UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-9681

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	11-2824646
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

417 Crossways Park Drive, Woodbury, New York	11797
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(516) 496-1900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant : (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by the court. Yes x No ¨o

As of ~~April~~July 1211, 2011, 1,000,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index

Part I - Financial Information
	Item 1. - Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at February 26, 2011(Successor Company) (Unaudited) and August 28, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 28, 2011(Successor Company) (Unaudited) and August 28, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011 (Successor Company), twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011, and thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011 (Successor Company), twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011 and thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010 (Predecessor Company)	4
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	5
	Item 2. - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2324
	Item 3. - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	34
	Item 4. - Controls and Procedures	34
		37
	Item 4. - Controls and Procedures
		37
Part II - Other Information
	Item 1. – Legal Proceedings	3538
	Item 1A. – Risk Factors	3538
	Item 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3638
	Item 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3638
	Item 4. – (Removed and Reserved)	3638
	Item 5. – Other Information	3638
	Item 6. – Exhibits	3839
Signatures		3940
Exhibit Index		4041
Ex. 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Ex. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Ex. 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Ex. 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Ex. 10.1 Warehousing Agreement by and between Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and Marks & Cohen LLC dated April 11, 2011

Index

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. ~~Financial~~ Fnancial ~~Statements (unaudited).~~Information

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

	Successor Company			Predecessor Company
	February 26, 2011
	May 28, 2011
	(Unaudited)			August 28, 2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	54,~~209~~958		$	5,591
Restricted cash		-			99
Accounts receivable		1,~~658~~750			4,160
Merchandise inventories, net		7,~~807~~189			8,603
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,~~337~~135			2,086
Total current assets		1615,~~011~~032			20,539
Store fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements, at cost, net		21,~~042~~972			2,239
Trademark		37,~~260~~310			-
Other intangibles		245			-
Goodwill		11,342			-
Goodwill		15,642			-
Other assets (primarily security deposits)		528			577
Other assets (primarily security deposits)		546			577
	$	36,184		$	23,355
	$	37,746		$	23,355
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, trade (including $329 and $4 to stockholder
Accounts payable, trade (including $2,673 and $4 to stockholder
and former stockholder, respectively)	$	14,~~579~~054		$	1,590
Customer deposits		54,~~758~~714			5,353
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		86,~~107~~784			5,565
Note payable		1,400			-
Deferred rent and allowances - current portion		-46			359
Total current liabilities		16,~~844~~998			12,867
Long-term debt		8,167			-
Deferred rent and allowances, net of current portion		-207			1,897
Deferred tax liability		1,255			-
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion		4742			58
		26,313			14,822
		26,669			14,822
Liabilities subject to compromise (including $994 to former stockholder)		-			37,249
Total liabilities		26,~~313~~669			52,071
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 2 and 18)
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Common stock, par value $.01 per share,
Authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
1,000,000 shares at February 26, 2011		10			-
1,000,000 shares at May 28, 2011		10			-
Additional paid-in capital		~~11,423~~			-
Predecessor Company:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share,
Authorized 1,000,000 shares
Series A Convertible Preferred - issued and outstanding 6,490
shares at August 28, 2010 (liquidation preference $3,245)		-			-
Series B Convertible Preferred - issued and outstanding 47,989
shares at August 28, 2010 (liquidation preference $240)		-			1
Common stock, par value $.01 per share
Authorized 12,000,000 shares; issued 7,073,466
shares at August 28, 2010		-			70
Additional paid-in capital		-11,458			29,659
Treasury stock, at cost, 93,579 shares at August 28, 2010		-			(125	)
(Accumulated deficit)		-			(58,321	)
Accumulated deficit		(1,953	)		(58,321	)
		11,433			(28,716	)
		9,515			(28,716	)
	$	3736,~~746~~184		$	23,355

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Predecessor Company
	Successor Company			Predecessor Company
	Thirteen weeks ended			Twenty-six weeks ended			Thirteen weeks ended	~~Twenty-six weeks ended~~			Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 26,			February 27,				February 26,			February 27,
	May 28, 2011			February 27, 2011				May 29, 2010			May 29, 2010
	2011			2010				2011			2010
Revenue:
Net sales	$	1618,~~010~~106		$	1833,~~610~~749			$	3317,~~749~~833		$	3553,~~641~~474
Revenue from service contracts		~~736~~882			1,~~045~~517				~~1,517~~948			12,~~891~~839
		16,746			19,655				35,266			37,532
Warehouse		17			-				-			-
		19,005			35,266				18,781			56,313
Cost of sales, including store occupancy,
warehousing, delivery and service costs		1213,~~372~~679			1426,~~612~~321				2614,~~321~~010			2741,~~477~~487
Loss related to service contracts		-			~~3,500~~-				-			3,500
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6,~~226~~841			713,~~501~~299				138,~~299~~249			1523,~~081~~330
(Recovery of) provision for loss on amounts due from Related Company		-			(39	)			-			3,128
Provision for loss on amounts due from Related Company		-			-				-			3,128
Depreciation and amortization		~~129~~286			~~196~~288				~~288~~192			~~367~~559
		18,727			25,770				39,908			49,553
		20,806			39,908				22,451			72,004
Loss from operations		(1,~~981~~801	)		(64,~~115~~642	)			(43,~~642~~670	)		(1215,~~021~~691	)
Gain on acquisition of Related Company		-			23-				-			23
Interest income		2-			2				2-			11
Interest expense		(65139	)		(468	)			(683	)		(811	)
Loss from continuing operations before reorganization items and income taxes		(2,044	)		(6,094	)			(4,708	)		(11,995	)
Loss from continuing operations before reorganization items
Reorganization items, net		34,128			-				33,378			-
and income taxes		(1,940	)		(4,708	)			(3,673	)		(15,668	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		32,084			(6,094	)			28,670			(11,995	)
Reorganization items, net		(4	)		33,378				-			-
Income tax expense		8			2				16			4
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,944	)		28,670				(3,673	)		(15,668	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		32,076			(6,096	)			28,654			(11,999	)
Income tax expense		9			16				2			6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (including loss on store
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,953	)		28,654				(3,675	)		(15,674	)
closings of $0 and $4 for the thirteen week and $53 and $6 for the
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (including income (loss) on store
twenty-six week periods ended in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively)		-			(317	)			62			(1,284	)
closings of $0 and $1 for the thirteen weeks for fiscal 2011 and 2010,
Net income (loss)	$	32,076		$	(6,413	)		$	28,716		$	(13,283	)
respectively and ($5) for the thirty-nine weeks ended in fiscal 2010)		-			62				(1,100	)		(2,384	)
Net income (loss)	$	(1,953	)	$	28,716			$	(4,775	)	$	(18,058	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	4.06		$	(0.87	)		$	3.62		$	(1.71	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(1.95	)	$	3.62			$	(0.52	)	$	(2.23	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-0.00			(0.0401	)			(0.0116	)		(0.1834	)
Net income (loss)	$	4.06		$	(0.91	)		$	3.63		$	(1.89	)
Net (loss) income	$	(1.95	)	$	3.63			$	(0.68	)	$	(2.57	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	4.04		$	(0.87	)		$	3.61		$	(1.71	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(1.95	)	$	3.61			$	(0.52	)	$	(2.23	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-0.00			(0.0401	)			(0.0116	)		(0.1834	)
Net income (loss)	$	4.04		$	(0.91	)		$	3.62		$	(1.89	)
Net (loss) income	$	(1.95	)	$	3.62			$	(0.68	)	$	(2.57	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		61,~~979~~000,~~887~~000			76,~~014~~979,~~199~~887				6,979,887			7,~~043~~022,~~996~~548
Weighted average common shares issuable on conversion of
outstanding Series A participating preferred stock		~~924,500~~-			-924,500				~~924,500~~-			-
Total weighted average common shares basic		71,~~904~~000,~~387~~000			7,~~014~~904,~~199~~387				76,~~904~~979,~~387~~887			7,~~043~~022,~~996~~548
Effect of potential common share issuance:
Stock options		-			-				-			-
Warrants		-			-				-			-
Series B convertible preferred stock		~~33,592~~-			-33,592				~~33,592~~-			-
Weighted average common shares diluted		71,~~937~~000,~~979~~000			7,~~014~~937,~~199~~979				76,~~937,~~979,887			7,~~043~~022,~~996~~548

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	Predecessor Company
	Successor Company			Predecessor Company
	Twenty-six weeks ended
	Thirteen weeks ended			Twenty-six weeks ended			Thirty-nine weeks ended
	February 26,			February 27,
	May 28, 2011			February 27, 2011			May 29, 2010
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,953	)	$	28,716		$	(18,058	)
Net income (loss)	$	28,716		$	(13,283	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating
provided by operating activities of continuing operations:
activities of continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization		286			288			559
Depreciation and amortization		288			367
Amortization of other intangibles		245			-			-
Provision for loss on amounts due from Related Company		-			~~3,128~~-			3,128
Provision for loss on service contracts		-			~~3,500~~-			3,500
Gain on acquisition of Related Company		-			~~(23~~-	)		(23	)
Non cash compensation to consultant		-			11-			12
(Income) loss from discontinued operations		(62	)		1,284
Non cash stock based compensation		35			-			-
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment		(307	)		2
(Income) loss from discontinued operations		-			(62	)		2,384
Gain on discharge of debt		(16,714	)		-
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment		-			(307	)		9
Fair value adjustments		(20,161	)		-
Loss on discharge of debt		148			(16,714	)		-
Deferred rent		13			38
Fair value adjustments		-			(20,161	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from the acquisition in
Deferred rent		253			13			317
2010 and discontinued operations
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Merchandise inventories, net		~~796~~618			~~(224~~796	)		676
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		~~749~~201			~~(335~~749	)		(257	)
Accounts receivable		~~2,469~~(92	)		~~(203~~2,469	)		(1,508	)
Due from Related Company, net		-			~~(682~~-	)		(682	)
Other assets		16(27	)		8316			(11	)
Accounts payable, trade		~~(610~~2,465	)		~~5,517~~(610	)		8,396
Customer deposits		~~553~~(1,029	)		~~3,545~~553			4,296
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		2(1,~~812~~312	)		12,~~046~~812			(696	)
Liabilities subject to compromise		~~(1,635~~-	)		-(1,635	)		-
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations		(~~3,077~~162	)		(3,~~771~~077	)		2,042
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(~~114~~65	)		(~~325~~114	)		(451	)
Purchase of business and assets of Related Company		-			~~(350~~-	)		(525	)
Restricted cash		99-			-99			-
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations		(1565	)		(~~675~~15	)		(976	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds received from loans		~~2,700~~-			-2,700			-
Principal payments under capital lease obligations		(239	)		(2123	)		(32	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations		~~2,677~~(9	)		~~(21~~2,677	)		(32	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations		(~~415~~236	)		~~3,075~~(415	)		1,034
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents of operating activities
of discontinued operations		33(15	)		~~(703~~33	)		(2,256	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of investing activities
of discontinued operations		-			~~(25~~-	)		(26	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5,~~591~~209			5,~~609~~591			5,609
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	54,~~209~~958		$	75,~~956~~209		$	4,361
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid	$	178		$	3017		$	42
Interest paid	$	602		$	860		$	11
Reorganization items paid	$	21,~~775~~282		$	-2,775		$	-

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” and the “Successor Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals other than adjustments reflecting the effects of the reorganization plan and applying fresh-start reporting in 2011 and the provision for loss on amounts due from the Related Company (as defined below) in 2010) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The Company emerged from bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), on February 22, 2011 (the “Effective Date”) and has adopted fresh-start reporting effective February 26, 2011, which is the second quarter period end date. The results of operations from February 22, 2011 through February 26, 2011, do not have a material effect on the financial statements. As a consequence of fresh-start reporting, the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows after adopting fresh-start reporting are not comparable with those prior to the fresh start period and, therefore, the consolidated balance sheets ~~have been~~ and ~~future~~consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows ~~will~~have ~~be,~~been segregated in the respective consolidated financial statements. References to the Company as the “Successor Company” and “Predecessor Company” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pertain to (a) the close of business on February 26, 2011 and thereafter and (b) periods prior thereto, respectively. See Note 3, “Fresh Start Accounting” for a presentation of the impact of emergence from reorganization and fresh start accounting on the consolidated financial position of the Successor Company and the consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows of the Predecessor Company.

Aside from the effects of fresh-start reporting, the Successor Company follows the same accounting policies as the Predecessor Company.

The consolidated balance sheet of the Predecessor Company as of August 28, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of such date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

For further information, please refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

NOTE 2: CHAPTER 11 PROCEEDINGS AND REORGANIZATION

On July 18, 2010 (the “Petition Date”), Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). On February 9, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Company’s Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, dated January 24, 2011 (as confirmed, the “Plan”). On February 22, 2011, the Plan became effective pursuant to its terms. Following are significant transactions consummated on the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

Following are significant transactions consummated on the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan.

(a) Exit Financing

On the Effective Date, the Senior Secured and Super-Priority Debtor-In-Possession Credit Agreement (the “DIP Agreement”), dated as of November 19, 2010, among the Company and its principal creditor and supplier, Haining Mengnu Group Co., Ltd. (“Mengnu”), was refinanced by a secured exit credit agreement among the Company and Mengnu pursuant to which Mengnu agreed to provide exit financing for the benefit of the Company (the “Secured Exit Credit Agreement”). The Secured Exit Credit ~~Facility~~Agreement comprises (i) a letter of credit backstopped by Mengnu funded by a bank for the benefit of the Company’s credit card processor in an amount of $3,000, which amount may be increased to an amount not to exceed $5,000 at the request of the Company and with Mengnu’s consent (the “LOC Facility”); and (ii) the relending of amounts owed by the Company to Mengnu under the DIP Agreement, which was $2,762 as of February 22, 2011, less $62, which was repaid by the Company to Mengnu on the Effective Date (the “Cash Facility”).

With respect to the LOC Facility, the Company is required to repay Mengnu all amounts drawn upon the earlier to occur of the termination date of the Secured Exit Credit Agreement or five business days following the occurrence of such a drawing. On a semi-annual basis, the Company is required to pay Mengnu a fee equal to 5% per annum applied to the face amount of the LOC Facility commencing on the Effective Date. The Company’s obligations under the LOC Facility are secured by (i) a first priority lien and security interest in all the assets, other than inventory of the Company (including of each of its subsidiaries other than Hartsdale Convertibles, Inc. (“Hartsdale”)); and (ii) a junior lien on all inventory of the Company (including of each of its subsidiaries other than Hartsdale), subordinated to the liens granted in connection with the Tranche A Note and Tranche C Note (each, as hereinafter defined).

In respect of the Cash Facility, on the Effective Date, the Company issued the Secured Tranche E Promissory Note to Mengnu in the principal amount of $2,700 (the “Tranche E Note”). The Tranche E Note, which matures on February 22, 2013, bears interest at a rate of 3½% per annum payable in four equal installments on each of August 22, 2011, February 22, 2012, August 22, 2012 and February 22, 2013. Under the Tranche E Note, if with respect to certain designated measurement periods, the Company has excess cash flow, as defined, then the Company must, no later than 60 days after the end of the relevant measurement period, prepay the Tranche E Note in an aggregate amount equal to 50% of such excess cash flow, provided, that such prepayment does not cause the Company’s average amount of cash and cash equivalents over the two-month period preceding the relevant measurement period, subject to certain exclusions, to be less than $3,000.

The Company’s obligations under the Tranche E Note are secured by (i) a first priority lien and security interest in all the assets of the Company, including inventory acquired from Ashley Homestores, Ltd. and sold in Hartsdale locations (the “Hartsdale Inventory”), but excluding all other inventory (the “JCI Inventory”) and the assets of Hartsdale (other than the Hartsdale Inventory); and (ii) a junior lien on all JCI Inventory, subordinated to the liens granted in connection with the Tranche A Note and Tranche C Note.

