UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-17455

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Pennsylvania		23-2242292
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

125 North State Street, Clarks Summit, PA		18411

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(570) 586-0377

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding ~~twelve~~ 12 months (or ~~for~~ for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 1,722,923 at ~~April~~July 3031, 2010.

Page 1 of 63
Exhibit Index on Page 59

COMM BANCORP, INC. FORM 10-Q June 30, 2010

March 31, 2010

INDEX

Contents	Page No.
CONTENTS	Page No.
Part I. Financial Information:
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited).
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income — for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		3
Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009		6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1617
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		*
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		5556
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures		*
Part II. Other Information:
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		57
Item 1A. Risk Factors		*
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		57
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		57
Item 4. Removed and Reserved		57
Item 5. Other Information		57
Item 6. Exhibits		57
Signatures		58
Exhibit Index		59
Exhbiit 31(i)
Exhibit 31(i)
Exhibit 32


*		Not Applicable

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans:
Taxable	$	5,942		$	6,436		$	11,883		$	12,884
Tax-exempt		318			619			640			1,285
Interest and dividends on investment securities available-for-sale:
Taxable		523			315			1,252			664
Tax-exempt		238			473			540			1,010
Dividends		2			9			4			20
Interest on federal funds sold		9						17			1

Total interest income		7,032			7,852			14,336			15,864


Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		2,315			2,426			4,748			5,059
Interest on short-term borrowings					36						92
Interest on long-term debt		160						320

Total interest expense		2,475			2,462			5,068			5,151

Net interest income		4,557			5,390			9,268			10,713
Provision for loan losses		300			520			1,300			1,090

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,257			4,870			7,968			9,623


Noninterest income:
Service charges, fees and commissions		730			832			1,471			1,596
Mortgage banking income		214			490			495			892
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment											294
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale								361			114

Total noninterest income		944			1,322			2,327			2,896


Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits expense		2,183			2,164			4,370			4,304
Net occupancy and equipment expense		547			583			1,150			1,258
Other expenses		1,636			2,260			3,200			3,793

Total noninterest expense		4,366			5,007			8,720			9,355

Income before income taxes		835			1,185			1,575			3,164
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		(355	)		(30	)		(765	)		174

Net income		1,190			1,215			2,340			2,990


Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale		2,030			13			1,755			355
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income								(361	)		(114	)
Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income		690			4			474			82

Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes		1,340			9			920			159

Comprehensive income	$	2,530		$	1,224		$	3,260		$	3,149


Per share data:
Net income	$	0.69		$	0.70		$	1.36		$	1.73
Cash dividends declared				$	0.28					$	0.56
Average common shares outstanding		1,722,923			1,722,282			1,722,923			1,725,310

For the Three Months Ended March 31	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans:
Taxable	$	5,941		$	6,448
Tax-exempt		322			666
Interest and dividends on investment securities available-for-sale:
Taxable		729			349
Tax-exempt		302			537
Dividends		2			11
Interest on federal funds sold		8			1
Total interest income		7,304			8,012
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		2,433			2,633
Interest on short-term borrowings					56
Interest on long-term debt		160
Total interest expense		2,593			2,689
Net interest income		4,711			5,323
Provision for loan losses		1,000			570
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,711			4,753
Noninterest income:
Service charges, fees and commissions		741			764
Mortgage banking income		281			402
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment					294
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale		361			114
Total noninterest income		1,383			1,574
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits expense		2,187			2,140
Net occupancy and equipment expense		603			675
Other expenses		1,564			1,533
Total noninterest expense		4,354			4,348
Income before income taxes		740			1,979
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		(410	)		204
Net income		1,150			1,775
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale		(275	)		342
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(361	)		(114	)
Income tax expense (benefit) related to other comprehensive income (loss)		(216	)		78
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes		(420	)		150
Comprehensive income	$	730		$	1,925
Per share data:
Net income	$	0.67		$	1.03
Cash dividends declared				$	0.28
Average common shares outstanding		1,722,923			1,728,371

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	10,050	$	23,978
Federal funds sold		31,700		25,300
Investment securities available-for-sale		112,851		108,005
Loans held for sale, net		110		2,016
Loans, net of unearned income		465,143		476,944
Less: allowance for loan losses		14,928		17,462

Net loans		450,215		459,482
Premises and equipment, net		11,425		11,616
Accrued interest receivable		1,962		2,122
Other assets		23,452		19,634

Total assets	$	641,765	$	652,153


Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	87,348	$	88,335
Interest-bearing		489,370		502,448

Total deposits		576,718		590,783
Long-term debt		8,000		8,000
Accrued interest payable		1,284		1,296
Other liabilities		2,124		1,740

Total liabilities		588,126		601,819


Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.33, authorized 12,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding: June 30, 2010, 1,722,923 shares; December 31, 2009, 1,721,007 shares		569		568
Capital surplus		8,010		7,966
Retained earnings		43,321		40,981
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,739		819

Total stockholders’ equity		53,639		50,334

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	641,765	$	652,153

	March 31,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Unaudited)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	8,798	$	23,978
Federal funds sold		33,800		25,300
Investment securities available-for-sale		116,593		108,005
Loans held-for-sale, net		811		2,016
Loans, net of unearned income		466,296		476,944
Less: allowance for loan losses		14,891		17,462
Net loans		451,405		459,482
Premises and equipment, net		11,480		11,616
Accrued interest receivable		2,213		2,122
Other assets		23,512		19,634
Total assets	$	648,612	$	652,153
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	90,999	$	88,335
Interest-bearing		495,361		502,448
Total deposits		586,360		590,783
Long-term debt		8,000		8,000
Accrued interest payable		1,623		1,296
Other liabilities		1,520		1,740
Total liabilities		597,503		601,819
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.33, authorized 12,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding: March 31, 2010, 1,722,923 shares; December 31, 2009, 1,721,007 shares		569		568
Capital surplus		8,010		7,966
Retained earnings		42,131		40,981
Accumulated other comprehensive income		399		819
Total stockholders’ equity		51,109		50,334
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	648,612	$	652,153

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


										Accumulated
										Other		Total
	Common			Capital			Retained			Comprehensive		Stockholders’
(Unaudited)	Stock			Surplus			Earnings			Income		Equity
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	568		$	7,966		$	40,981		$	819	$	50,334
Net income								2,340					2,340
Dividend reinvestment plan: 1,916 shares issued		1			44								45
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes											920		920

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	569		$	8,010		$	43,321		$	1,739	$	53,639


Balance, December 31, 2008	$	571		$	7,694		$	47,862		$	1,671	$	57,798
Net income								2,990					2,990
Dividends declared: $0.56 per share								(965	)				(965	)
Dividend reinvestment plan: 4,318 shares issued		1			159								160
Repurchase and retirement: 18,117 shares		(6	)		(54	)		(624	)				(684	)
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes											159		159

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	566		$	7,799		$	49,263		$	1,830	$	59,458

										Accumulated
										Other			Total
	Common			Capital			Retained			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
(Unaudited)	Stock			Surplus			Earnings			Income			Equity
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	568		$	7,966		$	40,981		$	819		$	50,334
Net income								1,150						1,150
Dividend reinvestment plan: 1,916 shares issued		1			44									45
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes											(420	)		(420	)
Balance, March 31, 2010	$	569		$	8,010		$	42,131		$	399		$	51,109
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	571		$	7,694		$	47,862		$	1,671		$	57,798
Net income								1,775						1,775
Dividends declared: $0.28 per share								(483	)					(483	)
Dividend reinvestment plan: 2,135 shares issued		1			78									79
Repurchase and retirement: 10,352 shares		(4	)		(31	)		(361	)					(396	)
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes											150			150
Balance, March 31, 2009	$	568		$	7,741		$	48,793		$	1,821		$	58,923

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


Six Months Ended June 30,	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,340		$	2,990
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		1,300			1,090
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		379			459
Net amortization of investment securities		1,048			181
Amortization of net loan costs		168			191
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		131			231
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		1,195			(214	)
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale		(361	)		(114	)
Net gain on sale of loans		(424	)		(942	)
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment					(294	)
Net loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed assets		8			(17	)
Changes in:
Loans held for sale, net		2,330			1,545
Accrued interest receivable		160			(383	)
Other assets		(2,031	)		(1,246	)
Accrued interest payable		(12	)		(119	)
Other liabilities		151			681

Net cash provided by operating activities		6,382			4,039


Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from repayments of investment securities available-for-sale		9,546			4,661
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale		6,154			4,341
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale		(19,839	)		(1,423	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		336			145
Net decrease (increase) in lending activities		4,342			(27,023	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment					509
Purchases of premises and equipment		(188	)		(630	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		351			(19,420	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Net changes in:
Money market, NOW, savings and noninterest-bearing accounts		(678	)		(358	)
Time deposits		(13,387	)		(3,136	)
Short-term borrowings					7,950
Proceeds from issuance of common shares		45			160
Repurchase and retirement of common shares					(684	)
Cash dividends paid		(241	)		(953	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(14,261	)		2,979

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(7,528	)		(12,402	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		49,278			20,717

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	41,750		$	8,315


Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	5,080		$	5,270
Income taxes					691
Noncash items:
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets		3,457			1,518
Unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale, net	$	(920	)	$	(159	)

For the Three Months Ended March 31	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	1,150		$	1,775
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		1,000			570
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		189			232
Net amortization of investment securities		394			81
Amortization of net loan costs		84			86
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		65			111
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		1,156			(79	)
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale		(361	)		(114	)
Net gain on sale of loans		(250	)		(424	)
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment					(294	)
Net loss on sale of foreclosed assets		8
Changes in:
Loans held for sale, net		1,455			(429	)
Accrued interest receivable		(91	)		(313	)
Other assets		(2,329	)		(628	)
Accrued interest payable		327			309
Other liabilities		237			169
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,034			1,052
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from repayments of investment securities available-for-sale		4,428			2,666
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale		6,154			4,341
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale		(19,839	)		(1,421	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		242
Net decrease (increase) in lending activities		3,973			(23,182	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment					509
Purchases of premises and equipment		(53	)		(479	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(5,095	)		(17,566	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net changes in:
Money market, NOW, savings and noninterest-bearing accounts		(4,181	)		(9,513	)
Time deposits		(242	)		(11,912	)
Short-term borrowings					27,450
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares		45			79
Repurchase and retirement of common shares					(396	)
Cash dividends paid		(241	)		(470	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(4,619	)		5,238
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(6,680	)		(11,276	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		49,278			20,717
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	42,598		$	9,441
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	2,266		$	2,380
Income taxes					11
Noncash items:
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets		3,020			1,518
Unrealized losses (gains) on investment securities available-for-sale, net	$	420		$	(150	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Comm Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior-period amounts are reclassified when necessary to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating results and financial position of the Company for the three months and six months ended and as of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected in the future.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, reference is made to the Company’s Restated Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009.

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009, and related disclosures, herein, ~~have been restated to~~ conform to the presentation as included in the Company’s 2009 Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed on May 17, 2010.

2. Earnings per common share:

The Company had no dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the three-month ~~periods~~and six-month periods ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, therefore, the per share data presented on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income relates to basic per share amounts.

3. Subsequent events:

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

3. Subsequent events (continued):

On August 9, 2010, the Company and F.N.B. Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, whereby the Company will be merged with and into F.N.B. Corporation and a related bank merger agreement by and between the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary bank, Community Bank and Trust Company and F.N.B. Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary bank, First National Bank of Pennsylvania. The closings on these mergers are conditioned upon, among other things, approvals of applicable regulatory agencies and the stockholders of the Company.

4. Investment securities:

All investment securities were classified as available-for-sale at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities aggregated by investment category at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:

Amortized

Unrealized

Fair

March 31, 2010

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

June 30, 2010

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

State and municipals

1918,~~542~~170

1,~~054~~166

2019,~~592~~336

Mortgage-backed securities:

U.S. Government agencies

9389,~~569~~199

751,625

~~629~~267

9390,~~015~~557

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises

~~201~~171

1211

~~213~~182

Equity securities:

Restricted

2,537

Other

139

98101

~~236~~239

Total

~~115~~110,~~988~~216

12,~~239~~903

~~634~~268

~~116~~112,~~593~~851


	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
December 31, 2009	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
State and municipals	$	25,343	$	1,520	$	1	$	26,862
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		78,537		17		399		78,155
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		208		12				220
Equity securities:
Restricted		2,537						2,537
Other		139		94		2		231

Total	$	106,764	$	1,643	$	402	$	108,005

Net unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included as a separate component in stockholders’ equity. The Company had net unrealized holding gains of $~~399~~1,739, net of deferred income taxes of $~~206~~896, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and $819, net of deferred income taxes of $422, at at December 31, 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~The~~4. ~~fair~~Investment ~~value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale~~ securities with unrealized losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows(continued):

	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
March 31, 2010	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
State and municipals	$	682	$	4					$	682	$	4
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		70,806		629						70,806		629
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
Equity securities:
Restricted
Other					$	8	$	1		8		1
Total	$	71,488	$	633	$	8	$	1	$	71,496	$	634

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
June 30, 2010	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
State and municipals
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies	$	8,287	$	267					$	8,287	$	267
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
Equity securities:
Restricted
Other					$	8	$	1		8		1

Total	$	8,287	$	267	$	8	$	1	$	8,295	$	268


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
December 31, 2009	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
State and municipals	$	686	$	1					$	686	$	1
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		30,651		399						30,651		399
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises
Equity securities:
Restricted
Other					$	7	$	2		7		2

Total	$	31,337	$	400	$	7	$	2	$	31,344	$	402

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company had ~~110~~102 investment securities, consisting of 8275 tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, 1918 mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, and two restricted and seven marketable equity securities. There were ~~ten~~four investment securities in an unrealized loss position at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, including ~~eight~~three mortgage-backed securities, ~~one tax-exempt state~~ and ~~municipal obligation and~~ one marketable equity security. The one marketable equity security has been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or more.

Community Bank holds all of the Company’s debt securities and is a state member bank of the Federal Reserve System which imposes strict limitations and restrictions on the types of securities that may be acquired. As a result, securities held are “Bank Quality Investment” grade, defined as bearing a credit quality rating of “Baa” or higher from Moody’s or “BBB” or higher from Standard and Poor’s rating services, and are readily marketable, but are still subject to price fluctuations because of changes in interest rates. Management does not consider the unrealized losses, as a result of changes in interest rates, to be other-than-temporary based on historical evidence that indicates the cost of these securities is recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market rates of interest.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Mortgage-backed~~4. Investment securities ~~having unrealized losses at March 31, 2010, consisted of obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association~~ (~~“GNMA”~~continued) ~~federal agency bonds which are direct~~: obligations of the U.S. Government. The eight GNMA mortgage-backed securities that were in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010, were backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government and thus considered to have no risk of default. The unrealized loss position for these securities were less than 12 months. The unrealized losses at March 31, 2010, are not considered to be other-than-temporary because they were a direct result of interest rate fluctuations, and management does not intend to sell the securities, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.

~~Tax~~Mortgage-~~exempt~~backed ~~state and municipal~~ securities ~~consisted of one insured general obligation bond at March 31, 2010. The duration of the unrealized loss position for the tax-exempt state and municipal security~~ having an unrealized ~~loss~~losses at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~was~~consisted ~~less~~of ~~than~~obligations ~~12 months. The insured general~~of ~~obligation~~the ~~has~~Government aNational ~~credit~~Mortgage ~~quality~~Association ~~rating of~~ (“~~AAA~~GNMA”) ~~and~~federal isagency ~~secured~~bonds bywhich ~~the~~are ~~unlimited~~direct obligations ~~taxing power~~ of the ~~issuer~~ ~~and~~U.S. isGovernment. ~~further~~The ~~safeguarded~~three ~~against~~GNMA ~~default~~mortgage-backed bysecurities ~~the~~that ~~unconditional~~were ~~guarantee~~in of an ~~insurance~~ ~~company~~unrealized ~~over~~loss ~~the~~position ~~term~~at ofJune 30, ~~the~~2010, ~~bond~~were tobacked ~~pay~~by the ~~bondholder~~full ~~any~~faith ~~principal~~and orcredit ~~interest~~of ~~that~~the isU.S. Government ~~due~~ and is ~~not~~thus ~~paid~~considered byto ~~the~~have ~~issuer~~no onrisk aof ~~stated maturity date~~default. ~~Because~~The ~~there~~unrealized ~~has~~loss ~~been~~positions nofor ~~material change in~~these ~~the~~securities ~~credit~~were ~~quality~~less ofthan ~~the~~12 months. ~~issuer~~The orunrealized ~~other~~losses ~~events~~were ornot ~~circumstances~~considered ~~that~~to ~~may cause a significant~~be ~~adverse~~other-than-temporary ~~impact~~because onthey ~~the~~were ~~fair~~a ~~value~~direct result of ~~this~~interest ~~security~~rate fluctuations, and management does not intend to sell the ~~security~~ securities and it is ~~more~~unlikely ~~likely than not~~ that the Company will ~~not~~ be required to sell the ~~security~~ securities before recovery of ~~its~~their amortized cost ~~basis~~bases, which may be at ~~maturity, the Company does not~~ ~~consider the unrealized loss to be an other-than-temporary impairment at March 31, 2010~~maturity.

~~Marketable~~Tax-exempt ~~equity~~state ~~securities~~and ~~are~~municipal ~~held~~securities byconsisted ~~the~~entirely ~~Parent Company consisting~~ of ~~common~~insured ~~stocks~~general ~~of commercial~~obligation ~~banks.~~bonds ~~At March~~at June 3130, 2010~~, the market value of common stock held in Wachovia Corporation was below its amortized cost basis of $9~~. ~~This~~There ~~stock~~were ~~was~~no ~~originally~~tax-exempt ~~held~~state ~~in Wachovia Corporation, which was acquired by Wells Fargo~~ and ~~Company~~municipal ~~after~~securities ~~the~~in ~~close~~an ofunrealized ~~business on December 31, 2008.~~loss ~~Wells~~position ~~Fargo and Company had a credit rating of “AA” and was categorized as well capitalized under regulatory capital guidelines~~ at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. ~~As a~~ result, the Company does not consider the unrealized loss to be other-than-temporary because it was directly related to the financial weakness of the former issuer. At the current time, management does not intend to sell, and it is more likely than not that management will not have to sell the security as the entire amortized cost basis is expected to be recovered.

Marketable equity securities are held at the Parent Company and consist of common stocks of commercial banks. At June 30, 2010, the market value of common stock held in Wells Fargo and Company was below its amortized cost basis. This stock was originally held in Wachovia Corporation, which was acquired by Wells Fargo and Company after the close of business on December 31, 2008. Wells Fargo and Company had a credit rating of “AA” and was categorized as well capitalized under regulatory capital guidelines at June 30, 2010. As a result, the Company does not consider the unrealized loss to be other-than-temporary because it was directly related to the financial weakness of the former issuer. At the current time we do not intend to sell, and it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell the security as the entire cost basis is expected to be recovered.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt securities classified as available-for-sale at March 31, 2010, is summarized in the table that follows~~4. ~~The~~Investment ~~distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed~~ securities. ~~Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash flows,~~(continued): assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

			After one		After five
	Within		but within		but within		After
March 31, 2010	one year		five years		ten years		ten years		Total
State and municipals	$	2,295	$	2,676	$	10,733	$	4,888	$	20,592
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		18,831		46,665		27,237		282		93,015
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		85		121		7				213
Total	$	21,211	$	49,462	$	37,977	$	5,170	$	113,820

The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt securities classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2010, is summarized in the table that follows. The distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash flows, assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


			After one		After five
	Within		but within		but within		After
June 30, 2010	one year		five years		ten years		ten years		Total
State and municipals	$	1,176	$	2,817	$	10,414	$	4,929	$	19,336
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		14,590		40,320		32,687		2,960		90,557
U.S. Government-sponsored		43		128		11				182

Total	$	15,809	$	43,265	$	43,112	$	7,889	$	110,075

5. Fair values of financial instruments:

GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the valuation methods used to measure fair value into three levels which include the following:

•

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

•

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

•

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Assets~~5. ~~and~~Fair ~~liabilities~~values ~~measured~~of atfinancial ~~fair~~instruments ~~value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized below~~(continued):

	Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
			Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
March 31, 2010	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
State and municipals	$	20,592			$	20,592
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		93,015				93,015
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		213				213
Equity securities:
Restricted
Other		236	$	236
Total	$	114,056	$	236	$	113,820

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

December 31, 2009

Amount

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

June 30, 2010

Amount

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets:

Investment securities available-for-sale:

State and municipals

2619,~~862~~336

Mortgage-backed securities:

U.S. Government agencies

7890,~~155~~557

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises

~~220~~182

Equity securities:

Restricted

Other

239

Other

231

Total

110,314

239

110,075

Total

105,468

231

105,237

Investment securities available-for-sale reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs include marketable equity securities trading in active exchange markets. The fair value of investment securities available-for-sale utilizing Level 2 inputs include debt securities with prices based on a matrix pricing model. This method for determining fair value is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities.


	Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
			Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2009	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
State and municipals	$	26,862			$	26,862
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		78,155				78,155
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		220				220
Equity securities:
Other		231	$	231

Total	$	105,468	$	231	$	105,237

Investment securities available-for-sale reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs include marketable equity securities trading in active exchange markets. The fair value of investment securities available-for-sale utilizing Level 2 inputs include debt securities with quoted market prices based on a matrix pricing model. This method for determining fair value is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Assets~~5. ~~and~~Fair ~~liabilities~~values ~~measured~~of atfinancial ~~fair~~instruments ~~value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized below~~(continued):

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

March 31, 2010

Amount

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets:

Impaired loans

5,733

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

June 30, 2010

Amount

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets:

Impaired loans

4,428

Foreclosed assets

3,064

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Unobservable Inputs

December 31, 2009

Amount

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets:

Impaired loans

7,719

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a recorded investment of $7,~~794~~038 and a related allowance of $2,~~061~~610 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Impaired loans had a recorded investment of $13,481 and a related allowance of $5,762 at December 31, 2009.

Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value is required by GAAP. The Company’s assets that were considered financial instruments approximated 94.7 percent of total assets at June ~~March 31~~30, 2010, and 95.3 percent of total assets at December 31, 2009. Liabilities that were ~~considered~~ considered financial instruments approximated 99.76 percent of total liabilities at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and 99.7 percent of total liabilities at December 31, 2009. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.

Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including discount ~~rates~~rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In many cases, these values cannot be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. This disclosure does not and is not intended to ~~represent~~ represent the fair value of the Company.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

5. Fair values of financial instruments (continued):

Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of certain assets and liabilities that are not considered financial.

Accordingly, such assets and liabilities are excluded from disclosure requirements. For example, no benefit is recorded for the value of low-cost funding subsequently discussed. In addition, Community Bank’s Trust and Wealth Management Division contributes fee income annually. Trust assets and liabilities are not considered financial instruments for this disclosure, and their values have not been incorporated into the fair value estimates.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to construct the accompanying table containing the fair values and related carrying amounts of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents as reported on the balance sheet approximate fair value.

Investment securities available-for-sale: The fair value of ~~marketable~~investment ~~equity~~ securities available-for-sale ~~are~~is based on quoted market prices ~~from active exchange markets~~. The ~~fair value of debt securities are based on pricing from a matrix pricing model. The~~ carrying values of restricted equity ~~securities~~ securities approximate fair value.

Loans held for sale, net: The fair value of loans held for sale, net, are based on quoted market prices.

Net loans: For adjustable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values of other nonimpaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently offered in the market for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis determined by the loan review function or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Mortgage servicing rights: The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on observable market prices when available or the present value of future cash flows when not available.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying value of accrued interest receivable as reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

Deposits without stated maturities: The fair value of noninterest-bearing deposits and savings, NOW and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from such low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Deposits with stated maturities: The carrying value of adjustable-rate, fixed-term time deposits approximates their fair value at the reporting date~~5. ~~For~~Fair ~~fixed-rate~~values ~~time deposits, the present value~~ of ~~future~~financial ~~cash~~instruments ~~flows is used to estimate fair value. The discount rates used are the interest~~(continued): ~~rates currently offered in the market for time deposits with similar maturities.~~

~~Long-term~~Deposits ~~debt~~with stated maturities: The ~~fair~~carrying value of ~~fixed~~adjustable-rate, ~~long~~fixed-term ~~debt~~time isdeposits approximates ~~based~~their onfair value at the ~~present~~reporting date. For fixed-rate time deposits, the present value of future cash flows is used to estimate fair value. The discount ~~rate~~rates used isare the current rates offered in the market for ~~long-term~~time ~~debt~~deposits with ~~the~~similar ~~same maturity~~maturities.

Long-term debt: The fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt is based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate used is the current rates offered for long-term debt.

Accrued interest payable: The carrying value of accrued interest payable as reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments: The majority of commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and ~~commercial~~ letters of credit carry current market interest rates if ~~converted~~ converted to loans. Because such commitments are generally unassignable by either the Company or ~~the~~ the borrower, they only have value to the Company and the borrower. None of the commitments are ~~subject~~ subject to undue credit risk. The estimated fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments ~~are~~ are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the ~~remaining~~ remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of off-balance sheet financial instruments was not material at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The estimated fair value of financial instruments at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:

	March 31, 2010				December 31,2009
	June 30, 2010				December 31,2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4241,~~598~~750	$	4241,~~598~~750	$	49,278	$	49,278
Investment securities available-for-sale		~~116~~112,~~593~~851		~~116~~112,~~593~~851		108,005		108,005
Loans held for sale, net		~~811~~110		~~811~~110		2,016		2,016
Net loans		~~451~~450,~~405~~215		~~456~~454,~~400~~154		459,482		467,018
Mortgage servicing rights		~~929~~935		~~929~~935		893		893
Accrued interest receivable		21,~~213~~962		21,~~213~~962		2,122		2,122
Total	$	~~614~~607,~~549~~823	$	~~619~~611,~~544~~762	$	621,796	$	629,332
Financial liabilities:
Deposits without stated maturities	$	~~334~~338,~~751~~254	$	~~334~~338,~~751~~254	$	338,932	$	338,932
Deposits with stated maturities		~~251~~238,~~609~~464		~~259~~245,~~631~~998		251,851		256,749
Long-term debt		8,000		8,~~066~~000		8,000		8,066
Accrued interest payable		1,~~623~~284		1,~~623~~284		1,296		1,296
Total	$	~~595~~586,~~983~~002	$	~~604~~593,~~071~~536	$	600,079	$	605,043

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

6. Recent accounting pronouncements:

In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2010-18, “Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset,” which codifies the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 09-I. The amendments to the Codification provide that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-10 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40. ASU 2010-18 is effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010, with early application permitted. Upon initial adoption of ASU 2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The adoption of ASU 2010-18 on July 1, 2010, is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” ASU 2010-20 will help investors assess the credit risk of a company’s receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses held against the portfolios by expanding credit risk disclosures. ASU 2010-20 requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivable in the disclosures to financial statements, such as aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure. For public entities such as the Company, ASU 2010-20 is effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, for amendments that require disclosures as of the end of a reporting period. The amendments that require disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Forward-Looking Discussion:

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The following factors, among others, may cause actual results to differ materially from projected results:

Local, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and government monetary, regulatory, and fiscal policies affect banking both directly and indirectly. Inflation, recession, unemployment, volatile interest rates, tight money supply, real estate values, international conflicts, and other factors beyond our control may also adversely affect our future results of operations. Our management team, consisting of the Board of Directors and executive officers, expects that no particular factor will affect the results of operations. The continuation of downward trends in areas such as real estate, construction and ~~business~~consumer spending, may adversely impact our ability to maintain or increase profitability. Therefore, we cannot assure our current ~~levels~~level of income.

Our earnings depend largely upon net interest income. The relationship between our cost of funds, deposits and borrowings, and the yield on our interest-earning assets, loans and investments, all influence net interest income levels. This relationship, defined as the net interest spread, fluctuates and is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, the volume, rate and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the level of nonperforming assets. As part of our interest rate risk (“IRR”) strategy, we monitor the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to control our exposure to interest rate changes.

To a certain extent, our success depends upon the general economic conditions in the geographic market that we serve. Further adverse changes to economic conditions would likely impair loan collections and may have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and financial position.

The banking industry is highly competitive, with rapid changes in product delivery systems and in consolidation of service providers. We compete with many larger institutions in terms of asset size. These competitors also have substantially greater technical, marketing and financial resources. The larger size of these companies affords them the opportunity to offer some specialized products and services not offered by us. We are constantly striving to meet the convenience and needs of our customers and to enlarge our customer base, however, we cannot assure that these efforts will be successful.

1617

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Critical Accounting Policies:

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during ~~those~~the reporting periods.

An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or if estimates changed from period to period. Readers of this report should understand that estimates are made considering facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce results that differ from when those estimates were made. Significant estimates that are particularly susceptible to material change in the next year relate to the allowance for loan losses, fair ~~value~~values of financial instruments, and the valuations of real estate acquired through foreclosure, deferred tax assets and liabilities and intangible assets. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

The allowance for loan losses account consists of an allocated element and an unallocated element. The allocated element consists of a specific portion for the impairment of loans individually evaluated and a formula portion for the impairment of those loans collectively evaluated. The unallocated element is used to cover inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but which have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment evaluation methodology due to limitations in the process. In addition, the unallocated element includes amounts in the allowance for loan losses required as a directive from the Federal Reserve Board at December 31, 2009.

17We monitor the adequacy of the allocated portion of the allowance quarterly and adjust the allowance as necessary through normal operations. This ongoing evaluation reduces potential differences between estimates and actual observed losses. In addition, the unallocated portion of the allowance is examined quarterly to ensure that it is consistent with changes in the related criteria that would indicate a need to either increase or decrease it. The determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will not be required, resulting in an adverse impact on operating results. We are regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and Pennsylvania Department of Banking and these agencies may require us to make additions to the allowance for loan losses as part of the examination process from time to time.

Comm Bancorp, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

We monitor the adequacy of the allocated portion of the allowance quarterly and adjust the allowance for any deficiencies through normal operations. This ongoing evaluation reduces potential differences between estimates and actual observed losses. In addition, the unallocated portion of the allowance is examined quarterly to ensure that it is consistent with changes in the related criteria that would indicate a need to either increase or decrease it. The determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will not be required, resulting in an adverse impact on operating results. We are regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and Pennsylvania Department of Banking and these agencies may require us to make additions to the allowance for loan losses as part of the examination process from time to time.

On May 6, 2010, our Joint Audit Committee concluded, based on the recommendation of management, that our wholly-owned subsidiary, Community Bank should amend its Call Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, based on a directive of the Federal Reserve Board. The regulatory directive required Community Bank to recognize a $7.0 million increase in its allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009. Concurrently with the decision to amend Community Bank’s Call Report, the Joint Audit Committee determined, based on the recommendation of management, that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, should no longer be relied upon and be restated to correct errors in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of our allowance for loan losses because of the misuse of facts that existed at the time these consolidated financial statements were prepared and in order to assure that the consolidated financial statements presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are consistent with those presented in the Call Report. The misuse of facts causing this restatement was the result of a misunderstanding between management and the Federal Reserve Board as to the methodology, i.e., model, to be used by us in determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP. Management was of the opinion that its model used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses was in accordance with the applicable supervisory guidance as provided by the Federal Reserve Board in 2009 and GAAP. Management was informed on May 5, 2010, by the Federal Reserve Board that we did not comply with the supervisory guidance, and, therefore, must restate our Call Report at December 31, 2009.

Fair values of financial instruments, in cases where quoted market prices are not available, are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques which are subject to change.

Real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans is adjusted to fair value based upon current estimates derived through independent appraisals less cost to sell. However, proceeds realized from sales may ultimately be higher or lower than those estimates.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

On May 6, 2010, our Joint Audit Committee concluded, based on the recommendation of management, that our wholly-owned subsidiary, Community Bank, should amend its Call Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, based on a directive of the Federal Reserve Board. The regulatory directive required Community Bank to recognize a $7.0 million increase in its allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009. Concurrently with the decisions to amend Community Bank’s Call Report, the Joint Audit Committee determined, based on the recommendation of management, that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, should no longer be relied upon and be restated to correct errors in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of our allowance for loan losses because of the misuse of facts that existed at the time those consolidated financial statements were prepared and in order to assure that the consolidated financial statements presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are consistent with those presented in the Call Report. The misuse of facts causing the restatement was the result of a misunderstanding between management and the Federal Reserve Board as to the methodology, i.e., model, to be used by us in determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP. Management was of the opinion that its model used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses was in accordance with the applicable supervisory guidance as provided by the Federal Reserve Board in 2009 and GAAP. Management was informed on May 5, 2010, by the Federal Reserve Board that we did not comply with the supervisory guidance, and therefore, must restate our Call Report at December 31, 2009.

Fair values of financial instruments, in cases where quoted market prices are not available, are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques which are subject to change.

Real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans is written-down to fair value based upon current estimates derived through independent appraisals less cost to sell. However, proceeds realized from sales may ultimately be higher or lower than those estimates.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The amount of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, to the amount that, based on available evidence, will more likely than not be realized. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

Intangible assets include goodwill. The valuation of goodwill is analyzed at least annually for impairment.

For a further discussion of our critical account policies, refer to the note entitled, “Summary of significant accounting policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to our Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009. This note lists the significant accounting policies used by management in the development and presentation of our financial statements. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for the understanding and evaluation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Operating Environment:

The United States economy continued to improve in the first quarter of 2010. The gross domestic product, the value of all goods and services produced in the Nation rose at a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 3.2 percent in the first quarter of 2010 after advancing 5.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009. Consumer spending rose 3.6 percent in the first quarter, while business investment advanced 4.1 percent. In addition, the labor market began showing signs of stabilizing. Despite an increase in the unemployment rate for the Nation to 9.9 percent in April 2010, the labor market is beginning to show signs of strengthening. Total nonfarm employment rose by 290,000 in April 2010, which pushed the total expansion in nonfarm employment to 573,000 jobs since year-end 2009. The majority of the job growth was in the private sector, with most major sectors, including manufacturing, reporting sizable gains. Although economic conditions improved, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) voted to keep the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 0.00 percent to 0.25 percent during the first quarter of 2010 and indicated that low resource utilization and subdued inflation would likely warrant such an accommodative stance for some time.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Review~~Intangible assets consist of ~~Financial~~goodwill. ~~Position:~~The valuation of goodwill is analyzed at least annually for impairment.

~~Total~~For ~~assets equaled $648.6 million at March 31, 2010,~~ a ~~decrease~~further discussion of ~~$3.6 million~~our ~~from~~critical ~~$652.2 million~~accounting ~~at December 31~~policies, ~~2009.~~refer ~~Subdued~~to ~~loan~~the ~~demand~~note ~~resulted~~entitled, ~~in a decrease~~ “Summary of ~~$10.6 million~~significant inaccounting ~~loans~~policies, ~~net~~” ofin ~~unearned~~the ~~income,~~Notes to ~~$466.3 million~~Consolidated atFinancial ~~the~~Statements ~~close~~to ofour Amended ~~the~~Annual ~~first~~Report ~~quarter~~on ~~from~~Form ~~$476.9 million~~10-K/A at for the ~~end~~period ofended December 31, 2009. ~~Cyclical~~This ~~deposit~~note ~~trends~~lists ofthe significant ~~our~~accounting ~~school~~policies ~~district~~used ~~and~~by ~~municipal~~management ~~customers caused a $4.4 million decrease~~ in ~~total deposits to $586.4 million at~~ the ~~end~~development ofand ~~the~~presentation ~~first quarter~~ of ~~2010,~~our ~~from~~financial ~~$590~~statements.~~8 million~~ atThis ~~the~~Management’s ~~end~~Discussion ofand ~~2009.~~Analysis, ~~Available-for-sale~~The ~~investment~~Notes ~~securities~~to ~~increased~~the ~~$8.6~~Consolidated ~~million~~Financial Statements, ~~while~~and ~~federal~~other ~~funds~~financial ~~sold~~statement ~~rose~~disclosures ~~$8.5 million,~~identify ~~from~~and ~~December 31,~~address ~~2009.~~key ~~Stockholders’ equity~~variables ~~increased~~and ~~$0.8 million~~other toqualitative ~~$51.1 million~~and atquantitative ~~the~~factors ~~end~~that ofare necessary for the ~~first~~understanding ~~quarter~~and evaluation of ~~2010~~our financial position, ~~from~~results ~~$50.3 million at~~of ~~December 31,~~operations ~~2009~~and cash flows.

~~Investment~~Operating ~~Portfolio~~Environment:

AtAfter ~~March~~two years of liquidation, businesses began rebuilding their inventories in the first half of 2010, which supported moderate economic growth. The United States economy grew at an annual rate of 2.4 31percent in the second quarter of 2010 after growing at an annual rate of 3.7 percent in the first quarter. In addition to rebuilding inventories, overall business spending advanced at a strong annual rate of 17.0 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Spending for equipment and software grew 21.9 percent, ~~our~~while investment ~~portfolio~~in ~~consisted~~nonresidential ~~primarily~~structures ofadvanced ~~short~~5.2 percent, the first positive change in seven consecutive quarters. Although labor conditions improved somewhat, they still were weak in comparison to pre-~~term~~recession Ustandards.S The unemployment rate, which spiked at 10.1 percent ~~Government~~in the fourth quarter of 2009, fell back to 9.5 percent in June 2010, the same rate ~~agency~~as ~~mortgage-backed~~experienced ~~securities~~one year earlier. Weak labor conditions continued to hinder consumer spending, which grew ~~provide~~only 1.6 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Inflation trended lower in the second quarter due to a ~~source~~decrease in energy prices. The price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures prices paid by residents of ~~liquidity~~the United States, ~~and~~increased ~~intermediate-term~~0.1 percent in the second quarter, significantly lower than the price increase of 2.1 percent in the first quarter. ~~tax-exempt~~Excluding ~~state~~food and ~~municipal obligations~~energy, ~~which~~this weindex ~~use~~increased 0.9 percent in the second quarter of 2010 compared to ~~mitigate~~1.6 percent ~~our~~in ~~tax~~the ~~burden~~first quarter of 2010.

~~The~~In ~~carrying~~addition ~~values~~to ofdomestic concerns, economic pressures weighed heavily on several European countries in the ~~major~~second ~~classifications~~quarter, which in turn produced volatility in global equity markets. In light of ~~available-for-sale~~domestic ~~securities~~and asglobal ~~they~~economic ~~relate~~uncertainty, tocoupled with low inflationary conditions, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) decided to keep the ~~total~~target ~~investment~~range ~~portfolio~~for the federal funds rate unchanged at ~~March~~0.00 ~~31,~~percent or 0.25 percent during the second quarter of 2010, and ~~December 31,~~indicated ~~2009,~~that conditions ~~are~~would ~~summarized~~continue asto ~~follows:~~warrant this accommodative position for some time.

