10-Q 1 cs33.txt CORNERSTONE FUND 3 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to __________________ Commission File No. 0-13299 MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) New York 13-3190919 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) Demeter Management Corporation 330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10017 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant?s telephone number, including area code (212) 905-2700 (Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ?accelerated filer and large accelerated filer? in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer___Accelerated filer____Non-accelerated filer X Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes___ No X MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q March 31, 2007

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2007 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2003~~2006..........................2 Statements of Operations for the Quarters Ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2007 and ~~2003~~2006 (Unaudited) .........................3 Statements of ~~Operations for Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (Unaudited)...................4 Statements of~~ Changes in Partners'? Capital for the ~~Six~~Quarters ~~Months~~ Ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2007 and ~~2003~~2006 (Unaudited)........5.4 Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Quarters ~~Months~~ Ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2007 and ~~2003~~2006 (Unaudited)........................5 6 Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)...............76-1112 Item 2. Management'?s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.......1213-23 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.........................................2423-3637 Item 4. Controls and Procedures................................37 Item 4T. Controls and Procedures................................37 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 51A.Risk ~~Other Information~~Factors...........................................38~~-39~~ Item 6. Exhibits ~~and Reports on Form 8-K~~....................~~40-42~~...........................38

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

~~June~~March 3031, December 31, ~~2004~~2007 ~~2003~~2006 $ $ (Unaudited) ASSETS Equity in futures interests trading accounts: ~~Cash~~Unrestricted 28cash 16,~~110~~896,~~949~~185 2518,~~869~~056,~~355~~766 Restricted cash 953,071 2,408,811 Total cash 17,849,256 20,465,577 Net unrealized gain ~~(loss)~~ on open contracts (~~MSIL~~MS&Co.) ~~(398~~423,~~954)~~297 ~~889~~489,~~391~~311 Net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts (~~MS&Co.~~MSIL) (~~412~~79,~~555~~452) 142,~~572,599~~675 Total net unrealized gain ~~(loss)~~ on open contracts ~~(811~~343,~~509)~~845 2531,~~461,990~~986 Total Trading Equity 2718,~~299~~193,~~440~~101 2820,~~331~~997,~~345~~563 Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) 2360,~~700~~951 1667,~~293~~511 Due from Morgan Stanley DW 21,935 34,489 Total Assets 2718,~~323~~275,~~140~~987 2821,~~347~~099,~~638~~563 LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS'? CAPITAL Liabilities ~~Accrued~~Redemptions ~~administrative~~payable ~~expenses 150~~223,~~533~~212 ~~149~~352,~~518~~302 ~~Redemptions~~Accrued ~~payable~~administrative ~~133~~expenses 110,~~856~~539 ~~119~~108,~~105~~753 Accrued management fees 7952,~~253~~982 8261,~~245~~223 Total Liabilities ~~363~~386,~~642~~733 ~~350~~522,~~868~~278 Partners'? Capital Limited Partners (64,~~818~~766.~~356~~036 and 74,~~059~~928.~~053~~664 Units, respectively) 2617,~~560~~512,~~158~~564 2720,~~596~~157,~~004~~999 General Partner (102.516 Units) ~~399~~376,~~340~~690 ~~400~~419,~~766~~286 Total Partners'? Capital 2617,~~959~~889,~~498~~254 2720,~~996~~577,~~770~~285 Total Liabilities and Partners'? Capital 2718,~~323~~275,~~140~~987 2821,~~347~~099,~~638~~563 NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT 3,~~895~~674.3945 34,~~909~~089.3195 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

For the Quarters Ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2007 ~~2003~~2006 $ $ ~~REVENUES~~INVESTMENT ~~Trading~~INCOME ~~profit~~Interest income (~~loss):~~Morgan ~~Realized~~Stanley ~~(1,214,205~~DW) ~~496~~204,~~347~~140 ~~Net~~201,857 ~~change~~EXPENSES inBrokerage ~~unrealized~~commissions (~~2,935,039~~Morgan Stanley DW) ~~333~~228,~~981~~715 ~~Total~~265,965 ~~Trading~~Management ~~Results~~fees (4173,~~149~~217 202,~~244)~~817 ~~830~~Common administrative expenses 24,~~328~~000 ~~Interest~~20,000 ~~income~~Transaction ~~(Morgan~~fees ~~Stanley~~and ~~DW)~~costs 6213,~~972~~060 6222,~~111~~506 Total (4Expenses 438,~~086,272)~~992 ~~892~~511,~~439~~288 ~~EXPENSES~~NET ~~Management~~INVESTMENT ~~fees~~LOSS ~~246~~(234,~~950~~852) ~~255~~(309,~~612~~431) ~~Brokerage~~TRADING ~~commissions~~RESULTS ~~(Morgan~~Trading ~~Stanley~~profit DW(loss): ~~214,822~~Realized ~~284~~(1,~~619 Common administrative expenses 22~~627,~~000~~641) 241,~~407~~109,160 ~~Transaction~~Net ~~fees~~change ~~and~~in ~~costs~~unrealized 9(188,~~844~~141) (19,~~439~~904) Total ~~493~~Trading Results (1,~~616~~815,782) ~~584~~1,~~077~~089,256 NET INCOME (LOSS) (42,~~579~~050,~~888~~634) ~~308~~779,~~362~~825 NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATION Limited Partners (42,~~512~~008,~~652~~038) ~~304~~765,~~224~~804 General Partner (6742,~~236~~596) 414,~~138~~021 NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT Limited Partners (~~655~~415.8650) 40136.3677 General Partner (~~655~~415.8650) 40136.3677 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS? CAPITAL For the Quarters Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)

