UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to _______________

Commission File Number 0-17711

Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		59-2852555
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

880 Carillon Parkway		St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:

(727) 567-1000

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X]

NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller Reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ]

No [X]

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Balance of this page intentionally left blank.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~CONSOLIDATED~~ BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

	December 31,	March 31,
	June 30,	March 31,
	2008	2008
	2009	2009
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$ ~~429~~360,~~109~~319	$ ~~350~~263,~~280~~458
Investment in Securities	-	202,647
Receivable - Other	59,040	-
Investments in Project Partnerships, net	2,580	124,138
Total Current Assets	419,359	263,458
Investment in Project Partnership Held for Sale	-	293,885
Total Assets	$ 419,359	$ 263,458
Total Current Assets	431,689	970,950
Total Assets	$ 431,689	$ 970,950
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Payable to General Partners	$ 5,~~073~~000,~~916~~450	$ 4,~~945~~955,~~524~~099
Accounts Payable - Other	5,435	6,131
Distribution Payable	73,943	26,423
Total Current Liabilities	5,079,351	4,951,655
Deferred Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships	26,076	-
Accounts Payable - Other	100,057	5,435
Total Current Liabilities	5,200,526	4,986,957
Partners' Equity (Deficit):
Limited Partners (25,566 units outstanding
at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008)	(5,258,110)	(4,571,641)
at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009)	(5,391,020)	(5,333,453)
General Partners	~~610~~609,~~448~~853	~~590~~609,~~936~~954
Total Partners' Deficit	(4,~~647~~781,~~662~~167)	(34,~~980~~723,~~705~~499)
Total Liabilities and Partners' Deficit	$ ~~431~~419,~~689~~359	$ ~~970~~263,~~950~~458
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~CONSOLIDATED~~ STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3130, ~~2008~~2009 AND ~~2007~~2008

(Unaudited)

	2008	2007
	2009	2008
Revenues:
Distribution Income	$ ~~733~~17,848	$ 1215,~~021~~654
Total Revenues	~~733~~17,848	1215,~~021~~654
Expenses:
Asset Management Fee - General Partner	6359,~~345~~844	9282,~~440~~105
General and Administrative:
Other	16,108	20,242
General Partner	-	-
Impairment Loss on Investment in Project Partnerships	112,895	-
Other	15,680	18,108
Total Expenses	~~192~~75,~~348~~524	~~112~~100,~~682~~213
Loss Before Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships and Other Income	(191,615)	(100,661)
Loss Before Equity in Income of Project Partnerships and Other Income	(57,676)	(84,559)
Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships	(15,924)	(10,420)
Equity in Income of Project Partnerships	-	1,026
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships	~~266~~47,~~294~~520	~~274~~246,~~513~~300
Minority Interest in Loss of Consolidated Project Partnership	-	242
Interest Income	8	4,079
Interest Income	1,755	9,391
Net (Loss) Income from Continuing Operations	$ (10,148)	$ 166,846
Net Income from Continuing Operations	$ 60,510	$ 173,065
Loss from Discontinued Operations (See Notes 2 & 5)	-	(29,333)
Income from Discontinued Operations (See Notes 2 & 6)	24,968	73,226
Net (Loss) Income	$ (10,148)	$ 137,513
Net Income	$ 85,478	$ 246,291
Allocation of Net (Loss) Income:
Allocation of Net Income:
Limited Partners	$ (10,047)	$ 136,138
Limited Partners	$ 84,623	$ 243,828
General Partners	(101)	1,375
General Partners	855	2,463
	$ (10,148)	$ 137,513
	$ 85,478	$ 246,291
Net (Loss) Income Per Limited Partnership Unit	$ (0.39)	$ 5.32
Net Income Per Limited Partnership Unit	$ 3.31	$ 9.54
Number of Limited Partnership Units Outstanding	25,566	25,566
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~CONSOLIDATED~~ STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS~~PARTNERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3130, ~~2008~~2009 AND ~~2007~~2008

(Unaudited)

		2008		2007
	Limited		General
Revenues:
	Partners'		Partners'
Distribution Income		$ 32,360		$ 55,367
	Deficit		Equity		Total
Total Revenues		32,360		55,367
Balance at March 31, 2008	$ (4,571,641)		$ 590,936		$ (3,980,705)
Expenses:
Net Income	136,138		1,375		137,513
Asset Management Fee - General Partner		224,177		293,692
Distributions	(246,300)		-		(246,300)
General and Administrative:
Balance at June 30, 2008	$ (4,681,803)		$ 592,311		$ (4,089,492)
General Partner		-		104,564
Balance at March 31, 2009	$ (5,333,453)		$ 609,954		$ (4,723,499)
Other		77,302		70,040
Net Loss	(10,047)		(101)		(10,148)
Impairment Loss on Investment in Project Partnerships		112,895		-
Distributions	(47,520)		-		(47,520)
Total Expenses		414,374		468,296
Balance at June 30, 2009	$ (5,391,020)		$ 609,853		$ (4,781,167)
Loss Before Equity in (Loss) Income of Project Partnerships and Other Income		(382,014)		(412,929)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Equity in (Loss) Income of Project Partnerships		(6,808)		17,786
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships		742,729		1,178,887
Minority Interest in Loss of Consolidated Project Partnership		-		356
Interest Income		9,986		32,242
Net Income from Continuing Operations		$ 363,893		$ 816,342
Income from Discontinued Operations (See Notes 2 & 6)		1,056,103		70,419
Net Income		$ 1,419,996		$ 886,761
Allocation of Net Income:
Limited Partners		$ 1,405,796		$ 877,893
General Partners		14,200		8,868
		$ 1,419,996		$ 886,761
Net Income Per Limited Partnership Unit		$ 54.99		$ 34.34
Number of Limited Partnership Units Outstanding		25,566		25,566
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~CONSOLIDATED~~ STATEMENTS OF ~~PARTNERS’~~CASH ~~EQUITY (DEFICIT)~~FLOWS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3130, ~~2008~~2009 AND ~~2007~~2008

(Unaudited)

	Limited		General
		2009		2008
	Partners'		Partners'
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Deficit		Equity		Total
Net (Loss) Income		$ (10,148)		$ 137,513
Balance at March 31, 2007	$ (4,014,192)		$ 261,735		$ (3,752,457)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:
Capital Contributions	-		318,720		318,720
Premium on Investment in Securities		-		70
Net Income	877,893		8,868		886,761
Equity in Income of Project Partnerships		-		(1,026)
Distributions	(1,559,260)		-		(1,559,260)
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships		(47,520)		(246,300)
Balance at December 31, 2007	$ (4,695,559)		$ 589,323		$ (4,106,236)
Discontinued Operations		-		29,333
Balance at March 31, 2008	$ (4,571,641)		$ 590,936		$ (3,980,705)
Distribution Income		(17,848)		(15,654)
Capital Contributions	-		5,312		5,312
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Net Income	1,405,796		14,200		1,419,996
Decrease in Interest Receivable		-		2,577
Distributions	(2,092,265)		-		(2,092,265)
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable - Other		63,082		(696)
Balance at December 31, 2008	$ (5,258,110)		$ 610,448		$ (4,647,662)
Increase in Payable to General Partners		43,927		60,186
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities		31,493		(33,997)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions Received from Project Partnerships		17,848		17,508
Net Proceeds from Sale of Project Partnerships		47,520		246,300
Redemption of Investment Securities		-		200,000
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities		65,368		463,808
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		96,861		429,811
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		263,458		350,280
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period		$ 360,319		$ 780,091
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Increase in Distribution Payable		$ 47,520		$ 246,300
Distribution to Limited Partners		(47,520)		(246,300)
Increase in Receivable - Other		(59,040)		-
Increase in Deferred Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships		26,076		-
Increase in Payable to General Partners		1,424		-
Increase in Accounts Payable - Other		31,540		-
		$ -		$ -
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~CONSOLIDATED~~NOTES ~~STATEMENTS~~TO ~~OF CASH FLOWS~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~FOR~~June ~~THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31~~30, ~~2008 AND 2007~~ 2009

(Unaudited)

	2008	2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income	$ 1,419,996	$ 886,761
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Impairment Loss on Investment in Project Partnerships	112,895	-
Premium on Investment in Securities	70	125
Equity in Loss (Income) of Project Partnerships	6,808	(17,786)
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships	(742,729)	(1,178,887)
Discontinued Operations	(1,056,103)	(70,419)
Minority Interest in Loss of Consolidated Project Partnership	-	(356)
Distribution Income	(32,360)	(55,367)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Decrease in Accounts Receivable	-	1,294
Decrease (Increase) in Interest Receivable	2,577	(28)
Decrease in Accounts Payable - Other	(696)	-
Increase in Payable to General Partners	126,402	264,590
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(163,140)	(170,073)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions Received from Project Partnerships	34,215	62,504
Net Proceeds from Sale of Project Partnerships	2,092,717	1,280,712
Redemption of Investment Securities	200,000	-
Purchase of Investment Securities	-	(200,266)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	2,326,932	1,142,950
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Capital Contributions	5,312	318,720
Distributions to Limited Partners	(2,090,275)	(1,528,335)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	(2,084,963)	(1,209,615)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	78,829	(236,738)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year	350,280	1,014,950
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$ 429,109	$ 778,212
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
(Decrease) Increase in Distribution Payable	$ (1,990)	$ 310,025
Increase in Payable to General Partners	1,990	-
Distribution to Limited Partners	-	(310,025)
	$ -	$ -
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION:

Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. (“Gateway”), a Florida Limited Partnership, was formed October 27, 1987 under the laws of Florida. Operations commenced on June 30, 1988. Gateway invests, as a limited partner, in other limited partnerships (“Project Partnerships”), each of which owns and operates apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“Tax Credits”), provided for in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of the limited partnership agreement (the “Agreement”). As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, Gateway had received capital contributions of $325,032 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from ~~the~~ ~~Limited Partners. As of March 31, 2008, Gateway had received capital contributions of $319,720 from~~ the ~~General Partners and $25,566,000 from the~~ Limited Partners. The fiscal year of Gateway for reporting ~~purposes~~ purposes ends on March 31.