Distribution of investment securities available-for-sale

	March 31,					December 31,
	2010					2009
	Amount		%			Amount		%
State and municipals	$	20,592		17.66	%	$	26,862		24.87	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		93,015		79.78			78,155		72.36
U.S. Government-sponsored		213		0.18			220		0.21
Equity securities:
Restricted		2,537		2.18			2,537		2.35
Other		236		0.20			231		0.21
Total	$	116,593		100.00	%	$	108,005		100.00	%

Investment securities totaled $116.6 million at March 31, 2010, an increase of $8.6 million from $108.0 million at December 31, 2009. Due to subdued loan demand, the investment portfolio played a more prominent role in the composition of our earning assets. As a percentage of earning assets, investments securities equaled 18.9 percent at the close of the first quarter compared to 17.6 percent at year-end 2009. The unrealized holding gain equaled $399, net of income taxes of $206 at March 31, 2010, compared to $819, net of income taxes of $422 at the end of 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~For~~On ~~the~~July 21, ~~three~~2010, ~~months~~President ~~ended~~Obama ~~March 31,~~signed weinto ~~received~~law ~~proceeds~~the ~~from~~Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the ~~sale~~“Act”). The goals of the new legislation include restoring public confidence in ~~available~~the financial system following the 2007-~~for-sale~~2008 ~~investment~~financial ~~securities~~and ofcredit ~~$6.2 million~~crises, inpreventing ~~2010~~another financial crisis and ~~$4.3 million~~allowing regulators to identify failings in ~~2009~~the system before another crisis can occur. ~~The~~Among other things, the Act creates the Financial Stability Oversight Council, with ~~securities~~oversight ~~sold~~authority infor ~~2010~~monitoring and ~~2009~~regulating ~~were~~systemic ~~comprised~~risk, ~~entirely~~and the Bureau of ~~intermediate-term~~Consumer Financial Protection, ~~tax-exempt~~which ~~state~~will have broad regulatory and enforcement powers over consumer ~~municipal~~financial ~~obligations~~products and services. ~~These~~The ~~securities~~Act ~~were~~also ~~sold~~changes asthe ~~part~~responsibilities of ~~alternative~~the ~~minimum~~current ~~tax~~federal banking ~~planning~~regulators, imposes additional corporate governance and disclosure requirements in areas ~~strategies.~~such ~~Net~~as ~~gains~~executive ~~recognized~~compensation onand proxy access, and limits or prohibits proprietary trading and hedge fund and private equity activities of banks. The scope of the ~~sale~~Act impacts many aspects of ~~available-for-sale~~the financial ~~investment~~services ~~securities~~industry, inand it requires the development and adoption of many implementing ~~first~~regulations ~~quarter~~over ~~totaled~~the ~~$361~~next inseveral ~~2010~~months and ~~$114~~years. inAccordingly, ~~2009~~we cannot assess the impact the Act will have on us at the present time.

~~For~~Review ~~the three months ended March 31, 2010, the investment portfolio averaged $114.5 million, an increase~~ of ~~$36.4 million~~Financial ~~compared to $78.1 million for the same three months of 2009. The~~Position: ~~tax-equivalent yield on our investment portfolio declined 188 basis points to 4.21 percent for the first quarter of 2010 compared to 6.09 percent for the same quarter last year.~~

Total assets equaled $641.8 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease of $10.4 million from $652.2 million at December 31, 2009. Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $11.8 million to $465.1 million at the close of the second quarter from $476.9 million at year-end 2009. Total deposits decreased $14.1 million to $576.7 million at June 30, 2010, from $590.8 million at December 31, 2009. The reduction in deposits was influenced by the cyclical deposit trends of our school district and municipal customers. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $1.0 million, while interest-bearing deposits decreased $13.1 million. Available-for-sale investment securities grew $4.9 million to $112.9 million at June 30, 2010, from $108.0 million at the end of 2009. Federal funds sold outstanding increased $6.4 million from the end of 2009. Stockholders’ equity rose $3.3 million to $53.6 million at June 30, 2010, from $50.3 million at December 31, 2009.

In comparison to the end of the previous quarter, total assets decreased $6.8 million from $648.6 million at March 31, 2010. The change in the balance sheet from the end of the first quarter reflected a $9.6 million decrease in total deposits. Loans, net of unearned income, decreased $1.2 million from the end of the first quarter, while investment securities decreased $3.7 million. Federal funds sold outstanding amounted to $31.7 million at June 30, 2010, compared to $33.8 million at March 31, 2010.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~The~~Investment ~~maturity distribution of the amortized cost, fair value and weighted-average tax-equivalent~~Portfolio: yield of the available-for-sale portfolio at March 31, 2010, is summarized as follows. The weighted-average yield, based on amortized cost, has been computed for tax-exempt state and municipals on a tax-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent. The distributions are based on contractual maturity with the exception of mortgage-backed securities and equity securities. Mortgage-backed securities have been presented based upon estimated cash flows, assuming no change in the current interest rate environment. Equity securities with no stated contractual maturities are included in the “After ten years” maturity distribution. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities, or estimated maturities for mortgage-backed securities, because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

~~Maturity~~At ~~distribution~~June 30, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of ~~available~~short-~~for~~term U.S. Government agency mortgage-~~sale~~backed ~~portfolio~~securities, which provide us with a source of liquidity and intermediate-term tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, which we use to mitigate our tax burden.

						After one					After five
	Within					but within					but within					After
	one year					five years					ten years					ten years					Total
March 31, 2010	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
Amortized cost:
State and municipals	$	2,253		7.66	%	$	2,592		7.90	%	$	9,941		7.37	%	$	4,756		7.04	%	$	19,542		7.39	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		18,957		3.30			46,900		3.14			27,430		3.49			282		4.11			93,569		3.28
U.S. Government-sponsored		80		6.83			114		6.71			7		6.62								201		6.75
Equity securities:
Restricted																	2,537		0.26			2,537		0.26
Other																	139		1.27			139		1.27
Total	$	21,290		3.77	%	$	49,606		3.40	%	$	37,378		4.52	%	$	7,714		4.60	%	$	115,988		3.91	%
Fair value:
State and municipals	$	2,295				$	2,676				$	10,733				$	4,888				$	20,592
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		18,831					46,665					27,237					282					93,015
U.S. Government-sponsored		85					121					7										213
Equity securities:
Restricted																	2,537					2,537
Other																	236					236
Total	$	21,211				$	49,462				$	37,977				$	7,943				$	116,593

The carrying values of the major classifications of securities as they relate to the total investment portfolio at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:

~~Loan~~Distribution ~~Portfolio:~~of investment securities available-for-sale

According to the minutes of the March 2010, FOMC meeting, economic activity strengthened during recent months. Business spending increased 4.1 percent in the first quarter of 2010, which resulted primarily from a 13.4 percent increase in spending on equipment and software. Despite the increase in spending within the corporate sector, commercial and industrial loans at all commercial banks throughout the United States contracted $84.5 billion or at an annualized rate of 25.5 percent from the end of 2009. With regard to our loan portfolio, business loans, including commercial loans, commercial mortgages, commercial construction and land development loans and lease financing, decreased $7.5 million to $330.1 million at March 31, 2010, from $337.6 million at December 31, 2009.


	June 30,					December 31,
	2010					2009
	Amount		%			Amount		%
State and municipals	$	19,336		17.13	%	$	26,862		24.87	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		90,557		80.25			78,155		72.36
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		182		0.16			220		0.21
Equity securities:
Restricted		2,537		2.25			2,537		2.35
Other		239		0.21			231		0.21

Total	$	112,851		100.00	%	$	108,005		100.00	%

Available-for-sale investment securities increased $4.9 million to $112.9 million at June 30, 2010, from $108.0 million at December 31, 2009. The unrealized holding gain, which equaled $819, net of income taxes of $422, at the end of 2009 appreciated $920 to $1,739, net of income taxes of $896, at June 30, 2010.

During the six months ended June 30, we received proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale investment securities of $6.2 million in 2010 and $4.3 million in 2009. The securities sold in 2010 and 2009 were composed entirely of intermediate-term, tax-exempt state and municipal obligations. These securities were sold as part of alternative minimum tax planning strategies. Net gains recognized on the sale of available-for-sale investment securities totaled $361 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $114 for the same six months of 2009.

For the first six months of 2010, the investment portfolio averaged $114.0 million, an increase of $39.0 million compared to $75.0 million for the same period of last year. The tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased 229 basis points to 3.67 percent for the first half of 2010 from 5.96 percent for the same period of 2009. Moreover, the tax-equivalent yield fell 108 basis points to 3.13 percent for the second quarter from 4.21 percent for the first quarter of 2010.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Low~~The ~~mortgage~~maturity ~~rates~~distribution of the amortized cost, ~~coupled~~fair ~~with~~value ~~federal~~and weighted-average tax-equivalent ~~credits~~yield of the available-for-sale ~~first~~portfolio ~~time~~at ~~homebuyers~~June 30, ~~led~~2010, tois asummarized ~~6.8~~as ~~percent~~follows. ~~increase~~The inweighted-average ~~existing~~yield, ~~homes~~based ~~sales~~on inamortized ~~March 2010.~~cost, ~~The~~has ~~rate~~been computed for tax-exempt state and municipals on a 30tax-~~year,~~equivalent ~~fixed-rate~~basis ~~mortgage in~~using the ~~United~~federal ~~States~~statutory ~~was~~tax 4rate of 34.97 0 percent. atThe ~~March 31,~~distributions ~~2010,~~are ~~compared~~based toon ~~5.00 percent~~contractual ~~one~~maturity ~~year~~with ~~earlier. In~~the ~~addition,~~exception ~~home~~of ~~prices~~mortgage-backed securities ~~appear~~and toequity ~~be stabilizing~~securities. ~~The~~Mortgage-backed ~~median~~securities ~~price~~have ofbeen anpresented ~~existing~~based ~~home rose 0.4~~upon ~~percent~~estimated incash ~~March.~~flows, ~~Despite~~assuming ~~the~~no ~~slight~~change ~~upturn~~ in the ~~housing~~current ~~market,~~interest ~~residential~~rate ~~mortgage~~environment. ~~lending in~~Equity ~~the~~securities ~~banking~~with ~~industry~~no ~~decreased~~stated contractual maturities are included in the ~~first~~“After ~~quarter,~~ten asyears” ~~evidenced~~maturity distribution. byExpected amaturities ~~$102.2 billion~~may differ from contractual maturities, or ~~10.9~~estimated maturities ~~percent~~for ~~annualized~~mortgage-backed ~~decrease~~securities, inbecause ~~real~~borrowers ~~estate~~have ~~loans~~the ~~for~~right ~~all~~to ~~commercial~~call ~~banks~~or ~~from~~prepay ~~the~~obligations ~~end~~with or ofwithout ~~2009~~call or prepayment penalties.

~~Due~~Maturity todistribution ~~favorable mortgage rates, activity in our secondary mortgage department was strong during the first quarter~~ of ~~2010. Residential mortgage loans serviced~~ available-for the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) increased $5.9 million or at an annual rate of 15.8 percent to $157.8 million at the end of the first quarter of 2010 from $151.9 million at the end of 2009. In comparison, for the first quarter of 2009, residential mortgage loans serviced for the FNMA increased at an annualized rate of 23.1 percent. For the three months ended March 31, residential mortgages sold to the FNMA totaled $10.1 million in 2010 compared to $20.9 million in 2009. Net gains realized on the -sale ~~of residential mortgages totaled $250 for the first quarter of 2010, compared to $424 for the same quarter last year. With regard to our~~ portfolio ~~mortgages, we experienced a decrease of $2.2~~ ~~million in residential mortgage loans, including residential construction mortgages, to $107.7 million at March 31, 2010, from $109.9 million at December 31, 2009.~~

Consumer spending throughout the United States rose 3.6 percent during the first quarter of 2010, which resulted primarily from an 11.3 percent increase in spending for durable goods. In addition, first quarter spending on non-durables and services increased 3.9 percent and 2.4 percent. Despite these improvements, our consumer loans decreased $0.9 million or 3.3 percent from the end of 2009.


						After one					After five
	Within					but within					but within					After
	one year					five years					ten years					ten years					Total
June 30, 2010	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
Amortized cost:
State and municipals	$	1,156		7.44	%	$	2,691		7.78	%	$	9,567		7.38	%	$	4,756		7.04	%	$	18,170		7.35	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		14,493		3.10			39,883		3.02			31,935		3.17			2,888		3.52			89,199		3.10
U.S. Government-sponsored		41		6.80			119		6.73			11		6.66								171		6.74
Equity securities:
Restricted																	2,537		0.26			2,537		0.26
Other																	139		0.98			139		0.98

Total	$	15,690		3.43	%	$	42,693		3.33	%	$	41,513		4.14	%	$	10,320		4.30	%	$	110,216		3.74	%


Fair value:
State and municipals	$	1,176				$	2,817				$	10,414				$	4,929				$	19,336
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government		14,590					40,320					32,687					2,960					90,557
U.S. Government-sponsored		43					128					11										182
Equity securities:
Restricted																	2,537					2,537
Other																	239					239

Total	$	15,809				$	43,265				$	43,112				$	10,665				$	112,851

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Average~~Loan ~~loans decreased $42.2 million or 8.2 percent to $474.3 million for the quarter ended~~Portfolio: March 31, 2010, from $516.5 million for the same quarter of 2009. The majority of the reduction was in tax-exempt loans of local municipalities, which declined $37.1 million or 54.1 percent comparing the first quarters of 2010 and 2009. Several tax and revenue anticipation notes, which were outstanding in the first quarter of 2009, matured on December 31, 2009, and were not renewed. Due to the sustained low interest rate environment and high levels of nonaccrual loans, the tax-equivalent yield on our loan portfolio decreased 36 basis points to 5.50 percent for the first quarter of 2010 compared to 5.86 percent for the same quarter of 2009. The FOMC has indicated that interest rates will remain at extremely low levels for some time. As a result, we expect loan yields to remain low.

According to the “Monetary Report to Congress” issued on July 21, 2010, businesses spending, ~~The~~which ~~composition~~began to turnaround in the fourth quarter 2009, continued to improve in the first half of 2010. For the second quarter of 2010, nonresidential investment advanced 17.0 percent. Specifically, in response to improved sales, production and corporate profits, businesses increased spending for equipment and software 21.9 percent in the second quarter. In addition, investment in nonresidential structures, which contracted for seven consecutive quarters, rose 5.2 percent in the second quarter. Despite the increase in business spending, commercial lending remained constrained. Businesses used pent up liquidity to fund investments. As a result, commercial and industrial loans at all commercial banks throughout the United States decreased $14.9 billion or 4.7 percent from the end of the first quarter of 2010. With regard to our loan portfolio, business loans, including commercial loans, commercial mortgages, commercial construction and land development loans and lease financing, increased $1.3 million to $331.4 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~and~~from ~~December~~$330.1 million at March 31, ~~2009~~2010. The growth was attributable primarily to increases in commercial loans and commercial construction and land development loans, ispartially ~~summarized~~offset asby a reduction in commercial ~~follows:~~mortgages.

~~Distribution~~Mortgage rates remained favorable for the second quarter of ~~loan~~2010. ~~portfolio~~The rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage in the United States was 4.74 percent at June 30, 2010, 23 basis points lower than 4.97 percent at the end of the previous quarter, and 68 basis points below 5.42 percent one year earlier. In addition, first time homebuyers were able to take advantage of federal tax credits during the first half of 2010. Despite low mortgage rates and fiscal stimulus, the housing market remained soft amid a struggling economy, a large inventory of foreclosed assets and tight credit conditions. Residential mortgage lending in the banking industry decreased in the second quarter, as evidenced by a $28.0 billion or 3.0 percent annualized reduction in real estate loans for all commercial banks from the end of the first quarter of 2010. We experienced a slight reduction in residential mortgage loans of $1.6 million or 6.2 percent annualized to $102.3 million at June 30, 2010, from $103.9 million at March 31, 2010.

	March 31,					December 31,
	2010					2009
	Amount		%			Amount		%
Commercial, financial and others	$	152,515		32.71	%	$	160,945		33.75	%
Real estate:
Construction		18,624		3.99			23,195		4.86
Residential		103,904		22.28			104,925		22.00
Commercial		159,702		34.25			155,269		32.55
Consumer, net		28,475		6.11			29,447		6.18
Lease financing, net		3,076		0.66			3,163		0.66
Loans, net of unearned income		466,296		100.00	%		476,944		100.00	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		14,891					17,462
Net loans	$	451,405				$	459,482

Although mortgage rates remained favorable, activity in our secondary mortgage department subsided somewhat in the first half of 2010 compared to the same period of the previous year. Residential mortgage loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) increased $9.2 million or at an annual rate of 12.2 percent to $161.1 million at the end of the second quarter of 2010 from $151.9 million at the end of 2009. In comparison, for the same period of 2009, residential mortgage loans serviced for the FNMA increased at an annualized rate of 30.8 percent. For the three months and six months ended June 30, residential mortgages sold to the FNMA totaled $7.2 million and $17.3 million in 2010 compared to $28.3 million and $49.2 million in 2009. Net gains realized on the sale of residential mortgages totaled $174 for the second quarter and $424 year-to-date 2010, compared to $518 and $942 for the same periods of 2009.

InStability anof ~~attempt~~household towealth ~~limit~~helped ~~IRR~~consumer ~~and~~spending ~~liquidity~~advance ~~strains,~~by wea ~~continually~~modest ~~examine the maturity distribution and interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio~~1.6 percent ~~For~~in the second ~~first~~ quarter of 2010. ~~market~~Consumers ~~interest rates~~increased ~~remained~~spending atfor ~~historically~~durable ~~low~~goods ~~levels.~~by ~~According to their recent statement~~3.4 percent, ~~the FOMC~~while ~~anticipates~~spending ~~that~~on ~~economic~~nondurable ~~conditions~~goods ~~will~~and ~~warrant~~services ~~these~~rose ~~exceptionally~~7.5 percent ~~low~~and ~~rates for the majority of 2010~~1.6 percent. Despite ~~this short-term interest rate forecast~~these improvements, ~~the risk of rising rates in the future caused us to employ an Asset/Liability management strategy for 2010 which focuses on restoring balance to~~ our ~~IRR.~~consumer ~~Accordingly, we place emphasis on originating~~ loans ~~with~~decreased ~~shorter repricing terms~~$0. ~~Adjustable-rate~~5 million ~~loans~~from ~~represented~~the ~~57.8 percent~~end of the ~~loan~~first ~~portfolio~~quarter atof ~~March 31,~~ 2010~~, compared to 56~~.~~2 percent at the end of 2009.~~

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Average loans decreased $43.6 million or 8.5 percent to $470.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from $513.9 million for the same six months of 2009. The ~~maturity~~majority of the reduction was in tax-exempt loans of local municipalities, which decreased $36.3 million or 53.8 percent comparing the six months ended June 30, 2010 and ~~sensitivity~~2009. ~~information~~Several tax and revenue anticipation notes, which were outstanding during the first half of 2009, matured by December 31, 2009, and were not renewed. Due to a sustained low interest rate environment and high levels of nonaccrual loans, the tax-equivalent yield on our loan portfolio decreased 31 basis points to ~~changes~~5.51 percent infor the six months ended June 30, 2010, from 5.82 percent for the same six months of 2009. The FOMC has indicated that interest rates by ~~major~~will ~~classification~~remain at ~~March 31,~~these ~~2010~~historically low levels for some time. As a result, iswe ~~summarized~~do asnot ~~follows:~~anticipate an increase in our loan yields for the remainder of 2010.

