UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ~~FORM 10-Q~~

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~January~~April 3130, 2009

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________________ to _______________________

Commission File Number: 0-22011

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF COMPANY AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

NEVADA		86-0760991
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF		I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)		IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

5360 NORTHWEST 35TH AVENUE, FT. LAUDERDALE, FL		33309
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)		(ZIP CODE)

(954) 486-4590
(COMPANY’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x [ X ] No o[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o [ ] Accelerated filer o [ ] Non-accelerated filer x [X] Smaller reporting company o[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o [ ] No x[ X ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of ~~March~~May 1331, 2009, there were 29,827,357 shares of common stock outstanding (~~not~~ including 4,000,000 shares of common stock that the Company is obligated to issue).

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q

		~~PAGE~~	PAGE
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I.	Financial Statements.
	(UNAUDITED)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	4	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	14
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	18
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
ITEM 4T.	Controls and Procedures.	18
	and Results of Operations.		15
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		20
ITEM 4T.	Controls and Procedures.		20
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings.	19	21
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors.	20	22
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	20	23
ITEM 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities.	20	23
ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.	20	23
ITEM 5.	Other Information.	21	23
ITEM 6.	Exhibits.	22	24
SIGNATURES		23	25

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

		January 31, 2009			October 31, 2008
	April 30,				October 31,
	2009				2008
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	$9,283	~~19,618~~		$	65,986
Trade receivables, net		2,529,228	~~3,763,558~~			3,820,465
Inventory		2,103,361	~~2,635,466~~			2,901,664
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		492,447	~~625,785~~			377,269
Total Current Assets		5,134,320	~~7,044,427~~			7,165,384
PROPERTY - Net of accumulated depreciation of $1,035,039 and $911,452, respectively			2,409,396			2,483,577
PROPERTY - Net of accumulated depreciation of $1,118,234
and $911,452, respectively		2,324,392				2,483,577
OTHER ASSETS:
Security deposits		87,548	~~87,548~~			87,548
Deferred financing fees		56,243	~~357,645~~			698,449
Intangible assets - net of accumulated amortization of $1,495,656 and $1,463,877, respectively			431,674			463,454
Intangible assets - net of accumulated amortization of
Goodwill			11,447,698			11,447,698
$1,495,656 and $1,463,877, respectively		384,005				463,454
Total Other Assets			12,324,565			12,697,149
Goodwill		11,447,698				11,447,698
TOTAL ASSETS		$	21,778,388		$	22,346,110
Total Other Assets		11,975,494				12,697,149
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
TOTAL ASSETS	$	19,434,205			$	22,346,110
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	$7,187,265	~~6,965,131~~		$	5,978,~~001~~002
Accrued interest		474,020	~~335,599~~			374,864
Accrued liabilities		3,571,513	~~3,682,888~~			4,054,~~738~~739
Dividend payable			614,633			382,650
Dividend Payable		819,386				382,649
Notes payable - shareholders and others		375,000	~~450,000~~			500,000
Notes payable		40,000	~~40,000~~			40,000
Current portion of capital leases			101,569			70,291
Current portion of Capital Leases		104,295				70,291
Current portion of note payable - bank		2,900,000	~~2,200,000~~			2,100,000
Total current liabilities		15,471,479	~~14,389,821~~			13,500,545
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Note payable bank, net of current portion		2,300,000	~~3,000,000~~			3,550,000
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion		322,885	~~350,809~~			294,071
Total Liabilities		18,094,364	~~17,740,630~~			17,344,~~615~~616
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Series A preferred stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 600,000 shares; 591,850 and 591,850 issued and outstanding, respectively (liquidation preference of $798,998)			798,998			798,998
Series A preferred stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 600,000 shares;
Series C preferred stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 100,000 shares; 28,955 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively			28,955			28,955
591,850 and 591,850 issued and outstanding, respectively
Common stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 45,000,000 shares; 28,494,014 and 27,619,015 issued and outstanding, respectively			39,154			38,279
(liquidation preference of $798,998)		798,998				798,998
Additional paid-in capital			94,255,696			93,887,270
Series C preferred stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 100,000 shares;
Accumulated deficit			(79,982,635	)		(78,649,598	)
28,955 and 28,955 issued and outstanding, respectively		28,955				28,955
Common Stock in Treasury			(10,952,410	)		(10,952,410	)
Common stock - $.001 par value - authorized, 45,000,000 shares;
Subscription receivable			(150,000	)		(150,000	)
28,744,013 and 27,619,015 issued and outstanding, respectively		39,404				38,280
Total stockholders’ equity			4,037,758			5,001,495
Additional paid-in capital		85,237,503				84,759,878
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	21,778,388		$	22,346,110
Warrants		9,127,392				9,127,392
Accumulated deficit		(82,790,001	)			(78,649,597	)
Common Stock in Treasury		(10,952,410	)			(10,952,410	)
Subscription receivable		(150,000	)			(150,000	)
Total stockholders' equity		1,339,841				5,001,494
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	19,434,205			$	22,346,110

See notes to the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended	~~Three Months Ended~~						Six Months Ended
		January 31, 2009			January 31, 2008
	April 30,				April 30,			April 30,			April 30,
REVENUES, net		$	6,836,279		$	4,255,120
	2009				2008			2009			2008
COST OF REVENUES			4,495,019			3,262,772
REVENUES, net	$	2,809,430			$	6,121,632		$	9,645,709		$	10,376,752
GROSS PROFIT			2,341,260			992,348
COST OF REVENUES		2,781,561				3,825,125			7,276,580			7,087,897
OPERATING EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT		27,869				2,296,507			2,369,129			3,288,855
Research and development			218,035			290,078
OPERATING EXPENSES
Selling, general, and administrative			2,757,039			1,693,210
Research and development		417,491				361,966			635,527			652,044
Total expenses			2,975,075			1,983,288
Selling, general, and administrative		1,700,799				2,921,861			4,457,839			4,615,070
OPERATING LOSS			(633,815	)		(990,940	)
Total expenses		2,118,290				3,283,827			5,093,366			5,267,114
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
OPERATING LOSS		(2,090,422	)			(987,320	)		(2,724,237	)		(1,978,259	)
Other income			—			1,572
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Interest expense, net			(467,239	)		(1,235,336	)
Other income		-				-			-			-
Total other (expenses) income			(467,239	)		(1,233,764	)
Interest expense, net		(502,196	)			(1,953,804	)		(969,435	)		(3,187,568	)
NET LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAX			(1,101,054	)		(2,224,704	)
Total other (expenses) income		(502,196	)			(1,953,804	)		(969,435	)		(3,187,568	)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES			—			—
NET LOSS	$	(2,592,618	)		$	(2,941,124	)	$	(3,693,672	)	$	(5,165,827	)
NET LOSS		$	(1,101,054	)	$	(2,224,704	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE	$	(0.09	)		$	(0.14	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.24	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.09	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING			28,343,652			23,547,066
OUTSTANDING		28,662,553				21,097,519			28,500,460			21,097,519

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~CASH~~ ~~FLOWS~~CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (~~UNAUDITED~~DEFICIT)

		FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
	Series A Preferred Stock					Series C Preferred Stock				Common Stock			Warrants					Paid in		Accumulated			Treasury stock					Subscription			Stockholders'
		January 31, 2009			January 31, 2008
	Shares		Amount			Shares			Amount	Shares	Amount		Number			Amount		Capital		Deficit			Shares		Amount			Receivable			Equity (Deficit)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Balances, October 31, 2007	591,850		$	798,998		-		$	-	19,177,183	$	29,838	8,846,915		$	4,892,997		$	71,537,564	$	(74,261,117	)	10,720,000	$	(10,952,410	)	$	(150,000	)	$	(8,104,130	)
Net loss		$	(1,101,054	)	$	(2,224,704	)
Stock for loan gaurantee	-			-		-			-	4,000,000		4,000	-			-			1,036,000		-		-		-			-			1,040,000
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Warrants issued or repriced	-			-		-			-	-		-	4,180,000			1,467,925			1,548,465		-		-		-			-			3,016,390
Depreciation and amortization			155,367			147,394
Warrants cancelled or expired	-			-		-			-	-		-	(3,920,000	)		(932,191	)				-		-		-			-			(932,191	)
Amortization of deferred financing fees			340,805			360,697
Stocks and warrants issued in
Stock based compensation			369,300			—
connection with convertible debt	-			-		28,955			28,955	3,394,712		3,395	18,500,200			3,263,837			9,956,277		-		-		-			-			13,252,464
Expenses satisfied with issuance of common stock			—			—
Stock and warrants issued for sevices	-			-		-			-	1,047,120		1,047	1,413,800			434,824			681,570		-		-		-			-			1,117,441
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Series C Preferred dividend	-			-		-			-	-		-	-			-			-		(382,649	)	-		-			-			(382,649	)
Accounts receivable			56,908			1,377,310
Net Loss	-			-		-			-	-		-	-			-			-		(4,005,831	)	-		-			-			(4,005,831	)
Inventory			266,198			599,745
Balances, October 31, 2008	591,850		$	798,998		28,955		$	28,955	27,619,015	$	38,280	29,020,915		$	9,127,392		$	84,759,876	$	(78,649,597	)	10,720,000	$	(10,952,410	)	$	(150,000	)	$	5,001,495
Prepaids and other current assets			(248,517	)		(145,600	)
Stock and warrants issued for sevices	-			-		-			-	1,124,998		1,124	-			-			477,627		-		-		-			-			478,751
Accounts payable			1,165,131			(105,220	)
Series C Preferred dividend	-			-		-			-	-		-	-			-			-		(446,732	)	-		-			-			(446,733	)
Accrued interest			(39,265	)		282,869
Net Loss	-			-		-			-	-		-	-			-			-		(3,693,672	)	-		-			-			(3,693,672	)
Accrued liabilities			(371,850	)		519,749
Balances, April 30, 2009	591,850		$	798,998		28,955		$	28,955	28,744,013	$	39,404	29,020,915		$	9,127,392		$	85,237,503	$	(82,790,001	)	10,720,000	$	(10,952,410	)	$	(150,000	)	$	1,339,841
Net cash provided in operating activities			593,022			812,241
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of machinery and equipment			(49,406	)		(132,879	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(49,406	)		(132,879	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of debt			(500,000	)		(664,785	)
Repayment of capital leases			(89,984	)		(13,573	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(589,984	)		(678,358	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			(46,368	)		1,004
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD			65,986			—
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD		$	19,618		$	1,004
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment through capital leases			178,000			—
Cash paid for interest			143,710			—
		$	321,710		$	—

