10-Q 1 a2086726z10-q.txt 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 ------------- OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ---------------- ---------------- Commission File Number 0-25000 ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- (Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-3750642 (Registrant) ------------------------------------ --------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) c/o MLIM Alternative Strategies LLC Princeton Corporate Campus 800 Scudders Mill Road - Section 2G Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536 ---------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 609-282-6996 ---------------------------------------------------- (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- (a Delaware Limited Partnership) -------------------------------- STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION ---------------------------------

NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT See notes to financial statements. 2 ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- (a Delaware Limited Partnership) -------------------------------- STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ------------------------ (unaudited)

See notes to financial statements. 3 ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- (a Delaware Limited Partnership) -------------------------------- STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL ------------------------------------------ For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 ----------------------------------------------- (unaudited)

See notes to financial statements. 4 ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- (a Delaware Limited Partnership) -------------------------------- NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ----------------------------- (unaudited) 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES These financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of ML Principal Protection L.P. (the "Partnership") as of June 30, 2002, and the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. However, the operating results for the interim periods may not be indicative of the results for the full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2001. 2. INVESTMENTS As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Partnership had an investment in ML Multi-Manager Portfolio LLC ("MM LLC") of $16,173,040 and $17,346,923, respectively. As of June 30, 2002, and December 31, 2001, the Partnership's percentage ownership share of MM LLC was 8.80% and 8.61%, respectively. Total revenues and fees with respect to the Partnership's investment in MM LLC are set forth as follows:

5 A condensed statements of financial condition and statements of operations for MM LLC are set forth as follows:

3. NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Net Asset Values of the different series of Units were: June 30, 2002 (unaudited)

6 December 31, 2001

4. ANNUAL DISTRIBUTIONS The Partnership makes annual fixed-rate distributions, payable irrespective of profitability, of $3.50 per Unit on Units issued prior to May 1, 1997. The Partnership may also pay discretionary distributions on such Series of Units of up to 50% of any Distributable New Appreciation, as defined on such Units. No distributions are payable on Units issued after May 1, 1997. As of June 30, 2002, the Partnership has made the following distributions:

7 5. FAIR VALUE AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK The nature of this Partnership has certain risks, which can not be presented on the financial statements. The following summarizes some of those risks. Market Risk ----------- Derivative instruments involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet market risk. Changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or the market values of the financial instruments or commodities underlying such derivative instruments frequently result in changes in the Partnership's net unrealized profit (loss) on such derivative instruments as reflected in the Statements of Financial Condition or, with respect to Partnership assets invested in MM LLC, the net unrealized profit (loss) as reflected in the respective Statements of Financial Condition of MM LLC. The Partnership's exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships among the derivative instruments held by the Partnership and MM LLC as well as the volatility and liquidity of the markets in which such derivative instruments are traded. MLIM Alternative Strategies LLC ("MLIM AS LLC") has procedures in place intended to control market risk exposure, although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact, succeed in doing so. These procedures focus primarily on monitoring the trading of the Advisors selected from time to time by the Partnership or MM LLC, and include calculating the Net Asset Value of their respective Partnership accounts and MM LLC accounts as of the close of business on each day and reviewing outstanding positions for over-concentrations both on an Advisor-by-Advisor and on an overall Partnership basis. While MLIM AS LLC does not itself intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the Partnership's market exposure, MLIM AS LLC may urge Advisors to reallocate positions, or itself reallocate Partnership assets, through MM LLC, among Advisors (although typically only as of the end of a month) in an attempt to avoid over-concentrations. However, such interventions are unusual. Except in cases in which it appears that an Advisor has begun to deviate from past practice or trading policies or to be trading erratically, MLIM AS LLC's basic risk control procedures consist simply of the ongoing process of advisor monitoring and selection with the market risk controls being applied by the Advisors themselves. Credit Risk ----------- The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are typically perceived to be less than those associated with over-the-counter (non-exchange-traded) transactions, because exchanges typically (but not universally) provide clearinghouse arrangements in which the collective credit (in some cases limited in amount, in some cases not) of the members of the exchange is pledged to support the financial integrity of the exchange. In over-the-counter transactions, on the other hand, traders must rely solely on the credit of their respective individual counterparties. Margins, which may be subject to loss in the event of a default, are generally required in exchange trading, and counterparties may require margin in the over-the-counter markets. The Partnership, through MM LLC, has credit risk in respect of its counterparties and brokers, but attempts to mitigate this risk by dealing exclusively with Merrill Lynch entities as clearing brokers. The Partnership, through MM LLC, in its normal course of business, enters into various contracts, with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith ("MLPF&S") acting as its commodity broker. Pursuant 8 to the brokerage agreement with MLPF&S (which includes a netting arrangement), to the extent that such trading results in receivables from and payables to MLPF&S, these receivables and payables are offset and reported as a net receivable or payable in the financial statements of MM LLC in the Equity in commodity futures trading accounts in the Statements of Financial Condition. Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations --------------------------------------------------------------- MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER SERIES A UNIT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 $112.97(a) $113.94(a) $117.81(a) $115.64(a) $115.09(a) $115.36(a) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 $109.41(b) $106.60(b) $108.32(b) $106.88(b) $108.25(b) $112.26(b) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) After reduction of $26.00 per Series A Unit distributions from inception to date. (b) After reduction of $29.50 per Series A Unit distributions from inception to date. Performance Summary All of the Partnership's trading assets are invested in MM LLC. The Partnership recognizes trading profits or losses as an investor in MM LLC. The following commentary describes the trading results of MM LLC. JANUARY 1, 2002 to JUNE 30, 2002 -------------------------------- January 1, 2002 to March 31, 2002 The energy sector was the only profitable trading strategy for the quarter. Natural gas short positions were profitable as the positions benefited from the mild weather in the United States. The sector experienced large declines in February due to increased concerns of the health of world economies. This lead to price instability. Gains were realized in March in the physical commodity markets, as fears of increased conflicts in the Middle East could potentially result in a shortage of oil supplies. Trading in stock indices resulted in losses for the quarter. Long equity exposures suffered losses in choppy market conditions as profit forecasts fell short and concern over the Enron accounting situation deepened. Uncertainty in the global market place prevailed, making for extremely difficult trading conditions. Long positions appreciated in March, notably in Japan, Germany and France, but not enough to offset earlier losses. Conflicting economic reports was the cause for losses in the interest rate sector. These reports prompted the Advisors to flip exposures from long positions to short positions in most major international bond markets during the quarter. European fixed income exposures posted losses under particularly direction less markets. Global bond prices declined on growing optimism for a stronger economic outlook for the remainder of 2002. 9 Trading in the metals sector was down for the quarter. Short positions in base metals were unsuccessful early on as base metals prices soared on the hope that an economic recovery in the United States would boost demand. Precious metal prices declined as the U. S. economy continued to show signs of stabilizing and inflation concerns waned. Long gold positioning generated gains as prices rose above $300 for the first time in two years. Currency trading resulted in losses for the Partnership. In January, gains were generated in short Japanese yen positions as the Japanese yen continued to depreciate against the U. S. dollar due to continued deterioration of economic fundamentals in Japan. In February, all of the futures traded currencies appreciated against the U.S. dollar, except the Canadian dollar. March was a relatively volatile month for G-7 currencies. The U.S. dollar fell from 133 to 127.50 Japanese yen during the first week, and then almost completely reversed the move by month-end, causing losses. Agricultural trading was the least successful strategy. During January and February, coffee prices were in a downward trend. This trend sharply reversed in March as reduced exports from Mexico and Central America trimmed inventories of exchange-approved soybeans in U.S. warehouses. As prices rose, the Partnership's short positions sustained losses. April 1, 2002 to June 30, 2002 Profits resulting from trading in the currency sector provided the Partnership with the majority of its gains in the second quarter. The decline in the U.S. dollar continued through June unabated fueled by the decline in the U.S. equity markets. The interest rate sector was profitable for the Partnership despite its slow start. Yields on major debt-instruments