10-Q 1 select.txt SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. FORM 10-Q SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (X) QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE Act of 1934 For the Quarter ended September 30, 2002 ------------------ Commission File Number 0-16627 ------- SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. ----------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-3405705 ----------------------------------------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) c/o Smith Barney Futures Management LLC 388 Greenwich St. - 7th Fl. New York, New York 10013 ----------------------------------------------------------------- (Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices) (212) 723-5424 ----------------------------------------------------------------- (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. FORM 10-Q INDEX Page Number PART I - Financial Information: Item 1. Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Condition at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (unaudited). 3 Condensed Schedules of Investments at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (unaudited). 4 - 5 Statements of Income and Expenses and Partners' Capital for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited). 6 Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited). 7 - 11 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 12 - 14 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk. 15 - 16 Item 4. Controls and Procedures. 17 PART II - Other Information 18 2 PART I Item 1. Financial Statements SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (Unaudited)

See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements. 3 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Condensed Schedule of Investments September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)

Percentages are based on Partners' capital unless otherwise indicated See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements 4 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Condensed Schedule of Investments December 31, 2001

Percentages are based on Partner's capital unless otherwise indicated See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements. 5 SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND EXPENSES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL (UNAUDITED)

* Amounts reclassified for comparative purposes See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements 6 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) 1. General Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P., (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership which was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 10, 1987. The Partnership is engaged in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership commenced trading on July 1, 1987. Smith Barney Futures Management LLC acts as the general partner (the "General Partner") of the Partnership. The Partnership's commodity broker is Salomon Smith Barney Inc. ("SSB"). SSB is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly owned by Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc. ("SSBHI"), which is the sole owner of SSB. SSBHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. As of September 30, 2002, all trading decisions are made by John W. Henry & Company (the "Advisor"). The accompanying financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership's financial condition at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements present the results of interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. You should read these financial statements together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2001. Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. 7 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) (Continued) 2. Financial Highlights: Changes in net asset value per Unit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 were as follows:

* Net realized and unrealized gains is net of commission expense. ** Expenses exclude commission expense. 8 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) (Continued) Financial Highlights continued:

* Annualized 9 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) (Continued) 3. Trading Activities: The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The results of the Partnership's trading activity are shown in the statement of income and expenses and partners' capital. The Customer Agreement between the Partnership and SSB gives the Partnership the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses. All of the commodity interests owned by the Partnership are held for trading purposes. The average fair values during the nine and twelve months ended September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, based on a monthly calculation, were $500,090 and $208,540, respectively. The fair value of these commodity interests, including options thereon, if applicable, at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, was $439,248 and $166,097, respectively. Fair values for exchange traded commodity futures and options are based on quoted market prices for those futures and options. Fair values for all other financial instruments for which market quotations are not readily available are based on calculations approved by the General Partner. 4. Financial Instrument Risk: The Partnership is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, in the normal course of its business. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options (but not currently), whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter ("OTC"). Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments because of thegreater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. 10 Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P. Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) (Continued) Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Partnership's risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized as unrealized appreciation in the statement of financial condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership has concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership's assets is SSB. The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership's risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership is subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments, while not recorded in the financial statements, reflect the extent of the Partnership's involvement in these instruments. The majority of these instruments mature within one year of September 30, 2002. However, due to the nature of the Partnership's business, these instruments may not be held to maturity. 11 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Liquidity and Capital Resources The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. Its only assets are its equity in its commodity futures trading account, consisting of cash, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures and forward contracts, commodity options and interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial losses could lead to a decrease in liquidity, no such losses occurred during the third quarter of 2002. The Partnership's capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on commodity futures trading, expenses, interest income, redemptions of Units and distributions of profits, if any. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, Partnership capital increased 39.9% from $3,175,711 to $4,443,292. This increase was attributable to net income from operations of $1,550,322 which was partially offset by the redemption of 92 Units resulting in an outflow of $282,741. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investments in commodity contract positions in subsequent periods. Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded in the statement of financial condition at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the last business day of the period. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on commodity interests and foreign 12 currencies are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests. Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership's net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the date of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the statement of financial condition. Realized gains(losses) and changes in unrealized values on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in the statement of income and expenses and partners' capital. Results of Operations During the Partnership's third quarter of 2002, the net asset value per Unit increased 22.8% from $2,951.80 to $3,624.22 as compared to an increase of 7.6% in the third quarter of 2001. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2002 of $1,083,278. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity contracts in U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies and metals. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2001 of $328,511. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity contracts in U.S. interest rates, indices and metals and were partially offset by losses in currencies and non-U.S interest rates. Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisor to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisor is able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations. Interest income on 70% of the Partnership's daily average equity was earned at the monthly average 13-week U.S. Treasury Bill yield. SSB may continue to maintain the Partnership assets in cash and/or place all of the Partnership assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 70% of the interest earned on the Treasury bills purchased. SSB will retain 30% of any interest earned on Treasury bills. Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $7,949 and $41,700, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2001. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to a decrease in interest rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to 2001. 13 Brokerage commissions are calculated on the adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and, therefore, vary according to trading performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $14,659 as compared to the corresponding period in 2001. The increase in brokerage commissions is due to higher average net assets during the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to 2001. Commissions and fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 decreased by $61 as compared to the corresponding period in 2001. The decrease in brokerage commissions is due to lower average net assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to 2001. Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $10,175, as compared to the corresponding period in 2001. The increase in management fees is due to higher average net assets during the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to 2001. Management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $83 as compared to 2001. The decrease in management fees is due to lower average net assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to 2001. Incentive fees paid by the Partnership are based on the net trading profits of the Partnership as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. Trading profits for the three and nine month ended September 30, 2002 resulted in incentive fees of $124,151. There were no incentive fees earned for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001. 14 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business. Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades. The Partnership rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results. Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date (i.e., "risk of ruin"). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market risk. Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day intervals. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk. 15 The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's open positions by market category as of September 30, 2002. All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of September 30, 2002, the Partnership's total capitalization was $4,443,292. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. September 30, 2002 (Unaudited)

