UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period ~~____________~~ to ~~____________~~ .

Commission file number 000-29513

INSILICON CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 77-0526155 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Delaware		77-0526155
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

411 East Plumeria Drive, San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(408) 894-1900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X x NO ¨

As of ~~January~~July 31, 2002 there were 1415,~~869~~204,~~540~~516, outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value.

INSILICON CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as ofJune 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for theThree and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for theNine Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of ~~Financial~~FinancialCondition ~~Condition~~ and Results of Operations	12
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	2631
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
	Exhibits	2732
	Reports on Form 8-K	2732

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INSILICON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	December 31, 2001			September 30, 2001
	June 30, 2002			September 30, 2001
	(unaudited)
Assets		(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1227,~~903~~873		$	32,040
Short term investments		15,727			—
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $231 and $434 at June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001		3,201			2,606
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $635 and $434 at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001		3,070			2,606
Other current assets		2,392			2,367
Other current assets		2,212			2,367
Total current assets		33,466			37,013
Total current assets		33,912			37,013
Property and equipment, net		876			1,405
Property and equipment, net		901			1,405
Computer software costs, net		4,476			6,912
Computer software costs, net		5,771			6,912
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		5,549			6,879
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		6,003			6,879
Other assets		51			68
Other assets		66			68
Total assets	$	44,418		$	52,277
Total assets	$	46,653		$	52,277
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~187~~298		$	658
Payroll and related liabilities		~~1,489~~802			1,791
Payable to Phoenix Technologies Ltd.		~~795~~1,986			1,143
Deferred revenue		23,~~814~~113			3,124
Purchase consideration payable		~~828~~—			1,226
Other accrued liabilities		1,~~799~~762			1,764
Total current liabilities		7,~~912~~961			9,706
Deferred income taxes		513			513
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 15,000 shares authorized, none outstanding		—			—
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 15,000 shares authorized,none outstanding		—			—
Exchangeable preferred stock, par value $0.001; unlimited shares authorized;539 and 618 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001		1			1
Exchangeable preferred stock, par value $0.001; unlimited shares authorized; 687 and 618 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001		1			1
Common stock, par value $0.001; 100,000 shares authorized, 14,655 and 14,404 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001		15			14
Common stock, par value $0.001; 100,000 shares authorized, 15,197 and 14,404 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001		15			14
Additional paid-in capital		8687,~~162~~666			85,914
Deferred stock-based compensation		(~~503~~317	)		(547	)
Accumulated deficit		(4751,~~480~~370	)		(43,338	)
Accumulated translation adjustment		33			14
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(51	)		14
Total stockholders’ equity		3835,~~228~~944			42,058
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4644,~~653~~418		$	52,277

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

INSILICON CORPORATION

CONDENSED ~~CO NSOLIDATED~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2001			2000
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Revenue:
License fees	$	3,~~251~~350		$	4,~~820~~130		$	10,169		$	12,790
Services		1,~~483~~310			1,~~208~~890			4,451			4,525
Total revenue (1)		4,~~734~~660			6,~~028~~020			14,620			17,315
Cost of revenue:
License fees		~~536~~647			~~246~~564			1,870			1,102
Services		5535			~~123~~81			166			274
Amortization of purchased technology		322			~~314~~322			966			958
Restructuring-related write-down of purchased technology		847			—
Restructuring-related write-down and impairment of purchased technology		325			—			1,172			—
Total cost of revenue		1,~~760~~329			~~683~~967			4,174			2,334
Gross margin		23,~~974~~331			5,~~345~~053			10,446			14,981
Operating expenses:
Research and development		21,~~214~~974			2,~~182~~991			5,962			8,354
Sales and marketing		1,~~889~~997			2,~~325~~353			5,799			7,104
General and administrative		1,~~114~~150			~~847~~1,444			3,409			3,783
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets		561			584
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets		594			1,106			1,757			2,768
Stock-based compensation		~~169~~53			~~143~~337			346			661
Restructuring charge		~~1,217~~—			—			1,217			—
Total operating expenses		75,~~164~~768			68,~~081~~231			18,490			22,670
Loss from operations		(42,~~190~~437	)		(~~736~~3,178	)		(8,044	)		(7,689	)
Interest and other income, net		~~218~~89			~~536~~419			440			1,426
Loss before income taxes		(3,972	)		(200	)
Loss on write-off of investment		—			(500	)		—			(500	)
Income tax expense		170			—
Loss before income taxes		(2,348	)		(3,259	)		(7,604	)		(6,763	)
Net loss	$	(4,142	)	$	(200	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		147			(968	)		428			(1,872	)
Net loss per share:
Net loss	$	(2,495	)	$	(2,291	)	$	(8,032	)	$	(4,891	)
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.01	)
Net loss per share:
Shares used in per share calculation
Basic and diluted	($	0.16	)	($	0.15	)	($	0.52	)	($	0.33	)
Basic and Diluted		15,083			14,262
Shares used in per share calculation:
(1) Includes related party revenue from Phoenix Technologies Ltd.	$	221		$	773
Basic and diluted		15,768			14,944			15,467			14,688
(1) Includes related party revenue from Phoenix Technologies Ltd.	$	77		$	979		$	329		$	1,931

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

INSILICON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2001			2000
	2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(48,~~142~~032	)	$	(~~200~~4,891	)
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,~~147~~018			14,~~074~~317
Stock-based compensation		~~169~~346			~~143~~661
Restructuring and related charges		1,510			—
Write-off of long term investment		—			500
Deferred income taxes		—			(914	)
Restructuring and related impairment charges		1,835			—
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from Xentec acquisition:
Accounts receivable		(~~464~~595	)		~~(314~~2,715	)
Receivable from (payable to) Phoenix Technologies Ltd.		(348	)		696
Payable to Phoenix Technologies Ltd.		843			795
Other assets		~~157~~(8	)		(~~671~~1,017	)
Accounts payable		(~~471~~360	)		(~~625~~1,418	)
Payroll and related liabilities		(~~440~~627	)		(~~878~~864	)
Deferred revenue		(~~310~~11	)		~~(233~~424	)
Other accrued liabilities		(~~350~~1,167	)		27(1,438	)
Total adjustments		~~600~~4,274			~~(781~~3,761	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(3,542	)		(981	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(3,758	)		(1,130	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments		(15,727	)		—
Purchases of property and equipment		(225	)		(836	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(17	)		(162	)
Additions to computer software costs		(593	)		(1,406	)
Additions to computer software costs		(119	)		(700	)
Purchase of long-term investment		—			(500	)
Acquisition of Xentec, Inc.		—			(2,973	)
Acquisition of Xentec, Inc		—			(3,432	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~15,863~~818	)		(46,~~335~~174	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock purchases under stock option and stock purchase plans		~~249~~473			~~445~~819
Net cash provided by financing activities		~~249~~473			~~445~~819
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		19(64	)		(2370	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(194,~~137~~167	)		(46,~~894~~555	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		32,040			38,181
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1227,~~903~~873		$	3331,~~287~~626
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Issuance of stock options, common and exchangeable preferred stock in connection with the acquisition of Xentec	$	—		$	8,167
Issuance of common stock, exchangeable preferred stock and stock options in connection with the acquisition of Xentec	$	1,289		$	8,167
Deferred stock compensation cost in connection with the acquisition of Xentec	$	—		$	(380	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

inSilicon Corporation (“inSilicon” or the “Company”) provides communications semiconductor technology, or SIP, that is used by semiconductor and systems companies to design complex semiconductors called systems-on-a-chip, or SOCs, which are critical components of a wide variety of electronic products. The Company provides cores, related silicon subsystems and firmware to customers that use its technologies in digital devices ranging from network routers to handheld computers.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of inSilicon Corporation and its subsidiaries have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to summarize fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The operating results for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002 or for any other future period.

The Company was incorporated on November 1, 1999. Prior to that date, the Company was operated as a division of Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (“Phoenix”). As of November 30, 1999, the assets, liabilities and operations of the Company were contributed by Phoenix to inSilicon in exchange for 10.4 million shares of inSilicon’s Series A preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. The Company completed an initial public offering in March of 2000, which generated net proceeds of $37.0 million. At that time, all shares of Series A Preferred Stock converted on a one-to-one basis into shares of common stock. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, Phoenix owned 10.4,450,010 ~~million~~ shares of the Company’s common stock (6865.48% of our outstanding common and exchangeable preferred stock ). The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include certain costs and expenses incurred by Phoenix and allocated to the Company based upon certain pro rata metrics. See Note 6.

Revenue Recognition. The Company’s revenue is derived from license and re-use fees, royalties, engineering service fees and maintenance and support service ~~fees~~ fees generated primarily from systems and semiconductor companies. Revenue from software license and re-use fees is generally recognized when a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed, the software product has been shipped, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection of the receivable is considered probable. Royalties are recognized in the quarter in which the royalty payment is either received from the customer or may be reasonably estimated. Engineering services revenue is generally recognized on a time-and-materials basis or when contractual milestones are met. Maintenance revenue, which relates principally to maintenance and support contracts, is generally recognized ratably over the contract period, which is typically one year. Deferred revenue consists primarily of billings under maintenance contracts in advance of revenue recognition, as well as software license fees that are

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

~~under maintenance contracts in advance of revenue recognition, as well as software license fees that are~~ expected to be recorded as revenue when all uncertainties surrounding the acceptance of the product have been removed.

When a license agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date, the Company recognizes license revenues based upon the residual method after all elements other than maintenance and engineering services have been delivered. The Company uses vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for the services and the maintenance to account for the arrangement using the residual method, regardless of any separate prices stated within the contract for each element. The Company recognizes maintenance revenues over the term of the maintenance contract and engineering services as time and materials are incurred as vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for maintenance and engineering services ~~exist~~exists.

The Company also enters into a limited number of contracts for services. Such contracts are generally based upon time and material basis, however, revenues from certain fixed-price contracts are recognized on the percentage of completion basis in accordance with AICPA SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts,” which involves the use of estimates. The amount of consulting contracts recognized on a percentage of completion basis has not been material to date. ~~The~~ ~~Company generally does not enter into consulting arrangements concurrent with license arrangements.~~

In accordance with paragraph 10 of Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” vendor specific objective evidence of fair value of maintenance is determined by reference to the price the customer will be required to pay when it is sold separately (that is, the renewal rate). Generally, each license agreement offers additional maintenance renewal periods at a stated price.

Allowances for estimated returns and customer credits are recorded in the same period as the related revenue.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make ~~estimates~~ estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, percentage-of-completion for fixed-price contracts, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, sales returns, valuation and realizability of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation and realizability of capitalized computer software costs, useful lives for intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and restructuring and related costs. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The operating results for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, or for any other future period.

Income taxes. Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The Company ~~records~~has not recorded a ~~provision~~tax benefit for ~~estimated~~the ~~sales~~carryforward ~~returns against~~of ~~revenues~~its’ inoperating ~~the~~loss ~~same~~because ~~period~~objective ~~that~~evidence ~~the~~was ~~related~~not ~~revenues~~available ~~are~~as ~~recorded.~~of AtJune ~~December 31~~30, ~~2001~~2002 ~~and~~or September 30, 2001, to overcome uncertainty regarding the ~~allowance~~realizability ~~for~~of ~~sales~~the ~~returns~~deferred ~~was~~tax ~~$460~~assets. Accordingly,~~000~~ ~~and~~a ~~$319,000,~~full ~~respectively~~valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax assets. ~~This~~Income ~~estimate~~tax expense recorded in fiscal year 2002 is ~~based~~attributable onto ~~historical~~foreign ~~sales~~withholding ~~returns~~tax ~~and~~payments ~~other factors~~related to revenue generated in certain foreign countries in which the Company transacts business. ~~Actual~~These payments ~~results~~qualify ~~could~~for ~~differ~~a ~~from~~foreign ~~these~~tax ~~estimates~~credit, but the deferred tax asset related to such tax credits was also fully reserved as of June 30, 2002.

