UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 000-53630

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

_______________________________________________

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	20-5859893
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

701 N. Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200, Henderson, Nevada, 89074

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

702-990-3256

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

________________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [x] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 1732,~~345~~295,998 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding as of ~~September~~December 1018, 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I - Financial Information	3
Item 1. Financial Statements
Balance Sheets July 31, 2013 (unaudited), and April 30, 2013	3
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three month periods ended
July 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to July 31, 2013	4
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three month periods ended
July 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to July 31, 2013	5
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	17
PART II – Other Information	18
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	18
Item 1A. Risk Factors	18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	18
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	18
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	18
Item 5. Other Information	18
Item 6. Exhibits	19

	Page

PART I - Financial Information	3

Item 1. Financial Statements	3
Balance Sheets October 31, 2013 (unaudited), and April 30, 2013	3
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and six month periods ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to October 31, 2013	4
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six month periods ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to October 31, 2013	5
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	18

PART II – Other Information	18

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	18
Item 1A. Risk Factors	18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	18
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	18
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	18
Item 5. Other Information	19
Item 6. Exhibits	19

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

(formerly DAKOTA GOLD CORP.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	July 31,			April 30,
	October 31,			April 30,
	2013			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	~~740~~134,990		$	3,660
Prepaid expenses		200			877
Total Current Assets		~~940~~135,190			4,537
Total Assets	$	~~940~~135,190		$	4,537
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	2941,~~556~~548		$	3,820
Related party bridge loan and accrued interest payable		~~113~~114,~~314~~662			111,950
Total Current Liabilities		~~142~~156,~~870~~210			115,770
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Stockholders’ Deficit
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001
Authorized 100,000,000 shares,
Issued 17,345,998 shares at
Issued 32,295,998 shares at
July 31, 2013 (April 30, 2013 – 2,345,998)		17,346			2,346
October 31, 2013 (April 30, 2013 – 2,345,998)		32,296			2,346
Paid-in capital		~~339~~474,~~704~~254			204,704
Accumulated deficit		(87,286)			(87,286)
Stock performance contingency		(150,000	)		—
Deficit accumulated since inception of exploration stage		(~~261~~290,~~694~~284	)		(230,997)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(141,930)			(111,233)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(21,020)			(111,233)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	940		$	4,537
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	135,190		$	4,537

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

(formerly DAKOTA GOLD CORP.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

							~~Cumulative~~						Cumulative
							~~Since~~						Since
							August 1, 2010,
	For the Three Months						For the Six Months						August 1, 2010,
	For the Three Months Ended						Inception of
	Ended						Ended						Inception of
	July 31,						Exploration
	October 31,						October 31,						Exploration
	2013			2012			~~Stage~~2013			2012			Stage
Revenues	$	—-		$	—-		$	—-		$	-		$	-
Cost of Revenues		—-			—-			—-			-			-
Gross Margin		—-			—-			—-			-			-
Expenses
Mineral property exploration expenditures		8,748			4,104			57,874
Mineral Property Exploration Expenditures		1,715			4,074			10,463			8,178			59,589
General and administrative		15,585			12,752			129,634
General and Administrative		25,527			6,147			41,112			18,899			155,161
Mineral property acquisition payments		5,000			—			60,000
Mineral Property Acquisition Payments		-			5,000			5,000			5,000			60,000
		29,333			16,856			247,508
Total Expenses		27,242			15,221			56,575			32,077			274,750
Net Loss from Operations		(2927,~~333~~242	)		(1615,~~856~~221	)		(~~247~~56,~~508~~575	)		(32,077	)		(274,750	)
Other Income (Expense)
Write-down of property and equipment		—			—			(872	)
Interest		(1,348	)		(1,297	)		(2,712	)		(2,356	)		(14,662	)
Interest expense		(1,364	)		(1,059	)		(13,314	)
Write-down of Property and Equipment		-			-			-			-			(872	)
Net Other Income (Expense)		(1,~~364~~348	)		(1,~~059~~297	)		(142,~~186~~712	)		(2,356	)		(15,534	)
Net Loss	$	(3028,~~697~~590	)	$	(1716,~~915~~518	)	$	(~~261~~59,~~694~~287	)	$	(34,433	)	$	(290,284	)
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Basic and Diluted
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		4,302,520			2,345,998
Loss per Share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding		19,458,498			2,345,998			11,880,509			2,345,998

