UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission file number 1-11149

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

(Exact Name of Issuer as Specified in its Charter)



District of Columbia		52-1219926
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

11200 Rockville Pike
Rockville, MD		20852
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(ZIP Code)

(301) 468-9200

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

~~_____________________~~____________________

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark ifwhether ~~disclosure~~the ofregistrant ~~delinquent~~has ~~filers~~submitted ~~pursuant~~electronically toand ~~Item~~posted ~~405~~on ofits ~~Regulation~~corporate ~~S-K~~Website, isif ~~not~~any, ~~contained~~every ~~herein,~~Interactive ~~and~~Date ~~will~~File ~~not~~required to be ~~contained,~~submitted and posted pursuant to ~~the~~Rule ~~best~~405 of ~~Registrant's~~Regulation ~~knowledge,~~S-T ~~in definitive~~(§232.405 ~~proxy~~of orthis ~~information~~chapter) ~~statements~~during ~~incorporated~~the bypreceding ~~reference~~12 inmonths ~~Part~~(or ~~III~~for ofsuch ~~this~~shorter ~~Form~~period ~~10-K~~that orthe ~~any~~registrant ~~amendment~~was required to ~~this~~submit ~~Form~~and ~~10-Kþ~~post such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of Aaccelerated filer and large accelerated filer@ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.Yes ¨ No þ

~~Large~~Indicate ~~accelerated~~by ~~filer ¨ Accelerated~~check ~~filer ¨ Non~~mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-~~accelerated~~K ~~filer ¨ Smaller~~is ~~reporting~~not ~~company~~ contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer@ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o	Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	X

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No þ

The units of limited partner interest of the Registrant are not traded in any market. Therefore, the units of limited partner interest had neither a market selling price nor an average bid or asked price. As of May 15, 2013, the issuer had 24,747 outstanding units of limited partner interest.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

~~2011~~2012 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page Number
	PART I
Item 1.	Business	I-1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	I-3
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	I-3
Item 2.	Properties	I-3
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	I-3
Item 4.	~~Submission~~Mine ofSafety ~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Disclosures	I-3
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’'s Partnership Interests, Related Partnership Matters and Issuer Purchases of Partnership Interests	II-1
	and Related Partnership Matters	II-1
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	II-1
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	II-1
	and Results or Operations	II-2
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	II-3
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	II-53
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	II-3
	on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	II-6
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	II-4
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	II-6
Item 9B.	Other Information	II-5
Item 9B.	Other Information	II-8
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, ~~and~~ Executive Officers ofand ~~the~~Corporate ~~Registrant~~Governance	III-1
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	III-1
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	III-21
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	III-32
Item 14.	Principal ~~Accountant~~Accounting Fees and Services	III-3
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statements and Related Partnership Matters	IV-1

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership which was formed under the District of Columbia Limited Partnership Act on June 1, 1981, and shall continue until December 31, 2030, unless sooner dissolved in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement. On December 31, 1981, the Partnership commenced offering 30,000 units of limited partner interest through a public offering managed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated. The Partnership closed the offering on December 31, 1982, at which time 24,837 units of limited partner interest had become subscribed. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, 90 units of limited partner interest had been abandoned.

The General Partners of the Partnership are C.R.I., Inc. (“CRI”), which is the Managing General Partner, current and former shareholders of CRI and Rockville Pike Associates, Ltd., a Maryland limited partnership which includes the shareholders of CRI and certain former officers and employees of CRI. Services for the Partnership are performed by CRI, as the Partnership has no employees of its own.

The Partnership was formed to invest in real estate, which is the Partnership's principal business activity, by acquiring and holding limited partner interests in limited partnerships (“Local Partnerships”). The Partnership originally made investments in eighteen Local Partnerships. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Partnership retained investments in ~~six~~three Local Partnerships. The original objectives of these investments, not necessarily in order of importance, were to:


(i)	preserve and protect the Partnership's capital;


(ii)	provide, during the early years of the Partnership's operations, current tax benefits to the partners in the form of tax losses which the partners could use to offset income from other sources;


(iii)	provide capital appreciation through increases in the value of the Partnership's investments and increased equity through periodic payments on the indebtedness of the apartment complexes; and


(iv)	provide cash distributions from sale or refinancing of the Partnership's investments and, on a limited basis, from rental operations.

See Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a discussion of factors affecting the original investment objectives.

The Local Partnerships in which the Partnership invested were organized by private developers who acquired the sites, or options thereon, applied for mortgage financing and applicable mortgage insurance and/or subsidies, and who generally remain as the local general partners in the Local Partnerships. In most cases, the local general partners of the Local Partnerships retain responsibility for maintaining, operating and managing the projects. However, under certain circumstances, the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements permit removal of the local general partner and replacement with another local general partner or with an affiliate of the Partnership's Managing General Partner.

As a result of its investment in the Local Partnerships, the Partnership became the principal limited partner in eighteen (~~six~~three remaining as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012) Local Partnerships. As a limited partner, the Partnership's legal liability for obligations of the Local Partnerships is limited to its investment. In most cases, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership is also a general partner of the Local Partnerships. The local general partners and affiliates of the Managing General Partner may operate other apartment complexes which may be in competition for eligible tenants with the Local Partnerships' apartment complexes.

I-1

~~PART~~Table Iof Contents

ITEM 1. BUSINESS -– Continued

A schedule of the apartment complexes owned by Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has an investment as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, follows.

SCHEDULE OF APARTMENT COMPLEXES OWNED BY LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

IN WHICH CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD. HAS AN INVESTMENT (1)

Name and Location Of Apartment Complex	Mortgage Payable at 12/31/11 (2)	Financed and/or Insured and/or Subsidized Under	Number of Rental Units	Units Authorized for Low Income Subsidies	Expiration of HAP Contract
Name and LocationOf Apartment Complex	MortgagePayable at12/31/12 (2)			Financed and/or Insuredand/or Subsidized Under	Number ofRental Units	UnitsAuthorized forLow IncomeSubsidies	ExpirationofHAP Contract (4)
Capitol Commons Lansing, MI	$ 881,480	Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MAHDA)	200	200	05/31/12 (4)
ChestnutFresno, CA	$	129,244		California Housing Finance Agency	90	90	1/14/2013
Chestnut Fresno, CA	420,123	California Housing Finance Agency	90	90	01/14/13
New Sharon Woods Apts.Deptford, NJ	3,536,432			Federal Housing Administration(FHA)	51	51	9/1/2026
Hillview Terrace Traverse City, MI	1,595,173	Rural Economic Community Development	125	--	--
Westwood VillageNew Haven, CT	—			Connecticut Housing Finance Authority	48	48	11/1/2032
New Sharon Woods Apts. Deptford, NJ	1,217,446	Federal Housing Administration(FHA)	51	51	09/01/26
Totals (3 Properties)	$	3,665,676			189	189
Shallowford Oaks Chamblee, GA	--	FHA	204	--	--
Westwood Village New Haven, CT	120,854	Connecticut Housing Finance Authority	48	48	11/01/12
Totals (6 Properties)	$4,235,076		717	389

Name and Location of Apartment Complex	~~Units Occupied As Percentage of Total Units As of December 31,~~	Units Occupied As Percentage of Total Units As of December 31,				~~Average Effective Annual Rental Per Unit for the Years Ended December 31,~~								Average Effective Annual Rental Per Unit for the Years Ended December 31,
	2011	2010	2009	2008	2007	2011	2010	2009	2008	2007
	2012	2011		2010		2009		2008		2007		2012		2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
Capitol Commons Lansing, MI	98%	100%	99%	99%	100%	$10,397	$10,325	$10,376	$10,122	$10,114
ChestnutFresno, CA	100%	100%		98%		99%		99%		99%		9,317		9,294		9,019		8,806		8,591		8,347
Chestnut Fresno, CA	100%	98%	99%	99%	99%	9,294	9,019	8,806	8,591	8,347
New Sharon Woods Apts.Deptford, NJ	100%	97%		98%		97%		98%		93%		13,049		12,485		12,513		11,960		11,784		10,835
Hillview Terrace Traverse City, MI	100%	99%	99%	99%	99%	5,253	5,172	5,160	5,062	4,846
Westwood VillageNew Haven, CT	97%	97%		97%		97%		96%		95%		16,535		16,021		15,464		14,891		13,793		12,853
New Sharon Woods Apts. Deptford, NJ	97%	98%	97%	98%	93%	12,485	12,513	11,960	11,784	10,835
Totals (3 Properties) (3)	99%	98	%	97	%	97	%	97	%	95	%	$	12,967	$	12,600	$	12,332	$	11,885	$	11,389	$	10,678
Shallowford Oaks Chamblee, GA	53%	88%	85%	82%	88%	4,202	6,849	7,013	7,877	8,229
Westwood Village New Haven, CT	97%	97%	97%	96%	95%	16,021	15,464	14,891	13,793	12,853
Totals (6 Properties) (3)	91%	91%	95%	96%	96%	$ 9,609	$ 8,770	$ 8,725	$ 8,771	$ 9,204


(1)	All properties are multifamily housing complexes. No single tenant rents 10% or more of the rentable square footage. Residential leases are typically one year or less in length, with varying expiration dates, and substantially all rentable space is for residential purposes.

(2) The amounts provided are the balances of first mortgage loans payable by the Local Partnerships as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012.


(3)	The totals for the percentage of units occupied and the average effective annual rental per unit are based on a simple average.

(4) ~~Management~~The ofHAP ~~the~~contract ~~Local~~related ~~Partnership~~to Chestnut has ~~applied~~been ~~for~~extended athrough ~~new 20 year HAP contract. As of~~ June 30, ~~2012, MHSDA is still in process of reviewing the application~~2013.

On November, 1, 2011, the mortgage holder for Shallowford Oaks, LSREF2 Chalk 2, LLC, foreclosed on the property and became the new owner of the property pursuant to a non-judicial foreclosure sale under the power of sale clause contained in its law documents. As a result of the foreclosure all of the assets and liabilities of the Local Partnership were written off as of December 31, 2011. During 2011, the resulting loss of the foreclosure was $31,263 and is recorded on the statements of operations as loss

I-2

~~PART~~Table Iof Contents

ITEM 1. BUSINESS – Continued

Onfrom ~~November,~~foreclosure ~~1, 2011, the mortgage holder for Shallowford Oaks, LSREF2 Chalk 2, LLC, foreclosed~~ on ~~the~~Local ~~property and became the new owner of the property pursuant to a non-judicial foreclosure sale under the power of sale clause contained in its law documents~~Partnership. As During a2012, ~~result of~~ the ~~foreclosure~~Local ~~all~~Partnership ofwas ~~the~~wound ~~assets~~up and ~~liabilities of~~ the ~~Local~~ Partnership ~~were~~no ~~written~~longer ~~off~~holds asa oflimited ~~December~~partner ~~31,~~interest ~~2011.~~in ~~The resulting loss of~~ the ~~foreclosure was $31,263 and is recorded on the Statements of Operations as Loss from foreclosure on~~ Local Partnership.