The Secured Exit Credit Agreement terminates on the earliest to occur of (i) the date on which a Termination Event, as defined, occurs; (ii) any date upon 30 days’ notice by the Company; or (iii) any date after December 31, 2012 upon 30 days’ notice by Mengnu. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Secured Exit Credit Agreement will not be terminated if Mengnu, in its discretion, advises the Company that it does not consider the Secured Exit Credit Agreement terminated. Mengnu will have the option to reinstate the Secured Exit Credit Agreement upon notice to the Company notwithstanding the occurrence of a Termination Event.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

(b) Settlement of Unsecured Claims

The Plan provides that each holder of an allowed general unsecured claim (except to the extent such holder agrees to different treatment) is to receive, in full and complete satisfaction, settlement and release of and in exchange for such holder’s allowed general unsecured claim, its pro rata share of (i) the proceeds of a $1,400 one-year secured note, at 3% interest per annum; (ii) the proceeds of a $950, three-year secured note, at 5% interest per annum; (iii) 9.9% of the Successor Company’s New Common Stock (as defined below); and (iv) 70% of the proceeds from the Jennifer Convertibles Litigation Trust (the “Litigation Trust”) described in (d) below.

In accordance with the foregoing, on the Effective Date, the Company issued (i) the Senior Secured Tranche A Promissory Note in the principal amount of $1,400 to the Litigation Trust (the “Tranche A Note”); and (ii) the Senior Secured Tranche C Promissory Note in the principal amount of $950 to the Litigation Trust (the “Tranche C Note”), each for the sole benefit of holders of allowed general unsecured claims.

The Tranche A Note matures on February 22, 2012 with interest payable in two equal installments on each of August 22, 2011 and February 22, 2012. The Tranche A Note may be voluntarily prepaid, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, subject to the terms of the Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement entered into between the Litigation Trust and Mengnu (the “Intercreditor Agreement”). The Tranche C Note matures on February 22, 2014, with interest payable in six equal installments in August and February, commencing on August 22, 2011 through February 22, 2014. The Tranche C Note may be voluntarily prepaid, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, subject to the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement.

The Company’s obligations under the Tranche A Note and Tranche C Note are secured by a first priority lien and security interest in all of the Company’s (including those of each of its subsidiaries other than Hartsdale) inventory, regardless of where located and all proceeds and products of the inventory, in whatever form.

The Plan provides that Mengnu, in full and complete satisfaction, settlement and release of and in exchange for its unsecured claim, is to receive (i) 90.1% of the Successor Company’s New Common Stock; (ii) a $1,879, four-year unsecured note, at 6% interest per annum; and (iii) 30% of the proceeds from the Litigation Trust. In addition, the Plan provides that Mengnu, in full and complete satisfaction, settlement and release of its claim for the value of certain goods received by the Company within 20 days before the date of commencement of the Chapter 11 cases, is to receive a $2,638, two-year secured note, at 4% interest per annum.

In accordance with the foregoing, on the Effective Date, the Company issued (i) the Secured Tranche B Promissory Note in the principal amount of $2,638 to Mengnu (the “Tranche B Note”); and (ii) the Unsecured Tranche D Promissory Note in the principal amount of $1,879 to Mengnu (the “Tranche D Note” and collectively with the Tranche A Note, the Tranche B Note, the Tranche C Note and the Tranche E Note, the “Tranche Notes”).

The Tranche B Note matures on February 22, 2013 with interest payable in four equal installments on each of August 22, 2011, February 22, 2012, August 22, 2012 and February 22, 2013. The Tranche D Note matures on February 22, 2015 with interest payable in eight equal installments in August and February, commencing on August 22, 2011 through February 22, 2015.

The Company’s obligations under the Tranche B Note are secured by (i) a first priority lien and security interest in all the assets of the Company (including of each of its subsidiaries other than Hartsdale); and (ii) a junior lien on all inventory of the Company (including each of its subsidiaries other than Hartsdale), subordinated to the liens granted in connection with the Tranche A Note and Tranche C Note.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

~~(c) Maturities~~The table below reflects the aggregate maturities of ~~Long~~long-term ~~Debt~~debt outstanding as of May 28, 2011:

2013	$	5,338
2014		950
2015		1,879

Total Long-term debt	$	8,167

(d) Litigation Trust Agreement

On the Effective Date, the Company entered into the Litigation Trust Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the “Litigation Trust Agreement”) with KDW Restructuring & Liquidation Services LLC, as litigation trustee (the “Litigation Trustee”), pursuant to which the Litigation Trust was established for the benefit of the holders of general unsecured claims and Mengnu in respect of its unsecured claim (the “Trust Beneficiaries”). The Litigation Trust was established for the purpose of collecting, holding, administering, distributing and liquidating, for the benefit of the Trust Beneficiaries, (i) funds in the amount of $100 that the Company will transfer to the Litigation Trust as part of the funding for the Litigation Trust; (ii) any and all causes of action which a trustee, debtors-in-possession, the estate or other appropriate party in interest may assert under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) any cause of action against any of the Company’s former directors and officers as permitted under and limited by the Plan; (iv) objections to general unsecured claims; (v) the proceeds of the causes of action set forth in subsections (ii) through (iv), less any amounts required to be reserved or paid by the Litigation Trustee pursuant to the Plan; (vi) the Tranche A Note; (vii) the Tranche C Note; (viii) 9.9% of the New Common Stock; (ix) any other assets acquired by the Litigation Trust after the Effective Date or pursuant to the Plan; and (x) all proceeds of the foregoing assets.

The Litigation Trustee may pursue the transferred causes of action, administer the Tranche A and Tranche C Note as described in and authorized by the Plan and the Litigation Trust Agreement, make timely and appropriate distributions to the Trust Beneficiaries and otherwise carry out the provisions of the Litigation Trust Agreement.

(e) Equity Securities

Pursuant to the Plan, all outstanding equity interests of the Company, including but not limited to all the common stock that existed prior to the Effective Date (the “Old Common Stock”), all the preferred stock that existed prior to the Effective Date (the “Old Preferred Stock”), and options and contractual or other rights to acquire any equity interests, were cancelled and extinguished on the Effective Date. Immediately prior to the Effective Date, there were 6,979,887 shares of Old Common Stock outstanding and 54,479 shares of Old Preferred Stock outstanding. In addition, pursuant to the Plan, on the Effective Date, the Company issued Mengnu 901,000 shares of new common stock and issued to the Litigation Trust 99,000 shares of new common stock, par value of $0.01 per share (the “New Common Stock”). Holders of equity interests prior to the Effective Date received no distributions or other consideration under the Plan.

(f) Trademark Usage Agreement

Pursuant to the Plan, on the Effective Date, the Company terminated the Ashley Homestores, Ltd. Trademark Usage Agreement, dated March 15, 2010, by and between Hartsdale, the Company, and Ashley Homestores, Ltd. (“Ashley”) relating to the Ashley store located at 2300 Broadway, in New York City, which was closed in connection with the ~~Reorganization~~reorganization. On the Effective Date, the Company assumed six other Trademark Usage Agreements relating to Ashley locations that were not closed in connection with the ~~Reorganization~~reorganization.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

(g) Employment Agreements and Stock Option Agreements

Pursuant to the Plan, Gebing Morris Zou, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board. On the Effective Date, the Company and Mr. Zou entered into an Employment Agreement (as amended, the “Zou Employment Agreement”) and a Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement (the “Zou Option Agreement”). Under the Zou Employment Agreement, Mr. Zou is to receive a base salary of $250 per annum, and beginning in fiscal year 2012, an annual bonus for the fiscal year equal to 3% of the Company’s Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”). The Zou Employment Agreement remains in effect through August 31, 2013 and will be automatically renewed for additional one-year periods unless either party provides the other party with notice of its intent not to renew. In addition, as more fully described in Note 15 – Stock Options, pursuant to the Zou Option Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Zou an option to purchase 30,000 shares of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $14.44 per share.

Also pursuant to the Plan, Rami Abada, who served as the Company’s President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer prior to the Effective Date, was appointed as the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer. On April 11, 2011, Mr. Abada resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company. On April 11, 2011, Joseph Schillero was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. On the Effective Date, the Company and Mr. Abada entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Abada Employment Agreement”) and a Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement (the “Abada Option Agreement”). Under the Abada Employment Agreement, Mr. Abada is to receive a base salary of $400 per annum, a bonus of $25 for the fiscal year 2011 at the discretion of the board of directors, and beginning in fiscal year 2012, an annual bonus for the fiscal year equal to 5% of the EBITDA. The Abada Employment Agreement remains in effect through August 31, 2013 and will be automatically renewed for additional one-year periods unless either party provides the other party with notice of its intent not to renew. In addition, as more fully described in Note 15 – Stock Options, pursuant to the Abada Option Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Abada an option to purchase 50,000 shares of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $14.44 per share.

Pursuant to the Plan, on the Effective Date, the Company terminated the Employment Agreement, dated August 15, 1999, by and between the Company and Harley J. Greenfield, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer. On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Greenfield, whereby he will provide consulting services to the Company for a period of six months at a flat fee of $20 per month.

NOTE 3: FRESH START ACCOUNTING

The Company adopted fresh start accounting and reporting effective the close of business on February 26, 2011 (the “Fresh Start Reporting Date”), in accordance with accounting guidance, as the holders of existing voting shares immediately before confirmation of the Plan received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately before the date of confirmation was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. The Company was required to adopt fresh start accounting and reporting as of February 22, 2011, the Effective Date. However, in light of the proximity of that date to the Company’s second quarter accounting period close immediately after the Effective Date, which was February 26, 2011, as well as the results of a materiality assessment discussed below, the Company elected to adopt fresh start accounting and reporting effective as the close of business on February 26, 2011.

The ~~Company~~financial ~~performed~~statements aas ~~quantitative~~of ~~and~~the ~~qualitative~~Fresh ~~materiality~~Start ~~assessment~~Reporting inDate ~~accordance~~report ~~with~~the ~~accounting~~results ~~guidance,~~of inthe ~~order~~Successor toCompany ~~determine~~with ~~the~~no ~~appropriateness~~beginning ofretained ~~choosing~~earnings ~~the~~or ~~Fresh~~accumulated ~~Start~~deficit. ~~Reporting~~Any ~~Date~~presentation ~~for~~of ~~accounting~~the ~~and~~Successor ~~reporting~~Company ~~purposes~~represents ~~instead~~the offinancial ~~the~~position ~~Effective~~and ~~Date.~~results ~~The~~of ~~Company~~operations ~~concluded~~of ~~that~~a ~~the~~new ~~quantitative~~reporting ~~assessment~~entity ~~did~~and is not ~~have~~comparable ato ~~material~~prior ~~impact~~periods onpresented by the Predecessor Company. The consolidated financial statements for periods ended prior to the ~~thirteen~~Fresh ~~and~~Start ~~twenty-six~~Reporting ~~weeks~~Date ~~ended~~do ~~February~~not ~~26,~~include ~~2011~~the ~~and~~effect ~~that~~of ~~there~~any ~~were~~changes noin ~~qualitative~~capital ~~factors~~structure ~~that~~or ~~would~~changes ~~preclude~~in the ~~use~~fair value of ~~the~~assets ~~Fresh~~and ~~Start~~liabilities ~~Reporting~~as ~~Date~~a ~~for~~result ~~accounting~~of ~~and~~fresh ~~reporting~~start ~~purposes~~accounting.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

The Company performed a quantitative and qualitative materiality assessment in accordance with accounting guidance, in order to determine the appropriateness of choosing the Fresh Start Reporting Date for accounting and reporting purposes instead of the Effective Date. The Company concluded that the quantitative assessment did not have a material impact on the Predecessor Company for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011 and that there were no qualitative factors that would preclude the use of the Fresh Start Reporting Date for accounting and reporting purposes.

Enterprise value represents the fair value of an entity’s interest-bearing debt and shareholders’ equity. In the amended disclosure statement associated with the Plan, which was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the Company estimated a range of enterprise values between $18,000 and $24,000, with a midpoint of $21,000. Based on current and anticipated economic conditions and the direct impact these conditions have on the Company’s business, the Company deemed it appropriate to use the midpoint of $21,000 as the final enterprise value. The estimated total equity value of the Successor Company amounting to $11,433 was determined after taking into account the $9,567 of interest bearing obligations assumed in connection with the Plan.

The Company’s valuation, which relies in large part on unobservable inputs, was based upon a discounted cash flow methodology, which included a calculation of the present value (based on a discount rate of 17.5%, representing the estimated weighted average cost of capital of the Successor Company) of expected unlevered after-tax free cash flows reflected in the Company’s long-term financial projections, including the calculation of the present value of the terminal value of cash flows (based on a 4.5 multiple), and supporting analysis that included (a) a comparison of selected financial data of the Company with similar data of other publicly held companies in businesses similar to it and (b) a valuation of post-emergence tax attributes.

Accounting guidance provides for a determination of the reorganization value to be assigned to the assets of the reorganized Company as of a date selected for financial reporting purposes. The Company increased its enterprise value of $21,000 for $16,~~746~~646 of post-petition, working capital and other liabilities post emergence to determine a reorganization value of $37,~~746~~646. Under fresh start accounting, the reorganization value was allocated to the Successor Company’s assets and liabilities based on their respective ~~estimated~~ fair values in conformity with the purchase method of accounting for business combinations included in accounting guidance. As of ~~April~~June 123, 2011, independent valuation specialists ~~have not~~ completed the determination of the fair value of the Company’s fixed assets, trademark and other identifiable intangibles. The Company’s Trademark Usage Agreements were impacted by the adoption of fresh-start accounting and as such have been assessed and determined to have a fair value of $4,200. Accordingly, the valuation ascribed to certain tangible and intangible assets in the ~~accompanying~~ consolidated balance sheet atas of February 26, 2011 iswas adjusted based on atheir ~~preliminary~~ valuation. The excess reorganization value over the ~~preliminary~~ fair value of identified tangible and intangible net assets was recorded as goodwill. ~~Adjustments~~Accordingly, certain adjustments were made to ~~such~~the preliminary allocation ~~will~~as bedisclosed ~~made~~in ~~upon~~the ~~completion~~Company’s ofQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~valuation~~quarterly period ended February 26, 2011 with an increase of $4,200 to trademarks and a decrease of $100 to liabilities and a corresponding net decrease of $4,300 to goodwill.

The following reconciliation of the Predecessor Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of February 26, 2011 to that of the Successor Company as of February 26, 2011 was prepared with the adjustments that give effect to the reorganization and the adoption of fresh-start ~~reporting~~accounting as of the Fresh Start Reporting Date.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

	February 26, 2011
	Predecessor			Reorganization			Fresh-Start			Successor
	Company			Adjustments (1)			Adjustments (2)			Company
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash & cash equivalents	$	5,209		$	-		$	-		$	5,209
Accounts receivable		1,658			-			-			1,658
Merchandise inventories, net		7,807			-			-			7,807
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,337			-			-			1,337
Total current assets		16,011			-			-			16,011
Store fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements		2,042			-			-			2,042
Other assets		546			-			-			546
Trademark		-			-			37,~~260~~460			37,~~260~~460
Other intangibles		-			-			245			245
Goodwill		-			-			1511,~~642~~342			1511,~~642~~342
	$	18,599		$	0		$	19,~~147~~047		$	37,~~746~~646
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, trade	$	1,579		$	-		$	-		$	1,579
Customer deposits		5,758			-			-			5,758
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		8,107			-			-(100	)		8,~~107~~007
Note Payable		-			1,400			-			1,400
Deferred rent and allowances - current portion		465			-			(465	)		-
Total current liabilities		15,909			1,400			(~~465~~565	)		16,~~844~~744
Loan payable		2,700			(2,700	)		-			-
Long-term debt		-			8,167			-			8,167
Deferred rent and allowances, net of current portion		1,804			-			(1,804	)		-
Deferred tax liability		-			-			1,255			1,255
Obligations under capital leases, net of current portion		47			-			-			47
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		20,460			6,867			(1,~~014~~114	)		26,~~313~~213
Liabilities Subject to Compromise		35,014			(35,014	)		-			-
Total liabilities		55,474			(28,147	)		(1,~~014~~114	)		26,~~313~~213
Stockholders (Deficit) Equity
Predecessor - Preferred stock-series A		-			-			-			-
Predecessor - Preferred stock-series B		1			-			(1	)		-
Predecessor - Common stock		70			-			(70	)		-
Predecessor - Treasury stock		(125	)		-			125			-
Predecessor - Additional paid-in capital		29,659			-			(29,659	)		-
Successor - Common Stock		-			10			-			10
Successor - Additional paid-in capital		-			11,423			-			11,423
(Accumulated deficit)		(66,480	)		16,714			49,766			-
		(36,875	)		28,147			20,161			11,433
	$	18,599		$	0		$	19,~~147~~047		$	37,~~746~~646

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

(1)

Represents amounts recorded on the Fresh Start Reporting Date for the implementation of the Plan, including the settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and related issuance of notes and Successor Company New Common Stock to prepetition creditors, and also reflects a gain on discharge of debt of $16,714. In addition, amounts reflect the elimination of a $2,700 loan payable to Mengnu in exchange for a $2,700 note payable to Mengnu.

(2)

Represents fair value adjustments upon adoption of fresh-start accounting and related deferred income tax liability for differences between fair value and tax basis of indefinite-lived trademark. Also reflects the cancellation of Predecessor Company Old Common Stock, Old Preferred Stock and the elimination of the Predecessor Company’s additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit and treasury stock.

NOTE 4: REORGANIZATION ITEMS, NET

Reorganization items consist of expenses and other items directly related to the ~~company~~Company’s bankruptcy filing and related reorganization. Reorganization items consist of the following:

	Thirteen weeks ended			Twenty-six weeks ended
	February 26, 2011			February 26, 2011
	May 28, 2011			February 27, 2011
Gain on discharge of debt	$	16,714		$	16,714
	(Successor)			(Predecessor)
Fair value adjustments		20,161			20,161
(Loss) gain on discharge of debt	$	(148	)	$	16,714
Professional fees and other		(2,747	)		(3,497	)
Fair value adjustments		-			20,161
Total reorganization items, net	$	34,128		$	33,378
Professional fees and other		144			(3,497	)
Total reorganization items, net	$	(4	)	$	33,378

NOTE 5: RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2009, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and addresses, among other matters, constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of former guidance, including those in which the accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The pronouncement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The adoption of this pronouncement in fiscal 2011 has not had an effect on either the Predecessor Company’s or the Successor Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance relating to accounting for transfers of financial assets which improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The pronouncement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The adoption of this pronouncement in fiscal 2011 has not had an effect on either the Predecessor Company’s or the Successor Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB updated the accounting guidance relating to the annual goodwill impairment test. The updated guidance requires companies to perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any, when it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative. In considering whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity shall evaluate whether there are adverse qualitative factors. The updated guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

In June 2011, the FASB updated the disclosure requirements for comprehensive income. The updated guidance requires companies to disclose the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The updated guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 6: MERCHANDISE INVENTORIES

Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out method) or market and are physically located as follows:

	February 26, 2011		August 28, 2010
	May 28, 2011		August 28, 2010
	(Successor)		(Predecessor)
Showrooms	$	3,~~855~~978	$	4,136
Warehouses		3,~~952~~211		4,467
	$	7,~~807~~189	$	8,603

Vendor discounts and allowances in respect of merchandise purchased by the Company are included as a reduction to the cost of inventory on hand and cost of sales upon sale of the merchandise.

NOTE 7: ACQUISITION OF BUSINESS OF RELATED COMPANY

Up until December 31, 2009, 19 stores which were licensed by the Predecessor Company, 17 of which were located in New York City and surrounding areas and were on a royalty-free basis, were owned and operated by a company (the “Related Company”) owned by the estate of a deceased stockholder of the Predecessor Company who was also the brother-in-law of the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The sister of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer was the president of the Related Company.

As of December 31, 2009, after the Related Company defaulted on its payment obligations to the Predecessor Company (see Note 8), the Predecessor Company, in order to protect its brand and its customers, entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Related Company, pursuant to which, effective January 1, 2010, the Related Company ceased operations at the 19 owned stores plus one store which it operated but did not own and the Predecessor Company began operating these stores solely for its own benefit and account. The Predecessor Company agreed to purchase the inventory in the stores’ showrooms for $635, payable over five months and subject to offset under certain circumstances. The Agreement allowed the Predecessor Company to evaluate each store location and negotiate with the landlords at such locations for entry into new leases and endeavor to cancel or defer the rent arrearages, which the Related Company advised aggregated approximately $300 as of January 1, 2010. The Predecessor Company agreed to pay no more than $300 to settle the arrearages at all 20 stores and if the arrearages exceed $300, the Related Company agreed to reimburse the Predecessor Company for such excess or such excess would be used to offset the amount the Predecessor Company ~~owes~~owed the Related Company for the purchase of the inventory. Other than the rent arrearages, the Predecessor Company did not assume any liabilities of the Related Company. The Predecessor Company also agreed to offer to employ all store employees previously employed by the Related Company but agreed not to be responsible for any commissions, salary, health or other benefits or other compensation owed them prior to January 1, 2010. The Predecessor Company agreed to be responsible for the costs of operating the stores on and after January 1, 2010, except with respect to stores vacated by the Predecessor Company.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Predecessor Company agreed to extinguish $301 owed to the Predecessor Company by the Related Company at December 31, 2009 under an Interim Agreement (as hereinafter defined) (see Note 8). In addition, the Related Company agreed to surrender to the Predecessor Company 93,579 shares of the Predecessor Company’s common stock owned by the Related Company.

As of April 12, 2011, the Company has entered into new leases for 19 of the 20 stores and has vacated one of the stores.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

The Company has entered into new leases for 19 of the 20 stores and has vacated one of the stores.

The purchase price to acquire the activities and net assets of the Related Company approximated $936 consisting of $635 in cash (of which $525 had been paid as of August 28, 2010) and $301 in receivables due from the Related Company, which was extinguished. The remaining balance of $110 was a prepetition obligation and is included in liabilities subject to compromise on the consolidated balance sheet as of August 28, 2010.

The transaction has been accounted for as a business combination. The Predecessor Company determined that the fair values of assets acquired exceeded the purchase price by approximately $23, which was recorded as a gain in the consolidated statements of operations for the ~~thirteen~~thirty-nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The Predecessor Company believes that this bargain purchase resulted from the financial difficulties of the Related Company and its need for cash. The following table presents the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and the gain attributable to the excess of such net assets over the purchase price:

Inventory	$	786
Store fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements		271
Order backlog		162
Treasury stock		125
Security deposits		16
Liability for rent arrearages		(151	)
Customer deposits		(250	)
Fair value of net assets acquired		959

Purchase price		936

Gain on acquisition of Related Company	$	23

The results of operations of the 20 acquired stores are included in the Predecessor Company’s results of operations, commencing on January 1, 2010 and are included in the Jennifer reportable segment. Five of the 20 stores previously operated by the Related Company shared a common wall with a Predecessor Company owned store and the acquired operations were combined with the Predecessor Company’s store for operational purposes. The results of operations of these five stores (“Combined Stores”) are not maintained separately, but are combined with the respective Predecessor Company owned store.

The following revenues and earnings of the acquired stores, exclusive of the Combined Stores, since January 1, 2010 were included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the thirteen and ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010:

Revenues		$	1,234
Operating income		$	253

Revenues of the Predecessor Company from the 20 acquired stores pursuant to the Interim Agreement amounted to $1,196 for the period from November 27 through December 31, 2009 (see Note 8).

The unaudited pro forma earnings of the Predecessor Company and the acquired stores as though the acquisition date had been as of the beginning of the fiscal 2010 annual reporting period is impracticable to present as the Predecessor Company has been unable to obtain prior financial information as to the results of operations of the acquired stores other than revenue. The unaudited pro forma revenues, after elimination of Predecessor Company revenues from the Related Company, were $27,012 and $54,399 for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended February 27, 2010, respectively.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

	May 29, 2010
	Thirteen weeks ended			Thirty-nine weeks ended
Revenues	$	2,820		$	4,054
Operating income (loss)	$	(7	)	$	244

Revenues of the Company from the 20 acquired stores pursuant to an Interim Agreement in effect for the period from November 27, 2009 through December 31, 2009 amounted to $91 and $1,359 for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, respectively (see Note 8).

The unaudited pro forma earnings of the Predecessor Company and the acquired stores as though the acquisition date had been as of the beginning of the fiscal 2010 annual reporting period is impracticable to present as the Predecessor Company has been unable to obtain prior financial information as to the results of operations of the acquired stores other than revenue. The unaudited pro forma revenues, after elimination of Predecessor Company revenues from the Related Company, were $62,383 for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010.

The unaudited pro forma revenues are not necessarily indicative of the revenues that would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of the date indicated or of the revenues that may be obtained in the future. The pro forma condensed revenues are not necessarily indicative of the revenues that would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of the dates indicated or of the revenues that may be obtained in the future.

NOTE 8: TRANSACTIONS WITH THE RELATED COMPANY

Included in the ~~Consolidated~~consolidated ~~Statements~~statements of ~~Operations~~operations are the following amounts charged by and to the Related Company pursuant to terms of existing agreements for the thirteen and ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010:

	Increase (decrease) to Related Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Thirteen weeks ended		~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended
	February 27, 2010		February 27, 2010
	May 29, 2010		May 29, 2010
Net Sales:
Royalty income	$	-	$	22
Warehouse fees		-		455
Delivery charges		-		540
Total charged to the Related Company	$	-	$	1,017
Revenue from Service Contracts:
Fabric protection fees charged by the Related Company	$	-	$	(100	)
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Administrative fees paid by the Related Company	$	2-	$	(30	)
Advertising reimbursement paid by the Related Company		-		(450	)
Royalty expense paid to the Related Company		-		100
Net charged to the Related Company	$	2-	$	(380	)

In November 2009, the Related Company defaulted on its payment obligation by not paying the remaining outstanding balance of the receivable due to the Predecessor Company as of August 29, 2009 within the 30-day grace period. ~~During December 2009, the Predecessor Company recovered $39 from the Related Company.~~ As a result thereof, during the ~~thirteen weeks and twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, the Predecessor Company ~~recorded a recovery of $39 and~~ provided an allowance for loss of $3,~~128~~167 related to increases in the receivable from the Related Company principally resulting from transfers of inventory and charges for delivery services, warehousing services and advertising costs during such period. During December 2009, the Company recovered $39 from the Related Company. Further, effective as of November 27, 2009, as described below, the Predecessor Company discontinued granting credit to the Related Company and as collectability was not reasonably assured, discontinued recognizing warehousing fee revenue, advertising expense reimbursements and administration fees from the Related Company. In addition, the Predecessor Company ceased paying royalty fees to the Related Company. In connection with the acquisition described in Note 7, in January 2010, the Predecessor Company wrote off the $4,075 net balance due from the Related Company against the allowance for loss previously provided.

Pursuant to a Purchasing Agreement, the Predecessor Company purchased merchandise for the Predecessor Company and the Related Company. During the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended February 27, 2010, the Related Company, through the Predecessor Company, purchased approximately $539 and $2,574, respectively, of inventory, at cost. On November 25, 2009, the Predecessor Company terminated the Purchasing Agreement. On December 11, 2009, the Predecessor Company entered into an agreement effective as of November 27, 2009 (the “Interim Agreement”), pursuant to which sales written on or after November 27, 2009 at the stores owned by the Related Company were made on the Predecessor Company’s behalf and the Related Company was entitled to compensation equal to 35% of the sales price of the merchandise (excluding home delivery fees and taxes) for writing such sales. With respect to sales written by the Related Company prior to November 27, 2009, the Related Company was obligated to pay the Predecessor Company for the cost of the merchandise the day prior to the date the merchandise was shipped to the customer. The Related Company was obligated to continue paying for its operational costs, including the costs of its employees at its stores and its store lease costs, and to remit sales taxes on merchandise sold by it. The agreement was terminable by the Predecessor Company upon 24 hours notice. As of December 18, 2009, the Related Company was not in compliance with the Interim Agreement.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

Pursuant to a Purchasing Agreement, the Predecessor Company purchased merchandise for the Predecessor Company and the Related Company. During the thirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010, the Related Company, through the Predecessor Company, purchased approximately $0 and $2,574, respectively, of inventory, at cost. On November 25, 2009, the Predecessor Company terminated the Purchasing Agreement. On December 11, 2009, the Predecessor Company entered into an agreement effective as of November 27, 2009 (the “Interim Agreement”), pursuant to which sales written on or after November 27, 2009 at the stores owned by the Related Company were made on the Predecessor Company’s behalf and the Related Company was entitled to compensation equal to 35% of the sales price of the merchandise (excluding home delivery fees and taxes) for writing such sales. With respect to sales written by the Related Company prior to November 27, 2009, the Related Company was obligated to pay the Predecessor Company for the cost of the merchandise the day prior to the date the merchandise was shipped to the customer. The Related Company was obligated to continue paying for its operational costs, including the costs of its employees at its stores and its store lease costs, and to remit sales taxes on merchandise sold by it. The agreement was terminable by the Predecessor Company upon 24 hours notice. As of December 18, 2009, the Related Company was not in compliance with the Interim Agreement.

Pursuant to the Agreement entered into on December 31, 2009, described in Note 7, all existing agreements between the Related Company and the Predecessor Company were terminated.

NOTE 9: SERVICE CONTRACTS

The Related Company was the sole obligor on all lifetime fabric and leather protection plans sold by the Predecessor Company or the Related Company and assumed all performance obligations and risk of loss ~~there under~~thereunder. During the period from January 2009 through November 2009, the Predecessor Company transitioned to an independent outside company, which assumed all performance obligations and risks of any loss under the protection plans for all stores. As a result of the acquisition of the business of the Related Company (see Note 7), effective as of January 1, 2010, the Related Company ceased operations and will no longer provide the services previously contracted for by the Predecessor Company. The Predecessor Company and the Successor Company, as a matter of customer relations, will likely have to pay for and arrange to supply services with respect to previously sold protection services. Accordingly, during fiscal 2010, the Predecessor Company, based on a study utilizing historical claims data, recorded a $3,614 charge to operations, of which $3,500 was recorded during the thirteen-weeks ended February 27, 2010, for the estimated cost of supplying future services with respect to the previously sold protection services. Claims paid for protection services during fiscal 2010 amounted to $592 resulting in a liability of $3,022 at August 28, 2010, included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. In connection with the adoption of fresh start accounting the Company determined the fair value of the liability for the estimated cost of supplying future services with respect to the previously sold fabric protection services to be $2,735, which results in a reduction of the liability by $100. Claims paid for protection services during the ~~twenty-six~~thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, amounted to $~~187~~83 resulting in a liability of $2,~~835~~652 on ~~February~~May 2628, 2011.

NOTE 10: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets represent amounts due from credit card processors and a finance company. Credit card processors paid the Predecessor Company shortly after credit card purchases by customers and before merchandise was delivered. However, in light of economic and credit conditions they changed their payment policies. As of February 26, 2011 and August 28, 2010, the credit card processors held back approximately $451 and $3,480, respectively, which is included in accounts receivable.

On January 13, 2010, the Predecessor Company entered into a Merchant Agreement and Application (the “Merchant Agreement”) with Renaissance Associates and Merrick Bank Corporation (collectively, the “Bank”), pursuant to which the Bank provides the Predecessor Company with certain credit card processing services. As a result of the Reorganization, the parties to the Merchant Agreement agreed to an amendment on January 13, 2011 that, among other things, requires the Successor Company to provide the Bank with certain financial information on a weekly and monthly basis and permits the Bank to require the Successor Company to fund a non-interest bearing chargeback account that the Bank may draw upon for funds that it is owed. As of February 26, 2011, the chargeback account approximates $158, which is included in accounts receivable. See Note 2 “Exit Financing” with respect to LOC Facility.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

NOTE 10: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets represent amounts due from credit card processors and a finance company. Credit card processors paid the Predecessor Company shortly after credit card purchases by customers and before merchandise was delivered. However, in light of economic and credit conditions they changed their payment policies. As of May 28, 2011 and August 28, 2010, the credit card processors held back approximately $462 and $3,480, respectively, which is included in accounts receivable.

