UNITED ~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K~~STATES

~~[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE~~ SECURITIES ~~EXCHANGE~~ ~~ACT~~AND OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 or [ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-17711 GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Florida 59-2852555 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (727) 567-4830 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:COMMISSION

~~Title of Each Class~~WASHINGTON, ~~Units of Limited Partnership Interest~~DC 20549

~~Number of Record Holders~~FORM Title of Class as of March 31, 2006 Limited Partnership Interest 2,274 General Partner Interest 210-K

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES NO [X ~~Indicate~~] byANNUAL ~~check~~REPORT ~~mark~~PURSUANT ifTO ~~the~~SECTION ~~registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section~~ 13 orOR ~~Section~~ 15(d) ofOF ~~the~~THE ~~Act. YES NO X~~ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~Indicate~~For ~~by check mark whether~~ the ~~Registrant~~fiscal ~~(1)~~year has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.ended ~~YES X NO Indicate~~March ~~by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein~~31, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer X Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes X No State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter. There is no market for the Registrants Limited Partnership interests.2009

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to _________________

Commission file number 0-17711

Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		59-2852555
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

880 Carillon Parkway		St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code		(727) 567-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

		Number of Record Holders
Title of Class		as of March 31, 2009
Limited Partnership Interest		1,835
General Partner Interest		2

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES [ ]

NO [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

YES [ ]

NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X]

NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller Reporting Company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ]

No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

There is no market for the Registrant’s Limited Partnership interests.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

~~PART~~Parts I ~~Item 1. Business Gateway Tax Credit Fund~~, Ltd. ("Gateway") is a Florida limited partnership. The general partners are Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, and Raymond James Partners, Inc. both of which are sponsors of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial, Inc. Gateway was formed October 27, 1987 and commenced operations as of June 30, 1988 with the first admission of Limited Partners. ~~Gateway is engaged in only one industry segment~~II, toIII ~~acquire limited partnership interests in unaffiliated limited partnerships ("Project Partnerships"), each of which owns~~ and ~~operates~~IV ~~one~~– orRegistration ~~more~~Form ~~apartment complexes eligible for Low~~S-~~Income~~11 Housing Tax Credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Tax Credits"), received over a ten year period. Subject to certain limitations, Tax Credits may be used by Gateway's investors to reduce their income tax liability generated from other income sources. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement. Gateway closed its initial offering of Limited Partnership Interests on March 1, 1990 after receiving capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from Limited Partners. Operating profits and losses, cash distributions from operations and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of interests in Project Partnerships will be allocated as described in the Limited Partnership Agreement. Gateway holds investments in 78 Project Partnerships as of March 31, 2006, acquiring a 99% interest in these properties by becoming the sole limited partner in the Project Partnerships that own the properties. In October 1996 Value Partners, Inc., an affiliate of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., became the sole general partner of one of the Project Partnerships, Village Apartments of Sparta, Limited Partnership ("Sparta"). In October 1997, Value Partners became the sole general partner of Village Apartments of Divernon ("Divernon"). See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional details. The primary sources of funds for the year ended March 31, 2006 were interest income of $27,927 earned on cash and cash equivalents and $116,895 in distributions received from Project Partnerships. As of March 31, 2006 Gateway had $758,509 of Cash and Cash Equivalents. All Project Partnerships are government subsidized. Most have mortgage loans from the Farmers Home Administration (now called USDA Rural Development) ("USDA RD") under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949. These mortgage loans are made at low interest rates for multi-family housing in rural and suburban areas, with the requirement that the interest savings be passed on to low income tenants in the form of lower rents. A significant portion of the Project Partnerships also receive rental assistance from USDA RD to subsidize certain qualifying tenants. The General Partners do not believe the Project Partnerships are subject to the risks generally associated with conventionally financed non-subsidized apartment properties. Risks related to the operations of Gateway are described in detail on pages 21 through 33 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Risk Factors" which is incorporated herein by reference. The investment objectives of Gateway are to: 1) Provide tax benefits to Limited Partners in the form of Tax Credits during the period in which each Project is eligible to claim tax credits; 2) Provide passive losses to individual investors to offset passive income from other passive activities, and provide passive losses to corporate investors to offset business income; 3) Preserve and protect the capital contributions of Investors; and 4) Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Projects. The investment objectives and policies of Gateway are described in detail on pages 33 through 38 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption "Investment Objectives and Policies" which is incorporated herein by reference. Gateway's goal was to invest in a diversified portfolio of Project Partnerships located in rural and suburban locations with a high demand for low-income housing. As of March 31, 2006 the capital contributions raised from Limited Partner investors were successfully invested in Project Partnerships which met the investment criteria. Management anticipates that competition for tenants will only be with other low income housing projects, and not with conventionally financed housing. With significant number of rural American households living below the poverty level in substandard housing, management believes there will be a continuing demand for affordable low income housing for the foreseeable future. Exit Strategy The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion.

~~Item 2. Properties~~all ~~Gateway~~Amendments owns interest in properties through 99% limited partnership interests in 78 Project Partnerships as of March 31, 2006. The largest individual Project Partnership net investment as of March 31, 2006 comprises 15.92% of Gateway's total assets. The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and ~~Divernon~~Supplements ~~(which is classified as held-for-sale on Gateway's consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006), as of December 31, 2005:~~thereto.

LOCATION OF # OF DATE PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP PROPERTY UNITS ACQUIRED COST OCCUP. ---------- ----------- ----- ------- ------- ------
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	Medway, OH Union, OH Bernalillo, NM Truth/Consequences, NM Fortville, IN Summitville, IN Yanceyville, NC Millsboro, DE Perryville, MD Georgetown, DE Federalsburg, MD Laurel, DE Easton, MD Madison, OH Thomaston, GA Cairo, GA Sylacauga, AL Monroe, GA Silver City, NM Ashland, VA Kalamazoo, MI Demopolis, AL McDonough, GA Fernandina Beach, FL Limestone, ME Beaufort, NC Rigby, ID Albany, KY Burkesville, KY Scotts Hill, TN Gallup, NM Cascade, ID Middleport, NY Columbus, NE Morgantown, IN Ashburn, GA Cuthbert, GA Melrose, FL Crescent City, FL Hastings, FL Norfolk, NE Springfield, TN Springfield, TN Mabank, TX Buena Vista, GA Elizabethtown, NC Quitman, GA Cherokee, AL Milton, FL Winder, GA Killen, AL Madison, NC Greeneville, TN Centralia, IL Poteau, OK Barling, AR Booneville, AR Augusta, KS Farmville, VA Kenly, NC Athens, TX Waggaman, LA Middlefield, OH Floresvile, TX Mathis, TX Sabinal, TX Kingsland, TX Crestline, OH Poteau, OK Decatur, AR Broken Bow, OK Grove, OK Grangeville, ID Hartwell, GA Pulaski, VA Jacksonville, TX	48 30 54 42 24 24 40 32 32 32 32 32 16 39 50 36 42 48 41 40 201 40 46 46 25 40 40 24 24 12 44 16 25 24 24 40 32 16 36 24 72 48 48 42 24 32 18 24 43 48 40 40 40 24 32 48 48 66 40 48 44 43 36 40 36 24 34 36 19 24 46 42 32 24 44 40	6/88 6/88 8/88 9/88 11/88 11/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 12/88 3/89 3/89 4/89 5/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 6/89 7/89 7/89 7/89 7/89 8/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 9/89 10/89 11/89 11/89 11/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 12/89 2/90 2/90 2/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 3/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 4/90 7/90 7/90	$ 1,861,785 1,194,871 2,139,299 1,920,016 810,389 879,994 2,177,840 1,323,452 1,428,882 1,423,093 1,488,927 1,403,796 747,509 1,478,675 1,812,786 1,192,946 1,630,043 1,788,673 1,802,564 1,549,636 6,318,535 1,501,865 1,852,933 1,824,879 1,420,783 1,963,249 1,850,091 935,747 913,773 505,653 2,024,713 634,996 1,167,852 1,039,281 959,783 1,300,760 1,028,295 573,562 1,238,885 863,203 3,260,824 1,838,020 1,557,550 1,419,333 814,227 1,497,433 607,608 1,009,828 1,394,746 1,762,725 1,420,816 1,874,064 1,576,060 976,228 716,016 1,152,864 1,682,587 2,381,719 1,588,193 1,721,200 1,385,579 1,580,305 1,350,227 1,312,062 1,084,390 780,115 1,161,513 1,387,334 583,005 969,816 1,957,868 1,558,446 1,494,739 821,329 1,856,679 1,261,802	88% 87% 100% 95% 96% 75% 98% 100% 100% 94% 88% 81% 88% 100% 100% 100% 86% 92% 100% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 50% 50% 100% 98% 88% 96% 92% 96% 98% 97% 94% 97% 92% 97% 100% 100% 95% 92% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 85% 98% 100% 88% 88% 92% 88% 95% 90% 100% 98% 91% 97% 100% 92% 96% 100% 78% 100% 92% 98% 100% 97% 96% 100% 98%
		-----2,902 =====		---------- $ 110,771,264 ===========

File No. 33-18142

The average effective rental per unit is $4,170 per year ($347 per month). The average effective occupancy rate at December 31, 2005 was 94.9% A summary of the book value of the fixed assets of the properties, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:2

	12/31/05 --------	12/31/04 --------	12/31/03 --------
Land Land Improvements Buildings Furniture and Fixtures Properties, at Cost Less: Accum. Depreciation Properties, Net	$ 4,799,885 1,566,732 99,681,232 4,723,415 ------------- 110,771,264 56,049,471 ------------- $ 54,721,793 =============	$ 5,061,085 1,569,073 102,827,091 4,659,162 ------------- 114,116,411 54,943,648 ------------- $ 59,172,763 =============	$ 4,908,530 1,567,738 102,260,340 5,056,328 ------------- 113,792,936 51,556,360 ------------- $ 62,236,576 =============

PART I

Item ~~3. Legal Proceedings~~ ~~Gateway is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings~~1. ~~Item 4.~~ ~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders As of March 31, 2006, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.~~Business

~~PART II~~Gateway ~~Item~~Tax ~~5. Market~~Credit ~~for~~Fund, ~~the~~Ltd. ~~Registrant's Securities and Related Security Holder Matters~~ (a) “Gateway's”) ~~Limited Partnership interests are not publicly traded. There~~ is noa ~~market~~Florida ~~for the Registrant's Limited Partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop~~limited partnership. No The ~~transfers of~~general ~~Limited~~partners ~~Partnership Units~~ are ~~permitted~~Raymond ~~without~~James ~~the~~Tax ~~prior written~~Credit ~~consent~~Funds, Inc., of the Managing General Partner~~. There~~, ~~have~~and ~~been several~~Raymond ~~transfers~~James ~~over the last two years~~Partners, ~~with most being from individuals to their trusts or heirs~~Inc. ~~The~~ ~~Managing~~ (“General ~~Partner~~ Partners”), isboth ~~not aware~~ of ~~the price at~~ which ~~the units~~ are ~~transferred. The~~ ~~conditions~~sponsors ~~under which investors may transfer units is found under ARTICLE XII - "Transfer~~ of aGateway ~~Limited Partnership~~Tax ~~Interest"~~Credit onFund, ~~pages~~Ltd. ~~A-24~~ and wholly ~~A-25~~owned subsidiaries of ~~the~~Raymond ~~Limited Partnership~~James ~~Agreement within the Prospectus~~Financial, ~~which is incorporated herein by reference~~Inc. Gateway ~~(b) Approximate~~was ~~Number~~formed ofOctober ~~Equity~~27, ~~Security~~1987 ~~Holders: Number~~and ofcommenced ~~Record~~operations ~~Holders Title of Class~~ as of ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2006 Limited~~1988 ~~Partnership Interest 2,274~~with ~~General~~the ~~Partner~~first ~~Interest 2 Item~~admission ~~6. Selected~~of ~~Financial~~Limited ~~Data~~Partners.

	2006 ----	2005 ----	2004 ----	2003 ----	2002 ----
Total Revenues	$ 227,383	$ 216,372	$ 201,958	$ 213,033	$ 126,985
Net Loss	(378,769)	(1,018,200)	(55,577)	(771,799)	(577,139)
Equity in Income (Losses) of Project Partnerships	(107,224)	(371,209)	541,590	(253,927)	(202,920)
Total Assets	2,054,699	2,381,717	3,360,108	4,334,857	4,946,571
Investments In Project Partnerships	620,184	938,137	1,355,760	1,531,068	1,832,496
Per Limited Partnership Unit: (A) Tax Credits Portfolio Income Passive Loss	.00 10.46 (135.51)	.00 13.65 (160.84)	2.01 10.59 (139.25)	2.49 10.80 (146.37)	4.94 21.61 (141.03)
Net Loss	(24.07)	(39.43)	(3.08)	(29.89)	(22.35)

Gateway is engaged in only one industry segment, to acquire limited partnership interests in unaffiliated limited partnerships (“Project Partnerships”), each of which owns and operates one or more apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“Tax Credits”) under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code, received over a ten year period. Subject to certain limitations, Tax Credits may be used by Gateway's investors to reduce their income tax liability generated from other income sources. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement. Gateway closed its initial offering of Limited Partnership Interests on March 1, 1990 after receiving capital contributions of $1,000 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from Limited Partners.

~~(A)~~Operating profits ~~The~~and ~~Tax information is as of December 31~~losses, ~~the~~cash ~~year~~distributions ~~end~~from ofoperations ~~the~~and ~~Partnership~~Tax ~~for~~Credits ~~tax purposes.~~are ~~The~~allocated ~~above~~99% ~~selected~~to ~~financial~~the ~~data~~Limited ~~should~~Partners beand ~~read~~1% into ~~conjunction with~~ the ~~financial~~General Partners. Profit ~~statements~~or loss and ~~related~~cash ~~notes~~distributions ~~appearing~~from ~~elsewhere~~sales of interests in ~~this~~Project ~~report. This~~Partnerships ~~statement~~will isbe ~~not~~allocated ~~covered~~as bydescribed ~~the auditor's opinion included elsewhere~~ in ~~this~~the ~~report~~Limited Partnership Agreement.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, Gateway ~~expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance.~~ ~~Results~~initially ofheld ~~Operations~~investments ~~- Interest income increased from $11,740 for the year ended March 31, 2005 to $28,176 for the year ended March 31, 2006 due to an increase~~ in ~~interest~~82 rates throughout fiscal 2006. However, interest income was lower for the year ended March 31, 2006 when compared with the year ended March 31, 2004 due to the maturity of Treasury Notes in the previous years. Both General and Administrative - General Partner and General and Administrative - Other increased for the year ended March 31, 2006 when compared to the year ended March 31, 2005 due to higher administrative costs and certain real estate valuation service expenses incurred by Gateway in fiscal year 2006 for properties being evaluated for possible disposition. Amortization expense also increased for the year ended March 31, 2006 due to a change in the useful life of the acquisition fees and expense. Amortization expense for the year ended March 31, 2005 increased from $13,643 to $181,818 for the year ended March 31, 2006. The useful life of the acquisition fees and expense was changed from 35 years to 15 years to better reflect the economic life of those investments. Two of the Project Partnerships, ~~Keysville,~~holding ~~L.P. and Rivermeade Associates sold their~~ 87 properties ~~during fiscal year 2006~~. ~~Gateway~~ As ~~received~~more ~~sale~~fully ~~proceeds~~discussed ~~totaling $604,258 which were distributed~~ in ~~December~~Item ~~2005~~7 ~~to the Limited Partners~~herein, less $4,000 in legal expenses, at $23.47 per limited partnership unit. The remaining $224 of this distribution is shown as a Distribution Payable on the Balance Sheet. As disclosed on the Statement of Operations, Gateway ~~reported a $598,499 gain on these sales transactions. One Project Partnership, Village Apartments of Divernon,~~ is ~~classified as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 and was sold subsequent to the balance sheet date.~~ ~~There~~presently were no property sales or Partnership liquidations during fiscal year 2005. During fiscal year 2004, two of the Project Partnerships, Clayfed Apartments, Ltd. and Westside Apartments, Ltd., sold their property in July 2003 and subsequently liquidated. The sale of these properties resulted in a gain allocated to Gateway of $769,311. Gateway received sale proceeds totaling $674,675, of which $672,175 was distributed to the ~~Limited~~process ~~Partners at $26.29 per limited partnership unit. For the year ended March 31, 2006 the Project Partnerships reported a loss~~ of ~~$107,224,~~disposing ~~while a loss~~ of ~~$371,209~~all was reported for the year ended March 31, 2005. The decrease in the reported loss was due to an increase in rental revenue at the Project Partnership level. It is customary in the low-income housing tax credit real estate industry to experience losses for financial and tax reporting purposes because of ~~the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization. As a result, management expects Gateway will continue to report~~ its ~~equity~~investments in Project Partnerships ~~as a loss for tax and financial reporting purposes~~. In As ~~total, the Partnership reported a loss~~ of ~~$378,769 from operations for the year ended~~ March 31, ~~2006. However~~2009, ~~after~~Gateway ~~adjusting~~holds ~~for~~investments ~~amortization, the changes~~ in ~~operating assets and liabilities, and the equity in losses of~~ 43 Project Partnerships, ~~net~~acquiring ~~cash~~what used in operating activities was $63,698. The net cash provided by investing activities was $712,229 consisting primarily of $116,895 in cash distributions received from Project Partnerships and $604,258 from the sale of the two Project Partnerships. The cash used in financing activities was $610,968 consisting primarily of distributions of $600,258 paid to the Limited Partners relating to the sale of Keysville, LP and Rivermeade Associates. On October 1, 1997 Value Partners, Inc. became the sole general partner of Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership ("Divernon"), replacing the former general partners. Value Partners, Inc. is angenerally ~~affiliate of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the managing general partner of Gateway. Divernon is~~ a 1299% ~~unit~~interest ~~property located~~ in ~~Divernon,~~these properties ~~Illinois~~by inbecoming ~~which Gateway invested as~~ the sole limited partner on October 1, 1989. The property's average occupancy rate for the year remained at 67%. Gateway loaned Divernon $6,000, $15,832, and $8,671 to cover the operating deficits for 2003, 2004, and 2005 respectively. As of June 30, 1999, an updated workout plan with the USDA RD was implemented. Management is using rent incentives, vigorous advertising, and tight controls over repairs and maintenance to improve occupancy and cash flows. Divernon is classified as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006. Subsequent to Gateway's year-end, Gateway sold its Project Partnership investment in ~~Village Apartments of Divernon. The sale of this Project Partnerships'assets will be reflected in~~ the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2007. Gateway estimates a net gain of approximately $130,000 will be recognized in fiscal year 2007 upon consummation of the sale transaction. Also subsequent to this year-end, the following fourteen Project Partnerships were actively listed for sale on a commercial marketing website: Laynecrest, Martindale, Fortville II, Summitville, Limestone Estates, Middleport, Morgantown, Robinhood Apartments, Skyview Terrace, Hunters Ridge, Centralia II, Fairview South, Southwood Apartments, and Village Apartments of Sparta. Liquidity and Capital Resources - Gateway's capital resources are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel, and legal and accounting associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that ~~Gateway's~~own ~~remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee due but unpaid at~~ the ~~time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the investors return of their original capital contribution~~properties.~~) The~~ See ~~sources of funds to pay the operating costs are short term investments and interest earned thereon. At March 31, 2006, Gateway had $758,509 of short-term investments (Cash and Cash Equivalents).~~ Management ~~believes these sources of funds are sufficient to meet Gateway~~'s ~~current~~Discussion and ~~ongoing~~Analysis ~~operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to pay part~~ of ~~the Asset Management Fee.~~ ~~For~~Financial ~~the~~Condition ~~year ending March 31, 2006, Gateway received $116,895 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships. The General~~ and ~~Administrative~~Results operating costs were $302,419 and the Asset Management Fee expensed was $464,115. Exit Strategy The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion. Nearly all of ~~the~~Operations Project Partnerships have reached the end of their tax-credit compliance period. As of March 31, 2006, four of the Project Partnerships holding five of the properties have been sold and, in accordance with the Gateway partnership agreement, the entire net proceeds received from these sales have been disbursed to the Limited Partners of Gateway. Subsequent to year-end, Gateway sold its Project Partnership investment in Village Apartments of Divernon. The sale of this Project Partnership's assets will be reflected in the financial statements for the year-ended March 31, 2007. Although Gateway estimates that it will not receive any net proceeds from the sale of this Project Partnership, Gateway estimates a net gain of approximately $130,000 will be recognized in fiscal year 2007 as a result of the sale transaction.additional Gateway is presently evaluating the potential disposition of each of the Project Partnerships which have reached the end of their tax-credit compliance period and as opportunities arise, will endeavor to sell Gateway's interest in those Project Partnershipsdetails. The Partnerships objective is to maximize the investor's return wherever possible and ultimately, to liquidate the Project Partnerships that no longer provide tax benefits to investors. Gateway has no direct employees. The General Partners have full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway. Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