1A. RISK FACTORS

None.

1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Through its ownership of limited partner interests in Local Partnerships, Capital Realty Investors, Ltd., indirectly holds an interest in the real estate owned by the Local Partnerships. See Part I, Item 1, for information concerning these properties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Partnership is a party.

ITEM 4. ~~SUBMISSION~~ MINE OFSAFETY ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~DISCLOSURES

None.

I-3

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS, ~~AND~~ RELATED PARTNERSHIP MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS


(a)	There is no established market for the purchase and sale of units of limited partner interest (Units) in the Partnership, although various informal secondary market services may exist. Due to the limited markets, however, investors may be unable to sell or otherwise dispose of their Units.

(b) As of ~~April~~May 115, ~~2012~~2013, there were approximately 1,196 registered holders of Units in the Partnership.

(c) OnThere ~~July~~was ~~26,~~no ~~2010,~~distributions ~~the~~paid ~~Partnership~~during ~~paid~~2012. However, a ~~cash~~ distribution was recommended and approved in December 2012 of $~~742~~5,~~410~~939,280 ($30240 per Unit). toThis ~~the~~distribution ~~Limited~~was ~~Partners~~paid ~~who~~subsequent ~~were~~to ~~holders~~December ~~of record as of July 1~~31, ~~2010~~2012.

~~II-1~~Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

~~PART~~Not IIapplicable.



ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Capital Realty Investors, Ltd.’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section is based on the financial statements, and contains information that may be considered forward looking, including statements regarding the effect of governmental regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward looking statements and will be affected by a variety of factors including national and local economic conditions, the general level of interest rates, governmental regulations affecting the Partnership and interpretations of those regulations, the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates, and the availability of working capital.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership has disclosed its selection and application of significant accounting policies in Note 1 of the notes to financial statements included in this ~~annual~~Annual ~~report~~Report on Form 10-K at December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The Partnership accounts for its investments in partnerships (Local Partnerships) by the equity method because the Partnership is a limited partner in the Local Partnerships. As such the Partnership has no control over the selection and application of accounting policies, or the use of estimates, by the Local Partnerships. Environmental and operational trends, events and uncertainties that might affect the properties owned by the Local Partnerships would not necessarily have a significant impact on the Partnership’s application of the equity method of accounting, since the equity method has been suspended for ~~four~~one Local ~~Partnerships~~Partnership which ~~have~~has cumulative losses in excess of the amount of the Partnership’s ~~investments~~investment in ~~those~~that Local ~~Partnerships~~Partnership. The Partnership reviews property assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If an asset was determined to be impaired, its basis would be adjusted to fair value through the recognition of an impairment loss.

GAAP provides guidance on when a company should include the assets, liabilities, and activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) in its financial statements and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is generally the entity that will receive a majority of the VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE’s expected residual returns, or both.

The Partnership does not consolidate the Partnership's interests in these VIE’s under this guidance, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary. Accounting guidance requires continued reconsideration as to the consideration of the primary beneficiary. The Partnership currently records the amount of its investment in these partnerships as an asset on its balance sheet, recognizes its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and discloses how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements.

II-1

Table of Contents

The Partnership’s balance in investment in Local Partnerships represents its maximum exposure to loss. The Partnership’s exposure to loss on these partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying properties as well as the strength of the local general partners.

II-2

PART II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May 2009~~2011, the FASB issued ~~guidance~~Accounting ~~addressing~~Standard ~~the~~Update ~~accounting~~(ASU) ~~for~~No. ~~and~~2011-04, ~~disclosure~~"Fair ~~requirements~~Value ofMeasurement:Amendments ~~events~~to orAchieve ~~transactions~~Common ~~that~~Fair ~~occur~~Value ~~after~~Measurement ~~the~~and ~~balance~~Disclosure ~~sheet~~Requirements ~~date,~~in ~~but~~U.S. ~~before~~GAAP ~~the~~and ~~financial statements are issued~~IFRS". This ~~The~~update ~~Partnership~~amends ~~adopted~~ the guidance ason offair ~~June 30,~~value ~~2009~~measurements asto itdevelop ~~was~~common ~~effective~~requirements for ~~interim~~measuring ~~and~~fair ~~annual~~value ~~periods~~and ~~ending~~for ~~after~~disclosing ~~June 15,~~information ~~2009.~~about ~~The~~fair ~~adoption~~value ~~did~~measurements ~~not~~in ~~have~~accordance awith ~~significant~~US ~~impact~~GAAP onand ~~the~~International ~~subsequent~~Financial ~~events~~Reporting ~~that~~Standards ~~the~~(IFRS). ~~Partnership~~This ~~reports,~~ASU ~~either~~does ~~through~~not ~~recognition~~require oradditional ~~disclosure,~~fair invalue ~~the~~measurements ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~is ~~statements.~~not Inintended ~~February~~to ~~2010,~~establish ~~however,~~valuation ~~the~~standards ~~FASB~~or ~~amended~~affect ~~its~~valuation ~~guidance~~practices onoutside ~~subsequent~~of ~~events~~financial toreporting. The ~~remove~~Partnership ~~the~~adopted ~~requirement~~this toupdate ~~disclose~~as ~~the~~of ~~date~~January ~~through~~1, ~~which~~2012 anand ~~entity~~the ~~has~~adoption ~~evaluated~~did ~~subsequent~~not ~~events,~~have ~~alleviating~~a ~~conflicts~~material ~~with~~impact ~~current~~on ~~SEC~~the ~~guidance.~~Partnership's ~~This~~results ~~amendment~~of ~~was~~operations, ~~effective~~financial ~~immediately~~position, ~~and~~or ~~therefore~~cash ~~the~~flows ~~Partnership~~during ~~did not include~~ the ~~disclosure~~year inended ~~this~~December ~~Form~~31, ~~10-K~~2012.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of VIEs. The amended guidance modifies the consolidation model to one based on control and economics, and replaces the current quantitative primary beneficiary analysis with a qualitative analysis. The primary beneficiary of a VIE will be the entity that has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the amended guidance requires continual reconsideration of the primary beneficiary of a VIE and adds an additional reconsideration event for determination of whether an entity is a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced and expanded disclosures around VIEs. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements.

General

The Partnership has invested, through Local Partnerships, primarily in federal or state government-assisted apartment complexes intended to provide housing to the elderly and/or to low and moderate income tenants. In conjunction with such governmental assistance, which may include federal and/or state financing at below-market interest rates and rental subsidies, the Local Partnerships agreed to regulatory limitations on (i) cash distributions, (ii) use of the properties, and (iii) sale or refinancing. These limitations typically were designed to remain in place for the life of the mortgage.

C.R.I., Inc. (the Managing General Partner) continues to evaluate the Partnership’s underlying apartment complexes to develop strategies that maximize the benefits to investors. Numerous variables, including adverse general economic conditions, as well as, Local Partnership agreements and regulatory restrictions impact the ability and timing of effectuating the sale of certain properties owned by the Local Partnerships or the Partnership’s interests in the Local Partnerships. The Managing General Partner continues to explore strategies that will result in the sale of properties owned by the Local Partnerships or the Partnership’s interests in the Local Partnerships at terms advantageous to the Partnership. While the Managing General Partner cannot predict the outcome for any particular property at this time, the Managing General Partner will continue to work with the Local Partnerships to develop strategies that maximize the benefits to investors.

II-3

PART II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Financial Condition/Liquidity

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Partnership had approximately 1,276 investors who held a total of 24,747 units of limited partner interest which were originally sold for the aggregate amount of $24,747,000. The Partnership originally made investments in eighteen Local Partnerships, of which ~~six~~three remain at December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The Partnership’s liquidity, with unrestricted cash resources of $27,~~194~~674,~~867~~174 as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, along with anticipated future cash distributions from the Local Partnerships, is expected to be adequate to meet its current and anticipated operating cash needs. As of ~~June~~May __15, ~~2012~~2013, there were no material commitments for capital expenditures.

During ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Partnership received cash distributions of $5127,~~316~~437 and $5951,~~372~~316, respectively, from the Local Partnerships.

The Partnership closely monitors its cash flow and liquidity position in an effort to ensure that sufficient cash is available for operating requirements. For the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, existing cash resources and the receipt of distributions from Local Partnerships were adequate to support net cash used in operating activities. Cash and cash equivalents ~~decreased~~increased $~~357~~5,~~671~~479,307 during ~~2011~~2012, primarily due to ~~operating~~proceeds ~~activities~~received related to the sale of Capital Commons and Hillview Terrace.

On July 26, 2010, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $742,410 ($30 per Unit) to the Limited Partners who were holders of record as of July 1, 2010.

Results of Operations

~~2011~~2012 versus ~~2010~~2011

The Partnership recognized a net income of $~~852~~1,~~463~~767,053 for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, compared to a net income of $~~296~~852,~~978~~463 for the year ended ~~2010~~2011, primarily due to ~~increases~~the ingain ~~share~~recorded ofrelated ~~income from partnerships and a decrease in general and administrative expenses. Share of income from partnerships increased primarily due~~ to ~~higher share of income from one Local Partnership as well as due to lower advances which were reduced to zero by~~ the ~~Partnership~~sale ~~as a result~~ of ~~losses~~Capitol atCommons ~~the~~and ~~Local~~Hillview ~~Partnership level (see note 2~~Terrace.b. ~~in notes to financial statements for additional information).~~

For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership, as a limited partner in the Local Partnerships, does not record losses from the Local Partnerships in excess of its investment to the extent that the Partnership has no further obligation to advance funds or provide financing to the Local Partnerships. As a result, the Partnership’s share of income from partnerships for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, did not include losses of $115,426 and $64,462, respectively. Distributions of $7,219 were received from one Local Partnership during both 2011 and 2010, for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended), were recorded as increases in the Partnership’s share of income from partnerships in the year received.II-2

~~II-4~~For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership, as a limited partner in the Local Partnerships, does not record losses from the Local Partnerships in excess of its investment to the extent that the Partnership has no further obligation to advance funds or provide financing to the Local Partnerships. As a result, the Partnership’s share of income from partnerships for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, did not include losses of $0 and $115,426, respectively. Distributions of $0 and $7,219 were received from one Local Partnership during 2012 and 2011, respectively, for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended), were recorded as increases in the Partnership’s share of income from partnerships in the year received.

~~PART II~~Inflation

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Continued

Inflation allows for increases in rental rates, usually offsetting any higher operating and replacement costs. Furthermore, inflation generally does not impact the fixed rate long-term financing under which the Partnership’s real property investments were purchased. Future inflation could allow for appreciated values of the Local Partnerships’ properties over an extended period of time as rental revenues and replacement values gradually increase.

The combined rental revenues of the Partnership’s remaining properties for the ~~three~~two years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 follow. Combined rental revenue amounts ~~have~~include ~~been~~rental ~~adjusted~~revenue tothrough ~~reflect~~the ~~property~~date ~~sales~~of ~~and~~sale ~~interests~~for ~~transferred~~the insale ~~prior~~of ~~years~~a property or limited partner interest.