See notes to the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements.

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	April 30,			April 30,
	2009			2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(3,693,672	)	$	(5,165,827	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		286,231			284,973
Amortization of deferred financing fees		642,207			(282,893	)
Stock based compensation		478,750			2,537,290
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,291,237			193,079
Inventory		798,303			(320,131	)
Prepaids and other current assets		(115,178	)		(188,716	)
Accounts payable		1,387,264			1,053,007
Accrued interest		99,157			1,215,285
Accrued liabilities		(493,223	)		851,348
Net cash provided in operating activities		681,076			177,414

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of machinery and equipment		(47,597	)		(262,914	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(47,597	)		(262,914	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock		-			82,137
Proceeds from debt		-			1,410,060
Repayment of debt		(575,000	)		(1,394,208	)
Repayment of capital leases		(115,182	)		9,412
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(690,182	)		107,401


NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS		(56,703	)		21,901

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		65,986			-
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	9,283		$	21,901


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH FINANCING
AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment through capital leases		178,000			-
Cash paid for interest		82,541			445,234
	$	260,541		$	445,234

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~The~~ The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Synovics”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with the instructions to Form 10-Q for ~~interim~~ interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information ~~and~~ and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~United~~ United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the three-month period ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be achieved for the entire fiscal year ending October 31, 2009. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Synovics’ financial statements and accompanying notes thereto as of and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Synovics has incurred accumulated operating losses of $7982,~~982~~790,~~635~~ 001 through ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 which have been funded through the issuance of stock and debt. The limitations ~~losses~~on Synovics’ inability to sell products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin as a result of the DEA enforcement action and related proceedings (as discussed elsewhere in these notes) has resulted in a significant decrease in sales and gross profit. Synovics does not expect sales of these products to reach the past levels. To address the decline in sales and product mix, Synovics is in late development stages of new non-controlled substance products that Synovics is targeting for launch during the end of the third fiscal quarter with the aim of restoring historical revenues and profit margin. There can be no assurances that Synovics will be able to launch such products or that they will be launched in a timely manner. Even if launched, there can be no assurances that such products will generate sufficient revenue to restore historical gross profit margins. Synovics continues to explore raising additional capital as well as alternate sources of financing. The losses incurred to date, the uncertainty regarding the DEA enforcement action and related proceedings, the uncertainty regarding the ability to raise additional capital and Synovics’ inability to generate operating profits and positive cash flows from operations indicate that Synovics may not be able to continue as a going concern ~~for a reasonable period of time~~.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Synovics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, (collectively the “Company”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Accounts receivable are reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the amount of receivables that will be actually collected. Management performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and provides an allowance based on credit history and worthiness of its customers. Receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of product.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.

Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed at least annually for impairments. Due to the recent developments relating to sale of ephedrine and quaifensin products an impairment of goodwill may be required in the future.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation using the fair value based method of accounting.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method. The liability method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet ~~date~~due to the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Any resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur.

Effective November 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB’s Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for ~~Uncertainty~~ uncertainly in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB No. 109”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return in its financial statements. FIN 48 requires that the financial statements reflect expected future ~~tax~~ tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts, but without considering ~~time~~ time values. No such amounts were accrued for at November 1, 2008. Additionally, no no adjustments related to uncertain tax positions were recognized during the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a reduction of the income tax benefit. No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued as of ~~January~~April 3130, 2009.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions within the United States of America. Although we do not believe that we are currently under examination in any of our major tax jurisdictions, we remain subject to examination in all of ~~our~~out tax jurisdictions until the applicable statutes of limitation expire. As of ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, the tax returns for years ended 2005 onwards remain subject to examination for our federal and major state tax jurisdictions. ~~The~~ The Company does not expect to have a material change to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months.

6 7

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2– PER SHARE (LOSS) INFORMATION

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”, basic earnings per share of common stock (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share of common stock (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, and dilutive common stock equivalents and convertible securities then outstanding. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Common stock equivalents totaling 58,567,765 and 9,438,765 were excluded from the computation of Diluted EPS for the three months ended ~~January 31~~April 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 58,567,765 and 13,344,165 were excluded for the six months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively, as their effect on the computation of Diluted EPS would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted per share information:

		For the Three Months Ended January 31,
	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		2009			2008
	Ended April 30,						Ended April 30,
Numerator:
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net income (loss) (in thousands):		$	(1,101,054	)	$	(2,224,704	)
Numerator:
Denominator:
Net income (loss) (in thousands):	$	(2,592,618	)	$	(2,941,124	)	$	(3,693,672	)	$	(5,165,827	)
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding			28,343,652			23,547,066
Denominator:
Net loss per share:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		28,662,553			21,097,519			28,500,460			21,097,519
Basic and diluted		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.09	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.24	)

NOTE 3 – NOSTRUM SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF NOSTRUM GUARANTEE

Synovics and its subsidiary Synovics Laboratories, Inc. (“Synovics Labs”), were involved in a legal dispute with Nostrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Nostrum”) and Nirmal Mulye, Ph.D. (“Mulye”). As disclosed in the Company’s previous periodic reports, these parties were among the parties to pending actions and proceedings before the Federal District Court of the Southern District of New York and the District of New Jersey as well as arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. As part of the legal dispute, the Company alleged, among other things, that (i) Mulye breached fiduciary duties and usurped corporate opportunities as a member of the board and Chief Scientific Officer and that Anil Anand (a confessed felon in a $700 million bank fraud) and Nostrum aided and abetted Mulye in such actions, (ii) Mulye, Anand and Nostrum tortiously interfered with prospective contractual relationships of the Company, (iii) Mulye fraudulently induced the Company to enter into certain financial transactions, and (iv) Mulye, Anand and Nostrum conspired to breach fiduciary duties and steal valuable corporate opportunities.

7 8

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 3 – NOSTRUM SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF NOSTRUM GUARANTEE (CONTINUED)

On July 31, 2007, the Company together with Synovics Labs entered into a settlement agreement with all parties to the various actions. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, all pending actions and proceedings between the parties were dismissed with prejudice, the parties mutually released one another and all pre-settlement agreements were terminated, including the Technology License Agreement between the Company and Nostrum and the ANDA Ownership Transfer and Product License Agreement (“ANDA Agreement”) between Synovics Labs and Nostrum. In connection with the termination of the ANDA Agreement, Synovics and Synovics Labs assigned to Nostrum the Abbreviated New Drug Application for Metformin Extended Release 500mg. As part of the settlement, 10,661,000 shares of common stock of the Company that were owned by Nostrum were placed in escrow pursuant to a separate escrow agreement (the “Escrow Shares”). The escrow agreement provided, among other things, that if the guarantees of Mulye and Nostrum to the Bank of India and the related undertakings in connection with the BOI Credit Facility were extinguished in full or in part by May 1, 2008, the Escrow Shares were to be released to Synovics in an amount proportionate to the amount by which the guarantees have been extinguished. Further, if the Escrow Shares were released to Nostrum and during the escrow period the Company issued additional shares of common stock or common stock equivalents to cause the Escrow Shares to represent less than 32% of the outstanding shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis, then the Company was required to issue to Nostrum additional shares of common stock so that the Escrow Shares together with the additional shares constitute 32% of the outstanding shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis.

