UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to

~~COMMISION~~COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-34612

OSTEOTECH, INC.

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE		13-3357370
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF		(I.R.S. EMPLOYER
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)		(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)		IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)

51 James Way, Eatontown, New Jersey, 07724 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, INCLUDING ZIP CODE) (732) 542-2800 (REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

(732) 542-2800 (REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “and” “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o ~~Smaller reporting company o~~ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of ~~August~~November 53, 2010 was 18,~~126~~272,~~882~~625.

OSTEOTECH, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		2
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1213
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		1821
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		1922
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		2023
Item 1A. Risk Factors		2023
Item 6. Exhibits		2025
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

- 1 -

~~PART~~Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands)

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1013,~~686~~777		$	10,708
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $303 in 2010 and $304 in 2009		16,125			16,165
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $125 in 2010 and $304 in 2009		15,815			16,165
Deferred processing costs		3331,~~185~~715			38,562
Inventories		1,~~476~~602			1,819
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,~~949~~998			3,247
Total current assets		6465,~~421~~907			70,501
Property, plant and equipment, net		2625,~~952~~637			29,575
Other assets		17,~~740~~752			16,861
Total assets		109,~~113~~296		$	116,937
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1012,~~180~~454		$	16,206
Current maturities of capital lease obligation		1,~~047~~074			994
Total current liabilities		1113,~~227~~528			17,200
Capital lease obligation		11,~~644~~365			12,181
Other liabilities		7,~~073~~006			7,270
Total liabilities		2931,~~944~~899			36,651
Commitments and contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock, $.01 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; issued 18,242,345 shares in 2010 and 18,179,180 shares in 2009		182			182
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; issued 18,361,033 shares in 2010 and 18,179,180 shares in 2009		184			182
Additional paid-in capital		72,~~060~~507			71,337
Treasury stock, at cost; 115,670 shares in 2010 and 2009		(227	)		(227	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 115,670 shares in 2010 and 2009		(227	)		(227	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,~~038~~274			1,410
Retained earnings		63,~~116~~659			7,584
Total stockholders’ equity		7977,~~169~~397			80,286
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	109,~~113~~296		$	116,937

See accompanying notes to condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

- 2 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenue	$	23,~~997~~104		$	2322,~~471~~961		$	4669,~~524~~628		$	4770,~~402~~363
Cost of revenue		11,~~922~~521			1112,~~940~~502			2335,~~479~~000			2336,~~904~~406
Gross profit		1211,~~075~~583			1110,~~531~~459			2334,~~045~~628			2333,~~498~~957
Marketing, selling and general and administrative expenses		10,390			10,768			21,093			22,386
Marketing, selling, and general and administrative expenses		13,096			10,648			34,189			33,034
Research and development expenses		~~1,051~~920			1,~~998~~544			23,~~259~~179			35,~~651~~195
		11,441			12,766			23,352			26,037
		14,016			12,192			37,368			38,229
Operating income (loss)		634			(1,235	)		(307	)		(2,539	)
Operating loss		(2,433	)		(1,733	)		(2,740	)		(4,272	)
Other income (expense):
Other expense:
Interest income		24			8			49			24
Interest expense, net		(310	)		(354	)		(965	)		(1,063	)
Interest expense		(340	)		(363	)		(704	)		(733	)
Other		136			58			(198	)		106
Other		(147	)		131			(334	)		48
		(174	)		(296	)		(1,163	)		(957	)
		(463	)		(224	)		(989	)		(661	)
Loss before income taxes		(2,607	)		(2,029	)		(3,903	)		(5,229	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		171			(1,459	)		(1,296	)		(3,200	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(150	)		(122	)		22			(322	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		56			(255	)		172			(200	)
Net loss	$	(2,457	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(3,925	)	$	(4,907	)
Net income (loss)	$	115		$	(1,204	)	$	(1,468	)	$	(3,000	)
Loss per share:
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.27	)
Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)
Diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.27	)
Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)
Shares used in computing loss per share:
Shares used in computing earnings (loss) per share:
Basic		18,182,443			18,120,350			18,134,819			17,925,718
Basic		18,069,937			18,004,217			18,098,827			17,882,059
Diluted		18,182,443			18,120,350			18,134,819			17,925,718
Diluted		18,201,915			18,004,217			18,098,827			17,882,059

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010			2009
Cash Flow From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(13,~~468~~925	)	$	(34,~~000~~907	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		24,~~874~~270			34,~~078~~619
Stock-based compensation expense, net		~~716~~985			~~842~~996
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		40350			(21,~~999~~425	)
Deferred processing costs		45,~~209~~879			(2,~~802~~112	)
Inventories		~~343~~217			(~~444~~216	)
Receivable from license agreements		~~800~~900			500
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		13(126	)		~~261~~312
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(6,164	)		(770	)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		(3,961	)		(3,596	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		14,~~363~~589			(5,~~334~~829	)
Cash Flow From Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(~~198~~292	)		(~~846~~1,267	)
Other, net		(~~590~~639	)		(~~362~~465	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~788~~931	)		(1,~~208~~732	)
Cash Flow From Financing Activities
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(102	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		7187			4748
Principal payments on capital lease obligation		(~~484~~736	)		(~~436~~663	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~477~~549	)		(~~491~~717	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(~~120~~40	)		962
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		~~(22~~3,069	)		(78,~~024~~216	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		10,708			18,823
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1013,~~686~~777		$	1110,~~799~~607
Supplementary cash flow data:
Supplementary cash flow data
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	~~701~~1,009		$	~~760~~1,137
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for taxes		39			(36	)
Cash paid during the period for taxes	$	43		$	110

See accompanying notes to condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

- 4 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Basis of Presentation

General

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, other than the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009, which has been derived from the audited balance sheet, are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary by management for a fair statement of financial position as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and the results of operations for each of the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations and cash flows for the respective interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain prior year amounts within the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, which were included as part of Osteotech, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), as updates to the Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”), and other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

~~Segment~~2. ~~Realignment~~Merger

~~Effective~~On ~~April~~August 116, 2010, the Company ~~eliminated~~entered ~~client~~into ~~services~~a asdefinitive aAgreement ~~separately~~and ~~reported~~Plan ~~segment~~of Merger (the “Merger ~~because~~Agreement”) itwith ~~exited~~Medtronic, ~~that~~Inc., ~~business~~a Minnesota corporation (“Medtronic”), Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., ~~Client~~an ~~service~~Indiana ~~revenue~~corporation and ~~related~~wholly ~~operating~~owned ~~income~~direct ~~have~~subsidiary ~~been reclassified~~of toMedtronic (“~~other~~MSD”), and ~~segment~~England Merger ~~information~~Corporation, ~~for~~a ~~the~~Delaware ~~three~~corporation and ~~six~~wholly ~~months~~owned ~~ended~~subsidiary ~~June 30~~of Medtronic (“Merger Sub”), pursuant ~~2009~~to which at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), Medtronic will ~~has~~acquire ~~been~~all ~~restated~~of tothe ~~reflect~~outstanding shares of the ~~segment~~Company’s ~~realignment~~common stock, $0.01 par value (“~~Other~~Common Stock”) ~~includes~~for ~~any~~$6.50 ~~products~~per orshare ~~services~~in cash (“Merger Consideration”) and pursuant to which Merger Sub will ~~not~~be ~~falling~~merged ~~within~~with and into the ~~following~~Company, ~~four~~with ~~operating~~the ~~segments:~~Company continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Medtronic (the “Merger”).

•On ~~Demineralized~~the ~~Bone~~terms ~~Matrix~~and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of Osteotech, at the Effective Time, and as a result thereof, each share of Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (~~DBM~~other than Common Stock held by Osteotech, Medtronic, Merger Sub or their subsidiaries, which will be canceled without payment of any consideration, and Common Stock for which appraisal rights have been validly exercised and not withdrawn) will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, which amount is subject to decrease under certain conditions as described in the Merger Agreement. Each option to purchase Common Stock that is outstanding as of the Effective Time will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive in cash the amount by which the Merger Consideration exceeds the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such option, less applicable withholding taxes, if any, required to be withheld with respect to such payment. Each restricted stock unit (“RSU”) that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will, at the Effective Time, be accelerated and canceled in exchange for the right to receive in cash the amount equal to the total number of shares of Common Stock represented by the RSU multiplied by the Merger Consideration, less applicable withholding taxes, if any, required to be withheld with respect to such payment.

•The ~~Hybrid/Synthetic~~Company and Medtronic have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants that: (i) the Company will conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, (ii) the Company will not engage in certain kinds of transactions during such period, and (iii) the Company will cause a meeting of the Company stockholders to be held to consider approval of the Merger Agreement, which is scheduled for November 9, 2010. The Company has also made certain additional customary covenants, including, among others, covenants not to: (i) solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, enter into discussions concerning or provide confidential information in connection with any proposals for alternative business combination transactions.

• Traditional Tissue, and

• Spinal Allograft.

The determination of the Company’s operating segments is based on an assessment by senior management, as well as a review process with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, based on the Company’s current and future business opportunities, current and future products and technologies, the markets in which it sells, and the revenue and cost make-up of its business segments.

