10-Q 1 d10q.txt QUARTERLY REPORT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ------------------- FORM 10-Q X Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) --- of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarter ended June 30, 2001 or Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) --- of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the period from to Commission File Number: 1934 Act File Number: 0-25968 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 54-1681657 (State of other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2345 Crystal Drive Crystal City, VA 22202 (Address of principal (Zip Code) executive offices) Registrant's telephone number including area code: (703) 920-8500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Class A Units of Limited Partnership Interest (Title of Class) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No -- -- As of June 30, 2001, there were 38,469,588 Common Units of Limited Partnership of the Registrant issued and outstanding. CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. FORM 10-Q INDEX Pages ----- PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1: Financial Statements Report of Independent Public Accountants 3 Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. Financial Statements as of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000, Filed as a Part of This Report Consolidated Balance Sheets 4 Consolidated Statements of Operations 5 Consolidated Statements of Partner's Equity and Other Limited Partners' Interests 6 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 8 Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 18 PART II: OTHER INFORMATION 31 SIGNATURES 33 2 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P.: We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001, the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the related condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquires of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Arthur Andersen LLP July 18, 2001 Vienna, Virginia 3 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements. 4 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Unit Data) (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements. 5 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNER'S EQUITY AND OTHER LIMITED PARTNERS' INTEREST (Dollars in Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements. 6 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements. 7 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying interim financial statements include all of the accounts of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") and its subsidiary financing partnerships, and Smith Realty Company ("SRC"). (As used herein, the term "Company" may be used to mean Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P., or its sole general partner, Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc., or both, unless the context indicates otherwise.) All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The financial information furnished is unaudited, and in management's opinion, includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments), that are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position as of June 30, 2001 and the results of operations for the interim periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. Such interim results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related footnotes appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Operating Partnership is engaged in the ownership, operation, management, leasing, acquisition, and development of real estate properties, primarily residential multifamily properties. As of June 30, 2001, the Operating Partnership owned 59 operating multifamily properties containing 27,186 apartment units, had 480 units under construction at one owned site, had 226 units under construction at one site for which the Company owned substantially all of the economic interest, and had an agreement to purchase 383 units at one additional site. The Operating Partnership also had interests in four operating multifamily properties totaling 1,724 apartment units and in one property under construction totaling 630 units. In addition, the Operating Partnership owned one freestanding retail shopping center aggregating 205,000 square feet. The Company's properties are located in the Washington, D.C., Chicago, Boston and Southeast Florida metropolitan areas. 2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" (effective July 1, 2001) and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (effective for the Company on January 1, 2002). SFAS No. 141 prohibits pooling-of-interests accounting for acquisitions. SFAS No. 142 specifies that goodwill and some intangible assets will no longer be amortized but instead will be subject to periodic impairment testing. The Company is in the process of evaluating the financial statement impact of adoption of SFAS No. 142. 