	~~For the years ended December 31,~~	For the years ended December 31,
	2011		2010
		2012					2011
Combined Rental Revenue	$5,835,632		$6,288,311
Combined RentalRevenue		$	4,925,744				$5,835,632
Annual Percentage Increase (decrease)		(7.2%)		0.5%
Annual PercentageIncrease (decrease)					(15.5	)%		(7.2)%

~~ITEM~~Item 87A. ~~FINANCIAL~~ QUANTITATIVE ~~STATEMENTS~~AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

None.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this item is contained in Part IV.

II-5

PART II



ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

OnThe ~~December~~Partnership 22was informed by Reznick Group, ~~2010~~P.C. ("Reznick Group"), the Partnership's ~~dismissed~~independent ~~Grant~~registered ~~Thornton~~public accounting firm, that it had entered into a business combination with J. H. Cohn LLP (~~“Grant~~J.H. ~~Thornton”~~Cohn). In asconnection with the ~~Partnership’s~~business ~~independent~~combination ~~registered~~J. ~~public~~H. ~~accounting~~Cohn ~~firm. The~~legally ~~decision~~changed its name to ~~change~~CohnReznick ~~accountants~~LLP ~~was~~("CohnReznick") ~~approved~~and bycontinues ~~the~~to ~~Audit~~be ~~Committee~~registered ofwith the ~~Board~~PCAOB. On ofNovember ~~Directors~~8, of2012, Reznick Group resigned as the ~~Partnership~~Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

Effective as of ~~December~~November 238, ~~2010~~2012, the Audit Committee of the Partnership's ~~engaged~~Board ~~Reznick~~of ~~Group,~~Directors ~~P.C.~~has ~~(“Reznick”)~~appointed CohnReznick as the Partnership’'s independent registered public accounting firm. ~~The decision to engage Reznick was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Partnership as of such date.~~

~~During~~Reznick ~~the~~Group's ~~interim~~reports ~~period~~on ~~ended September 30, 2010, and through December 22, 2010, neither~~ the Partnership's ~~nor~~financial ~~anyone~~statements onfor ~~its behalf has consulted with Reznick regarding either (i)~~ the ~~application~~fiscal ofyears ~~accounting~~ended ~~principles~~December ~~to a specified transaction~~31, ~~either~~2011 ~~completed~~and or2010 ~~proposed,~~and orthrough the ~~type~~subsequent ofinterim ~~audit~~period ~~opinion~~ended ~~that~~November ~~might~~8, be2012 ~~rendered~~did onnot ~~the~~contain ~~Partnership’s~~any ~~financial~~adverse ~~statements;~~opinion or ~~(ii) any~~disclaimer ~~matter~~of ~~that~~opinion, ~~was~~nor ~~the~~were ~~subject~~they ofqualified aor ~~disagreement~~modified (as ~~that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions~~ to ~~Item 304~~uncertainty, ofaudit ~~Regulation S-K)~~scope or aaccounting ~~reportable event (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K)~~principles.

During the ~~interim~~two ~~period~~fiscal years ended ~~September~~December 3031, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~through December 22,~~ 2010, ~~there~~and ~~were no disagreements with Grant Thornton on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to~~ the ~~satisfaction~~subsequent ~~of Grant Thornton, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in its reports on the financial statements for such years. During the~~ interim period ~~ended September 30, 2010 and~~ through ~~December~~November 228, ~~2010~~2012, there were (i) no ~~reportable~~disagreements ~~events~~ (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(viv) of Regulation S-K~~. Grant~~ ~~Thornton~~and ~~has furnished a letter addressed to~~ the ~~Securities~~related ~~and~~instructions) ~~Exchange~~between ~~Commission that was included as an exhibit to~~ the Partnership’s ~~Form 8-K, initially filed with the Securities~~ and ~~Exchange~~Reznick ~~Commission~~Group on ~~December~~any ~~28,~~matter ~~2010,~~of ~~stating~~accounting ~~its~~principles ~~agreement~~or ~~with~~practices, ~~the~~financial ~~statements~~statement ~~concerning~~disclosure, ~~Grant Thornton made in this Item 9.~~

II-3

Table of Contents

or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Reznick Group would have caused Reznick Group to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company's financial statements for such years, and (ii) no “reportable events” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the subsequent interim period through November 8, 2012, neither the Partnership, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted CohnReznick regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered with respect to the financial statements of the Partnership, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Partnership by CohnReznick that was an important factor considered by the Partnership in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).



ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

AsEvaluation of ~~the~~Disclosure ~~end~~Controls ~~of the periods covered by this report, representatives of the General Partner, under the supervision~~ and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the Partnership’s periodic report filings with SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, consistent with the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Procedures

IIThe Partnership's management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in Rules 13a-615(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 'Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

PART II

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES - Continued

The General Partner must rely on the Local Limited Partnerships to provide the Partnership with certain information necessary to the timely filing of the Partnership’s periodic reports. Factors in the accounting at the Local Limited Partnerships have caused delays in the provision of such information during past reporting periods, and resulted in the Partnership’s inability to file its periodic reports in a timely manner.

Once the Partnership has received the necessary information from the Local Limited Partnerships, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that the material information required to be disclosed in the Partnership’s periodic report filings with SEC is effectively recorded, processed, summarized and reported, albeit not in a timely manner. Going forward, the Partnership will use the means reasonably within its power to impose procedures designed to obtain from the Local Limited Partnerships the information necessary to the timely filing of the Partnership’s periodic reports.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining for the Partnership adequate internal control over financial reporting as that term is defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The internal control process, as it is applicable to the Partnership, was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, and includes those policies and procedures that:


(1)	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;


(2)	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that the Partnership’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the management of the Partnership; and


(3)	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements

All internal control processes, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.II-4

~~Representatives~~Table of ~~the~~Contents General Partner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, as of the end of the Partnership’s most recent fiscal year. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, the General Partner has concluded that, for the reasons set forth above under “Disclosure controls and procedures,” the internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, was not effective as of December 31, 2011.

II-7

PART II

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES - Continued

~~For~~All ~~purposes~~internal ofcontrol ~~the~~processes, ~~Securities~~no ~~Exchange~~matter ~~Act~~how ofwell ~~1934~~designed, ~~the~~have ~~term~~inherent ~~“material~~limitations. ~~weakness”~~Therefore, iseven athose ~~deficiency,~~processes ordetermined ato ~~combination~~be ofeffective ~~deficiencies,~~can inprovide aonly ~~reporting~~reasonable ~~company’s~~assurance ~~internal~~with ~~control~~respect ~~over~~to ~~financial~~the ~~reporting~~reliability ~~such~~of ~~that~~financial ~~there~~statement ispreparation aand ~~reasonable~~presentation. ~~possibility~~Further, ~~that~~projections aof ~~material~~any ~~misstatement~~evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the ~~company's~~risk ~~annual~~that orcontrols ~~interim~~may ~~financial~~become ~~statements~~inadequate ~~will~~because ~~not~~of bechanges ~~prevented~~in conditions or ~~detected~~that onthe adegree ~~timely~~of ~~basis. For~~compliance with the ~~reasons~~policies ~~discussed~~or ~~above~~procedures inmay ~~this~~deteriorate.

~~Item~~Representatives 9Aof the General Partner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, ~~sub-section~~as it is applicable to the Partnership, as of the end of the Partnership’s most recent fiscal year. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (aCOSO). ~~under~~Based on its assessment, the ~~caption~~General Partner has concluded that, for the reasons set forth above under “Disclosure ~~Controls~~controls and ~~Procedures~~procedures,” the ~~Partnership’s~~ internal control over financial reporting, ~~has~~as ~~not~~it ~~been~~is applicable to the Partnership, was not effective inas ~~permitting~~of ~~timely~~December 31, ~~reporting~~2012. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’'s independent registered accounting firm regarding internal control over financial ~~information~~reporting. ~~Accordingly,~~ ~~the~~Management's ~~management~~report ofwas not subject to attestation by the Partnership's ~~believes~~independent ~~that~~registered ~~this~~public ~~inability~~accounting firm pursuant to ~~generate~~rules ~~timely~~of ~~reports~~the ~~constitutes~~Securities aand ~~material~~Exchange ~~weakness~~Commission inthat ~~its~~permit ~~internal~~the ~~control~~Partnership ~~over~~to ~~financial~~provide ~~reporting~~only management's report in this annual report.

For purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the term “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in a reporting company’s internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For the reasons discussed above in this Item 9A, sub-section (a) under the caption “Disclosure Controls and Procedures,” the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting has not been effective in permitting timely reporting of the Partnership’s financial information. Accordingly, the management of the Partnership believes that this inability to generate timely reports constitutes a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in internal controls

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~March~~December 31, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

Certain states may assert claims against the Partnership for failure to withhold and remit state income tax on operating profit or where the sale(s) of property in which the Partnership was invested failed to produce sufficient cash proceeds with which to pay the state tax and/or to pay statutory partnership filing fees. The Partnership is unable to quantify the amount of such potential claims at this time. The Partnership has consistently advised its Partners that they should consult with their tax advisors as to the necessity of filing non-resident returns in such states with respect to their proportional taxes due.

II-85

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OFAND ~~THE~~CORPORATE ~~REGISTRANT~~GOVERNANCE

(a) and (b)

The Partnership has no directors, executive officers or employees of its own.

(a) and (b)

The names, ages and business experience of the directors and executive officers of C.R.I., Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, follow.

William B. Dockser, 7576, has been the Chairman of the Board and a Director of CRI since 1974. Prior to forming CRI, he served as President of Kaufman and Broad Asset Management, Inc., an affiliate of Kaufman and Broad, Inc., which managed publicly held limited partnerships created to invest in low and moderate income multifamily apartment properties. Prior to joining Kaufman and Broad, he served in various positions at HUD, culminating in the post of Deputy FHA Commissioner and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing Production and Mortgage Credit, where he was responsible for all federally insured housing production programs. Before coming to the Washington, D. C. area, Mr. Dockser was a practicing attorney in Boston and served as a special Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from Yale University Law School and a Bachelor of Arts degree, cum laude, from Harvard University.

H. William Willoughby, 6566, has been President, Secretary and a Director of CRI since January 1990, and was Senior Executive Vice President, Secretary and a Director of CRI from 1974 to 1989. Effective May 7, 2005, he assumed the duties of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of CRI. He is principally responsible for the financial management of CRI and its associated partnerships. Prior to joining CRI in 1974, he was Vice President of Shelter Corporation of America and a number of its subsidiaries dealing principally with real estate development and equity financing. Before joining Shelter Corporation, he was a senior tax accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co. He holds a Juris Doctor degree, a Master of Business Administration degree and a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of South Dakota.


(c)	There is no family relationship between any of the foregoing directors and executive officers.

(dci) Involvement in certain legal proceedings.

None.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h)

The Partnership has no officers or directors. However, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, and as disclosed in the public offering, various kinds of compensation and fees were paid or are payable to the General Partners and their affiliates. Additional information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to Notes 3 and 4 of the notes to financial statements contained in Part IV.

