UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-21244

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Massachusetts		04-2776269
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

195 West Street, Waltham, Massachusetts		02451
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 487-9900

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class:		Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share		Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

The aggregate market value of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, held by non-affiliates as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was approximately $3.63 billion based on the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The registrant has assumed that all holders of 10% or more of its Common Stock, if any, are affiliates solely for purposes of calculating the aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates. As of August 3125, ~~2016~~2017 there were 5351,~~181~~115,~~849~~310 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement, which will be issued in connection with the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INDEX

PART I	1
Item 1. Business	1
Item 1A. Risk Factors	1415
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	2528
Item 2. Properties	2528
Item 3. Legal Proceedings	2628
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	2629
PART II	2730
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	2730
Item 6. Selected Financial Data	3033
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3134
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	5052
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	5153
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	8894
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures	8894
Item 9B. Other Information	8894
PART III	8996
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	8996
Item 11. Executive Compensation	8996
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	8996
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	8996
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services	8996
PART IV	9097
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	9097
SIGNATURES	9198

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

PAREXEL International Corporation (“PAREXEL,” “the Company,” or “we”) is a leading biopharmaceutical outsourcing services company, providing a broad range of expertise in clinical research, clinical logistics, medical communications, consulting, commercialization and advanced technology products and services to the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. Our primary objective is to provide quality solutions for managing the biopharmaceutical product lifecycle with the goal of reducing the time, risk, and cost associated with the development and commercialization of new therapies. Since our incorporation in 1983, we have developed significant expertise in processes and technologies supporting this strategy. Our product and service offerings include: clinical trials management, observational studies and patient/disease registries, data management, biostatistical analysis, epidemiology, health economics/outcomes research, pharmacovigilance, medical communications, clinical pharmacology, patient recruitment, clinical supply and drug logistics, post-marketing surveillance, regulatory and product development and commercialization consulting, health policy and reimbursement and market access consulting, medical imaging services, regulatory information management (“RIM”) solutions, ClinPhone randomization and trial supply management services (“RTSM”), electronic data capture systems (“EDC”), clinical trial management systems (“CTMS”), web-based portals, systems integration, patient diary applications, and other product development tools and services. We believe that our comprehensive services, depth of therapeutic area expertise, global footprint and related access to patients, and sophisticated information technology, along with our experience in global drug development and product launch services, represent key competitive strengths.

~~Our~~On ~~services~~June ~~complement the research and development (“R&D”) and marketing functions of pharmaceutical~~19, ~~biotechnology~~2017, ~~diagnostics,~~PAREXEL ~~and~~entered ~~medical~~into ~~device~~an ~~companies.~~Agreement ~~Through our clinical research~~ and ~~product~~Plan ~~launch~~of ~~and~~Merger ~~commercialization~~pursuant ~~services, we seek~~ to ~~help~~which ~~clients~~West ~~maximize~~Street ~~the~~Merger ~~return on their significant investments in research and development by reducing the time~~Sub, ~~risk~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~cost~~Massachusetts ofcorporation ~~clinical development~~ and ~~launch of new therapies. For large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, outsourcing these services to us provides those companies with~~ a ~~high~~wholly-~~quality,~~owned ~~variable~~subsidiary ~~cost~~of ~~alternative~~West toStreet ~~the fixed costs associated with internal drug development. In addition~~Parent, ~~these large companies can benefit from our technical resource pool~~LLC, ~~broad~~a ~~therapeutic~~Delaware ~~area~~limited ~~expertise,~~liability ~~other~~company ~~advisory services, and global infrastructure, all of~~ (which ~~are~~we ~~designed~~refer to ~~expedite~~as ~~parallel,~~Parent) ~~multi-country clinical trials~~ and ~~accelerate~~affiliate ~~time-to-market.~~of ~~For~~Pamplona ~~smaller~~Capital ~~bio-pharma~~Management, ~~companies~~LLP, wewill ~~provide~~be ~~access~~merged towith ~~expertise~~ and ainto ~~virtual~~us, ~~and~~with ~~global~~PAREXEL ~~network~~surviving ~~that~~as ~~enables~~a ~~these~~subsidiary ~~companies~~of toWest ~~develop~~Street ~~their~~Parent, ~~new~~LLC, ~~products.~~which ~~Our~~we ~~vision~~refer is to ~~strive~~as ~~to be~~ the ~~premier~~merger ~~provider~~will toacquire ~~the~~all ~~biopharmaceutical~~of ~~and medical device industries for~~ the ~~development~~outstanding ~~and~~shares ~~commercialization~~ of ~~new~~PAREXEL ~~medical~~for ~~therapies worldwide~~$88. ~~Our~~10 ~~goal~~per isshare toin ~~provide~~cash ~~significant~~in ~~benefits to sponsor clients through this strategy, namely,~~ a ~~faster~~transaction ~~and~~valued ~~less~~at ~~expensive~~approximately ~~development~~$5.5 ~~and launch process~~billion, asincluding ~~well~~PAREXEL’s asnet ~~a clinical development strategy and expertise that support the marketing strategy for new medical products~~debt. WeConsummation ~~believe that the outsourcing~~ of ~~these services has increased in~~ the ~~past~~merger ~~and~~is ~~should~~subject ~~continue~~ to ~~increase~~various incustomary ~~the~~conditions, ~~future~~including ~~because~~adoption of ~~several factors, which are placing increased pressure on clients. These factors include~~ the ~~need~~merger toagreement ~~more~~by ~~tightly manage costs, capacity limitations, expirations of drug patent exclusivity periods,~~ the ~~desire~~Company’s tostockholders ~~speed up patient recruitment~~ and ~~reduce~~receipt ~~development time, increased globalization~~ of ~~clinical~~required ~~trials,~~regulatory ~~productivity issues~~approvals, ~~more~~the ~~stringent~~closing ~~government~~is ~~regulations,~~expected ~~and pricing pressure. With increased levels of investment continuing~~ to be ~~required,~~completed welate ~~believe~~in ~~these trends will continue to create opportunities for companies like us that are focused on improving~~ the ~~efficiency~~third ofor ~~the~~early ~~bio-pharma product development and commercialization processes. Moreover, many of our clients are reassessing how they conduct their R&D activities and are now engaging~~ in ~~outsourcing~~the atfourth aquarter ~~more strategic level. One consequence~~ of ~~this~~calendar ~~reassessment~~year ~~is higher concentrations of their outsourced clinical development activities with a smaller number of providers~~2017. We have been successful in winning many strategic partnerships. We believe that our broad range of offerings, our global presence, our information technology solutions, and our expertise in clinical drug development position us well to continue to participate in these strategic partnerships.

WeImmediately ~~are~~prior ~~one of the largest biopharmaceutical services companies in the world~~to, ~~based upon annual service revenue. Headquartered near Boston, Massachusetts, we have offices in 84 locations~~ and ~~have~~contingent ~~approximately 18~~upon,~~600~~ ~~employees throughout 52 countries around~~ the ~~world.~~closing Weof ~~conduct business in healthcare markets around~~ the ~~world~~merger, ~~including~~each ~~the~~outstanding ~~United~~Company ~~States~~stock ~~(“U.S.”)~~option, ~~Argentina,~~restricted ~~Australia,~~stock ~~Austria~~unit, ~~Belarus,~~restricted ~~Belgium,~~share ~~Bosnia,~~and ~~Brazil,~~performance ~~Canada,~~restricted ~~Chile,~~stock ~~China,~~unit ~~Colombia~~(collectively, ~~Croatia,~~the ~~Czech~~“Company ~~Republic,~~Equity ~~Denmark,~~Awards”) ~~Estonia,~~will ~~Finland,~~vest ~~France,~~in ~~Georgia,~~full ~~Germany,~~(in ~~Hungary,~~the ~~India,~~case ~~Indonesia,~~of ~~Ireland,~~performance ~~Israel,~~restricted ~~Italy,~~stock ~~Japan~~units, ~~Korea,~~at ~~Latvia,~~target ~~Lithuania,~~level ~~Malaysia,~~regardless ~~Mexico,~~of the ~~Netherlands,~~actual ~~Norway,~~achievement ~~Peru,~~of the ~~Philippines,~~applicable ~~Poland,~~performance ~~Romania,~~metric). ~~Russia,~~Such ~~Serbia,~~fully ~~Singapore,~~vested ~~Slovakia,~~Company ~~South~~Equity ~~Africa,~~Awards ~~Spain,~~will ~~Sweden,~~be ~~Switzerland,~~canceled ~~Taiwan,~~and ~~Thailand,~~converted ~~Turkey,~~into ~~Ukraine,~~ the ~~United~~right ~~Kingdom~~to ~~(“U.K.”),~~receive ~~and~~an ~~Vietnam.~~amount ~~During~~in ~~our~~cash ~~fiscal~~equal ~~year~~to ~~ended~~$88.10 ~~June 30,~~per ~~2016~~share ~~(“Fiscal~~for ~~Year~~each ~~2016”),~~share ~~we derived 43%~~ of our ~~service~~common ~~revenue~~stock ~~from~~underlying ~~our~~such ~~U.S.~~Company ~~operations~~Equity ~~and~~Awards ~~57%~~(net ~~from our non-U.S. operations. Breakdowns~~ of ~~service~~any ~~revenue~~applicable byexercise ~~geographic~~price ~~region~~and ~~for~~subject ~~previous years can be found in Note 16~~ to ~~the~~any ~~consolidated~~applicable ~~financial~~withholding ~~statements included in Item 8 of this annual report~~taxes).

WeOn ~~were~~August ~~incorporated~~15, in2017, ~~1983~~the asCompany announced a ~~regulatory~~special ~~affairs~~meeting ~~consulting~~of ~~firm~~the shareholders of PAREXEL to be held on September 15, 2017. At the shareholder meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and ~~are~~vote on a ~~Massachusetts~~proposal ~~corporation.~~to ~~Josef~~approve H.the ~~von~~Agreement ~~Rickenbach~~and Plan of Merger, ~~our~~dated ~~Chairman~~as of ~~the~~June 19, ~~Board~~2017, by and ~~Chief~~among ~~Executive~~PAREXEL, ~~Officer~~West Street Parent, ~~was~~LLC a(“Parent”) ~~co-founder.~~and ~~Since~~West ~~our~~Street ~~inception~~Merger Sub, weInc. ~~have~~(“Merger ~~executed~~Sub, aproviding ~~focused~~for ~~growth~~the ~~strategy~~acquisition ~~embracing~~of ~~internal~~the ~~expansion~~Company asby ~~well~~an asaffiliate ~~strategic~~of ~~acquisitions~~the private equity investment firm Pamplona. Subject to ~~expand~~the orterms ~~enhance our~~and ~~portfolio~~conditions of ~~services,~~the ~~geographic~~Merger ~~presence~~Agreement, ~~therapeutic~~the ~~area~~acquisition ~~knowledge~~will occur by means of a merger of Merger Sub, ~~information~~a ~~technology~~wholly-owned ~~capabilities~~subsidiary of Parent, with and ~~client~~into ~~relationships~~the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent in accordance with the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act (the “MBCA”).

In connection with the consummation of the Merger, West Street Merger Sub, Inc expects to finance the transaction by borrowing of $2.065 billion under a new senior secured term loan facility and the entry into a new $300 million senior secured revolving credit facility, issue $770 million of notes and contribute approximately $2.633 billion of common equity

Our services complement the research and development (“R&D”) and marketing functions of pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics, and medical device companies. Through our clinical research and product launch and commercialization services, we seek to help clients maximize the return on their significant investments in research and development by reducing the time, risk, and cost of clinical development and launch of new therapies. For large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, outsourcing these services to us provides those companies with a high-quality, variable cost alternative to the fixed costs associated with internal drug development. In addition, these large companies can benefit from our technical resource pool, broad therapeutic area expertise, other advisory services, and global infrastructure, all of which are designed to expedite parallel, multi-country clinical trials and accelerate time-to-market. For smaller bio-pharma companies, we provide access to expertise and a virtual and global network that enables these companies to develop their new products. Our vision is to strive to be the premier provider to the biopharmaceutical and medical device industries for the development and commercialization of new medical therapies worldwide. Our goal is to provide significant benefits to sponsor clients through this strategy, namely, a faster and less expensive development and launch process, as well as a clinical development strategy and expertise that support the marketing strategy for new medical products. We believe that the outsourcing of these services has increased in the past and should continue to increase

Wein ~~have~~the ~~completed~~future ~~four~~because ~~acquisitions~~of ~~over~~several factors, which are placing increased pressure on clients. These factors include the ~~past~~need ~~three~~to ~~fiscal~~more ~~years~~tightly ~~which~~manage ~~included~~costs, capacity limitations, expirations of drug patent exclusivity periods, the ~~acquisitions~~desire to speed up patient recruitment and reduce development time, increased globalization of ~~Health~~clinical ~~Advances~~trials, ~~LLC~~productivity ~~(“Health~~issues, ~~Advances”)~~more instringent ~~February~~government ~~2016~~regulations, ~~Quantum~~and ~~Solutions~~pricing ~~India~~pressure. ~~(“QSI”)~~With inincreased ~~April~~levels ~~2015~~of investment continuing to be required, ~~ClinIntel~~we ~~Limited~~believe ~~(“ClinIntel”)~~these intrends ~~October~~will ~~2014~~continue to create opportunities for companies like us that are focused on improving the efficiency of the bio-pharma product development and commercialization processes. Moreover, many of our clients are reassessing how they conduct their R&D activities and ~~ATLAS~~are ~~Medical~~now ~~Services~~engaging ~~(“ATLAS”)~~in outsourcing at a more strategic level. One consequence of this reassessment is higher concentrations of their outsourced clinical development activities with a smaller number of providers. We have been successful in ~~July~~winning ~~2014~~many strategic partnerships. We believe that our broad range of offerings, our global presence, our information technology solutions, and our expertise in clinical drug development position us well to continue to participate in these strategic partnerships.

•We ~~Health~~are ~~Advances~~one isof anthe ~~independent~~largest ~~life~~biopharmaceutical ~~sciences~~services ~~strategy~~companies ~~consulting~~in ~~firm~~the ~~that~~world, ~~combines~~based ~~clinical~~upon annual service revenue. Headquartered near Boston, ~~scientific~~Massachusetts, we have offices in 85 locations and ~~business~~have ~~expertise~~approximately to18,900 ~~provide~~employees ~~strategic~~throughout ~~advice~~52 tocountries ~~executives~~around ~~leading~~the ~~life~~world. ~~sciences~~We ~~companies~~conduct ~~and~~business toin ~~investors~~healthcare markets around the world, including the United States (“U.S.”), ~~Health~~Argentina, ~~Advances~~Australia, isAustria, ~~part~~Belarus, ofBelgium, Bosnia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, the ~~PAREXEL~~Netherlands, ~~Consulting~~Norway, ~~Services~~Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom (“PCU.K.”), ~~segment~~and Vietnam. During our fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (“Fiscal Year 2017”), we derived 44% of our service revenue from our U.S. operations and 56% from our non-U.S. operations. Breakdowns of service revenue by geographic region for previous years can be found in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.

•We ~~QSI~~were isincorporated ~~a leader~~ in ~~providing~~1983 ~~outsourced~~as ~~safety~~a ~~management~~regulatory ~~solutions,~~affairs orconsulting ~~pharmacovigilance,~~firm and ~~has~~are ~~been~~a ~~integrated~~Massachusetts ~~into~~corporation. ~~our~~Josef ~~PAREXEL~~H. ~~Access~~von ~~business unit~~Rickenbach, ~~which~~our isChairman aof ~~part~~the ofBoard ~~Clinical~~and ~~Research~~Chief ~~Services~~Executive ~~("CRS")~~Officer, ~~business~~was ~~segment~~a co-founder. ~~Our~~Since ~~acquisition~~our ofinception, ~~QSI~~we ~~strengthens~~have ~~and~~executed ~~creates~~a ~~greater~~focused ~~scale~~growth instrategy ~~our~~embracing ~~pharmacovigilance~~internal ~~capabilities,~~expansion ~~enabling~~as uswell as strategic acquisitions to ~~provide~~expand aor ~~more~~enhance our ~~comprehensive~~portfolio of services, ~~efficient~~geographic presence, ~~and~~therapeutic ~~economical~~area ~~solution~~knowledge, toinformation ~~clients~~technology ~~around~~capabilities, ~~the~~and ~~world~~client relationships.

We have completed six acquisitions over the past three fiscal years which included the acquisitions of The Medical Affairs Company, LLC ("TMAC") in March 2017, ExecuPharm, Inc. ("ExecuPharm"), in October 2016, Health Advances LLC (“Health Advances”) in February 2016, Quantum Solutions India (“QSI”) in April 2015, ClinIntel Limited (“ClinIntel”) in October 2014, and ATLAS Medical Services (“ATLAS”) in July 2014.


•	TMAC is a leading provider of outsourced medical affairs services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. TMAC is part of our Clinical Research Services ("CRS") business segment.


•	ExecuPharm is a leading functional service provider that provides clinical monitoring or study management, along with associated operational activities such as onboarding, training, line management, performance management and policy administration. ExecuPharm is included in our CRS business segment.


•	Health Advances is an independent life sciences strategic consulting firm that combines clinical, scientific and business expertise to provide strategic advice to executives leading life sciences companies and to investors. Health Advances is part of the PAREXEL Consulting Services (“PC”) segment.

•

QSI is a leader in providing outsourced safety management solutions, or pharmacovigilance, and has been integrated into our PAREXEL Access business unit, which is a part of CRS business segment. Our acquisition of QSI strengthens and creates greater scale in our pharmacovigilance capabilities, enabling us to provide a more comprehensive, efficient, and economical solution to clients around the world.

•

ClinIntel, a provider of clinical randomization and trial supply management (“RTSM”) services, which are designed to make patient randomization and clinical supply chain solutions more efficient, has been combined into our ClinPhone® RTSM suite. ClinIntel's capabilities include advanced RTSM technologies for planning, forecasting and managing supply chain logistics. ClinIntel has been integrated into our PAREXEL Informatics ("PI") business segment.


•	Our acquisition of ATLAS, a clinical research service provider in Turkey, the Middle East and North Africa, strengthens our presence in these geographic regions.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We provide a broad ~~range of~~ expertise in clinical research, medical communications, consulting, commercialization and advanced technology services to the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. We have three reporting segments: CRS, PC, and PI.

CRS constitutes our core business and includes all phases of clinical research from “first-in-man” trials, where a medicinal entity is tested on human subjects for the first time, through post-marketing studies, following approval by the presiding regulatory body. CRS service offerings include clinical trials management, observational studies, patient/disease registries, and post-marketing surveillance, data management and biostatistics, epidemiology and health economics/outcomes research, clinical logistics, pharmacovigilance, commercialization, clinical pharmacology, medical affairs, patient recruitment, and investigator site services. 2

PCCRS ~~provides~~constitutes ~~technical~~our ~~expertise~~core business and ~~advice~~includes inall ~~such~~phases ~~areas~~of asclinical ~~strategy,~~research ~~drug~~from ~~development,~~Early ~~regulatory~~Phase ~~affairs,~~(encompassing ~~strategic~~the ~~compliance~~early ~~and~~stages ~~targeted~~of ~~communications~~clinical ~~services~~testing that range from first-in-man ~~support~~through proof-of-concept studies) to Phase II-III and Phase IV, which we include in our PAREXEL Access product ~~launch~~offering. InOur ~~addition~~services include clinical trials management and biostatistics, PCdata ~~provides~~management aand ~~full~~clinical ~~spectrum~~pharmacology, ofas ~~market~~well ~~development~~as related medical advisory, patient recruitment, pharmacovigilance, and ~~product~~investigator ~~development~~site ~~consulting~~services. PCCRS ~~consultants~~ also ~~identify~~includes ~~alternatives~~our clinical supply and ~~propose~~drug ~~solutions~~logistics tobusiness. ~~address~~We ~~clients’~~have ~~product~~aggregated ~~development,~~Early Phase and ~~registration~~PAREXEL ~~needs.~~Access with Phase II-III for the purposes of segment reporting due to economic similarities in these operating segments.

PIPC provides ~~information~~technical ~~technology~~expertise ~~solutions~~and ~~designed~~advice toin ~~improve~~such ~~the~~areas ~~product~~as drug development, ~~processes~~regulatory ofaffairs, ~~our~~product ~~clients.~~pricing ~~PI’s~~and ~~portfolio~~reimbursement, ofcommercialization, ~~products~~ and ~~services~~strategic ~~includes~~compliance. ~~ClinPhone®~~It ~~RTSM,~~also ~~medical~~provides ~~imaging~~a ~~services,~~full ~~centralized~~spectrum ~~assessment~~ of ~~patient~~market ~~technology solutions (such as spirometry~~development, ~~electronic~~product ~~clinical outcomes~~development, and ~~wearables),~~targeted ~~LIQUENT~~communications ~~InSight®~~services ~~RIM,~~in ~~IMPACT®~~support ~~CTMS,~~of ~~DataLabs®~~product ~~EDC,~~launch. ~~web-based~~Our ~~portals,~~PC ~~systems~~consultants ~~integration,~~identify alternatives and ~~patient~~propose ~~diary~~solutions ~~applications.~~to ~~These~~address ~~solutions~~client ~~are~~issues ~~sold~~associated ~~individually~~with orproduct indevelopment, ~~combination~~registration, asand ~~elements of an eClinical suite~~commercialization.

PI provides information technology solutions designed to help improve clients’ product development and regulatory submission processes. PI offers a portfolio of products and services that includes medical imaging services, ClinPhone® RTSM, IMPACT® CTMS, DataLabs® EDC, web-based portals, systems integration, electronic clinical outcome assessments (“eCOA”). and LIQUENT InSight® RIM platform. These services are often bundled together and integrated with other applications to provide an eClinical solution for our clients. In addition, PI's portfolio of services is increasingly being embedded with that of CRS to provide our clients with a more integrated service offering.

The revenue generated by each of our business segments for each of the last three fiscal years is described below under the heading for each segment. The gross profit of each segment for each of the last three fiscal years is described in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report. We have a global infrastructure supporting our business segments and, therefore, assets are not identified by reportable segment.

CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES (CRS)

Our CRS business segment generated service revenue of $1,626.06 million, or 7776.68%, of our consolidated service revenue in Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, service revenue of $1,~~599~~626.10 million, or 7977.46%, of our consolidated service revenue in our fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2015~~2016 (“Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016”), and service revenue of $1,~~508~~599.81 million, or 7779.84%, of our consolidated service revenue in our fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 (“Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015”).

CRS offers complete services for the design, initiation, and management of clinical trial programs, a critical element in obtaining regulatory approval for biopharmaceutical products. We have performed services in connection with clinical trials in most therapeutic areas, including: Oncology, Cardiology, Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Allergy/Immunology, Endocrinology/Metabolism, Gastroenterology, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Orthopedics, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Pulmonology, Rheumatology, Dermatology, Genitourinary, Ophthalmology, and Transplantation. Our multi-disciplinary clinical trials group examines a product’s existing preclinical and clinical data to design clinical trials to provide evidence of the product’s safety and efficacy.

CRS can manage many aspects of clinical trials including: project management;, study protocol design;, Case Report Form (“CRF”) design;, site and investigator recruitment;, patient enrollment;, study monitoring and data collection;, data management;, biostatistics and programming;, report writing;, medical services;, and clinical logistics.

2Clinical trials and observational studies are monitored and conducted by CRS in adherence with Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) and Good Pharmacoepidemiological Practice (“GPP”), respectively. The design of efficient CRFs, detailed operations manuals, and site monitoring by our clinical research associates is undertaken to ensure that clinical investigators and their staff follow established study protocols. We have adopted standard operating procedures (“SOPs”) that are intended to satisfy regulatory requirements and serve as a tool for controlling and enhancing the quality of our worldwide clinical services.

Clinical trials ~~and~~represent ~~observational~~one ~~studies~~of ~~are~~the ~~monitored~~most expensive and ~~conducted~~time-consuming byparts ~~CRS~~of inthe ~~adherence~~overall ~~with~~biopharmaceutical ~~Good~~product ~~Clinical~~development ~~Practice~~process. The information generated during these trials is critical to gaining marketing approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “~~GCP~~FDA”), ~~and~~the ~~Good~~European ~~Pharmacoepidemiological~~Medicines ~~Practice~~Agency (the “~~GPP~~EMA”), ~~respectively.~~the ~~The~~Committee ~~design~~for ofMedicinal ~~efficient~~Products ~~CRFs,~~for ~~detailed~~Human ~~operations~~Use ~~manuals~~(the “CHMP”), and ~~site~~other ~~monitoring~~comparable byregulatory ~~our~~agencies ~~clinical~~around ~~research~~the ~~associates~~world. ~~seek~~The todata ~~ensure~~may ~~that~~also ~~clinical~~be ~~investigators~~used ~~and~~to ~~their~~gain ~~staff~~market ~~follow~~acceptance ~~established~~by ~~study~~clinicians, ~~protocols~~patients, and third-party payers. WeCRS ~~have~~clinical ~~adopted~~trial ~~standard~~management ~~operating~~services ~~procedures~~involve ~~(“SOPs”)~~many ~~that~~phases ~~are~~of ~~intended~~clinical totrials, ~~satisfy~~including ~~regulatory~~Phases ~~requirements~~I, ~~and~~II, ~~serve~~III, asand aIV. ~~tool~~See ~~for~~“Government ~~controlling~~Regulations” ~~and~~below ~~enhancing~~for ~~the~~additional ~~quality~~information ofregarding ~~our~~processes ~~worldwide~~involved in clinical ~~services~~trials.

~~Clinical~~Early ~~trials~~Phase ~~represent~~– ~~one~~The ofEarly ~~the~~Phase ~~most~~business ~~expensive~~unit ~~and~~of ~~time-consuming~~CRS ~~parts~~encompasses of the ~~overall~~early ~~biopharmaceutical~~stages ~~product~~of ~~development~~clinical ~~process.~~testing, ~~The~~when ~~information~~a ~~generated~~product ~~during~~is ~~these~~first ~~trials~~evaluated isin ~~critical~~humans to ~~gaining~~assess ~~marketing~~the ~~approval~~potential ~~from~~safety ~~the~~and ~~United~~efficacy ~~States~~of ~~Food~~the ~~and~~product. ~~Drug~~These ~~Administration~~tests ~~(the~~vary from “~~FDA~~first-in-man”), ~~the~~to ~~European~~“dose-ranging” ~~Medicines~~to ~~Agency~~“proof ~~(the~~of ~~“EMA~~concept”), ~~the~~studies ~~Committee~~in ~~for~~Phases ~~Medicinal~~I ~~Products~~and ~~for~~IIa ~~Human~~of ~~Use~~development. ~~(the~~The ~~“CHMP”),~~Early ~~and~~Phase ~~other~~business ~~comparable~~unit ~~regulatory~~of ~~agencies~~CRS offers clients a one-stop service where studies are performed in healthy volunteers as well as ~~market~~in ~~acceptance~~patients byfrom ~~clinicians,~~various ~~patients,~~disease ~~and~~populations. ~~third-party~~The ~~payors.~~support ~~CRS~~services ~~clinical~~include ~~trial~~project ~~management~~and ~~services~~program ~~involve~~management, ~~many~~drug ~~phases~~development ofconsulting, ~~clinical~~medical ~~trials~~writing, ~~including~~handling ~~Phases~~of I,investigational IIproducts, ~~III~~data management, and ~~IV.~~biostatistical ~~See~~and ~~“Government~~bioanalytical ~~Regulations”~~services. ~~below~~Our ~~for~~international ~~additional~~network ~~information~~of ~~regarding~~Clinical ~~processes~~Pharmacology ~~involved~~Units are located in ~~clinical~~Berlin, ~~trials~~Germany; Baltimore, Maryland (U.S.); Glendale, California (U.S.); Bloemfontein,

Early Phase – The Early Phase business unit of CRS encompasses the early stages of clinical testing, when a product is first evaluated in humans to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the product. These tests vary from “first-in-man” to “dose-ranging” to “proof of concept” studies in Phases I and IIa of development. The Early Phase business unit of CRS offers clients a one-stop service where studies are performed in healthy volunteers as well as in patients from various disease populations. The support services include project and program management, drug development consulting, medical writing, handling of investigational products, data management, and biostatistical and bioanalytical services. Our international network of Early Phase operations includes operations in Berlin, Germany; Baltimore, Maryland (U.S.); Glendale, California (U.S.); Bloemfontein, South Africa; and Harrow, U.K. Our network also includes a bioanalytical laboratory in Bloemfontein, which performs drug analyses in accordance with Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”), a system of managed controls for laboratory and research organizations to ensure the consistency and reliability of results. With these locations, the Early Phase business unit offers clinical pharmacology services (including bioanalytical services) on three continents. 3

~~Phase~~South ~~II-III~~Africa; –and ~~The~~Harrow, ~~Phase~~U.K. ~~II-III~~Our ~~business~~network ~~unit~~also ofincludes ~~CRS~~a ~~encompasses~~bioanalytical ~~the~~laboratory ~~later~~in ~~stages~~Bloemfontein, ofwhich ~~clinical~~performs ~~testing.~~drug ~~CRS~~analyses ~~assists~~in ~~clients~~accordance with ~~one~~Good orLaboratory ~~more~~Practices of(“GLP”), ~~the~~a ~~aspects~~system of ~~clinical~~managed ~~trials~~controls ~~and~~for ~~observational~~laboratory ~~studies~~and ~~described~~research ~~below.~~organizations ~~CRS~~to ~~performs~~ensure ~~both~~the ~~full-service~~consistency and ~~single-~~reliability orof ~~multi-service projects~~results. AsWith athese ~~result~~locations, ~~our~~the ~~involvement~~Early ~~may~~Phase ~~range~~business ~~from~~unit ~~participating~~offers inclinical ~~just~~pharmacology ~~one~~services ~~aspect~~(including ofbioanalytical aservices) ~~clinical~~on ~~trial~~three orcontinents. ~~observational~~In ~~study~~addition to ~~participating~~the inPAREXEL ~~all~~Clinical ~~aspects.~~Pharmacology ~~These~~Units, ~~services~~our ~~include~~Early ~~the~~Product ~~following,~~Development ~~the~~(EPD) ~~majority~~service ofis ~~which~~mainly ~~are~~focused ~~also~~on ~~provided~~proof-of-concept bystudies ~~our~~conducted ~~Early~~at ~~Phase~~sites ~~business~~around ~~unit:~~the globe.

Phase II-III – The Phase II-III business unit of CRS encompasses the later stages of clinical testing. CRS assists clients with one or more of the aspects of clinical trials and observational studies described below. CRS performs both full-service and single- or multi-service projects. We support our clients on a full service and functional basis. As a result, our involvement may range from participating in just one aspect of a clinical trial or observational study to participating in all aspects. These services include the following, the majority of which are also provided by our Early Phase business unit:

•

Study Protocol Design – The protocol defines, among other things, the medical issues a study seeks to examine and the statistical tests that will be conducted. Accordingly, the protocol specifies the frequency and type of laboratory and clinical measures that are to be tracked and analyzed, the number of patients required to produce a statistically valid result, the period of time over which such patients must be tracked and the frequency and dosage of drug administration.


•	CRF Design – Once the study protocol has been finalized, a paper or electronic CRF must be developed. The CRF is the critical document for collecting the necessary clinical data as dictated by the study protocol. It may change at different stages of a trial.

•

Site and Investigator Recruitment – The product under investigation is administered to patients usually by third-party physicians, serving as independent contractors (referred to as investigators) at hospitals, clinics, or other locations, referred to as clinical sites. Medical devices are implemented or tested by investigators in similar settings. Potential investigators may be identified and solicited by the product sponsor. A significant portion of a trial’s success depends on the identification and recruitment of experienced investigators with an adequate base of patients who satisfy the requirements of the study protocol. We have access to thousands of investigators who have conducted clinical trials for us. We provide additional services at the clinical site to assist physicians and expedite the clinical research process.

• Patient Enrollment – The investigators, usually with our assistance, find and enroll patients suitable for the study. The speed with which trials can be completed is significantly affected by the rate at which patients are enrolled. Prospective patients are required to review information about the clinical trial and the investigational product and its possible side effects, and they sign an informed consent form to record their knowledge and acceptance of potential side effects. Patients also undergo a medical examination to determine whether they meet the requirements of the study protocol. Patients then receive the product under investigation or a control (for example, a placebo) and are examined by the investigator as specified by the study protocol. Investigators are responsible for administering the products to patients, as well as examining patients and conducting necessary tests.

• Study Monitoring and Data Collection – As patients are examined and tests are conducted in accordance with the study protocol and applicable regulatory requirements, data are recorded on CRFs, either electronically or paper-based. CRFs are transmitted electronically from study sites or collected by specially trained persons known as clinical monitors. To ensure that the CRFs are completed correctly and the study has been conducted in compliance with the protocol and regulatory requirements, we manage the sites closely over the telephone/internet and through monitoring visits as needed. We offer several EDC technologies, which significantly enhance both the quality and timeliness of clinical data capture and collection while achieving significant efficiency savings. Our study monitoring and data collection services are designed to comply with the adverse events reporting guidelines and related regulatory requirements of the FDA and other relevant regulatory agencies.

3• Data Management – Our data management professionals provide a broad array of services to support the accurate collection, organization, validation, and analysis of clinical data. For instance, they assist in the design of CRFs and investigator training manuals to ensure that data are collected in an organized and consistent format in compliance with the study protocol and applicable regulatory requirements. Databases are designed according to the analytical specifications of the project and the particular needs of the client. The use of EDC technologies to gather and report clinical data and the use of scanning and imaging of the CRFs expedites data exchange while minimizing data collection errors by permitting the verification of data integrity in a more timely manner. After the data is entered, the data management team performs an array of services, including data abstraction, data review, medical coding, serious adverse event reconciliations, loading of electronic data (such as laboratory data), database verification, and editing and resolution of data problems. The data is then submitted in a format prescribed by the client. Our CRS business segment has extensive experience throughout the world in the creation of scientific databases for all phases of the drug development process, including the creation of customized databases to meet client-specific formats, integrated databases to support New Drug

and collection while achieving significant efficiency savings. Our study monitoring and data collection services are designed to comply with the adverse events reporting guidelines and related regulatory requirements of the FDA and other relevant regulatory agencies. 4

•Application Data Management – Our data management professionals provide a broad array of services to support the accurate collection, organization, validation, and analysis of clinical data. For instance, they assist in the design of CRFs and investigator training manuals to ensure that data are collected in an organized and consistent format in compliance with the study protocol and applicable regulatory requirements. Databases are designed according to the analytical specifications of the project and the particular needs of the client. The use of EDC technologies to gather and report clinical data and the use of scanning and imaging of the CRFs expedites data exchange while minimizing data collection errors by permitting the verification of data integrity in a more timely manner. After the data is entered, the data management team performs an array of services, including data abstraction, data review, medical coding, serious adverse event reconciliations, loading of electronic data (such as laboratory data), database verification, and editing and resolution of data problems. The data is then submitted in a format prescribed by the client. Our CRS business segment has extensive experience throughout the world in the creation of scientific databases for all phases of the drug development process, including the creation of customized databases to meet client-specific formats, integrated databases to support new drug application (“NDA”) and equivalent submissions and databases created and maintained in compliance with FDA, European, Asian, and other regulatory specifications and requirements.

• Biostatistics and Programming – Our biostatistics professionals assist clients with all phases of drug development, including biostatistical consulting, database design, data analysis, and statistical reporting. These professionals develop and review protocols, design appropriate analysis plans, and design report formats to address the objectives of the study protocol as well as the client’s individual objectives. Working with programming staff, biostatisticians/epidemiologists perform appropriate ~~analyses~~analysis and produce tables, graphs, listings, and other applicable displays of results according to an analysis plan. Our biostatisticians/epidemiologists may also represent clients during panel hearings at the FDA and other regulatory agencies.

• Report Writing – A description of the study conducted, ~~along~~and ~~with~~ the statistical analysis of data collected during the trial and other clinical data are presented and summarized in a final report generated for inclusion in a regulatory document.

•

Medical Services – Throughout the course of a development program, our physicians provide a wide range of medical research and consulting services to improve the efficiency and quality of clinical research, including medical supervision of clinical trials, medical monitoring of patient safety, review and reporting of adverse events, medical writing, and strategy and product development. Our medical services professionals also provide lifecycle drug safety services combining operational pharmacovigilance and pharmacovigilance consulting. Operational pharmacovigilance capabilities and pharmacovigilance consulting cover all phases of clinical development and drug safety for marketed products.

•

Project Management – Throughout the entire spectrum of activities described above, our CRS segment provides project management services. These services entail providing overall leadership to our project team, acting as the main client liaison, project planning, managing progress against study goals and deliverables, budget management, progress and metrics reporting, and issue resolution. These project management services are offered on all types of studies – single-service, multi-service, or full-service.

PAREXEL Access – The PAREXEL Access business unit of CRS encompasses many services listed within the Phase II-III business unit description. However, the PAREXEL Access business unit also offers a range of additional capabilities to support lifecycle management activities:

• Observational Research – Observational research encompasses several study designs in which groups of patients are observed within routine clinical practice. We help our clients define the needs of their target audience(s) and to develop the best study design to meet their research objectives; define the optimal regulatory authority and ethics committee submission strategies in each country or region; and implement a study management and resourcing model ~~trained~~created to collect the required data in the most efficient manner and to agreed-upon standards of quality.


•	Pragmatic Studies - Interventional studies that utilize many of the approaches developed for observational research.

• Patient-~~reported~~Reported Outcomes – Patient reported outcome measures ~~were~~are developed to evaluate the impact of disease and interventions on emotional, social and physical functioning from the patient's perspective. We help our clients by advising them on the multiple variations of available tools and their appropriateness, acceptability, interpretability, precision, reliability, validity and responsiveness.