Raymond James Partners, Inc. and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., wholly owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc., are the General Partner and Managing General Partner, respectively and collectively the General Partners.

Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of properties are allocated as specified in the Agreement.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Consolidated Statements

In the prior fiscal year, the financial statements included, on a consolidated basis, the accounts of Gateway and Village Apartments of Sparta Limited Partnership (“Sparta”), a Project Partnership in which Gateway had invested. In the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year, Gateway disposed of its investment in Sparta (see further discussion of this disposition transaction in Note 6). The operating activity of Sparta is reported as discontinued operations on the consolidated financial statements for the third quarter of the prior fiscal year.

Basis of Accounting

Gateway utilizes the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when obligations are incurred.

Gateway accounts for its investments as the sole limited partner in Project Partnerships (“Investments in Project Partnerships”) using the equity method of accounting, because management believes that Gateway does not have a majority control of the major operating and financial policies of the Project Partnerships in which it invests, and reports the equity in loss of the Project Partnerships on a 3-month lag in the ~~Consolidated~~ Statements of Operations. Under the equity method, the Investments in Project Partnerships initially include:

1) Gateway's capital contribution,

2) Acquisition fees paid to the General Partner for services rendered in selecting properties for acquisition, ~~and~~

3) Acquisition expenses including legal fees, travel and other miscellaneous costs relating to acquiring properties.

Quarterly the Investments in Project Partnerships are increased or decreased as follows:

1) Increased for equity in income or decreased for equity in loss of the Project Partnerships,

2) Decreased for cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships, ~~and~~

3) Decreased for the amortization of the acquisition fees and expenses.,

~~Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships~~4) Decreased, ~~cash losses~~ ~~generated~~where ~~by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years~~appropriate, ~~cash~~for ~~profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior years’ cash losses~~impairment.

8Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships, cash losses generated by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years, cash profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior cash losses.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Since Gateway invests as a limited partner, and therefore is not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, it does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment in those Project Partnerships below zero. The suspended losses will be used to offset future income, if any, from the individual Project Partnerships. Any cash distributions received from Project Partnerships which have a zero investment balance are accounted for as distribution income in the period the cash distribution is received by Gateway.

Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. As part of its analysis, Gateway has historically considered the residual value of the Project Partnerships as one key component of its estimate of future cash flows. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as a direct result of the deterioration that occurred within the United States financial markets and more specifically, its negative impact on the Tax Credit market, Gateway has concluded that any residual value of the Project Partnerships in the present Tax Credit market conditions cannot be practicably determined. As a result, Gateway has eliminated estimates of residual value of the Project Partnerships from the recoverability portion of its impairment analysis. Accordingly, in the quarter ended December 31, 2008, impairment expense of $112,895 was recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Impairment expense for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 totaled $112,895. Gateway is continuing to execute its process of disposition of its interest in Project Partnerships that have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period, refer to Note 6 – Summary of Disposition Activities for the most recent update of those on-going activities. No impairment expense was recognized for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007.7

~~Gateway, as~~NOTE a2 limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility for Tax Credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment. However, Gateway does not guarantee any of the mortgages or other debt of the Project Partnerships. No such funding to Project Partnerships occurred during each of the nine-~~month~~ ~~periods~~SIGNIFICANT ~~ended~~ACCOUNTING ~~December~~POLICIES ~~31, 2008 and 2007.~~(Continued):

Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. As part of its analysis, Gateway has historically considered the residual value of the Project Partnerships as one key component of its estimate of future cash flows. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as a direct result of the deterioration that occurred within the United States financial markets and more specifically, its negative impact on the Tax Credit market, Gateway concluded that any residual value of the Project Partnerships in the present Tax Credit market conditions cannot be practicably determined. As a result, Gateway eliminated estimates of residual value of the Project Partnerships from the recoverability portion of its impairment analysis. Accordingly, in the quarter ended December 31, 2008, impairment expense of $112,895 was recognized in the Statement of Operations. No impairment expense was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. Gateway is continuing to execute its process of disposition of its interest in Project Partnerships that have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period, refer to Note 5 – Summary of Disposition Activities for the most recent update of those on-going activities. No impairment expense was recognized during each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Gateway's policy is to include short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in cash and cash equivalents. Short-term investments are comprised of money market mutual funds.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets which meet certain specific criteria are classified as property held for sale as of the balance sheet date. One of the Project Partnerships, Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership (“Crosstown”) met such criteria as of March 31, 2008. Accordingly, the ~~investment in~~equity ~~Crosstown is presented as Investment~~ in ~~Project Partnership Held for Sale on~~ ~~the~~loss ~~consolidated balance sheet as~~ of ~~March 31, 2008. In addition, the equity in income of~~ Crosstown is presented as discontinued operations for the quarter ended June ~~December 31~~30, ~~2007~~2008. Crosstown was sold during September 2008. ~~The gain on sale of Crosstown is presented as discontinued operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.~~ (See further discussion of this sale transaction in Note 6 5).

~~Sparta~~Discontinued ~~met~~Operations ~~such~~on ~~criteria~~the asStatements of ~~March~~Operations ~~31,~~consist ~~2007. Accordingly,~~of the ~~results~~following ~~of operations~~amounts ~~of Sparta are presented as discontinued operations~~ for the ~~period~~ three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007. Sparta~~2009 ~~was~~and ~~disposed during March~~ 2008~~. (See further discussion of this disposition transaction in Note 6).~~:

Discontinued Operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations consist of the following amounts for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

	2009	2008
Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships	$ -	$ (29,333)
Total Loss from Discontinued Operations	$ -	$ (29,333)

	2008	2007
Rental Revenue	$ -	$ 62,362
Miscellaneous Income	-	1,596
Rental Operating Expenses	-	(56,549)
Interest Expense	-	(13,648)
Depreciation Expense	-	(29,538)
Equity in Income of Project Partnerships	-	106,049
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships	1,056,103	-
Interest Income	-	147
Total Income from Discontinued Operations	$ 1,056,103	$ 70,419

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject Gateway to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash investments in a money market mutual fund whose investment advisor is a wholly owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc. ~~and U.S. Treasury securities.~~

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates are based on management's knowledge and experience. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Investment in Securities

Gateway applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“FAS 115”) ~~(refer to Note 3 herein)~~. Under FAS 115, Gateway is required to categorize its debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading securities, dependent upon Gateway’s intent in holding the securities. Gateway’s intent is to hold all of its debt securities (U.S. Treasury Notes) until maturity and to use these assets to fund Gateway’s ongoing operations. The securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximates market value, and are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such adjustments are included in Interest Income. There are no investments in securities as of June 30, 2009.

Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements, as income taxes are a liability of the partners rather than of Gateway.

Reclassifications

For comparability, certain fiscal year 2008 amounts have been reclassified, where appropriate, to conform to the fiscal year 2009 financial statement presentation.

Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” which was subsequently revised in December 2003. Gateway has adopted FIN46 and applied its requirements to all Project Partnerships in which Gateway holds an interest. Generally a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics, (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Gateway’s determination of the primary beneficiary of each VIE requires judgment and is based on an analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances including: (1) the existence of a principal-agency relationship between the limited partner and the general partner, (2) the relationship ~~and~~ and significance of the activities of the VIE to each partner, (3) each partner’s exposure to the expected losses of the VIE, and (4) the design of the VIE. In the design of Project Partnership VIEs, the overriding concept centers around the premise that the limited partner invests solely for tax attributes associated with the property held by the VIE, while the general partner of the ~~project~~Project ~~partnership~~Partnership is responsible for overseeing its operations. Based upon its analysis of all the relevant facts and considerations, Gateway has concluded that in those instances where the Project Partnership interests are determined to be VIEs, the general partner of the Project Partnership is more closely associated with the Project Partnership than the limited partner (Gateway) and therefore, Gateway is not the primary beneficiary.