On January 13, 2010, the Predecessor Company entered into a Merchant Agreement and Application (the “Merchant Agreement”) with Renaissance Associates and Merrick Bank Corporation (collectively, the “Bank”), pursuant to which the Bank provides the Predecessor Company with certain credit card processing services. As a result of the Reorganization, the parties to the Merchant Agreement agreed to an amendment on January 13, 2011 that, among other things, requires the Successor Company to provide the Bank with certain financial information on a weekly and monthly basis and permits the Bank to require the Successor Company to fund a non-interest bearing chargeback account that the Bank may draw upon for funds that it is owed. As of May 28, 2011, the Bank is not holding any funds in the chargeback account. See Note 2 “Exit Financing” with respect to LOC Facility.

On February 24, 2011, the Successor Company entered into a retailer program agreement with GE Money Bank (“GE”) to run the Successor Company’s private label credit card program. The program will allow qualified customers to finance the purchase of goods and services provided by the Successor Company. The financed sales and sold financed receivables are on a non-recourse basis and the Successor Company does not retain any interests in or service the sold receivables. The selling price of the receivables is dependent upon the payment terms with the customer and results in either a payment to or receipt from GE of a percentage of the receivable as a fee. In connection with the agreement, the Successor Company provided GE with $500 of cash collateral.

NOTE 11: TRANSACTIONS WITH PRINCIPAL SUPPLIER AND STOCKHOLDER

The Company’s principal supplier, Mengnu, gave the Predecessor Company up to 180 days to pay for merchandise without interest, and thereafter interest was charged at a per annum rate of 2%. During May 2010, the Predecessor Company exceeded the 180-day terms. Amounts payable to Mengnu for purchases are denominated in U.S. dollars. Subsequent to the Predecessor Company’s filing a petition under Chapter 11, it was required to prepay certain vendors, including Mengnu. As of the Effective Date, the Company has 90-day terms with Mengnu. As of ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and August 28, 2010, Mengnu was owed approximately $~~329~~2,673 and $17,366, respectively for merchandise purchases. The amounts owed at August 28, 2010 are included in liabilities subject to compromise. As of August 28, 2010, amounts prepaid for merchandise approximated $362 and are included in prepaid expenses and other currents assets.

NOTE 12: ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities are as follows:

	February 26, 2011		August 28, 2010
	(Successor)		(Predecessor)
Payroll and bonuses	$	786	$	773
Rent		319		232
Sales tax		351		169
Accounting		183		255
Insurance		410		162
Freight		13		52
Warranty		36		36
Franchise and minimum taxes		32		18
Home delivery		96		77
Estimated claims related to service contracts		2,835		3,022
Reorganization costs		2,781		460
Other		265		309
	$	8,107	$	5,565

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

	May 28,		August 28,
	2011 (Successor)		2010 (Predecessor)

Estimated claims related to service contracts	$	2,652	$	3,022
Reorganization costs		1,175		460
Rent		603		232
Payroll and bonuses		533		773
Advertising		509		-
Sales tax		371		169
Accounting		236		255
Insurance		194		162
Interest		145		-
Home delivery		109		77
Warranty		36		36
Franchise and minimum taxes		24		2
Income Taxes		24		16
Freight		11		52
Other		162		309

	$	6,784	$	5,565

NOTE 13: LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

Certain claims against the Predecessor Company in existence before the filing of the petitions for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws were stayed while the Predecessor Company continued business operations as debtor-in-possession. These claims are reflected in the August 28, 2010 balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise. Additional claims (liabilities subject to compromise) arose after the filing date resulting from rejection of executory contracts, including leases, and from the determination by the court (or agreed to by parties in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts. The Predecessor Company received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor certain of its prepetition obligations, including employee wages, domestic carrier fees, customer programs, utilities, insurance and taxes. Such amounts were excluded from liabilities subject to compromise.

Liabilities subject to compromise consisted of:

	August 28, 2010
	(Predecessor)

Accounts payable, trade	$	33,080
Claims related to rejected leases		3,669
Obligation related to litigation		500

	$	37,249

In connection with confirmation of the Plan, pursuant to Bankruptcy Court approval, $2,235 of liabilities subject to compromise became payable in full, of which $1,635 was paid on or about the Effective Date and $600 was reclassified to accounts payable, trade.

NOTE 14: INCOME TAXES

A valuation allowance had been established to offset the net deferred tax asset of $20,288 at August 28, 2010, as management of the Predecessor Company had not determined that it was more likely than not that the future tax benefits will be realized. As of August 28, 2010, the Predecessor Company had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $39,000, which expires in years 2023 through 2030. In connection with the consummation of the Plan, the net operating loss carryforward will be reduced by the $16,714 gain on discharge of debt. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 states that when a corporation that is in bankruptcy undergoes an ownership change, the section 382 limitation does not apply if the shareholders and creditors of the corporation immediately before the ownership change own at least 50% of the vote and value of the corporation after the ownership change (as a result of being shareholders or creditors immediately before the change). Accordingly, the utilization of the remaining net operating loss carryforward should not be subject to an annual limitation.

As of February 26, 2011, the Successor Company has also established a valuation allowance to fully offset the deferred tax asset. In addition, a deferred tax liability of $1,255 related to the indefinite lived trademark has been recorded in connection with adoption of fresh-start reporting (see Note 3).

Minimum and franchise taxes are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010. Income tax expense for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 consists principally of state income taxes. The Company’s annual effective tax rate, which is used for interim reporting purposes, differs from the federal statutory rate principally due to the exclusion from taxable income in fiscal 2011 of the $16,714 gain on discharge of debt and the $20,161 of income from fair value adjustments, in addition to the establishment of a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets attributable to any net operating loss incurred in the 2011 and 2010 fiscal years.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

Liabilities subject to compromise of $35,014 at the Effective Date were settled pursuant to the Plan by the issuance of New Common Stock valued at $11,433 and Tranche Notes of $6,867 resulting in a gain on discharging debt of $16,714 included in reorganization items, net in the accompanying statements of operations for the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011. During the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011, the Company settled certain additional claims resulting in a loss on the discharged debt in the amount of $148 included in reorganization items, net.

NOTE 14: INCOME TAXES

A valuation allowance had been established to offset the net deferred tax asset of $20,288 at August 28, 2010, as management of the Predecessor Company had not determined that it was more likely than not that the future tax benefits will be realized. As of August 28, 2010, the Predecessor Company had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $39,000, which expires in years 2023 through 2030. In connection with the consummation of the Plan, the net operating loss carryforward will be reduced by the $16,714 gain on discharge of debt. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 states that when a corporation that is in bankruptcy undergoes an ownership change, the Section 382 limitation does not apply if the shareholders and creditors of the corporation immediately before the ownership change own at least 50% of the vote and value of the corporation after the ownership change (as a result of being shareholders or creditors immediately before the change). Accordingly, the utilization of the remaining net operating loss carryforward should not be subject to an annual limitation.

As of May 28, 2011, the Successor Company has also established a valuation allowance to fully offset the deferred tax asset. In addition, a deferred tax liability of $1,255 related to the indefinite lived trademark has been recorded in connection with adoption of fresh-start reporting (see Note 3).

Minimum and franchise taxes are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the thirteen week periods ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010, the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011 and the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010. Income tax expense for the thirteen week periods ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010, the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011 and the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010 consists principally of state income taxes. The Company’s annual effective tax rate, which is used for interim reporting purposes, differs from the federal statutory rate principally due to the exclusion from taxable income in fiscal 2011 of the $16,714 gain on discharge of debt and the $20,161 of income from fair value adjustments, in addition to the establishment of a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets attributable to any net operating loss incurred in the 2011 and 2010 fiscal years.

The Company files federal and various state and local income tax returns. The 2007 through 2010 tax years remain open for examination by the federal and certain state and local taxing authorities under the normal three-year statute of limitations and the 2006 through 2010 tax years remain open for examination by certain state tax authorities under a four-year statute of limitations.

NOTE 15: STOCK OPTIONS

Immediately prior to the Effective Date, there were stock options to purchase 1,798,563 ~~stock~~shares ~~options~~of Old Common Stock outstanding representing options granted under plans, which have expired, plus options granted outside plans pursuant to individual stock option agreements, which were cancelled pursuant to the Plan (see Note 2).

The Successor Company granted Mr. Zou an option to purchase 30,000 shares of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $14.44 per share (the “Zou Option”). Subject to Mr. Zou’s continued employment with the Company, the Zou Option vests and becomes exercisable in three equal installments on each of August 27, 2011, August 26, 2012, and August 31, 2013. Upon a Change of Control of the Company, as defined, the Zou Option will fully vest. The expiration date of the Zou Option is (i) at all times beginning thirty days after the listing of the Company’s New Common Stock on NASDAQ or another national securities exchange, the earlier of three years from the date of Mr. Zou’s final day of employment by the Company and August 31, 2018; or (ii) at all other times, the earlier of five years from the date of Mr. Zou’s final day of employment by the Company and August 31, 2018.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended May 28, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

The Successor Company granted Mr. Abada an option to purchase 50,000 shares of New Common Stock at an exercise price of $14.44 per share (the “Abada Option”). Subject to Mr. Abada’s continued employment with the Company, the Abada Option vests and becomes exercisable with respect to 30,000 shares in three equal installments on each of August 27, 2011, August 26, 2012, and August 31, 2013. The Abada Option vests and becomes exercisable with respect to 20,000 shares in two equal installments on each of August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2013, provided the Company meets or exceeds 85% of the EBITDA forecasted in the Company’s annual budget approved by the board of directors in fiscal years 2012 and 2013, respectively. Upon a Change of Control of the Company, as defined, the Abada Option will fully vest. The expiration date of the Abada Option is (i) at all times beginning thirty days after the listing of the New Common Stock on NASDAQ or another national securities exchange, the earlier of three years from the date of Mr. Abada’s final day of employment by the Company and August 31, 2018; or (ii) at all other times, the earlier of five years from the date of Mr. Abada’s final day of employment by the Company and August 31, 2018.

AsThe fair value of ~~April~~the ~~12,~~stock ~~2011~~options granted to purchase 80,000 ~~the~~shares ~~Successor~~of ~~Company~~New ~~had~~Common ~~not~~Stock ~~yet~~referred ~~established~~to above was $464 on the date of issuance or $11.43 per share. The fair value of the stock options ~~granted~~was todetermined ~~purchase~~by 80utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: 66% volatility,~~000~~ ~~shares~~five-year ofexpected ~~New~~life, ~~Common~~risk-free ~~Stock~~interest ~~referred~~rate toof ~~above~~2.18% and a dividend yield ratio of 0%. The fair value ~~established~~of 60,000 shares in the amount of $348 will be charged to operations of the Successor Company over the vesting period. The fair value of the 20,000 performance-based stock options will be charged to operations on the date it is probable that the performance goals will be met. The Successor Company recorded $35 of stock-based compensation expense during the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011.

There were no stock options granted to employees during the twenty-six week period ended February 27, 2010 and the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010 and there was no employee compensation expense related to stock options or other stock based awards during the periods ended February 26, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010.

NOTE 16: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As stores are closed, their results are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations for the current and prior periods, except for those stores where in management’s judgment there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in the area. During August 2010, the Predecessor Company closed an Ashley segment store, for which the operating results were included in continuing operations.

19During the thirteen-weeks ended May 28, 2011 the Successor Company closed one store in California. The operating results of this closed store are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in the surrounding area. During the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, the Company closed two stores in New York, two in California (San Diego territory), two in Nevada, two in New Hampshire, one in Illinois, one in Maryland, one in Massachusetts, and one in Georgia. The operating results of the closed stores in Illinois, New York, Maryland and Massachusetts are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed store from other stores in their respective areas. The operating results of the closed stores in Georgia, New Hampshire, California (San Diego territory), and Nevada are reported in discontinued operations. During the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011, the Predecessor Company closed nineteen stores of which seven were located in New Jersey, five in New York, four in California, one in Connecticut, one in Maryland and one in Virginia. The operating results of these closed stores are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in their respective areas. The operating results of the closed stores in California and New York are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in their respective areas. The operating results of the closed stores in Arizona are reported in discontinued operations. During the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, the Predecessor Company closed four stores in New York, three in California (San Diego territory), two in Arizona, two in Nevada, two in New Hampshire, one in Georgia, one in Maryland, one in Massachusetts, and one in Illinois. The operating results of the closed stores in New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Illinois are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in their respective areas. The operating results of the closed stores in Arizona, California (San Diego territory), Georgia, New Hampshire, and Nevada are reported in discontinued operations.

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

Revenues from the closed stores reported as discontinued operations amounted to $0 and $4,253 in the thirteen week periods ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010, respectively, $5 in the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011 and $15,189 in the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010.

During the twenty-six weeks ended February 26, 2011, the Predecessor Company closed nineteen stores of which seven were located in New Jersey, five in New York, four in California, one in Connecticut, one in Maryland and one in Virginia. The operating results of these closed stores are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in their respective areas. During the twenty-six week period ended February 27, 2010, the Predecessor Company closed two stores in Arizona, one in California and two in New York. The operating results of the closed stores in California and New York are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed stores from other stores in their respective area. The operating results of the closed stores in Arizona are reported in discontinued operations.

Revenues from the closed stores reported as discontinued operations amounted to $0 and $5,615 in the thirteen week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010, respectively, and $5 and $10,936 in the twenty-six week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 17: SEGMENT INFORMATION

As of May ~~February 26~~28, 2011, the Predecessor Company operated seventy-two Jennifer specialty furniture stores. On October 27, 2006, the Predecessor Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Hartsdale, entered into the Ashley Homestores, Ltd. Trademark Usage Agreement (the “Trademark Usage Agreement”) with Ashley, pursuant to which Hartsdale was granted a five-year nonexclusive, limited sublicense to use the image, technique, design, concept, trademarks and business methods developed by Ashley for the retail sale of Ashley products and accessories. As of ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, the Predecessor Company operated six Ashley Furniture HomeStores of which four were opened during the year ended August 28, 2010. On the Effective Date, the Company assumed six Trademark Usage Agreements relating to Ashley locations, one of which is currently in the process of being renewed and five that expire at certain dates between February 2013 and March 2015.

Prior to the Trademark Usage Agreement, the Predecessor Company operated in a single reportable segment, the operation of Jennifer specialty furniture retail stores. Subsequent thereto, the Company has determined that it has two reportable segments organized by product line: Jennifer–specialty furniture retail stores–and Ashley–a big box, full line home furniture retail store. There are no inter-company sales between segments. The Predecessor Company did not allocate indirect expenses such as compensation to executives and corporate personnel, corporate facility costs, professional fees, information systems, finance, insurance, and certain other operating costs to the individual segments. These costs apply to all of the ~~Predecessor~~ Company’s businesses and are reported and evaluated as corporate expenses for segment reporting purposes.

The following tables present segment level financial information of the Successor and Predecessor Company for the thirteen week periods ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010, twenty-six week ~~periods~~period ended February 26, 2011 and ~~February~~thirty-nine 27week period ended May 29, 2010:

	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	February 26,		February 27,		February 26,		February 27,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Revenue:
Jennifer	$	9,948	$	14,887	$	21,618	$	28,949
Ashley		6,798		4,768		13,648		8,583
Total Consolidated	$	16,746	$	19,655	$	35,266	$	37,532

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	(Successor)			(Predecessor)
	February 26,			February 27,			February 26,			February 27,
	Thirteen weeks			Thirteen weeks			Twenty-six weeks			Thirty-nine weeks
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	ended			ended			ended			ended
Segment (loss) income from continuing operations
	May 28, 2011			May 29, 2010			February 26, 2011			May 29, 2010
before reorganization items and income taxes
Revenue:
Jennifer	$	(112,~~062~~383	)	$	(413,~~471~~472	~~)(a)~~	$	(221,~~155~~618	)	$	(842,~~852~~421	~~)(a)(b)~~
Ashley		~~459~~6,622			~~379~~5,309			~~878~~13,648			~~548~~13,892
Total for Reportable Segments	$	(603	)	$	(4,092	)	$	(1,277	)	$	(8,304	)
Total Consolidated	$	19,005		$	18,781		$	35,266		$	56,313

	(Successor)			(Predecessor)
	Thirteen weeks			Thirteen weeks			Twenty-six weeks			Thirty-nine weeks
	ended			ended			ended			ended
	May 28, 2011			May 29, 2010			February 26, 2011			May 29, 2010
Segment (loss) income from
continuing operations before
reorganization items and
income taxes
Jennifer	$	(799	)	$	(1,927	)	$	(2,155	)	$	(10,778	)(a)(b)
Ashley		395			144			878			691
Total for Reportable Segments	$	(404	)	$	(1,783	)	$	(1,277	)	$	(10,087	)

(a)

Includes $3,500 loss related to service contracts (see Note 9).