• Pharmacovigilance - Our patient safety services have been specifically designed to comprehensively assist biopharmaceutical companies in meeting increasing pharmacovigilance obligations. We have established global infrastructure in drug safety management, extensive safety consulting expertise, standalone drug safety processing and leading capabilities in post-marketing authorization safety studies.

4• Managed Access Programs - We have the global infrastructure, multi-disciplinary expertise, and integrated technologies to help clients design, implement, and support managed access programs that help patients access new medical technologies prior to formal marketing authority via a range of regulatory pathways.

infrastructure in drug safety management, extensive safety consulting expertise, standalone drug safety processing and leading capabilities in post marketing authorization safety studies.

• Market Access – We have the global infrastructure, multi-disciplinary expertise, and integrated technologies to help clients implement a market strategy that will quickly build brand value and establish a strong market position - all while continuing to monitor their new product’s long-term effects and manage related safety data and other regulatory information.

•

Medical Communications Services (“MedCom”) – Our MedCom group assists biopharmaceutical clients in their efforts to achieve optimal market penetration for their products worldwide through expert medical communications and publications services. MedCom utilizes its expertise in strategic consultancy, market and competitive landscaping, publications planning, scientific writing, managed markets, and regulatory compliance to provide effective and compliant scientific communications to a diverse audience of provider, payer, and patient advocacy group stakeholders. An integrated communications plan can detail external and internal strategies, including communications objectives, target audiences, communications priorities and timing, key messages, key meetings and events, and target publications and media. MedCom supports marketing communication objectives across a broad spectrum of media from publications through interactive technologies. Other services include planning of meetings and exhibits in premier scientific conferences and symposia.

• Commercialization Consulting Services – Our Commercialization Consulting Services group provides commercialization strategies and deliverables that assist clients in understanding how changing marketplace dynamics may impact product development, product reimbursement, patient access and commercial success. We identify, gather, analyze, and communicate data that is critical to maximizing product value and commercial success. Our service lines include strategic market access planning, systematic reviews for evidence development, economic modeling and evaluation, pricing, reimbursement strategies, global value dossier writing, and engagement with health technology assessment authorities. Our acquisition of HERON has strengthened our ability to offer our clients a full spectrum of services that aid in developing products through reimbursement and market access strategies. We help our clients better prepare their products for the market, better prepare the market for their products and demonstrate product value in the marketplace.5

•

Commercialization Consulting Services – Our Commercialization Consulting Services (formerly HERON) group provides commercialization strategies and deliverables that assist clients in understanding how changing marketplace dynamics may impact product development, product reimbursement, patient access and commercial success. We identify, gather, analyze, and communicate data that is critical to maximizing product value and commercial success. Our service lines include strategic market access planning, systematic reviews for evidence development, economic modeling and evaluation, pricing, reimbursement strategies, global value dossier writing, and engagement with health technology assessment authorities. Our acquisition of HERON has strengthened our ability to offer our clients a full spectrum of services that aid in developing products through reimbursement and market access strategies. We help our clients better prepare their products for the market, better prepare the market for their products and demonstrate product value in the marketplace.


•	Medical Science Liaisons - PAREXEL, via the acquisition of The Medical Affairs Company (TMAC), is a leading provider of contract Medical Science Liaison services and related staffing solutions. In addition, PAREXEL provides Medical Affairs strategy expertise and related ancillary activities including Medical Information Call Center services.

Clinical Trial Supplies & Logistics (“CTSL”) - The CTSL business unit of CRS encompasses a full range of end-to-end clinical trial supplies and laboratory logistics services associated with clinical trials. This unit was specifically formed to help sponsors mitigate the risks associated with global supply chains for clinical studies. Our experts address the logistical challenges of complying with the rules and regulations required by different countries in the handling and shipment conditions of Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs), medical devices, point-of-care devices, bedside diagnostics and the purchasing and distribution of other study specific documents and equipment. PAREXEL ensures that the right supplies are in the right places at the right time to avoid costly trial delays and risks to patients.

PAREXEL manages clients' global supply chain of clinical trial materials ~~supply chain~~ end-to-end. These services extend from demand forecasting, sourcing, secondary packaging, and labeling to global storage and distribution through management of inventory and depots, and import/export management including customs clearance all the way to return and destruction management. Additional services also include ancillary printing, storage and distribution of paper documents, lab kit production, lab sample logistics as well as return management and destruction of unused clinical trial materials.

PAREXEL CONSULTING SERVICES (PC)

Service revenue from the PC business segment represented $~~190~~210.43 million, or 9.19% of consolidated service revenue in Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, $~~152~~190.24 million, or 79.51% of consolidated service revenue in Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, and $~~176~~152.42 million, or 97.15% of consolidated service revenue in Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015.

We conduct our PC operations through three groups:

• Integrated Product Development (“IPD”) Consulting – Our IPD consulting group provides comprehensive product development and regulatory consulting services for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies inaround ~~major jurisdictions throughout~~ the world. These services include drug and device development and regulatory strategy design,; scientific and technical evaluation,; writing and review services,; expert liaison with the FDA, EMA, and PMDA,; and the preparation, review, and submission of regulatory applications (both for clinical trials and for marketing authorizations) to regulatory authorities in more than 75 countries. Our IPD consulting group works closely with clients to design product development and regulatory strategies and comprehensive registration programs. Our product development and regulatory experts include individuals who have joined us from the biopharmaceutical industry and from regulatory agencies such as the FDA in the U.S. and agencies in the United Kingdom, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden, South Korea, and France. Our experts review existing published literature and regulatory precedents, evaluate the client's scientific and technical data for a product (Non-Clinical, Clinical, Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”); and Regulatory) based on their individual and collective expertise and experience, assess the competitive and regulatory environments in relation to our clients’ specific products and business goals, identify deficiencies in client product documentation (“gap analysis”), and define the steps necessary to obtain regulatory approvals in the most expeditious manner. Through these services, we aim to help our clients obtain regulatory approval for particular products or product lines in markets around the world.

(“CMC”) and Regulatory) based on their individual and collective expertise and experience, assess the competitive and regulatory environments in specific relation to our clients’ products and business goals, identify deficiencies in client product documentation (“gap analysis”), and define the steps necessary to obtain regulatory approvals in the most expeditious manner. Through these services, we aim to help our clients obtain regulatory approval for particular products or product lines in markets around the world.

•

Strategic Compliance Consulting – Our Strategic Compliance Consulting group offers a range of specialized clinical and manufacturing compliance consulting services designed to help pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies achieve and maintain regulatory compliance, product quality, and process excellence. These services include clinical and manufacturing compliance strategy, assistance addressing regulatory agency enforcement issues, risk management, GCP, GLP, Good Tissue Practice and current GMP audits, consent decrees, pre-approval inspection readiness, process optimization, organizational alignment, and training. Our Strategic Compliance Consulting group offers its clients experienced regulatory and industry professionals – who formerly worked at the FDA or the quality departments of major biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies.

• Regulatory Outsourcing Services - Our Regulatory Outsourcing Services group combines enabling technology, operational expertise and global regulatory intelligence to deliver high-quality cost-effective regulatory affairs and regulatory operations solutions as a functional outsourced service. These services include both pre-approval and post-approval activities ranging from compilation, publishing and dispatching of large regulatory dossiers to the authoring of routine product variations, annual reports and other product lifecycle maintenance tasks. These services are used by our clients to provide a flexible outsourcing model that yields predictable year-over-year savings and addresses regulatory complexities, increased workloads, and limited budgets facing the industry.6

•

Regulatory Outsourcing Services - Our Regulatory Outsourcing Services group combines enabling technology, operational expertise and global regulatory intelligence to deliver high-quality cost-effective regulatory affairs and regulatory operations solutions as a functional outsourced service. These services include both pre-approval and post-approval activities ranging from compilation, publishing and dispatching of large regulatory dossiers to the authoring of routine product variations and annual reports and other product lifecycle maintenance tasks. These services are used by our clients to provide a flexible outsourcing model that yields predictable year-over-year savings and addresses regulatory complexities, increased workloads, and limited budgets facing the industry.

PAREXEL INFORMATICS (PI)

Service revenue from our PI business represented $~~277~~280.97 million, or 13.3% of consolidated service revenue, in Fiscal Year ~~2016,~~2017; $~~264~~277.79 million, or 13.13% of consolidated service revenue, in Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, and $~~254~~264.27 million, or 13.1% of consolidated service revenue in Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015.

We conduct our PI operations through seven groups, within two categories of service, offering patient technology solutions and regulatory and clinical solutions:

•Patient ~~ClinPhone~~Technology Randomization & Trial Supply Management (“ClinPhone® RTSM”) – PI provides automated randomization and logistics management through its ClinPhone® RTSM solutions. PI services include both Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”) and Interactive Web Response (“IWR”) technologies. The ClinPhone® RTSM solutions are used in clinical trials to achieve treatment group balance, eliminate selection bias, and limit the predictability of treatment allocations, all of which are designed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. ClinPhone® RTSM allows effective real-time implementation of randomization algorithm modifications required for adaptive trial designs. In addition, supply chain experts use this technology to automate the restocking of sites and depots across the supply chain. We can apply advanced methods to solve difficult supply issues such as managing adaptive trial designs, titration regimens or medication pooling across multiple protocols.Solutions

•

ClinPhone Randomization and Trial Supply Management (“ClinPhone® RTSM”) – PI provides automated randomization and logistics management through its ClinPhone® RTSM solutions. PI services include both Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”) and Interactive Web Response (“IWR”) technologies. The ClinPhone® RTSM solutions are used in clinical trials to achieve treatment group balance, eliminate selection bias, and limit the predictability of treatment allocations, all of which are designed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. ClinPhone® RTSM allows effective real-time implementation of randomization algorithm modifications required for adaptive trial designs. In addition, supply chain experts use this technology to automate the restocking of sites and depots across the supply chain. We can apply advanced methods to solve difficult supply issues such as managing adaptive trial designs, titration regimens or medication pooling across multiple protocols.

•

Medical Imaging Services – PI offers products and services that allow our clients to apply and manage medical imaging in clinical trials. Clinical trial sponsors increasingly rely on imaging as a surrogate endpoint in support of efficacy and safety. Our therapeutic and imaging experts provide a range of capabilities in the application of imaging techniques from early clinical development through peri-approval studies. These services include:


◦	standardization of imaging and image management at investigative sites


◦	image collection at a central location


◦	development of independent review charters for review and approval by regulatory authorities


◦	employing directly or subcontracting independent reviewers and training these reviewers on the assessment criteria and reviewer roles and responsibilities; and


◦	management of the logistical processes involved in the independent review

• ~~Patient~~Clinical ~~Technology~~Technologies ~~Solutions~~ - PI services include the coordination, collection, and centralized assessment of technology endpoints performed in clinical research and post approval observational studies. These services include protocol design, technology selection and support, device management, and data collection. Specific services include:

• Lung function testing (spirometry)


•	Electronic clinical outcome assessments (eCOA) using internet and mobile applications


•	Clinical trial development and support for a wide range of wearables and sensors for collecting data directly from research subjects.

6Regulatory and Clinical Solutions

• Platform Solutions (“PS”) - PS provides leading solutions consulting and services to integrate systems and processes to help companies simplify the concurrent use of the multiple technologies involved in clinical trials all with the purpose of giving clients better visibility and faster access to their data. We utilize a range of technologies including our Clinical Technology Integration Platform, which is a proprietary environment designed to facilitate seamless two-way exchange of data across different systems via reliable and repeatable integrations, our proprietary user environment which includes sophisticated reporting, analytics and visualizations, and our security technologies to manage user access to systems. PS’s services are delivered by our dedicated experts who have an in-depth understanding of advanced technologies, clinical development processes and validated system integrations.


•	Clinical Trial Management System (“CTMS”) – We offer CTMS solutions to assist biopharmaceutical companies with the complex process of planning and managing clinical trials. Our IMPACT^® solution provides pharmaceutical companies and service organizations with flexible options that include hosted or on-premise solutions.

•

Electronic Data Capture (“EDC”) – DataLabs^® EDC is a data management system that unifies the functionality of paper data entry with the flexibility of electronic data capture (EDC). DataLabs^®EDC is able to combine data collected on paper with data collected electronically into one easy-to-use electronic clinical data management platform. The collected information feeds into a single database providing clients with fully integrated data. With DataLabs^® EDC, users are able to design a study, collect data using either method and then clean and manage that data using a single system.

•

LIQUENT Regulatory Information Management (“RIM”) –We offer software and professional service solutions designed to support the regulatory business processes of our life science clients. Our product suite, LIQUENT InSight®, is an end-to-end, integrated RIM platform. LIQUENT InSight® provides our clients with regulatory submission planning, publishing, viewing and registration management capabilities necessary to get their products to market and effectively maintain them throughout their lifespan. We also provide a full complement of flexible regulatory affairs consulting and regulatory operational outsourcing services to help our clients meet the demands of a dynamic regulatory landscape.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

We have invested in information technology designed to help us to provide high quality services, competitive and cost-effective client-facing solutions, and well-managed internal resources. We have built our solutions by developing proprietary technology as well as purchasing and integrating commercially available technology that addresses critical aspects of our business. The proprietary technology we use supports project proposals/budget generation, time information management, revenue and resource forecasting, clinical data entry and management, clinical trial management, project management, quality management, and procurement/expense processing.

We maintain an internal information technology group that is responsible for technological planning, applications development, program management, technical operations, and management of our worldwide computer infrastructure and voice and data networks. Our information systems are designed to support and reinforce all of our policies and procedures while enabling us to respond to the multiple needs of our different clients and regulatory systems. Our systems also enable us to respond quickly to client inquiries regarding progress on projects and, in some cases, to gain direct access to client data on client owned systems.

SALES AND MARKETING

Our sales and marketing personnel carry out our global business development activities. In addition to significant selling experience, most of these individuals have technical and/or scientific backgrounds. Our senior executives and project team leaders also participate in maintaining key client relationships and engaging in business development activities.

Each of our three reporting segments has a business development team that focuses on its particular market segment. In many cases, however, the reporting segment selling teams work together in order to provide clients with the most appropriate service offering to meet their needs. Moreover, we have developed strategic account management teams to provide clients with a single point of contact and to facilitate cross-selling opportunities.

Each business development employee is ~~generally~~ responsible for a specific client segment or group of clients and for strengthening and expanding an effective relationship with that client. Each individual is responsible for developing his or her client base on our behalf, responding to client requests for information, developing and defending proposals, and making presentations to clients.

Our business development group is supported by our marketing team. Our marketing activities consist primarily of market information development and analysis, strategic planning, competitive analysis, brand management, collateral development, participation in industry conferences, advertising, e-marketing, publications, and website development and maintenance. The marketing team focuses both on supporting the individual business development teams for their specific market segments as well as promoting an integrated marketing strategy and communications plan for PAREXEL as a whole.

CLIENTS

We have derived in the past ~~derived~~, and may derive in the future ~~derive~~, a significant portion of our service revenue from both an individual client and a core group of clients. Concentrations of business in the biopharmaceutical services industry are common and we expect to continue to experience such concentration in future years due to our increasing number of strategic partnerships. Our five largest clients accounted for 4037%, 4440% and 4744% of our consolidated service revenue in the aggregate for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, and Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015, respectively. For Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, ~~one~~Fiscal ~~client~~Year 2016, ~~Pfizer~~and ~~Inc. (“Pfizer”) individually accounted for 13% of our consolidated service revenue. For~~ Fiscal Year 2015, one client, Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) individually accounted for 1412% ~~of our consolidated service revenue. For Fiscal Year 2014~~, ~~Pfizer and Merck individually accounted for 16~~13% and 1114% of our consolidated service revenue, respectively.

BACKLOG

~~Backlog~~During ~~represents~~Fiscal ~~anticipated~~Year ~~service~~2017, ~~revenue~~PAREXEL ~~from~~started ~~work~~reporting ~~not~~backlog ~~yet~~based ~~completed~~on orexecuted ~~performed~~contract ~~under~~awards, ~~signed~~in ~~contracts,~~line ~~letters~~with ofemerging ~~intent~~practice in our industry. Like other industry leaders, ~~and~~we are moving away from prior industry practice of including pre-contract ~~commitments~~awards ~~that~~in ~~are~~net ~~supported~~new bybusiness ~~written~~and ~~communications~~backlog. ~~Once~~We ~~work~~will ~~commences~~continue to track pre-contract written awards internally, ~~revenue~~as iswe ~~generally~~believe ~~recognized~~a ~~over~~substantial ~~the~~portion ~~life~~will ofresult ~~the~~in ~~contract~~contracts, asbe ~~services~~added ~~are~~to ~~provided~~backlog, and generate revenue. Backlog at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was approximately $53.7397 billion, compared with approximately $54.3357 billion at June 30, ~~2015~~2016 calculated on a consistent method, ana ~~increase~~decrease of 713.51%. Subject to the matters addressed in the following paragraph, we anticipate that approximately $1.6 billion of the backlog will be recognized as revenue in our fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2017~~2018 (“Fiscal Year ~~2017~~2018”).

We believe that our backlog as of any date is not necessarily a meaningful predictor of future results. Projects included in backlog are subject to cancellation, revision, or delay. As detailed more fully in the “Risk Factors” section of this annual report, clients terminate, delay, or change the scope of projects for a variety of reasons including, among others, the failure of products being tested to satisfy safety requirements, unexpected or undesirable clinical results of the product, client decisions to forego a particular study, insufficient patient enrollment or investigator recruitment, or production problems resulting in shortages of the drug. Additionally, our backlog dynamic may be impacted by our strategic partnerships, which generally represent our largest customers. As a result, any delay or cancellation related to these partnerships could significantly impact the conversion of backlog into revenue. Generally, our contracts can be terminated at any time upon thirty to one hundred twenty days' notice by the client.

COMPETITION

We compete with other biopharmaceutical outsourcing services companies and other clinical research organizations (“CROs”) that provide one or more of the services currently being offered by us. Some of the large biopharmaceutical services companies, such as ~~Quintiles Transnational Corporation~~QuintilesIMS, Laboratory Corporation of America, Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc., INC Research/inVentiv Health, ~~INC Research,~~ PRA Health Sciences, Inc. and Icon plc, offer services that compete directly with our services at many levels.

We believe that the synergies arising from integrating the products and services offered by our different business units, coupled with our global infrastructure (and resulting rapid access to diverse patient populations and markets), technology products and services, and depth of expertise and experience differentiate us from our competitors. Although there are no guarantees that we will continue to do so, we believe that we compete favorably in all of our business areas and segments, as more fully described below.

CRS

The clinical outsourcing services industry is very fragmented, with several hundred providers offering varying levels of service, skills, and capabilities. Our CRS group primarily competes against in-house departments of pharmaceutical companies, other full service biopharmaceutical outsourcing services companies, small specialty CROs, and to a small extent, universities, teaching hospitals, and other site organizations. The primary competitors for our CRS business include ~~Quintiles Transnational Corporation~~QuintilesIMS, Laboratory Corporation of America, Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc., and Icon plc.

CRS generally competes on the basis of:


•	a broad international presence with strategically located facilities and access to end markets;


•	the ability to organize and manage large-scale clinical trials on a global basis;


•	the ability to recruit investigators and patients expeditiously;


•	medical and scientific expertise in a specific therapeutic area;


•	quality of services;


•	breadth of services;


•	the ability to integrate information technology with systems to improve the efficiency of clinical research;


•	previous experience with a client or a specific therapeutic area;


•	the ability to manage large and complex medical databases;


•	the ability to provide statistical and regulatory services;


•	financial strength and stability; and


•	price.

We believe that the key competitive strengths of our CRS business are its global footprint and related rapid access to diverse patient populations, therapeutic expertise, technological expertise, commercialization expertise and its experience in global drug development.

Our PC segment competes with a large and diverse group of specialty service providers, including major consulting firms with pharmaceutical industry practices, large and small biopharmaceutical services companies, individual consultants, specialty medical communications services companies, and medical communication subsidiaries of large international advertising companies.

We believe that a key differentiator of our PC service offering is our combination of scientific and regulatory expertise. We consider PC’s key competitive strengths to include a combination of deep global expertise in early and late stage drug development, regulatory strategy and submissions, ~~GMP compliance, reimbursement~~ and ~~market~~GMP ~~access consulting, and global communications strategies~~compliance. We believe that this broad range of capabilities enables us to help our clients achieve their regulatory and marketing objectives.

Our Health Advances business is a strategy consulting group that focuses exclusively on the healthcare industry. Health Advances helps clients realize growth opportunities worldwide for healthcare technologies, products and services. Health Advances consultants partner with senior executives and investors on their highest-stakes strategic decisions. As a result of deep knowledge of the complexities of the healthcare sector, they provide clients with innovative perspectives and actionable insights that help them make more confident strategic business decisions that capitalize on their company’s growth potential.

Our PI business competes primarily with biopharmaceutical services companies, information technology companies, and software companies. Companies in this segment compete based on the strength and usability of their technology offerings, their expertise and experience, and their understanding of the clinical development process. PI’s key competitive strength is its combination of technological expertise and knowledge of clinical development. Additionally, PI’s offerings and CRS services provide substantial synergies to our customers ~~and CRS services~~.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Our trademark “PAREXEL^®” is of material importance to us. This and other trademarks have been registered in the United States and many foreign countries. The duration of trademark registrations varies from country to country. However, trademarks generally may be renewed indefinitely as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained, and as long as they have not been found to have become generic.

EMPLOYEES

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had approximately 18,~~600~~900 full-time equivalent employees. Approximately 2526% of our employees are located in the United States and approximately 7574% are located internationally. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees.

The success of our business depends upon our ability to attract and retain qualified professional, scientific, and technical staff. The level of competition among employers in the U.S. and overseas for skilled personnel, particularly those with Ph.D., M.D., or equivalent degrees, is high. We believe that our ~~recognition~~position as one of the recognized leaders in our industry and, in particular, the breadth-and-depth of our expertise, are anadvantages ~~advantage~~ in attracting qualified candidates. In addition, we believe that the wide range of clinical trials in which we participate allows us to offer broad experience to clinical researchers.

GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

We provide clinical trial services and diverse consulting solutions to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries worldwide. Lack of success in obtaining approval for the conduct of clinical trials in the countries in which we manage clinical trials on behalf of our clients can adversely affect us. We make no guarantees to our clients with regard to successful outcomes of the regulatory process, including the success of clinical trial applications or marketing authorization applications.

The clinical research services we provided in the U.S. are subject to established and evolving FDA regulations. We are obligated to comply with FDA requirements governing activities such as obtaining Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) approval and patient informed consents, verifying qualifications of investigators, reporting patients’ adverse reactions to products, and maintaining thorough and accurate records. We are also required to ensure that the computer systems we use to process human data from clinical trials are validated in accordance with the FDA’s electronic records regulations, 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11, which apply to the pharmaceutical and CRO industries when companies choose to use electronic records in lieu of paper records or electronic signatures in lieu of traditional signatures. We must maintain source documents for each trial for specified periods, and such documents may be reviewed according to GCP or GPP standards by the study sponsors and the FDA and other regulatory agencies (for example the EMA and the Japanese Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency) during audits and inspections. Non-compliance with GCP or GPP can result in the disqualification of data collected during a clinical study and in non-approval or non-clearance of a product application submitted to the FDA or other regulatory agencies around the world.

9The clinical investigation of new drugs, biologics, and medical devices is highly regulated by government agencies around the world. The standard for the conduct of clinical research and development studies is embodied in GCP, a set of international standards and guidelines, which stipulate procedures designed to ensure the quality and integrity of data obtained from clinical testing, and

Non-compliance with GCP or GPP can result in the disqualification of data collected during a clinical study and in non-approval or non-clearance of a product application submitted to the FDA or other regulatory agencies around the world.10

The clinical investigation of new drugs, biologics, and medical devices is highly regulated by government agencies around the world. The standard for the conduct of clinical research and development studies is embodied in GCP, a set of international standards and guidelines, which stipulate procedures designed to ~~ensure the quality and integrity of data obtained from clinical testing, and to~~ protect the rights and safety of clinical trial participants. The FDA and many other regulatory authorities require that study results submitted to such authorities be based on studies conducted in compliance with GCP. The European Union (“EU”) enacted the Clinical Trials Directive (the “Directive”) in 2004 in attempt to harmonize the requirements of the members of the EU regarding the conduct of clinical trials. The EU released in April 2014 a new legislation to repeal the Directive in a stepwise approach between mid-2016 and 2019 to increase the attractiveness for the conduct of clinical trials in its territory by reducing the bureaucratic burden. The regulation will not require adoption by each member country thus ensuring greater harmonization. The Directive requires sponsors of clinical trials to submit formal applications to national ethics committees and regulatory authorities prior to the initiation of clinical trials in any of the 28 Member States of the EU, and the new legislation will require submission through a portal at the EMA. The regulatory landscape in Asia and Latin America is heterogeneous, with each country independently enforcing its unique regulatory policies. This has improved with more cooperation between countries and a deeper awareness of regional and global differences in regulatory policies and practice, especially in Asia. As in the United States, clinical trials in the EU are expected to be carried out in compliance with detailed requirements for GCP. The revised ICH GCP E6 R2 guideline, strengthening especially risk management and oversight, is being implemented progressively (came into effect in June 2017 in the European Union). PAREXEL maintains an agile Quality Management System that anticipated the changes that would be required by the revised guideline and preemptively adjusted. As a result minimal changes to existing processes were required. The international regulatory approval process, in the EU as well as many other countries, includes all of the risks and potential delays associated with the FDA approval process.

Because the FDA’s regulatory requirements have served as the model for much of the regulation of new drug development worldwide, regulatory requirements similar to those of the FDA exist in the other countries in which we operate. Our regulatory capabilities include knowledge of the specific regulatory requirements of numerous countries. For more than ten years, we have managed successful regulatory submissions for life science companies around the world. Beginning in 1990, the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies of the EU and Japan commenced discussions to develop harmonized standards for preclinical and clinical studies and the format and content of applications for new drug approvals through a process known as the International Conference on Harmonisation (“ICH”) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Data from multinational studies adhering to GCP are now generally acceptable to the FDA and regulators in Australia, Canada, the EU, Japan and Latin American countries, although there can be no advance assurance that the submission of such data to any regulatory authority will result in regulatory approval for marketing of the product. The ICH process has sanctioned a single common format for drug and biologic marketing authorization applications, known as the Common Technical Document (“CTD”) in the U.S., Europe, Japan and Canada. On July 1, 2003 the CTD format became mandatory in Europe and Japan and highly recommended by the FDA in the United States and by the Canadian regulatory authorities. We have developed the expertise to prepare CTDs for our clients in both paper and electronic form.

REGULATION OF DRUGS AND BIOLOGICS

Before a new drug or biologic may be approved and marketed, the drug or biologic must undergo extensive testing and regulatory review in order to determine that the drug or biologic is safe and effective. It is not possible to estimate the time in which preclinical and Phase I, II and III studies will be completed with respect to a given product, although the time period may last many years. Using the U.S. regulatory environment as an example, the stages of this development process are generally as follows:

Preclinical Research (approximately 1 to 3.5 years) – In vitro (“test tube”) and animal studies must be conducted in accordance with GLP to establish the relative toxicity of the drug or biologic over a wide range of doses and to detect any potential to cause a variety of adverse conditions or diseases, including birth defects or cancer. If results warrant continuing development of the drug or biologic, the results of the studies are submitted to the FDA by the manufacturer as part of an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”), which must be submitted to the FDA before proposed clinical testing can begin. An IND must include, among other things, preclinical data, CMC information, and an investigational plan, and must become effective before such trials may begin. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, raises concerns or questions relating to one or more proposed clinical trials. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. In addition, clinical trials cannot begin at a particular study site until approved by the site's IRB, which is an independent expert body charged with protecting patient safety and privacy. As a result, there can be no assurance that submission of an IND will result in the ability to commence clinical trials.

Clinical Trials (approximately 3.5 to 6 years)

Phase I consists of basic safety and pharmacology testing in approximately 20 to 80 human subjects, usually healthy volunteers or stable patients, and includes studies to evaluate the metabolic and pharmacologic action of the product in humans, how the drug or biologic works, how it is affected by other drugs, how it is tolerated and absorbed, where it goes in the body, how long it remains active, and how it is broken down and eliminated from the body.

Phase II includes basic efficacy (effectiveness) and dose-range testing in a limited patient population (usually 100 to 200 patients) afflicted with a specific disease or condition for which the product is intended for use, further safety testing, evaluation of

1011

effectiveness, and determination of optimal dose levels, dose schedules, and routes of administration. If Phase II studies yield satisfactory results and no hold is placed on further studies by the FDA, Phase III studies can commence.

Phase III includes larger scale, multi-center, comparative clinical trials conducted with patients afflicted by a target disease, in order to provide enough data for a valid statistical test of safety and efficacy required by the FDA and others, and to provide an adequate basis for product labeling.

The FDA receives reports on the progress of each phase of clinical testing and may require the modification, suspension, or termination of clinical trials if, among other things, an unreasonable risk is presented to patients or if the design of the trial is insufficient to meet its stated objective. In addition, information about certain clinical trials must be submitted to, and made available to the public on, the government website www.clinicaltrials.gov.

NDA or Biologic License Application (“BLA”) Preparation and Submission – Upon completion of Phase III trials, the sponsor assembles the statistically analyzed data from all phases of development, along with the chemistry and manufacturing and pre-clinical data and the proposed labeling, among other things, into a single large document, the NDA or BLA in CTD format as of July 1, 2003, which today comprises, on average, roughly 100,000 pages. Typically, an NDA or BLA must be accompanied by payment of a statutory fee.

FDA Review of NDA or BLA – The FDA carefully scrutinizes data from all phases of development to confirm that the manufacturer has complied with regulations and that the drug or biologic is safe and effective for the specific use (or “indication”) under study. The FDA may refuse to accept the NDA or BLA for filing and substantive review if certain administrative and content criteria are not satisfied. Even after accepting the submission for review, the FDA may also require additional testing or information before approval of an NDA or BLA. The FDA must deny approval of an NDA or BLA if applicable regulatory requirements are not satisfied.

Post-Marketing Surveillance and Phase IV Studies – Regulatory authorities require companies to collect and periodically report additional safety and, where appropriate, benefit data on the drug or biologic for as long as the manufacturer markets the product. The FDA and other major regulatory agencies require sponsor companies to prepare risk management plans as part of their approval requirements for marketed drugs and biologics, aimed at monitoring areas of drug risk and implementing plans for minimizing their occurrence. In addition, global agencies may impose additional post-marketing study requirements as a condition of a product’s approval to confirm the safety profile or verify clinical benefit in the “real-world” clinical setting or after a product's approval if safety issues are identified. Regulated post marketing surveillance studies are imposed by a number of national agencies for all new products launched into their market and the data used to re-evaluate the continuation of the product license. Product approval may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if a significant safety issue is identified that brings into question the clinical benefit relative to the emerging risks.

REGULATION OF MEDICAL DEVICES

Unless a medical device is exempted from pre-market approval or clearance requirements, which are described below, or is eligible for de novo review, FDA approval or clearance of the device is required before the product may be marketed in the United States. In order to obtain pre-market clearance for marketing, a manufacturer must demonstrate substantial equivalence to a similar legally marketed product by submitting a pre-market notification, or 510(k), to the FDA. The FDA may require preclinical and clinical data to support a substantial equivalence determination, and there can be no assurance the FDA will find a device substantially equivalent. Clinical trials can take extended periods of time to complete. In addition, if the FDA requires an approved Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) before clinical device trials may commence, there can be no guarantee that the agency will approve the IDE. The IDE approval process could also result in significant delays.

After submission of a pre-market notification containing, among other things, any data collected, the FDA may find the device substantially equivalent and the device may be marketed. After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, requires a new 510(k) clearance or could require approval of a pre-market approval application (“PMA”). If the FDA finds that a device is not substantially equivalent, the manufacturer may request that the FDA make a risk-based classification to place the device in Class I or Class II. However, if a timely request for risk-based classification is not made, or if the FDA determines that a Class III designation is appropriate, a PMA will be required before the device may be marketed.

If there is no legally marketed predicate device, a manufacturer can seek to have a device classified into Class I or Class II through the de novo review process. As a result of statutory revisions made in 2012, the de novo process can be used without first going through the 510(k) process.

The PMA approval process is lengthy, expensive, and typically requires, among other things, extensive data from preclinical testing and a well-controlled clinical trial or trials that demonstrate a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. There can be no assurance that review will result in timely, or any, PMA approval. There may also be significant conditions associated with the approval, including limitations on labeling and advertising claims and the imposition of post-market testing, tracking, or surveillance requirements. Even after approval, a new PMA or PMA supplement is required in the event of a modification to the device, its

1112

labeling or its manufacturing process. Typically, a PMA or 510(k) must be accompanied by payment of a statutory fee. In addition, information about certain clinical trials must be submitted to the government website www.clinicaltrials.gov, where it may be made publicly available.

REGULATION OF PATIENT INFORMATION

The confidentiality, security, use and disclosure of patient-specific information are subject to governmental regulation. Regulations to protect the safety and privacy of human subjects who participate in or whose data are used in clinical research generally require clinical investigators to obtain legally effective informed consent from identifiable research subjects before research is undertaken. Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economics and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act of 2009, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued regulations mandating privacy and data security standards and breach notification requirements for certain types of individually identifiable health information, or protected health information, when used or disclosed by health care providers and other HIPAA-covered entities or business associates that provide services to or perform functions on behalf of these covered entities. HIPAA regulations generally require individuals’ written authorization before identifiable health information may be used for research, in addition to any required informed consent. HIPAA regulations also specify standards for de-identifying health information so that information can be handled outside of the HIPAA requirements and for creating limited data sets that can be used for research purposes under less stringent HIPAA restrictions.

Outside of the United States, many countries have enacted laws to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information, including individually identifiable health information. The member states of the European Union have adopted a rigorous system of data protection regulations, based upon a framework imposed by the 1995 European Commission Directive on Data Protection. These rules provide broad protections for personal information, including, among other things, notice requirements, limits on the scope and duration for which personal information may be maintained and processed, restrictions on disclosures of personal information, standards for providing individuals with control over the manner in which personal information is processed, and restrictions on transfers of such data to the United States and other countries that the European Union finds to lack “adequate” data protection laws of their own. Health-related information is recognized as a special, sensitive category of personal information, which may generally be processed only pursuant to the affirmative, or opt-in, consent of the individual to whom the information pertains. Violations of these data protection regulations are subject to administrative penalties, civil money penalties, and criminal prosecution, including corporate fines and personal liability.

In order to comply with these laws and regulations, we must maintain internal compliance policies and procedures, and we may need to implement new privacy and security measures, which may require us to make substantial expenditures or cause us to limit the products and services we offer. In addition, if we violate applicable laws, regulations, contractual commitments, or other duties relating to the use, privacy or security of health information, we could be subject to civil liability or criminal penalties and it may be necessary to modify our business practices.

REGULATION OF HEALTH INDUSTRY ARRANGEMENTS

Since the United States Medicare program will pay for certain costs of qualifying clinical drug trials, as well as certain reasonable and necessary items and services used to diagnose and treat complications arising from participation in clinical trials, the conduct of such trials may be subject to laws and regulations that are intended to prevent misuse of such government health care program funding. In the U.S., these laws include, among others, the False Claims Act, which prohibits submitting or causing the submission of false statements or improper claims for government health care program payments; the so-called Stark physician self-referral law, which prohibits physicians from referring or billing for certain designated health services performed or provided by an entity from which the physician or an immediate family member receives financial compensation, or in which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial compensation, investment, or ownership interest; and the health care anti-kickback law, which prohibits paying, offering to pay, or receiving payment in exchange for the referral of services or devices that are covered under a federal health care program, and which therefore restrict the permissibility of financial and promotional arrangements with patients, physicians, investigators, and study sites, such as, for example, financial incentives for physicians to enroll study participants or for patients, investigators or study sites to participate in a trial. Violations of these restrictions are subject to potentially severe administrative, civil and criminal penalties that could have a substantial and material adverse effect on our business, our reputation, and our continued ability to offer our biopharmaceutical outsourcing services.

POTENTIAL LIABILITIES AND INSURANCE

Our clinical research services focus on the testing of experimental drugs and devices on human volunteers pursuant to study protocols and in accordance with laws and regulations which govern clinical trials. Clinical research involves a risk of liability for personal injury or death to patients due to, among other reasons, possible unforeseen adverse side effects or improper administration of the new drug or medical device. We do not generally provide health care services directly to patients. Rather, our physicians or third party physician investigators are responsible for administering drugs and evaluating the study patients. Many of the patients enrolled in clinical trials are already seriously ill and are at risk of further illness or death.

1213

We believe that the risk of liability to patients in clinical trials is mitigated by various regulatory requirements, including the role of IRBs, the need to obtain each patient’s informed consent, and the oversight by applicable regulatory authorities. The FDA, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom, and regulatory authorities in other countries require each human clinical trial to be reviewed and approved by the IRB at each study site. An IRB is an independent ethics committee that includes both medical and non-medical personnel and is obligated to protect the interests of patients enrolled in the trial. The IRB approves and monitors the protocol and the measures designed to protect patients, such as the requirement to obtain informed consents.

To reduce our potential liability, we generally seek to incorporate indemnity provisions into our contracts with clients to protect us from liability for adverse reactions to the study drug as well as any negligent acts by the study sponsor and/or third party physician investigators. These indemnity provisions do not, however, protect us against certain of our own actions, such as those involving negligence. Moreover, these indemnities are contractual arrangements that are subject to negotiation with individual clients, and the terms and scope of such indemnities can vary from client to client and from study to study. Finally, the financial performance of these indemnities is not secured; therefore we bear the risk that an indemnifying party may not have the financial ability to fulfill its indemnification obligations. We could be materially and adversely affected if we were required to pay damages or incur defense costs in connection with an uninsured claim that is outside the scope of an indemnity or where an indemnification obligation, although applicable, is not performed in accordance with its terms.