~~For~~Units ~~the~~of ~~Six~~Partnership ~~Months~~Limited ~~Ended~~General ~~June~~Interest ~~30,~~Partners ~~2004~~Partner ~~2003~~Total $ $ ~~REVENUES~~$ ~~Trading~~Partners? ~~profit~~Capital, ~~(loss):~~December ~~Realized 4~~31,~~254,107~~ 2005 5,~~210,035~~796.009 ~~Net change in unrealized (3~~22,~~273~~552,~~499)~~335 (2406,~~207~~073 22,~~148)~~958,408 ~~Total~~Net ~~Trading~~Income ~~Results~~? ~~980~~765,~~608~~804 314,~~002~~021 779,~~887~~825 ~~Interest~~Redemptions ~~income~~(186.582) (~~Morgan~~751,708) ~~Stanley~~? DW(751,708) ~~119~~Partners? Capital,~~766~~ ~~132~~March 31,~~625~~ ~~Total~~2006 15,~~100,374~~609.427 322,~~135~~566,~~512~~431 ~~EXPENSES Brokerage commissions (Morgan Stanley DW) 522~~420,~~703~~094 ~~663~~22,~~184 Management fees 519~~986,~~031~~ 525~~,886~~ ~~Common~~Partners? ~~administrative~~Capital, ~~expenses~~December 4131,~~000~~ ~~49,445~~2006 ~~Transaction fees and costs 23~~5,~~162~~031.180 4020,~~613~~157,999 ~~Total 1~~419,~~105,896~~286 120,~~279~~577,~~128~~285 ~~NET~~Net ~~INCOME~~Loss ? (~~LOSS~~2,008,038) (542,~~522~~596) 1(2,~~856~~050,~~384~~634) ~~NET~~Redemptions ~~INCOME~~ (~~LOSS~~162.628) ~~ALLOCATION Limited Partners~~ (4637,~~096~~397) ~~1,824,261~~? ~~General Partner~~ (1637,~~426~~397) 32Partners? Capital,~~123~~ ~~NET~~March ~~INCOME~~31, ~~(LOSS)~~2007 ~~PER UNIT Limited Partners (13~~4,868.~~92)~~552 ~~237.31~~17,512,564 ~~General~~376,690 ~~Partner~~17,889,254 ~~(13.92) 237.31~~ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

~~Units~~For ofthe ~~Partnership~~Quarters ~~Limited~~Ended ~~General~~March ~~Interest~~31, ~~Partners~~2007 ~~Partner~~2006 ~~Total~~ $ $ $CASH ~~Partners'~~FLOWS ~~Capital,~~FROM ~~December~~OPERATING ~~31,~~ACTIVITIES ~~2002~~Net ~~7,750.175~~income 27(loss) (2,~~329~~050,~~760~~634) ~~510~~779,~~464~~825 27Noncash item included in net income (loss): Net change in unrealized 188,~~840~~141 19,~~224~~904 ~~Net~~(Increase) ~~Income~~decrease -in operating assets: Restricted cash 1,~~824~~455,~~261~~740 ~~32,123~~ (1,~~856~~900,~~384~~352) ~~Redemptions~~Interest receivable (~~315.596~~Morgan Stanley DW) 6,560 (17,~~075,759~~392) Due from Morgan Stanley DW 12,554 (~~150~~37,~~000~~659) Increase (~~1,225,759~~decrease) ~~Partners'~~in ~~Capital,~~operating ~~June~~liabilities: ~~30,~~Accrued ~~2003~~administrative ~~7,434.579~~expenses 281,~~078,262~~786 ~~392~~6,~~587~~018 ~~28,470,849~~Accrued ~~Partners'~~management ~~Capital~~fees (8,241) ~~December~~117 ~~31,~~Net ~~2003~~cash ~~7,161.569~~used ~~27,596,004~~for ~~400~~operating activities (394,~~766~~094) 27(1,~~996~~139,~~770~~539) ~~Net~~CASH ~~Loss~~FLOWS -FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Cash paid for redemptions of Units (4766,~~096~~487) (1739,~~426~~874) Net cash used for financing activities (5766,~~522~~487) ~~Redemptions~~ (~~240.697~~739,874) Net decrease in unrestricted cash (1,~~031~~160,~~750~~581) - (1,~~031~~879,~~750~~413) ~~Partners'~~Unrestricted ~~Capital,~~cash ~~June~~at ~~30,~~beginning ~~2004~~of 6period 18,~~920.872~~056,766 2621,~~560~~002,~~158~~788 ~~399~~Unrestricted cash at end of period 16,~~340~~896,185 2619,~~959~~123,~~498~~375 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS March 31, 2007 (Unaudited) The unaudited financial statements contained herein include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition of Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?). The financial statements and condensed notes herein should be read in conjunction with the Partnership?s December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 1. Organization Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Fund III L.P. is a New York limited partnership organized in 1983 to engage in the speculative trading of futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and forward contracts on foreign currencies and other commodity interests. The Partnership is one of the Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Funds, comprised of the Partnership, Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Fund II L.P., and Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. The Partnership?s general partner is Demeter Management Corporation (?Demeter?). Effective April 1, 2007, Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (?Morgan Stanley DW?), which previously acted as the non- clearing broker, was merged into Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) (?MS&Co.?), which has assumed all of the responsibilities of Morgan Stanley DW. Upon completion of the merger, MS&Co. has become the Partnership?s principal commodity broker-dealer and also acts as the counterparty on all trading of foreign currency forward contracts. In addition, Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited (?MSIL?) serves as the commodity broker for trades on the London Metal Exchange. Effective April 13, 2007, Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited changed its name to Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc. The commodity brokers prior to April 1, 2007, were Morgan Stanley DW, MS&Co., and MSIL. Demeter, MS&Co., and MSIL are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. The trading managers to the Partnership are Graham Capital Management, L.P. and Sunrise Capital Management, Inc. (individually, a ?Trading Manager?, or collectively, the ?Trading Managers?). 2. Related Party Transactions The Partnership?s cash is on deposit with Morgan Stanley DW (through March 31, 2007), MS&Co., and MSIL in futures, forward, and options trading accounts to meet margin requirements as needed. Monthly, MS&Co. (Morgan Stanley DW, prior to April 1, 2007) pays the Partnership interest income on 80% of its average daily Net Assets at a rate equal to the average yield on MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 13-week U.S. Treasury bills. The Partnership pays brokerage commissions to MS&Co. (Morgan Stanley DW, prior to April 1, 2007). 