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

(formerly DAKOTA GOLD CORP.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative
							Since
							August 1 2010
	For the Three Months Ended						Inception of
	For the Six Months Ended						Inception of
	July 31,			July 31,			Exploration
	October 31,			October 31,			Exploration
	2013			2012			Stage
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss	$	(3059,~~697~~287	)	$	(1734,~~915~~433	)	$	(~~261~~290,~~694~~284	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Write-down of property and equipment		—			—			872
Accrued interest		12,~~364~~712			12,~~059~~356			1314,~~314~~662
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		677			(52,~~005~~897	)		(200	)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		2537,~~736~~728			~~6,561~~891			1830,~~343~~335
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(218,~~920~~170	)		(1534,~~300~~083	)		(~~229~~244,~~365~~615	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of common stock		—149,500			—			~~130~~279,~~000~~500
Proceeds from bridge loan payable		—			—20,000			100,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		—149,500			—20,000			~~230~~379,~~000~~500
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(2131,~~920~~330	)		(1514,~~300~~083)			~~635~~134,885
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Year		3,660			36,996			105
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Period		3,660			36,996			105
Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Year	$	740		$	21,696		$	740
Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Period	$	134,990		$	22,913		$	134,990

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

(formerly DAKOTA GOLD CORP.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Continued)

(Unaudited)

					Cumulative
					Since
					August 1, 2010
	For the Three Months Ended				Inception of
	For the Six Months Ended				Inception of
	July 31,		July 31,		Exploration
	October 31,		October 31,		Exploration
	2013		2012		State
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	—	$	—	$	—
Income taxes	$	—	$	—	$	—
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Settlement of a Shareholder Loan Payable by a Contribution from a Shareholder	$	—	$	—	$	9,400

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMERICAN MAGNA CORP.

(formerly DAKOTA GOLD CORP.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

For the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

Organization and Basis of Presentation

American Magna Corp. (an exploration stage company) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on October 27, 2006 under the name Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. The Company was originally established to provide services to public companies requiring guidance and assistance in converting and filing their documents with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

On August 18, 2010, Mr. Daulat Nijjar, as the holder of 197,500, or at that time 57.6%, of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, provided the Company with written consent in lieu of a meeting of stockholders authorizing the Company to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation for the purpose of changing the name of the Company from Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. to Dakota Gold Corp. In connection with the change of the Company’s name to Dakota Gold Corp. the Company intended to change its business to mineral resource exploration and move its domicile to Nevada. In order to undertake the name, business and domicile change, the Company incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary in Nevada named Dakota Gold Corp. and merged Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. with the new subsidiary. The Company received final regulatory for the name, business, and domicile change on November 26, 2010 and is now a Nevada corporation.

On May 21, 2013, Mr. Bobby Nijjar, as the holder of 2,000,000, or at that time 85.3%, of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, provided the Company with written consent in lieu of a meeting of stockholders authorizing the Company to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation for the purpose of changing the name of the Company from Dakota Gold Corp. to “American Magna Corp.” In connection with the change of the Company’s name to American Magna Corp. the Company changed its business from an emphasis on gold exploration to magnesium exploration. The Company received final regulatory for the name change on July 2, 2013. In relation to the name and business emphasis change, subsequent to April 30, 2013 the Company terminated its Crescent Fault Property and entered into a Property Option Agreement for the Bell Flat Project (note 4).

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on a going concern basis.

Nature of Operations

The Company is in the development stage and has no products or services as of ~~July~~October 31, 2013. We are currently an exploration stage company as defined by the SEC and we are in the business of exploring and if warranted, advancing certain unpatented Nevada mineral claims to the discovery point where we believe maximum shareholder returns can be realized.

Interim Reporting

The unaudited financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state the financial position of American Magna Corp. and the results of its operations for the periods presented. This report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013. The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context. Accordingly, footnote disclosure, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013 has been omitted. The results of operations for the three and six month ~~period~~periods ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 are not necessary indicative of results for the entire year ending April 30, 2014 or for any future annual or interim period.

NOTE 2 – ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $~~261~~290,~~694~~284 for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to ~~July~~October 31, 2013. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its mineral property. On ~~September~~October 118, ~~2011~~2013 the Company ~~issued~~closed 2a public offering of 14,~~000~~950,000 shares of common ~~shares~~stock at $0.0501 per share for a total offering price of $~~100~~149,~~000~~500. The shares were offered by the Company pursuant to ~~Mr.~~a ~~Bobby~~registration ~~Nijjar,~~statement ~~our~~on ~~Secretary~~Form ~~and~~S-1 ~~director~~which became effective on March 14, 2013 and on August 20, 2012 the Company received an additional $20,000 under its related party bridge loan. The funds from these financings are not sufficient to fund the Company’s expected operational requirements of approximately $~~116~~204,000 for the next twelve months. Management may seek additional capital that will be required in order to continue to operate in the future. However, management’s efforts to raise additional funding may not be successful. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