We currently maintain a portfolio of insurance coverage, including a professional liability insurance policy, subject to deductibles and coverage limits. There can be no assurance that this insurance coverage will be adequate, or that insurance coverage will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Our Internet website is http://www.parexel.com. We make available through this website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). We make these reports available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any materials we file with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and, in particular, the description of our Business set forth in Part I, Item 1 and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Part II, Item 7 (“MD&A”) contain or incorporate a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

Any statements contained in or incorporated by reference into this report that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “intends,” “estimates”, and other similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions and should be read in conjunction with our MD&A and our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements made. There are a number of important risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, those set forth in this annual report under the heading “Risk Factors” as well as risks that emerge from time to time that are not possible for us to predict. Forward-looking statements, like all statements in this annual report, speak only as of the date of this annual report (unless another date is indicated). We disclaim any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

1314

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this report, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our company and our business. Additional risks not currently known to us or other factors not perceived by us to present significant risk to our business at this time also may impair our business operations.

Risks Associated with the Merger

We may not complete the merger within the time frame we anticipate or at all, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial results and/or operations.

In June of 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which West Street Merger Sub, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of West Street Parent, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (which we refer to as Parent) and affiliate of Pamplona Capital Management, LLP, will be merged with and into us, with PAREXEL surviving as a subsidiary of West Street Parent, LLC, which we refer to as the merger. Completion of the merger is subject to a number of closing conditions, including obtaining approval of our stockholders and receipt of required regulatory approvals. Each party’s obligation to consummate the merger is also subject to the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party (subject to certain qualifications and exceptions) and the performance in all material respects of the other party’s covenants under the merger agreement, including, with respect to us, covenants regarding operation of our business prior to closing. In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated under certain specified circumstances, including, but not limited to, by Parent in connection with a change in the recommendation of our Board of Directors or by us to enter into an agreement for a “Superior Proposal,” as defined in the merger agreement. As a result, we cannot assure you that the merger will be completed, even if our stockholders approve the merger, or that, if completed, it will be exactly on the terms set forth in the merger agreement or within the expected time frame.

If the merger is not completed within the expected time frame or at all, we may be subject to a number of material risks. The price of our common stock may decline to the extent that current market prices reflect a market assumption that the merger will be completed. We could be required to reimburse certain expenses of Parent or pay Parent a termination fee of $138 million if the merger agreement is terminated under specific circumstances described in the merger agreement. The failure to complete the merger may result in negative publicity and negatively affect our relationship with our stockholders, employees and clients. We may also be required to devote significant time and resources to litigation related to any failure to complete the merger or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against us to perform our obligations under the merger agreement.

The merger agreement provides us with limited remedies in the event of a breach by Parent that results in termination of the merger agreement, including the right to a reverse termination fee payable under certain specified circumstances, as described in the merger agreement. We cannot assure you that a remedy will be available to us in the event of such a breach or that the damages we incur in connection with such breach will not exceed the amount of the reverse termination fee. In addition, Parent requires significant third-party debt financing to complete the merger and in the event that the Parent’s lenders do not provide such debt financing, we may only be entitled to receive the reverse termination fee as provided under the merger agreement.

The announcement and pendency of the merger could adversely affect our business, financial results and/or operations.

Our efforts to complete the merger could cause substantial disruptions in, and create uncertainty surrounding, our business, which may materially adversely affect our results of operation and our business. Uncertainty as to whether the merger will be completed may affect our ability to recruit prospective employees or to retain and motivate existing employees. Employee retention may be particularly challenging while the merger is pending because employees may experience uncertainty about their roles following the merger. A substantial amount of our management’s and employees’ attention is being directed toward the completion of the merger and thus is being diverted from our day-to-day operations. Uncertainty as to our future could adversely affect our business and our relationship with clients and potential clients. For example, clients and other counterparties may defer decisions concerning working with us, or seek to change existing business relationships with us. Changes to or termination of existing business relationships could adversely affect our revenue, earnings and financial condition, as well as the market price of our common stock. The adverse effects of the pendency of the merger could be exacerbated by any delays in completion of the merger or termination of the merger agreement.

While the merger agreement is in effect, we are subject to restrictions on our business activities.

While the merger agreement is in effect, we are subject to restrictions on our business activities, including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to acquire other businesses and assets, dispose of our assets, make investments, enter into certain contracts, repurchase or issue securities, pay dividends, make capital expenditures, take certain actions relating to intellectual property, amend our organizational documents and incur indebtedness. These restrictions could prevent us from pursuing strategic business opportunities, taking actions with respect to our business that we may consider advantageous and responding effectively and/or timely to competitive pressures and industry developments, and may as a result materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In certain instances, the merger agreement requires us to pay a termination fee to Parent, which could affect the decisions of a third party considering making an alternative acquisition proposal.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, we may be required to pay Parent a termination fee of $138 million under specified conditions including in the event we terminate the merger agreement to enter into a “Superior Proposal,” as defined in the merger agreement or in the event Parent terminates the merger agreement following a change in the recommendation of our Board of Directors that our shareholders approve the merger. This payment could affect the structure, pricing and terms proposed by a third party seeking to acquire or merge with us and could discourage a third party from making a competing acquisition proposal, including a proposal that would be more favorable to our stockholders than the merger.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, direct and indirect costs as a result of the merger.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant costs and expenses, including fees for professional services and other transaction costs, in connection with the merger. We must pay substantially all of these costs and expenses whether or not the merger is completed. There are a number of factors beyond our control that could affect the total amount or the timing of these costs and expenses.

Legal proceedings in connection with the merger, the outcomes of which are uncertain, could delay or prevent the completion of the merger.

Since the announcement of the merger, putative class actions have been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in connection with the proposed merger against us, other parties to the merger, and the members of our Board of Directors. The lawsuits allege that the preliminary that the proxy statement violates Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by materially omitting material information related to Company’s projections and the explanation of the analysis of the Company’s financial advisor, among other claims. Among other remedies, the plaintiffs in these lawsuits seek to enjoin the merger. This and other potential legal proceedings could delay or prevent the merger from becoming effective.

Risks Associated with our Business and Operations

The loss, modification, or delay of large or multiple contracts or a strategic partner may negatively impact our financial performance.

Our clients generally can terminate their contracts with us upon 30 to 60120 days' notice or can delay the execution of services. The loss or delay of a large contract or the loss or delay of multiple contracts could adversely affect our operating results, possibly materially. We have in the past experienced large contract cancellations and delays, which have adversely affected our operating results. The loss of a strategic partner could potentially have a material adverse effect on our business and financial statements.

Clients may terminate or delay their contracts for a variety of reasons, including:


•	failure of products being tested to satisfy safety requirements;


•	failure of products being tested to satisfy efficacy criteria;


•	products having unexpected or undesired clinical results;


•	client cost reductions as a result of budgetary limits or changing priorities;


•	client decisions to forego a particular study, perhaps for economic reasons;


•	merger or potential merger related activities involving the client;


•	insufficient patient enrollment in a study;


•	insufficient investigator recruitment;


•	clinical drug manufacturing problems resulting in shortages of the product;


•	product withdrawal following market launch; and


•	shut down of manufacturing facilities.

Unfavorable economic and financial market conditions could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our ability to attract and retain clients, invest in and grow our business and meet our financial obligations depends on our operating and financial performance, which, in turn, is subject to numerous factors. In addition to factors specific to our business, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, political and other factors beyond our control can also affect us. For example, if global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in the United States, Europe or other key markets remain uncertain or deteriorate, demand for our services could decline, and we may experience material adverse impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In this regard, we are exposed to risks associated with any reduced profitability and the potential financial instability of our clients resulting from disruptions to the demand for health care services and pharmaceuticals and/or in the credit and capital markets. These conditions could cause clients to experience reduced profitability and/or cash flow problems that could lead them to modify, delay, cancel or fail to make payment under contracts with us, including contracts included in our current backlog, which could, in turn, have a negative effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our business is also affected by local economic environments, including inflation, recession, financial liquidity and currency volatility or devaluation. Political changes, some of which may be disruptive, could interfere with our clients and our activities in a particular location. We cannot anticipate all the ways in which unfavorable economic and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

financial instability of our clients resulting from disruptions to the demand for health care services and pharmaceuticals and/or in the credit and capital markets. These conditions could cause clients to experience reduced profitability and/or cash flow problems that could lead them to modify, delay, cancel or fail to make payment under contracts with us, including contracts included in our current backlog, which could, in turn, have a negative effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our business is also affected by local economic environments, including inflation, recession, financial liquidity and currency volatility or devaluation. Political changes, some of which may be disruptive, could interfere with our clients and our activities in a particular location. We cannot anticipate all the ways in which unfavorable economic and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

We face risks arising from the restructuring of our operations.

InOn ~~June~~January ~~2015~~6, 2017, we ~~adopted~~approved a plan ~~(the “Margin Acceleration Program”)~~ to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the ~~Company~~company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. ~~For~~ ~~Fiscal~~In ~~Years~~May ~~2016~~2017, ~~and~~the ~~2015,~~Company weapproved ~~recorded~~an ~~$27~~expansion of the 2017 Restructuring Program.8 ~~million~~The ~~and~~restructuring initiatives are company-wide. For Fiscal Years 2017 we recorded $2041.02 million, ~~respectively,~~ in restructuring charges, substantially related to the ~~Margin~~2017 ~~Acceleration~~Restructuring Program, which consisted of employee separation benefits and facility exit costs. If weThe ~~incur~~remainder ~~additional~~of ~~restructuring~~the charges are expected to be incurred by the end of the fiscal year ending June 30, ~~our~~2018 ~~financial~~(“Fiscal ~~condition~~Year ~~and~~2018”). ~~results~~These actions are expected to result in pre-tax savings in the range of ~~operations~~$85.0 ~~may~~million to $95.0 million, all of which are anticipated to be ~~adversely~~cash ~~impacted~~expenditures.

In June 2015, we adopted the Margin Acceleration Program and in January 2017, we approved a plan to further restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the Company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. For Fiscal Years 2017 and 2016, we recorded $0.5 million and $27.8 million, respectively, in restructuring charges related to the Margin Acceleration Program, which consisted of employee separation benefits and facility exit costs. If we incur additional restructuring charges, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

Restructuring presents significant potential risks of events occurring that could adversely affect us, including a decrease in employee morale, the failure to achieve targeted cost savings and the failure to meet operational targets and customer requirements due to the loss of employees and any work stoppages that might occur.

The fixed price nature of our contracts or failure to document changes to work orders could hurt our operating results.

The majority of our contracts are fixed price. If we fail to accurately price our contracts, if we experience significant cost overruns that are not recovered from our clients, or if we do not properly document changes to work orders under existing contracts, our gross margins on the contracts would be reduced and we could lose money on contracts. In the past, we have had to commit unanticipated resources to complete projects, resulting in lower gross margins on those projects. We might experience similar situations in the future.

If we are unable to attract suitable investigators and volunteers for our clinical trials, our clinical development business might suffer.

The clinical research studies we run in our CRS segment rely upon the ready accessibility and willing participation of physician investigators and volunteer subjects. Investigators are typically located at hospitals, clinics or other sites and supervise administration of the study drug to patients during the course of a clinical trial. Volunteer subjects generally include people from the communities in which the studies are conducted, and the rate of completion of clinical trials is significantly dependent upon the rate of participant enrollment.

Our clinical research development business could be adversely affected if we were unable to attract suitable and willing investigators or volunteers on a consistent basis. If we are unable to obtain sufficient patient enrollment or investigators to conduct clinical trials as planned, we might need to expend substantial additional funds to obtain access to resources or else be compelled to delay or modify our plans significantly. These considerations might result in our inability to successfully achieve projected development timelines as agreed with trial sponsors. In rare cases, it potentially may even lead us to recommend that trial sponsors terminate ongoing clinical trials or development of a product for a particular indication.

We rely on third parties and the transportation industry for important services.

We depend on third parties to provide us with products and services critical to our business. The failure of any of these third parties to adequately provide the needed products and services including, without limitation, transportation services, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our clinical logistics services and other businesses are also heavily reliant on air travel for transport of clinical trial kits and other material, research products, and people, and a significant disruption to the air travel system, or our access to it, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If our business, including PI, is unable to maintain continuous, effective, reliable and secure operation of its computer hardware, software and internet applications and related tools and functions, its business will be harmed.

Our business, including PI, involves collecting, managing, manipulating and analyzing large amounts of data and communicating data via the Internet. In our business, we depend on the continuous, effective, reliable and secure operation of computer hardware, software, networks, telecommunication networks, Internet servers and related infrastructure. If the hardware or software malfunctions or access to data by internal research personnel or customers through the Internet is interrupted, our business could suffer. In addition, any sustained disruption in Internet access provided by third parties could adversely impact our business.

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential data, whether through systems failure or employee negligence, cyber-attacks, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers. Similarly, we could be subject to attempts to gain unauthorized access to or through our information systems, including a cyber-attack by computer programmers and hackers who may develop and deploy viruses, worms or other malicious software programs, process breakdowns, denial-of-service attacks, malicious social engineering or other malicious activities, or any combination of the foregoing. These concerns about security are increased when information is transmitted over the Internet. Threats include cyber-attacks such as computer viruses, worms or other destructive or disruptive software, and any of these could result in a degradation or disruption of our services or damage to our properties, equipment and data. They could also compromise data security. If such attacks are not detected immediately, their effect could be compounded. Successful attacks in the future could result in negative publicity, significant remediation and recovery costs, legal liability and damage to our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Although the computer and communications hardware used in our business is protected through physical and software safeguards, it is still vulnerable to fire, storm, flood, power loss, earthquakes, telecommunications failures, physical or software break-ins, and similar events. And while certain of our operations have appropriate disaster recovery plans in place, we currently do not have redundant facilities everywhere in the world to provide IT capacity in the event of a system failure. In addition, many of the software applications we use, including the PI software products are complex and sophisticated, and could contain data, design or software errors that could be difficult to detect and correct. If PI fails to maintain and further develop the necessary computer capacity and data to support the needs of our PI customers, it could result in a loss of or a delay in revenue and market acceptance. Additionally, significant delays in the planned delivery of system enhancements or inadequate performance of the systems once they are completed could damage our reputation and harm our business.

Finally, long-term disruptions to infrastructure caused by events such as natural disasters, the outbreak of war, the escalation of hostilities, and acts of terrorism (particularly in areas where we have offices) could adversely affect our businesses. Although we carry property and business interruption insurance, our coverage may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur.

Our business is subject to international economic, political, and other risks that could negatively affect our results of operations or financial position.

We provide most of our services on a worldwide basis. Our service revenue from non-U.S. operations represented approximately 5756% and 5157% of total consolidated service revenue for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 and Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, respectively. More specifically, for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 and Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, our service revenue from operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa represented 3937% and 3439%, respectively, of total consolidated service revenue. Our service revenue from operations in the Asia/Pacific region represented 1416% and 1314% of total consolidated service revenue for the respective periods. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally, including:


•	changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions, including Western Europe, in particular;

• the outbreak of war or hostilities in specific geographic regions, including the Ukraine, Russia, ~~and~~ the Middle East and North Korea;


•	potential negative impact from changes in tax laws affecting any repatriation of profits;


•	difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations;


•	unfavorable labor regulations applicable to our European or other international operations;


•	changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and


•	the need to ensure compliance with the numerous regulatory and legal requirements applicable to our business in each jurisdiction and to maintain an effective compliance program to ensure compliance.

Our operating results are impacted by the health of the global and local economies in which we operate. Our business and financial performance may be adversely affected by current and future economic conditions that cause a decline in business and consumer spending, including a reduction in the availability of credit, rising interest rates, financial market volatility and recession.

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved a withdrawal from the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” 2.3% and 3.1% of our consolidated service revenue was denominated in the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”) in Fiscal Year 2016 and Fiscal Year 2015, respectively. It is expected that the U.K. will initiate a process to leave the E.U. and begin negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s future relationship with the E.U. At this time, it is uncertain what impact this process will have on the economy in Europe, including in the U.K. or on the “GBP” or other European exchange rates. Adverse consequences such as deterioration in economic conditions, volatility in currency exchange rates or adverse changes in regulation could have a negative impact on our results of operations or financial position.18

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved a withdrawal from the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” 1.9% and 2.3% of our consolidated service revenue was denominated in the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”) in Fiscal Year 2017 and Fiscal Year 2016, respectively. It is expected that the U.K. will initiate a process to leave the E.U. and begin negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s future relationship with the E.U. At this time, it is uncertain what impact this process will have on the economy in Europe, including in the U.K. or on the “GBP” or other European exchange rates. Adverse consequences such as deterioration in economic conditions, volatility in currency exchange rates or adverse changes in regulation could have a negative impact on our results of operations or financial position.

If we cannot retain our highly qualified management and technical personnel, our business would be harmed.

We rely on the expertise of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Josef H. von Rickenbach, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Mark A. Goldberg, and it would be difficult and expensive to find qualified replacements who have a comparable level of specialized knowledge of our products and services and the biopharmaceutical outsourcing services industry. While we are a party to an employment agreement with Mr. von Rickenbach, it may be terminated by either party at any time upon notice to the counterparty.

In addition, in order to compete effectively, we must attract and retain qualified sales, professional, scientific, and technical operating personnel. Competition for these skilled personnel, particularly those with a medical degree, a Ph.D. or equivalent degrees, or industry specific expertise, is intense. We may not be successful in attracting or retaining key personnel.

We have only a limited ability to protect our intellectual property rights, and these rights are important to our success.

The proprietary methodologies, analytics, systems, technologies and other intellectual property we develop is important to our success. Existing laws of the various countries in which we provide services or solutions offer only limited protection of our intellectual property rights, and the protection in some countries may be very limited. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality policies, nondisclosure agreements, and other contractual arrangements, and copyright and trademark laws, to protect our intellectual property rights. These laws are subject to change at any time and certain agreements might not be fully enforceable, which could further restrict our ability to protect our innovations. Furthermore, our intellectual property rights might not prevent competitors from independently developing services similar to or duplicative of ours or alleging infringement by us of their intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions. The steps we take in this regard might not be adequate to prevent or deter infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property or claims against us for alleged infringement or misappropriation by competitors, former employees or other third parties, and we might not be able to detect unauthorized use of, or take appropriate and timely steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. Enforcing our rights might also require considerable time, money and oversight, and we might not be successful in enforcing our rights.

and timely steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. Enforcing our rights might also require considerable time, money and oversight, and we might not be successful in enforcing our rights.

Risks Associated with our Financial Results

Our operating results have fluctuated between quarters and years and may continue to fluctuate in the future, which could affect the price of our common stock.

Our quarterly and annual operating results have varied and will continue to vary in the future as a result of a variety of factors. For example, our income from operations totaled $6448.20 million for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017, $6929.79 million for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017, $5460.60 million for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016 ~~$35.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015,~~ and $3953.3 million for the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2015~~2016. Our income from operations for the Fiscal Years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 respectively, totaled $~~224~~191.02 million, $~~199~~224.90 million and $199.59 million. Factors that cause these variations include:


•	the level of new business authorizations in particular quarters or years;


•	the timing of the initiation, progress, or cancellation of significant projects;


•	foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations between quarters or years;


•	restructuring charges;


•	the mix of services offered in a particular quarter or year;


•	the timing of the opening of new offices or internal expansion;


•	timing, costs and the related financial impact of acquisitions;


•	the timing and amount of costs associated with integrating acquisitions;


•	the timing and amount of startup costs incurred in connection with the introduction of new products, services or subsidiaries;


•	the dollar amount of changes in contract scope finalized during a particular period; and


•	the amount of any reserves we are required to record.

We do not control many of these factors, such as the timing of cancellations of significant projects and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations between quarters or years.

If our operating results do not match the expectations of securities analysts and investors, the trading price of our common stock will likely decrease.

Backlog may not result in revenue.

Our backlog is not necessarily a meaningful predictor of future results because backlog can be affected by a number of factors, including the size and duration of contracts, many of which are performed over several years. Additionally, as described above, contracts relating to our clinical development business are subject to early termination by the client, and clinical trials can be delayed or canceled for many reasons, including unexpected test results, safety concerns, regulatory developments or economic issues. Also, the scope of a contract can be reduced significantly during the course of a study. If the scope of a contract is revised, the adjustment to backlog occurs when the revised scope is approved by the client. For these and other reasons, we do not fully realize our entire backlog as service revenue.

Our revenue and earnings are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations, which have substantially affected our operating results.

Our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Because we conduct a significant portion of our operations in foreign countries, changes in foreign currency exchange rates could have and have had a significant effect on our operating results. Exchange rate fluctuations between local currencies and the U.S. dollar create risk in several ways, including:

• Foreign Currency Translation Risk. The revenue and expenses of our foreign operations are generally denominated in local currencies, primarily the Euro and the pound sterling, and are translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. For Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 and Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, our Euro denominated service revenue accounted for approximately 912.81% and 129.28% of consolidated service revenue, respectively. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates between relevant foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the translation of foreign results into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our consolidated financial results.

• Foreign Currency Transaction Risk. We may be subjected to foreign currency transaction risk when our foreign subsidiaries enter into contracts or incur liabilities denominated in a currency other than the foreign subsidiary's functional (local) currency. We also may be subject to foreign currency transaction risk based upon our internal contracts and the extent of work performed in a particular region. To the extent that we are unable to shift the effects of currency fluctuations to our clients, foreign currency exchange losses as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

work performed in a particular region. To the extent that we are unable to shift the effects of currency fluctuations to our clients, foreign currency exchange losses as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Although we try to limit these risks through the inclusion of exchange rate fluctuation provisions stated in our service contracts or by hedging transaction risk with foreign currency exchange contracts, we do not succeed in all cases. Even in those cases in which we are successful, we may still experience fluctuations in financial results from our operations outside of the United States, and we may not be able to reduce the currency transaction risk associated with our service contracts.

Our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which may affect our earnings and earnings per share.

Our quarterly effective income tax rate is influenced by our annual projected profitability in the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. Changes in the distribution of profits and losses among taxing jurisdictions may have a significant impact on our effective income tax rate, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our net income and earnings per share. Factors that affect the effective income tax rate include, but are not limited to:


•	the requirement to exclude from our quarterly worldwide effective income tax calculations losses in jurisdictions in which no tax benefit can be recognized;


•	the repatriation of foreign earnings to the United States;


•	actual and projected full-year pretax income;


•	changes in tax laws in various taxing jurisdictions;


•	audits by taxing authorities; and


•	the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that future tax benefits will not be realized.

These changes may cause fluctuations in our effective income tax rate that could cause fluctuation in our earnings and earnings per share, which could affect our stock price.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by the results of regulatory tax examinations.

We are subject to value added tax, customs tax, sales and use tax, withholding tax, payroll tax, income tax, and other taxes as a result of the operations of our business. The regulators from the various jurisdictions in which we operate periodically perform audits. In the conduct of such audits, we may be required to disclose information of a sensitive nature and, in general, to modify the way we conduct business with our vendors and customers, and our intercompany transfer pricing, as compared to our prior practices, which may affect our business in an adverse manner. We are also regularly subject to, and are currently undergoing, audits by tax authorities in the United States and foreign jurisdictions for prior tax years. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable and we intend to defend our positions through litigation if necessary, the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation is inherently uncertain and could be materially different than that reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Moreover, we could be subject to assessments of substantial additional taxes and/or fines or penalties relating to ongoing or future audits. The adverse resolution of any audits or litigation could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected if our goodwill or intangible assets are impaired.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, our total assets included $~~519~~676.91 million of goodwill and net intangible assets. We assess the realizability of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill annually as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that these assets may be impaired. These events or changes in circumstances generally include operating losses or a significant decline in earnings associated with the acquired business or asset. Our ability to realize the value of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will depend on the future cash flows of the underlying businesses. These cash flows may be impacted by how well we have integrated these businesses. If we are not able to realize the value of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we may be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets.

Changes to our computer operating systems, programs or software could adversely impact our business.

We may make changes to our existing computer operating systems, programs and/or software in an effort to increase our operating efficiency and/or deliver better value to our clients. Such changes may cause disruptions to our operations and have an adverse impact on our business in the short term.

Our business has experienced substantial expansion in the past and such expansion and any future expansion could strain our resources if not properly managed.

We have expanded our business substantially in the past. Future rapid expansion could strain our operational, human and financial resources. In order to manage expansion, we must:


•	continue to improve operating, administrative, and information systems;


•	accurately predict future personnel and resource needs to meet client contract commitments;


•	track the progress of ongoing client projects; and


•	attract and retain qualified management, sales, professional, scientific and technical operating personnel.

If we do not take these actions and are not able to manage the expanded business, the expanded business may be less successful than anticipated. We may be required to allocate existing or future resources to the expanded business, that in either case, we would have otherwise allocated to another part of our business.

If we are unable to successfully execute our acquisition strategies and successfully integrate acquired businesses, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted.

Historically our growth strategy has been based in part on our ability to acquire existing businesses, services or technologies. We do not know whether in the future we will be able to:


•	identify suitable businesses or technologies to buy;


•	complete the purchase of any such businesses or technologies on terms acceptable to us;


•	successfully integrate the operations of acquired businesses into our own;


•	obtain financing necessary for an acquisition at all or on commercially acceptable terms; or


•	retain key personnel and customers of acquired businesses.

We compete with other potential buyers for the acquisition of existing businesses and technology. This competition may result in fewer opportunities to purchase companies that are for sale. It may also result in higher purchase prices for the businesses that we want to purchase. We may also spend time and money investigating and negotiating with potential acquisition targets but not complete the transaction. Any future acquisition could involve other risks, including the assumption of additional liabilities and ~~expenses, issuances of potentially dilutive securities or interest-bearing debt, transaction costs, and diversion of management's attention from other business concerns.~~

In addition if we are unable to successfully integrate an acquired company, the acquisition could lead to disruptions to our business. In July 2014, we acquired ATLAS Medical Services, a provider of clinical research services in Turkey, the Middle East, and North Africa. In October 2014, we acquired ClinIntel, a provider of clinical RTSM services, based in the United Kingdom. In April 2015, we acquired Quantum Solutions India, a provider of specialized pharmacovigilance services, based in Chandigarh, India. In February 2016, we acquired Health Advances, an independent life sciences strategy consulting firm, based in Boston, Massachusetts. If we fail to integrate any of these businesses, or any businesses that we acquire in the future, it could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.21

expenses, issuances of potentially dilutive securities or interest-bearing debt, transaction costs, and diversion of management's attention from other business concerns.

In addition, if we are unable to successfully integrate an acquired company, the acquisition could lead to disruptions to our business. In July 2014, we acquired ATLAS Medical Services, a provider of clinical research services in Turkey, the Middle East, and North Africa. In October 2014, we acquired ClinIntel, a provider of clinical RTSM services, based in the United Kingdom. In April 2015, we acquired Quantum Solutions India, a provider of specialized pharmacovigilance services, based in Chandigarh, India. In February 2016, we acquired Health Advances, an independent life sciences strategy consulting firm, based in Boston, Massachusetts. On October 3, 2016, we acquired all of the capital stock of privately owned ExecuPharm, Inc. ("ExecuPharm"), a leading global functional service provider, based in Pennsylvania. On March 1, 2017, we acquired all of the membership interests of privately owned The Medical Affairs Company, LLC ("TMAC"), a leading provider of outsourced medical affairs services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. If we fail to integrate any of these businesses, or any businesses that we acquire in the future, it could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The success of our acquisition strategy will depend upon, among other things, our ability to:


•	assimilate the operations and services or products of the acquired company;


•	integrate acquired personnel;


•	retain and motivate key employees;


•	retain customers;


•	identify and manage risks facing the acquired company; and


•	minimize the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns.

Acquisitions of companies outside of the United States may also involve additional risks, including assimilating differences in foreign business practices and overcoming language and cultural barriers.

In the event that the operations of an acquired business do not meet our performance expectations, we may have to restructure the acquired business or write-off the value of some or all of the assets of the acquired business.

Our failure to execute our acquisition strategies, including the identification of potential acquisitions, completing targeted acquisitions, and integrating completed acquisitions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Associated with our Industry

We depend on the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, either or both of which may suffer in the short or long term.

Our revenues depend greatly on the expenditures made by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in research and development. In some instances, companies in these industries are reliant on their ability to raise capital in order to fund their research and development projects. Accordingly, economic factors and industry trends that affect our clients in these industries also affect our business. If companies in these industries were to reduce the number of research and development projects they conduct or outsource, our business could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we are dependent upon the ability and willingness of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to continue to spend on research and development and to outsource the services that we provide. We are therefore subject to risks, uncertainties and trends that affect companies in these industries. We have benefited to date from the tendency of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to outsource clinical research projects, but any downturn in these industries or reduction in spending or outsourcing could adversely affect our business. For example, if these companies expanded upon their in-house clinical or development capabilities, they would be less likely to utilize our services.

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have been entering into strategic partnerships with clinical research organizations in recent years. To the extent we are not selected or do not otherwise enter into a strategic partnership with a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, future business with that company may be limited.

Because we depend on a small number of industries and there is a concentration of large clients in those industries, the loss of business from a significant client could harm our business, revenue and financial condition.

The loss of, or a material reduction in the business of, a significant client could cause a substantial decrease in our revenue and adversely affect our business and financial condition, possibly materially. In Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, our five largest clients accounted for approximately 4037%, 4440%, and 4744% of our consolidated service revenue, respectively. In Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, our largest client individually accounted for 1312% of our consolidated service revenue, and in Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, our largest client individually accounted for 1413% of our consolidated service revenue. In Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, we expect that a small number of clients will continue to represent a significant part of our consolidated revenue. This concentration may increase as a result of the increasing number of strategic partnerships into which we have been entering with sponsors. Our contracts with these clients generally can be terminated at any time on short notice. We have in the past experienced contract cancellations with significant clients. If we lose clients, we may not be able to attract new ones, and if we lose individual projects, we may not be able to replace them.

will continue to represent a significant part of our consolidated revenue. This concentration may increase as a result of the increasing number of strategic partnerships into which we have been entering with sponsors. Our contracts with these clients generally can be terminated at any time on short notice. We have in the past experienced contract cancellations with significant clients. If we lose clients, we may not be able to attract new ones, and if we lose individual projects, we may not be able to replace them.

In addition, the portion of our backlog that consists of large, multi-year awards from strategic partnerships has grown in recent years and this trend may continue in the future. A higher concentration of backlog from strategic partnerships may result in an imbalance across our project portfolio among projects in the start-up phase, which typically generate lower revenue, and projects in later stages, which typically generate higher revenue. This in turn may cause fluctuations in our revenue and profitability from period to period.

We face intense competition in many areas of our business; if we do not compete effectively, our business will be harmed.

The biopharmaceutical services industry is highly competitive, and we face numerous competitors in many areas of our business. If we fail to compete effectively, we may lose clients, which would cause our business to suffer.

We primarily compete against in-house departments of pharmaceutical companies, other full service CROs, small specialty CROs, and, to a lesser extent, universities, teaching hospitals, and other site organizations. Some of the larger CROs against which we compete include ~~Quintiles Transnational Corporation~~QuintilesIMS, Laboratory Corporation of America, Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc., INC research, PRA Health Sciences and Icon plc. In addition, our PC business competes with a large and fragmented group of specialty service providers, including advertising/promotional companies, major consulting firms with pharmaceutical industry groups and smaller companies with pharmaceutical industry focus. PI competes primarily with CROs, information technology companies and other software companies. Some of these competitors, including the in-house departments of pharmaceutical companies, have greater capital, technical and other resources than we have. In addition, our competitors that are smaller specialized companies may compete effectively against us because of their concentrated size and focus.

In recent years, a number of the large pharmaceutical companies have established formal or informal alliances with one or more CROs relating to the provision of services for multiple trials over extended time periods. Our success depends in part on successfully establishing and maintaining these alliances. If we fail to do so, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely affected, possibly materially.

If we do not keep pace with rapid technological changes, our products and services may become less competitive or obsolete, especially in our PI business.

The biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device industries generally, and clinical research specifically, are subject to increasingly rapid technological changes. Our competitors or others might develop technologies, products or services that are more effective or commercially attractive than our current or future technologies, products or services, or render our technologies, products or services less competitive or obsolete. If our competitors introduce superior technologies, products or services and we cannot make enhancements to our technologies, products and services necessary to remain competitive, our competitive position would be harmed. If we are unable to compete successfully, we may lose clients or be unable to attract new clients, which could lead to a decrease in our revenue.

Risks Associated with Regulation or Legal Liabilities

If governmental regulation of the drug, medical device and biotechnology industry changes, the need for our services could decrease.

Governmental regulation of the drug, medical device and biotechnology product development process is complicated, extensive, and demanding. A large part of our business involves assisting pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies through the regulatory approval process. Changes in regulations that, for example, streamline procedures or relax approval standards, could eliminate or reduce the need for our services. If companies regulated by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities needed fewer of our services, we would have fewer business opportunities and our revenues would decrease, possibly materially.

In the United States, the FDA and the Congress have attempted to streamline the regulatory process by providing for industry user fees that fund the hiring of additional reviewers and better management of the regulatory review process. In Europe, governmental authorities have approved common standards for clinical testing of new drugs throughout the European Union by adopting standards for GCP and by making the clinical trial application and approval process more uniform across member states. The FDA has had GCP in place as a regulatory standard and requirement for new drug approval for many years, and Japan adopted GCP in 1998.

The United States, Europe and Japan have also collaborated for over 15 years on the International Conference on Harmonisation (“ICH”), the purpose of which is to eliminate duplicative or conflicting regulations in the three regions. The ICH partners have agreed on a common format (the Common Technical Document) for new drug marketing applications that reduces the need to tailor the format to each region. Such efforts and similar efforts in the future that streamline the regulatory process may reduce the demand for our services. The revised ICH GCP E6 R2 guideline, strengthening especially risk management and oversight, is

being implemented progressively (came into effect in June 2017 in the European Union). PAREXEL maintains an agile Quality Management System that anticipated the changes that would be required by the revised guideline and preemptively adjusted. As a result minimal changes to existing processes were required.

Parts of our PC business advise clients on how to satisfy regulatory standards for manufacturing and clinical processes and on other matters related to the enforcement of government regulations by the FDA and other regulatory bodies. Any reduction in levels of review of manufacturing or clinical processes or levels of regulatory enforcement, generally, would result in fewer opportunities for our business in this area.

If we fail to comply with existing regulations, and ethics standards our reputation and operating results would be harmed.

Our business is subject to numerous governmental regulations, and ethics standards, primarily relating to worldwide pharmaceutical and medical device product development and regulatory approval, the conduct of clinical trials, and limitations on activities relating to delivery of health care items or services that are paid for with government health care program funding. In addition, we may be contractually obligated to assist our clients in complying with regulations that apply to our clients, including the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which requires manufacturers and group purchasing organizations to report all payments or transfers of value to health care providers and teaching hospitals. If we fail to comply with these governmental regulations and ethics standards, such non-compliance could result in the termination of our ongoing research, development or sales and marketing projects, or the disqualification of data for submission to regulatory authorities. We also could be barred from providing clinical trial services in the future or could be subjected to civil monetary penalties or, in certain cases, criminal fines and penalties. Any of these consequences would harm our reputation, our prospects for future work and our operating results. In addition, we may have to repeat research or redo trials. If we are required to repeat research or redo trials, we may be contractually required to do so at no further cost to our clients, but at substantial cost to us.

We may lose business opportunities as a result of healthcare reform and the expansion of managed-care organizations.

Numerous governments, including the U.S. government, have undertaken efforts to control growing healthcare costs through legislation, regulation and voluntary agreements with medical care providers and drug companies. In March 2010, the United States Congress enacted healthcare reform legislation intended over time to expand health insurance coverage and impose health industry cost containment measures. The continuing implementation of this legislation may significantly impact the pharmaceutical industry. In addition, this legislation and its implementation continue to face challenges in Congress and federal courts, and from certain state governments, opposition advocacy groups and some small business organizations, and we are uncertain as to the effects of this legislation on our business and are unable to predict what legislative proposals will be adopted in the future. The U.S. Congress has also considered and may adopt legislation that could have the effect of putting downward pressure on the prices that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can charge for prescription drugs. In addition, various state legislatures and European and Asian governments may consider various types of healthcare reform in order to control growing healthcare costs. We are presently uncertain as to the effects of the enacted legislation on our business and are unable to predict what legislative proposals will be adopted in the future, if any.

If these efforts are successful, drug, medical device and biotechnology companies may react by spending less on research and development. If this were to occur, we would have fewer business opportunities and our revenue could decrease, possibly materially. In addition, new laws or regulations may create a risk of liability, increase our costs or limit our service offerings.

In addition to healthcare reform proposals, the expansion of managed-care organizations in the healthcare market and managed-care organizations’ efforts to cut costs by limiting expenditures on pharmaceuticals and medical devices could result in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies spending less on research and development. If this were to occur, we would have fewer business opportunities and our revenue could decrease, possibly materially.

We may have substantial exposure to payment of personal injury claims and may not have adequate insurance to cover such claims.

Our CRS business primarily involves the testing of experimental drugs and medical devices on consenting human volunteers pursuant to a study protocol. Clinical research involves a risk of liability for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to:


•	personal injury or death to patients who participate in the study or who use a product approved by regulatory authorities after the clinical research has concluded;


•	general risks associated with our Early Phase facilities, including professional malpractice of physicians, nurses and other medical care providers; and


•	errors and omissions during a trial that may undermine the usefulness of a trial or data from the trial or study.

In order to mitigate the risk of liability, we seek to include indemnification provisions in our CRS contracts with clients and with investigators. However, we are not able to include indemnification provisions in all of our contracts. In addition, even if we are able to include an indemnification provision in our contracts, the indemnification provisions may not cover our exposure if:


•	we had to pay damages or incur defense costs in connection with a claim that is outside the scope of an indemnification agreement; or


•	a client failed to indemnify us in accordance with the terms of an indemnification agreement because it did not have the financial ability to fulfill its indemnification obligation or for any other reason.

In addition, contractual indemnifications generally do not protect us against liability arising from certain of our own actions, such as negligence or misconduct.

We also carry insurance to cover our risk of liability. However, our insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limits and may not be adequate to cover claims. In addition, liability coverage is expensive. In the future, we may not be able to maintain or obtain the same levels of coverage on reasonable terms, at a reasonable cost, or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to claims.

Existing and proposed laws and regulations regarding confidentiality of patients’ and other individuals’ personal information could result in increased risks of liability or increased cost to us or could limit our product and service offerings.

The confidentiality, security, use and disclosure of patient-specific information are subject to governmental regulation. Regulations to protect the safety and privacy of human subjects who participate in or whose data are used in clinical research generally require clinical investigators to obtain legally effective informed consent from identifiable research subjects before research is undertaken. Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) Act of 2009, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued regulations mandating privacy and data security standards and breach notification requirements for certain types of individually identifiable health information, or protected health information, when used or disclosed by health care providers and other HIPAA-covered entities or business associates that provide services to or perform functions on behalf of these covered entities. HIPAA regulations generally require individuals’ written authorization before identifiable health information may be used for research, in addition to any required informed consent. HIPAA regulations also specify standards for de-identifying health information so that information can be handled outside of the HIPAA requirements and for creating limited data sets that can be used for research purposes under less stringent HIPAA restrictions.

other HIPAA-covered entities or business associates that provide services to or perform functions on behalf of these covered entities. HIPAA regulations generally require individuals’ written authorization before identifiable health information may be used for research, in addition to any required informed consent. HIPAA regulations also specify standards for de-identifying health information so that information can be handled outside of the HIPAA requirements and for creating limited data sets that can be used for research purposes under less stringent HIPAA restrictions.

The European Union and its member states, as well as other countries, such as Canada, Argentina, Japan and other Asian countries, and state governments in the United States, have adopted and continue to implement new medical privacy and general data protection laws and regulations. In those countries, collecting, processing, using and transferring an individual’s personal data is subject to specific requirements, such as obtaining explicit consent, processing the information for limited purposes and restrictions with respect to cross-border transfers. Many countries and almost all states in the United States have adopted data security breach laws that require the user of such data to inform the affected individuals and, in some cases, government authorities and the general public of security breaches. In order to comply with these laws and regulations and corresponding contractual demands from our clients, we must maintain internal compliance policies and procedures, and we may need to implement new privacy and security measures, which may require us to make substantial expenditures or cause us to limit the products and services we offer. In addition, if we violate applicable laws, regulations, contractual commitments, or other duties relating to the use, privacy or security of health information, we could be subject to civil liability or criminal penalties and it may be necessary to modify our business practices.

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and delays in completing our internal control audit and financial audit, could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

AsManagement ~~described~~assessments inhave ~~Item 9A, our Fiscal Year 2016 management assessment~~ identified a material ~~weaknesses~~weakness in our internal control over financial reporting due to ineffective controls associated with revenue recognition in our CRS reporting segment. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, ~~and~~or ~~our~~a ~~approval~~combination of ~~invoices~~deficiencies, ~~for~~in ~~payment~~internal ~~and~~control ~~validation~~over offinancial ~~vendors~~reporting, ~~regarding~~such that there is a ~~specific~~reasonable ~~class~~possibility ofthat ~~vendors.~~a Wematerial ~~have~~misstatement ~~begun~~of the ~~process~~company's ofannual ~~implementing~~or ~~remedial~~interim ~~actions~~financial tostatements ~~resolve~~will ~~these~~not ~~material~~be ~~weaknesses,~~prevented ~~but~~or wedetected ~~have~~on ~~not~~a ~~yet~~timely ~~completed~~basis. Management is continuing to execute a remediation plan intended to address the control deficiencies which resulted in the material weakness. During the course of our testing, we ~~also~~ may identify other significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, in addition to the ~~ones~~one already identified, which we may not be able to remediate in a timely manner. If we continue to have one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will not be able to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, or delays in completing our internal control audit and financial audit, could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock, and cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations in the future, which in turn could impact our ability to raise equity financing if needed in the future. While we believe our reported revenue ~~and~~is ~~expenses are~~ accurate, until ~~these~~this ~~deficiencies~~deficiency ~~are~~is substantially remediated, it is possible that internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material ~~errors~~misstatements in revenue ~~and expenses~~ reflected in our financial statements.

We operate in many different jurisdictions and we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances, anti-corruption laws have appeared to conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot assure that our internal control policies and procedures always will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by persons associated with PAREXEL. Our continued global expansion, including in developing countries, could increase such risk in the future. Violations of these laws, or even allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Risks Associated with Indebtedness

Our indebtedness may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had $~~497~~671.5 million principal amount of debt, excluding debt issuance cost of $2.7 million, outstanding and remaining borrowing availability of $~~350~~170.0 million under our credit arrangements. We may incur additional debt in the future. Our leverage could have significant adverse consequences, including:


•	requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of interest on, and principal of, our debt, which will reduce the amounts available to fund working capital and capital expenditures, and for other general corporate purposes;


•	increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;


•	limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we compete; and


•	placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that have less debt.

Under the terms of our various credit facilities, interest rates are fixed based on market indices at the time of borrowing and, depending upon the interest mechanism selected by us, may float thereafter. Some of our other smaller credit facilities also bear interest at floating rates. As a result, the amount of interest payable by us on our borrowings may increase if market interest rates change.

We may not have sufficient funds, our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or we may be unable to arrange for additional financing, to pay the amounts due under our existing or any future debt, or any other liquidity needs. In addition, a failure to comply with the covenants under our existing credit facilities could result in an event of default under those credit facilities. In the event of an acceleration of amounts due under our credit facilities as a result of an event of default, we may not have sufficient funds or may be unable to arrange for additional financing to repay our indebtedness or to make any required accelerated payments.

In addition, the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement provide that upon the occurrence of a change in control, as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement, all outstanding indebtedness under the 2016 Credit Agreement and the Notes would become due. This provision may delay or prevent a change in control that our stockholders may consider desirable.

Our existing credit facilities contain covenants that limit our flexibility and prevent us from taking certain actions.

The agreements in connection with our 2016 Credit Agreement and in our short term debt facilities include a number of restrictive covenants. These covenants could adversely affect us by limiting our ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet our capital needs and execute our business strategy. These covenants, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:


•	incur additional debt;


•	buy back our common stock;


•	make certain investments;


•	enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;


•	make specified restricted payments; and


•	sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies.

These covenants may limit our operating and financial flexibility and limit our ability to respond to changes in our business or competitive activities. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in our being required to repay these borrowings before their scheduled due date.

Risks Associated with our Common Stock

Our corporate governance structure, including provisions of our articles of organization, by-laws, as well as Massachusetts law, may delay or prevent a change in control or management that stockholders may consider desirable.

Provisions of our articles of organization, and by-laws, as well as provisions of Massachusetts law, may enable our management to resist an acquisition of us by a third party, or may discourage a third party from acquiring us. These provisions include the following:


•	we have divided our board of directors into three classes of directors that serve staggered three-year terms;

• we are subject to Section 8.06 of the Massachusetts Business Corporation Law, which provides that directors may only be removed by stockholders for cause, vacancies in our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors may only be filled by a vote of our board of directors, and the number of directors may be fixed only by our board of directors;


•	we are subject to Chapter 110F of the Massachusetts General Laws, which may limit the ability of some interested stockholders to engage in business combinations with us; and


•	our stockholders are limited in their ability to call or introduce proposals at stockholder meetings.

These provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us or a change in our management that our stockholders may consider favorable or beneficial. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our stock.

In addition, our board of directors may issue preferred stock in the future without stockholder approval. If our board of directors issues preferred stock, the rights of the holders of common stock would be subordinate to the rights of the holders of preferred stock. Our board of directors’ ability to issue the preferred stock could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from acquiring, a majority of our stock.

Our stock price has been, and may in the future be volatile, which could lead to losses by investors.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated widely in the past and may continue to do so in the future. On ~~September~~August 725, ~~2016~~2017, the closing sales price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $6587.7570 per share. During the period from June 30, ~~2011~~2012 to June 30, ~~2016~~2017, our common stock traded at prices ranging from a high of $7686.1750 per share to a low of $15.26 per share. Investors in our common stock must be willing to bear the risk of such fluctuations in stock price and the risk that the value of an investment in our common stock could decline.

Our stock price can be affected by quarter-to-quarter variations in a number of factors including, but not limited to:


•	operating results;


•	earnings estimates by industry analysts;


•	market conditions in our industry or the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries;


•	prospects of healthcare reform;


•	changes in government regulations;


•	general economic conditions, and


•	our effective income tax rate.

In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Although our common stock has traded in the past at a relatively high price-earnings multiple, due in part to analysts’ expectations of earnings growth, the price of our common stock could quickly and substantially decline as a result of even a relatively small shortfall in earnings from, or a change in, analysts’ expectations.

We do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

We do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, capital requirements, legal requirements, earnings and other factors. Our ability to pay dividends is restricted by the terms of our ~~2015~~2016 Credit Agreement and might be restricted by the terms of any indebtedness that we incur in the future. Consequently, you should not rely on dividends in order to receive a return on your investment. For additional information on our dividend policy, see Part II, Item 5 "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

in order to receive a return on your investment. For additional information on our dividend policy, see Part II, Item 5 "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we leased approximately 2,~~857~~935,~~000~~200 square feet of building space, primarily office space, in 8485 locations in 41 countries under various leases that expire between ~~2016~~2017 and 2035. Total square feet by region is summarized below:

Region	Square Feet
The Americas	~~870~~844,~~000~~600
Europe, Middle East & Africa	1,~~212~~267,000
Asia/Pacific	~~775~~823,~~000~~600
Total	2,~~857~~935,~~000~~200

25Our largest facilities are located in (a) the USA, where we lease approximately 758,700 square feet, (b) Germany, where we lease approximately 520,600 square feet, (c) India, where we lease approximately 424,300 square feet, (d) the United Kingdom, where we lease approximately 242,500 square feet, and (e) China, where we lease approximately 119,000 square feet. Our principal facilities are set forth below:

Our largest facilities are located in (a) the USA, where we lease approximately 768,000 square feet, (b) Germany, where we lease approximately 482,000 square feet, (c) India, where we lease approximately 402,000 square feet, (d) the United Kingdom, where we lease approximately 230,000 square feet, and (e) China, where we lease approximately 119,000 square feet. Our principal facilities are set forth below:



Facility	Sq. Ft.	Use of Facility	Lease Expirations
Headquarters in Waltham, MA	64,000	CRS, PC and Corporate	2019
Berlin, Germany	496,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2019-2035
Billerica, MA	265,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2025
Hyderabad, India	204,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2017-2021
Durham, NC	104,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2026
Uxbridge, UK	88,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2022
Nottingham, UK	68,000	PI, CRS and General & Administrative	2018-2030
Dublin, Ireland	28,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2025

Facility	Sq. Ft.	Use of Facility	Lease Expirations
Headquarters in Waltham, MA	64,000	CRS, PC and Corporate	2019
Berlin, Germany	434,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2016 - 2035
Billerica, MA	265,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2025
Hyderabad, India	175,000	All Business Segments and General & Administrative	2016 - 2018
Durham, NC	104,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2026
Uxbridge, UK	88,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2022
Nottingham, UK	73,000	PI, CRS and General & Administrative	2017 - 2030
Dublin, Ireland	28,000	CRS, PC and General & Administrative	2025

In June 2015, we adopted a plan (the “Margin Acceleration Program”) to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the Company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. Due to restructuring initiatives, we have vacated approximately 113,000 square feet of our leased properties. The vacated space has either been sublet or is being actively marketed for sublease or disposition. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for more information.

We believe that our facilities are adequate for our operations and that additional space will be available at satisfactory terms, if needed.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~PAREXEL~~On ~~periodically~~July ~~becomes~~24, ~~involved~~2017, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in ~~various~~the ~~legal~~United ~~proceedings~~States ~~and~~District ~~claims~~Court ~~that~~of ~~arise~~Massachusetts inby a shareholder of PAREXEL against the ~~ordinary~~Company, ~~course~~members of ~~business~~the Board of Directors, Pamplona, Parent and Merger Sub, captioned Louis Scarantino v. WePAREXEL ~~believe~~International ~~that~~Corporation, noet ~~matters~~al., ~~currently~~1:17-cv-11360. On ~~pending~~July ~~would~~25, 2017, a second putative class action lawsuit was filed in the ~~event~~United ofStates anDistrict ~~adverse~~Court ~~outcome,~~of ~~have~~Massachusetts by a ~~material~~shareholder ~~impact~~of onPAREXEL ~~our~~against ~~consolidated~~the ~~financial~~Company ~~position,~~and ~~results~~members of ~~operations~~the Board of Directors, orcaptioned ~~liquidity~~Catherine ~~but~~Fischer ~~there~~v. ~~can~~PAREXEL beInternational noCorporation, ~~assurance~~et ~~that~~al., ~~such~~1:17-cv-11364. On ~~matters~~July ~~would~~27, ~~not~~2017, a third putative class action lawsuit was filed in the ~~event~~United States District Court of anMassachusetts ~~adverse~~by ~~outcome~~another shareholder of PAREXEL against the Company and members of the Board of Directors, ~~have~~captioned Peter Manning v. PAREXEL International Corporation, et al., 1:17-cv-11376. All three complaints allege that the preliminary proxy statement violates Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by materially omitting material ~~impact~~information onrelated ~~our~~to ~~consolidated~~the Company’s projections and the explanation of the analysis of the Company’s financial ~~position~~advisor, ~~results~~among other claims. All of ~~operations~~the complaints seek, among other things, equitable relief to enjoin the consummation of the merger, rescission of the merger or ~~liquidity~~rescissory damages, compensatory damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company, the Board of Directors, Pamplona, Parent and Merger Sub believe that the claims asserted against them are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

2629

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION AND HOLDERS

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “PRXL.” The table below shows the high and low sales prices of the common stock for each quarter of the Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016.

	2016		2015
	2017		2016
	High	Low	High	Low
First Quarter	$7671.1713	$60.7670	$6476.4617	$5260.0876
Second Quarter	$6971.4910	$5751.0116	$6469.7249	$5257.1901
Third Quarter	$7072.2432	$5660.0060	$70.7324	$5556.3600
Fourth Quarter	$6887.7750	$5760.0451	$7268.6977	$6257.0604

As of August 3125, ~~2016~~2017, there were approximately 90350 stockholders of record of our common stock. The number does not include stockholders for which shares were held in a “nominee” or “street” name.

DIVIDENDS

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock, nor do we anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings for the development and expansion of our business.

Under the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement, which are described in “Credit Agreements” in Part II, Item 7 of this annual report, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries may pay any dividend or make any other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock except that (a) we and our subsidiaries may declare and pay dividends with respect to equity interests payable solely in additional shares of common stock, (b) our subsidiaries may declare and pay dividends and other distributions ratably with respect to their equity interests, (c) we may make restricted payments pursuant to and in accordance with stock option plans or other benefit plans for management or employees of PAREXEL and our subsidiaries, and (d) we may make certain permitted stock repurchases.

STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

Fiscal Year 2017 Share Repurchase

On October 26, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2017 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On November 21, 2016, we entered into an agreement (the “2017 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from HSBC, National Association (“HSBC”), for an aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2017 Agreement, in November 2016, we paid $200.0 million to HSBC and received from HSBC 2.8 million shares of our common stock, representing 80% of the estimated shares to be repurchased by us under the 2017 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $57.51 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on November 21, 2016. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. We recorded a $160.0 million payment, which represents the 80% of the shares we repurchased, as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings. The remaining $40.0 million, which is an advanced payment accounted for as a forward share repurchase contract, was recorded within other current assets within the condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, the fair value of the forward accelerated share repurchase contract decreased by $20.7 million.

On March 20, 2017, we received 0.3 million shares representing the final settlement of the 2017 Agreement and the 2017 Program was completed. We applied the $19.3 million against equity as additional paid-in capital, which was reduced to zero and the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings. Pursuant to the 2017 Program, we repurchased 3.1 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $64.04 per share from November 2016 to March 2017.

Fiscal Year 2016 Share Repurchase

On September 14, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2016 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On September 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the “2016 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“WF”), for an aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2016 Agreement, in September 2015, we paid $200.0 million to WF and received from WF 2.3 million shares of our common stock, representing 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the 2016 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $70.35 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on September 16, 2015. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. As of June 30, 2016, we recorded the $200.0 million payment to WF as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings.

On February 10, 2016 we received 0.9 million shares representing the final settlement of the 2016 Agreement and the 2016 Program was completed. Pursuant to the 2016 Program, we repurchased 3.2 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $62.92 per share from September 2015 to February 2016.

In Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2016, ~~Share~~we ~~Repurchase~~recorded the $200.0 million payment to WF as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings.

On June 2, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2014 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On June 13, 2014, we entered into an agreement (the “2014 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from Goldman Sachs & Co. (“GS”), for an aggregate purchase price of $150.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2014 Agreement, in June 2014, we paid $150.0 million to GS and received from GS 2.3 million shares of common stock, representing 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the 2014 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $52.52 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 13, 2014. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. As of June 30, 2014, we recorded the $150.0 million payment to GS as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, 31

consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings.

On October 31, 2014, we received 0.3 million shares representing the final settlement of the 2014 Agreement and the 2014 Program was completed. Pursuant to the 2014 Program, we repurchased 2.6 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $57.03 per share from June 2014 to October 2014.

Fiscal Year 2013 Share Repurchase

In August 2012, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2013 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. During Fiscal Year 2013, we repurchased $197.6 million of our common stock. We repurchased the remaining $2.4 million of our common stock in July 2013. The 2013 Program repurchases were effected pursuant to a $50.0 million accelerated share repurchase agreement and a $50.0 million open market agreement entered into in September 2012 and a $50.0 million accelerated share repurchase agreement (“March 2013 ASR Agreement”) and a $50.0 million open market agreement (“March 2013 Open Market Agreement”) entered in March 2013. Pursuant to the 2013 Program, we repurchased 5.5 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $36.64 per share from September 2012 to July 2013. The buyback activity also resulted in a reduction of our stockholders’ equity of $200.0 million for the value of shares repurchased and retired by the Company.

In July 2013, we purchased 51,071 shares under our March 2013 Open Market Agreement and received 101,247 shares representing the final settlement of our March 2013 ASR Agreement. With the completion of our March 2013 Open Market Agreement and the final settlement of the March 2013 ASR Agreement, the 2013 Program was completed.

There were no share buybacks in Fiscal Year 2015.

COMPANY STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “PRXL.” The Stock Price Performance Graph set forth below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the period from June 30, ~~2011~~2012 through June 30, ~~2016~~2017, with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq Health Care Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on June 30, ~~2011~~2012 in PAREXEL’s common stock, in the Nasdaq Composite Index, and in the Nasdaq Health Care Index and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any.

Fiscal Years Ended June 30,

Total Return Index For:

~~2011~~2012

~~2012~~2013

~~2013~~2014

~~2014~~2015

~~2015~~2016

~~2016~~2017

PAREXEL International Stock

$100

$~~120~~163

$~~195~~187

$~~224~~228

$~~273~~223

$~~267~~308

Nasdaq Composite Index

$100

$~~107~~118

$~~126~~154

$~~165~~177

$~~189~~174

$~~186~~223

Nasdaq Health Care Index

$100

$~~107~~113

$~~121~~127

$~~136~~163

$~~174~~142

$~~151~~133

The stock price performance shown on the graph above is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Information used in the graph was obtained from The Nasdaq Stock Market, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

The information included under the heading “Company Stock Performance Graph” is “furnished” and not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be “soliciting material” subject to Regulation 14A or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

2932

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data of PAREXEL for the five years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 are derived from our consolidated financial statements. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included as Item 7 in this annual report and the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included as Item 8 in this annual report.

		For the fiscal years ended June 30,
		For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
(dollars in millions, except per share data and number of employees)		~~2016~~2017		~~2015~~2016		~~2014~~2015		~~2013~~2014		~~2012~~2013
OPERATIONS
	Service revenue	$	2,~~094~~117.36	$	2,~~016~~094.03	$	12,~~939~~016.40	$	1,~~734~~939.4	$	1,~~396~~734.54
	Income from operations	$	~~224~~191.02	$	~~199~~224.90	$	199.59	$	~~136~~199.15	$	88136.81
	Net income	$	~~154~~107.93	$	~~147~~154.89	$	~~129~~147.18	$	96129.01	$	6396.20
	Basic earnings per share	$	2.9008	$	2.6990	$	2.2869	$	12.6428	$	1.0664
	Diluted earnings per share	$	2.8606	$	2.6586	$	2.2565	$	12.6125	$	1.0561
FINANCIAL POSITION
	Cash and marketable securities	$	~~248~~302.67	$	~~207~~248.46	$	~~283~~207.84	$	~~274~~283.28	$	~~213~~274.62
	Working capital	$	~~411~~400.80	$	~~352~~411.58	$	~~350~~352.95	$	~~403~~350.29	$	~~359~~403.62
	Total assets	$	2,~~036~~313.24	$	12,~~865~~036.02	$	1,~~834~~865.0	$	1,~~779~~834.60	$	1,~~532~~779.26
	Short-term debt	$	1629.62	$	816.96	$	128.59	$	2012.45	$	520.04
	Long-term debt	$	487.8	$	348.2	$	337.5	$	427.5	$	211.8
	Long-term debt *	$	645.0	$	487.8	$	348.2	$	337.5	$	427.5
	Stockholders’ equity	$	~~633~~634.45	$	~~665~~633.34	$	~~577~~665.73	$	~~538~~577.97	$	~~609~~538.79
OTHER DATA
	Purchases of property and equipment	$	9572.56	$	8095.25	$	7280.62	$	8172.16	$	7481.41
	Depreciation and amortization	$	96106.94	$	8496.9	$	8184.39	$	7381.23	$	6673.2
	Number of employees	18,~~600~~900		18,~~660~~600		1518,~~560~~660		1415,~~690~~560		1214,~~695~~690
	Weighted average shares
	Basic	5351.5		5453.95		5654.59		5856.45		5958.54
	Diluted	5452.2		5554.82		5755.58		5957.45		6059.4

* Excludes debt issuance cost of $2.7 million, $3.0 million, $2.8 million, $3.1 million and $3.4 million as of June 30, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

We are a leading biopharmaceutical ~~outsourcing~~ services outsourcing company, providing a broad range of expertise in clinical research, clinical logistics, medical communications, consulting, commercialization and advanced technology products and services to the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. Our primary objective is to provide quality solutions for managing the biopharmaceutical product lifecycle with the goal of reducing the time, risk, and cost associated with the development and commercialization of new therapies. Since our incorporation in 1983, we have developed significant expertise in processes and technologies supporting this strategy. Our product and service offerings include: clinical trials management, observational studies and patient/disease registries, data management, biostatistical analysis, epidemiology, health economics/outcomes research, pharmacovigilance, medical communications, clinical pharmacology, patient recruitment, clinical supply and drug logistics, post-marketing surveillance, regulatory and product development and commercialization consulting, health policy and reimbursement and market access consulting, medical imaging services, regulatory information management (“RIM”) solutions, ClinPhone randomization and trial supply management services (“RTSM”), electronic data capture systems (“EDC”), clinical trial management systems (“CTMS”), web-based portals, systems integration, patient diary applications, and other product development tools and services. We believe that our comprehensive services, depth of therapeutic area expertise, global footprint and related access to patients, and sophisticated information technology, along with our experience in global drug development and product launch services, represent key competitive strengths.

On June 19, 2017, PAREXEL entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which West Street Merger Sub, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of West Street Parent, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (which we refer to as Parent) and affiliate of Pamplona Capital Management, LLP, will be merged with and into us, with PAREXEL surviving as a subsidiary of West Street Parent, LLC, which we refer to as the merger will acquire all of the outstanding shares of PAREXEL for $88.10 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $5.5 billion, including PAREXEL’s net debt. Consummation of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including adoption of the merger agreement by the Company’s stockholders and receipt of required regulatory approvals. The closing of the merger is expected to be completed late in the third or early in the fourth quarter of calendar year 2017.

Immediately prior to, and contingent upon, the closing of the merger, each outstanding Company stock option, restricted stock unit, restricted share and performance restricted stock unit (collectively, the “Company Equity Awards”) will vest in full (in the case of performance restricted stock units, at target level regardless of the actual achievement of the applicable performance metric). Such fully vested Company Equity Awards will be canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to $88.10 per share for each share of our common stock underlying such Company Equity Awards (net of any applicable exercise price and subject to any applicable withholding taxes).

On August 15, 2017, the Company announced a special meeting of the shareholders of PAREXEL to be held on September 15, 2017. At the shareholder meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 19, 2017, by and among PAREXEL, West Street Parent, LLC (“Parent”) and West Street Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub, providing for the acquisition of the Company by an affiliate of the private equity investment firm Pamplona. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, the acquisition will occur by means of a merger of Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent in accordance with the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act (the “MBCA”).

We have incurred $7.7 million as of June 30, 2017, and will continue to incur significant costs and expenses, including fees for professional services and other transaction costs, in connection with the merger.

We have three reporting segments: Clinical Research Services ("CRS"), PAREXEL Consulting Services (“PC”), and PAREXEL Informatics ("PI").

•

CRS constitutes our core business and includes all phases of clinical research from Early Phase (encompassing the early stages of clinical testing that range from first-in-man through proof-of-concept studies) to Phase II-III and Phase IV, which we call PAREXEL Access, formerly known as Peri/Post-Approval Services. Our services include clinical trials management and biostatistics, data management and clinical pharmacology, as well as related medical advisory, patient recruitment, pharmacovigilance, and investigator site services. CRS also includes our clinical supply and drug logistics business. We have aggregated Early Phase and PAREXEL Access with Phase II-III due to economic similarities in these operating segments.

•

PC provides technical expertise and advice in such areas as drug development, regulatory affairs, product pricing and reimbursement, commercialization and strategic compliance. It also provides a full spectrum of market development, product development, and targeted communications services in support of product launch. Our PC consultants identify alternatives and propose solutions to address client issues associated with product development, registration, and commercialization.

• PI provides information technology solutions designed to help improve clients’ product development and regulatory submission processes. PI offers a portfolio of products and services that includes medical imaging services, ClinPhone® RTSM, IMPACT® CTMS, DataLabs® EDC, web-based portals, systems integration, electronic patient reported outcomes (“ePRO”) and the LIQUENT InSight® RIM platform. These services are often bundled together and integrated with other applications to provide an eClinical solution for our clients. In addition, PI's portfolio of services is increasingly being embedded with that of CRS, to provide our clients with an integrated offering.

~~Effective~~We ~~July~~conduct 1,a ~~2015,~~significant ~~certain~~portion ~~components~~ of our ~~business~~operations ~~segments~~in ~~were~~countries ~~reorganized~~outside toof ~~better~~the ~~align~~United ~~services~~States. ~~offered~~Approximately to56% ~~clients.~~and ~~Specifically,~~57% ~~Commercialization~~of ~~Consulting~~our ~~Services~~consolidated service revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (~~formerly~~“Fiscal ~~HERON~~Year 2017”) and ~~MedCom~~the ~~were~~fiscal ~~transferred~~year toended ~~the~~June 30, ~~CRS~~2016 ~~segment~~(“Fiscal Year 2016”), respectively, were from non-U.S. operations. Because our PCfinancial ~~segment~~statements toare ~~broaden~~denominated ~~the~~in ~~range~~U.S. ofdollars, ~~fully-integrated~~changes ~~services~~in toforeign ~~help~~currency ~~clients~~exchange ~~position~~rates ~~their~~can ~~products~~have ~~for~~a ~~market~~significant ~~access~~effect ~~and~~on ~~ongoing~~our ~~commercial~~operating ~~success~~results. For Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, weapproximately ~~included~~12.1% ~~the~~of ~~operating~~total ~~results~~consolidated service revenue was from euro-denominated contracts, approximately 3.6% of ~~Commercialization~~total ~~Consulting~~consolidated ~~Services~~service ~~(formerly~~revenue ~~HERON)~~was from yen-denominated contracts, and ~~MedCom~~approximately ~~within~~1.9% ~~the~~of ~~CRS~~total ~~segment~~consolidated ~~and~~service ~~retroactively~~revenue ~~revised~~was ~~the~~from ~~presentation~~pound ~~for~~sterling-denominated contracts. For Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, approximately 9.8% of total consolidated service revenue was from euro-denominated contracts, approximately 2.4% of total consolidated service revenue was from yen-denominated contracts and ~~Fiscal~~approximately ~~Year~~2.3% ~~2014~~of tototal ~~reflect~~consolidated ~~this~~service ~~change~~revenue was from pounds sterling-denominated contracts.

We conduct a significant portion of our operations in countries outside of the United States. Approximately 57% and 51% of our consolidated service revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 (“Fiscal Year 2016”) and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 (“Fiscal Year 2015”), respectively, were from non-U.S. operations. Because our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, changes in foreign currency exchange rates can have a significant effect on our operating results. For Fiscal Year 2016, approximately 9.8% of total consolidated service revenue was from euro-denominated contracts, approximately 2.4% of total consolidated service revenue was from yen-denominated contracts, and approximately 2.3% of total consolidated service revenue was from pound sterling-denominated contracts. For Fiscal Year 2015, approximately 12.2% of total consolidated service revenue was from euro-denominated contracts and approximately 3.1% of total consolidated service revenue was from pounds sterling-denominated contracts.

The majority of our contracts are fixed price, with some variable components, and range in duration from a few months to several years. Cash flows from these contracts typically consist of a down payment required at the time of contract execution with the balance due in installments over the contract’s duration, usually on a milestone achievement basis. Revenue from these contracts is recognized generally as work is performed. As a result, the timing of client billing and cash receipts do not necessarily correspond to costs incurred and revenue recognized on contracts.

Generally, our clients can either terminate their contracts with us upon notice of thirty to ~~sixty~~one hundred twenty days or acan delay inthe execution of services. Clients may terminate or delay contracts for a variety of reasons, including: merger or potential merger-related activities involving the client, the failure of products being tested to satisfy safety requirements or efficacy criteria, unexpected or undesired clinical results of the product, client cost reductions as a result of budgetary limits or changing priorities, the client’s decision to forego a particular study, insufficient patient enrollment or investigator recruitment, or clinical drug manufacturing problems resulting in shortages of the product. In the cases where the contracts are canceled, services delivered through the cancellation date are due and payable by the client, including certain costs to conclude the trial or study.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and other financial information. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We regard an accounting estimate underlying our financial statements as a “critical accounting estimate” if the nature of the estimate or assumption is material due to the level of subjectivity and judgment involved, or the susceptibility of such matter to change, and if the impact of the estimate or assumption on financial condition or operating performance is material. We believe that the following accounting policies are most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results:

REVENUE RECOGNITION

We derive revenue from the delivery of services or software solutions to clients in the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. We recognize revenue as services are performed when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service offering has been delivered to the client; (3) the collection of fees is probable; and (4) the amount of fees to be paid by the client is fixed or determinable.

Our client arrangements in CRS generally involve multiple service deliverables, where bundled service deliverables are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25, “Multiple-Element Arrangements.” We determined that standalone value exists for each of our service deliverables and we allocate contract (arrangement) value to each of our service deliverables based on the relative selling price of each service deliverable in the arrangement. We use best estimated selling price (“BESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. Our determination of BESP involves the consideration of several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. Specifically, we consider the cost to provide services, the anticipated margin on those deliverables, our ongoing pricing strategy and policies, and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the services are provided. We allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement using the relative selling prices of the deliverables within the contract based on BESP.

Specifically, we consider the cost to provide services, the anticipated margin on those deliverables, our ongoing pricing strategy and policies, and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the services are provided. We allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement using the relative selling prices of the deliverables within the contract based on BESP.

Within PI’s Clinphone® RTSM business, we offer selected software solutions through a hosted application delivered through a standard web-browser. We recognize revenue from application hosting services in accordance with ASC 985-605, “Software” and ASC 605-25 as our customers do not have the right to take possession of the software. Revenue resulting from these hosting services is recognized over the service period.

Critical management estimates may be involved in the determination of the customer relationship period, and other revenue elements. Changes to these elements could affect the amount and timing of revenue recognition.

BILLED AND UNBILLED ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Billed accounts receivable represent amounts for which invoices have been sent to clients based upon contract terms. Unbilled accounts receivable represent amounts recognized as revenue for which invoices have not yet been sent to clients due to contract terms. We maintain a provision for losses on receivables based on historical collectability and specific identification of potential problem accounts. Critical management estimates may be involved in the determination of “collectability” and the amounts required to be recorded as provisions for losses on receivables.

INCOME TAXES

Our global provision for corporate income taxes is determined in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that future tax benefits from the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is based on the distribution of profit before tax among the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate, adjusted as required by the tax laws of each taxing jurisdiction. Changes in the distribution of profits and losses among taxing jurisdictions may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.

assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that future tax benefits from the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is based on the distribution of profit before tax among the various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate, adjusted as required by the tax laws of each taxing jurisdiction. Changes in the distribution of profits and losses among taxing jurisdictions may have a significant impact on our effective tax rate.

We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, which requires financial statement reporting of the expected future tax consequences of uncertain tax return reporting positions on the presumption that all relevant tax authorities possess full knowledge of those tax reporting positions, as well as all of the pertinent facts and circumstances. In addition, ASC 740 requires financial statement disclosure about uncertainty in income tax reporting positions.

We are subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities that may result in proposed assessments. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is based on judgment. We believe we have adequately provided for any uncertain tax positions. However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period assessments are made or resolved or when statutes of limitation on potential assessments expire.

GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLES

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the related net assets at the date of acquisition and is subject to annual impairment testing or more frequent testing if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying value. We ~~Our~~have ~~impairment testing in Fiscal Year 2016 for goodwill and~~ an ~~indefinite-lived~~option ~~intangible,~~to ~~the~~make ~~ClinPhone~~a ~~RTSM~~qualitative ~~tradename,~~assessment ~~involved determining the fair value~~ of ~~each~~a ~~of the~~ reporting ~~units~~unit’s ~~with which the~~ goodwill and of indefinite-~~live~~lived intangible ~~was~~assets ~~associated~~for ~~and comparing that value with the reporting unit’s carrying value~~impairment. ~~The~~ If ~~assessment~~we ~~for~~choose ~~goodwill~~to ~~used~~perform a ~~market~~qualitative ~~approach~~assessment ~~analysis~~ and adetermine ~~discounted cash flow analysis at~~ the ~~reporting unit level to determine~~ fair value. ~~The~~more ~~discounted~~likely ~~cash~~than ~~flow~~not ~~analysis~~exceeds ~~included significant judgment regarding~~ the ~~assumptions~~carrying ~~used~~value, ~~such~~no asfurther ~~our~~evaluation ~~weighted~~is ~~average~~necessary. If ~~cost~~we offail ~~capital,~~the ~~revenue~~qualitative ~~growth rates, profit margins, capital expenditures, and other factors that were all based on current strategic forecasts and other financial metrics. The~~ assessment ~~for~~or ~~our~~choose ~~indefinite-lived intangible used a relief from royalty approach~~ to ~~determine~~bypass ~~fair value. Under~~ the ~~relief~~qualitative ~~from royalty approach~~assessment, ~~the~~we ~~fair~~assess ~~value~~our ofgoodwill ~~the~~and indefinite-lived intangible isasset ~~based~~using ona ~~after~~two-step ~~tax royalty rate and discount rate applied to future forecasted sales~~process. ~~Based on our Fiscal Year 2016 assessment of impairment for goodwill and our ClinPhone RTSM tradename, there was no evidence of impairment as of June 30, 2016.~~

We used the qualitative assessment option for our impairment testing in Fiscal Year 2017 for goodwill and determined that the fair values of the reporting units and the indefinite-lived intangible more likely than not exceeded their carrying values and that there was no evidence of impairment as of June 30, 2017. Our assessment of our indefinite-lived intangible, the ClinPhone RTSM tradename, for impairment uses a relief from royalty approach to determine fair value. Under the relief from royalty approach, the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible is based on after tax royalty rate and discount rate applied to future forecasted sales. Based on our assessment of the ClinPhone RTSM tradename, there was no evidence of impairment as of June 30, 2017.

For our Fiscal Year 2016 assessment, we performed the two-step process, which uses a market approach analysis and a discounted cash flow analysis at the reporting unit level to determine fair value. The discounted cash flow analysis included significant judgment regarding the assumptions used, such as our weighted average cost of capital, revenue growth rates, profit margins, capital expenditures, and other factors that were all based on current strategic forecasts and other financial metrics. The assessment for our indefinite-lived intangible uses a relief from royalty approach to determine fair value. Under the relief from royalty approach, the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible is based on the after tax royalty rate and discount rate applied to future forecasted sales. Based on our Fiscal Year 2016 assessment of impairment for goodwill and our ClinPhone RTSM tradename, there was no evidence of impairment as of June 30, 2016.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Allocating the purchase price requires us to estimate the fair value of various assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including contingent consideration to be paid if specific financial targets are achieved. We are responsible for determining the appropriate valuation model and estimated fair values, and in doing so, we consider a number of factors, including information provided by an outside valuation advisor. We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and estimates including future revenues and expenses, as well as discount factors and income tax rates.

Contingent consideration liabilities are remeasured to fair value each reporting period using projected financial targets, discount rates, probabilities of payment, and projected payment dates. Projected contingent payment amounts are discounted back to the current period using a discounted cash flow model. Increases or decreases in projected financial targets and probabilities of payment may result in significant changes in the fair value measurements. Increases in discount rates and the time to payment may result in lower fair value measurements. Increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation may result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.

3337

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report provides a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of operations for Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016.