~~The~~Reclassifications. Certain ~~Company~~amounts ~~records a provision for doubtful accounts against general and administrative expenses~~ in the ~~same~~prior ~~period~~year’s ~~that~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~related~~have ~~revenues~~been ~~are~~reclassified ~~recorded.~~to Atconform ~~December~~to ~~31, 2001 and September 30, 2001,~~ the ~~allowance~~current ~~for~~year ~~doubtful accounts was $175,000 and $115,000, respectively~~presentation. This estimate is based on historical bad debt write-offs, specific identification of probable bad debts based on collection efforts, and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

AtNet ~~December~~Loss ~~31,~~Per ~~2001~~Share. Basic and ~~September~~diluted net ~~30,~~loss ~~2001,~~per ~~the~~share ~~Company~~are ~~had~~calculated ~~net~~by ~~goodwill~~dividing ~~and~~the ~~other~~net ~~intangible~~loss ~~assets~~by ofthe ~~$6.0~~weighted ~~million~~average ~~and~~number ~~$6.9~~of ~~million,~~common ~~respectively,~~ and ~~capitalized~~exchangeable ~~computer~~preferred ~~software~~shares ~~costs~~outstanding ofduring $5the period.8 ~~million~~Options and ~~$6.9 million,~~warrants ~~respectively.~~could Inpotentially ~~assessing~~dilute ~~the~~basic ~~recoverability~~earnings ofper ~~goodwill,~~share ~~other~~in ~~intangible assets~~the future, ~~and~~but ~~capitalized~~were ~~computer~~excluded ~~software~~from ~~costs,~~ the ~~Company~~calculation ~~makes~~of ~~assumptions~~diluted ~~regarding~~net ~~estimated~~loss ~~future~~per ~~cash~~share ~~flows~~as ~~and~~their ~~other~~effect ~~factors~~is toantidilutive ~~determine~~for the ~~fair~~periods ~~value of~~presented. ~~the~~Had ~~respective~~inSilicon ~~assets.~~been ~~Cash~~profitable ~~flow~~in ~~calculations~~the ~~are~~three ~~based~~months onended ~~management’s~~June ~~best estimates~~30, ~~using~~2002 ~~appropriate~~and ~~assumptions.~~2001, Ifdiluted ~~these~~earnings ~~estimates~~per orshare ~~their~~would have ~~related~~been ~~assumptions~~impacted ~~change~~by in the ~~future,~~calculated ~~the~~effect ~~Company~~using ~~may~~the betreasury ~~required~~method toof ~~record~~outstanding ~~impairment charges~~stock ~~for~~options ~~these~~of ~~assets.~~245,000 ~~During~~and ~~the~~122,000, ~~fourth~~respectively, ~~quarter~~and ~~ended~~warrants ~~September~~of 3029,000 ~~2001~~and 50,000, ~~the~~respectively. ~~Company~~Had ~~recorded~~inSilicon ~~impairment~~been ~~charges~~profitable in the ~~amount~~nine ofmonths ~~$9.4~~ended ~~million~~June in30, 2002 ~~connection~~and ~~with~~2001, ~~assets~~diluted ~~recorded~~earnings ~~through~~per ~~the~~share ~~acquisition~~would ofhave ~~Xentec~~been inimpacted ~~December~~by ~~2000.~~the ~~Also,~~calculated aseffect ~~a result~~using of the ~~restructuring~~treasury ~~program~~method ~~instituted~~of inoutstanding ~~the~~stock ~~first~~options ~~quarter~~ of ~~fiscal 2002~~105,000 ~~the~~and ~~Company~~267,000, ~~recorded~~respectively, anand ~~impairment~~warrants ~~charge~~ of ~~$0.8~~43,000 ~~million~~and ~~for~~50,000, ~~capitalized computer software development costs (see Note 3~~respectively.).

~~Income~~Recently-issued ~~taxes~~accounting pronouncements. ~~Income~~ In ~~taxes~~July ~~are~~2001, ~~accounted~~the ~~for~~FASB inissued ~~accordance with~~ SFAS No. ~~109~~142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“~~Accounting~~SFAS 142”), which establishes new standards for ~~Income~~goodwill ~~Taxes~~and other intangible assets.” ~~The Company~~Under ~~has~~the ~~not~~new ~~recorded~~rules, agoodwill ~~tax~~and ~~benefit~~indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for ~~the~~impairment. ~~carryforward~~Separable ofintangible ~~its’~~assets ~~operating~~that ~~loss~~have ~~because~~a ~~objective~~definite ~~evidence~~life ~~was~~will ~~not~~continue ~~available~~to asbe amortized over their useful lives. The amortization provisions of ~~December~~SFAS ~~31,~~142 ~~2001~~apply orto ~~September~~goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to ~~overcome~~goodwill ~~uncertainty~~and ~~regarding~~intangible ~~the~~assets ~~realizability~~acquired ofprior ~~the~~to ~~deferred tax~~June ~~assets.~~30, ~~Accordingly~~2001, aSFAS ~~full~~142 ~~valuation~~is ~~allowance~~effective ~~was~~for ~~recorded~~fiscal ~~against~~years ~~the~~beginning ~~net~~after ~~deferred~~December ~~tax~~15, ~~assets~~2001. ~~Income~~The ~~tax~~Company ~~expense~~will ~~recorded~~adopt inSFAS 142 on October 1, 2002 when its new fiscal year begins. ~~2002~~Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company is ~~attributable~~required to ~~foreign~~make ~~withholding~~any ~~tax~~necessary ~~payments~~reclassifications ~~related~~in order to ~~revenue~~comply ~~generated~~with the new criteria in ~~certain~~SFAS ~~foreign~~142 for recognition of intangible assets, and to then evaluate goodwill and intangible assets for ~~countries~~impairment in ~~which~~accordance with the ~~Company~~new ~~transacts~~rules ~~business~~of SFAS 142. ~~These~~Any ~~payments~~impairment ~~qualify~~charge ~~for~~recognized upon adoption of SFAS 142 will be recorded in the statement of operations as a ~~foreign~~cumulative ~~tax~~effect ~~credit~~of a change in accounting principle. Since any potential impairment charge upon adoption is dependent on the fair value of the Company on the date of adoption, ~~but~~the amount of a charge, if any, will not be known until the ~~deferred~~date ~~tax~~of ~~asset~~adoption. ~~related~~At toJune ~~such~~30, ~~tax~~2002, ~~credits~~the Company had $4.9 million of goodwill, and other intangible assets totaling $0.7 million. Amortization expense for goodwill and other intangible assets was ~~also~~$594,000 ~~fully~~and ~~reserved~~$1,757,000 asduring ofthe ~~December~~three 31and nine months ended June 30, ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

~~Reclassifications~~On October 3, 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~Certain~~ ~~amounts~~144, in“Accounting for the ~~prior~~Impairment ~~year’s~~or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), that is applicable to financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. These new rules on asset impairment supersede FASB Statement 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” and portions of APB Opinion 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations.” SFAS 144 provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of and significantly changes the criteria that would have ~~been~~to ~~reclassified~~be met to ~~conform~~classify an asset as held-for-sale. Classification as held-for-sale is an important distinction since such assets are not depreciated and are stated at the lower of fair value and carrying amount. SFAS 144 also requires expected future operating losses from discontinued operations to be displayed in the ~~current~~period(s) ~~year~~in which the losses are incurred, rather than as of the measurement date as presently required. The Company expects to adopt SFAS 144 on October 1, 2002 ~~presentation~~when its new fiscal year begins, and does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

~~Net~~NOTE ~~Loss Per Share~~3. ~~Basic~~ RESTRUCTURING ~~and~~AND ~~diluted~~ASSET ~~net~~IMPAIRMENT ~~loss~~CHARGES per share are calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common and exchangeable preferred shares outstanding during the period. Options and warrants could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share as their effect is antidilutive for the periods presented. Had inSilicon been profitable in the three months ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, diluted earnings per share would have been impacted by the calculated effect using the treasury method of outstanding stock options of 54,000 and 403,000 respectively and warrants of 50,000 and 50,000, respectively.

~~Recently-issued accounting pronouncements.~~ In ~~July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), which establishes new standards for goodwill and other~~ intangible assets. Under the new rules, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment. Separable intangible assets that have a definite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The amortization provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to June 30, 2001, SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December ~~15,~~ 2001~~. The Company will adopt SFAS 142 on October 1~~, ~~2002~~in ~~when~~an ~~its~~effort ~~new fiscal year begins. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company is required~~ to ~~make~~align ~~any~~our ~~necessary~~operating ~~reclassifications~~expenses ~~in order to comply~~ with the ~~new criteria~~anticipated inlevel ~~SFAS 142 for recognition~~ of ~~intangible~~future ~~assets~~revenue, ~~and~~we toannounced ~~then~~and ~~evaluate~~implemented ~~goodwill~~a ~~and~~workforce ~~intangible~~reduction ~~assets~~plan ~~for~~which ~~impairment~~resulted in ~~accordance with~~ the ~~new~~elimination ~~rules~~ of ~~SFAS~~approximately ~~142.~~20% ~~Any impairment charge recognized upon adoption~~ of ~~SFAS~~our ~~142~~workforce. ~~will~~As ~~be recorded in the statement of operations as~~ a ~~cumulative~~result ~~effect~~ of this arestructuring, ~~change~~charges intotaling ~~accounting principle~~$2.1 ~~Since~~million ~~any~~were ~~potential~~recorded ~~impairment~~during ~~charge upon adoption is dependent on~~ the ~~fair~~first ~~value~~quarter of ~~the~~fiscal ~~Company~~2002. onIn ~~the~~connection ~~date~~with ~~of adoption,~~ the ~~amount~~elimination of a27 ~~charge~~positions, ifwe ~~any, will~~recorded ~~not~~approximately be$282,000 ~~known until the date~~ of ~~adoption.~~severance ~~At December 31, 2001, the Company had $5~~costs.1 ~~million~~All of ~~goodwill,~~these ~~and~~terminations ~~other intangible assets totaling $0.9 million. Amortization expense for goodwill and other intangible assets was $561,000 during the~~were ~~three months ended December 31, 2001.~~

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

Oncompleted ~~October~~by 3,December ~~2001~~31, ~~the FASB issued SFAS No~~2001. ~~144,~~In ~~“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets~~addition,” ~~that~~in ~~is applicable to financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after~~ December ~~15,~~ 2001. ~~These~~and ~~new~~early ~~rules~~January on2002 ~~asset~~we vacated ~~impairment~~leased ~~supersede~~office ~~FASB~~facilities ~~Statement~~at ~~121~~two locations, ~~“Accounting~~which ~~for~~resulted ~~the~~in ~~Impairment~~a charge of ~~Long-Lived~~approximately ~~Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of~~$249,”000, ~~and~~consisting ~~portions~~primarily of ~~APB~~minimum ~~Opinion~~rental ~~30,~~payments ~~“Reporting~~through the ~~Results~~termination of ~~Operations.”~~ ~~This~~the ~~Standard~~leases ~~provides~~in amid ~~single~~calendar ~~accounting~~year ~~model~~2002. ~~for~~We ~~long-lived~~recognized ~~assets~~an toimpairment loss ~~be disposed~~ of ~~and~~$371,000 ~~significantly~~related ~~changes the criteria that would have~~ to befixed ~~met~~assets toused ~~classify~~in anthe ~~asset~~development asof ~~held-for-sale.~~our ~~Classification~~products, asprimarily ~~held-for-sale~~at isour ~~an important~~Japan ~~distinction~~research ~~since such assets are not depreciated~~ and ~~are~~development ~~stated~~office atwhich ~~the~~handled ~~lower~~our ofBluetooth ~~fair~~product ~~value~~development, and ~~carrying~~we ~~amount. This Standard~~ also ~~requires~~recognized ~~expected~~an ~~future~~impairment ~~operating~~loss ~~losses~~of ~~from~~$315,000 ~~discontinued~~related to ~~operations~~an toassembled beworkforce ~~displayed~~intangible inasset ~~the~~and ~~period(s)~~acquisition in costs which ~~the~~were ~~losses~~recorded ~~are~~in ~~incurred,~~connection ~~rather~~with ~~than~~our asacquisition of the ~~measurement~~wireless ~~date~~design asservices ~~presently~~group ~~required.~~of ~~The~~HD ~~Company~~Lab ~~will~~in ~~adopt~~December ~~SFAS~~2000. ~~144~~The onemployees ~~October 1, 2002 when its new fiscal year begins, and does not expect the adoption~~ to ~~have~~which athis ~~material~~intangible ~~effect~~asset onrelated ~~the~~were ~~Company’s~~terminated ~~operating~~in ~~results~~connection orwith ~~financial~~the ~~condition~~restructuring.