III-1

PART III



ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT


(a)	Security ownership of certain beneficial owners.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning any person (including any “group”) who is known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the issued and outstanding units of additional limited partner interest (Units) at ~~June~~May 2715, ~~2012~~2013.

		% of Total
Name and Address	Amount and Nature	Units Issued
Of Beneficial Owner	of Beneficial Ownership	and Outstanding
Equity Resource	6,682.25 Units	26.9%
Investments, LLC
& Affiliates
44 Brattle Street
Cambridge, MA 02138

III-1



Name and Address Of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	% of Total Units Issued and Outstanding

Peachtree Partners & Affiliates	1332.875 Units	5.39	%
P.O. Box 47638
Phoenix, AZ 85068

Equity Resource	7799.75 Units	31.52	%
Investments, LLC
& Affiliates
1280 Massachusetts Ave., 4th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138


(b)	Security ownership of management.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning all Units beneficially owned, as of May ~~June 27~~15, ~~2012,~~2013 by each director and by all directors and officers as a group of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership.

			% of Total
Name of Beneficial Owner	% of TotalAmount and Natureof Beneficial Ownership	Units Issuedand Outstanding
		Name of	Amount and Nature	Units Issued
William B. Dockser	None	—%
		Beneficial Owner	of Beneficial Ownership	and Outstanding
H. William Willoughby	None	—%
		William B. Dockser	None	0.0%
All Directors and Officers
		H. William Willoughby	None	0.0%
as a Group (2 persons)	None	—%
		All Directors and Officers
		as a Group (2 persons)	None	0.0%


(c)	Changes in control.

There exists no arrangement known to the Partnership, the operation of which may, at a subsequent date, result in a change in control of the Partnership. There is a provision in the Limited Partnership Agreement which allows, under certain circumstances, the ability to change control.

~~III-2~~ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

PART III

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

(a) and (b)

Transactions with management and others.

The Partnership has no directors or officers. In addition, the Partnership has had no transactions with individual officers or directors of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership other than any indirect interest such officers and directors may have in the amounts paid to the Managing General Partner or its affiliates by virtue of their stock ownership in CRI. Item 11 of this report, which contains a discussion of the fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the General Partners or their affiliates, is incorporated herein by reference. Note 3 of the notes to financial statements contained in Part IV, which contains disclosure of related party transactions, is also incorporated herein by reference.


(c)	Certain business relationships.

The Partnership's response to Item 13(a) is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the Partnership has no business relationship with entities of which the officers and directors of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership are officers, directors or equity owners other than as set forth in the Partnership's response to Item 13(a).

III-2


(d)	Transactions with promoters.

Not applicable.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ~~ACCOUNTANT~~ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

For the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~December 31~~2011, ~~2010,~~ the Partnership incurred professional fees for the services of the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting ~~firm~~firms ~~Grant~~of ~~Thornton~~Reznick Group and CohnReznick as follows:

		2011			2010
	2012			2011
Audit fees (1)	$	$97,000	~~64,250~~	$	$64,250	~~31,945~~
Tax fees (2)	13,000		~~13,000~~	13,000		~~16,800~~
Total billed	$	$110,000	~~77,250~~	$	$77,250	~~48,745~~


(1)	Principally fees for the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Partnership’s quarterly financial statements, and services provided in connection with the Partnership’s regulatory filings.

(21) Fees for preparation of Partnership federal and state tax returns.

III-3

PART III

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES - Continued

The Partnership has no directors or officers. The Board of Directors of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, serving as the Audit Committee, has approved in advance 100% of the fees paid to, and services provided by the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm. Prior to approving the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm providing any non-audit services, the Board of Directors of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership would assess whether the provision of those services would compromise the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm independence.

~~Grant~~On ~~Thornton~~November ~~was~~8, ~~dismissed~~2012, Reznick Group resigned as the Partnership’'s independent registered public accounting firm after the filing of the Partnership’'s 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal year ~~2010~~2012. CohnReznick ~~Reznick~~ was engaged as the Partnership’'s new independent registered public accounting firm and performed the fiscal ~~2010 yearend~~2012 year end audit. CohnReznick also provided partnership tax return preparation services for the year ended December 31, 2012 and Reznick Group provided partnership tax return preparation services for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2011, ~~and~~which ~~2010~~services it was determined did not compromise CohnReznick's or Reznick Group's independence.

III-43

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED PARTNERSHIP MATTERS

1. Financial Statements

a. The following documents are included as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements

~~Report~~Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting ~~Firm~~Firms

Balance Sheets

Statements of Operations

Statements of Changes in Partners’ (Deficit) Capital

Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Financial Statements

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

None.

(3) Exhibits

Index of Exhibits (Listed according to the number assigned in the table in Item 601 of Regulation S-K.)

Exhibit No. 4 - Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.

a. Amended Certificate and Limited Partnership Agreement of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended, dated December 4, 1981.)

Exhibit No. 10 - Material Contracts.

a. Management Services Agreement between CRI and Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10(b) to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended, dated December 4, 1981.)

	Exhibit No. 31.1 -	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	Exhibit No. 31.2 -	Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	Exhibit No. 32 -	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	Exhibit No. 99	Additional Exhibits

Exhibit No. 31.1 -Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 31.2 -Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 32 -Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit No. 99 Additional Exhibits

a.Prospectus of the Partnership, dated December 31, 1981. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended, dated December 4, 1981.)

IV-1

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS - Continued

a. Prospectus of the Partnership, dated December 31, 1981. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, as amended, dated December 4, 1981.)

IV-2

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-III
	CAPITAL REALTY
		LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
		INVESTORS, LTD.
	(Registrant)
June 27, 2012	by:		/s/ William B. Dockser
May 15, 2013	by:	/s/ William B. Dockser
DATE		William B. Dockser,	~~William B. Dockser,~~
		Director, Chairman of the Board	~~Director, Chairman of the Board~~
		and Treasurer		~~and Treasurer~~
		Principal Executive Officer)	~~Principal Executive Officer)~~

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

June 27, 2012	by:	/s/ H. William Willoughby
May 15, 2013	by:	/s/ H. William Willoughby
DATE		H. William Willoughby
		Director, President, Secretary,
		Principal Financial Officer and
			Principal Accounting Officer

IV-32

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Financial Statements of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	IV-5
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	IV-4
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010	IV-6
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011	IV-6
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	IV-7
December 31, 2011 and 2010	IV-7
Statements of Changes in Partners’ (Deficit) Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	IV-8
Statements of Changes in Partners’ (Deficit) Capital for the Years Ended
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	IV-9
December 31, 2011 and 2010	IV-8
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2011 and 2010	IV-9
Notes to Financial Statements	IV-10

IV-3

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Capital Realty Investors, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2012 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners’ (deficit) capital, and cash flows for the year then ended. The Partnership's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. as of December 31, 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ CohnReznick LLP

Bethesda, Maryland

May 15, 2013

IV-4

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Capital Realty Investors, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance ~~sheets~~sheet of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2011 and ~~2010 and~~ the related statements of operations, changes in partners’ (deficit) capital, and cash flows for the ~~years~~year then ended. ~~These~~The ~~financial~~Partnership's ~~statements~~management ~~are~~is ~~the~~responsible ~~responsibility~~for ofthese ~~the~~financial ~~Partnership’s management~~statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our ~~audits~~audit.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our ~~audits~~audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit ~~provide~~provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. as of December 31, 2011 ~~and 2010~~, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the ~~years~~year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ ~~REZNICK~~Reznick ~~GROUP~~Group, P.C.

Bethesda, Maryland

June 27, 2012

IV-5

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

	December 31,	~~December 31,~~
		2011			2010
	2012			2011
Investments in and advances to partnerships	$	$1,597,027	~~5,297,827~~	$	$5,297,827	~~4,021,281~~
Cash and cash equivalents	7,674,174		~~2,194,867~~	2,194,867		~~2,552,538~~
Acquisitions fees, principally paid to related parties,
Note receivable and accrued interest,
net of accumulated amortization of $108,671 and $184,526, respectively
net of allowance of $619,000	—			—
Property purchase costs,
Acquisitions fees, principally paid to related parties,
net of accumulated amortization of $39,489 and $47,819, respectively			14,028			19,026
net of accumulated amortization of $44,471 and $108,671, respectively	14,447			40,733
Other assets			-			2,911
Property purchase costs,
Total assets		$	7,547,455		$	6,670,385
net of accumulated amortization of $20,471 and $39,489, respectively	6,390			14,028
Total assets	$	9,292,038		$	7,547,455
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	43,602		$	66,072
Total liabilities	43,602			66,072
Commitments and contingencies	—			—
Partners' capital:
Capital paid in:
General Partners	14,000			14,000
Limited Partners	24,837,000			24,837,000
	24,851,000			24,851,000
Less:
Accumulated distributions to partners	(16,251,682		)	(16,251,682		)
Offering costs	(2,689,521		)	(2,689,521		)
Accumulated gain	3,338,639			1,571,586
Total partners' capital	9,248,436			7,481,383
Total liabilities and partners' capital	$	9,292,038		$	7,547,455

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ (DEFICIT) CAPITAL

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	66,072		$	41,465
Total liabilities		66,072			41,465
Commitments and contingencies
Partners' capital:
Capital paid in :
General Partners		14,000			14,000
Limited Partners		24,837,000			24,837,000
		24,851,000			24,851,000
Less:
Accumulated distributions to partners		(16,251,682	)		(16,251,682	)
Offering costs		(2,689,521	)		(2,689,521	)
Accumulated gain		1,571,586			719,123
Total partners' (deficit) capital		7,481,383			6,628,920
Total liabilities and partners' (deficit) capital	$	7,547,455		$	6,670,385

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these financial statements.

IV-6

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		For the years ended
	For the years ended December 31,
		December 31,
	2012				2011
		2011				2010
Share of income from partnerships	$	1,510,098			$	1,299,472
Share of income from partnerships		$	1,299,472			$	784,932
Other revenue and expenses:
Other revenue and expenses:
Revenue:
Revenue:
Gain on sale of interest in Local Partnership, net of disposition fee	765,817				—
Interest and other	11,244		~~52,882~~		52,882		~~53,511~~
Expenses:
	777,061				52,882
General and administrative			235,531				276,481
Expenses:
Professional fees			130,258				161,632
General and administrative	297,472				235,531
Management fees			95,208				95,208
Professional fees	122,542				130,258
Amortization of deferred costs			7,631				8,144
Management fees	95,208				95,208
Loss on foreclosure of Local Partnership			31,263				-
Amortization of deferred costs	4,884				7,631
			499,891				541,465
Loss on foreclosure of Local Partnership	—				31,263
Total other revenue and expenses			(447,009	)			(487,954	)
	520,106				499,891
Net income		$	852,463			$	296,978
Total other revenue and expenses	256,955				(447,009		)
Net income allocated to
Net income	$	1,767,053			$	852,463
General Partners (3%)		$	25,574			$	8,909
Net income allocated to
Net income allocated to
General Partners (3%)	$	53,012			$	25,574
Limited Partners (97%)		$	826,889			$	288,069
Net income allocated to
Net income per unit of Limited Partner
Limited Partners (97%)	$	1,714,041			$	826,889
Interest, based on 24,747 units outstanding		$	33.41			$	11.64
Net income per unit of Limited Partner
Interest, based on 24,747 units outstanding	$	69			$	33

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these financial statements.