		Payment due by period
Contractual Obligations	Total	Less than 1 year	1-3 years	3-5 years	More than 5 years
Long-Term Debt Obligations of continuing operations	812,881 (1)	5,148	10,644	11,125	785,964
Long-Term Debt Obligations of discontinued operations	398,904 (1)	0	0	0	398,904
Capital Lease Obligations
Operating Lease Obligations
Purchase Obligations
Other Long-Term Liabilities reflected on the Registrant's Balance Sheet under GAAP	4,007,869(2)	270,438	3,737,431	0	0

The primary sources of funds for the year ended March 31, 2009 were proceeds from the sale of Project Partnerships of $2,119,202, $45,376 in distributions received from Project Partnerships, and interest income of $10,077 earned on cash and cash equivalents and investments in securities. Gateway made cash distributions to Limited Partners during the year-ended March 31, 2009 totaling $2,090,275. As of March 31, 2009 Gateway had $263,458 of cash and cash equivalents.

(1) The Long-Term Debt Obligations of continuing operations as of March 31, 2006 represent, on a consolidated basis, the accounts of Gateway and Village Apartments of Sparta Limited Partnership. The Long-Term Debt Obligations of discontinued operations as of March 31, 2006 represent, on a consolidated basis, the accounts of Gateway and Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership. All ~~together, these entities are the "Combined Entities", and represent two~~ Project Partnerships inare ~~which~~government ~~Gateway has invested~~subsidized. As Most ofhave ~~October~~mortgage loans 1,from ~~1996 and October 1, 1997, respectively, an affiliate of Gateway's Managing General Partner, Value Partners, Inc. became~~ the ~~general~~Farmers ~~partner~~Home ofAdministration ~~the Combined Entities. Since the general partner of the Combined Entities is~~ (now ancalled ~~affiliate~~USDA ~~of Gateway, these combined statements include the long-term liabilities. On November 1, 2005,~~ Rural Development,) (“USDA ~~the~~RD”) ~~holder~~under ofSection ~~the~~515 ~~note payable, suspended mortgage payments due from Village Apartments~~ of ~~Divernon~~the ~~Limited~~Housing ~~Partnership~~Act ~~until further notice. The entire balance~~ of ~~the note payable is included in the greater than five years column above~~1949. ~~Interest~~ These mortgage isloans ~~still~~are ~~being~~made ~~accrued~~at ~~from~~low ~~the~~interest ~~time~~rates offor ~~suspension. Subsequent to year~~multi-~~end,~~family ~~Gateway~~housing ~~sold its interest~~ in ~~the Village Apartments of Divernon.~~rural ~~(2) The~~and ~~Other~~suburban ~~Long-Term Liabilities represent the asset management fees owed to the General Partners as of March 31~~areas, ~~2006. This payable is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance~~ with the ~~limited~~requirement ~~partnership~~that ~~agreement,~~the ~~non-~~interest ~~bearing. As~~savings ~~referred~~be topassed ~~in Note 4, the Managing General Partner does not intend~~ on to ~~demand~~low ~~payment~~income oftenants ~~the portion of this balance reflected as due~~ in ~~greater than one year within~~ the ~~next~~form 12of ~~months. Item~~lower 7Arents. ~~Quantitative~~A ~~and~~significant portion ~~Qualitative~~of ~~Disclosures~~the ~~about~~Project ~~Market~~Partnerships ~~Risk. As~~also areceive ~~small~~rental ~~business~~assistance ~~issuer,~~from noUSDA ~~information is required.~~RD ~~Item~~to ~~8. Financial~~subsidize ~~Statements~~certain ~~and~~qualifying ~~Supplementary Data~~tenants.

The General Partners do not believe the Project Partnerships are subject to the risks generally associated with conventionally financed non-subsidized apartment properties. Risks related to the operations of Gateway are described in detail on pages 21 through 33 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, contained in the Registration Statement, File No. 33-18142 (“Prospectus”), under the caption “Risk Factors” which is incorporated herein by reference.

The investment objectives of Gateway are to:

1) Provide tax benefits to Limited Partners in the form of Tax Credits during the period in which each Project is eligible to claim Tax Credits;

2) Provide passive losses to individual investors to offset passive income from other passive activities, and provide passive losses to corporate investors to offset

business income;

3) Preserve and protect the capital contributions of Investors; and

4) Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Projects.

The investment objectives and policies of Gateway are described in detail on pages 33 through 38 of the Prospectus, under the caption “Investment Objectives and Policies” which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1. Business (Continued)

Gateway's goal was to invest in a diversified portfolio of Project Partnerships located in rural and suburban locations with a high demand for low-income housing. The capital contributions which were raised from Limited Partner investors were successfully invested in Project Partnerships which met the investment criteria. The Tax Credits have been delivered to Gateway and the fifteen year tax credit compliance period has expired for all of the Project Partnerships. Gateway is now disposing of its remaining interests and distributing proceeds from those sales to the Limited Partners.

Exit Strategy

The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion.

All of the Project Partnerships have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period. As of March 31, 2009, 39 of the Project Partnerships holding 42 of the properties have been sold and, in accordance with the Gateway partnership agreement, the entire net proceeds received from these sales either have been or will be distributed to the Limited Partners of Gateway. On a cumulative basis as of March 31, 2009, $5,369,875 of net sales proceeds representing $210.23 per Limited Partner unit have been distributed to Limited Partners.

Gateway is currently in the process of disposing of its remaining investments in Project Partnerships. Gateway’s objective is to sell Gateway’s interest in such properties for fair market value and ultimately, liquidate the Project Partnerships and in turn liquidate Gateway.

Gateway has no direct employees. The General Partners have full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Gateway, as a limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility of Tax Credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment. No such contributions have been made during fiscal year 2009.

Investors eventually may be allocated profits for tax purposes which exceed any cash Gateway distributes to them. Under these circumstances, unless an investor has passive losses or credits to reduce such tax liability, the investor will have to pay federal income tax without a corresponding cash distribution from Gateway. Similarly, in the event of a sale or foreclosure of an apartment complex, an investor may be allocated taxable income, resulting in tax liability, in excess of any cash distributed to the investor as a result of such event.

There is no assurance that investors will receive any cash distributions from the sale or refinancing of a Project Partnership. The price at which a Project Partnership is sold may not be sufficient to pay the mortgage and other expenses which must be paid at such time.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties

Gateway owns interest in properties through 99% limited partnership interests in 43 Project Partnerships holding 45 properties as of March 31, 2009. No Project Partnership carries a net investment for book purposes as of March 31, 2009. The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Project Partnerships in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008 (the Project Partnerships’ financial information contained herein is reported on a 3-month lag):

Item 2. Properties (Continued)

PARTNERSHIP	LOCATION OF PROPERTY	# OF UNITS	DATE ACQUIRED	PROPERTY COST	OCCUPANCY RATE
PARTNERSHIP	LOCATION OF PROPERTY	# OF UNITS	DATE ACQUIRED	PROPERTY COST	OCCUPANCY RATE

Laynecrest	Medway, OH	48	6/88	1,861,785	94%
Martindale	Union, OH	30	6/88	1,226,923	90%
La Villa Elena	Bernalillo, NM	54	8/88	2,203,313	94%
Rio Abajo	Truth or Consequences, NM	42	9/88	1,968,521	100%
Fortville II	Fortville, IN	24	11/88	810,389	88%
Summitville	Summitville, IN	24	11/88	879,994	96%
Suncrest	Yanceyville, NC	40	12/88	2,177,840	100%
Brandywine III	Millsboro, DE	32	12/88	1,393,353	100%
Concord IV	Perryville, MD	32	12/88	1,436,065	94%
Dunbarton Oaks III	Georgetown, DE	32	12/88	1,446,569	97%
Federal Manor	Federalsburg, MD	32	12/88	1,546,040	94%
Mulberry Hill IV	Easton, MD	16	12/88	759,749	94%
Madison	Madison, OH	39	12/88	1,478,675	100%
Hannah's Mill	Thomaston, GA	50	12/88	1,812,786	100%
Longleaf Apts.	Cairo, GA	36	12/88	1,218,731	100%
Sylacauga Garden	Sylacauga, AL	42	12/88	1,652,746	98%
Monroe Family	Monroe, GA	48	12/88	1,788,673	56%
Casa Linda	Silver City, NM	41	3/89	1,840,974	100%
Eagle's Bay	Beaufort, NC	40	6/89	1,975,445	100%
Sage	Gallup, NM	44	7/89	2,055,407	98%
Middleport	Middleport, NY	25	9/89	1,167,852	96%
Morgantown	Morgantown, IN	24	9/89	959,783	96%
Cuthbert Elderly	Cuthbert, GA	32	9/89	1,028,295	94%
Mabank 1988	Mabank, TX	42	9/89	1,435,789	95%
Buena Vista	Buena Vista, GA	24	9/89	814,227	92%
Woodcroft	Elizabethtown, NC	32	9/89	1,497,433	100%
Spring Creek	Quitman, GA	18	10/89	607,608	94%
Spring Creek	Cherokee, AL	24	11/89	1,042,287	96%
Milton Elderly	Milton, FL	43	11/89	1,396,378	100%
Stone Arbor	Madison, NC	40	12/89	1,887,202	98%
Centralia II	Centralia, IL	24	12/89	976,228	96%
Poteau IV	Poteau, OK	32	12/89	716,016	88%
Barling	Barling, AR	48	12/89	1,152,864	81%
Booneville	Booneville, AR	48	12/89	1,682,587	96%
Augusta	Augusta, KS	66	12/89	2,381,719	88%
Mathis Retirement	Mathis, TX	36	3/90	1,085,311	83%
Sabinal Housing	Sabinal, TX	24	3/90	780,115	92%
Kingsland Housing	Kingsland, TX	34	3/90	1,162,250	100%
Poteau Prop. III	Poteau, OK	19	4/90	583,005	100%
Decatur Properties	Decatur, AR	24	4/90	969,816	79%
Broken Bow Prop II	Broken Bow, OK	46	4/90	1,957,868	89%
Turtle Creek II	Grove, OK	42	4/90	1,558,446	98%
Hartwell Elderly	Hartwell, GA	24	4/90	821,329	92%

Total		1,517		$ 59,198,386

The average effective rental per unit for the year ended December 31, 2008 is $4,551 per year ($379 per month).

The average effective occupancy rate at December 31, 2008 was 93.6%

Item 2. Properties (Continued)

A summary of the book value of the fixed assets of the Project Partnerships (excluding Village Apartments of Sparta Limited Partnership (“Sparta”)
for the year ended December 31, 2006), as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2008		2007		2006

Land	$	2,520,971	$	3,379,633	$	4,370,614
Land Improvements		448,595		1,044,572		1,568,350
Buildings		54,310,634		74,155,361		90,212,695
Furniture and Fixtures		1,918,186		3,486,209		4,359,598

Properties, at Cost		59,198,386		82,065,775		100,511,257
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		35,291,195		46,432,941		53,702,442

Properties, Net	$	23,907,191	$	35,632,834	$	46,808,815

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Gateway is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

As of March 31, 2009, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a) Gateway's Limited Partnership interests are not publicly traded. There is no market for the Registrant's Limited Partnership interests and it is unlikely that any will develop. No transfers of Limited Partnership Units are permitted without the prior written consent of the Managing General Partner. There have been several transfers over the last two years, with most being from individuals to their trusts or heirs. The Managing General Partner is not aware of the price at which the units are transferred. The conditions under which investors may transfer units is found under ARTICLE XII – “Transfer of a Limited Partnership Interest” on pages A-24 and A-25 of the Limited Partnership Agreement within the Prospectus, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders:

		Number of Record Holders
Title of Class		as of March 31, 2009
Limited Partnership Interest		1,835
General Partner Interest		2

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

	2009	2008	2007	2006	2005
Total Revenues	$ 40,941	$ 82,163	$ 72,730	$ 89,743	$ 216,372
Net Income (Loss)	1,370,644	1,048,120	(190,201)	(378,769)	(1,018,200)

Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships	(6,808)	(32,216)	(26,727)	(107,224)	(371,209)

Total Assets	263,458	970,950	2,009,969	2,054,699	2,381,717

Investments in Project Partnerships	-	418,023	541,534	620,184	938,137

Per Limited Partnership Unit: (A)
Tax Credits	.00	.00	.00	.00	.00
Portfolio Income	135.29	68.16	(10.40)	10.46	13.65
Passive Loss	(64.95)	(78.32)	(103.29)	(135.51)	(160.84)

Net Income (Loss)	53.08	40.59	(16.84)	(24.07)	(39.43)

(A) The Tax information is as of December 31, the year-end of Gateway for tax purposes.

The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This statement is not covered by the auditor's opinion included elsewhere in this report.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.

The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas, and certain provisions of the Act have been implemented by Gateway and other provisions will be implemented by Gateway in subsequent years.

Results of Operations

As more fully detailed in the Exit Strategy discussion included herein, all of the Project Partnerships have delivered their Tax Credits to Gateway, the Tax Credit compliance period has expired, and Gateway is in the process of sale of all of its remaining Project Partnership interests. Net proceeds received from the sales are being distributed to the Limited Partners. Once all Project Partnership interests have been sold or otherwise disposed of, Gateway will be liquidated. The latest target date for liquidation of Gateway is on or before December 31, 2009, although there is no certainty that all the activities necessary to occur as of such date will have transpired.

Gateway has no direct employees. The General Partners have full and exclusive discretion in management and control of Gateway. There was no General and Administrative expense charged by the General Partner to Gateway in fiscal year 2009. In fiscal year 2008, general and administrative expense was $104,564 or 53% less than the fiscal year 2007 expense of $223,671. The decreased general and administrative expense in fiscal year 2008 results primarily from a decrease in Project Partnerships held by Gateway. These administrative costs are funded from interest income received, distributions received from Project Partnerships, and from cash reserves which were funded at the inception of Gateway for the purpose of funding on-going administrative costs of Gateway. During fiscal year 2009, these funds were used to partially pay accrued General and Administrative Expense – General Partner arising in prior years.

General and Administrative expense - Other, increased in fiscal year 2009 by $5,557 or 6% to $100,179 as compared to $94,622 incurred in fiscal year 2008. Fiscal year 2008 General and Administrative expense – Other when compared to fiscal year 2007 decreased $7,110, or 7% from the fiscal year 2007 expense of $101,732. Expenses for annual tax return preparation and financial statement audits and quarterly reviews, third-party investor reporting services and any other third-party professional services incurred are included in this category of expenses.

Impairment expense of $112,895 was recognized during the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. There was no impairment expense recognized during fiscal year 2008 or 2007. Impairment expense is a non-cash charge that reflects a potential decline in the carrying value of Gateway’s interest in Project Partnerships. Historically, Gateway has considered the residual value of the Project Partnerships as one key component of its estimate of the present value of Gateway’s interest in any of its Project Partnerships. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as a direct result of the deterioration that occurred within the United States financial markets and more specifically, its negative impact arising in that quarter on the Tax Credit market, Gateway has concluded that any residual value of the Project Partnerships in those Tax Credit market conditions cannot be practicably determined. As a result, in the quarter ended December 31, 2008 Gateway eliminated estimates of residual value of the Project Partnerships from the recoverability portion of its impairment analysis. Resultantly, non-cash impairment expense for the quarter was incurred. No impairment expense was incurred during the quarter-ended March 31, 2009.