~~NOTE~~Because 3we decided to focus our efforts in fiscal 2002 on our core communication products, we terminated the development of our Bluetooth product line, and the related purchased and developed computer software costs with a carrying value of $1. ~~RESTRUCTURING~~7 ~~AND~~million ~~ASSET~~were ~~IMPAIRMENT~~subject ~~CHARGES~~to impairment review as of December 31, 2001. Our Bluetooth product was in the final stages of completion in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, and was scheduled for general release during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. In accordance with the requirements of SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” the software was written-down to estimated net realizable value. This product will be sold on an “as is” basis, without future development, product support, or maintenance. Future revenue was estimated based on expressed interest in the “as is” product from our existing customers, as well as a detailed market analysis of prospective customers. An impairment loss of $847,000 has been recorded in cost of revenue in the consolidated statement of operations in the quarter ended December 31, 2001, based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over estimated future revenue, net of estimated selling costs. Selling costs were estimated based upon historical experience, planned available resources, incentives, and anticipated time required to sell. We made assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the net realizable value. Cash flow calculations were based on management’s best estimates, using appropriate assumptions regarding projections of future product revenue and related expenses, among other factors. Actual revenue from this product has been less than prior estimates, and the product was re-evaluated for impairment and written-down to its estimated net realizable value of $50,000 as of June 30, 2002 resulting in an impairment loss charged to cost of goods sold of $325,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2002. The estimated net realizable value at June 30, 2002 is based upon updated estimates of future revenue during the six months ended December 31, 2002, net of estimated selling costs considering the actual experience. This asset will be reviewed for realizability on a quarterly basis. If these estimates or the facts underlying the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges for the software. The remaining carrying value of the software will be amortized on the greater of a straight-line basis over a period of six months (the estimated remaining life of the product), or based on the ratio of current revenue to total anticipated revenue.

InOf ~~December 2001, in an effort to align our operating expenses with~~ the ~~anticipated~~total ~~level~~restructuring ofcharge ~~future revenue, we announced and implemented a workforce reduction plan which resulted in the elimination~~ of approximately ~~20% of our workforce. As a result of this restructuring, charges totaling~~ $2.1 million ~~were~~ recorded ~~during~~in the first quarter of fiscal 2002., In$847,000 ~~connection~~related ~~with~~to ~~the~~product ~~elimination~~impairment ofhas 27been ~~positions,~~included wein ~~recorded~~cost ~~approximately~~of revenue, and $~~282~~1,217,000 ofis ~~severance~~included ~~costs.~~in ~~All~~operating ofexpenses. ~~these~~Of ~~terminations~~the ~~were~~total ~~completed~~operating byexpense ~~December~~of 31$1,217,000, ~~2001. In addition~~$929,000 inis ~~December~~related ~~2001~~to research and ~~early~~development ~~January~~activities, ~~2002~~$276,000 weis ~~vacated~~related ~~leased~~to ~~office~~sales ~~facilities~~and ~~at two~~marketing ~~locations~~expense, ~~which~~and ~~resulted~~$12,000 inis arelated ~~charge~~to ofgeneral ~~approximately~~and administrative expense. Approximately $~~249~~517,000, ~~consisting primarily~~ of ~~minimum~~restructuring ~~rental~~expenses ~~payments~~have ~~through~~been ~~the~~paid ~~termination~~during of the ~~leases~~nine inmonths ~~mid~~ended ~~calendar~~June ~~year~~30, 2002. WeDuring ~~recognized~~the anquarter ~~impairment~~ended ~~loss~~June of30, ~~$371~~2002,~~000~~ ~~related to fixed assets used in~~ the ~~development~~Company ofterminated ~~our~~a ~~products,~~lease prior ~~primarily~~to atits’ ~~our~~expiration ~~Japan~~in ~~research~~the ~~and~~fourth ~~development~~quarter ~~office~~of ~~which~~fiscal ~~handled our Bluetooth product development~~2002, and werecorded ~~also~~a ~~recognized an impairment loss of~~ $~~315~~35,000 ~~related~~adjustment to anthe ~~assembled~~restructuring ~~workforce~~reserve. ~~intangible~~All ~~asset and~~restructuring ~~acquisition~~liabilities ~~costs~~have ~~which~~been ~~were~~paid, ~~recorded~~and inthere ~~connection~~is ~~with~~no ~~our~~remaining ~~acquisition~~accrued ofliability ~~the~~related ~~wireless design services group of HD Lab in December 2000. The employees~~ to ~~which~~ this restructuring ~~intangible~~as ~~asset~~of ~~related~~June ~~were~~30, ~~terminated in connection with the restructuring~~2002.

Because our efforts in fiscal 2002 will focus on our core communication products, we terminated the development of our Bluetooth product line, and the related purchased and developed computer software costs with a carrying value of $1.7 million were subject to impairment review as of December 31, 2001. Our Bluetooth product was in the final stages of completion in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, and was scheduled for general release during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. In accordance with the requirements of SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” the software was written-down to estimated net realizable value. This product will be sold on an “as is” basis, without future development, product support, or maintenance. Future revenue was estimated based on expressed interest in the “as is” product from our existing customers, as well as a detailed market analysis of prospective customers. An impairment loss of $847,000 has been recorded in cost of revenue in the consolidated statement of operations, based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over estimated future revenue, net of estimated selling costs. Selling costs were estimated based upon historical experience, planned available resources, incentives, and anticipated time required to sell. The remaining carrying value of the software will be amortized on the greater of a straight-line basis over a period of 12 months (the estimated remaining life of the product), or based on the ratio of current revenue to total anticipated revenue. This asset will be reviewed for realizability on a quarterly basis, and additional charges may be recorded in the future in the event that actual revenue for this product is less than amounts used to estimate the net realizable value of the product as of December 31, 2001.

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

Of the total restructuring charge of approximately $2.1 million recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, $847,000 has been included in cost of revenue, and $1,217,000 is included in operating expenses. Of the total operating expense of $1,217,000, $929,000 is related to research and development activities, $276,000 is related to sales and marketing expense, and $12,000 is related to general and administrative expense. Approximately $250,000 of the restructuring charge was paid in the first quarter, and $302,000 of the total charge is unpaid as of December 31, 2001. Of the unpaid amount, $290,000 is included in other accrued expenses, with the balance of $12,000 included in payroll and related liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The $302,000 will be paid through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.

NOTE 4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (“SFAS 130”), “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which requires that all items that are required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income or losses (revenue, expenses, gains and losses) be included in comprehensive income or loss. Total comprehensive losses, which include currency translation adjustments, were not materially different from net losses incurred for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001.

NOTE 5. GEOGRAPHIC REPORTING

The Company operates in one reportable industry segment, the development and sale of semiconductor intellectual property. The Company makes key decisions and evaluates performance of the Company based on this single industry segment.

Revenue by geographic region for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2001		2000
	2002		2001		2002		2001
North America	$	2,~~249~~510	$	3,~~386~~210	$	8,368	$	9,542
Asia		1,~~845~~445		12,~~976~~198		4,452		4,823
Europe		~~640~~705		~~666~~612		1,800		2,950
Total revenue	$	4,~~734~~660	$	6,~~028~~020	$	14,620	$	17,315

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has entered into a Technology Distributor Agreement and a Services and Cost Sharing Agreement with Phoenix. Under the terms of the Technology Distributor Agreement, Phoenix is licensed to distribute certain of the Company’s products in Asia and Phoenix pays the Company a sublicense fee related to such distribution. Under the terms of the Services and Cost Sharing Agreement, Phoenix provides to the Company certain administrative services, such as data processing, telecommunications and information technology support, accounting, financial management, tax preparation and facilities management. These administrative costs are generally allocated to the Company based upon the aggregate cost of the services to Phoenix and the Company multiplied by the pro rata number of the Company’s employees. The combined impact of all related party transactions with Phoenix on the consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):

INSILICON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

	December 31,
	2001		2000
Revenue	$	221	$	773
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		84		123
Research and development		203		193
Sales and marketing		142		155
General and administrative		406		273
Total costs and expenses	$	835	$	744

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~NOTE~~The 7Company has entered into a Technology Distributor Agreement and a Services and Cost Sharing Agreement with Phoenix. ~~SUBSEQUENT~~ ~~EVENT~~Under the terms of the Technology Distributor Agreement, Phoenix was licensed to distribute certain of the Company’s products in Asia, and Phoenix paid the Company a sublicense fee related to such distribution. In connection with Phoenix’s ceasing to distribute certain of our products in Asia under this agreement, in February 2002 we entered into an agreement with a third-party distributor to service those areas.

OnUnder ~~February~~the 5,terms ~~2002,~~of the ~~Company~~Services ~~announced~~and ~~the~~Cost ~~appointment~~Sharing ofAgreement, ~~Barry~~Phoenix A.provides ~~Hoberman~~ to ~~interim~~the ~~Chief~~Company ~~Executive~~certain ~~Officer.~~administrative ~~Mr.~~services, ~~Hoberman~~such ~~will~~as ~~succeed~~data ~~Wayne~~processing, C.telecommunications and ~~Cantwell,~~information ~~who~~technology ~~will~~support, beaccounting, ~~leaving~~financial ~~the~~management, ~~Company~~tax topreparation ~~pursue~~and ~~other~~facilities ~~opportunities~~management. InThese ~~accordance~~administrative ~~with~~costs ~~his~~are ~~employment~~generally ~~agreement,~~allocated ~~Mr. Cantwell will continue~~ to ~~receive~~the ~~his~~Company ~~base~~based ~~salary~~upon ~~for~~the aaggregate ~~period~~cost of ~~twelve~~the ~~months,~~services ~~and~~to hePhoenix ~~will~~and bethe ~~paid~~Company multiplied by the pro~~-rated~~ ~~portion~~rata number of ~~his~~ ~~targeted~~the ~~bonus~~Company’s ~~for fiscal year 2002~~employees. ~~Health~~Generally, ~~insurance~~either ~~premiums~~party ~~will~~can beterminate ~~paid for by~~ the ~~Company~~Services ~~for~~and aCost ~~period~~Sharing upAgreement toon 30 ~~months~~days’ written notice. HeThe ~~will~~Services ~~also~~and ~~receive~~Cost-Sharing ~~accelerated~~Agreement ~~vesting~~has onbeen ~~approximately~~renewed ~~100,000~~on ~~previously~~a month-~~issued~~to-month ~~options,~~basis ~~which~~for ~~will~~all ~~remain exercisable~~services upand tocosts, 15and ~~months~~we ~~following~~anticipate the ~~termination~~further extension of ~~his~~the ~~employment.~~agreement ~~The~~through ~~Company~~fiscal ~~will~~year ~~record~~2002. aThe ~~charge~~combined toimpact ~~earnings~~of all related toparty ~~these~~transactions ~~matters~~with inPhoenix on the ~~second~~consolidated ~~quarter~~statements of ~~fiscal~~operations ~~2002.~~is summarized below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2002		2001		2002		2001
Revenue	$	77	$	979	$	329	$	1,931

Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		2		43		88		169
Research and development		161		263		556		717
Sales and marketing		128		146		410		457
General and administrative		432		438		1,232		1,057

Total costs and expenses	$	723	$	890	$	2,286	$	2,400

During the nine months ended June 30, 2002, the Company recognized $92,000 of revenue from a corporation whose Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is a director of the Company.

NOTE 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 23, 2002 the Company announced that a definitive agreement had been signed whereby Synopsys, Inc. has agreed to acquire all outstanding shares of the Company for approximately $64 million in proceeds. The transaction will be effected by means of a cash tender offer at a purchase price of $4.05 a share, followed by a back-end merger in order to purchase any untendered shares. Synopsys, Inc. will also assume certain of the Company’s stock options in the transaction. The offer is subject to certain conditions, including the tender of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company, receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary conditions.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report on Form 10-Q, including without limitation this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning expected price erosion, plans to make acquisitions, dispositions or strategic investments, expectation of increased sales to original equipment manufacturers, and plans to improve and enhance existing products and develop new products.

The forward-looking statements of the Company are subject to risks and uncertainties. Some of the factors that could cause future results to materially differ from our recent results or those projected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, significant increases or decreases in demand for our products, increased competition, lower prices and margins, failure to successfully develop and market new products and technologies, competitor introductions of superior products, continued industry consolidation, increased costs resulting from the Company’s separation from Phoenix, instability and currency fluctuations in international markets, product defects, failure to secure intellectual property rights, results of litigation, failure to integrate acquisitions and failure to retain and recruit key employees.

Company Overview

inSilicon Corporation (“inSilicon” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of communications technology that is used by semiconductor and systems companies to design complex semiconductors called systems-on-a-chip that are critical components of a wide variety of electronic products. We provide cores, related silicon subsystems and firmware to over 450 customers that use our technologies in hundreds of different digital devices ranging from network routers to handheld computers.