IV-7

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (~~DEFICT~~DEFICIT) CAPITAL

	General			Limited
	Partners			Partners			Total
Partners' (deficit) capital, January 1, 2010	$	(46,241	)	$	7,120,593		$	7,074,352
Net income		8,909			288,069			296,978
Distribution of $30 per Unit of
Limited Partner Interest		-			(742,410	)		(742,410	)
Partners' (deficit) capital, December 31, 2010		(37,332	)		6,666,252			6,628,920
Net income		25,574			826,889			852,463
Partners' (deficit) capital, December 31, 2011	$	( 11,758	)	$	7,493,141		$	7,481,383

For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011



	General Partners			Limited Partners		Total
Partners' (deficit) capital, January 1, 2011	$	(37,332	)	$	6,666,252	$	6,628,920

Net income	25,574			826,889		852,463

Partners' (deficit) capital, December 31, 2011	(11,758		)	7,493,141		7,481,383

Net income	53,012			1,714,041		1,767,053

Partners' capital, December 31, 2012	$	41,254		$	9,207,182	$	9,248,436

The accompanying notes are an integral part

of these financial statements.

IV-8

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		For the years ended
	For the years ended December 31,
		December 31,
	2012				2011
		2011				2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	1,767,053			$	852,463
Net income		$	852,463			$	296,978
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Adjustments to reconcile net loss income to net cash
used in operating activities:
used in operating activities:
Share of income from partnerships	(1,510,098		)		(1,299,472		)
Share of income from partnerships			(1,299,472	)			(784,932	)
Amortization of deferred costs	4,884				7,631
Amortization of deferred costs			7,631				8,144
Loss on foreclosure of Local Partnership	—				31,263
Loss on foreclosure of Local Partnership			31,263				-
Gain on sale of interest in Local Partnership	(765,817		)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in accrued interest receivable on advances
to local partnership	—		~~(28,390~~	)	(28,390		~~(51,315~~)	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets			2,911				(2,911	)
Decrease in other assets	—				2,911
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses	(22,470		~~24,607~~)		24,607		~~19,579~~
Net cash used in operating activities	(526,448		~~(408,987~~)	)	(408,987		~~(514,457~~)	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Receipt of distributions from partnerships			51,316				59,372
Proceeds from sale of interest in Local Partnership	6,545,318				—
Advances made to local partnership			-				(100,000	)
Disposition fee paid	(567,000		)		—
Net cash provided by (used in ) investing activities			51,316				(40,628	)
Receipt of distributions from partnerships	27,437				51,316
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net cash provided by investing activities	6,005,755				51,316
Distributions to Limited Partners			-				(742,410	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	5,479,307				(357,671		)
Net cash used in financing activities			-				(742,410	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	2,194,867				2,552,538
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(357,671	)			(1,297,495	)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	7,674,174			$	2,194,867
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year			2,552,538				3,850,033
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year		$	2,194,867			$	2,552,538

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

of these financial statements.

IV-9

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


a.	Organization

Capital Realty Investors, Ltd. (the Partnership) was formed under the District of Columbia Limited Partnership Act on June 1, 1981, and shall continue until December 31, 2030, unless sooner dissolved in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement. The Partnership was formed to invest in real estate by acquiring and holding limited partner interests in limited partnerships (Local Partnerships) that own and operate federal or state government-assisted properties or properties which provide housing principally to the elderly or to individuals and families of low or moderate income, or conventionally financed apartment properties, located throughout the United States.

The General Partners of the Partnership are C.R.I., Inc. (CRI), which is the Managing General Partner, current and former shareholders of CRI, and Rockville Pike Associates, Ltd., a Maryland limited partnership which includes the shareholders of CRI and certain former officers and employees of CRI.

The Partnership sold 24,837 units at $1,000 per unit of limited partner interest through a public offering. The offering period was terminated on December 31, 1982. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, 90 units of limited partner interest had been abandoned.


b.	Method of accounting

The financial statements of the Partnership are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


c.	Variable interest entities

IV-10

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

1.DECEMBER ~~ORGANIZATION~~31, 2012 AND ~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued~~2011


d.	Investments in and advances to partnerships

The Partnership’s investment in Local Partnerships is considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs) because the owners of the equity at risk in these entities do not have the power to direct their operations. However, the Partnership is not considered the primary beneficiary of the Local Partnerships since it does not have the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the economic performance of these entities. Therefore, and because the Partnership is a limited partner in the Local Partnerships, the Partnership accounts for the investment in its Local Partnerships using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the initial investment is recorded at cost, increased or decreased by the Partnership’s share of income or losses, and decreased by distributions received and syndication costs. The investment balance cannot be reduced below zero. After the investment account is reduced to zero, receivables due from the Local Partnership are decreased by the Partnership’s share of losses. Distributions received after the investment account is reduced to zero are recorded as income.

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Partnership's share of cumulative losses for three and four of the Local Partnerships exceeded the amount of the Partnership's investments in and advances to those Local Partnerships by $32,~~356~~898,~~064~~119 and $43,~~760~~356,~~850~~064, respectively. Since the Partnership has no further obligation to advance funds or provide financing to these Local Partnerships, the excess losses have not been reflected in the accompanying financial statements. The Partnership’s carrying value is zero and the equity method has been suspended for the following ~~three~~ Local ~~Partnerships~~Partnership as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012: ~~Hillview Terrace,~~ New Sharon Woods ~~and Shallowford Oaks~~. The Partnership’s carrying value is zero and the equity method has been suspended for the following ~~four~~three Local Partnerships as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011: Hillview Terrace, New Sharon Woods, ~~Shallowford Oaks,~~ and ~~Westwood~~Shallowford ~~Village~~Oaks. Distributions of $7,219 received from one Local Partnership during ~~both~~ 2011 ~~and 2010~~, for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended) were recorded as increases in the Partnership’s share of income from partnerships in the year received.

Costs incurred in connection with acquiring these investments have been capitalized and are being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the properties owned by the Local Partnerships.

e. ~~Investment~~ inDeferred ~~partnerships held for sale~~Costs

~~When~~Acquisition ~~investments~~Fees ~~are~~and ~~reclassified~~Property Purchase Costs incurred for services rendered to ~~investment~~acquire inthe ~~partnerships~~Local ~~held~~Partnerships ~~for~~are ~~sale,~~amortized ~~amortization~~over of40 ~~acquisition~~years ~~fees~~using ~~and~~the ~~property~~straight-line ~~purchase~~method, ~~costs~~beginning ~~are~~upon ~~discontinued~~commencement of operations of the Local Partnerships. ~~Assets~~The ~~held~~Partnership regularly assesses deferred costs for ~~sale~~the ~~are~~existence ~~recorded~~of atimpairment in conjunction with the ~~lower~~assessment of its investment in Local Partnerships. Amortization expense for the ~~carrying~~years ~~amount~~ended orDecember ~~expected~~31, ~~sales~~2012 ~~price~~and ~~less~~2011 ~~costs~~was to$4,884 ~~sell~~and $7,631, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the ensuing years through December 31, 2017 is $2,139.

~~IV-11~~The Partnership sold its interest in two Local Partnerships during 2012. Therefore, deferred costs of $117,142 and associated accumulated amortization of $88,102 were written off. During 2012, this amount is included in gain on sale of interest in Local Partnership on the statements of operations.

~~CAPITAL~~One ~~REALTY~~Local ~~INVESTORS~~Partnership was foreclosed on during 2011. Therefore, ~~LTD~~deferred costs of $123,079 and associated accumulated amortization of $91,816 were written off. During 2011, this net amount of $31,263 is included in loss of foreclosure of Local Partnership on the statements of operations.

~~NOTES~~f. TOCash ~~FINANCIAL~~and ~~STATEMENTS~~cash equivalents

1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued

f. Deferred Costs

Acquisition Fees and Property Purchase Costs incurred for services rendered to acquire the Local Partnerships are amortized over 40 years using the straight-line method, beginning upon commencement of operations of the Local Partnerships. The Partnership regularly assesses deferred costs for the existence of impairment in conjunction with the assessment of its investment in Local Partnerships. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $7,631 and $8,144, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the ensuing years through December 31, 2016 is $5,401. One Local Partnership was foreclosed on during 2011. Therefore, deferred costs of $123,079 and associated accumulated amortization of $91,816 were written off. This amount is included in Loss of foreclosure of Local Partnership on the Statements of operations.

g. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of money market funds, time and demand deposits, and repurchase agreements with original maturities of three months or less. Interest income is recognized as earned.

hg. Income taxes

The Partnership has elected to be treated as a pass-through entity for income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to income taxes. Rather, all items of taxable income, deductions and tax credits are passed through to and are reported by its owners on their respective income tax returns. The Partnership’s federal tax status as a pass-through entity is based on its legal status as a partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership is not required to take any tax positions in order to qualify as a pass-through entity. The Partnership is required to file and does file tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. Accordingly, these financial statements do not reflect a provision for income taxes and the Partnership has no other tax positions which must be considered for disclosure.

~~i. Use of estimates~~IV-11

In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the Partnership is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

IV-12

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

1.DECEMBER ~~ORGANIZATION~~31, 2012 AND ~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued~~2011

jAccounting guidance conveys how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ~~Fair~~ The ~~Value~~guidance requires the evaluation of ~~Financial~~tax ~~Instruments~~positions in the course of preparing the Partnership's tax returns to determine whether tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-than-likely threshold would not be recognized as tax expense in the current year. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Partnership did not recognize any interest or penalties related to the income taxes in the its financial statements. Generally, the tax returns filed with the various taxing authorities remain available for audit subject to statutes of limitation specific to those jurisdictions. Income tax returns filed by the Partnership are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years. While no income tax returns are currently being examined by the Internal Revenue Service, tax years since 2009 remain open.

~~The~~h. ~~Financing~~Use ~~Accounting~~of ~~Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:~~estimates


i.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


1.	Level 1 Inputs -- quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.


2.	Level 2 Inputs -- observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.


3.	Level 3 Inputs -- unobservable inputs.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The balance sheet carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.

kj. Impairment analysis

The Partnership reviews property assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Impairment for investments in partnerships is determined by review of the performance of the underlying asset and expected proceeds from the sale of the investment. If an asset were determined to be impaired, its basis would be adjusted to fair value through the recognition of an impairment loss. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, no impairment loss was recognized.

lk. Allocation of net income (loss)

Net income (loss) is allocated based on respective partnership interest or units outstanding. The Partnership has no dilutive interests.

ml. Subsequent events

Events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements were available to be issued must be evaluated for recognition or disclosure. The effects of subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are recognized in the accompanying financial statements. Subsequent events which provide evidence about conditions that existed after the balance sheet date require disclosure in the accompanying notes. Management evaluated the activity of the Partnership and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the financial statements. See orNote ~~disclosure~~2.d. inand ~~the~~Note ~~notes~~4 tofor ~~the~~disclosure ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~subsequent events.