16 Item 4. Control and Procedures Based on their evaluation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the Partnership's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. 17 PART II OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings - Enron Corp. In April 2002, Citigroup Inc. ("Citigroup") and, in one case, SSB, were named as defendants along with, among others, commercial and/or investment banks, certain current and former Enron officers and directors, lawyers and accountants in two putative consolidated class action complaints that were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking unspecified damages. One action, brought on behalf of individuals who purchased Enron securities (Newby, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al.), alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the other action, brought on behalf of current and former Enron employees (Tittle, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al.), alleges violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), as well as claims for negligence and civil conspiracy. On May 8, 2002, Citigroup and SSB filed motions to dismiss the complaints, which are pending. In July 2002, Citigroup, SSB, a number of their affiliates and certain of their officers and other employees were named as defendants, along with, among others, commercial and/or investment banks, certain current and former Enron officers and directors, lawyers and accountants in a putative class action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of the Yosemite Notes and Enron Credit-Linked Notes, among other securities (Hudson Soft Co., Ltd. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, et al.). The amended complaint alleges violations of RICO and of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and seeks unspecified damages. Additional actions have been filed against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, along with other parties, including (i) two actions brought in different state courts by state pension plans alleging violations of state securities law and claims for common law fraud and unjust enrichment; (ii) an action by banks that participated in two Enron revolving credit facilities, alleging fraud, gross negligence, and breach of implied duties in connection with defendants' administration of a credit facility with Enron; (iii) an action brought by several funds in connection with secondary market purchases of Enron Corp. debt securities alleging violations of federal securities laws, including Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and claims for fraud and misrepresentation; (iv) a series of putative class actions by purchasers of NewPower Holdings common stock alleging violations of the federal securities law, including Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; (v) an action brought by two investment funds in connection with purchases of Enron-related securities for alleged violations of state securities and unfair competition statutes; (vi) an action brought by 18 several investment funds and fund owners in connection with purchases of notes of the Osprey I and Osprey II Trusts for alleged violation of state and federal securities laws and claims for common law fraud, misrepresentation and conspiracy; (vii) an action brought by several investment funds and fund owners in connection with purchases of notes of the Osprey I and Osprey II Trusts for alleged violation of state and federal securities laws and state unfair competition laws and claims for common law fraud and misrepresentation; and (viii) an action brought by the Attorney General of Connecticut in connection with various commercial and investment banking services provided to Enron. Several of these cases have been consolidated with the Newby action and stayed pending the Court's decision on the pending motions to dismiss Newby. Additionally, Citigroup and certain of its affiliates have received inquiries and requests for information from various regulatory and governmental agencies and Congressional committees, as well as from the Special Examiner in the Enron bankruptcy, regarding certain transactions and business relationships with Enron and its affiliates. Citigroup is cooperating fully with all such requests. Research Since May 2002, SSB and Jack Grubman have been named as defendants in approximately 62 putative class action complaints by purchasers of various securities alleging they violated federal securities law, including Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for allegedly issuing research reports without a reasonable basis in fact and for allegedly failing to disclose conflicts of interest with companies in connection with published investment research, including Global Crossing, WorldCom, Inc., AT&T, Winstar, Rhythm Net Connections, Level 3 Communications, MetroMedia Fiber Network, XO Communications and Williams Communications Group Inc. Similar claims with respect to research have also been included in approximately 100 cases pending against SSB and other broker dealers in the IPO Allocation Securities Litigation and the IPO Allocation Antitrust Litigation, disclosed below under the caption "Other." Nearly all of these actions are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Since April 2002, SSB and several other broker dealers have received subpoenas and/or requests for information from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies and Congressional committees, including the National Association of Securities Dealers (the "NASD"), which has raised issues about SSB's internal e-mail retention practices and research on Winstar Communications, Inc. With respect to Winstar, SSB and the NASD have entered into a settlement agreement. SSB agreed to pay a penalty in the amount of $5 million and did not admit to any wrongdoing. With respect to other such matters, these agencies have been engaged in discussions with a number of broker dealers, including SSB, about resolving potential enforcement proceedings relating to research. SSB is cooperating fully with all such requests. 