Interest income for the year ended March 31, 2009 of $10,077 represents a decrease of $28,825 or 74%, as compared to fiscal year 2008. Interest income in fiscal year 2008 of $38,902 was an increase of $3,867 or 11% over the fiscal year 2007 interest income of $35,035. The changes in interest income over the prior two fiscal years result primarily from the fluctuation of interest rates on short-term investments over that period. Interest income is generally one source of funds available to pay administrative costs of Gateway.

Twelve Project Partnership investments were sold or otherwise disposed of during fiscal year 2009 (Pulaski Village, Middlefield, Limited, Laurel Apartments, Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), Hastings Manor, Ltd., Oakwood Grove, Ltd., Sandhill Forest, Ltd., Lakewood Apartments, Oakwood Apartments, Winder Apartments, Ltd., The Meadows Associates, and Limestone Estates). Gateway received net sales proceeds totaling $2,113,817. Of this amount, $2,089,342 was distributed in fiscal year 2009 to the Limited Partners at $81.71 per limited partner unit. The remaining $24,475 ($0.96 per limited partner unit) will be distributed to the Limited Partners in fiscal year 2010.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Fourteen Project Partnership investments were sold or otherwise disposed of during fiscal year 2008 (Ashburn Housing, Ltd., Laurel Woods Associates, Brookshire Apartments, L.P., Sandridge Apartments, Ltd., Greeneville Limited Partnership, Hunters Ridge, Ltd., Riverside Apartments, Ltd., Kenly Housing Associates Limited Partnership, River Road Apartments, Pleasant Valley Housing Limited Partnership, Claremont Housing Limited Partnership, Teton View Limited Partnership (Phase I and Phase II), Scotts Hill, Ltd., and Village Apartments of Sparta Limited Partnership). Gateway received net sales proceeds totaling $1,277,242 which were distributed in fiscal year 2008 to the Limited Partners at $49.95 per limited partner unit.

Nine Project Partnership investments were sold or otherwise disposed of during fiscal year 2007. Four of the Project Partnerships - Albany, Ltd., Burkesville, Ltd., Floresville Housing Ltd., and Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership – were sold or otherwise disposed of during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2007. Gateway received net sales proceeds for these four Project Partnership transactions totaling $136,778 which were distributed in fiscal year 2007 to the Limited Partners at $5.35 per limited partner unit. Five of the Project Partnerships – Applewood Apartments (Crestwood Villa II), Fairview South, Ltd., Robinhood Apartments, Ltd., Skyview Terrace Apartments, Ltd. and Southwood Apartments, Ltd. – were sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007. Gateway received net sales proceeds for these five Project Partnerships totaling $277,723 which have been distributed to the Limited Partners subsequent to the March 31, 2007 year-end (in May, 2007) at $10.87 per Limited Partner unit.

Cumulative distributions of sales proceeds since inception of Gateway to Limited Partners amount to $210.23 per unit.

For the year ended March 31, 2009 the Project Partnerships reported losses of $6,808 which represents a $25,408 decrease as compared to the losses from Project Partnerships for the year ended March 31, 2008 of $32,216. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, the Project Partnerships reported a loss of $26,727. Typically, it is customary in the low-income housing Tax Credit industry to experience losses for financial and tax reporting purposes because of the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization. Since Gateway invests as a limited partner in Project Partnerships, and is therefore not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, Gateway does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment balance below zero. Therefore, as the Project Partnership investments mature and the Investments in Project Partnership balances decrease over time, the losses from Project Partnerships recorded by Gateway decrease.

In fiscal year 2009, the Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships amounted to $769,214, a decrease of $447,501 from the fiscal year 2008 Gain on Sale amount of $1,216,715. The fiscal year 2007 Gain on Sale amount was $411,217. As more fully discussed herein, twelve Project Partnership investments were sold or disposed of in fiscal year 2009 as compared to fiscal year 2008 when fourteen Project Partnership investments were sold or disposed of. The amount of the gain or loss on a sale of a Project Partnership is dependent upon the specifics related to each sale or disposition transaction. Refer to the discussion of each Project Partnership sold in the exit strategy section that follows.

In fiscal year 2009, income from Discontinued Operations totaled $1,056,103, an increase of $704,184 from the fiscal year 2008 income from Discontinued Operations of $351,919. The fiscal year 2007 income from Discontinued Operations was $132,333. Discontinued Operations for fiscal year 2009 includes the gain on sale of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership (“Crosstown”). Discontinued Operations for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 includes the results of operations of Sparta and Village Apartments of Divernon Limited Partnership (“Divernon”), which when considered with Gateway Project Partnerships are the (“Operating Entities”). As more fully discussed in Notes 2 and 7 of the accompanying financial statements, Crosstown was sold during fiscal year 2009, Sparta was disposed of by Gateway late in fiscal year 2008 and Divernon was disposed of by Gateway early in fiscal year 2007. Refer to the discussion of these Project Partnership dispositions in the exit strategy section that follows.

In total, Gateway reported net income of $314,541 from continuing operations for the year ended March 31, 2009. Cash and Cash Equivalents decreased by $86,822 due in part to payments of accrued General and Administrative Expense – General Partner during fiscal year 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Gateway's capital resources are used to pay General and Administrative operating costs including personnel, supplies, data processing, travel, legal, and accounting and audit fees associated with the administration and monitoring of Gateway and the Project Partnerships. The capital resources are also used to pay the Asset Management Fee due the Managing General Partner, but only to the extent that Gateway's remaining resources are sufficient to fund Gateway's ongoing needs. (Payment of any Asset Management Fee due but unpaid at the time Gateway sells its interests in the Project Partnerships is subordinated to the investors return of their original capital contribution.)

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

The sources of funds to pay the operating costs are cash and cash equivalents and the interest earned thereon, and cash distributed to Gateway from operations of the Project Partnerships. Due to the rent limitations applicable to the Project Partnerships as a result of their qualifying for Tax Credits, Gateway does not expect there to be a significant increase in future rental income of the Project Partnerships. Therefore, cash distributions from operations of the Project Partnerships are not expected to increase. At March 31, 2009, Gateway had $263,458 of cash and cash equivalents. However, $26,423 of this balance represents proceeds Gateway received prior to March 31, 2009 from the sale of Project Partnerships which is for distribution to Limited Partners. Management believes that sources of funds are sufficient to meet Gateway's current and ongoing operating costs for the foreseeable future, and to perhaps pay a small portion of the unpaid Asset Management Fee.

For the year ending March 31, 2009, Gateway received $45,376 in cash distributions from the Project Partnerships and $10,077 in interest income which are available for payment of Gateway expenses. The General and Administrative operating costs (both General Partner and Other) were $100,179 in fiscal year 2009 and the Asset Management Fee expensed was $285,809; no asset management fees were actually paid to the General Partner during fiscal year 2009.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Recent Accounting Changes

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS No. 157”), which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. FAS No. 157 establishes a common definition of fair value and provides a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 until November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. Gateway has adopted FAS No. 157 effective as of fiscal year end March 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS No. 159”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. FAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Gateway has adopted FAS No. 159 in fiscal year 2009 but did not remeasure its financial assets and financial liabilities as a result of its adoption. Accordingly, the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN No. 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, was issued in July 2006 and interprets SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires all taxpayers to analyze all material positions they have taken or plan to take in all tax returns that have been filed or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all years still subject to challenge by those taxing authorities. If the position taken is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority on its technical merits and if there is more than a 50% likelihood that the position would be sustained if challenged and considered by the highest court in the relevant jurisdiction, the tax consequences of that position should be reflected in the taxpayer’s GAAP financial statements. Earlier proposed interpretations of SFAS 109 had recommended a “probable” standard for recognition of tax consequences rather than the “more-likely-than-not” standard finally adopted.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Because Gateway is a pass-through entity and is not required to pay income taxes, FIN No. 48 does not currently have any impact on its financial statements. On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FIN 48-3: Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 48 for Certain Nonpublic Enterprises, which deferred the effective date of FIN No. 48 for nonpublic enterprises included within the scope of FSP No. FIN 48-3 to the annual financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The deferred effective date was intended to give the Board additional time to develop guidance on the application of FIN No. 48 by pass-through entities and not-for-profit organizations. Gateway may modify its disclosures if the FASB’s guidance regarding application of FIN No. 48 to pass-through entities changes.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. The FSP, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

In November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF No. 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations,” which clarifies the accounting for how to account for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. This standard shall be effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8—Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities. The FSP amends Statement 140 to require public entities to provide additional disclosures about transferors’ continuing involvements with transferred financial assets. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Gateway’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. Upon adoption of FAS 167, Gateway will have reconsidered its previous FIN46(R) conclusions regarding its investments in Project Partnerships. FAS 167 is not effective for Gateway until its fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 and early adoption is prohibited. Gateway has not yet determined the impact, if any, FAS 167 will have on its financial statements for the year-ended March 31, 2011.

Exit Strategy

The IRS compliance period for low-income housing tax credit properties is generally 15 years from occupancy following construction or rehabilitation completion. All of Gateway’s Project Partnerships have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period; consequently, Gateway is currently in the process of disposing of all of its investments in Project Partnerships. Gateway’s objective is to sell Gateway’s interest in such assets for fair market value and ultimately, to liquidate the Project Partnerships. Generally, the market for Project Partnerships is limited. Some of the factors which negatively impact the marketability of these projects include (1) requirements by government agencies or the project’s debt holder to continue to maintain the property in the low-income housing program, and (2) a mortgage balance of the property which is very near the initial balance as a result of the heavily subsidized debt of the Project Partnerships and lengthy (usually 50 year) amortization periods.

As of March 31, 2009, Gateway holds a limited partner interest in 43 Project Partnerships holding 45 properties which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes. Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties. As of March 31, 2009, 39 of the Project Partnerships holding 42 of the properties have been sold and, in accordance with the Gateway partnership agreement, the entire net proceeds received from these sales either have been or will be distributed to the Limited Partners of Gateway. A summary of the sale or disposition transactions for the Project Partnerships disposed during the past three fiscal years are summarized herein:

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Fiscal Year 2009 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
January 2009	Limestone Estates	$ 24,475	$ 0.96	$ 24,475	$ -
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	198,792	7.78	197,674	-
September 2008	Winder Apartments, Ltd.	38,160	1.49	38,000	-
September 2008	Oakwood Apartments	9,741	0.38	9,741	-
September 2008	Lakewood Apartments	19,760	0.77	19,760	-
September 2008	Sandhill Forest, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Oakwood Grove, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Hastings Manor, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II)	1,349,749	52.79	-	1,055,863
August 2008	Laurel Apartments	226,840	8.87	225,535	-
June 2008	Middlefield, Limited	117,530	4.60	118,321	-
June 2008	Pulaski Village	128,770	5.03	128,770	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	6,938	240
				$ 769,214	$ 1,056,103

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Limestone Estates are a component of the Distribution Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2009. These net proceeds will be distributed to the Limited Partners during fiscal year 2010.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of The Meadows Associates, Winder Apartments, Ltd., Oakwood Apartments, and Lakewood Apartments, plus additional proceeds from the sale of Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), were distributed to the Limited Partners in December 2008.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II), Laurel Apartments, Middlefield, Limited, and Pulaski Village were distributed to the Limited Partners in September 2008.

Gateway recognized additional gains on sale of Project Partnerships in the amount of $6,938 and an additional component of discontinued operations of $240 resulting from the true-up of certain legal and other sale transaction closing expenses arising from Project Partnership sale transactions. Any undistributed proceeds related hereto will be distributed to the Limited Partners during fiscal year 2010.

Re-syndications of Project Partnerships occur when a new buyer acquires the assets of a Project Partnership and renovates the existing affordable housing property and finances the costs of the renovation in part through the acquisition and sale of Tax Credits. In such re-syndication transactions, the assets of the existing Project Partnership are sold to a new partnership, net sales proceeds from the sale of assets are remitted to either Gateway or the general partner of the Project Partnership as appropriate, and the Project Partnership is liquidated. In a separate transaction, interests in the new partnership, which has a “fresh” allocation of Tax Credits, are sold to an unrelated third party or fund. In certain limited circumstances, the Managing General Partner of Gateway is involved in “re-syndicating” the sale of interests in the new partnership to an unrelated third party or fund. In those instances, the Managing General Partner has adopted the policy that it will contribute any net profits it received from the re-syndication transaction to Gateway. The Riverside Apartments property was the subject of a fiscal year 2008 re-syndication transaction in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $5,312 of re-syndication profit has been contributed during fiscal year 2009 to Gateway by the Managing General Partner (in October 2008). This amount was then distributed to the Limited Partners as part of the December 2008 distribution.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Fiscal Year 2008 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
March 2008	Village Apartments of Sparta	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 401,634
March 2008	Scotts Hill	-	-	(2,000)	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase I)	23,000	0.90	21,811	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase II)	15,000	0.59	14,504	-
December 2007	Claremont Housing	22,000	0.86	23,850	-
December 2007	Pleasant Valley Housing	31,775	1.24	31,249	-
December 2007	River Road Apartments	8,750	0.34	(51,411)	-
December 2007	Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II	137,444	5.38	137,444	-
October 2007	Riverside Apartments	110,056	4.30	109,530	-
September 2007	Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL)	27,362	1.07	27,363	-
August 2007	Greenville Landing Apartments	34,306	1.34	33,775	-
July 2007	Sandridge Apartments	248,000	9.70	248,798	-
July 2007	Brookshire Apartments	248,000	9.70	249,032	-
May 2007	Laurel Woods Apartments	223,240	8.73	224,347	-
April 2007	Ashburn Housing	148,309	5.80	147,778	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	645	-
				$ 1,216,715	$ 401,634

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Teton View Apartments (Phase I), Teton View Apartments (Phase II), Claremont Housing, Pleasant Valley Housing, River Road Apartments, Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II, and Riverside Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in February 2008.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL), Greenville Landing Apartments, and Ashburn Housing were distributed to the Limited Partners in October 2007.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Sandridge Apartments, Brookshire Apartments, and Laurel Woods Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in August 2007.

As part of the October 2007 distribution, Gateway distributed an additional $4,942 to the Limited Partners ($0.19 per limited partnership unit) and recognized an additional gain on sale of Project Partnerships in the amount of $645 resulting from the true-up of certain legal and other sale transaction closing expenses arising from Project Partnership sale transactions which closed in prior quarters.

The following properties were the subject of re-syndication transactions in which the Managing General Partner was involved in the re-syndication, and $318,720 of re-syndication profit was contributed to Gateway by the Managing General Partner in October 2007. The re-syndication profit contributions associated with each transaction are as follows:

Floresville Square Apartments	$ 57,694
Albany Village Apartments	29,923
Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	29,922
Ashburn Housing	201,181

Total Re-syndication contribution	$ 318,720

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Fiscal Year 2007 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
February 2007	Skyview Terrace Apartments	$ 38,732	$ 1.51	$ 38,732	$ -
February 2007	Fairview South Apartments	50,360	1.97	50,360	-
February 2007	Southwood Apartments	42,710	1.67	42,710	-
February 2007	Robinhood Apartments	40,383	1.58	40,383	-
January 2007	Applewood Apartments	105,538	4.14	105,538	-
October 2006	Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	47,616	1.90	47,616	-
October 2006	Albany Village Apartments	47,668	1.90	47,668	-
July 2006	Floresville Square Apartments II	39,064	1.54	38,210	-
April 2006	Village Apartments of Divernon	-	-	-	151,256
				$ 411,217	$ 151,256

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Skyview Terrace Apartments, Fairview South Apartments, Southwood Apartments, Robinhood Apartments, and Applewood Apartments are a component of the Distribution Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2007. These net proceeds were distributed to the Limited Partners in May 2007.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY), Albany Village Apartments, and Floresville Square Apartments II were distributed to the Limited Partners in December 2006.

Status Update on Unsold Project Partnerships:

The following summarizes the most recent status of the sale/disposal process for the remaining Project Partnership investments held as of March 31, 2009:

Project Partnerships sold subsequent to March 31, 2009:

Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA)

Subsequent to the March 31, 2009 year-end, Gateway sold its partnership interest in Spring Creek Apartments, Ltd. (GA). Gateway received approximately $47,000 in net proceeds (approximately $1.84 per limited partnership unit) which also approximates the gain on sale of the Project Partnership. This gain will be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the net proceeds from this sale transaction will be distributed to the Limited Partners in a subsequent quarter.

Gateway has approved the sale to the general partner of the Project Partnerships or a third party:

Buena Vista Housing, Ltd., L.P.	Hannah’s Mill Apartments, Ltd.
Monroe Family, Ltd.	Hartwell Elderly, Ltd., L.P.
Sabinal Housing Ltd.	Kingsland Housing Ltd.
Mathis Retirement Ltd.	Eagle’s Bay Limited Partnership
Stone Arbor Limited Partnership	Suncrest Limited Partnership
Woodcroft Limited Partnership	Mabank 1988 Limited
Casa Linda Limited Partnership	La Villa Elena Limited Partnership
Rio Abajo	Sage Limited Partnership
Augusta Properties, L.P.	Booneville Properties
Barling Properties	Poteau Properties IV
Turtle Creek Properties Phase II	Broken Bow Properties II
Decatur Properties	Poteau Properties III

These approvals are subject to a number of contingencies, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty. However, utilizing the sales amounts as approved by Gateway, should all the transactions close without modification, the estimated net proceeds from the sales of these Project Partnerships to Gateway are estimated to approximate $1,915,000, or $74.90 per limited partnership unit. Sales proceeds would be available for distribution to the Limited Partners subsequent to the closing of these sale transactions which would most likely occur within the next 6-month period.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)

Gateway has consented to the general partner granting an option for either the general partner or a third-party to purchase either the Project Partnership Interest or Assets:

Cuthbert Elderly Housing, Ltd.	Madison, Ltd.
Concord IV Limited Partnership	Middleport Limited Partnership
Longleaf Apartments, Ltd.

Should all of these options be exercised, the estimated net sales proceeds to Gateway from the sales transactions are estimated to be $720,000, or $28.16 per limited partnership unit potentially available for distribution to the Limited Partners within the next 6 months. These options to purchase could expire without being exercised which would result in no sales proceeds and remarketing of the Project Partnerships the results of which are undeterminable.

Gateway is exploring options regarding the sale or other disposition of the remaining Project Partnership investments not specifically listed above. Any net proceeds arising from these particular Project Partnerships are anticipated to be minimal.

Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

		Payment due by period
Contractual Obligations	Total	Less than 1 year	1-3 years	3-5 years	More than 5 years

Debt Obligations
Capital Lease Obligations
Operating Lease Obligations
Purchase Obligations
Other Liabilities reflected on the
Registrant’s Balance Sheet under GAAP	$4,955,099 (1)	4,955,099	0	0	0

(1) The Other Liabilities represent the asset management fees and other general and administrative expense reimbursements owed to the General Partners as of March 31, 2009. This payable is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, no information is required.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. (a Florida Limited Partnership) as of March 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of a certain Project Partnership for which $327,130 of net investment is included in these financial statements as of March 31, 2006, and for which a net loss of $40,561 is included in these financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2006. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such underlying partnership, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. The financial statements of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. as of March 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors whose report dated September 8, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. at March 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed under Item 15(a)(2) in the index are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. REZNICK GROUP, P.C. Atlanta, Georgia July 13, 2006

Gateway ~~REPORT~~Tax OFCredit ~~THE~~Fund, ~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~Ltd.

~~To the Partners of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd.~~ We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. (a Florida Limited Partnership) as of March 31, ~~2005~~2009 and ~~the~~2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2009. Gateway’s ~~2005~~management ~~and~~is ~~2004,~~responsible ~~respectively. These~~for ~~consolidated~~these consolidated financial statements ~~are the responsibility of the Partnership's management~~. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of a certain Project Partnership for which $~~463~~293,~~329~~885 of net investment is included in these financial statements as of March 31, ~~2005~~2008, and for which equity in its net ~~losses~~(loss) ofincome was ($~~188~~35,~~168~~167) and $8315,~~787~~136, ~~are~~respectively, ~~included in the accompanying financial statements~~ for the years ended March 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004, respectively~~ 2007. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for such underlying partnership, is based solely on the report ~~of the other auditor.~~ ~~We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards~~ of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors ~~provide a reasonable basis for our opinion~~. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. as of March 31, 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co. SPENCE, MARSTON, BUNCH, MORRIS & CO. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Clearwater, Florida September 8, 2005

~~PART~~We conducted Iour -audits ~~Financial~~in ~~Information~~accordance with the standards of the Public Company ~~Item~~Accounting 1Oversight Board (United States). ~~Financial~~ Those ~~Statements~~standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. Gateway is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed under Item 15(a)(2) in the index are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Reznick Group, P.C.

REZNICK GROUP, P.C.

Atlanta, Georgia

June 29, 2009

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

	2006 ----	2005 ----
ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and Cash Equivalents Accounts Receivable Prepaid Insurance Tenant Security Deposits Assets Held for Sale Total Current Assets Investments in Project Partnerships, Net Replacement Reserves Non-Current Assets Held for Sale Rental Property at Cost, Net Property Held for Sale Total Assets LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Payable to General Partners Distribution Payable Accounts Payable Accrued Real Estate Taxes Tenant Security Deposits Mortgage Notes Payable - Current Liabilities Related to Property Held for Sale Total Current Liabilities Long Term Liabilities: Payable to General Partners Mortgage Notes Payable Liabilities Related to Property Held for Sale Total Long Term Liabilities Minority Interest in Local Limited Partnerships Partners' Equity (Deficit): Limited Partners (25,566 units outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2005 General Partners Total Partners' (Deficit) Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficit)	$ 758,509 15,823 190 0 2,794 ----------- 777,316 620,184 19,231 3,626 426,698 207,644 ----------- $ 2,054,699 =========== $ 270,438 224 29,984 10,138 4,500 5,148 7,291 ----------- 327,723 ----------- 3,737,431 807,733 398,904 ----------- 4,944,068 ----------- (69,517) ----------- (3,168,987) 21,412 ----------- (3,147,575) ----------- $ 2,054,699 ===========	$ 720,946 9,117 177 5,883 0 ----------- 736,123 938,137 22,667 0 684,790 0 ----------- $ 2,381,717 =========== $ 348,301 0 2,219 12,672 5,400 6,893 0 ----------- 375,485 ----------- 3,032,297 1,211,602 0 ----------- 4,243,899 ----------- (69,119) ----------- (1,953,424) (215,124) ----------- (2,168,548) ----------- $ 2,381,717 ===========

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~See~~CONSOLIDATED ~~accompanying~~BALANCE ~~notes to financial statements.~~SHEET

	March 31,	March 31,
	2009	2008
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$ 263,458	$ 350,280
Investment in Securities	-	202,647
Investments in Project Partnerships, net	-	124,138
Investment in Project Partnership Held for Sale	-	293,885

Total Current Assets	263,458	970,950

Total Assets	$ 263,458	$ 970,950

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Payable to General Partners	$ 4,955,099	$ 4,945,524
Distribution Payable	26,423	-
Accounts Payable - Other	5,435	6,131

Total Current Liabilities	4,986,957	4,951,655

Partners' Equity (Deficit):
Limited Partners (25,566 units outstanding
at March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008)	(5,333,453)	(4,571,641)
General Partners	609,954	590,936

Total Partners' Deficit	(4,723,499)	(3,980,705)

Total Liabilities and Partners' Deficit	$ 263,458	$ 970,950


See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

	2006 ----	2005 ----	2004 ----
Revenues: Rental Distribution Income Miscellaneous Income Total Revenues Expenses: Asset Management Fee-General Partner General and Administrative: General Partner Other Rental Operating Expenses Interest Depreciation Amortization Total Expenses Loss Before Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships and Other Income Equity in Income (Losses) of Project Partnerships: Current Year Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships Gain on Sale of Partnership Assets Minority Interest in Loss of Consolidated Project Partnerships Interest Subsidy Interest Income Net Loss Allocation of Net Loss: Limited Partners General Partners Net Loss Per Number of Limited Partnership Units Number of Limited Partnership Units Outstanding	$ 133,428 89,743 4,212 ---------- 227,383 ---------- 464,115 173,378 129,041 92,138 85,529 57,669 181,818 ---------- 1,183,688 ---------- (956,305) ---------- (107,224) 598,499 398 57,687 28,176 ----------- $ (378,769) =========== $ (615,305) 236,536 ----------- $ (378,769) =========== $ (24.07) =========== 25,566 ===========	$ 125,995 86,068 4,309 ---------- 216,372 ---------- 476,680 116,631 78,336 102,850 85,105 59,648 13,643 ---------- 932,893 ---------- (716,521) ---------- (371,209) 0 601 57,189 11,740 ----------- $(1,018,200) =========== $(1,008,018) (10,182) ----------- $(1,018,200) =========== $ (39.43) =========== 25,566 ===========	$ 125,628 71,378 4,952 ---------- 201,958 ---------- 479,165 117,118 58,297 87,014 85,824 58,510 13,643 ---------- 899,571 ---------- (697,613) ---------- (227,721) 769,311 432 57,189 42,825 ----------- $ (55,577) =========== $ (78,850) 23,273 ----------- $ (55,577) =========== $ (3.08) =========== 25,566 ===========

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~See~~CONSOLIDATED ~~accompanying~~STATEMENTS ~~notes~~OF ~~to financial statements.~~OPERATIONS

~~GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD. (A Florida Limited Partnership) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)~~ FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, ~~2006~~2009, ~~2005~~2008 AND ~~2004:~~ 2007

	Limited Partners Equity (Deficit) --------------	General Partners Equity (Deficit) ---------------	Total -----
		2009		2008	2007
Balance at March 31, 2003 Net Income (Loss) Distributions Balance at March 31, 2004 Net Loss Balance at March 31, 2005 Net Income (Loss) Distributions Balance at March 31, 2006	$ (194,381) (78,850) (672,175) ------------ (945,406) (1,008,018) ------------ (1,953,424) (615,305) (600,258) ------------ $(3,168,987) ============	$ (228,215) 23,273 0 ----------- (204,942) (10,182) ----------- (215,124) 236,536 0 ----------- $ 21,412 ===========	$ (422,596) (55,577) (672,175) ----------- (1,150,348) (1,018,200) ----------- (2,168,548) (378,769) (600,258) ------------ $(3,147,575) ============
Revenues:
Distribution Income		$ 40,941		$ 82,163	$ 72,730
Total Revenues		40,941		82,163	72,730
Expenses:
Asset Management Fee - General Partner		285,809		379,409	450,140
General and Administrative:
General Partner		-		104,564	223,671
Other		100,179		94,622	101,732
Impairment Loss on Investment in Project Partnerships		112,895		-	-
Total Expenses		498,883		578,595	775,543
Loss Before Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships and Other Income		(457,942)		(496,432)	(702,813)
Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships		(6,808)		(32,216)	(26,727)
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships		769,214		1,216,715	411,217
Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Project Partnership		-		(30,768)	(39,246)
Interest Income		10,077		38,902	35,035
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		$ 314,541		$ 696,201	$ (322,534)
Income from Discontinued Operations (See Notes 2 & 7)		1,056,103		351,919	132,333
Net Income (Loss)		$ 1,370,644		$ 1,048,120	$ (190,201)
Allocation of Net Income (Loss):
Limited Partners		$ 1,356,938		$ 1,037,639	$ (430,524)
General Partners		13,706		10,481	240,323
		$ 1,370,644		$ 1,048,120	$ (190,201)
Net Income (Loss) Per Limited Partnership Unit		$ 53.08		$ 40.59	$ (16.84)
Number of Limited Partnership Units Outstanding		25,566		25,566	25,566
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

~~See accompanying notes to financial statements.~~18

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

	2006 ----	2005 ----	2004 ----
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: Net Loss Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities: Amortization Depreciation Distributions Included in Distribution Income Accreted Interest Income on Investments in Securities Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships Gain on the Sale of Partnership Assets Minority Interest in Losses of Consolidated Project Partnerships Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: (Increase) Decrease in Accounts Receivable (Increase) Decrease in Prepaid Insurance Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable Increase in Distribution Payable Increase in Replacement Reserves Increase (Decrease) in Security Deposits Increase (Decrease) in Accrued Real Estate Taxes Increase (Decrease) in Payable to General Partners Net Cash Used in Operating Activities Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Distributions Received from Project Partnerships Redemption of Investment in Securities Purchase of Equipment Proceeds from Sale of Project Partnerships Cash related to Property Held for Sale Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Principal Payment on Debt Distributions to Investors Expenses Related to Sales of Project Partnerships Net Cash Used In Financing Activities Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$ (378,769) 181,818 57,669 (89,743) 0 107,224 (598,499) (398) (7,710) (101) 30,483 224 (190) 6,583 439 627,272 --------- (63,698) --------- 116,895 0 (7,221) 604,258 (1,703) --------- 712,229 --------- (6,710) (600,258) (4,000) --------- (610,968) --------- 37,563 720,946 --------- $ 758,509 ==========	$(1,018,200) 13,643 59,648 (86,068) (2,955) 371,209 0 (601) (708) (84) (1,538) 0 (6,143) 33 671 48,255 --------- (622,838) --------- 118,839 142,000 (3,149) 0 0 --------- 257,690 --------- (6,578) 0 0 --------- (6,578) --------- (371,726) 1,092,672 --------- $ 720,946 ==========	$ (55,577) 13,643 58,510 (71,378) (36,997) (227,721) (769,311) (432) 35,975 172 1,548 0 (16,524) (7,316) (2,850) (238,116) --------- (860,932) --------- 774,633 514,000 (373) 0 0 --------- 1,288,260 --------- (6,147) (672,175) 0 --------- (678,322) --------- (250,994) 1,343,666 --------- $1,092,672 ==========
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Interest Paid	$ 26,409 ==========	$ 27,917 ==========	$ 28,635 ==========

(A Florida Limited Partnership)

~~See~~CONSOLIDATED ~~accompanying~~STATEMENTS ~~notes~~OF toPARTNERS’ ~~financial~~EQUITY ~~statements.~~(DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

	Limited	General
	Partners'	Partners'
	Deficit	Equity	Total

Balance at March 31, 2006	$ (3,168,987)	$ 21,412	$ (3,147,575)

Net (Loss) Income	(430,524)	240,323	(190,201)

Distributions	(414,681)	-	(414,681)

Balance at March 31, 2007	(4,014,192)	261,735	(3,752,457)

Capital Contributions	-	318,720	318,720

Net Income	1,037,639	10,481	1,048,120

Distributions	(1,595,088)	-	(1,595,088)

Balance at March 31, 2008	(4,571,641)	590,936	(3,980,705)

Capital Contributions	-	5,312	5,312

Net Income	1,356,938	13,706	1,370,644

Distributions	(2,118,750)	-	(2,118,750)

Balance at March 31, 2009	$ (5,333,453)	$ 609,954	$ (4,723,499)


See accompanying notes to financial statements.

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

~~NOTE~~(A 1Florida -Limited ~~ORGANIZATION~~Partnership)

~~NOTE~~CONSOLIDATED 3STATEMENTS -OF ~~INVESTMENT~~CASH ~~IN SECURITIES:~~ FLOWS

	Cost ------	Accumulated Depreciation ------------	Book Value -----
Land Buildings Furniture and Appliances Net Book Value	$ 32,000 961,171 44,826 --------- $1,037,997 ==========	$ 0 573,112 38,187 -------- $611,299 ========	$ 32,000 388,059 6,639 -------- $426,698 ========

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009, 2008 AND 2007

A summary of the rental property is as follows at December 31, 2004:

	2009	2008	2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$ 1,370,644	$ 1,048,120	$ (190,201)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Impairment Loss on Investment in Project Partnerships	112,895	-	-
Premium on Investment in Securities	70	195	-
Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships	6,808	32,216	26,727
Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships	(769,214)	(1,216,715)	(411,217)
Discontinued Operations	(1,056,103)	(351,919)	(132,333)
Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Project Partnership	-	30,768	39,246
Net Change in Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated
Project Partnership Held for Sale	-	-	1,428
Distribution Income	(40,941)	(82,163)	(72,730)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Decrease in Accounts Receivable	-	1,294	1,619
Decrease (Increase) in Interest Receivable	2,577	(2,577)	-
(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable - Other	(696)	696	(21,027)
Increase in Payable to General Partners	7,523	263,491	676,216
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(366,437)	(276,594)	(82,272)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Distributions Received from Project Partnerships	45,376	92,198	87,232
Net Proceeds from Sale of Project Partnerships	2,119,202	1,276,538	408,239
Redemption of Investment Securities	200,000	-	-
Purchase of Investment Securities	-	(200,266)	-
Cash Related to Property Held for Sale	-	-	(19,979)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	2,364,578	1,168,470	475,492

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Capital Contributions	5,312	318,720	-
Distributions to Limited Partners	(2,090,275)	(1,875,266)	(136,779)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	(2,084,963)	(1,556,546)	(136,779)

(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	(86,822)	(664,670)	256,441
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year	350,280	1,014,950	758,509

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$ 263,458	$ 350,280	$ 1,014,950

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest Paid	$ -	$ 17,874	$ 19,632

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Increase in Distribution Payable	$ 24,475	$ 2,052	$ 277,902
Distribution to Limited Partners	(24,475)	-	(277,902)
Decrease in Payable to General Partners	-	(2,052)	-
Increase in Investment in Project Partnership Held for Sale	-	(293,885)	-
Decrease in Investments in Project Partnerships	-	293,885	-
	$ -	$ -	$ -

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

	Cost ------	Accumulated Depreciation ------------	Book Value -----
Land Buildings Furniture and Appliances Net Book Value	$ 47,000 1,439,355 54,290 --------- $1,540,645 ==========	$ 0 804,489 51,366 -------- $855,855 ========	$ 47,000 634,866 2,924 -------- $684,790 ========

~~NOTE~~GATEWAY 6TAX -CREDIT ~~MORTGAGE NOTE PAYABLE:~~FUND, LTD.

~~NOTE~~(A Florida 7Limited ~~- TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS~~Partnership):

	2006 ----	2005 ----	2004 ----
Net Loss per Financial Statements	$ (378,769)	$ (1,018,200)	$ (55,577)
Equity in Losses of Project Partnerships for tax purposes in excess of losses for financial statement purposes	(905,444)	(378,427)	(225,098)
Losses suspended for financial reporting purposes	(1,998,796)	(1,984,370)	(1,355,991)
Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end to December 31, taxable year end	219,027	58,355	17,867
Additional gain on sale for tax purposes	999,397	0	0
Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes not expensed for Tax purposes: Asset Management Fee Amortization Expense Miscellaneous Income Capital Loss	466,433 12,885 (89,491) 0 ------------	(356,406) 13,644 (133,949) 0 ------------	186,980 12,913 (83,682) (11,581) ------------
Partnership loss for tax purposes as of December 31	$(1,674,758) ============	$(3,799,353) ============	$(1,514,169) ============
	December 31, 2005 ------------	December 31, 2004 ------------	December 31, 2003 ------------
Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)	$ 0 ============	$ 0 ============	$ 51,799 ============

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Partnership's Investment in Project Partnerships is approximately $27,694,575 higher for financial reporting purposes than for tax return purposes because (i) annual tax depreciation expense is higher than financial depreciation, (ii) certain expenses are not deductible for tax return purposes and (iii) losses are suspended for financial purposes but not for tax return purposes. The differences in the assets and liabilities of the Fund for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, ~~2006~~2009, ~~are~~2008 ~~as follows:~~AND Financial Tax Reporting Reporting Purposes Purposes Differences Investments in Local Limited Partnerships $ 620,184 $(26,903,324) $27,523,508 Other Assets $ 1,434,515 $ 758,546 $ 675,969 Liabilities $ 5,271,791 $ 21,468 $ 5,250,3232007

NOTE 81 - ~~INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS~~ ORGANIZATION:

	MARCH 31, 2006 --------------	MARCH 31, 2005 --------------
Capital Contributions to Project Partner-ships and purchase price paid for limited partner interests in Project Partnerships Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1) Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustments Excess of investment cost over the underlying assets acquired: Acquisition fees and expenses Accumulated amortization of acquisition fees and expenses Investments in Project Partnerships	$ 17,228,138 (17,245,840) (771,541) ------------ (789,243) 2,176,055 (766,628) ------------ $ 620,184 ============	$ 17,706,016 (17,607,190) (783,455) ------------ (684,629) 2,207,576 (584,810) ------------ $ 938,137 ============

Gateway Tax Credit Fund, Ltd. (“Gateway”), a Florida Limited Partnership, was formed October 27, 1987 under the laws of Florida. Operations commenced on June 30, 1988. Gateway invests, as a limited partner, in other limited partnerships (“Project Partnerships”), each of which owns and operates apartment complexes eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“Tax Credits”), provided for in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Gateway will terminate on December 31, 2040 or sooner, in accordance with the terms of the limited partnership agreement (the “Agreement”). As of March 31, 2009, Gateway had received capital contributions of $325,032 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from the Limited Partners. As of March 31, 2008, Gateway had received capital contributions of $319,720 from the General Partners and $25,566,000 from the Limited Partners. The fiscal year of Gateway for reporting purposes ends on March 31.