IV-1312

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

1.DECEMBER ~~ORGANIZATION~~31, 2012 AND ~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued~~2011

nm. Recent accounting pronouncements

In ~~May 2009~~2011, the FASB issued ~~guidance~~Accounting ~~addressing~~Standard ~~the~~Update ~~accounting~~(ASU) ~~for~~No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement:Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and ~~disclosure~~Disclosure ~~requirements~~Requirements ofin ~~events~~U.S. orGAAP ~~transactions~~and ~~that~~IFRS". This ~~occur~~update ~~after~~amends the ~~balance~~guidance ~~sheet~~on ~~date,~~fair ~~but~~value ~~before~~measurements ~~the~~to ~~financial~~develop ~~statements~~common ~~are~~requirements ~~issued.~~for ~~The~~measuring ~~Partnership~~fair ~~adopted~~value ~~the~~and ~~guidance~~for asdisclosing ofinformation ~~June 30,~~about ~~2009~~fair asvalue itmeasurements ~~was~~in ~~effective~~accordance ~~for~~with ~~interim~~US GAAP and ~~annual~~International ~~periods~~Financial ~~ending~~Reporting ~~after~~Standards ~~June 15, 2009~~(IFRS). ~~The~~This ~~adoption~~ASU ~~did~~does not ~~have~~require aadditional ~~significant~~fair ~~impact~~value onmeasurements ~~the~~and ~~subsequent~~is ~~events~~not ~~that~~intended ~~the~~to ~~Partnership~~establish ~~reports,~~valuation ~~either~~standards ~~through recognition~~ or ~~disclosure,~~affect invaluation ~~the~~practices ~~consolidated~~outside of financial ~~statements~~reporting. The InPartnership ~~February~~adopted ~~2010,~~this ~~however,~~update ~~the~~as ~~FASB~~of ~~amended~~January ~~its~~1, ~~guidance~~2012 onand ~~subsequent~~the ~~events~~adoption todid ~~remove~~not ~~the~~have ~~requirement~~a tomaterial ~~disclose~~impact on the ~~date~~Partnership's ~~through~~results ~~which~~of anoperations, ~~entity~~financial ~~has~~position, ~~evaluated~~or ~~subsequent~~cash ~~events,~~flows ~~alleviating~~during ~~conflicts~~the ~~with~~year ~~current~~ended December 31, 2012.

SEC guidance. This amendment was effective immediately and therefore the Partnership did not include the disclosure in this Form 10-K.

IV-14

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS

a. Interests in profits, losses and cash distributions made by Local Partnerships

The Partnership has a 9498.9900% to 98.98% interest in profits, losses and cash distributions (as restricted by various federal and state housing agencies) (collectively, the “Agencies”) of each Local Partnership. An affiliate of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership is also a general partner of each Local Partnership. As stipulated by the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements, the Local Partnerships are required to make annual cash distributions from surplus cash flow, if any. During ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Partnership received cash distributions from rental operations of the Local Partnerships of $5127,~~316~~437 and $5951,~~372~~316, respectively. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, ~~two~~one and ~~three~~two of the Local Partnerships had aggregate surplus cash, as defined by their respective regulatory Agencies, in the amounts of $135,~~238,617~~863 and $1,~~043~~238,~~598~~617, respectively, which may be available for distribution in accordance with their respective regulatory Agencies' regulations.

The cash distributions to the Partnership from the operations of the Local Partnerships may be limited by the Agencies' regulations. Such regulations limit annual cash distributions to a percentage of the owner's equity investment in a rental property. Funds in excess of those which may be distributed to owners are generally required to be placed in a residual receipts account held by the governing state or federal agency for the benefit of the property. In addition, local general partners have the authority to withhold funds if needed for property repairs, improvements, or other property needs.

Upon sale or refinancing of a property owned by a Local Partnership, or upon the liquidation of a Local Partnership, the proceeds from such sale, refinancing or liquidation shall be distributed in accordance with the respective provisions of each Local Partnership's partnership agreement. In accordance with such provisions, the Partnership would receive from such proceeds its respective percentage interest of any remaining proceeds, after payment of (i) all debts and liabilities of the Local Partnership and certain other items, (ii) the Partnership's capital contributions plus certain specified amounts as outlined in each partnership agreement, and (iii) certain special distributions to general partners and related entities of the Local Partnership.

~~Local Partnership, the proceeds from such sale, refinancing or liquidation shall be distributed in accordance with the respective provisions of each Local Partnership's partnership agreement~~b. In Pending ~~accordance with such provisions, the Partnership would receive from such proceeds its respective percentage interest of any remaining proceeds, after payment of (i) all debts~~ and ~~liabilities~~Completed of the Local Partnership and certain other items, (ii) the Partnership's capital contributions plus certain specified amounts as outlined in each partnership agreement, and (iii) certain special distributions to general partners and related entities of the Local Partnership.Sales

~~b. Advance~~Pending ~~to Local Partnership~~Sales

AsOn ofJune ~~both December 31~~29, ~~2011 and 2010~~2012, the Partnership ~~had~~entered ~~advanced~~into ~~funds,~~a ~~including~~partnership ~~accrued~~purchase ~~interest,~~agreement ~~totaling $1,008,738 and $980,348, respectively,~~ to ~~ARA~~sell ~~Associates~~their -partnership ~~Shangri-La~~interest ~~Ltd.~~in ~~(Shallowford~~New ~~Oaks). On~~Sharon ~~April~~Woods ~~15, 2010, the Partnership advanced $100,000 to Shallowford Oaks~~ for ~~operating expenses~~$1. The Partnership's ~~accrued~~investment ~~$28,390~~basis ~~and~~in ~~$51,315~~this toLocal ~~interest~~Partnership ~~receivables~~at onboth ~~the advances to Shallowford Oaks as of~~ December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011 ~~respectively~~was $0. ~~For~~ The ~~financial~~sale ~~reporting~~is ~~purposes,~~expected ~~these loans have been reduced~~ to ~~zero~~close ~~by the Partnership as a result of losses at the Local Partnership level~~ during ~~prior years. As a result,~~ the ~~amount~~second ~~advanced~~quarter ~~and accrued interest has been reflected as a reduction~~ of ~~share of income from partnerships~~2013.

~~IV-15~~On August 2, 2012, the Local Partnership entered into a purchase agreement to sell The Chestnut Apartments for $5,440,000. The Partnership's investment basis in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,171,612 and $1,024,547, respectively. The Partnership expects to receive approximately $3,500,000 as a result of the sale. The sale is expected to close during the second quarter of 2013.

On August 2, 2012, the Local Partnership entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell Westwood Village for $3,085,000. The Partnership's investment basis in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $425,415 and $155,120, respectively. The Partnership expects to receive approximately $2,100,000 as a result of the sale. The sale is expected to close during the third quarter of 2013.

Completed Sales

On August 29, 2012, the Partnership sold its limited partner interest in Traverse City Elderly, LP, which owns the Hillview Terrace Apartments, for $299,990. In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, in September 2012, the Managing General Partner paid a disposition fee of $92,000 related to the sale. The net proceeds received as a result of the sale of was $207,990. The Partnership's investment basis at the date of the sale was $0. Net acquisition fees and property purchase costs netted against the gain on sale of interest in Local Partnership were $7,465. The net gain recognized for this sale was $200,525.

On December 17, 2012, the Partnership sold its limited partner interest in Capitol Senior Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership, which owns the Capital Commons Senior Apartments. Total proceeds received as a result of the sale were $6,245,328. In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, in December 2012, the Managing General Partner paid a disposition fee of $475,000 related to the sale. The net proceeds received as a result of the sale was $5,770,328. Net acquisition

IV-13

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

~~2. INVESTMENTS~~DECEMBER IN31, 2012 AND ~~ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued~~2011

Asfees ~~of January 2011, the Shallowford Oaks property was unable to meet its debt service requirements~~ and ~~was therefore in default with regards to the mortgage encumbering the~~ property. Inpurchase ~~February~~costs ~~2011,~~netted ~~the~~against ~~mortgage lender for~~ the ~~mortgage~~gain ~~encumbering the Shallowford Oaks property sent notice accelerating the debt. On November, 1, 2011, the mortgage holder for Shallowford Oaks, LSREF2 Chalk 2, LLC, foreclosed~~ on ~~the property and became the new owner of the property pursuant to a non-judicial foreclosure~~ sale ~~under the power~~ of ~~sale~~interest ~~clause contained~~ in ~~its law documents. As a result of the foreclosure all of the assets and liabilities of the~~ Local Partnership were ~~written off as of December 31~~$21, ~~2011~~575. The ~~resulting~~Partnership's ~~loss~~investment ofbasis at the ~~foreclosure~~date of sale was $315,~~263~~183,461 and iswas ~~recorded~~written onoff ~~the~~and ~~Statements~~included ofin ~~Operations~~the asgain ~~Loss~~on ~~from~~sale ~~foreclosure~~of oninterest in Local Partnership. The ~~loss~~net isgain arecognized ~~result~~for ~~of writing off~~ the ~~deferred~~sale ~~costs associated with the investment in the Local Partnership~~was $565,292.

c. ~~Property~~ Advance ~~matters~~to Local Partnership

As of December 31, 2011, the Partnership had advanced funds, including accrued interest, totaling $1,008,738 to ARA Associates-Shangri-La Ltd. (Shallowford Oaks). On April 15, 2010, the Partnership advanced $100,000 to Shallowford Oaks for operating expenses. The Partnership accrued $28,390 to interest receivable on the advances to Shallowford Oaks as of December 31, 2011. For financial reporting purposes, these loans have been reduced to zero by the Partnership as a result of losses at the Local Partnership level during prior years. As a result, the amount advanced and accrued interest has been reflected as a reduction of share of income from the Partnership in 2011.