The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:

Distribution of loan portfolio


	June 30,					December 31,
	2010					2009
	Amount		%			Amount		%
Commercial, financial and others	$	152,944		32.88	%	$	160,945		33.75	%
Real estate:
Construction		19,853		4.27			23,195		4.86
Residential		102,305		21.99			104,925		22.00
Commercial		158,960		34.17			155,269		32.55
Consumer, net		28,025		6.03			29,447		6.18
Lease financing, net		3,056		0.66			3,163		0.66

Loans, net of unearned income		465,143		100.00	%		476,944		100.00	%

Less: allowance for loan losses		14,928					17,462

Net loans	$	450,215				$	459,482

In an attempt to limit IRR and liquidity strains, we continually examine the maturity distribution and interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio. For the first half of 2010, market interest rates remained at historically low levels and the FOMC has indicated that this low level would likely remain in place for some time. Despite this short-term interest rate forecast, the risk of rising rates in the future caused us to employ an Asset/Liability management strategy for 2010 which focuses on restoring balance to our IRR. Accordingly, we place emphasis on originating loans with shorter repricing terms. Adjustable-rate loans represented 58.7 percent of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2010, compared to 56.2 percent at the end of 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The maturity and repricing information of the loan portfolio by major classification at June 30, 2010, is summarized as follows:

Maturity distribution and interest sensitivity of loan portfolio

			After one
	Within		but within		After
March 31, 2010	one year		five years		five years		Total
June 30, 2010	one year		five years		five years		Total
Maturity schedule:
Commercial, financial and others	$	6761,~~343~~896	$	4526,~~846~~619	$	3964,~~326~~429	$	152,~~515~~944
Real estate:
Construction		1310,~~895~~401		13,~~635~~742		35,~~094~~710		1819,~~624~~853
Residential		158,~~038~~057		4728,~~811~~236		4166,~~055~~012		~~103~~102,~~904~~305
Commercial		227,~~088~~910		618,~~445~~270		76142,~~169~~780		~~159~~158,~~702~~960
Consumer, net		31,~~861~~841		2019,~~057~~405		46,~~557~~779		28,~~475~~025
Lease financing, net		~~616~~612		2,~~460~~444				3,~~076~~056
Total	$	~~122~~90,~~841~~717	$	~~179~~88,~~254~~716	$	~~164~~285,~~201~~710	$	~~466~~465,~~296~~143
Sensitivity schedule:
Predetermined interest rates	$	30,485	$	72,116	$	89,677	$	192,278
Predetermined interest rates	$	43,569	$	98,401	$	54,885	$	196,855
Floating- or adjustable-interest rates		60,232		16,600		196,033		272,865
Floating or adjustable interest rates		79,272		80,853		109,316		269,441
Total	$	90,717	$	88,716	$	285,710	$	465,143
Total	$	122,841	$	179,254	$	164,201	$	466,296

In addition to the risks inherent in our loan portfolio, in the normal course of business we are also a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments include legally binding commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and commercial letters of credit, and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and IRR in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer.

Unused portions of lines of credit, including home equity and credit card lines and overdraft protection agreements, are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. Unused portions of home equity lines are collateralized and generally have fixed expiration dates. Credit card lines and overdraft protection agreements are uncollateralized and usually do not carry specific maturity dates. Unused portions of lines of credit ultimately may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which we are committed.

2526

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the ~~performance~~ performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially, all commercial letters of credit have expiration dates within one year and often expire unused in whole or in part by the customer. The carrying value of the liability for our obligations under guarantees was not material at ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009.

Credit risk is the principal risk associated with these instruments. Our involvement and exposure to credit loss in the event that the instruments are fully drawn upon and the customer defaults is represented by the contractual amounts of these instruments. In order to control credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, we employ the same credit quality and collateral policies in making commitments that we use in other lending activities. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis, and if deemed necessary, obtain collateral. The amount and nature of the collateral obtained is based on our credit evaluation.

The contractual amounts of off-balance sheet commitments at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:

Distribution of off-balance sheet commitments

	March 31,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Commitments to extend credit	$	7685,~~278~~426	$	81,945
Unused portions of lines of credit		2425,~~846~~314		24,723
Commercial letters of credit		2019,~~371~~076		20,982
Total	$	~~121~~129,~~495~~816	$	127,650

We record an allowance for credit losses associated with off-balance sheet ~~credit losses~~commitments, if deemed necessary, separately as a liability. NoThe allowance was deemed ~~necessary~~immaterial at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009. We do not anticipate that losses, if any, that may occur as a result of funding off- balance sheet commitments, would have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial position.

2627

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Asset Quality:

National, Pennsylvania and market area unemployment rates at June 30, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:


June 30,	2010			2009
United States		9.5	%		9.5	%
Pennsylvania		9.2			8.2
Lackawanna county		9.6			8.2
Luzerne county		10.7			9.0
Monroe county		9.9			9.4
Susquehanna county		8.9			8.8
Wayne county		7.8			7.6
Wyoming county		9.7	%		8.8	%

The National unemployment rate, which spiked to 10.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009, rebounded to 9.5 percent at June 30, 2010, the same rate as one year ago. However, employment conditions deteriorated significantly for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and all counties in our market area from one year ago.

As a result of significant deterioration in asset quality over the previous two years, we initiated several remedial steps to our asset quality in the latter part of 2009. These steps included:

•

Hiring an independent loan review company to assist and advise us with our credit risk management practices;

•

Enhancing the oversight and workout of classified assets by hiring an in-house attorney to expedite the process of loan foreclosures and redeploying existing staff to the workout and loan review functions;

•

Initiating the formation of a problem loan committee for the purpose of monitoring the status of problem assets and devising action plans for the timely workout or liquidation of assets;

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

•

Overhauling the appraisal process by requiring new appraisals on all impaired loans subject to evaluation under FASB ASC 310, “Receivables,” and any loan that is delinquent over 60 days; and

•

Tightening underwriting standards to ensure a more rigorous review of potential loans and more conservative lending standards.

Nonperforming assets decreased $~~2,507~~125 tofrom ~~$25,653~~the atend ~~March 31,~~of ~~2010,~~the ~~from~~previous ~~$28,160~~quarter atand ~~December~~$2.6 ~~31,~~million from year-end 2009. ~~The~~Nonperforming ~~ratio~~assets ofequaled ~~nonperforming~~$25.5 million ~~assets~~or to5.41 percent of loans, net of unearned income, and foreclosed assets ~~equaled~~ at June 30, 2010, compared to $25.7 million or 5.43 percent at March 31, 2010, and $28.2 million or 5.86 percent at December 31, 2009. ~~The~~In ~~improvement~~comparison to ~~resulted~~year-end ~~from~~2009, ~~decreases~~the ofimprovement ~~$1,713~~resulted inprimarily ~~nonaccrual~~from ~~loans,~~decreases ~~$2,322~~ in ~~restructured~~nonperforming loans and ~~$1,242 in~~ ~~loans past due 90 days or more~~leases, partially offset by an increase ~~of $2,770~~ in foreclosed assets.

~~During~~With ~~the~~regard ~~first~~to ~~quarter~~foreclosed ~~of 2010~~assets, ~~two~~there were five properties with an aggregate ~~fair~~carrying value ~~less cost to sell~~ of $3,~~020~~457 ~~were~~ transferred ~~into~~to foreclosed assets during the first half of 2010. ~~One~~Two ~~property~~properties with aan aggregate carrying value of $~~250~~344 ~~was~~were sold for $~~242~~336, resulting in a net realized loss of $8 ~~during the three months ended March 31, 2010~~. At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2010, there were ~~nine~~eleven properties with an aggregate ~~fair~~carrying value ~~less cost to sell~~ of $56,~~979~~322 in foreclosed assets.

~~We anticipate economic conditions in our local market area to remain stable~~29 for the remainder of 2010. However, should economic conditions weaken, borrowers’ ability to make timely loan payments could be further hindered. The possibility exists that these levels could deteriorate should this occur.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Information concerning nonperforming assets at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows. The table includes loans or other extensions of credit classified for regulatory purposes and all material loans or other extensions of credit that cause management to have serious doubts as to the borrowers’ ability to comply with present loan repayment terms.

Distribution of nonperforming assets

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial, financial and others	$	32,~~333~~752		$	7,438
Real estate:
Construction		5,~~893~~886			4,532
Residential		1,~~666~~457			1,797
Commercial		6,~~293~~423			5,196
Consumer, net		~~117~~160			52
Lease financing, net
Total nonaccrual loans		1716,~~302~~678			19,015
Restructured loans:
Commercial, financial and others		1,346			1,777
Real estate:
Construction
Residential		~~278~~277
Commercial		~~356~~352			2,525
Consumer, net
Lease financing, net
Total restructured loans		1,~~980~~975			4,302
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Commercial, financial and others		~~105~~			263
Real estate:
Construction
Residential		41196			603
Commercial		162			469
Consumer, net		3919			134
Lease financing, net		~~207~~176			165
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more		~~392~~553			1,634
Total nonperforming loans		19,~~674~~206			24,951
Foreclosed assets		56,~~979~~322			3,209
Total nonperforming assets	$	25,~~653~~528		$	28,160
Ratios:
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of loans, net		4.2213	%		5.23	%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans, net, and foreclosed assets		5.43	%		5.86	%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of loans, net and foreclosed assets		5.41	%		5.86	%

2830

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred loan losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The balance in the allowance for loan losses account is based on past events and current economic conditions. We employ the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement, as amended, and GAAP in assessing the adequacy of the allowance account. Under GAAP, the adequacy of the allowance account is determined based on the provisions of FASB ASC 310, “Receivables,” for loans specifically identified to be individually evaluated for impairment and the requirements of FASB ASC 450, “Contingencies,” for large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans to be collectively evaluated for impairment.

We follow our systematic methodology in accordance with procedural discipline by applying it in the same manner regardless of whether the allowance is being determined at a high point or a low point in the economic cycle. Each quarter, our loan review department identifies those loans to be individually evaluated for impairment and those loans collectively evaluated for impairment utilizing a standard criteria. Internal loan review grades are assigned quarterly to loans identified to be individually evaluated. A loan’s grade may differ from period to period based on current conditions and events, however, we consistently utilize the same grading system each quarter. We use loss experience from the most recent rolling eight quarters in determining the historical loss factor for each pool collectively evaluated for impairment. We place ~~higher~~a ~~weight~~higher weight on the latest four quarters to place emphasis on the current periods compared to the previous four quarters in arriving at historical loss factors. Qualitative factors are evaluated in the same manner each quarter and are adjusted within a relevant range of values based on current ~~conditions~~ conditions to assure directional consistency of the provision for loan losses and allowance for loan loss account.

2931

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Information concerning impaired loans at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows. The table includes credits classified for regulatory purposes and all material credits that cause management to have serious doubts as to the borrower’s ability to comply with present loan repayment terms.

Distribution of impaired loans

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial, financial and others	$	32,~~333~~752		$	7,438
Real estate:
Construction		5,~~893~~886			4,532
Residential		1,~~666~~457			1,797
Commercial		6,~~293~~423			5,196
Consumer, net		~~117~~160			52
Lease financing, net
Total nonaccrual loans		1716,~~302~~678			19,015
Accruing loans:
Commercial, financial and others		21,~~088~~346			3,400
Real estate:
Construction
Residential		~~278~~277			55
Commercial		~~1,890~~352			5,198
Consumer, net
Lease financing, net
Total accruing loans		41,~~256~~975			8,653
Total impaired loans	$	2118,~~558~~653		$	27,668
Ratio:
Impaired loans as a percentage of loans, net		4.6201	%		5.80	%

Impaired loans decreased $~~6,110~~9.0 million or 2232.15 percent to $~~21,558~~18.7 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, from $27~~,668~~.7 million at December 31, 2009. ~~Impaired~~The improvement in impaired loans, asresulted from a ~~percentage~~$6.7 million decrease ofin accruing loans, ~~net~~coupled ofwith ~~unearned~~a ~~income~~$2.3 million decrease in nonaccrual loans, ~~improved~~from toyear-end 42009.~~62 percent~~ atThe ~~the~~decrease ~~close~~in ofimpaired ~~the~~loans, ~~first~~which ~~quarter~~was oflargely ~~2010~~concentrated ~~from~~in ~~5.80 percent~~commercial, atfinancial ~~the~~and other ~~end~~loans ofand ~~2009. Nonaccrual~~commercial ~~loans~~real ~~decreased~~estate $1loans,~~713,~~ ~~while~~was ~~impaired~~due ~~accruing~~primarily ~~loans~~to ~~declined~~the ~~$4,397.~~migration ~~The~~of ~~majority~~loans ofto ~~the~~foreclosed ~~improvement~~assets inand ~~impaired~~an ~~loans~~increase ~~was~~in ~~concentrated~~charge-offs. inNotwithstanding the ~~commercial~~decrease, ~~financial~~we ~~and~~continue ~~other~~to closely monitor all impaired loans and the supporting collateral to mitigate any potential losses ~~commercial~~associated ~~real~~with ~~estate~~these credits.

3032

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Information related to the recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is a related allowance and the amount of that allowance and the recorded investment in impaired loans for which there is no allowance at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:

March 31, 2010

December 31, 2009

June 30, 2010

December 31, 2009

Recorded

Investment

Allowance

Investment

Allowance

Impaired loans:

With a related allowance

7,~~794~~038

2,~~061~~610

13,481

5,762

With no related allowance

1311,~~764~~615

14,187

Total

2118,~~558~~653

2,~~061~~610

27,668

5,762

Interest income on impaired loans that would have been recognized had the loans been current and the terms of the loans not been modified, the aggregate amount of interest income recognized and the amount recognized using the cash-basis method and the average recorded investment in impaired loans for the three-month ~~months~~and six-month periods ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31	2010		2009
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Gross interest due under terms	$	425	$	537
	June 30,				June 30,
Interest income recognized		183		260
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Interest income not recognized	$	242	$	277
Gross interest due under terms	$	283	$	385	$	708	$	922
Interest income recognized (cash-basis)	$	259	$	192
Interest income recognized		104		225		287		485
Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	28,790	$	32,662
Interest income not recognized	$	179	$	160	$	421	$	437
Interest income recognized (cash-basis)	$	137	$	155	$	396	$	347
Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	21,089	$	30,249	$	24,918	$	31,449

~~For~~Cash ~~the three months ended March 31, cash~~ received on impaired loans applied as a reduction of principal totaled $~~348~~1,147 ~~in 2010~~ and $21,~~316~~495 infor the ~~2009.~~three Atand ~~March~~six months ended June 3130, 2010,. weFor ~~had~~the arespective ~~$887~~periods ~~commitment~~of ~~to one~~2009 ~~commercial~~cash ~~customer~~receipts ~~with~~ on impaired loans totaled $451 and $2,767.

3133

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The allocation of the allowance for loan losses at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, is summarized as follows:

Allocation of the allowance for loan losses

	March 31, 2010					December 31, 2009
	June 30,					December 31,
	2010					2009
			Category					Category
			as a					as a
			% of					% of
	Amount		loans			Amount		loans
Allocated allowance:
Specific:
Commercial, financial and others	$	~~697~~921		10.1688	%	$	3,679		2.27	%
Real estate:
Construction		~~685~~913		1.2627			1,002		0.95
Residential		~~168~~163		0.4237			265		0.39
Commercial		~~442~~545		1.7646			812		2.18
Consumer, net		6968		0.03			4		0.01
Lease financing, net
Total specific		2,~~061~~610		4.6301			5,762		5.80
Formula:
Commercial, financial and others		4,~~128~~023		3132.5500			1,024		31.48
Real estate:
Construction		1,~~586~~732		23.7300			1,645		3.91
Residential		97104		21.8662			103		21.61
Commercial		3,~~048~~156		32.4971			1,413		30.37
Consumer, net		~~250~~216		6.0800			184		6.17
Lease financing, net		12128		0.66			12		0.66
Total formula		9,~~121~~359		95.3799			4,381		94.20
Total allocated allowance		11,~~182~~969		100.00	%		10,143		100.00	%
Unallocated allowance		32,~~709~~959					7,319
Total allowance for loan losses	$	14,~~891~~928				$	17,462

The allocated ~~element of the~~ allowance for loan losses account ~~was~~increased $1,826 to $11,~~182~~969 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~an increase of $1,039~~ from $10,143 at December 31, 2009. The change from year-end resulted primarily ~~resulted~~ from a $4,~~740~~ 978 increase in the formula portion of the allowance for impairment of loans collectively ~~evaluated~~ evaluated under FASB ASC 450, partially offset by a reduction of $3,~~701~~152 in the specific portion for loans individually evaluated for impairment under FASB ASC 310. ~~Specifically,~~With regard to the formula portion, the total loss ~~factors~~ factor for collectively evaluated commercial, financial and other loans and commercial real estate loans increased from year-end 2009 due to a higher amount of weighted-average net charge-offs for the past eight consecutive quarters. The majority of the decrease in the specific portion resulted from two commercial credits. The collateral supporting one of the credits was transferred to foreclosed assets with the specific reserve recognized as a write down at the time of transfer. The specific reserve associated with the other credit was charged-off as a confirmed loss during the first half of 2010.

3234

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses equaled $32,~~709~~959 at the end of the ~~first~~ second quarter of 2010, which we believe is sufficient to cover any inherent losses in the loan ~~portfolio~~ portfolio that have not been identified as part of the allocated allowance using our impairment methodology.

The coverage ratio, the allowance for loan losses ~~account~~, as a percentage of nonperforming loans, is an industry ratio used to test the ability of the allowance account to absorb potential losses ~~arising~~ arising from nonperforming loans. The coverage ratio equaled 0.78 percent at June 30, 2010, compared to 0.76 percent at March 31, 2010, ~~an improvement~~and ~~from~~ 0.70 percent at December 31, 2009.

A reconciliation of the allowance for loan losses and illustration of charge-offs and recoveries by major loan category for the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, is summarized as follows:

Reconciliation of allowance for loan losses

	March 31,
	June 30,
	2010
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	17,462
Loans charged-off:
Commercial, financial and others		23,~~691~~002
Real estate:
Construction		525
Residential		9
Commercial		~~332~~432
Consumer, net		4360
Lease financing, net
Total		34,~~591~~028
Loans recovered:
Commercial, financial and others		12179
Real estate:
Construction
Residential		1
Commercial
Consumer, net		714
Lease financing, net
Total		20194
Net loans charged-off		3,~~571~~834
Provision charged to operating expense		1,~~000~~300
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	14,~~891~~928
Ratios:
Net loans charged-off as a percentage of average loans outstanding		31.0564	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period end loans		3.1921	%

3335

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The allowance for loan losses account equaled $14,~~891~~928 or 3.1921 percent of loans, net of ~~unearned~~ unearned income, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, compared to $17,462 or 3.65 percent at ~~year-end~~December 31, 2009. Net charge-offs of $3,~~571~~834 ~~exceed~~exceeded the provision for loan losses of $1,~~000~~300, which resulted in the $2,~~571~~534 decrease in the allowance for loan losses account.