3. MERGER ANNOUNCEMENT In May 2001, the Company announced plans to merge with Archstone Communities ("Archstone"). The combined company will operate under the name Archstone-Smith Trust and will use the Smith Residential brand name for its high-rise portfolio and the Archstone brand name for 8 all other communities. For each Company share held, a shareholder will receive 1.975 shares of Archstone-Smith. This exchange ratio is not subject to change. The merger is structured as a tax-free transaction and is expected to close in the fall of 2001, subject to shareholder and other approvals. 4. DEBT In February 2001, the Company closed on two unsecured credit facilities totaling $150 million from bank groups led by PNC Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, which refinanced existing credit facilities scheduled to mature in March 2001. Draws upon the new lines are subject to certain unencumbered asset requirements and bear interest based on London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin of 85 to 125 basis points based on the leverage ratio of the Company. If the Company chooses to and obtains an Investment Grade Rating the applicable margin will be between 62.5 and 100 basis points over LIBOR based on such rating. The Company also pays a quarterly fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.20% on the full amount available under the lines of credit, depending upon the applicable leverage ratio or investment rating. The line of credit agreements contain certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of minimum equity value, debt to equity ratios and debt service coverage requirements. In March 2001, the Company closed on two second mortgage loans totaling $31.1 million. The $23.4 million loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.795% and is collateralized by Crystal Towers. The $7.7 million loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.62% and is collateralized by 2000 Commonwealth. The loans require monthly payments of interest only and mature coterminous with their respective first mortgages in January 2006 and January 2007, respectively. In March 2001, the Company refinanced an existing $12.3 million mortgage loan on The Consulate with a $27.0 million mortgage loan. The new loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.7% and requires monthly payments of interest only through March 2011, at which time principal amortization begins using a 30-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due March 2012. 5. INVESTMENT IN AND ADVANCES TO PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES In January 2001, the Company and the Property Service Businesses ("PSB") elected to treat each PSB as a taxable REIT subsidiary. In addition, the Company began consolidating the financial results of SRC in 2001 due to the Company's acquisition of all of the voting stock of SRC. Prior to 2001, SRC was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. This had no impact to net income but simply changed the financial statement presentation of SRC's results. In February 2001, Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. ("CES") acquired Commonwealth Air Conditioning and Heating, Inc., one of the largest independent service contractors in the metropolitan Boston, Massachusetts area. The purchase price of $19.1 million consisted of 100,310 shares of common stock (purchased by CES from the Company) and cash. CES funded the transaction through the Operating Partnership in exchange for a promissory note. 9 In March 2001, CES closed on a twelve-month $50 million line of credit with PNC Bank and Commerzbank replacing an expiring facility. The line is guaranteed by the Operating Partnership and bears interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 75 to 115 basis points based on the leverage ratio of the Company. The current borrowing rate is LIBOR plus 100 basis points. CES also pays a quarterly fee of 10 basis points on the full amount available under the line. In May 2001, CES acquired Trimech Corporation of Pompton Plains, New Jersey. The purchase price of $3.2 million consisted of 37,232 shares of common stock (purchased by CES from the Company) and cash. CES funded the transaction through the Operating Partnership in exchange for a promissory note. 6. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES In February 2001, the Company entered into and funded a $23.8 million participating loan collateralized by Plaza 440, a 457-unit luxury high-rise property in downtown Chicago. The loan, which matures September 1, 2009, provides the Company with a 90% participation in the property cash flow after debt service if certain minimum property performance thresholds are met. Otherwise, the Company will earn a fixed interest rate of 7%. The loan is subordinate to a first mortgage of $63 million at 7%. After two years, the loan agreement provides the Company the option to convert its loan to an ownership interest. Simultaneous with the loan transaction, Smith Realty Company entered into a multi-year property management agreement with the owner. The Company has accounted for this investment as an ADC arrangement in accordance with AICPA Practice Bulletin No. 1. 10 7. PREFERRED EQUITY The following table sets forth the Operating Partnership's issued and outstanding preferred units:

