fair market value of the collateral may deviate significantly from the proceeds received when the collateral is sold. To mitigate the imprecision inherent in most estimates of expected credit losses, the allowance has an unallocated component. The unallocated component reflects our judgmental assessment of the impact that various quantitative factors have on the overall measurement of credit losses.

Allowance for Losses on Real Estate Held for Sale

The following table summarizes changes in our allowance for losses on real estate held for sale:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Nine Months Ended June 30,

	2003			2002		2003			2002

Beginning balance	$	2,318,388		$	2,952,413	$	2,316,093		$	2,626,303
Provisions		1,857,684			66,394		2,264,412			1,156,806
Charge-offs		(62,109	)		109,653		(466,542	)		(654,649	)

Ending balance	$	4,113,963		$	3,128,460	$	4,113,963		$	3,128,460

Real estate held for sale is periodically evaluated for impairment. Loss provisions for real estate held for sale are calculated as the difference between the estimated net realizable value and the carrying value at the measurement date. The $2.3 million provision for loss during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 was primarily the result of a reduction in sales prices on some of our real estate held for sale portfolio and a $1.7 million provision for losses based on new appraisals that we obtained on two properties that we previously acquired through foreclosure proceedings of defaulted commercial loans.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The objective of liquidity management is to provide funds at an acceptable cost to service liabilities as they become due and to meet demands for additional commercial loans and receivable purchases. Managing liquidity also enables us to take advantage of opportunities for business expansion. We finance our business operations and growth primarily through the sale of annuity products, the sale of debt securities and preferred stock and a secured line of credit agreement, reverse repurchase agreements, receivable cash flows, the sale of real estate and securities portfolio earnings. Primarily, our sources of liquidity are long-term in nature as they are used for long-term investments. Generally, short-term liquidity is provided through earnings and contractual repayments from our receivable and investment portfolios. However, the secured line of credit agreement and the reverse repurchase agreement discussed below can be used for short-term liquidity purposes.

Annuities

The annuity business is highly competitive. We compete with other financial institutions, including ones with greater resources and greater name recognition. Annuity yields and commissions to agents are particularly sensitive to competitive forces. Additionally, we believe that the primary competitive factors among life insurance companies for investment-oriented insurance products, like annuities, include product flexibility, net return after fees, innovation in product design, the claims-paying ability rating and the name recognition of the issuing company, the availability of distribution channels and service rendered to the customer before and after a policy is issued. Other factors affecting the annuity business include the benefits, including before-tax and after tax investment returns, and guarantees provided to the customer and the commissions paid to the agent. If we are unable to effectively price our annuities, offer competitive commissions and effectively compete in general for the sale of our annuity products, our liquidity could be adversely affected.

At June 30, 2003, approximately 88% of our assets were held by our insurance subsidiaries. The growth in our assets during the nine months ended June 2003 was primarily due to the growth in annuity sales. Future growth will continue to be dependent on the successful efforts to sell our annuity products. We manage our financing activities to match investment opportunities that are available. Since the sale of annuity products are interest rate sensitive, we can manage annuity product sales by pricing the products accordingly. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, we offered a more competitive price on our annuity products than during the nine months ended June 30, 2002, and therefore experienced an increase in annuity sales during the current period as compared to the similar period last year. If we maintain our current level of annuity sales, our annuity sales are expected to exceed annuity surrenders, which could lead to a growth in our total assets and thereby potentially increasing our earnings. To the extent that annuity sales decline such that annuity surrenders begin to exceed new annuity sales, and to the extent that we do not cede new annuity sales from our reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan, we could experience a reduction in our total assets, thereby potentially reducing our earnings capability.

We have an annuity reinsurance agreement with Metropolitan, which became effective July 1, 1998. Under this agreement, Metropolitan may reinsure with us 75% of the risk on 15 different annuity products. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, $7.5 million of annuity premiums were ceded to us under this agreement. We also pay a fee to Metropolitan for servicing the reinsured policies of approximately 0.40% annually on the cash value of the reinsured policies.