~~(1)~~Raymond James ~~In accordance with the Partnership's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero~~Partners, ~~cumulative~~Inc. ~~suspended losses of $19,655,193 for the year ended March 31, 2006~~ and ~~cumulative~~Raymond ~~suspended~~James ~~losses~~Tax ofCredit ~~$18~~Funds,~~592,904~~ ~~for the year ended March 31~~Inc., ~~2005~~wholly ~~are not included.~~owned ~~The~~subsidiaries ~~Partnership's~~of ~~equity~~Raymond asJames ~~reflected~~Financial, ~~by the Project Partnerships of $(21~~Inc.,~~204,017)~~ ~~differs~~are ~~from~~ the ~~Partnership's~~General ~~Investments~~Partner ~~in Project Partnerships before acquisition fees~~ and Managing ~~expenses~~General ~~and amortization of $(789~~Partner,~~243),~~ ~~primarily because of suspended losses on the Partnership's books~~respectively.

~~NOTE~~Operating profits 8and -losses, ~~INVESTMENTS~~cash INdistributions ~~PROJECT~~from ~~PARTNERSHIPS~~operations ~~(continued):~~and Tax Credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners. Profit or loss and cash distributions from sales of properties are allocated as specified in the Agreement.

	2005 ----	2004 ----	2003 ----
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS Assets: Current assets Investment properties, net Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Partners' Equity: Current liabilities Long-term debt Total liabilities Partners' equity Limited Partner General Partners Total Partners' equity Total liabilities and partners' equity SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Rental and other income Expenses: Operating expenses Interest expense Depreciation and amortization Total expenses Net loss Other partners' share of net loss Partnerships' share of net loss Suspended losses Equity in Income (Loss) of Project Partnerships	$ 8,866,220 54,721,793 476,710 ------------ $64,064,723 ============ $ 3,673,308 83,731,653 ------------ 87,404,961 ------------ (21,204,017) (2,136,221) ------------ (23,340,238) ------------ $64,064,723 ============ $17,514,169 9,322,311 6,997,036 3,322,115 ------------ 19,641,462 ------------ $(2,127,293) ============ $ (21,273) ============ $(2,106,020) 1,998,796 ------------ $ (107,224) ============	$ 9,373,440 59,172,763 490,196 ------------ $69,036,399 ============ $ 3,531,551 87,638,861 ------------ 91,170,412 ------------ (20,002,194) (2,131,819) ------------ (22,134,013) ------------ $69,036,399 ============ $16,991,124 9,301,845 6,613,496 3,455,156 ------------ 19,370,497 ------------ $(2,379,373) ============ $ (23,794) ============ $(2,355,579) 1,984,370 ------------ $ (371,209) ============	$ 9,728,256 62,236,576 85,771 ------------ $72,050,603 ============ $ 3,611,898 87,934,669 ------------ 91,546,567 ------------ (17,517,241) (1,978,723) ------------ (19,495,964) ------------ $72,050,603 ============ $16,693,028 9,016,473 6,764,573 3,436,960 ------------ 19,218,006 ------------ $(2,524,978) ============ $ (24,304) ============ $(2,500,674) 2,272,953 ------------ $ (227,721) ============

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Two of the Project Partnerships, Keysville, L.P. and Rivermeade Associates sold their properties during fiscal year 2006. Gateway received sale proceeds totaling $604,258 which were distributed in December 2005 to the Limited Partners, less $4,000 in legal expenses, at $23.47 per limited partnership unit. The remaining $224 of this distribution is shown as a Distribution Payable on the Balance Sheet. As disclosed on the Statement of Operations, Gateway reported a $598,499 gain on these sales transactions.Consolidated During fiscal year 2004, two of the Project Partnerships, Clayfed Apartments, Ltd. and Westside Apartments, Ltd., sold their property in July 2003 and subsequently liquidated. The sale of the properties resulted in a gain allocated to Gateway of $769,311. Gateway received sale proceeds totaling $674,675, of which $672,675 were distributed to the Limited Partners at $26.29 per limited partnership unit. As of December 31, 2005, the largest Project Partnership constituted 7.6% and 7.5% of the consolidated total assets and consolidated total revenues. As of December 31, 2004, the largest Project Partnership constituted 7.4% and 7.7% of the consolidated total assets and consolidated total revenues.Statements

The ~~NOTE~~accompanying 9financial -statements ~~SUBSEQUENT~~for ~~EVENTS: Subsequent~~fiscal toyears ~~Gateway's~~ended ~~year-end~~March 31, ~~Gateway~~2008 ~~sold~~and ~~its~~2007 include, ~~Project~~on ~~Partnership~~a ~~investment~~consolidated inbasis, ~~Village~~the ~~Apartments~~accounts of ~~Divernon. The~~Gateway, Village Apartments ~~sale~~ of ~~this~~Sparta ~~Project~~Limited ~~Partnerships'assets~~Partnership ~~will~~(“Sparta”) beand ~~reflected~~Village inApartments ~~the~~of Divernon ~~financial~~Limited ~~statements~~Partnership ~~for~~(“Divernon”) (together, the ~~year~~“Operating ~~ended~~Entities”), two ~~March~~Project ~~31,~~Partnerships ~~2007. Although~~in which Gateway ~~estimates~~had ~~that~~invested. As itof ~~will~~October 1, ~~not~~1996 ~~receive~~and ~~any~~October ~~net~~1, ~~proceeds~~1997, ~~from~~respectively, ~~the~~an ~~sale~~affiliate of ~~this~~Gateway's ~~Project~~Managing General ~~Partnership~~Partner, ~~Gateway~~Value ~~estimates~~Partners, ~~a net gain of approximately $130~~Inc.,~~000~~ ~~will~~became bethe ~~recognized~~general inpartner ~~fiscal~~of ~~year~~the Operating ~~2007~~Entities. Since asthe ageneral ~~result~~partner of the ~~sale transaction.~~Operating ~~Also~~Entities ~~subsequent~~was toan ~~this~~affiliate ~~year-end~~of Gateway, ~~the~~these ~~following~~consolidated ~~fourteen~~financial ~~Project~~statements include ~~Partnerships~~the ~~were~~financial ~~actively~~activity ~~listed~~of ~~for~~the ~~sale~~Operating onEntities afor ~~commercial~~all ~~marketing~~years ~~website: Laynecrest,~~up ~~Martindale,~~to ~~Fortville~~and including ~~II,~~their ~~Summitville,~~fiscal ~~Limestone~~year ~~Estates,~~of ~~Middleport,~~disposition ~~Morgantown,~~by ~~Robinhood~~Gateway. Gateway disposed ~~Apartments,~~of ~~Skyview~~its ~~Terrace,~~investment ~~Hunters~~in ~~Ridge,~~Sparta ~~Centralia~~during ~~II,~~the ~~Fairview~~fiscal ~~South,~~year ~~Southwood~~ended ~~Apartments~~March 31, 2008 and ~~Village~~Divernon ~~Apartments~~during ofthe ~~Sparta. Subsequent~~fiscal ~~to Gateway's~~ year~~-end,~~ aended ~~casualty~~March ~~loss~~31, ~~due~~2007 to(See afurther ~~fire~~discussion of ~~was~~these ~~experienced~~disposition attransactions ~~the~~in ~~Meadows~~Note ~~Project Partnership~~7). ~~One~~ All ~~ten~~significant intercompany ~~unit~~balances ~~building~~and intransactions ~~this~~have ~~four~~been ~~building~~eliminated. Gateway has ~~apartment~~elected ~~project~~to ~~suffered~~report ~~significant~~the ~~damage~~results ~~which~~of ~~may~~operations ~~ultimately,~~of ~~once~~ the ~~damage~~Operating ~~can~~Entities beon ~~completely~~a 3-month ~~assessed~~lag basis, beconsistent ~~considered~~with tothe bepresentation aof ~~total~~financial ~~loss~~information of all ~~that~~Project ~~building~~Partnerships. The ~~Project~~operating ~~Partnership~~activity ~~maintained~~and ~~casualty~~gain ~~insurance~~on disposition ~~and~~of ~~the~~Sparta ~~insurance~~are ~~carrier~~reported ~~has~~as ~~been~~discontinued ~~notified. Gateway's~~operations ~~investment~~on ~~balance~~the infinancial statements ~~this~~for ~~Project~~the ~~Partnership~~years asended of March 31, ~~2006~~2008 ~~was~~and ~~$0,~~2007. The ~~therefore,~~operating activity ~~Gateway~~and ~~does~~gain ~~not~~on ~~expect~~disposition toof ~~record~~Divernon ~~any~~are ~~loss~~reported inas ~~its~~discontinued operations on the financial statements infor ~~fiscal~~the year ~~2007~~ended asMarch ~~a result of this event~~31, 2007.

~~NOTE~~Basis ~~10 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):~~of Year 2006 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 6/30/2005 9/30/2005 12/31/2005 3/31/2006 Total Revenues $ 63,273 $ 49,092 $ 62,920 $ 52,098 Net Income (Loss) $(182,951) $ 398,411 $(246,930) $(347,299) Earnings (Loss) Per Weighted Average Beneficial Assignee Certificates Outstanding $ (7.08) $ 12.77 $ (9.65) $ (13.59) Year 2005 Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 6/30/2004 9/30/2004 12/31/2004 3/31/2005 Total Revenues $ 89,870 $ 33,342 $ 44,207 $ 48,953 Net Income (Loss) $ (89,754) $(378,351) $ 61,992 $(612,087) Earnings (Loss) Per Weighted Average Beneficial Assignee Certificates Outstanding $ (3.48) $ (14.65) $ 2.40 $ (23.70)Accounting

~~Schoonover~~Gateway utilizes ~~Boyer~~the &accrual ~~Associates 383~~basis ~~North~~of ~~Front~~accounting ~~Street Columbus,~~whereby OHrevenues ~~43215~~are recognized when ~~PHONE: 614-888-8000 FAX: 614-888-8634~~earned and expenses are recognized when obligations are incurred.

~~INDEPENDENT~~Gateway accounts ~~AUDITORS'~~for ~~REPORT~~its investments as the sole limited partner in Project Partnerships (“Investments in Project Partnerships”), with the exception of the Operating Entities, using the equity method of accounting, because management believes that Gateway does not have a majority control of the major operating and financial policies of the Project Partnerships in which it invests, and reports the equity in loss of the Project Partnerships on a 3-~~---------------------------~~month lag in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under the equity method, the Investments in Project Partnerships initially include:

~~The Partners Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership (A Michigan Limited Partnership~~1) Kalamazoo, Michigan We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, (a Michigan Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners Gateway' ~~equity/(deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership'~~s ~~management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.~~ Wecapital conducted our audits in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership has determined that it is not required to havecontribution, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity/(deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~/s/~~2) Acquisition fees ~~Schoonover~~paid ~~Boyer~~to &the ~~Associates Columbus,~~General ~~Ohio~~Partner for services rendered in selecting properties ~~January~~for 26acquisition, ~~2006~~and

~~Item 9. Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures On or about January~~ 3~~, 2006, Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co., Certified Public Accountants, P.C. ("SMBM"~~) resigned as the principal independent accountant of Gateway. As explained to the Registrant by SMBM, the Registrant and its two affiliated funds were the only clients of SMBM required to file reports as a public company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. SMBM decided to resign due to the economic unfeasibility of providing auditing services to a small number of public company clients. Acquisition ~~During~~expenses the years ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, and the subsequent interim periods through January 3, 2006, there were no disagreements with SMBM on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of SMBM, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their report. In addition, none of the reportable events listed in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurred with respect to the Registrant during the Registrant's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods preceding the resignation of SMBM. The audit reports of SMBM on the financial statements of the Registrant for the two most recent fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. On January 11, 2006, Gateway engaged the firm of Reznick Group, P.C. ("Reznick") as its independent registered public accounting firm. The engagement was authorized by Gateway's audit committee. From January 1, 2004 to such date of engagement, neither Gateway nor anyone on behalf of Gateway consulted with Reznick regarding any matter requiring disclosure under Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K. Item 9a. Controls and Procedures Within 90 days prior to the filing of this report, under the supervision and with the participation of the Partnership's management, including ~~the~~legal ~~Partnership's chief executive and chief financial officer of the Partnership's Managing General Partner~~fees, antravel ~~evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures~~other ~~(as~~miscellaneous ~~defined~~costs in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed. Based on this evaluation, such officers have concluded that the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the date of that evaluation in alerting them in a timely manner to material information relating to the Partnership required to be included in this report and the Partnership's other reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There were no significant changes in the Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. ~~Item~~acquiring 9Bproperties. ~~Other Information None.~~

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Quarterly the Investments in Project Partnerships are increased or decreased as follows:

1) Increased for equity in income or decreased for equity in loss of the Project Partnerships,

2) Decreased for cash distributions received from the Project Partnerships,

3) Decreased for the amortization of the acquisition fees and expenses, and

4) Decreased, where appropriate, for impairment.

Pursuant to the limited partnership agreements for the Project Partnerships, cash losses generated by the Project Partnerships are allocated to the general partners of those partnerships. In subsequent years, cash profits, if any, are first allocated to the general partners to the extent of the allocation of prior years' cash losses.

Since Gateway invests as a limited partner, and therefore is not obligated to fund losses or make additional capital contributions, it does not recognize losses from individual Project Partnerships to the extent that these losses would reduce the investment in those Project Partnerships below zero. The suspended losses will be used to offset future income, if any, from the individual Project Partnerships. Any cash distributions received from Project Partnerships which have a zero investment balance are accounted for as distribution income in the period the cash distribution is received by Gateway.

Gateway reviews its investments in Project Partnerships to determine if there has been any permanent impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the investment, Gateway recognizes an impairment loss. As part of its analysis, Gateway has historically considered the residual value of the Project Partnerships as one key component of its estimate of future cash flows. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as a direct result of the deterioration that occurred within the United States financial markets and more specifically, its negative impact on the Tax Credit market, Gateway concluded that any residual value of the Project Partnerships in the present Tax Credit market conditions cannot be practicably determined. As a result, Gateway eliminated estimates of residual value of the Project Partnerships from the recoverability portion of its impairment analysis. Accordingly, in the quarter ended December 31, 2008, impairment expense of $112,895 was recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. No impairment expense was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. Gateway is continuing to execute its process of disposition of its interest in Project Partnerships that have reached the end of their Tax Credit compliance period, refer to Note 7 – Summary of Disposition Activities for the most recent update of those on-going activities. No impairment expense was recognized during either of the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.

Gateway, as a limited partner in the Project Partnerships, is subject to risks inherent in the ownership of property which are beyond its control, such as fluctuations in occupancy rates and operating expenses, variations in rental schedules, proper maintenance and continued eligibility for Tax Credits. If the cost of operating a property exceeds the rental income earned thereon, Gateway may deem it in its best interest to voluntarily provide funds in order to protect its investment. However, Gateway does not guarantee any of the mortgages or other debt of the Project Partnerships. No such funding to Project Partnerships occurred during fiscal years 2007, 2008, or 2009.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Gateway's policy is to include short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in cash and cash equivalents. Short-term investments are comprised of money market mutual funds.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets which meet certain specific criteria are classified as property held for sale as of the balance sheet date. One of the Project Partnerships, Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership (“Crosstown”) met such criteria as of March 31, 2008. Accordingly, the investment in Crosstown was presented as Investment in Project Partnership Held for Sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008 and 2007. Crosstown was sold during September 2008. The gain on sale of Crosstown is presented as discontinued operations for the year ended March 31, 2009. (See further discussion of this sale transaction in Note 7).

Sparta met such assets held for sale criteria as of March 31, 2007 and Divernon met such criteria as of March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the results of operations of Sparta and Divernon are presented as discontinued operations for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. Gateway’s interest in Sparta was disposed of during March 2008 and Gateway’s interest in Divernon was disposed of during April 2006. (See further discussion of these disposition transactions in Note 7).

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Discontinued Operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations consist of the following amounts for fiscal year 2009, 2008 and 2007:

	2009	2008	2007
Rental Revenue	$ -	$ 109,586	$ 109,342
Miscellaneous Income	-	2,646	3,695
Rental Operating Expenses	-	(105,550)	(74,651)
Interest Expense	-	(49,295)	(49,638)
Depreciation Expense	-	(38,714)	(39,382)
Gain on Disposition of Project Partnerships	1,056,103	401,634	151,256
Interest Subsidy	-	31,421	31,440
Interest Income	-	191	271
Total Discontinued Operations Income (Loss)	$ 1,056,103	$ 351,919	$ 132,333

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject Gateway to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash investments in a money market mutual fund whose investment advisor is a wholly owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and as of March 31, 2008, U.S. Treasury securities.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates are based on management's knowledge and experience. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Investment in Securities

Gateway applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“FAS 115”) (refer to Note 3 herein). Under FAS 115, Gateway is required to categorize its debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading securities, dependent upon Gateway’s intent in holding the securities. As of March 31, 2008, Gateway’s intent was to hold all of its debt securities (U.S. Treasury Notes) until maturity and to use these assets to fund Gateway’s ongoing operations. The securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximates market value, and are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such adjustments are included in Interest Income. There are no Investments in Securities as of March 31, 2009.

Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements, as income taxes are a liability of the partners rather than of Gateway.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51,” which was subsequently revised in December 2003. Gateway has adopted FIN46 and applied its requirements to all Project Partnerships in which Gateway holds an interest. Generally a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics, (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Gateway’s determination of the primary beneficiary of each VIE requires judgment and is based on an analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances including: (1) the existence of a principal-agency relationship between the limited partner and the general partner, (2) the relationship and significance of the activities of the VIE to each partner, (3) each partner’s exposure to the expected losses of the VIE, and (4) the design of the VIE. In the design of Project Partnership VIEs, the overriding concept centers around the premise that the limited partner invests solely for tax attributes associated with the property held by the VIE, while the general partner of the project partnership is responsible for overseeing its operations. Based upon its analysis of all the relevant facts and considerations, Gateway has concluded that in those instances where the Project Partnership interests are determined to be VIEs, the general partner of the Project Partnership is more closely associated with the Project Partnership than the limited partner (Gateway) and therefore, Gateway is not the primary beneficiary.