On June 29, 2001, 3,600,000 Series H Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Units were converted into 2,337,662 common units. 11 8. PER UNIT DATA Earnings per common unit of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 is computed based on weighted average common units outstanding during the period as follows (in millions):

12 A reconciliation of income and units used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per common unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 follows:

13 9. SEGMENT REPORTING Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by senior management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Property Segments The Company's primary business is the ownership and operation of multifamily residential real estate. As such, the residential rental properties constitute the four primary operating segments -- Core, Acquisition/Disposition, Redevelopment and Development portfolios -- depending upon the maturity and nature of each property. Core consists of multifamily properties, other than Redevelopment or Development, which have been owned more than one full calendar year. Therefore, the 2001 Core represents properties owned as of December 31, 1999. Acquisition/Disposition consists of purchased properties which have not yet reflected one full calendar year of operations and disposed properties. Redevelopment includes purchased properties in which the Company is making significant renovations to reposition the property in the market place. Properties will remain in the Redevelopment Portfolio until one full calendar year of operating results is reflected subsequent to completion of the renovations. Development consists of properties which the Company has constructed or is in the process of constructing which have not yet had a full calendar year of stabilized operating results. On the first of January each year, Acquisition, Redevelopment and Development properties that meet the one-year requirement are transferred to the Core portfolio. The Company's fifth property segment is the Retail portfolio, which reflects results for the one free standing retail property. The Company evaluates performance for the Property Segments based on Net Operating Income ("NOI") which is the difference between Rental Revenue and Operating Expenses (which primarily excludes interest expense, general and administrative costs and depreciation). Property Service Business Segment The Company also evaluates the separate financial information of the Property Service Businesses. These businesses provide professional services such as property management, furnished corporate apartment rentals, engineering and technical consulting, and construction management to both Company-owned properties and properties owned by third parties. Given the similarities in the nature of services, customers and distribution methods, the Company considers the Property Service Businesses to be one segment. The Company evaluates performance for the Property Service Business segment, which includes both consolidated and unconsolidated entities, based on Funds from Operations ("FFO"), which is defined using the revised definition adopted by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sale of property, plus depreciation/amortization of assets unique to the real estate 14 industry. Depreciation/amortization of assets not unique to the industry, such as amortization of deferred financing costs, goodwill and non-real estate assets, is not added back. The accounting policies for all segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. 15 Information concerning operations by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 were as follows (in thousands): Property Segments

16 Property Service Business Segment

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In July 2001, the $33.6 million Mirador mortgage matured. The loan was paid off through a draw on the Company's line of credit. In addition, the Company repaid the $11.8 million Bennington mortgage and the $32.0 million Stonegate mortgage through draws on its lines of credit. The Company paid prepayment penalties totaling $0.4 million. As a result of the proposed merger with Archstone Communities, the Company obtained a $100 million loan from Archstone in order to avoid encumbering additional assets and to avoid incurring third party financing fees. Proceeds were used to pay down the Company's lines of credit. The loan matures on the earlier of the completion of the merger or 180 days after the merger agreement is terminated. The Company will pay a minimum interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points until 60 days after the termination of the merger agreement, if applicable, and thereafter will pay interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The loan is unsecured but may become secured at Archstone's option upon an event of default. The loan may be prepaid at anytime in whole or in part. 17 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and discussed below represent the operations of Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") and its subsidiary financing partnerships and Smith Realty Company ("SRC"). (As used herein, the term "Company" may be used to mean Charles E. Smith Residential Realty L.P., or its sole general partner, Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc., or both, unless the context indicates otherwise.) In 2001, the Company began consolidating Smith Realty Company due to the acquisition of its voting stock by the Operating Partnership. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS When used throughout this report, the words "believes," "anticipates," "expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements indicate that assumptions have been used that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual financial results or management plans and objectives to differ materially from those projected or expressed herein, including: the effect of national and regional economic conditions, particularly with regard to the levels of multifamily property occupancy and rental growth in the Washington, D.C., southeast Florida, Chicago, and Boston metropolitan areas; the Company's ability to identify and secure additional properties and sites that meet its criteria for acquisition or development; the acceptance of the Company's financing plans by the capital markets, and the effect of prevailing market interest rates and the pricing of the Company's stock; and other risks described from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. The registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances. Merger In May 2001, the Company announced plans to merge with Archstone Communities ("Archstone"). The combined company will operate under the name Archstone-Smith Trust. For each Operating Partnership unit held, a unitholder will receive 1.975 shares of Archstone-Smith. This exchange ratio is not subject to change. The merger is structured as a tax-free transaction and is expected to close in the fall of 2001, subject to shareholder and other approvals. Rental Revenue Average revenue per apartment unit for the Company's core multifamily properties increased approximately 7.0% in the second quarter of 2001 as compared with 2000. A schedule of portfolio statistics follows: 18 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential Portfolio Statistics For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2001

19 CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Residential Portfolio Statistics For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2001

(1) Property is currently under construction. 20 RENTAL PROPERTIES Revenues, expenses and income from the multifamily and retail properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 were as follows (in thousands):

(1) Represents properties owned as of December 31, 1999 (other than Redevelopment of Development properties). (2) Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. 21 PROPERTY SERVICE BUSINESSES Revenues, expenses and income from the Property Service Businesses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 were as follows (in thousands):