2. Deferred Processing Costs

Deferred processing costs consist of the following:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Unprocessed donor tissue	$	13,200	$	16,692
Tissue in process		4,938		4,062
Implantable donor tissue		15,047		17,808
	$	33,185	$	38,562

Unprocessed donor tissue represents the value of such allograft bone tissue expected to be processed by the Company during the next twelve months. Unprocessed donor tissue expected to be processed in periods subsequent to one year of $9,643 and $8,475 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, are reflected in other assets.

- 5 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

3.Notes ~~Inventories~~ to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including (i) approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) the absence of any law or order prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (iii) the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (for which early termination of the waiting period was granted effective October 12, 2010), and the receipt of approvals under applicable foreign antitrust laws (all of which have been received), (iv) not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock being the subject of validly exercised appraisal rights and (v) the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to the Company.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and Medtronic, and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances, the Company would be required to reimburse Medtronic for its transaction-related expenses up to $3,000 or pay a termination fee of $5,000.

As described above, the Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties by the Company and Medtronic. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the Merger Agreement and (i) may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to the Company or Medtronic if those statements prove to be inaccurate, (ii) have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the Merger Agreement, (iii) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors, and (iv) were made only as of the date of the Merger Agreement or such other dates as may be specified in the Merger Agreement and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties should not be relied on as characterizations of the actual state of facts or for any other purpose either at the time they were made or at any other time.

3. Deferred Processing Costs

Deferred processing costs consist of the following:


	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Unprocessed donor tissue	$	13,065	$	16,692
Tissue in process		4,431		4,062
Implantable donor tissue		14,219		17,808

	$	31,715	$	38,562

Unprocessed donor tissue represents the value of such allograft bone tissue expected to be processed by the Company during the next twelve months. Unprocessed donor tissue expected to be processed in periods subsequent to one year of $9,693 and $8,475 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, are reflected in other assets.

- 6 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Supplies	$	~~336~~409	$	428
Raw materials		~~673~~581		779
Finished goods		~~467~~612		612
	$	1,~~476~~602	$	1,819

45. Revolving Credit Facility

OnThe ~~December 29, 2009, the~~ Company ~~entered~~has ~~into~~ a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National Association as lender and agent (“PNC”). Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement and upon request, the Company may borrow from PNC up to $10,000 subject to a maximum borrowing base that is based upon an amount equal to 85% of the Company’s eligible receivables (as that term is defined in the Credit Agreement) less such reserves as PNC reasonably deems proper and necessary. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is permitted to use the proceeds of any such borrowings to satisfy its working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at one of three variable rates: PNC’s base commercial lending rate plus 2%; the federal funds open rate plus 0.5%; or LIBOR plus 3%. In no event will the interest rate be less than 3%. Borrowings are secured by essentially all the assets of the Company. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay PNC a quarterly facility fee of 0.5% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Agreement.

The Company is also required to maintain compliance with various financial and other covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to, a prohibition on paying cash dividends, a requirement that a fixed charge coverage ratio be maintained beginning onfor the quarter ending March 31, 2011, and certain limitations on engaging in affiliate transactions, making acquisitions, incurring ~~additional~~ additional indebtedness and making capital expenditures, the breach of any of which would permit PNC to accelerate the obligations. The Credit ~~Facility~~Agreement also includes subjective acceleration provisions. Such provisions are based upon, in the reasonable opinion of PNC, the occurrence of any adverse or material change in the condition or affairs, financial or otherwise, of the Company, which impairs the interest of PNC.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement and the Company iswas in compliance with all covenants. The Credit Agreement expires on December 28, 2012.

5PNC, at its option, can declare the Credit Agreement in default, if and when, the proposed Merger is consummated and exercise any remedies to such default as defined in the Credit Agreement. ~~Stockholders’~~As noted ~~Equity~~above, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2010 and we currently do not expect any amounts to be outstanding upon the closing of the Merger.

6. Stockholders’ Equity

Stock Compensation Plans

The Company’s stock compensation plan authorizes the grant of incentive and non-qualified share based equity awards to eligible employees, directors, consultants and others with a business relationship with the Company. Incentive stock options may be granted at prices not less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant. Other share-based equity awards may be granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors under terms and conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee.

- 6 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The following table details certain information concerning the Company’s restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock options:

	RSUs					Options
											Weighted-
											Average
				Weighted-					Weighted-		Remaining
				Average					Average		Contractual
	Number of			Grant Date		Number of			Exercise		Term
	Shares			Fair Value		Shares			Price		(Years)
Outstanding, January 1, 2010		434,283		$	4.58		1,386,812		$	6.04
Granted		291,830		$	4.75		—
Vested RSUs or exercised options		(87,505	)	$	3.96		(2,000	)	$	3.50
Forfeited, cancelled or expired		(56,722	)	$	3.03		(92,400	)	$	9.71
Outstanding, June 30, 2010		581,886		$	4.91		1,292,412		$	5.78		3.87
Options exercisable							1,192,412		$	5.86		3.44

Share-based compensation, included in selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses, of $435 and $822 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $448 and $874 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, resulted in no tax benefit to the Company as a result of the Company providing a full valuation reserve on all deferred tax assets. For vesting RSUs, the Company, in accordance with the current operation of its equity award programs, withholds shares equal to the employee’s tax liability and, as a result, the Company effectively pays the tax on its employees’ behalf. The Company funded employment taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of $14 and $106, respectively, and $13 and $32 for the comparable prior year periods. Any such shares withheld by the Company are returned to the pool of available shares and are eligible for re-issuance. Shares of common stock available for future issuance under the stock compensation plan were 772,153 at June 30, 2010.

At June 30, 2010, the unrecorded non-cash fair value based compensation expense with respect to nonvested share-based awards was $1,890 and the weighted average period over which that compensation will be charged to operations is 1.8 years.

6. Income Taxes

Based on internal projections, including the effects of timing differences mainly related to depreciation and amortization, the Company estimated as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 that it would generate income for tax purposes. As a result, the Company, after the application of available net operating loss carry forwards, provided for Federal taxes based on the alternative minimum tax method, as well as recorded a provision for certain state and foreign taxes. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, certain unrecognized tax positions were effectively settled resulting in the recognition of a $330 tax benefit. The Company continues not to recognize any Federal, state or certain foreign tax benefits, which are subject to full valuation allowances in accordance with FASB Codification Topic (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company intends to maintain the valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of a valuation allowance that the Company has established. The Company evaluates its position with respect to the valuation allowances each quarter by taking into consideration numerous factors, including, but not limited to: past, present and forecasted results; the impact in each jurisdiction of operating activities; and the anticipated effects of the Company’s strategic plan.

The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Tax years subsequent to 2005 generally remain subject to examination by Federal, foreign and most state authorities including, but not limited to, the United States, France, Bulgaria and the State of New Jersey.

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were not material. If the Company prevails in matters for which either a receivable or a liability for a UTB has been established, is required to pay an amount or utilize NOLs to settle a tax liability, or estimates regarding a UTB change as a result of changes in facts and circumstances, the Company’s effective tax rate in a given financial reporting period may be affected. It is expected that the amount of UTBs will change in the next twelve months; however, the Company does not anticipate such change to be significant.

- 7 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

7.Notes ~~Commitments~~to ~~and~~Unaudited ~~Contingencies~~ Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Litigation~~ (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

AsThe ~~discussed~~following ~~more~~table ~~fully~~details incertain ~~the~~information ~~Company’s~~concerning ~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for~~ the ~~year ended December 31, 2009, the~~ Company was involved in a lawsuit filed on August 8, 2007 by ReSource Tissue Bank (“RTB”) against OST Developpement SA (“OST”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, before the Commercial Court of Clermond-Ferrand, France, arising from OST’s ~~allegedly~~RSUs ~~unlawful termination of its exclusive distribution agreement. In April 2010, the Court issued its ruling in the case~~ and ~~ordered~~ ~~OST~~stock ~~to make a nominal payment to RTB. Neither party intends to appeal the Court’s ruling.~~options:


	RSUs					Options
											Weighted-
											Average
				Weighted-					Weighted-		Remaining
				Average					Average		Contractual
	Number of			Grant Date		Number of			Exercise		Term
	Shares			Fair Value		Shares			Price		(Years)
Outstanding, January 1, 2010		434,283		$	4.58		1,386,812		$	6.04
Granted		291,830		$	4.75		—
Vested RSU’s or exercised options		(178,354	)	$	5.64		(36,437	)	$	5.10
Forfeited, cancelled or expired		(63,872	)	$	3.23		(92,900	)	$	9.69

Outstanding, September 30, 2010		483,887		$	4.47		1,257,475		$	5.79		3.61

Options exercisable							1,257,475		$	5.79		3.61

8Share-based compensation, included in selling, marketing and general and administrative expenses, of $296 and $1,118 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $446 and $1,320 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, resulted in no tax benefit to the Company as a result of the Company providing a full valuation reserve on all deferred tax assets. ~~Comprehensive~~For ~~Loss~~vesting RSUs, the Company at its option, in accordance with the current operation of its equity award programs, withholds shares equal to the employee’s tax liability and, as a result, the Company effectively pays appropriate withholding taxes on its employees’ behalf. The Company funded employment taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $27 and $133, respectively, and $292 and $324 for the comparable prior year periods. Any such shares withheld by the Company are returned to the pool of available shares and are eligible for re-issuance. Shares of common stock available for future issuance under the stock compensation plan were 783,258 at September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the Merger, no additional equity awards can be issued without the approval of Medtronic.