3. Financial Instruments The Partnership trades futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and forward contracts on foreign currencies and other commodity interests. Futures and forwards represent contracts for delayed delivery of an instrument at a specified date and price. Risk arises from changes in the value of these contracts and the potential inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts. There are numerous factors which may significantly influence the market value of these contracts, including interest rate volatility. The market value of exchange-traded contracts is based on the settlement price quoted by the exchange on the day with respect to which market value is being determined. If an exchange-traded contract could not have been liquidated on such day due to the operation of daily limits or other rules of the exchange, the settlement price shall be the settlement price on the first subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated. The market value of off-exchange-traded contracts is based on the fair market value quoted by the counterparty. MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) The Partnership?s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The Partnership accounts for its derivative investments in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ?Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities? (?SFAS No. 133?). SFAS No. 133 defines a derivative as a financial instrument or other contract that has all three of the following characteristics: 1) One or more underlying notional amounts or payment provisions; 2) Requires no initial net investment or a smaller initial net investment than would be required relative to changes in market factors; 3) Terms require or permit net settlement. Generally, derivatives include futures, forward, swap or options contracts, and other financial instruments with similar characteristics such as caps, floors, and collars. The net unrealized gains on open contracts, reported as a component of ?Equity in futures interests trading accounts? on the Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract maturities were as follows: MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Net Unrealized Gains on Open Contracts Longest Maturities Off- Off- Exchange- Exchange- Exchange- Exchange- Date Traded Traded Total Traded Traded $ $ $ Mar. 31, 2007 23,604 320,241 343,845 Sep. 2008 Jun. 2007 Dec. 31, 2006 413,691 118,295 531,986 Jun. 2008 Mar. 2007 The Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty non- performance. As of the date of the financial statements, the credit risk associated with the instruments in which the Partnership trades is limited to the amounts reflected in the Partnership?s Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership also has credit risk because Morgan Stanley DW (through March 31, 2007), MS&Co., and MSIL act as the futures commission merchants or the counterparties, with respect to most of the Partnership?s assets. Exchange-traded futures, exchange- traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts are marked to market on a daily basis, with variations in value settled on a daily basis. Morgan Stanley DW (through March 31, 2007), MS&Co., and MSIL, each as a futures commission merchant for the Partnership?s exchange-traded futures, exchange- traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, are required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Futures Trading Commission (?CFTC?), to segregate from their own assets, and for the sole benefit of their commodity customers, all funds held by them with respect to exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, including an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on all open exchange-traded futures, exchange- traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, which funds, in the aggregate, totaled $17,872,860 and $20,879,268 at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. With respect to the Partnership?s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, there are no daily settlements of variation in value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on such contracts be segregated. However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS&Co. With respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MS&Co., the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. The Partnership has a netting agreement with MS&Co. This agreement, which seeks to reduce both the Partnership?s and MS&Co.?s exposure MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED) on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, should materially decrease the Partnership?s credit risk in the event of MS&Co.?s bankruptcy or insolvency. 4. New Accounting Developments In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (?FASB?) issued interpretation No. 48, ?Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes ? an interpretation of FASB Statement 109? (?FIN 48?). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 is effective for the Partnership as of January 1, 2007. Based on its analysis, management believes that the adoption of FIN 48 will not impact the Partnership?s Financial Statements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, ?Fair Value Measurements? (?SFAS No. 157?). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS NO. 157 is effective for the Partnership as of January 1, 2008. The impact to the Partnership?s Financial Statements, if any, is currently being assessed. Item 2. MANAGEMENT?S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Liquidity. The Partnership deposits its assets with Morgan Stanley DW (through March 31, 2007), MS&Co., and MSIL as commodity brokers in separate futures, forward, and options trading accounts established for each Trading Manager. Such assets are used as margin to engage in trading and may be used as margin solely for the Partnership?s trading. The assets are held in either non- interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and instruments permitted by the CFTC for investment of customer segregated or secured funds. Since the Partnership?s sole purpose is to trade in futures, forwards, and options, it is expected that the Partnership will continue to own such liquid assets for margin purposes. The Partnership?s investment in futures, forwards, and options may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as ?daily price fluctuations limits? or ?daily limits?. Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular futures or options contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or options contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market conditions could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating its futures or options contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions. There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from trading in potentially profitable markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership?s assets. There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership?s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. Capital Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets. Redemptions of units of limited partnership interest (?Unit(s)?) in the future will affect the amount of funds available for investments in futures, forwards, and options in subsequent periods. It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the impact, of future outflows of Units. There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership?s capital resource arrangements at the present time. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. The Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments that would affect its liquidity or capital resources. Results of Operations General. The Partnership?s results depend on the Trading Managers and the ability of each Trading Manager?s trading program(s) to take advantage of price movements in the futures, forward, and options markets. The following presents a summary of the Partnership?s operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and a general discussion of its trading activities during each period. It is important to note, however, that the Trading Managers trade in various markets at different times and that prior activity in a particular market does not mean that such market will be actively traded by the Trading Managers or will be profitable in the future. Consequently, the results of operations of the Partnership are difficult to discuss other than in the context of the Trading Managers? trading activities on behalf of the Partnership during the period in question. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Partnership?s results of operations set forth in the financial statements on pages 2 through 12 of this report are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements, including the following: The contracts the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The difference between their cost and market value is recorded on the Statements of Operations as ?Net change in unrealized trading profit (loss)? for open (unrealized) contracts, and recorded as ?Realized trading profit (loss)? when open positions are closed out. The sum of these amounts constitutes the Partnership?s trading results. The market value of a futures contract is the settlement price on the exchange on which that futures contract is traded on a particular day. The value of a foreign currency forward contract is based on the spot rate as of the close of business. Interest income, as well as management fees, incentive fees, and brokerage commissions, and transaction fees and costs of the Partnership are recorded on an accrual basis. Demeter believes that, based on the nature of the operations of the Partnership, no assumptions relating to the application of critical accounting policies other than those presently used could reasonably affect reported amounts. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(1,611,642) and expenses totaling $438,992, resulting in a net loss of $2,050,634 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $4,089.95 at December 31, 2006 to $3,674.45 at March 31, 2007. The most significant trading losses of approximately 2.5% were recorded in the metals markets primarily during February and March from long positions in silver and gold futures as prices reversed sharply lower on concerns that a slowing Chinese economy would reduce demand for precious metals. Elsewhere in the metals markets, losses were experienced from long positions in aluminum futures during January and March as prices fell amid news of an overabundance in supply. Additional losses of approximately 2.4% were experienced in the currency sector during March from long positions in the British pound versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the British pound dropped sharply at the beginning of the month amid speculation that the Bank of England would not continue to increase interest rates in the near-term. Elsewhere in the currency markets, short positions in the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar resulted in losses during February and early March as the value of the Japanese yen reversed sharply higher against the U.S. dollar after a combination of factors including an almost 10% drop in the Shanghai stock market and a warning from Rodrigo Rato, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, that a weak Japanese yen "could lead to more entrenched exchange rate misalignments that worsen global imbalances" encouraged traders to unwind short positions in the Japanese yen against most of its major rivals. Furthermore, investor speculation that consistently strong economic data out of Japan might force the Bank of Japan to continue raising interest rates in order to combat possible inflation also pushed the value of the Japanese yen higher. Similarly, short positions in the Swiss franc versus the U.S. dollar incurred losses during February as the value of the Swiss franc also reversed higher against the U.S. dollar amid worries of a narrowing interest rate differential. Finally, losses were recorded during January from long positions in the New Zealand dollar and Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the U.S. dollar strengthened against