UPDATE TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN EARNINGS PRESS RELEASE DATED AUGUST 3, 2016 FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR END JUNE 30, 2016

On August 3, 2016, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K including the earnings press release announcing our consolidated financial results for its fiscal fourth quarter and year ended June 30, 2016. The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K differ from those included in our earnings press release, primarily reflecting the effect of a legal settlement finalized subsequent to the filing of our earnings release and late identified revenue adjustments, partially offset by discretionary incentive compensation adjustments. As a result, our consolidated net income for the year ended June 30, 2016 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K decreased $1.6 million to $154.9 million, or $2.86 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $156.5 million or $2.89 per diluted share, as reported on August 3, 2016.

ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT

~~Effective~~We ~~July~~evaluate 1,our ~~2015,~~segment ~~certain~~performance ~~components~~and ofallocate ~~our~~resources ~~business~~based ~~segments~~on ~~were~~service ~~reorganized~~revenue toand ~~better~~gross ~~align~~profit ~~services~~(service ~~offered~~revenue toless ~~clients~~direct costs), while other operating costs are allocated and evaluated on a geographic basis. ~~Specifically~~Accordingly, ~~Commercialization~~we ~~Consulting~~do ~~Services~~not include the impact of selling, general, and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, interest income (~~formerly~~expense), ~~HERON~~other income (loss), and ~~MedCom~~income ~~were~~tax ~~transferred~~expense to(benefit) ~~the~~in ~~CRS~~ segment ~~from~~profitability. ~~our~~We PCattribute ~~segment~~revenue to ~~broaden~~individual countries based upon the ~~range~~cost of ~~fully-integrated~~ services toperformed ~~help~~in ~~clients~~the ~~position~~respective ~~their~~countries ~~products~~and ~~for~~inter-segment ~~market~~transactions ~~access~~are ~~and~~not ~~ongoing~~included ~~commercial~~in ~~success~~service revenue. ~~For Fiscal Year 2016~~Furthermore, we ~~included~~have ~~the~~a ~~operating~~global ~~results~~infrastructure ofsupporting ~~Commercialization~~our ~~Consulting~~business ~~Services~~segments ~~(formerly~~and ~~HERON)~~therefore, ~~and~~assets ~~MedCom~~are ~~within~~not ~~the~~identified ~~CRS~~by reportable segment. Service revenue, direct costs, and ~~retroactively~~gross ~~revised~~profit ~~the~~on ~~presentation~~service revenue for Fiscal ~~Year~~Years ~~2015~~2017, 2016, and ~~Fiscal~~2015 ~~Year~~were ~~2014~~as ~~to reflect this change.~~follows:

We evaluate our segment performance and allocate resources based on service revenue and gross profit (service revenue less direct costs), while other operating costs are allocated and evaluated on a geographic basis. Accordingly, we do not include the impact of selling, general, and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, interest income (expense), other income (loss), and income tax expense (benefit) in segment profitability. We attribute revenue to individual countries based upon the cost of services performed in the respective countries and inter-segment transactions are not included in service revenue. Furthermore, we have a global infrastructure supporting our business segments and therefore, assets are not identified by reportable segment. Service revenue, direct costs, and gross profit on service revenue for Fiscal Years 2016, 2015, and 2014 were as follows:



(dollars in millions)	Years Ended				Increase/Decrease $			Increase/Decrease %
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016		Increase/Decrease $			Increase/Decrease %
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,626.6	$	1,626.0	$	0.6		—	%
PC	210.3		190.4		19.9			10.5	%
PI	280.7		277.9		2.8			1.0	%
Total service revenue	$	2,117.6	$	2,094.3	$	23.3		1.1	%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,111.9	$	1,111.0	$	0.9		0.1	%
PC	120.5		102.2		18.3			17.9	%
PI	145.1		147.1		(2.0		)	(1.4	)%
Total direct costs	$	1,377.5	$	1,360.3	$	17.2		1.3	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	514.7	$	515.0	$	(0.3	)	(0.1	)%
PC	89.8		88.2		1.6			1.8	%
PI	135.6		130.8		4.8			3.7	%
Total gross profit	$	740.1	$	734.0	$	6.1		0.8	%

(dollars in millions)	Years Ended				Increase/Decrease $			Increase/Decrease %
	June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015		Increase/Decrease $			Increase/Decrease %
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,626.0	$	1,599.1	$	26.9		1.7	%
PC	190.4		152.2		38.2			25.1	%
PI	277.9		264.7		13.2			5.0	%
Total service revenue	$	2,094.3	$	2,016.0	$	78.3		3.9	%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,111.0	$	1,126.5	$	(15.5	)	(1.4	)%
PC	102.2		80.5		21.7			27.0	%
PI	147.1		137.2		9.9			7.2	%
Total direct costs	$	1,360.3	$	1,344.2	$	16.1		1.2	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	515.0	$	472.6	$	42.4		9.0	%
PC	88.2		71.7		16.5			23.0	%
PI	130.8		127.5		3.3			2.6	%
Total gross profit	$	734.0	$	671.8	$	62.2		9.3	%

3438

(dollars in millions)	Years Ended				Increase $			Increase %
	June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,626.0	$	1,599.1	$	26.9		1.7	%
PC	190.4		152.2		38.2			25.1	%
PI	277.9		264.7		13.2			5.0	%
Total service revenue	$	2,094.3	$	2,016.0	$	78.3		3.9	%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,111.0	$	1,126.5	$	(15.5	)	(1.4	)%
PC	102.2		80.5		21.7			27.0	%
PI	147.1		137.2		9.9			7.2	%
Total direct costs	$	1,360.3	$	1,344.2	$	16.1		1.2	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	515.0	$	472.6	$	42.4		9.0	%
PC	88.2		71.7		16.5			23.0	%
PI	130.8		127.5		3.3			2.6	%
Total gross profit	$	734.0	$	671.8	$	62.2		9.3	%
(dollars in millions)	Years Ended				Increase $			Increase %
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,599.1	$	1,508.8	$	90.3		6.0	%
PC	152.2		176.4		(24.2		)	(13.7	)%
PI	264.7		254.2		10.5			4.1	%
Total service revenue	$	2,016.0	$	1,939.4	$	76.6		3.9	%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,126.5	$	1,046.8	$	79.7		7.6	%
PC	80.5		96.9		(16.4		)	(16.9	)%
PI	137.2		135.5		1.7			1.3	%
Total direct costs	$	1,344.2	$	1,279.2	$	65.0		5.1	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	472.6	$	462.0	$	10.6		2.3	%
PC	71.7		79.5		(7.8		)	(9.8	)%
PI	127.5		118.7		8.8			7.4	%
Total gross profit	$	671.8	$	660.2	$	11.6		1.8	%

FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 COMPARED WITH THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

35Revenue

Our service revenue by segment is as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017		2016		Increase/(Decrease)%
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,626.6	$	1,626.0	—	%
PC	210.3		190.4		10.5	%
PI	280.7		277.9		1.0	%
Total service revenue	$	2,117.6	$	2,094.3	1.1	%

On a segment basis, CRS service revenue remained flat in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. Revenue in Fiscal Year 2017 included $86.0 million and $10.6 million related to the acquisition of ExecuPharm and TMAC, respectively, offset by organic decline mostly driven by Phase II-III business due to cancellations and studies reaching completion across several strategic partners.

PC service revenue increased by 10.5% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. Higher service revenue is primarily driven by the Health Advances acquisition in the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2016, which resulted in a $22.2 million increase in service revenue. This impact was slightly offset by organic decline mostly due to projects reaching completion.

PI service revenue increased by 1.0% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. The increase was due primarily to growth in Medical Imaging and Regulatory Information Management Solutions.

Reimbursement revenue consists of reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of, and reimbursable by, clients. Reimbursement revenue does not yield any gross profit to us, nor does it have an impact on net income.

Direct Costs

Our direct costs and service gross profit by segment are as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017		2016		Increase/(Decrease)%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,111.9	$	1,111.0	0.1	%
PC	120.5		102.2		17.9	%
PI	145.1		147.1		(1.4	)%
Total direct costs	$	1,377.5	$	1,360.3	1.3	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	514.7	$	515.0	(0.1	)%
PC	89.8		88.2		1.8	%
PI	135.6		130.8		3.7	%
Total gross profit	$	740.1	$	734.0	0.8	%

Direct costs increased by 1.3% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. As a percentage of total service revenue, direct costs remained at 65.1% for the respective periods. The gross margin was relatively flat due to more efficient staff utilization and savings from our Restructuring Programs

On a segment basis, CRS direct costs increased by 0.1% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. As a percentage of service revenue, CRS direct costs increased to 68.4% for Fiscal Year 2017 from 68.3% for Fiscal Year 2016. This increase resulted primarily from the business mix as well as the unfavorable impact of hedging.

PC direct costs increased by 17.9% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. This increase is primarily driven by the acquisition of Health Advances. As a percentage of service revenue, PC direct costs increased to 57.3% from 53.7% for the respective periods as a result of an increase in both fixed and variable cost and change in business mix.

PI direct costs decreased by 1.4% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016.As result of cost control measures, PI direct costs, as percentage of service revenue, decreased to 51.7% for Fiscal Year 2017 from 52.9% for Fiscal Year 2016 due primarily to lower headcount and savings driven by restructuring programs.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

SG&A expense is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017			2016			Increase/(Decrease)%
Selling, general and administrative	$	401.3		$	385.3		4.2	%
% of service revenues	19.0		%	18.4		%

SG&A expense increased by 4.2% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016. This increase was due primarily to an increase in pay raises offset by decrease in MIP, and an increase in professional fees related to the announced merger. This increase was partially offset by the savings in rent due to the Company restructuring program. As a percentage of service revenue, SG&A is slightly higher at 19.0% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to 18.4% in Fiscal Year 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization (“D&A”)

D&A expense is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017			2016			Increase/(Decrease)%
Depreciation and amortization	$	106.4		$	96.9		9.8	%
% of service revenues	5.0		%	4.6		%

D&A expense increased by 9.8% in Fiscal Year 2017 compared to Fiscal Year 2016, due primarily to higher intangible assets amortization expense of $5.4 million attributed to the acquisitions of ExecuPharm and TMAC during Fiscal Year 2017 and Health Advances in second half of Fiscal Year 2016. The remaining increase in depreciation expense was due to an increase in capital spending. As a percentage of service revenue, D&A was 5.0% in Fiscal Year 2017, up from 4.6% in Fiscal Year 2016.

Restructuring Charge

Restructuring charge is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017		2016		Increase/(Decrease)%
Restructuring charge	$	41.2	$	27.8	48.2	%

In January 2017, we approved a plan to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. In May 2017, the Company approved an expansion of the 2017 Restructuring Program. The restructuring initiatives are company-wide. These actions are expected to result in pre-tax charges in the range of $50.0 million to $64.0 million, all of which are anticipated to be cash expenditures. For Fiscal Year 2017 we recorded a $40.7 million restructuring charge for the new program, of which employee separation benefits amounted to $39.7 million, the remaining $1.0 million relates to facilities separation costs. We expect the remainder of the charges to be incurred by the end of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 (“Fiscal Year 2018”). The charges will include approximately $8.0 million to $20.0 million in employee separation costs and approximately $1.0 million to $3.0 million in other costs. We anticipate completing restructuring activities by the end of Fiscal Year 2018, and the charges resulted in pre-tax savings of approximately $9.5 million over the course of Fiscal Year 2017 and we estimate approximately $85.0 million to $95.0 million on an annual basis when fully completed.

Income from Operations



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017			2016			Increase/(Decrease)%
Income from operations	$	191.2		$	224.0		(14.6	)%
Operating margin	9.0		%	10.7		%

The decline in income from operations and income from operations as a percentage of service revenue (“operating margin”) was driven by an increase in restructuring charges as well as by higher direct costs as the result of additional expenses incurred relating to the Pamplona merger and additional restructuring programs.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017			2016			Increase/(Decrease)%
Interest expense, net	$	(12.3	)	$	(8.6	)	43.0	%
Miscellaneous expense	(22.7		)	(0.2		)	>1000%
Other expense, net	$	(35.0	)	$	(8.8	)	>1000%

The $26.2 million increase in net expenses was driven primarily by a $22.5 million increase in miscellaneous expense, due primarily to a loss on a forward accelerated share repurchase contract amounting to $20.7 million and further impacted by the net foreign currency exchange losses recorded during Fiscal Year 2017, compared to the net foreign currency exchange gains recorded during Fiscal Year 2016 and $3.7 million increase in net interest expense related to a higher average debt balance in Fiscal Year 2017.

Taxes

The following table presents the provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2017			2016			Increase/(Decrease)%
Provision for income taxes	$	48.9		$	60.3		(18.9	)%
Effective tax rate	31.3		%	28.0		%

The increase in the Fiscal Year 2017 tax rate was primarily attributable to the non-deductibility of the unrealized loss in connection with the accelerated share repurchase program, as well as certain R&D tax benefits being recorded outside of the provision for income taxes during Fiscal Year 2017 due to a change in law, offset by a benefit from the adoption of ASU 2016-09.

FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 COMPARED WITH THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

Revenue

Our service revenue by segment is as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016		2015		Increase/(Decrease)%
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,626.0	$	1,599.1	1.7	%
PC	190.4		152.2		25.1	%
PI	277.9		264.7		5.0	%
Total service revenue	$	2,094.3	$	2,016.0	3.9	%

On a segment basis, CRS service revenue increased by 1.7% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. The increase was attributable to growth in both the Phase II-III and the Early Phase businesses. Compared to the prior year period growth was slower due to the increasing complexity of clinical trials and certain large late-phase studies reaching completion. Within the Phase II-III business, revenue increased due primarily to study ramp-up across several strategic partners. The Early Phase business increases were due primarily to growth and new capabilities.

due to the increasing complexity of clinical trials and certain large late-phase studies reaching completion. Within the Phase II-III business, revenue increased due primarily to study ramp-up across several strategic partners. The Early Phase business increases were due primarily to growth and new capabilities.

PC service revenue increased by 25.1% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. Higher service revenue was due primarily to an increase in revenues from expanded client relationships and new business wins. Revenue in Fiscal Year 2016 included $12.2 million related to the acquisition of Health Advances.

PI service revenue increased by 5.0% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. The increase was due primarily to growth in Medical Imaging and Regulatory Information Management Solutions.

Reimbursement revenue consists of reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of and reimbursable by clients. Reimbursement revenue does not yield any gross profit to us, nor does it have an impact on net income.

Direct Costs

Our direct costs and service gross profit by segment are as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016		2015		Increase/(Decrease)%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,111.0	$	1,126.5	(1.4	)%
PC	102.2		80.5		27.0	%
PI	147.1		137.2		7.2	%
Total direct costs	$	1,360.3	$	1,344.2	1.2	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	515.0	$	472.6	9.0	%
PC	88.2		71.7		23.0	%
PI	130.8		127.5		2.6	%
Total gross profit	$	734.0	$	671.8	9.3	%

Direct costs increased by 1.2% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. As a percentage of total service revenue, direct costs decreased to 65.0% from 66.7% for the respective periods. The gross margin increase primarily related to more efficient staff utilization and savings from our Margin Acceleration Program (“MAP”).

On a segment basis, CRS direct costs decreased by 1.4% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. This decrease resulted primarily from decreased labor costs. As a percentage of service revenue, CRS direct costs decreased to 68.3% for Fiscal Year 2016 from 70.4% for Fiscal Year 2015. The decrease as a percentage of service revenue was primarily related to our MAP.

PC direct costs increased by 27.0% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. As a percentage of service revenue, PC direct costs increased to 53.7% from 52.9% for the respective periods as a result of an increase in both fixed and variable compensation costs.

PI direct costs increased by 7.2% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. As a percentage of service revenue, PI direct costs increased to 52.9% for Fiscal Year 2016 from 51.8% for Fiscal Year 2015 due primarily to revenue growth in our Medical Imaging and Regulatory Solutions business.

~~Selling, General and Administrative (“~~SG&A”)

SG&A expense is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016			2015			Increase/(Decrease)%
Selling, general and administrative	$	385.3		$	367.2		4.9	%
% of service revenues	18.4		%	18.2		%

SG&A expense increased by 4.9% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015. This increase was due primarily to an increase in fixed and variable compensation costs, an increase in costs incurred to support our information technology infrastructure and a $16.1 million change for the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration related to acquisitions. This increase was partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements and savings from our MAP. As a percentage of service revenue, SG&A remained relatively flat at 18.4% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to 18.2% in Fiscal Year 2015.

~~Depreciation and Amortization (“D&A”)~~42

a $16.1 million change for the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration related to acquisitions. This increase was partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements and savings from our MAP. As a percentage of service revenue, SG&A remained relatively flat at 18.4% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to 18.2% in Fiscal Year 2015.

D&A

D&A expense is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016			2015			Increase/(Decrease)%
Depreciation and amortization	$	96.9		$	84.9		14.1	%
% of service revenues	4.6		%	4.2		%

D&A expense increased by 14.1% in Fiscal Year 2016 compared to Fiscal Year 2015, due primarily to higher amortization expense, $9.4 million of which related to the acquisitions of QSI and Health Advances, as well as higher depreciation expense related to increased capital spending. As a percentage of service revenue, D&A was 4.6% in Fiscal Year 2016, up from 4.2% in Fiscal Year 2015.

Restructuring Charge

Restructuring charge is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016		2015		Increase/(Decrease)%
Restructuring charge	$	27.8	$	19.8	40.4	%

For Fiscal Year 2016 we recorded a net $27.8 million restructuring charge related to MAP, announced in June 2015. In Fiscal Year 2015, we recorded a net $19.8 million restructuring charge, substantially all of which related to our MAP. We recorded $47.8 million in restructuring charges related to the MAP program since ~~it's~~its announcement in June 2015, which consisted of $38.5 million of employee separation benefits and $9.3 million of facility exit and other costs.

Income from Operations



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016			2015			Increase/(Decrease)%
Income from operations	$	224.0		$	199.9		12.1	%
Operating margin	10.7		%	9.9		%

The increase in income from operations and income from operations as a percentage of service revenue (“operating margin”) was due primarily to higher service revenue and relatively flat direct costs due primarily to savings from our MAP that were partially offset by increased incentive compensation costs, contingent consideration and higher D&A.

Other (Expense~~) Income~~, Net

Other (expense) income, net is summarized as follows:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016			2015			Increase/(Decrease)%
Interest expense, net	$	(8.6	)	$	(7.1	)	21.1	%
Miscellaneous (expense) income	(0.2		)	7.4			(102.7	)%
Other income, net	$	(8.8	)	$	0.3		>1000%

The $9.1 million increase in net expenses was driven primarily by a $7.6 million increase in miscellaneous expense, due primarily to net foreign currency exchange losses recorded during Fiscal Year 2016 compared to the net foreign currency exchange gains recorded during Fiscal Year 2015. Additionally, the increase was attributable in part to a $1.5 million increase in net interest expense related to a higher average debt balance in Fiscal Year 2016.

Taxes

The following table presents the provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2016			2015			Increase/(Decrease)%
Provision for income taxes	$	60.3		$	52.4		15.1	%
Effective tax rate	28.0		%	26.2		%

The increase in the Fiscal Year 2016 tax rate was primarily attributable to the reduction of tax credits and incentives in various jurisdictions compared to the prior year period, offset by a benefit from favorable changes in the jurisdictional distribution of our profits.

FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 COMPARED WITH THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Revenue

Our service revenue by segment is as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015		2014		Increase/(Decrease)%
Service revenue
CRS	$	1,599.1	$	1,508.8	6.0	%
PC	152.2		176.4		(13.7	)%
PI	264.7		254.2		4.1	%
Total service revenue	$	2,016.0	$	1,939.4	3.9	%

On a segment basis, CRS service revenue increased by 6.0% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. The increase was attributable to growth in both the Phase II-III and the Early Phase businesses. Within the Phase II-III business, the growth of

backlog caused revenue to increase. The Early Phase business increases were due to strong new business wins and a favorable burn rate.

PC service revenue decreased by 13.7% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in revenues from a large Strategic Compliance Consulting assignment.

PI service revenue increased by 4.1% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. The increase was primarily due to growth in Medical Imaging and Platform Solutions.

Direct Costs

Our direct costs and service gross profit by segment are as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015		2014		Increase/(Decrease)%
Direct costs
CRS	$	1,126.5	$	1,046.8	7.6	%
PC	80.5		96.9		(16.9	)%
PI	137.2		135.5		1.3	%
Total direct costs	$	1,344.2	$	1,279.2	5.1	%
Gross profit
CRS	$	472.6	$	462.0	2.3	%
PC	71.7		79.5		(9.8	)%
PI	127.5		118.7		7.4	%
Total gross profit	$	671.8	$	660.2	1.8	%

Direct costs increased by 5.1% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. As a percentage of total service revenue, direct costs increased to 66.7% from 66.0% for the respective periods. The gross margin decline primarily related to hiring resources ahead of the revenue curve in CRS, and proportionally more CRS work in study start up.

On a segment basis, CRS direct costs increased by 7.6% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. This increase resulted primarily from increased labor costs associated with headcount growth in CRS reflecting higher levels of clinical trial activity. As a percentage of service revenue, CRS direct costs increased to 70.4% for Fiscal Year 2015 from 69.4% for Fiscal Year 2014. The increase as a percentage of service revenue was related to the need to hire staff in response to recent new business wins.

PC direct costs decreased by 16.9% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. As a percentage of service revenue, PC direct costs decreased to 52.9% from 54.9% for the respective periods as a result of a more favorable revenue mix.

PI direct costs increased by 1.3% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. As a percentage of service revenue, PI direct costs decreased to 51.8% for Fiscal Year 2015 from 53.3% for Fiscal Year 2014 due to revenue growth in our Medical Imaging and Platform Solutions business.

SG&A

SG&A expense is summarized as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015			2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Selling, general and administrative	$	367.2		$	379.8		(3.3	)%
% of service revenues	18.2		%	19.6		%

SG&A expense decreased by 3.3% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014. This decrease was primarily due to the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements, efficiency initiatives and lower variable compensation expense. As a percentage of service revenue, SG&A decreased to 18.2% in Fiscal Year 2015 from 19.6% in Fiscal Year 2014.

D&A

D&A expense is summarized as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015			2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Depreciation and amortization	$	84.9		$	81.3		4.4	%
% of service revenues	4.2		%	4.2		%

D&A expense increased by 4.4% in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to Fiscal Year 2014, due to higher depreciation expense from higher capital spending. As a percentage of service revenue, D&A was 4.2% for both Fiscal Year 2015 and Fiscal Year 2014.

Restructuring Charge

Restructuring charge is summarized as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015		2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Restructuring charge (benefit)	$	19.8	$	(0.4	)	>1000%

For Fiscal Year 2015 we recorded a net $19.8 million restructuring charge, substantially all of which related to MAP, announced in June 2015. In Fiscal Year 2014, we recorded a $0.4 million benefit to restructuring charges for adjustments to facility-related charges under our previously announced restructuring plans.

Income from Operations

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015			2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Income from operations	$	199.9		$	199.5		0.2	%
Operating margin	9.9		%	10.3		%

This decrease in operating margin was due primarily to higher direct costs which included a $20.0 million charge related to the Margin Acceleration Program, depreciation and was partially offset by lower SG&A.

Other Expense, Net

Other (expense) income, net is summarized as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015			2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Interest expense, net	$	(7.1	)	$	(9.1	)	(22.0	)%
Miscellaneous (expense) income	7.4			(2.5		)	(396.0	)%
Other income, net	$	0.3		$	(11.6	)	(102.6	)%

The $11.9 million decrease in net expenses was driven primarily by a $9.9 million increase in miscellaneous income, largely due to net foreign currency exchange gains recorded during Fiscal Year 2015 compared to the net foreign currency exchange losses recorded during Fiscal Year 2014. Additionally, the decrease was attributable in part to a $2.0 million decrease in net interest expense related to a lower average debt balance in Fiscal Year 2015.

Taxes

The following table presents the provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

	Year Ended June 30,
(dollar amounts in millions)	2015			2014			Increase/(Decrease)%
Provision for income taxes	$	52.4		$	58.8		(10.9	)%
Effective tax rate	26.2		%	31.3		%

The decrease in the Fiscal Year 2015 tax rate was primarily attributable to various global tax credits and incentives, and the decrease in tax reserves related to the favorable settlements with tax authorities offset in part by the increase in tax reserves related to tax positions taken in the current year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Since our inception, we have financed our operations and growth with cash flow from operations, proceeds from the sale of equity securities, and credit facilities to fund business acquisitions and working capital. Investing activities primarily reflect capital expenditures for information systems enhancements, ~~and~~ leasehold improvements and business combinations. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $~~248~~302.67 million, of which $~~221~~276.54 million is held in countries which are outside of the U.S. since excess cash generated in the U.S. is primarily used to repay our debt obligations. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 we did not hold any marketable securities. Foreign cash ~~include~~includes unremitted foreign earnings, which are invested indefinitely outside of the U.S. Our cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in deposit accounts which provide us with immediate and unlimited access to the funds. Repatriation of funds to the U.S. from non-U.S. entities may be subject to taxation or certain legal restrictions. Nevertheless, most of our cash resides in countries with few or no such restrictions.

DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING

Our operating cash flow is heavily influenced by changes in the levels of billed and unbilled receivables and deferred revenue. These account balances as well as days sales outstanding (“DSO”) in accounts receivable, net of deferred revenue, can vary based on contractual milestones and the timing and size of cash receipts. We calculate DSO by adding end-of-period balances for billed and unbilled account receivables, net of deferred revenue (short-term and long term) and the provision for losses on receivables, then dividing the resulting amount by the sum of total revenue plus investigator fees billed for the most recent quarter, and multiplying the resulting fraction by the number of days in the quarter. The following table presents the DSO, account receivables balances, and deferred revenue as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016.

(dollars in millions)	June 30, ~~2016~~2017			June 30, ~~2015~~2016
Billed accounts receivable, net	$	~~506~~588.12		$	~~460~~506.61
Unbilled accounts receivable, net	~~327~~306.94			~~262~~327.29
Total accounts receivable	~~834~~894.06			~~722~~834.80
Deferred revenue	(~~458~~522.59		)	(~~414~~458.05		)
Net receivables	$	~~375~~371.57		$	~~308~~375.85
DSO (in days)	4845			3948

The ~~increase~~decrease in DSO for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the quarter ended June 30, ~~2015~~2016, ~~was~~is ~~largely~~due ~~driven~~to bybetter cash collections and contractual billing terms. This resulted in a higher ~~billed~~deferred revenue and lower unbilled accounts ~~receivable balances~~receivables, offset by an increase in ~~deferred~~billed ~~revenue~~accounts receivables in quarter ending June 30, 2017.

4144

CASH FLOWS

Sources and uses of cash flows are summarized as follows:

	Year Ended June 30,									% Change
(dollar amounts in millions)	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016			~~2014~~2015			~~2016~~2017 Compared to ~~2015~~2016		~~2015~~2016 Compared to ~~2014~~2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	~~261~~306.34		$	~~157~~261.83		$	~~287~~157.28		6517.63	%	~~(45~~65.16	)%
Net cash used in investing activities	(~~162~~257.82		)	(96162.18		)	(3196.21		)	6958.40	%	~~208~~69.04	%
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	~~(45~~4.50		)	26(45.25		)	~~(224~~26.02		)	(~~273~~108.78	)%	(~~111~~273.7	)%
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	~~(11~~0.89		)	(6811.78		)	12(68.17		)	(82107.86	)%	(~~667~~82.8	)%
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	4154.21		$	1941.2		$	4419.12		~~114~~31.63	%	~~(56~~114.56	)%

Operating Activities

The cash flows provided by operating activities for Fiscal Year 2017 primarily resulted from $107.3 million in net income, $106.4 million in depreciation and amortization, and offset by changes in working capital. The changes in working capital were primarily driven by a $23.6 million increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable, excluding accounts receivable arising from acquisitions, offset by a $67.8 million increase in deferred revenue, and a $23.6 million decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The increase in billed accounts receivable was due to increased revenue. The decrease in unbilled accounts receivable was due to the timing of the achievement of billing milestones compared with the delivery of units for revenue recognition purposes. The increase in deferred revenue was due primarily to a higher amount of deposits from key sponsors for reimbursable costs and investigator payments. The increase in our accrued expenses and other current liabilities was due primarily to the increased severance provision.

The cash flows provided by operating activities for Fiscal Year 2016 primarily resulted from $154.9 million in net income, $96.9 million in depreciation and amortization, and offset by changes in working capital. The changes in working capital were primarily driven by a $122.1 million increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable, offset by a $58.2 million increase in deferred revenue, and a $32.7 million increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The increase in billed accounts receivable was due to increased revenue. The increase in unbilled accounts receivable was due to the timing of the achievement of billing milestones compared with the delivery of units for revenue recognition purposes. The increase in deferred revenue was due primarily to a higher amount of deposits from key sponsors for reimbursable costs and investigator payments. The increase in our accrued expenses and other current liabilities was due primarily to the increase in variable compensation costs.

The cash flows provided by operating activities for Fiscal Year 2015 primarily resulted from $147.8 million in net income, $84.9 million in depreciation and amortization, and changes in working capital. The changes in working capital were primarily driven by a $33.7 million decrease in deferred revenue, and a $19.0 million increase in accounts payable, offset in part by a $24.5 million increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The decrease in deferred revenue was due primarily to a lower amount of deposits from key sponsors for reimbursable costs and investigator payments. The increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable was due to the timing of the achievement of billing milestones compared with the delivery of units for revenue recognition purposes. The increase in our accounts payable was due primarily to the timing of invoice receipts and payments.

The cash flows provided by operating activities for Fiscal Year 2014 primarily resulted from $129.1 million in net income, $81.3 million in depreciation and amortization, and changes in working capital. The changes in working capital were primarily driven by a $46.7 million increase in deferred revenue, a $28.9 million increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and a $23.1 million increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The increase in deferred revenue was due primarily to a higher volume of new contracts and a corresponding increase in the minimum advances received from customers. The increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities were due primarily to increases in our bonus and vacation accruals. The increase in billed and unbilled accounts receivable was due primarily to an increase in revenue in fiscal year 2014 as compared to fiscal year 2013.

Investing Activities

Net cash used for investing activities was $~~162~~257.82 million for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 as compared with $96162.18 million for Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016 and $3196.21 million for Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015.

During Fiscal Year 2017, we spent $184.6 million for business acquisitions and made $72.6 million in capital expenditures.

During Fiscal Year 2016, we spent $67.3 million for business acquisitions and made $95.5 million in capital expenditures.

During Fiscal Year 2015, we spent $104.5 million for business acquisitions and made $80.2 million in capital expenditures, which was partially offset by our receipt of $88.6 million in proceeds we received from the sale of marketable securities.

During Fiscal Year 2014, we made $72.6 million in capital expenditures, which was partially offset by $41.5 million in net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Net cash ~~used~~provided inby financing activities was $454.50 million for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, as compared with net cash ~~provided~~used byin financing activities of $2645.25 million for Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016 and $~~224~~26.02 million of net cash ~~used~~provided inby financing activities for Fiscal Year ~~2014~~2015.

During Fiscal Year 2016, we paid $200.0 million as part of the accelerated share repurchase program and borrowed a net $147.3 million from the 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below). In addition we paid $9.9 million related to the contingent consideration 45

42During Fiscal Year 2017, we paid $200.0 million as part of the accelerated share repurchase program and borrowed a net $163.4 million under the 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below). In addition we received $34.3 million proceeds related to employee stock purchases and $6.4 million related to borrowing proceeds under a factoring agreement and accounted for as our debt.

During Fiscal Year 2016, we paid $200.0 million as part of the accelerated share repurchase program and borrowed a net $147.3 million under the 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below). In addition we paid $9.9 million related to the contingent consideration for a previous acquisition and had debt issuance costs of $1.0 million related to the 2016 Credit Agreement (as defined below), partially offset by $18.1 million in proceeds related to employee stock purchases.

During Fiscal Year 2015, we received $7.1 million under the Master Financing Agreement (as defined below) and received $19.8 million in proceeds related to employee stock purchases. These amounts were partially offset by debt issuance costs of $0.7 million related to the 2014 Credit Agreement ~~(as defined below)~~.

During Fiscal Year 2014, we paid $154.9 million for share repurchases and made net payments of $187.5 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement (as defined below), which were partially offset by $100.0 million borrowings under the Note Purchase Agreement, $14.6 million in proceeds received related to employee stock purchases and $4.5 million in proceeds received from our receivable factoring.

CREDIT AGREEMENTS

2016 Credit Agreement

On March 11, 2016, PAREXEL, certain subsidiaries of PAREXEL,; Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and L/C Issuer,; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPFS”),; HSBC Bank USA, National Association (“HSBC”),; U.S. Bank, National Association (“US Bank”),; TD Securities (USA) LLC (“TD Securities”) and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“Wells Fargo Securities”) as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, HSBC, US Bank, TD Bank, N.A. (“TD Bank”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”) as Joint Syndication Agents, and the other lenders party thereto entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2016 Credit Agreement”) providing for a five-year term loan and revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $750.0 million (collectively, the “Loan Amount”), plus additional amounts of up to $300.0 million of loans to be made available upon request of the Company subject to specified terms and conditions.

The 2016 Credit Agreement amends and restates the amended and restated credit agreement dated as of October 15, 2014, (the “2014 Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company, Bank of America, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and L/C Issuer,; MLPFS, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, HSBC,; and US Bank, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers,; JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.,; HSBC and US Bank, as Joint Syndication Agents, and the other lenders party thereto.

The 2016 Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $350.0 million from time to time outstanding. A portion of the revolving credit facility is available for swingline loans of up to a sublimit of $100.0 million and for the issuance of standby letters of credit up to a sublimit of $10.0 million.

On the closing date of March 11, 2016, after giving effect to the amendment and restatement of the 2014 Credit Agreement and the effectiveness of the 2016 Credit Agreement, the Company was obligated under the 2016 Credit Agreement for term loans in the principal amount of $400.0 million and revolving loans in the principal amount of $65.0 million.

As of June 30, 2016, we had no principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility and $397.5 million of principal borrowed under the term loan. The outstanding amount is presented net of debt issuance costs of approximately $2.8 million in our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, we had borrowing availability of $350.0 million under the revolving credit facility.

The 2016 Credit Agreement is intended to provide funds (i) for stock repurchases, (ii) for the issuance of letters of credit and (iii) for other general corporate purposes of PAREXEL and its subsidiaries, including permitted acquisitions.

As of June 30, 2017, we had $180.0 million principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility and $385.0 million of principal borrowed under the term loan. The outstanding amount is presented net of debt issuance costs of approximately $2.4 million in our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, we had borrowing availability of $170.0 million under the revolving credit facility.

PAREXEL’s obligations under the 2016 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain material domestic subsidiaries of the Company, and the obligations, if any, of any foreign designated borrower are guaranteed by the Company and certain of its material domestic subsidiaries.

Borrowings (other than swingline loans) under the 2016 Credit Agreement bear interest, at PAREXEL’s determination, at a rate based on either (a) LIBOR plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 2.0%) based on a ratio of consolidated net funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) (the “Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio”) or (b) the highest of (i) prime, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, and (iii) the one month LIBOR rate plus 100 basis points (such highest rate, the “Alternate Base Rate”), plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.0%) based on the Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio. Swingline loans in U.S. dollars bear interest calculated at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.0%). Loans outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs, if any, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2016 Credit Agreement. The 2016 Credit Agreement terminates and any outstanding loans under it mature on March 11, 2021.

4346

Repayment of the principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility (other than a swingline loan) is due on March 11, 2021. A swingline loan under the 2016 Credit Agreement generally must be paid ten (10) business days after the loan is made. Repayment of principal borrowed under the term loan facility is as follows, with the final payment of all amounts outstanding, plus accrued interest, being due on March 11, 2021:

• 0.63% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made commencing June 30, 2016. and made on or prior to ~~March~~June 3130, 2017;


•	1.25% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2017, but on or prior to March 31, 2019;


•	1.88% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2019, but on or prior to March 31, 2020;


•	2.50% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2020, but prior to March 11, 2021; and


•	72.50% (or if less, the remaining principal amount of the term loan) on March 11, 2021.

To the extent not previously paid, all borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement must be repaid on March 11, 2021.

Interest due under the revolving credit facility (other than a swingline loan) and the term loan facility must be paid quarterly for borrowings with an interest rate determined with reference to the Alternate Base Rate. Interest must be paid on the last day of the interest period selected by the Company for borrowings determined with reference to LIBOR; provided that for interest periods of longer than three months, interest is required to be paid every three months. Interest under US dollar swingline loans at the alternate base rate is payable quarterly.

The obligations of PAREXEL under the 2016 Credit Agreement may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default under the 2016 Credit Agreement, which includes customary events of default, including payment defaults, defaults in the performance of affirmative and negative covenants, the inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency related defaults, cross defaults to material indebtedness, defaults relating to such matters as ERISA and judgments, and a change of control default.

The 2016 Credit Agreement contains negative covenants applicable to PAREXEL and its subsidiaries, including financial covenants requiring PAREXEL to comply with a maximum net leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as well as restrictions on liens, investments, indebtedness, fundamental changes, acquisitions, dispositions of property, making specified restricted payments (including cash dividends and stock repurchases that would result in the Company exceeding an agreed to Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio), transactions with affiliates, and other restrictive covenants. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2016 Credit Agreement.

Under the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries may pay any dividend or make any other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock except that (a) we may declare and pay dividends with respect to equity interests payable solely in additional shares of common stock, (b) our subsidiaries may declare and pay dividends and other distributions ratably with respect to their equity interests, (c) we may make payments pursuant to and in accordance with stock option plans or other benefit plans for management or employees of the Company and our subsidiaries, and (d) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries may make payments in connection with permitted repurchases of their respective capital stock.