~~Comprehensive~~At ~~loss~~September 30, ~~for~~2010, the ~~periods~~unrecorded ~~indicated~~non-cash fair value based compensation expense with respect to nonvested share-based awards was $1,577 and the weighted average period over which that compensation will be charged to operations is as1.8 years. ~~follows:~~Immediately prior to the Effective Time, all unvested equity awards will fully vest and the Company will recognize all of that unrecorded compensation expense associated with the vesting of such equity awards at that time.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income (loss)	$	115		$	(1,204	)	$	(1,468	)	$	(3,000	)
Currency translation adjustments		(226	)		103			(372	)		(11	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(111	)	$	(1,101	)	$	(1,840	)	$	(3,011	)

7. Income Taxes

At September 30, 2010, based on internal projections including the impact of timing differences mainly related to depreciation and amortization, the Company estimates it will not generate taxable income in 2010 and therefore only provided for certain state and foreign taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. In 2009, as a result of the effects of timing differences, the Company estimated it would generate taxable income, and therefore provided for Federal alternative minimum taxes in addition to certain state and foreign taxes.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $152 as the result of a change in certain Federal tax regulations allowing the Company to carry back additional operating losses to prior years to recover previously paid Federal alternative minimum taxes and, the reversal of previously recorded provisions for 2010 Federal alternative minimum taxes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, certain unrecognized tax positions were effectively settled resulting in the recognition of tax benefits of $152 and $482, respectively. The Company continues not to recognize any Federal, state or certain foreign tax benefits, which are subject to full valuation allowances in accordance with FASB Codification Topic (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company intends to maintain the valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of a valuation allowance that the Company has established. The Company evaluates its position with respect to the valuation allowances each quarter by taking into consideration numerous factors, including, but not limited to: past, present and forecasted results; the impact in each jurisdiction of operating activities; and the anticipated effects of the Company’s strategic plan.

- 8 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

9.Notes ~~Loss~~to ~~Per~~Unaudited ~~Share~~ Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The Company files U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Tax years subsequent to 2006 generally remain subject to examination by Federal, foreign and most state authorities including, but not limited to, the United States, France, Bulgaria and the State of New Jersey.

The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were not material. If the Company prevails in matters for which either a receivable or a liability for a UTB has been established, is required to pay an amount or utilize NOLs to settle a tax liability, or estimates regarding a UTB change as a result of changes in facts and circumstances, the Company’s effective tax rate in a given financial reporting period may be affected. It is expected that the amount of UTBs will change in the next twelve months; however, the Company does not anticipate such change to be significant.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

minSURG International, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., et al.

On July 19, 2010, minSURG International, Inc. (“minSURG”) sued several entities, including the Company, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. MinSURG’s complaint alleges that the Company’s FacetLinx^TM Fusion Technology infringes minSURG’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,708,761, D590,943, and D574,495. The complaint also makes business torts allegations against the Company, specifically, Lanham Act false advertising, Florida law unfair competition, defamation, and tortious interference with business and contractual relationship allegations. The Company was served with the complaint on July 28, 2010. On August 3, 2010 minSURG filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking an injunction only with respect to its claims that the Company (and other defendants) was and continues to induce and contribute to the infringement of the ‘761 Patent. The Company filed its response to the preliminary injunction motion on September 1, 2010. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the preliminary injunction motion on October 5, 2010. The Company also filed a motion to dismiss all of minSURG’s claims, for failure to effectively state a claim, on August 31, 2010. We await decisions on minSURG’s motion for a preliminary injunction, and on our motion to dismiss.

The Company believes the claims made against it in this case are without merit and intendeds to vigorously defend itself in this action.

Medtronic Merger Litigation

In August 2010, four class action complaints were filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, concerning the Merger. The first class action was instituted by certain individual stockholders, individually and on behalf of all public stockholders of the Company, against the Company, its board of directors, president, and chief executive officer, as well as Medtronic, MSD, and Merger Sub. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty by the members of the board of directors arising out of the attempt to sell the Company by means of an allegedly unfair process with preclusive deal protection devices and at an unfair price of $6.50 in cash for each share of Common Stock. The complaint also alleges that Medtronic aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the other defendants. The other three class action complaints filed with respect to the proposed Merger are substantially the same as the first action filed. The lawsuits have all been transferred to Chancery Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County and consolidated. An amended complaint was filed and has been designated as the operative complaint in this consolidated action. In addition to the allegations summarized above, the amended complaint makes additional allegations that the Company’s proxy statement relative to the special meeting of stockholders to be held on November 9, 2010 was deficient because it did not disclose certain information about the proposed Merger and the financial analysis performed by Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., the Company’s financial advisor in connection with the proposed merger. The plaintiff also alleges that the Company violated the corporate law of Delaware when it canceled its annual stockholder meeting scheduled for August 23, 2010. The parties have conducted limited discovery and the plaintiff has filed a motion with the court for a temporary restraining order to, among other things, delay the stockholder vote. On November 8, 2010, the Chancery Court of New Jersey denied the plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order.

- 9 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The Company believes the claims made against it in these cases are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in these actions.

9. Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss for the periods indicated is as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009

Net loss	$	(2,457	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(3,925	)	$	(4,907	)
Currency translation adjustments		236			78			(136	)		67

Comprehensive loss	$	(2,221	)	$	(1,829	)	$	(4,061	)	$	(4,840	)

10. Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	115		$	(1,204	)	$	(1,468	)	$	(3,000	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(2,457	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(3,925	)	$	(4,907	)
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share, weighted average common shares outstanding		18,069,937			18,004,217			18,098,827			17,882,059
Denominator for basic loss per share, weighted average common shares outstanding		18,182,443			18,120,350			18,134,819			17,925,718
Effect of dilutive securities after application of the treasury stock method:
Restricted stock units		~~113,504~~—			—			—			—
Stock options		~~18,474~~—			—			—			—
Denominator for diluted loss per share		18,~~201~~182,~~915~~443			18,~~004~~120,~~217~~350			18,~~098~~134,~~827~~819			17,~~882~~925,~~059~~718
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)
Basic loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.27	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.27	)

~~For~~Common ~~the~~Stock ~~three~~equivalent ~~and~~shares ~~six~~at ~~months ended June~~September 30, 2010, ~~common~~and ~~stock~~2009 ~~equivalent~~of ~~shares~~1,741,362 and 2,121,795, respectively, consisting of all outstanding stock options and RSUs, ofwere ~~1,552,677~~not ~~and~~included ~~1,803,738~~in ~~respectively, are excluded from~~ the ~~calculation~~ calculation of diluted loss per share as their ~~effects~~effect ~~are~~is ~~anti-dilutive~~antidilutive.

~~For~~11. ~~the~~Fair ~~three~~Value ~~and six months ended June 30, 2009, common stock equivalent shares, consisting of~~Measurements ~~stock options and RSUs, of 2,223,231 are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their effects are antidilutive.~~

~~10.~~In accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) the Company values its financial assets and liabilities at fair value but, unless required by other provisions of the Codification, does not value non-financial assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC 820 provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, summarized as follows:

In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) the Company values its financial assets and liabilities at fair value but, unless required by other provisions of the Codification, does not value non-financial assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC 820 provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, summarized as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or observable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions.

- 910 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. ~~and~~AND SUBSIDIARIES ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)~~

~~The~~Notes following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value as of June 30, 2010 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to ~~determine~~Unaudited ~~such~~Condensed ~~fair~~Consolidated ~~value:~~ Financial Statements

Quoted Prices in

Significant

Active Markets

Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Assets

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Asset:

Money market funds

5,837

—

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value as of September 30, 2010 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value:

Quoted Prices in

Significant

Active Markets

Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Assets

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Asset:

Money market funds

5,842

—

Money market funds are classified as cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

1112. Operating Segments

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s segments is shown in the following tables.