If the Company were unable to continue as a “going concern”, then substantial adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of assets, the reported amounts of its liabilities, the reported expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management’s Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and notes. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates relate to accrued liabilities and the impairment of long-lived assets. Management believes the estimates utilized in preparing these financial statements are reasonable and prudent and are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Foreign Currency

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar and to date has undertaken the majority of its transactions in U.S. dollars. Any transaction gains and losses that may take place will be included in the statement of operations as they occur.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company has no off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company maintains all of its cash balances with one financial institution in the form of a demand deposit.

Loss per Share

Net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. As of ~~July~~October 31, 2013 the ~~company~~Company does not have any outstanding common stock options or warrants.

Comprehensive Income

The Company has adopted FASB ASC 220, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. The Company has disclosed this information on its Statement of Operations. Comprehensive income is comprised of net income (loss) and all changes to capital deficit except those resulting from investments by owners and distribution to owners.

Property Holding Costs

Holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. These costs include security and maintenance expenses, lease and claim fees payments, and environmental monitoring and reporting costs.

Exploration and Development Costs

Mineral property interests include optioned and acquired mineral development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral property interest represents its fair value at the time it was optioned or acquired, either as an individual asset or as a part of a business combination. The value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained in such properties. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and development costs are capitalized if proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mineral interests costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

Income Taxes

The Company adopted FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, at its inception deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carryforwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of ~~July~~October 31, 2013.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, formerly FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Company had no material unrecognized income tax assets or liabilities for the years ended April 30, 2013 or 2012. The Company’s policy regarding income tax interest and penalties is to expense those items as general and administrative expense but to identify them for tax purposes. During the years ended April 30, 2013 and 2012 there were no income tax or related interest and penalty items in the income statement, or liability on the balance sheet. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. Tax years 2011 to present remain open to U.S. Federal income tax examination. The Company is not currently involved in any income tax examinations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The book values of cash, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

•· Level one — inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; • Level two — inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and • Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

·	Level two — inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and

·	Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Company reviews new accounting standards as issued. No new standards had any material effect on these financial statements. The accounting pronouncements issued subsequent to the date of these financial statements that were considered significant by management were evaluated for the potential effect on these financial statements. Management does not believe any of the subsequent pronouncements will have a material effect on these financial statements as presented and does not anticipate the need for any future restatement of these financial statements because of the retro-active application of any accounting pronouncements issued subsequent to ~~July~~October 31, 2013 through the date these financial statements were issued.

NOTE 4 – MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS

Bell Flat Project

On July 19, 2013 the Company executed a property option agreement (the “Agreement”) with Desert Pacific Exploration, Inc. (“DPE”) granting the Company the right to acquire 100% of the mining interests of a Nevada mineral exploration property currently controlled by DPE. DPE, the owner of the Bell Flat Project, is an affiliate controlled by the wife of the Company’s President and CEO. The property known as the Bell Flat Project is located in Churchill County, Nevada and currently consists of 11 unpatented claims (the “Property”).

On August 26, 2013 the Company and DPE amended the Agreement to clarify certain provisions of the Agreement. Annual option payments and minimum annual exploration expenditures under the Agreement are as noted below:

	Property Payments $	Work Expenditures $
Upon Execution of Agreement	5,000
August 26, 2014	10,000	50,000
August 26, 2015	15,000	150,000
August 26, 2016	20,000	200,000
August 26, 2017	30,000	350,000
August 26, 2018	40,000	400,000
August 26, 2019	50,000	450,000
August 26, 2020	50,000	500,000
August 26, 2021	50,000	550,000
August 26, 2022	50,000	600,000
August 26, 2023	-	750,000
Totals:	320,000	4,000,000

In addition to the payment of $5,000 upon execution of the Agreement, the Company is required to reimburse DPE for the 2012 and 2013 claim fees for the Property. The Company has recorded the initiation payment of $5,000 and the reimbursement of the aggregate 2012 and 2013 claim fees of $13,~~715~~430 at ~~July~~October 31, 2013. ~~The 2013 claim fees were due on August 31, 2013 and as such the Company will record those fees in the subsequent quarter.~~

Since our payment obligations are non-refundable, if we do not make any payments under the Agreement we will lose any payments made and all our rights to the Property. If all said payments under the Agreement are made, then we will acquire all mining interests in the Property. If the Company fails to make any payment when due, the Agreement gives the Company a 60-day grace period to pay the amount of the deficiency. DPE retained a 3% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) of the aggregate proceeds received by the Company from any smelter or other purchaser of any ores, concentrates, metals or other material of commercial value produced from the Property, minus the cost of transportation of the ores, concentrates or metals, including related insurance, and smelting and refining charges, including penalties.

