UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number of issuing entity: 333-188672-03

Commission file number of depositor: 333-188672-01

TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES 2014-A OWNER TRUST

(Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0001601715

TOYOTA AUTO FINANCE RECEIVABLES LLC

(Exact name of depositor and registrant as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of depositor and registrant: 0001131131

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor: 0000834071

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of issuing entity)	38-7097698 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No. of issuing entity)

19851 S. Western Avenue EF 12 Torrance, California (Address of principal executive offices of issuing entity)	90501 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (310) 468-7333

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

☐Yes ☒No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

☐Yes ☒No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☒Yes ☐No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

☐Yes ☐No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ ~~Non-accelerated filer ☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ☐~~

Non-accelerated filer

☒

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

☐Yes ☒No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

REGISTRANT HAS NO VOTING OR NON-VOTING COMMON EQUITY OUTSTANDING HELD BY NON-AFFILIATES.

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders).

NOT APPLICABLE.

PART I

The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:

Item 1. Business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Item 2. Properties.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

The following substitute information is provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB. Significant Obligors of Pool Assets.

No single obligor represents 10% or more of the asset pool ~~held~~owned by Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust (the “Trust”).

Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB. Credit Enhancement and Other Support, Except for Certain Derivatives Instruments.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support with respect to either payment on the pool assets ~~held~~owned by the Trust or payments on the notes (the “Notes”) or the certificate (the “Certificate”) issued by the Trust.

Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB. Certain Derivatives Instruments.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external derivative instruments to either payment on the pool assets ~~held~~owned by the Trust or payments on the Notes or the Certificate.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB. Legal Proceedings.

NoAs ~~material~~previously ~~updates~~disclosed by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”), TMCC has received a request for documents and information from the New York State Department of Financial Services relating to ~~report~~its lending practices (including fair lending), and a request for documents and information pursuant to a civil investigative demand from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General relating to TMCC’s financing of guaranteed auto protection insurance products on retail contracts. TMCC is cooperating with these requests, but is unable to predict their outcome given their preliminary status.

The following five paragraphs are disclosures received from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”), which serves as the indenture trustee under the indenture for the Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust transaction.

DBTCA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a derivative action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “TIA”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBNTC and DBTCA’s alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for the trusts. The Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court complaint and filed a derivative and class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564 private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially overlapped with the trusts at issue in the state court action. The complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss, and on January 19, 2016, the court partially granted the motion on procedural grounds: as to the 500 trusts that are governed by pooling and servicing agreements, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction. The court did not rule on substantive defenses asserted in the motion to dismiss. On March 22, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in federal court. In the amended complaint, in connection with 62 trusts governed by indenture agreements, the Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract, violation of the TIA, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $9.8 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On July 15, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 23, 2017,

the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to Plaintiffs’ conflict-of-interest claim, thereby dismissing it, and denied the motion to dismiss with respect to Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim (except as noted below) and claim for violation of the TIA, thereby allowing those claims to proceed. On January 26, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order dismissing Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty. On January 27, 2017, the court entered the parties’ joint stipulation and ordered that Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty be dismissed. On February 3, 2017, following a hearing concerning DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss on February 2, 2017, the court issued a short form order dismissing (i) Plaintiffs’ representation and warranty claims as to 21 trusts whose originators and/or sponsors had entered bankruptcy and the deadline for asserting claims against such originators and/or sponsors had passed as of 2009 and (ii) Plaintiffs’ claims to the extent they were premised upon any alleged pre-event of default duty to terminate servicers. Discovery is ongoing.

On March 25, 2016, the BlackRock plaintiffs filed a state court action against DBTCA in the Superior Court of California, Orange County with respect to 513 trusts. On May 18, 2016, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint with respect to 465 trusts, and included DBNTC as an additional defendant. The amended complaint asserts three causes of action: breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. The plaintiffs purport to bring the action on behalf of themselves and all other current owners of certificates in the 465 trusts. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $75.7 billion, but does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On August 22, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a demurrer as to plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty cause of action and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest cause of action and motion to strike as to plaintiffs’ breach of contract cause of action. On October 18, 2016, the court granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s demurrer, providing plaintiffs with thirty days’ leave to amend, and denied DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to strike. The plaintiffs did not further amend their complaint and, on December 19, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of New York’s Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. As of January 17, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court. Certain limited discovery is permitted to go forward while the motion to dismiss is pending.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the four immediately preceding paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as indenture trustee under the indenture for the Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust transaction.