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	September 30,				September 30,
Revenue:	2010		2009		2010		2009
	2010		2009		2010		2009
DBM	$	14,128	$	14,808	$	27,261	$	28,834
Revenue			restated				restated
Hybrid/Synthetic		2,855		647		5,235		1,395
DBM	$	13,241	$	14,611	$	40,502	$	43,445
Traditional Tissue		4,933		5,443		10,003		10,720
Hybrid/Synthetic		3,353		894		8,588		2,289
Spinal Allograft		1,886		1,862		3,585		3,742
Traditional Tissue		4,972		5,101		14,975		15,821
Other		195		711		440		2,711
Spinal Allograft		1,384		1,966		4,969		5,708
	$	23,997	$	23,471	$	46,524	$	47,402
Other		154		389		594		3,100
	$	23,104	$	22,961	$	69,628	$	70,363

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September 30,						September 30,
Operating income (loss):	2010			2009			2010			2009
	2010			2009			2010			2009
DBM	$	4,381		$	3,768		$	8,556		$	7,700
Operating income (loss):				restated						restated
Hybrid/Synthetic		641			(234	)		927			(132	)
DBM	$	5,052		$	4,462		$	13,608		$	12,162
Traditional Tissue		483			778			783			1,068
Hybrid/Synthetic		832			(261	)		1,759			(393	)
Spinal Allograft		179			307			(100	)		551
Traditional Tissue		(569	)		(220	)		214			848
Other		4			141			16			1,205
Spinal Allograft		33			320			(67	)		871
Corporate		(5,054	)		(5,995	)		(10,489	)		(12,931	)
Other		(12	)		(410	)		4			795
	$	634		$	(1,235	)	$	(307	)	$	(2,539	)
Corporate		(7,769	)		(5,624	)		(18,258	)		(18,555	)
	$	(2,433	)	$	(1,733	)	$	(2,740	)	$	(4,272	)

InEffective ~~each~~April 1, of2010 the ~~three~~Company eliminated client services as a separately reported segment because the Company exited that business. Client service revenue and ~~six~~related ~~months~~operating ~~ended~~income ~~June 30,~~have been ~~2010~~reclassified to “other” and ~~2009,~~prior noyear ~~customer~~segment ~~accounted~~information ~~for~~has ~~more than~~been ~~10%~~restated ofto ~~revenue~~reflect the segment realignment.

-In each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, no customer accounted for more than 10% -of revenue.

OSTEOTECH, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

12. Other Income (expense)

Certain components of Other income (expense) for the periods indicated are as follows:

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
Other:	2010			2009		2010			2009
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	$	(134	)	$	112	$	(309	)	$	42
Other		(13	)		19		(25	)		6
	$	(147	)	$	131	$	(334	)	$	48

- 11 -

OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

13. Other Expense

Certain components of Other expense for the periods indicated are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
Other	2010			2009			2010			2009
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	$	154		$	74		$	(155	)	$	116
Other		(18	)		(16	)		(43	)		(10	)

	$	136		$	58		$	(198	)	$	106

- 12 -

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussions should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Information included herein contains “forward-looking statements” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. No assurance can be given that the future results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. Some of the matters set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, in Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 constitute cautionary statements identifying factors with respect to such forward-looking statements, including certain risks and uncertainties, that could cause actual results to vary materially from the future results indicated in such forward-looking statements. Other factors could also cause actual results to vary materially from the future results indicated in such forward-looking statements. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report.

~~FOR~~On ~~THE~~August 16, ~~THREE~~2010, ~~AND~~we ~~SIX~~entered ~~MONTHS~~into ~~ENDED~~a ~~JUNE~~definitive 30Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Medtronic, ~~2010~~Inc., ~~AND~~a ~~2009~~Minnesota corporation (“Medtronic”), Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., an Indiana corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of Medtronic (“MSD”), and England Merger Corporation, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Medtronic (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), Medtronic will acquire all of our outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 (“Common Stock”) for $6.50 per share in cash (“Merger Consideration”) and pursuant to which Merger Sub will be merged with and into us, with us continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Medtronic (the “Merger”).

On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by our Board of Directors, at the Effective Time, and as a result thereof, each share of Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Common Stock held by us, Medtronic, Merger Sub or their subsidiaries, which will be canceled without payment of any consideration, and Common Stock for which appraisal rights have been validly exercised and not withdrawn) will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, which amount is subject to decrease under certain conditions as described in the Merger Agreement. Each option to purchase Common Stock that is outstanding as of the Effective Time will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive in cash the amount by which the Merger Consideration exceeds the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such option, less applicable withholding taxes, if any, required to be withheld with respect to such payment. Each restricted stock unit (“RSU”) that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will, at the Effective Time, be accelerated and canceled in exchange for the right to receive in cash the amount equal to the total number of shares of Common Stock represented by the RSU multiplied by the Merger Consideration, less applicable withholding taxes, if any, required to be withheld with respect to such payment.

We and Medtronic have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants that: (i) we will conduct our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, (ii) we will not engage in certain kinds of transactions during such period, and (iii) we will cause a meeting of our stockholders to be held to consider approval of the Merger Agreement, which is scheduled for November 9, 2010. We have also made certain additional customary covenants, including, among others, covenants not to: (i) solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, enter into discussions concerning or provide confidential information in connection with any proposals for alternative business combination transactions.

- 13 -

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and Medtronic, and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances, we would be required to reimburse Medtronic for its transaction-related expenses up to $3.0 million or pay a termination fee of $5.0 million.

As described above, the Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties by us and Medtronic. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the Merger Agreement and (i) may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to us or Medtronic if those statements prove to be inaccurate, (ii) have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the Merger Agreement, (iii) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors, and (iv) were made only as of the date of the Merger Agreement or such other dates as may be specified in the Merger Agreement and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties should not be relied on as characterizations of the actual state of facts or for any other purpose either at the time they were made or at any other time.

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the estimates and may adjust them based upon the latest information available. These estimates generally include those related to product returns, bad debts, inventories including purchase commitments, deferred processing costs including reserves for rework, excess and obsolescence, long-lived assets, asset retirement obligations, income taxes, stock-based compensation, contingencies and litigation. We base the estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our accounting practices are discussed in more detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as well as in “Recent Accounting Developments” included elsewhere herein. There have been no significant modifications in our critical accounting policies or estimates since December 31, 2009.

Net ~~income (~~loss)

	Three Months Ended									~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands,	June 30,									June 30,
(dollars in thousands, except	September 30,									September 30,
except per share amounts)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change
per share amounts)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change
Net income (loss)	$	115		$	(1,204	)	$	1,319		$	(1,468	)	$	(3,000	)	$	(1,532	)
Net loss	$	(2,457	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(550	)	$	(3,925	)	$	(4,907	)	$	982
Earnings (loss) per share:
Loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.0114	)	$	(0.0711	)				$	(0.0822	)	$	(0.1727	)
Diluted	$	(0.0114	)	$	(0.0711	)				$	(0.0822	)	$	(0.1727	)

We ~~generated~~incurred ~~net income in the second quarter of 2010 while incurring~~ a net loss for the ~~six~~three ~~months ended~~and ~~June 30,~~nine ~~2010.~~months ~~Results in the quarter~~ ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~were~~primarily ~~positively~~as ~~impacted~~a byresult ~~improved~~of ~~revenue~~the direct and ~~operating~~indirect ~~expense~~out-of-pocket ~~cost~~costs ~~containment~~associated ~~while,~~with ~~for~~ the ~~six~~pursuit ~~month~~of ~~period~~strategic alternatives ~~ended~~and ~~June 30,~~the ~~2010,~~proposed ~~unit~~Merger. ~~sales~~Although ~~volume~~we have ~~was~~been ~~insufficient~~successful toin ~~cover~~improving ~~our~~gross margins and reducing operating expenses. ~~During~~(exclusive of the ~~three~~costs and ~~six~~ ~~months~~expenses ~~ended~~noted ~~June 30,~~directly ~~2010~~above), we ~~incurred~~did ~~$0.5 million~~not ~~and $0.9 million of costs and expenses,~~generate ~~respectively,~~sufficient ~~related~~revenue to ~~the~~effectively ~~investigation~~leverage ofour ~~strategic~~internal ~~alternatives~~costs ~~by the Company. Also~~base, inwhich ~~both the~~also ~~three~~contributed ~~and six month periods, currency losses related~~ to the loss ~~decline~~ in ~~the~~both ~~exchange~~periods ~~rate between~~in ~~the U~~2010. ~~S. dollar and the euro negatively impacted our results of operations.~~

In ~~both~~- ~~the~~14 ~~three~~- ~~and six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred a net loss because our unit sales~~ ~~volume was insufficient to effectively leverage the fixed cost base of our processing facilities to cover our operating expenses.~~

- 12 -

In both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a net loss because our unit sales volume was insufficient to effectively leverage the fixed cost base of our processing facilities and to cover our operating expenses.

Revenue

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, revenue was $2423.01 million as compared to $23.~~5 million~~0 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, revenue was $4669.56 million as compared to $4770.4 million in the comparable prior year period. We plan to continue to focus our strategic efforts on the expansion of our new products ~~from our technology platforms~~ and to maintain the market position of our existing products lines.

The following table details the components of our revenue for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009.

	Three Months Ended										~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,										June 30,
	September 30,										September 30,
								Percent										Percent
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Change			Change			2010		2009		Change			Change
DBM	$	1413,~~128~~241	$	14,~~808~~611	$	(~~680~~1,370	)		-59	%	$	2740,~~261~~502	$	2843,~~834~~445	$	(12,~~573~~943	)		-57	%
Hybrid/Synthetic		23,~~855~~353		~~647~~894		2,~~208~~459			~~341~~275	%		58,~~235~~588		12,~~395~~289		36,~~840~~299			275	%
Traditional Tissue		4,~~933~~972		5,~~443~~101		(~~510~~129	)		-93	%		1014,~~003~~975		1015,~~720~~821		(~~717~~846	)		-75	%
Spinal Allograft		1,~~886~~384		1,~~862~~966		24(582	)		1-30	%		34,~~585~~969		35,~~742~~708		(~~157~~739	)		-413	%
Other		~~195~~154		~~711~~389		(~~516~~235	)		-7360	%		~~440~~594		23,~~711~~100		(2,~~271~~506	)		-8481	%
	$	23,~~997~~104	$	2322,~~471~~961	$	~~526~~143			21	%	$	4669,~~524~~628	$	4770,~~402~~363	$	(~~878~~735	)		-21	%

DBM Segment revenue, which consists of revenue from the sale of Grafton® DBM and Xpanse® Bone Inserts and revenue from the processing of a private label DBM, declined 59% and 7%, respectively, for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily as a result of the decline in domestic unit sales volume.

Revenue in the Hybrid/Synthetic Segment, which consists of revenue from our Magnifuse™ Technology, Plexur® Biocomposites, and GraftCage® Spacers, increased ~~341% and~~ 275% for both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~respectively,~~ as compared to the same periods in 2009 as a result of the ~~continued~~ continued expansion of our Magnifuse™ Bone Graft and Plexur M® Innovative Grafting products.

Traditional Tissue Segment revenue generated from the worldwide distribution of allograft bone tissue grafts declined 93% and 75%, respectively, for three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as as compared to the comparable periods in 2009 primarily due to a decline in international unit ~~sales~~ sales volume.

Revenue in the Spinal Allograft Segment in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010 ~~was~~declined ~~relatively flat~~30%, compared to the prior year period, as a result of ~~revenue from the sale of our FacetLinxTM Fusion Technology product, offsetting~~ a decline in domestic unit sales volume of Graftech® Spacers. ~~For~~ For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, Spinal Allograft Segment revenue declined by 413% compared to the prior year period as a result of ~~revenue from~~ the ~~sale of our FacetLinxTM Fusion Technology product not totally offsetting the~~ decline in the domestic unit sales volume of Graftech® Spacers.

In both the ~~second~~third quarter and ~~six~~nine months end ~~June~~September 30, 2010, other revenue consisted mainly of revenue from the international distribution of Xenograft products and miscellaneous other revenue. In the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, revenue from the processing of allograft ~~bone~~ bone tissue for clients, a business we have exited, was $~~255~~125 and $12,~~888~~013, respectively.

~~For~~ ~~the~~- ~~three~~15 ~~and~~- ~~six months ended June 30, 2010, domestic revenue was $18.9 million and $36.9~~ million, respectively, compared to $17.9 million and $37.0 million in the comparable prior year periods. The increase in domestic revenue in the second quarter of 2010, compared to the comparable 2009 quarter, mainly results from revenue from new products of $2.5 million, introduced in the second half of 2009, partially offset by reductions in DBM revenue and revenue from client services, a business we have exited. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 domestic revenue from new products of $4.3 million only partially offset declines in DBM and client services revenue from that reported in 2009.

- 13 -

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~international~~domestic revenue was $519.10 million and $955.6 9 million, respectively, compared to $518.64 million and $1055.4 million in the ~~same~~ comparable prior ~~year~~ year periods. ~~International revenue~~The ~~represented~~increase ~~21%~~in ofdomestic ~~total~~ revenue ~~both~~ in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010, ~~and~~compared ~~for~~to the ~~six months~~ ~~ended~~comparable ~~June 30,~~2009 ~~2010~~quarter, ~~compared~~mainly toresults ~~24%~~from ~~and~~revenue ~~22%,~~from ~~respectively,~~new products of ~~total~~$3.4 million ~~revenue~~partially offset by reductions in ~~the~~DBM ~~three~~and spinal allograft revenue and ~~six~~revenue from client services. During the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009.~~2010 ~~The~~domestic ~~reduction in international~~ revenue infrom ~~2010~~new ~~mainly~~products ~~results~~of ~~from~~$7.3 million aonly ~~decline~~partially inoffset ~~revenue~~declines in ~~certain~~DBM, ~~Asian~~spinal ~~markets~~allograft, ~~which~~and ~~was~~client ~~partially~~services ~~offset~~revenue byfrom ~~improvements~~that reported in ~~certain European markets~~2009.

For ~~each of~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, international revenue was $4.1 million and $13.7 million, ~~2009~~respectively, nocompared ~~customer~~to ~~accounted~~$4.6 million ~~for~~and ~~more~~$15.0 million in the same comparable ~~than~~prior ~~10%~~year ofperiods. The reduction in international revenue in 2010 mainly results from a decline in revenue in certain European and Asian markets which was partially offset by improvements in certain Latin American markets.

For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue.

Gross Profit Margin

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September 30,						September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Gross Profit	$	1211,~~075~~583		$	1110,~~531~~459		$	2334,~~045~~628		$	2333,~~498~~957
Gross Margin		50	%		4946	%		50	%		5048	%

In the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010, ~~gross~~and ~~margin~~for ~~improved~~the ~~from~~nine ~~the~~months ~~second~~ended ~~quarter~~September 30, of2010, ~~2009~~our ~~primarily~~gross ~~due~~margin to improved ~~unit~~compared ~~sales volume, resulting in our ability~~ to ~~absorb~~ the ~~fixed~~prior ~~cost~~year ~~base~~periods ofprimarily ~~our processing~~due ~~facility,~~to ~~and~~ lower ~~royalty~~ costs. ~~For~~and ~~the~~expenses ~~six~~resulting from ~~months ended June 30, 2010~~ our ~~gross margin~~cost ~~was~~containment ~~flat compared to the prior year period~~programs.

Operating Expenses

	Three Months Ended										~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,										June 30,
	September 30,										September 30,
								Percent										Percent
(dollars in thousands)	2010		2009		Change			Change			2010		2009		Change			Change
Marketing, selling and general and administrative	$	1013,~~390~~096	$	10,~~768~~648	$	~~(378~~2,448	)		-423	%	$	2134,~~093~~189	$	2233,~~386~~034	$	(1,~~293~~155	)		-63	%
Research and development		~~1,051~~920		1,~~998~~544		(~~947~~624	)		-4740	%		23,~~259~~179		35,~~651~~195		(12,~~392~~016	)		-3839	%
	$	1114,~~441~~016	$	12,~~766~~192	$	(1,~~325~~824	)		~~-10~~15	%	$	2337,~~352~~368	$	2638,~~037~~229	$	(~~2,685~~861	)		-102	%

~~Marketing~~The increase in marketing, selling and general and administrative expenses ~~declined~~for ~~4% and 6%, respectively, in~~ the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the ~~respective~~prior ~~2009~~year ~~periods~~period ~~primarily~~is due primarily to the direct and ~~lower~~indirect ~~employee~~out-of-pocket costs and ~~cost~~expenses ~~containment~~of ~~initiatives~~$1.6 million associated Inwith the ~~three~~pursuit of strategic alternatives and ~~six~~the proposed Merger. For the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, wemarketing, selling ~~incurred $0.5 million~~ and ~~$0.9 million~~general ~~of costs~~ and administrative expenses, ~~respectively,~~increased ~~related~~as compared to the ~~investigation~~ ofsame ~~strategic~~period ~~alternatives~~in by2009 primarily ~~the~~due ~~Company.~~to In the ~~three~~direct and ~~six~~indirect ~~months~~out-of-pocket ~~ended~~costs ~~June~~and expenses of $2.5 ~~30,~~million incurred ~~2010,~~in ~~research~~connection ~~and~~with ~~development~~the ~~expenses~~pursuit ~~decreased~~of ~~47%~~strategic alternatives and ~~38%,~~the ~~respectively,~~proposed asMerger ~~compared~~and towere ~~the~~only ~~respective~~partially ~~2009~~offset ~~periods,~~by ~~primarily~~our ~~due~~cost tocontainment ~~several~~efforts ~~new~~in ~~tissue~~all ~~technologies~~functional areas and ~~products~~our ~~that~~reduced ~~were~~spending ~~still~~on innew ~~development~~programs inand ~~the~~initiatives ~~first~~as ~~half~~we ofconcentrate ~~2009~~on ~~moving~~the ~~into~~launch ~~commercialization~~of our new products.

-In 14the -three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, research and development expenses decreased 40% and 39%, respectively, as compared to the respective 2009 periods, primarily due to several new tissue technologies and products that were still in development in 2009 moving into full commercialization in 2010, our focus on cost containment initiatives and not initiating new projects as we focused on the commercialization efforts of the new products.

- 16 -

Operating Income (Loss) By Segment

	Three Months Ended												~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,												June 30,
	September 30,												September 30,
										Percent												Percent
(dollars in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			Change			2010			2009			Change			Change
DBM	$	45,~~381~~052		$	34,~~768~~462		$	~~613~~590			1613	%	$	813,~~556~~608		$	712,~~700~~162		$	~~856~~1,446			1112	%
Hybrid/Synthetic		~~641~~832			(~~234~~261	)		~~875~~1,093			~~374~~419	%		~~927~~1,759			(~~132~~393	)		12,~~059~~152			~~802~~548	%
Traditional Tissue		~~483~~(569	)		~~778~~(220	)		(~~295~~349	)		-38159	%		~~783~~214			~~1,068~~848			(~~285~~634	)		-2775	%
Spinal Allograft		~~179~~33			~~307~~320			(~~128~~287	)		-4290	%		(~~100~~67	)		~~551~~871			(~~651~~938	)		-~~118~~108	%
Other		4(12	)		~~141~~(410	)		~~(137~~398	)		-97	%		164			~~1,205~~795			(~~1,189~~791	)		-99	%
Product Segment Operating Income		5,~~688~~336			43,~~760~~891			~~928~~1,445			1937	%		1015,~~182~~518			1014,~~392~~283			~~(210~~1,235	)		-29	%
Corporate		(57,~~054~~769	)		(5,~~995~~624	)		~~941~~(2,145	)		~~-16~~38	%		(1018,~~489~~258	)		(1218,~~931~~555	)		~~2,442~~297			~~-19~~2	%
Operating Income (Loss)	$	~~634~~(2,433	)	$	(1,~~235~~733	)	$	~~1,869~~(700	)		~~151~~-40	%	$	(~~307~~2,740	)	$	(24,~~539~~272	)	$	21,~~232~~532			8836	%

Product segment operating income is comprised of segment revenue less material and processing cost and selling and marketing expenses. Total product segment operating income for the ~~second~~three ~~quarter of 2010 increased 19% as compared to the comparable prior year quarter due to higher gross profit~~ and ~~lower selling expenses. For the six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~product~~increased ~~segment~~37% ~~operating income~~and ~~declined 2~~9%, ~~from~~respectively, as compared to the comparable prior year ~~period~~periods asdue ato ~~result~~higher ~~of lower~~ gross profit ~~partially~~ ~~being~~and ~~offset by~~ lower selling expenses. As a result, in the three ~~second~~and ~~quarter~~nine ofmonths ended September 30, 2010 , product segment operating income, as a percent of revenue, increase to 2423% ~~compared~~and ~~to 20~~22%, ~~in the second quarter of 2009~~respectively, ~~but~~compared ~~was~~to ~~relatively~~17% ~~constant~~and ~~at 22~~20% ~~during~~in ~~both~~ the ~~six~~comparable ~~months ended June~~prior ~~30,~~year ~~2010 and 2009~~periods.

Costs and expenses associated with Corporate for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~declined~~increased 1638% and 192%, respectively, when compared to the comparable 2009 periods primarily due to ~~lower~~our ~~employee~~incurring ~~costs and cost containment initiatives~~$1.6 million ~~In the three~~ and ~~six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred~~ $02.5 million of direct and ~~$0.9 million~~indirect out-of-pocket costs and expenses, ~~respectively~~in the respective 2010 periods, related to the ~~investigation~~ review of strategic alternatives byand the proposed ~~Company~~Merger.

Other ~~Income (~~Expense)

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, other expense was $0.52 million and $1.0 2 million, respectively, compared to $0.23 million and $01.70 million in the respective 2009 periods. ~~Interest~~ Interest expense associated with our capital lease obligation, declined in the 2010 periods compared to the 2009 periods and interest income on our invested cash balances was not significant. In the ~~second~~ third quarter of 2010, and ~~six~~in ~~months~~the ~~ended~~comparable ~~June 30,~~prior ~~2010~~year period, we recorded foreign exchange ~~losses~~ gains of $0.12 million and $0.31 million, respectively,. ~~compared~~We toincurred a foreign exchange ~~gains~~loss of $0.12 million and a foreign exchange gain of $.050.1 million in the ~~comparable~~nine ~~2009~~months ~~periods~~ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ~~The~~Our foreign exchange ~~losses~~gains inresult ~~2010 resulted~~ from the U.S. dollar ~~strengthening~~ weakening against the euro whereas inwe ~~2010~~incur ~~compared~~foreign toexchange alosses ~~weakening~~when the U.S. dollar strengthens against the euro ~~in 2009~~.

Income Tax Provision

~~Based~~At September 30, 2010, based on internal projections, including the ~~effects~~impact of timing differences mainly ~~related~~relate to depreciation and amortization, we ~~estimated~~estimate aswe ofwill ~~June 30,~~not ~~2010~~generate ~~and~~taxable ~~2009 that we would generate~~ income ~~for tax purposes. As a result, after the application of available net operating loss carry~~in ~~forwards,~~2010 weand ~~provided~~therefore ~~for~~only ~~Federal taxes based on the alternative minimum tax method, as well as~~provided ~~recorded a provision~~ for certain state and foreign taxes. ~~During~~for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2009, certain unrecognized tax positions were effectively settled resulting in the recognition of $0~~2010.~~3 million~~ ~~in tax benefits. We continue not to recognize any Federal, state or~~In ~~certain foreign tax benefits~~2009, ~~which~~as ~~were~~a ~~subject~~result toof ~~full valuation allowances in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” We intend to maintain~~ the ~~valuation~~effects ~~allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal~~ of ~~a valuation~~timing ~~allowance~~differences, ~~that~~ we ~~have~~generated ~~established.~~taxable ~~We evaluate our position with respect to the valuation allowances each quarter by taking into consideration numerous factors~~income, ~~including,~~and ~~but not~~therefore ~~limited~~provided ~~to:~~for ~~past,~~Federal ~~present~~alternative ~~and~~minimum ~~forecasted~~taxes ~~results; the impact~~ in ~~each~~addition ~~jurisdiction~~to ofcertain ~~operating activities;~~state and ~~the~~foreign ~~anticipated effects of our strategic plan~~taxes.

-During 15the -three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized a tax benefit of $0.2 million as the result of a change in certain Federal tax regulations allowing us to carry back additional operating losses to prior years to recover previously paid Federal alternative minimum taxes and, the reversal of previously recorded provisions for 2010 Federal alternative minimum taxes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, certain unrecognized tax positions were effectively settled resulting in the recognition of tax benefits of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. We continue not to recognize any Federal, state or certain foreign tax benefits, which are subject to full valuation allowances in accordance with FASB Codification Topic (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company intends to maintain the valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of a valuation allowance that we have established. We evaluate our position with respect to the valuation allowances each quarter by taking into consideration numerous factors, including, but not limited to: past, present and forecasted results; the impact in each jurisdiction of operating activities; and the anticipated effects of our strategic plan.

- 17 -

We file ~~United States~~U.S., state, and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of of limitations. Tax years subsequent to ~~2005~~2006 generally remain subject to examination by Federal, foreign and most state authorities including, but not limited to, the United States, France, Bulgaria and the State of New Jersey.

Our unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were not material. If we prevail in matters for which either a receivable or a liability for a UTB has been established, are required to pay an amount or utilize NOLs to settle a tax liability, or estimates regarding a UTB change as a result of changes in facts and circumstances, our effective tax rate in a given financial reporting period may be affected. It is expected that the amount of UTBs will change in the next twelve months; however, we do not anticipate such change to be significant.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
(dollars in thousands)

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1013,~~686~~777	$	10,708
Working Capital	$	5352,~~194~~379	$	53,301
Stockholders’ equity	$	7977,~~169~~397	$	80,286

Summary of our cash flow:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
Summary of our cash flow:	2010			2009
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	4,589		$	(5,829	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(931	)	$	(1,732	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(549	)	$	(717	)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash	$	(40	)	$	62

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	3,069		$	(8,216	)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010			2009
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	1,363		$	(5,334	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(788	)	$	(1,208	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(477	)	$	(491	)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash	$	(120	)	$	9
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(22	)	$	(7,024	)

Cash Flow From Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.4.6 million in the ~~first~~nine ~~half~~months ofended September 30, 2010 compared to a consumption of $5.38 million in cash by operating activities in the ~~first~~comparable prior ~~half~~year ~~of 2009~~period. The change resulted primarily from our efforts to more closely manage our investment in working capital, especially our tissue inventories, and a reduction in our net loss in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the prior year period. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, working capital, excluding cash, was $4238.56 million compared to $42.6 million at December 31, 2009. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, we reduced our investment in inventory and deferred processing costs by $45.6 8 million. Offsetting that reduction was a $63.2 8 million reduction in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

- 18 -

Cash Flow From Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.89 million and $1.27 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We anticipate that for 2010, the funding of capital expenditures and patent development will be below our 2009 levels.

Cash Flow From Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.5 million ~~for~~and ~~both~~$0.7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Principal payments on our capital lease obligation were $0.57 in both the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $02009.4 Partially offsetting these ~~million~~payments in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~and~~were ~~2009,~~$0.2 ~~respectively~~in proceeds from the sale of common stock through the exercise of stock options. In the ~~first~~nine ~~half~~months ofended September 30, 2009, we used $0.1 million to repurchase our common stock which was partially offset from the proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan.