The Company shall have the one time right exercisable for 90 days following completion of a publicly disclosed preliminary feasibility study or preliminary economic assessment to buy up to one half (50%) of the DPE’s NSR interest (i.e. an amount equal to 1.5% of the NSR interest) for $3,000,000. The right to purchase the said NSR interest shall be exercised by the Company providing DPE with notice of the purchase accompanied by payment in the amount of $3,000,000. Upon the completion of the work commitments and option payments and the exercise of the option under the Agreement, DPE is to receive an advance royalty payment of $20,000 per year to be paid in cash. Payment is to be paid within 30 days of completing the terms of the option under the Agreement and any subsequent annual anniversary within the following framework:

(i) The advance royalty is to be capped at $500,000 in total and shall be deducted from any future royalty obligations under the NSR; and

(ii) The advance royalty will cease on the commencement of payment by the Company of the NSR royalty to DPE for a period of three consecutive years of production; and

(iii) The advance royalty will not recommence at any future date once a minimum of three consecutive years of production has been achieved or there has been 25 years without production.

The Agreement will terminate if the Company fails to comply with any of its obligations under the Agreement and fails to cure such alleged breach within 30 days written notice from DPE. If the Company gives notice that it denies a default has occurred, the matter shall be determined finally through such means of dispute resolution as such matter has been subjected to by either party. The Agreement provides that all disputes shall be resolved by a sole arbitrator under the rules of the Arbitration Act of Nevada. The Company also has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving 30 days written notice to DPE.

As part of the Agreement, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of common stock to DPE subject to a binding escrow agreement (note 6).

Crescent Fault Property

On August 17, 2012 the Company executed a property option agreement (the “Agreement”) with MinQuest, Inc. (“MinQuest”) granting the Company the right to acquire 100% of the mining interests of a Nevada mineral exploration property currently controlled by MinQuest. The Company’s principal executive officer is also a Vice President of MinQuest. The property known as the Crescent Fault Property is located in Eureka County, Nevada and currently consists of 33 unpatented claims.

On July 20, 2013, the Company gave notice of termination to MinQuest pursuant to the terms of the Crescent Fault Property Agreement. The Company has determined that the Crescent Fault Property no longer fits with its business parameters as the Company is changing its exploration emphasis from gold to magnesium.

As a result of such termination, the Crescent Fault Property has been returned to MinQuest and the Company is responsible to pay all claim fees, payments and expenses in order to maintain the property in good standing until July 2014. ItThe isCompany ~~estimated~~has ~~that~~paid ~~such~~these fees ~~and~~of ~~expenses will be~~ $5,234~~. The~~ ~~Company has accrued these fees~~ at ~~July~~October 31, 2013.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY BRIDGE LOAN AND ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE

On August 20, 2012, the bridge loan in the principal amount of $84,000 accruing interest at 5% per year was extended by the holder. The previous bridge loan which was due August 20, 2012 was renewed into a new loan of $88,200 plus an additional $20,000 for a total loan amount of $108,200 bearing interest at 5% per year and being due on August 20, 2013. The unsecured loan may be repaid in its entirety including the outstanding interest earlier than August 20, 2013 as long as the Company advises the lender of such intent to repay 15 days in advance.

On August 27, 2013, the bridge loan in the principal amount of $108,200 accruing interest at 5% per year was extended by the holder. The previous bridge loan which was due August 20, 2013 was renewed into a new loan of $113,610 bearing interest at 5% per year and being due on August 20, 2014. The unsecured loan may be repaid in its entirety including the outstanding interest earlier than August 20, 2014 as long as the Company advises the lender of such intent to repay 15 days in advance.

At ~~July~~October 31, 2013 the total balance of the loan was $~~113~~114,~~314~~662 including aggregate accrued interest. Total interest expense of $1,~~364~~348 (2012 - $1,~~059~~297) has been accrued for the three months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 and total interest expense of $2,712 (2012 - $2,356) has been accrued for the six months ended October 31, 2013.

NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

Escrow Agreement

As part of its Bell Flat Property Agreement (the “Agreement”) with DPE (note 4) the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of common stock to DPE subject to a binding Escrow Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement the Company and DPE agreed that the stock certificate representing the 15,000,000 shares of common stock (the “Shares”) shall be delivered to the Escrow Agent. The Shares are duly authorized, fully paid and non-assessable and constitute issued and outstanding shares of the Company.