Debt and Equity Securities

Historically, Summit has generally funded its investing activities through the sale of investment certificates and preferred stock. Furthermore, Summit has relied on new offerings to re-finance previously issued debt as it matures. Currently, Summit has two public offerings under regulatory review and as such, are not currently available for sale to the public. While Summit maintains sufficient short term liquidity (generally up to twelve months) to pay maturing investment certificates and preferred stock dividends during periods in which its securities offerings are not available to the public, Summit does not anticipate that it will generate sufficient after tax cash earnings that would permit it to fully pay its maturing debt obligations on a continual basis without the sale of additional debt securities to re-finance that debt as it matures. Summit’s short-term liquidity is primarily comprised of cash, a secured line of credit agreement with Metropolitan and other assets including investments and receivables that can be converted to cash through the sale of those assets. To the extent Summit is unable to sell additional securities or re-finance investment certificates as they mature from another source, and to the extent that existing short-term liquidity is not sufficient, our business would be harmed.

Summit’s investments are typically offered to the public on a continuous best efforts basis through our subsidiary. On October 4, 2002, Summit filed with the SEC a registration statement for the sale of up to $50.0 million of Series B and B-1 Investment Certificates. This registration statement is currently under regulatory review. Also on October 4, 2002, Summit filed with the SEC a registration statement for the sale of up to 2,000,000 shares of our Variable Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series S-3 for $25.00 per share, for a total preferred stock offering amount of $50.0 million. This registration statement is also currently under regulatory review.

Secured Line of Credit

Our insurance subsidiary has a secured line of credit agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”). When an institution becomes a stockholder in the FHLB, it can borrow from the FHLB at a stock to borrowing ratio of 1 to 20. At June 30, 2003, our insurance subsidiary had a stock investment in the FHLB of approximately $1.3 million. The collateral eligible to be used to secure the borrowing is predefined by the FHLB and generally consists of high quality collateralized mortgage obligations. Each type of collateral has a minimum requirement that ranges from 100% to 125% of borrowings. At June 30, 2003, our insurance subsidiary had $39.0 million in eligible collateral with a market value of $49.0 million and had a borrowing capacity of $36.8 million, subject to the purchase of approximately $1.1 million in additional FHLB stock. Approximately $18.5 million in securities having a market value of $23.3 million were pledged to collateralize the outstanding borrowings to the FHLB at June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2003, our insurance subsidiary had approximately $17.5 million in outstanding borrowings to the FHLB leaving an unused borrowing capacity of approximately $19.3 million, subject to the purchase of approximately $1.1 million in additional FHLB stock. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, our insurance subsidiary’s outstanding borrowings on the secured line of credit decreased $10.0 million.

Other Liquidity Sources

Another source of liquidity is derived from payments received on receivables and the sale of real estate. A decrease in the prepayment rate on receivables or in the ability to sell real estate would reduce future cash flows from receivables. Additionally, to increase liquidity, we may occasionally sell securities to a broker-dealer under the provision that we will buy them back by a predetermined date for a specific price, often called a reverse repurchase agreement. We did not enter into any reverse repurchase transactions during the periods presented.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, we entered into two line of credit agreements with Metropolitan, an affiliate. The first agreement was a $25.0 million unsecured line of credit. At June 30, 2003, we had approximately $13.7 million in outstanding advances having an interest rate of 11.5% related to this agreement. Effective June 27, 2003, the use of this line of credit was discontinued due to the availability of a second line of credit agreement with Metropolitan which was secured and carried a lower interest rate than the first agreement. On June 27, 2003, we entered into a $4.0 million secured line of credit agreement with Metropolitan. This second agreement is secured by $4.1 million of various real estate receivables and securities investments and has an interest rate of 7.82%. At June 30, 2003, we had approximately $1.0 million in outstanding advances. At June 30, 2003, we were pursuing a third secured line of credit with Metropolitan to increase our short-term liquidity. At June 30, 2003, these lines of credit with Metropolitan were the only active source of short-term liquidity available to Summit. To the extent Metropolitan does not maintain adequate liquidity allowing it to fully fund the line of credit, our short-term liquidity would be harmed.

