10-K 1 y41439e10-k.txt AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from _______________ to _______________ Commission file number 1-9748 American Film Technologies, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 23-2359277 State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 300 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10022 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 572-6370 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, -$.002 Par Value (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] -1- 2 State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The aggregate market value shall be computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within 60 days prior to the date of filing. The aggregate market value is approximately $7,544,607, based on 107,780,103 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates at the last trading price of $0.07 per share as of September 28, 2000. APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS: Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. YES _ NO X APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS: Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of September 28, 2000 there were 147,019,437 shares of Common Stock of the Registrant outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part 1, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). Not Applicable. -2- 3 PART I THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S ("AFT" OR THE "COMPANY") CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-K. EXCEPT FOR THE HISTORICAL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, THE DISCUSSION IN THIS FORM 10-K CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, SUCH AS STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY'S PLANS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTATIONS AND INTENTIONS. THE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS FORM 10-K SHOULD BE READ AS BEING APPLICABLE TO ALL RELATED FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS WHEREVER THEY APPEAR IN THIS FORM 10-K. THE COMPANY'S RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DISCUSSED HERE. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH DIFFERENCES INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE "RISK FACTORS" SET FORTH BELOW. RISK FACTORS Any investment in AFT is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the following investment considerations. Start-Up Operations: As a result of AFT's financial difficulties and bankruptcy proceedings it has not engaged in ongoing operations for six years. In addition to hiring qualified personnel, the expense and the time required to recommence operations may be greater than anticipated. History Operating Losses: In spite of the past profitability of AFT's colorization fee-for-services business, AFT has not entered into an agreement to render such services for six years. It cannot state with any degree of certainty whether it will be able to obtain contracts for fee-for-services work and if so, upon economically viable terms. In addition, AFT incurred a net operating loss for each of the last two years prior to its filing for bankruptcy. Technological Obsolescence: AFT's business plan is to a great extent driven by it being the low cost provider of colorization services. AFT also believes its colorization process can produce more volume of product than any other process of which it is aware. Developments in computer hardware and software are very rapid, resulting in more sophisticated technology available at lower cost. There is no assurance AFT's current technology will continue to produce colorized product that is technically acceptable to broadcasters and viewers or that if acceptable will be provided at competitive prices. If that should occur AFT would have to upgrade its technology. There is no assurance AFT will have the financial or technical resources to do so. Patent Protection: AFT's success will be largely dependent upon its technology and its ability to maintain patent protection on the technology it develops. AFT has obtained patents for certain aspects of its colorized software and will take steps to obtain other and future patents on all patentable devices and processes which it has developed. There can be no guarantee that patents will be granted in each or any instance. It is also possible that patents granted to AFT may be successfully challenged or that AFT's patents may infringe upon other patents which would cause additional unexpected costs and delays. A former competitor of AFT has in the past, unsuccessfully challenged AFT's patents. AFT also attempts to protect its proprietary products and processes by relying upon trade secret laws and nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with its employees and certain persons who have been given access to its proprietary products and processes. Despite this protection, no assurance can be given that others will not independently develop a colorized process and compete with AFT. Competition in Colorization: The lure of the entertainment industry, technological advances in computers, software and related hardware, and the decline in the cost of new equipment all have an effect on potential competitors' decisions to enter the colorization industry. Many entertainment companies are better established, have substantially greater financial resources and larger research and development staffs and facilities than AFT. Such companies may develop their own colorization process and facilities that would compete for third party colorization work. Such companies may also prove to be more successful in the production and distribution of colorized product. In addition, it is possible that a competitor may colorize and seek to obtain a copyright for a television or theatrical film product from the public domain which it colorizes subsequent to AFT. In recent years, AFT has had only one competitor. Towards the end of 1996 and the early months of 1997, this competitor experienced significant financial difficulties and filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. AFT has been advised that its competitor's assets were purchased by a group including former officers and directors of the competitor and one or more investors. -3- 4 Need for Additional Financing: The success of AFT's plan to commence the building of a valuable colorized film and television library will require substantial additional financing of no less than $4,000,000 in order for AFT to upgrade its technology and recommence operations. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The failure by AFT to secure such additional financing to fund the operations of AFT could have a material adverse effect on AFT. Default in Settlement Agreement: The Company entered into a settlement agreement with its former chairman, Gerald Wetzler, requiring it to pay Mr. Wetzler the sum of $1,140,000 on or before September 30, 2000. The Company did not make this payment and is now attempting to renegotiate the terms of the settlement agreement with Mr. Wetzler. There can be no assurance that this negotiation will result in a further agreement with Mr. Wetzler which would preclude the exercise of his rights under a senior secured debenture which he holds. Motion Picture and Television Industry: The industry is highly speculative and historically has involved a substantial degree of risk. The success of a particular film, TV program or video cassette depends upon unpredictable and changing factors, including the success of promotional efforts, the availability of alternative forms of entertainment and leisure time activities, general economic conditions, public acceptance and other tangible and intangible factors, many of which are beyond AFT's control. There can be no assurance that colorized motion pictures and television programs will find acceptance among broadcasters or consumers. There is intense competition to provide broadcast quality material for television, satellite and cable and for the attention of the television movie-viewing audience. There can be no assurances of future demand for colorized movies and television series. Market Demand for Colorized Television and Theatrical Product: Although the colorization of black and white theatrical and television programming has been ongoing for a decade or more, it has only represented a minuscule percentage of the total amount of programming produced during that time period. The U.S. television market is currently supplied with network programming, theatrical and television motion pictures, syndicated and other forms of programming. In addition, virtually all of the distribution of colorized theatrical and television programming has been handled by a small group of major production companies. AFT cannot state with certainty that the market will accept any increase in the amount of product available or that AFT will be able to distribute its product on economically feasible terms. Market Demand for Colorization Services: AFT historically generated almost all its revenue from providing its colorization services to third party owners of films and television shows. Since 1992, when AFT's major customer, Turner Entertainment, decided to stop colorizing its library, there has been very little demand for colorization. Although AFT intends to concentrate on building its own colorized film library, it may require revenue from its colorization services to sustain its operations. To the extent that this requirement develops, the lack of demand for colorization on a fee-for-services basis could have a material adverse effect upon AFT's ability to continue in business. Retail Sales of Video Cassettes: The sale of AFT's home video cassettes will depend upon the willingness of retailers to display and sell the merchandise. Because of competition for shelf space, there is no assurance this will occur. Availability of Suitable Product: The success of AFT is contingent upon finding and acquiring, on economically feasible terms, enough product for its library or joint ventures suitable for colorization. AFT cannot predict with certainty that sufficient product will be available and if so, whether such product will be available at economically feasible terms. Lack of Distribution Experience: AFT has no experience in the distribution of film and television product, a highly competitive business. The success of AFT will depend in great part on its ability to hire qualified personnel to perform distribution or, in the alternative, to negotiate joint venture or other favorable distribution agreements with established distribution companies. There is no assurance AFT can accomplish this. Regulations: In 1988, the United States Congress enacted legislation addressing change and modification of motion pictures which included colorized films. The legislation created the "National Film Preservation Board," which is empowered to select 25 "classic" films per year. The alteration of these films, including colorization, must carry a label stating that they have been "altered and/or modified" without the participation of the principal director, screenwriter and other creators of the original film. AFT does not believe that this legislation has had any impact (either positive or negative) on its business. Members of the film making community continue to lobby for additional governmental restrictions that could restrict colorization. Therefore, there can be no guarantee that further legislation will not be enacted in the United States or other countries which may have an adverse effect on AFT's business. -4- 5 Creative Opposition: Most of the larger and better libraries in the United States are owned by film production companies. Because of the vocal opposition from certain actors, writers, directors and other creative personnel in the film community, several of the major studios have been reluctant to colorize their libraries. There is no assurance that this reluctance will not continue. To the extent that it limits the supply of a commercially viable product, this creative opposition could have an adverse material effect upon AFT's business. Need to Locate and Retain Senior Management: The success of AFT will largely be dependent upon it being able to locate and retain certain executive officers of AFT, in particular operational, financial marketing and distribution executives. Should AFT be unable to locate and retain such executives in a timely manner or any of these key employees cease to be affiliated with AFT for any reason before a qualified replacement could be found, this could have a material adverse effect on AFT's business and prospects. Price of Common Stock/Market for Common Stock: As a result of its bankruptcy proceedings, the shares of the Company's $.002 par value common stock (the "Common Stock") have been delisted from NASDAQ. Accordingly, there has been no regular trading market of the common stock since such time. In addition, due to AFT's financial difficulties it has not engaged in active operations since October 1993. The current market price of the Common Stock does not meet certain minimum per share prices designated by NASDAQ and state "blue sky" regulations. Accordingly, unless the per share price increases dramatically, the trading price of the shares may further restrict AFT's ability to list the shares on NASDAQ and to publicly trade in certain states. Future Sales/Dilution: The trading price of the Common Stock may also be adversely affected by the significant overhang of securities issued by AFT. At this time, approximately 147,019,437 shares of Common Stock are outstanding or subject to options or issuance upon conversion of the Company's debentures. Certain of these shares are not freely tradable and are subject to restrictions on the re-offer or resale imposed by the Act and applicable state securities laws. The issuance of additional shares upon the exercise of the Company's options and the conversion of the Company's debentures could have a dilutive effect on the ownership interest of existing shareholders. While the Company may challenge the validity of certain options and conversion rights, there can be no assurance that such a challenge will be successful. Dividends Unlikely: AFT has not paid any dividends on its Common Stock to date and does not intend to pay dividends in the near future. The payment of dividends in the future will be contingent upon AFT's revenues and earnings (if any), capital requirements and general financial condition. The payment of any dividends will be within the discretion of AFT's then Board of Directors. It is the present intention of the Board of Directors to retain any earnings for use in AFT's business operations. Accordingly, the Board does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future. -5- 6 ITEM 1. BUSINESS. GENERAL American Film Technologies, Inc.'s ("AFT" or the "Company") principal business has been the production of color versions of motion pictures and television programs originally produced in black and white. AFT was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and completed its first project in November 1987. AFT completed a public offering of its common stock in August 1987. Since its organization, AFT has colorized over 200 motion pictures, 170 television programs and 90 animated cartoons. Through its filing