In connection with the 2016 Credit Agreement, PAREXEL agreed to pay a commitment fee on the revolving loan commitment calculated as a percentage of the unused amount of the revolving loan commitment at a per annum rate of up to 0.250% (based on the Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio). To the extent there are letters of credit outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement, PAREXEL will pay letter of credit fees plus a fronting fee and additional charges. PAREXEL agreed to pay (i) Bank of America for its own account, an arrangement fee, (ii) to each of the lenders on the closing date, an upfront fee, and (iii) to Bank of America for its own account, an annual agency fee.

In May 2013, we entered into ana five year interest rate swap agreement and hedged an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate of 0.73%. The interest rate swap agreement now hedges $100.0 million of principal under our 2016 Credit Agreement. These interest rate hedges were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) and, as such, unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets.

On October 1, 2015, we entered into a two year interest rate swap agreement effective September 30, 2016, which now hedges an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2016 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate 1.104%.

44On April 26, 2017, we entered into a four year interest rate swap agreement effective April 28, 2017, which now hedges an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2016 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate 1.7680%.

All interest rate hedges were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815 and, as such, unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets.

2014 Credit Agreement

The 2014 Credit Agreement provided for a five-year term loan and revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $500.0 million (collectively, the “Loan Amount”), plus additional amounts of up to $300.0 million of loans to be made available upon request of the Company subject to specified terms and conditions. The loan facility available under the 2014 Credit Agreement consisted of a term loan facility and a revolving credit facility. The principal amount of up to $200.0 million of the Loan Amount was available through the term loan facility, and the principal amount of up to $300.0 million of the Loan Amount was available through the revolving credit facility. A portion of the revolving credit facility was available for swingline loans of up to a sublimit of $100.0 million and for the issuance of standby letters of credit of up to a sublimit of $10.0 million.

Our obligations under the 2014 Credit Agreement were guaranteed by certain of our material domestic subsidiaries, and the obligations, if any, of any foreign designated borrower were guaranteed by us and certain of our material domestic subsidiaries.

The 2014 Credit Agreement was superseded by the 2016 Credit Agreement and as of June 30, 2016 all outstanding amounts under the 2014 Credit Agreement were fully repaid.

2016 Term Loan Agreement

On February 10, 2016, PAREXEL entered into a short term unsecured term loan agreement with TD Bank, providing for a loan to the Company in the amount of $75.0 million (the “Loan”). The Loan would have matured on April 30, 2016 ~~(the “Maturity Date”)~~ unless earlier payment ishas been required under the terms of the Company loan agreement with TD Bank. The Loan bore interest, at PAREXEL’s determination, at a base rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 0.750%) based on a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for the prior four fiscal quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”), or at a LIBOR rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio. The Loan could have been prepaid at any time in whole or in part without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs, if any, subject to the terms and conditions of the loan agreement.

The proceeds of the Loan were advanced to the Company on February 12, 2016 and were used to repay borrowings under the Company’s 2014 Facility.

The obligations of PAREXEL under the Loan could have been accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Loan, which included customary events of default, including payment defaults, the inaccuracy of representations or warranties and cross defaults to the 2014 Facility.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, all outstanding amounts under the Loan were fully repaid with the proceeds from the 2016 Credit Agreement.

Master Financing Agreement

On June 12, 2015, we entered into a 3 year, interest free Master Financing Agreement for $7.1 million with General Electric Capital Corporation, (“GECC”), in conjunction with a software term license purchase. On June 30, 2015 we received the gross proceeds of $7.1 million from GECC. Repayment of the principal borrowed under the Master Financing Agreement is due annually on July 1st as follows:


•	$1.4 million made on or prior to July 1, 2015;


•	$2.8 million made on or prior to July 1, 2016; and


•	$2.8 million made on or prior to July 1, 2017.

As of June 30, 2017, we had $2.8 million principal borrowed under the Master Financing Agreement.

Note Purchase Agreement

On July 25, 2013, we issued $100.0 million principal amount of 3.11% senior notes due July 25, 2020 (the “Notes”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $100.0 million in a private placement solely to accredited investors. The Notes were issued pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement entered into by us with certain institutional investors on June 25, 2013 (the “Note Purchase Agreement”). Proceeds from the Notes were used to pay down $100.0 million of principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility portion of the 2013 Credit Agreement. We will pay interest on the outstanding balance of the Notes at a rate of 3.11% per annum, payable semi-annually on January 25 and July 25 of each year until the principal on the Notes shall have become due and payable. We may, at our option, upon notice and subject to the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, prepay at any time all or part of the Notes in an amount not less than 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding, plus a Make-Whole Amount (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement). The Notes become due and payable on July 25, 2020, unless payment is required to be made earlier under the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.

The Note Purchase Agreement includes operational and financial covenants, with which we are required to comply, including, among others, maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens and dispositions. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Note Purchase Agreement.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, certain subsidiaries of ours entered into a Subsidiary Guaranty, pursuant to which such subsidiaries guaranteed our obligations under the Notes and the Note Purchase Agreement.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had $100.0 million of principal borrowed under the Note Purchase Agreement. The outstanding amounts are presented net of debt issuance cost of approximately $0.23 million in our consolidated balance sheets. Our debt under the Note Purchase Agreement carried an average annualized interest rate of 3.05%.

In April and May 2013, we entered into three treasury lock agreements each with a notional amount of $25.0 million in connection with the planned issuance of our Notes that were issued in July 2013. The three treasury locks were used to minimize our interest rate exposure prior to locking in the fixed interest rate on our Notes. The treasury locks matured in May 2013 when the interest rate on our Notes was fixed. The treasury locks were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815, and as such, the unrealized gains related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income and are amortized over the life of the Notes as interest income. As of June 30, 2016, our debt under the Note Purchase Agreement carried an average annualized interest rate of 3.05%.

Receivable Purchase Agreement

On February 1922, ~~2013~~2017, we entered into a receivables purchase agreement (the “Bank of America Receivable Agreement”) with ~~JPMorgan~~Bank ~~Chase~~of ~~Bank~~America, N.A. (“~~JPMorgan~~Bank”). Under the Bank of America Receivable Agreement, we sell to ~~JPMorgan~~the Bank or other investors on an ongoing basis certain of our trade receivables, together with ancillary rights and the proceeds thereof, which arise under contracts with a client ~~of ours~~, or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The Bank of America Receivable Agreement includes customary representations and covenants on behalf of us, and may be terminated by either us or ~~JPMorgan~~the Bank upon ~~five~~thirty business days' advance notice. The Bank of America Receivable Agreement provides a mechanism for accelerating the receipt of cash due on outstanding receivables. We account for the transfer of our receivables with respect to which we have satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria in accordance with ~~FASB~~ ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” If we have not satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria for the underlying sales transaction, the transfer of the receivable is accounted for as a financing activity in accordance with ~~FASB~~ ASC 470, “Debt.” The accounts receivable and short-term debt balances are derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets at the earlier of the factored receivable’s due date or when all of the revenue recognition criteria are met for those billed services. For Fiscal Year ~~2016 and 2015~~2017, we transferred approximately $7327.6 million ~~and $122.6 million~~ of trade receivables~~, respectively~~. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, ~~and~~$6.4 ~~June 30,~~million ~~2015,~~of nothe transfers were accounted for as a financing activity.

~~2014~~On ~~Credit~~February 19, 2013, we entered into a receivables purchase agreement (the “Receivable Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”). Under the Receivable Agreement, we sell to JPMorgan or other investors on an ongoing basis certain of our trade receivables, together with ancillary rights and the proceeds thereof, which arise under contracts with a client of ours, or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The Receivable Agreement includes customary representations and covenants on behalf of us, and may be terminated by either us or JPMorgan upon five business days advance notice. The Receivable Agreement provides a mechanism for accelerating the receipt of cash due on outstanding receivables. We account for the transfer of our receivables with respect to which we have satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria in accordance with ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” If we have not satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria for the underlying sales transaction, the transfer of the receivable is accounted for as a financing activity in accordance with ASC 470, “Debt.” The accounts receivable and short-term debt balances are derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets at the earlier of the factored receivable’s due date or when all of the revenue recognition criteria are met for those billed services. For Fiscal Year 2017 and 2016, we transferred approximately $0.7 million and $73.6 million of trade receivables, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, no transfers were accounted for as a financing activity.

As of June 30, 2015, we had $50 million of principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility and $200.0 million of principal borrowed under the term loan. The outstanding amounts are presented net of debt issuance cost of approximately $2.5 million in our consolidated balance sheets.

The 2014 Credit Agreement was superseded by the 2016 Credit Agreement and as of June 30, 2016 all outstanding amounts under the 2014 Credit Agreement were fully repaid.

Borrowings (other than swingline loans) under the 2014 Credit Agreement bore interest, at our determination, at a rate based on either (a) LIBOR plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio or (b) the highest of (i) prime, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.500%, and (iii) the one month LIBOR rate plus 1.000% (such highest rate, the “Alternate Base Rate”), plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 0.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio. Swingline loans in U.S. dollars bear interest calculated at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin (not to exceed a per annum rate of 0.750%).

Repayment of the principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility (other than a swingline loan) was due on October 15, 2019. A swingline loan under the 2014 Credit Agreement generally had to be paid ten business days after the loan was made. Repayment of principal borrowed under the term loan facility was as follows, with the final payment of all amounts outstanding, plus accrued interest, having been due on October 15, 2019:

• 1.25% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made commencing December 2015 and made on or prior to September 30, 2017;

• 2.50% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made after September 30, 2017, but on or prior to September 30, 2018;

• 5.00% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made after September 30, 2018, but prior to October 15, 2019; and

• 60.00% on October 15, 2019.

Interest due under the revolving credit facility (other than a swingline loan) and the term loan facility had to be paid quarterly for borrowings with an interest rate determined with reference to the Alternate Base Rate. Interest had to be paid on the last day of the interest period selected by the Company for borrowings determined with reference to LIBOR; provided that for interest periods of longer than three months, interest is required to be paid every three months. Interest under U.S. dollar swingline loans at the alternate base rate is payable quarterly.

of affirmative and negative covenants, the inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency related defaults, cross defaults to material indebtedness, defaults relating to such matters as ERISA and judgments, and a change of control default.

The 2014 Credit Agreement contained negative covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, including financial covenants requiring us to comply with maximum leverage ratios and minimum interest coverage ratios, as well as restrictions on liens, investments, indebtedness, fundamental changes, acquisitions, dispositions of property, making specified restricted payments (including stock repurchases that would result in our exceeding an agreed-to leverage ratio), transactions with affiliates, and other restrictive covenants.

Under the terms of the 2014 Credit Agreement, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries could have paid any dividend or made any other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock except that (a) we and our subsidiaries could have declared and paid dividends with respect to equity interests payable solely in additional shares of common stock, (b) our subsidiaries could have declared and paid dividends and other distributions ratably with respect to their equity interests, (c) we could have made payments pursuant to and in accordance with stock option plans or other benefit plans for management or employees of the Company and our subsidiaries, and (d) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries could have made payments in connection with permitted repurchases of their respective capital stock.

In connection with the 2014 Credit Agreement, we agreed to pay a commitment fee on the revolving loan commitment calculated as a percentage of the unused amount of the revolving loan commitment at a per annum rate of up to 0.300% (based on the Leverage Ratio). To the extent there are letters of credit outstanding under the 2014 Credit Agreement, we would have paid letter of credit fees plus a fronting fee and additional charges. We agreed to pay Bank of America (i) for its own account, an arrangement fee, (ii) for the account of each of the lenders, an upfront fee and (iii) for its own account, an annual agency fee.

In September 2011, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement which hedged $100.0 million of principal under our prior debt obligations and carried a fixed interest rate of 1.30%. In September 2015, the interest rate swap agreement matured and the related accumulated other comprehensive income was reclassified to net income during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

As discussed above, in May 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement. Prior to the execution of the 2016 Credit Agreement, principal in the amount of $100.0 million under the 2014 Credit Agreement had been hedged with an interest rate swap agreement and carried a fixed interest rate of 0.73%. The interest rate swap agreement now hedges $100.0 million of principal under our 2016 Credit Agreement. These interest rate hedges were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815 and, as such, unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets.

On October 1, 2015, we entered into a two year interest rate swap agreement effective September 30, 2016. Prior to the execution of the 2016 Credit Agreement, additional principal in the amount of $100.0 million under the 2014 Credit Agreement had been hedged with an interest rate swap agreement and carried a fixed interest rate 1.104%.

Additional Lines of Credit

WeOn ~~have~~December 23, 2016, we entered into an unsecured line of credit with JPHSBC ~~Morgan~~Bank, UKUSA in the amount of $4100.50 million. ~~that~~The line bears interest, at anour ~~annual~~determination, at a base rate ~~ranging~~plus ~~between 2~~a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.00%) based on a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and 4 amortization (EBITDA) for the prior four fiscal quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”), or at a LIBOR rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 2.00%.) based on the Leverage Ratio. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions during the remaining Fiscal Year 2017. AtThis line matured on June 30 23, ~~2016~~2017, weand ~~had $4.5~~no ~~million~~borrowings ~~available~~were ~~under~~outstanding ~~this~~as ~~line~~ of ~~credit~~June 30, 2017.

We have aan ~~cash~~unsecured line ~~pool~~of ~~facility~~credit with JP ~~RBS~~Morgan ~~Nederland,~~UK NV in the amount of $4.05 million ~~Euros~~ that bears interest at an annual rate ranging between 2.00% and 4.00%. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions. At June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had $4.05 million ~~Euros~~ available under this line of credit.

We have an unsecured uncommitted overdraft facility with ING Bank NV in the amount of 7.5 million Euros that bears interest at an annual rate ranging between 2.00% and 4.00%. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions. At June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had 7.5 million Euros available under this line of credit.

FINANCING NEEDS

Our primary cash needs are for operating expenses (such as salaries and fringe benefits, hiring and recruiting, business development and facilities), business acquisitions, stock buybacks, capital expenditures, and repayment of principal and interest on our borrowings.

~~Fiscal Year 2016 Share Repurchase~~49

~~On September 14, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “~~2016 ~~Program”)~~Credit authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On September 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement (the “2016 Agreement~~”) to purchase shares of our common stock from Wells Fargo Bank~~, ~~National~~Term ~~Association~~Loans ~~(“WF”),~~and ~~for~~Note anPurchase ~~aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2016~~ Agreement~~, in September~~

2015, we paid $200.0 million to WF and received from WF 2.3 million shares of our common stock, representing 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the 2016 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $70.35 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on September 16, 2015. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. As of June 30, 2016, we recorded the $200.0 million payment to WF as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings.

Fiscal Year 2014 Share Repurchase

On June 2, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2014 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On June 13, 2014, we entered into an agreement (the “2014 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from Goldman Sachs & Co. (“GS”), for an aggregate purchase price of $150.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2014 Agreement, in June 2014, we paid $150.0 million to GS and received from GS 2.3 million shares of our common stock, representing 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the 2014 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $52.52 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 13, 2014. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. As of June 30, 2014, we recorded the $150.0 million payment to GS as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings.

On October 31, 2014, we received 345,165 shares representing the final settlement of the 2014 Agreement and the 2014 Program was completed. Pursuant to the 2014 Program, we repurchased 2.6 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $57.03 per share from June 2014 to October 2014.

Credit Agreements, Term Loan and Note Purchase Agreement

In July 2013, we issued $100.0 million principal amount of 3.11% senior notes due July 25, 2020 for aggregate gross proceeds of $100.0 million in a private placement solely to accredited investors.

In March 2016, we entered into the 2016 Credit Agreement, which amended and restated the 2014 Credit Agreement.

Our requirements for cash to pay principal and interest on our borrowings will increase significantly in future periods based on amounts borrowed under our 2016 Credit Agreement and the Notes. Our primary committed external source of funds is the 2016 Credit Agreement. Our principal source of cash is from the performance of services under contracts with our clients. If we are unable to generate new contracts with existing and new clients or if the level of contract cancellations increases, our revenue and cash flow would be adversely affected (see Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” for further detail on these risks). Absent a material adverse change in the level of our new business bookings or contract cancellations, we believe that our existing capital resources together with cash flow from operations and borrowing capacity under existing credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our foreseeable cash needs over the next twelve months and on a longer term basis. Depending upon our revenue and cash flow from operations, it is possible that we will require external funds to repay amounts outstanding under our 2016 Credit Agreement upon its maturity in 2021.

We expect to continue to acquire businesses that enhance our service and product offerings, expand our therapeutic expertise, and/or increase our global presence. Depending on their size, any future acquisitions may require additional external financing, and we may from time to time seek to obtain funds from public or private issuances of equity or debt securities. We may be unable to secure such financing at all or on terms acceptable to us, as a result of our outstanding borrowings, including our outstanding borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement.

Under the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement, interest rates are fixed based on market indices at the time of borrowing and, depending upon the interest mechanism selected by us, may float thereafter. As a result, the amount of interest payable by us on our borrowings may increase if market interest rates change. However, we expect to mitigate the risk of increasing market interest rates with our hedging programs described below under Part III, Item 3 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Foreign Currency Exchange Rates and Interest Rates.”

On February 10, 2016, we entered into a short term unsecured term loan agreement with TD Bank, providing for a loan to the Company in the amount of $75.0 million. The proceeds of the loan were advanced to us on February 12, 2016 and were used to repay borrowings under our 2014 Facility. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, all outstanding amounts under the loan were fully repaid with the proceeds from the 2016 Credit Agreement.

48Share Repurchase Programs

In both, Fiscal Year 2017 and Fiscal Year 2016, our Board of Directors approved an accelerated share repurchase program (the “2017 Program”), and a share repurchase program (the “2016 Program”). Refer to Part II, Item 5 Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities" under the Stock Repurchase Program for further details on both programs.

DEBT, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND GUARANTEES

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, ~~2016~~2017:

(dollars in millions)	Less than1 ~~year~~Year		2-3 ~~years~~Years		4-5 ~~years~~Years		More than5 ~~years~~Years		Total
Debt obligations (principal)	$	1628.64	$	4553.35	$	~~442~~589.56	$	—	$	~~504~~671.45
Operating leases	5744.21		8065.54		4841.71		9981.38		~~285~~232.74
Purchase obligations*	129.46		4159.01		213.05		0.2		~~172~~202.64
Total	$	~~203~~202.21	$	~~166~~178.80	$	~~493~~644.2	$	9982.50	$	~~962~~1,106.73
*includes commitments to purchase software, hardware, and services.

The above table does not include approximately $2931.50 million of potential tax liabilities from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for more information.

The above table does not include asset retirement obligations due to the uncertainty of the timing of the future cash outflows related to the restoration costs associated with returning certain facilities to their original condition upon termination of our long-term leases. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, the obligation expected to be incurred is approximately $133.18 million.

The above table does not include contingent consideration due to the uncertainty regarding the amounts and timing of the future cash outflows related to the potential payments. As ofThe ~~June~~potential ~~30,~~maximum ~~2016~~payout wefor ~~recorded~~Health ~~contingent~~Advances ~~consideration~~is ~~liabilities of~~ $522.25 million. ~~See~~with ~~Note 13~~a topayout ~~our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for more information.~~

We have letter-of-credit agreements with banks, totaling approximately $10.8 million, guaranteeing performance under various operating leases and vendor agreements. Additionally, the borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries. 50

Wedate ~~periodically~~by February ~~become~~28, ~~involved~~2019. inExecupharm ~~various~~has ~~claims~~a ~~and~~potential ~~lawsuits~~maximum ~~that~~payout ~~are~~of ~~incidental~~$20 tomillion ~~our~~by ~~business.~~June We30, ~~believe~~2018, ~~after~~and ~~consultation~~TMAC ~~with~~has ~~counsel,~~potential ~~that~~maximum nopayout ~~matters~~of ~~currently~~$11 ~~pending~~million ~~would,~~by inDecember ~~the~~31, ~~event~~2019.As of ~~an adverse outcome~~June 30, ~~either~~2017 ~~individually~~we orrecorded incontingent ~~the~~consideration ~~aggregate,~~liabilities ~~have~~of a$18.0 ~~material~~million. ~~impact~~See onNote 13 to our consolidated financial ~~position,~~statements ~~results~~included ofin ~~operations,~~this orannual ~~liquidity~~report for more information.

We have letter-of-credit agreements with banks, totaling approximately $9.5 million, guaranteeing performance under various operating leases and vendor agreements. Additionally, the borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries.

We periodically become involved in various claims and lawsuits that are incidental to our business. In connection with the pending acquisition of the Company by certain investments funds affiliated with Pamplona Capital Management, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, three lawsuits were filed by shareholders of PAREXEL against the Company. All three complaints allege that the preliminary proxy statement violates Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by materially omitting material information related to the Company’s projections and the explanation of the analysis of the Company’s financial advisor, among other claims. All of the complaints seek, among other things, equitable relief to enjoin the consummation of the merger, rescission of the merger or rescissory damages, compensatory damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company believes that the claims asserted against them are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against these lawsuits.

We will continue incurring additional cost till the Merger is completed.

We are also regularly subject to, and are currently undergoing, audits by tax authorities in the United States and foreign jurisdictions for prior tax years relating to indirect taxes. Although we believe our accruals for non-income tax related tax exposures to be appropriately estimated, and we intend to defend our positions through litigation if necessary, the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation is inherently uncertain and could be materially different than that reflected in our accruals. Adverse outcomes of tax audits could also result in assessments of substantial additional taxes and/or fines or penalties relating to ongoing or future audits. For indirect tax-related matters we estimate our reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued as probable and estimable to be up to approximately $9.2 million as of June 30, 2017.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial position, changes in financial position, ~~revenues~~revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our investors.

RESTRUCTURING PLANS

In June 2015, we adopted the Margin Acceleration Program to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the Company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. For Fiscal Year 2016, we recorded $27.8 million in restructuring charges related to the Margin Acceleration Program, which consisted of $18.5 million of employee separation benefits associated with the elimination of approximately 700 managerial and staff positions and $9.3 million of facility exit and other costs. Since the program's inception approximately 800 managerial and staff positions have been eliminated or the employees have been notified. In Fiscal Year 2015 we recorded restructuring charges of $20.0 million related to the Margin Acceleration Program. The program is now substantially complete. As a result of these initiatives, we expect to realize annual savings of $60.0 million in Fiscal Year 2017. In Fiscal Year 2016 savings of $34.6 million were realized related to the Margin Acceleration Program.

INFLATION

We believe the effects of inflation generally do not have a material adverse impact on our operations or financial condition.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Note 2 in Item 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on recently implemented and issued accounting standards.

4951

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and other relevant market rates or price changes. In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to market risk resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, and we regularly evaluate our exposure to such changes. Our overall risk management strategy seeks to balance the magnitude of the exposure and the costs and availability of appropriate financial instruments.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES AND INTEREST RATES

We derived approximately 5756% of our consolidated service revenue for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 from operations outside of the United States and 5157% of our consolidated service revenue for Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016 from operations outside of the United States. In addition, 912.81% of our consolidated revenue was denominated in Euros, 23.46% of our consolidated revenue was denominated in Yen and 21.39% was denominated in pounds sterling for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, while 129.28% of our consolidated revenue was denominated in Euros, 2.4% was denominated in Yen and 32.13% was denominated in pounds sterling for Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016. We have no significant operations in any country in which the economy is considered to be highly inflationary. Our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect the translation of financial results into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our consolidated financial results.

It is our policy to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Accordingly, we have instituted foreign currency hedging programs and an interest rate swap program. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for more information on our hedging programs and interest rate swap program.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had programs with derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 and the related notional values of the derivatives were approximately $~~384~~449.51 million, including ~~two~~three interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $~~200~~300.0 million executed to hedge our borrowings under our 2016 Credit Agreement. Under certain circumstances, such as the occurrence of significant differences between actual cash payments and forecasted cash payments, the ASC 815 programs could be deemed ineffective. In that event, the unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives, which are currently reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, would be recognized in earnings. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, the estimated amount that could be recognized in earnings was a gain of approximately $58.56 million, net of tax.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, the notional value of derivatives that were not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 was approximately $84155.27 million.

During Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 and Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016, we recorded foreign currency exchange losses of $04.50 million and ~~a gain of~~ $7.0.5 million, respectively~~, which reflects foreign currency exchange losses in 2016 and gains in 2015~~. We also have exposure to additional foreign exchange rate risk as it relates to assets and liabilities that are not part of the economic hedge or designated hedging programs, but quantification of this risk is difficult to assess at any given point in time.

Our exposure to interest rate changes relates primarily to the amount of our short-term and long-term debt. Short-term debt was $1629.62 million at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and $816.96 million at June 30, ~~2015~~2016. Long-term debt before financing cost was $~~487~~645.80 million at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and $~~348~~487.28 million at June 30, ~~2015~~2016. Based on average short-term and long-term debt for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, an increase in the average interest rate of 100 basis points would decrease our pre-tax earnings and cash flows by approximately $36.07 million on an annual basis.

In April and May 2013, we entered into three treasury lock agreements, each with a notional amount of $25.0 million, in connection with the planned issuance of our Notes that were issued in July 2013. The three treasury locks were used to minimize our interest rate exposure prior to locking in the fixed interest rate on our Notes. The treasury locks matured in May 2013 when the interest rates on our Notes were fixed. The treasury locks were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815, and as such, the unrealized gains related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income and are amortized over the life of the Notes as interest income. 52

50Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in millions, except per share data)

	For the years ended June 30,
	For the Years ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2014
	2017			2016			2015
Service revenue	$	2,~~094~~117.36		$	2,~~016~~094.03		$	12,~~939~~016.40
Reimbursement revenue	~~332~~323.09			~~314~~332.30			~~327~~314.03
Total revenue	2,~~426~~441.35			2,~~330~~426.3			2,~~266~~330.43
Costs and expenses:
Direct costs	1,~~360~~377.35			1,~~344~~360.23			1,~~279~~344.2
Reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses	~~332~~323.09			~~314~~332.30			~~327~~314.03
Selling, general and administrative	~~385~~401.3			~~367~~385.23			~~379~~367.82
Depreciation	7478.67			6974.36			6669.43
Amortization	2227.37			1522.63			1415.96
Restructuring charge (benefit)	27.8			19.8			(0.4		)
Restructuring charge	41.2			27.8			19.8
Total costs and expenses	2,~~202~~250.3			2,~~130~~202.43			2,~~066~~130.94
Income from operations	~~224~~191.02			~~199~~224.90			199.59
Interest expense, net	(812.63		)	(78.16		)	(97.1		)
Miscellaneous (expense) income, net	(022.27		)	7(0.42		)	(27.54		)
Total other (expense) income, net	(835.80		)	0(8.38		)	~~(11~~0.63		)
Income before provision for income taxes	~~215~~156.2			~~200~~215.2			~~187~~200.92
Provision for income taxes	6048.39			5260.43			5852.84
Net income	$	~~154~~107.93		$	~~147~~154.89		$	~~129~~147.18
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	2.9008		$	2.6990		$	2.2869
Diluted	$	2.8606		$	2.6586		$	2.2565
Weighted average shares:
Basic	5351.5			5453.95			5654.59
Diluted	5452.2			5554.82			5755.58
Comprehensive income:
Net income	$	~~154~~107.93		$	~~147~~154.89		$	~~129~~147.18
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of taxes	~~(5.~~8.6		)	(35.98		)	5(3.19		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	~~(34~~7.32		)	(9434.13		)	27(94.01		)
Total comprehensive income	$	~~114~~123.81		$	49114.8		$	~~161~~49.28

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5153

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except per share data)

	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015
	June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~248~~302.67		$	~~207~~248.46
Billed accounts receivable, net	~~506~~588.12			~~460~~506.61
Unbilled accounts receivable, net	~~327~~306.94			~~262~~327.29
Prepaid expenses	2320.36			1523.53
Deferred tax assets	—			59.1
Income taxes receivable	9.6			25.2
Income taxes receivable	25.2			12.8
Other current assets	52.9			50.1
Other current assets	50.1			44.4
Total current assets	1,280.4			1,181.2
Total current assets	1,181.2			1,062.0
Property and equipment, net	252.1			259.3
Property and equipment, net	259.3			241.2
Goodwill	476.3			389.2
Goodwill	389.2			354.9
Other intangible assets, net	199.8			130.7
Other intangible assets, net	130.7			142.1
Non-current deferred tax assets	35.1			27.1
Non-current deferred tax assets	27.1			11.7
Long-term income taxes receivable	31.6			10.4
Long-term income taxes receivable	10.4			11.1
Other assets	38.1			38.3
Other assets	38.3			42.0
Total assets	$	2,313.4		$	2,036.2
Total assets	$	2,036.2		$	1,865.0
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	1629.62		$	816.96
Accounts payable	62102.6			8162.26
Deferred revenue	~~420~~485.20			~~371~~420.82
Accrued expenses	3547.06			3335.40
Accrued restructuring charges, current portion	1432.61			2014.26
Accrued employee benefits and withholdings	~~176~~143.43			~~152~~176.74
Current deferred tax liabilities	—			10.0
Income taxes payable	27.6			21.6
Income taxes payable	21.6			13.1
Other current liabilities	13.0			22.4
Other current liabilities	22.4			18.2
Total current liabilities	880.4			769.4
Total current liabilities	769.4			709.5
Long-term debt, net of current portion	642.3			484.8
Long-term debt, net of current portion	484.8			345.4
Non-current deferred tax liabilities	12.6			19.3
Non-current deferred tax liabilities	19.3			33.0
Long-term income tax liabilities	34.0			31.5
Long-term income tax liabilities	31.5			27.1
Long-term deferred revenue	37.9			38.3
Long-term deferred revenue	38.3			42.2
Other liabilities	71.7			59.5
Other liabilities	59.5			42.5
Total liabilities	1,678.9			1,402.8
Total liabilities	1,402.8			1,199.7
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock - $0.01 par value; 5.0 million shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively.	—			—
Common stock - $0.01 par value; 150.0 million shares authorized; 52.9 million and 55.2 million shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively.	0.5			0.6
Common stock - $0.01 par value; 150.0 million shares authorized; 51.1 million and 52.9 million shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively.	0.5			0.5
Additional paid-in capital	3122.40			3731.74
Retained earnings	~~737~~732.52			~~722~~737.95
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(~~136~~120.02		)	(95136.90		)
Total stockholders’ equity	~~633~~634.45			~~665~~633.34
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,~~036~~313.24		$	12,~~865~~036.02

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5254

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in millions, except per share data)

	Common Stock								RetainedEarnings			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			TotalStockholders’Equity
	Numberof Shares		ParValue			AdditionalPaid-inCapital
Balance at June 30, 2013	56.3		$	0.5		$	113.8		$	454.7		$	(30.0	)	$	539.0
Shares issued under stock option/restricted stock/employee stock purchase plans, net	0.8		—			6.8			—			—			6.8
Stock-based compensation	—		—			15.3			—			—			15.3
Excess tax benefit related to employee equity awards	—		—			7.8			—			—			7.8
Share repurchase	(2.4	)	—			(143.7		)	(8.7		)	—			(152.4		)
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of taxes	—		—			—			—			5.1			5.1
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—			27.0			27.0
Net income	—		—			—			129.1			—			129.1
Balance at June 30, 2014	54.7		$	0.5		$	—		$	575.1		$	2.1		$	577.7
Shares issued under stock option/restricted stock/employee stock purchase plans, net	0.9		0.1			12.6			—			—			12.7
Stock-based compensation	—		—			17.9			—			—			17.9
Excess tax benefit related to employee equity awards	—		—			7.2			—			—			7.2
Share repurchase	(0.4	)	—			—			—			—			—
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of taxes	—		—			—			—			(3.9		)	(3.9		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—			(94.1		)	(94.1		)
Net income	—		—			—			147.8			—			147.8
Balance at June 30, 2015	55.2		$	0.6		$	37.7		$	722.9		$	(95.9	)	$	665.3
Shares issued under stock option/restricted stock/employee stock purchase plans, net	0.9		—			13.9			—			—			13.9
Stock-based compensation	—		—			20.1			—			—			20.1
Excess tax benefit related to employee equity awards	—		—			4.0			15.3			—			19.3
Share repurchase	(3.2	)	(0.1		)	(44.3		)	(155.6		)	—			(200.0		)
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of taxes	—		—			—			—			(5.8		)	(5.8		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—			(34.3		)	(34.3		)
Net income	—		—			—			154.9			—			154.9
Balance at June 30, 2016	52.9		$	0.5		$	31.4		$	737.5		$	(136.0	)	$	633.4
Shares issued under stock option/restricted stock/employee stock purchase plans, net	1.3		—			34.2			—			—			34.2
Stock-based compensation						22.1			—			—			22.1
Share repurchase	(3.1	)	—			(67.3		)	(112.0		)				(179.3		)
Excess tax benefit related to employee equity awards	—		—			1.0			—			—			1.0
Adoption of ASU 2016-09	—		—			0.6			(0.6		)	—			—
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of taxes	—		—			—			—			8.6			8.6
Foreign currency translation adjustment	—		—			—			—			7.2			7.2
Net income	—		—			—			107.3			—			107.3
Balance at June 30, 2017	51.1		$	0.5		$	22.0		$	732.2		$	(120.2	)	$	634.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5355

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in millions)

	For the years ended June 30,
	For the Years ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2014
	2017			2016			2015
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	~~154~~107.93		$	~~147~~154.89		$	~~129~~147.18
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	96106.94			8496.9			8184.39
Stock-based compensation	2022.1			1720.91			1517.39
Deferred income taxes	24.0			(16.1		)	(14.7		)
Change in fair value	20.7			—			—
Fair value adjustment of contingent consideration	8.7			(7.4		)	(0.8		)
Deferred income taxes	(14.8		)	24.0			(16.1		)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	(4.2		)	(7.1		)	(7.8		)
Impairment charges	5.7			—			—
Other non-cash items	(0.1		)	2.1			(0.2		)
Fair value adjustment of contingent consideration	(2.9		)	8.7			(7.4		)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	—			(4.2		)	(7.1		)
Other non-cash items	(0.7		)	(0.1		)	2.1
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effect from acquisitions:
Billed and unbilled accounts receivable	(~~122~~23.16		)	(24122.51		)	(2324.15		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(174.94		)	(317.19		)	(103.81		)
Other assets	1.69			~~(11~~1.96		)	6(11.89		)
Accounts payable	~~(20~~38.89		)	19(20.08		)	1119.50
Deferred revenue	5867.28			~~(33~~58.72		)	46(33.7		)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	32(23.76		)	932.7			~~28.~~9.7
Long-term income taxes payable, net of long-term income taxes receivable	214.17			~~(10~~21.61		)	13(10.16		)
Other liabilities	80.29			(98.2		)	~~11.~~(9.2		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	~~261~~306.34			~~157~~261.83			~~287~~157.28
Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of marketable securities	—			—			(250.3		)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of marketable securities	—			—			88.6
Proceeds from sale and maturity of marketable securities	—			88.6			291.8
Purchases of property and equipment	(72.6		)	(95.5		)	(80.2		)
Purchases of property and equipment	(95.5		)	(80.2		)	(72.6		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(184.6		)	(67.3		)	(104.5		)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(67.3		)	(104.5		)	(0.1		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(257.2		)	(162.8		)	(96.1		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(162.8		)	(96.1		)	(31.2		)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of tax payments for cashless exercises	1334.92			1213.69			612.86
Payments for share repurchase	(200.0		)	—(200.0		)	~~(154.9~~—		)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	~~4.2~~			74.12			7.81
Borrowings under credit agreement/facility	~~1,176~~535.20			~~429~~1,176.62			~~502~~429.56
Repayments under credit agreement/facility	(~~1,028~~371.96		)	(~~422~~1,028.59		)	(~~590~~422.05		)
Borrowings under factoring agreement	—6.4			—			~~4.5~~—
Payments for contingent consideration	~~(9.9~~		)	—(9.9		)	—
Payments for debt issuance costs	~~(1.0~~		)	(01.60		)	(0.76		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(45.5		)	26.2			(224.0		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	4.0			(45.5		)	26.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	~~(11~~0.89		)	(6811.78		)	12(68.17		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	4154.21			1941.2			4419.12
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	~~207~~248.46			~~188~~207.24			~~144~~188.12
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	~~248~~302.67		$	~~207~~248.46		$	~~188~~207.24
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Non-cash capital expenditures	$	4.5		$	64.95		$	—6.9
Non-cash debt settlement under factoring agreement	$	—21.2		$	—		$	~~14.9~~—
Net cash paid during year for:
Interest	$	139.06		$	1013.80		$	1310.78
Income taxes, net of refunds	$	1965.74		$	7819.47		$	6178.04

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5456

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

PAREXEL International Corporation (“PAREXEL,” “the Company,” or “we”) is a leading biopharmaceutical outsourcing services company, providing a broad range of expertise in clinical research, clinical logistics, medical communications, consulting, commercialization and advanced technology products and services to the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. Our primary objective is to provide quality solutions for managing the biopharmaceutical product lifecycle with the goal of reducing the time, risk, and cost associated with the development and commercialization of new therapies. Since our incorporation in 1983, we have developed significant expertise in processes and technologies supporting this strategy. Our product and service offerings include: clinical trials management, observational studies and patient/disease registries, data management, biostatistical analysis, epidemiology, health economics/outcomes research, pharmacovigilance, medical communications, clinical pharmacology, patient recruitment, clinical supply and drug logistics, post-marketing surveillance, regulatory and product development and commercialization consulting, health policy and reimbursement and market access consulting, medical imaging services, regulatory information management (“RIM”) solutions, randomization and trial supply management services (“RTSM”), electronic data capture systems (“EDC”), clinical trial management systems (“CTMS”), web-based portals, systems integration, patient diary applications, and other product development tools and services.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PAREXEL International Corporation, our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. For the year ended June 30, 2017, we recorded $7.5 million related to service revenue arrangements recognized in prior periods. The adjustments were recorded as reductions to service revenue in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the year ended June 30, 2017. We concluded the effect of these errors was not material to our consolidated financial statements for the current fiscal year, or any of the prior periods and, as such, these consolidated financial statements are not materially misstated.