- 16 -

Financing Needs

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, cash and cash equivalents were $1013.78 million, ~~which~~an ~~approximated~~increase ~~our~~of ~~December~~$3.1 ~~31,~~million ~~2009~~from ~~balances.~~cash Weand ~~have~~cash ~~instituted~~equivalents ~~plans~~at toDecember 31, ~~recover~~2009 ~~some~~ of ~~our~~$10.7 million. ~~investments~~Our intissue ~~working~~inventory reduction ~~capital~~efforts, ~~but we~~cost ~~will~~cutting ~~still~~initiatives ~~fund~~and ~~additional~~reduced ~~investments~~spending inon capital expenditures ~~and~~are ~~make~~the primary ~~payments~~reasons ~~under~~for ~~our capital~~the ~~lease~~improvement ~~obligation.~~in Wecash ~~are instituting~~and ~~cost~~cash ~~reduction~~equivalents. ~~programs~~During to2010, ~~align~~we ~~our~~have ~~infrastructure~~also incurred $2.5 million in direct and ~~initiatives~~indirect out-of-pocket costs associated with the ~~size~~evaluation of ~~our~~strategic ~~revenue~~alternatives ~~base~~and the proposed Merger ($1.3 million Inremains ~~addition~~unpaid at September 30, we2010) which ~~are~~had ~~currently~~a ~~focused~~negative impact on ~~the~~our ~~launch~~financial ofresults ~~several~~and ~~new~~cash ~~tissue~~balance. We continue to focus on the ~~products~~launch ~~from~~of our new, ~~proprietary~~tissue ~~technology~~products ~~platforms~~ which we believe ~~will~~are ~~provide~~the ~~revenue growth~~generators inbehind future ~~periods~~revenue growth. ~~Revenue~~This revenue growth is the ~~most~~key ~~important~~ factor infor achieving the benefits of our internal financial model by leveraging our processing operation and back office infrastructure. ~~All~~and ofgenerating ~~these~~increased profitability ~~efforts~~and ~~are important components of our plan to reduce our~~ cash ~~burn rate~~flow. Based on our current projections and estimates, we believe that our currently available cash and cash equivalents, ~~and the~~ cash ~~generated~~flow from ~~the~~operations ~~actions~~and ~~noted~~availability ~~above,~~under the Credit Agreement will be sufficient to meet our forecasted cash needs for the next twelve months. We can provide no assurance that ~~our efforts~~we will be ~~successful~~able to ~~recover~~maintain ~~some~~our ofcurrent ~~the~~efforts ~~investments~~to wereduce ~~have~~tissue inventories, ~~made~~cut incosts ~~working~~and ~~capital,~~reduce ~~that our~~spending ~~cost~~on ~~reduction~~capital ~~programs~~expenditures ~~will~~or ~~be effective,~~ that our new products will continue to be accepted in the market or that we will realize the benefits of our ~~internal~~ financial model. Separately, we continue to monitor and evaluate the impact, if any, that the announcement of the proposed Merger will have on our customers, sales teams and employees, which, if negatively received by any of these constituencies, could result in reduced revenues or increased costs impacting profitability and cash flow. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the:

• ~~the~~revenue ~~timing and expansion of our internal sales and marketing efforts~~growth, ~~including~~which ~~additional~~may ~~field~~be ~~sales~~impinged ~~staff,~~by tothe ~~support~~announcement ~~our~~of ~~product~~the ~~launches~~proposed Merger;

• the ~~progress~~costs, ~~of our product launch~~ and ~~product~~continuing ~~development programs and the need and associated~~ costs ~~relating~~ to ~~regulatory~~effectuate ~~approvals,~~the ifproposed ~~any, which may be needed to commercialize some of our products under development~~Merger; ~~and~~

• ~~the~~timing ~~resources~~and weexpansion ~~devote~~of toour ~~the~~internal ~~development,~~sales ~~manufacture~~ and marketing ofefforts, ~~our~~including ~~services~~additional ~~and~~field ~~products.~~sales staff, to support our product launches;

•

progress of our product launch and product development programs and the need and associated costs relating to regulatory approvals, if any, which may be needed to commercialize some of our products under development; and

•

resources we devote to the development, manufacture and marketing of our services and products.

Should we not attain our current projections and estimates, the pace of new product introductions and new product development could be effected. We may seek additional funding to meet the needs of our long-term strategic plans. We can provide no assurance that such additional funds will be available or, if available, that such funds will be available on favorable terms.

- 19 -

Credit Facility

OnWe ~~December 29,~~have ~~2009, we entered into~~ a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National Association as lender and agent (“PNC”). Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement and upon request, we may borrow from PNC up to $10~~.0 million~~,000 subject to a maximum borrowing base that is based upon an amount equal to 85% of our eligible receivables (as that term is defined in the Credit Agreement) less such reserves as PNC reasonably deems proper and necessary. Under the Credit Agreement, we are permitted to use the proceeds of any such borrowings to satisfy ~~our~~its working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at one of three variable rates: PNC’s base commercial lending rate plus 2%; the federal funds open rate plus 0.5%; or LIBOR plus 3%. In no event will the interest rate be less than 3%. Borrowings are secured by essentially all ~~our~~the assets of ours. Under the Credit Agreement, we are obligated to pay PNC a quarterly facility fee of 0.5% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Agreement.

We are also required to maintain compliance with various financial and other covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to, a prohibition on paying cash dividends, a requirement that a fixed charge coverage ratio be maintained beginning onfor ~~June~~the quarter ending March 3031, 2011, and certain limitations on engaging in affiliate transactions, making acquisitions, incurring ~~additional~~ additional indebtedness and making capital expenditures, the breach of any of which would permit PNC to accelerate the obligations. The Credit ~~Facility~~Agreement also includes subjective acceleration provisions. Such provisions are based upon, in the reasonable opinion of PNC, the occurrence of any adverse or material change in the condition or affairs, financial or otherwise, of usours, which impairs the interest of PNC.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement and we are in compliance with all covenants. The Credit Agreement expires on December 28, 2012.

PNC, at its option, can declare the Credit Agreement in default, if and when, the proposed Merger is consummated and exercise any remedies to such default as defined in the Credit Agreement. As stated above, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2010 and we currently do not expect any amounts to be outstanding upon the closing of the Merger.

Recent Accounting Developments

For information on new accounting standards, refer to Note 1, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in “Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere herein.

Contractual Obligations

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations from that disclosed in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

- 17 -

Impact of Inflation and Foreign Currency Exchange Fluctuations

The results of operations for the periods discussed have not been materially affected by inflation. We are subject to foreign currency fluctuations for material changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the euro and other foreign currencies. To the extent our foreign source revenue grows and represents a larger percentage of our consolidated revenues and profits, foreign currency translation adjustments may impact our operating results to a greater extent. We do not hedge our foreign currency transactions.

The majority of our sales to international stocking distributors are denominated in U.S. dollars. Generally, our results of operations are directly or indirectly impacted by the strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies, especially the euro, in countries to which we sell. ~~During~~Generally, ~~the~~a ~~three~~weakening ~~and~~of ~~six months ended June 30, 2010,~~ the U.S. dollar ~~strengthened~~ against the euro, ~~resulting~~as inoccurred ~~our~~during ~~incurring~~the third aquarter ~~loss~~of ~~whereas~~2010, results in ~~the~~our ~~respective~~realizing ~~prior~~a ~~year~~foreign ~~periods~~currency ~~the~~gain whereas a strengthening of the U.S. dollar ~~weakened~~against ~~resulting~~the euro, as occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, results in ~~gains~~our realizing a foreign currency loss.

- 20 -

Litigation

AsminSURG ~~discussed~~International, ~~more~~Inc. ~~fully in Note 14 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and Item 3~~v. ~~Legal~~ ~~Proceedings in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31~~Nuvasive, 2009, we were involved in a lawsuit filed on August 8, 2007 by ReSource Tissue Bank (“RTB”) against OST Developpement SA (“OST”), our wholly owned subsidiary, before the Commercial Court of Clermond-Ferrand, France, arising from OST’s allegedly unlawful termination of its exclusive distribution agreementInc. ~~In April 2010~~, ~~the~~et ~~Court issued its ruling in the case and ordered OST to make a nominal payment to RTB~~al. ~~Neither party intends to appeal the Court’s ruling.~~

On July 19, 2010, minSURG International, Inc. (“minSURG”) sued several entities, including us, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. MinSURG’s complaint alleges that ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~FacetLinxTM ~~FacetLinx~~Fusion ~~product~~Technology infringes minSURG’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,708,761, D590, 943, and D574,495. The complaint also makes business torts allegations against us, specifically, Lanham Act false advertising, Florida law unfair competition, defamation, and tortious interference with business and contractual relationship allegations. We were served with the complaint on July 28, 2010. On August 3, 2010 minSURG filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking an injunction only with respect to its claims that we (and other defendants) was and continues to induce and contribute to the infringement of the ‘761 Patent. We ~~are~~filed ~~currently~~our response ~~evaluating~~to ~~this~~the ~~recently~~preliminary injunction motion on September 1, 2010. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the preliminary injunction motion on October 5, 2010. We also filed ~~complaint~~a motion to dismiss all of minSURG’s claims, for failure to effectively state a claim, on August 31, 2010. We await decisions on minSURG’s motion for a preliminary injunction, and on our motion to dismiss.