On April 29, 2008, the guarantees given by Nostrum and Mulye were replaced with a letter of credit issued by an affiliate of Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Maneesh”) in favor of BOI securing the BOI Loan. Maneesh is an affiliate of the Company and three of its designees presently serve on the Company’s board of directors. Consequently, the Company delivered a notice to the escrow agent, pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement demanding release to the Company of the Escrow Shares. Nostrum is currently contesting the release of the Escrow Shares and the Company commenced an action in the Federal District Court of the ~~Southern~~ Southern District of New York (the “Court”) ~~(see Note 8)~~.

The Escrow Shares are being treated as treasury stock. The cost of the shares included in treasury stock at ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 was $10,767,610. In the event that the Court orders the release of any Escrow Shares to Nostrum from escrow, the Company may recognize an additional charge at that time.

As an inducement for replacing the guarantees, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of its common stock to Maneesh and provided anti-dilution protection in the event that all or part of the Escrow Shares are ultimately released to Nostrum. These shares were valued at $1,040,000 and were expensed during ~~the~~ fiscal year ended 2008.

NOTE 4 - NOTE PAYABLE - BANK

In May 2006, the Company entered into a bank financing with the Bank of India (“BOI”) as senior secured debt in the principal amount $10,500,000 (the “BOI Credit Facility”). Of the principal, $5,250,000 could only be utilized for working capital purposes, the amount borrowed to equal 70% of ~~the~~ the value of fully paid inventory and the accounts receivable and 100% of the cash in the accounts maintained by the borrower at the bank. The interest rate is 1% above the bank’s prime rate (87.5% at ~~January~~April 3130, 2009). Interest is payable monthly. In September, 2007, the amount of the loan was reduced by $5,250,000 held back for working capital purposes. As of ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, the outstanding principal balance due under the BOI Credit Facility was $5,200,000.

8 9

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 4 - NOTE PAYABLE – BANK (CONTINUED)

Future maturities of notes payable - bank are as follows:

Year ended January 31,
Year ended April 30,
2010	$2,900,000	$	~~3,000,000~~
2011	$2,300,000	$	~~2,200,000~~
		$	5,200,000
	$5,200,000

~~Interest~~ Interest expense under the note payable was $~~143~~105,~~710~~500 and $~~163~~139,~~894~~762 for the three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE - SHAREHOLDERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES

The Company entered into a promissory note (the “Copanos Note”) in the principal amount of $3,000,000 with the seller, John Copanos, as partial consideration for the acquisition of Kirk and ANDAPharm.

During the year ended October 31, 2007, $1,000,000 was paid to the seller. The Copanos Note was subsequently amended in 2007 and 2008. As a result of the most recent amendment, the then outstanding principal on the note and an additional ($2,000,000) was due in two payments, one in the amount of $1,500,000 due on or before May 1, 2008 and $500,000 on or before August 1, 2008. During the year ended October 31, 2008, the Company paid an additional $1,500,000 to the seller with a principal balance of $500,000 remaining outstanding. Commencing January 1, 2009, the Company began paying down the principal ~~due~~ due on the Copanos Note and during the three months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, paid $5075,000 of principal. The Copanos Note bore interest of 12% per annum from October 3, 2007 to January 14, 2008 and 15% per annum from January 15, 2008 to May 1, 2008. From May 2, 2008 to August 31, 2008, the note bore an interest rate of 18% per annum and from September 1, 2008 onwards it bears an interest rate of 24% per annum with interest payments payable monthly. As of ~~January 31~~April 30, 2009, there was unpaid interest of $3559,~~067~~049, which has been included in these financial statements. Interest expense under the Copanos Note was $3023,~~400~~ 983 and $64141,~~167~~931 for the three months ended April ~~January 31~~30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In In connection with renegotiation of the repayment terms of the Copanos Note, the Company consented, in the case of default, to the seller obtaining a final judgment without necessity of a further hearing.

In addition, in connection with the renegotiation of the repayment terms of the Copanos Note, on March 19, 2008, the Company issued to the seller a seven year warrant to acquire 2,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.00 per share (the “Seller Warrant”). Of the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant, 1,400,000 are immediately exercisable and the remaining 700,000 ~~are~~vested ~~exercisable if the seller is employed by the Company or its subsidiary~~ on March 19, 2009 ~~except that if Ronald Lane is removed or resigns from the Company’s board of directors, then such 700,000 shares shall become immediately exercisable~~. As a result of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock offering that initially closed on May 9, 2008, (the ~~“Series C Preferred Stock Offering”), the~~ exercise price of the Seller Warrant automatically reduced to $0.75. The Company also agreed to include the shares issuable upon exercise of the Seller Warrant in the Company’s next registration statement subject to reasonable adjustments as may be required by the investor or investor group whose shares are also being registered.

9The per share weighted value of the warrants to purchase 2,100,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share is $0.35. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: no dividend yield; expected volatility of 80%; risk free interest rate of 2.25%; and expected life of seven years. The Company has fully recognized a charge of $741,361 for the issuance and repricing of these warrants.

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE - SHAREHOLDERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES (CONTINUED)

The per share weighted value of the warrants to purchase 2,100,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share is $0.35. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: no dividend yield; expected volatility of 80%; risk free interest rate of 2.25%; and expected life of seven years.

NOTE 6 - 2007 PRIVATE PLACEMENT

During January and February 2007, the Company completed closings of a private placement (“2007 Private Placement”), whereby the Company sold an aggregate of 1,575,000 units (“Units”) to accredited investors. Of the 1,575,000 Units sold, 450,000 Units were exchanged in lieu of repayment of notes issued in the 2006 Bridge Note Financing in the principal amount of $450,000.

The price per Unit was $1.00 and each Unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock of the Company; and (ii) a warrant to purchase, at any time prior to the third anniversary following the final closing of the 2007 Private Placement, one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, subject to adjustment in certain instances; except that with respect to 290,000 Units, the warrant is exercisable for half a share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50. The warrants are also redeemable by the Company where the exercise price exceeds a certain amount.

The per share weighted value of the warrants to purchase 1,575,000 shares of common stock at $3.00 per share was between $0.98 and $1.32. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: no dividend yield; expected volatility between 153% and 155%; risk free interest rate of between 4.63% and 4.9%; and expected life of three years.

The subscription agreement requires the Company to file a registration statement, covering the securities sold in the 2007 Private Placement within 30 days of final closing of the 2007 Private Placement and use its best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective within 90 days of final closing. If the registration statement has not been declared effective within 150 days following final closing, the Company has agreed to pay to the investors liquidated damages, payable in cash or common stock, of 1.5% of the purchase price paid by the investor in the 2007 Private Placement and 1% of the purchase price paid by the investor in the 2007 Private Placement for each subsequent 30 day period, with the total of the foregoing capped at 9%. The Company recognized $~~103~~67,~~000~~875 of penalties as of ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, which is reflected as interest expense.

NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Singh Strategic Alliance

On April 20, 2007, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with Harcharan Singh. In connection with this strategic alliance, the Company and Kirk, entered into a Consulting Agreement with Mr. Singh (the “Consulting Agreement”) and Kirk issued to an affiliate of Mr. Singh, a note in the principal amount of $1,250,000 (the “Singh Note”). Mr. Singh was appointed to the Corporation’s board on May 23, 2008.

10 11

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)

During the term of the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Singh is being retained to provide strategic consulting services to the Company. In consideration for these services, Mr. Singh receives a $10,000 monthly retainer and was issued 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase a further 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, if the Company achieves annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation ~~and~~ and amortization (EBITA) of at least $20,000,000, then Mr. Singh will be ~~entitled~~ entitled to a further grant of 1,000,000 shares of Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants are exercisable for a period of seven years from the date of grant at an initial exercise price of $2.00, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, ~~and~~ and contain a cashless or net issuance component. In connection with the Series C ~~Preferred~~C Preferred Stock Offering, the Company reduced the exercise price of the ~~warrants~~ warrants to acquire 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to $0.75 ~~and~~ and eliminated the cashless or net issuance component. The per share weighted ~~value~~ value of the warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 is $0.36. The warrants ~~were~~are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: no dividend yield; expected ~~volatility~~ volatility of 84%; risk free interest rate of 2% and expected life of seven years. The Company recorded a charge of $1,192,153 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 to recognize the agreement.

On April 3, 2008, ~~accrued~~liabilities ~~consulting~~for unpaid consulting fees of $120,000 were converted into a 2008 Bridge Note. Consulting fees amounting to $60,000 for the year ended October 31, 2008, are included in the accompanying financial statements.

On November 11, 2008, the Company’s board of directors authorized the grant of 125,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Singh, in consideration for his deferral in payment of certain fees due to him under the Consulting Agreement. ~~(see~~See also Note 9).