In January 2011, the Shallowford Oaks property was unable to meet its debt service requirements and was therefore in default with regards to the mortgage encumbering the property. In February 2011, the mortgage lender for the mortgage encumbering the property sent notice accelerating the debt. On November 1, 2011, the mortgage holder for Shallowford Oaks, LSREF2, LLC, foreclosed on the property and became the new owner of the property pursuant to a non-judicial foreclosure sale under the power of sale clause contained in its law documents. As a result of the foreclosure all of the assets and liabilities of the Local Partnership were written off as of December 31, 2011. The resulting loss of the foreclosure was $31,263 and is recorded on the statements of operations as loss from foreclosure on Local Partnership. During 2011, the Local Partnership was wound up, and the Partnershiop no longer holds a limited partner interest in the Local Partnership.

d. Property matters

Baltic Plaza

On December 19, 2002, the Local Partnership which owned the Baltic Plaza apartments sold the property. Cash proceeds received by the Partnership totaled $2,053,358. As part of the consideration, the Local Partnership took back a 30-year purchase money note in the principal amount of $2,300,000, collateralized by the partnership interests of the general partner of the maker/purchaser. The Local Partnership assigned the purchase money note to an escrow for the benefit of its partners (with CRI serving as escrow agent), so that the Local Partnership entity could be dissolved. The purchase money note bears interest at 4.660% compounded annually, and requires a minimum annual payment equal to 50% of the maker/purchaser’s annual audited cash flow, as defined, with the balance of unpaid principal, if any, plus accrued interest, due and payable on December 31, 2032. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, no payments of principal or interest have been received on this purchase money note. The Partnership’s 98% beneficial interest in this purchase money note is reflected in the accompanying balance sheets at December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~December 31~~2011, ~~2010,~~ at its original principal balance of $2,300,000 plus estimated accrued but unpaid interest, all discounted to $619,000 to provide for an effective interest rate commensurate with the investment risk. The resulting discounted amount has been fully reserved due to uncertainty of collection of the purchase money note and related interest.

dOn November 28, 2012, the Partnership entered an agreement to sell the note to an affiliate of the SP Baltic Plaza, LP for a sale price of $2,000,000. ~~Summarized~~ The ~~financial~~note ~~information~~sold on April 29, 2013. The Partnership received $1,960,000 in proceeds from the sale of the note.

~~Combined balance sheets and combined statements of operations for the six Local Partnerships in which the Partnership is invested as of December 31, 2011, follow~~e. ~~The~~ Summarized ~~information~~financial is presented separately for two Local Partnerships which have investment basis (equity method), and for four Local Partnerships for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended).information

Combined balance sheets and combined statements of operations for the three Local Partnerships in which the Partnership is invested as of December 31, 2012 follow. The information is presented separately for two Local Partnerships which have investment basis (equity method), and for one Local Partnership for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended).

IV-14

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2012



	Equity Method			Suspended				Total
Number of Local Partnerships	2		(a)	1			(b)	3

Rental property, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation of $4,792,429, $3,873,267,
and $8,665,696, respectively	$	956,676		$	465,476			$	1,422,152
Land	406,000			71,050				477,050
Other assets	642,727			1,157,199				1,799,926
Total assets	$	2,005,403		$	1,693,725			$	3,699,128

Mortgage notes payable	$	129,244		$	3,536,432			$	3,665,676
Other liabilities	217,116			1,076,488				1,293,604
Due to general partners	294,158			36,999				331,157
Total liabilities	640,518			4,649,919				5,290,437

Partners' capital (deficit)	1,364,885			(2,956,194		)		(1,591,309		)

Total liabilities and partners'
capital (deficit)	$	2,005,403		$	1,693,725			$	3,699,128

(a) Westood Village; Chestnut

(b) New Sharon Woods

IV-15

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended December 31, 2012



	Equity Method			Suspended			Total
Number of Local Partnerships	3		(a)	2		(b)	5

Revenue:
Rental	$	3,575,298		$	1,350,446		$	4,925,744
Other	405,497			21,164			426,661
Total revenue	3,980,795			1,371,610			5,352,405

Expenses:
Operating	2,061,140			989,221			3,050,361
Interest	75,654			167,966			243,620
Depreciation and amortization	261,243			131,047			392,290
Total expenses	2,398,037			1,288,234			3,686,271

Net income	$	1,582,758		$	83,376		$	1,666,134

Cash distributions	$	27,437		$	—		$	27,437

Cash distributions recorded as reduction
of investments in partnerships	$	27,437		$	—		$	27,437

Partnership’s share of Local Partnership
net income	$	1,510,098		$	—		$	1,510,098

Advance to Local Partnership,
including accrued interest	—			—			—

Share of income from partnerships	$	1,510,098		$	—		$	1,510,098

(a) Westood Village; Chestnut; Capital Commons ( through the date of sale)

(b) New Sharon Woods; Hillview Terrace (through the date of sale)

IV-16

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

~~2. INVESTMENTS~~DECEMBER IN31, 2012 AND ~~ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued~~2011

Combined balance sheets and combined statements of operations for the six Local Partnerships in which the Partnership is invested as of December 31, 2011 follow. The information is presented separately for three Local Partnerships which have investment basis (equity method), and for three Local Partnerships for which the Partnership’s carrying value is zero (equity method suspended).

COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2011

		Equity
	EquityMethod				Suspended					Total
		Method			Suspended				Total
Number of Local Partnerships	3			(a)	3			(b)		6
Number of Local Partnerships			3	(a)		3	(b)
Rental property, at cost, net of accumulated
Rental property, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation of $11,437,387 and $9,695,715,
depreciation of $11,437,387 and $9,695,715,
respectively	$	1,454,914			$	960,379				$	2,415,293
Respectively		$	1,454,914		$	960,379			$	2,415,293
Land	715,103				303,428					1,018,531
Land			715,103			303,428				1,018,531
Other assets	4,531,684				1,941,575					6,473,259
Other assets			4,531,684			1,941,575				6,473,259
Total assets	$	6,701,701			$	3,205,382				$	9,907,083
Total assets		$	6,701,701		$	3,205,382			$	9,907,083
Mortgage notes payable	$	1,422,457			$	2,812,619				$	4,235,076
Mortgage notes payable		$	1,422,457		$	2,812,619			$	4,235,076
Other liabilities	480,041				5,327,515					5,807,556
Other liabilities			480,041			5,327,515				5,807,556
Due to general partners	294,158				36,999					331,157
Due to general partners			294,158			36,999				331,157
Total liabilities	2,196,656				8,177,133					10,373,789
Total liabilities			2,196,656			8,177,133				10,373,789
Partners' capital (deficit)	4,505,045				(4,971,751		)			(466,706		)
Partners' capital (deficit)			4,505,045			(4,971,751	)			(466,706	)
Total liabilities and partners'
Total liabilities and partners'
capital (deficit)	$	6,701,701			$	3,205,382				$	9,907,083
capital (deficit)		$	6,701,701		$	3,205,382			$	9,907,083

(a) Capital Commons; Chestnut; Westwood Village

(b) Hillview Terrace; New Sharon Woods; Shallowford Oaks

IV-17

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

~~2. INVESTMENTS~~DECEMBER IN31, 2012 AND ~~ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued~~2011

COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended December 31, 2011

		Equity
	EquityMethod						Suspended						Total
		Method				Suspended				Total
Number of Local Partnerships	3				(a)		3				(b)		6
Number of Local Partnerships			3	(a)			3	(b)
Revenue:
Revenue:
Rental	$	3,684,975					$	2,150,657					$	5,835,632
Rental		$	3,684,975			$	2,150,657			$	5,835,632
Other	361,263						2,918,184						3,279,447
Other			361,263				2,918,184				3,279,447
Total revenue	4,046,238						5,068,841						9,115,079
Total revenue			4,046,238				5,068,841				9,115,079
Expenses:
Expenses:
Operating	2,022,557						1,838,509						3,861,066
Operating			2,022,557				1,838,509				3,861,066
Interest	230,273						482,462						712,735
Interest			230,273				482,462				712,735
Depreciation and amortization	378,171						265,349						643,520
Depreciation and amortization			378,171				265,349				643,520
Total expenses	2,631,001						2,586,320						5,217,321
Total expenses			2,631,001				2,586,320				5,217,321
Net income	$	1,415,237					$	2,482,521					$	3,897,758
Net income		$	1,415,237			$	2,482,521			$	3,897,758
Cash distributions	$	44,097					$	7,219					$	51,316
Cash distributions		$	44,097			$	7,219			$	51,316
Cash distributions recorded as reduction
Cash distributions recorded as reduction
of investments in partnerships	$	44,097					$	—					$	44,097
of investments in partnerships		$	44,097			$	--			$	44,097
Cash distributions recorded as income	$	—					$	7,219					$	7,219
Cash distributions recorded as income		$	--			$	7,219			$	7,219
Partnership’s share of Local Partnership
Partnership’s share of Local Partnership
net income	1,320,643						—						1,320,643
net income		$	1,320,643			$	--			$	1,320,643
Advance to Local Partnership,
Advance to Local Partnership,
including accrued interest	—						(28,390		)				(28,390		)
including accrued interest			--				(28,390	)			(28,390	)
Share of income (loss) from partnerships	$	1,320,643					$	(21,171	)				$	1,299,472
Share of income (loss) from partnerships		$	1,320,643			$	(21,171	)		$	1,299,472

(a) Capital Commons; Chestnut; Westwood Village

(b) Hillview Terrace; New Sharon Woods; Shallowford Oaks

IV-18

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued

COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2010

	Equity
	Method			Suspended			Total
Number of Local Partnerships		2	(a)		4	(b)		6
Rental property, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation of $11,918,134, $16,147,113,
and $28,065,247, respectively	$	1,788,227		$	2,428,822		$	4,217,049
Land		709,103			960,528			1,669,631
Other assets		3,621,938			2,189,208			5,811,146
Total assets	$	6,119,268		$	5,578,558		$	11,697,826
Mortgage notes payable	$	2,423,402		$	10,181,858		$	12,605,261
Other liabilities		163,590			2,728,440			2,892,030
Due to general partners		294,158			218,239			512,397
Total liabilities		2,881,150			13,128,537			16,009,688
Partners' capital (deficit)		3,238,118			(7,549,979	)		(4,311,861	)
Total liabilities and partners'
capital (deficit)	$	6,119,268		$	5,578,558		$	11,697,826

(a) Capital Commons; Chestnut

(b) Hillview Terrace; New Sharon Woods; Shallowford Oaks; Westwood Village

IV-19

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued

COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended December 31, 2010

	Equity
	Method			Suspended			Total
Number of Local Partnerships		2	(a)		4	(b)		6
Revenue:
Rental	$	2,876,645		$	3,411,666		$	6,288,311
Other		305,913			69,969			375,882
Total revenue		3,182,558			3,481,635			6,664,193
Expenses:
Operating		1,455,052			2,334,239			3,789,291
Interest		330,198			601,728			931,926
Depreciation and amortization		449,241			327,959			777,200
Total expenses		2,234,491			3,263,926			5,498,417
Net income	$	948,067		$	217,709		$	1,165,776
Cash distributions	$	52,153		$	7,219		$	59,372
Cash distributions recorded as reduction
of investments in partnerships	$	52,153		$	--		$	52,153
Cash distributions recorded as income	$	--		$	7,219		$	7,219
Partnership’s share of Local Partnership
net income	$	929,028		$	--		$	929,028
Advance to Local Partnership,
including accrued interest		--			(151,315	)		(151,315	)
Share of income (loss) from partnerships	$	929,028		$	(144,096	)	$	784,932

(a) Capital Commons; Chestnut

(b) Hillview Terrace; New Sharon Woods; Shallowford Oaks; Westwood Village

IV-20

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO PARTNERSHIPS - Continued


f.	Reconciliation of the Local Partnerships' financial statement

net income to taxable income

For federal income tax purposes, the Local Partnerships report on a basis whereby: (i) certain revenue and the related assets are recorded when received rather than when earned; (ii) certain costs are expensed when paid or incurred rather than capitalized and amortized over the period of benefit; and (iii) a shorter life is used to compute depreciation on the property as permitted by the Internal Revenue Code and the underlying regulations. These returns are subject to examination and, therefore, possible adjustment by the IRS.