these currencies after a government report showed that U.S. job growth had been unexpectedly higher during December 2006. Within the global stock index sector, losses of approximately 2.0% were experienced during late February and early March from long positions in U.S., European, and Japanese stock index futures as prices reversed sharply lower after the aforementioned massive sell-off in the global equity markets that began on February 27, 2007, following comments from former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan that the U.S. economy could be due for a recession. In addition, concerns that tighter credit conditions in China and Japan might dampen global growth first sent Chinese stock markets plunging before the sell-off spread to other equity markets. Furthermore, global equity prices were negatively affected by sub-prime loan delinquency concerns in the United States. Additional losses of approximately 1.8% were experienced in the global interest rate sector from short positions in U.S., German, and British fixed-income futures as prices spiked significantly higher during late February and early March in a flight to quality after the worldwide sell-off that affected the global equity and currency markets. Additional losses in the global interest rate futures markets were incurred from newly established long positions in U.S. fixed-income futures as prices moved lower later in the month on reduced demand for the ?safe- haven? of fixed-income investments after the stabilization of the global equity markets as investors concluded that markets had been oversold. Furthermore, U.S. interest rate futures prices declined after a stronger than expected government jobs report. Finally, losses of approximately 1.8% were recorded within the energy markets during February from short futures positions in gasoline, heating oil, and crude oil futures as prices reversed higher during February and March on increased concerns that unexpected refinery shutdowns would curb fuel stockpiles in the future. In addition, prices were pressured higher on rising geopolitical concerns in the Middle East after the United Nations Security Council voted unanimously to increase sanctions against Iran. News that Iran had captured 15 members of the British Royal Navy in the Persian Gulf added to investor worries about the stability of the world?s oil supply in the region, thus weighing on prices. Smaller losses in the energy markets were experienced from short positions in natural gas futures as prices moved higher during March after the U.S. Department of Energy reported that natural gas supplies were down 15% from a year ago. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $1,291,113 and expenses totaling $511,288, resulting in net income of $779,825 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit increased from $3,961.07 at December 31, 2005 to $4,097.84 at March 31, 2006. The most significant trading gains of approximately 3.3% were recorded in the global interest rate futures markets, primarily during March, from short positions in U.S., European, and Japanese interest rate futures as global bond prices trended lower amid strength in regional equity markets and investor sentiment that interest rates in the United States, the European Union, and Japan would rise. Additional gains of approximately 2.2% were experienced in the metals markets during January and March from long positions in copper and aluminum as prices strengthened amid news of weak supplies, forecasts for continued buying by China, and acceleration in demand from Japan, Europe, and the U.S. Elsewhere in the metals markets, gains were recorded from long futures positions in silver and gold as precious metals prices moved higher on persistent demand from foreign central banks. Silver prices were also pressured higher after news that a silver-backed Exchange Traded Fund would soon launch and create greater investment interest in the metal. Within the global stock index futures markets, gains of approximately 1.9% were experienced from long positions in European and U.S. stock index futures as global equity markets trended higher during the quarter on strong corporate earnings, and solid economic data. Smaller gains of approximately 0.3% were experienced in the agricultural markets, from long positions in sugar futures as prices trended higher during January, moving to their highest level since 1981 in response to a decline in inventories, as well as from increased ethanol demand caused by higher energy prices. A portion of these gains for the quarter was offset by losses of approximately 5.2% in the currency sector from long U.S. dollar positions versus the Swiss franc, euro, and Japanese yen as the value of the U.S. dollar moved lower during January on expectations that a string of increases in interest rates by the U.S. Federal Reserve could possible come to an end. Also pushing the value of the U.S. dollar lower against its rivals was speculation that China might move to diversify some of its U.S. dollar based assets into other currencies. Further losses were experienced during February from short positions in the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of the yen increased on the release of better than expected Japanese machinery orders data and speculation that the Bank of Japan might move to tighten monetary policy in Japan. Additional losses during February were recorded from short positions in the Swiss franc versus the U.S. dollar as value of the dollar weakened amid investor concern regarding the massive U.S. trade deficit. Currency losses were also incurred during March from long positions in the British pound relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of the pound finished lower after news that Gross Domestic Product in the United Kingdom for 2005 was weaker than expected. Smaller losses were experienced during March from short positions in the euro and the Swiss franc relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of these European currencies moved higher after the release of generally positive economic data from the Euro-Zone reinforced expectations that European interest rates would continue to rise. In the energy markets, losses of approximately 0.2% were recorded, primarily during March, from short positions in crude oil futures as prices strengthened early in the month on supply fears fueled by news of geopolitical tensions in Nigeria and Iran. Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Introduction The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the speculative trading of futures, forwards, and options. The market-sensitive instruments held by the Partnership are acquired for speculative trading purposes only and, as a result, all or substantially all of the Partnership?s assets are at risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market- sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business activity of the Partnership. The futures, forwards, and options traded by the Partnership involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership?s open positions, and consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange- traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange- traded futures-styled options contracts are settled daily through variation margin. Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts are settled upon termination of the contract. However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS&Co. The Partnership?s total market risk may increase or decrease as it is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the diversification among the Partnership?s open positions, the volatility present within the markets, and the liquidity of the markets. The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the applicable margin requirements. Margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value. Additionally, the use of leverage causes the face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership typically to be many times the total capitalization of the Partnership. The Partnership?s past performance is no guarantee of its future results. Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership?s market risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative trading. The Partnership?s speculative trading and use of leverage may cause future losses and volatility (i.e., ?risk of ruin?) that far exceed the Partnership?s experience to date under the ?Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors? section and significantly exceed the Value at Risk (?VaR?) tables disclosed. Limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment. Quantifying the Partnership?s Trading Value at Risk The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s market risk exposures contain ?forward-looking statements? within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward- looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact. The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark to market accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the Partnership?s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership?s earnings and cash flow. The Partnership?s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Trading Managers is estimated below in terms of VaR. The Partnership estimates VaR using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 99%) which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear exposures to risk including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices or other market factors (?market risk factors?) to which the portfolio is sensitive. The one-day 99% confidence level of the Partnership?s VaR corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 100 trading days, or one day in 100. VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome. Demeter uses approximately four years of daily market data (1,000 observations) and re-values its portfolio (using delta-gamma approximations) for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily ?simulated profit and loss? outcomes. The VaR is the appropriate percentile of this distribution. For example, the 99% one-day VaR would represent the 10th worst outcome from Demeter?s simulated profit and loss series. The Partnership?s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and do not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. They are also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements. VaR models, including the Partnership?s, are continually evolving as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either Demeter or the Trading Managers in their daily risk management activities. Please further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other entities. The Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors The following table indicates the VaR associated with the Partnership?s open positions as a percentage of total Net Assets by primary market risk category at March 31, 2007 and 2006. At March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership?s total capitalization was approximately $18 million and $23 million, respectively. Primary Market March 31, 2007 March 31, 2006 Risk Category Value at Risk Value at Risk Currency (1.61)% (0.90)% Equity (1.11) (1.35) Interest Rate (0.50) (5.57) Commodity (0.61) (0.32) Aggregate Value at Risk (2.04)% (6.39)% The VaR for a market category represents the one-day downside risk for the aggregate exposures associated with this market category. The Aggregate Value at Risk listed above represents the VaR of the Partnership?s open positions across all the market categories, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market categories due to the diversification benefit across asset classes. Because the business of the Partnership is the speculative trading of futures, forwards, and options, the composition of its trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading day. Such changes could positively or negatively materially impact market risk as measured by