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, Gateway holds variable interests in 4439 VIEs, which consist of Project Partnerships. Gateway is not the primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs. Gateway’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to Gateway’s capital contributions to those VIEs, which is approximately $98,~~535~~693,~~507~~713 at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009. Gateway may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that Gateway voluntarily provides to those Project Partnerships in the future.

10Recent Accounting Changes

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS No. 157”), which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. FAS No. 157 establishes a common definition of fair value and provides a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 until November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. Gateway has adopted FAS No. 157 effective as of fiscal year end March 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Recent Accounting Changes

In ~~September~~February ~~2006~~2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. ~~157~~159, “The Fair Value ~~Measurements”~~Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS No. ~~157~~159”), which ~~provides~~permits ~~enhanced~~entities ~~guidance for~~to ~~using~~choose ~~fair value~~ to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities. ~~FAS~~at Nofair value. Unrealized ~~157~~gains ~~establishes~~and alosses ~~common~~on ~~definition~~items offor which the fair value ~~and~~option ~~provides~~has abeen ~~framework~~elected ~~for~~are ~~measuring~~reported ~~fair~~in ~~value~~earnings. FAS ~~under U~~No.S. ~~generally~~159 ~~accepted~~is ~~accounting~~effective ~~principles~~for ~~and~~fiscal ~~expands~~years ~~disclosure~~beginning after ~~requirements~~November ~~about~~15, ~~fair~~2007, ~~value~~and ~~measurements~~interim periods within those fiscal years. Gateway has adopted FAS No. ~~157~~159 isin ~~effective~~fiscal year 2009 but did ~~for~~not remeasure its financial ~~statements~~assets ~~issued~~and ~~for~~financial ~~fiscal~~liabilities ~~years~~as ~~beginning~~a ~~after~~result ~~November~~of ~~15,~~its ~~2007~~adoption. Accordingly, ~~and~~the ~~interim~~adoption ~~periods~~of ~~within~~this ~~those~~standard ~~fiscal~~did ~~years~~not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

InFASB ~~February~~Interpretation ~~2008,~~No. ~~the~~48 ~~FASB~~(“FIN ~~issued~~No. ~~FASB~~48”), ~~Staff~~Accounting ~~Position~~for ~~157-2~~Uncertainty in Income Taxes, ~~“Effective~~was ~~Date~~issued ~~of FASB~~in ~~Statement~~July 2006 and interprets SFAS No. ~~157”~~109, ~~which~~Accounting ~~delays~~for Income ~~the~~Taxes. FIN ~~effective~~48 ~~date~~requires ofall ~~FAS~~taxpayers ~~No.~~to ~~157~~analyze ~~until~~all material ~~November~~positions ~~15,~~they ~~2008~~have taken or plan to take in all tax returns that have been filed or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all ~~nonfinancial~~years ~~assets~~still subject ~~and~~to ~~liabilities~~challenge ~~except~~by those ~~that are~~taxing ~~recognized~~authorities. If orthe ~~disclosed~~position taken atis ~~fair~~“more-likely-than-not” ~~value~~to inbe sustained by the ~~financial~~taxing ~~statements~~authority on atits ~~least~~technical anmerits ~~annual~~and ~~basis. Gateway~~if ~~will~~there ~~adopt~~is ~~FAS~~more ~~No.~~than ~~157~~a ~~effective~~50% aslikelihood ofthat the position ~~fiscal~~would ~~year~~be ~~end~~sustained ~~March~~if ~~31,~~challenged ~~2009. The~~and ~~adoption~~considered ofby ~~this~~the ~~standard~~highest iscourt ~~not~~in the ~~expected~~relevant tojurisdiction, ~~have~~the atax ~~material~~consequences ~~impact~~of onthat ~~Gateway~~position should be reflected in the taxpayer’s GAAP financial ~~position,~~statements. Earlier ~~operations~~proposed orinterpretations ~~cash~~of ~~flow~~SFAS 109 had recommended a “probable” standard for recognition of tax consequences rather than the “more-likely-than-not” standard finally adopted.

InBecause ~~February~~Gateway ~~2007,~~is ~~the~~a ~~FASB~~pass-through ~~issued~~entity ~~Statement~~and ofis ~~Financial~~not ~~Accounting~~required ~~Standards~~to pay income taxes, FIN No. ~~159,~~ ~~“The~~48 ~~Fair~~does ~~Value~~not ~~Option~~currently ~~for~~have ~~Financial~~any ~~Assets~~impact ~~and~~on ~~Financial~~its ~~Liabilities”~~financial ~~(“FAS No~~statements. On ~~159”)~~December 30, ~~which~~2008, ~~permits~~the ~~entities~~FASB toissued ~~choose~~FSP toNo. ~~measure many financial~~FIN ~~assets~~48-3: Effective ~~and~~Date ~~financial~~of ~~liabilities~~FASB atInterpretation ~~fair value~~No. ~~Unrealized~~ ~~gains~~48 ~~and~~for Certain ~~losses~~Nonpublic onEnterprises, ~~items for~~ which deferred the ~~fair~~effective ~~value~~date ~~option~~of ~~has~~FIN ~~been~~No. ~~elected~~48 ~~are~~for nonpublic ~~reported~~enterprises ~~in earnings. FAS~~included within the scope of FSP No. ~~159~~FIN is48-3 ~~effective~~to the annual financial statements for fiscal years beginning after ~~November~~ December 15, ~~2007, and interim periods within those fiscal~~ ~~years~~2008. ~~Gateway~~The ~~will~~deferred ~~adopt~~effective ~~FAS~~date ~~No.~~was ~~159~~intended into ~~fiscal~~give ~~year~~the ~~2009 but does~~Board ~~not~~additional ~~intend~~time to ~~remeasure~~develop ~~its~~guidance ~~financial~~on ~~assets~~the ~~and~~application ~~financial liabilities as a result~~ of ~~its~~FIN ~~adoption~~No. ~~Accordingly,~~ ~~the~~48 ~~adoption~~by pass-through ofentities ~~this~~and ~~standard is~~ not-for-profit ~~expected~~organizations. Gateway tomay modify ~~have~~its adisclosures ~~material~~if ~~impact~~the ~~on Gateway~~FASB’s ~~financial~~guidance ~~position,~~regarding application of FIN No. ~~operations~~48 orto ~~cash~~pass-through ~~flow~~entities changes.

~~Financial~~In April ~~Accounting~~2009, ~~Standards~~the ~~Board (~~FASB) ~~Interpretation~~issued ~~(FIN)~~FSP ~~No.~~FAS 48157-4, ~~Accounting~~Determining ~~for Uncertainty~~Fair inValue ~~Income~~When ~~Taxes,~~the ~~was~~Volume ~~issued in July 2006~~ and ~~interprets SFAS No.~~ ~~109,~~Level ~~Accounting~~of Activity for ~~Income~~the ~~Taxes. FIN~~Asset ~~48 requires all taxpayers to analyze all material positions they have taken~~ or ~~plan~~Liability toHave ~~take~~Significantly inDecreased ~~all tax~~and ~~returns~~Identifying ~~that~~Transactions ~~have~~That ~~been~~Are ~~filed~~Not ~~or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all years still subject to challenge by those taxing authorities~~Orderly. IfThe ~~the~~FSP, ~~position~~which ~~taken~~ is ~~“more-likely-than-not” to be~~ ~~sustained~~effective byfor ~~the~~interim ~~taxing~~and ~~authority~~annual onreporting ~~its~~periods ~~technical~~ending ~~merits~~after ~~and~~June if15, ~~there is more~~2009, ~~than~~provides aadditional ~~50%~~guidance ~~likelihood~~for ~~that~~estimating ~~the~~fair ~~position~~value ~~would~~in beaccordance ~~sustained~~with ~~if challenged and~~FASB ~~considered~~Statement byNo. ~~the~~157, ~~highest~~Fair ~~court~~Value inMeasurements, when the ~~relevant~~volume ~~jurisdiction,~~and ~~the~~level ~~tax~~of ~~consequences~~activity offor ~~that~~the ~~position~~asset ~~should~~or beliability ~~reflected~~have insignificantly ~~the taxpayer’s GAAP financial statements~~decreased. ~~Earlier~~The adoption ~~proposed~~of ~~interpretations~~this ofstandard ~~SFAS~~did ~~109 had~~not ~~recommended~~have a ~~“probable”~~material ~~standard~~impact ~~for~~on ~~recognition~~Gateway’s ~~of tax consequences rather~~financial ~~than~~position, ~~the~~operations ~~“more-likely-than-not”~~or ~~standard~~cash ~~finally adopted~~flow.