If, on or before January 2, 2014 the Escrow Agent has received notification from either the Company or DPE that

(A) the Agreement is terminated, then the Escrow Agent shall return the Shares to the Company for cancellation, or

(B) the Agreement is in good standing, then 3,000,000 of the Shares shall be released to DPE and the balance of the Shares shall remain in escrow subject to the terms of the Escrow Agreement.

If, on or before January 2, 2015 the Escrow Agent has have received notification from either the Company or DPE that

(A) the Agreement is terminated, then the Escrow Agent shall return the remaining Shares to the Company for cancellation, or

(B) the Agreement is in good standing, then 5,000,000 of the remaining Shares shall be released to DPE and the balance of the Shares shall remain in escrow subject to the terms of the Escrow Agreement.

If, on or before January 2, 2016 the Escrow Agent has received notification from either the Company or DPE that

(A) the Agreement is terminated, then the Escrow Agent shall return the remaining Shares to the Company for cancellation, or

(B) the Agreement is in good standing, then 7,000,000 of the Shares shall be released to DPE.

During the term of the Escrow Agreement, DPE shall have all rights to vote the Shares, whether such vote is at a shareholders' meeting or by written consent. The Company has recorded $150,000 as contra equity as a result of the issuance of the Shares. The valuation of the stock is based on a value of $0.01 per share of common stock.

shareholders' meeting or by written consent. The Company has recorded $150,000 as contra equity as a result of the issuance of the Shares. The valuation of the stock is based on a value of $0.01 per share of common stock.

Share Issuances

On October 18, 2013 the Company closed a public offering of 14,950,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share for a total offering price of $149,500. The shares were offered by the Company pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 which became effective on March 14, 2013. The public offering was fully subscribed to by eleven persons.

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On July 19, 2013 (as amended on August 26, 2013) the Company entered into the Bell Flat Property Option Agreement (note 4) with DPE. Herb Duerr, the Company’s Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, and a director is the Vice President of DPE. Naomi Duerr, Mr. Duerr’s wife is President of and controls DPE. DPE was issued 15,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company on July 19, 2013 pursuant to the DPE Agreement (note 6). In connection with his work on behalf of the Company, the Company recorded $11,400 in consulting expenses for Herb Duerr (2012 - $0).

For the ~~three~~six-months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013, the Company paid one of its directors $500 per month to serve on its Board of Directors. The total amount paid for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 was $13,~~500~~000 (2012- $34,~~000~~500). In the prior period there were two directors being compensated by the Company for a portion of the period.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of American Magna Corp. (an exploration stage company) (the “Company”), which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Certain statements contained in this report, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of the Company's business, the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company, its directors or its officers, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of the Company and the products it expects to offer and other statements contained herein regarding matters that are not historical facts, are "forward-looking" statements. Future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, future press releases and future oral or written statements made by or with the approval of the Company, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain forward-looking statements. Because such statements include risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For a more detailed listing of some of the risks and uncertainties facing the Company, please see the Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2013 filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.

Business Operations

During the next twelve months our objective is to explore the property subject to our mineral claims. We continue to run our operations with the use of contract operators and as such do not anticipate a change to our company staffing levels. We remain focused on keeping a minimal staff level, which currently consists of our two directors, one of which is also our principal executive officer, to conserve capital. The Company anticipates that a significant portion of the exploration program will be carried out either directly by the Company’s principal executive officer or under his supervision. We believe the outsourcing of some of the necessary operations continues to be the most cost effective and efficient manner of conducting the business of the Company.

We are a natural resource exploration company with an objective of acquiring, exploring, and if warranted and feasible, exploiting natural resource properties. Our primary focus in the natural resource sector is magnesium. We do not consider ourselves a “blank check” company required to comply with Rule 419 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, because we were not organized for the purpose of effecting, and our business plan is not to effect, a merger with or acquisition of an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person. We do not intend to merge with or acquire another company in the next 12 months.

Though we have the expertise on our board of directors to take a resource property that hosts a viable ore deposit into mining production, the costs and time frame for doing so are considerable, and the subsequent return on investment for our shareholders would be very long term indeed. We therefore anticipate optioning or selling any ore bodies that we may discover to a major mining company. Most major mining companies obtain their ore reserves through the purchase of ore bodies found by junior exploration companies. Although these major mining companies do some exploration work themselves, many of them rely on the junior resource exploration companies to provide them with future deposits for them to mine. By optioning or selling a deposit found by us to these major mining companies, it would provide an immediate return to our shareholders without the long time frame and cost of putting a mine into operation ourselves, and it would also provide future capital for the company to continue operations.