VaR. The table below supplements the quarter-end VaR set forth above by presenting the Partnership?s high, low, and average VaR, as a percentage of total Net Assets for the four quarter-end reporting periods from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. Primary Market Risk Category High Low Average Currency (1.66)% (0.68)% (1.32)% Equity (2.44) (0.55) (1.40) Interest Rate (1.74) (0.50) (0.95) Commodity (1.11) (0.21) (0.74) Aggregate Value at Risk (2.95)% (1.67)% (2.22)% Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk VaR models permit estimation of a portfolio?s aggregate market risk exposure, incorporating a range of varied market risks, reflect risk reduction due to portfolio diversification or hedging activities, and can cover a wide range of portfolio assets. However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of the methodology?s limitations, which include, but may not be limited to the following: * past changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market movements; * changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the VaR model; * VaR results reflect past market fluctuations applied to current trading positions while future risk depends on future positions; * VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and * the historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements. In addition, the VaR tables above, as well as the past performance of the Partnership, give no indication of the Partnership?s potential ?risk of ruin?. The VaR tables provided present the results of the Partnership?s VaR for each of the Partnership?s market risk exposures and on an aggregate basis at March 31, 2006, and for the four quarter-end reporting periods from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. VaR is not necessarily representative of the Partnership?s historic risk, nor should it be used to predict the Partnership?s future financial performance or its ability to manage or monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Partnership?s actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated above or that such losses will not occur more than once in 100 trading days. Non-Trading Risk The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances. These balances and any market risk they may represent are immaterial. The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion of its available assets in cash at MS&Co. (Morgan Stanley DW, prior to April 1, 2007); as of March 31, 2007, such amount is equal to approximately 94% of the Partnership?s net asset value. A decline in short-term interest rates would result in a decline in the Partnership?s cash management income. This cash flow risk is not considered to be material. Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and any associated potential losses, taking into account the leverage, optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership?s market- sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership?s Net Assets. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s market risk exposures - except for (A) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (B) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures - constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership?s primary market risk exposures, as well as the strategies used and to be used by Demeter and the Trading Managers for managing such exposures, are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership?s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation, and many other factors could result in material losses, as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership. The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership at March 31, 2007, by market sector. It may be anticipated, however, that these market exposures will vary materially over time. Currency. The largest market exposure of the Partnership at March 31, 2007, was to the currency sector. The Partnership?s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. Interest rate changes, as well as political and general economic conditions influence these fluctuations. The Partnership trades a large number of currencies including cross-rate ? i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. dollar. At March 31, 2007, the Partnership?s major exposures were to Australian dollar, euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, and British pound currency crosses, as well as to outright U.S. dollar positions. Outright positions consist of the U.S. dollar vs. other currencies. These other currencies include major and minor currencies. Demeter does not anticipate that the risk associated with the Partnership?s currency trades will change significantly in the future. Equity. The second largest market exposure of the Partnership at March 31, 2007, was to the global stock index sector, primarily to equity price risk in the G-7 countries. The G-7 countries consist of France, the U.S., Britain, Germany, Japan, Italy, and Canada. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership are by law limited to futures on broadly-based indices. At March 31, 2007, the Partnership?s primary exposures were to the DAX (Germany), TOPIX (Japan), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), and NASDAQ 100 (U.S.) stock indices. The Partnership is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the U.S., European, and Japanese stock indices. Static markets would not cause major market changes but would make it difficult for the Partnership to avoid trendless price movements, resulting in numerous small losses. Interest Rate. At March 31, 2007, the Partnership had market exposure to the global interest rate sector. This exposure was primarily spread across the U.S., European, and Japanese interest rate sectors. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and indirectly affect the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate movements between countries, materially impact the Partnership?s profitability. The Partnership?s interest rate exposure is generally to interest rate fluctuations in the U.S. and the other G-7 countries. Demeter anticipates that the G-7 countries? interest rates will remain the primary interest rate exposures of the Partnership for the foreseeable future. The speculative futures positions held by the Partnership may range from short to long-term instruments. Consequently, changes in short, medium, or long-term interest rates may have an effect on the Partnership. Commodity. Metals. The third largest market exposure of the Partnership at March 31, 2007, was to the metals sector. The Partnership?s metals exposure was to fluctuations in the price of precious metals, such as gold, as well as base metals, such as aluminum and copper. Economic forces, supply and demand inequalities, geopolitical factors, and market expectations influence price movements in these markets. The Trading Managers utilize their trading system(s) to take positions when market opportunities develop, and Demeter anticipates that the Partnership will continue to do so. Energy. At March 31, 2007, the Partnership had market exposure to the energy sector. The Partnership?s primary energy exposure was to futures contracts in crude oil and its related products, as well as natural gas. Price movements in these markets result from geopolitical developments, particularly in the Middle East, as well as weather patterns, and other economic fundamentals. Significant profits and losses, which have been experienced in the past, are expected to continue to be experienced in the future. Natural gas has exhibited volatility in price resulting from weather patterns and supply and demand factors and will likely continue in this choppy pattern. Soft Commodities and Agriculturals. At March 31, 2007, the Partnership had market exposure to the markets that comprise these sectors. Most of the exposure was to the soybeans, sugar, cocoa, coffee, and wheat markets. Supply and demand inequalities, severe weather disruptions, and market expectations affect price movements in these markets. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure The following was the only non-trading risk exposure of the Partnership at March 31, 2007: Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership?s primary foreign currency balances at March 31, 2007, were in euros, British pounds, Swiss francs, Japanese yen, and Australian dollars. The Partnership controls the non-trading risk of foreign currency balances by regularly converting them back into U.S. dollars upon liquidation of their respective positions. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure The Partnership and the Trading Managers, separately, attempt to manage the risk of the Partnership?s open positions in essentially the same manner in all market categories traded. Demeter attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying the Partnership?s assets among different Trading Managers in a multi-manager Partnership, each of whose strategies focus on different market sectors and trading approaches, and by monitoring the performance of the Trading Managers daily. In addition, the Trading Managers establish diversification guidelines, often set in terms of the maximum margin to be committed to positions in any one market sector or market-sensitive instrument. Demeter monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership?s non- trading instrument, cash. Cash is the only Partnership investment directed by Demeter, rather than the Trading Managers. Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Demeter, the general partner of the Partnership, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership?s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a?15(e) and 15d?15(e) of the Exchange Act), and have judged such controls and procedures to be effective. (b) There have been no material changes during the period covered by this quarterly report in the Partnership?s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. Item 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Not applicable. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1A. RISK FACTORS Information regarding risk factors appears in Item 2. ?Management?s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations? and Item 3. ?Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk? of this Form 10-Q. There have been no other material changes from the risk factors previously referenced in the Partnership?s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Item 6. EXHIBITS 31.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. 32.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Morgan Stanley Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (Registrant) By: Demeter Management Corporation (General Partner) May 15, 2007 By: /s/Lee Horwitz Lee Horwitz Chief Financial Officer The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the Registrant. The Registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors. ? 48 ?

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 2003 $ $ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss) (5,522) 1,856,384 Noncash item included in net income (loss): Net change in unrealized 3,273,499 2,207,148 (Increase) decrease in operating assets: Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) (7,407) 2,556 Due from Morgan Stanley DW - 242,202 Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: Accrued administrative expenses 1,015 (7,668) Accrued management fees (2,992) 1,993 Net cash provided by operating activities 3,258,593 4,302,615 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Increase in redemptions payable 14,751 51,106 Redemptions of Units (1,031,750) (1,225,759) Net cash used for financing activities (1,016,999) (1,174,653) Net increase in cash 2,241,594 3,127,962 Balance at beginning of period 25,869,355 26,372,589 Balance at end of period 28,110,949 29,500,551 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Filing Compare · MORGAN STANLEY CORNERSTONE FUND III L.P.