~~Because~~In ~~Gateway~~November ~~is a pass-through entity and is not required to pay income taxes, FIN 48 does not currently have any impact on its financial statements. On December 30,~~ 2008, the FASB ~~issued~~ratified ~~FASB~~EITF ~~Staff Position (FSP)~~ No. ~~FIN 48~~08-~~3: Effective~~6, ~~Date~~“Equity ofMethod ~~FASB Interpretation No. 48 for Certain~~Investment ~~Nonpublic~~Accounting ~~Enterprises~~Considerations,” which ~~defers~~clarifies the ~~effective~~accounting ~~date~~for ofhow ~~Interpretation~~to ~~48 for~~account ~~nonpublic~~for ~~enterprises~~certain ~~included~~transactions ~~within~~and ~~the~~impairment ~~scope~~considerations ofinvolving ~~FSP~~equity Nomethod investments. This ~~FIN~~standard ~~48-3~~shall tobe ~~the annual~~effective ~~financial~~in ~~statements for~~ fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008~~. The~~, ~~deferred~~and ~~effective~~interim ~~date~~periods iswithin ~~intended~~those ~~to give the Board~~fiscal ~~additional~~years. The ~~time~~adoption ~~to develop guidance on the application~~ of ~~Interpretation~~this 48standard ~~by pass-through~~did ~~entities~~not ~~and~~have ~~not-for-profit~~a ~~organizations. Gateway~~material ~~may~~impact ~~modify~~on ~~its disclosures if the FASB~~Gateway’s ~~guidance~~financial ~~regarding~~position, ~~application~~operations ofor ~~FIN~~cash ~~48 to pass-through entities changes~~flow.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8—Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities. The FSP amends Statement 140 to require public entities to provide additional disclosures about transferors’ continuing involvements with transferred financial assets. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Gateway’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. Upon adoption of FAS 167, Gateway will have reconsidered its previous FIN46(R) conclusions regarding its investments in Project Partnerships. FAS 167 is not effective for Gateway until its fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 and early adoption is prohibited. Gateway has not yet determined the impact, if any, FAS 167 will have on its financial statements for the year-ended March 31, 2011.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Basis of Preparation

The unaudited financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included with Gateway's report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and any amendments thereto. In the opinion of management, these financial statements include adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly summarize Gateway’s financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the periods may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the year.

11NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES:

Investments in Securities consist of U.S. Treasury Notes at their cost, plus accrued interest and unamortized premiums of $2,647 as of March 31, 2008. The Investments in Securities are commonly held in a brokerage account maintained at Raymond James and Associates, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partners.

	December 31, 2008	March 31, 2008
Amortized Cost	$ -	$ 202,647
Gross Unrealized Loss	-	(803)
Fair Value	$ -	$ 201,844

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees and general and administrative expenses owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. This payable is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the Agreement, non-interest bearing.

The General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses as follows:

Asset Management Fee – The Managing General Partner is entitled to receive an annual asset management fee equal to 0.45% of the aggregate cost of Gateway’s interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the ~~Consolidated~~ Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~ 2009 and ~~2007~~2008 were $~~224~~59,~~177~~844 and $~~293~~82,~~692~~105, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses – The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. These expenses are included in the ~~Consolidated~~ Statements of Operations. ~~Totals~~No such expenses were incurred for the ~~nine~~three months ended June ~~December 31~~30, ~~2008~~ ~~and~~2009 ~~2007 were $0~~ and ~~$104,564, respectively~~2008.

Refer to the discussion of net profit on re-syndication transactions contributed to Gateway by the Managing General Partner in Note 65, Summary of Disposition Activities herein.

NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS:

As of June 30, 2009, Gateway holds a 99% interest in the profits, losses, and Tax Credits as a limited partner in 39 Project Partnerships holding 41 properties which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes. Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Project Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution, proceeds will be distributed according to each Project Partnership agreement.

The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

	June 30,	March 31,
	2009	2009
Capital Contributions to Project Partnerships
and purchase price paid for limited partner
interests in Project Partnerships	$ 8,693,713	$ 9,304,507

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)	(9,098,006)	(9,606,978)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships	(314,038)	(360,043)

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment	(718,331)	(662,514)

Excess of investment cost over the underlying
assets acquired:
Acquisition fees and expenses	1,083,464	1,160,581
Accumulated amortization of acquisition
fees and expenses	(330,613)	(385,172)

Reserve for Impairment of Investment in
Project Partnerships	(34,520)	(112,895)

Investments in Project Partnerships	$ -	$ -

(1) In accordance with Gateway's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $14,157,492 for the period ended June 30, 2009 and cumulative suspended losses of $14,227,196 for the year ended March 31, 2009 are not included.

NOTE 54 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (Continued):

AsIn ofaccordance ~~December~~with ~~31, 2008,~~ Gateway's ~~holds~~policy aof ~~99%~~presenting ~~interest in~~ the ~~profits,~~financial ~~losses,~~information ~~and~~of ~~Tax~~the ~~Credits as a limited partner in 44~~ Project Partnerships ~~holding~~on 46a ~~properties~~three ~~which~~month ~~own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes. Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Project Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution~~lag, ~~proceeds~~below ~~will~~is bethe ~~distributed~~summarized ~~according~~balance tosheets ~~each~~for ~~Project~~the ~~Partnership agreement. The total Investments in~~ Project Partnerships atas of March 31, ~~2008~~and ~~includes both~~ the ~~Investments~~summarized instatements ~~Project~~of ~~Partnerships~~operations ~~and Investment in Project Partnership Held~~ for ~~Sale on~~ the ~~consolidated~~three ~~balance~~months ~~sheet.~~ended ~~The~~March ~~following~~31 ~~is a summary~~ of ~~Investments~~each ~~in Project Partnerships as of~~year:

	December 31,	March 31,
	2009	2008
	2008	2008
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Capital Contributions to Project Partnerships
Assets:
and purchase price paid for limited partner
Current assets	$ 4,997,351	$ 7,077,771
interests in Project Partnerships	$ 9,535,507	$ 12,794,791
Investment properties, net	21,328,694	33,716,655
Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)	(9,854,684)	(12,793,161)
Other assets	79,406	464,220
Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships	(364,951)	(605,078)
Total assets	$ 26,405,451	$ 41,258,646
Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment	(684,128)	(603,448)
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit:
Excess of investment cost over the underlying
Current liabilities	$ 1,561,345	$ 3,159,080
assets acquired:
Long-term debt	41,367,531	57,974,445
Acquisition fees and expenses	1,189,346	1,617,977
Total liabilities	42,928,876	61,133,525
Accumulated amortization of acquisition
Partners' deficit
fees and expenses	(389,743)	(596,506)
Limited Partner	(15,717,812)	(18,504,486)
Reserve for Impairment of Investment in
General Partners	(805,613)	(1,370,393)
Project Partnerships	(112,895)	-
Total Partners' deficit	(16,523,425)	(19,874,879)
Investments in Project Partnerships	$ 2,580	$ 418,023
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$ 26,405,451	$ 41,258,646
SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income	$ 1,754,631	$ 2,571,811
Expenses:
Operating expenses	1,191,282	1,765,799
Interest expense	217,175	348,601
Depreciation and amortization	429,026	593,589
Total expenses	1,837,483	2,707,989
Net loss	$ (82,852)	$ (136,178)
Other partners' share of net loss	$ (828)	$ (1,362)
Gateway's share of net loss	$ (82,024)	$ (134,816)
Suspended losses	82,024	106,509
Equity in Income of Project Partnerships	$ -	$ 1,026
Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships - Held for Sale	$ -	$ (29,333)

~~(1) In accordance with~~ Gateway's ~~accounting~~deficit ~~policy~~as toreflected ~~not~~by ~~carry~~the ~~Investments in~~ Project Partnerships ~~below~~of ~~zero~~$(15,717,812) ~~cumulative~~differs ~~suspended~~from ~~losses~~Gateway's ofInvestments ~~$14,251,896~~in ~~for~~Project ~~the~~Partnerships ~~period~~before ~~ended~~acquisition ~~December~~fees 31and expenses, ~~2008~~amortization, and ~~cumulative~~the ~~suspended~~impairment ~~losses~~reserve of $17(718,~~461,710~~331) ~~for~~primarily ~~the~~because ~~year~~of ~~ended~~suspended ~~March~~losses ~~31,~~on ~~2008~~Gateway's ~~are not included~~books.