Past due loans not satisfied through repossession, foreclosure or related actions, are evaluated individually to determine if all or part of the outstanding balance should be charged against the allowance for loan losses account. Any subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance account. ~~Loans~~Net ~~charged~~charge-~~off,~~offs ~~net of recoveries, for the first quarter~~ amounted to $3,~~571~~834 inor ~~2010 and $294 in 2009~~1.64 percent ~~As a percentage~~ of average loans outstanding, ~~net charge-offs equaled 3.05 percent~~ for the six ~~first~~months ~~quarter~~ended ofJune 30, 2010 ~~and 0~~.~~23 percent~~ ~~for~~For the ~~first~~same ~~quarter~~period of 2009., ~~The~~net ~~$3.6 million of loans charged~~charge-~~off~~offs inwere ~~the~~$326 ~~first~~or ~~quarter of 2010 reflected the recognition of confirmed~~0.13 ~~losses~~percent ~~as a result~~ of ~~receiving~~average ~~new information in the first quarter of 2010 on certain~~ loans ~~having~~ ~~unconfirmed loss allocations in accordance with FASB ASC 310 at December 31, 2009~~outstanding. ~~Generally, at December 31, 2009, these losses were included in the allocated element as being reserved for loans individually evaluated and measured for impairment under FASB ASC 310.~~

Deposits:

~~Employment~~According ~~conditions~~the ~~and~~Monetary ~~the~~Policy ~~housing~~Report ~~market~~to ~~showed~~Congress, ~~signs~~real ofwage ~~stabilizing~~and insalary ~~the~~income, ~~first~~which ~~quarter~~had offallen ~~2010.~~appreciably Inin ~~addition~~2009, ~~consumers’~~improved ~~wealth~~during ~~appreciated somewhat as equity markets advanced in~~ the first ~~three~~ ~~months~~half of 2010. ~~Moreover~~As a result, disposable personal income increased 14.54 percent in the ~~first~~ second quarter of 2010. Asafter aincreasing ~~result, consumers increased their spending and cutback on their saving~~3.8 percent ~~For the~~in the first quarter. ofConsumers ~~2010,~~continued ~~consumer~~to ~~spending~~favor ~~advanced~~saving ~~3.6 percent,~~and ~~compared~~reducing tohousehold ~~1.6 percent~~debt inas ~~the fourth~~opposed ~~quarter of 2009~~to spending. ~~Conversely,~~The ~~the~~ personal savings rate was 36.12 percent infor the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010~~, compared to 3~~.~~9 percent in the final quarter of 2009.~~

WeTotal ~~experienced~~deposits adecreased $49.47 million ~~decrease~~or inat ~~total~~an ~~deposits~~annualized torate of 6.6 percent from $586.4 million at March 31, 2010, ~~from~~ to $~~590~~576.87 million at ~~December 31,~~the ~~2009~~end of the second quarter. ANoninterest-bearing deposits declined $23.7 million, ~~increase~~while ~~in noninterest~~interest-bearing deposits ~~was more~~decreased ~~than offset by a~~ $76.10 million. ~~decrease~~The majority of the reduction in interest-bearing ~~deposits.~~accounts ~~Historically,~~was ~~during~~concentrated ~~the first~~in ~~quarter~~time ofdeposits. ~~each~~Due ~~year~~to a favorable liquidity position, ~~our~~we ~~deposits~~chose ~~are~~not ~~influenced~~to byaggressively ~~the~~compete ~~cyclical~~for time deposits ~~trends~~within ofour ~~certain~~market area. ~~business~~As ~~and~~a ~~municipal~~result, ~~customers.~~total ~~Interest-bearing~~time ~~transaction~~deposits ~~accounts~~ decreased $613.91 million ~~due~~ to ~~these~~$238.5 million ~~trends~~at June 30, as2010, ~~certain~~from $251.6 million ~~larger-account~~at ~~balances~~the ~~vary~~end ~~due~~of tothe ~~timing~~first ofquarter. ~~tax~~Partially ~~receipts~~offsetting ~~and~~the reduction ~~disbursements~~in ~~and~~total ~~government~~time ~~contracts.~~deposits Inwas ~~addition~~an increase in interest-bearing transaction accounts, wewhich ~~experienced~~include money amarket, ~~reduction~~NOW inand ~~total~~savings ~~time~~accounts. These accounts together grew $7.1 million to $250.9 million ~~deposits~~at ofJune 30, 2010, from $0243.28 million at March 31, 2010.

3436

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The average amount of, and the rate paid on, the major classifications of deposits for the ~~quarters~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:

Deposit distribution

March 31,

June 30,

2010

2009

Average

Balance

Rate

Balance

Rate

Interest-bearing:

Money market accounts

3634,~~972~~895

10.0098

2827,~~352~~229

0.8384

NOW accounts

99100,~~544~~946

1.5651

7675,~~743~~689

1.6249

Savings accounts

~~108~~110,~~154~~124

0.4644

~~100~~104,~~659~~034

0.4953

Time deposits less than $100

~~160~~157,~~570~~696

3.1107

~~168~~165,~~255~~475

3.4838

Time deposits $100 or more

9290,~~472~~426

2.6562

75,~~233~~684

3.7856

Total interest-bearing

~~497~~494,~~712~~087

1.9894

~~449~~448,~~242~~111

2.3828

Noninterest-bearing

8688,~~711~~005

7981,~~997~~115

Total deposits

~~584~~582,~~423~~092

529,~~239~~226

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, average total deposits ~~averaged~~grew $~~584~~52.49 million inor ~~2010, an~~10.0 percent ~~increase~~to of $55582.21 million ~~or 10.4 percent~~ compared to $529.2 million infor the same period of 2009. ~~Interest~~Noninterest-bearing deposits rose $486.59 million, while ~~noninterest~~interest-bearing ~~deposits~~accounts ~~grew~~increased $646.70 million. ~~Interest-bearing~~We experienced ~~transaction~~growth ~~accounts,~~in ~~including~~all ~~money~~major ~~market,~~deposit ~~NOW~~categories ~~and~~except ~~savings~~for ~~accounts, averaged $38.9 million higher, while total~~ time deposits ~~grew~~less than $9100.~~6 million.~~ ~~Market~~However ~~interest rates are at historically low~~almost ~~levels. The 3~~three-~~month~~quarters ~~U.S. Treasury rate declined 6 basis points to 0.15 percent at March 31, 2010, from 0.21 percent at March 31, 2009. In addition, given the prolonged length~~ of ~~time interest rates remained at historically low levels, management reduced~~ the ~~standard~~growth ~~rate~~was ~~paid~~concentrated ~~for~~in interest-bearing transaction accounts ~~10 basis points to 0~~.~~15 percent from 0.25 percent. Furthermore, promotional~~ gas lease certificates of deposit were renewed at lower market rates. As a result, our cost of deposits for the first quarter decreased 40 basis points to 1.98 percent in 2010 from 2.38 percent in 2009. The FOMC has indicated that it will keep interest rates at these low levels for some time. We anticipate our funding costs to remain favorable for the remainder of 2010. However, should competition within our market area intensify, our cost of funds could be negatively impacted.

~~Volatile~~Market ~~deposits,~~interest ~~time~~rates ~~deposits~~remained inat ~~denominations~~historically oflow ~~$100~~levels orduring ~~more,~~the ~~increased~~first ~~$19.0 million~~half toof ~~$92~~2010.5 The ~~million~~3-month U.S. Treasury rate was 0.17 percent at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~from~~and ~~$73~~0.519 ~~million~~percent at ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. ~~These~~In addition, ~~deposits~~given ~~averaged~~the ~~$92.5 million~~prolonged inlength ~~2010~~of time interest rates have been at historically low levels, management anreduced ~~increase~~the ofstandard ~~$17~~rate paid for interest-bearing transaction accounts 10 basis points to 0.315 ~~million~~percent orfrom ~~23.~~0.25 percent. ~~from~~Furthermore, anpromotional ~~average~~gas lease certificates of ~~$75.2 million~~deposit inwere ~~2009.~~renewed ~~Due~~at tolower ~~the~~market ~~decline~~rates. inAs ~~market~~a ~~interest rates~~result, ~~the~~our ~~average~~ cost of ~~large~~deposits ~~denomination~~for ~~time deposits~~the ~~declined~~six ~~113~~months ended June 30, decreased 34 basis points to 1.94 percent in 2010 from 2.6528 percent ~~for~~in ~~the~~2009. ~~first~~The ~~three~~FOMC ~~months~~has ofindicated that ~~2010~~economic ~~from~~conditions 3appear to warrant these low interest rate levels for some time.78 We ~~percent~~anticipate our funding costs to remain favorable for the ~~same~~remainder ~~three~~of ~~months~~2010. However, should competition within our market area intensify, our cost of ~~last~~funds ~~year~~could be negatively impacted.

35Volatile time deposits, time deposits in denominations of $100 or more, decreased $7.0 million to $85.5 million at June 30, 2010, from $92.5 million at the end of the previous quarter. These deposits averaged $90.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $14.7 million or 19.4 percent compared to $75.7 million for the same six months of 2009. The average cost of large denomination time deposits decreased 94 basis points to 2.62 percent for the first half of 2010, compared to 3.56 percent for the same period of 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Maturities of time deposits of $100 or more at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows:

Maturity distribution of time deposits of $100 or more

	March 31,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Within three months	$	3027,~~927~~693	$	13,860
After three months but within six months		2719,~~545~~746		31,501
After six months but within twelve months		1517,~~287~~800		22,289
After twelve months		1820,~~741~~275		21,287
Total	$	9285,~~500~~514	$	88,937

Market Risk Sensitivity:

Market risk is the risk to our earnings or financial position resulting from adverse changes in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our exposure to market risk is primarily IRR associated with our lending, investing and deposit-gathering activities. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for change in our reported earnings and/or the market value of our net worth. Variations in interest rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive income and operating expenses. Interest rate changes also affect the underlying economic value of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value and provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. IRR is inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries. However, a bank with a high degree of IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a greater risk of insolvency. Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and soundness in their activities.

3638

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Given the recent financial crisis and current economic recession, IRR and effectively managing it are very important to both bank management and regulators. Bank regulations require us to develop and maintain an IRR management program, overseen by the Board of Directors and senior management, that involves a comprehensive risk management process in order to effectively identify, measure, monitor and control risk. Should we have material weaknesses in our risk management process or high exposure relative to our capital, bank regulatory agencies will take action to remedy these shortcomings. Moreover, the level of IRR exposure and the quality of our risk management process is a determining factor when evaluating capital adequacy.

The Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”), comprised of members of our Board of Directors, senior management and other appropriate officers, oversees our IRR management program. Specifically, ALCO analyzes economic data and market interest rate trends, as well as competitive pressures, and utilizes several computerized modeling techniques to reveal potential exposure to IRR. This allows us to monitor and attempt to control the influence these factors may have on our rate -sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate -sensitive liabilities (“RSL”), and overall operating results and financial position. One such technique utilizes a static gap model that considers repricing frequencies of RSA and RSL in order to monitor IRR. Gap analysis attempts to measure our interest rate exposure by ~~calculating~~ calculating the net amount of RSA and RSL that reprice within specific time intervals. A positive gap occurs when the amount of RSA repricing in a specific period is greater than the amount of RSL ~~repricing~~ repricing within that same time frame and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio greater than 1.0. A negative gap occurs when the amount of RSL repricing is greater than the amount of RSA and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio less than 1.0. A positive gap implies that earnings will be impacted favorably if interest rates rise and adversely if interest rates fall during the period. A negative gap tends to indicate that earnings will be affected inversely to interest rate changes.

3739

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Our interest rate sensitivity gap position, illustrating RSA and RSL at their related carrying values, is summarized as follows. The distributions in the table are based on a combination of maturities, call provisions, repricing frequencies and prepayment patterns. Variable-rate assets and liabilities are distributed based on the repricing frequency of the instrument. Mortgage instruments are distributed in accordance with estimated cash flows, assuming there is no change in the current interest rate environment.

Interest rate sensitivity

Due after

three months

one year

Due within

but within

Due after

March 31, 2010

three months

twelve months

five years

Total

June 30, 2010

three months

twelve months

five years

Total

Rate-sensitive assets:

Investment securities

74,~~111~~007

1411,~~100~~802

4943,~~462~~265

4553,~~920~~777

~~116~~112,~~593~~851

Loans held for sale, net

~~811~~110

Loans, net of unearned income

~~126~~165,~~317~~891

69115,~~618~~382

~~213~~165,~~180~~327

5718,~~181~~543

~~466~~465,~~296~~143

Federal funds sold

3331,~~800~~700

Total

~~168~~201,~~039~~708

83127,~~718~~184

~~262~~208,~~642~~592

~~103~~72,~~101~~320

~~617~~609,~~500~~804

Rate-sensitive liabilities:

Money market accounts

2523,~~931~~548

8,~~714~~259

3431,~~645~~807

NOW accounts

8087,~~248~~232

1819,~~629~~325

98106,~~877~~557

Savings accounts

52,~~358~~741

~~104~~109,~~872~~801

~~110~~112,~~230~~542

Time deposits less than $100

2927,~~356~~268

4743,~~749~~766

7069,~~170~~793

1112,~~834~~123

~~159~~152,~~109~~950

Time deposits $100 or more

3027,~~927~~693

4237,~~832~~546

1719,~~592~~022

1,~~149~~253

9285,~~500~~514

Long-term debt

8,000

Total

~~171~~168,~~820~~482

~~117~~108,~~924~~896

~~192~~198,~~634~~616

2021,~~983~~376

~~503~~497,~~361~~370

Rate-sensitivity gap:

Rate sensitivity gap:

Period

(333,~~781~~226

)

~~(34~~18,~~206~~288

)

709,~~008~~976

8250,~~118~~944

Cumulative

(333,~~781~~226

)

~~(37~~51,~~987~~514

)

3261,~~021~~490

~~114~~112,~~139~~434

RSA/RSL ratio:

Period

01.9820

01.7117

1.3605

43.9138

Cumulative

01.9820

01.8719

1.0713

1.23

AtOur ~~March 31, 2010, we had a~~ cumulative one-year RSA/RSL ratio ofequaled 01.8719 at June 30, 2010, compared to ~~a RSA/RSL ratio of~~ 0.8287 at ~~December 31,~~the ~~2009~~end of the previous quarter. Given the current rate environment, our asset liability strategy for 2010 focuses ~~will~~on ~~focus~~trying onto ~~restoring~~maintain equilibrium tobetween rate sensitive assets and liabilities~~. Specifically,~~ with ~~regard~~a shift towards a positive ratio should interest rates begin to ~~rate~~rise. ~~sensitive~~As ~~assets~~part of our current strategy, we ~~will~~ stress shorter repricing terms for new loan originations. In addition, we ~~will~~are ~~offer~~ offering preferential rates on ~~longer~~our long-term certificates of ~~deposits~~ deposit, including 60-, 72- and 90-month maturities. ~~A more balanced IRR position will allow us to appropriately shift our strategy should interest rates begin to rise.~~ However, these forward-looking statements are qualified in the aforementioned section entitled “Forward-Looking Discussion” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

3840

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Specifically,~~The ~~the~~ increase in our RSA/RSL ratio from the end of the first quarter of 2010 resulted from a $1077.01 million ~~or 4.1 percent~~ increase in RSA maturing or repricing within the next 12 months, coupled with a $512.9 4 million ~~or 2.0 percent~~ decrease in RSL maturing or repricing within ~~one~~the ~~year~~same time frame. The increase in RSA resulted primarily from ~~increases~~an of $885.~~5 million in federal funds sold and $~~3.7 million inincrease ~~investment securities, partially offset by a combined $2.2 million reduction~~ in loans, net of unearned income, ~~and~~maturing ~~loans~~or repricing ~~held~~within ~~for sale, net~~12 months. ~~With~~In ~~regard~~addition to ~~RSL,~~stressing weloan ~~experienced~~originations ~~an $8.2 million~~with ~~decrease~~shorter ~~in interest-bearing transaction accounts~~repricing terms, ~~which~~we ~~include~~enhanced ~~money~~our ~~market,~~Asset/Liability ~~NOW~~modeling ~~and savings~~to ~~accounts.~~incorporate ~~This~~prepayment ~~decline~~speeds ~~was~~as ~~caused~~required ~~primarily~~ by ~~cyclical~~our bank ~~changes~~regulators. inPartially ~~the~~offsetting ~~deposit~~this ~~accounts~~increase ~~of our~~was ~~municipal~~reductions ~~and~~in ~~school~~investment ~~district~~securities maturing ~~accounts~~within ~~that~~this ~~rely~~time onframe ~~tax monies~~ and ~~government~~federal ~~support~~funds ~~for their funding~~sold. ~~Partially~~With ~~offsetting~~respect ~~this~~to the decrease ~~was a $2.3 million increase~~ in ~~total~~RSL, total time deposits maturing or repricing within 12 months decreased $14.6 million.

~~Our~~We also experienced an increase in our three-month ratio ~~was~~to 01.9820 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~compared~~from ~~to 1~~0.0298 at the end of ~~2009. The decrease in~~ the ~~three-month~~previous ~~ratio resulted primarily from a $15~~quarter.~~3 million~~ ~~increase in RSL, partially offset by a $9.0 million increase in RSA.~~ The increase inprimarily ~~RSL~~ resulted ~~primarily~~ from a $2233.07 million increase in ~~total~~the amount ~~time~~of ~~deposits~~RSA maturing or repricing within three months~~, partially offset by a $6~~.~~7 million~~ ~~reduction~~Similar ~~in interest-bearing transaction accounts. With regard~~ to ~~RSA, similar to~~ the 12-month ratio, the increase primarily resulted from the $839.56 million increase in ~~federal~~loans, ~~funds~~net ~~sold~~of ~~was~~unearned ~~the primary~~income, ~~factor causing the overall increase in RSA~~ maturing or repricing within three months.

Static gap analysis, although a credible measuring tool, does not fully illustrate the impact of interest rate changes on future earnings. First, market rate changes normally do not equally or simultaneously affect all categories of assets and liabilities. Second, assets and liabilities that can contractually reprice within the same period may not do so at the same time or to the same magnitude. Third, the interest rate sensitivity table presents a one-day position,. ~~variations~~ Variations occur daily as we adjust our rate sensitivity ~~position~~ throughout the year. Finally, assumptions must be made in constructing such a table. For example, the conservative nature of our Asset/Liability Management Policy assigns money market and NOW accounts to the “Due after three but within twelve months” repricing interval. In reality, these items may reprice less frequently and in different magnitudes than changes in general interest rate levels.

As the static gap report fails to address the dynamic changes in the balance sheet composition or prevailing interest rates, we utilize a simulation model to enhance our asset/liability management. This model is used to create pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate shocks. According to the most recent model results, instantaneous and parallel shifts in general market rates of plus 100 basis points would ~~cause~~result in a ~~slight~~positive ~~decrease~~change in net interest income for ~~the~~ the 12 months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. Model results under a minus 100 basis ~~points~~point scenario were not meaningful, as the majority of short-term general ~~markets~~market rates are already near zero.

3941

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

WeFinancial ~~will~~institutions ~~continue~~are toaffected ~~monitor~~differently ~~our~~by ~~IRR~~inflation ~~position~~than commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in ~~2010~~fixed assets and ~~employ~~inventories. ~~deposit~~Most ~~and~~of ~~loan~~our ~~pricing~~assets ~~strategies~~are monetary in nature and ~~direct~~change ~~the~~correspondingly ~~reinvestment~~with ofvariations ~~loan~~in ~~and~~the ~~investment~~inflation ~~repayments~~rate. inIt ~~order~~is difficult to ~~promote~~precisely ameasure ~~favorable~~the ~~IRR~~impact inflation has on us, however we believe that our exposure ~~position~~to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.

Financial institutions are affected differently by inflation than commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Most of our assets are monetary in nature and change correspondingly with variations in the inflation rate. It is difficult to precisely measure the impact inflation has on us. However, we believe that our exposure to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.

Liquidity:

Liquidity management is essential to our continuing operations as it gives us the ability to meet our financial obligations as they come due, as well as to take advantage of new business opportunities as they arise. Our financial obligations include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

Funding new and existing loan commitments;

•

Payment of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity;

•

Repayment of borrowings as they mature;

•

Payment of lease obligations; and

•

Payment of operating expenses.

Historically, core deposits have been our primary source of liquidity because of their stability and lower cost, in general, than other types of funding. Providing additional sources of funds are loan and investment payments and prepayments and the ability to sell both available-for-sale securities and mortgage loans held for sale. We believe our liquidity is adequate to meet both present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.

40Community Bank has a Contingency Funding Plan in place to address alternative sources of liquidity, that go beyond our core deposit base, in the event of a funding crisis. Examples of events that may result in a liquidity crisis include, among others, natural disasters, war, reputational harm and severe and prolonged asset quality problems. The funding program ensures the availability of various alternative wholesale funding sources that can be used whenever appropriate. These identified alternative funding sources include:

Comm Bancorp, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

On February 19, 2010, the Board of Directors of Community Bank adopted a Contingency Funding Plan to address liquidity in the event of a funding crisis. Examples of some of the causes of a liquidity crisis include, among others, natural disasters, war, events causing reputational harm and severe and prolonged asset quality problems. The Plan recognizes the need to provide alternative funding sources in times of crisis that go beyond our core deposit base. As a result, we have created a funding program that ensures the availability of various alternative wholesale funding sources that can be used whenever appropriate. Identified alternative funding sources include:

•

FHLB-Pgh liquidity contingency line of credit;

•

Federal Reserve Bank discount window;

•

Internet certificates of deposit;

•

Brokered deposits;

•

Institutional Deposit Corporation deposits;

•

Repurchase agreements; and

•

Federal funds purchased.