PART II

The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Nothing to report.

PART III

The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The following substitute information is provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:

Item 1119 of Regulation AB. Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Information required by Item 1119 of Regulation AB has been omitted from this report on Form 10-K in reliance on the Instruction to Item 1119.

Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

Each of ~~Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“~~TMCC”) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (each, a “Servicing Participant”) has been identified by the registrant as a party participating in the servicing function during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (the “~~2015~~2016 Reporting Period”) with respect to the pool assets ~~held~~owned by the Trust. Each of the Servicing Participants has completed a report on an assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to such Servicing Participant (each, a “Report on Assessment”) as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, and for the ~~2015~~2016 Reporting Period. In addition, each of the Servicing Participants has provided an attestation report (each, an “Attestation Report”) by a registered public accounting firm regarding its Report on Assessment. Each Report on Assessment and Attestation Report is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.

~~TMCC’s~~Neither ~~compliance~~the ~~review~~Report ~~tested~~on ~~samples~~Assessment ofnor ~~receivable~~the ~~files~~Attestation ~~sold to public securitization trusts. The~~ Report ~~on Assessment~~ for TMCC has identified ~~two~~any material ~~instances~~instance of noncompliance ~~related~~with tothe servicing ~~criterion:~~criteria described in such Report on Assessment as being applicable to TMCC.

· 1122(d)(4)(vi) – certain changes to the terms of obligors’ pool assets were not made in accordance with the transaction agreements and related pool asset documents. The instances in which certain changes to the terms of obligor’s pool assets were not made in accordance with the transaction documents and related pool asset documents generally fell into one category: “processing” – certain due date changes were granted in a manner inconsistent with TMCC’s policies and procedures, and consequently, the transaction agreements.

The instances of non-compliance related to certain changes to the terms of obligors’ pool assets included instances where customer signatures were not obtained from customers when granting a due date change, as required by applicable state regulations. Based on the samples of receivables tested, the instances of non-compliance relating to processing can be extrapolated to have occurred with respect to less than 0.02% of the average number of receivables outstanding in securitizations during the 2015 Reporting Period. The extrapolation does not take into account any potential sampling error. Based on the actual sample assets selected for testing, there were processing errors with respect to none of the receivables in the Trust.

To address this processing error, TMCC is considering greater automation, additional monitoring, and testing and development of additional preventive and detective controls.

· 1122(d)(4)(vii) – certain loss mitigation or recovery actions were not conducted in accordance with the timeframes or other requirements established by the transaction agreements. The instances in which loss mitigation or recovery actions undertaken by TMCC were conducted in a manner inconsistent with its policies and procedures and consequently, the transaction agreements, generally fell into one of two categories: (i) “processing” – clerical and operational issues in delivery and content of notices or system updates on delinquent receivables or (ii) “policy-based” – policy and procedures that do not reflect TMCC’s actual business practices.

The instances of non-compliance related to processing errors included (a) the failure to send a notification of billing statement cessation on certain receivables after bankruptcy filing, (b) content of surplus/deficiency notices on vehicles sold at auction, and (c) the inaccurate coding of the type of repossession in the servicing system. Based on the samples of receivables tested, the instances of non-compliance relating to processing can be extrapolated to have occurred with respect to less than 0.03% of the average number of receivables outstanding in securitizations during the 2015 Reporting Period. The extrapolation does not take into account any potential sampling error. Based on the actual sample assets selected for testing, there were processing errors with respect to three of the receivables in the Trust.

In order to address the processing errors, TMCC has already implemented additional monitoring activities, including additional monitoring by TMCC and its vendor agents over the bankruptcy statement cessation notices and more

frequent monitoring of repossession status. Additionally, TMCC is considering system enhancements and increased automation, increased awareness campaigns and monitoring for activities incapable of complete automation, and testing and development of additional preventive and detective controls.

The instances of non-compliance related to policy-based errors included (a) timing of coding repossessions in the servicing system, and (b) timing of outbound call attempts.

Based on the samples of receivables tested, the instances of non-compliance relating to policy-based errors can be extrapolated to have occurred with respect to less than 0.47% of the average number of receivables outstanding in securitizations during the 2015 Reporting Period. The extrapolation does not take into account any potential sampling error. Based on the actual sample assets selected for testing, there were policy-based errors with respect to three of the receivables in the Trust.