(b)

Includes $3,128 loss related to amounts due from Related Company (see Note 8).

Reconciliation:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	(Successor)			(Predecessor)
	February 26,			February 27,			February 26,			February 27,
	Thirteen weeks			Thirteen weeks			Twenty-six weeks			Thirty-nine weeks
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	ended			ended			ended			ended
	May 28, 2011			May 29, 2010			February 26, 2011			May 29, 2010
Loss from continuing operations
before reorganization items and income
before reorganization items and
taxes for reportable segments	$	(603	)	$	(4,092	)	$	(1,277	)	$	(8,304	)
income taxes for reportable
Reorganization items, net		34,128			-			33,378			-
segments	$	(404	)	$	(1,783	)	$	(1,277	)	$	(10,087	)
Corporate expenses and other		(1,441	)		(2,002	)		(3,431	)		(3,691	)
Reorganization items, net		(4	)		-			33,378			-
Corporate expenses and other		(1,536	)		(1,890	)		(3,431	)		(5,581	)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes	$	32(1,~~084~~944	)	$	(63,~~094~~673	)	$	28,670		$	(1115,~~995~~668	)

	February 26,		August 28,
	May 28,		August 28,
	2011 (Successor)		2010 (Predecessor)
Total Assets:
Jennifer	$	8,725	$	11,784
Jennifer (b) (c)	$	16,452	$	11,784
Ashley		4,883		5,658
Ashley (b) (c)		14,923		5,658
Corporate (a)		244,~~138~~809		5,913
Total Consolidated	$	3736,~~746~~184	$	23,355

(a) Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and other current assets, goodwill, trademark and other intangibles at February 26, 2011. The assignment of goodwill to the Jennifer and Ashley segments has not been completed as of February 26, 2011. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and prepaid expenses and other current assets at August 28, 2010.22

Index

JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the ~~Twenty~~Thirty-~~Six~~Nine Weeks Ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011

(In thousands, except for share amounts)

(a)

Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and prepaid expenses and other current assets at May 28, 2011. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and prepaid expenses and other current assets at August 28, 2010.

(b)

Includes $5,232 and $6,110 of goodwill assigned to the Jennifer and Ashley segments, respectively.

(c)

Includes $3,260 (non-amortizing) and $4,050 of trademark, net of amortization in the amount of $150 for Jennifer and Ashley segments, respectively, at May 28, 2011.

NOTE 18: LITIGATION

The Predecessor Company reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiff in the putative class and FLSA collective action case filed on July 16, 2009 (the “Combs Case”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay the plaintiff $50 and further agreed that the plaintiff would have an allowed general unsecured claim of $450 in the ~~Bankruptcy~~bankruptcy ~~Case~~case. The settlement agreement was preliminarily approved by the Bankruptcy Court ~~and~~on January 28, 2011. As of the date hereof, the $50 was paid to the plaintiff. On May 27, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court granted final approval of the settlement agreement. The payments and other consideration to be received by plaintiff in settlement of its allowed general unsecured claim ~~were~~will be made pro rata in proportion to and in the form of the payments and other consideration received by other general unsecured creditors in the Plan. ~~As of February 26, 2011, the $50 was paid to the plaintiff. A hearing to consider final approval of the settlement of the Combs Case is currently anticipated to be held in May 2011.~~

22NOTE 19: OTHER

On April 11, 2011, the Company entered into a Warehousing Agreement with Marks & Cohen LLC (“Marks & Cohen”), an entity controlled by Herb Hester Jr., a director of the Company. The Warehousing Agreement is for a term of one year unless terminated earlier by either party upon 30 days notice and provides that in consideration of warehousing fees the Company will provide warehousing and distribution services for certain home-furnishing merchandise owned by Marks & Cohen. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Company received $17 during the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011, which is included in revenue in the accompanying statement of operations for such period.

Index

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes filed as part of this report.

Forward-Looking Information

Except for historical information contained herein, this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results or outcome to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward -looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Item 1A in Part II of our ~~this~~subsequently-filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to statements that explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, investors are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” or “anticipates” to be uncertain and forward-looking.

Overview

We are the owner of sofabed specialty retail stores that specialize in the sale of a complete line of sofa beds and companion pieces such as loveseats, chairs and recliners. We also have specialty retail stores that specialize in the sale of leather furniture. In addition, we have stores that sell both fabric and leather furniture. Under a Trademark Usage Agreement, we operate full line home furniture retail stores that sell products and accessories of Ashley Homestores, Ltd. (“Ashley”). We have determined that we have two reportable segments organized by product line: Jennifer–sofabed specialty retail stores– and Ashley–big box, full line home furniture retail stores.

~~On July 18, 2010, Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy under~~ Chapter 11 ofProceedings the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). On February 9, 2011 (the “Confirmation Date”), the Bankruptcy Court entered the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and ~~Order Confirming the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of~~ Reorganization of Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Confirmation Order”), which confirmed our Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors, dated January 24, 2011 (as confirmed, the “Plan”). On February 22, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), we substantially consummated its reorganization (the “Reorganization”) through a series of transactions contemplated by the Plan, and the Plan became effective pursuant to its terms.

~~Pursuant~~On toJuly ~~the~~18, ~~terms~~2010, ofJennifer ~~the~~Convertibles, ~~Plan~~Inc. ~~agreed~~and toall ~~with~~of ~~our~~its ~~principal~~subsidiaries ~~supplier,~~filed ~~Haining~~voluntary ~~Mengnu~~petitions ~~Group~~for ~~Co.,~~bankruptcy ~~Ltd.~~under ~~(“Mengnu”),~~Chapter ~~which~~11 isof ~~also~~the ~~our~~United ~~principal~~States ~~creditor,~~Bankruptcy ~~Mengnu~~Code ~~(i)~~in ~~owns~~the ~~90.1%~~United ofStates ~~our~~Bankruptcy ~~new~~Court ~~equity~~for ~~securities;~~the ~~(ii)~~Southern ~~received~~District aof ~~$2,638,284,~~New ~~two-year~~York ~~secured~~(the ~~note~~“Bankruptcy atCourt”). On 4%February ~~interest~~9, ~~per~~2011 ~~annum;~~(the ~~and~~“Confirmation ~~(iii~~Date”), ~~received~~the aBankruptcy ~~$1,878,760,~~Court ~~four-year~~entered ~~unsecured~~the ~~note~~Findings atof 6%Fact, ~~interest~~Conclusions ~~per~~of ~~annum. The~~Law ~~remaining~~and ~~9.9%~~Order ofConfirming the ~~new~~Amended ~~equity~~Joint ~~securities~~Chapter is11 ~~owned~~Plan byof ~~the~~Reorganization of Jennifer Convertibles, ~~Litigation~~Inc. ~~Trust~~and its Affiliated Debtors (the “~~Litigation~~Confirmation ~~Trust~~Order”), which ~~was~~confirmed ~~established~~our ~~for~~Second ~~the~~Amended ~~benefit~~Joint ofChapter ~~the~~11 ~~holders~~Plan of ~~general~~Reorganization ~~unsecured~~for ~~claims~~Jennifer ~~and~~Convertibles, ~~Mengnu~~Inc. inand ~~respect of~~ its ~~unsecured~~Affiliated ~~claim. In addition~~Debtors, ~~theLitigation~~dated ~~Trust~~January ~~received~~24, 2011 (i)as ~~a $1~~confirmed,~~400,000,~~ ~~one-year~~the ~~secured~~“Plan”). ~~note~~On atFebruary 3%22, ~~interest~~2011 ~~per annum; and~~ (~~ii)~~the a“Effective ~~$950~~Date”),~~000,~~ ~~three-year~~we ~~secured~~substantially ~~note~~consummated atour 5%reorganization ~~interest per annum. In exchange for~~ (the ~~new~~“Reorganization”) ~~equity~~through ~~interests~~a ~~and~~series ~~notes~~of ~~issued,~~transactions ~~certain~~contemplated ~~claims~~by ~~from both~~ the ~~principal~~Plan, ~~supplier~~ and the ~~other~~Plan ~~general~~became ~~unsecured~~effective ~~creditors~~pursuant ~~have~~to ~~been~~its ~~extinguished~~terms. ~~The equity interests were cancelled.~~

Pursuant to the terms of the Plan agreed to with our principal supplier, Haining Mengnu Group Co., Ltd. (“Mengnu”), which is also our principal creditor, Mengnu (i) owns 90.1% of our new equity securities; (ii) received a $2,638,284, two-year secured note at 4% interest per annum; and (iii) received a $1,878,760, four-year unsecured note at 6% interest per annum. The remaining 9.9% of the new equity securities is owned by the Jennifer Convertibles Litigation Trust (the “Litigation Trust”), which was established for the benefit of the holders of general unsecured claims and Mengnu in respect of its unsecured claim. In addition, the Litigation Trust received (i) a $1,400,000, one-year secured note at 3% interest per annum; and (ii) a $950,000, three-year secured note at 5% interest per annum. In exchange for the new equity interests and notes issued, certain claims from both the principal supplier and the other general unsecured creditors have been extinguished. The equity interests were cancelled.

Further, on the Effective Date, the Senior Secured and Super-Priority Debtor-In-Possession Credit Agreement (the “DIP Agreement”), dated as of November 19, 2010, among Mengnu and us, was refinanced by a secured exit credit agreement among us and Mengnu pursuant to which Mengnu agreed to provide exit financing for our benefit (the “Secured Exit Credit Agreement”). The Secured Exit Credit Agreement comprises (i) a letter of credit backstopped by Mengnu funded by a bank for the benefit of our credit card processor in an amount of $3,000,000 which amount may be increased to an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 at our request and with Mengnu’s consent (the “LOC Facility”); and (ii) the relending of amounts owed by us to Mengnu that accrued, whether due and owing or not, under the DIP Agreement, which was $2,762,145 as of February 22, 2011, less $62,145, which was repaid by us to Mengnu on the Effective Date (the “Cash Facility”).

2324

Index

As a result of an agreement with the formerly affiliated related company (the “Related Company”) (as described below) effective January 1, 2010, we operate 20 stores previously operated by the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company, including one store that it did not own (the “Acquired Stores”). As part of the acquisition, as more fully described in Note 87 to the ~~Consolidated~~consolidated ~~Financial~~financial ~~Statements~~statements herein, five of the 20 Acquired Stores purchased from the Related Company that shared a common wall with a store owned by us were combined with our respective stores for operational purposes (“Combined Stores”). As of January 1, 2010, the results of the operations of the Acquired Stores are included in our consolidated financial statements, and are reflected in the Jennifer reportable segment.

Fresh Start Accounting

We adopted fresh start accounting and reporting effective the close of business on February 26, 2011 (the “Fresh Start Reporting Date”), in accordance with accounting guidance. We were required to adopt fresh start accounting and reporting as of the Effective Date. However, in light of the proximity of that date to our second quarter accounting period close immediately after the Effective Date, which was February 26, 2011, as well as the results of a materiality assessment as more fully discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, we elected to adopt fresh start accounting and reporting effective as the close of business on February 26, 2011.

The financial statements as of the Fresh Start Reporting Date report the results of the Successor Company (as defined below) with no beginning retained earnings or accumulated deficit. Any presentation of the Successor Company represents the financial position and results of operations of a new reporting entity and is not comparable to prior periods presented by the Predecessor Company (as defined below). The consolidated financial statements for periods ended prior to the Fresh Start Reporting Date do not include the effect of any changes in capital structure or changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities as a result of fresh start accounting. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements for the reporting entity subsequent to the Effective Date (the “Successor Company”) are not comparable to the consolidated financial statements for the reporting entity prior to the Effective Date (the “Predecessor Company”).

Combined Pro forma Financial Results of Predecessor and Successor

For purposes of management’s discussion and analysis of the results of operations in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we combined the results of operations for the period from August 29, 2010 to February 26, 2011 of the Predecessor Company with the period from February 26, 2011 to May 28, 2011 of the Successor Company. We then compared the combined pro forma results of operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011 with the corresponding periods in the prior year, although the operations of the Successor Company is not a direct comparison with the performance of the predecessor Company for prior respective period.

We believe the combined pro forma results of operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011 provide management and investors with some meaningful perspective on our ongoing financial and operational performance and trends. Similarly, we combined the financial results of the Predecessor Company and the Successor Company when discussing our sources and uses of cash for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011.

Index

Results of Operations

The following is a summary of operating results for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010. See the consolidated statement of operations in Item 1 for the predecessor period from August 29, 2010 to February 26, 2011 and the successor period from February 26, 2011 to May 28, 2011, which have been combined to form the thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011.

													Pro forma
	Thirteen weeks ended												Thirty-nine weeks ended
	Successor			Predecessor									Combined		Predecessor
(Dollars in thousands)	May 28, 2011			May 29,2010			Variance in Dollars			Variance in Percent			May 28, 2011		May 29,2010			Variance in Dollars			Variance in Percent

Total revenues	$	19,005		$	18,781		$	224			1.2	%	$	54,271	$	56,313		$	(2,042	)		-3.6	%

Cost of sales		13,679			14,010			(331	)		-2.4	%		40,000		41,487			(1,487	)		-3.6	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses		6,841			8,249			(1,408	)		-17.1	%		20,140		23,330			(3,190	)		-13.7	%

Reorganization items, net		(4	)		-			(4	)		-100	%		33,374		-			33,374			100	%

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,953	)		(3,675	)		(1,722	)		-46.9	%		26,701		(15,674	)		42,375			270.4	%

Income (loss) from discontinued operations		-			(1,100	)		1,100			100	%		62		(2,384	)		2,446			102.6	%

Net income (loss)		(1,953	)		(4,775	)		(2,822	)		-59.1	%		26,763		(18,058	)		44,821			248.2	%

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of consolidated revenue from continuing operations contributed by each class:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	Thirteen weeks			Thirteen weeks			Twenty-six weeks			Thirty-nine weeks
	February 26,			February 27,			February 26,			February 27,
	ended			ended			ended			ended
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor			Predecessor
Merchandise Sales – net		83.8	%		81.9	%		83.9	%		80.4	%
	May 28, 2011			May 29, 2010			February 26, 2011			May 29, 2010
Home Delivery Income		11.8	%		12.8	%		11.8	%		11.9	%
Merchandise Sales – net		83.3	%		82.5	%		83.8	%		81.1	%
Charges to the Related Company		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		2.7	%
Home Delivery Income		12.0	%		12.5	%		11.8	%		12.1	%
Net Sales		95.6	%		94.7	%		95.7	%		95.0	%
Charges to the Related Company		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		1.8	%
Revenue from Service Contracts		4.4	%		5.3	%		4.3	%		5.0	%
Net Sales		95.3	%		95.0	%		95.6	%		95.0	%
Revenue from Service Contracts		4.6	%		5.0	%		4.4	%		5.0	%
Warehouse		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Total Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

~~Thirteen Weeks Ended February~~ 26~~, 2011 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended February 27, 2010~~

Index

Thirteen Weeks Ended May 28, 2011 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended May 29, 2010

Revenue

Jennifer Segment

Sales and delivery fees paid by customers are recognized as revenue upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. Net sales from continuing operations were $911,~~469~~751,000 and $1412,~~030~~727,000 for the thirteen-week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations decreased by 327.57%, or $4976,~~561,~~000 for the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~The~~ ~~decrease~~Approximately in$898,000 of the net sales isdecrease ~~largely~~was attributable to ~~a decline in overall demand within~~ the ~~furniture~~closing ~~industry sector due to a poor housing market and an overall weak U.S. economy. Further, the lack~~ of ~~private~~unprofitable ~~label~~stores ~~customer financing has negatively impacted our written sales at a time~~ during ~~which~~fiscal ~~personal~~2011 ~~credit lines~~ and ~~limits have been tightened. Also, there were numerous store closings during fiscal~~ 2010 in connection with our ~~plan of~~ reorganization. ~~Net~~The ~~sales~~decrease ~~from~~in ~~continuing operations for the thirteen-week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 included~~ net sales ~~from~~also ~~the~~reflects ~~Acquired~~a ~~Stores,~~decline ~~exclusive~~in ofoverall ~~the~~demand ~~Combined~~within ~~Stores, of $1,926,000 and $1,169,000, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations for~~ the ~~Combined~~furniture ~~Stores~~industry ~~was~~sector ~~$1,323,000~~due ~~and~~to ~~$1,280,000~~a ~~for~~poor ~~the~~housing ~~thirteen~~market ~~week periods ended February 26, 2011~~ and ~~February~~an ~~27,~~overall ~~2010,~~weak ~~respectively~~U. InS. addition, net sales from continuing operations for the thirteen-week period ended February 27, 2010 included $1,196,000 in connection with an interim agreement between us and the Related Company prior to our acquisition of the Acquired Stores (the “Interim Agreement”)economy.

24Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations decreased by 17.4% in the thirteen-week period ended May 28, 2011 to $615,000, from $745,000 for the thirteen-week period ended May 29, 2010. The decrease is primarily attributable to fewer merchandise sales during the thirteen-week period ended May 28, 2011, compared to the same period ended May 29, 2010. Approximately $44,000 of the decrease in revenue from service contracts from continuing operations was attributable to the closing of unprofitable stores during fiscal 2011 and 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization.

Index

Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations decreased by 44.1% in the thirteen-week period ended February 26, 2011 to $479,000, from $857,000 for the thirteen-week period ended February 27, 2010. The decrease is primarily attributable to fewer merchandise sales during the thirteen-week period ended February 26, 2011, compared to the same period ended February 27, 2010, as well as numerous store closings during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization. Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the thirteen week period ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 included revenues from Acquired Stores, exclusive of the Combined Stores, of $77,000 and $66,000, respectively. Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the Combined Stores was $60,000 and $79,000 for the thirteen-week period ended February 27, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively. In addition, revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the thirteen-week period ended February 27, 2010 included $72,000 in connection with the Interim Agreement.

Ashley Segment

Net sales from continuing operations were $6,~~541~~355,000 and $45,~~580~~106,000 for the thirteen-week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations increased by 4224.85%, or $1,~~961~~249,000 for the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The increase is largely attributable to four new Ashley locations in fiscal 2010 open for the full thirteen -week period this year, that were not open during the entire same thirteen -week period last year.

Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations increased by 3631.75% in the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 to $~~257~~267,000 from $~~188~~203,000 for the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~four~~greater ~~new~~merchandise ~~Ashley~~sales ~~locations~~during ~~in fiscal 2010 opened for~~ the ~~full~~ thirteen -week period ~~this~~ended ~~year~~May 28, ~~that were not open during the entire same thirteen week last year~~2011.

Consolidated

Consolidated same store sales from continuing operations (sales at those stores open for the entire current and prior comparable periods) ~~decreased~~increased 118.97% for the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Total square footage leased for the Jennifer segment ~~decreased~~increased by 268,~~671~~776 square feet or 62.95% during the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 as a result of ~~nine~~three ~~closed~~store ~~stores~~openings, ~~net~~offset ofby one store ~~opening~~closing ~~and~~as ~~one~~compared ~~store~~to ~~relocating~~the February 26, 2011. There was no change in total square footage leased for the Ashley segment during the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales, as a percentage of revenue for the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, was 7372.90% compared to 74.36% for the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Cost of sales from continuing operations decreased to $1213,~~372~~679,000 for the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 from $14,~~612~~010,000 for the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~Cost~~The decrease in the percentage of cost of sales asis adue ~~percentage~~mainly to lower occupancy costs, offset by amortization expense of ~~revenue~~$245,000 isfor ~~comparable~~an ~~period~~identified intangible asset related to ~~period~~the order backlog at February 26, 2011.

~~Cost of sales is comprised of five categories: cost of merchandise, occupancy costs, warehouse expenses, home delivery expenses and warranty costs.~~27

Cost of sales for the thirteen weeks ended February 26, 2011 included an increase of $1,515,000 related to our Ashley operating segment, a decrease of $3,746,000 related to our Jennifer operating segment and a decrease of $9,000 for corporate activities. The increase in the Ashley segment is largely attributable to the opening of five new stores during fiscal 2010, one of which closed in August 2010. The decrease in the Jennifer segment is mainly due to the impact of the decrease in revenues as more fully described above and the corresponding decreases in related costs such as cost of merchandise, warehouse expenses and home delivery expenses. The corporate decrease is attributable to lower occupancy costs.

Index

~~Loss~~Cost ~~related~~of tosales ~~service~~is ~~contracts~~comprised of five categories: cost of merchandise, occupancy costs, warehouse expenses, home delivery expenses and warranty costs.

~~Effective~~Cost ~~January~~of 1,sales ~~2010,~~for the thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2011 included an increase of $929,000 related ~~company~~to ~~ceased~~our ~~operations~~Ashley ~~and~~operating ~~will~~segment, noa ~~longer~~decrease ~~provide~~of ~~the~~$1,221,000 ~~services~~related ~~previously~~to ~~contracted~~our Jennifer operating segment and a decrease of $40,000 for bycorporate usactivities. AsThe aincrease ~~matter~~in the Ashley segment is largely attributable to the opening of ~~customer~~five ~~relations~~new stores during fiscal 2010, weone ~~have~~of ~~decided~~which toclosed ~~honor~~in ~~the~~August ~~related~~2010. ~~company’s~~The ~~commitment~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~pay~~the ~~for~~Jennifer ~~and~~segment ~~arrange~~is mainly due to ~~supply~~the ~~services~~impact ~~with~~of ~~respect~~the todecrease ~~previously~~in ~~sold~~revenues ~~protection~~as ~~services. Accordingly,~~more ~~during~~fully described above and the ~~thirteen-weeks~~corresponding ~~ended~~decreases ~~February~~in ~~27,~~related ~~2010~~costs, wesuch ~~have~~as ~~recorded~~cost aof $3merchandise,~~500,000~~ ~~charge~~warehouse toexpenses ~~operations~~and ~~for~~home ~~the~~delivery ~~estimated~~expenses. The decrease in cost of ~~supplying~~sales ~~future~~for ~~services~~corporate ~~with~~activities ~~respect~~is attributable to ~~previously~~lower ~~sold~~occupancy ~~protection services~~costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing operations were $6,~~226~~841,000 (3736.20% as a percentage of revenue) and $78,~~501~~249,000 (3843.29% as a percentage of revenue) during the thirteen-week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively.

~~Selling~~The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 ~~includes~~comprises ana ~~increase~~decrease of $~~482~~8,000 for the Ashley segment, ana decrease of $1948,~~141,~~000 for the Jennifer segment and ana decrease of $~~616~~452,000 related to corporate activities, consisting of compensation, advertising, finance fees and other administrative costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of four categories: compensation, advertising, finance fees and other administrative costs. Compensation is primarily comprised of compensation of executives, finance, customer service, information systems, merchandising, sales associates and sales management. Advertising expenses are primarily comprised of newspaper/magazines, circulars, television and other soft costs. Finance fees are comprised of fees paid to credit card companies. Administrative expenses are comprised of professional fees, utilities, insurance, supplies, permits and licenses, property taxes, repairs and maintenance, and other general administrative costs.

Compensation expense decreased $~~205~~256,000 during the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Compensation expense decreased by $~~408~~212,000 for the Jennifer segment, increased $~~257~~158,000 for the Ashley segment and decreased by $54202,000 for corporate activities. The decrease in the Jennifer segment was primarily attributable to the numerous store closings during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization. The increase for the Ashley segment is largely due to the opening of four new locations during fiscal 2010, ~~that~~one ~~were~~of which was open for the full thirteen-week period in the current year ~~that~~but ~~were~~ not open during the entire thirteen-week period last year. Corporate compensation decreased due to ~~decreased~~salary ~~bonus~~reductions ~~payments~~in ~~made~~management ~~during~~and the ~~thirteen-week~~impact ~~period~~of ~~ended~~changes ~~February~~in ~~26,~~senior ~~2011~~management.

Advertising expense decreased $~~614~~878,000 during the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Advertising expense decreased by $~~703~~726,000 for the Jennifer segment and ~~increased~~decreased by $89152,000 for the Ashley segment. The decrease for the Jennifer segment is primarily due to the reduction in national advertising costs as a result of closing numerous stores during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization, as well as an overall decrease in regional newspaper and television advertising for the segment. The ~~increase~~decrease for the Ashley segment is largely due to ~~the~~an ~~opening~~increase ofin ~~four~~co-operative ~~new~~advertising ~~locations~~campaigns ~~during~~with ~~fiscal~~other ~~2010~~Ashley ~~that~~Homestore ~~were~~owners ~~open~~in ~~for~~ the ~~full~~New York/ New Jersey region during the thirteen-week period inended ~~the~~May ~~current~~28, ~~year~~2011 ~~that~~as ~~were~~compared ~~not~~to ~~open during~~ the ~~entire~~same ~~thirteen-week~~ period ~~last~~ended ~~year~~May 29, 2010.

Finance fees ~~decreased~~increased $4611,000 during the thirteen-week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Finance fees decreased by $678,000 for the Jennifer segment and increased $2119,000 for the Ashley segment. The decrease in the Jennifer segment is primarily due to the closing of sixty-nine stores during fiscal 2010 and an additional ~~nine~~twenty stores during ~~the~~fiscal ~~thirteen weeks ended February 26,~~ 2011, and the resulting decline in credit card transactions. The increase for the Ashley segment can be attributed to the opening of four new locations during fiscal 2010, ~~that~~one ~~were~~of which was open for the full thirteen-week period in the current year but not open during the entire thirteen-week period in the prior year, and the corresponding increase in the number of credit card transactions for this segment.

Other administrative costs decreased $410,000 during the thirteen-week period ended February 26, 2011 compared to the same period ended February 27, 2010. The Jennifer segment increased in the amount of $37,000 as a result of increased insurance related charges during the thirteen-week period ended February 26, 2011. The Ashley segment increased in the amount of $115,000 is largely due to the opening of four new locations during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full thirteen-week period in the current year that were not open during the entire thirteen-week period last year. Corporate activities decreased $562,000 due to a decrease in professional fees.28

Index

Other administrative costs decreased $285,000 during the thirteen-week period ended May 28, 2011 compared to the same period ended May 29, 2010. Other administrative costs decreased by $2,000 for the Jennifer segment as a result of savings related to the closing of twenty stores during the thirty-nine week period ended May 28, 2011, offset by an increase in insurance related fees. Other administrative costs decreased by $33,000 for the Ashley segment due to the decrease in the showroom and store supplies related to the opening of new stores in the prior year. Other administrative costs decreased by $250,000 for corporate activities due to a decrease in professional fees.

Depreciation and Amortization

In connection with our reorganization the accounting guidance provides for a determination of the reorganization value to be assigned to the assets of our reorganized company as of a date selected for financial reporting purposes. As of June 3, 2011, independent valuation specialists completed the determination of the fair value of our fixed assets, trademark and other identifiable intangibles. Accordingly, the value ascribed to our Trademark Usage Agreements with Ashley Homestores, Ltd. was $4,200,000 at February 26, 2011. During the thirteen-week period ended May 28, 2011 we incurred a charge of $150,000 for amortization related to the expected useful life of these agreements.

Reorganization Items, Net

Reorganization items consist of agains ~~gain~~and losses on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise, legal and other professional fees for bankruptcy services and fresh start accounting adjustments. During the thirteen weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, we recorded a loss on reorganization items from continuing operations of approximately $344,~~128,~~000. Such amount for the thirteen week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 is comprised of a $16148,~~714,~~000 ~~gain~~loss on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and ~~fresh~~a ~~start accounting adjustments of~~ $20144,~~161,~~000~~. Also~~ ~~included~~gain ~~are~~on ~~charges~~the ~~incurred~~final allowance of ~~approximately~~compensation ~~$2,747,000~~ for legal and other professional fees as approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

~~Provision for~~ Loss onfrom ~~Amounts~~Continuing ~~Due From the Related Company~~Operations

~~During~~The ~~the~~loss ~~year~~from ~~ended~~continuing ~~August~~operations ~~29,~~was ~~2009~~$1,953,000 ~~the~~and ~~Related~~$3,675,000 ~~Company~~for ~~failed to make payment in full of~~ the ~~amount~~thirteen-week ~~due~~periods byended ~~the~~May ~~required~~28, ~~due~~2011 ~~date~~and inMay ~~five~~29, ~~instances~~2010, respectively. ~~The~~During ~~shortfalls were paid off in full during~~ the ~~permitted~~thirteen-week ~~grace~~ period noended ~~later~~May ~~than~~28, 222011, ~~days~~existing ~~after~~stores ~~the~~generated ~~original~~greater revenue due ~~date,~~in ~~including~~part ~~interest~~to at the ~~rate~~availability of 9%deferred ~~per~~financing ~~annum. In~~which ~~November~~was ~~2009, the Related Company defaulted on its payment obligation by~~ not ~~paying~~offered ~~the~~in ~~remaining outstanding balance of~~ the ~~receivable~~thirteen-week ~~due~~period toended usMay ~~as of August~~ 29, ~~2009 within the 30-day grace period~~2010. As aIn ~~result thereof~~addition, wethe ~~provided~~Ashley ansegment ~~allowance~~generated ~~for~~higher ~~loss~~revenues ofas ~~$947,000~~discussed asmore offully ~~August~~above. 29Further, ~~2009,~~we ~~representing~~experienced ~~the~~lower ~~net~~fixed ~~balance~~and ~~due~~other costs resulting from the ~~Related~~closure ~~Company as~~ of ~~such~~unprofitable ~~date~~stores. The ~~after~~loss ~~giving~~from ~~effect~~continuing tooperations ~~subsequent~~for ~~payments received. During~~ the thirteen -week ~~period~~periods ended ~~November~~May 28, ~~2009,~~2011 weand ~~provided~~May an29, ~~additional~~2010 ~~allowance~~includes ~~for~~income ~~loss~~ of $3379,~~167,~~000 ~~related to increases in the receivable from the related company principally resulting from transfers of inventory~~ and ~~charges for delivery services~~$144, ~~warehousing services and advertising costs during such period. During December 2009~~000, ~~we recovered $39~~respectively,~~000~~ ~~from~~related ~~the~~to ~~related~~our ~~company~~Ashley segment.

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

The income (loss) from continuing operations was $32,076,000 and ($6,096,000) for the thirteen-week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010, respectively. This change is primarily attributable to a net reorganization gain resulting from our emergence from bankruptcy.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

During the thirteen week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, we closed ~~nine~~one ~~stores~~store ~~of which four were~~ located in ~~New Jersey, one in New York, two in~~ California~~, one in Connecticut and one in Maryland~~. The operating ~~results~~result of ~~these~~this closed ~~stores~~store ~~are~~is recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed store from other stores in ~~their~~the ~~respective~~surrounding area. During fiscal 2010, we closed ~~one~~two ~~store~~stores in ~~Arizona~~New York, ~~one~~two in California ~~and~~(San Diego territory), two in Nevada, two in New ~~York~~Hampshire, one in Illinois, one in Maryland, one in Massachusetts, and one in Georgia. The operating results of the closed stores in ~~California~~Illinois, ~~and~~ New York, Maryland and Massachusetts are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed store from other stores in their respective ~~area~~areas. The operating results of the closed ~~store~~stores in ~~Arizona~~Georgia, ~~along~~New ~~with~~Hampshire, ~~another~~California ~~Arizona~~(San ~~store~~Diego ~~closed~~territory), ~~during~~and ~~the~~Nevada ~~first quarter,~~ are reported in discontinued operations. Income (loss) from discontinued operations amounted to $0 and ($~~317~~1,100,000) for the thirteen-week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively.