WeMedtronic ~~are~~Merger ~~not aware of any other material matters or legal proceedings initiated against us during the~~Litigation ~~three months ended June 30, 2010.~~

~~Government~~In ~~Proceedings~~August 2010, four class action complaints were filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, concerning the Merger. The first class action was instituted by certain individual stockholders, individually and on behalf of all public stockholders of the Company, against us, our board of directors, presidents, and chief executive officer, as well as Medtronic, MSD, and Merger Sub. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty by the members of the board of directors arising out of the attempt to sell the Company by means of an allegedly unfair process with preclusive deal protection devices and at an unfair price of $6.50 in cash for each share of Common Stock. The complaint also alleges that Medtronic aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the other defendants. The other three class action complaints filed with respect to the proposed Merger are substantially the same as the first action filed. The lawsuits have all been transferred to Chancery Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County and consolidated. An amended complaint was filed and has been designated as the operative complaint in this consolidated action. In addition to the allegations summarized above, the amended complaint makes additional allegations that our proxy statement relative to the special meeting of stockholders to be held on November 9, 2010 was deficient because it did not disclose certain information about the proposed Merger and the financial analysis performed by Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., our financial advisor in connection with the proposed merger. The plaintiff also alleges that we violated the corporate law of Delaware when we canceled our annual stockholder meeting scheduled for August 23, 2010. The parties have conducted limited discovery and the plaintiff has filed a motion with the court for a temporary restraining order to, among other things, delay the stockholder vote. On November 8, 2010, the Chancery Court of New Jersey denied the plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order.

InThe ~~December 2008,~~Company webelieves ~~were~~the ~~advised~~claims ~~that~~made ~~during~~against anit ~~inspection of donor recovery sites~~ in ~~Bulgaria~~this ~~by the~~case ~~French~~are ~~regulatory~~without ~~agency,~~merit ~~afssaps,~~and ~~deficiencies~~intendeds ~~were identified, unrelated~~ to ~~product~~ ~~contamination.~~vigorously Wedefend ~~have~~itself ~~completed~~in ~~additional~~this ~~procedures, and all tissue product can be released from our self imposed suspension of shipment~~action.

We are not aware of any other material matters or legal proceedings initiated against us during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Except as discussed below, there have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures since the fiscal 2009 year-end.

We- ~~sell~~21 ~~our products to hospitals in the United States and to stocking distributors~~- internationally. Stocking distributors in turn sell to hospitals or other medical establishments and, in many instances, individual stocking distributors maintain higher individual balances with longer payment terms. Loss, termination or changes in financial condition of a distributor, as well as a change in medical reimbursement regimens by foreign governments where our products are sold, along with changes in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rates or changes in local currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, in international countries where our distributors operate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

At June 30, 2010, international stocking distributors accounted for 31% of our accounts receivable.

- 18 -

We sell our products to hospitals in the United States and to stocking distributors internationally. Stocking distributors in turn sell to hospitals or other medical establishments and, in many instances, individual stocking distributors maintain higher individual balances with longer payment terms. Loss, termination or changes in financial condition of a distributor, as well as a change in medical reimbursement regimens by foreign governments where our products are sold, along with changes in the U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rates or changes in local currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, in international countries where our distributors operate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

At September 30, 2010, international stocking distributors accounted for 28% of our accounts receivable.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 related to the recording, processing, summarization and reporting of information in our reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is made known to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, by others within our organization, and that this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. Based upon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal ~~control~~ control over financial reporting.

- 1922 -

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as disclosed in Item 2, “Litigation,” in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there were no material developments that occurred during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 in the proceedings reported under Item 3. Legal Proceedings in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009., Wenor are ~~not~~we aware of any other material legal proceedings initiated ~~against~~ against us during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. ~~See Item 2, “Litigation,” in Part 1 of this~~ ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for legal proceedings initiated against us subsequent to June 30, 2010.~~

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our ~~2009~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The following are new or modified risk factors that should be read in conjunction with the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our business and our financial condition may be adversely affected if our proposed merger with Medtronic is not completed, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our proposed merger with Medtronic is subject to several customary conditions, including obtaining clearance from governmental entities and the approvals of the transaction by the outstanding holders of our Common Stock. During the period following execution of our definitive Merger Agreement with Medtronic until we are able to close the transaction, our employees, agents, distributors and customers could be significantly distracted and our business could be adversely affected by the uncertainty created by the announcement of our proposed transaction. If our proposed merger with Medtronic ultimately is not completed and we have to remain independent, we believe our business would have been, and would continue to be, adversely affected by a variety of risks, including those identified below, and we believe we would not be in as good a position as we would have been had we not attempted the transaction with Medtronic in the first place:

•

management’s attention to our day-to-day business may be diverted to investigating other strategic alternatives;

•

the consequences of our management’s attention having been diverted from our day-to-day business over time between execution of our definitive Merger Agreement with Medtronic and the date on which the agreement would terminate;

•

the disruption to our relationships with customers and suppliers as a result of our and their efforts relating to the proposed Merger;

•

actual and potential litigation associated with our proposed transaction with Medtronic;

•

our inability to acquire further necessary financing to fund our ongoing operations post-termination of our proposed Merger with Medtronic;

•

the potential distraction to our sales force caused by uncertainties relating to the proposed Merger; and

•

the potential loss of business to our competitors.

- 23 -

If the proposed Merger with Medtronic is not completed, the holders of our common stock, RSUs and options to purchase common stock will not receive the cash Merger Consideration provided in the Merger Agreement.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of our Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the Merger (other than shares held by us, Medtronic or its subsidiaries, which will be canceled without payment of any consideration, and shares for which appraisal rights have been validly exercised and not withdrawn) will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration in cash, without interest. Each option to purchase our Common Stock that is outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the Merger will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive in cash the amount by which the Merger Consideration exceeds the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such option. Each RSU that is outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the Merger will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the Merger Consideration per RSU in cash. The proposed Merger with Medtronic is subject to customary conditions, including obtaining clearance from governmental entities and the approval of the Merger by a majority of the outstanding holders of our Common Stock. We may not be able to meet all closing conditions in order to complete the proposed Merger. If we are not able to complete the Merger, the holders of our Common Stock, RSUs and options to purchase Common Stock will not receive the Merger Consideration.

In connection with the proposed Merger with Medtronic, we may incur litigation costs which may harm our business and financial condition and cause our stock price to decline.

The proposed Merger with Medtronic has resulted in and could result in additional litigation against our Company in connection with the transaction itself regardless of whether we are able to close the transaction. This would result in additional litigation costs and management distraction and any failure to successfully defend against these actions could harm our business and our financial condition and cause our stock price to decline.

If the Merger with Medtronic is not consummated, we may need to re-schedule the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

In accordance with the requirements of the Merger Agreement, we postponed the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in favor of a Special Meeting of Stockholders to approve the Merger and Merger Agreement. At the 2010 Annual Meeting, stockholders were requested to vote upon two proposals, the election of directors and the approval of our independent registered public accounting firm. The election of directors at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was contested by a dissident shareholder group which proposed to replace four of the existing members of the Board of Directors with their own candidates. Although the major shareholders supporting the dissident group have sold all or a substantial portion of their ownership positions in the Company, we can provide no assurance that a re-scheduled Annual Meeting of Stockholders would not again result in a contested election for seats on the Board of Directors. If there was a contested election, the members of our current Board of Directors and management may be required to spend substantive time focusing on the aspects and details of the proxy contest and Annual Meeting and not focused on our strategic initiatives and on running the business. In addition, any proxy contest may be costly and may provide another distraction to our customers, sales teams and employees and divert their attention from our strategic initiatives, negatively impacting revenue growth, profitability and cash flow.

- 24 -

Item 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)

Exhibit			Page
Number		Description	Number
	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger among Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., England Merger Corporation and Osteotech, Inc. dated as of August 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2010.)
	3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Osteotech, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2002)
	3.2	Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Osteotech (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 7, 2007)
	4.1	First Amendment, dated as of August 16, 2010, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2010, by and between Osteotech, Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2010.)
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+


+		Filed herewith.

- 2025 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 9, 2010	Osteotech, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: November 8, 2010	Osteotech, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: August 9, 2010	By:	/s/ Sam Owusu-Akyaw
Date: November 8, 2010	By:	/s/ Sam Owusu-Akyaw
		Sam Owusu-Akyaw
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 9, 2010	By:	/s/ Mark H. Burroughs
		Mark H. Burroughs
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

- 21 -


Date: November 8, 2010	By:	/s/ Mark H. Burroughs
		Mark H. Burroughs
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

- 26 -

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit			Page
Number		Description	Number
	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger among Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., England Merger Corporation and Osteotech, Inc. dates as of August 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2010.)
	3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Osteotech, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 27, 2002)
	3.2	Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Osteotech (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 7, 2007)
	4.1	First Amendment, dated as of August 16, 2010, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2010, by and between Osteotech, Inc. and Registrar and Transfer Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 17, 2010.)
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	+


+		Filed herewith.

- 2227 -

Filing Compare · OSTEOTECH INC