(1) SRC is consolidated in 2001 due to change in voting control. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2001 to Three Months Ended June 30, 2000. Summary. Net income of the Operating Partnership decreased $2.9 million, or 9.0%, from $32.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $29.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. This was due primarily to a $4.2 million gain on the sale of property during 2000 versus a $2.9 million expense in 2001 related to merger costs. Funds from Operations ("FFO") of the Operating Partnership increased $8.4 million, or 23.6%, from $35.6 million to $44.0 million during the same period. The increase in FFO is primarily attributable to net operating income growth of 7.5% on the core portfolio and contributions from acquired and developed properties. Revenue increased $14.4 million, or 15.2%, from $94.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000 to $109.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Operating expenses increased $8.7 million, or 24.9%, from $35.1 million during the second quarter of 2000 to $43.8 million during the current quarter. Core Portfolio. Revenue from the core portfolio increased $4.5 million, or 7.0%, over the prior year period resulting in average monthly revenue per apartment unit of $1,291. The Company continued its selective kitchen and/or bath renovation program, which has significantly enhanced its ability to increase rents. Management estimates the return on such investments is approximately 12% to 15%. Overall, rent potential increased 7.6% during the quarter as compared to the prior year. 22 This was partially offset by a decrease in occupancy. Average economic occupancy for the core portfolio was 96.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to 97.5% for the comparable prior year quarter. Expenses for the core portfolio increased $1.5 million, or 6.2%, due primarily to a significant increase in utility costs over the prior year's quarter. A combination of higher usage and significantly higher gas rates resulted in a $0.8 million increase over the prior year. Acquisition/Disposition Portfolio. The acquisition properties are defined as properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 1999. Results for the first quarter of 2000 reflect two acquisition properties, two residential dispositions totaling 989 apartment units, and one retail disposition. Results for the first quarter of 2001 reflect four acquisition properties and no dispositions totaling 1,044 apartment units. Total capitalized cost of the acquisition portfolio at June 30, 2001 was $131.0 million. Redevelopment Portfolio. The redevelopment portfolio includes purchased properties in which the Company is making significant renovations to reposition the property in the market place. The redevelopment portfolio consists of ten properties totaling 7,361 units and contributed approximately 36%, or $5.2 million, of the total revenue increase. Total capitalized cost of the redevelopment portfolio at June 30, 2001 was $630.1 million. The total spent on renovations for the second quarter of 2001 was $22.3 million. Development Portfolio. One Superior Place reached stabilized occupancy in June 2000 and produced net operating income of $3.3 million for current quarter, compared to $2.8 million in the prior year quarter. Total capitalized cost at June 30, 2001 was $116.2 million, which does not reflect an earnout payment expected to be paid to the developer in early 2002. Park Connecticut reached stabilized occupancy in October 2000 and produced net operating income of $0.6 million for the current quarter compared to a $0.1 million in the prior year quarter. Total capitalized cost at June 30, 2001 was $28.5 million. Alban Towers delivered initial units in May 2001 and had 100 units delivered as of June 30, 2001. The project had a net operating loss of $0.2 million for the current quarter. As of June 30, the property was 27% leased and 10% occupied. Stabilization is expected in the first quarter of 2002. Total capitalized cost at June 30, 2001 was $56.8 million. Property Service Businesses. Recent tax legislation which became effective January 1, 2001 allows the direct ownership and control by REITs of Taxable REIT Subsidiaries ("TRS"). Such TRS's may engage in activities which were previously considered impermissible for REITs in terms of qualifying income for purposes of maintaining REIT qualification. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company and all of its Property Service Businesses have elected TRS status in accordance with the new legislation. No changes have been made, however, to the ownership structure of CES or SMC. The Company continues to maintain its 99%, non-voting interest as it has in the past. However, SRC has changed. In 2001 the Company purchased the remaining 1% voting interest in SRC and began consolidating the financial results of SRC instead of using the equity method of accounting. This had no impact to net income or FFO but simply changed the financial statement presentation of SRC's results. 23 Income from Property Service Businesses increased $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2001 compared to the prior year quarter. Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. and affiliates contributed an increase of $1.7 million in income during the quarter, which was due to both internal growth and the acquisition of six businesses during the second half of 2000 and first half of 2001. Smith Management Construction contributed $0.3 million to the increase. Other. Corporate general and administrative expenses were 3.0% of total revenues. Net interest expense increased $2.4 million during the quarter, or 11.9%, due to financing of acquisition and development activity. Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2000. Summary. Net income of the Operating Partnership increased $0.2 million, or 0.3%, from $55.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $55.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Funds from Operations ("FFO") of the Operating Partnership increased $17.7 million, or 27.4%, from $64.7 million to $82.4 million during the same period. Revenue increased $32.1 million, or 17.5% from $183.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $215.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Operating expenses increased $18.7 million, or 26.5% from $70.6 million during the first half of 2000 to $89.3 million during the current period. Core Portfolio. Revenue from the core portfolio increased $9.7 million, or 7.7%, over the prior year resulting in average monthly revenue per apartment units of $1,271. This was primarily due to strong demand and the kitchen and bath renovation program. Average economic occupancy for the core portfolio was 96.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to 97.1% for the comparable prior year. Expenses for the core portfolio increased $3.6 million, or 7.7%, due primarily to expected increases in real estate taxes, and higher wages due to staffing at the properties. Acquisition/Disposition Portfolio. The acquisition properties are defined as properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 1999. Results for the six months ended June 30, 2000 reflect two acquisition properties, two residential disposition properties totaling 989 apartment units, and one retail disposition. Results for the six months ended June 30, 2001 reflect four acquisition properties totaling 1,044 apartment units and no disposition properties. Redevelopment Portfolio. The redevelopment properties contributed approximately 34%, or $11.1 million, of the total rental revenue increase and approximately $5.6 million of the total rental expense increase. Development Portfolio. One Superior Place reached stabilized occupancy in June 2000 and produced net operating income of $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to $4.4 million in the prior year period. 24 Park Connecticut reached stabilized occupancy in October 2000 and produced net operating net income of $1.2 million for the current period compared to a $0.1 million net operating loss in the prior year period. Alban Towers delivered initial units in May 2001 and had 100 units delivered as of June 30, 2001. The project had a net operating loss of $0.3 million for the current period. Property Service Businesses. Income from Property Service Businesses increased $4.8 million in the first half of 2001 compared to the prior year period. Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. and affiliates contributed an increase of $2.4 million in income during the period, which was due to both internal growth and the acquisition of six businesses during the second half of 2000 and first half of 2001. Smith Management Construction contributed $1.0 million to the increase. Other. Corporate general and administrative expenses were 3.3% of total revenues. The increase in total cost of $1.4 million, or 25.2%, was due primarily to a $0.8 million reserve established in connection with the Company's investment in Broadband Residential, Inc. ("BBR"), a privately owned telecommunications company. Net interest expense increased $6.5 million during the period, or 17.1%, due to financing of acquisition and development activity. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Summary. Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $17.2 million from $81.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $63.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, primarily due to changes in other assets related to the SRC consolidation in 2001. Net cash flow of $148.4 million was used by investment activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $144.6 million during the comparable prior year period. The increase was due primarily to no acquisition activity in the first half of 2001, which was partially offset by higher development activity and capital improvements. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $84.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, primarily comprised of $116.9 million of net borrowings against the properties, lines of credit, and construction loans, offset by a $52.2 million cash outflow for dividends and distributions. Net cash flows provided by financing activities of $53.0 million in the comparable prior year period primarily consisted of $98.3 million of net cash inflow from borrowings less $49.9 million of dividends/distributions. Funds from Operations FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") as net income (loss), computed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and property sales, plus depreciation/amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry. FFO does not represent cash 25 flow from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income) and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of the Company's performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. The Company considers FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance primarily because it excludes the assumption that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as a performance measure. Comparison of the Company's presentation of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs. 26 Funds from Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 are computed as follows (in thousands):