Capital and Regulatory Considerations

The States of Idaho and Arizona’s Risk Based Capital Model Laws require an insurance company to maintain specified amounts of capital and surplus based on complex calculations of risk factors that encompass the invested assets and business activities of the insurance company. Compliance with the Risk-Based Capital Model Law requirements is tested annually as of a calendar year-end. At the last annual review at their statutory reporting period ended December 31, 2002, our insurance subsidiaries’ capital and surplus levels exceeded the calculated specified requirements. Historically, our insurance subsidiaries have maintained adequate levels of capital through the sale of common stock to Summit. To the extent that we do not maintain adequate levels of liquidity permitting us to make further capital investments in our insurance subsidiaries, our insurance subsidiaries’ ability to generate capital could be adversely affected, which in turn could negatively affect their ability to increase their investments in higher risk-adjusted assets such as commercial loans, real estate and equity investments.

While there are no specific regulatory limitations as of June 30, 2003 imposed by the state of Idaho or the state of Arizona on the percent of assets that our insurance subsidiaries may invest in receivables secured by real estate, we monitor and manage the percent of statutory assets that our insurance subsidiaries hold in receivables

secured by real estate. Our insurance subsidiaries’ ability to sell available-for-sale investments for liquidity purposes is partially affected by this internally regulated policy. We may restrict the selling of non-real estate related assets if, after the sale, our insurance subsidiaries’ real estate assets would exceed an acceptable percentage of our statutory assets. However, effective July 1, 2003, the State of Idaho enacted a law that limits an insurance company’s investments in mortgage and real estate assets to 65% of the insurer’s statutory admitted assets. The limitation does not apply to investment-grade mortgage-backed securities. Our ability to sell available-for-sale investments for liquidity purposes will be partially affected by this limitation. As of June 30, 2003, our life insurance company that is domiciled in Idaho held 64% of its statutory admitted assets in mortgages, real estate and non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities subject to this limitation.

For statutory purposes, we perform cash flow testing under seven different rate scenarios. An annual opinion regarding the adequacy of the cash flow testing is filed with the insurance departments in the states where our insurance subsidiaries are licensed as an insurance company. At the last annual review at the statutory reporting period ended December 31, 2002, the results of this cash flow testing process were satisfactory.

Lending Commitments

We had approximately $13.1 million of outstanding commitments to extend credit to commercial borrowers at June 30, 2003.

New Accounting Rules

In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,”which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS No. 144 addresses accounting and reporting of long-lived assets, except goodwill, that are either held and used or disposed of through sale or other means. The adoption of this new statement on October 1, 2002 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,”which is effective for the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS No. 150 establishes how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Management does not expect the adoption of this new standard on July 1, 2003 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which is effective for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. FIN No. 46 is a clarification of the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, which addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. Management does not expect the adoption of this new standard on July 1, 2003 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We monitor interest sensitive income and expenses as we manage the objectives for our results of operations. Interest sensitive income consists of interest and earned discounts on receivables, insurance revenues and other investment interest. Interest sensitive expense consists of interest expense on borrowed money and insurance policy and annuity benefits.

We believe there has not been a material change in our market risk since the end of our last fiscal year.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the

time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in those reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In addition, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits


	31.1			Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.
	31.2			Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.
	32.1			Section 1350 Certification.
	32.2			Section 1350 Certification.

(b) During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, we filed the following reports on Form 8-K:

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed this 14th day of August 2003 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	SUMMIT SECURITIES, INC.

	/s/ TOM TURNER

	Tom Turner
	President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

	/s/ ROBERT A. NESS

	Robert A. Ness
	Principal Accounting Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


	31.1			Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.
	31.2			Rule 13a-14(a) Certification.
	32.1			Section 1350 Certification.
	32.2			Section 1350 Certification.

Filing Compare · SUMMIT SECURITIES INC /ID/