Based on our liquidity position at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we do not anticipate the need to utilize any of these sources in the near term.

~~We employ a number of analytical techniques in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity position.~~42 One such technique is the use of ratio analysis related to our reliance on noncore funds to fund our investments and loans maturing after March 31, 2011. Our noncore funds at March 31, 2010, consisted of time deposits in denominations of $100 or more. Time deposits in denominations of $100 or more are not considered to be a strong source of liquidity since they are very interest rate sensitive and are considered to be highly volatile. At March 31, 2010, our net noncore funding dependence ratio, the difference between noncore funds and short-term investments to long-term assets, was 7.2 percent. Similarly, our net short-term noncore funding dependence ratio, noncore funds maturing within one year, less short-term investments to long-term assets equaled 3.6 percent at the end of the first quarter of 2010. These ratios indicate that we had some reliance on noncore funds at March 31, 2010. Comparatively, our ratios improved from year-end 2009 indicating our reliance on noncore funds had decreased. The decrease in noncore funding reliance resulted primarily from an increase in federal funds sold.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, noninterest-bearing deposits with other banks, balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the FHLB-Pgh, and federal funds sold. For the three months end March 31, cash and cash equivalents decreased $6.7 million in 2010 and $11.3 million in 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash outflows from investing and financing activities more than offset a net cash inflow from operating activities.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Primary~~We ~~investing~~employ ~~activities~~a ~~involve~~number ~~transactions~~of ~~related~~analytical totechniques ~~our~~in ~~lending~~assessing ~~activities~~the ~~and~~adequacy ~~investment securities~~of our liquidity position. One ~~Due~~such technique is the use of ratio analysis related to aour ~~decline~~reliance inon ~~demand~~noncore ~~for~~funds to fund our ~~loan~~investments ~~products~~and loans maturing after June 30, ~~our~~2011. ~~investment~~Our ~~portfolio~~noncore ~~continues~~funds toat June 30, 2010, ~~play~~consisted asolely ~~more~~of ~~prominent~~time ~~role~~deposits in ~~the~~denominations ~~composition~~ of ~~our~~$100 ~~balance~~or ~~sheet~~more. ~~Net~~At ~~cash~~June 30, ~~used~~2010, inour ~~investing~~net ~~activities~~noncore ~~for~~funding ~~the~~dependence ~~first~~ratio, ~~quarter~~the ~~totaled~~difference ~~$5.1 million~~between innoncore ~~2010~~funds and ~~$17~~short-term investments to long-term assets, was 7.63 ~~million~~percent, inwhile ~~2009.~~our ~~The~~net ~~$5.1 million~~short-term ofnoncore ~~cash~~funding ~~used~~dependence inratio, noncore ~~2010~~funds ~~resulted~~maturing ~~primarily~~within ~~from~~one-year, ~~$19.8 million~~less inshort-term ~~purchases~~investments ofto ~~investment~~long-term assets equaled 3.4 ~~securities~~percent. ~~Partially~~These ~~offsetting~~ratios ~~the~~indicated ~~purchases,~~that ~~were~~we ~~proceeds~~had ~~received~~some ~~from~~reliance ~~sales~~on ~~and~~noncore ~~repayments~~funds ofat June 30, 2010. These ~~available-for-sale~~ratios ~~investment~~were ~~securities~~stable ~~totaling~~in ~~$10~~comparison to 7.2 percent and 3.6 ~~million~~percent for the previous quarter. In addition, aaccording ~~net~~to ~~decrease~~the ~~in lending~~most ~~activities~~recent ~~provided~~Bank ~~net~~Holding ~~cash~~Company ofPerformance ~~$4.0 million.~~Report ~~Comparatively~~for our Federal Reserve District, inwe ~~the~~were ~~first~~significantly ~~quarter~~less ofreliant ~~2009~~on noncore funds than our peer group, which wehad ~~used~~noncore ~~$23.2 million~~and inshort-term ~~net~~noncore ~~cash~~funding ~~for~~dependence ~~lending~~ratios ~~activities~~of 24.0 percent and 12.5 percent.

~~Operating~~The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. ~~provided~~Cash ~~net~~and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, noninterest-bearing deposits with other banks, balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the FHLB-Pgh, and federal funds sold, decreased $37.05 million ~~for~~during the ~~first~~six ~~three~~ months ofended June 30, 2010. Similarly, ~~compared~~cash and cash toequivalents decreased $112.14 million for the same period oflast ~~2009~~year. ~~Net~~For ~~income~~the first half of 2010, ~~adjusted~~cash used ~~for~~in financing activities totaled $14.3 million. Partially offsetting the ~~effects~~outflow offrom ~~noncash~~financing ~~transactions~~activities ~~such~~were asnet ~~depreciation~~cash provided by operating activities of $6.4 million and investing activities of $0.4 million. For the ~~provision~~same ~~for~~period ~~loan~~of ~~losses~~2009, ~~and~~cash ~~net~~used ~~changes~~ in ~~current~~investing activities totaled $19.4 ~~assets,~~million. isNet ~~the~~cash ~~primary~~provided ~~source~~by operating activities of ~~funds~~$4.0 million ~~from~~and ~~operations~~financing activities of $3.0 million partially offset the cash used in investing activities.

~~Deposit~~Investing ~~gathering~~activities isprimarily ~~our~~include ~~predominant~~transactions ~~financing~~related ~~activity.~~to Weour ~~used~~lending ~~$4.6 million~~activities ~~in net cash for~~and ~~financing~~investment ~~activities for the first three months of 2010~~portfolio. ~~Comparatively~~Investing inactivities ~~2009,~~provided ~~we received~~ net cash of $50.24 million ~~from~~for ~~financing~~the ~~activities.~~six ~~Cyclical trends usually cause a decrease in~~months ~~deposits~~ended ~~during~~June 30, ~~the first quarter~~2010. ~~Total~~In ~~deposits~~comparison, ~~decreased~~for ~~during~~ the ~~first~~same ~~quarter~~period of ~~2010~~2009, ~~resulting~~ inwe aused net cash ~~outflow~~ of $419.4 million. The ~~However,~~change ~~this~~resulted ~~decrease~~primarily ~~was~~from ~~not~~a asdecrease ~~severe~~in aslending ~~the previous~~activities ~~year~~partially ~~when~~offset ~~these~~by ~~cyclical~~an ~~trends~~increase in ~~caused~~purchases aof ~~$21.4 million~~available-for-sale ~~reduction~~investment ~~in total deposits~~securities.

42Operating activities provided net cash of $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $4.0 million for the same six months of 2009. Net income, adjusting for the effects of noncash transactions such as depreciation and the provision for loan losses is the primary source of funds from operations.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Deposit gathering is our predominant financing activity. During the first six months of 2010 deposit gathering slowed, which resulted in a $14.1 million reduction in net cash.

Capital Adequacy:

We attempt to assure capital adequacy by monitoring our current and projected capital positions to support future growth, while providing stockholders with an attractive long-term appreciation of their investments. According to bank regulation, at a minimum, banks must maintain a Tier I ~~capital~~ capital to risk-~~weighted~~adjusted assets ratio of 4.0 percent and a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0 percent. Additionally, banks must maintain a Leverage ratio, defined as Tier I capital to total average assets less intangibles, of 3.0 percent. The minimum Leverage ratio of 3.0 ~~percent~~ percent only applies to institutions with a composite rating of one under the Uniform Interagency ~~Bank~~ Bank Rating System, that are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk. An additional 100 to 200 basis points are required for all but these most highly-rated institutions. Our minimum Leverage ratio was 4.0 percent at ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2009 and ~~2009~~2008. If an institution is deemed to be undercapitalized under these standards, banking law prescribes an increasing amount of regulatory intervention, including the required ~~implementation~~institution of a capital restoration plan and restrictions on the growth of assets, branches or lines of business. Further restrictions are applied to significantly or critically undercapitalized institutions, including restrictions on interest payable on accounts, dismissal of management and appointment of a receiver. For well capitalized institutions, banking law provides authority for regulatory intervention where the institution is deemed to be engaging in unsafe and unsound practices or receives a less than satisfactory examination report rating.

Regulatory agencies define institutions, not under a written directive to maintain certain capital levels, as well capitalized if they exceed the following:

• A Tier I risk-based ratio of at least 6.0 percent;:

•

A total risk-based ratio of at least 10.0 percent; and

•

A Leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.

43However, the periodic regulatory exam process may require institutions to maintain capital ratios and amounts in excess of the minimum levels discussed above.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Our and Community Bank’s capital ratios at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009, as well as the required ~~minimum~~ minimum ratios for capital adequacy purposes and to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective ~~action~~ action provisions as defined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 are summarized as follows:

Regulatory capital

													Minimum to be Well
													Capitalized under
							Minimum for Capital						Prompt Corrective
	Actual						Adequacy Purposes						Action Provisions
March 31	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010			2009
June 30,	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010			2009
Basis for ratios:
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated	$	5051,~~269~~459		$	5657,~~686~~197		$	19,~~977~~799		$	2021,~~935~~127
Community Bank		4445,~~672~~814			51,~~379~~877			19,~~749~~578			20,~~798~~970		$	29,~~624~~367		$	31,~~197~~455
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated		6465,~~620~~755			6263,~~217~~216			39,~~953~~598			4142,~~871~~254
Community Bank		5860,~~952~~042			5657,~~910~~896			39,~~498~~156			41,~~596~~940			4948,~~373~~945			5152,~~995~~424
Tier I capital to total average assets less intangibles assets:
Tier I capital to total average assets less goodwill:
Consolidated		5051,~~269~~459			5657,~~686~~197			25,~~983~~771			24,~~917~~727
Community Bank		4445,~~672~~814			51,~~379~~877		$	25,~~616~~535		$	24,~~771~~577		$	3231,~~020~~919		$	30,~~963~~722
Risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated		~~482~~478,~~374~~005			~~509~~511,~~637~~779
Community Bank		~~476~~472,~~683~~483			~~506~~507,~~201~~851
Risk-weighted off-balance sheet items:
Consolidated		1716,~~044~~970			1316,~~749~~394
Community Bank		1716,~~044~~970			1316,~~749~~394
Average assets for Leverage ratio:
Consolidated		~~646~~644,~~820~~285			~~622~~618,~~935~~174
Community Bank	$	~~640~~638,~~395~~387		$	~~619~~614,~~267~~435
Ratios:
Tier I capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items:
Tier I capital as a percentage of risk- weighted assets and off-balance sheet items:
Consolidated		10.14	%		10.8	%		4.0	%		4.0	%
Community Bank		9.04			9.9			4.0			4.0			6.0	%		6.0	%
Total of Tier I and Tier II capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items:
Consolidated		1213.93			1112.90			8.0			8.0
Community Bank		1112.93			1011.90			8.0			8.0			10.0			10.0
Tier I capital as a percentage of total average assets less intangibles assets:
Tier I capital as a percentage of total average assets less intangible assets:
Consolidated		7.8.0			9.13			4.0			4.0
Community Bank		7.02	%		8.34	%		4.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%		5.0	%

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we reported a Tier I capital, Total capital and Leverage ratios of 10.14 percent, 1213.93 percent and 7.8.0 percent. In addition, Community Bank reported Tier I capital, Total capital and Leverage ratios of 9.04 percent, 1112.93 percent and 7.02 percent. Community Bank continued to exceed the requirements to be categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action at the close of the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010.

4445

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Stockholders’ equity equaled $5153.16 million or $2931.6613 per share at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, an increase of $03.83 million compared to $50.3 million or $29.25 per share at December 31, 2009. Net income of $~~1,150~~2.3 million was the primary factor leading to the ~~increase in~~ capital improvement. We also experienced aan ~~$420~~increase in other comprehensive ~~loss~~income of $920 resulting from market value ~~fluctuations~~appreciation on available-for-sale investment securities.

We did not declare ~~or pay~~ any dividends ~~for~~during the three months or six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Our ability to declare and pay dividends is based on our operating results, financial and economic conditions, capital and growth objectives, appropriate dividend restrictions and other relevant factors. We rely on dividends received from ~~our subsidiary~~ Community Bank, for payment of dividends to stockholders. Community Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to federal and state regulations. On March 1, 2010, ~~management~~we received notification from the Federal Reserve Board ~~recommending~~ recommending that we and Community Bank ~~not~~suspend ~~declare or pay a dividend for~~ the ~~first~~declaration ~~quarter~~or payment of ~~2010~~ dividends. Moreover, this notification requires us and Community Bank to inform the Federal Reserve Board prior to declaring future dividends.

We have a dividend reinvestment plan which allows stockholders to automatically reinvest their dividends in shares of our common stock. We did declare ~~and pay~~ a dividend for the fourth quarter of 2009. As ~~During~~a result, for the ~~first~~six ~~quarter~~months ofended June 30, 2010, 1,916 shares were issued under this plan relative to the fourth quarter of 2009 dividend.

Review of Financial Performance:

WeNet ~~reported~~income ~~net~~for ~~income~~the second quarter of 2010 equaled $1,~~150~~190 or $0.6769 per share, ~~for~~year-to-date ~~the~~earnings totaled ~~three~~$2,340 ~~months~~or ~~ended~~$1.36 ~~March 31,~~per ~~2010~~share. ~~In comparison~~Comparable earnings for ~~the~~2009 ~~same~~were ~~period~~$1,215 ofor ~~2009,~~$0.70 weper ~~reported~~share ~~net~~for the ~~income~~second ofquarter and $12,~~775~~990 or $1.0373 per share year-to-date. ~~The first~~Net ~~quarter~~income ~~earnings~~was ~~decrease~~impacted ~~resulted~~by ~~primarily~~lower ~~from reductions in~~ net interest income and noninterest income, ~~coupled~~partially ~~with~~mitigated anby ~~increase~~decreases in ~~the~~noninterest ~~provision for loan losses~~expense. Return on average assets was 0.74 percent for the second quarter and ~~return~~0.73 percent onfor ~~average~~the ~~equity~~first half ~~equaled~~of 2010, compared to 0.7279 percent and 90.1697 percent for the ~~three~~respective ~~months~~2009 periods. Return on ~~ended~~average ~~March~~stockholders’ equity was 9.22 ~~31,~~percent for the second quarter and 9.19 percent year-to-date 2010, compared to 18.1518 percent and 1210.3021 percent for the same ~~three~~periods ~~months~~ of 2009.

4546

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Net Interest Income:

Net interest income is still the fundamental source of earnings for commercial banks. Moreover, fluctuations in the level of net interest income can have the greatest impact on net profits. Net interest income is defined as the difference between interest revenue, interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets, and interest expense, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets. The primary sources of earning assets are loans and investment securities, while interest-bearing deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt comprise interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted by:

•

Variations in the volume, rate and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities;

•

Changes in general market rates; and

•

The level of nonperforming assets.

Changes in net interest income are measured by the net interest spread and net interest margin. Net interest spread, the difference between the average yield earned on earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, illustrates the effects changing interest rates have on profitability. Net interest margin, net interest income as a percentage of earning assets, is a more comprehensive ratio, as it reflects not only the spread, but also the change in the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Tax-exempt loans and investments carry pre-tax yields lower than their taxable counterparts. Therefore, in order to make the analysis of net interest income more comparable, tax-exempt income and yields are reported on a tax-equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.

Comm Bancorp, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

We analyze interest income and interest expense by segregating rate and volume components of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The impact changes in the interest rates earned and paid on assets and liabilities, along with changes in the volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have on net interest income are summarized as follows. The net change or mix component, attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume has been allocated proportionately to the change due to rate and the change due to volume.

Net interest income changes due to rate and volume

	March 31,
	2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (decrease)
	attributable to
	Total
	Change			Rate			Volume
Interest income:
Loans:
Taxable	$	(507	)	$	(435	)	$	(72	)
Tax-exempt		(521	)		51			(572	)
Investments:
Taxable		371			(98	)		469
Tax-exempt		(356	)		(3	)		(353	)
Federal funds sold		7			(2	)		9
Total interest income		(1,006	)		(487	)		(519	)
Interest expense:
Money market accounts		33			13			20
NOW accounts		76			(11	)		87
Savings accounts		2			(7	)		9
Time deposits less than $100		(214	)		(150	)		(64	)
Time deposits $100 or more		(97	)		(237	)		140
Short-term borrowings		(56	)		(5	)		(51	)
Long-term debt		160						160
Total interest expense		(96	)		(397	)		301
Net interest income	$	(910	)	$	(90	)	$	(820	)

For the three months ended March 31, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $910 or 15.3 percent to $5,033 in 2010 from $5,943 in 2009. The reduction resulted primarily from an unfavorable volume variance of $820.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~For~~We ~~the~~analyze ~~three~~interest ~~months~~income ~~ended~~and ~~March 31,~~interest ~~average~~expense ~~earning~~by ~~assets~~segregating ~~grew~~rate ~~$22.5 million~~and orvolume ~~3.8 percent~~components toof ~~$617.9 million in 2010 from $595.4 million in 2009. Despite the growth in~~ earning assets, ~~we experienced~~and ~~a $519 reduction in tax-equivalent~~ interest ~~revenue, due for the most part to a $42.2 million or 8.2 percent decrease in average loans. Average tax~~-~~exempt~~bearing ~~loans decreased $37~~liabilities.~~1 million, while~~ ~~taxable~~The ~~loans~~impact ~~declined~~changes ~~$5.1 million. With regard to tax-exempt loans, several large tax anticipation notes of local municipalities, which were outstanding~~ in the ~~first quarter, matured at the end of 2009, causing a $572 decrease in tax-equivalent~~ interest ~~revenue.~~rates ~~We chose to not~~earned ~~aggressively~~and ~~compete~~paid ~~for~~on ~~tax~~assets ~~exempt~~and ~~loans~~liabilities, ~~for~~along ~~2010~~with changes in ~~anticipation of~~ the ~~higher~~volume ~~level~~ of ~~tax credits~~earning ~~available~~assets ~~through our investments in limited partnership interests. The maturities~~ and ~~repayments received from loans were reinvested in lower~~interest-~~yielding~~bearing ~~assets.~~liabilities ~~For~~have ~~the~~on ~~first~~net ~~quarter, average~~interest ~~investments~~income ~~grew~~are ~~$36.4 million~~summarized ~~to $114.5 million~~ in ~~2010~~the ~~from~~following ~~$78~~table.~~1 million 2009. Taxable~~ ~~investments~~The ~~grew~~net ~~$55.6 million,~~change ~~while~~attributable ~~tax-exempt~~to ~~investments~~the ~~declined~~combined ~~$19.2 million,~~impact ~~resulting in additional tax-equivalent interest revenue~~ of ~~$116.~~rate ~~Federal~~and ~~funds~~volume ~~sold~~has ~~averaged~~been ~~$29.1 million for~~allocated ~~the~~proportionately ~~three months ended March 31, 2010, compared~~ to ~~$0.8 million for~~ the ~~same~~change ~~three~~due ~~months~~to ofrate ~~2009. The~~and ~~significant increase resulted in additional interest revenue of only $9, as~~ the ~~federal~~change ~~funds target~~due ~~rate~~to ~~remained at a historical low level~~volume.

~~Average~~Net interest~~-bearing~~ ~~liabilities~~income ~~increased~~changes ~~$24.7 million~~due ~~or 5.1 percent~~ to ~~$505.7 million~~rate ~~in 2010 from $481.0 million in 2009, which resulted in additional interest expense of $301. Specifically, average interest-bearing transaction accounts, which include money market, NOW accounts~~ and ~~savings accounts, grew $38.9 million and together caused interest expense to increase~~volume $116. Average total time deposits increased $9.5 million, which resulted in an increase in interest expense of $76. Long-term debt averaged $8.0 million and resulted in an increase in interest expense of $160. Partially offsetting these increases, was a decrease in average short-term borrowings of $31.7 million comparing the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, which resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $51.