As of March 31, 2009, Gateway holds variable interests in 43 VIEs, which consist of Project Partnerships. Gateway is not the primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs. Gateway’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to Gateway’s capital contributions to those VIEs, which is approximately $9,304,507 at March 31, 2009. Gateway may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that Gateway voluntarily provides to those Project Partnerships in the future.

Recent Accounting Changes

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which delayed the effective date of FAS No. 157 until November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. Gateway has adopted FAS No. 157 effective as of fiscal year end March 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard is did not have a material impact on Gateway’s financial position, operations or cash flow.

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):

NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES:

Investments in Securities consist of U.S. Treasury Notes at their cost, plus accrued interest and unamortized premiums of $2,647 as of March 31, 2008. The Investments in Securities were held in a brokerage account maintained at Raymond James and Associates, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partners.

	March 31, 2009	March 31, 2008
Amortized Cost	$ -	$ 202,647
Gross Unrealized Loss	-	(803)

Fair Value	$ -	$ 201,844

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees and general and administrative expenses owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. This payable is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the Agreement, non-interest bearing.

The General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses as follows:

Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to an annual asset management fee equal to 0.45% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $285,809, $379,409 and $450,140, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses - The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. These expenses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No such expenses were incurred for the year ended March 31, 2009. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 were $104,564 and $223,671, respectively.

Refer to the discussion of net profit on re-syndication transactions contributed to Gateway by the Managing General Partner in Note 7, Summary of Disposition Activities herein.

NOTE 5 - TAXABLE INCOME (LOSS):

The following is a reconciliation between net income (loss) as described in the financial statements and Gateway’s loss for tax purposes:

	2009	2008	2007
Net Income (Loss) per Financial Statements	$ 1,370,644	$ 1,048,120	$ (190,201)

Equity in Loss of Project Partnerships for tax purposes
in excess of losses for financial statement purposes	(292,437)	(274,659)	(114,857)

Losses suspended for financial reporting purposes	(1,070,084)	(1,262,292)	(1,730,651)

Adjustments to convert March 31, fiscal year end
to December 31, taxable year end	(1,006)	(47,007)	(219,518)

Additional Gain on Sale of Project Partnerships for tax purposes	6,240,954	2,897,681	526,598

Items Expensed for Financial Statement purposes
not expensed for Tax purposes:
Asset Management Fee	309,894	403,468	455,354
Amortization Expense	-	-	172,343
Impairment Expense	112,895	-	-
Miscellaneous Income	(59,156)	(90,840)	(58,505)

Items Expensed for Tax purposes not expensed for
Financial Statement purposes:
Administrative Expense	-	-	(224)

Gateway income (loss) for tax purposes as of December 31	$ 6,611,704	$ 2,674,471	$ (1,159,661)

	December 31,	December 31,	December 31,
	2008	2007	2006

Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Unaudited)	$ -	$ -	$ -

Gateway’s Investments in Project Partnerships is approximately $19,262,095 higher for financial reporting purposes than for tax return purposes because (i) annual tax depreciation expense is higher than financial depreciation, (ii) certain expenses are not deductible for tax return purposes and (iii) losses are suspended for financial purposes but not for tax purposes.

The differences in the assets and liabilities of Gateway for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes for the year ended March 31, 2009 are as follows:

	Financial	Tax
	Reporting	Reporting
	Purposes	Purposes	Differences
Investments in Local Limited
Partnerships	$ -	$ (19,262,095)	$ 19,262,095

Other Assets	$ 263,458	$ 429,109	$ (165,651)

Liabilities	$ 4,986,957	$ 212,213	$ 4,774,744

NOTE 6 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS:

As of March 31, 2009, Gateway holds a 99% interest in the profits, losses, and Tax Credits as a limited partner in 43 Project Partnerships holding 45 properties which own and operate government assisted multi-family housing complexes. Cash flows from operations are allocated according to each Project Partnership agreement. Upon dissolution, proceeds will be distributed according to each Project Partnership agreement. The total Investments in Project Partnerships at March 31, 2008 includes both the Investments in Project Partnerships and Investment in Project Partnership Held for Sale on the consolidated balance sheet.

The following is a summary of Investments in Project Partnerships as of:

	March 31,	March 31,
	2009	2008
Capital Contributions to Project Partnerships
and purchase price paid for limited partner
interests in Project Partnerships	$ 9,304,507	$ 12,794,791

Cumulative equity in losses of Project Partnerships (1)	(9,606,978)	(12,793,161)

Cumulative distributions received from Project Partnerships	(360,043)	(605,078)

Investment in Project Partnerships before Adjustment	(662,514)	(603,448)

Excess of investment cost over the underlying
assets acquired:
Acquisition fees and expenses	1,160,581	1,617,977
Accumulated amortization of acquisition
fees and expenses	(385,172)	(596,506)

Reserve for Impairment of Investment in
Project Partnerships	(112,895)	-

Investments in Project Partnerships	$ -	$ 418,023

(1) In accordance with Gateway's accounting policy to not carry Investments in Project Partnerships below zero, cumulative suspended losses of $14,227,196 for the year ended March 31, 2009 and cumulative suspended losses of $17,461,710 for the year ended March 31, 2008 are not included.

NOTE 6 - INVESTMENTS IN PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS (Continued):

In accordance with Gateway's policy of presenting the financial information of the Project Partnerships, excluding Sparta for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, on a three month lag, below is the summarized balance sheets for the Project Partnerships as of December 31 and the summarized statements of operations for the year ended December 31 of each year:

	2008	2007	2006
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
Current assets	$ 5,337,539	$ 7,261,688	$ 8,441,716
Investment properties, net	23,907,191	35,632,834	46,808,815
Other assets	147,032	449,635	876,557
Total assets	$ 29,391,762	$ 43,344,157	$ 56,127,088

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit:
Current liabilities	$ 1,884,668	$ 3,488,506	$ 4,140,571
Long-term debt	44,067,897	60,465,838	74,864,944
Total liabilities	45,952,565	63,954,344	79,005,515

Partners' deficit
Limited Partner	(15,715,208)	(19,091,714)	(20,692,359)
General Partners	(845,595)	(1,518,473)	(2,186,068)
Total Partners' deficit	(16,560,803)	(20,610,187)	(22,878,427)

Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$ 29,391,762	$ 43,344,157	$ 56,127,088

SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Rental and other income	$ 9,620,622	$ 13,642,751	$ 16,218,199
Expenses:
Operating expenses	5,457,558	7,523,441	8,922,830
Interest expense	3,452,165	4,949,038	6,019,721
Depreciation and amortization	1,792,343	2,477,856	3,051,054

Total expenses	10,702,066	14,950,335	17,993,605

Net loss	$ (1,081,444)	$ (1,307,584)	$ (1,775,406)

Other partners' share of net loss	$ (4,552)	$ (13,076)	$ (18,028)

Gateway's share of net loss	$ (1,076,892)	$ (1,294,508)	$ (1,757,378)
Suspended losses	1,070,084	1,262,292	1,730,651

Equity in (Loss) Income of Project Partnerships	$ (6,808)	$ 2,951	$ (41,863)

Equity in (Loss) Income of Project Partnerships - Held for Sale	$ -	$ (35,167)	$ 15,136

Gateway's deficit as reflected by the Project Partnerships of $(15,715,208) differs from Gateway's Investments in Project Partnerships before acquisition fees and expenses, amortization, and the impairment reserve of $(656,252) primarily because of suspended losses on Gateway's books.

NOTE 7 – SUMMARY OF DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES:

Gateway at one time held investments in 82 Project Partnerships holding 87 properties. As of March 31, 2009, Gateway has sold or otherwise disposed of its interest in 39 Project Partnerships which held 42 properties. A summary of the sale or disposition transactions for the Project Partnerships disposed during the past three fiscal years are summarized below:

Fiscal Year 2009 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
January 2009	Limestone Estates	$ 24,475	$ 0.96	$ 24,475	$ -
November 2008	The Meadows Associates	198,792	7.78	197,674	-
September 2008	Winder Apartments, Ltd.	38,160	1.49	38,000	-
September 2008	Oakwood Apartments	9,741	0.38	9,741	-
September 2008	Lakewood Apartments	19,760	0.77	19,760	-
September 2008	Sandhill Forest, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Oakwood Grove, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Hastings Manor, Ltd.	-	-	-	-
September 2008	Crosstown Seniors (Phase I & II)	1,349,749	52.79	-	1,055,863
August 2008	Laurel Apartments	226,840	8.87	225,535	-
June 2008	Middlefield, Limited	117,530	4.60	118,321	-
June 2008	Pulaski Village	128,770	5.03	128,770	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	6,938	240
				$ 769,214	$ 1,056,103

NOTE 7 – SUMMARY OF DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES (Continued):

Fiscal Year 2008 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
March 2008	Village Apartments of Sparta	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 401,634
March 2008	Scotts Hill	-	-	(2,000)	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase I)	23,000	0.90	21,811	-
January 2008	Teton View Apartments (Phase II)	15,000	0.59	14,504	-
December 2007	Claremont Housing	22,000	0.86	23,850	-
December 2007	Pleasant Valley Housing	31,775	1.24	31,249	-
December 2007	River Road Apartments	8,750	0.34	(51,411)	-
December 2007	Kenly Court Apartments Phase I & II	137,444	5.38	137,444	-
October 2007	Riverside Apartments	110,056	4.30	109,530	-
September 2007	Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL)	27,362	1.07	27,363	-
August 2007	Greenville Landing Apartments	34,306	1.34	33,775	-
July 2007	Sandridge Apartments	248,000	9.70	248,798	-
July 2007	Brookshire Apartments	248,000	9.70	249,032	-
May 2007	Laurel Woods Apartments	223,240	8.73	224,347	-
April 2007	Ashburn Housing	148,309	5.80	147,778	-
	Other, net (see below)	-	-	645	-
				$ 1,216,715	$ 401,634

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (AL), Greenville Landing Apartments, and Ashburn Housing were distributed to the Limited Partners in October 2007.

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Sandridge Apartments, Brookshire Apartments, and Laurel Woods Apartments were distributed to the Limited Partners in August 2007.

Floresville Square Apartments	$ 57,694
Albany Village Apartments	29,923
Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	29,922
Ashburn Housing	201,181

Total Re-syndication contribution	$ 318,720

NOTE 7 – SUMMARY OF DISPOSITION ACTIVITIES (Continued):

Fiscal Year 2007 Disposition Activity:

Transaction Month / Year	Project Partnership	Net Proceeds	Net Proceeds Per LP Unit	Gain (Loss) on Disposal	Component of Discontinued Operations
February 2007	Skyview Terrace Apartments	$ 38,732	$ 1.51	$ 38,732	$ -
February 2007	Fairview South Apartments	50,360	1.97	50,360	-
February 2007	Southwood Apartments	42,710	1.67	42,710	-
February 2007	Robinhood Apartments	40,383	1.58	40,383	-
January 2007	Applewood Apartments	105,538	4.14	105,538	-
October 2006	Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY)	47,616	1.90	47,616	-
October 2006	Albany Village Apartments	47,668	1.90	47,668	-
July 2006	Floresville Square Apartments II	39,064	1.54	38,210	-
April 2006	Village Apartments of Divernon	-	-	-	151,256
				$ 411,217	$ 151,256

The net proceeds per LP unit from the sale of Hunters Ridge Apartments (KY), Albany Village Apartments, and Floresville Square Apartments II were distributed to the Limited Partners in December 2006.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

NOTE 9 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):

	Quarter 1	Quarter 2	Quarter 3	Quarter 4
	6/30/2008	9/30/2008	12/31/2008	3/31/2009
Year 2009

Total Revenues	$ 15,654	$ 15,973	$ 733	$ 8,581

Net Income (Loss)	$ 137,513	$ 1,197,005	$ 85,478	$ (49,352)

Income (Loss) Per
Weighted Average
Limited Partnership
Units Outstanding	$ 5.32	$ 46.35	$ 3.31	$ (1.90)

	Quarter 1	Quarter 2	Quarter 3	Quarter 4
	6/30/2007	9/30/2007	12/31/2007	3/31/2008
Year 2008

Total Revenues	$ 38,683	$ 4,663	$ 12,021	$ 26,796

Net Income	$ 100,330	$ 540,140	$ 246,291	$ 161,359

Income Per Weighted
Average Limited
Partnership Units
Outstanding	$ 3.89	$ 20.92	$ 9.54	$ 6.24

Schoonover Boyer & Associates

383 North Front Street

Columbus, OH 43215

PHONE: 614-888-8000

FAX: 614-888-8634

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

----------------------------

The Partners

Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend

Housing Association Limited Partnership

(A Michigan Limited Partnership)

Kalamazoo, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, (a Michigan Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity/(deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ equity/(deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Schoonover Boyer & Associates

Columbus, Ohio

February 27, 2008

Schoonover Boyer & Associates

383 North Front Street

Columbus, OH 43215

PHONE: 614-888-8000

FAX: 614-888-8634

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

----------------------------

The Partners

Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend

Housing Association Limited Partnership

(A Michigan Limited Partnership)

Kalamazoo, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, (a Michigan Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity/(deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ equity/(deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Schoonover Boyer & Associates

Columbus, Ohio

February 17, 2007

Item 9. Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Not applicable to Gateway’s annual report for fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Gateway's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as Gateway's are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Managing General Partner’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Gateway has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting during the year ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Gateway’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Gateway. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of Gateway’s financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect Gateway’s transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of its financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of Gateway’s assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Gateway’s assets that could have a material effect on Gateway’s financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of Gateway’s financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Gateway’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2009.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Gateway Gateway has no directors or executive officers. Gateway's affairs are managed and controlled by the Managing General Partner. Certain information concerning the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner are set forth below. Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. - Managing General Partner Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. is the Managing General Partner and is responsible for decisions pertaining to the acquisition and sale of Gateway's interests in the Project Partnerships and other matters related to the business operations of Gateway. Certain officers and directors of the Managing General Partner are as follows: Ronald M. Diner, age 62, is President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., with whom he has been employed since June 1983. Mr. Diner received an M.B.A. degree from Columbia University (1968) and a B.S. degree from Trinity College (1966). Prior to joining Raymond James & Associates, Inc., he managed the broker-dealer activities of Pittway Real Estate, Inc., a real estate development firm. He was previously a loan officer at Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp., and spent three years with Common, Dann & Co., a New York regional investment firm. He has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Council for Rural Housing and Development, a national organization of developers, managers and syndicators of properties developed under the RECD Section 515 program, and is a member of the Board of Directors of the Florida Council for Rural Housing and Development. Mr. Diner has been a speaker and panel member at state and national seminars relating to the low-income housing credit. J. Davenport Mosby, age 50, is a Vice President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. which he joined in 1982. Mr. Mosby received an MBA from the Harvard Business School (1982). He graduated magna cum laude with a BA from Vanderbilt University where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. Raymond James Partners, Inc. - Raymond James Partners, Inc. has been formed to act as the general partner, with affiliated corporations, in limited partnerships sponsored by Raymond James Financial, Inc. Raymond James Partners, Inc. is a general partner for purposes of assuring that Gateway and other partnerships sponsored by affiliates have sufficient net worth to meet the minimum net worth requirements of state securities administrators. Information regarding the officers and directors of Raymond James Partners, Inc., is included on pages 51 and 52 of the Prospectus under the section captioned "Management" (consisting of pages 49 through 52 of the Prospectus) which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive ~~Compensation~~ ~~Gateway~~Officers ~~has no directors or officers. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners~~ and ~~Management Neither~~Corporate of the General Partners, nor their directors and officers, own any units of the outstanding securities of Gateway as of March 31, 2006. Gateway is a Limited Partnership and therefore does not have voting shares of stock. To the knowledge of Gateway, no person owns of record or beneficially, more than 5% of Gateway's outstanding units.Governance

~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions~~ Gateway has no ~~officers or~~ directors~~. However,~~ various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the General Partners and their affiliates during the organization and operations of Gateway. Additionally, the General Partners will receive distributions from Gateway if there is cash available for distribution or ~~residual~~executive ~~proceeds as defined in the Partnership agreement~~officers. The amounts and kinds of compensation and fees are described on pages 13 to 15 of the Prospectus under the caption "Management Compensation", which is incorporated herein by reference. See Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for amounts accrued or paid to the General Partners and their affiliates during the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing. Within the next 12 months, the Managing General Partner does not intend to demand payment on the portion of Asset Management Fees payable classified as long-term on the Balance Sheet. The General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses as follows: Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to an annual asset management fee equal to 0.45% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's ~~interest~~affairs ~~in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees~~ are ~~included in the Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $464,115, $476,680, and $479,165, respectively.~~managed ~~General~~ and ~~Administrative~~controlled ~~Expenses~~by ~~- Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.,~~ the Managing General Partner~~, is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis~~. ~~These expenses are included in the Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $173,378, $116,631, and $117,118, respectively. Item 14.~~ ~~Principal~~Certain ~~Accounting Fees & Services~~information ~~The~~concerning ~~aggregate fees billed by~~ the ~~Partnership's~~directors ~~principal accounting firm, Reznick Group, P.C., for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements~~ and ~~review~~officers of ~~financial statements included in~~ the ~~Partnership's~~Managing ~~quarterly~~General ~~report~~Partner onare Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2006 was $26,000. The aggregate fees billed by the Partnership's former principal accounting firm, Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris and Co., during fiscal year 2006 for review of certain quarterly reports on Form 10-Q were $1,400.set ~~The~~forth ~~aggregate fees billed by Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris and Co~~below., for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Partnerships quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2005 was $16,650. Tax - During fiscal 2006 and 2005, Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris & Co. was engaged to prepare the Partnership's federal tax return, for which they billed $5,500 and $5,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Other Fees - The Company's Audit Committee Charter requires that the Committee approve the engagement of the principal auditing firm prior to the rendering of any audit or non-audit services. During fiscal 2006, 100% of the audit related and other services and 100% of the tax services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. - Managing General Partner

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. is the Managing General Partner and is responsible for decisions pertaining to the acquisition and sale of Gateway's interests in the Project Partnerships and other matters related to the business operations of Gateway. Certain officers and directors of the Managing General Partner are as follows:

Ronald M. Diner, age 65, is President and a Director. He is a Senior Vice President of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., with whom he has been employed since June 1983. Mr. Diner received an M.B.A. degree from Columbia University (1968) and a B.S. degree from Trinity College (1966). Prior to joining Raymond James & Associates, Inc., he managed the broker-dealer activities of Pittway Real Estate, Inc., a real estate development firm. He was previously a loan officer at Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp., and spent three years with Common, Dann & Co., a New York regional investment firm. He has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Council for Rural Housing and Development, a national organization of developers, managers and syndicators of properties developed under the RECD Section 515 program, and is a member of the Board of Directors of the Florida Council for Rural Housing and Development. Mr. Diner has been a speaker and panel member at state and national seminars relating to the low-income housing credit.