The search for valuable natural resources as a business is extremely risky. We can provide investors with no assurance that the property we have in Nevada contains commercially exploitable reserves. Exploration for natural reserves is a speculative venture involving substantial risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing commercially feasible reserves. Problems such as unusual or unexpected geological formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, we would be unable to complete our business plan and any money spent on exploration would be lost.

Natural resource exploration and development requires significant capital and our assets and resources are limited. Therefore, we anticipate participating in the natural resource industry through the purchase or option of early stage property. We currently have one property under option. There has been no indication as yet that any mineral deposits exist on the property, and there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our property. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility is determined.

In the following discussion, there are references to “unpatented” mining claims. An unpatented mining claim on U.S. government lands establishes a claim to the locatable minerals (also referred to as stakeable minerals) on the land and the right of possession solely for mining purposes. No title to the land passes to the claimant. If a proven economic mineral deposit is developed, provisions of federal mining laws permit owners of unpatented mining claims to patent (to obtain title to) the claim. If you purchase an unpatented mining claim that is later declared invalid by the U.S. government, you could lose all rights to the minerals within that unpatented mining claim.

Bell Flat Project

	Property Payments $	Work Expenditures $
Upon Execution of Agreement	5,000
August 26, 2014	10,000	50,000
August 26, 2015	15,000	150,000
August 26, 2016	20,000	200,000
August 26, 2017	30,000	350,000
August 26, 2018	40,000	400,000
August 26, 2019	50,000	450,000
August 26, 2020	50,000	500,000
August 26, 2021	50,000	550,000
August 26, 2022	50,000	600,000
August 26, 2023	-	750,000
Totals:	320,000	4,000,000

In addition to the payment of $5,000 upon execution, the Company is required to reimburse DPE for the 2012 and 2013 claim fees for the Property. The Company has paid an initial payment of $5,000 and reimbursed DPE for 2012 and 2013 claim fees of ~~$1,715~~an ~~and~~aggregate $13,~~715~~430 ~~for 2013 claim fees~~ under the Agreement.

Crescent Fault Property

As a result of such termination, the Crescent Fault Property has been returned to MinQuest and the Company is responsible to pay all claim fees, payments and expenses in order to maintain the property in good standing until July 2014. ItThe isCompany ~~estimated~~has ~~that~~paid ~~such~~these fees and expenses ~~will~~of be $5,234. ~~The Company has accrued these fees at July 31, 2013.~~

Results of Operations

WeThree ~~did not earn any revenues during the three~~ months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 orcompared ~~2012. We~~to ~~will be in~~ the ~~exploration~~three ~~stage~~months ofended ~~our~~October business for an extended period of time and as a result do not anticipate earning revenues until we have developed an exploration property. We can provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property31, ~~or if such resources are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production of our mineral property.~~2012

~~For~~We ~~the~~did ~~three~~not ~~months~~earn ~~ended~~any ~~July~~revenues ~~31,~~during ~~2013 we had a net loss of $30,697 compared to a net loss of $17,915 for~~ the three months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 or 2012. ~~The~~We ~~increase~~will be in the ~~net~~exploration ~~loss~~stage ~~was largely due to the recognition~~ of ~~$5,000~~our ~~payable~~business onfor ~~the~~an ~~execution~~extended period of ~~the~~time ~~Bell Flat Property Option Agreement~~ and ~~$1,715 for the reimbursement of claim fees on the property. During the three months ended July 31, 2013 the Company also recognized $5,234 in claims fees that are payable to MinQuest~~ as a result ofdo ~~the~~not ~~Company~~anticipate ~~terminating~~earning ~~the~~revenues ~~Crescent~~until ~~Fault~~we ~~Property~~have ~~Option~~developed ~~Agreement.~~an ~~During the three months ended July 31, 2012 the Company had the Caldera Property under option and did not perform any significant~~ exploration ~~work on the~~ property ~~during the quarter~~. OnWe ~~August~~can ~~17,~~provide ~~2012~~no ~~the~~assurance ~~Company~~that ~~terminated~~we ~~the~~will ~~Caldera~~discover ~~Property. General~~commercially ~~and~~exploitable ~~administrative~~levels ~~expenses~~of ~~increased~~mineral toresources ~~$15,585~~on ~~for~~our ~~the three months ended July 31~~property, ~~2013~~or ~~from~~if ~~$12,752for~~such ~~the~~resources ~~three~~are ~~months ended July 31~~discovered, ~~2012. The~~that ~~increase~~we ~~was~~will ~~due~~enter tointo ~~small~~commercial ~~increases~~production inof ~~legal,~~our ~~transfer~~mineral ~~agent and filing fees~~property.