Maneesh Joint Venture

On June 6, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Maneesh. Under the terms of the ~~Joint~~joint ~~Venture~~venture ~~Agreement~~agreement, Maneesh has agreed to provide consulting services to the Company and its subsidiaries for an initial term of one year, which term shall automatically renew for additional one year terms absent notice of non-renewal. Pursuant to the ~~Joint~~joint ~~Venture~~venture ~~Agreement~~agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Maneesh a consulting fee of $25,000 per month, plus reimbursement of reasonable and accountable expenses. The joint venture agreement further provides that Maneesh and Kirk may in the future agree to the license by Maneesh to Kirk of the non-exclusive right to manufacture and ~~distribute~~ distribute pharmaceutical products proprietary to Maneesh.

On November 11, 2008, the Company’s board of directors authorized the grant of 500,000 shares of its common stock to Maneesh in consideration for its deferral in payment of certain fees due to it under the Joint Venture Agreement. ~~(see~~See also Note 9).

Lane Compensation

On July 3, 2008, Dr. Lane resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and currently serves as the Company’s Chairman of the Board. On November 11, 2008, the Company agreed to compensate Dr. Lane’s services as Chairman of the Board pursuant to which he is to receive a salary of $120,000 per annum. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Dr. Lane severance of $400,000 of which $~~372~~344,~~308~~616 is outstanding at ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 as well as pay down Dr. Lane’s deferred compensation which was $~~188~~161,~~716~~024 at ~~January~~April 3130, 2009 and reimburse Dr. Lane for expenses incurred by him which were $6054,846 at ~~January~~April 3130, 2009.

11 12

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)

Getraer Separation Agreement

On January 27, 2009, the Company entered into a separation agreement with ~~Steven~~Mr. Getraer, ~~the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer,~~ pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay Mr. Getraer severance of $175,000 less applicable withholding and deductions payable over ten months, unpaid salary of $8,154 less applicable withholdings and deductions as well as expense reimbursement of $1,658. In addition, the Company issued to Mr. Getraer warrants to acquire 200,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share exercisable at any time prior to July 31, 2012, it being acknowledged that Mr. Getraer holds no additional options, warrants or other rights to purchase the Company’s common stock. ~~The~~ The per share weighted value of the warrants was $0.31 or $62,000 which was charged to general and administrative expense. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: no dividend yield; expected volatility of 84% risk free interest rate of 2%; and expected life of 5 years.

NOTE 8 - LITIGATION

DEA Administrative Proceeding

On September 15, 2008, the DEA commenced an administrative proceeding with the U.S. Department of Justice against Kirk to revoke its DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances in schedules III-V and deny any amendment to Kirk’s application to add specific List I chemical manufacturing codes to its controlled substance registration. The DEA alleges in the administrative proceedings that Kirk shipped ephedrine guaifenesin products to a contract packager for repackaging and relabeling that did not have the requisite DEA license. In addition, the DEA alleges that Kirk failed to maintain an effective system of controls to guard against and prevent a theft of approximately 1.3 ~~million~~ million ephedrine ~~guiafenesin~~guaifenesin tablets, which occurred at Kirk in July 2008. ~~The~~ The DEA also alleges that Kirk failed to maintain appropriate recordkeeping practices. Subsequently, in March 2009, the DEA seized finished ephedrine guaifenesin product supplied by Kirk to Kirk’s major customer and as a result Kirk has ceased manufacturing ephedrine guaifenesin products for such customer. As discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, this is having a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

In addition, in December 2007 and June 2008, Kirk applied to the DEA for a 2008 ephedrine and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota and a 2009 ephedrine and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota. In April 2008 and April 2009, the DEA rejected Kirk’s application for its 2008 quota and 2009 quota respectively, and Kirk is challenging its rejection which has been consolidated with the administrative proceeding commenced by the DEA. ~~Kirk’s application~~as ~~for~~described ain ~~2009~~the ~~ephedrine~~preceding ~~and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota also remains pending~~paragraph.

~~During~~ During February, March and ~~March~~June 2009, hearings on the merits of the case were held before an administrative judge and athe ~~further~~parties ~~hearing~~have been ~~has~~requested ~~been~~to ~~scheduled~~submit ~~for~~their ~~June~~proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by September 8, 2009. Based on the allegations made by the DEA, and the Company’s ~~understanding~~ understanding of relevant facts and circumstances, itthe Company believes that the action commenced by the DEA is without merit and the Company intends to vigorously defend against this.

In a separate but related action, the United States of America commenced an action in the United States District Court District of New Jersey on July 3, 2008 to forfeit and condemn ephedrine guaifenesin products shipped to Kirk’s contract packager referenced above at an appraised value of approximately $680,000 and which were seized by the DEA. On September 2, 2008, the Company filed its answer and counterclaimed seeking an award of damages for wrongful seizure of the seized property as well as a declaratory judgment that the United States acted unlawfully, arbitrarily and capriciously in implementing the quota system. This case is currently in the discovery phase.

There can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in these actions or that they will be resolved upon terms favorable to the Company. If the Company’s registration were revoked, denied or suspended, or if its quota application is rejected, the Company could no longer lawfully possess or distribute controlled substances or manufacture and distribute products containing the disallowed controlled substance which ~~would~~could have a further material adverse effect on the Company’s business , prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

12 13

SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 8 – LITIGATION (CONTINUED)

Nostrum

On June 27, 2008, the Company commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Mulye and Nostrum (Case No. 08-Civ-5861) seeking declaratory judgment for the immediate release to the Company of the Escrow Shares as well as damages for breach of contract and implied covenant of good faith and dealing. On August 13, 2008, Nostrum and Mulye filed an answer and counterclaim to the Company’s complaint and on August 26, 2008 they amended their answer. The counterclaim is seeking declaratory judgment for the immediate release to Nostrum of the Escrow Shares and the issuance to Nostrum of additional shares of common stock such that, under Nostrum’s theory, together with the Escrow Shares will represent 32% of the Company’s outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. On September 5, 2008, Nostrum and Mulye made a motion to the Court to dismiss the Company’s breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and dealing claims and the Company is in the process of responding to this motion. Both parties ~~have~~ have filed motions for summary judgment seeking a ruling from the Judge regarding the return of the Escrow Shares and subsequently in February 2009 the Court held a hearing. The parties are currently awaiting a ~~decision~~ruling ~~from~~on summary judgment by the ~~Court~~Judge. The Company intends to vigorously prosecute this case and believes its claims against Nostrum and Mulye are meritorious.

Stockbridge

On June 9, 2008, an action was commenced by Stockbridge Capital Investors, Inc. (“Stockbridge”) against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in the County of Maricopa. The complaint alleges that the Company breached a letter agreement with Stockbridge by not paying Stockbridge a “success” fee to which it claims entitlement. The complaint seeks damages to be proven at trial together with attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 2, 2008 the Company filed its answer. This case is currently in the discovery phase. Based on the ~~allegations~~ allegations in the amended complaint, and the Company’s understanding of relevant facts and circumstances, it believes that the claims made by the plaintiff in this lawsuit are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against them.

Body Dynamics

On December 19, 2008, Kirk commenced an action against Body Dynamics, Inc. (“Body Dynamics”) in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial District in Broward County, Florida. Body Dynamics is a customer to whom Kirk delivered goods and for which Kirk has not been paid. The Company is seeking judgment in the amount of $~~375~~362,~~637~~ 341 plus court costs and pre-judgment interest. On February 6, 2009, the case was moved by Body Dynamics to the United States District Court Southern District of Florida and on the same day Body Dynamics filed its answer to the complaint. Mediation hearings ~~are~~ ~~being~~were scheduled for April 2009 but have since been cancelled and the case is now in the discovery phase.

NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the ~~quarter~~ six months ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2009, the Company’s board of directors authorized the grant of 500,000 shares of its common stock to Maneesh and 125,000 shares of its common stock to Mr. Singh. as discussed above under “Singh Strategic Alliance” and “Maneesh Joint Venture”. The Company valued the shares for Maneesh at $175,000 and the shares for Mr. Singh at $43,750 which was charged to general and administrative expense. The Company recognized warrant expense of $46,830 for the quarter. This expense related to the warrant issuance of John Capanos, $43,576 and David Coffin-Beach, $3,254.

13 14

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 (the “10-K”) and the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We have included in this Quarterly Report certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning our business, operations and financial condition. “Forward-looking statements” consist of all non-historical information, and the analysis of historical information, including the references in this Quarterly Report to future revenue growth, future expense growth, future credit exposure, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, future profitability, anticipated cash resources, anticipated capital expenditures, capital requirements, and the Company’s plans for future periods. In addition, the words “could”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “objective”, “plan”, “may affect”, “may depend”, “believes”, “estimates”, “projects” and similar words and phrases are also intended to identify such forward-looking statements.