NOTE 5 -– ~~INVESTMENTS~~SUMMARY INOF ~~PROJECT~~DISPOSITION ~~PARTNERSHIPS (Continued)~~ACTIVITIES:

In accordance with Gateway's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships, excluding Sparta for the period ended December 31, 2007, on a three month lag, below is the summarized balance sheets for the Project Partnerships as of September 30 and the summarized statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30 of each year:
	2008	2007
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
Current assets	$ 5,661,237	$ 7,532,676
Investment properties, net	24,611,179	36,730,175
Other assets	127,169	910,559
Total assets	$ 30,399,585	$ 45,173,410
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit:
Current liabilities	$ 1,588,363	$ 2,752,240
Long-term debt	45,443,040	62,538,322
Total liabilities	47,031,403	65,290,562
Partners' deficit
Limited Partner	(15,753,658)	(18,210,644)
General Partners	(878,160)	(1,906,508)
Total Partners' deficit	(16,631,818)	(20,117,152)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$ 30,399,585	$ 45,173,410
SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income	$ 5,456,772	$ 8,143,620
Expenses:
Operating expenses	4,070,847	5,409,141
Interest expense	745,162	1,112,610
Depreciation and amortization	1,374,667	1,911,063
Total expenses	6,190,676	8,432,814
Net loss	$ (733,904)	$ (289,194)
Other partners' share of net loss	$ (7,339)	$ (2,892)
Gateway's share of net loss	$ (726,565)	$ (286,302)
Suspended losses	719,757	410,137
Equity in (Loss) Income of Project Partnerships	$ (6,808)	$ 17,786
Equity in Income of Project Partnerships - Held for Sale	$ -	$ 106,049
Gateway's deficit as reflected by the Project Partnerships of $(15,753,658) differs from Gateway's Investments in Project Partnerships before acquisition fees and expenses, amortization, and the impairment reserve of $(684,128) primarily because of suspended losses on Gateway's books.

Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties. As of June 30, 2009, Gateway has sold or otherwise disposed of its interest in 43 Project Partnerships which held 46 properties. A summary of the sale or disposition transactions for the Project Partnerships disposed during the current fiscal year-to-date and the previous fiscal year are summarized below:

Fiscal Year 2010 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Deferred Gain on Disposal
June 2009	Sabinal Housing Ltd.	$ 4,665	$ 0.18	$ -	$ 4,665
June 2009	Kingsland Housing Ltd.	12,497	0.49	-	12,497
June 2009	Mathis Retirement Ltd.	8,914	0.35	-	8,914
May 2009	Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA)	47,520	1.86	47,520	-
				$ 47,520	$ 26,076

In accordance with FASB No. 66 (“FASB No. 66”) “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” although the sales of Sabinal Housing, Ltd., Kingsland Housing, Ltd., and Mathis Retirement, Ltd. were consummated on or prior to June 30, 2009, the gains on the sales are being deferred on the Balance Sheet and not recognized on the Statement of Operations until the period that the net sales proceeds are received. Gateway recorded a receivable for the gross proceeds from these sales totaling $27,500 which is included in Receivable – Other on the Balance Sheet and has been subsequently received in July 2009. The net proceeds will be distributed to the Limited Partners in a subsequent quarter. The deferred gain of $26,076 will be recognized in the fiscal year 2010 second quarter Statement of Operations.

Of the March 31, 2009 Reserve for Impairment of Investments in Project Partnerships balance, $57,628 pertained to Sabinal Housing, Ltd. After giving effect to the Reserve for Impairment, Gateway will recognize a $4,665 gain on the sale of this Project Partnership during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010.

Of the March 31, 2009 Reserve for Impairment of Investments in Project Partnerships balance, $20,747 pertained to Kingsland Housing, Ltd. After giving effect to the Reserve for Impairment, Gateway will recognize a $12,497 gain on the sale of this Project Partnership during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA) are a component of the Distribution Payable on the Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009. These net proceeds will be distributed to the Limited Partners in a subsequent quarter.

NOTE 65 – SUMMARY OF DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES (Continued):

Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties. As of December 31, 2008, Gateway has sold or otherwise disposed of its interest in 38 Project Partnerships which held 41 properties. A summary of the sale or disposition transactions for the Project Partnerships disposed during the current fiscal year-to-date and the previous fiscal year are summarized below:

Fiscal Year 2009 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	$ 198,792	$ 7.78	$ 198,793	$ -
January 2009	Limestone Estates	$ 24,475	$ 0.96	$ 24,475	$ -
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	198,792	7.78	197,674	-
September 2008	Winder Apartments, Ltd.	38,160	1.49	38,000	-
September 2008	Oakwood Apartments	9,741	0.38	9,741	-
September 2008	Lakewood Apartments	19,760	0.77	19,760	-
September 2008	Sandhill Forest, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Oakwood Grove, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Hastings Manor, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II)	1,349,749	52.79	-	1,055,863
August 2008	Laurel Apartments	226,840	8.87	~~226~~225,~~840~~535	-
June 2008	Middlefield, Limited	117,530	4.60	~~117~~118,~~530~~321	-
June 2008	Pulaski Village	128,770	5.03	128,770	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	36,~~295~~938	240
				$ 742,729	$ 1,056,103
				$ 769,214	$ 1,056,103

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Limestone Estates are a component of the Distribution Payable on the Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2009. These net proceeds will be distributed to the Limited Partners during fiscal year 2010.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of The Meadows Associates, Winder Apartments, Ltd., Oakwood Apartments, and Lakewood Apartments, plus additional proceeds from the sale of Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), were distributed to the Limited Partners in December 2008.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), Laurel Apartments, Middlefield, Limited, and Pulaski Village were distributed to the Limited Partners in September 2008.

~~As part of the December 2008 distribution,~~ Gateway ~~distributed an additional $3,535 to~~ ~~the Limited Partners ($0.14 per limited partnership unit) and~~ recognized an additional ~~gain~~gains on sale of Project Partnerships in the amount of $36,~~295~~938 and an additional component of discontinued operations of $240 resulting from the true-up of certain legal and other sale transaction closing expenses ~~arising~~ arising from Project Partnership sale transactions. Any ~~which~~undistributed proceeds ~~closed~~related inhereto will be distributed to the ~~prior~~Limited ~~fiscal~~Partners during fiscal year 2010.

Re-syndications of Project Partnerships occur when a new buyer acquires the assets of a Project Partnership and renovates the existing affordable housing property and finances the costs of the renovation in part through the acquisition and sale of Tax Credits. In such re-syndication transactions, the assets of the existing Project Partnership are sold to a new partnership, net sales proceeds from the sale of assets are remitted to either Gateway or the general partner of the Project Partnership as appropriate, and the Project Partnership is liquidated. In a separate transaction, interests in the new partnership, which has a “fresh” allocation of Tax Credits, are sold to an unrelated third party or fund. In certain limited circumstances, the Managing General Partner of Gateway is involved in “re-syndicating” the sale of interests in the new partnership to an unrelated third party or fund. In those instances, the Managing General Partner has adopted the policy that it will contribute any net profits it received from the re-syndication transaction to Gateway. The Riverside Apartments property was the subject of a fiscal year ~~2009~~2008 re-syndication transaction in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $5,312 of re-syndication profit has been contributed toduring fiscal year 2009 to Gateway by the Managing General Partner (in October 2008). This amount was then distributed to the Limited Partners as part of the December 2008 distribution.

NOTE 6 – SUMMARY OF DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES (Continued):

Fiscal Year 2008 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
March 2008	Village Apartments of Sparta	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 401,634
March 2008	Scotts Hill	-	-	(2,000)	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase I)	23,000	0.90	21,811	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase II)	15,000	0.59	14,504	-
December 2007	Claremont Housing	22,000	0.86	23,850	-
December 2007	Pleasant Valley Housing	31,775	1.24	31,249	-
December 2007	River Road Apartments	8,750	0.34	(51,411)	-
December 2007	Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II	137,444	5.38	137,444	-
October 2007	Riverside Apartments	110,056	4.30	109,530	-
September 2007	Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL)	27,362	1.07	27,363	-
August 2007	Greenville Landing Apartments	34,306	1.34	33,775	-
July 2007	Sandridge Apartments	248,000	9.70	248,798	-
July 2007	Brookshire Apartments	248,000	9.70	249,032	-
May 2007	Laurel Woods Apartments	223,240	8.73	224,347	-
April 2007	Ashburn Housing	148,309	5.80	147,778	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	645	-
				$ 1,216,715	$ 401,634

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Teton View Apartments (Phase I), Teton View Apartments (Phase II), Claremont Housing, Pleasant Valley Housing, River Road Apartments, Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II, and Riverside Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in February 2008.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL), Greenville Landing Apartments, and Ashburn Housing were distributed to the Limited Partners in October 2007.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Sandridge Apartments, Brookshire Apartments, and Laurel Woods Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in August 2007.

As part of the October 2007 distribution, Gateway distributed an additional $4,942 to the Limited Partners ($0.19 per limited partnership unit) and recognized an additional gain on sale of Project Partnerships in the amount of $645 resulting from the true-up of certain legal and other sale transaction closing expenses arising from Project Partnership sale transactions which closed in prior quarters.