continued to decline. U.S. fixed income markets have rallied sharply due to the flight-to-safety effect as well as the conviction that the U.S. Federal Reserve will raise rates later rather than sooner. The agricultural commodities sector posted small gains for the quarter. Strong gains were posted in livestock and grains in April as prices trended downward. Soybean by-products positions also contributed to the profits in this sector. The continued weakness in the U.S. dollar and low stockpiles in grains and soybeans should aid in sustaining a price rally in the summer months. The metals sector sustained slight losses for the quarter. In June, the uptrend in gold and silver reversed and losses were sustained on long position eliminating profits earned earlier in the quarter. Energy futures experienced whipsaw markets and trading brought in losses for the Partnership. The market was volatile during the quarter due to continued turmoil in the Middle East. Losses were experienced in the stock indices sector. The quarter began with the stall of the appreciation in the U.S. and European equity markets in April due to weak recovery expectations. The continued erosion of confidence in the quarter about corporate earnings and the timing of recovery caused both the U.S. and European markets to fall back. 10 JANUARY 1, 2001 to JUNE 30, 2001 -------------------------------- January 1, 2001 to March 31, 2001 Trading in the interest rate sector was highly profitable for the Partnership during the quarter. Long positions in the Euro resulted in gains in January. The impact of the weakening U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve's move to cut interest rates was felt throughout the interest rate futures market, as Euro futures contracts rose dramatically since December 2000. Euro-yen and Euro-bund cross futures trading produced gains for the sector. Agricultural trading was profitable despite losses sustained early in the quarter. During January, the agricultural sector faced weak grain and oilseed prices. Excellent growing weather in the U.S., Argentina and Brazil, concerns about U.S. export potential and inventories at historically high levels, kept the markets on the defensive. Contract lows in cotton produced gains for short positions. The cotton market sank to a 15-year low as a result of short supply and increased demand. Potential increased planting, paired with a drop in demand, forced prices lower. Currency trading resulted in gains for the Partnership. Losses were realized during January and February on long Euro and Swiss franc trading. After rallying from a low of 82--83 cents to 96 cents, the Euro fell back to the 90 cent level, despite strong fundamentals. This resulted in losses for the Partnership's long positions. The sector rebounded strongly in March on substantial gains from short Japanese yen positions. Trading in the metals markets was successful. Losses from short silver positions were sustained in January as silver had a minor technical run as it reached it's four month high. Short silver positions were profitable in February as silver prices reversed its earlier trend and declined as the market was generally weak and on gold's failure to rally weighed on the market. March was a volatile trading month as another attempted gold rally failed, resulting in gains in short positions. Stock index trading was moderately successful despite uncertainty in equity markets. Short S&P 500 and NASDAQ positions resulted in gains as global equity markets remain caught between negative news about earnings and the potential positive effects of further monetary easing. Energy trading was the only unprofitable sector during the quarter. Natural gas prices pulled back in January after rallying during the last few months, resulting in losses. Crude oil prices were driven lower by both a seasonal downturn in global oil usage and heavier than normal refinery maintenance work, reducing the demand. Short natural gas positions were unprofitable in March on concerns over supply availability. April 1, 2001 to June 30, 2001 Trading in agricultural commodities was profitable despite a sluggish start to the quarter. The market for grains has been weak throughout the beginning of 2001. Excellent crops in Argentina and Brazil and a good start to the U.S. growing season has resulted in weakness in the grain complex. Also, during the quarter, profits from short corn and cotton positions outweighed losses from soybeans. Stock index trading was profitable for the Partnership as long NASDAQ 100 positions outweighed losses from German DAX trading. Trading in S&P contracts was successful despite continued volatility. 11 Trading in the energy sector was down slightly. Despite profitable unleaded gas trading, losses were posted on long light crude oil and heating oil positions. Crude prices fell due to increased total inventories, stemming from the effects of crude oil stores rising more than 42 million barrels over the last few months. The energy sector faded from downside pressure from a slowing global economy, inventory surplus and OPEC's decision to leave production levels unchanged. Currency trading suffered losses, particularly in Euro and Japanese yen positions. The further weakening of the Euro and Japanese yen displayed how the global economy is not immune to the slowdown of the U.S. economy. Gains were posted in the Canadian dollar at quarter end due to a healthy trade surplus and a favorable short-term interest rate differential. The metals sector performed poorly. Weakness in the Euro, a decline in the Australian dollar to all time lows and producer and Central Bank selling sent gold prices lower. Silver trading was volatile, as China's silver exports have been high due to poor domestic demand, adversely affecting prices. Trading in the interest rate markets was accounted for most of the Partnership's trading losses for the quarter. Positions in Euro-bund futures, three-month Euribor futures and U.S. ten-year notes were unprofitable. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Not applicable 12 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings There are no pending proceedings to which the Partnership or MLIM AS LLC is a party. Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds (a) None. (b) None. (c) None. (d) None. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. Item 5. Other Information None. Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. (a) Exhibits There are no exhibits required to be filed with this report. (b) Reports on Form 8-K There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the first six months of fiscal 2002. 13 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P. ---------------------------- By: MLIM ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES LLC (General Partner) Date: August 15, 2002 By /s/ FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI ------------------------ Fabio P. Savoldelli Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Manager (Principal Executive Officer) Date: August 15, 2002 By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO ----------------------- Michael L. Pungello Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 14 EXHIBIT 99 FORM OF CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE We, Fabio P. Savoldelli and Michael L. Pungello, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of MLIM Alternative Strategies LLC, general partner of ML Principal Protection L.P., certify that (i) the quarterly report Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ML Principal Protection L.P. Date: August 15, 2002 By /s/ FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI ----------------------- Fabio P. Savoldelli Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Manager (Principal Executive Officer) Date: August 15, 2002 By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO ----------------------- Michael L. Pungello Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 15

ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION LP 10-Q