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, unanticipated technological difficulties, the volatile and competitive environment for drug products, changes in domestic and foreign economic, market and regulatory conditions, the results of development agreements with pharmaceutical companies, the inherent uncertainty of financial estimates and projections, the uncertainties involved in certain legal proceedings, instabilities arising from terrorist actions and responses thereto, and other considerations described as “Risk Factors” in other filings by us with the SEC including our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such factors may also cause substantial volatility in the market price of our common stock. All such forward-looking statements are current only as of the date on which such statements were made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Our Business

We We are a specialty pharmaceutical company implementing what is referred to as a global “Front-End” growth strategy - the core of our business model. This strategy incorporates targeting a series of partnering relationships with international pharmaceutical companies to supply us with low-cost competitive pharmaceutical products, both active pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”) and finished dosage forms. As a result of the acquisition of Kirk Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Kirk”) and ANDAPharm LLC (“ANDAPharm”) in May 2006, we have a facility in Fort Lauderdale operating under cGMP (current good manufacturing practices) guidelines for the manufacturing and distribution of over-the-counter (“ OTC”) private label drugs and prescription drugs (“Rx”).

We We have initiated our Front-End strategy, which sources low cost, high-quality products developed and manufactured internationally, and packages and distributes to our customers through our Florida operation. Our access to low-cost raw materials and manufacturing is the cornerstone of the Front-End strategy and key to our dual objectives of growing our OTC business and introducing a pipeline of Rx generic drugs. A critical key to this strategy and its implementation is our alliance with Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Maneesh”) and Harcharan (Harry) Singh of Glopec International. Maneesh is an ~~international~~ international pharmaceutical company with its headquarters located in Mumbai, India. Harry Singh is a pharmaceutical industry veteran with a 20 year proven track record of sourcing competitive ~~pharmaceutical~~pharmaceuticals products for North America from Asia and Europe.

14 15

Our key assets can be summarized as: • Private label OTC drug manufacturer - Kirk Pharmaceuticals, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; • DEA license for controlled substances, Schedule III, IIIN, IV, V and List I Chemicals; • Containment suites for manufacture of highly regulated/toxic substances (e.g. hormones and anti-cancer); • Robust pipeline of prescription Rx and OTC generic drug products; • Access to difficult to source price competitive APIs; • Manufacture in both U.S. and India - Package and Distribute in U.S;

~~From~~ ~~2005~~Private tolabel ~~mid-2007,~~OTC ~~our~~drug ~~focus~~manufacturer ~~for revenue growth was the development of oral controlled~~-~~release~~ ~~generic~~Kirk ~~drug formulations utilizing proprietary drug formulations and delivery technologies under license from Nostrum. During 2007~~Pharmaceuticals, we ~~amended~~Fort ~~our focus and business model as a result of the impact of two factors: first~~Lauderdale, ~~our disassociation from Nostrum following the July 2007 settlement of the Nostrum legal actions~~Florida; second, our new strategic alliances with Maneesh and Harry Singh established in May 2008 and April, 2007, respectively. These alliances are principally designed to assist us in sourcing low-cost APIs and generic drug applications (abbreviated new drug applications - ANDAs), submitted by international pharmaceutical companies to the FDA and approved for sale in the United States drug market and is the foundation of our current business model.

DEA license for controlled substances, Schedule III, IIIN, IV, V and List I Chemicals;

Containment suites for manufacture of highly regulated/toxic substances (e.g. hormones and anti-cancer);

Robust pipeline of prescription Rx and OTC generic drug products;

Access to difficult to source price competitive APIs;

Manufacture in both U.S. and India - Package and Distribute in U.S;

From 2005 to mid-2007, our focus for revenue growth was the development of oral controlled-release generic drug formulations utilizing proprietary drug formulations and delivery technologies under license from Nostrum. During 2007, we amended our focus and business model as a result of the impact of two factors: first, our disassociation from Nostrum following the July 2007 settlement of the Nostrum legal actions; second, our new strategic alliances with Maneesh and Mr. Singh established in May 2008 and April, 2007, respectively. This alliance is principally designed to assist us in sourcing low-cost APIs and generic drug applications (abbreviated new drug applications - ANDAs), submitted by international pharmaceutical companies to the FDA and approved for sale in the United States drug market and is the foundation of our current business model.

We are firstly a manufacturer, packager and distributor of private label, or store brand, OTC products to chain drug stores, wholesalers and distributors throughout the United States. The U.S. market for manufacturing and distribution of OTC drugs, is approaching $4 billion in size and is dominated by Perrigo Company, with sales approximating 50% of the total store brand or private label market. The private label market is growing substantially with the drug stores continuing to develop and expand their “store brands” to compete with the traditional “national brands”. Presently, in the categories in which we are supplying products, store brands exceed approximately 35% of our total sales and we expect this to reach more than 50% over the next few years. We believe that this growth provides us with a great opportunity to grow our OTC sales and that with our focus on competitive pricing and customer service, we believe that we can, with adequate capitalization and assuming certain DEA actions, as described in the “Legal Proceedings” in Item 1 of Part II of this Form 10-Q, are resolved in a manner favorable to us, continue to grow our OTC business in the U.S. substantially.

~~Our~~ Our OTC product categories include analgesics, cough and cold, antihistamines, asthma relief and laxatives. Executing our Front-End strategy, Kirk has initiated the shifting of manufacturing of its high-volume commodity OTC drugs internationally to ~~effect~~affect cost savings and maintain competitiveness. These products are manufactured internationally and shipped in bulk to Fort Lauderdale for packaging and distribution to our customers. We do ~~manufacture~~ manufacture certain OTC products in our Fort Lauderdale facilities for reasons of size of a given production, cost or convenience. Our OTC products are subject to control by the DEA and will continue to be manufactured (as well as packaged and distributed) through our Fort Lauderdale facilities and assuming certain DEA actions, as described in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 1 of Part II of this Form 10-Q are resolved in a manner favorable to us.

In addition to the OTC business, we are a manufacturer, packager and distributor of private label solid dosage Rx products. These products are sold through several distribution channels under exclusive or semi-exclusive agreements. These agreements include minimum sales requirements.

Our Front-End strategy is the source of a developing pipeline of targeted in-licensed generic Rx drug (FDA approved or to be filed) candidates. The Front-End strategy is founded on the fact that a variety of first-quality small to medium international pharmaceutical companies, well financed with state of the art manufacturing facilities, have developed and in many cases filed ANDAs with the FDA for the U.S. market, but have no marketing or distribution presence in the US market, i.e. no front-end. We have entered into a joint venture agreement with Maneesh that not only provides development and manufacturing of both OTC and Rx drugs, but resources of personnel, operating and IT systems as well as consulting on facilities build-out and equipment procurement. Maneesh has a variety of drug development and manufacturing facilities in various locations throughout the world, although we are coordinating principally with the operations in India. Harry Singh has a long standing business relationships with numerous other pharmaceutical companies

15 16

in India (and their owners) and is directing many of our steps in arranging agreements for ANDA in-licensing, low-cost APIs and specialty contract manufacturing. We source finished product internationally, then package and distribute through Florida; the customer belongs to Synovics.

As a result of historical events as well as the costs incurred in the acquisition of Kirk in 2006 and the disputes with Dr. Mulye and Nostrum, we have not been able to adequately generate enough cash to support our ongoing operations and service our debt. As a result, we have suffered from chronic working capital deficiency and there has been a continuing need for financing activities which have also been adversely affected by the disputes with Dr. Mulye and Nostrum.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, we completed a series of closings of a Series C Preferred Stock Offering that resulted in the issuance of 28,138 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, convertible into 28,138,000 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment, and warrants to acquire 18,780,200 shares of our common stock. The incremental gross proceeds to us from the Series C Preferred Stock Offering were $7,780,000 and together with a bridge note offering that immediately preceded the Series C Preferred Stock Offering, the incremental gross proceeds to us were $9,335,000. We principally used this infusion of cash to reduce our debt. Management believes that the restructuring of our balance sheet and the reduction of our short term and long term debt will provide management with greater flexibility to make operational decisions for growth and focus on implementing our Front-End strategy.

Since our inception through the current fiscal year, we have received an opinion noting the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern from our independent auditors due to the significant recurring operating losses.