Prior to our incorporation on November 1, 1999, we ~~operated~~ operated as a division of Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (“Phoenix”). As of November 30, 1999, Phoenix transferred certain assets to us substantially in exchange for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and the assumption of certain liabilities. We completed an initial public offering in March of 2000, which generated net proceeds of $37.0 million. At that time, all shares of Series A Preferred Stock converted on a one-to-one basis into shares of common stock. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~ 2002, Phoenix owned 10.4,450,010 ~~million~~ shares of our common stock (6865.48% of our outstanding common and exchangeable preferred stock).

At the time of separation from Phoenix, we entered into a Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement with Phoenix effective as of November 30, 1999. The services have included data processing, telecommunications, information technology support, accounting, financial management, tax preparation, payroll, stockholder and public relations, legal, human resources administration, procurement, real estate management and other administrative functions. The shared costs include the costs of the office space that we occupy at Phoenix’s headquarters and insurance premiums. Our portion of the costs is equal to the aggregate cost of the services for both companies multiplied by a percentage representing the number of our employees to the total number of employees for both companies. The Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement has been renewed on a month-to-month basis for all services and costs, and we anticipate the further extension of the agreement through fiscal year 2002. Generally, either party can terminate on 30 days’ written notice.

We have incurred operating and net losses for nearly all historical periods. These losses have primarily resulted from two factors: research and development and marketing costs incurred in order to generate market share and product development in order to support future revenue growth; and charges for restructurings, merger costs, and amortization of acquired intangible assets. See further discussion included in “Business Risks.”

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~You~~The ~~should not consider our historical financial statements to be representative of the~~ operating results, ~~financial~~for ~~position~~the orthree and ~~cash~~nine ~~flows~~months toended beJune ~~expected~~30, in2002 ~~future~~are ~~periods~~not ornecessarily ~~what~~indicative of the results ofthat ~~operations,~~may ~~financial~~be ~~position~~expected orfor ~~cash~~the ~~flows~~fiscal ~~would~~year ~~have~~ending ~~been~~September ~~had we been a separate~~30, ~~stand-alone~~2002 ~~entity~~or ~~during~~for ~~the~~any ~~periods~~other ~~presented~~future period.

Recent Developments

On July 23, 2002 the Company announced that a definitive agreement had been signed whereby Synopsys, Inc. has agreed to acquire all outstanding shares of the Company for approximately $64 million. The transaction will be effected by means of a cash tender offer at a purchase price of $4.05 a share, followed by a back-end merger in order to purchase any untendered shares. Synopsys, Inc. will also assume certain of the Company’s stock options in the transaction. The offer is subject to certain conditions, including the tender of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company, receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary conditions.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. However, certain of our other accounting policies are particularly important to an understanding of our financial position and results of operations. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies effect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, percentage-of-completion for fixed-price contracts, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, sales returns, valuation and realizability of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation and realizability of capitalized computer software costs, useful lives for intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and restructuring and related costs. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The operating results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, or for any other future period.

We record a provision for estimated sales returns against revenues in the same period that the related revenues are recorded. At June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, the allowance for sales returns was $171,000 and $319,000, respectively. This estimate is based on historical sales returns and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

We record a provision for doubtful accounts against general and administrative expenses in the same period that the related revenues are recorded. At June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $60,000 and $115,000, respectively. This estimate is based on historical bad debt write-offs, specific identification of probable bad debts based on collection efforts, and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2002, we recorded a restructuring reserve in connection with a workforce reduction plan. This reserve was based on estimates pertaining to employee separation costs and the settlement of contractual obligations resulting from our actions. As of June 30, 2002 all payments relating to this reserve have been made.

At June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, we had net goodwill and other intangible assets of $5.5 million and $6.9 million, respectively, and capitalized computer software costs of $4.5 million and $6.9

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

million, respectively. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, other intangible assets, and capitalized computer software costs, we make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. Cash flow calculations are based on management’s best estimates, using appropriate assumptions regarding projections of future product revenue and related expenses, among other factors. If these estimates or the facts underlying the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. During the fourth quarter ended September 30, 2001, we recorded impairment charges in the amount of $9.4 million in connection with assets recorded through the acquisition of Xentec in December 2000. Also, as a result of the workforce reduction plan instituted in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded an impairment charge of $847,000 for capitalized computer software development costs and $315,000 for intangible assets. In addition, in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $325,000 for capitalized computer software development costs.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

The following table includes Consolidated Statements of Operations data as a percentage of total revenue:

	Three months ended December 31,
	Three months ended June 30,				Nine months ended June 30,
	2001		2000
Revenue:	2002		2001		2002		2001
Revenue:
License fees	71.9	%	68.6	%	69.6	%	73.9	%
License fees	68.7	%	80.0	%
Services	28.1		31.4		30.4		26.1
Services	31.3		20.0
Total revenue	100.0		100.0		100.0		100.0
Total revenue	100.0		100.0
Cost of revenue:
Cost of revenue:
License fees	13.9		9.4		12.8		6.4
License fees	11.3		4.1
Services	0.7		1.4		1.1		1.6
Services	1.2		2.0
Amortization of purchased technology	6.9		5.3		6.6		5.5
Amortization of purchased technology	6.8		5.2
Restructuring-related write-down of purchased technology	7.0		—		8.0		—
Restructuring-related write-down of purchased technology	17.9		—
Total cost of revenue	28.5		16.1		28.5		13.5
Total cost of revenue	37.2		11.3
Gross margin	71.5		83.9		71.5		86.5
Gross margin	62.8		88.7
Operating expenses:
Operating expenses:
Research and development	42.4		49.7		40.8		48.3
Research and development	46.8		36.2
Sales and marketing	42.9		39.1		39.7		41.0
Sales and marketing	39.9		38.6
General and administrative	24.7		24.0		23.3		21.8
General and administrative	23.5		14.0
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets	12.7		18.4		12.0		16.0
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets	11.8		9.7
Stock-based compensation	1.1		5.6		2.4		3.8
Stock-based compensation	3.6		2.4
Restructuring charge	—		—		8.3		—
Restructuring charge	25.7		—
Total operating expenses	123.8		136.8		126.5		130.9
Total operating expenses	151.3		100.9
Loss from operations	(52.3	)	(52.9	)	(55.0	)	(44.4	)
Loss from operations	(88.5	)	(12.2	)
Interest and other income, net	1.9		7.0		3.0		8.2
Interest and other income, net	4.6		8.9
Loss on write-off of investment	—		(8.3	)	—		(2.9	)
Loss before income taxes	(8350.94	)	(354.32	)	(52.0	)	(39.1	)
Income tax expense	3.6		—
Income tax expense (benefit)	3.1		(16.1	)	2.9		(10.8	)
Net loss	(8753.5	)%	(338.31	)%	(54.9	)%	(28.3	)%

1315

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue

Revenue for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 was $4.7 million, a decrease of 2123% from ~~$6.0 million for~~ the comparable period of fiscal 2001. In ~~The decline in revenue during~~ the ~~first~~ third quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the ~~comparable~~third ~~period~~quarter of fiscal 2001, ~~was~~the ~~due~~Company ~~primarily~~reported to a ~~decline~~$780,000 decrease in license revenue, asand ~~our~~a ~~business~~$580,000 ~~was~~decrease ~~negatively~~in ~~impacted~~services byrevenue. ~~the~~The ~~cautious~~decline ~~purchasing~~in ~~behavior~~license ofrevenue ~~customers~~is inmainly ~~the~~attributable ~~current~~to ~~economic~~an ~~environment~~$885,000 ~~particularly~~decline in ~~North~~related ~~America.~~party Aslicense ~~compared~~revenue tofrom ~~the~~Phoenix ~~first~~Technologies ~~quarter~~Ltd., ofpartially ~~fiscal~~offset ~~2001~~by an increase of $106,000 in initial license ~~revenue~~fees. inIn ~~the~~connection ~~first~~with ~~quarter~~Phoenix’s ceasing to distribute certain of ~~fiscal~~our ~~2002~~products ~~was~~in ~~impacted~~Asia byunder ~~declines~~the Technology ofDistribution ~~16%~~Agreement, ~~and~~in ~~20%~~February ~~for~~2002 ~~initial~~we ~~license~~entered ~~fees~~into ~~and~~an reagreement with a third-~~use~~party ~~fees,~~distributor ~~respectively~~to service those areas. ~~Royalty fees~~No ~~decreased~~revenue bywas ~~65%~~generated ~~from~~under this new agreement in the ~~first~~second or third quarter of ~~2001~~fiscal 2002, ~~due~~and ~~primarily~~there tocan abe no ~~decline~~assurance ofthat ~~$552,000~~any revenue generated in ~~revenue~~the ~~from~~future ~~Phoenix.~~under ~~Service~~this agreement will be comparable to the level of revenue ~~increased~~earned byunder ~~$275,000,~~our oragreement ~~23%,~~with Phoenix. The decrease in services revenue in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2001~~. This~~ ~~increase~~ is ~~primarily~~ attributable to ana ~~increased~~$447,000 ~~level~~decrease ofin ~~nonrecurring~~maintenance ~~engineering~~and training services, ~~earned~~ in ~~our~~addition ~~North~~to ~~America~~a ~~region~~$133,000 decrease in ~~the~~nonrecurring ~~first~~engineering ~~quarter~~services ofearned ~~fiscal~~in ~~2002~~our North America region.

~~Revenue~~For bythe ~~geographic~~nine ~~region~~months ~~for~~ended June 30, 2002, revenue declined $2.7 million, or 16% from the ~~three~~comparable period of fiscal 2001. During the nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2002 as compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2001, license revenue decreased $2.6 million, or 20%, and ~~2000~~services revenue decreased slightly by $74,000, or 2%. The decline in license revenue is attributable partly to a $1.6 million decrease in related party license revenue from Phoenix, as well as lower levels of initial license fees and re-use fees from customers. We believe license revenue was negatively impacted by the cautious purchasing behavior of our customers, particularly during the first quarter of fiscal 2002 as ~~follows~~compared ~~(dollars~~to inthe ~~thousands):~~first quarter of fiscal 2001.

	Amount					% of Consolidated Revenue
Three months ended December 31:	2001		2000		% Change	2001		2000
North America	$	2,249	$	3,386	(34)%	47	%	56	%
Asia		1,845		1,976	(7)%	39	%	33	%
Europe		640		666	(4)%	14	%	11	%
Total revenue	$	4,734	$	6,028	(21)%	100	%	100	%

Revenue by geographic region for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Revenue in our Asia region includes revenue from Phoenix, which declined from $773,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2001 to $221,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. This decline in revenue was offset by revenue earned in Japan by one customer in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 which total $591,000, or 32% of revenue from our Asia region, and 12% of our total revenue. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

	Amount				% Change		% of Consolidated Revenue
	2002		2001		% Change		2002		2001
Three months ended June 30:
North America	$	2,510	$	3,210	(22	)%	54	%	53	%
Asia		1,445		2,198	(34	)%	31	%	37	%
Europe		705		612	15	%	15	%	10	%

Total revenue	$	4,660	$	6,020	(23	)%	100	%	100	%


Nine months ended June 30:
North America	$	8,368	$	9,542	(12	)%	57	%	55	%
Asia		4,452		4,823	(8	)%	31	%	28	%
Europe		1,800		2,950	(39	)%	12	%	17	%

Total revenue	$	14,620	$	17,315	(16	)%	100	%	100	%

~~Gross~~16 ~~Margin~~

Gross margin is revenue less cost of revenue. License fee cost of revenue generally consists of amortization of capitalized software development costs and costs of licensing certain technologies from third-party developers. Services cost of revenue includes internal payroll costs, third-party consulting costs associated with providing non-recurring engineering services to customers, and related-party costs from Phoenix. Cost of revenue also includes amortization of technology capitalized in connection with the acquisition of other companies, and write-downs of purchased technology. Gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2001 was $3.0 million (or 63% of revenue), a decrease of 44% from $5.3 million (or 89% of revenue) for the comparable period of fiscal 2001. Excluding the $847,000 restructuring-related write-down of purchased technology (See “Restructuring and Asset Impairment” below) the net margin was $3.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, or 81% of revenue. Excluding the write-down of purchased technology, the net margin as a percentage of revenue decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2001 due to higher license fee cost of revenue. In the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we incurred fees payable to third-party developers for license fee revenue earned during the quarter, particularly for certain of our USB 2.0 products.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

North American revenue decreased 22% in the third quarter of 2002 as compared to the third quarter of 2001 due in part to a $302,000 decrease in re-use fees and a $130,000 decrease in maintenance revenue, as well as a $175,000 decrease in royalty revenue. This decrease is due in large part to a one-time royalty payment of $165,000 received in the third quarter of 2001. Revenue in our Asia region decreased 34% in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2001 due to a $800,000 one-time royalty-based revenue contract from one customer in the third quarter of 2001, recorded under our distribution agreement with Phoenix. Revenue in our Europe region increased 15% in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2001 due to an increase in both initial license revenue and re-use fees from various customers.

No customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in the three or nine month periods ended June 30, 2002.

Gross Margin

Gross margin is revenue less cost of revenue. License fee cost of revenue generally consists of amortization of capitalized software development costs and costs of licensing certain technologies from third-party developers. Services cost of revenue includes internal payroll costs, third-party consulting costs associated with providing nonrecurring engineering services to customers, and related-party costs from Phoenix. Cost of revenue also includes amortization of technology capitalized in connection with the acquisition of other companies, and write-downs of purchased technology. Gross margin for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 decreased 34% and 30%, respectively, from the corresponding periods of the prior year. As a percentage of revenue, the gross margin in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 was 71%, compared to 84% in the comparable period of fiscal 2001. The decline in the gross margin in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 is a result of an additional impairment loss of $325,000 related to our Bluetooth product, as well as higher amortization of capitalized software development costs. Cost of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 includes a $1,172,000 impairment loss related to the Bluetooth product, which was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 as well as the third quarter of fiscal 2002 (See “Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges”). Excluding this write-down of purchased technology, the gross margin as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 was 79%, compared to 87% in the comparable period of fiscal 2001. The decline in the gross margin as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 reflects an increased level of amortization of capitalized software development costs, as well as an increase in licensing fees to third-party developers, particularly for certain of our USB 2.0 products.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist principally of payroll and related costs associated with the development of semiconductor intellectual property and related software, net of amounts capitalized. Research and development expenses ~~for~~in the ~~three~~third ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~December~~fiscal ~~31,~~2002 ~~2001,~~decreased ~~increased~~by $321.0 million,~~000~~ (1or 34%), from the ~~comparable~~third ~~period~~quarter inof fiscal 2001. ~~From~~Research ~~the~~and development ~~end~~expenses ofin ~~our~~the ~~fiscal~~nine ~~year~~months onended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2001~~2002 todecreased ~~December~~by 31$2.4 million, ~~2001~~or 29%, ~~our research~~from ~~and~~the ~~development~~comparable ~~headcount~~period ~~decreased~~of byfiscal 152001. ~~employees,~~The toreduction 48in ~~employees~~research onand ~~December~~development ~~31,~~expense ~~2001,~~is attributable primarily ~~due~~ to the ~~restructuring~~workforce ~~which~~reduction ~~occurred~~plan that was implemented in early December 2001. ~~The~~Engineering ~~partial~~headcount ~~benefit~~decreased by 29% from ~~this~~June ~~restructuring~~30, in2001 to June 30, 2002. During the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2002, ~~was~~$99,000 ~~offset~~of bydevelopment ~~increased~~costs ~~expenses~~were ~~for~~capitalized as software ~~tool~~development ~~rentals~~costs, inwhile ~~the~~no such ~~first~~costs ~~quarter~~were ofcapitalized in fiscal ~~2002~~2001. asAs ~~compared~~a topercentage ~~2001.~~of ~~Research~~revenue, research and development expenses were ~~46.8~~42% ofand ~~revenue~~50% in the ~~first~~third ~~quarter~~quarters of fiscal 2002 and 2001, ~~compared~~respectively, toand ~~36.2~~41% and 48% in the ~~comparable period~~nine ofmonth ~~fiscal~~periods ~~2001.~~ended ~~The~~June 30, 2002 ~~fiscal~~and ~~year~~2001, ~~2002~~respectively. ~~increase~~The reduction in ~~this~~these ~~percentage~~percentages islargely ~~attributable~~reflects ~~primarily~~the tobenefit ~~lower levels~~ of ~~revenue~~lower inspending ~~fiscal~~levels, ~~2002.~~offset Wepartially ~~expect~~by ~~our~~lower ~~research~~revenue ~~and development expenses to decrease further~~ in the ~~second~~first ~~quarter~~nine months of fiscal 2002, as we ~~will~~compared ~~achieve~~to the ~~full~~first ~~benefit~~nine ~~of the workforce reduction which occurred in December 2001.~~

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

months of fiscal 2001. We expect our research and development expenses in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 to be consistent with the amount recorded in the third quarter of 2002.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses consist of costs related to advertising, public relations and other marketing, selling and distribution activities. These costs include direct out-of-pocket and payroll expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, decreased $~~436~~356,000 (1915%) from the comparable period inof fiscal 2001. During the nine months ended June 30, 2002, sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.3 million (18%) from the comparable nine months ended, June 30, 2001. This decrease is ~~consistent~~attributable primarily to expense ~~with~~reductions within the ~~21%~~Company’s ~~decline~~marketing indepartment ~~revenue~~which occurred primarily during the ~~comparable~~last ~~period,~~half of fiscal 2001 and isthe ~~attributable~~first ~~largely~~quarter toof ~~declines~~fiscal 2002, as we reduced expenditures in ~~sales~~this ~~commissions,~~area ~~travel,~~consistent ~~and~~with ~~marketing~~declining ~~expenses~~revenue. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses were ~~39.9~~43% ofand ~~revenue~~39% in the ~~first quarter~~third quarters of fiscal 2002 and 2001, ~~compared~~respectively, toand ~~38.6~~40% and 41% in the ~~comparable~~nine ~~period~~month ofperiods ~~fiscal~~ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. ~~From~~The increase in the ~~end~~percentage ~~our~~in ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~third quarter onof ~~September~~2002 ~~30,~~as ~~2001~~compared to ~~December~~the ~~31,~~third quarter of 2001, is primarily attributable to a decline in revenue. We expect our sales and marketing ~~headcount~~expenses ~~decreased~~in bythe 8fourth ~~employees,~~quarter toof 30fiscal ~~employees~~2002 onto ~~December~~be ~~31, 2001,~~consistent ~~primarily~~with ~~due to~~ the ~~restructuring~~amount ~~which~~recorded ~~occurred~~ in ~~December~~the ~~2001~~third quarter of 2002.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist of expenditures for executive, accounting, legal, personnel, recruiting and other administrative functions. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, ~~increased~~decreased $~~267~~294,000 (3220%) from the corresponding period of fiscal 2001. ~~The~~General ~~increase~~and ~~was~~administrative ~~due~~expenses ~~partially~~in tothe annine ~~increase~~months inended ~~allocated~~June ~~expenses~~30, ~~from~~2002 ~~Phoenix under~~decreased ~~the~~by ~~Services~~$374,000, ~~and~~or ~~Cost-Sharing Agreement~~10%, as from the ~~level~~comparable period of ~~Phoenix’s~~fiscal ~~expenses~~2001. ~~increased~~The decline in expenses in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the ~~same~~third quarter of fiscal 2001 is attributable primarily to a $204,000 ~~and~~decrease ~~our~~in ~~proportionate~~consulting ~~share~~expenses. During the nine months ended June 30, 2002, the net impact of these ~~expenses~~items ~~increased~~was ~~due~~offset topartially ~~an increase~~by inhigher ~~our~~allocations ~~headcount~~of ~~relative~~expense tofrom Phoenix~~’s.~~ ~~General~~under ~~and~~the ~~administrative~~Services ~~expenses~~and ~~also~~Cost-Sharing ~~increased~~Agreement, ~~due~~particularly toin ~~higher~~the ~~levels~~first quarter of ~~legal~~fiscal ~~and~~2002 ~~consulting~~as ~~expense~~compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2001. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses were ~~23.5~~25% ofand ~~revenue~~24% in the ~~first~~third ~~quarter~~quarters of fiscal 2002 and 2001, ~~compared~~respectively, toand ~~14.0~~23% and 22% in the ~~comparable~~nine ~~period~~month ofperiods ~~fiscal~~ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. ~~This~~The slight increase in both the third quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2002 from the third quarter of 2001 and nine months ended June 30, 2001 is ~~due~~attributable to ~~both~~ lower revenue. We expect our general and administrative expenses in the ~~first~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 to increase from the level generated in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, asdue ~~well~~to ascosts anincurred ~~increase~~ in ~~expenses~~connection with the pending acquisition of the Company by Synopsys, Inc.

Amortization of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Amortization of intangible assets represents the straight-line amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the purchase of Sand Microelectronics, Inc. in September 1998, and Xentec, Inc., ~~Goodwill~~acquired isin ~~being~~December 2000. ~~amortized~~Amortization ~~over~~expense afor ~~six-~~the three months ended June 30, 2002 decreased $512,000 (46%) from the corresponding period of fiscal year 2001. During the first nine months of fiscal 2002, amortization expense decreased $1.0 million (37%) from the ~~period~~first nine months of fiscal 2001. These declines are due primarily to the September 30, ~~while~~2001 ~~other~~impairment charge of $9.4 million for goodwill generated from the December 2000 acquisition of Xentec, Inc. In addition, certain intangible assets associated ~~are~~with ~~being~~the Sand Microelectronics acquisition became fully amortized ~~over~~at the three-toyear ~~six~~anniversary of the acquisition in September 2001. In January 2002, in connection with the earn-out provisions of our merger agreement with Xentec’s shareholders, we issued 324,500 shares of exchangeable preferred stock, valued at $789,000. This amount has been recorded as goodwill, and is being amortized on straight-line basis over a five-year ~~periods~~period. ~~Amortization~~Because ~~expense~~the ~~for~~future undiscounted cash flows which are expected to be generated as a result of the ~~three~~Xentec ~~months~~acquisition ~~ended~~are ~~December~~in 31excess of the carrying value of this goodwill and the other net assets of the acquired company, ~~2001~~no impairment loss has been recognized for this goodwill. Beginning in fiscal year 2003, amortization of goodwill and intangible

1518

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~decreased $23,000 (4%) from the corresponding period of fiscal year 2001 because certain intangible~~ assets ~~became~~ ~~fully amortized at the three-year anniversary of the acquisition in September 2001. Beginning in fiscal year 2003, amortization of intangible assets~~ will be impacted by our adoption of SFAS No. 142 (See “Recently-issued Accounting Pronouncements”).

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense consists of amortization of deferred stock compensation associated with stock options granted in December 1999, and stock options granted in connection with the acquisition of Xentec in December 2000, at exercise prices less than the fair market value of our stock at the grant date. Amortization expense related to these options is recognized as the options vest, and totaled $4453,000 and $337,000 in the ~~first~~third ~~quarter~~quarters of fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. Amortization expense totaled $214,000 and $~~169~~661,000 infor the ~~comparable~~nine ~~period~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. At ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, the unamortized balance of deferred stock-based compensation was $~~503~~317,000. InStock-based ~~the~~compensation ~~first~~expense ~~quarter~~in ofthe ~~fiscal~~nine ~~2002,~~months ~~stock-based~~ended ~~compensation~~June ~~expense~~30, 2002 also included ~~the remaining~~ $125,000 earned in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, related to common stock with a fair value of $500,000 which ~~will~~was be issued to former employees of Xentec in January 2002, based on their continued employment with us through December 2001. ~~At December 31, 2001, the $500,000 is included in payroll and related liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.~~

Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges

In December 2001, in an effort to align our operating expenses with the anticipated level of future revenue, we announced and implemented a workforce reduction plan which resulted in the elimination of approximately 20% of our workforce. As a result of this restructuring, charges totaling $2.1 million were recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2002. In connection with the elimination of 27 positions, we recorded approximately $282,000 of severance costs. All of these terminations were completed by December 31, 2001. In addition, in December 2001 and early January 2002 we vacated leased office facilities at two locations, which resulted in a charge of approximately $249,000, consisting primarily of minimum rental payments through the termination of the leases in mid calendar year 2002. We recognized an impairment loss of $371,000 related to fixed assets used in the development of our products, primarily at our Japan research and development office which handled our Bluetooth product development, and we also recognized an impairment loss of $315,000 related to an assembled workforce intangible asset and acquisition costs which were recorded in connection with our acquisition of the wireless design services group of HD Lab in December 2000. The employees to which this intangible asset related were terminated in connection with the restructuring.