In addition to the unfavorable volume variance, a negative rate variance caused a decrease in tax-equivalent net interest income of $90. Reductions in loan and investment yields, coupled with an elevated level of nonaccrual loans more than offset a decrease in funding costs. The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased 87 basis points to 5.01 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from 5.88 percent for the same period of 2009, and resulted in a reduction in interest revenue of $487. Specifically, the tax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio decreased 36 basis points, while the tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio declined 188 basis points comparing the first quarter of 2010 and 2009. These reductions in yield led to declines in tax-equivalent interest income of $384 and $101.


	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30,									June 30,
	2010 vs. 2009									2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (decrease)									Increase (decrease)
	attributable to									attributable to
	Total									Total
	Change			Rate			Volume			Change			Rate			Volume
Interest income:
Loans:
Taxable	$	(494	)	$	(357	)	$	(137	)	$	(1,001	)	$	(792	)	$	(209	)
Tax-exempt		(456	)		89			(545	)		(977	)		140			(1,117	)
Investments:
Taxable		201			(189	)		390			572			(287	)		859
Tax-exempt		(357	)		6			(363	)		(713	)		3			(716	)
Federal funds sold		9						9			16			(2	)		18

Total interest income		(1,097	)		(451	)		(646	)		(2,103	)		(938	)		(1,165	)


Interest expense:
Money market accounts		23			8			15			56			21			35
NOW accounts		121			18			103			197			7			190
Savings accounts		(36	)		(42	)		6			(34	)		(49	)		15
Time deposits less than $100		(155	)		(93	)		(62	)		(369	)		(243	)		(126	)
Time deposits $100 or more		(64	)		(155	)		91			(161	)		(392	)		231
Short-term borrowings		(36	)		(6	)		(30	)		(92	)		(11	)		(81	)
Long-term debt		160						160			320						320

Total interest expense		13			(270	)		283			(83	)		(667	)		584

Net interest income	$	(1,110	)	$	(181	)	$	(929	)	$	(2,020	)	$	(271	)	$	(1,749	)

For the six months ended June 30, tax-equivalent net interest income decreased $2,020 or 17.0 percent to $9,876 in 2010 from $11,896 in 2009. Negative volume and rate variances, caused the net interest income reduction.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~The~~Changes ~~reduction~~ in ~~revenue~~the ~~was~~volumes ~~offset~~of ~~partially~~earning byassets aand ~~decrease in~~ interest-bearing ~~expense~~liabilities ofcontributed to a $~~397~~1,749 ~~which resulted~~decrease ~~from~~in anet 19interest ~~basis~~income. ~~point~~For ~~decrease~~the insix ~~the~~months ~~cost~~ended ofJune 30, ~~funds~~average toearning 2assets increased $24.080 ~~percent~~million ~~for~~or ~~the~~4.1 percent ~~first~~to ~~quarter of~~$613.3 million in 2010 from 2$589.273 ~~percent~~million ~~for~~in 2009. Despite the ~~same~~growth, ~~quarter~~tax-equivalent ofinterest ~~2009.~~income Wedecreased ~~experienced~~$1,165 adue ~~significant~~to ~~decrease~~changes in ~~our~~ ~~time~~volumes ~~deposit~~of earning ~~costs~~assets. Specifically, asthe ~~promotional~~decline ~~gas~~was ~~lease~~due, ~~certificates~~for ofthe ~~deposit~~most ~~were~~part, ~~renewed~~to ata ~~lower rates~~$43.6 million Asor a8.5 percent ~~result,~~reduction ~~the~~in average ~~cost~~loans. ofAverage ~~time~~tax-exempt ~~deposits~~loans decreased 64$36.3 million, ~~basis~~while ~~points~~taxable loans todeclined 2$7.943 ~~percent~~million, which resulted in reductions in tax-equivalent interest income of ~~2010~~$1,117 ~~from~~and 3$209.~~58 percent~~ inWith ~~2009.~~regard ~~This~~to ~~resulted~~tax-exempt inloans, aseveral ~~reduction~~large intax ~~interest~~and ~~expense~~revenue anticipation notes of ~~$387~~local ~~and~~municipalities, which were outstanding ~~accounted~~during ~~for~~the 97first half of 2009, matured by year end.~~5 percent~~ As part of ~~the~~our ~~total~~tax ~~decrease~~planning instrategy ~~interest~~for ~~expense~~2010, we ~~due~~chose not to ~~changes~~actively incompete ~~interest~~for these types of loans. The maturities and repayments received ~~rates~~from the loan portfolio were reinvested in lower-yielding assets.

~~Maintenance~~Also ofadversely animpacting ~~adequate~~tax-equivalent net interest ~~margin~~income iswas ~~one~~growth ofin ~~our~~average ~~primary~~interest-bearing liabilities ~~concerns~~of $27.5 million ~~Our~~to ~~net~~$502.1 million ~~interest margin~~for ~~contracted~~the 75six ~~basis~~months ~~points~~ended ~~to 3.30~~June ~~percent~~30, in 2010, from 4$474.~~05 percent~~6 million infor the same six months of 2009. ~~Short-term~~The growth resulted in additional interest expense of $584. Specifically, average interest-bearing ~~rates~~transaction ~~are~~accounts, ~~expected~~which toinclude ~~remain~~money ~~low~~market, ~~for~~NOW ~~the~~and savings ~~majority~~accounts, ofgrew ~~2010~~$39.0 million ~~However,~~and notogether ~~assurance~~caused ~~can~~interest ~~be given~~expense ~~that~~to ~~these~~increase ~~conditions~~$240. ~~will~~Average total ~~occur~~time deposits increased $7.0 million ~~Net~~and resulted in additional interest ~~income~~expense ~~could~~of be$105. Long-term ~~adversely~~debt ~~affected~~averaged by$8.0 million ~~changes~~ in ~~general~~2010 ~~market~~and ~~rates~~resulted orin ~~increased~~an ~~competition~~increase in interest expense of $320. WePartially ~~believe~~offsetting ~~following~~these ~~prudent~~increase, ~~pricing~~was ~~practices~~a decrease in average short-term borrowings of $26.5 ~~coupled~~million ~~with~~comparing ~~careful~~the ~~investing~~six months ended June 30, ~~will~~2010 ~~keep~~and ~~our~~2009, ~~net~~which resulted in a reduction in interest ~~margin~~expense ~~favorable~~of $81.

In addition to the unfavorable volume variance, a negative rate variance resulted in a decrease of $271 in tax-equivalent net interest income. Reductions in loan and investment yields, more than offset a decrease in funding costs. The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased 92 basis points to 4.91 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from 5.83 percent for the same period of 2009, resulting in a reduction in interest income of $938. Specifically, the tax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio decreased 31 basis points, while the tax-exempt yield on the investment portfolio declined 229 basis points comparing the first half of 2010 and 2009. These reductions in yield led to declines in tax-equivalent interest income of $652 and $284.

The reduction in interest revenue was offset partially by a decrease in interest expense of $667, which resulted from a 15 basis point decrease in the cost of funds to 2.04 percent for the first half of 2010 from 2.19 percent for the same period of 2009. We experienced a significant decrease in our time deposit costs, as promotional gas lease certificates of deposit were renewed at lower rates. As a result, the average cost of time deposits decreased 53 basis points to 2.91 percent in 2010 from 3.44 percent in 2009. This resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $635 and accounted for 95.2 percent of the total decrease in interest expense.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~The~~For ~~average~~the ~~balances~~quarter ofended ~~assets~~June 30, ~~and liabilities~~2010, ~~corresponding~~tax-equivalent net interest income ~~and~~decreased ~~expense~~$1,110 ~~and~~in ~~resulting~~comparison ~~average~~to ~~yields~~the orsame ~~rates~~three ~~paid~~months ~~for~~of last year. Similar to the ~~quarters~~results ~~ended~~for ~~March 31~~six months, ~~2010~~the increase ~~and~~was ~~2009~~due primarily to a negative volume variance of $929, ~~are~~coupled with a negative rate ~~summarized~~variance asof ~~follows~~$181. ~~Earning~~Average earning assets ~~averages~~grew ~~include~~$25.5 million ~~nonaccrual~~comparing ~~loans.~~the ~~Investment~~second ~~averages~~quarters of 2010 ~~include~~and ~~available~~2009. However, similar to the year-~~for~~to-~~sale~~date ~~securities~~analysis, atthe ~~amortized~~change ~~cost~~resulted in a reduction in tax-equivalent interest income of $646. ~~Income~~In onaddition, ~~investment~~growth ~~securities~~of ~~and~~$30.2 million ~~loans~~in interest-bearing liabilities resulted in additional ~~are~~interest ~~adjusted~~expense of $283. With regard to athe negative rate variance, the tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased 97 basis ~~using~~points comparing the ~~prevailing~~second ~~statutory~~quarters ~~tax~~of ~~rate~~2010 and 2009, which resulted in a reduction in interest revenue of 34$451.~~0 percent~~ Partially mitigating the decrease in revenue was a reduction in interest expense of $270 due to a 12 basis point decline in our cost of funds.

~~Summary~~Maintenance of an adequate net interest margin is one of our primary concerns. Monies received from repayments and maturities from our loan portfolio reinvested into lower-yielding assets, a reduction in the volume of tax-exempt loans, higher levels of nonaccrual loans and issuance of subordinated debt all factored into the 82 basis point decrease in our tax-equivalent net interest margin to 3.25 percent for the first half of 2010 from 4.07 percent for the same period of 2009. For the second quarter, our net interest margin was 3.19 percent, a contraction of 90 basis points compared to 4.09 percent for the second quarter of 2009 and 11 basis points compared to 3.30 percent for the previous quarter. The FOMC has indicated that general market rates would remain low for some time. However, no assurance can be given that these conditions will continue. Net interest income could be adversely affected by changes in general market rates or increased competition. We believe by following prudent pricing practices coupled with careful investing, our net interest margin will improve.

	March 31, 2010							March 31, 2009
			Interest		Average					Interest		Average
	Average		Income/		Interest			Average		Income/		Interest
	Balance		Expense		Rate			Balance		Expense		Rate
ASSETS:
Earning assets:
Loans:
Taxable	$	442,821	$	5,941		5.44	%	$	447,922	$	6,448		5.84	%
Tax-exempt		31,479		488		6.29			68,567		1,009		5.97
Investments:
Taxable		89,635		731		3.31			34,068		360		4.29
Tax-exempt		24,889		458		7.46			44,051		814		7.49
Federal funds sold		29,093		8		0.11			833		1		0.49
Total earning assets		617,917		7,626		5.01	%		595,441		8,632		5.88	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		16,821							5,503
Other assets		46,165							33,413
Total assets	$	647,261						$	623,351
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market accounts	$	36,972		91		1.00	%	$	28,352		58		0.83	%
NOW accounts		99,544		382		1.56			76,743		306		1.62
Savings accounts		108,154		124		0.46			100,659		122		0.49
Time deposits less than $100		160,570		1,231		3.11			168,255		1,445		3.48
Time deposits $100 or more		92,472		605		2.65			75,233		702		3.78
Short-term borrowings		33				0.63			31,773		56		0.71
Long-term debt		8,000		160		8.11
Total interest-bearing liabilities		505,745		2,593		2.08	%		481,015		2,689		2.27	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		86,711							79,997
Other liabilities		3,881							3,821
Stockholders’ equity		50,924							58,518
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	647,261						$	623,351
Net interest income/spread			$	5,033		2.93	%			$	5,943		3.61	%
Net interest margin						3.30	%						4.05	%
Tax equivalent adjustments:
Loans			$	166						$	343
Investments				156							277
Total adjustments			$	322						$	620

Note: Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Interest income on loans include fees of $167 in 2010 and $206 in 2009. Available-for-sale securities, included in investment securities, are stated at amortized cost with the related average unrealized holding gains of $1,210 and $2,531 for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009 included in other assets. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using the prevailing statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

The average balances of assets and liabilities, corresponding interest income and expense and resulting average yields or rates paid for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows. Earning assets averages include nonaccrual loans. Investment averages include available-for-sale securities at amortized cost. Income on investment securities and loans are adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.

Summary of net interest income


	June 30, 2010							June 30, 2009
			Interest		Average					Interest		Average
	Average		Income/		Interest			Average		Income/		Interest
	Balance		Expense		Rate			Balance		Expense		Rate
ASSETS:
Earning assets:
Loans:
Taxable	$	439,048	$	11,883		5.46	%	$	446,405	$	12,884		5.82	%
Tax-exempt		31,218		970		6.27			67,528		1,947		5.81
Investments:
Taxable		91,983		1,256		2.75			33,589		684		4.11
Tax-exempt		22,063		818		7.48			41,375		1,531		7.46
Federal funds sold		29 011		17		0.12			433		1		0.47

Total earning assets		613,323		14,944		4.91	%		589,330		17,047		5.83	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		15,900							5,602
Other assets		47,303							34,877

Total assets	$	644,726						$	618,605


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market accounts	$	34,895		170		0.98	%	$	27,229		114		0.84	%
NOW accounts		100,946		758		1.51			75,689		561		1.49
Savings accounts		110,124		241		0.44			104,034		275		0.53
Time deposits less than $100		157,696		2,403		3.07			165,475		2,772		3.38
Time deposits $100 or more		90,426		1,176		2.62			75,684		1,337		3.56
Short-term borrowings		17				0.61			26,537		92		0.70
Long-term debt		8,000		320		8.07

Total interest-bearing liabilities		502,104		5,068		2.04	%		474,648		5,151		2.19	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		88,005							81,115
Other liabilities		3,260							3,782
Stockholders’ equity		51,357							59,060

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	644,726						$	618,605

Net interest income/spread			$	9,876		2.87	%			$	11,896		3.64	%

Net interest margin						3.25	%						4.07	%
Tax equivalent adjustments:
Loans			$	330						$	662
Investments				278							521

Total adjustments			$	608						$	1,183


Note:		Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Interest income on loans include fees of $381 in 2010 and $532 in 2009. Available-for-sale securities, included in investment securities, are stated at amortized cost with the related average unrealized holding gains of $918 and $2,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 included in other assets. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using the prevailing statutory tax rate of 34.0 percent.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Provision for Loan Losses:

We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account on a quarterly basis utilizing our systematic analysis in accordance with procedural discipline. We take into consideration certain factors such as composition of the loan portfolio, volumes of nonperforming loans, volumes of net charge-offs, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors when determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account. We make monthly provisions to the allowance for loan losses account in order to maintain the allowance at the appropriate level indicated by our evaluations. Based on our most current evaluation, we believe that the allowance is adequate to absorb any known and inherent losses in the portfolio.

For the three months and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the provision for loan losses ~~equaled~~totaled $300 and $1,300.~~0 million.~~ In comparison, ~~for~~ the ~~same three months of 2009, the~~ provision for loan losses ~~equaled~~was $~~570.~~520 ~~The increase~~and in$1,090 ~~the provision~~ for ~~loan losses in~~ the ~~first quarter of 2010 was a result of the recent~~respective ~~recognition~~periods of higher levels of confirmed losses which caused a corresponding increase in the portion required for the allocated element of the allowance for loan loss account for collectively evaluated loan pools under FASB ASC 450. Generally, at December 31, 2009~~, these losses were included in the allocated element as being reserved for loans individually evaluated and measured for impairment under FASB ASC 310~~.

Noninterest Income:

Noninterest income for the ~~first~~second quarter decreased $~~191~~378 or 1228.16 percent to $~~1,383~~944 in 2010 from $1,~~574~~322 in 2009. ~~Included~~A in$276 ~~noninterest~~or ~~income~~56.3 percent decrease in ~~2009~~mortgage banking income was athe ~~net~~primary ~~gain~~factor contributing ofto ~~$294~~the ~~from~~second quarter reduction. For the ~~disposition of~~six ~~our~~months ~~former~~ended ~~Tunkhannock~~June 30, ~~and~~2010, ~~Eaton~~noninterest income ~~Township~~totaled $2,327, ~~Pennsylvania~~a ~~branch~~decrease ~~offices~~of $569 or 19.6 percent ~~For~~from $2,896 for the ~~three~~same six months of ~~ended~~2009. ~~March 31,~~Included wein ~~recorded~~year-to-date ~~gains~~noninterest onincome ~~the~~in ~~sale~~2009 ofwas ~~available-for-sale~~a ~~investment~~net ~~securities~~gain of $~~361~~294 from the indispositions ~~2010~~of the former Tunkhannock and ~~$114~~Eaton inTownship, ~~2009~~Pennsylvania branch offices. Activity in our secondary mortgage banking division subsided ~~somewhat~~, which caused a $~~121~~397 decrease in mortgage banking income comparing the first ~~quarters~~half of 2010 and 2009. Service charges, fees and commissions decreased $23125 to $~~741~~1,471 in 2010 from $~~764~~1,596 in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, noninterest income included a net gain from the sale of available-for-sale investment securities of $361 in 2010 and $114 in 2009.

Noninterest Expense:

In general, noninterest expense is categorized into three main groups,: ~~including~~ employee-related expenses, occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses. Employee-related expenses are costs associated with providing salaries, including payroll taxes and benefits, to our employees. Occupancy and equipment expenses, the costs related to the maintenance of facilities and equipment, include depreciation, general maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, rental expense offset by any rental income, and utility costs. Other expenses include general operating expenses such as advertising, contractual services, insurance, including FDIC assessment, other taxes and supplies. Several of these costs and expenses are variable while the remainder are fixed. We utilize budgets and other related strategies in an effort to control the variable expenses.

Comm Bancorp, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Noninterest expense for the first quarter amounted to $4,354 in 2010 and $4,348 in 2009. Increases of $47 in salaries and employee benefits expense and $31 in other expenses were almost entirely offset by a decrease in net occupancy and equipment expense of $72. Despite the stability in noninterest expense, our operating efficiency, as measured by the operating efficiency ratio, deteriorated due to the reduction in net interest income and noninterest income. The operating efficiency ratio, noninterest expenses divided by net interest income and noninterest income, was 71.4 percent for the first quarter of 2010 compared to 63.0 percent for the same quarter last year. Contrarily, the overhead ratio, another measure of productivity, defined as noninterest expense as a percentage of total average assets, improved to 2.7 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 2.8 percent for the same period in 2009.

Major components of noninterest expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:

Noninterest expenses

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010		2009
Salaries and employee benefits expense:
Salaries and payroll taxes	$	1,728	$	1,694
Employee benefits		459		446
Salaries and employee benefits expense		2,187		2,140
Net occupancy and equipment expense:
Net occupancy expense		330		354
Equipment expense		273		321
Net occupancy and equipment expense		603		675
Other expenses:
Marketing expense		96		186
Other taxes		161		186
Stationery and supplies		43		69
Contractual services		493		537
Insurance including FDIC assessment		360		170
Other		411		385
Other expenses		1,564		1,533
Total noninterest expense	$	4,354	$	4,348

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Salaries~~Major ~~and~~components ~~employee~~of ~~benefits~~noninterest expense ~~comprise~~for the ~~majority~~three ofmonths ~~our~~and ~~noninterest~~six ~~expense. These~~months ~~payroll-related~~ended ~~expenses increased $47 or 2.2~~June ~~percent to $2~~30,~~187~~ in 2010 and ~~$2,140 in 2009.~~ ~~Salaries and payroll taxes increased $34~~2009, ~~while~~are ~~employee~~summarized ~~benefits~~as ~~rose $13. The increase in~~follows: salaries and payroll taxes was a function of a reduction in amount of salary expense deferred and recorded on the balance sheet related to a decrease in the level of loan originations in 2010 compared to 2009.