~~Revenues from the closed stores reported as discontinued operations amounted to $0 and $5,615,000 in the thirteen-week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010, respectively.~~29

Net Income (Loss)

Net income (loss) for the thirteen-week period ended February 26, 2011 was $32,076,000, compared to net loss of ($6,413,000) for the thirteen-week period ended February 27, 2010. The income (loss) from continuing operations for the thirteen-week periods ended February 26, 2011 and February 27, 2010 includes income of $1,873,000 and $379,000, respectively, related to our Ashley segment.

Index

~~Twenty-six~~Revenues ~~Weeks~~from ~~Ended~~the ~~February~~closed ~~26,~~stores ~~2011~~reported ~~Compared~~as discontinued operations amounted to ~~Twenty~~$0 and $4,253,000 in the thirteen-~~six~~week ~~Weeks~~periods ~~Ended~~ended ~~February~~May 2728, 2011 and May 29, 2010, respectively.

Net Loss

Net loss for the thirteen-week periods ended May 28, 2011 and May 29, 2010 was $1,953,000 and $4,775,000, respectively.

Index

Pro forma Thirty-nine Weeks Ended May 28, 2011 Compared to Thirty-nine Weeks Ended May 29, 2010

Revenue

Jennifer Segment

Sales and delivery fees paid by customers are recognized as revenue upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. Net sales from continuing operations were $2032,~~607~~358,000 and $2740,~~396~~123,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations decreased by 2419.84%, or $67,~~789~~765,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine-week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~The~~Approximately $7,202,000 of the net sales decrease iswas attributable to the closing of unprofitable stores during fiscal 2011 and 2010 in connection with our reorganization. The decrease in net sales also reflects a decline in overall demand within the furniture industry sector due to ~~the~~a ~~continuing~~poor ~~recessionary~~housing ~~trend~~market inand ~~the~~an overall weak U.S. economy. Further, the lack of private label customer financing from January 2009 through February 2011 has negatively impacted our written sales at a time during which personal credit lines and limits have been tightened. ~~Also, there were numerous store closings during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization.~~ Net sales from continuing operations for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010 included net sales from the Acquired Stores, exclusive of the Combined Stores, of $46,~~210~~749,000 and $13,~~169~~847,000, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations for the Combined Stores was $24,~~911~~562,000 and $24,~~477~~167,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. In addition, net sales from continuing operations for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010 included $1,~~196~~283,000 in connection with an interim agreement between us and the Related Company prior to our acquisition of the Acquired Stores (the “Interim Agreement”).

Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations decreased by 3429.92% in the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 to $1,~~011~~626,000, from $12,~~553~~298,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The decrease is primarily attributable to fewer merchandise sales during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. Approximately $419,000 asof ~~well~~the asdecrease ~~numerous~~in ~~store~~revenue ~~closings~~from service contracts from continuing operations was attributable to the closing of unprofitable stores in fiscal 2011 and 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization. Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010 included revenues from Acquired Stores, exclusive of the Combined Stores, of $~~166~~273,000 and $66207,000, respectively. Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the Combined Stores was $~~136~~214,000 and $~~152~~243,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. In addition, revenue from service contracts from continuing operations for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010 included $7276,000 in connection with the Interim Agreement.

Ashley Segment

Net sales from continuing operations were $1319,~~142~~497,000 and $813,~~245~~351,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. Net sales from continuing operations increased by 5946.40%, or $46,~~897~~146,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The increase is largely attributable to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period in the current year and were not open during the entire corresponding period last year.

Revenue from service contracts from continuing operations increased by 4942.79% in the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 to $~~506~~773,000 from $~~338~~541,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~four~~greater ~~new~~merchandise ~~Ashley~~sales ~~locations opened~~ during ~~fiscal 2010 that were open for~~ the ~~full twenty~~thirteen-~~six~~ week period inended ~~the~~May ~~current~~28, ~~year and were not open during the entire corresponding period last year~~2011.

Index

Consolidated

Consolidated same store sales from continuing operations (sales at those stores open for the entire current and prior comparable periods) decreased 125.21% for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. During the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, ~~nineteen~~we ~~stores~~ closed, ~~one~~twenty stores, opened ~~and~~three ~~another~~stores and relocated one store as compared to August 28, 2010. Total square footage leased for the Jennifer segment decreased by 4133,~~843~~067 square feet, or 108.53%, as a result of store closings. Total square footage leased for the Ashley segment remained unchanged.

Index

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales, as a percentage of revenue for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, ~~was~~and ~~74.6%~~May ~~compared~~29, to2010 was 73.27% for ~~the~~both ~~same period ended February 27, 2010~~periods. Cost of sales from continuing operations decreased to $2640,~~321~~000,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, from $2741,~~477~~487,000 for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~The increase in the percentage of cost of sales is due to fixed costs being spread over a decreased revenue base.~~

Cost of sales is comprised of five categories: cost of merchandise, occupancy costs, warehouse expenses, home delivery expenses and warranty costs.

Cost of sales for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 included an increase of $34,~~557~~485,000 related to our Ashley operating segment, a decrease of $45,~~701~~921,000 related to our Jennifer operating segment and a decrease of $1251,000 for corporate activities. The increase in the Ashley segment is largely attributable to the opening of five new stores during fiscal 2010, one of which closed August 2010. The decrease in the Jennifer segment is mainly due to the impact of the decrease in revenues as more fully described above and the corresponding decreases in related costs, such as cost of merchandise, warehouse expenses and home delivery expenses. The decrease in cost of sales for corporate ~~decrease~~activities is attributable to lower occupancy costs.

Loss related to service contracts

Effective January 1, 2010, the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company ceased operations and will no longer provide the services previously contracted for by us. As a matter of customer relations, we have decided to honor the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company’s commitment and pay for and arrange to supply services with respect to previously sold fabric and leather protection services. Accordingly, during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, we recorded a $3,500,000 charge to operations for the estimated cost of supplying future services with respect to the previously sold protection services.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing operations were $1320,~~299~~140,000 (37.71% as a percentage of revenue) and $1523,~~081~~330,000 (4041.24% as a percentage of revenue) during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 includes an increase of $1,~~214~~206,000 for the Ashley segment, a decrease of $23,~~676~~624,000 for the Jennifer segment and a decrease of $~~320~~772,000 related to corporate activities, consisting of compensation, advertising, finance fees and other administrative costs.

Compensation expense decreased $172,000 during the thirty-nine week period ended May 28, 2011 compared to the same period ended May 29, 2010. Compensation expense decreased by $865,000 for the Jennifer segment, increased $860,000 for the Ashley segment and decreased by $167,000 for corporate activities. The decrease in the Jennifer segment was primarily attributable to the numerous store closings during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization. The increase for the Ashley segment is largely due to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full thirty-nine week period in the current year and were not open during the entire corresponding period last year. Corporate compensation decreased due to salary reductions in management and the impact of changes in senior management.

Index

~~Compensation~~Advertising expense ~~increased~~decreased $842,415,000 during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~Compensation~~Advertising expense decreased by $~~653~~2,591,000 for the Jennifer segment, ~~increased $702,000 for the Ashley segment~~ and increased by $35176,000 for ~~corporate~~the ~~activities~~Ashley segment. The decrease in the Jennifer segment ~~was~~is primarily ~~attributable~~due to the ~~numerous~~reduction ~~store~~in ~~closings~~national advertising costs as a result of closing numerous stores during fiscal 2010 in connection with our plan of reorganization. The increase for the Ashley segment is largely due to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period in the current year ~~and~~that were not open during the entire corresponding period last year~~. Corporate~~, ~~compensation~~which ~~increased~~was ~~due~~partially tooffset ~~the termination of voluntary salary reductions~~ by ~~the~~an ~~Chief~~increase ~~Executive~~in ~~Officer~~co-operative ~~and~~advertising ~~Executive~~campaigns ~~Vice~~with ~~President~~other asAshley ofHomestore ~~December~~owners ~~31,~~in ~~2009 and~~ the ~~hiring~~New ofYork/ ~~additional~~New ~~employees~~Jersey ~~to assist in matters related to bankruptcy~~region.

~~Advertising~~Finance ~~expense~~fees decreased $1,~~537,~~000 during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~Advertising~~Finance ~~expense~~fees decreased by $1107,~~865,~~000 for the Jennifer segment and increased by $~~328~~106,000 for the Ashley segment. The decrease in the Jennifer segment is primarily due to the ~~reduction~~closing inof ~~national~~sixty-nine ~~advertising~~stores ~~costs~~during asfiscal a2010 ~~result~~and ofan ~~closing~~additional ~~numerous~~twenty stores during ~~fiscal~~the ~~2010~~thirty-nine inweeks ~~connection~~ended ~~with~~May ~~our~~28, ~~plan~~2011, ofand ~~reorganization~~the resulting decline in credit card transactions. The increase for the Ashley segment is largely due to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period in the current year ~~and~~that were not open during the entire corresponding period last year and the corresponding increase in the number of credit card transactions for this segment during the thirty-nine week period ended May 28, 2011.

~~Finance~~Other ~~fees~~administrative costs decreased $12602,000 during the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 compared to the same period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. ~~Finance~~ Other ~~fees~~administrative costs decreased by $9961,000 for the Jennifer segment ~~and~~as ~~increased~~a ~~$87,000~~result ~~for~~of ~~the~~savings ~~Ashley~~related ~~segment. The decrease in the Jennifer segment is primarily due~~ to the closing of ~~sixty-nine~~twenty stores during ~~fiscal 2010 and an additional nineteen stores during~~ the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine ~~weeks~~week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, ~~and~~reduced ~~the~~by ~~resulting~~an ~~decline~~increase in ~~credit~~insurance ~~card~~related ~~transactions~~fees. ~~The~~Other ~~increase~~administrative costs increased by $64,000 for the Ashley segment is largely due to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period in the current year and were not open during the entire corresponding period last year. Other ~~and~~administrative ~~the~~costs ~~corresponding~~decreased ~~increase~~by in$605,000 ~~the number of credit card transactions~~ for ~~this~~corporate ~~segment~~activities ~~during~~due ~~the~~to ~~twenty-six~~a ~~week~~decrease ~~period~~in ~~ended~~professional ~~February 26, 2011~~fees.

Other administrative costs decreased $317,000 during the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011 compared to the same period ended February 27, 2010. The Jennifer segment decreased in the amount of $59,000 as a result of savings related to the closing of nineteen stores during the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011, reduced by an increase in insurance related fees. The Ashley segment increased in the amount of $97,000 largely due to four new Ashley locations opened during fiscal 2010 that were open for the full twenty-six week period in the current year and were not open during the entire corresponding period last year. Corporate activities decreased $355,000 due to a decrease in professional fees.

Reorganization Items, Net

Reorganization items consist of a gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise, legal and other professional fees for bankruptcy services and fresh start accounting adjustments. During the ~~twenty~~ thirty-~~six~~nine weeks ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, we recorded reorganization items from continuing operations of approximately $33,~~378~~374,000. Such amount for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 is comprised of a $16,~~714~~566,000 gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and fresh start accounting adjustments of $20,161,000. Also included are charges incurred of approximately $3,~~497~~353,000 for legal and other professional fees.

Provision for Loss on Amounts Due From the Related Company

During the year ended August 29, 2009, the Related Company failed to make payment in full of the amount due by the required due date in five instances. The shortfalls were paid off in full during the permitted grace period no later than 22 days after the original due date, including interest at the rate of 9% per annum. In November 2009, the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company defaulted on its payment obligation by not paying the remaining outstanding balance of the receivable due to us as of August 29, 2009 within the 30-day grace period. As a result thereof, we provided an allowance for loss of $947,000 as of August 29, 2009, representing the net balance due from the related company as of such date after giving effect to subsequent payments received. During the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~November~~May 2829, ~~2009~~2010, we provided an additional allowance for loss of $3,167,000 related to increases in the receivable from the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company principally resulting from transfers of inventory and charges for delivery services, warehousing services and advertising costs during such period. During December 2009, we recovered $39,000 from the ~~related~~Related ~~company~~Company.

3033

Index

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

The income (loss) from continuing operations was $2826,~~654~~701,000 and $(1115,~~999~~674,000) for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively. This change is primarily attributable to a net reorganization gain resulting from our emergence from bankruptcy during the twenty-six week period ended February 26, 2011.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

During the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, we closed ~~nineteen~~twenty stores of which seven were located in New Jersey, five in New York, ~~four~~five in California, one in Connecticut, one in Maryland and one in Virginia. The operating results of these closed stores are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed store from other stores in their respective areas. During the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, we closed ~~two~~four stores in ~~Arizona~~New York, ~~one~~three in California ~~and~~(San Diego territory), two in Arizona, two in Nevada, two in New ~~York~~Hampshire, one in Georgia, one in Maryland, one in Massachusetts, and one in Illinois. The operating results of the closed stores in ~~California and~~ New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Illinois are recorded in continuing operations based on management’s judgment that there will be significant continuing sales to customers of the closed ~~store~~stores from other stores in their respective areas. The operating results of the closed stores in Arizona, California (San Diego territory), Georgia, New Hampshire, and Nevada are reported in discontinued operations. Income (loss) from discontinued operations amounted to $62,000 and $(12,~~284~~384,000) for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively.

Revenues from the closed stores reported as discontinued operations amounted to $5,000 and $1015,~~936~~189,000 in the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010, respectively.

Net Income (Loss)

Net income ~~(loss)~~ for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 was $2826,~~716~~763,000, compared to net loss of $(1318,~~283~~058,000) for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week period ended ~~February~~May 2729, 2010. The income (loss) from continuing operations for the ~~twenty~~thirty-~~six~~nine week periods ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011 and ~~February~~May 2729, 2010 includes income of $2,~~290~~669,000 and $~~548~~691,000, respectively, related to our Ashley segment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During our third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2010, we experienced a delay in the receipt of merchandise from our principal supplier, Mengnu, which negatively impacted our revenues. In addition, during such period and thereafter, the credit card processor increased the holdback of certain payments due to us. As a consequence of such events, during May 2010 and thereafter, amounts payable by us to our principal supplier were not paid by their extended due dates. Further, as settlement negotiations progressed with respect to our previously disclosed employment class litigation it became apparent that we would be required to make a $1,300,000 cash payment as part of any such settlement.

Based on the above and other factors, on July 18, 2010, Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The decision to file for Chapter 11 protection was driven primarily by the lack of financing available to us given the state of the credit markets. We had sought financing alternatives that would allow us to continue operating outside of bankruptcy; however, our Board of Directors determined that a Chapter 11 reorganization, was in our best interests, and the best interests of our customers, creditors, employees, and other interested parties.

Index

On the Confirmation Date, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Confirmation Order, which confirmed our Plan. On the Effective Date, we substantially consummated the Reorganization through a series of transactions contemplated by the Plan, and the Plan became effective pursuant to its terms.

Pursuant to the terms of the Plan agreed to with Mengnu, which is also our principal creditor, Mengnu (i) owns 90.1% of our new equity securities; (ii) received a $2,638,000, two-year secured note at 4% interest per annum; and (iii) received a $1,879,000, four-year unsecured note at 6% interest per annum. The remaining 9.9% of the new equity securities is owned by the Litigation Trust. In addition, the Litigation Trust received (i) a $1,400,000, one-year secured note at 3% interest per annum; and (ii) a $950,000, three-year secured note at 5% interest per annum. In exchange for the new equity interests and notes issued, certain claims from both the principal supplier and the other general unsecured creditors have been extinguished. The equity interests were cancelled.34

Further, on the Effective Date, the DIP Agreement was refinanced by the Secured Exit Credit Agreement. The Secured Exit Credit Agreement comprises (i) the LOC Facility, which is a letter of credit backstopped by Mengnu funded by a bank for the benefit of our credit card processor in an amount of $3,000,000 which amount may be increased to an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 at our request and with Mengnu’s consent; and (ii) the Cash Facility, which is the relending of amounts owed by us to Mengnu that accrued, whether due and owing or not, under the DIP Agreement, which was $2,762,000 as of February 22, 2011, less $62,000 which was repaid by us to Mengnu on the Effective Date.

We reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiff in the putative class and FLSA collective action case filed on July 16, 2009 (the “Combs Case”), pursuant to which we agreed to pay the plaintiff $50,000 and further agreed that the plaintiff would have an allowed general unsecured claim of $450,000 in the bankruptcy case. The settlement agreement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and the payments and other consideration to be received by plaintiff in settlement of its allowed general unsecured claim was made pro rata in proportion to and in the form of the payments and other consideration received by other general unsecured creditors in the Plan. As of February 26, 2011, we have paid the $50,000 to the plaintiff. A hearing to consider final approval of the settlement of the Combs Case is currently anticipated to be held in May 2011.

We were a party to a letter agreement with Mengnu pursuant to which Mengnu agreed to provide us with $10,000,000 of debt financing. On April 13, 2009, we amended and restated the terms of the letter agreement to provide that, effective August 1, 2009, we had up to 150 days to pay for the goods without interest or penalty. On December 10, 2009, Mengnu further amended the terms of the letter agreement extending the terms from 150 days to 180 days. Under the agreement, any amounts due that were not paid within the additional 30 day grace period, would be charged interest at a per annum rate of 2% until payment is made. Prior to the filing of our voluntary petition for bankruptcy, the amended and restated letter agreement was scheduled to terminate on September 30, 2010. After review of the terms, and as of July 18, 2010, the petition date, Mengnu continued to supply us goods under the terms of the amended and restated letter agreement. As of February 26, 2011 and August 28, 2010, we owed Mengnu approximately $329,000 (included in accounts payable, trade) and $17,366,000 (included in liabilities subject to compromise), respectively. Subsequent to filing a petition under Chapter 11, we were required to prepay certain vendors, including Mengnu. Currently, we have 90-day terms with Mengnu.

The credit card companies have, for the past several years, paid us shortly after credit card purchases by our customers. However, in light of economic and credit conditions they changed their payment policies. As of February 26, 2011 and August 28, 2010, the credit card processors held back approximately $451,000 and $3,480,000, respectively. On January 13, 2010, we entered into a Merchant Agreement and Application (the “Merchant Agreement”) with Renaissance Associates and Merrick Bank Corporation (collectively, the “Bank”), pursuant to which the Bank provides us with certain credit card processing services. As a result of the Reorganization, the parties to the Merchant Agreement agreed to an amendment on January 13, 2011 that, among other things, requires us to provide the Bank with certain financial information on a weekly and monthly basis and permits the Bank to require us to fund a non-interest bearing chargeback account that the Bank may draw upon for funds that it is owed. As of February 26, 2011, the chargeback account approximates $158,000.

Index

OnPursuant ~~February~~to ~~24,~~the ~~2011,~~terms weof ~~entered~~the ~~into~~Plan aagreed ~~retailer~~to ~~program~~with ~~agreement~~Mengnu, ~~with~~which GEis ~~Money~~also ~~Bank~~our principal creditor, Mengnu (~~“GE”~~i) toowns ~~run~~90.1% of our ~~private~~new ~~label~~equity ~~credit~~securities; ~~card~~(ii) ~~program.~~received ~~The~~a ~~program~~$2,638,000, ~~will~~two-year ~~allow~~secured ~~qualified~~note ~~customers~~at to4% ~~finance~~interest ~~the~~per ~~purchase~~annum; ofand ~~goods~~(iii) ~~and~~received ~~services~~a ~~provided~~$1,879,000, byfour-year usunsecured note at 6% interest per annum. The ~~financed~~Litigation ~~sales~~Trust ~~and~~owns ~~sold~~the ~~financed~~remaining ~~receivables~~9.9% ~~are~~of onthe anew ~~non-recourse~~equity ~~and~~securities. weIn doaddition, ~~not~~the ~~retain~~Litigation ~~any~~Trust ~~interests~~received in(i) ora ~~service~~$1,400,000, ~~the~~one-year ~~sold~~secured ~~receivables. The~~note ~~selling~~at ~~price~~3% ofinterest ~~the~~per ~~receivables~~annum; isand ~~dependent~~(ii) ~~upon~~a ~~the~~$950,000, ~~payment~~three-year ~~terms~~secured ~~with~~note ~~the~~at ~~customer~~5% ~~and~~interest ~~results~~per inannum. In ~~either~~exchange afor ~~payment~~the tonew orequity ~~receipt~~interests ~~from~~and GEnotes ofissued, acertain ~~percentage~~claims offrom both the ~~receivable~~principal assupplier aand ~~fee. In~~the ~~connection~~other ~~with~~general ~~the~~unsecured ~~agreement,~~creditors wehave ~~provided~~been GEextinguished. ~~with~~The ~~$500,000~~equity ofinterests ~~cash~~were ~~collateral~~cancelled.

WeFurther, ~~closed~~on ~~nineteen~~the ~~stores~~Effective Date, ~~opened~~the ~~one~~Secured ~~store~~Exit ~~and~~Credit ~~relocated~~Agreement ~~one~~refinanced ~~store~~the ~~during~~DIP Agreement. The Secured Exit Credit Agreement comprises (i) the ~~twenty-six~~LOC ~~weeks~~Facility, ~~ended~~which ~~February~~is 26a letter of credit backstopped by Mengnu funded by a bank for the benefit of our credit card processor in an amount of $3,000,000 ~~2011.~~which Weamount ~~spent~~may be increased to an amount not to exceed $~~114~~5,000,000 ~~for~~at ~~capital~~our ~~expenditures~~request and with Mengnu’s consent; and (ii) the Cash Facility, which is the relending of ~~continuing~~amounts ~~operations~~owed ~~during~~by ~~such~~us ~~twenty-week~~to ~~period~~Mengnu ~~and~~that weaccrued, ~~anticipate~~whether ~~capital~~due ~~expenditures~~and ~~approximating~~owing ~~$187~~or not,~~000~~ ~~during~~under the ~~remainder~~DIP Agreement, which was $2,762,000 as of ~~fiscal~~February 22, 2011, less $62,000 which was repaid by us to ~~support~~Mengnu ~~existing~~on ~~facilities~~the Effective Date.

We reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiff in the putative class and FLSA collective action case filed on July 16, 2009 (the “Combs Case”), pursuant to which we agreed to pay the plaintiff $50,000 and further agreed that the plaintiff would have an allowed general unsecured claim of $450,000 in the bankruptcy case. The settlement agreement was preliminarily approved by the Bankruptcy Court on January 28, 2011. As of the date hereof, we have paid the $50,000 to the plaintiff. On May 27, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court granted final approval of the settlement agreement. The payments and other consideration to be received by plaintiff in settlement of its allowed general unsecured claim will be made pro rata in proportion to and in the form of the payments and other consideration received by other general unsecured creditors in the Plan.

We were a party to a letter agreement with Mengnu pursuant to which Mengnu agreed to provide us with $10,000,000 of debt financing. On April 13, 2009, we amended and restated the terms of the letter agreement to provide that, effective August 1, 2009, we had up to 150 days to pay for the goods without interest or penalty. On December 10, 2009, Mengnu further amended the terms of the letter agreement extending the terms from 150 days to 180 days. Under the agreement, any amounts due that were not paid within the additional 30 day grace period, would be charged interest at a per annum rate of 2% until payment is made. Prior to the filing of our voluntary petition for bankruptcy, the amended and restated letter agreement was scheduled to terminate on September 30, 2010. After review of the terms, and as of July 18, 2010, the petition date, Mengnu continued to supply us goods under the terms of the amended and restated letter agreement. As of May 28, 2011 and August 28, 2010, we owed Mengnu approximately $2,673,000 (included in accounts payable, trade) and $17,366,000 (included in liabilities subject to compromise), respectively. Subsequent to filing a petition under Chapter 11, we were required to prepay certain vendors, including Mengnu. Currently, we have 90-day terms with Mengnu.

The credit card companies have, for the past several years, paid us shortly after credit card purchases by our customers. However, in light of economic and credit conditions they changed their payment policies. As of February 26, 2011 and August 28, 2010, the credit card processors held back approximately $451,000 and $3,480,000, respectively. On January 13, 2010, we entered into a Merchant Agreement and Application (the “Merchant Agreement”) with Renaissance Associates and Merrick Bank Corporation (collectively, the “Bank”), pursuant to which the Bank provides us with certain credit card processing services. As a result of the Reorganization, the parties to the Merchant Agreement agreed to an amendment on January 13, 2011 that, among other things, requires us to provide the Bank with certain financial information on a weekly and monthly basis and permits the Bank to require us to fund a non-interest bearing chargeback account that the Bank may draw upon for funds that it is owed. As of May 28, 2011, the Bank is not holding any funds in the chargeback account.

On February 24, 2011, we entered into a retailer program agreement with GE Money Bank (“GE”) to run our private label credit card program. The program will allow qualified customers to finance the purchase of goods and services provided by us. The financed sales and sold financed receivables are on a non-recourse basis and we do not retain any interests in or service the sold receivables. The selling price of the receivables is dependent upon the payment terms with the customer and results in either a payment to or receipt from GE of a percentage of the receivable as a fee. In connection with the agreement, we provided GE with $500,000 of cash collateral.

Index

We closed twenty stores, opened three stores and relocated one store during the thirty-nine weeks ended May 28, 2011. We spent $65,000 and $179,000 for capital expenditures of continuing operations during the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 28, 2011, respectively, and we anticipate capital expenditures approximating $122,000 during the remainder of fiscal 2011 to open a new store and support existing facilities.

Our recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations over the past several years, together with various events that negatively impacted our liquidity, together with our filing a bankruptcy petition raised substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result of our emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings, we anticipate generating sufficient cash flow from operations to adequately fund operations for the next twelve months.

3336

Index

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, the PEO and PFO have concluded that, as of ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information relating to us (including our consolidated subsidiaries), which is required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the PEO and PFO, or persons performing similar functions as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting, identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal controls that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended ~~February~~May 2628, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

3437

Index

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiff in the Combs Case, pursuant to which we agreed to pay the plaintiff $50,000 and further agreed that the plaintiff would have an allowed general unsecured claim of $450,000 in the bankruptcy case. The settlement agreement was preliminarily approved by the Bankruptcy Court ~~and~~on January 28, 2011. As of the date hereof, we have paid $50,000 to the plaintiff. On May 27, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court granted final approval of the settlement agreement. The payments and other consideration to be received by plaintiff in settlement of its allowed general unsecured claim will be made pro rata in proportion to and in the form of the payments and other consideration received by other general unsecured creditors in the Plan. ~~As of February 26, 2011, we have paid $50,000 to the plaintiff. A hearing to consider final approval of the settlement of the Combs Case is currently anticipated to be held in May 2011.~~

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~The~~There ~~information~~are ~~below~~no ~~amends,~~material ~~updates~~changes ~~and~~from ~~should be read in conjunction with~~ the risk factors ~~and information~~ disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, ~~2010~~2011 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 26, 2011.

Mengnu has the ability to control our operations.

Mengnu owns 901,000 shares, or 90.1%, of our common stock and thus has the ability to control our policies and affairs and the outcome of any action requiring a stockholder vote, including the election of our Board of Directors, the approval of amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, and the approval of mergers or sales of substantially all of our assets. The interests of Mengnu in such matters may differ from the interests of our other stockholders in some respects. In addition, employees and affiliates of Mengnu hold positions with us, including Morris Gebing Zou as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and Yaoxiang Yue as a director.

There is no existing market for our common stock and we do not know if one will develop, so you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

There is no public market for our common stock issued pursuant to the Plan. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of an active trading market or how liquid that market might become. If an active trading market does not develop, our stockholders may have difficulty selling any shares of our common stock that they own. This may also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

Our actual financial results may vary significantly from the projections filed with the Bankruptcy Court, and investors should not rely on such projections.

The projected financial information that was previously filed with the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings has not been incorporated by reference into this report. Neither these projections nor the Amended Disclosure Statement should be considered or relied on in connection with the purchase of our new common stock. We were required to prepare projected financial information to demonstrate to the Bankruptcy Court the feasibility of the Plan and the ability to continue operations upon emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The projections reflect numerous assumptions concerning anticipated future performance and prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and continue to be beyond our control and that may not materialize. Projections are inherently subject to uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic and competitive risks. Our actual results will vary from those contemplated by the projections for a variety of reasons, including the adoption of fresh-start accounting in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 852 (“ASC 852”), “Reorganizations,” upon our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Further, the projections were limited by the information available to us as of the date of the preparation of the projections. Therefore, variations from the projections may be material, and investors should not rely on such projections.

Index

Because of the adoption of fresh-start accounting and the effects of the transactions contemplated by the Plan, financial information subsequent to February 26, 2011 will not be comparable to financial information prior to February 26, 2011.

Upon our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, fresh-start accounting was adopted in accordance with the provisions of ASC 852, pursuant to which our reorganization value was allocated to its assets in conformity with the procedures specified by FASB Accounting Standards Codification 805 (“ASC 805”), “Business Combinations.” The excess of reorganization value over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which is subject to periodic evaluation for impairment. Liabilities, other than deferred taxes, were recorded at the present value of amounts expected to be paid. In addition, under fresh-start accounting, common stock, additional paid in capital, and accumulated deficit of the Predecessor Company were eliminated. The consolidated financial statements also reflect all of the transactions contemplated by the Plan. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements subsequent to February 26, 2011 will not be comparable to the consolidated financial statements prior to February 26, 2011.

Our emergence from bankruptcy will reduce our net operating losses incurred prior to the emergence from bankruptcy.

The discharge of a debt obligation by a taxpayer in a bankruptcy proceeding for an amount less than its adjusted issue price (as defined for tax purposes) generally creates cancellation of indebtedness income (“CODI”) that is excludable from a taxpayer’s taxable income. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 states that when a corporation that is in bankruptcy undergoes an ownership change, the section 382 limitation does not apply if the shareholders and creditors of the corporation immediately before the ownership change own at least 50% of the vote and value of the corporation after the ownership change (as a result of being shareholders or creditors immediately before the change). Accordingly, the utilization of the remaining net operating loss carryforward should not be subject to an annual limitation. However, as a result of our emergence from bankruptcy we expect to have excludable CODI that will reduce our net operating loss carryforward.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

Item 5. Other Information.

~~On April 11, 2011, Rami Abada resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Board of Directors appointed him as Chief Operating Officer of the Company~~None. On April 11, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed Joseph Schillero as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. Mr. Schillero will receive an annual salary of $250,000. Biographical and compensation information with respect to Mr. Abada was included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, Mr. Schillero, age 46, served as controller of the Company from May 2000 to April 11, 2011. Mr. Schillero graduated from Bryant College with a B.S. in Business Administration and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants38

Index

On April 11, 2011, the Company entered into a Warehousing Agreement with Marks & Cohen LLC (“Marks & Cohen”), an entity controlled by Herb Hester Jr., a director of the Company. The Warehousing Agreement is for a term of one year unless terminated earlier by either party upon 30 days notice and provides that in consideration of warehousing fees the Company will provide warehousing services for certain home-furnishing merchandise owned by Marks & Cohen. The material facts as to Mr. Hester’s interest in the transaction were disclosed and known to the Board of Directors and the Company believes the forgoing transaction complies with the requirements of Section 144 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Index

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits filed with this report:

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~10.1 Warehousing Agreement by and between Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and Marks & Cohen LLC dated April 11, 2011.~~39

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC.	~~JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES, INC.~~
April 12, 2011	By:	/s/ Gebing Morris Zou
July 12, 2011	By:	/s/ Gebing Zou
		Gebing Morris Zou, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
			Gebing Zou, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
April 12, 2011	By:	/s/ Joseph Schillero
		Joseph Schillero, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

July 12, 2011	By:	s/ Joseph Schillero
			Joseph Schillero, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

Index

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
10.1	Warehousing Agreement by and between Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. and Marks & Cohen LLC dated April 11, 2011. *

* Filed herewith.

4041

Filing Compare · JENNIFER CONVERTIBLES INC