IV-18

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

A reconciliation of the Local Partnerships' financial statement net income reflected above to taxable income follows.

		For the years ended
	For the years endedDecember 31,
		December 31,
	2012				2011
		2011				2010
Financial statement net income	$	1,666,134			$	3,897,758
Financial statement net income		$	3,897,758			$	1,165,776
Differences between financial statement
Differences between financial statement
and tax depreciation, amortization,
and tax depreciation, amortization,
and miscellaneous differences	(132,478		)		(2,790,616		)
and miscellaneous differences			(2,790,616	)			279,300
Taxable income	$	1,533,656			$	1,107,142
Taxable income		$	1,107,142			$	1,445,076


g.	Investment reconciliation

The following is a reconciliation of investments in partnerships at December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011:

Investments in partnerships at January 1, 2010:		$	3,144,406
Investments in partnerships at January 1, 2011:	$	4,021,281
Share of income from partnerships	1,299,472		~~784,932~~
Distribution from partnerships	(51,316		~~(59,372~~)	)
Advance to Local Partnership ( including accrued			-
Accrued interest on advance to Local Partnership	28,390
interest of $51,315)			151,315
Investments in partnerships at December 31, 2011:	5,297,827
Investments in partnerships at December 31, 2010:			4,021,281
Share of income from partnerships	1,510,098
Share of income from partnerships			1,299,472
Distribution from partnerships	(27,437		)
Distribution from partnerships			(51,316	)
Write off of investment due to sale of interest	(5,183,461		)
Accrued interest on advance to Local Partnership			28,390
Investments in partnerships at December 31, 2012:	$	1,597,027
Investments in partnerships at December 31, 2011:		$	5,297,827

3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership paid the Managing General Partner a fee for services in connection with the review, selection, evaluation, negotiation and initial acquisition of the original interests in the Local Partnerships. The fee amounted to $993,480, which is equal to four percent of the Limited Partners' capital contributions to the Partnership. The acquisition fee was capitalized and is being amortized over a 40-year period using the straight-line method.

~~IV-21~~In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is obligated to reimburse the Managing General Partner or its affiliates for certain direct expenses and payroll expenses in connection with managing the Partnership. Payroll expenses are reimbursed at a factor of 1.75 times base salary. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership paid $119,820 and $166,466 respectively, to the Managing General Partner or its affiliates as direct reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership. In addition, certain employees of the Managing General Partner provided legal and tax accounting services to the Partnership. These are reimbursed comparable to third party service charges. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership paid $138,538 and $69,420, respectively, to the Managing General Partner or its affiliates for these services. Such reimbursed expenses are included in the accompanying statements of operations as general and administrative expenses.

~~CAPITAL~~In ~~REALTY~~accordance ~~INVESTORS~~with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, ~~LTD~~the Partnership is obligated to pay the Managing General Partner an annual incentive management fee (Management Fee) after all other expenses of the Partnership are paid. The amount of the Management Fee shall be equal to 0.25% of original invested assets, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and shall be payable from the Partnership's cash available for distribution, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, as of the end of each calendar year, as follows:

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - Continued

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is obligated to reimburse the Managing General Partner or its affiliates for certain direct expenses and payroll expenses in connection with managing the Partnership. Payroll expenses are reimbursed at a factor of 1.75 times base salary. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership paid $166,466 and $167,844 respectively, to the Managing General Partner or its affiliates as direct reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership. In addition, certain employees of the Managing General Partner provided legal and tax accounting services to the Partnership. These are reimbursed comparable to third party service charges. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership paid $69,420 and $83,391, respectively, to the Managing General Partner or its affiliates for these services. Such reimbursed expenses are included in the accompanying statements of operations as general and administrative expenses.

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is obligated to pay the Managing General Partner an annual incentive management fee (Management Fee) after all other expenses of the Partnership are paid. The amount of the Management Fee shall be equal to 0.25% of invested assets, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and shall be payable from the Partnership's cash available for distribution, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, as of the end of each calendar year, as follows:


(i)	First, on a monthly basis as an operating expense before any distributions to limited partners in an annual amount equal to $95,208; and

IV-19

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011


(ii)	Second, after distributions to the limited partners in the amount of one percent of the gross proceeds of the offering, the balance of such 0.25% of invested assets.

For each of the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Partnership paid the Managing General Partner a Management Fee of $95,208.

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing General Partner and/or its affiliates may receive a fee of not more than five percent of the sales price of an investment in a Local Partnership or the property it owns, payable under certain conditions upon the sale of an investment in a Local Partnership or the property it owns. The payment of the fee is subject to certain restrictions, including the achievement of a certain level of sales proceeds and making certain minimum distributions to limited partners. During 2012, the fee was calculated based on the hypothetical sale of the properties. During the year ended December 31, 2012 fees of $567,000 were incurred and paid.

4. PARTNERSHIP PROFITS AND LOSSES, AND DISTRIBUTIONS

All profits and losses are allocated 97% to the limited partners and 3% to the General Partners. The net proceeds resulting from the liquidation of the Partnership or the Partnership's share of the net proceeds from any sale or refinancing of the Local Partnerships or their rental properties which are not reinvested shall be distributed and applied as follows:

(i)

to the payment of debts and liabilities of the Partnership (including all expenses of the Partnership incident to the sale or refinancing) other than loans or other debts and liabilities of the Partnership to any partner or any affiliate; such debts and liabilities, in the case of a non-liquidating distribution, to be only those which are then required to be paid or, in the judgment of the Managing General Partner, required to be provided for;


(ii)	to the establishment of any reserves which the Managing General Partner deems reasonably necessary for contingent, unmatured or unforeseen liabilities or obligations of the Partnership;

(iii) to the limited partners in the amount of their capital contributions without deduction for prior cash distributions other than prior distributions of proceeds from any sale or refinancing.;

IV-22

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. PARTNERSHIP PROFITS AND LOSSES, AND DISTRIBUTIONS - Continued


(iv)	to the repayment of any unrepaid loans theretofore made by any partner or any affiliate to the Partnership for Partnership obligations and to the payment of any unpaid amounts owing to the General Partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement;


(v)	to the General Partners in the amount of their capital contributions;

(vi)

thereafter, for their services to the Partnership, in equal shares to certain general partners (or their designees), whether or not any is then a general partner, an aggregate fee of one percent of the gross proceeds resulting from (A) such sale (if the proceeds are from a sale rather than a refinancing) and (B) any prior sales from which such one percent fee was not paid to the General Partners or their designees; and,

(vii)

the remainder, 15% to the General Partner (or their assignees) and 85% to the limited partners (or their assignees). Fees payable to certain general partners (or their designees) under (vi) above, together with all other property disposition fees and any other commissions or fees payable upon the sale of apartment properties, shall not in the aggregate exceed the lesser of the competitive rate or six percent of the sales price of the apartment properties.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, all cash available for distribution, as defined, shall be distributed, not less frequently than annually, 97% to the limited partners and 3% to the General Partners, after payment of the Management Fee (see Note 3), as specified in the Partnership Agreement. On July 26, 2010, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $742,~~410~~000 ($30 per Unit) to the Limited Partners who were holders of record as of July 1, 2010. There was no distributions paid in 2012 or 2011. However, a distribution was recommended and approved in December 2012 of $5,939,280 ($240 per Unit). The distribution was paid subsequent to December 31, 2012.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, after the payment of the distributions described in the previous paragraph, after the establishment of any reserves deemed necessary by the Managing General Partner and after payment of the Management Fee, the Partnership had no remaining cash available for distribution for the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011. The Managing General Partner currently intends to retain all of the Partnership's remaining undistributed cash for operating cash reserves.

5. RECONCILIATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP'S FINANCIAL STATEMENT NET INCOME TO TAXABLE INCOME

~~NET~~For federal income tax purposes, the Partnership reports on a basis whereby: (~~LOSS~~i) ~~INCOME~~certain TOexpenses ~~TAXABLE~~are ~~INCOME~~amortized rather than expensed when incurred; (ii) certain costs are amortized over a shorter period for tax purposes, as permitted by the Internal Revenue Code and underlying regulations, and (iii) certain costs are amortized over a longer period for tax purposes. The Partnership records

For federal income tax purposes, the Partnership reports on a basis whereby: (i) certain expenses are amortized rather than expensed when incurred; (ii) certain costs are amortized over a shorter period for tax purposes, as permitted by the Internal Revenue Code and underlying regulations, and (iii) certain costs are amortized over a longer period for tax purposes. The Partnership records its share of income or losses from its investments in limited partnerships for federal income tax purposes as reported on the Local Partnerships' federal income tax returns (see Note 2.f.), including losses in excess of related investment amounts. These returns are subject to examination and, therefore, possible adjustment by the IRS.IV-20

IV-23

CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS, LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

~~5. RECONCILIATION~~DECEMBER OF31, ~~THE~~2012 ~~PARTNERSHIP'S~~AND ~~FINANCIAL STATEMENT~~2011

~~NET~~its ~~INCOME~~share of income or losses from its investments in limited partnerships for federal income tax purposes as reported on the Local Partnerships' federal income tax returns (~~LOSS~~see Note 2.f.), TOincluding ~~TAXABLE~~losses ~~INCOME~~in -excess ~~Continued~~of related investment amounts. These returns are subject to examination and, therefore, possible adjustment by the IRS.

A reconciliation of the Partnership's financial statement net income ~~(loss)~~ to taxable income follows.

		For the years ended
	For the years endedDecember 31,
		December 31,
	2012				2011
		2011				2010
Financial statement net income	$	1,767,053			$	852,463
Financial statement net income (loss)		$	852,463			$	296,978
Adjustments:
Adjustments:
Differences between financial statement
Differences between financial statement
net income and taxable income related
net income and taxable income related
to the Partnership's equity in the Local
to the Partnership's equity in the Local
Partnerships' income or losses and accrued
Partnerships' income or losses and accrued
expenses	160,810				(149,380		)
expenses			(149,380	)			608,830
Difference between financial statement
Difference between financial statement
gain (loss) and tax gain (loss) from
gain (loss) and tax gain (loss) from
foreclosure of a Local Partnership	—				2,956,645
foreclosure of a Local Partnership			2,956,645				--
Difference between financial statement gain and tax gain
Costs amortized over a shorter period for
from sale of interest in Local Partnership	3,941,057				—
income tax purposes			(10,106	)			1,280
Costs amortized over a shorter period for
Taxable income		$	3,649,622			$	907,088
income tax purposes	4,884				(10,106		)
Taxable income	$	5,873,804			$	3,649,622

6. CASH CONCENTRATION RISK

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Partnership to concentrations of risk consist primarily of cash. The Partnership maintains ~~four~~five cash accounts with two banks. As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the uninsured portion of the cash balances was $01,537,926.

IV-21

Filing Compare · CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS LTD