Cash Pooling Arrangement, Net Presentation

WeIn ~~have~~Fiscal aYear 2017, our cash pooling arrangement with RBS Nederland, NV ended and we increased our cash pooling with J.P Morgan Chase. Pooling occurs when debit balances are offset against credit balances and the overall net position is used as a basis by the bank for calculating the overall pool interest payable or receivable amount. Each legal entity owned by us and party to this arrangement remains the owner of either a credit (deposit) or a debit (overdraft) balance. Therefore, interest income is earned by legal entities with credit balances, while interest expense is charged to legal entities with debit balances. Based on the pool’s aggregate balance, the bank then (1) recalculates the overall interest to be charged or earned, (2) compares this amount with the sum of previously charged/earned interest amounts per account and (3) additionally pays/charges the difference.

Use of Estimates

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, revenue recognition, allowance for credit losses on receivables, valuation of derivative instruments, periodic impairment reviews of goodwill and intangible assets, contingent consideration, income taxes, and the valuation of acquired and long-term assets. Our estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at the time estimates are made, historical experience, risk of loss, general economic conditions, trends, and assessments of the probable future outcomes of these matters. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of changes, if any, are reflected in the statement of operations in the period in which they are determined.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximates the carrying value of these financial instruments because of the short-term nature of any maturities. We determine the estimated fair values of other financial instruments, using available market information and valuation methodologies, primarily discounted cash flow analysis or input from independent investment bankers.

Segments

We identify a business as an operating segment if: i) it engages in business activities from which it may earn ~~revenues~~revenue and incur expenses; ii) its operating results are regularly reviewed by our chief operating decision maker, who is our chief executive officer, and iii) it has available discrete financial information. We aggregate our operating segments into a reportable segment if the operating segments are determined to have similar economic characteristics and are similar in the nature of products and services, nature of production processes, type or class of customer for their products and services, product or service distribution method and, if applicable, nature of the regulatory environment. We have three reportable segments: Clinical Research Services (“CRS”), PAREXEL Consulting Services (“PC”), and PAREXEL Informatics (“PI”).

5557

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Effective~~nature ~~July~~of 1,production ~~2015~~processes, ~~certain~~type ~~components~~or class of ~~our~~customer ~~business~~for ~~segments~~their ~~were~~products ~~reorganized~~and ~~to better align~~ services ~~offered to clients. Specifically~~, ~~Commercialization~~product ~~Consulting~~or ~~Services~~service ~~(formerly~~distribution ~~HERON)~~method, and, ~~MedCom~~if ~~were~~applicable, ~~transferred~~nature toof the ~~CRS~~regulatory ~~segment~~environment. ~~from~~We ~~our~~have PCthree ~~segment~~reportable tosegments: ~~broaden~~Clinical ~~the~~Research ~~range~~Services ~~of fully-integrated services to help clients position their products for market access and ongoing commercial success. For the year ended June 30, 2016~~ (“~~Fiscal Year 2016~~CRS”), wePAREXEL ~~included the operating results of Commercialization~~ Consulting Services (~~formerly HERON) and MedCom within the CRS segment and retroactively revised the presentation for the year ended June 30, 2015 (~~“~~Fiscal Year 2015~~PC”), and ~~for~~PAREXEL ~~the~~Informatics ~~year ended June 30, 2014~~ (“~~Fiscal Year 2014~~PI”) ~~to reflect this change~~.

Revenue Recognition

We derive revenue from the delivery of service or software solutions to clients in the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service offering has been delivered to the client; (3) the collection of fees is probable; and (4) the amount of fees to be paid by the client is fixed or determinable. Revenue recognition treatment of each business segment is described below.

CRS and PC Service Revenue

Service ~~revenues~~revenue in our CRS and PC businesses are derived principally from fee-for-service or fixed-price executory contracts, which typically involve competitive bid awards and multi-year terms. Client billing schedules and payment arrangements are prescribed under negotiated contract terms. Contract provisions do not provide for rights of return or refund, but normally include rights of cancellation with notice, in which case services delivered through the cancellation date are due and payable by the client, including certain costs to conclude the trial or study.

Our client arrangements generally involve multiple service deliverables, where bundled service deliverables are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25, “Multiple-Element Arrangements.” We determined that each of our service deliverables ~~have~~has standalone value. ASC 605-25 requires the allocation of contract (arrangement) value to each separate unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of the various separate units of accounting in the arrangement. ASC 605-25 requires a hierarchy of evidence be followed when determining if evidence of the selling price of an item exists, such that the best evidence of selling price of a unit of accounting is vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), or the price charged when a deliverable is sold separately. When VSOE is not available to determine selling price, relevant third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price should be used, if available. Lastly, when neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price for similar deliverables exists, management must use its best estimated of selling price (“BESP”) considering all relevant information that is available without undue cost and effort.

We use BESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact if the services were sold by us on a standalone basis. Our determination of BESP involves the consideration of several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. Specifically, we consider the cost to provide services, the anticipated margin on those deliverables, our ongoing pricing strategy and policies, and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the services are provided. We allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of the arrangement using the relative selling prices of the deliverables within the contract based on BESP.

We analyze the selling prices used in the allocation of arrangement consideration at least annually. Selling prices are analyzed on a more frequent basis if a significant change in our business necessitates a more timely analysis or if we experience significant variances in our selling prices.

We recognize ~~revenues~~revenue for the separate elements of our contracts upon delivery of actual units of output and when all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Revenue from fee-for-service contracts generally is recognized as units of output are delivered. Revenue on fixed-price contracts generally is measured by applying a proportional performance model using output units, such as site or investigator recruitment, patient enrollment, data management, or other deliverables common to our CRS business. Performance-based output units are pre-defined in contracts and revenue is recognized based upon actual units of completion. Revenue related to changes in contract scope, which are subject to client approval, is recognized when realization is assured and amounts are fixed or determinable.

We present revenue-related taxes collected on behalf of customers and remitted to taxing authorities, principally value-added taxes, on a net basis.

PI Service Revenue

Service revenue is derived principally from the delivery of software solutions through our PI business segment. Software solutions include ClinPhone^®RTSM, CTMS, EDC, RIM and Platform Solutions.

Within PI’s ~~Clinphone~~ClinPhone® RTSM business, we offer selected software solutions through a hosted application delivered through a standard web- browser. We recognize revenue from application hosting services in accordance with ASC 985-605, “Software” and ASC 605-25, as our customers do not have the right to take possession of the software. Revenue resulting from these hosting services consists of three stages: set-up (client specification and workflow), hosting and support services, and closeout reporting.

56Fees charged and costs incurred in the set-up stage are deferred until the start of the hosting period and are amortized and recognized ratably over the estimated hosting period, including customary and expected extensions. Deferred costs are direct costs associated

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Fees charged and costs incurred in the set-up stage are deferred until the start of the hosting period and are amortized and recognized ratably over the estimated hosting period, including customary and expected extensions. Deferred costs are direct costs associated with the trial and application setup. These costs include salary and benefits associated with direct labor costs incurred during trial setup, as well as third-party subcontract fees and other contract labor costs. In the event of a contract cancellation by a client, all deferred revenue is recognized and all deferred setup costs are expensed. To the extent that termination-related fees are payable under the contract, such fees are recognized in the period of termination.

PI's Medical Imaging business provides a service allowing customers to manage the image acquisitions and the analysis and quality of data obtained during a clinical trial. Service revenue is derived from executory contracts that are tailored to meet individual client requirements. Client billing schedules and payment arrangements are prescribed under negotiated contract terms. We recognize service revenue related to our Medical Imaging business based upon a proportional performance method utilizing a unitized output method. The defined units used for revenue recognition are used to track output measures that are specific to the services being provided in the contract, and may include site survey reports, project management tasks, number of reviews completed, and image receipt and processing.

Reimbursement Revenue & Investigator Fees

Reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income under “Reimbursement revenue” and “Reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses,” as we are the primary obligor for these expenses despite being reimbursed by our clients. ~~We record costs for such activities based upon payment requests or invoices that have been received from third parties in the periods presented.~~ In addition, as is customary in our industry, we routinely subcontract on behalf of our clients with independent physician investigators in connection with clinical trials. The related investigator fees are not reflected in our Service revenue, Reimbursement revenue, Reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses, or Direct costs, because these fees are reimbursed by clients on a “pass through basis,” without risk or reward to us. The amounts of these investigator fees were $~~397~~408.18 million, $~~461~~397.01 million, and $~~523~~461.10 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Business Combinations

We account for acquisitions as business combinations in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.” We allocate the amounts that we pay for each acquisition to the assets we acquire, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities we assume based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition~~, including identifiable intangible assets~~. We base the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions determined by management and which consider management's best estimates of inputs and assumptions that a market participant would use. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired to goodwill.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Securities

We account for investments in debt and equity securities in accordance with ASC 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities.”

Marketable securities are held in foreign government treasury certificates that are actively traded and have original maturities over 90 days but less than one year. Our foreign government treasury certificates securities are classified as held-to-maturity based on our intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity and are recorded at amortized cost, which is not materially different than fair value. We do not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Interest and dividends related to these securities are reported as a component of interest income in our consolidated statements of income. At June 30, 2017 and 2016, we did not hold any marketable securities.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that subject us to credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivative financial instrument contracts, and accounts receivable. We maintain our cash and cash equivalent balances with high-quality financial institutions and, consequently, we believe that such funds are subject to minimal credit risk. Our marketable securities primarily consist of foreign government treasury certificates.

We have ~~approximately~~ seven different counterparties in our derivative contracts, which include interest rate swaps, an interest rate cap and foreign currency hedges. Each of these counterparties is in the financial services industry and is subject to the credit risks inherent to that industry. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of these counterparties.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations related to the financial condition of our clients and, generally, do not require collateral. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016 , one client individually accounted for 12% of our total billed and unbilled accounts receivables. As ofFor ~~June 30,~~Fiscal ~~2015,~~Year ~~two~~2017 ~~clients~~one client individually accounted for 12% ~~and 11%~~ of our ~~billed~~consolidated ~~and~~service ~~unbilled accounts receivables~~revenue. For Fiscal Year 2016, one client individually accounted for 13% of our consolidated service revenue. For Fiscal Year 2015, one client individually accounted for 14% of our consolidated service revenue.

5759

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

accounted for 14% of our consolidated service revenue. For Fiscal Year 2014, two clients individually accounted for 16% and 11% of our consolidated service revenue.

Billed Accounts Receivable, Unbilled Accounts Receivable and Deferred Revenue

Billed accounts receivable represent amounts invoiced to our clients based on contract terms. In general, prerequisites for billings and payments are established by contractual provisions including predetermined payment schedules, which may or may not correspond to the timing of the performance of services under the contract. Unbilled services arise when services have been rendered for which revenue has been recognized but the customers have not been billed. Deferred revenue, which had an estimated weighted average age of 6 months for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, represents payments received in excess of revenue recognized. These payments received in advance of services being provided or reimbursable out of pocket expenses and investigator fees incurred are classified as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and include amounts billed based on contractual provisions such as milestone payments or customer advances at the beginning of a project. As the contracted services are subsequently performed and the associated revenue is recognized, the deferred revenue balance is reduced by the amount of the revenue recognized during the period. We maintain a provision for losses on receivables based on historical collectability and specific identification of potential problem accounts. Uncollectible invoices are written off when collection efforts have been exhausted.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of 3 to 8 years for computer software and hardware, and 5 years for office furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the remaining lease term, which include lease extensions when reasonably assured. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Development of Software for Internal Use

PAREXEL accounts for the costs of software developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with ASC 350-40, “Internal-Use Software.” We capitalize costs of materials, consultants, payroll, and payroll-related costs for employees incurred in developing internal-use software. These costs are included in computer software in Note 5 below. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense.

Capitalized software costs, net, were $~~174~~172.89 million and $~~162~~174.98 million at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. Expense related to the capitalized software was $4345.27 million, $3843.72 million and $3438.27 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively. Future expense for all capitalized software placed in service as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 is estimated to be $5145.65 million, $4637.64 million, $3627.49 million, $2317.47 million and $106.12 million for the years ending June 30, ~~2017,~~ 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and ~~2021~~2022, respectively.

Research and Development Costs

We incur ongoing research and development costs related to core technologies used internally as well as software and technology sold externally. Unless eligible for capitalization, these costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expense was $1917.28 million, $2419.02 million, and $2624.90 million in Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

Goodwill

PAREXEL follows the provisions of ASC 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.” Under this statement, goodwill as well as certain other intangible assets, determined to have an indefinite life, are not amortized. Instead, these assets are evaluated for impairment at least annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. ~~For~~We ~~Fiscal~~used ~~Year~~the ~~2016,~~qualitative weassessment ~~performed~~option for our ~~annual~~ impairment ~~test~~testing ~~primarily~~in ~~using~~Fiscal aYear ~~market~~2017 ~~approach~~for ~~analysis~~goodwill and adetermined ~~discounted~~that ~~cash~~the ~~flow~~fair ~~analysis,~~values ~~which~~of isthe ~~based~~reporting onunits ~~strategic~~and ~~business~~the ~~plans~~indefinite-lived ~~and~~intangible ~~long-term~~more ~~forecasts,~~likely tothan ~~determine~~not ~~fair~~exceeded ~~value.~~their ~~The~~carrying ~~discounted~~values ~~cash~~and ~~flow~~that ~~analysis~~there ~~included~~was ~~significant~~no ~~judgment~~evidence ~~regarding~~of ~~the~~impairment ~~assumptions~~as ~~used~~of June 30, ~~such~~2017. asOur assessment of our ~~weighted~~indefinite-lived ~~average~~intangible, ~~cost~~the ofClinPhone ~~capital~~RTSM tradename, ~~revenue~~for ~~growth~~impairment ~~rates,~~uses ~~profit~~a ~~margins,~~relief ~~capital~~from ~~expenditures~~royalty approach to determine fair value. Under the relief from royalty approach, ~~and~~the ~~other~~fair ~~factors~~value ~~that~~of ~~were~~the ~~all~~indefinite-lived intangible is based on ~~current~~after ~~strategic~~tax ~~forecasts~~royalty rate and ~~other~~discount ~~financial~~rate ~~metrics~~applied to future forecasted sales. ~~There~~ Based on our assessment of the ClinPhone RTSM tradename, there was no evidence of impairment as of ~~our~~June 30, ~~goodwill~~2017 ~~balances~~and ~~as of~~ June 30, 2016.

Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets which have a definitive life, are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets might not be recoverable.

Indefinite-lived assets are reviewed annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below the carrying value of the asset. For Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, we performed our annual impairment test using the relief from royalty approach to determine fair value. Under the relief from royalty approach, the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is based on after tax royalty rate and discount rate applied to future forecasted sales. The Company recognized an impairment charge related to an internally-developed software program of approximately $5.7 million for twelve months of Fiscal Year 2017. There was no evidence of impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible asset balances as of June 30, ~~2016. Intangible assets are initially~~

5860

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

2017. Intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value and stated net of accumulated amortization and impairments. We ~~amortizes~~amortize ~~its~~our intangible assets that have finite lives using either the straight-line method, or if reliably determinable, based on the pattern in which the economic benefit of the asset is expected to be utilized. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 15 years.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated future tax benefits of deductible temporary differences and tax operating loss and credit carryforwards and are presented net of valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are established in jurisdictions where it is more likely than not that the benefits of the associated deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income tax expense represents the change in the net deferred tax asset and liability balances. Interest and penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense.

Foreign Currency

Assets and liabilities of PAREXEL’s international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates that are in effect on the balance sheet date and equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the year. Translation adjustments are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheet. Transaction gains and losses are included in miscellaneous expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Transaction gains (losses) were $(04.50) million, $7.(0.5) million, and $(37.5)0 million in Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. We do not have any participating securities outstanding nor do we have more than one class of common stock.

Recently Implemented Accounting Standards

In March 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-05, “Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.” ASU 2013-05 addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. We adopted ASU 2013-05 beginning in our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-05 did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 ("ASU 2015-17"), Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes as it requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as any related valuation allowance be classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company early adopted this ASU prospectively for the year ended June 30, 2016, which resulted in all deferred taxes being reported as non-current in its consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, we have not adjusted prior period amounts in our consolidated balance sheets.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. As originally issued, ASU 2014-09 will be effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved the proposal to defer the effective date of this standard by one year. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016. WeThe ~~are~~Company ~~assessing~~has ~~the~~made ~~impact~~progress toward completing its evaluation of the potential changes from adopting ~~ASU~~this ~~No.~~new ~~2014-09~~standard on ~~our~~its ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~statements~~reporting and disclosures, drafting accounting policies, and designing changes to business processes, controls, and systems. The Company expects to adopt the new standard effective July 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach.

Subsequent to issuing ASU 2014-09, the FASB issued the following amendments concerning clarification of ASU 2014-09. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08 (“ASU 2016-08”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which further clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The new guidance requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, (“ASU 2016-10”) Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 (“ASU 2016-12”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which provides clarification on assessing the collectability criterion, presentation of sales taxes, measurement date for noncash consideration and completed contracts at transition. We are currently evaluating the impact these ASUs will have on our consolidated financial statements.

59In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”), Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This ASU is intended to provide users of financial statements with more useful information on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Expedients~~In February 2016, ~~which~~the ~~provides~~FASB ~~clarification~~issued onASU ~~assessing~~No. ~~the~~2016-02 ~~collectability~~(“ASU ~~criterion~~2016-02”), ~~presentation~~Leases of(Topic ~~sales~~842) ~~taxes,~~Section ~~measurement~~A-Leases: ~~date~~Amendments ~~for~~to ~~noncash~~the ~~consideration~~FASB ~~and~~Accounting ~~completed~~Standards ~~contracts~~Codification® atSection ~~transition. We~~B-Conforming ~~are~~Amendments ~~currently~~Related ~~evaluating~~to Leases: Amendments to the ~~impact~~FASB ~~these~~Accounting ~~ASUs~~Standards ~~will~~Codification® ~~have~~Section C-Background Information and Basis for Conclusions. This ASU requires an entity that leases assets to recognize on ~~our~~the ~~financial~~balance ~~position~~sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~results~~2018, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of ~~operations,~~adopting ~~cash~~ASU ~~flows~~2016-02 ~~and~~on ~~disclosures~~our consolidated financial statements.

In ~~June~~March ~~2014~~2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2014~~2016-1205 (“ASU ~~2014~~2016-1205”), ~~Accounting~~Derivatives ~~for~~and ~~Share-Based~~Hedging ~~Payments~~(Topic ~~When~~815): ~~the~~Effect ~~Terms~~ of anDerivative ~~Award~~Contract ~~Provide~~Novations ~~That~~on aExisting ~~Performance~~Hedge ~~Target~~Accounting ~~Could~~Relationships Be(a ~~Achieved~~Consensus ~~after~~of the ~~Requisite~~Emerging ~~Service~~Issues ~~Period~~Task Force). This ASU ~~2014-12~~clarifies ~~requires~~ that a ~~performance~~change ~~target~~in ~~that affects vesting and could be achieved after~~ the ~~requisite~~counterparty ~~service~~to ~~period be treated as~~ a ~~performance~~derivative ~~condition.~~instrument Athat ~~reporting~~has ~~entity~~been ~~should~~designated ~~apply existing guidance in ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation,~~ as itthe ~~relates~~hedging toinstrument ~~such~~under ~~awards.~~Topic ~~ASU~~815 ~~2014-12~~does isnot, ~~effective~~ in ~~the~~and ~~first quarter~~ of ~~our fiscal year ending June 30~~itself, ~~2017~~require ~~with~~dedesignation ~~early adoption permitted using either~~ of ~~two~~that ~~methods:~~hedging ~~(i)~~relationship ~~prospective~~provided tothat all ~~awards~~other ~~granted~~hedge oraccounting ~~modified~~criteria ~~after~~continue ~~the effective date; or (ii) retrospective~~ to ~~all~~be ~~awards~~met. ~~with~~ASU ~~performance~~2016-05 ~~targets~~is ~~that~~effective ~~are~~for ~~outstanding~~fiscal asyears ~~of the~~ beginning ofafter ~~the~~December ~~earliest~~15, ~~annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter~~2016, with ~~the~~early ~~cumulative~~adoption ~~effect of applying ASU 2014-12 as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements~~permitted. We doare ~~not~~assessing ~~expect~~ the ~~adoption~~impact of ~~this~~adopting ~~guidance~~ASU to2016-05 ~~have a material impact~~ on our consolidated financial statements.

In ~~February~~January ~~2015~~2017, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015~~2017-0201 (“ASU ~~2015~~2017-0201”), ~~Consolidation~~Business Combinations (Topic ~~810~~805): ~~Amendments~~Clarifying to the ~~Consolidation~~Definition ~~Analysis~~of a Business. The ASU ~~2015-02~~clarifies ~~amended~~that when substantially all of the ~~process~~fair ~~that~~value aof ~~reporting~~gross ~~entity~~assets ~~must~~acquired ~~follow~~is toconcentrated ~~determine~~in ~~whether~~a itsingle ~~should~~asset ~~consolidate~~(or ~~certain~~a ~~types~~group of ~~legal~~similar ~~entities~~assets), the assets acquired would not represent a business. This introduces an initial required screen that, if met, eliminates the need for further assessment. ASU ~~2015~~2017-0201 is effective for ~~fiscal~~annual ~~years~~ and interim periods ~~within those years~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2015.~~2017, ~~Early~~with ~~application~~early isadoption permitted. We do not ~~expect~~believe the ~~adoption~~updated ofrequirements under ASU ~~2015~~2017-0204 towill ~~have~~materially ~~a material~~ impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In ~~April~~January ~~2015~~2017, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015~~2017-0304 (“ASU ~~2015~~2017-0304”), ~~Simplifying~~ ~~the~~Intangibles—Goodwill ~~Presentation~~and ofOther ~~Debt~~(Topic ~~Issuance Costs~~350). The ASU ~~2015-03~~removes ~~requires~~Step 2 of the ~~presentation~~goodwill ofimpairment ~~debt~~test, ~~issuance~~which ~~costs~~requires ina ~~the~~hypothetical ~~consolidated~~purchase ~~balance~~price ~~sheets~~allocation. asA agoodwill ~~reduction~~impairment towill ~~the~~now ~~related~~be ~~debt~~the ~~liability~~amount ~~rather~~by ~~than~~which asa anreporting ~~asset.~~unit’s ~~Amortization~~carrying ofvalue ~~debt~~exceeds ~~issue~~its ~~costs~~fair ~~continues~~value, not to beexceed ~~classified~~the ascarrying ~~interest~~amount ~~expense~~of goodwill. ASU ~~2015~~2017-0304 is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~2019, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of adopting ASU ~~2015~~2017-0304 on our consolidated financial statements.

InRecently ~~September~~Adopted ~~2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16 (“ASU 2015-16”), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the~~ Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. This ASU requires adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period of a business combination to be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Acquirers are no longer required to revise comparative information for prior periods as if the accounting for the business combination had been completed as of the acquisition date. The provisions of ASU 2015-16 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We are assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2015-16 on our consolidated financial statements. Standards

InThe ~~January~~Company ~~2016,~~adopted ~~the FASB issued~~ ASU No. ~~2016~~2014-0115 (“"ASU ~~2016~~2014-~~01”~~15"), Preparation of Financial ~~Instruments—Overall~~Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic ~~825~~205-1040), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern which states that under U.S. GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this ASU should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

~~Recognition~~The ~~and~~Company ~~Measurement~~adopted ASU No. 2014-12 (“ASU 2014-12”), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of ~~Financial~~an ~~Assets~~Award ~~and~~Provide ~~Financial~~That ~~Liabilities~~a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period. ~~This~~ ASU is2014-12 ~~intended~~requires tothat ~~provide~~a ~~users~~performance oftarget ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~affects ~~with~~vesting ~~more~~and ~~useful~~could ~~information~~be onachieved after the ~~recognition,~~requisite ~~measurement~~service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, ~~presentation~~Compensation—Stock Compensation, ~~and~~as ~~disclosure~~it ofrelates ~~financial~~to ~~instruments~~such awards. ASU ~~2016~~2014-0112 ispermits ~~effective~~using ~~for~~either ~~fiscal~~of ~~years~~two ~~beginning~~methods: (i) prospective to all awards granted or modified after ~~December~~the ~~15,~~effective ~~2017~~date; or (ii) retrospective to all awards with ~~early~~performance ~~adoption~~targets ~~permitted. We~~that are ~~assessing~~outstanding as of the ~~impact~~beginning of ~~adopting~~the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter, with the cumulative effect of applying ASU No2014-12 as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements. ~~2016-01~~The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

InThe ~~February~~Company ~~2016,~~adopted ~~the FASB issued~~ ASU No. ~~2016~~2015-0216 (“ASU ~~2016~~2015-0216”), Business ~~Leases~~Combinations (Topic ~~842~~805) ~~Section A-Leases~~: ~~Amendments~~Simplifying to the ~~FASB~~ Accounting ~~Standards~~for ~~Codification® Section B~~Measurement-~~Conforming~~Period ~~Amendments~~Adjustments. This ~~Related~~ASU torequires ~~Leases:~~adjustments ~~Amendments~~ to ~~the~~provisional ~~FASB~~amounts ~~Accounting~~that ~~Standards~~are ~~Codification®~~identified ~~Section~~during ~~C-Background~~the ~~Information~~measurement ~~and~~period ~~Basis~~of ~~for~~a ~~Conclusions. This~~business ~~ASU~~combination ~~requires~~to anbe ~~entity~~recognized ~~that~~in ~~leases~~the ~~assets~~reporting toperiod ~~recognize~~in onwhich the ~~balance~~adjustment ~~sheet~~amounts ~~the~~are ~~assets~~determined. ~~and~~Acquirers ~~liabilities~~are ~~for~~no ~~the~~longer ~~rights~~required ~~and~~to ~~obligations~~revise ~~created~~comparative byinformation ~~those~~for ~~leases. ASU~~prior ~~2016-02~~periods isas ~~effective~~if the accounting for ~~fiscal~~the ~~years~~business ~~beginning~~combination ~~after~~had ~~December~~been ~~15,~~completed ~~2018~~as ~~with~~of ~~early~~the ~~adoption~~acquisition ~~permitted~~date. We ~~are~~The ~~assessing~~adoption ~~the impact~~ of ~~adopting~~this ASU ~~2016-02~~did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

InThe ~~March~~Company ~~2016,~~adopted ~~the FASB issued~~ ASU No. ~~2016~~2015-0503 (“ASU ~~2016~~2015-0503”), ~~Derivatives~~Simplifying ~~and~~the ~~Hedging~~Presentation ~~(Topic 815): Effect~~ of ~~Derivative~~Debt ~~Contract~~Issuance ~~Novations~~Costs. onASU ~~Existing~~2015-03 ~~Hedge~~requires ~~Accounting~~the ~~Relationships(a~~presentation ~~consensus~~ of ~~the~~debt ~~Emerging~~issue ~~Issues~~costs ~~Task Force). This ASU clarifies that a change~~ in the ~~counterparty~~consolidated tobalance asheets ~~derivative~~as ~~instrument~~a ~~that~~reduction ~~has~~to ~~been designated as~~ the ~~hedging~~related ~~instrument~~debt ~~under~~liability ~~Topic~~rather ~~815~~than ~~does~~as ~~not,~~an inasset. ~~and~~Amortization of ~~itself,~~debt ~~require~~issuance ~~dedesignation~~costs ofcontinues ~~that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue~~ to be ~~met. ASU~~classified ~~2016-05~~as isinterest ~~effective~~expense. ~~for~~The ~~fiscal~~adoption ~~years~~of ~~beginning~~this ~~after~~ASU ~~December~~did ~~15,~~not ~~2016~~have ~~with~~a ~~early~~material ~~adoption permitted. We are assessing the~~ impact ~~of adopting ASU 2016-05~~ on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.62

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The following summarizes the effects of the adoption on the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements:

Income taxes - Upon adoption of this standard, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards are treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. The Company also recognizes excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. As a result, the Company recognized discrete adjustments to income tax expense for Fiscal Year 2017, in the amount of $4.5 million related to excess tax benefits. The Company has applied the modified retrospective adoption approach beginning in Fiscal Year 2017. This cumulative-effect adjustment related to tax assets that had previously arisen from tax deductions for equity compensation expenses that were greater than the compensation recognized for financial reporting. These assets had been excluded from the deferred tax assets and liabilities totals on the balance sheet as a result of certain realization requirements previously included in ASC 718. Prior periods have not been adjusted.

Forfeitures - Prior to adoption, share-based compensation expense was recognized on a straight line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, such that expense was recognized only for share-based awards that are expected to vest. A forfeiture rate was estimated annually and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differed from initial estimates. Upon adoption, the Company will no longer apply a forfeiture rate and instead will account for forfeitures as they occur. As we previously estimated forfeitures to determine stock-based compensation expense, this change resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment as of July 1, 2016 to reduce retained earnings by $0.6 million.

Statements of Cash Flows - The Company historically accounted for excess tax benefits on the Statement of Cash Flows as a financing activity. Upon adoption of this standard, excess tax benefits are classified as an operating activity. The Company has elected to adopt this portion of the standard on a prospective basis beginning in Fiscal Year 2017. Prior periods have not been adjusted.

Earnings Per Share - The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute diluted earnings per share, unless the effect would be anti-dilutive. Under this method, the Company will no longer be required to estimate the tax rate and apply it to the dilutive share calculation for determining the dilutive earnings per share. The Company has applied this methodology beginning in Fiscal Year 2017, and prior periods have not been adjusted.

Upon adoption, no other aspects of ASU 2016-09 had a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements or related footnote disclosures.

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONS

The pro forma effects of the acquisitions described below are not significant to the Company's reported results for any period presented. Accordingly, no pro forma financial statements have been presented herein.

ATLAS ACQUISITION

On July 1, 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding equity securities of ATLAS, a provider of clinical research services in Turkey, the Middle East, and North Africa, for approximately $2.1 million. ATLAS provides services across all phases of clinical development, has broad therapeutic expertise, and provides clinical trial-related services from study planning and feasibility, through site selection, data management and medical writing. The business has been integrated into our CRS segment. The acquisition was funded with existing cash. The fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The goodwill of $1.4 million arising from the Atlas acquisition largely reflects the expansion of our service offerings across geographic markets complementary to our existing markets. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

CLININTEL ACQUISITION

On October 3, 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding equity securities of privately-owned ClinIntel, a provider of clinical Randomization and Trial Supply Management (RTSM) services, based in the United Kingdom. ClinIntel’s offerings have been combined into the ClinPhone® RTSM suite and are designed to make patient randomization and clinical supply chain solutions more efficient. Capabilities include advanced RTSM technologies for planning, forecasting and supply chain eLogistics. The business has been integrated into the PI segment.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $8.8 million, plus the potential to pay up to an additional $16.2 million, representing the United States Dollar (the "USD") equivalent at the date of the acquisition, over a twenty-one months month period following the acquisition date if ClinIntel achieves certain financial targets. We funded the acquisition with existing cash.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities from ClinIntel were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. We finalized the fair value estimates of the acquired assets and the assumed liabilities in June 2015. The components of the consideration transferred in conjunction with the ClinIntel acquisition and the respective fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date isare as follows (dollars in millions):

Total Consideration transferred:
Total consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	8.8
Fair value of contingent consideration	9.9
Net purchase price	$	18.7
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Accounts receivable	$	0.4
Definite-lived intangible assets	6.2
Goodwill	13.4
Total assets acquired	20.0
Current liabilities	0.1
Deferred tax liabilities	1.2
Total liabilities assumed	1.3
Fair value of net assets acquired:	$	18.7

The fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The goodwill of $13.4 million arising from the ClinIntel acquisition largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of our service offerings across products and markets complementary to our existing service offering and markets. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. ~~During~~ ~~Fiscal~~All ~~Year~~contingent ~~2016,~~consideration weobligations ~~paid~~for ~~$14.1~~this ~~million,~~acquisition ~~representing~~were ~~the USD equivalent at the date of the payment, related to the contingent consideration for ClinIntel~~paid.

The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective fair value and estimated useful lives (dollars in millions):

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

QUANTUM SOLUTIONS INDIA ACQUISITION

On April 13, 2015, we acquired all of the business assets of privately-owned Quantum Solutions India (“QSI”), a leading provider of specialized pharmacovigilance services, based in Chandigarh, India. Pharmacovigilance is the collection, detection, assessment, monitoring, and prevention of adverse effects associated with pharmaceutical products. The business has been integrated into our CRS segment.

We paid approximately $93.6 million for the assets of QSI. We funded the acquisition through use of existing cash held outside of the United States.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities from QSI were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The consideration transferred in conjunction with the QSI acquisition and the respective estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date is as follows (dollars in millions):64

Total Consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	93.6
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Accounts receivable	$	4.9
Other Current Assets	1.3
Property and equipment, net	2.0
Definite-lived intangible assets	62.4
Goodwill	24.1
Total assets acquired	94.7
Current liabilities	1.1
Total liabilities assumed	1.1
Fair value of net assets acquired:	$	93.6

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities from QSI were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. We finalized the fair value estimates of the acquired assets and the assumed liabilities in June 2016. The consideration transferred in conjunction with the QSI acquisition and the respective estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date are as follows (dollars in millions):



Total consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	93.6
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Accounts receivable	$	4.9
Other Current Assets	1.3
Property and equipment, net	2.0
Definite-lived intangible assets	62.4
Goodwill	24.1
Total assets acquired	94.7
Current liabilities	1.1
Total liabilities assumed	1.1
Fair value of net assets acquired:	$	93.6

The goodwill of $24.1 million arising from the QSI acquisition largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of our service offerings across products and markets complementary to our existing service offering and markets. All of the goodwill held in the respective jurisdiction is deductible for tax purposes.

The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective estimated useful lives, as determined based on ~~preliminary~~the valuations (dollars in millions):



	Amount		Estimated Useful Life (Years)
Customer relationships	$	56.3	10
Backlog	4.7		1
Trade name	1.4		5
Total	$	62.4

HEALTH ADVANCES ACQUISITION

On January 19, 2016, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity securities of Health Advances, LLC (“Health Advances”), an independent life sciences strategy consulting firm. Health Advances combines clinical, scientific and business expertise to provide strategic advice to executives leading life sciences companies and investors. The acquisition closed on February 10, 2016, and is part of the PAREXEL Consulting Services (“PC”) segment.

The net purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $67.1 million, plus the potential to pay up to an additional $15.8 million over a thirty-six month period following the acquisition date if Health Advances achieves specified financial targets. We funded the acquisition with borrowings under our credit facilities.

6265

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The components of the consideration transferred in conjunction with the Health Advances acquisition and the ~~preliminary~~ fair value allocation of that consideration is as follows (dollars in millions):

Total Consideration transferred:
Total consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	67.3
Receivable from working capital adjustment	(0.2		)
Fair value of contingent consideration	4.5
Net purchase price	$	71.6
Preliminary Allocation of consideration transferred:
Allocation of consideration transferred:
Accounts receivable	$	4.0
Other current assets	0.7
Property and equipment, net	1.0
Deferred tax assets	0.2
Definite-lived intangible assets	15.0
Goodwill	52.5
Total assets acquired	73.4
Current liabilities	1.8
Total liabilities assumed	1.8
Net assets acquired:	$	71.6

~~The~~During ~~amounts~~the ~~above~~Fiscal ~~represent~~Year ~~our preliminary fair value estimates as of June 30~~2017, ~~2016~~we ~~and~~received ~~may~~a beworking ~~subject~~capital ~~to subsequent~~ adjustment aspayment wefrom ~~obtain additional information during~~ the ~~measurement~~sellers ~~period and finalize our fair value estimates. We expect to complete our accounting for the Health Advances acquisition in the beginning~~ of ~~Fiscal Year 2017~~$0.2 million

The goodwill of $52.5 million arising from the Health Advances acquisition largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of our service offerings across products and markets complementary to our existing service offering and markets. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following are the ~~preliminary~~ identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective estimated useful lives, as determined based on ~~preliminary~~ valuations (dollars in millions):



	Amount		Estimated Useful Life (Years)
Customer relationships	$	11.6	10
Technology	1.8		3
Trade name	1.6		5
Total	$	15.0

ExecuPharm, Inc.

On October 3, 2016, we acquired all of the capital stock of privately owned ExecuPharm, Inc. ("ExecuPharm"), a leading global functional service provider, based in Pennsylvania. ExecuPharm provides clinical monitoring or study management, along with associated operational activities such as onboarding, training, line management, performance management and policy administration.

We paid approximately $148.9 million for the capital stock of ExecuPharm, plus the potential for us to pay an additional $20 million if specific financial targets for ExecuPharm are achieved, and $5.0 million for management retention bonuses. In addition, we made a 338(h)(10) tax election with respect to the ExecuPharm acquisition. Under the 338(h)(10) election, ExecuPharm was deemed to have sold and repurchased its assets at fair market value. In connection with this election, the Company provided the seller with a tax gross-up payment, which was paid during the fourth quarter of our Fiscal Year 2017, in the estimated amount of $9.2 million. We funded the acquisition through the use of existing cash held within the United States and $100.0 million from our credit agreement as defined in Note 8. We included ExecuPharm results of operations in our CRS business segment.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The components of the consideration transferred in conjunction with the ExecuPharm acquisition and the allocation of that consideration is as follows (in millions):



Total consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	148.5
Fair value of contingent consideration	9.4
Deferred payment	9.3
Net purchase price	$	167.2
Allocation of consideration transferred:
Accounts receivable	$	29.2
Other current assets	0.1
Property and equipment, net	0.9
Definite-lived intangible assets	87.1
Goodwill	58.6
Total assets acquired	175.9
Current liabilities	8.7
Total liabilities assumed	8.7
Net assets acquired:	$	167.2

The amounts above represent our fair value estimates as of June 30, 2017 and may be subject to subsequent adjustment as we obtain additional information during the measurement period and finalize our fair value estimates.