19 WorldCom, Inc. Citigroup and SSB are involved in a number of lawsuits arising out of the underwriting of debt securities of WorldCom, Inc. These lawsuits include putative class actions filed in July 2002 by alleged purchasers of WorldCom debt securities in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Above Paradise Investments Ltd. v. WorldCom, Inc., et al.; Municipal Police Employees Retirement System of Louisiana v. WorldCom, Inc., et al.), and in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (Longacre Master Fund v. WorldCom, Inc., et al.). These putative class action complaints assert violations of federal securities law, including Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and seek unspecified damages from the underwriters. On October 11, 2002, the Above Paradise and Municipal Police Employees lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York were superseded by the filing of a consolidated putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation). In the consolidated complaint, in addition to the claims of violations by the underwriters of federal securities laws, including Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the plaintiffs allege violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by SSB, arising out of alleged conflicts of interest of SSB and Jack Grubman. The plaintiffs continue to seek unspecified compensatory damages. In addition to the consolidated class action complaint, the Southern District of Mississippi class action has been transferred by the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation to the Southern District of New York for centralized pre-trial proceedings with other WorldCom-related actions. In addition to the putative class actions that have commenced, certain individual actions have been filed in various federal and state courts against Citigroup and SSB, along with other parties, concerning WorldCom debt securities, including individual state court actions brought by various pension funds in connection with the underwriting of debt securities of WorldCom alleging violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and, in one case, violations of various state securities laws and common law fraud. Most of these actions have been removed to federal court and an application has been made to have them transferred to the Southern District of New York for centralized pre-trial proceedings with other WorldCom-related actions. A putative class action on behalf of participants in WorldCom's 401(k) salary savings plan and those WorldCom benefit plans covered by ERISA alleging violations of ERISA and common law fraud (Emanuele v. WorldCom, Inc., et al.), which was commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, also has been transferred by the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation to the Southern District of New York for centralized pre-trial proceedings with other WorldCom-related actions. Additional lawsuits containing similar claims to those described above may be filed in the future. 20 Other In April 2002, consolidated amended complaints were filed against Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc. and other investment banks named in numerous putative class actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of certain federal securities laws (including Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) with respect to the allocation of shares for certain initial public offerings and related aftermarket transactions and damage to investors caused by allegedly biased research analyst reports. The defendants in these actions have moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaints but the Court has not yet rendered a decision on those motions. Also pending in the Southern District of New York against Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc. and other investment banks are several putative class actions which have been consolidated into a single class action alleging violations of certain federal and state antitrust laws in connection with the allocation of shares in initial public offerings when acting as underwriters. The defendants in this action have moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint but the Court has not yet rendered a decision on those motions. For information concerning a suit filed by a hedge fund and its investment advisor against SSB, see the description that appears in the eleventh paragraph under the caption "Legal Proceedings" of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2001, which is incorporated by reference herein. In August 2002, SSB filed a motion for summary judgment. Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds - None Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None Item 5. Other Information - None Item 6. (a) Exhibit - 99.1 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer. Exhibit - 99.2 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer. (b) Reports on Form 8-K - On July 17, 2002 the Partnership filed a notice on Form 8-K to report a change in accountants from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to KPMG LLP. 21 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SHEARSON SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L.P. By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC (General Partner) By: /s/ David J. Vogel, President ------------------------------- David J. Vogel, President Date: 11/14/02 ---------------- Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC (General Partner) By: /s/ David J. Vogel, President ------------------------------- David J. Vogel, President Date: 11/14/02 ---------------- By: /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. ----------------------------------- Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director Date: 11/14/02 ---------------- 22 CERTIFICATION I, David J. Vogel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on 23 our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ David J. Vogel ----------------------- David J. Vogel Chief Executive Officer 24 CERTIFICATION I, Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on 25 our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: November 14, 2002 /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. ------------------------ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer 26

SHEARSON LEHMAN SELECT ADVISORS FUTURES FUND L P 10-Q