Because we decided to focus our efforts in fiscal 2002 ~~will focus~~ on our core communication products, we terminated the development of our Bluetooth product line, and the related purchased and developed computer software costs with a carrying value of $1.7 million were subject to impairment review as of December 31, 2001. Our Bluetooth product was in the final stages of completion in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, and was scheduled for general release during the second quarter of fiscal 2002. In accordance with the requirements of SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” the software was written-down to estimated net realizable value. This product will be sold on an “as is” basis, without future development, product support, or maintenance. Future revenue was estimated based on expressed interest in the “as is” product from our existing customers, as well as a detailed market analysis of prospective customers. An impairment loss of $847,000 has been recorded in cost of revenue in the consolidated statement of operations in the quarter ended December 31, 2001, based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over estimated future revenue, net of estimated selling costs. Selling costs were estimated based upon historical experience, planned available resources, incentives, and anticipated time required to sell. ~~The~~We ~~remaining~~made ~~carrying~~assumptions ~~value~~regarding ofestimated ~~the~~future ~~software~~cash ~~will~~flows beand ~~amortized~~other onfactors to determine the ~~greater~~net ofrealizable avalue. ~~straight-line~~Cash ~~basis~~flow ~~over~~calculations awere ~~period~~based ofon 12management’s ~~months~~best ~~(the~~estimates, ~~estimated~~using ~~remaining~~appropriate ~~life~~assumptions regarding projections of ~~the~~future product) revenue and related expenses, oramong ~~based~~other onfactors. Actual revenue from this product has been less than prior estimates, and the ~~ratio~~product ofwas ~~current revenue~~re-evaluated for impairment and written-down to ~~total~~its ~~anticipated~~estimated ~~revenue.~~net ~~This~~realizable ~~asset~~value ~~will~~of be$50,000 ~~reviewed~~as ~~for~~of ~~realizability~~June on30, a2002 resulting in an impairment loss charged to

1619

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~quarterly~~cost ~~basis~~of goods sold of $325,000 ~~and~~during ~~additional~~the ~~charges~~three ~~may~~months ended beJune ~~recorded~~30, in2002. ~~the~~The estimated net realizable value at June 30, 2002 is based upon updated estimates of future inrevenue during the ~~event~~six ~~that~~months ended December 31, 2002, net of estimated selling costs considering the actual ~~revenue~~experience. ~~for~~This asset ~~this~~will ~~product~~be isreviewed ~~less~~for ~~than~~realizability ~~amounts~~on ~~used~~a quarterly basis. If these estimates or the facts underlying the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to ~~estimate~~record additional impairment charges for the ~~net~~software. ~~realizable~~The remaining carrying value of the ~~product~~software aswill be amortized on the greater of ~~December~~a 31straight-line basis over a period of six months (the estimated remaining life of the product), ~~2001~~or based on the ratio of current revenue to total anticipated revenue.

Of the total restructuring charge of approximately $2.1 million recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, $847,000 related to product impairment has been included in cost of revenue, and $1,217,000 is included in operating expenses. Of the total operating expense of $1,217,000, $929,000 is related to research and development activities, $276,000 is related to sales and marketing expense, and $12,000 is related to general and administrative expense. Approximately $~~250~~517,000 of ~~the~~ restructuring ~~charge~~expenses ~~was~~have been paid induring the ~~first quarter,~~nine ~~and~~months ~~$302,000~~ended ofJune ~~the~~30, ~~total~~2002. ~~charge~~During isthe ~~unpaid~~quarter asended ofJune ~~December~~30, 312002, ~~2001.~~the OfCompany terminated ~~the~~a ~~unpaid~~lease ~~amount,~~prior ~~$290,000~~to isits’ ~~included~~expiration in ~~other~~the ~~accrued~~fourth ~~expenses,~~quarter ~~with~~of ~~the~~fiscal ~~balance~~2002, ofand recorded a $1235,000 ~~included~~adjustment into ~~payroll~~the ~~and~~restructuring ~~related~~reserve. All restructuring liabilities inhave ~~the~~been ~~consolidated~~paid, ~~balance sheet.~~and ~~The~~there ~~$302,000~~is ~~will~~no beremaining ~~paid~~accrued ~~through~~liability ~~the~~related to ~~fourth~~this ~~quarter~~restructuring as of ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2002.

We anticipate an annualized cost savings of approximately $2.8 million from this restructuring program.

Interest and other income, net

Interest and other income ~~declined~~in ~~from~~the third quarter of fiscal 2002 decreased by $~~536~~330,000, inor 78%, from the ~~first~~comparable ~~quarter~~period of fiscal 2001, toand decreased by $~~218~~986,000, inor 69%, during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to the first ~~quarter~~nine months of fiscal ~~2002~~2001. ~~The~~These ~~decline~~declines isare due to lower balances of investable funds, as well as lower short-term interest rates in ~~the first quarter of~~ fiscal 2002 as compared to ~~the comparable period of~~ fiscal 2001.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax expense of $~~170~~147,000 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2002, compared to a tax benefit of $968,000 during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. NoFor the nine months ended June 30, 2002, income tax expense totaled or$428,000, compared to a tax benefit ~~was~~of ~~recorded~~$1,872,000 in the ~~comparable~~first ~~period~~nine months of fiscal 2001. InThe tax benefit recognized in the first ~~quarter~~half of fiscal 2001 represents the maximum benefit that could be recognized from deferred tax assets relating to net operating losses through June 30, 2001. During the nine months ended June 30, 2002, we did not record a tax benefit for the carryforward of our operating loss because objective evidence was not available as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002 to overcome uncertainty regarding the realizability of our deferred tax assets. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance was recorded against our net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2002. The expense recorded in the ~~first~~ third quarter ofand first nine months of fiscal 2002 is attributable to foreign withholding tax payments related to revenue generated in certain foreign countries in which we transact business. These payments qualify for a foreign tax credit in our U.S. federal tax return, but the deferred tax asset related to such tax credits was also fully reserved as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, we had ~~liquid assets of $28.6 million, consisting of~~ cash and cash equivalents of $1227.9 million, ~~and short~~consisting ~~term investments~~ of ~~$15.7 million. Cash and cash equivalents consist of~~ bank deposits and highly liquid securities with an original maturity of less than three months. Short term investments at December 31, 2001 consist of U.S. Government Agency obligations. We define short-term investments as debt securities with original maturities ranging from three months to one year. At December 31, 2001, the weighted average original maturity of our short term investments was 92 days. Our existing balances of cash, and cash equivalents, ~~and short-term investments~~ are our primary source of liquidity. We presently have no lending arrangements with banks or other potential creditors.

Cash used in operating activities was $3.58 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, as compared to cash used in operating activities of $1.01 million for the ~~three months~~nine ~~ended December 31, 2000. Cash used in operating activities during the three~~ months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2001 ~~included the impact of our net loss of $4~~.1 ~~million, reduced by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization,~~

1720

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~stock-based~~Cash ~~compensation,~~used ~~and~~in ~~restructuring~~operating ~~charges~~activities ~~totaling~~during ~~$2.8~~the ~~million.~~nine ~~Additional~~months ended ~~cash~~June ~~was~~30, ~~used~~2002 inincluded the ~~first~~ ~~quarter~~impact ~~due~~of toour ~~payments~~net ~~related~~loss toof ~~acquisitions (~~$08.40 million), areduced ~~net~~by ~~repayment~~non-cash ofcharges ~~our~~for ~~payable~~depreciation ~~with~~and ~~Phoenix~~amortization, ~~Technologies~~stock-based ~~($0.3 million)~~compensation, impairment and ~~$0.3~~restructuring ~~million~~charges ~~paid~~totaling in$6.1 ~~connection with the restructuring charge~~million. ~~Cash~~Additional cash was ~~also~~ used in the first ~~quarter~~ nine months of fiscal 2002 due to aacquisition-related ~~decline~~payments oftotaling $01.52 million. inAccounts ~~accounts~~receivable ~~payable,~~increased aduring ~~$0.4~~the ~~million~~nine ~~decline~~months inended ~~payroll~~June ~~and~~30 ~~related~~due ~~liabilities~~to ~~related~~our ~~primarily~~sales toshortfall ~~the~~recorded ~~payment~~late ofin ~~bonuses~~the ~~accrued~~fourth atquarter ~~September~~of ~~30,~~ 2001, and ~~a $0.5 million increase in accounts~~this ~~receivable. The~~ increase inaccounted ~~accounts~~for ~~receivable~~a ~~was~~$595,000 ~~due~~use toof ancash ~~increase~~during inthe ~~accounts~~first ~~receivable~~nine ~~late~~months inof ~~December~~fiscal ~~2001~~2002. Cash used by operating activities during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2000~~2001, was primarily attributable to ~~a decrease in payroll and related liabilities attributable to~~ the ~~payment~~pre-tax loss of ~~bonuses accrued at September 30~~$6.8 million, ~~2000,~~reduced aby non-cash ~~$0.6~~charges ~~million~~for ~~decline~~depreciation inand ~~accounts payable~~amortization, and astock-based $0compensation.3 ~~million increase in accounts receivable.~~

Cash used in investing activities was $~~15.9~~818,000 ~~million~~ for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001.~~2002, ~~This~~due ~~use~~primarily ofto ~~cash~~additions ~~includes~~to ~~purchases~~computer ofsoftware ~~short~~costs, ~~term investments~~including ~~totaling~~amounts ~~$15.8~~capitalized ~~million~~for ~~during~~internal ~~the first quarter of fiscal 2002~~development. Cash used for investing activities in the first ~~quarter~~nine months of fiscal 2001 ~~was~~totaled $6.2 million, primarily due to purchases of Xentec, Inc., and the wireless design services group of HD Lab~~, long-term investments and property and equipment~~.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $~~249~~481,000 for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, and $~~445~~819,000 during the comparable period of fiscal 2001. Net cash provided in both periods related to the proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and the issuance of stock under the employee stock purchase plan.

We expect our future liquidity and capital requirements to vary greatly from quarter to quarter, depending on numerous factors, including the cost, timing and success of product development efforts, the cost and timing of sales and marketing activities, the extent to which our existing and new technologies gain market acceptance, the number and complexity of communications standards, the level and timing of revenues, competing technological and market developments and the costs of maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights. We believe that our present liquid assets, together with cash generated by our operations, if any, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. Thereafter, we believe we will be able to raise any additional funds required through public or private financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. However, we cannot be certain that any such financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could seriously harm our business. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Moreover, strategic relationships, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require that we relinquish our rights to certain technology.

Recently-issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), which establishes new standards for goodwill and other intangible assets. Under the new rules, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment. Separable intangible assets that have a definite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The amortization provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to June 30, 2001, SFAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company will adopt SFAS 142 on October 1, 2002 when its new fiscal year begins. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company is required to make any necessary reclassifications in order to comply with the new criteria in SFAS 142 for recognition of intangible assets, and to then evaluate goodwill and intangible assets for impairment in accordance with the new rules of SFAS 142. Any impairment charge recognized upon adoption of SFAS 142 will be recorded in the statement of operations as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Since any potential impairment charge upon adoption is dependent on the fair value of the Company on the date of adoption, the amount of a charge, if any, will not be known until the date of adoption. At June 30, 2002, the Company had $4.9 million of goodwill, and other intangible assets totaling $0.7 million.

1821

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~any~~Amortization ~~potential~~expense ~~impairment~~for charge upon adoption is dependent on the fair value of the Company on the date of adoption, the amount of a charge, if any, will not be known until the date of adoption. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $5.1 million of goodwill, and other intangible assets ~~totaling~~was $~~0.9~~594,000 ~~million. Amortization expense for goodwill~~ and ~~other intangible assets was~~ $~~561~~1,757,000 during the three and nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2001~~2002, respectively.

On October 3, 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (“SFAS 144”), that is applicable to financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. These new rules on asset impairment supersede FASB Statement 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” and portions of APB Opinion 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations.” ~~This~~SFAS 144 ~~Standard~~ provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of and significantly changes the criteria that would have to be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. Classification as held-for-sale is an important distinction since such assets are not depreciated and are stated at the lower of fair value and carrying amount. ~~This~~SFAS ~~Standard~~144 also requires expected future operating losses from discontinued operations to be displayed in the period(s) in which the losses are incurred, rather than as of the measurement date as presently required. The Company ~~will~~expects to adopt SFAS 144 on October 1, 2002 when its new fiscal year begins, and does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, sales returns, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation and realizability of capitalized computer software costs, useful lives for intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and restructuring and related costs. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, or for any other future period.

The Company records a provision for estimated sales returns against revenues in the same period that the related revenues are recorded. At December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001, the allowance for sales returns was $460,000 and $319,000, respectively. This estimate is based on historical sales returns and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

The Company records a provision for doubtful accounts against general and administrative expenses in the same period that the related revenues are recorded. At December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $175,000 and $115,000, respectively. This estimate is based on historical bad debt write-offs, specific identification of probable bad debts based on collection efforts, and other factors. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

At December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001, the Company had net goodwill and other intangible assets of $6.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, and capitalized computer software costs of $5.8 million and $6.9 million, respectively. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, other intangible assets, and capitalized computer software costs, the Company makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. Cash flow calculations are based on management’s best estimates, using appropriate assumptions. If these estimates

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. During the fourth quarter ended September 30, 2001, the Company recorded impairment charges in the amount of $9.4 million in connection with assets recorded through the acquisition of Xentec in December 2000. Also, as a result of the restructuring program instituted in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million for capitalized computer software development costs.

Business Risks

The additional following factors should be considered carefully when evaluating us and our business.

The Company faces numerous risks in connection with the proposed transaction with Synopsys, Inc., which may adversely affect our results of operations whether or not the acquisition is completed, and the merger may not be completed on a timely basis, if at all.

On July 23, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Synopsys, Inc. pursuant to which Synopsys’ wholly-owned subsidiary has commenced a cash tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding Company stock, including Company shares issuable upon the exchange of shares of Exchangeable Preferred Stock of inSilicon Canada, Ltd., for $4.05 per share in cash. The planned acquisition could have an adverse effect on the Company’s revenues in the near-term if customers delay, defer, or cancel purchases due to uncertainty about the direction of our product offerings following the acquisition and our willingness to support and service existing products. To address customer uncertainty, we may incur additional obligations. To the extent a prolonged delay in completing the planned acquisition creates uncertainty among those persons and organizations contemplating purchases of products or services such that several large customers, or a significant group of small customers, delay purchase decisions pending resolution of the planned acquisition, the Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected, and quarterly revenues could be substantially below the expectations of market analysts and could cause a reduction in stock price. Additionally, speculation regarding the likelihood of the closing of the acquisition could increase the volatility of the Company’s stock price.

Completion of the acquisition also is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. If the acquisition is not completed, the Company could be subject to a number of risks that may adversely affect its business and stock price, including:

the Company would not realize the benefits it expects by being part of a combined company with Synopsys, Inc., as well as the potentially enhanced financial position as a result of being part of the combined company;

the diversion of management’s attention from the Company’s day-to-day business and the unavoidable disruption to its employees and its relationships with customers as a result of efforts and uncertainties relating to the Company’s anticipated acquisition by Synopsys, Inc. may detract from its ability to grow revenues and minimize costs, which, in turn may lead to a

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

loss of market position that the Company could be unable to regain if the acquisition does not occur;

the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of those shares reflects a market assumption that the acquisition will be completed;

the Company must pay the costs related to the proposed transactions, such as legal, accounting, and financial advisory fees, whether or not the acquisition is completed;

under specified circumstances, the Company may be required to pay Synopsys, Inc. a termination fee of $2,460,000 in connection with the termination of the merger agreement; and

the Company may not be able to continue its present level of operations, may need to scale back its business, may have to consider additional reductions in force, may have to consider alternative sources of funding and may not be able to take advantage of future opportunities or effectively respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations.

Covenants in the merger agreement may impede our ability to make acquisitions or complete other transactions that are not in the ordinary course of business pending completion of the acquisition. As a result, if the acquisition is not completed, we may be at a disadvantage to our competitors. In addition, while the merger agreement is in effect, subject to very narrowly defined exceptions, we are prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or entering into certain extraordinary transactions, such as a merger, sale of assets or other business combination outside the ordinary course of business, with any third party. Any such transactions could be favorable to our stockholders.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The unpredictability of our quarterly operating results may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

We expect our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Our revenue is difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly from period to period. Because our expenses are largely independent of our revenue in any particular period, it is difficult to accurately forecast our operating results. Our operating expenses are based, in part, on anticipated future revenue and a high percentage of our expenses are fixed in the short term. As a result, if our revenue is below expectations in any quarter, the negative effect may be magnified by our inability to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for the revenue shortfall.

Factors that could cause our revenue and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter include:

•· shifts in demand for and average selling prices of semiconductors that incorporate our technology;

•· large orders or regional spending patterns unevenly spaced over time;

•· the financial terms of our contractual arrangements with our licensees and partners that may provide for significant up-front payments or payments based on the achievement of certain milestones;

•· the relative mix of license revenues, royalties and services;

•· the impact of competition on license revenue or royalty rates;

•· establishment or loss of strategic relationships with semiconductor or systems companies;

•· timing of new technologies and technology enhancements by us and our competitors;

•· seasonality of demand; and

•· changes in development schedules, research and development expenditure levels and product support by us and semiconductor and systems companies.

As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and, accordingly, that these comparisons should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. Due to these and other factors, it is likely that our operating results will be below market analysts’ expectations in some future quarters, which would cause the market price of our stock to decline.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We have incurred net losses since our inception, and we may not achieve or sustain annual profitability.

We24 incurred net losses of $19.2 million for fiscal year 2001, $1.3 million for fiscal year 2000 and $12.1 million for fiscal year 1999, and had an accumulated deficit of $43.3 million as of September 30, 2001. Our net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2001 was $4.1 million, and our accumulated deficit was $47.4 million on December 31, 2001. Although we have experienced revenue growth in the past, we cannot assure you that we will be able to grow our revenue in future periods. If we do achieve annual profitability, we cannot be certain that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future or at all. This may in turn cause our stock price to decline. In addition, if we do not achieve or sustain profitability in the future, we may be unable to continue our operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We incurred net losses of $19.2 million for fiscal year 2001, $1.3 million for fiscal year 2000 and $12.1 million for fiscal year 1999, and had an accumulated deficit of $43.3 million as of September 30, 2001. Our net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 was $8.0 million, and our accumulated deficit was $51.4 million on June 30, 2002. Although we have experienced revenue growth in the past, we cannot assure you that we will be able to grow our revenue in future periods. If we do achieve annual profitability, we cannot be certain that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future or at all. This may in turn cause our stock price to decline. In addition, if we do not achieve or sustain profitability in the future, we may be unable to continue our operations.

If semiconductor and systems companies do not adopt our semiconductor intellectual property and use it in the products they sell, our revenues will not grow.

The adoption and continued use of our semiconductor intellectual property by semiconductor and systems companies and an increasing demand for products requiring complex semiconductors, such as portable computing devices and cellular phones, is important to our continued success. The market for merchant semiconductor intellectual property has only recently begun to emerge. Our ability to achieve sustained revenue growth and profitability in the future will depend on the continued development of this market and, to a large extent, on the demand for complex semiconductors. There can be no assurance that the merchant semiconductor intellectual property and complex semiconductor markets will continue to develop or grow at a rate sufficient to support our business. If either of these markets fails to grow or develops slower than expected, our business, operating results and financial condition would be seriously harmed.

We face numerous risks in obtaining agreements with semiconductor and systems companies on terms beneficial to our business, including:

•· the lengthy and expensive process of building a relationship with a potential licensee or prospective partner;

•· the fact that we may compete with the internal development groups of semiconductor and systems companies;

•· the fact that we may be unable to persuade semiconductor and systems companies to rely on us for critical technology;

•· the fact that we may be unable to persuade potential licensees and partners to bear development costs associated with our communications technology;

•· the risk that even after our customers select our communications technology, they may not produce semiconductors using our communications technology; and

•· the risk that even if a particular semiconductor or systems company adopts our communications technology, that the customer may fail due to competition or lack of market acceptance of its products that use our communications technology.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our current relationships or establish new relationships with additional licensees or partners, and any failure by us to do so could seriously harm our business. None of our current licensees or partners is obligated to license new or future generations of our communications technology.

If we are not able to protect our intellectual property adequately, we will have less proprietary technology to license, which will reduce our revenues and profits.

21Our patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property are critical to our success. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, mask work and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights. We own U.S. patents on various aspects of our technology and have

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property are critical to our success. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, mask work and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights. We own U.S. patents on various aspects of our technology and have several pending U.S. patent applications. We cannot be sure that patents will be issued from any patent applications submitted, that any patents we hold will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that any claims allowed from our patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to us. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not adequately protect our intellectual property as well as the laws of the United States.

We use various agreements including licenses, employee assignments, independent contractor, third-party nondisclosure, and assignments, to limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information and to obtain license rights or ownership of technology prepared on a work-for-hire or other basis. Even though we have taken all customary industry precautions, we cannot be sure that the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights will be adequate to deter misappropriation of the rights or that we will be able to detect unauthorized uses and take immediate or effective steps to enforce our rights. We also cannot be sure that the steps we may take to obtain ownership of any contributed intellectual property will be sufficient to assure our ownership of all proprietary rights. We also rely on unpatented trade secrets to protect our proprietary technology, however, we cannot be certain that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire the same or substantially equivalent technologies or otherwise gain access to our proprietary technology or disclose that technology. We also cannot be sure that we can ultimately protect our rights to our unpatented proprietary technology. In addition, third parties might obtain patent rights that could be used to assert infringement claims against us.

Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property rights, and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from licensing our technology.

Third parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, and we may be found to infringe those intellectual property rights. While we do not believe that any of our technologies infringe the valid intellectual property rights of third parties, we may be unaware of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of our technology and services.

Any litigation regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming, and divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. The complexity of the technology involved and the uncertainty of the outcome of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Claims of intellectual property infringement also might require us to enter into costly royalty or license agreements. However, we may not be able to obtain royalty or license agreements on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions against development and licensing of certain of our technologies.

Any acquisitions we make could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and results of operation.

As part of our growth strategy, we pursue the acquisition of other companies, assets and product lines that either complement or expand our existing business. During fiscal year 2001, we completed two acquisitions. Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including the diversion of management’s attention to the assimilation of the operations and personnel of the acquired companies, adverse short-term effects on our operating results, integration of financial reporting systems and the amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assets. During fiscal year 2001, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.4 million as a result of the Xentec acquisition. Furthermore, as a result of the discontinuance of our Bluetooth product line in conjunction with the workforce reduction announced in December 2001, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 we recorded an impairment charge of $1.2 million related to capitalized computer software costs and intangible assets and an additional $325,000 charge in the third quarter of 2002. The Bluetooth technology was acquired primarily as a result of the HD Lab acquisition.

22There can be no assurance that we can successfully integrate acquired businesses or that such businesses will enhance our business. We are unable to predict the likelihood of a material acquisition

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

capitalized computer software costs and intangible assets. The Bluetooth technology was acquired primarily as a result of the HD Lab acquisition. There can be no assurance that we can successfully integrate acquired businesses or that such businesses will enhance our business. We are unable to predict the likelihood of a material acquisition being completed in the future. We may seek to finance any such acquisition through debt or additional equity financings, which could result in dilution and additional risk for the holders of our common stock.

~~We anticipate that one or more potential acquisition opportunities, including those that would be material, may become available in the near future.~~ If and when appropriate acquisition opportunities become available, we intend to pursue them actively. No assurance can be given that any acquisition by us will or will not occur, that if an acquisition does occur that it will not materially and adversely affect us or that any such acquisition will be successful in enhancing our business. Our future results of operations will also depend in part on our ability to successfully expand internally by increasing the number of new product lines, and to manage any future growth. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain or integrate additional product lines or manage any future growth successfully.

The semiconductor intellectual property market is highly competitive, and we may lose market share to larger competitors with greater resources and to companies that develop their own semiconductor intellectual property using internal design teams.

We will face competition from both existing and new suppliers of semiconductor intellectual property that we anticipate will enter the market. We also compete with the internal development groups of large, vertically integrated semiconductor and systems companies. We also may face competition from suppliers of technologies based on new or emerging technology standards.

We must also differentiate our communications technology from those available or under development by other suppliers or the internal development groups of semiconductor and systems companies, including some of our current and prospective licensees. Many of these internal development groups have substantial programming and design resources and are part of larger organizations with substantial financial and marketing resources. These internal development groups may develop technologies that compete directly with ours or may actively seek to license their own technologies to third parties.

Many of our existing competitors, as well as a number of potential new competitors, have longer operating histories, greater brand recognition and larger customer bases, as well as greater financial and marketing resources, than we do. This may allow them to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. It may also allow them to devote greater resources than we can to the development and promotion of their technologies.

Many of our products are based on standard communication protocols that are available to the general public. As new competitors enter the market, the introduction of competitive products based on these protocols may result in pricing pressure on our existing products, which could limit our ability to increase revenue.