The following properties were the subject of re-syndication transactions in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $318,720 of re-syndication profit has been contributed to Gateway by the Managing General Partner in October 2007. The re-syndication profit contributions associated with each transaction are as follows:

Floresville Square Apartments	$ 57,694
Albany Village Apartments	29,923
Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	29,922
Ashburn Housing	201,181
Total Re-syndication contribution	$ 318,720

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

Subsequent to the December 31, 2008 quarter-end, Gateway sold its partnership interest in Limestone Estates. Gateway received approximately $24,000 in net proceeds which also approximates the gain on sale of Project Partnerships to be recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 (approximately $0.94 per limited partnership unit) from this sale transaction in January 2009 which will be distributed to the Limited Partners in a subsequent quarter. This sale will be reflected in the financial statements for the year-ended March 31, 2009.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of Gateway. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying footnotes to the financial statements contained elsewhere in this report.

The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas, and certain provisions of the Act have been implemented by Gateway and other provisions will be implemented by Gateway in subsequent years.

The following discusses the results of operations, liquidity and capital resources for Gateway.

Results of Operations

As ~~disclosed~~ ~~on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, distribution income~~more ~~received~~fully ~~from~~detailed ~~the~~in ~~Project Partnerships decreased $23,007 from $55,367 for~~ the ~~nine~~ ~~months~~Exit ~~ended~~Strategy ~~December~~discussion ~~31,~~included ~~2007~~within tothis ~~$32~~MD&A,~~360 for the nine months ended~~ ~~December~~all ~~31, 2008. Equity in (Loss) Income~~ of the Project Partnerships ~~decreased~~ ~~$24,594~~have ~~from~~delivered ~~income~~their ofTax ~~$17,786~~Credits ~~for the nine months ended December 31, 2007~~ to ~~a loss of $6~~Gateway,~~808~~ ~~for~~ the ~~nine months ended December 31,~~ ~~2008. Income~~Tax ~~from~~Credit ~~Discontinued~~compliance ~~Operations increased $985,684 from $70,419 for the nine-month~~ period ~~ended~~has ~~December 31~~expired, ~~2007~~and toGateway ~~$1,056,103~~is ~~for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008. The decrease~~ in ~~distribution~~ ~~income for~~ the ~~nine~~process ~~months ended December 31, 2008 is a result~~ of ~~fewer~~selling ~~Project~~or ~~Partnerships~~disposing of ~~invested~~all ~~in by Gateway. As~~ of ~~December~~its ~~31, 2008,~~remaining ~~Gateway has an investment in 44~~ Project ~~Partnerships as compared to 58 Project~~ Partnership ~~investments, including Sparta, held as of December 31,~~ ~~2007~~interests. ~~Equity~~Net inproceeds ~~(Loss)~~received ~~Income~~from ~~of Project Partnerships decreased for~~ the ~~nine~~sales ~~months~~are ~~ended~~being ~~December 31, 2008 as compared~~ distributed to the ~~nine~~Limited ~~months~~Partners. Once ~~ended December~~all ~~31, 2007 because Gateway’s share of net loss from~~ Project ~~Partnerships exceeded~~Partnership ~~the~~interests ~~suspended losses from the Project Partnerships. Because~~have ~~Gateway~~been ~~utilizes~~sold ~~the~~or ~~equity~~otherwise ~~method~~disposed of ~~accounting for its Project Partnerships~~, ~~income~~ orGateway ~~losses~~will ~~from~~be ~~Project Partnerships with a zero investment balance are not recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations~~liquidated. ~~Gateway’s~~The ~~share~~latest oftarget ~~the~~date ~~net loss from Project Partnerships~~ for ~~the~~liquidation ~~nine-month~~of ~~periods~~Gateway ~~ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (Project Partnership financial information~~ is on ~~a three-month~~or ~~lag)~~before ~~was~~December ~~$726~~31,~~565~~ ~~and $286~~2009,~~302, respectively. Gateway~~ ~~suspended~~although ~~net~~there ~~losses~~is ~~from~~no ~~Project~~certainty ~~Partnerships~~that ~~for~~all the ~~nine~~activities ~~months~~necessary ~~ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaling $719,757 and $410,137, respectively. Income from Discontinued Operations for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 increased due~~ to ~~the~~occur ~~sale~~as of ~~Crosstown in~~ ~~September~~such ~~2008. Additionally,~~date ~~financial~~will ~~information~~have ~~for Sparta is no longer included because Gateway disposed of its interest in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008~~transpired.

~~Total~~Distribution ~~expenses~~income ofreceived ~~Gateway~~from ~~were $414,374 for~~ the ~~nine~~Project ~~months~~Partnerships ~~ended~~increased ~~December 31~~$2,194 ~~2008,~~from ~~a decrease of~~ $5315,~~922~~654 ~~as compared to~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008 ~~total expenses~~to of $~~468~~17,~~296. The~~848 ~~decrease~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 ~~results~~while ~~from~~total ~~decreases~~distributions infrom ~~asset management fees and general and administrative expenses – General Partner due to sales of~~ Project Partnerships ~~(Gateway~~ ~~ceases~~only ~~accruing~~increased ~~asset management fees and general and administrative~~$340 ~~expense – General Partner~~ for ~~sold~~the ~~Project~~same ~~Partnerships), offset by impairment losses on Project Partnership investments~~periods. ~~Impairment~~The ~~expense~~increase in distribution income is a ~~non-cash~~result ~~charge~~of ~~that reflects~~ a ~~potential~~decrease ~~decline~~ in the ~~carrying~~number ~~value~~ of ~~Gateway’s~~ ~~interest in~~ Project Partnerships~~. Historically,~~ ~~Gateway~~with ~~has~~investment ~~considered~~balances ~~the~~(distribution ~~residual~~income ~~value~~arises offrom ~~the~~any ~~Project~~cash ~~Partnerships~~distributions asreceived ~~one key component~~from ofProject ~~its~~Partnerships ~~estimate~~which ofhave ~~the~~a ~~present~~zero ~~value~~investment ofbalance ~~Gateway’s~~for ~~interest in any of its Project~~financial ~~Partnerships~~reporting purposes). ~~During~~As ~~the~~of ~~quarter~~June ~~ended December 31~~30, 2008, asfour a direct result of the deterioration that occurred within the United States financial markets and more specifically, its negative impact on the Tax Credit market, Gateway has concluded that any residual value of the Project Partnerships ~~in the~~ ~~present~~had ~~Tax~~investment ~~Credit~~balances ~~market~~as ~~conditions~~compared ~~cannot~~to bezero ~~practicably determined. As a result, in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 Gateway eliminated estimates of residual value of the~~ Project Partnerships ~~from~~with investment ~~the~~balances ~~recoverability~~as ~~portion~~ of ~~its~~June ~~impairment analysis. Resultantly~~30, ~~non-cash~~ ~~impairment expense for the quarter was incurred~~2009.

~~In total,~~Total ~~Gateway~~expenses ~~had net income~~ of ~~$1,419,996~~Gateway ~~for~~were ~~the nine months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to net income of~~ $~~886~~75,~~761~~524 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007. The~~ ~~increase in net income for the nine months ended December 31~~2009, ~~2008 is~~ a ~~result of the gains on the sales of The Meadows Associates, Winder~~ ~~Apartments,~~decrease Ltd., Oakwood Apartments, Lakewood Apartments, Sandhill Forest, Ltd., Oakwood Grove, Ltd., Hastings Manor, Ltd., Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), Laurel Apartments, Middlefield, Limited, and Pulaski Village being greater than the gains on the sales of ~~Claremont Housing~~$24,689 ~~Pleasant~~as ~~Valley Housing,~~compared ~~River~~to Road Apartments, Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II, Riverside Apartments, Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL), Greenville Landing Apartments, Sandridge Apartments, Brookshire Apartments, Laurel Woods Apartments, and Ashburn Housing that were recorded in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~ 31June 30, ~~2007. After~~2008 ~~adjusting for Equity in Loss of Project~~total ~~Partnerships~~expenses of $6100,~~808 and the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash used in operating activities was $163,140~~213. ~~Cash~~The ~~provided~~decrease results ~~by investing~~primarily ~~activities was $2,326,932 consisting of $34,215 in cash distributions~~ from decreases ~~the Project Partnerships, $2,092,717~~ in ~~net~~asset ~~proceeds~~management ~~from~~fees ~~the~~due ~~Sale of Project Partnerships (refer~~ to ~~the exit strategy section herein for more detailed discussion of these~~ sales of Project Partnerships), ~~and $200,000 from~~(Gateway ~~matured~~ceases ~~U.S.~~accruing ~~Treasury~~asset ~~Notes. Cash~~management ~~used~~fees infor ~~financing~~sold ~~activities was~~Project ~~$2,084,963 consisting of $5,312 in capital contributions offset by $2,090,275 in distributions paid to Limited Partners~~Partnerships).

Interest income decreased $4,071 from $4,079 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 to $8 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The change in interest income results primarily from the fluctuation of interest rates on short-term investments over this period and a lower balance of funds earning interest. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $419,772 from $780,091 as of June 30, 2008 as compared to the June 30, 2009 balance of $360,319. Interest income is generally one source of funds available to pay administrative costs of Gateway.