Results of Operations

~~The~~ The following ~~table~~tables set ~~sets~~ forth, for the periods indicated, financial information related to operations, as well as expressed as a percentage of our net revenue:

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,
	THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,										SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
	2009	~~2009~~				2008		~~2008~~			2009					2008
Net Revenues	$	$2,809,430	~~6,836,279~~			~~100.0~~$	%6,121,632	$	~~4,255,120~~		$	~~100.0~~9,645,709	%			$	10,376,752
Cost of Revenues		2,781,561	~~4,495,019~~	99	%	66	%3,825,125		~~3,262,772~~62	%		777,276,580	%	75	%		7,087,897		68	%
Gross Profit		27,869	~~2,341,260~~	1	%	34	%2,296,507		~~992,348~~38	%		232,369,129	%	25	%		3,288,855		32	%
Operating Expenses
Research and development		417,491	~~218,035~~	14	%	3	%361,966		~~290,078~~6	%		7635,527	%	7	%		652,044		6	%
Selling, general and administrative		1,700,799	~~2,757,039~~	61	%	40	%2,921,861		~~1,693,210~~48	%		404,457,839	%	46	%		4,615,070		44	%
Total Operating Expenses		2,118,290	~~2,975,075~~	75	%	43	%3,283,827		~~1,983,288~~54	%		475,093,366	%	53	%		5,267,114		51	%
Loss from Operations		(2,090,422	~~(633,815~~)	)-74	%	(9	)%(987,320	)	~~(990,940~~-16	)%		(242,724,237	)%	-28	%		(1,978,259	)	-19	%
Other Expenses		(502,196	~~(467,239~~)	)-18	%	(7	)%(1,953,804	)	~~(1,233,764~~-32	)%		(29969,435	)%	-10	%		(3,187,568	)	-31	%
Provision (Benefit) for Income Tax		-	0	0	%	0	%-		0	%		0-	%	0	%		-		0	%
Net Loss	$	$(2,592,618	~~(1,101,054~~)	)-92	%	~~(16~~$	)%(2,941,124	$)	~~(2,224,704~~-48	)%	$	(533,693,672	)%	-38	%	$	(5,165,827	)	-50	%

Results of Operations for Three Months Ended January 31, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended January 31, 2008

Consolidated revenues for the three months ended January 31, 2009 were $6,836,279 compared to $4,255,120 for the same period in 2008, an increase of approximately 61% over the prior fiscal quarter. This increase results from increases in sales of the Rx product line and the introduction of a new OTC product. Our sales could be negatively impacted in the future as a result of the rejection of our application to the DEA for our 2008 and 2009 procurement quota as well as the related DEA administrative proceeding commenced against us to, among other things, revoke our DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances. If we do not prevail in this action, this will have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation. See Part II, Item 1 “Legal Proceedings.”

During the three months ended January 31, 2009, sales of products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin accounted for approximately 27% of sales as compared to approximately 42% for the same period in 2008.

Our three largest customers represented approximately 58% of the sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009. Although we believe Kirk has good working relationships with each of these customers, Kirk is working to further relationships with these and other entities in order to continue to broaden its sales base.

Cost of revenues for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $4,495,019 compared to $3,262,772 for the three months ended January 31, 2008. This increase is directly attributable to our increase in sales revenue. Our gross profit percentage increased to 34% from 23% as a result of increases in sales of our Rx product line and the introduction of a new OTC product that sell at a higher margin than our current inventory of products.

Research and development expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $218,035 compared to $290,078 for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The research and development expenses are in line with our historical norms. Research and development expense consists of direct costs which include salaries and related costs of research and development personnel, and the costs of consultants, materials and supplies associated with research and development projects, as well as clinical studies. Indirect research and development costs include facilities, depreciation, and other indirect overhead costs.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $2,757,039 as compared to $1,693,210 for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses is a result of an increase in legal expense as well as non-cash stock based compensation expense which was not incurred during the same period in 2008.

Interest expense for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $467,239 as compared to $1,235,336 for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The reason for this reduction is a result of the significant reduction in outstanding debt during the previous fiscal year.

As a result of the foregoing, the net loss for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $1,101,054 or ($0.04) per share, as compared to a net loss of $2,224,704 or ($0.09) per share for the three months ended January 31, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, our operations have not generated sufficient cash flow to satisfy our capital needs. We have financed our operations primarily through the private sale of common stock, warrants and debt securities. We had a working capital deficit of $7,345,393 at January 31, 2009 as compared with $6,335,161 at October 31, 2008. Cash and cash equivalents were $19,618 at January 31, 2009, as compared with $65,986 at October 31, 2008.

Net cash provided in operating activities during the three months ended January 31, 2009 was $593,022. This resulted from our net loss of $1,101,054 reduced by significant amortization of loan discounts and increases in current liabilities accounts. We have generally incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception. We expect the negative cash flow will be reduced in the future as our short and long term debt obligations, and financing expenses are reduced or eliminated.

~~Net~~ ~~cash~~ Results ~~used~~of inOperations ~~investing~~for ~~activities~~Three ~~during~~Months ~~the~~Ended ~~three~~April ~~month period ended January 31~~30, 2009 ~~was~~compared ~~$49,406.~~to ~~These~~Three ~~funds~~Months ~~were~~Ended ~~used~~April ~~for~~30 ~~capital~~2008 ~~expenditures funded through leasing activities. Net cash used in financing activities during the three month period ended January 31, 2009 was $589,984.~~

Consolidated revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2009 were $2,809,430 compared to $6,121,631 for the same period in 2008, a decrease of approximately 54% over the prior fiscal quarter. This decrease results from decreases in sales of the Rx product line and our products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin. As discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are the subject of administrative and related proceedings involving the DEA against us to, among other things, revoke our DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances. As a result of the these proceedings and in particular recent developments, since the end of March 2009, we have ceased sales of any products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin for our major customer, which during the three months ended April 30, 2009 accounted for approximately 38% of overall sales. This is having a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

During the three months ended April 30, 2009, sales of products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin accounted for approximately 40% of sales as compared to approximately 47% for the same period in 2008 and although sales of ephedrine and guaifenesin products continue they now only account for a negligible portion of our overall sales. We are limited by both contractual restrictions and our inability to procure ephedrine and guaifenesin and accordingly do not expect to recommence selling ephedrine and guaifenesin products on the scale that we have sold in the past unless a favorable outcome is reached in our DEA proceedings for which there can be no assurances and which are expected to continue into the next fiscal year. As a result, we expect a continued decrease in sales and expect such decrease to deepen as the impact of this is reflected in future financial results. In the meantime, to address the decline in sales and product mix, we are in late development stages of new non-controlled substance products that we are targeting for launch during the end of the third fiscal quarter with the aim of restoring historical gross profit margins. There can be no assurances that we will be able to launch such products or that they will be launched in a timely manner. Even if launched, there can be no assurances that such products will generate sufficient revenue to restore our historical gross profit margins.

Our three largest customers represented approximately 67% of the sales for the three months ended April 30, 2009. Although we believe Kirk has good working relationships with each of these customers, the DEA proceedings have resulted in the cessation of sales to our major customer and we are working to minimize the impact of this on our relationship with such customer. In addition, we are working on furthering relationships with our other two largest customers and other entities in order to continue to broaden our sales base.

Cost of revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $2,781,561 compared to $3,825,125 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. This decrease is directly attributable to our decrease in sales revenue. Our gross profit percentage decreased to 1% from 38% as a result of decreases in sales of our high gross margin Rx product line and our products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin. Increased raw material costs and the inability to pass them on to our customers also contributed to the lower gross profit. Further adding to the decreased gross profit were higher fuel, shipping and outsourcing costs.

Research and development expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $417,491 compared to $361,966 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. The research and development expenses are in line with our historical norms. Research and development expense consists of direct costs which include salaries and related costs of research and development personnel, and the costs of consultants, materials and supplies associated with research and development projects, as well as clinical studies. Indirect research and development costs include facilities, depreciation, and other indirect overhead costs.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $1,700,799 as compared to $2,921,861 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was a result of a reduction in personnel staff and legal expenses.

Interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $502,196 as compared to $1,953,804 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. The reason for this reduction is a result of the significant reduction in outstanding debt during the previous fiscal year.

As a result of the foregoing, the net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was $2,592,618 or ($0.09) per share, as compared to a net loss of $2,941,124 or ($0.14) per share for the three months ended April 30, 2008.

Results of Operations for Six Months Ended April 30, 2009 compared to Six Months Ended April 30 2008

Consolidated revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2009 were $9,645,709 compared to $10,376,752 for the same period in 2008, a decrease of approximately 7% over the prior fiscal quarter. This decrease results from decreases in sales of the Rx product line and our products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin. As discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are the subject of administrative and related proceedings involving the DEA against us to, among other things, revoke our DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances. As a result of the these proceedings and in particular recent developments, since the end of March 2009, we have ceased sales of any products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin for our major customer, which during the six months ended April 30, 2009 accounted for approximately 29% of overall sales. This is having a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

During the six months ended April 30, 2009, sales of products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin accounted for approximately 31% of sales as compared to approximately 45% for the same period in 2008 and although sales of ephedrine and guaifenesin products continue they now only account for a negligible portion of our overall sales. We are limited by both contractual restrictions and our inability to procure ephedrine and guaifenesin and accordingly do not expect to recommence selling ephedrine and guaifenesin products on the scale that we have sold in the past unless a favorable outcome is reached in our DEA proceedings for which there can be no assurances and which are expected to continue into the next fiscal year. As a result, we expect a continued decrease in sales and expect such decrease to deepen as the impact of this is reflected in future financial results. In the meantime, to address the decline in sales and product mix, we are in late development stages of new non-controlled substance products that we are targeting for launch during the end of the third fiscal quarter with the aim of restoring historical gross profit margins. There can be no assurances that we will be able to launch such products or that they will be launched in a timely manner. Even if launched, there can be no assurances that such products will generate sufficient revenue to restore our historical gross profit margins.