~~During~~For the three- months ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 ~~the~~we ~~Company~~had ~~recognized~~a net loss of $~~150~~28,~~000~~590 incompared ~~share-based~~to ~~compensation. The~~a net loss of $~~150~~16,~~000~~518 ~~has~~for ~~been~~the ~~recognized~~three asmonths ~~stock~~ended ~~performance~~October ~~contingency~~31, ~~that~~2012. The ~~will~~increase bein ~~recognized~~the ~~into~~net loss aswas largely due to an increase in general and administrative expenses partially offset by lower mineral property exploration expenditures and a decrease in mineral property acquisition payments. General and administrative expenses increased to $25,527 for the ~~shares~~three ~~are~~months ~~released~~ended October 31, 2013 from ~~escrow~~$6,147 for the three months ended October 31, 2012. AsThe ~~part~~increase ofin the current quarter was due to legal, accounting, and consulting expenses relating to the Company’s new property agreement, name change and share issuances. Mineral property exploration expenditures decreased to $1,715 for the three months ended October 31, 2013 from $4,074 for the three months ended October 31, 2012. During the current quarter the Company paid $1,715 for claim fees on the Bell Flat Property ~~Option~~while ~~Agreement~~in the prior quarter the Company incurred $4,074 in mineral property exploration expenditures on its Crescent Fault Property. Additionally, in the prior quarter the Company ~~issued~~paid 15$5,000~~,000~~ ~~shares~~to MinQuest upon execution of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~Crescent toFault ~~DPE~~Property ~~contingent~~Option ~~upon~~Agreement. The ~~certain~~Company ~~events~~has since terminated the Crescent Fault Property Option Agreement.

Six months ended October 31, 2013 compared to the six months ended October 31, 2013

We did not earn any revenues during the three months ended October 31, 2013 or 2012. We will be in the exploration stage of our business for an extended period of time and as a result do not anticipate earning revenues until we have developed an exploration property. We can provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property, or if such resources are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production of our mineral property.

For the six months ended October 31, 2013 we had a net loss of $59,287 compared to a net loss of $34,433 for the six months ended October 31, 2012. The increase in the net loss was due to an increase in general and administrative expenses as well as higher mineral property exploration expenditures. General and administrative expenses increased to $41,112 for the six months ended October 31, 2013 from $18,899 for the six months ended October 31, 2012. The increase in the current period was due to legal, accounting, and consulting expenses relating to the Company’s new property agreement, name change and share issuances. Mineral property exploration expenses increased to $10,463 for the six months ended October 31, 2013 from $8,178 for the six months ended October 31, 2012. In the current period the Company recognized a total of $3,430 in claim fees on its Bell Flat Property and $5,234 in claims fees that were payable to MinQuest as a result of the Company terminating the Crescent Fault Property Option Agreement. In the prior period the Company incurred $8,178 in mineral property exploration expenditures on its now terminated Crescent Fault Property.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had cash of $~~740~~134,990 and negative working capital of $~~141~~21,~~930~~020 as of ~~July~~October 31, 2013. We anticipate that we will incur the following expenses over the next twelve months:

· $66154,~~700~~500 in property option payments, annual claim filing fees, and exploration expenditures on the Company’s Bell Flat Project;

· $49,~~300~~500 for operating expenses, including working capital and general, legal, accounting and administrative expenses associated with reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Net cash used in operating activities during the three-months ended July 31, 2013 was $2,920 compared to $15,300 during the three months ended July 31, 2012. Despite an increase in the net loss to $30,697 during the three months ended July 31, 2013 from $17,915 for the three months ended July 31, 2012 cash used in operations decreased. In addition, partially offsetting the impact of the higher loss in the current period was an increase in cash inflows from an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities to $25,736 for the three months ended July 31, 2013 from $6,561 for the three months ended July 31, 2012. Also effecting changes in working capital was an inflow of $677 from changes in prepaid expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2013 while in the three months ended July 31, 2012 there was an outflow of $5,005. There were no investing or financing activities in either of the three months ended July 31, 2013 or 2012.