J. Davenport Mosby, age 53, is a Vice President and a Director. He is a Senior Managing Director of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. which he joined in 1982. Mr. Mosby received an MBA from the Harvard Business School (1982). He graduated magna cum laude with a BA from Vanderbilt University where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa.

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Raymond James Financial, Inc. (“RJF”). RJF has adopted a Business Ethics and Corporate Policy that is applicable to the officers and employees of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner of Gateway. That policy is posted on RJF’s Internet website at http://www.raymondjames.com under “About Our Company” --- Investor Relations --- Corporate Governance --- Employee Code of Ethics.

Raymond James Partners, Inc. –

Raymond James Partners, Inc. was formed to act as the general partner, with affiliated corporations, in limited partnerships sponsored by Raymond James Financial, Inc.

Information regarding the officers and directors of Raymond James Partners, Inc. is included on pages 51 and 52 of the Prospectus under the section captioned “Management” (consisting of pages 49 through 52 of the Prospectus), which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Gateway has no directors or officers.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Neither of the General Partners, nor their directors and officers, own any units of the outstanding securities of Gateway as of March 31, 2009.

Gateway is a Limited Partnership and therefore does not have voting shares of stock. To the knowledge of Gateway, no person owns of record or beneficially, more than 5% of Gateway's outstanding units.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Gateway has no officers or directors. However, various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the General Partners and their affiliates during the organization and operations of Gateway. Additionally, the General Partners will receive distributions from Gateway if there is cash available for distribution or residual proceeds as defined in the Partnership agreement. The amounts and kinds of compensation and fees are described on pages 13 to 15 of the Prospectus under the caption “Management Compensation”, which is incorporated herein by reference. See Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for amounts accrued or paid to the General Partners and their affiliates during the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

The Payable to General Partners primarily represents the asset management fees and general and administrative expenses owed to the General Partners at the end of the period. It is unsecured, due on demand and, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement, non-interest bearing.

The General Partners and affiliates are entitled to compensation and reimbursement for costs and expenses as follows:

Asset Management Fee - The Managing General Partner is entitled to receive an annual asset management fee equal to 0.45% of the aggregate cost of Gateway's interest in the projects owned by the Project Partnerships. The asset management fee will be paid only after all other expenses of Gateway have been paid. These fees are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $285,809, $379,409 and $450,140, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses - Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc., the Managing General Partner, is reimbursed for general and administrative expenses of Gateway on an accountable basis. These expenses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. No such expenses were incurred for the year ended March 31, 2009. Totals incurred for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 were $104,564 and $223,671, respectively.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees & Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by Gateway’s principal accounting firm, Reznick Group, P.C., for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements, various matters related to SEC filings, and review of financial statements included in Gateway’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2009 amounted to $37,200.

The aggregate fees billed by Gateway’s principal accounting firm, Reznick Group, P.C., for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in Gateway’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2008 amounted to $34,800. The aggregate fees billed by Gateway’s former principal accounting firm, Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris and Co., during fiscal year 2008 for services pertaining to prior years audit reports were $2,000.

Tax Fees

During fiscal 2009 and 2008, Spence, Marston, Bunch, Morris and Co. was engaged to prepare Gateway’s federal tax return, for which they billed $8,000 for each of the years ended 2009 and 2008.

Other Fees

The two members of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. Board of Directors, Ronald M. Diner and J. Davenport Mosby III also serve as the members of the Audit Committee on behalf of Gateway. The audit committee charter requires that the committee approve the engagement of the principal accounting firm prior to the rendering of any audit or non-audit services. During fiscal 2009, 100% of the audit related and other services and 100% of the tax services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial ~~Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K~~ ~~a.(1) Financial Statements (2) Financial~~ Statement Schedules - Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation of Property Owned by Project Partnerships All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is shown either in the financial statements or in the notes thereto. (3) Exhibit Index - The following are included with Form S-11, Registration No. 33-18142 and amendments and supplements thereto previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (b) Exhibit Listing Exhibit Number Description

~~GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD~~a. ~~SCHEDULE~~ ~~III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION~~(1) OFFinancial PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2005:Statements

Partnership -----------	Location --------	# of Units -----	Mortgage Loan Balance -------------
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts. Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	Medway, OH Union, OH Bernalillo, NM Truth or Consequences, NM Fortville, IN Summitville, IN Yanceyville, NC Millsboro, DE Perryville, MD Georgetown, DE Federalsburg, MD Laurel, DE Easton, MD Madison, OH Thomaston, GA Cairo, GA Sylacauga, AL Monroe, GA Silver City, NM Ashland, VA Kalamazoo, MI Demopolis, AL McDonough, GA Fernandina Beach, FL Limestone, ME Beaufort, NC Rigby, ID Albany, KY Burkesville, KY Scotts Hill, TN Gallup, NM Cascade, ID Middleport, NY Columbus, NE Morgantown, IN Ashburn, GA Cuthbert, GA Melrose, FL Crescent City, FL Hastings, FL Norfolk, NE Springfield, TN Springfield, TN Mabank, TX Buena Vista, GA Elizabethtown, NC Quitman, GA Cherokee, AL Milton, FL Winder, GA Killen, AL Madison, NC Greeneville, TN Centralia, IL Poteau, OK Barling, AR Booneville, AR Augusta, KS Farmville, VA Kenly, NC Athens, TX Waggaman, LA Middlefield, OH Floresvile, TX Mathis, TX Sabinal, TX Kingsland, TX Crestline, OH Poteau, OK Decatur, AR Broken Bow, OK Grove, OK Grangeville, ID Hartwell, GA Pulaski, VA Jacksonville, TX	48 30 54 42 24 24 40 32 32 32 32 32 16 39 50 36 42 48 41 40 201 40 46 46 25 40 40 24 24 12 44 16 25 24 24 40 32 16 36 24 72 48 48 42 24 32 18 24 43 48 40 40 40 24 32 48 48 66 40 48 44 43 36 40 36 24 34 36 19 24 46 42 32 24 44 40	$ 1,436,805 915,775 1,435,234 1,364,203 657,163 717,734 1,441,146 1,061,509 1,060,740 1,074,752 1,132,712 1,103,920 580,508 1,162,191 1,440,536 948,680 1,379,703 1,431,861 1,349,935 1,245,492 3,741,179 1,136,507 1,360,628 1,287,349 1,125,380 1,449,431 1,399,042 721,674 723,980 401,510 1,442,027 432,153 929,200 771,647 774,376 1,032,934 804,404 456,182 993,311 685,315 2,382,487 1,435,312 1,296,173 1,089,902 643,705 1,132,255 481,578 859,950 1,060,790 1,392,105 1,144,629 1,460,099 1,180,375 784,979 562,276 869,013 1,322,973 1,882,678 1,301,535 1,311,879 1,045,135 1,009,851 1,165,758 1,016,414 856,996 592,641 828,878 1,046,403 453,924 758,389 1,454,152 1,220,692 1,126,426 657,203 1,362,313 932,957
			------------
			$ 83,731,653
			============

(2) Financial Statement Schedules -

~~GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.~~Schedule ~~SCHEDULE~~ III - ~~REAL~~Real ~~ESTATE~~Estate AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and ~~Divernon,~~Accumulated asDepreciation of ~~December~~Property ~~31,~~Owned ~~2005:~~by Project Partnerships

Apartment Properties	Cost At Acquisition --------------------
Partnership -----------	Land ----	Buildings, Improvements and Equipment -------------	Net Improvements Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition ---------------
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts. Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	$ 310,264 243,665 128,000 88,500 25,000 30,000 331,988 105,508 120,440 123,135 142,632 144,680 55,379 60,000 60,000 54,700 70,000 110,000 153,730 96,242 408,338 89,250 114,500 144,000 79,224 175,735 50,218 49,161 44,697 30,000 196,207 23,500 18,000 96,800 15,000 35,000 22,550 28,091 44,712 18,000 207,700 50,500 40,112 57,200 11,390 82,500 33,330 20,000 50,000 73,500 48,275 57,280 47,258 36,450 33,000 62,500 32,500 101,300 102,342 25,000 103,909 138,000 70,700 75,524 37,127 18,000 30,000 54,000 18,350 24,300 70,000 45,000 65,227 49,800 75,000 46,189	$ 1,533,433 928,824 1,672,703 1,610,884 780,355 849,511 1,788,595 1,154,434 1,198,338 1,205,530 1,252,927 1,156,847 652,234 1,378,177 1,754,918 1,135,966 1,521,755 1,678,673 1,518,228 1,301,860 5,164,734 1,329,102 1,602,613 1,476,180 1,318,259 1,752,762 972,662 865,007 838,328 465,835 1,616,554 505,789 1,132,502 862,439 940,191 1,265,760 1,006,889 544,545 1,191,986 839,600 2,754,382 1,752,851 1,424,008 1,210,248 804,816 1,402,798 575,656 589,739 1,292,395 1,692,510 1,370,214 1,813,230 1,434,138 954,070 683,016 1,049,173 1,650,087 2,280,419 1,455,858 1,588,636 1,218,102 1,340,045 1,250,957 1,050,346 1,041,038 752,263 894,081 1,317,395 564,655 945,516 1,887,868 1,513,446 1,342,952 771,529 1,650,373 1,153,440	$ 18,088 22,382 338,596 220,632 5,034 483 57,257 63,510 110,104 94,428 93,368 102,269 39,896 40,498 (2,132) 2,280 38,288 0 130,606 151,534 745,463 83,513 135,820 204,699 23,300 34,752 827,211 21,579 30,748 9,818 211,952 105,707 17,350 80,042 4,592 0 (1,144) 926 2,187 5,603 298,742 34,669 93,430 151,885 (1,979) 12,135 (1,378) 400,089 52,351 (3,285) 2,327 3,554 94,664 (14,292) 0 41,191 0 0 29,993 107,564 63,568 102,260 28,570 186,192 6,225 9,852 237,432 15,939 0 0 0 0 86,560 0 131,306 62,173
	-----------	------------	------------
	$ 6,230,109	$ 98,238,179	$ 6,302,976
	===========	============	============

Schedule IV – Mortgage loans on real estate

~~GATEWAY~~All ~~TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.~~other ~~SCHEDULE~~schedules ~~III~~are -omitted ~~REAL~~because ~~ESTATE~~they ~~AND~~are ~~ACCUMULATED~~not ~~DEPRECIATION OF~~applicable ~~PROPERTY~~or ~~OWNED~~not ~~BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN AS OF DECEMBER 31~~required, ~~2005~~or ~~The~~because ~~following~~the ~~table~~required ~~provides certain summary~~ information ~~regarding~~is ~~the~~shown ~~Projects~~either in ~~which~~the ~~Gateway~~financial ~~had~~statements anor in ~~interest,~~the ~~excluding~~notes ~~Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2005:~~thereto.

Apartment Properties	Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2005 --------------------
Partnership -----------	Land ----	Buildings, Improvements and Equipment --------------	Total -----
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	$ 324,659 251,096 187,734 107,245 25,000 30,000 349,456 30,382 35,899 27,853 86,281 40,971 20,761 60,000 60,000 54,700 70,000 110,000 158,341 106,742 600,414 102,229 142,601 147,400 79,224 181,070 87,187 49,161 44,697 30,000 275,484 29,041 18,000 98,308 15,000 35,000 22,550 28,091 44,712 18,000 268,767 50,500 40,112 112,306 11,390 82,500 33,330 20,000 50,000 73,500 48,275 57,280 47,258 36,450 33,000 62,500 32,500 101,300 105,846 25,000 82,501 138,000 70,700 76,669 37,127 18,000 30,000 54,000 18,350 24,300 70,000 45,000 65,227 49,800 75,000 34,840	$ 1,537,126 943,775 1,951,565 1,812,771 785,389 849,994 1,828,384 1,293,070 1,392,983 1,395,240 1,402,646 1,362,825 726,748 1,418,675 1,752,786 1,138,246 1,560,043 1,678,673 1,644,223 1,442,894 5,718,121 1,399,636 1,710,332 1,677,479 1,341,559 1,782,179 1,762,904 886,586 869,076 475,653 1,749,229 605,955 1,149,852 940,973 944,783 1,265,760 1,005,745 545,471 1,194,173 845,203 2,992,057 1,787,520 1,517,438 1,307,027 802,837 1,414,933 574,278 989,828 1,344,746 1,689,225 1,372,541 1,816,784 1,528,802 939,778 683,016 1,090,364 1,650,087 2,280,419 1,482,347 1,696,200 1,303,078 1,442,305 1,279,527 1,235,393 1,047,263 762,115 1,131,513 1,333,334 564,655 945,516 1,887,868 1,513,446 1,429,512 771,529 1,781,679 1,226,962	$ 1,861,785 1,194,871 2,139,299 1,920,016 810,389 879,994 2,177,840 1,323,452 1,428,882 1,423,093 1,488,927 1,403,796 747,509 1,478,675 1,812,786 1,192,946 1,630,043 1,788,673 1,802,564 1,549,636 6,318,535 1,501,865 1,852,933 1,824,879 1,420,783 1,963,249 1,850,091 935,747 913,773 505,653 2,024,713 634,996 1,167,852 1,039,281 959,783 1,300,760 1,028,295 573,562 1,238,885 863,203 3,260,824 1,838,020 1,557,550 1,419,333 814,227 1,497,433 607,608 1,009,828 1,394,746 1,762,725 1,420,816 1,874,064 1,576,060 976,228 716,016 1,152,864 1,682,587 2,381,719 1,588,193 1,721,200 1,385,579 1,580,305 1,350,227 1,312,062 1,084,390 780,115 1,161,513 1,387,334 583,005 969,816 1,957,868 1,558,446 1,494,739 821,329 1,856,679 1,261,802
	-----------	------------	------------
	$ 6,366,617	$104,404,647	$110,771,264
	===========	============	============

(3) Exhibit Listing

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD. SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2005:Exhibit

Apartment Properties Partnership -----------	Accumulated Depreciation -------------	Depreciable Life ----------------
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	$ 1,255,008 728,638 866,880 759,042 496,225 540,739 739,982 886,930 943,659 940,801 953,905 946,097 489,801 742,471 1,000,881 660,323 1,094,834 1,018,998 692,842 983,705 2,802,067 584,089 920,521 872,425 893,107 666,271 996,513 451,604 441,175 251,201 730,907 379,958 462,763 492,449 539,833 686,929 547,993 244,314 538,741 356,525 1,719,580 944,715 841,717 714,600 428,261 500,956 306,949 298,147 694,583 926,272 490,247 639,226 914,244 544,190 436,117 713,122 1,082,125 1,487,204 927,058 669,863 864,405 542,637 624,317 487,656 349,117 255,256 350,191 652,765 363,893 596,428 1,037,024 956,125 824,140 430,870 1,081,151 753,174	5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 33.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 35.0 5.0 - 35.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 35.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 30.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 40.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 50.0 5.0 - 33.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 25.0 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 27.5 5.0 - 25.0
	-----------
	$56,049,471
	===========

Number Description

~~GATEWAY~~3.1 ~~TAX~~Amended ~~CREDIT~~Certificate ~~FUND,~~of ~~LTD. SCHEDULE~~Limited ~~III~~Partnership -of ~~REAL~~Gateway ~~ESTATE~~Tax ~~AND~~Credit ~~ACCUMULATED~~Fund, ~~DEPRECIATION OF~~Ltd. ~~PROPERTY~~(Filed ~~OWNED~~as BYan ~~PROJECT~~Exhibit ~~PARTNERSHIPS~~to ~~INVESTED~~Registration ~~IN AS~~Statement OFon ~~DECEMBER~~Form 31S-11, ~~2005~~File ~~Reconciliation~~No. ~~of Land~~33-18142, ~~Building~~and &incorporated ~~Improvements~~herein ~~current~~by ~~year changes:~~reference.)

Balance at beginning of period - December 31, 2004 Additions during period: Acquisitions through foreclosure Other acquisitions Improvements, etc. Other Deductions during period: Cost of retired assets Other	0 616,020 0 0 ---------- (3,961,167) 0 ----------	$ 114,116,411 616,020 (3,961,167) ------------
Balance at end of period - December 31, 2005		$110,771,264 =============

4.1	The form of Partnership Agreement of the Partnership (included as Exhibit “A” to the Prospectus, File No. 33-18142, and incorporated herein by reference.)

~~Reconciliation~~31.1 ofCertification ~~Accumulated~~required ~~Depreciation~~by ~~current~~Rule ~~year~~15d-14(a).(Filed ~~changes:~~herewith.)

Balance at beginning of period - December 31, 2004 Adjustment to Prior Year's Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation of retired assets Current year expense		$ 54,943,648 1,842 (2,216,641) 3,320,622 -----------
Balance at end of period - December 31, 2005		$ 56,049,471 ============

31.2	Certification required by Rule 15d-14(a).(Filed herewith.)

~~GATEWAY~~32 ~~TAX~~Certification ~~CREDIT~~required ~~FUND,~~by ~~LTD. SCHEDULE~~Rule IV 15d-14(b).(Filed MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005 The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest, excluding Sparta and Divernon, as of December 31, 2005:herewith.)