Our three largest customers represented approximately 58% of the sales for the six months ended April 30, 2009. Although we believe Kirk has good working relationships with each of these customers, the DEA proceedings have resulted in the cessation of sales to our major customer and we are working to minimize the impact of this on our relationship with such customer. In addition, we are working on furthering relationships with our other two largest customers and other entities in order to continue to broaden our sales base.

Cost of revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $7,276,280 compared to $7,087,897 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. This increase is directly attributable to our decrease in sales of our RX product line and ephedrine and guaifenesin product. Our gross profit percentage decreased to 25% from 32% as a result of our decrease in sales of our higher margin RX product line and ephedrine and guaifenesin product.

Research and development expenses for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $635,527 compared to $652,044 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. The research and development expenses are in line with our historical norms. Research and development expense consists of direct costs which include salaries and related costs of research and development personnel, and the costs of consultants, materials and supplies associated with research and development projects, as well as clinical studies. Indirect research and development costs include facilities, depreciation, and other indirect overhead costs.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $4,457,839 as compared to $4,615,070 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. The slight decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is a result of a reduction in personnel staff and legal expenses.

Interest expense for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $969,435 as compared to $3,187,568 for the six months ended April 30, 2008. The reason for this reduction is a result of the significant reduction in outstanding debt during the previous fiscal year.

As a result of the foregoing, the net loss for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $3,693,672 or ($0.13) per share, as compared to a net loss of $5,165,827 or ($0.24) per share for the six months ended April 30, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, our operations have not generated sufficient cash flow to satisfy our capital needs. We have financed our operations primarily through the private sale of common stock, warrants and debt securities. We had a working capital deficit of $10,337,159 at April 30, 2009 as compared with $6,335,161 at October 31, 2008. Cash and cash equivalents were $9,283 at April 30, 2009, as compared with $65,986 at October 31, 2008.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $681,076. This resulted from our net loss of $3,693,672 reduced by amortization of loan discounts and stock based compensation, collection of accounts receivable and reduction in inventory levels as well as increases in current liability accounts. We have generally incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception. We expect the negative cash flow to continue for the foreseeable future.

Net cash used in investing activities during the six month period ended April 30, 2009 was $47,597. These funds were used for capital expenditures funded through purchases and leasing activities.

Net cash used in financing activities during the six month period ended April 30, 2009 was $690,182. These funds were used to make a principal payment on the Company’s bank loan as well as payments towards the seller note.

We will require additional equity and/or debt financing for fiscal year 2009 to fund our operations and to satisfy our debt service obligations. There can be no assurance given that we will be successful in the sale of our equity or obtaining additional capital from other sources or means.

Our auditors have emphasized the uncertainty related to our ability to continue as a going concern in their audit report for the year ended October 31, 2008.

We have not entered into any material capital expenditure agreements or engaged in any off balance sheet financing.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We We do not invest in or own any market risk sensitive instruments entered into for trading purposes or for purposes other than trading purposes. All loans to us have been made with fixed interest rates, and, accordingly, the market risk to us prior to the maturity of those instruments is minimal.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

~~Evaluation~~ Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Our~~ Our management, with the participation of our ~~Principal~~Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Changes~~ Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~There~~ There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting which occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

18 20

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

DEA Administrative Proceeding

On On September 15, 2008, the DEA commenced an administrative proceeding with the U.S. Department of Justice against Kirk to revoke its DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances in schedules III-V and deny any amendment to Kirk’s application to add specific List I chemical manufacturing codes to its controlled substance registration. The DEA alleges in the administrative proceedings that Kirk shipped ephedrine guaifenesin products to a contract packager for repackaging and relabeling that did not have the requisite DEA license. In addition, the DEA alleges that Kirk failed to maintain an effective system of controls to guard against and prevent a theft of approximately 1.3 million ephedrine ~~guiafenesin~~guaifenesin tablets, which occurred at Kirk in July 2008. The DEA also alleges that Kirk failed to ~~maintain~~ maintain appropriate recordkeeping practices. Subsequently, in March 2009, the DEA seized finished ephedrine guaifenesin product supplied by Kirk to Kirk’s major customer and as a result Kirk has ceased manufacturing ephedrine guaifenesin products for such customer. As discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, this is having a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

In In addition, in December 2007 and June 2008, Kirk applied to the DEA for a 2008 ephedrine and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota and a 2009 ephedrine and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota. In April 2008 and April 2009, the DEA rejected Kirk’s application for its 2008 quota and 2009 quota respectively, and Kirk is challenging its rejection which has been consolidated with the administrative proceeding commenced by the DEA. ~~Kirk’s~~ ~~application for a 2009 ephedrine and pseudoephedrine manufacturing procurement quota also remains pending.~~

~~During~~ During February, March and ~~March~~June 2009 hearings on the merits of the case were held before an ~~administrative~~ administrative judge and athe ~~further~~parties ~~hearing~~have ~~has~~ been ~~scheduled~~requested ~~for~~to ~~June~~submit their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by September 8, 2009. Based on the allegations made by the DEA, and our understanding of relevant facts and circumstances, we believe that the action commenced by the DEA is without merit and weit ~~intend~~intends to vigorously defend against this.

In In a separate but related action, the United States of America commenced an action in the United States District Court District of New Jersey on July 3, 2008 to forfeit and condemn ephedrine guaifenesin products shipped to Kirk’s contract packager referenced above at an appraised value of approximately $680,000 and which were seized by the DEA. On September 2, 2008, Kirk filed its answer and counterclaimed seeking an award of damages for wrongful seizure of the seized property as well as a declaratory judgment that the United States acted unlawfully, arbitrarily and capriciously in implementing the quota system. This case is currently in the discovery phase.

~~There~~ There can be no assurance that we will prevail in these actions or that they will be resolved upon terms favorable to us. If our registration were revoked, denied or suspended, or if our quota application is rejected, we could no longer lawfully possess or distribute controlled substances or manufacture and distribute products containing the disallowed controlled substance which ~~would~~ could have a further material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

Nostrum

As As previously reported, on June 27, 2008, we commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Nirmal Mulye (“Mulye”) and Nostrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Nostrum”) (Case No. 08-Civ-5861). On July 31, 2007, the Company, Mulye and Nostrum entered into a global settlement of disputes which were the subject of four prior contested legal proceedings between the parties. Previously, Nostrum was our largest shareholder and Mulye served as our Chief Scientific Officer and was a member of our Board of Directors.

~~Pursuant~~ Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement and a related escrow agreement, certain contested intellectual property, products and corporate opportunities allegedly stolen by Mulye and Nostrum were assigned to Mulye and Nostrum, while 10,661,000 shares of our common stock (the “Escrow Shares”), then owned by Nostrum, were placed in escrow to be returned to us subject to the release and discharge of guarantees and a related undertaking given by Mulye and Nostrum securing our credit facility with the Bank of India (the “BOI Loan”) by April 30, 2008.

19 21

On April 28, 2008, the guarantees and undertaking given by Nostrum and Mulye were released and discharged and replaced with a letter of credit issued by Maneesh in favor of the Bank of India securing the BOI Loan. Maneesh is an affiliate of the Company and three of its designees presently serve on our Board of Directors. In response to our demand to the escrow ~~agent~~ to ~~release~~be ~~the~~returned ~~Escrow Shares~~ to us ~~pursuant~~subject to the ~~terms~~release ofand ~~the~~discharge ~~escrow agreement, Nostrum objected to the release~~ of ~~the~~guarantees ~~Escrow Shares for reasons we believe lack merit,~~ and ~~consequently~~ ~~we commenced~~ a ~~lawsuit~~related ~~against~~undertaking ~~Nostrum~~given ~~and~~by Mulye ~~seeking declaratory~~and ~~judgment~~Nostrum ~~for~~securing ~~the~~our ~~immediate~~credit ~~release~~facility towith ~~us of~~ the ~~Escrow~~Bank ~~Shares as well as damages for breach~~ of ~~contract~~India ~~and~~(the ~~implied~~“BOI ~~covenant~~Loan”) ofby ~~good~~April ~~faith~~30, ~~and dealing~~2008.