Four Project Partnership investments were sold or otherwise disposed of during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 (Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA), Sabinal Housing, Ltd., Kingsland Housing, Ltd., and Mathis Retirement, Ltd.). Gateway received net sales proceeds totaling $73,596 ($47,520 was received during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and $26,076 was received during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010). The $73,596 in net proceeds ($2.88 per limited partner unit) will be distributed to the Limited Partners during a subsequent quarter of fiscal year 2010.

Twelve Project Partnership investments were sold or otherwise disposed of during fiscal year 2009 (Pulaski Village, Middlefield, Limited, Laurel Apartments, Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), Hastings Manor, Ltd., Oakwood Grove, Ltd., Sandhill Forest, Ltd., Lakewood Apartments, Oakwood Apartments, Winder Apartments, Ltd., The Meadows Associates, and Limestone Estates). Gateway received net sales proceeds totaling $2,113,817. Of this amount, $2,089,342 was distributed in fiscal year 2009 to the Limited Partners at $81.71 per limited partner unit. The remaining $24,475 ($0.96 per limited partner unit) will be distributed to the Limited Partners in fiscal year 2010.

Cumulative distributions of sales proceeds since inception of Gateway to Limited Partners amount to $210.23 per unit.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Equity in Income of Project Partnerships decreased to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1,026 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of the suspension of all losses so that the Investments in Project Partnerships does not fall below zero. Because Gateway utilizes the equity method of accounting to account for its investment in Project Partnerships, income or losses from Project Partnerships with a zero investment balance are not recognized in the Statement of Operations. Gateway’s share of the net loss from Project Partnerships for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Project Partnership financial information is on a three-month lag), excluding Crosstown for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was $82,024 and $105,483, respectively. Gateway suspended net losses from Project Partnerships for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 totaling $82,024 and $106,509, respectively.

Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships decreased $198,780 from $246,300 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 to $47,520 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. As more fully discussed within this MD&A, four Project Partnership investments were sold or disposed of during the quarter-ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the quarter-ended June 30, 2008 when two Project Partnership investments were sold or disposed of. The amount of the gain or loss on a sale of a Project Partnership and the period in which it is recognized on the Statement of Operations is dependent upon the specifics related to each sale or disposition transaction. Refer to the discussion of each Project Partnership sold in the Exit Strategy section wihtin this MD&A.

Loss from Discontinued Operations decreased to $0 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 from $29,333 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. No assets were classified as held for sale on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2009. Crosstown was classified as Investments in Project Partnerships held for sale as of June 30, 2008 and its equity in loss was presented as discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Crosstown was sold during September 2008.

In total, Gateway reported a net loss of $10,148 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. After adjusting for the changes in operating assets and liabilities, net cash provided by operating activities was $31,493. Cash provided by investing activities was $65,368 consisting of $17,848 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $47,520 in net proceeds from the Sale of Project Partnerships (refer to the Exit Strategy section within this MD&A for more detailed discussion of these sales of Project Partnerships).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Gateway's capital resources are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel, legal, and accounting and audit fees associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that Gateway's remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee due but unpaid at the time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the investors’ return of their original capital contribution.)

The sources of funds to pay the operating costs are cash and cash equivalents and the interest earnings thereon, and cash distributed to Gateway from the operations of the Project Partnerships. Due to the rent limitations applicable to the Project Partnerships as a result of their qualifying for Tax Credits, Gateway does not expect there to be a significant increase in future rental income of the Project Partnerships. Therefore, cash distributions from operations of the Project Partnerships are not expected to increase. At June 30, 2009, Gateway had $360,319 of cash and cash equivalents. However, $73,943 of this balance represents proceeds Gateway received prior to June 30, 2009 from the sale of Project Partnerships which is for distribution to Limited Partners. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet Gateway's current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to perhaps pay a small portion of the unpaid Asset Management Fee.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Gateway received $17,848 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $8 in interest income which are available for payment of Gateway expenses. The General and Administrative operating costs (both General Partner and Other) were $15,680 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and the Asset Management Fee expensed was $59,844; no asset management fees were actually paid to the General Partner during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

The sources of funds to pay the operating costs are cash and cash equivalents and the interest earnings thereon, and cash distributed to Gateway from the operations of the Project Partnerships. Due to the rent limitations applicable to the Project Partnerships as a result of their qualifying for Tax Credits, Gateway does not expect there to be a significant increase in future rental income of the Project Partnerships. Therefore, cash distributions from operations of the Project Partnerships are not expected to increase. At December 31, 2008, Gateway had $429,109 of cash and cash equivalents. Management believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet Gateway's current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part of the Asset Management Fee.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Recent Accounting Changes

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which ~~delays~~delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 ~~until~~ until November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except those ~~that~~ that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. Gateway ~~will~~has ~~adopt~~adopted FAS No. 157 effective as of of fiscal year end March 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard ~~is not~~did ~~expected~~not to have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS No. 159”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. FAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Gateway ~~will~~has ~~adopt~~adopted FAS No. 159 in fiscal year 2009 but ~~does~~did not ~~intend to~~ remeasure its financial assets and financial liabilities as a result of its adoption. Accordingly, the adoption of this standard is did not ~~expected to~~ have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

~~Financial~~FASB ~~Accounting~~Interpretation ~~Standards~~No. ~~Board~~48 (~~FASB) Interpretation (~~“FIN) No. 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, was issued in July 2006 and interprets SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires all taxpayers to analyze all material positions they have taken or plan to take in all tax returns that have been filed or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all years still subject to challenge by those taxing authorities. If the position taken is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority on its technical merits and if there is more than a 50% likelihood that the position would be sustained if challenged and considered by the highest court in the relevant jurisdiction, the tax consequences of that position should be reflected in the taxpayer’s GAAP financial statements. Earlier proposed interpretations of SFAS 109 had recommended a “probable” standard for recognition of tax consequences rather than the “more-likely-than-not” standard finally adopted.

Because Gateway is a pass-through entity and is not required to pay income taxes, FIN No. 48 does not currently have any impact on its financial statements. On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued ~~FASB Staff Position (~~FSP) No. FIN 48-3: Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 48 for Certain Nonpublic Enterprises, which ~~defers~~deferred the effective date of ~~Interpretation~~FIN No. 48 for nonpublic enterprises included within the scope of FSP No. FIN 48-3 to the annual financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The deferred effective date iswas intended to give the Board additional time to develop guidance on the application of ~~Interpretation~~FIN No. 48 by pass-through entities and not-for-profit organizations. Gateway may modify its disclosures if the FASB’s guidance regarding application of FIN No. 48 to pass-through entities changes.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. The FSP, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

In November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF No. 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations,” which clarifies the accounting for how to account for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. This standard shall be effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Exit Strategy

The IRS compliance period for low-income housing Tax Credit properties is generally ~~fifteen~~ 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion. All of Gateway’s Project Partnerships have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period; consequently, Gateway is currently in the process of disposing of all of its investments in Project Partnerships. Gateway’s objective is to sell Gateway’s interest in such assets for fair market value and ultimately, to liquidate the Project Partnerships. Generally, the market for Project Partnerships is limited. Some of the factors which negatively impact the marketability of these projects include (1) requirements by government agencies or the project’s debt holder to continue to maintain the property in the low-income housing program, and (2) a mortgage loan balance on the property which is very near the initial balance as a result of the heavily subsidized debt of the Project Partnerships and lengthy (usually 50 year) amortization periods.

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, Gateway holds a limited partner interest in 4439 Project Partnerships holding 4641 properties which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes. Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~ 2009, 3843 of the Project Partnerships holding 4146 of the properties have been sold and, in accordance with the Gateway partnership agreement, the entire net ~~proceeds~~ proceeds received from these sales either have been or will be distributed to the Limited Partners of Gateway. ~~Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties.~~ During the quarter-ended ~~December~~ ~~31,~~June ~~2008~~30, 2009, Gateway sold or otherwise disposed of its interest in ~~1 Project~~4 ~~Partnership, bringing the total number of~~ Project ~~Partnerships sold~~ ~~during the current fiscal year-to-date to 11~~Partnerships. A summary of the sale or disposition transactions for the Project Partnerships disposed during the current fiscal year-to-date and the previous fiscal year are summarized ~~herein.~~ below:

Fiscal Year 2010 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Deferred Gain on Disposal
June 2009	Sabinal Housing Ltd.	$ 4,665	$ 0.18	$ -	$ 4,665
June 2009	Kingsland Housing Ltd.	12,497	0.49	-	12,497
June 2009	Mathis Retirement Ltd.	8,914	0.35	-	8,914
May 2009	Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA)	47,520	1.86	47,520	-
				$ 47,520	$ 26,076