PARTNERSHIP -----------	# OF UNITS -----	BALANCE --------	INTEREST RATE --------	MONTHLY DEBT SERVICE -------	TERM (YEARS) -------
Laynecrest Martindale La Villa Elena Rio Abajo Fortville II Summitville Suncrest Brandywine III Concord IV Dunbarton Oaks III Federal Manor Laurel Apts Mulberry Hill IV Madison Hannah's Mill Longleaf Apts. Sylacauga Garden Monroe Family Casa Linda Laurel Woods Crosstown Riverside Apts. Brookshire Apts. Sandridge Apts. Limestone Estates Eagle's Bay Teton View Albany Burkesville Scotts Hill Sage Claremont Middleport Oakwood Apts. Morgantown Ashburn Housing Cuthbert Elderly Sandhill Forest Oakwood Grove Hastings Manor Lakewood Apts. Robinhood Apts. Skyview Terrace Mabank 1988 Buena Vista Woodcroft Spring Creek Spring Creek Milton Elderly Winder Apartments Hunters Ridge Stone Arbor Greeneville Centralia II Poteau IV Barling Booneville Augusta Meadows Kenly Housing Fairview South River Road Apts. Middlefield Floresville Mathis Retirement Sabinal Housing Kingsland Housing Crestwood Villa II Poteau Prop. III Decatur Properties Broken Bow Prop II Turtle Creek II Pleasant Valley Hartwell Elderly Pulaski Village Southwood Apts.	48 30 54 42 24 24 40 32 32 32 32 32 16 39 50 36 42 48 41 40 201 40 46 46 25 40 40 24 24 12 44 16 25 24 24 40 32 16 36 24 72 48 48 42 24 32 18 24 43 48 40 40 40 24 32 48 48 66 40 48 44 43 36 40 36 24 34 36 19 24 46 42 32 24 44 40	$ 1,436,805 915,775 1,435,234 1,364,203 657,163 717,734 1,441,146 1,061,509 1,060,740 1,074,752 1,132,712 1,103,920 580,508 1,162,191 1,440,536 948,680 1,379,703 1,431,861 1,349,935 1,245,492 3,741,179 1,136,507 1,360,628 1,287,349 1,125,380 1,449,431 1,399,042 721,674 723,980 401,510 1,442,027 432,153 929,200 771,647 774,376 1,032,934 804,404 456,182 993,311 685,315 2,382,487 1,435,312 1,296,173 1,089,902 643,705 1,132,255 481,578 859,950 1,060,790 1,392,105 1,144,629 1,460,099 1,180,375 784,979 562,276 869,013 1,322,973 1,882,678 1,301,535 1,311,879 1,045,135 1,009,851 1,165,758 1,016,414 856,996 592,641 828,878 1,046,403 453,924 758,389 1,454,152 1,220,692 1,126,426 657,203 1,362,313 932,957	10.63% 9.50% 9.00% 9.50% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.50% 9.00% 9.00% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 9.00% 9.00% 9.50% 9.00% 7.88% 9.25% 8.75% 9.00% 9.00% 8.75% 8.25% 9.00% 9.50% 8.75% 8.75% 9.75% 8.75% 9.50% 9.25% 8.75% 8.75% 9.00% 9.50% 9.00% 8.75% 9.75% 8.50% 8.75% 9.25% 9.00% 9.00% 11.50% 9.25% 8.75% 9.00% 9.25% 9.25% 8.75% 9.00% 9.00% 8.25% 8.75% 8.75% 8.75% 9.50% 8.75% 9.25% 9.50% 9.50% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 8.75% 8.75% 9.00% 8.75% 8.75% 9.25% 8.75%	$ 13,193 7,591 11,397 11,306 5,214 5,691 11,372 8,429 8,822 8,270 8,994 9,191 4,822 9,604 11,920 7,852 10,941 11,294 11,167 9,677 36,182 8,204 10,486 10,071 8,910 11,153 10,261 5,703 5,996 3,073 11,087 3,750 7,144 6,379 6,226 7,935 6,189 3,615 8,215 5,412 18,332 11,031 9,866 8,345 5,187 8,912 4,591 5,223 8,547 10,709 9,032 11,759 9,511 6,031 4,777 7,382 10,250 14,465 10,010 11,366 8,648 9,625 8,579 8,466 7,082 4,674 6,554 8,620 3,569 5,801 11,110 9,818 8,646 5,045 10,978 7,175	50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 33 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
		------------$ 83,731,653 ===========

99.1	Financial statements of Crosstown Seniors Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008:

Apartment Properties
		# of	Mortgage Loan
Partnership	Location	Units	Balance

Laynecrest	Medway, OH	48	$ 1,416,930
Martindale	Union, OH	30	902,029
La Villa Elena	Bernalillo, NM	54	1,409,213
Rio Abajo	Truth or Consequences, NM	42	1,343,230
Fortville II	Fortville, IN	24	645,435
Summitville	Summitville, IN	24	705,572
Suncrest	Yanceyville, NC	40	1,418,295
Brandywine III	Millsboro, DE	32	1,042,263
Concord IV	Perryville, MD	32	1,043,171
Dunbarton Oaks III	Georgetown, DE	32	1,047,597
Federal Manor	Federalsburg, MD	32	1,112,176
Mulberry Hill IV	Easton, MD	16	583,605
Madison	Madison, OH	39	1,267,594
Hannah's Mill	Thomaston, GA	50	1,419,281
Longleaf Apts.	Cairo, GA	36	934,567
Sylacauga Garden	Sylacauga, AL	42	1,355,276
Monroe Family	Monroe, GA	48	1,409,335
Casa Linda	Silver City, NM	41	1,330,018
Eagle's Bay	Beaufort, NC	40	1,426,035
Sage	Gallup, NM	44	1,418,573
Middleport	Middleport, NY	25	914,086
Morgantown	Morgantown, IN	24	763,753
Cuthbert Elderly	Cuthbert, GA	32	791,518
Mabank 1988	Mabank, TX	42	1,073,458
Buena Vista	Buena Vista, GA	24	634,731
Woodcroft	Elizabethtown, NC	32	1,115,526
Spring Creek	Quitman, GA	18	474,573
Spring Creek	Cherokee, AL	24	842,394
Milton Elderly	Milton, FL	43	1,046,041
Stone Arbor	Madison, NC	40	1,440,066
Centralia II	Centralia, IL	24	772,406
Poteau IV	Poteau, OK	32	539,252
Barling	Barling, AR	48	833,428
Booneville	Booneville, AR	48	1,288,946
Augusta	Augusta, KS	66	1,852,452
Mathis Retirement	Mathis, TX	36	844,662
Sabinal Housing	Sabinal, TX	24	583,170
Kingsland Housing	Kingsland, TX	34	814,991
Poteau Prop. III	Poteau, OK	19	447,164
Decatur Properties	Decatur, AR	24	746,697
Broken Bow Prop II	Broken Bow, OK	46	1,433,379
Turtle Creek II	Grove, OK	42	1,203,810
Hartwell Elderly	Hartwell, GA	24	646,959

Total		1,517	$ 44,333,657

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008:

	Cost at Acquisition Date
Apartment Properties			Net Improvements
		Buildings	Capitalized
		Improvements	Subsequent to
Partnership	Land	& Equipment	Acquisition

Laynecrest	$ 310,264	$ 1,533,433	$ 18,088
Martindale	243,665	928,824	54,434
La Villa Elena	128,000	1,672,703	402,610
Rio Abajo	88,500	1,610,884	269,137
Fortville II	25,000	780,355	5,034
Summitville	30,000	849,511	483
Suncrest	331,988	1,788,595	57,257
Brandywine III	105,508	1,154,434	133,411
Concord IV	120,440	1,198,338	117,287
Dunbarton Oaks III	123,135	1,205,530	117,904
Federal Manor	142,632	1,252,927	150,481
Mulberry Hill IV	55,379	652,234	52,136
Madison	60,000	1,378,177	40,498
Hannah's Mill	60,000	1,754,918	(2,132)
Longleaf Apts.	54,700	1,135,966	28,065
Sylacauga Garden	70,000	1,521,755	60,991
Monroe Family	110,000	1,678,673	0
Casa Linda	153,730	1,518,228	169,016
Eagle's Bay	175,735	1,752,762	46,948
Sage	196,207	1,616,554	242,646
Middleport	18,000	1,132,502	17,350
Morgantown	15,000	940,191	4,592
Cuthbert Elderly	22,550	1,006,889	(1,144)
Mabank 1988	57,200	1,210,248	168,341
Buena Vista	11,390	804,816	(1,979)
Woodcroft	82,500	1,402,798	12,135
Spring Creek	33,330	575,656	(1,378)
Spring Creek	20,000	589,739	432,548
Milton Elderly	50,000	1,292,395	53,983
Stone Arbor	57,280	1,813,230	16,692
Centralia II	36,450	954,070	(14,292)
Poteau IV	33,000	683,016	0
Barling	62,500	1,049,173	41,191
Booneville	32,500	1,650,087	0
Augusta	101,300	2,280,419	0
Mathis Retirement	37,127	1,041,038	7,146
Sabinal Housing	18,000	752,263	9,852
Kingsland Housing	30,000	894,081	238,169
Poteau Prop. III	18,350	564,655	0
Decatur Properties	24,300	945,516	0
Broken Bow Prop II	70,000	1,887,868	0
Turtle Creek II	45,000	1,513,446	0
Hartwell Elderly	49,800	771,529	0

Total	$ 3,510,460	$ 52,740,426	$ 2,947,500

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008:

Apartment Properties	Gross Amount At Which Carried At December 31, 2008
		Buildings,
		Improvements
Partnership	Land	& Equipment	Total

Laynecrest	$ 41,817	$ 1,819,968	$ 1,861,785
Martindale	40,500	1,186,423	1,226,923
La Villa Elena	187,734	2,015,579	2,203,313
Rio Abajo	107,245	1,861,276	1,968,521
Fortville II	25,000	785,389	810,389
Summitville	30,000	849,994	879,994
Suncrest	349,456	1,828,384	2,177,840
Brandywine III	30,382	1,362,971	1,393,353
Concord IV	35,899	1,400,166	1,436,065
Dunbarton Oaks III	27,853	1,418,716	1,446,569
Federal Manor	86,281	1,459,759	1,546,040
Mulberry Hill IV	20,761	738,988	759,749
Madison	60,000	1,418,675	1,478,675
Hannah's Mill	60,000	1,752,786	1,812,786
Longleaf Apts.	80,485	1,138,246	1,218,731
Sylacauga Garden	74,725	1,578,021	1,652,746
Monroe Family	110,000	1,678,673	1,788,673
Casa Linda	161,550	1,679,424	1,840,974
Eagle's Bay	181,070	1,794,375	1,975,445
Sage	276,506	1,778,901	2,055,407
Middleport	18,000	1,149,852	1,167,852
Morgantown	15,000	944,783	959,783
Cuthbert Elderly	22,550	1,005,745	1,028,295
Mabank 1988	112,306	1,323,483	1,435,789
Buena Vista	11,390	802,837	814,227
Woodcroft	82,500	1,414,933	1,497,433
Spring Creek	33,330	574,278	607,608
Spring Creek	21,619	1,020,668	1,042,287
Milton Elderly	50,000	1,346,378	1,396,378
Stone Arbor	57,280	1,829,922	1,887,202
Centralia II	36,450	939,778	976,228
Poteau IV	33,000	683,016	716,016
Barling	62,500	1,090,364	1,152,864
Booneville	32,500	1,650,087	1,682,587
Augusta	101,300	2,280,419	2,381,719
Mathis Retirement	37,127	1,048,184	1,085,311
Sabinal Housing	18,000	762,115	780,115
Kingsland Housing	30,000	1,132,250	1,162,250
Poteau Prop. III	18,350	564,655	583,005
Decatur Properties	24,300	945,516	969,816
Broken Bow Prop II	70,000	1,887,868	1,957,868
Turtle Creek II	45,000	1,513,446	1,558,446
Hartwell Elderly	49,800	771,529	821,329

Total	$ 2,969,566	$ 56,228,820	$ 59,198,386

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008:

Apartment Properties
	Accumulated	Depreciable Life
Partnership	Depreciation	Depreciable Life

Laynecrest	$ 1,450,303	5.0	- 27.5
Martindale	851,180	5.0	- 27.5
La Villa Elena	1,050,187	5.0	- 40.0
Rio Abajo	933,953	5.0	- 40.0
Fortville II	578,908	5.0	- 27.5
Summitville	629,531	5.0	- 27.5
Suncrest	868,289	5.0	- 40.0
Brandywine III	1,021,934	5.0	- 27.5
Concord IV	1,085,147	5.0	- 27.5
Dunbarton Oaks III	1,089,486	5.0	- 27.5
Federal Manor	1,115,770	5.0	- 27.5
Mulberry Hill IV	566,367	5.0	- 27.5
Madison	869,864	5.0	- 33.0
Hannah's Mill	1,170,060	5.0	- 30.0
Longleaf Apts.	773,856	5.0	- 30.0
Sylacauga Garden	1,284,495	5.0	- 27.5
Monroe Family	1,196,889	5.0	- 27.5
Casa Linda	840,154	5.0	- 40.0
Eagle's Bay	771,191	5.0	- 50.0
Sage	900,281	5.0	- 40.0
Middleport	549,783	5.0	- 27.5
Morgantown	640,105	5.0	- 27.5
Cuthbert Elderly	644,362	5.0	- 30.0
Mabank 1988	868,443	5.0	- 35.0
Buena Vista	505,760	5.0	- 30.0
Woodcroft	580,672	5.0	- 50.0
Spring Creek	361,942	5.0	- 40.0
Spring Creek	374,131	5.0	- 30.0
Milton Elderly	829,489	5.0	- 30.0
Stone Arbor	735,661	5.0	- 50.0
Centralia II	646,169	5.0	- 27.5
Poteau IV	518,079	5.0	- 25.0
Barling	839,023	5.0	- 25.0
Booneville	1,271,142	5.0	- 25.0
Augusta	1,747,513	5.0	- 25.0
Mathis Retirement	411,656	5.0	- 50.0
Sabinal Housing	300,391	5.0	- 50.0
Kingsland Housing	411,748	5.0	- 50.0
Poteau Prop. III	428,423	5.0	- 25.0
Decatur Properties	704,766	5.0	- 25.0
Broken Bow Prop II	1,234,003	5.0	- 25.0
Turtle Creek II	1,128,270	5.0	- 25.0
Hartwell Elderly	511,819	5.0	- 27.5

Total	$ 35,291,195

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OF PROPERTY OWNED BY PROJECT PARTNERSHIPS INVESTED IN

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

Reconciliation of Land, Building & Improvements current year changes:
Balance at beginning of period - December 31, 2007			$ 82,065,775
Additions during period:
	Acquisitions through foreclosure	0
	Other acquisitions	201,946
	Improvements, etc.	0
	Other	0
			201,946
Deductions during period:
	Cost of retired assets	(23,069,335)
	Other	0
			(23,069,335)

Balance at end of period - December 31, 2008			$ 59,198,386


Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation current year changes:
Balance at beginning of period - December 31, 2007			$ 46,432,941
	Adjustment to prior year's depreciation		(5,862)
	Accumulated depreciation of retired assets		(12,926,516)
	Current year expense		1,790,632

Balance at end of period - December 31, 2008			$ 35,291,195

GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND, LTD.

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008

The following table provides certain summary information regarding the Projects in which Gateway had an interest as of December 31, 2008:

PARTNERSHIP	# OF UNITS	BALANCE	INTEREST RATE	MONTHLY DEBT SERVICE	TERM (YEARS)



Laynecrest	48	$ 1,416,930	10.63%	13,193	50
Martindale	30	902,029	9.50%	7,591	50
La Villa Elena	54	1,409,213	9.00%	11,397	50
Rio Abajo	42	1,343,230	9.50%	11,306	50
Fortville II	24	645,435	9.00%	5,214	50
Summitville	24	705,572	9.00%	5,691	50
Suncrest	40	1,418,295	9.00%	11,372	50
Brandywine III	32	1,042,263	9.00%	8,429	50
Concord IV	32	1,043,171	9.50%	8,822	50
Dunbarton Oaks III	32	1,047,597	9.00%	8,270	50
Federal Manor	32	1,112,176	9.00%	8,994	50
Mulberry Hill IV	16	583,605	9.50%	4,822	50
Madison	39	1,267,594	9.50%	9,604	50
Hannah's Mill	50	1,419,281	9.50%	11,920	50
Longleaf Apts.	36	934,567	9.50%	7,852	50
Sylacauga Garden	42	1,355,276	9.00%	10,941	50
Monroe Family	48	1,409,335	9.00%	11,294	50
Casa Linda	41	1,330,018	9.50%	11,167	50
Eagle's Bay	40	1,426,035	8.75%	11,153	50
Sage	44	1,418,573	8.75%	11,087	50
Middleport	25	914,086	8.75%	7,144	50
Morgantown	24	763,753	9.25%	6,226	50
Cuthbert Elderly	32	791,518	8.75%	6,189	50
Mabank 1988	42	1,073,458	8.75%	8,345	50
Buena Vista	24	634,731	9.25%	5,187	50
Woodcroft	32	1,115,526	9.00%	8,912	50
Spring Creek	18	474,573	9.00%	4,591	50
Spring Creek	24	842,394	11.50%	5,223	50
Milton Elderly	43	1,046,041	9.25%	8,547	50
Stone Arbor	40	1,440,066	9.25%	11,759	50
Centralia II	24	772,406	8.75%	6,031	50
Poteau IV	32	539,252	9.00%	4,777	50
Barling	48	833,428	9.00%	7,382	50
Booneville	48	1,288,946	8.25%	10,250	50
Augusta	66	1,852,452	8.75%	14,465	50
Mathis Retirement	36	844,662	9.50%	7,082	50
Sabinal Housing	24	583,170	9.00%	4,674	50
Kingsland Housing	34	814,991	9.00%	6,554	50
Poteau Prop. III	19	447,164	9.00%	3,569	50
Decatur Properties	24	746,697	8.75%	5,801	50
Broken Bow Prop II	46	1,433,379	8.75%	11,110	50
Turtle Creek II	42	1,203,810	9.00%	9,818	50
Hartwell Elderly	24	646,959	8.75%	5,045	50

TOTAL	1,517

Filing Compare · GATEWAY TAX CREDIT FUND LTD