~~Occupancy~~Noninterest ~~and equipment expense decreased $72 to $603 for the first quarter of 2010 from $675 for~~expenses the same quarter of 2009. Building-related expense declined $24 due to a reduction in rental expense, while decreases in software and office equipment depreciation resulted in a $48 decline in equipment-related expense.

For the three months ended March 31, other expenses equaled $1,564 in 2010 and $1,533 in 2009. The 2.0 percent increase was a result of higher FDIC insurance costs and expenses associated with maintaining foreclosed assets partially offset by a significant reduction in marketing-related expenses.


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Salaries and employee benefits expense:
Salaries and payroll taxes	$	1,733	$	1,681	$	3,461	$	3,375
Employee benefits		450		483		909		929

Salaries and employee benefits expense		2,183		2,164		4,370		4,304


Net occupancy and equipment expense:
Net occupancy expense		260		273		590		627
Equipment expense		287		310		560		631

Net occupancy and equipment expense		547		583		1,150		1,258


Other expenses:
Marketing expense		108		175		204		361
Other taxes		154		160		315		346
Stationery and supplies		53		60		96		129
Contractual services		512		599		1,005		1,136
Insurance, including FDIC assessment		402		807		762		977
Other		407		459		818		844

Other expenses		1,636		2,260		3,200		3,793

Total noninterest expense	$	4,366	$	5,007	$	8,720	$	9,355

~~Our~~For ~~deposits~~the ~~are~~second ~~insured~~quarter, upnoninterest toexpense ~~regulatory~~decreased ~~limits~~$641 byor ~~the~~12.8 percent ~~FDIC~~to ~~and accordingly~~$4,366 ~~are~~in ~~subject~~2010 tofrom ~~deposit~~$5,007 ~~insurance~~in ~~assessments~~2009. ~~Under the provisions of~~ The ~~Federal~~decrease ~~Deposit~~resulted ~~Insurance~~primarily ~~Reform~~from ~~Act~~a ~~of 2005~~$624 ~~(the~~or ~~“Reform~~27.6 percent ~~Act”),~~decrease ~~the~~in ~~Bank~~other expenses. ~~Insurance~~Salaries ~~Fund~~ and ~~the~~employee ~~Savings~~benefits ~~Association~~expense ~~Insurance~~increased ~~Fund~~$19, ~~were merged~~while ~~into~~net ~~the~~occupancy ~~Deposit~~and ~~Insurance~~equipment expense ~~Fund~~decreased ~~(“DIF”)~~$36. ~~Under~~For the ~~Reform~~six ~~Act~~months ended June 30, ~~the~~2010, ~~annual~~noninterest ~~DIF~~expense ~~assessment~~decreased $635 ~~rate~~or is6.8 percent ~~based~~to ~~upon~~$8,720 ~~statutory~~in ~~factors~~2010 ~~that~~from ~~include~~$9,355 ~~the~~in ~~balance~~2009. ofWe ~~insured~~measure ~~deposits~~our asefficiency ~~well~~using astwo ~~the~~key ~~degree~~industry ofratios, ~~risk~~ the ~~institution~~operating ~~poses~~efficiency toratio and the ~~insurance~~overhead ~~fund~~ratio. ~~Each~~The ~~institution~~operating efficiency ratio is ~~placed~~defined ~~into~~as ~~one~~noninterest expense as a percentage of ~~four~~ ~~risk~~net ~~categories~~interest ~~depending~~income onand noninterest income, and the ~~institution’s~~overhead ~~capital~~ratio ~~ratios~~is ~~and~~calculated ~~supervisory~~by ~~ratings.~~dividing ~~Based~~noninterest expense by average total onassets. ~~our~~Despite ~~latest~~the ~~assignments~~decrease in noninterest expense, weour ~~migrated~~operating ~~from~~efficiency ~~Risk~~ratio ~~Category~~weakened Ito 75.2 percent for the six months ended June 30, ~~institutions~~2010 ~~posing~~from 68.7 percent for the ~~least~~same ~~amount~~ six months of 2009 ~~risk~~due to ~~the~~a ~~DIF,~~reductions toin ~~Risk~~net ~~Category~~interest IIincome and ~~will~~noninterest ~~pay approximately $0~~income.22 ~~per~~However, ~~$100~~our ~~dollars~~overhead ofratio ~~assessable~~improved ~~deposits~~to 2.7 percent for the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010. ~~The~~compared ~~migration~~to ~~resulted~~3.0 percent ~~directly~~for ~~from~~ the ~~deterioration~~ insame ~~our~~period ~~asset quality~~last year.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule that required all insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Our prepaid assessment was $3.3 million at March 31, 2010, and $3.5 million at December 31, 2009. The FDIC also adopted a uniform increase in assessment rates of $0.03 per $100 dollars of assessable deposits effective January 1, 2011.

There is a separate levy assessed on all FDIC-insured institutions to cover the cost of Finance Corporation (“FICO”) funding. The FDIC established the annual FICO assessment rates effective for the first quarter of 2010 at $0.0104 per $100 dollars of DIF-assessable deposits. Our FICO assessments for the three months ended March 31, were $15 in 2010 and $14 in 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Income~~Salaries ~~Taxes:~~and employee benefits expense comprise the majority of our noninterest expense. These payroll-related expenses increased $19 to $2,183 for the second quarter of 2010 from $2,164 for the same quarter of 2009. Salaries and payroll taxes increased $52, while employee benefits decreased $33. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, payroll and benefit related expenses totaled $4,370, an increase of $66 or 1.5 percent from $4,304 for the same six months of 2009.

~~For~~Occupancy ~~the~~and ~~first~~equipment ~~quarter~~expense ofdecreased ~~2010,~~$36 weor ~~recorded an income tax benefit of $410~~6.2 percent Incomparing ~~comparison, we had income tax expense of $204 for~~ the ~~same~~second ~~quarter~~quarters of 2010 and 2009. ~~The~~Building-related ~~income~~expense ~~tax~~declined ~~benefit~~$13 ~~arose~~ due primarily to ~~the utilization of tax credits from our investments as~~ a ~~limited~~reduction ~~partner~~ in ~~elderly~~rental ~~and low-income~~expense, ~~housing~~while ~~projects~~decreases ~~to mitigate our tax burden. One such project affords us approximately $3.7 million~~ in ~~investment~~software ~~tax~~and ~~credits~~office ~~over~~equipment adepreciation ~~10-year~~resulted ~~period which began~~ in ~~2007. We expect to recognize~~ a ~~total of~~ $~~372~~23 indecline ~~tax credits from this project~~ in equipment-related ~~2010~~expense. InFor the ~~fourth~~six ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~2009~~June 30, ~~Community Bank made an investment in another elderly~~2010, ~~low-income~~occupancy ~~housing~~and ~~project.~~equipment ~~For~~expense ~~this~~totaled ~~investment~~$1,150 ~~Community Bank will receive~~ a ~~one-time~~decrease ~~historical tax credit~~ of ~~approximately~~ $~~1.5 million~~108 infrom ~~2010 and approximately~~ $~~5.5 million~~1,258 infor ~~low-income~~the ~~housing~~same ~~tax~~six ~~credits~~months ~~spread~~of ~~over a period beginning in 2010 and ending in 2021~~2009.

~~The~~For ~~difference between~~ the ~~amount~~second ofquarter, ~~income~~other ~~tax~~expenses ~~currently~~decreased ~~payable~~$624 ~~and~~or ~~the~~27.6 percent ~~provision~~to ~~for~~$1,636 ~~income tax expense reflected~~ in ~~the~~2010 ~~income~~from ~~statements arises~~$2,260 ~~from~~in ~~temporary differences~~2009. ~~Temporary~~Year-to-date ~~differences~~other ~~are~~expenses ~~differences~~totaled ~~between~~$3,200, ~~the~~a ~~tax~~decrease ~~bases~~ of ~~assets and~~$593 ~~liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which result in deferred tax assets~~ or ~~liabilities~~15.6 percent Wecompared ~~perform quarterly reviews on the tax criteria related~~ to ~~the~~ ~~recognition~~$3,793 ~~of deferred tax assets. We decided not to establish a valuation reserve~~ for the ~~deferred~~ ~~tax~~same ~~assets~~period ~~since~~one ityear isago. ~~likely~~The ~~that~~quarterly ~~these~~and ~~assets will be realized through carry~~year-~~back~~ to ~~taxable~~-date ~~income~~decreases inwere ~~prior~~due ~~years and by future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences or,~~largely to areductions ~~lesser~~in ~~extent~~marketing-related expenses, ~~through~~directors’ ~~future~~fees ~~taxable~~and ~~income~~deposit insurance.

Our deposits are insured up to regulatory limits by the FDIC and accordingly, are subject to deposit insurance assessments. Under the provisions of The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”), the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund were merged into the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). Under the Reform Act, the annual DIF assessment rate is based upon statutory factors that include the balance of insured deposits as well as the degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund. Each institution is placed into one of four risk categories depending on the institution’s capital ratios and supervisory ratings. Based on our latest assignments, we migrated from Risk Category I, institutions posing the least amount of risk to the DIF, to Risk Category II and will pay approximately $0.22 per $100 dollars of assessable deposits for the second quarter of 2010. The migration resulted directly from the deterioration in our asset quality.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule that required all insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Our prepaid assessment was $2.9 million at June 30, 2010 and $3.5 million at December 31, 2009. The FDIC also adopted a uniform increase in assessment rates of $0.03 per $100 dollars of assessable deposits effective January 1, 2011.

Comm Bancorp, Inc. ~~CONTROLS~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ~~PROCEDURES~~ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

~~Item 4~~There is a separate levy assessed on all FDIC-insured institutions to cover the cost of Finance Corporation (“FICO”) funding. ~~Controls~~The FDIC established annual FICO assessment rate effective for the first and ~~Procedures~~second quarters of 2010 at 0.0104 per $100 dollars of DIF-assessable deposits. Our FICO assessments totaled $31 and $28 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

~~Disclosure~~Income ~~Controls and Procedures~~Taxes:

InFor ~~connection~~the ~~with~~six ~~the~~months ~~preparation~~ended ofJune 30, ~~our~~2010, ~~previously~~we ~~filed~~recorded ~~Annual~~an ~~Report~~income ontax ~~Form~~benefit ~~10-K,~~of as$765. In comparison, ~~originally~~we ~~filed~~had ~~with~~income tax expense of $174 for the ~~Securities~~same ~~and~~period ~~Exchange~~of ~~Commission~~2009. onThe ~~March 29,~~income ~~2010,~~tax ~~our~~benefit ~~Chief~~arose ~~Executive~~from ~~Officer~~the ~~and~~utilization ~~Chief~~of ~~Financial~~tax ~~Officer~~credits ~~previously~~from ~~concluded~~our ~~that~~investments ~~our~~as ~~disclosure~~a ~~controls~~limited partner in elderly and low-income ~~procedures~~housing ~~were~~projects ~~effective~~to asmitigate ofour ~~December~~tax burden. One such project affords us approximately $3.7 ~~31,~~million in ~~2009~~investment ~~and~~tax ~~reported~~credits ~~that~~over ~~there~~a ~~was~~10-year noperiod ~~change~~which began in ~~our~~2007. We expect to recognize a total ~~internal~~of ~~control~~$372 ~~over~~in ~~financial~~tax ~~reporting~~credits ~~that~~from ~~occurred~~this ~~during~~project in 2010. In the fourth quarter ~~ended~~of ~~December 31,~~ 2009, Community Bank ~~that~~made ~~materially~~an ~~affected,~~investment orin ~~was~~another ~~reasonably~~elderly, ~~likely~~low-income tohousing ~~materially~~project. ~~affect~~For this investment, ~~our~~Community Bank ~~internal~~will ~~control~~receive a one-time historical tax credit of approximately $1.5 million in 2010 and approximately $5.5 million in low-income housing credits spread over a period beginning in 2010 and ~~financial~~ending ~~reporting~~in 2021. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized tax credits totaling $932 from these investments.

AsThe adifference ~~result~~between of the ~~restatement~~amount of ~~our~~income ~~financial~~tax ~~statements~~currently aspayable ~~discussed~~and in the ~~note~~provision ~~entitled “Restatement~~for ofincome ~~consolidated~~tax expense ~~financial~~reflected ~~statements,”~~ in the ~~Notes~~income tostatements ~~Consolidated~~arise ~~Financial Statements~~from totemporary ~~the~~differences. ~~Amended~~Temporary ~~Annual~~differences are ~~Report~~differences onbetween ~~Form~~the ~~10-K/A,~~tax ~~filed~~bases ~~on May 17, 2010, a reevaluation was performed as~~ of ~~December 31,~~assets ~~2009,~~and ~~under~~liabilities ~~the supervision~~ and ~~with~~their ~~the~~reported ~~participation~~amounts ofin the ~~Company’s~~financial ~~management~~statements, ~~including~~which ~~its~~result ~~Chief~~in ~~Executive~~deferred ~~Officer~~tax ~~and~~assets ~~Chief~~or ~~Financial~~liabilities. ~~Officer,~~We ofperform ~~the~~quarterly ~~effectiveness~~reviews ofon the ~~design~~tax ~~and~~criteria ~~operation~~related ofto ~~our~~the ~~disclosure~~recognition ~~controls~~of ~~and~~deferred ~~procedures~~tax assets. ~~Based~~We ~~upon this~~decided ~~evaluation,~~not ~~the~~to establish ~~Company’s~~a ~~Chief~~valuation ~~Executive~~reserve ~~Officer~~for ~~and Chief Financial Officer concluded that~~ the ~~Company’s~~deferred ~~disclosure~~tax ~~controls~~assets ~~and~~since ~~procedures~~it ~~were~~is ~~not~~likely ~~effective~~that asthese ~~of December 31, 2009, to~~assets ~~ensure~~will ~~that~~be ~~information~~realized ~~required~~through carry-back to betaxable ~~disclosed~~income in ~~the~~prior ~~reports~~years ~~the~~and ~~Company~~by ~~files~~future ~~and~~reversals ~~submits under~~of ~~the~~existing ~~Exchange~~taxable ~~Act~~temporary ~~are~~differences ~~recorded~~or, ~~processed, summarized and reported as and when required due~~ to a ~~material~~lesser ~~weakness~~extent, inthrough ~~our~~future ~~internal~~taxable ~~control over financial reporting~~income.

Our conclusion was based on the requirement to correct errors in the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of the Company’s allowance for loan losses because of the misuse of facts that existed at the time these financial statements were prepared. The misuse of facts causing this restatement was the result of a misunderstanding between management and the Federal Reserve Board as to the methodology, i.e., model, to be used by the Company in determining the estimate for the allowance for loan losses under GAAP. Management was of the opinion that the Company’s model to determine the allowance for loan losses was in accordance with the applicable supervisory guidance as provided by the Federal Reserve Board in 2009 and GAAP. The Company was informed on May 5, 2010, by the Federal Reserve Board that the Company did not comply with the supervisory guidance, and, therefore, must restate its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Comm Bancorp, Inc. ~~CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (CONTINUED)~~

~~The~~CONTROLS ~~Company~~AND ~~has restated its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended~~PROCEDURES December 31, 2009 in its Form 10-K/A as discussed in the note entitled “Restatement of consolidated financial statements,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company is undertaking certain remedial actions as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q and believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. However, at March 31, 2010, the material weakness described above still existed.

~~Changes~~Evaluation inof ~~Internal~~Disclosure ~~Control~~Controls ~~over~~and ~~Financial Reporting~~Procedures:

~~The~~As ~~Company~~of ~~has~~June 30, ~~identified~~2010, athe ~~material~~end ~~weakness~~of asthe ~~described~~period ~~above.~~covered ~~There~~by ~~were~~this noQuarterly ~~changes~~Report inon ~~the~~Form 10-Q, our Chief ~~Company’s~~Executive ~~internal~~Officer ~~control~~(“CEO”) ~~over~~and ~~financial~~Chief ~~reporting~~Financial Officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(fe) and 15d-15(fe) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). ~~during~~Based upon that evaluation, the ~~fiscal~~CEO ~~quarter~~and ~~ended~~CFO ~~March~~concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 3130, 2010, were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information ~~have~~required ~~materially~~to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, ~~affected~~processed, orsummarized ~~are~~and ~~reasonably~~reported ~~likely~~within tothe ~~materially~~time ~~affect,~~periods specified in the ~~Company~~SEC’s ~~internal~~rules ~~control~~and ~~over~~forms, ~~financial~~and ~~reporting~~to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Remediation~~Internal ~~Steps~~Control toOver ~~Address~~Financial ~~Material Weakness~~Reporting:

AsManagement ofis responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the ~~date~~Exchange ofAct. ~~this~~Management ~~filing,~~previously reported in the Company’s isForm in10-Q for the ~~process~~quarter ofended ~~revising~~March 31, ~~its~~2010, ~~methodology~~that ~~for~~it identified a ~~determining~~material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the ~~adequacy~~recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of the Company’s allowance for loan losses. inIn ~~accordance~~order ~~with~~to rectify the ~~supervisory guidance.~~previously Inreported ~~order~~material toweakness, ~~ensure~~management ~~that~~revised ~~adequacy~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~accuracy~~methodology in determining ~~these~~the ~~determinations~~estimate ~~are~~for ~~consistently present,~~the ~~management~~allowance ~~will~~for ~~continue~~loan tolosses ~~enhance~~under ~~its~~GAAP ~~methodology~~and applicable supervisory guidance to ~~improve~~include in the ~~estimates~~impairment ~~with~~valuation ~~respect to~~for ~~the~~loans ~~applicable~~collectively ~~supervisory~~evaluated ~~guidance~~for ~~with~~impairment under ~~the~~FASB ~~assistance~~ASC of450, an“Contingencies,” ~~external~~qualitative ~~independent~~factors ~~consulting~~to address the following: ~~firm.~~

•

The measurement of changes in the levels and trends of adversely classified loans and their potential effect on risked-based capital ratios; and

•

The identification of and changes in concentrations of credit and their potential effect on the allowance for loan losses.

After reviewing the results of these revisions, management concluded that internal controls related to the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of the Company’s allowance for losses are designed and operating effectively to prevent a material error from occurring or to assure that such an error would be detected and corrected in a timely manner. In order to ensure that adequacy and accuracy in these determinations are consistently present, management will continue to enhance its methodology to improve the estimates with respect to the applicable supervisory guidance with the assistance of an external independent consulting firm.

Comm Bancorp, Inc.
OTHER INFORMATION

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

NONE

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

NONE

Item 3. Defaults ~~upon~~Upon Senior Securities

NONE

Item 4. Removed and ~~Reserved~~reserved

NONE

Item 5. Other Information

~~NONE~~On August 9, 2010, the Company and F.N.B. Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, whereby the Company will be merged with and into F.N.B. Corporation and a related bank merger agreement by and between the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary bank, Community Bank and Trust Company and F.N.B. Corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary bank, First National Bank of Pennsylvania. The closings on these mergers are conditioned upon, among other things, approvals of applicable regulatory agencies and the stockholders of the Company.

Item 6. Exhibits


31	(i)	CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32		CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Section 1350.

COMM BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q

SIGNATURE PAGE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto, duly authorized.

	Registrant, Comm Bancorp, Inc.
Date: May 17, 2010	/s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
Date: August 13, 2010	/s/ William F. Farber, Sr.
	William F. Farber, Sr.
	President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board/Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 17, 2010	/s/ Scott A. Seasock
Date: August 13, 2010	/s/ Scott A. Seasock
	Scott A. Seasock
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: May 17, 2010	/s/ Stephanie A. Westington
Date: August 13, 2010	/s/ Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
	Stephanie A. Westington, CPA
	Vice President of Finance (Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Item Number			Description	Page
	31	(i)	CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).		60	60
	32		CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350.		62	62

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · COMM BANCORP INC