On ~~August~~ On 13April 28, 2008, ~~Nostrum~~the guarantees and ~~Mulye~~undertaking ~~filed~~given anby ~~answer~~Nostrum and ~~counterclaim~~Mulye towere ~~our complaint~~released and ondischarged ~~August~~and ~~26,~~replaced ~~2008~~with ~~they~~a ~~amended~~letter ~~their~~of ~~answer.~~credit ~~The~~issued ~~counterclaim is~~by ~~seeking~~Maneesh ~~declaratory~~in ~~judgment~~favor ~~for~~of the ~~immediate~~Bank ~~release~~of toIndia ~~Nostrum~~securing of the BOI Loan. Maneesh ~~Escrow~~is ~~Shares~~an ~~and~~affiliate of the ~~issuance~~Company toand ~~Nostrum~~three of ~~additional~~its ~~shares~~designees presently serve on our Board of ~~common stock~~Directors. ~~such~~In ~~that,~~response ~~under~~to ~~Nostrum’s~~our ~~theory,~~demand ~~together~~to ~~with~~the escrow agent to release the Escrow Shares ~~will~~ ~~represent~~to ~~32%~~us ofpursuant ~~our~~to ~~outstanding~~the ~~shares~~terms onof athe ~~fully~~escrow ~~diluted~~agreement, ~~basis.~~Nostrum ~~Both~~objected to ~~parties~~the ~~have~~release ~~filed~~of ~~motions~~the ~~for~~Escrow ~~summary~~Shares ~~judgment~~for ~~seeking~~reasons awe ~~ruling~~believe ~~from~~lack ~~the Judge~~merit, ~~regarding~~and ~~the~~consequently ~~return~~we ofcommenced ~~the~~a ~~Escrow~~lawsuit ~~Shares~~against Nostrum and ~~are~~Mulye ~~awaiting~~seeking adeclaratory ~~decision~~judgment ~~from~~ for the ~~Court.~~immediate Werelease ~~intend~~ to ~~vigorously~~us ~~prosecute~~of ~~this~~the ~~case~~Escrow ~~and~~Shares ~~believe~~as ~~our claims~~well ~~against~~as ~~Nostrum~~damages for breach of contract and ~~Mulye~~implied ~~are~~covenant ~~meritorious.~~of good faith and dealing.

~~Stockbridge~~ On August 13, 2008, Nostrum and Mulye filed an answer and counterclaim to our complaint and on August 26, 2008 they amended their answer. The counterclaim is seeking declaratory judgment for the immediate release to Nostrum of the Escrow Shares and the issuance to Nostrum of additional shares of common stock such that, under Nostrum’s theory, together with the Escrow Shares will represent 32% of our outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. On September 5, 2008, Nostrum and Mulye made a motion to the Court to dismiss our breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and dealing claims and we are in the process of responding to this motion. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment seeking a ruling from the Judge regarding the return of the Escrow Shares and subsequently in February 2009, the Court held a hearing. The parties are currently awaiting a ruling on summary judgment by the Judge. We intend to vigorously prosecute this case and believe its claims against Nostrum and Mulye are meritorious.

On ~~June 9, 2008, an action was commenced by~~ Stockbridge Capital Investors, Inc. (“Stockbridge”) against us in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in the County of Maricopa. The complaint alleges that we breached a letter agreement with Stockbridge by not paying Stockbridge a “success” fee to which it claims entitlement. The complaint seeks damages to be proven at trial together with attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 2, 2008 we filed our answer. Based on the allegations in the amended complaint, and our understanding of relevant facts and circumstances, we believe that the claims made by the plaintiff in this lawsuit are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against them.

~~Body~~ On ~~Dynamics~~June 9, 2008, an action was commenced by Stockbridge Capital Investors, Inc. (“Stockbridge”) against us in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in the County of Maricopa. The complaint alleges that we breached a letter agreement with Stockbridge by not paying Stockbridge a “success” fee to which it claims entitlement. The complaint seeks damages to be proven at trial together with attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 2, 2008 we filed our answer. This case is currently in the discovery phase. Based on the allegations in the amended complaint, and our understanding of relevant facts and circumstances, we believe that the claims made by the plaintiff in this lawsuit are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend against them.

On ~~December 19, 2008, Kirk commenced an action against~~ Body Dynamics, Inc. (“Body Dynamics”) in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial District in Broward County, Florida. Body Dynamics is a customer to whom we delivered goods and for which we have not been paid. We are seeking judgment in the amount of $375,637 plus court costs and pre-judgment interest. On February 6, 2009, the case was moved by Body Dynamics to the United States District Court Southern District of Florida and on the same day Body Dynamics filed its answer to our complaint. Mediation hearings are being scheduled for April 2009.

~~ITEM~~ On 1ADecember 19, 2008, Kirk commenced an action against Body Dynamics, Inc. ~~RISK~~(“Body Dynamics”) ~~FACTORS~~in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial District in Broward County, Florida. Body Dynamics is a customer to whom we delivered goods and for which we have not been paid. We are seeking judgment in the amount of $362,341 plus court costs and prejudgment interest. On February 6, 2009, the case was moved by Body Dynamics to the United States District Court Southern District of Florida and on the same day Body Dynamics filed its answer to our complaint. Mediation hearings were scheduled for April 2009 but have since been cancelled and the case is now in the discovery phase.

~~We had~~ITEM no1A. ~~material~~RISK ~~changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2009~~FACTORS.

~~ITEM~~ Except 2.as ~~UNREGISTERED~~set ~~SALES~~forth OFbelow, ~~EQUITY~~we ~~SECURITIES~~had ~~AND~~no ~~USE~~material OFchanges ~~PROCEEDS~~to our risk factors as previously disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2009.

On We ~~November~~ have ~~11,~~ceased ~~2008, our board of directors authorized~~ the ~~grant~~sale of ~~500,000 shares~~products ofcontaining ~~our~~controlled ~~common~~substances ~~stock~~ to ~~Maneesh and 125,000 shares of~~ our ~~common~~major ~~stock to~~customer ~~Harry~~which ~~Singh, both~~accounts ~~affiliates of ours, in consideration~~ for ~~their deferral in payment of certain fees due to them under~~ a ~~joint~~significant ~~venture~~portion ~~agreement in the case~~ of ~~Maneesh~~our ~~and a consulting agreement in the case of Harry Singh~~sales. ~~We have not issued these shares although we are treating them, for the purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as if they were issued and outstanding.~~

~~The~~ As ~~securities~~a result ~~were~~of ~~offered~~recent developments in connection with the administrative and ~~sold~~related proceedings ininvolving ~~reliance~~the ~~upon~~DEA ~~exemptions~~against us to, among other things, revoke our ~~from~~ DEA ~~registration~~license ~~pursuant~~to manufacture and distribute controlled substances, since the end of March 2009, we have ceased selling our ephedrine and pseudoephedrine products to ~~Section~~our ~~4(2)~~major ~~under~~customer which during the ~~Securities~~three ~~Act~~and six months ended April 30, 2009, accounted for approximately 38% and 29% of ~~1933~~our overall sales, respectively. We are limited by both contractual restrictions and our inability to procure ephedrine and guaifenesin and accordingly do not expect to recommence selling ephedrine and guaifenesin products on the scale that we have sold in the past unless a favorable outcome is reached in our DEA proceedings for which there can be no assurances and which are expected to continue into the next fiscal year. As a result, we are incurring significant losses and expect such losses to deepen as ~~amended~~the impact of the cessation of such sales is reflected in future financial results. Accordingly, the cessation of such sales is having a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation and is expected to have an even greater material adverse effect in the foreseeable future.

~~ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.~~ 22

~~None~~ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

~~ITEM~~ None 4.that ~~SUBMISSION~~were OFnot ~~MATTERS~~previously TOdisclosed Ain ~~VOTE~~Form OF8-K ~~SECURITY~~filings ~~HOLDERS~~during the quarter ended April 30, 2009.

~~None~~ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

20 None.

ITEM 54. ~~OTHER~~SUBMISSION ~~INFORMATION~~OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None .

21ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

~~ITEM~~ The 6.following ~~EXHIBITS~~disclosure would have otherwise been filed on Form 8-K under the heading “Item 8.01 Other Events”:

	Exhibits
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We are the subject of administrative and related proceedings involving the DEA against us to, among other things, revoke our DEA license to manufacture and distribute controlled substances. As a result of the these proceedings and in particular the seizure in March 2009 by the DEA of finished ephedrine guaifenesin product supplied by us to a major customer of ours, since the end of March 2009, we have ceased sales of any products containing ephedrine and guaifenesin to such customer. Sales to this customer during the three and six months ended April 30, 2009 accounted for approximately 38% and 29% of our overall sales, respectively. We are limited by both contractual restrictions and our inability to procure ephedrine and guaifenesin and accordingly do not expect to recommence selling ephedrine and guaifenesin products on the scale that we have sold in the past unless a favorable outcome is reached in our DEA proceedings for which there can be no assurances and which are expected to continue into the next fiscal year.

22 As a result, we expect a continued decrease in sales and expect such decrease to deepen as the impact of this is reflected in future financial results. In the meantime, to address the decline in sales and product mix, we are in late development stages of new non-controlled substance products that we are targeting for launch during the end of the third fiscal quarter with the aim of restoring historical gross profit margins. There can be no assurances that we will be able to launch such products or that they will be launched in a timely manner. Even if launched, there can be no assurances that such products will generate sufficient revenue to restore our historical gross profit margins.

~~SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.~~ 23

~~SIGNATURE~~ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Date: March 17, 2009
	By:	/s/ Jyotindra Gange
		Jyotindra Gange
		Principal Executive Officer

23 SYNOVICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: June 22, 2009
	By:	/s/ Jyotindra Gange
		Jyotindra Gange
		Principal Executive Officer


	By:	/s/ Mahendra Desai
		Mahendra Desai
		Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · Synovics Pharmaceuticals