Development As of June 30, 2001, the Company had the following properties under construction:

(1) The Company has a 40% ownership interest. (2) The Company owns substantially all of the economic interest. Commitments As of June 30, 2001, the Company had executed contracts to purchase multifamily properties under construction as follows:

27 This contract is contingent upon satisfactory completion of construction and attainment of final certificates of occupancy by the owners. As of June 30, 2001, the Company had posted a $10.9 million letter-of-credit in accordance with the contract to be drawn only if the Company defaults on its contractual obligation to purchase the completed asset. Several other acquisition and development projects are being pursued by the Company. As of June 30, 2001, the capitalized development costs related to probable development projects totaled $7.5 million. The Company anticipates meeting funding requirements for acquisitions and development, including the repositioning program, through draws on its lines of credit, long-term borrowings, asset sales and public or private issuances of equity, including Operating Partnership unit exchanges. Debt In February 2001, the Company closed on two unsecured credit facilities, totaling $150 million, both from bank groups led by PNC Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, which refinanced existing unsecured credit facilities scheduled to mature in March 2001. Draws upon the lines are subject to certain unencumbered asset requirements and bear interest based on London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin of 85 to 125 basis points based on the leverage ratio of the Company. If the Company chooses to and obtains an Investment Grade Rating the applicable margin will be between 62.5 and 100 basis points over LIBOR based on such rating. The Company also pays a quarterly fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.20% on the full amount available under the lines of credit, depending upon the applicable leverage ratio or investment rating. The line of credit agreements contain certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of minimum equity value, debt to equity ratios and debt service coverage requirements. In March 2001, the Company closed on two second mortgage loans totaling $31.1 million. The $23.4 million loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.795% and is collateralized by Crystal Towers. The $7.7 million loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.62% and is collateralized by 2000 Commonwealth. The loans require monthly payments of interest only and mature coterminous with their respective first mortgages in January 2006 and January 2007, respectively. In March 2001, the Company refinanced an existing $12.3 million mortgage loan on The Consulate with a $27.0 million mortgage loan. The new loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.7% and requires monthly payments of interest only through March 2011, at which time principal amortization begins using a 30-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due March 2012. In March 2001, CES closed on a twelve-month $50 million line of credit with PNC Bank and Commerzbank replacing an expiring facility. The line is guaranteed by the Operating Partnership and bears interest based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 75 to 115 basis points based on the leverage ratio of the Company. The current borrowing rate is LIBOR plus 100 basis points. CES also pays a quarterly fee of 10 basis points on the full amount available under the line. 28 In July 2001, the $33.6 million Mirador mortgage matured. The loan was paid off through a draw on the Company's line of credit. Also, the Company repaid the $11.8 million Bennington mortgage and the $32.0 million Stonegate mortgage through draws on its lines of credit and paid prepayment penalties totaling $0.4 million. As a result of the proposed merger with Archstone Communities, the Company obtained a $100 million loan from Archstone in order to avoid encumbering additional assets and to avoid incurring third party financing fees. Proceeds were used to pay down the Company's lines of credit. The loan matures on the earlier of the completion of the merger or 180 days after the merger agreement is terminated. The Company will pay a minimum interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points until 60 days after the termination of the merger agreement, if applicable, and thereafter will pay interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The loan is unsecured but may become secured at Archstone's option upon an event of default. The loan may be prepaid at anytime in whole or in part. As of June 30, 2001, the Company had mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which carried a weighted average interest rate of 7.0%, as follows: Dollars in % of Thousands Total --------- ----- Fixed Rate Debt: Mortgages $ 1,107,538 82.6% Variable Rate Debt: $300M Line of Credit 139,000 10.4% $100M Line of Credit 64,000 4.8% $50M Line of Credit - 0.0% Construction Loans 30,046 2.2% ---------- ------ $1,340,584 100.0% ========== ====== As of June 30, 2001, the Company had $121.0 million of unused borrowing capacity on lines of credit and construction loans. (Unused borrowing capacity includes $24.8 million from the $300 million line, which reflects the borrowing capacity currently available under the line of $163.8 million, less $139.0 million used at June 30, 2001.) Amounts outstanding under lines of credit average $180.