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Fiscal Year 2009 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	$ 198,792	$ 7.78	$ 198,793	$ -
January 2009	Limestone Estates	$ 24,475	$ 0.96	$ 24,475	$ -
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	198,792	7.78	197,674	-
September 2008	Winder Apartments, Ltd.	38,160	1.49	38,000	-
September 2008	Oakwood Apartments	9,741	0.38	9,741	-
September 2008	Lakewood Apartments	19,760	0.77	19,760	-
September 2008	Sandhill Forest, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Oakwood Grove, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Hastings Manor, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II)	1,349,749	52.79	-	1,055,863
August 2008	Laurel Apartments	226,840	8.87	~~226~~225,~~840~~535	-
June 2008	Middlefield, Limited	117,530	4.60	~~117~~118,~~530~~321	-
June 2008	Pulaski Village	128,770	5.03	128,770	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	36,~~295~~938	240
				$ 742,729	$ 1,056,103
				$ 769,214	$ 1,056,103

19Re-syndications of Project Partnerships occur when a new buyer acquires the assets of a Project Partnership and renovates the existing affordable housing property and finances the costs of the renovation in part through the acquisition and sale of Tax Credits. In such re-syndication transactions, the assets of the existing Project Partnership are sold to a new partnership, net sales proceeds from the sale of assets are remitted to either Gateway or the general partner of the Project Partnership as appropriate, and the Project Partnership is liquidated. In a separate transaction, interests in the new partnership, which has a “fresh” allocation of Tax Credits, are sold to an unrelated third party or fund. In certain limited circumstances, the Managing General Partner of Gateway is involved in “re-syndicating” the sale of interests in the new partnership to an unrelated third party or fund. In those instances, the Managing General Partner has adopted the policy that it will contribute any net profits it received from the re-syndication transaction to Gateway. The Riverside Apartments property was the subject of a fiscal year 2008 re-syndication transaction in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $5,312 of re-syndication profit has been contributed during fiscal year 2009 to Gateway by the Managing General Partner (in October 2008). This amount was then distributed to the Limited Partners as part of the December 2008 distribution.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Re-syndications of Project Partnerships occur when a new buyer acquires the assets of a Project Partnership and renovates the existing affordable housing property and finances the costs of the renovation in part through the acquisition and sale of Tax Credits. In such re-syndication transactions, the assets of the existing Project Partnership are sold to a new partnership, net sales proceeds from the sale of assets are remitted to either Gateway or the general partner of the Project Partnership as appropriate, and the Project Partnership is liquidated. In a separate transaction, interests in the new partnership, which has a “fresh” allocation of Tax Credits, are sold to an unrelated third party or fund. In certain limited circumstances, the Managing General Partner of Gateway is involved in “re-syndicating” the sale of interests in the new partnership to an unrelated third party or fund. In those instances, the Managing General Partner has adopted the policy that it will contribute any net profits it received from the re-syndication transaction to Gateway. The Riverside Apartments property was the subject of a fiscal year 2009 re-syndication transaction in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $5,312 of re-syndication profit has been contributed to Gateway by the Managing General Partner in October 2008. This amount was distributed to the Limited Partners as part of the December 2008 distribution.

Fiscal Year 2008 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
March 2008	Village Apartments of Sparta	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 401,634
March 2008	Scotts Hill	-	-	(2,000)	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase I)	23,000	0.90	21,811	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase II)	15,000	0.59	14,504	-
December 2007	Claremont Housing	22,000	0.86	23,850	-
December 2007	Pleasant Valley Housing	31,775	1.24	31,249	-
December 2007	River Road Apartments	8,750	0.34	(51,411)	-
December 2007	Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II	137,444	5.38	137,444	-
October 2007	Riverside Apartments	110,056	4.30	109,530	-
September 2007	Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL)	27,362	1.07	27,363	-
August 2007	Greenville Landing Apartments	34,306	1.34	33,775	-
July 2007	Sandridge Apartments	248,000	9.70	248,798	-
July 2007	Brookshire Apartments	248,000	9.70	249,032	-
May 2007	Laurel Woods Apartments	223,240	8.73	224,347	-
April 2007	Ashburn Housing	148,309	5.80	147,778	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	645	-
				$ 1,216,715	$ 401,634

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL), Greenville Landing Apartments, and Ashburn Housing were distributed to the Limited Partners in October 2007.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Sandridge Apartments, Brookshire Apartments, and Laurel Woods Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in August 2007.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Floresville Square Apartments	$ 57,694
Albany Village Apartments	29,923
Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	29,922
Ashburn Housing	201,181
Total Re-syndication contribution	$ 318,720

Status Update on Unsold Project Partnerships:

The following summarizes the most recent status of the sale/disposal process for the remaining Project Partnership investments held as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~ 2009:

Project Partnerships sold subsequent to December 31, 2008:

Limestone Estates

Gateway has approved the sale to the general partner of the Project Partnerships or a third party:

Buena Vista Housing, Ltd., L.P.	Hannah’s Mill Apartments, Ltd.
Mabank 1988 Limited	Casa Linda Limited Partnership
Monroe Family, Ltd.	Hartwell Elderly, Ltd., L.P.
La Villa Elena Limited Partnership	Rio Abajo
Brandywine III Limited Partnership	Dunbarton Oaks III Limited Partnership
Sage Limited Partnership	Augusta Properties, L.P.
Federal Manor III Limited Partnership	Mulberry Hill IV Associates LP
Booneville Properties	Barling Properties
Middleport Limited Partnership	Eagle’s Bay Limited Partnership
Poteau Properties IV	Turtle Creek Properties Phase II
Stone Arbor Limited Partnership	Suncrest Limited Partnership
Broken Bow Properties II	Decatur Properties
Woodcroft Limited Partnership	Mabank 1988 Limited
Poteau Properties III
Casa Linda Limited Partnership	La Villa Elena Limited Partnership
Rio Abajo	Sage Limited Partnership
Laynecrest Associates Limited Partnership	Martindale Limited Partnership
Augusta Properties, L.P.	Booneville Properties
Barling Properties	Poteau Properties IV
Turtle Creek Properties Phase II	Broken Bow Properties II
Decatur Properties	Poteau Properties III

These approvals are subject to a number of contingencies, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty. However, utilizing the sales amounts as approved by Gateway, should all the transactions close without modification, the ~~estimated~~ estimated net proceeds from the sales of these Project Partnerships to Gateway ~~are~~ are estimated to beapproximate ~~approximately~~ $12,~~540~~040,000, or $6079.2479 per limited partnership unit. Sales proceeds would be available for distribution to the Limited Partners subsequent to the closing of these sale transactions which would most likely occur within the next 126-month period.

Gateway has consented to the general partner granting an option for either the general partner or a third-party to purchase either the Project Partnership Interest or Assets:

Cuthbert Elderly Housing, Ltd. ~~Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA)~~ Madison, Ltd. Concord IV Limited Partnership ~~Middleport Limited Partnership~~ Longleaf Apartments, Ltd.

Should all of these options be exercised, the estimated net sales proceeds to Gateway from the sales transactions are estimated to be $~~650~~665,000, or $2526.4201 per limited partnership unit potentially available for distribution to the Limited Partners ~~over~~within the next 126 months. These options to purchase could expire without being exercised which would result in no sales proceeds and remarketing of the Project Partnerships the results of which are undeterminable.

21Gateway is exploring options regarding the sale or other disposition of the remaining Project Partnership investments not specifically listed above. Any net proceeds arising from these particular Project Partnerships are anticipated to be minimal.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued):

Project Partnerships currently or previously listed for sale on a commercial real estate for sale website or listed for sale by the general partner of the Project Partnership:

Sylacauga Garden Apartments III, Ltd. Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (AL) Monroe Family, Ltd. Hartwell Elderly, Ltd., L.P. Sabinal Housing Ltd. Kingsland Housing Ltd. Mathis Retirement Ltd. Eagle’s Bay Limited Partnership Stone Arbor Limited Partnership Suncrest Limited Partnership Woodcroft Limited Partnership Laynecrest Associates Limited Partnership Martindale Limited Partnership Village Apartments of Centralia II, Limited Partnership Village Apartments of Fortville II, L.P. Village Apartments of Morgantown, Limited Partnership Village Apartments of Summitville, L.P.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a smaller reporting company, no information is required.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Gateway's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as Gateway's are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Managing General Partner’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Gateway has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting during the ~~nine~~three months ~~ended~~ ~~December~~ended 31June 30, ~~2008~~2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable to this report.

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1 Principal Executive Officer Certification as required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), filed herewith.

31.2 Principal Financial Officer Certification as required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), filed herewith.

32 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section

1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

By: Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.

(the Managing General Partner)

Date: February 19, 2009	By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner Ronald M. Diner
Date: August 14, 2009	By:/s/ Ronald M. Diner Ronald M. Diner
	President
Date: February 19, 2009	By:/s/ Jonathan Oorlog Jonathan Oorlog
Date: August 14, 2009	By:/s/ Toni S. Matthews Toni S. Matthews
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 19, 2009	By:/s/ Sandra C. Humphreys Sandra C. Humphreys
Date: August 14, 2009	By:/s/ Sandra C. Humphreys Sandra C. Humphreys
	Secretary and Treasurer

Filing Compare · GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND LTD