If we are unable to develop enhancements and new generations of our intellectual property, we may be unable to attract or retain customers.

Our future success will depend on our ability to develop enhancements and new generations of our communications technology that satisfy the requirements of new and evolving standards and introduce these new technologies to the marketplace in a timely manner. If our development efforts are not successful or are significantly delayed, or if the characteristics of our communications technology are not compatible with the requirements of specific product applications, we may be unable to attract or retain customers.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

not compatible with the requirements of specific product applications, we may be unable to attract or retain customers.

Technical innovations of the type critical to our success are inherently complex and involve several risks, including:

•27 ~~our ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changes in the requirements of semiconductor and systems companies;~~

•Table the emergence of new standards by semiconductor and systems companies;Contents

•ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION ~~the~~AND ~~significant~~ANALYSIS ~~research~~OF ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~development~~CONDITION ~~investment~~AND ~~that~~RESULTS isOF ~~often~~OPERATIONS ~~required before market acceptance, if any, of a particular standard;~~

•· ~~the~~our ~~possibility~~ability ~~that~~to ~~even~~anticipate ~~after~~and respond in a ~~significant~~timely ~~investment~~manner ofto ~~our~~changes ~~resources,~~in the ~~standard~~requirements ~~will~~of ~~not~~semiconductor ~~become~~and ~~accepted~~systems ~~by the industry~~companies; ~~and~~

•· the ~~introduction~~emergence of ~~products~~new standards by ~~our~~semiconductor ~~competitors~~and ~~embodying~~systems ~~new technologies or features.~~companies;

the significant research and development investment that is often required before market acceptance, if any, of a particular standard;

the possibility that even after a significant investment of our resources, the standard will not become accepted by the industry; and

the introduction of products by our competitors embodying new technologies or features.

Our failure to adequately address these risks could render our existing or future communications technology obsolete and could seriously harm our business. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will have the financial and other resources necessary to develop communications technology in the future, or that any enhancements or new generations of the technology that we develop or procure will generate revenue in excess of the costs of development or procurement.

Rapid product transitions or introductions of new standards may cause our technologies to become obsolete.

From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new technologies or capabilities that may replace or shorten the life cycles of our existing technologies. Announcements of currently planned or other new technologies may cause customers to defer or stop licensing our technologies until those new technologies become available. In addition, announcements of a new standard may cause customers to defer or stop licensing our technologies until that standard becomes available or accepted.

If we do not compete effectively with others to attract and retain key personnel, we may be unable to develop the new communications technology necessary to expand our business.

~~Our~~We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to ~~continue~~successfully tomanage ~~grow~~our ~~successfully~~growth, ~~requires~~including anattracting ~~effective~~and retaining ~~planning~~engineers, other highly skilled personnel and ~~management~~senior ~~process~~managers. ~~Since~~Our ~~October~~employees ~~31,~~are ~~1998,~~“at wewill” ~~increased~~and ~~our~~are ~~headcount~~not ~~substantially,~~hired ~~from~~for 51a ~~employees~~specified ~~at that~~term. ~~date~~Hiring qualified sales and technical personnel will be difficult due to 91the limited number of qualified professionals. Competition for these types of employees atis ~~October~~intense. 31We have, ~~2000~~in the past, experienced difficulty in recruiting and ~~119~~retaining qualified sales and technical personnel. Our employees atare ~~November~~recruited ~~30,~~aggressively ~~2001~~by our competitors and by start-up companies. ~~During~~We ~~December~~believe ~~2001~~our salaries are competitive, ~~primarily~~but asunder certain circumstances, start-up companies can offer more attractive stock option packages. As a result, ofwe ~~our~~have ~~workforce reduction~~experienced, ~~our~~and ~~headcount~~may ~~decreased~~continue byto 26experience, significant ~~employees~~employee turnover. Failure to 93attract ~~employees~~and asretain ofpersonnel, ~~December~~particularly 31sales and technical personnel, ~~2001~~would materially harm our business.

Our growth has placed, and the recruitment and integration of additional employees will continue to place, a strain on our resources. Semiconductor and systems company licensees typically require significant engineering support in the design, testing and manufacture of products incorporating our technology. Accordingly, increases in the adoption of our technology can be expected to increase the strain on our personnel, particularly our engineers.

We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to successfully manage our growth, including attracting and retaining engineers, other highly skilled personnel and senior managers. Our employees are “at will” and are not hired for a specified term. Hiring qualified sales and technical personnel will be difficult due to the limited number of qualified professionals. Competition for these

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

types of employees is intense. We have, in the past, experienced difficulty in recruiting and retaining qualified sales and technical personnel. Our employees are recruited aggressively by our competitors and by start-up companies. We believe our salaries are competitive, but under certain circumstances, start-up companies can offer more attractive stock option packages. As a result, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant employee turnover. Failure to attract and retain personnel, particularly sales and technical personnel, would materially harm our business.

As we seek to expand our operations, we may also significantly strain our financial and management systems and other resources. We cannot be certain that our systems, procedures, controls and facilities will be adequate to support our operations.

~~Risks~~International ~~Related~~sales of our products account for a significant portion of our revenue which exposes us to ~~the~~risks ~~Semiconductor~~inherent ~~Industry~~in international operations.

We market and sell our products and services in the United States and internationally. International sales of our products and services accounted for approximately 46% of our total revenue for the quarter ending June 30, 2002. Our operations outside the United States also expose us to the following general risks associated with international operations:

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

disruptions to commercial activities or damage to our facilities as a result of political unrest, war, terrorism, labor strikes and work stoppages;

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations;

the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States;

greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods;

potential adverse tax consequences, including higher tax rates generally in Asia;

tariff’s, duties, price controls or other restrictions on foreign currencies or trade barriers imposed by foreign countries; and

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements of foreign countries.

To the extent that such disruptions and costs interfere with our commercial activities, our results of operations could be harmed.

RISKS RELATED TO THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY

A downturn in the semiconductor or electronics businesses would reduce our sales.

~~Our~~In the past our business has benefited from the rapid worldwide growth of the semiconductor industry, which in turn has been fueled by growth in telecommunications, computers and consumer electronics. Continued licenses of our technologies are largely dependent upon the commencement of new design projects by semiconductor and systems companies. However, the semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and subject to rapid technological change. It also has been subject to significant economic downturns at various times, characterized by diminished demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices and production overcapacity. In addition, the semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints. As a result, we may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to general semiconductor industry conditions, overall economic conditions or other factors. A number of semiconductor and systems companies have announced layoffs of their employees or the suspension of investment plans, and we have seen a drop-off in demand from these customers. In addition, there have been a number of mergers in the electronics industry, which may reduce the aggregate level of licenses of our technologies and purchases of our services by the merged companies. Potential slower growth in the electronics industry, a reduced number of design starts, tightening of customers’ operating budgets or continued consolidation among our customers may seriously harm our business.

~~Risks~~RISKS ~~Related~~RELATED toTO ~~our~~OUR ~~Separation~~SEPARATION ~~from~~FROM ~~Phoenix~~PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES ~~Technologies Ltd~~LTD. inIN ~~November~~NOVEMBER 1999

We depend on agreements with Phoenix for many important services that may be hard to replace on a cost-effective basis if Phoenix terminates the agreements.

We have entered into agreements with Phoenix that have defined and will continue to define our business relationship. These agreements include a Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement, under which Phoenix provides various, primarily administrative, services to us, including accounting, treasury, tax and information services, and we share with Phoenix certain costs, including facilities and insurance. The Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement initially extended to June 30, 2000 for all services other than accounting; the term for accounting services initially extended to September 30, 2000., ~~The Services~~ and ~~Cost-Sharing Agreement~~ has been renewed on a month-to-month basis for all services and costs,. ~~and~~We we anticipate the further extension of the agreement through fiscal year 2002. Generally, either party can terminate on 30 days’ written notice. Consequently, we cannot be sure how long Phoenix will continue to provide us services under the Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement and, if it does not, whether or on what terms we could obtain these services. If we cannot perform these services ourselves or obtain them on acceptable terms, this could materially harm our business. In addition, we have entered into a distribution agreement under which Phoenix acts as a non-exclusive sales representative for us in certain Asian countries and this service will be difficult to replace if Phoenix terminates this agreement.

2529

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ~~CONDITIONAND~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

agreement through fiscal year 2002. Generally, either party can terminate the agreement on 30 days written notice. Consequently, we cannot be sure how long Phoenix will continue to provide us services under the Services and Cost-Sharing Agreement and, if it does not, whether or on what terms we could obtain these services. If we cannot perform these services ourselves or obtain them on acceptable terms, this could materially harm our business. In connection with Phoenix’s ceasing to distribute certain of our products in Asia under the Technology Distributor Agreement, in February 2002 we entered into an agreement with a third-party distributor to service those areas. There can be no assurance that revenue, if any, generated in the future under this new agreement will be comparable to the level of revenue earned under our agreement with Phoenix.

Since Phoenix can elect all our directors and influence our business for its benefit for at least as long as it owns 50% or more of our shares, Phoenix can take actions beneficial to it at our expense.

For at least as long as Phoenix continues to own more than 50% of our common stock, Phoenix can direct the election of all our directors and exercise a controlling influence over our business, including any mergers or other business combinations, acquisitions or dispositions of assets, future issuances of our common stock or other equity securities, the incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends. Phoenix also can determine matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders without the consent of our other stockholders, prevent or cause a change in who controls us and take other actions that might be favorable to Phoenix.

We may have conflicts of interest with Phoenix that are not resolved in our favor.

We may have conflicts of interest with Phoenix in areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including potential competitive business activities, indemnity arrangements, tax and intellectual property matters, registration rights, potential acquisitions or financing transactions, sales or other dispositions by Phoenix of our shares of common stock it holds and the exercise by Phoenix of its ability to control our management and affairs. We also cannot be sure that any conflicts that may arise between us and Phoenix will be resolved in a manner that does not seriously harm us, even if Phoenix does not intend that result.

In addition, the ownership interests of our directors or officers in Phoenix common stock or service as both a director of inSilicon and either an officer or director of Phoenix could create or appear to create potential conflicts of interest when directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and Phoenix. One of our current directors is a director and officer of Phoenix.

Loss of the Phoenix affiliation as a result of our separation from Phoenix may damage our relationships with existing licensees or partners or their perceptions of us, which could reduce our revenues.

Licensees of our communications technology or our strategic partners may have chosen our technologies because of the positive reputation of Phoenix or their economic ties to Phoenix. For example, Phoenix may also be a customer for their products. As a separate, stand-alone entity, we may not enjoy these advantages with those customers and partners and it may be harder for us to compete for their continued business. For example, our company name is not as well recognized as the Phoenix brand in certain markets, and as a result our technology licensing could suffer. The loss of the “Phoenix” brand name may hinder our ability to establish new relationships with potential customers and partners, particularly in Asia. In addition, our current customers, suppliers and partners may react negatively to the separation. Although we believe we have all necessary rights to use the brand name “inSilicon,” our rights to use it may be challenged by others.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s exposure to the impact of interest rate changes, currency fluctuations, and changes in the market values of its investments has not changed materially from that described in the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

2631

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a) Exhibits.

~~None~~10.15 Restated Executive Officer Severance Agreement with Barry Hoberman*

~~(b) Reports~~10.19 ~~on Form~~Executive ~~8-K.~~Officer Severance Agreement with Joe Hustein*

No99.1 ~~reports~~Certification onpursuant ~~Form~~to ~~8-K~~Section ~~were~~906 ~~filed~~of ~~during~~ the ~~quarter~~Corporate ~~ended~~Fraud ~~December~~Accountability ~~31,~~Act ~~2001.~~of 2002

27* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

Reports on Form 8-K.

The Company filed two Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Information regarding the items reported on is as follows:

Date of Report (as Filed)		Item Reported On
May 10, 2002		The Company announced its financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002, and the Company announced the appointment of Barry A. Hoberman as President and CEO.
May 13, 2002		The Company announced the departure of Chief Financial Officer, Bryan J. LeBlanc.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INSILICON CORPORATION By: /S/ BRYAN J. LEBLANC Bryan J. LeBlanc Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

		INSILICON CORPORATION

Date:	August 6, 2002	By:	/s/ BARRY A. HOBERMAN
			Barry A. Hoberman President and Chief Executive Officer

~~Date:~~33 ~~February 13, 2002~~

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

•Table the emergence of new standards by semiconductor and systems companies;Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · INSILICON CORP