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $117.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. As of June 30, 2001, the Company's Debt to Total Market Capitalization Ratio was 37.6% (based on 25.3 million common shares, 4.9 million convertible preferred shares, and 13.1 million partnership units outstanding at a common stock price of $50.15, and $50 million of perpetual preferred stock) versus 37.3% as of December 31, 2000 and 39.5% as of June 30, 2000. The Company's Interest Coverage Ratio, excluding gains on sales and extraordinary items, for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was 3.10 to 1 compared to 3.10 to 1 for the comparable prior year period. 29 Equity In May 2001, CES acquired Trimech Corporation of Pompton Plains, New Jersey. The purchase price of $3.2 million consisted of 37,232 shares of common stock (purchased by CES from the Company) and cash. CES funded the transaction through the Operating Partnership in exchange for a promissory note. In June 2001, 3,600,000 Series H Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Units were converted into 2,337,662 common units. Capital Expenditures For the six months ended June 30, 2001, total capital improvements were $70.5 million, of which $21.0 million were for the core portfolio ($1,176 per unit). Approximately 55% of the capital expenditures on the core portfolio in 2001 are considered by management to be non-recurring, repositioning improvements. Management considers such improvements as one-time, non-recurring capital expenditures, which significantly enhance the asset. Certain repositioning improvements directly result in higher revenues. For example, the Company renovated approximately 800 kitchens and baths during the first quarter of 2001 based solely on the ability to charge and obtain a rent premium. The remaining 45% of the capital expenditures on the core portfolio indirectly influence the Company's ability to generate revenues and are considered more recurring in nature and less discretionary. For example, periodic replacement is expected for items such as appliances and HVAC equipment. However, the Company does not generate additional revenue from these improvements and has little discretion as to whether or not they are made. A summary of core capital expenditures for the period follows: Total $ Average $ Spent Per (In Thousands) Core Unit -------------- --------- Expenditure Type Kitchen/Bath $ 9,548 $ 535 Washer/Dryer 203 11 Other (1) 1,815 102 --------- ------ Core Repositioning 11,566 648 Recurring Improvements 9,409 528 --------- ------ Total Capital Expenditures -Core Portfolio $ 20,975 $ 1,176 ========= ======= (1) Primarily represents carryover repositioning improvements which were identified and/or begun upon acquisition of the property. 30 PART II Item 1. Legal Proceedings None Item 2. Changes in Securities On May 17, 2001, the Company issued 37,232 unregistered shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company for $1,700,013 or $45.66 per share, CES pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement between CES and the Company dated May 17, 2001. CES subsequently transferred these shares in exchange for shares of Trimech Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, in a cash and securities acquisition of a 100% interest in that corporation. The Company believes that the shares described above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") by virtue of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the provisions of Rule 506 of Regulation D. Following the above transaction, the Company contributed the net proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock to the Operating Partnership in exchange for 37,232 Common Units. Item 3. Defaults on Senior Securities None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None Item 5. Other Information None Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K a) Exhibits: None 31 b) Reports on Form 8-K: The Company filed a Form 8-K on May 9, 2001, announcing the execution of an Agreement of Merger with Archstone Communities Trust of Denver, Colorado. On June 19 the Company filed additional Form 8-K providing information concerning this proposed merger, including copies of the Agreement of Merger and ancillary documents, and unaudited pro forma financial statements for the resulting entity, to be known as the Archstone-Smith Trust. The Company filed a Form 8-K on August 7, 2001, announcing the purchase of Harbour House on October 25, 2000 for a purchase price of $94.3 million. 32 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. CHARLES E. SMITH RESIDENTIAL REALTY L.P. By: Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc., its General Partner August 14, 2001 By: /s/ W. D. Minami ---------------------------------------------- W. D. Minami President Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. (on behalf of the Registrant) By: /s/ Steven E. Gulley --------------------------------------------- Steven E. Gulley Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer Charles E. Smith Residential Realty, Inc. 33

SMITH CHARLES E RESIDENTIAL REALTY LP 10-Q