for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, AFT believes it had accounted for approximately 70% of the global colorized production of black and white films. During the year ended 1993, AFT completed COLORIMAGED versions of 43 full length motion pictures, 7 episodes of a one-half hour television series and 5 short cartoons, a theatrical animated short, an animated half-hour special for television, a half-hour video introducing a new board game and portions of the ink and paint and special effects work for the Amblin Entertainment full-length animated motion picture "We're Back." While most of AFT's colorization activities have been for customers on a fee-for-services basis, AFT has also produced colorized films for its own library. The Company owns the copyrights of 11 colorized films, including 4 Sherlock Holmes films starring Basil Rathbone; "The Scarlett Pimpernel" starring Leslie Howard, Merle Oberon and Raymond Massey; 3 Bela Lugosi horror films; "Outpost in Morocco" starring George Raft; "Gung Ho" starring Robert Mitchum and Randolph Scott; and "Eternally Yours" starring David Niven. AFT's film products are based on AFT's proprietary technology for the creation of color versions of motion picture and television programs originally produced in black and white, called COLORIMAGED films, as well as animation ink and paint and special effects. The AFT-owned COLORIMAGED films may be licensed for television broadcast, cable television, and for sale in home video markets. AFT's colorization business continued to grow and prosper during the late 1980' s with the development of significant customers such as 20th Century Fox, Republic Pictures and Turner Entertainment ("Turner"). By 1990, Turner accounted for more than 75% of AFT's colorization business. In 1991, AFT's founding investor and principal shareholder, George R. Jensen, decided to step down to pursue other business opportunities. At the time, the Board determined it would be in AFT's best interests to diversify its operations through entry into the computer animation and ink and paint (the process of putting color into animated film) which utilized similar technology. In the early 1990's, AFT experienced a slowdown in its colorization activities. In response, AFT increased its animation activities, which required significant cash investments and resulted in a decrease in AFT's available cash reserves. Ultimately, AFT was forced to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in October 1993. AFT emerged from bankruptcy in October 1995. Since that time, AFT has explored means of product development and sought financial and strategic partners. -6- 7 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS On September 13, 1999, the Registrant held an annual meeting of shareholders at which the entire slate of new directors were elected by a vote of 37,106,326 for and 158,000 against. On June 28, 2000, the directors met and appointed Jeffrey B. Yapp and Barry B. Sandrew as directors of the Company. Each new director received options to acquire 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The Board of Directors also authorized the Company to enter into a consulting agreement with Adasar Group, Inc. ("Adasar"). Pursuant to the terms of that consulting agreement, Adasar is to receive a monthly fee of $25,000 subject to the cash flow needs of the Company. If cash flow is unavailable, this monthly fee will accrue until the financial condition of the Company permits the payment of this fee. Adasar is also to receive options to purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.05 per share and the right to receive a similar option at such time as Adasar is responsible for bringing a material transaction to the Company. The Board of Directors also granted a further option of 500,000 shares for legal services rendered and to be rendered. The Company has signed a feature film and content development agreement with MetroChannels. MetroChannels a unit of Cablevision System Corporation's Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc., will work together with American Film Technologies on the development of interactive content for digital set-top-boxes and other distribution platforms. Under the terms of the agreement, AFT will provide several films from its current library of titles for development and distribution with MetroChannels. This collaboration will result in MetroChannels/AFT co-branded television interactive film products. AFT will cooperate with Cablevision in identifying additional content for exhibition that is appropriate for modernization using AFT's modern technology to restore, and/or add interactive components. The present directors of the Registrant are Fred S. Ruby, Porter Bibb, Anthony K. Chan, John H. Hoagland, Barry B. Sandrew and Jeffrey B. Yapp. (See "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant" below.) -7- 8 HISTORY OF AFT PRE-BANKRUPTCY EVENTS In 1991, AFT engaged Joseph Taritero, formerly Chief Executive Officer of Marvel Production ("Marvel") as its Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Taritero's business plan was to raise additional capital to fund the purchase and development of additional hardware and software for animation, to establish an offshore animation studio for AFT so that it could operate competitively and to enter into agreements for the production of animation products. During 1991 and 1992, AFT incurred significant additional expenses in acquiring the required equipment and technology for animation production. As a result, it incurred significant losses on its animation operations. At the same time, competitive factors and increasing reliance on fee colorization business from Turner led to reduced fees and narrowed profit margins in colorization operations, the only area of AFT's business that had positive cash flow. These problems were further exacerbated by concentrating AFT's resources on computer animation and ink and paint. AFT was also doing small projects such as music videos, animated shorts and interactive game projects. At the end of 1992, Turner announced its intention to terminate its film colorization program. AFT was faced with declining revenues and had depleted its cash reserves through the cost of, and losses incurred in connection with, its animation and ink and paint operations. In addition, it had failed to capitalize on its market dominance by broadening its customer base in the colorization business. Accordingly, its back orders dropped significantly. As a result of the foregoing, by the end of 1992, AFT was faced with the depletion of its remaining cash within a few months. In response to this crisis, the Board terminated Mr. Taritero and appointed Arthur Hartel as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hartel had previously served as the General Counsel and Secretary to the Company. Mr. Hartel's principal objective was to locate additional capital for AFT. Pre-Petition Investor. During early 1993, efforts were made to find a major investor to inject new capital into AFT. An investor group led by minister and broadcaster Pat Robertson (the "Robertson Group") entered into an agreement to purchase control of AFT. In August 1993, the Robertson Group failed to close the transaction. On September 28, 1993, AFT entered into an agreement with Gerald M. Wetzler pursuant to which Mr. Wetzler became the majority stockholder through the purchase of equity interests in AFT. During the second half of fiscal 1993 and the first quarter of fiscal year 1994, in order to lengthen the amount of time available for it to obtain new business and to secure additional capital, AFT implemented a program of cost reductions to go along with its program to extend the time period over which its contractual film coloring would be produced. The principal areas in which AFT reduced its costs were in the number of employees and in the amount of its leased space. AFT's reduced film coloring schedule negatively impacted AFT's earnings, principally due to its inability to cover such non-cash items as depreciation; however, it extended AFT's available cash over a longer period of time. Management commenced a restructuring of the Company, suspending certain operations of the animation and ink and paint divisions. Comerica. During the quarter ended September 30, 1992, AFT refinanced its bank debt with a California bank, which later became Comerica Bank - California ("Comerica"). The refinancing replaced approximately $1,008,000 of existing bank debt and provided AFT additional available lines of credit of $400,000 in short term financing and up to $450,000 to finance 70% of the cost of new equipment. Because of the operating losses in fiscal 1993, AFT was in violation of covenants of its lending agreement with Comerica relating to tangible net worth, fixed charges, working capital, debt ratio and current ratio. During this period, AFT and Comerica entered into three forbearance agreements, the last of which expired on September 30, 1993. As a result of AFT's financial difficulties, Comerica required AFT to reduce the outstanding principal balance on this loan by approximately $445,000 (from $1,068,000 as of June 30, 1993 to approximately $623,000 on October 8, 1993). On September 8, 1993, in order to obtain a forbearance agreement until October 1, 1993, AFT granted the bank a security interest in AFT's patents and copyrights as additional collateral. During early October 1993, Comerica refused to allow AFT to utilize certain funds which AFT had believed would -8- 9 be available to it. As a result of the bank's actions, AFT did not meet its obligations to third parties, including payroll for its Mexican subsidiary. In October 1993, the employees of this subsidiary went on strike. On October 8, 1993, Comerica advised AFT that it would file a motion in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles seeking the appointment of a receiver for AFT and an order restricting its use of cash. AFT filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Code on October 15, 1993. AFT BANKRUPTCY On October 16, 1993, AFT filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. AFT has not generated any new film colorization or animation service orders since the filing under Chapter 11. From the filing of the bankruptcy until October 1995, AFT was funded principally from equity investments by its principal shareholder, Mr. Wetzler and certain other individuals. In addition, pursuant to a debtor in possession secured lending arrangement, Mr. Wetzler and Mr. Robert Bernhard, in their discretion, were authorized to make available to AFT up to an aggregate of $150,000 (the "DIP Financing"). The maximum outstanding at any time under the DIP Financing was $122,300 in July 1995. Although AFT reduced its overhead and operating expense significantly since the filing of the Chapter 11 proceeding, the lack of capital and film colorization contracts made it impossible for AFT to resume operations and to generate sufficient revenues to cover its ongoing overhead and administrative expenses. In order to preserve its resources, AFT reduced its overhead by laying off substantially all of its employees and by reducing the amount of space it leases in San Diego. In January 1995, AFT ceased its post-petition operations and has vacated the space which it had leased in San Diego. 1995 FINANCING EVENTS H.J. Meyers Private Placement. On May 3, 1995, the Company entered into an option agreement with H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc. ("Meyers") pursuant to which the Company granted Meyers a ninety-day option (beginning May 30, 1995) to purchase up to 51% of the Company's Common Stock, or 35,182,508 shares, for $3,000,000 (the "Meyers Placement"). Upon approval of the Meyers Placement by the Bankruptcy Court on May 30, 1995, Meyers paid the Company a non-refundable fee of $150,000 for the Meyers option. The Agreement required Meyers to pay the Company $3,000,000 on the effective date of the Company's plan of reorganization (the "Plan"). (See "Plan of Reorganization" below.) Through a subsequent amendment to that agreement, Meyers agreed to use its best efforts to increase the proceeds of the offering to $4,000,000 which would result in net proceeds of $3,480,000 to the Company. In exchange for this possible increase, the Company agreed to issue an additional 3,800,000 shares to Meyers and its assignees. Meyers raised the money through a private placement of the Common Stock to "accredited investors," as that term is defined by the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (the "Meyers Shareholders"). As of October 31, 1995, the termination date for the sale, Meyers had sold subscriptions totaling $3,460,200 for the purchase of the Company's stock. As of June 30, 1996, the net proceeds to the Company totaled $3,460,200, including the conversion of a $300,000 bridge loan described below. (See "Meyers Loan" below.) In consideration for, among other things, funding the $150,000 price of the Meyers Placement, the Placement Agent agreed to assign 14,345,854 shares of Common Stock to L&R Holdings, Inc. and 10,545,854 shares of Common Stock to JCV Capital Corp. The stockholders from the Meyers Placement also have a right to register their stock in any offering of the Company's stock. The amount of stock these shareholders may register and sell is subject to pro-rata reduction or elimination at the sole discretion of the underwriter. However, the non-affiliate Meyers Shareholders can sell their shares under Rule 144 without any volume or manner of sale limitations on or after October 17, 1997. The potential influx into the public marketplace of these approximately 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock and the existence of the registration rights could adversely impact the price of the Common Stock or the ability of the Company to raise additional equity capital. Meyers Loan. On July 28, 1995, Meyers arranged for a $500,000 bridge loan (the "Meyers Loan") to the Company bearing an interest of 8% per annum to fund certain obligations of the Company prior to the effective date of the Plan. In addition to interest, the accredited investors received Common Stock at the rate of one-half share for every dollar of the bridge loan. On the effective date of the Plan, $300,000 of the bridge loan was converted into the Common Stock and the remaining $200,000 was repaid. Proceeds from the Meyers Loan were utilized as follows: (1) $250,000 to the outstanding principal balance due on the Comerica Bank loan; (2) $100,000 to pay the remaining balance on the purchase agreement with the employees at the Company's Mexican facility (See "Properties" below); and (3) $150,000 for the Company's general administrative expenses. -9- 10 Plan of Reorganization. In July 1995, AFT proposed a plan of reorganization to raise sufficient new capital to recommence operations. Pursuant to the proposed plan, AFT contemplated raising up to $4 million in new equity, including the Meyers Placement, described above. On October 6, 1995, the Plan was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and became effective October 17, 1995 (the "Effective Date"). In connection with the Plan, the Company raised approximately $3.4 million in new equity capital. Under the terms of the Plan, the following is a summary of the treatment of each of the major classes of creditors and stockholders:

* Does not include the Class 7 claim of Joseph Taritero, which was compromised pursuant to the terms of a prior stipulation and order and has been paid in full by the Company. -10- 11 In October 1995, AFT completed the Meyers Placement pursuant to which it has received approximately $3.4 million of new capital in exchange for the issuance of shares representing approximately 54% of its total outstanding Common Stock, including funds received in exchange for the Meyers Loan. Since emerging from bankruptcy, the Company has actively pursued new strategic alliances and partners. SUBSEQUENT FINANCING During fiscal 2000, the Company's operations were financed almost entirely by remaining working capital, proceeds from private placements of its securities and option exercises by Gerald Wetzler and others. During this period $50,000 in secured convertible notes were issued in a private placement, $250,000 was realized from a private placement of its securities with the Rudy Group and $32,500 was realized from the exercise of options by Gerald Wetzler and others. Between July 1, 2000 and September 30, 2000, $150,000 was realized from a private placement of securities. During fiscal 1999, the Company's operations were financed almost entirely by remaining working capital, proceeds from private placements of its securities and purchases and option exercises by Gerald Wetzler. During this period $49,000 in secured convertible notes were issued in a private placement. In January 1997, the Company issued a $100,000 principal amount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture to an accredited investor in a private placement. In September 1997, the investor converted this Debenture into 1,100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to its terms. Between October 1997 and April 1998, the Company issued a $264,000 principal amount Senior Secured Convertible Debenture to accredited investors in a private placement. In fiscal 1999, the investors converted these Debentures into 8,800,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to its terms. In January 1997, May 1997 and June 1997, the Company raised an additional $420,000 through the sale of director stock options to purchase 15,500,000 shares to Gerald Wetzler. These options plus an option purchased by Mr. Wetzler for $200,000 in June 1996 to purchase 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock were terminated by Mr. Wetzler in two separate transactions in September 1997. (See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.) AFT received commitments from Mr. Wetzler and a group of investors, pursuant to which such investors committed to provide up to $1,000,000 of new financing to AFT through the purchase of two-year Senior Secured Convertible Notes bearing no interest and convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a rate of three cents ($.03) per share (the "October 1997 Financing"). The initial phase of the funding of this offering aggregating to $500,000 was completed on October 14, 1997. The proceeds of the October 1997 Financing were utilized to make the principal and interest payments due on the Company's Bankruptcy Notes. An additional $404,965 was raised from Mr. Wetzler and other investors to fund the Company's working capital requirements between late 1997 and 1999. During September 2000, the Company raised the sum of $150,000 pursuant to a private placement. -11- 12 OPERATIONS Colorized Films. Historically, AFT has created color-imaged films which are color versions of motion pictures originally produced in black and white. The first color version of a full-length motion picture was completed by AFT in late November 1987. Prior to embarking on its attempt to enter into the animation business in 1991, AFT was operating profitably from its colorization operations. As recently as its fiscal year ended June 30, 1990, it generated $3.1 million of net income on revenues of $18.5 million. After a poor year in 1991 when revenues dropped by almost 50% as compared to the prior year, AFT was again profitable in fiscal 1992, generating $0.9 million of net income on revenues of $14.1 million. During the year ended June 30, 1992, AFT completed color versions of 40 full-length motion pictures, 71 episodes of a one-half hour television series and 25 short cartoons. During the year ended June 30, 1993, AFT completed 43 full-length motion pictures. For the six month period ended December 31, 1993, AFT completed 7 COLORIMAGED motion pictures. Traditionally, Turner has been the most active studio in colorizing its black and white library, principally the old MGM library. During fiscal 1993, AFT's agreement with Turner amounted to approximately 65% of the work completed in the year ended June 30, 1993. Turner announced its intention to terminate its film colorization program at the end of 1992. Subsequently, it has not ordered any new films colorized by AFT beyond those which have been completed. AFT does not know when, if ever, Turner will resume its colorization activities. However, AFT believes that other studios and media companies, principally Universal, Columbia, Fox, Warner Brothers, and Viacom, all have significant black and white film and television libraries that have not been colorized. AFT also believes that substantial foreign film and television libraries exist which have not been colorized. Under a typical contract, AFT could decline to colorize a particular film if the elements (print or negative) of the film were not acceptable to AFT. Each customer otherwise selected the films for which color versions are to be made, has final approval on color selection, aesthetic approach, etc., and owns all rights in the final product. AFT received partial payments of its fees at various points in the production process. Film Library. Prior to 1993, in addition to colorizing movies for other owners, AFT created colorized films for its own library from movies in the public domain. By doing this, AFT acquired a new 75-year copyright in the colorized version of the motion picture. Among the films owned in whole or in part were "It's a Wonderful Life, " "The Scarlet Pimpernel, " and 4 Sherlock Holmes films, and others. As of June 30, 1997, AFT's library consisted of the following 11 completed films: "Terror By Night," "Dressed to Kill," "Woman in Green" and "Sherlock Holmes and the Secret Weapon" starring Basil Rathbone; "Outpost in Morocco" starring George Raft; "Gung Ho" starring Randolph Scott and Robert Mitchum; "Eternally Yours" starring David Niven and Loretta Young; "The Scarlet Pimpernel" starring Leslie Howard, Merle Oberon and Raymond Massey; and "Black Dragons," "Scared To Death" and "White Zombie" starring Bela Lugosi. In the first quarter of fiscal 1993, AFT sold its joint venture interest in 5 films (including "It's a Wonderful Life") it held in agreement with Republic Pictures ("Republic") to Republic for $600,000. This price was in excess of the carrying value of these films. -12- 13 The 4 Sherlock Holmes films were distributed through Multimedia Entertainment as part of a two program agreement. Each 3-hour program consisted of 2 Sherlock Holmes films. AFT's recognized revenues of $190,000 related to the showing of the first of these programs during fiscal 1989. In fiscal 1990, AFT recognized $191,000 in revenues from broadcast of the second film program. AFT has received copyrights on the color versions of the films in its library. Since June 1987, the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress has been accepting registrations for copyright protection for a 75-year period (amended in 1998 for an additional 20 years) on certain colorized versions of black and white motion pictures. The distribution business is highly competitive. The most important factors are: price, quality, dependability, audience appeal of the product and marketing skills. There are numerous domestic and foreign competitors, many of whom have resources substantially greater than AFT. These competitors include major motion picture studios and other production and distribution companies which distribute their own programs and films as well as those produced by others. The Company cannot state with any degree of certainty what revenues could be derived at this time from the exploitation of its current library. Animation. During the years ended June 30, 1989 and 1990, AFT engaged in a research and development project to produce a computer-generated, paperless, animation process and ink and paint (the process of putting color in animated films), which would be competitive with existing traditional and computer animated systems with respect to both the perceived production values and costs. During fiscal 1992, AFT completed a short theatrical cartoon for Twentieth Century Fox. AFT also animated a 30-minute prime time television special, a Ronald McDonald's Storybook Theater presentation titled "The Magic Paintbrush," for Marvel and CBS Television. AFT has also used its high resolution computer and film based ink, paint and compositing technology on the full-length animated feature film "We're Back" for Universal Pictures. AFT's computer process colors traditional animation cells and outputs the final product to 35mm film. "We're Back" was completed for Amblin Entertainment during September 1993 to meet a theatrical release date of November 1993. Although AFT developed significant technology in this area, it was not able to match its competitors' prices. Accordingly, AFT produced only few significant projects and has incurred significant losses in producing certain of those projects. AFT's business plan upon reorganization focuses on the core colorization business. While AFT has proven animation technology, profit margins in animation were minimal due to lower cost foreign animation competition. In addition, technological advances in computer hardware and software have surpassed AFT's technology. AFT also believes that substantial resources would be required in order for it to compete effectively and to attain full-scale production. (See "History of AFT" above.) Mexican Subsidiary. The Company performed much of its colorization work through its wholly owned subsidiary, American Film Technologies de Mexico, S.A., a Mexican corporation. AFT loaned a significant amount of its colorization, animation and ink and paint equipment to the subsidiary. Due to restraints on the utilization of its cash imposed by Comerica Bank, the subsidiary missed its payroll on October 8, 1993 and the subsidiary's employees began a work stoppage. As a result of the strike, the Mexican employees filed a lien against AFT's equipment located at the Mexico production facility. Since the equipment is owned by AFT and the labor claim is against the subsidiary, AFT challenged the validity of the lien, and in August, 1994, a Mexican court ruled in favor of the workers, validating their lien on the equipment. This equipment was subsequently repurchased by the Company. In December 1994, the subsidiary negotiated a settlement of the strike. The settlement called for a schedule of payments to its employees. Subsequently, the subsidiary failed to make payments. In March 1995, the Mexican Labor Board allowed the employees to execute their lien and granted them title to the equipment. Subsequently, AFT has organized a new Mexican subsidiary, Midtech de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ("Midtech"). Midtech negotiated a purchase agreement with the owners of AFT's former equipment. The agreement required a purchase price of $215,000, which has been paid. -13- 14 Current management believes that a Mexican production facility is advantageous to the strategic plan of the Company. However, the Company has not operated for six years and although historically the Company was able to achieve significant cost savings through its Mexican operations as compared to the U.S., it is uncertain whether such cost savings can be achieved in the future. Should the Company resume operations at this time, it would consider re-establishing operations in Mexico, which will require re-employment of selected former employees of the Company's former subsidiary. Since the Mexican operation was suspended in October 1993, most of the former employees have found other jobs. The success of the Company will depend upon Midtech's ability to rehire certain former employees. If Midtech is unable to do so, it will have to recruit and train a new work force. That would delay the resumption of production and increase the cost of production. As such, it could have a materially adverse effect on the Company. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The Company holds three United States patents pertaining to colorizing monochrome images, which will expire in January 2008, March 2009 and July 2013. AFT also holds a patent pertaining to the animation process, which will expire in October 2010. AFT's success will largely be dependent upon its technology and its ability to maintain patent protection on the technology it develops. (See "Risk Factors -- Patent Protection" above). EMPLOYEES At present, the Company has no employees. The Company will add employees as necessary in phases as it commences design work on films, then production of colorized films and finally, distribution and exploitation of the colorized films. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS The Company is continuing to experience cash flow difficulties. The Company was required to make a payment in October 1998, October 1999, and October 2000, each of approximately $405,000 plus interest to unsecured creditors in connection with its 1995 bankruptcy reorganization but has not made such payments. No creditor has filed a complaint or objection or instituted any legal action to date because of such failure. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. AFT leases office space in New York City, New York located at 300 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10022. The lease is renewable on a month to month basis. -14- 15 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. On June 9, 1999, four stockholders of the Company filed suit in the Newcastle County, Delaware Chancery Court against Mr. Gerald Wetzler as Chairman and Chief Executive officer of the Company, and the Company as a nominal defendant, seeking on various grounds to abrogate a stock option agreement and secured convertible note previously granted and issued by the Company in 1997 to Mr. Wetzler, as previously disclosed at that time, and to terminate Mr. Wetzler's 1996 employment agreement with the Company. The action also sought, among other things, to compel the Company to hold an annual meeting of shareholders to elect directors as required by Delaware law. Mr. Wetzler vigorously prosecuted his defense of this action and filed a motion for Summary Judgment with the Court based on terms of all the agreements in question which require exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of California for all disputes arising out of or relating to these agreements. The Court, by order dated July 6, 1999, denied a motion by Mr. Wetzler to dismiss the action on various grounds and set and August 16, 1999 date for a hearing on all matters then outstanding before the Court in the case, including the motion for Summary Judgment. The Court also set September 1, 1999 as the date on which the annual meeting of stockholders to elect directors was to be held and also set July 15, 1999 as the record date for stockholders of record entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting. The annual meeting was held on September 13, 1999. (See "Recent Developments" above.) Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement dated December 30, 1999, this litigation was settled; however, the Company is now in default with respect to the terms of this agreement. The mutual terms of the settlement agreement provides for the payment of $1,140,000 on or before September 30, 2000, to Gerald M. Wetzler for an option to purchase all or substantially all of his holdings in the Company and for a further payment of $900,000 on or before January 1, 2001. In consideration for the foregoing, Mr. Wetzler agreed to extend the due date for the payment of all his Senior Secured Notes to January 1, 2001. The Company has been unable to make the payment due to Mr. Wetzler on or before September 30, 2000. The Company is attempting to renegotiate the terms of such settlement agreement. On December 6, 1999, a Judgment was entered against the Company in the amount of $45,724.46. The Company has paid $22,399.76 of this amount and will attempt to negotiate a settlement of the balance of this Judgment and to arrange for a reasonable payout. Grant & Eisenhofer, PA ("Grant") claim that the company owes them $298, 225.06 for legal services performed on behalf of AFT. In September 2000, this matter was settled by issuing 3,313,611 shares of the Company's common stock to Grant. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. The Company has not submitted any matters to a vote of its security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report. -15- 16 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. The Company's Common Stock trades on a limited basis on the "pink sheets" under the symbol "AFTC." Stock price ranges for each full quarterly period during the two most recent fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 2000 are listed below:

* The Company filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 16, 1993. According to the records of the Company's transfer agent on September 28, 2000 the Company had 1,301 shareholders of record. On September 28, 2000, the last trading price of the Common Stock was reported at $.07 per share. The Company has not declared dividends on the Common Stock since it became a public company. The Company does not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. The tables below set forth certain selected consolidated financial data of the Company for each year of the five-year period ended June 30, 2000 and should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" below, "Risk Factors" above and the financial statements included elsewhere herein. All data for the period ended June 30, 1997 is reported on a fresh start basis of accounting in accordance with the Statement of Position ("SOP") 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," issued in November 1990 by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and includes activity from October 17, 1995 (the Effective Date) to June 30, 1997. Under this concept, all assets and liabilities are restated to reflect the reorganization value of the reorganized entity, which approximates its fair value at the date of reorganization. In addition, the accumulated deficit of the Company was eliminated and its capital structure was recast in conformity with the Plan. As such, the accompanying financial data as of June 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999 represents that of a successor company which, in effect, is a new entity with assets, liabilities and a capital structure having carrying values not comparable with prior periods and with no beginning retained earnings or deficit. -16- 17 Summary of Financial Information (000's omitted except for per share numbers)

* Includes the period from October 17, 1995 (the Effective Date) to June 30, 1996. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION. GENERAL The operations of AFT for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and 2000 were significantly affected by the reduction and, in fiscal year 1994, the cessation of production operations of the Company. As a result, the financial results of the Company for each of the three fiscal years addressed by this report do not reflect any earnings capacity of the Company. The financial data for the periods ended June 30, 1998, 1999 and 2000 reflects the adoption of Fresh Start Accounting and includes the period from October 17, 1995 (the Effective Date) to June 30, 1996. As such, the financial data is considered that of a Successor Company and is not comparable to prior periods. The opinion of the Company's auditors, Cummings & Carroll, P.C., which accompanies the Company's financial statements, contains an emphasis paragraph as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Year ended June 30, 2000 compared to June 30, 1999 The Company did not record any revenues during the period. Total expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 amounted to $1,611,000. This included $750,000 for a change of control expense. Total expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 amounted to $726,000. Year Ended June 30, 1999 compared to June 30, 1998 The Company did not record any revenues during the period. Total expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 amounted to $726,000. Total expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998 amounted to $1,389,000. -17- 18 Financial Condition and Liquidity. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 the Company financed its activities principally through the sale of its securities in private placements to accredited investors. In January 1997, the Company raised $100,000 through the issuance of the January 1997 Debenture. In September 1997, the January 1997 Debenture was converted by the debenture-holder into 1,111,111 shares of Common Stock in accordance with its terms. In addition, in January 1997, May 1997 and June 1997, the Company in three separate transactions raised an additional $420,000 through the sale of Director stock options to purchase 15,500,000 shares to Gerald Wetzler. As of June 30, 1997 the Company had current assets of approximately $283,000 available to finance its operations through the middle of September. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 1997, the Company has continued to finance its activities through the sale of its securities in private placements to accredited investors and the exercise of previously granted options. In August 1997, Mr. Wetzler exercised a portion of his 20,000,000 share option grant of June 1996 option for 250,000 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $0.12 per share or $30,000. On September 12, 1997, Mr. Wetzler purchased two year options to purchase 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock at one cent ($.01) per share for $130,000, in order to finance the Company's activities during September and October of 1997. In connection with this option purchase, Mr. Wetzler terminated the remaining 29,750,000 of his outstanding June 1996 and January 1997 options, which options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate purchase price of $400,000. In addition, in order to facilitate additional financing for the Company, on September 19, 1997, Mr. Wetzler terminated the outstanding options to purchase 5,500,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Company's May and June 1997 option grants, which options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate purchase price of $220,000. On and after October 10, 1997, AFT received commitments from a new group of lenders, including Gerald Wetzler, the Company's then Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which such investors committed to provide at least $710,000 of new financing to AFT through the purchase of two year Senior Secured Convertible Notes bearing no interest and convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a rate of three cents ($.03) per share (the "October 1997 Financing"). The initial phase of the funding of this offering aggregating to $500,000 was completed on October 14, 1997. The proceeds of the October 1997 Financing were principally utilized to make the October, 1997 principal and interest payments due on the Company's Bankruptcy Notes and to fund the Company's working capital requirements. The Board of Directors has authorized a sale of up to $2,000,000 of Senior Secured Convertible Notes. AFT is continuing to experience cash flow difficulties. AFT was required to make payments in October 1998, October 1999, and October 2000, each of approximately $405,000 plus interest, to unsecured creditors in connection with its 1995 bankruptcy reorganization but has not made such payment. No creditor has filed a complaint or objection or instituted any legal action to date because of such failure. The Rudy group invested $250,000.00 in or about September 1999. An additional $150,000 in September 2000 was received from outside investors in a private placement of securities. These amounts are being used to fund the operations of the Company and to pay certain of the Company's expenses. These amounts are not sufficient to pay off a significant portion of the Company's debt. To the extent outside financing is not obtained in the immediate future, the Company may be liquidated or the Company may seek further relief in the previously instituted Bankruptcy proceeding. In the event of liquidation, the shareholders in all likelihood will receive nothing with respect of their stock. In addition, the Company needs funding sufficient to enable it to become operational again. The amount of funding required is contingent on a number of variables, such as the speed of the start up and the initial production capacity required. The Company believes that the minimum amount of funding required (including working capital) would be approximately $4,000,000 -18- 19 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Report of Independent Auditors ........................................... F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets .............................................. F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations .................................... F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) ................ F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows .................................... F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................... F-7

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. None. -19- 20 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT. The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:

The directors serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification of their successors. The officers are elected by the directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. (See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.) FRED S. RUDY, age twenty-six (26), is a Managing Director of Olympia Partners, LLC, ("Olympia") a New York based private equity investment partnership. Mr. Rudy specializes in early-stage equity investments and corporate turnarounds for public and private companies. Prior to joining Olympia in June 1998, Mr. Rudy was a Corporate Finance Consultant at Broad Capital Associates, Inc. from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Rudy attended New York University and currently resides in New York with his wife and two children. Mr. Rudy is the beneficial owner of 5,000 shares of Common Stock. PORTER BIBB, age sixty-three (63), who had served as a Director of the Registrant previously from October 1996 through December 1996, has spent his entire business career in the media and entertainment industry. He currently serves as a Senior Advisor to Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., an investment banking company and subsidiary of New Valley Corp., a NYSE company. Prior to Ladenburg's sale to New Valley, he was a Partner, Principal and Director of Corporate Finance of the firm, which he joined in 1984. In 1998, he founded Technology Partners, LLC, a company that specializes in new media, entertainment and Internet technology. From 1972 to 1977, Mr. Bibb was Corporate Development Director of The New York Times Company, where he was responsible for expanding the company's involvement in new media and technology. Mr. Bibb served as a Newsweek White House correspondent from 1989 to 1996 and is also a published author, screenwriter and producer of numerous documentaries. Mr. Bibb has also served as publisher for Rolling Stone Magazine from 1970 to 1971 and for US Magazine from 1972 to 1977. Mr. Bibb received his B.A. from Yale University in 1959 and also studied at the London School of Economics and the Harvard Business School. Mr. Bibb is the beneficial owner of 500,000 shares of Common Stock. ANTHONY K. CHAN, age forty-five (45), has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of American Champion Entertainment (NASDAQ: ACEI) since February 1997. Prior to that, he was the Chief Executive Officer of America's Best Karate, which was reorganized to become a wholly owned subsidiary of ACEI. His diligent efforts led the company through an IPO in July 1997. He is an international businessman, writer, martial artist, husband and father. He is a published author and has been featured in magazines, newspapers, and television. A four-time world champion, he was inducted into the Black Belt Hall of Fame in 1981. Currently, Mr. Chan also serves as an executive producer, co-creator and co-writer of the award-winning "Adventures with Kanga Roddy" series for public television. -20- 21 Mr. Chan received his MBA from the University of California at Berkeley at the age of twenty-two (22). From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Chan managed $50 million of investments in industrial production facilities in the People's Republic of China for the Eisenberg Company, an international investment and trading enterprise. Prior to that, Mr. Chan was employed by Bank of America NT & SA as an economic forecaster. JOHN H. HOAGLAND, age seventy (70), has served as Chairman of J-Net Group, Inc., a Delaware company (the "Group"), since its founding (as J-Net Broadcasters, Inc.) in 1992 and has served as its Chairman since that time. Mr. Hoagland has led the growth of the Group to its present position as a well-established programming producer and technology resource for multimedia publishing. Under Mr. Hoagland's direction, the Group has successfully established the following divisions: (i) Ecology Cable Service, which provides weekly environmental television programming to more than one-hundred (100) cable operators throughout the United States serving nearly 11 million homes; (ii) J-Net Consultants, which provides technical and management consulting to major print and electronic publishers in the United States and Europe; and (iii) RomNet, Inc., a leading technical support company serving the Internet and CD-ROM industries. From 1983 to 1992 Mr. Hoagland served as Chairman of Monitor Television, Inc., a major producer of daily television news, and as General Manager of The Christian Science Monitor. He has served in numerous advisory roles. In 1989, he was appointed to the U.S. State Department Special Task Force on Telecommunications and Broadcasting in Eastern Europe. He has also served on the Private Sector Television Committee of the U.S. Information Agency, the Advisory Committee on International Communications of the U.S. State Department and the Board of Directors of the International Media Fund. He received a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1951 and served for 10 years as a US naval and civilian officer in government service. BARRY B. SANDREW, Ph.D., President of Global Media Technology Inc., was appointed a Director of American Film Technologies Inc. on July 27, 2000 Mr. Sandrew, an original founder of AFT and inventor of AFT's core technology, served as the company's Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from 1986 to 1993. In that position, Mr. Sandrew established a client base that included Walt Disney Studios, Warner Brothers Animation, 20th Century Fox, MGM, Universal Pictures, Amblin Entertainment, Turner Broadcasting Systems, Republic Pictures, Marvel Entertainment, the three major U.S. television networks, Gaumont, TF1 and other entertainment companies in the United States and Europe. Mr. Sandrew was appointed president of eSAT's wholly owned subsidiary, Global Media Technology (GMT) in December 1999. GMT is focused on leveraging eSAT's technology, services and products in order to integrate and deliver Internet services and online content to diverse vertical markets such as health care, education and hospitality. JEFFREY B. YAPP, age forty-one (41), President of Hollywood Entertainment Corp., was appointed a Director of American Film Technologies, Inc. and Chairman of its Executive Committee on July 5, 2000. Prior to joining Hollywood Entertainment Corp., Mr. Yapp served as President Worldwide of Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, Inc. and as President of Fox International. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") requires the Company's officers and directors and the holders of more than ten percent of the company's outstanding Common Stock to file reports of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and to furnish the Company with copies of these reports. The Company is informed that Mr. Wetzler is up to date with respect to all his filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On May 9, 2000, Mr. Wetzler filed a form 13D. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. The following table sets forth the compensation of the officers of the Company. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 2000, neither Mr. Rudy, Mr. Wetzler nor any of the other executive officers received compensation over $100,000. The present CEO is operating without compensation. -21- 22 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

--------------------- * Upon confirmation of the Plan in October 1995, Mr. Wetzler received a bonus of $125,000, in accordance with the terms of the Plan. (1) See "Employment Contracts - Wetzler Employment Agreement" below. In addition to the above, Mr. Wetzler purchased options in connection with his providing working capital to the Company. (See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.) OPTIONS During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997, the Company granted the following options to Mr. Wetzler:

-22- 23 In addition, on September 12, 1997, Mr. Wetzler purchased 30,000,000 options for an aggregate purchase price of $130,000 in connection with his providing working capital to the Company. Simultaneously with the purchase of the September 1997 options, Mr. Wetzler agreed, to the extent that they had not been exercised, to terminate the June 1996 options as well as the January 1997 options. As of the termination date, Mr. Wetzler had only exercised 250,000 of the 20,000,000 options granted to him in June of 1996. None of the January 1997 options had been exercised. In addition, as of September 18, 1997, Mr. Wetzler terminated the May 1997 options as well as the June 1997 options, none of which had been exercised by Mr. Wetzler. (For further discussion of the above, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.) No options were granted Mr. Wetzler during the fiscal years ended June 30, 1998, June 30, 1999 or June 30, 2000. According to information provided by Mr. Wetzler, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999, Mr. Wetzler exercised options to purchase 5,100,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.002 par value at a price of $0.01 per share. On July 8, 1999, Mr. Wetzler exercised an option to purchase 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.002 par value, by canceling $40,000 of his senior secured notes and signing a $160,000 promissory note due November 6, 1999 with interest at 10% per annum. The note is collateralized by 23,500,000 of his shares of Common Stock, 2,200,000 of his brother's shares of Common Stock and $30,000 of senior subordinated notes. The market price of the Company's common shares on July 8, 1999 was $.04. On December 30, 1999, the Board of Directors voted to grant 2,000,000 options to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company at an option price of $0.05 per share to the Company's counsel. The Company also voted to approve similar options in the amount of 1,000,000 shares to each of the four directors of the Company. In July, 2000 the Company voted to approve similar options in the amount of 2,000,000 shares to each of two additional directors of the Company and an option to purchase 500,000 shares to counsel for the Company. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS The current officers and directors are serving without any compensation from the Company. -23- 24 EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS Wetzler Employment Agreement. Effective January 1, 1996, Mr. Wetzler and the Company entered into an employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement" of the "Agreement") wherein Mr. Wetzler was to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The following are the terms of the Employment Agreement: The Agreement provides for a term of five years, subject to termination as provided in the Agreement, and provides that, as sole compensation under the Agreement, Mr. Wetzler will receive an option to purchase 10,000,000 shares of the Company's $.002 par value common stock, at an exercise price of twelve cents less than the average trading price in the Company's common stock for the twenty trading days prior to and including January 18, 1996, which has been calculated as $.0628 per share, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Option Agreement (described below). The Employment Agreement provides for no cash compensation, but does entitle Mr. Wetzler to fringe benefits, including health insurance, on terms which may be agreed to from time to time by the Company and Mr. Wetzler. The Employment Agreement obligates the Company to indemnify Mr. Wetzler from and against third party claims in accordance with the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws. Mr. Wetzler was entitled to terminate the Employment Agreement on the occurrence of certain events, including a breach by the Company or a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Employment Agreement. If the Employment Agreement was terminated because of a breach of the Employment Agreement by the Company, Mr. Wetzler was entitled to receive, as liquidated damages, a termination payment equal to $250,000, multiplied by the number of years, including partial years, remaining on the original term of the Employment Agreement. If the Employment Agreement was terminated in connection with a change in control of the Company, Mr. Wetzler was entitled to receive an amount equal to 2.99 multiplied by the greater of (a) the average annual gross compensation received by Mr. Wetzler from the Company from all sources during the five years prior to and including the year in which the event giving rise to termination occurred or (b) $250,000. The Board of Directors, in April 1998, amended Mr. Wetzler's Employment Agreement to provide that Mr. Wetzler would receive a $750,000 zero coupon senior secured note convertible at $.03 per share as full compensation if the Employment Agreement was terminated in connection with a change of control. This amendment was approved by the entire Board of Directors of the Company (three directors excluding Mr. Wetzler). By approving the settlement agreement dated December 30, 1999, the Board of Directors ratified the terms of this Employment Agreement. However, the settlement agreement would require Mr. Wetzler to relinquish his options upon the payment of the sums due by the Company. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. As of September 28, 2000 the only class of voting securities issued and outstanding was 147,019,437 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The following sets forth information as of September 28, 2000 with respect to the shares of the Company's Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each person who is known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5 % of any class of the Company's voting securities, (ii) the five highest paid officers including the Chief Executive Officer, (iii) each director of the Company, and (iv) all directors and officers as a group. -24- 25

(1) Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property and similar laws, the Company assumes that each named person has the sole voting and investment power with respect to his or her shares (other than shares subject to options). (2) Percent of class is based on the number of shares outstanding as of September 28, 2000. In addition, shares which a person had the right to acquire within 60 days are also deemed outstanding in calculating the percentage ownership of the person but not deemed outstanding as to any other person. Does not include shares issuable upon exercise of any warrants, options, or other convertible rights issued by the Company which are not exercisable within 60 days from the date hereof. (3) This sum includes approximately 20 million shares of Common Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an option. (4) Mr. Rudy is a principal of Olympia Partners, LLC, which acquired 5.5 million shares of the Company on August 25, 1999. Mr. Rudy does not have primary voting control of Olympia Partners, LLC. -25- 26 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. On September 12, 1997, Mr. Gerald Wetzler purchased options to acquire 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $130,000. Pursuant to these options, shares of Common Stock of the Company may be purchased at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. From July 1, 1998 to July 8, 1999, Mr. Wetzler exercised his option and purchased 26,400,000 shares of Common Stock. These remaining options terminated on September 12, 1999. The Board of Directors granted Mr. Wetzler these options in part to enable the Company to have sufficient working capital to operate through October 1997 so that the Company could either obtain additional financing or proceed with an orderly liquidation. Simultaneously with the purchase of the foregoing options, Mr. Wetzler agreed, to the extent that they had not been exercised, to terminate certain June 1996 options to purchase 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.12 per share, as well as certain January 1997 options to purchase 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. Such options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate price of $400,000. As of the termination date, Mr. Wetzler had only exercised 250,000 of the 20,000,000 options granted to him in June of 1996. In addition, as of September 18, 1997, Mr. Wetzler terminated certain May, 1997 options to purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.09 per share, as well as certain June 1997 options to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.09 per share. Such options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate price of $220,000. As of July 8, 1999, Mr. Wetzler provided $511,965 of new financing to AFT through the purchase of two-year Senior Secured Convertible Notes bearing no interest and convertible into Common Stock of the Company at a rate of three cents ($.03) per share. -26- 27 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. a. Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith as required under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2000 and 1999, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for each of the three years ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998. The Consolidated Financial Statement schedules of American Film Technologies, Inc. are omitted since they are either not required, not applicable or the relevant information is otherwise included. b. None. c. The following exhibits are included in this report or incorporated by reference: 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. 3.2 Bylaws, as amended. 10.1 Option Agreement dated May 3, 1995 between the Company and H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreement between the Company and H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc., dated July 11, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.3 Selling Agency Agreement between the Company and H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc., dated as of July 12, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 5 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.4 Amendment No. 2 to Selling Agency Agreement between the Company and H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc., dated October 5, 1995 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.5 Consulting Agreement, dated December 20, 1995, between Adasar Group, Inc. and the Company is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1996 between the Company and Gerald M. Wetzler is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.7 Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 1, 1996 between the Company and Gerald M. Wetzler is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. -27- 28 10.8 Stock Option Agreement dated as of February 23, 1996, between the Company and Larry King is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 10 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.9 Letter Agreement dated as of February 23, 1996, between the Company and Larry King is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.10 Transactional Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1996, between the Company and Larry King is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10-11 Registration Undertaking dated as of February 23, 1996 between the Company and Larry King is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 12 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.12 Letter of Intent dated March 28, 1996 between the Company and H.J. Meyers & Co., Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 13 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.13 Lease for San Diego Office is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 14 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1995. 10.14 Lease for New York Office is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. 10.15 Consulting Agreement between the Company and Harvey Finkel dated April 22, 1997 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. 10.16 Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Harvey Finkel dated April 22, 1997 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. -28- 29 10.17 Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Harvey Finkel dated August 15, 1997 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. 10.18 Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Gerald M. Wetzler dated June 17, 1996 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. 10.19 Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Gerald M. Wetzler dated September 12, 1997 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 15 to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1997. 10.20 Amendment to Gerald M. Wetzler employment agreement dated April, 1998. 10.21 Stock Option Agreement with Eric Illowsky dated April, 1998. 10.22 Stock and Consulting Option Agreement with Michael Bruno dated January, 1999. 10.23 Promissory Note Agreement relating to exercise of September 12, 1997 options. 10.24 Settlement Agreement with Gerald M. Wetzler dated December 30, 1999. 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant 27 Financial Data Schedule d. Schedules filed herewith include: All schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X of the Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted. -29- 30 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

-30- 31 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. American Film Technologies, Inc.

-31- 32 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Auditors F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7

F-1 33 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Stockholders American Film Technologies, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of American Film technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American Film Technologies, Inc. at June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that American Film Technologies, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on October 15, 1993. The filing was the result of continuing defaults related to the Company's loans, recurring operating losses and insufficient cash flows. The Company's Plan of Reorganization was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on October 6, 1996; however, the Company must raise additional funds to finance its ongoing operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from this uncertainty. CUMMINGS & CARROLL, P.C. Certified Public Accountants Great Neck, New York September 28, 2000 F-2 34 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS

See accompanying notes. F-3 35 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes. F-4 36 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

See accompanying notes. F-5 37 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes. F-6 38 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 1. REORGANIZATION UNDER CHAPTER 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Basis of Presentation On October 16, 1993, the Company filed for protection from its creditors under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Chapter 11 filing was the result of continuing defaults related to the Company's loans, recurring operating losses and cash flow problems. The filing of a Chapter 11 petition operates as a stay of, among other actions, the commencement or continuation of a judicial administrative or other action or proceeding against a debtor that was or could have been initiated before the commencement of a Chapter 11 case or the enforcement against the debtor or against the property of the estate or a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case. Under Chapter 11, substantially all prepetition liabilities of debtors are subject to settlement under a plan of reorganization. The consummation of a plan of reorganization is dependent upon the satisfaction of numerous conditions, including, among other things, the acceptance by several classes of interests and confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court. On October 6, 1995, The Company's Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and became effective October 17, 1995. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with principles of accounting applicable to a going concern. As discussed below (see "H.J. Meyers Agreement"), the Company completed a private placement for $3,460,200 and the Company must raise additional funds to finance its future operations. While management believes it will be successful in its efforts, there are no assurances whether sufficient financing or equity will be available to fund the operations through June 30, 2000. No adjustments have been made to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Further, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments relating to settlement of the claims or any class of creditors that are provided for in the Plan. Any adjustments relating to such settlements will be recorded at such time as the Bankruptcy Court enters a final order relating to these settlements. See discussion under "Fresh Start Accounting" below. The only effects of the bankruptcy proceedings reflected in the accompanying financial statements as of June 30, 1996 are "Liabilities Subject to Compromise", which are impaired prepetition liabilities in accordance with the Plan and "Reorganization items" (including professional fees) have been specifically identified on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Plan of Reorganization On October 6, 1995, the Company's Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan") was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and became effective October 17, 1995 (the "Effective Date"). F-7 39 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 Under the terms of the Plan, the following is a summary of treatment of each of the major classes of creditors and stockholders:

F-8 40 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 The above Class 7 Unsecured Claims does not include the Class 7 Claim of Joseph Taritero which has been compromised pursuant to the provisions of a prior Stipulation and Order (see Note 10). A claim becomes impaired when the legal, contractual or equitable right of such claim is altered, modified or changed by the proposed treatment under the Plan. H.J. Meyers Agreement On May 3, 1995, the Company executed an agreement with H.J. Meyers and Co., Inc. ("Meyers") pursuant to which Meyers purchased an exclusive 90 day option as of May 30, 1995, to purchase common stock from the Company for $3,000,000 which would provide Meyers up to 51% of the outstanding shares. Upon approval of the agreement by the Bankruptcy Court, on May 30, 1995, Meyers paid the Company a non-refundable fee of $150,000 for the option. The agreement required Meyers to pay the $3,000,000 to the Company upon the Effective Date of the Company's Plan. Through a subsequent amendment to that agreement, Meyers agreed to use its best efforts to increase the proceeds of the offering to $4,000,000 which would result in net proceeds of $3,480,000 to the Company. In exchange for this possible increase, the Company agreed to issue an additional 3,800,000 shares to Meyers and its assignees. Meyers raised the money through a private placement of the Company's common stock to "accredited investors", as that term is defined by the Securities Act of 1933. The net proceeds to the Company totaled $3,460,200, including the conversion of the $300,000 bridge loan discussed below. The Company agreed to grant a one-time demand and piggyback registration right. For a period of two years from the Effective Date, the new stockholder can demand (upon demand by at least 25% of the new stockholders) the Company file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) covering the reoffer and resale of its shares (up to 38,982,508). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time prior to exercise of the demand registration right the Company receives a Letter of Intent from an underwriter for a public equity offering of at least $5,000,000 of the Company's securities, then the demand registration right shall terminate. On March 28, 1995, the Company entered into a letter of intent with H.J. Meyers (the "Meyers Letter of Intent") under which Meyers confirmed its interest in underwriting on a firm commitment basis a public offering of shares of the Company's common stock. The Meyers Letter of Intent contemplates the negotiation and execution of formal agreements relating to the proposed offering and provides, among other things, that the Company will apply for listing on the NASDAQ Small Cap Market and use its best reasonable efforts to maintain such listing for not less than five years; that the Company, if requested, will obtain "key man" life insurance on the lives of designated officers of the Company and that the Company shall have entered into a joint venture, business alliance or business combination with an owner of content on terms acceptable to Meyers. F-9 41 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 The new stockholders also have a right to register their shares in any offerings of the Company stock (a "piggyback" right). The amount of stock the new stockholders may register and sell is subject to pro-rata reduction or elimination at the sole discretion of the underwriter. The existence of these rights could adversely impact the future price of the common stock or the ability of the Company to raise additional equity capital. To enable the Company to fund certain obligations prior to the Effective Date of the Plan, on July 28, 1995, Meyers arranged a $500,000 bridge loan to the Company with interest at 8% plus common stock at the rate of one half share for every dollar of bridge loan. The loans are convertible into common stock at the same rate as the private placement to the accredited investors. On the Effective Date, $300,000 of the bridge loan was converted into the Company's common stock and the remaining $200,000 was repaid. The $500,000 bridge loan is included in Class 4-Secured Claims mentioned above. Fresh Start Reporting Under the provision of State of Position (SOP) 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code, issued in November 1990 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of the Effective Date, October 17, 1995 on the basis of "fresh start" reporting since the reorganization value, as defined, was less than the total of all post-petition liabilities and pre-petition claims, and holders of voting shares immediately before confirmation of the Plan received less than fifty percent of the voting shares of the emerging entity. Under this concept, all assets and liabilities are restated to reflect the reorganization value of the reorganized entity, which approximates its fair value at the date of reorganization. In addition, the accumulated deficit of the Company was eliminated and its capital structure was recast in conformity with the Plan. As such, the accompanying consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of October 17, 1995 represents that of a successor company which, in effect, is a new entity with assets, liabilities and a capital structure having carrying values not comparable with prior periods and with no beginning retained earnings or deficit. The Company estimated the fair value of the reorganized entity based on the proceeds received from the private placement for 56% of its common stock which was completed on the Effective Date. While the estimated reorganization value of the Company has been primarily allocated to specific asset categories pursuant to Fresh Start Reporting, the effects of such are subject to further refinement or adjustment. Current assets have been recorded at their book value, which the Company believes approximates fair value. Equipment, software and film library have been recorded at their fair value as estimated by management after considering replacement cost or potential sales value. Long-term debt consists of pre-petition liabilities and will be paid out subject to the terms of the Plan. F-10 42 AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2000 The effect of the Plan on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at October 17, 1995 (the Effective Date) is as follows:

F-11 43 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 (1) To record the effects of the H.J. Meyers Private Placement Plan. Subsequent to October 17, 1995, the Company received an additional $200,000 from subscriptions related to the Private Placement. (2) To record assets, liabilities and capital at their fair value pursuant to Fresh Start Reporting and eliminate any retained deficit. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES The Company The Company's business is the production of color versions of motion pictures and television programs originally produced in black and white. The Company has produced colorized films for its own library and owns the copyrights on eleven such films. These films are available for sale and or distribution. Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Midtech de Mexico, S.A., the Company's wholly owned inactive Mexican subsidiary. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue from coloring films on the completed contract method. It is the Company's experience that the production cycle for coloring a film is less than ninety days. Financial position and results of operations do not vary significantly from those which would result using the percentage-of-completion method. If the production cycle exceeds 90 days, the Company recognizes revenue using the percentage of completion method, as measured by the percentage of costs incurred to total estimated costs. A feature film is considered complete upon acceptance by the customer. The Company recognizes revenue on its distribution business on the accrual basis. Based on the ratings received, revenue projections received from the distributors and experience, the Company estimates the revenue to be recognized in each quarter. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization are provided over the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets using primarily the straight-line method over a five-year period. The Film Library is being amortized over a three-year period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the assets. Production Costs - Excluding Depreciation and Amortization Cost of sales includes direct salaries and related benefits of production personnel and an allocation of overhead and materials costs used in the coloring and animation processes. F-12 44 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 Loss per Share In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share". SFAS 128 replaced the previously reported primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share are calculated utilizing weighted average shares outstanding and exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of dilutive securities outstanding. All earnings per share amounts for all period presented, where necessary, have been restated to conform to the SFAS 128 requirements. Stock Options The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, for those Company employee stock options issued with an exercise price not less than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. New Accounting Pronouncement In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information' ("SFAS 131"), which is effective for years beginning after December 15, 1997. SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The Company will adopt the new requirements retroactively in 1999. F-13 45 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 3. FILM LIBRARY The Company's film library, consists of 11 films held for distribution and or sale, and are stated as follows:

The related amortization of the Film Library for the year ended June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999 was $0.00 and $37,500.00, respectively. 4. EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE Equipment and software consists of the following:

F-14 46 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 5. REORGANIZATION VALUE IN EXCESS OF IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS In accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 90-7, upon the Effective Date, $6,326,258 of the reorganization value of the Company was not attributable to identifiable tangible or intangible assets and accordingly has been classified as an intangible asset. While the estimated reorganization value of the Company has been allocated to specific asset categories pursuant to Fresh Start Reporting, the allocation may be subject to further refinement, which will cause this "reorganization value" account to be adjusted accordingly. Furthermore, any adjustment relating to the settlement of a disputed prepetition claim by the Bankruptcy court will also cause this "reorganization value" account to be adjusted accordingly. Since the Effective Date through June 30, 2000, the Company has not been able to restart its operations. Due to the Company's financial position and uncertainty in estimating future cash flows, at June 30, 1997, the Company wrote off the reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets as recoverability of the asset is uncertain. 6. DEBTOR IN POSSESSION SECURED FINANCING On May 22, 1994, the Company obtained from the Bankruptcy Court a final order granting the motion for debtor-in-possession secured financing with certain stockholders as the lenders which permitted the Company to borrow up to $150,000 with interest at 4% per annum. A total of $122,300 was borrowed, all of which has been repaid in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization. F-15 47 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 7. NOTES PAYABLE At June 30, 1996, liabilities are reported in accordance with SOP 90-7, which requires that the balance sheet of an entity in Chapter 11 distinguish prepetition liabilities subject to compromise from those that are not (such as fully secured liabilities that are expected not to be compromised) and postpetition liabilities. Liabilities that may be affected by the Plan should be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. As of the Effective Date, liabilities subject to compromise were reclassified to long-term notes payable in accordance with the repayment terms of the Plan of Reorganization. Principal categories of notes payable at June 30, 2000 and 1999 consist of the following:

The amounts at June 30, 1996 have been converted to notes payable under the Plan and bear interest at 7%. Accrued interest payable at June 30, 2000 and 1999 are $276,516 and $186,299, respectively. Included in notes payable above at June 30, 1997 is a $100,000 loan from a shareholder. On February 3, 1997, the Company signed a two-year convertible note payable secured by the Company's assets and bearing interest at 9% per annum. The note converts, at the option of the of the holder, into common stock of the Company at a rate of $0.09 per share, a discount of $83,000 from the market price of common stock on that date. The estimated value of this discounted conversion term has been recorded to reduce the carrying value of the note and as capital in excess of par. On September 28, 1997 the notes was converted to common stock. Included above are $597,965 of two year Senior Secured Convertible Notes bearing no interest and convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.03 per share in 1999, 2000 and 2001. F-16 48 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 Annual aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the three years subsequent to June 30, 2000 are: 2001 $ 2,636,770 ------------ $ 2,636,770 ============ 8. OPERATING LEASES There are no minimum annual rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases. The Company is currently renting office space on a month to month basis Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 was $18,032 and $81,005, respectively. 9. INCOME TAXES At June 30, 2000, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $21,600,000 for federal income tax purposes and approximately $12,537,000 for state income tax purposes. These carryforwards will begin expiring in 1998 unless previously utilized. In addition, the Company has federal research and development credits of approximately $136,000 which expire in 2004 and 2008. The use of these carryforwards in any one year will be limited as a result of changes in ownership, as defined by Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, of the Company during fiscal 1993 and 1996. As a result of these changes, the net operating losses incurred and tax credits generated prior to the first date of change will be subject to an annual limitation of approximately $6,500 and those generated prior to the second date of change will be subject to an annual limitation of approximately $146,000. As a result of these limitations, approximately $14,799,000 of federal and $7,739,000 of state net operating losses, and $136,000 of credits will not be utilized. 10. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In January 1993, a suit was instituted against the Company by Joseph M. Taritero in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging breach of contract and fraud and seeking damages of $892,000. The Company has settled with Mr. Taritero for an amount totaling $275,000. In accordance with the terms of the Plan, $125,000 was paid on the Effective Date, $75,000 was paid in April 1996 and the remaining $75,000 was paid in October 1997. F-17 49 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 On June 9, 1999, four stockholders of the Company filed suit in the Newcastle County, Delaware Chancery Court against Mr. Gerald Wetzler as Chairman and Chief Executive officer of the Company, and the Company as a nominal defendant, seeking on various grounds to abrogate a stock option agreement and secured convertible note previously granted and issued by the Company in 1997 to Mr. Wetzler, as previously disclosed at that time, and to terminate Mr. Wetzler's 1996 employment agreement with the Company. The action also sought, among other things, to compel the Company to hold an annual meeting of shareholders to elect directors as required by Delaware law. Mr. Wetzler vigorously prosecuted his defense of this action and filed a motion for Summary Judgment with the Court based on terms of all the agreements in question which require exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of California for all disputes arising out of or relating to these agreements. The Court, by order dated July 6, 1999, denied a motion by Mr. Wetzler to dismiss the action on various grounds and set and August 16, 1999 date for a hearing on all matters then outstanding before the Court in the case, including the motion for Summary Judgment. The Court also set September 1, 1999 as the date on which the annual meeting of stockholders to elect directors was to be held and also set July 15, 1999 as the record date for stockholders of record entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting. The annual meeting was held on September 13, 1999. (See "Recent Developments" above.) Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement dated December 30, 1999, this litigation was settled; however, the Company is now in default with respect to the terms of this agreement. The mutual terms of the settlement agreement provides for the payment of $1,140,000 on or before September 30, 2000, to Gerald M. Wetzler for an option to purchase all or substantially all of his holdings in the Company and for a further payment of $900,000 on or before January 1, 2001. In consideration for the foregoing, Mr. Wetzler agreed to extend the due date for the payment of all his Senior Secured Notes to January 1, 2001. The Company has been unable to make the payment due to Mr. Wetzler on or before September 30, 2000. The Company is attempting to renegotiate the terms of such settlement agreement. On December 6, 1999, a Judgment was entered against the Company in the amount of $45,724.46. The Company has paid $22,399.76 of this amount and will attempt to negotiate a settlement of the balance of this Judgment and to arrange for a reasonable payout. Grant & Eisenhofer, PA ("Grant") claim that the company owes them $298, 225.06 for legal services performed on behalf of AFT. In September 2000, this matter was settled by issuing 3,313,611 shares of the Company's common stock to Grant. F-18 50 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) STOCK OPTIONS In accordance with the terms of the Plan, all prepetition stock options were canceled. Subsequent to filing Chapter 11, the Board of Directors granted options to purchase common stock totaling 22,300,000 shares as of June 30, 2000 and 20,081,210 shares as of June 30, 1999. The following table summarizes stock option activity for the two years ended June 30, 1999:

The following is a table that summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable stock options at June 30, 1999:

F-19 51 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 In January 1996, the Company granted options pursuant to an employment agreement with Gerald Wetzler, the Company's President and CEO. Under terms of the employment agreement, in lieu of cash compensation, the Company granted an option to purchase 10,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.002 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.0628. The options become exercisable at the rate of 1 and 2/3% per month. At June 30, 2000, 9,000,000 options were vested and exercisable. The options terminate on January 1, 2001. Deferred compensation or the estimated fair value of the options granted of $1,702,000 was recorded during 1996 and 1997. Compensation expense of $240,000 per year is being recognized in relation to these options. Also included in 1996, Mr. Wetzler purchased, for a fee of $200,000, an option to acquire the Company's common stock, or in the alternative, preferred stock convertible into common stock, subject to approval of the shareholders, which occurred in February 1997. The option gives the right to purchase up to 20,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per share. In accordance with APB 25, the difference between the exercise price and fair value of $4,600,000 was recorded as compensation. The option expires on June 17, 1998. In 1997, the Company received proceeds of $30,000 related to the exercise price of 250,000 options at $.13 per share by Mr. Wetzler. On January 3, 1997, May 12, 1997 and June 5, 1997, Mr. Wetzler purchased, for $200,000, $160,000 and $60,000 respectively, options to purchase up to 10,000,000, 4,000,000 and 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at exercise prices of $0.09, $0.13 and $0.13, respectively. The options vest over six months and expire on January 3, 2000, May 12, 2001 and June 6, 2001, respectively. In accordance with APB 25, the difference between the exercise price and the fair value on the date of grant of $3,298,000 is recorded as deferred compensation, which is then amortized over the vesting period. On September 12, 1997, Mr. Gerald Wetzler purchased options to acquire 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $130,000. Pursuant to these options, shares of Common Stock of the Company may be repurchased at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. Such options are currently exercisable by Mr. Wetzler provided that Mr. Wetzler does not sell or transfer the shares of Common Stock issuable upon such exercise for a period of six months from the date of grant. These options terminate on September 12, 1999. The Board of Directors granted Mr. Wetzler these options in part to enable the Company to have sufficient working capital to operate through October 1997 so that the Company could either obtain additional financing or proceed with an orderly liquidation. Simultaneously with the purchase of the foregoing options, Mr. Wetzler agreed, to the extent that they had not been exercised, to terminate certain June, 1996 options to purchase 20,000,000 share of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $.012 per share, as well as certain January, 1997 options to purchase 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. Such options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate price of $400,000. As of the termination date, Mr. Wetzler had only exercise 250,000 of the 20,000,000 options granted to him in June of 1996. F-20 52 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 In addition, as of September 18, 1997, Mr. Wetzler terminated certain May, 1997 options to purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.09 per share, as well as certain June 1997 options to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.09 per share. Such options were purchased by Mr. Wetzler for an aggregate price of $220,000. On February 9, 1996, the Company granted an option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.002 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 to Larry King, a member of the Board of Directors. The options vest and become exercisable upon consummation of a financing arrangement within a two-year period from the date of grant. At June 30, 1997, no options were vested or exercisable. The options terminated on February 9,1998. Also in 1996, the Company granted an option to purchase 1.0 million shares of common stock to Larry King at an exercise price of $0.18 per share. These options are currently vested. During fiscal 2000, the Company granted an option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company's $.002 par value common stock at an exercise price of $.05 to Martin & Taub, LLP, attorney's for the company. These options are currently vested. In addition, during fiscal 2000 the company granted an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the company's $0.0002 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 to four members of the board of directors, and 2,000,000 shares to two of the board members. Additional options to purchase 500,000 shares were granted to counsel for the Company. These options are currently vested. In accordance with APB 25, of the 800,000 options granted in 1997, the Company recorded $161,000 of compensation expense. The options were granted at exercise prices ranging from $0.05 per share to $0.62 per share (weighted-average exercise price of $0.23 per share). In accordance with the terms of the related option agreements, all options are fully vested at June 30, 1997 and are exercisable for a period of two years. Pro forma information regarding net loss and net loss per share is required by Statement 123, and has been determined as if the Company has accounted for its employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares under the fair value method of that statement. The fair value of these options or employee stock purchase rights was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 1998 and 1997, respectively; risk-free interest rates of 6.0%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of 75% and a weighted average life of the options of 2.0 years. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require. the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. F-21 53 American Film Technologies, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2000 Post-Petition Employee Stock Grants As inducement and compensation to certain key employees, (who were first put on reduced work and compensation schedules and later put on administrative leave), the Company agreed to issue common stock as compensation to discourage these key employees from seeking other employment. The agreement which became effective with the approval of the Plan, called for an initial grant of 10,000 shares per employee, plus an additional 2,000 shares per employee per week up to a maximum of 36 weeks. These shares vested immediately and will be issued only if the employee is asked to return to the Company and does so. If the employee is not asked to return to the Company, the shares will be subsequently issued to the employee. As of June 30, 2000, 742,000 shares have been set aside, of which 164,000 of these shares were issued as of the Effective Date of the Plan. F-22

AMERICAN FILM TECHNOLOGIES INC /DE/ 10-K