~~The~~Net ~~future~~cash ofused ~~the~~in ~~Company~~operating isactivities ~~dependent~~during ~~upon~~the ~~its~~six ~~ability~~months toended ~~obtain~~October ~~future~~31, ~~financing~~2013 ~~and~~was ~~upon~~$18,170 ~~future~~compared ~~profitable~~to ~~operations~~$34,083 ~~from~~during the ~~development~~six ofmonths ~~its~~ended ~~mineral~~October ~~property~~31, 2012. OnDespite ~~August~~an ~~27,~~increase ~~2012~~in the ~~Company~~net ~~received~~loss anto ~~additional~~ $2059,~~000~~287 induring ~~proceeds~~the ~~from~~six amonths ~~bridge~~ended ~~loan~~October ~~and~~31, on2013 ~~September~~from 1$34,433 ~~2011~~for the ~~Company~~six ~~received~~months ~~$100~~ended October 31,~~000~~ ~~from~~2012 acash ~~private~~used ~~placement~~in operations decreased. The ~~proceeds~~decrease ~~from~~was ~~these~~largely ~~financings~~due ~~are~~to ~~not~~an ~~sufficient~~increase ~~for~~in ~~all~~cash ofinflows ~~the~~from ~~Company’s~~an ~~commitments~~increase ~~for~~in ~~the~~accounts ~~next~~payable 12and ~~months.~~accrued ~~The~~liabilities ~~Company~~to ~~expects~~$37,728 ~~that~~for itthe ~~will~~six ~~need~~months ~~approximately~~ended ~~$116~~October 31,~~000~~ to2013 ~~fund~~from ~~its~~$891 ~~operations~~for ~~through~~the ~~July~~six months ended October 31, ~~2014~~2012. WeAlso ~~anticipate~~effecting ~~that~~changes in ~~the~~working ~~future~~capital wewas ~~will~~an ~~need~~inflow ~~additional~~of ~~funding~~$677 ~~and~~from ~~that~~changes ~~such~~in ~~funding~~prepaid ~~will~~expenses befor the six months ended October 31, 2013 while in the ~~form~~six ofmonths ~~equity~~ended ~~financing~~October ~~from~~31, ~~the~~2012 ~~sale~~there ofwas ~~our~~an ~~common~~outflow ~~stock~~of $2,897. ~~However,~~There wewere ~~cannot~~no ~~provide~~investing ~~investors~~activities ~~with~~in ~~any~~either ~~assurance~~of ~~that~~the wesix ~~will~~months beended ~~able~~October to31, ~~raise~~2013 ~~sufficient~~or ~~funding~~2012. Financing activities included $149,500 received from the ~~sale~~issuance of ~~our~~ common stock tofor ~~fund~~the ~~additional~~six ~~phases~~months ofended ~~the~~October ~~exploration program~~31, ~~should~~2013 wewhile ~~decide~~$20,000 towas ~~proceed. We~~received dofrom ~~not~~loan ~~have~~proceeds ~~any~~during ~~arrangements~~the insix ~~place~~months ~~for~~ended ~~any~~October ~~future~~31, ~~equity financing~~2012.

The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its mineral property. On October 18, 2013 the Company closed a public offering and issued 14,950,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share for a total offering price of $149,500. The shares were offered by the Company pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 which became effective on March 14, 2013 and on August 20, 2012 the Company received an additional $20,000 under its related party bridge loan. The proceeds from these financings are not sufficient for all of the Company’s commitments for the next 12 months. The Company expects that it will need approximately $204,000 to fund its operations through October 31, 2014. We anticipate that in the future we will need additional funding and that such funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. However, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund additional phases of the exploration program, should we decide to proceed. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

Going Concern Consideration

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $~~261~~290,~~694~~284 for the period from August 1, 2010 (inception of the exploration stage) to ~~July~~October 31, 2013, and has had no sales. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its mineral property. Management may seek to raise additional capital in the future through the sale of equity. There are no present plans to do so and there can be no assurances that any such plans will be realized. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

There is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, its independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the April 30, 2013 financial statements regarding concerns about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by its independent auditors.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of ~~July~~October 31, 2013. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that the Company’s disclosure and controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Lack of Segregation Of Duties

Management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the small number of persons dealing with general administrative and financial matters. However, at this time management has decided that considering the abilities of the persons now involved and the control procedures in place, the risks associated with such lack of segregation are low and the potential benefits of adding employees to clearly segregate duties do not justify the substantial expenses associated with such increases. Management will periodically reevaluate this situation.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company. The Company’s property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item 1A.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no issuances of equity securities during the quarter ended ~~July~~October 31, 2013 which were not previously reported.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

The Company does not currently have any mining operations.

Item 5. Other information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31 - Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32 – Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: ~~September~~December 1018, 2013 AMERICAN MAGNA CORP. By: /s/ Herb Duerr Herb Duerr President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, and Director (Principal Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · American Magna Corp