The goodwill of $58.6 million arising from the ExecuPharm acquisition largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of our service offerings across products and markets complementary to our existing service offering and markets. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective estimated useful lives, based on valuations (dollars in millions):

The Medical Affairs Company, LLC

On March 1, 2017, we acquired all of the membership interests of privately owned The Medical Affairs Company, LLC ("TMAC"), a leading provider of outsourced medical affairs services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries.

We paid approximately $37.7 million for the membership interests of TMAC, plus the potential for us to pay an additional $11.0 million if specific financial targets for TMAC are achieved. We funded the acquisition through the use of existing cash held within the United States. We included TMAC results of operations in our Clinical Research Services ("CRS") business segment.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The components of the consideration transferred in conjunction with the TMAC acquisition and the allocation of that consideration are as follows (in millions):



Total consideration transferred:
Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	36.3
Fair value of contingent consideration	2.1
Net purchase price	$	38.4
Allocation of consideration transferred:
Accounts receivable	$	4.7
Other current assets	0.1
Property and equipment, net	0.3
Definite-lived intangible assets	10.2
Goodwill	25.8
Total assets acquired	41.1
Current liabilities	2.7
Total liabilities assumed	2.7
Net assets acquired:	$	38.4

The goodwill of $25.8 million arising from the TMAC acquisition largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of our service offerings across products and markets complementary to our existing service offering and markets. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired and their respective estimated useful lives, based on valuations (dollars in millions):



	Amount		Estimated Useful Life (Years)
Customer relationships	$	7.5	10
Trade name	0.7		3
Backlog	2.0		1
Total	$	10.2

NOTE 4. DERIVATIVES

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Accordingly, we have instituted interest rate and foreign currency hedging programs that are accounted for in accordance with ~~FASB~~ ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”).


•	Our interest rate hedging program is a cash flow hedge program designed to minimize interest rate volatility. We swap the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount, at specified intervals. Our interest rate contracts are designated as hedging instruments.

•

Our foreign currency hedging program is a cash flow hedge program designed to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate volatility due to the foreign currency exchange exposure related to our intercompany transactions, direct costs, service revenues and significant external transactions. We primarily utilize forward currency exchange contracts and cross-currency swaps with maturities of no more than 12 months. These contracts are designated as hedging instruments.

We also enter into other economic hedges to mitigate foreign currency exchange risk and interest rate risk related to intercompany and significant external transactions. These contracts are not designated as hedges in accordance with ASC 815.

The following table presents the notional amounts and fair values of our derivatives as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016. All asset and liability amounts are reported in other current and non-current assets and other current and non-current liabilities.

6368

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

	June 30, 2016					June 30, 2015
	June 30, 2017					June 30, 2016
(dollars in millions)	NotionalAmount		Asset(Liability)			NotionalAmount		Asset(Liability)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Derivatives in an asset position:
Interest rate contracts	$	—300.0	$	—0.7		$	~~100.0~~—	$	~~0.8~~—
Foreign exchange contracts	81122.27		34.58			~~140~~81.62		23.95
Derivatives in a liability position:
Interest rate contracts	~~200.0~~		~~(1.3~~		)	25200.0		(0.1.3		)
Foreign exchange contracts	~~103~~26.34		(80.93		)	56103.13		(48.69		)
Cross-currency swap contracts	—		—			19.0		(2.7		)
Total designated derivatives	$	449.1	$	5.2		$	384.5	$	(6.7	)
Total designated derivatives	$	384.5	$	(6.7	)	$	340.7	$	(3.7	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Derivatives in an asset position:
Foreign exchange contracts	$	3693.20	$	12.52		$	4636.12	$	01.65
Derivatives in a liability position:
Foreign exchange contracts	4862.07		(1.40		)	8148.70		(1.84		)
Total non-designated derivatives	$	84155.27	$	0.1.2		$	~~127~~84.82	$	(10.21	)
Total derivatives	$	~~468~~604.78	$	(6.64	)	$	468.57	$	(46.96	)

Under certain circumstances, such as the occurrence of significant differences between actual cash payments and forecasted cash payments, the ASC 815 programs could be deemed ineffective. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 to other accumulated comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets, net of deferred taxes, and any ineffective portion to miscellaneous (expense) income, net in our consolidated statements of income. During Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the amounts recorded in miscellaneous (expense) income, net in our consolidated statements of income to reflect ineffective portions of any hedges were losses of $20.34 million and $2.53 million, respectively.

The amounts recognized for Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 in other comprehensive income (loss) are presented below:

	Fiscal Years
(dollars in millions)	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Interest rate contracts, net of taxes	$	(1.31	)	$	0.(1.3	)
Foreign exchange contracts, net of taxes	(47.5		)	(34.95		)
Cross-currency swap contracts, net of taxes	—			(0.1		)
Total designated derivative unrealized gain (loss), net	$	8.6		$	(5.8	)
Total designated derivative unrealized gain (loss), net	$	(5.8	)	$	(3.9	)

The unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments is net of $12.36 million and $21.63 million of taxes for Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. The estimated net amount of the existing ~~losses~~gains that are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months is $53.03 million.

The change in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 is recorded to miscellaneous (expense) income, net in our consolidated statements of income. The total gains and losses related to foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments were ~~losses~~gains of $12.73 million and losses of $~~18.~~1.7 million for Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. The unrealized (loss) gain recognized ~~are~~is presented below:

	Fiscal Years
(dollars in millions)	~~2016~~2017		~~2015~~2016
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
Foreign exchange contracts	$	1.31	$	~~(2.~~1.3	)
Total non-designated derivative unrealized gain (loss), net	$	1.31	$	~~(2.~~1.3	)

6469

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

NOTE 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016 consisted of the following:

(dollars in millions)	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016
Property and equipment:
Computer software	$	~~424~~473.93		$	~~377~~424.89
Computer hardware and office equipment	~~122~~134.38			~~110~~122.93
Leasehold improvements	~~113~~120.57			~~100~~113.45
Medical equipment	1518.20			1615.52
Furniture and fixtures	3032.78			30.27
Office equipment and other assets	1718.2			1617.32
Total	~~723~~797.8			~~652~~723.18
Less: accumulated depreciation	(~~464~~545.57		)	(~~410~~464.95		)
Total	$	~~259~~252.31		$	~~241~~259.23

We retired $42.06 million and $64.50 million of fully-depreciated assets for Fiscal Years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

The Company recognized an impairment charge related to an internally-developed software program of approximately $5.7 million for twelve months of Fiscal Year 2017.

NOTE 6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for Fiscal Years 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

(dollars in millions)	CRS			PC			PI			Consolidated
Goodwill - July 1, 2014	$	125.5		$	22.1		$	181.9		$	329.5
Goodwill arising from QSI acquisition	24.1			—			—			24.1
Goodwill arising from ClinIntel acquisition	—			—			13.4			13.4
Goodwill arising from ATLAS acquisition	1.4			—			—			1.4
Effect of changes in exchange rates used for translation	(7.2		)	(1.5		)	(4.8		)	(13.5		)
Goodwill - June 30, 2015	$	143.8		$	20.6		$	190.5		$	354.9
Effect of changes in business segments	3.9			(3.9		)	—			—
Goodwill arising from Health Advances acquisition	—			52.5			—			52.5
Effect of changes in exchange rates used for translation	(5.9		)	(2.1		)	(10.2		)	(18.2		)
Goodwill - June 30, 2016	$	141.8		$	67.1		$	180.3		$	389.2
Goodwill arising from ExecuPharm acquisition	58.6			—			—			58.6
Goodwill arising from TMAC acquisition	25.8			—			—			25.8
Effect of changes in exchange rates used for translation	1.6			2.9			(1.8		)	2.7
Goodwill - June 30, 2017	$	227.8		$	70.0		$	178.5		$	476.3

Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets

As of June 30, 2017, intangible assets consisted of the following:

(dollars in millions)	WeightedAverage UsefulLife (~~years~~Years)	Cost		AccumulatedAmortization/Effectof Exchange RateChanges			Net
Intangible Asset
Customer relationships	11.6	$	176.1	$	(74.5	)	$	101.6
Customer relationships and backlog	12.5	$	271.0	$	(97.2	)	$	173.8
Technology and other intangibles	8.0	39.5		(3134.49		)	84.16
Definite-life tradename	65.64	6.9.2		(2.4.1		)	4.5.1
Indefinite-life tradename *	indefinite	22.12		(5.69		)	16.53
Total intangible assets		$	~~244~~341.69	$	(~~113~~142.91	)	$	~~130~~199.78
* The tradename acquired in the ClinPhone acquisition has an indefinite useful life.

6570

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

As of June 30, 2016, intangible assets consisted of the following:

(dollars in millions)	WeightedAverage UsefulLife (~~years~~Years)	Cost		AccumulatedAmortization/Effectof Exchange RateChanges			Net
Intangible Asset
Customer relationships and backlog	11.56	$	~~167~~176.41	$	(5774.5	)	$	~~109~~101.96
Technology and other intangibles	8.0	39.5		(2831.84		)	108.71
Definite-life tradename	76.06	56.39		(12.4		)	34.95
Indefinite-life tradename *	indefinite	22.1		(4.5.6		)	1716.65
Total intangible assets		$	~~234~~244.36	$	(92113.29	)	$	~~142~~130.17
* The tradename acquired in the ClinPhone acquisition has an indefinite useful life.

The changes in the carrying amounts of other intangible assets for Fiscal Years 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

(dollars in millions)	Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017			Fiscal Year ~~2015~~2016
Beginning Balance	$	142.1		$	91.8
Beginning balance	$	130.7		$	142.1
Intangibles assets acquired from Health Advances acquisition	~~15.0~~—			—15.0
Intangibles assets acquired from QSI acquisition	—			62.4
Intangibles assets acquired from ExecuPharm acquisition	87.1			—
Intangibles assets acquired from ClinIntel acquisition	—			6.2
Intangibles assets acquired from TMAC acquisition	10.2			—
Amortization	(2227.37		)	(1522.63		)
Effect of changes in exchange rates used for translation	(40.15		)	(24.71		)
Ending Balance	$	130.7		$	142.1
Ending balance	$	199.8		$	130.7

Estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:

(dollars in millions)
2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
$21.3	$19.8	$17.9	$15.9	$13.6
$29.5	$26.7	$25.5	$21.9	$17.7

NOTE 7. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

InJanuary ~~June~~6, ~~2015~~2017, ~~the~~we ~~Board of Directors~~ approved a plan ~~(the “Margin Acceleration Program”)~~ to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the ~~Company~~company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. ~~The~~ ~~Margin~~In ~~Acceleration~~May ~~Program~~2017, isthe ~~companywide. The~~company ~~activities~~approved ~~under~~an expansion of the ~~Margin~~2017 ~~Acceleration~~Restructuring Program. ~~are~~For ~~substantially~~the ~~complete~~Fiscal asYear of2017 ~~June~~we ~~30,~~recorded ~~2016~~a $40.7 ~~For~~million ~~Fiscal~~restructuring ~~Years~~charge, ~~2016~~related ~~and~~to ~~2015~~the 2017 Restructuring Program, weof ~~recorded~~which employee separation benefits amounted to $2739.87 million, ~~and~~remaining $201.0 million, ~~respectively,~~relates ~~in restructuring charges related~~ to ~~the~~facilities ~~Margin~~separation ~~Acceleration Program~~cost.

In June 2015, the Board of Directors approved a plan (the “Margin Acceleration Program”) to restructure our operations to improve the productivity and efficiency of the Company, simplify the organization, and streamline decision-making, thereby enhancing client engagement. The Margin Acceleration Program was companywide. The activities under the Margin Acceleration Program were substantially complete as of June 30, 2016. For Fiscal Year 2017 and 2016, we recorded $0.5 million and $27.8 million, respectively, in restructuring charges related to the Margin Acceleration Program.

Various restructuring plans adopted by us since Fiscal Year 2005 are included in the Pre-2012 Plans.

~~Changes in the restructuring accrual during Fiscal Year 2016 are summarized below:~~71

	Balance at		Charges/(Benefits)		Payments/ForeignCurrency Exchange			Balance at
(dollars in millions)	June 30, 2015							June 30, 2016
2015 Margin Acceleration Program
Employee severance	$	20.0	$	18.5	$	(28.0	)	$	10.5
Facilities-related and other costs	—		9.3		(2.2		)	7.1
Pre-2012 Restructuring Plans
Facilities-related and other costs	0.3		—		(0.2		)	0.1
Total	$	20.3	$	27.8	$	(30.4	)	$	17.7

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Net~~Changes ~~restructuring~~in ~~charges~~the byrestructuring ~~segment~~accrual ~~for~~during Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017 ~~and Fiscal Year 2015~~ are assummarized ~~follows~~below:

	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
	Balance at		Charges/(Benefits)			Payments/ForeignCurrency Exchange			Balance at
(dollars in millions)	June 30, 2016		~~2015~~						June 30, 2017
CRS	$	9.1	$	13.7
2017 Restructuring Plan
PC	2.3		3.8
Employee severance	$	—	$	39.7		$	(10.7	)	$	29.0
PI	10.6		1.1
Facilities-related and other costs	—		1.0			—			1.0
Segment Total	22.0		18.6
2015 Margin Acceleration Program
Corporate restructuring charges	5.8		1.2
Employee severance	10.5		(1.0		)	(9.1		)	0.4
Total restructuring charges	$	27.8	$	19.8
Facilities-related and other costs	7.1		1.5			(5.0		)	3.6
Pre-2012 Restructuring Plans
Facilities-related and other costs	0.1		—			(0.1		)	—
Total	$	17.7	$	41.2		$	(24.9	)	$	34.0

Net restructuring charges by segment for Fiscal Year 2017 and Fiscal Year 2016 are as follows:



	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
(dollars in millions)	2017			2016
CRS	$	26.4		$	9.1
PC	(0.1		)	2.3
PI	6.3			10.6
Segment Total	32.6			22.0
Corporate restructuring charges	8.6			5.8
Total restructuring charges	$	41.2		$	27.8

NOTE 8. CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

2016 Credit Agreement

On March 11, 2016, PAREXEL, certain subsidiaries of PAREXEL, Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and L/C Issuer,; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPFS”),; HSBC Bank USA, National Association (“HSBC”),; U.S. Bank, National Association (“US Bank”),; TD Securities (USA) LLC (“TD Securities”); and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“Wells Fargo Securities”) as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, HSBC, US Bank, TD Bank, N.A. (“TD Bank”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”) as Joint Syndication Agents, and the other lenders party thereto entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2016 Credit Agreement”) providing for a five-year term loan and revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $750.0 million (collectively, the “Loan Amount”), plus additional amounts of up to $300.0 million of loans to be made available upon request of the Company subject to specified terms and conditions.

The 2016 Credit Agreement amends and restates the amended and restated credit agreement dated as of October 15, 2014, (the “2014 Credit Agreement”), by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company, Bank of America, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and L/C Issuer,; MLPFS, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,; HSBC,; and US Bank, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers,; JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.,; HSBC and US Bank,; as Joint Syndication Agents, and the other lenders party thereto.

As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we had no$180.0 million of principal borrowed under the revolving credit facility and $~~397~~385.50 million of principal borrowed under the term loan. The outstanding amount is presented net of debt issuance costs of approximately $2.84 million in ~~our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, we had borrowing availability of $350.0 million under the revolving credit facility.~~

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, we had borrowing availability of $170.0 million under the revolving credit facility.

• 0.63% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made commencing June 30, 2016 and made on or prior to ~~March~~June 3130, 2017;


•	1.25% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2017, but on or prior to March 31, 2019;


•	1.88% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2019, but on or prior to March 31, 2020;


•	2.50% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made on or after June 30, 2020, but prior to March 11, 2021; and


•	72.50% (or if less, the remaining principal amount of the term loan) on March 11, 2021.

To the extent not previously paid, all borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement must be repaid on March 11, 2021.

Interest due under the revolving credit facility (other than a swingline loan) and the term loan facility must be paid quarterly for borrowings with an interest rate determined with reference to the Alternate Base Rate. Interest must be paid on the last day of the interest period selected by the Company for borrowings determined with reference to LIBOR;, provided that for interest periods of longer than three months, interest is required to be paid every three months. Interest under US dollar swingline loans at the alternate base rate is payable quarterly.

The 2016 Credit Agreement contains negative covenants applicable to PAREXEL and its subsidiaries, including financial covenants requiring PAREXEL to comply with maximum net leverage ratios and minimum interest coverage ratios, as well as restrictions on liens, investments, indebtedness, fundamental changes, acquisitions, dispositions of property, making specified restricted payments (including cash dividends and stock repurchases that would result in the Company exceeding an agreed to Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio), transactions with affiliates, and other restrictive covenants. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2016 Credit Agreement.

Under the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries may pay any dividend or make any other distribution with respect to any shares of capital stock except that (a) we and our subsidiaries may declare and pay dividends with respect to equity interests payable solely in additional shares of common stock, (b) our subsidiaries may declare and pay dividends and other distributions ratably with respect to their equity interests, (c) we may make payments pursuant to and in accordance with stock option plans or other benefit plans for management or employees of the Company and our subsidiaries, and (d) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries may make payments in connection with permitted repurchases of their respective capital stock.

~~In May 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement and hedged an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate of 0.~~73%. The interest rate swap agreement now hedges $100.0 million of principal under our 2016 Credit Agreement. These interest rate hedges were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815 and, as such, unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets.

2016 Term Loan Agreement

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~Date”)~~on ~~unless~~the ~~earlier~~Consolidated ~~payment~~Net isLeverage ~~required~~Ratio). ~~under~~To the ~~terms~~extent ofthere ~~the~~are ~~Company~~letters ~~loan~~of ~~agreement~~credit ~~with~~outstanding TDunder ~~Bank.~~the ~~The~~2016 ~~Loan~~Credit ~~bore interest~~Agreement, at PAREXEL’s ~~determination,~~will atpay aletter ~~base~~of ~~rate~~credit fees plus a ~~margin~~fronting ~~(such~~fee ~~margin~~and ~~not~~additional ~~to exceed a per annum rate of 0~~charges.~~750%)~~ ~~based~~PAREXEL onagreed ~~a ratio of consolidated funded debt~~ to ~~consolidated~~pay ~~earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization~~ (~~EBITDA~~i) ~~for~~Bank ~~the~~of ~~prior~~America ~~four~~for ~~fiscal~~its ~~quarters~~own ~~(the “Leverage Ratio”)~~account, oran atarrangement afee, ~~LIBOR rate plus a margin~~ (~~such margin not~~ ii) to ~~exceed~~each ~~a per annum rate~~ of ~~1.750%)~~the ~~based~~lenders on the ~~Leverage~~closing ~~Ratio. The Loan could have been prepaid at any time in whole or in part without premium or penalty~~date, ~~other~~an ~~than~~upfront ~~customary breakage costs~~fee, ifand ~~any,~~(iii) to ~~subject~~Bank toof ~~the~~America ~~terms~~for ~~and~~its ~~conditions~~own ofaccount, ~~the~~an ~~loan~~annual ~~agreement~~agency fee.

In May 2013, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement and hedged an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2013 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate of 0.73%. The interest rate swap agreement now hedges $100.0 million of principal under our 2016 Credit Agreement.

On April 26, 2017, we entered into a four year interest rate swap agreement effective April 28, 2017, which now hedges an additional principal amount of $100.0 million under the 2016 Credit Agreement with a fixed interest rate 1.7680%.

The 2013 and 2015 interest rate hedges were deemed to be fully effective in accordance with ASC 815 and, as such, unrealized gains and losses related to these derivatives are recorded as other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2017, we recognized less than $0.1 million of interest expense related to the ineffectiveness of the 2017 interest rate swap.

2016 Term Loan Agreement

On February 10, 2016, PAREXEL entered into a short term unsecured term loan agreement with TD Bank, providing for a loan to the Company in the amount of $75.0 million (the “Loan”). The Loan matured on April 30, 2016. The Loan bore interest, at PAREXEL’s determination, at a base rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 0.750%) based on a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for the prior four fiscal quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”), or at a LIBOR rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio.

The proceeds of the Loan were advanced to the Company on February 12, 2016 and were used to repay borrowings under the Company’s 2014 Facility.

~~The~~As ~~obligations~~ of ~~PAREXEL~~June 30, ~~under~~2017, ~~the~~all ~~Loan~~outstanding ~~could~~amounts ~~have been accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default~~ under the Loan, ~~which~~were ~~included~~fully ~~customary~~repaid ~~events~~with ~~of default, including payment defaults,~~ the ~~inaccuracy~~proceeds offrom ~~representations or warranties and cross defaults to~~ the ~~2014~~2016 ~~Facility~~Credit Agreement.

As of June 30, 2016, all outstanding amounts under the Loan were fully repaid with the proceeds from the 2016 Credit Agreement.

Master Financing Agreement


•	$1.4 million made on or prior to July 1, 2015;


•	$2.8 million made on or prior to July 1, 2016; and


•	$2.8 million made on or prior to July 1, 2017.

At June 30, 2017, we had $2.8 million principal borrowed under the Master Financing Agreement.

Note Purchase Agreement

The Note Purchase Agreement includes operational and financial covenants, with which we are required to comply, including, among others, maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens and dispositions. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance will all covenants under the Note Purchase Agreement.

As of June 30, 2016, we had $100 million of principal borrowed under the Note Purchase Agreement. The outstanding amounts are presented net of debt issuance cost of approximately $0.2 million in our consolidated balance sheets. 74

Receivable Purchase Agreement

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

~~and~~As ~~Servicing.”~~of IfJune 30, 2017, we ~~have~~had ~~not~~$100 ~~satisfied~~million ~~the~~of ~~applicable~~principal ~~revenue~~borrowed ~~recognition~~under ~~criteria for~~ the ~~underlying~~Note ~~sales~~Purchase ~~transaction, the transfer of the receivable is accounted for as a financing activity in accordance with FASB ASC 470, “Debt~~Agreement.” The ~~accounts~~outstanding ~~receivable~~amounts ~~and short-term debt balances~~ are ~~derecognized~~presented ~~from~~net ~~our consolidated balance sheets at the earlier~~ of ~~the~~debt ~~factored~~issuance ~~receivable’s~~cost ~~due date or when all~~ of ~~the revenue recognition criteria are met for those billed services. For Fiscal Years 2016 and 2015, we transferred~~ approximately $730.63 million ~~and~~in ~~$122.6~~our ~~million~~consolidated ofbalance ~~trade receivables, respectively~~sheets. As ofOur ~~June 30,~~debt ~~2016~~under ~~and~~the ~~June 30,~~Note ~~2015,~~Purchase noAgreement ~~transfers~~carried ~~were~~an ~~accounted~~average ~~for~~annualized asinterest arate ~~financing~~of ~~activity~~3. 05%.

Receivable Purchase Agreement

On February 22, 2017, we entered into a receivables purchase agreement (the “Bank of America Receivable Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank”). Under the Bank of America Receivable Agreement, we sell to the Bank or other investors on an ongoing basis certain of our trade receivables, together with ancillary rights and the proceeds thereof, which arise under contracts with a client, or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The Bank of America Receivable Agreement includes customary representations and covenants on behalf of us, and may be terminated by either us or the Bank upon thirty business days' advance notice. The Bank of America Receivable Agreement provides a mechanism for accelerating the receipt of cash due on outstanding receivables. We account for the transfer of our receivables with respect to which we have satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria in accordance with ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” If we have not satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria for the underlying sales transaction, the transfer of the receivable is accounted for as a financing activity in accordance with ASC 470, “Debt.” The accounts receivable and short-term debt balances are derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets at the earlier of the factored receivable’s due date or when all of the revenue recognition criteria are met for those billed services. For Fiscal Year 2017, we transferred approximately $27.6 million of trade receivables. As of June 30, 2017, $6.4 million of the transfers were accounted for as a financing activity.

On February 19, 2013, we entered into a receivables purchase agreement (the “Receivable Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”). Under the Receivable Agreement, we sell to JPMorgan or other investors on an ongoing basis certain of our trade receivables, together with ancillary rights and the proceeds thereof, which arise under contracts with a client of ours, or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The Receivable Agreement includes customary representations and covenants on behalf of us, and may be terminated by either us or JPMorgan upon five business days advance notice. The Receivable Agreement provides a mechanism for accelerating the receipt of cash due on outstanding receivables. We account for the transfer of our receivables with respect to which we have satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria in accordance with FASB ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” If we have not satisfied the applicable revenue recognition criteria for the underlying sales transaction, the transfer of the receivable is accounted for as a financing activity in accordance with FASB ASC 470, “Debt.” The accounts receivable and short-term debt balances are derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets at the earlier of the factored receivable’s due date or when all of the revenue recognition criteria are met for those billed services. For Fiscal Year 2017 and 2016, we transferred approximately $0.7 million and $73.6 million of trade receivables, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016 no transfers were accounted for as a financing activity.

2014 Credit Agreement

The 2014 Credit Agreement was superseded by the 2016 Credit Agreement and as of June 30, 2016 all outstanding amounts under the 2014 Credit Agreement were fully repaid.

• 1.25% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made commencing December 2015 and made on or prior to September 30, 2017;

• 2.50% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made after September 30, 2017, but on or prior to September 30, 2018;

• 5.00% by quarterly term loan amortization payments to be made after September 30, 2018, but prior to October 15, 2019; and

• 60.00% on October 15, 2019.

Our obligations under the 2014 Credit Agreement could have been accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default under the 2014 Credit Agreement, which included customary events of default, including payment defaults, defaults in the performance of affirmative and negative covenants, the inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency related defaults, cross defaults to material indebtedness, defaults relating to such matters as ERISA and judgments, and a change of control default.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

dividends with respect to equity interests payable solely in additional shares of common stock, (b) our subsidiaries could have declared and paid dividends and other distributions ratably with respect to their equity interests, (c) we could have made payments pursuant to and in accordance with stock option plans or other benefit plans for management or employees of the Company and our subsidiaries, and (d) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries could have made payments in connection with permitted repurchases of their respective capital stock.

2013 Credit Agreement

The 2013 Credit Agreement provided for a five-year term loan of $200.0 million and a revolving credit facility in the amount of up to $300.0 million, plus additional amounts of up to $200.0 million of loans to be made available upon our request subject to specified terms and conditions. A portion of the revolving credit facility was available for swingline loans of up to a sublimit of $75.0 million and for the issuance of standby letters of credit of up to a sublimit of $10.0 million. The 2013 Credit Agreement was amended and restated on October 15, 2014 as discussed above.

Our obligations under the 2013 Credit Agreement were guaranteed by certain of our material domestic subsidiaries, and the obligations, if any, of any foreign designated borrower were guaranteed by us and certain of our material domestic subsidiaries.

Borrowings (other than swingline loans) under the 2013 Credit Agreement bore interest, at our determination, at a rate based on either (i) LIBOR plus a margin (not to have exceeded a per annum rate of 1.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio or (ii) the Alternate Base Rate, plus a margin (not to have exceeded a per annum rate of 0.750%) based on the Leverage Ratio. Swingline loans in U.S. dollars bore interest calculated at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin (not to have exceeded a per annum rate of 0.750%).

On October 15, 2014, all outstanding amounts under the 2013 Credit Agreement were fully repaid with the proceeds from the 2014 Credit Agreement.

In September 2011, we also entered into an interest rate cap agreement. The interest rate cap agreement hedged $25.0 million of principal under our 2013 Credit Agreement with an interest rate cap of 2.00% plus an applicable margin. In March 2014, the interest rate cap agreement matured and the related accumulated other comprehensive income was reclassified to net income during Fiscal Year 2014.

Additional Lines of Credit

WeOn ~~have~~December 23, 2016, we entered into an unsecured line of credit with JPHSBC ~~Morgan~~Bank, UKUSA in the amount of $~~4.5~~100 million. ~~that~~The line bears interest, at anour ~~annual~~determination, at a base rate ~~ranging~~plus ~~between 2~~a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 1.00%) based on a ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and 4 amortization (EBITDA) for the prior four fiscal quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”), or at a LIBOR rate plus a margin (such margin not to exceed a per annum rate of 2.00%) based on the Leverage Ratio. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions during the remaining Fiscal Year 2017. AtThis line matured on June 30 23, ~~2016~~2017, weand ~~had $4.5~~no ~~million~~borrowings ~~available~~were ~~under~~outstanding ~~this~~as ~~line~~ of June 30, ~~credit~~2017.

We have an unsecured uncommitted overdraft facility with ING Bank NV in the amount of 7.5 million Euros that bears interest at an annual rate ranging between 2.00% and 4.00%. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions. At June 30, 2016, we had 7.5 million Euros available under this line of credit.75

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

We have an unsecured uncommitted overdraft facility with ING Bank NV in the amount of 7.5 million Euros that bears interest at an annual rate ranging between 2.00% and 4.00%. We entered into this line of credit to facilitate business transactions. At June 30, 2017, we had 7.5 million Euros available under this line of credit.

NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share Repurchase Plan

Fiscal Year 2017 Share Repurchase

On October 26, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an accelerated share repurchase program (the “2017 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On November 21, 2016, we entered into an agreement (the “2017 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from HSBC, National Association (“HSBC”), for an aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2017 Agreement, in November 2016, we paid $200.0 million to HSBC and received from HSBC 2.8 million shares of our common stock, representing 80% of the estimated shares to be repurchased by us under the 2017 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $57.51 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on November 21, 2016. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. We recorded the $160.0 million payment, which represents the 80% of the shares we repurchased, as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings. The remaining $40.0 million, which was an advanced payment accounted for as a forward accelerated share repurchase contract, was recorded within other current assets within the condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the Fiscal Year 2017, the fair value of the forward accelerated share repurchase contract decreased by $20.7 million.

Fiscal Year 2016 Share Repurchase

On June 2, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the "2014 Program") authorizing the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. On June 13, 2014, we entered into an agreement (the “2014 Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from Goldman Sachs & Co. (“GS”), for an aggregate purchase price of $150.0 million pursuant to an accelerated share purchase program. Pursuant to the 2014 Agreement, in June 2014, we paid $150.0 million to GS and received from GS 2.3 million shares of common stock, representing 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the 2014 Agreement. The shares were repurchased at a price of $52.52 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 13, 2014. These shares were canceled and restored to the status of authorized and unissued shares. As of June 30, 2014, we recorded the $150.0 million payment to GS as a decrease to equity in our consolidated balance sheet, consisting of decreases in common stock and additional paid-in capital. As additional paid-in capital was reduced to zero, the remainder was applied as a reduction in retained earnings. 76

Fiscal Year 2013 Share Repurchase

In August 2012, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “2013 Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock to be financed with cash on hand, cash generated from operations, existing credit facilities, or new financing. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we repurchased $197.6 million of our common stock. We repurchased the remaining $2.4 million of our common stock in July 2013. The 2013 Program repurchases were effected pursuant to two separate $50.0 million accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreements and two separate $50.0 million open market agreements (the “Open Market Agreements”) entered into in September 2012 and March 2013. Pursuant to the 2013 Program, we repurchased 5.5 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $36.64 per share from September 2012 to July 2013. The buyback activity also resulted in a reduction of our stockholders’ equity of $200.0 million for the value of shares that we repurchased and retired.

In September 2012, we entered into an ASR agreement (the “September Agreement”) to purchase shares of our common stock from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as agent for JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch (“JPMorgan”), for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million. In March 2013, we finalized the settlement of the September Agreement and received an additional 0.2 million shares representing the final shares delivered by JPMorgan. These shares were in addition to the initial 1.3 million shares of our common stock delivered to us in September 2012. The total number of shares repurchased under the September Agreement was 1.6 million at an average price per share of $31.98.

In March 2013, we entered into a second $50.0 million ASR agreement (the “March Agreement”) with JPMorgan. Pursuant to the March Agreement, JPMorgan delivered 1.0 million shares of our common stock, representing an estimated 80% of the shares to be repurchased by us under the Agreement based on a price of $38.28 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on March 15, 2013. In July 2013, subsequent to our fiscal year end, we finalized the settlement of the March Agreement and

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

received an additional 0.1 million shares representing the final shares delivered by JPMorgan. The total number of shares repurchased under the March Agreement was 1.1 million at an average price per share of $43.62.

During Fiscal Year 2013, we also entered into two separate $50.0 million Open Market Agreements to buy back an additional $100.0 million of our common stock under the Program. For Fiscal Year 2013, we purchased 2.7 million shares pursuant to the Open Market Agreements at an average price of $36.17 per share for a total of $97.6 million in common stock repurchases. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $2.4 million remained available under the 2013 Program for the purchase of additional shares. In July 2013, we purchased an additional 0.1 million shares in the open market and completed our available purchases under the 2013 Program. Upon the completion of the purchases under our Open Market Agreements in July 2013, the total number of shares repurchased under the Open Market Agreements was 2.7 million at an average price per share of $36.38.

In July 2013, with the completion of our Open Market Agreements and the final settlement of the ASR agreements, the 2013 Program was completed.

NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table outlines the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations:

	Years ended June 30,
(dollars in millions, except per share data)	~~2016~~2017		~~2015~~2016		~~2014~~2015
Net income attributable to common shares	$	~~154~~107.93	$	~~147~~154.89	$	~~129~~147.18
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, used in computing basic earnings per share	5351.5		5453.95		5654.59
Dilutive common stock equivalents	0.7		0.97		1.0.9
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share	5452.2		5554.82		5755.58
Basic earnings per share	$	2.9008	$	2.6990	$	2.2869
Diluted earnings per share	$	2.8606	$	2.6586	$	2.2565
Anti-dilutive options and restricted stock (excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share)	0.7		0.87		0.58

NOTE 11. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following table reflects the activity for the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the Fiscal Years ended ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015:

(dollars in millions)	Foreign Currency			Unrealized Gain/Loss on Derivatives			Total
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	(29.1	)	$	(0.9	)	$	(30.0	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	27.0			6.4			33.4
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			(1.3		)	(1.3		)
Net current-period other comprehensive income	$	27.0		$	5.1		$	32.1
Balance at June 30, 2014	$	(2.1	)	$	4.2		$	2.1
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(94.1		)	(14.3		)	(108.4		)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	(94.1		)	(14.3		)	(108.4		)
Gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			10.4			10.4
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			10.4			10.4
Net current-period other comprehensive loss	$	(94.1	)	$	(3.9	)	$	(98.0	)
Net current-period other comprehensive income	$	(94.1	)	$	(3.9	)	$	(98.0	)
Balance at June 30, 2015	$	(96.2	)	$	0.3		$	(95.9	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(34.3		)	(10.6		)	(44.9		)
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			4.8			4.8
Gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			4.8			4.8
Net current-period other comprehensive loss	$	(34.3	)	$	(5.8	)	$	(40.1	)
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	(130.5	)	$	(5.5	)	$	(136.0	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	7.2			15.2			22.4
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—			(6.6		)	(6.6		)
Net current-period other comprehensive loss	$	7.2		$	8.6		$	15.8
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	(123.3	)	$	3.1		$	(120.2	)

The ~~significant~~ change in our translation adjustment was due primarily to the movements in the ~~Great~~Euro ~~British Pound~~ (~~GBP~~EUR), ~~Japanese~~Indian ~~Yen~~Rupee (~~JPY~~INR), ~~Indian~~Taiwan ~~Rupee~~Dollar (~~INR~~TWD), ~~and~~ South African Rand (ZAR) Great British Pound (GBP) and Japanese Yen (JPY) exchange rates against the United States Dollar (USD). For Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, the USD ~~strengthened~~weakened by ~~16.~~2.9%, 64.38%, 6.3%and 2315.8% as compared to the ~~GBP~~EUR, INR ~~and ZAR between June 30~~, ~~2015~~TWD and ~~June 30~~ZAR, ~~2016,~~ respectively; and the USD ~~depreciated~~ appreciated by 178.7% and 3.2% against JPY and GBP during the same period. The movement in the ~~GBP~~EUR, INR, TWD and ZAR represents $165.70 million, $4.25 million, $2.3 million and $21.27 million, respectively, out of the $347.32 million foreign currency translation adjustment during Fiscal Year 2017. The overall change in our translation adjustment was partially offset by the movement in JPY and GBP, representing $2.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Also decreased by tax related CTA adjustment amounting to $3.5 million. This represents the Fiscal Year 2017 foreign exchange related movement in the non-US deferred tax, tax receivable/payable and tax exposure balances.

7377

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

translation adjustment during Fiscal Year 2016. The overall change in our translation adjustment was partially offset by the movement in JPY, representing $4.7 million.

The details regarding pre-tax gain (loss) on derivative instruments reclassified to net income from accumulated other comprehensive income are presented below:

	Fiscal Year									Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Income
(dollars in millions)	~~2016~~2017			~~2015~~2016			~~2014~~2015
Interest rate contracts	$	(0.54	)	$	(10.5	)	$	(1.75	)	Interest expense, net
Foreign exchange contracts	(42.96		)	(124.39		)	3(12.43		)	Direct Costs
Foreign exchange contracts	(25.34		)	(2.73		)	0(2.37		)	Service revenue
Cross-currency swap contracts	—			~~0.2~~—			0.12			Miscellaneous (expense) income, net
Total	$	(78.74	)	$	(167.37	)	$	2(16.13	)

The amounts of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net income are net of taxes of $21.98 million, $52.9 million, and $05.89 million and for Fiscal Year ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

NOTE 12. STOCK AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Stock-Based Compensation

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated Filer

¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Company

Filing Compare · PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL CORP