In order to address the policy-based errors, in February 2016, TMCC modified the debt collection policy over timing of outbound call attempts to reflect actual business practice. Further, TMCC is evaluating system enhancements related to the timing of coding repossessed receivables in order to prevent the repossession date in the servicing system from preceding the vehicle retrieval date.

TMCC believes that no material impact resulted from the material instances of noncompliance because these inconsistencies did not result in any material adverse effect on security holders or the amounts or timing of payments to security holders.

Neither the Report on Assessment nor the Attestation Report for Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has identified any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria described in such Report on Assessment as being applicable to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

In order to address the processing-based errors related to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(vii) that were previously identified in the report by TMCC on its assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria during the year ended December 31, 2014, TMCC implemented a new software package to address content and delivery of repossession related notices in spring of 2015, corrected coding in its system related to the generation of cure notices, and implemented greater automation, additional monitoring and testing and developed preventive and detective controls over timing of surplus or deficiency notices, system updates on repossessions and statement cessation notices. In order to address the policy-based errors related to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(vii) that were previously identified in the report by TMCC on its assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria during the year ended December 31, 2014, TMCC modified its applicable policies to reflect its actual business practices, consistent with any applicable legal requirements. Further, TMCC increased training of its associates, implemented greater management oversight, monitoring, quality assurance controls and internal testing for such processing- and policy-based errors.

Item 1123 of Regulation AB. Servicer Compliance Statement.

TMCC has been identified by the registrant as a servicer during the ~~2015~~2016 Reporting Period with respect to the pool assets ~~held~~owned by the Trust. TMCC has provided a statement of compliance for the ~~2015~~2016 Reporting Period, signed by an authorized officer, and such compliance statement is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Not applicable.

(2)

Not applicable.

(3)

See Item 15(b) below.

(b) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Certificate of Formation of Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC (“TAFR LLC”) (included in Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed by the registrant with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
3.2	Limited Liability Company Agreement of TAFR LLC (included in Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed by the registrant with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.1	Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee (included in Exhibit 4.1 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.2	Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2014, between the Trust and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the “Indenture Trustee”) and securities intermediary (included in Exhibit 4.2 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.3	Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, among TAFR LLC, as seller, TMCC, as servicer and sponsor, and the Trust, as issuer (included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.4	Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC, as purchaser, and TMCC, as seller (included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.5	Administration Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, among TMCC, as administrator, the Trust, as issuer, and the Indenture Trustee (included in Exhibit 4.5 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.6	Securities Account Control Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC, as pledgor, and the Indenture Trustee, as secured party (included in Exhibit 4.6 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
31.1*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
33.1*	Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
33.2*	Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 2624, ~~2016~~2017.
34.1*	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
34.2*	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of KPMG LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 2624, ~~2016~~2017.
35.1*	Servicer Compliance Statement, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017, of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.

~~_____________~~____________

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC
	(Depositor)
Date: March 25, 2016	By: /s/ Wei Shi
	Wei Shi
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

	Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC (Depositor)
Date: March 27, 2017	By: /s/ Wei Shi Wei Shi President, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer (Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT

No annual report to security holders, proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material has been sent to security holders or is anticipated to be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Certificate of Formation of Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC (“TAFR LLC”) (included in Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
3.2	Limited Liability Company Agreement of TAFR LLC (included in Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-159170), as filed with the Commission on May 28, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.1	Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee (included in Exhibit 4.1 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.2	Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2014, between the Trust and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the “Indenture Trustee”) and securities intermediary (included in Exhibit 4.2 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.3	Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, among TAFR LLC, as seller, TMCC, as servicer and sponsor, and the Trust, as issuer (included in Exhibit 4.3 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.4	Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC, as purchaser, and TMCC, as seller (included in Exhibit 4.4 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.5	Administration Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, among TMCC, as administrator, the Trust, as issuer, and the Indenture Trustee (included in Exhibit 4.5 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
4.6	Securities Account Control Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, between TAFR LLC, as pledgor, and the Indenture Trustee, as secured party (included in Exhibit 4.6 to the Trust’s Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference).
31.1*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
33.1*	Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
33.2*	Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 2624, ~~2016~~2017.
34.1*	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017.
34.2*	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of KPMG LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria relating to Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, dated February 2624, ~~2016~~2017.
35.1*	Servicer Compliance Statement, dated March 2527, ~~2016~~2017, of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.

_____________

* Filed herewith

Filing Compare · Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust