UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended

~~June~~September 30, 2010

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission File No.

Exact Name of Registrants as Specified in their Charters, Address and Telephone Number

States of Incorporation

I.R.S. Employer Identification Nos.

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

1-14201

SEMPRA ENERGY

California

33-0732627

No change

101 Ash Street

San Diego, California 92101

(619)696-2034

1-3779

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

California

95-1184800

No change

8326 Century Park Court

San Diego, California 92123

(619)696-2000

1-40

PACIFIC ENTERPRISES

California

94-0743670

No change

101 Ash Street

San Diego, California 92101

(619)696-2020

1-1402

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

California

95-1240705

No change

555 West Fifth Street

Los Angeles, California 90013

(213)244-1200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).

Sempra Energy

Yes

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Yes

Pacific Enterprises

Yes

Southern California Gas Company

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Sempra Energy

[ X ]

[ ]

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

[ ]

[ X ]

[ ]

Pacific Enterprises

[ ]

[ X ]

[ ]

Southern California Gas Company

[ ]

[ X ]

[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Sempra Energy

Yes

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Yes

Pacific Enterprises

Yes

Southern California Gas Company

Yes

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers' classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock outstanding on July 30, 2010:

Common stock outstanding on November 5, 2010:

Sempra Energy

~~247~~240,~~855~~054,~~454~~962 shares

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Wholly owned by Enova Corporation, which is wholly owned by Sempra Energy

Pacific Enterprises

Wholly owned by Sempra Energy

Southern California Gas Company

Wholly owned by Pacific Enterprises, which is wholly owned by Sempra Energy

SEMPRA ENERGY FORM 10-QTABLE OF CONTENTS
		Page
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		4
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7073
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	9699
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	97100
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	98101
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	98101
Item 6.	Exhibits	99
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	102
Signatures		102
Item 6.	Exhibits	103
Signatures		105

This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by Sempra Energy, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Pacific Enterprises and Southern California Gas Company. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company provides information only as to itself and its consolidated entities and not as to any other company.

You should read this report in its entirety as it pertains to each respective reporting company. No one section of the report deals with all aspects of the subject matter. Separate Part I - Item 1 sections are provided for each reporting company, except for the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for all of the reporting companies are combined. All Items other than Part I – Item 1 are combined for the reporting companies.

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make statements in this report that are not historical fact and constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon assumptions with respect to the future, involve risks and uncertainties, and are not guarantees of performance. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report.

In this report, when we use words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "contemplates," "intends," "depends," "should," "could," "would," "may," "potential," "target," "goals," or similar expressions, or when we discuss our strategy, plans or intentions, we are making forward-looking statements.

Factors, among others, that could cause our actual results and future actions to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements include

§local, regional, national and international economic, competitive, political, legislative and regulatory conditions and developments;

§actions by the California Public Utilities Commission, the California State Legislature, the California Department of Water Resources, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Federal Reserve Board, and other regulatory and governmental bodies in the United States and other countries in which we operate;

§capital markets conditions and inflation, interest and exchange rates;

§energy and trading markets, including the timing and extent of changes and volatility in commodity prices;

§the availability of electric power, natural gas and liquefied natural gas;

§weather conditions and conservation efforts;

§war and terrorist attacks;

§business, regulatory, environmental and legal decisions and requirements;

§the status of deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity delivery;

§the timing and success of business development efforts;

§the resolution of litigation; and

§other uncertainties, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

We caution you not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. You should review and consider carefully the risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect our business as described in this report and other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEMPRA ENERGY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(unaudited)
REVENUES
Sempra Utilities	$	1,~~512~~575	$	1,~~316~~424	$	34,~~424~~999	$	24,~~958~~382
Sempra Global and parent		~~496~~541		~~373~~429		1,~~118~~659		~~839~~1,268
Total revenues		2,~~008~~116		1,~~689~~853		46,~~542~~658		35,~~797~~650
EXPENSES AND OTHER INCOME
Sempra Utilities:
Cost of natural gas		(~~359~~285)		(~~249~~208)		(1,~~117~~402)		(~~789~~997)
Cost of electric fuel and purchased power		(~~129~~203)		(~~129~~208)		(~~277~~480)		(~~300~~508)
Sempra Global and parent:
Cost of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased power		(~~257~~292)		(~~187~~220)		(~~595~~887)		(~~455~~675)
Other cost of sales		(2023)		(1619)		(4568)		(3352)
Litigation expense		1(17)		(43)		(~~167~~184)		3-
Other operation and maintenance		(~~616~~590)		(~~582~~568)		(1,~~192~~782)		(1,~~105~~673)
Depreciation and amortization		(~~215~~218)		(~~189~~196)		(~~425~~643)		(~~372~~568)
Franchise fees and other taxes		(7776)		(6977)		(~~167~~243)		(~~151~~228)
Write-off of long-lived assets		-		~~(132)~~-		-		(132)
Equity earnings (losses):
RBS Sempra Commodities LLP		(16281)		~~126~~105		(9290)		~~279~~384
Other		8		218		1624		927
Other income, net		866		7024		1682		7397
Interest income		45		5		813		1116
Interest expense		(~~103~~111)		(7996)		(~~212~~323)		(~~161~~257)
Income before income taxes and equity earnings
of certain unconsolidated subsidiaries		~~237~~99		~~256~~410		~~376~~475		~~674~~1,084
Income tax expense		(59)		(90)		(117)		(199)
Income tax benefit (expense)		32		(128)		(85)		(327)
Equity earnings, net of income tax		27		23		46		39
Equity earnings (losses), net of income tax		(4)		20		42		59
Net income		~~205~~127		~~189~~302		~~305~~432		~~514~~816
Losses attributable to noncontrolling interests		206		1217		2834		522
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries		(32)		(32)		(57)		(57)
Earnings	$	~~222~~131	$	~~198~~317	$	~~328~~459	$	~~514~~831
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.9053	$	01.8230	$	1.3386	$	23.1242
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding, basic (thousands)		246,~~784~~668		~~242~~243,~~718~~925		246,~~435~~513		242,~~245~~806
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.8953	$	01.8027	$	1.3184	$	23.0937
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding, diluted (thousands)		249,~~727~~811		~~247~~248,~~090~~461		249,~~835~~773		246,~~039~~875
Dividends declared per share of common stock	$	0.39	$	0.39	$	01.7817	$	01.7817
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEMPRA ENERGY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~188~~547	$	110
Restricted cash		34		35
Trade accounts receivable		~~687~~632		971
Other accounts and notes receivable		~~131~~144		159
Due from unconsolidated affiliates		32		41
Due from unconsolidated affiliate		30		41
Income taxes receivable		~~196~~312		221
Deferred income taxes		-		10
Inventories		~~151~~296		197
Regulatory assets		8297		54
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		7784		77
Insurance receivable related to wildfire litigation (Note 10)		150		273
Other		~~176~~199		147
Total current assets		12,~~873~~495		2,295
Investments and other assets:
Restricted cash		27		-
Regulatory assets arising from fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		~~243~~241		241
Regulatory assets arising from pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations		~~967~~950		959
Other regulatory assets		~~836~~973		603
Nuclear decommissioning trusts		~~675~~737		678
Investment in RBS Sempra Commodities LLP		~~1,956~~825		2,172
Other investments		2,~~451~~317		2,151
Goodwill and other intangible assets		~~538~~542		524
Sundry		~~596~~621		608
Total investments and other assets		87,~~289~~233		7,936
Property, plant and equipment:
Property, plant and equipment		2526,~~873~~286		25,034
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(67,~~949~~065)		(6,753)
Property, plant and equipment, net ($528 at June 30, 2010 related to VIE)		18,924		18,281
Property, plant and equipment, net ($523 at September 30, 2010 related to VIE)		19,221		18,281
Total assets	$	2928,~~086~~949	$	28,512
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEMPRA ENERGY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	~~923~~574	$	618
Accounts payable - trade		~~524~~572		522
Accounts payable - other		~~125~~130		171
Due to unconsolidated affiliates		12		29
Deferred income taxes		216		-
Dividends and interest payable		~~181~~232		190
Accrued compensation and benefits		~~220~~247		264
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		~~525~~242		382
Current portion of long-term debt		~~307~~313		573
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		99107		95
Customer deposits		~~138~~133		145
Reserve for wildfire litigation (Note 10)		~~241~~344		270
Other		~~754~~855		629
Total current liabilities		43,~~051~~777		3,888
Long-term debt ($360 at June 30, 2010 related to VIE)		7,562		7,460
Long-term debt ($357 at September 30, 2010 related to VIE)		8,032		7,460
Deferred credits and other liabilities:
Due to unconsolidated affiliate		-		2
Customer advances for construction		147		146
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of plan assets		1,~~242~~225		1,252
Deferred income taxes		1,~~466~~516		1,318
Deferred investment tax credits		5352		54
Regulatory liabilities arising from removal obligations		2,~~588~~635		2,557
Asset retirement obligations		1,~~319~~327		1,277
Other regulatory liabilities		~~156~~144		181
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		~~326~~336		312
Deferred credits and other		~~687~~672		735
Total deferred credits and other liabilities		78,~~984~~054		7,834
Contingently redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary		79		79
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Preferred stock (50 million shares authorized; none issued)		-		-
Common stock (750 million shares authorized; 248 million and 247 million shares
Common stock (750 million shares authorized; 242 million and 247 million shares
outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively; no par value)		2,493		2,418
outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively; no par
Retained earnings		7,106		6,971
value)		2,012		2,418
Deferred compensation		(10)		(13)
Retained earnings		7,143		6,971
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(399)		(369)
Deferred compensation		(9)		(13)
Total Sempra Energy shareholders' equity		9,190		9,007
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(344)		(369)
Total Sempra Energy shareholders' equity		8,802		9,007
Preferred stock of subsidiaries		100		100
Other noncontrolling interests		~~120~~105		144
Total equity		9,~~410~~007		9,251
Total liabilities and equity	$	2928,~~086~~949	$	28,512
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEMPRA ENERGY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~305~~432	$	~~514~~816
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~425~~643		~~372~~568
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		96133		90181
Equity earnings		(53)		(327)
Equity losses (earnings)		224		(470)
Write-off of long-lived assets		-		132
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		1419		(3827)
Other		(624)		4842
Net change in other working capital components		~~294~~(77)		~~364~~220
Distributions from RBS Sempra Commodities LLP		198		~~375~~407
Changes in other assets		5376		2181
Changes in other liabilities		(1922)		(2666)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,~~307~~602		1,~~525~~884
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(~~839~~1,354)		(~~938~~1,371)
Proceeds from sale of assets		-		179
Expenditures for investments and acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(~~370~~385)		(~~217~~762)
Distributions from investments		36		9
Distributions from RBS Sempra Commodities LLP		849		-
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning and other trust assets		(159)		(99)
Distributions from other investments		259		16
Proceeds from sales by nuclear decommissioning and other trusts		159		93
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning and other trust assets		(261)		(167)
Other		6		(14)
Proceeds from sales by nuclear decommissioning and other trusts		261		155
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,167)		(987)
Other		(2)		(20)
Net cash used in investing activities		(633)		(1,970)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common dividends paid		(~~172~~269)		(~~170~~255)
Preferred dividends paid by subsidiaries		(57)		(57)
Issuances of common stock		2229		2852
Repurchases of common stock		(2502)		-
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net		~~534~~184		(~~612~~52)
Issuances of debt (maturities greater than 90 days)		~~270~~771		1,~~108~~181
Payments on debt (maturities greater than 90 days)		(~~710~~727)		(~~311~~325)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest		-		(94)
Other		1(11)		511
Net cash used in financing activities		(62)		(51)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(532)		511
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		78437		~~487~~425
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		110		331
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	188	$	818
Cash and cash equivalents, September 30	$	547	$	756
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEMPRA ENERGY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized	$	~~212~~264	$	~~141~~201
Income tax payments, net of refunds		532		3698
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of business:
Assets acquired	$	303	$	-
Cash paid, net of cash acquired		(~~285~~292)		-
Additional consideration accrued		(7)		-
Liabilities assumed	$	11	$	-
Increase in capital lease obligations for investments in property, plant and
equipment	$	183	$	-2
Dividends declared but not paid		9997		9899
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(unaudited)
Operating revenues
Electric	$	~~589~~718	$	~~535~~695	$	1,~~152~~870	$	1,~~088~~783
Natural gas		~~103~~93		9678		~~282~~375		~~275~~353
Total operating revenues		~~692~~811		~~631~~773		12,~~434~~245		12,~~363~~136
Operating expenses
Cost of electric fuel and purchased power		~~129~~203		~~129~~208		~~277~~480		~~300~~508
Cost of natural gas		4437		3730		~~133~~170		~~124~~154
Operation and maintenance		~~237~~235		~~232~~236		~~469~~704		~~413~~649
Depreciation and amortization		9596		81		~~187~~283		~~158~~239
Franchise fees and other taxes		4142		3946		84126		80126
Total operating expenses		~~546~~613		~~518~~601		1,~~150~~763		1,~~075~~676
Operating income		~~146~~198		~~113~~172		~~284~~482		~~288~~460
Other income (expense), net		(162)		271		(1618)		4445
Interest expense		(31)		(21)		(62)		(46)
Interest income		-		1		-		1
Income before income taxes		99		119		206		286
Interest expense		(37)		(29)		(99)		(75)
Income tax expense		(44)		(28)		(75)		(88)
Income before income taxes		159		145		365		431
Net income		55		91		131		198
Income tax expense		(56)		(53)		(131)		(141)
Losses (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests		21		(20)		29		(27)
Net income		103		92		234		290
Earnings		76		71		160		171
Losses (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests		5		18		34		(9)
Preferred dividend requirements		(1)		(1)		(2)		(2)
Earnings		108		110		268		281
Earnings attributable to common shares	$	75	$	70	$	158	$	169
Preferred dividend requirements		(2)		(2)		(4)		(4)
Earnings attributable to common shares	$	106	$	108	$	264	$	277
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	28332	$	13
Restricted cash		34		8
Accounts receivable - trade		~~225~~216		229
Accounts receivable - other		5733		85
Due from unconsolidated affiliates		124		8
Income taxes receivable		58114		59
Deferred income taxes		36		41
Inventories		6267		61
Regulatory assets arising from fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		6273		30
Other regulatory assets		4		4
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		29		40
Insurance receivable related to wildfire litigation (Note 10)		150		273
Other		2061		35
Total current assets		~~746~~1,123		886
Other assets:
Due from unconsolidated affiliate		1-		2
Deferred taxes recoverable in rates		~~458~~474		415
Regulatory assets arising from fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		~~243~~241		241
Regulatory assets arising from pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations		~~338~~331		342
Other regulatory assets		243		53
Regulatory assets arising from wildfire litigation costs		311		-
Nuclear decommissioning trusts		675		678
Other regulatory assets		72		53
Sundry		41		43
Nuclear decommissioning trusts		737		678
Total other assets		1,999		1,774
Sundry		50		43
Total other assets		2,216		1,774
Property, plant and equipment:
Property, plant and equipment		10,~~614~~816		10,156
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,~~632~~659)		(2,587)
Property, plant and equipment, net ($528 at June 30, 2010 related to VIE)		7,982		7,569
Property, plant and equipment, net ($523 at September 30, 2010 related to VIE)		8,157		7,569
Total assets	$	1011,~~727~~496	$	10,229
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	63-	$	33
Accounts payable		~~197~~229		249
Due to unconsolidated affiliate		1621		-
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		188		159
Accrued compensation and benefits		93		104
Customer deposits		57		56
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		79		159
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		50		51
Accrued compensation and benefits		80		104
Current portion of long-term debt		22		45
Reserve for wildfire litigation (Note 10)		241		270
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		50		51
Other		128		157
Customer deposits		53		56
Total current liabilities		1,042		1,124
Reserve for wildfire litigation (Note 10)		344		270
Long-term debt ($360 at June 30, 2010 related to VIE)		2,984		2,623
Other		172		157
Total current liabilities		1,063		1,124
Long-term debt ($357 at September 30, 2010 related to VIE)		3,473		2,623
Deferred credits and other liabilities:
Customer advances for construction		2221		23
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of plan assets		~~360~~354		370
Deferred income taxes		~~834~~953		774
Deferred investment tax credits		26		26
Regulatory liabilities arising from removal obligations		1,~~337~~376		1,330
Asset retirement obligations		~~605~~601		585
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		~~275~~278		265
Deferred credits and other		~~144~~161		145
Total deferred credits and other liabilities		3,~~603~~770		3,518
Contingently redeemable preferred stock		79		79
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Common stock (255 million shares authorized; 117 million shares outstanding;
no par value)		1,138		1,138
Retained earnings		1,~~769~~875		1,611
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(9)		(10)
Total SDG&E shareholders' equity		23,~~898~~004		2,739
Noncontrolling interest		~~121~~107		146
Total equity		3,~~019~~111		2,885
Total liabilities and equity	$	1011,~~727~~496	$	10,229
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~131~~234	$	~~198~~290
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~187~~283		~~158~~239
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		23125		1535
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives		2842		(3428)
Other		(1424)		(914)
Net change in other working capital components		(~~133~~247)		30115
Changes in other assets		915		1320
Changes in other liabilities		(1012)		(2338)
Net cash provided by operating activities		~~221~~416		~~348~~619
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(~~522~~822)		(~~443~~633)
Expenditures for short-term investments		-		(152)
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments		-		176
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust assets		(~~155~~256)		(95161)
Proceeds from sales by nuclear decommissioning trusts		~~150~~248		93155
Decrease in loans to affiliates, net		1413		33
Net decrease in restricted cash		54		-
Other		~~(1)~~-		12
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~509~~813)		(~~387~~580)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common dividends paid		-		(150)
Preferred dividends paid		(2)		(2)
Capital contribution received by Otay Mesa VIE		-		4
Issuances of long-term debt		250		358
Capital distribution made by Otay Mesa VIE		(10)		-
Payments on long-term debt		(5)		-
Preferred dividends paid		(4)		(4)
Increase in short-term debt, net		63		-
Issuances of long-term debt		744		386
Other		(3)		1
Payments on long-term debt		(7)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		303		207
Other		(7)		(3)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		15		168
Net cash provided by financing activities		716		233
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		319		272
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		13		19
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	28	$	187
Cash and cash equivalents, September 30	$	332	$	291
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized	$	5867	$	5051
Income tax payments, net of refunds		4961		86144
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Increase in capital lease obligations for investments in property, plant and
equipment	$	183	$	-
Dividends declared but not paid		1		1
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PACIFIC ENTERPRISES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(unaudited)
Operating revenues	$	~~834~~776	$	~~694~~662	$	2,~~016~~792	$	12,~~614~~276
Operating expenses
Cost of natural gas		~~318~~252		~~214~~180		~~992~~1,244		~~669~~849
Operation and maintenance		~~294~~283		~~266~~249		~~555~~838		~~517~~766
Depreciation		7778		7573		~~152~~230		~~147~~220
Franchise fees and other taxes		2827		2425		6592		5681
Total operating expenses		~~717~~640		~~579~~527		12,~~764~~404		1,~~389~~916
Operating income		~~117~~136		~~115~~135		~~252~~388		~~225~~360
Other income, net		2		4		6		5
Other income (expense), net		2		(4)		8		1
Interest income		1-		2-		1		3
Interest expense		(1617)		(1817)		(3350)		(3552)
Income before income taxes		~~104~~121		~~103~~114		~~226~~347		~~198~~312
Income tax expense		(3342)		(4041)		(90132)		(76117)
Net income		7179		6373		~~136~~215		~~122~~195
Preferred dividends of subsidiary		~~(1)~~-		~~(1)~~-		(1)		(1)
Earnings		7079		6273		~~135~~214		~~121~~194
Preferred dividend requirements		(1)		(1)		(23)		(23)
Earnings attributable to common shares	$	6978	$	6172	$	~~133~~211	$	~~119~~191
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PACIFIC ENTERPRISES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~101~~72	$	49
Accounts receivable - trade		~~344~~302		567
Accounts receivable - other		3757		44
Due from unconsolidated affiliates		~~264~~118		12
Income taxes receivable		723		36
Inventories		44181		93
Other regulatory assets		810		9
Other		4135		39
Total current assets		~~846~~798		849
Other assets:
Due from unconsolidated affiliate		504		513
Regulatory assets arising from pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations		~~621~~614		617
Other regulatory assets		~~132~~114		131
Sundry		38		40
Total other assets		1,~~295~~270		1,301
Property, plant and equipment:
Property, plant and equipment		9,~~445~~558		9,299
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(3,~~682~~735)		(3,615)
Property, plant and equipment, net		5,~~763~~823		5,684
Total assets	$	7,~~904~~891	$	7,834
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PACIFIC ENTERPRISES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - trade	$	~~160~~167	$	207
Accounts payable - other		6277		120
Due to unconsolidated affiliates		9587		87
Deferred income taxes		43		5
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		337		223
Accrued compensation and benefits		89		86
Customer deposits		80		87
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		163		223
Accrued compensation and benefits		88		86
Current portion of long-term debt		260		11
Current portion of long-term debt		264		11
Customer deposits		77		87
Other		~~151~~193		162
Total current liabilities		1,~~241~~116		988
Long-term debt		1,~~022~~021		1,283
Deferred credits and other liabilities:
Customer advances for construction		125		123
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of plan assets		~~649~~643		644
Deferred income taxes		~~311~~373		273
Deferred investment tax credits		26		28
Regulatory liabilities arising from removal obligations		1,~~240~~247		1,227
Asset retirement obligations		~~681~~690		662
Deferred taxes refundable in rates		~~154~~144		175
Deferred credits and other		~~193~~165		203
Total deferred credits and other liabilities		3,~~379~~413		3,335
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Preferred stock		80		80
Common stock (600 million shares authorized; 84 million shares outstanding;
no par value)		1,462		1,462
Retained earnings		~~724~~802		691
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(2423)		(25)
Total Pacific Enterprises shareholders' equity		2,~~242~~321		2,208
Preferred stock of subsidiary		20		20
Total equity		2,~~262~~341		2,228
Total liabilities and equity	$	7,~~904~~891	$	7,834
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PACIFIC ENTERPRISES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~136~~215	$	~~122~~195
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation		~~152~~230		~~147~~220
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		1463		2024
Other		(2)		42
Net change in other working capital components		~~316~~56		~~266~~129
Changes in other assets		46		78
Changes in other liabilities		(10)		(933)
Net cash provided by operating activities		~~610~~562		~~557~~545
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(~~216~~337)		(~~227~~336)
Decrease (increase) in loans to affiliates, net		(239)		5
(Increase) decrease in loans to affiliates, net		(97)		8
Net cash used in investing activities		(455)		(222)
Other		(1)		(1)
Net cash used in investing activities		(435)		(329)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common dividends paid		(100)		-
Preferred dividends paid		(23)		(23)
Preferred dividends paid by subsidiary		(1)		(1)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~103~~104)		(34)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		5223		~~332~~212
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		49		206
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	101	$	538
Cash and cash equivalents, September 30	$	72	$	418
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized	$	2938	$	3040
Income tax payments, net of refunds		4463		2954
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Dividends declared but not paid	$	1	$	1
Increase in capital lease obligations for investments in property, plant and
equipment	$	-	$	2
Dividends declared but not paid		1		1
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(unaudited)
Operating revenues	$	~~834~~776	$	~~694~~662	$	2,~~016~~792	$	12,~~614~~276
Operating expenses
Cost of natural gas		~~318~~252		~~214~~180		~~992~~1,244		~~669~~849
Operation and maintenance		~~293~~285		~~265~~252		~~555~~840		~~516~~768
Depreciation		7778		7573		~~152~~230		~~147~~220
Franchise fees and other taxes		2827		2425		6592		5681
Total operating expenses		~~716~~642		~~578~~530		12,~~764~~406		1,~~388~~918
Operating income		~~118~~134		~~116~~132		~~252~~386		~~226~~358
Other income, net		2		4		6		5
Other income (expense), net		2		(1)		8		4
Interest income		-1		1		-1		23
Interest expense		(1617)		(1816)		(3350)		(3551)
Income before income taxes		~~104~~120		~~103~~116		~~225~~345		~~198~~314
Income tax expense		(3442)		(3742)		(90132)		(73115)
Net income		7078		6674		~~135~~213		~~125~~199
Preferred dividend requirements		~~(1)~~-		~~(1)~~-		(1)		(1)
Earnings attributable to common shares	$	6978	$	6574	$	~~134~~212	$	~~124~~198
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~101~~72	$	49
Accounts receivable - trade		~~344~~302		567
Accounts receivable - other		3755		44
Due from unconsolidated affiliate		~~260~~118		6
Income taxes receivable		219		35
Inventories		44181		93
Other regulatory assets		810		9
Other		3934		40
Total current assets		~~835~~791		843
Other assets:
Regulatory assets arising from pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations		~~621~~614		617
Other regulatory assets		~~132~~114		131
Sundry		1310		14
Total other assets		~~766~~738		762
Property, plant and equipment:
Property, plant and equipment		9,~~443~~556		9,297
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(3,~~682~~735)		(3,615)
Property, plant and equipment, net		5,~~761~~821		5,682
Total assets	$	7,~~362~~350	$	7,287
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - trade	$	~~160~~167	$	207
Accounts payable - other		6277		120
Due to unconsolidated affiliate		113		3
Deferred income taxes		5		6
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		337		223
Accrued compensation and benefits		89		86
Customer deposits		80		87
Regulatory balancing accounts, net		163		223
Accrued compensation and benefits		88		86
Current portion of long-term debt		260		11
Current portion of long-term debt		264		11
Customer deposits		77		87
Other		~~147~~191		158
Total current liabilities		1,~~154~~032		901
Long-term debt		1,~~022~~021		1,283
Deferred credits and other liabilities:
Customer advances for construction		125		123
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of plan assets		~~649~~643		644
Deferred income taxes		~~317~~379		280
Deferred investment tax credits		26		28
Regulatory liabilities arising from removal obligations		1,~~240~~247		1,227
Asset retirement obligations		~~681~~690		662
Deferred taxes refundable in rates		~~154~~144		175
Deferred credits and other		~~193~~163		198
Total deferred credits and other liabilities		3,~~385~~417		3,337
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock		22		22
Common stock (100 million shares authorized; 91 million shares outstanding;
no par value)		866		866
Retained earnings		~~937~~1,015		903
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(2423)		(25)
Total shareholders' equity		1,~~801~~880		1,766
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	7,~~362~~350	$	7,287
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009
	(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~135~~213	$	~~125~~199
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation		~~152~~230		~~147~~220
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		1362		2022
Other		(2)		46
Net change in other working capital components		~~325~~62		~~263~~125
Changes in other assets		46		74
Changes in other liabilities		(6)		(627)
Net cash provided by operating activities		~~621~~569		~~560~~549
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(~~216~~337)		(~~227~~336)
Increase in loans to affiliates, net		(~~252~~108)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~468~~445)		(~~227~~336)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common dividends paid		(100)		-
Preferred dividends paid		(1)		(1)
Net cash used in financing activities		(101)		(1)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		5223		~~332~~212
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		49		206
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	101	$	538
Cash and cash equivalents, September 30	$	72	$	418
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized	$	2937	$	3040
Income tax payments, net of refunds		4463		2954
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Increase in capital lease obligations for investments in property, plant and
equipment	$	-	$	2
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEMPRA ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. GENERAL

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

Sempra Energy

Sempra Energy's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sempra Energy, a California-based Fortune 500 holding company, and its consolidated subsidiaries and a variable interest entity (VIE). Sempra Energy’s principal subsidiaries are

§San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), which we collectively refer to as the Sempra Utilities; and

§Sempra Global, which is the holding company for Sempra Commodities, Sempra Generation, Sempra Pipelines & Storage, and Sempra LNG.

Sempra Energy uses the equity method to account for investments in affiliated companies over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control. We discuss our investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in Note 4 below and Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

SDG&E

SDG&E's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include its accounts and the accounts of a variable interest entity of which SDG&E is the primary beneficiary, as we discuss in Note 5 under "Variable Interest Entities." SDG&E’s common stock is wholly owned by Enova Corporation, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sempra Energy.

Pacific Enterprises and SoCalGas

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Pacific Enterprises include the accounts of Pacific Enterprises (PE) and its subsidiary, SoCalGas. Sempra Energy owns all of PE’s common stock and PE owns all of SoCalGas’ common stock. SoCalGas’ Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include its subsidiaries, which comprise less than one percent of its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

PE's operations consist solely of those of SoCalGas and additional items (e.g., cash, intercompany accounts and equity) attributable to serving as a holding company for SoCalGas.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

This is a combined report of Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas. We provide separate information for SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas as required. In the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (except in Note 11), when only information for SoCalGas is provided, it is the same for PE. References in this report to "we," "our" and "Sempra Energy Consolidated" are to Sempra Energy and its consolidated entities, unless otherwise indicated by the context. We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions within the consolidated financial statements of each reporting entity.

We have prepared the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and in accordance with the interim-period-reporting requirements of Form 10-Q. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year. We evaluated events and transactions that occurred after ~~June~~September 30, 2010 through the date the financial statements were issued, and in the opinion of management, the accompanying statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. These adjustments are only of a normal, recurring nature.

You should read the information in this Quarterly Report in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report), and our Quarterly ~~Report~~Reports on Form 10-Q for the ~~quarter~~quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, which are combined reports for Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. We follow the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, except for the adoption of new accounting standards as we discuss in Note 2.

The Sempra Utilities and Sempra Pipelines & Storage's Mobile Gas Service Corporation ~~(Mobile Gas)~~ and Ecogas Mexico, S de RL de CV ~~(Ecogas)~~ prepare their financial statements in accordance with GAAP provisions governing regulated operations, as we discuss in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Orange Grove Energy L.P.

SDG&E has a 25-year tolling agreement to purchase power generated by Orange Grove Energy L.P. (Orange Grove) at its 99-megawatt (MW) generating facility located in San Diego County, California. Under a tolling agreement, SDG&E purchases power generated by facilities for which it supplies all of the natural gas to fuel the power plant. In the third quarter of 2009, Sempra Energy and SDG&E determined that Orange Grove was a VIE and that SDG&E was the primary beneficiary of the VIE based on the criteria in GAAP as written at that time and applicable through December 31, 2009. Sempra Energy and SDG&E therefore consolidated Orange Grove beginning in the third quarter of 2009 through December 31, 2009.

In the first quarter of 2010, Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-17, “Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities” (ASU 2009-17), which we discuss in Note 2 below, became effective. Applying the guidance in ASU 2009-17, ~~which indicated that~~ because of SDG&E’s obligation to absorb the natural gas costs for the fuel to operate the facility, along with the power to direct the dispatch, Sempra Energy and SDG&E continued to consolidate Orange Grove in the first quarter of 2010.

In the ~~current~~second quarter, Sempra Energy and SDG&E reevaluated the provisions of ASU 2009-17 as they apply to Orange Grove. Sempra Energy and SDG&E determined that because the Orange Grove facility is a peaker plant, it operates infrequently to meet peak power needs. We believe that the owners of Orange Grove retain the most significant economic power through their control over operations and maintenance of the plant, which impacts the capacity payments under the agreement that are expected to have the greatest effect on the overall economic performance of the entity. Accordingly, SDG&E does not have the right to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Orange Grove, and Sempra Energy and SDG&E should not consolidate Orange Grove, but instead should record the agreement as a capital lease. The effect of this change has no effect on Sempra Energy’s or SDG&E’s earnings and is not material to their previously issued financial statements.

Presentation of Restricted Cash

In Sempra Energy’s previously issued financial statements, we presented all restricted cash as a current asset on the balance sheet. At both ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $27 million of restricted cash represents funds held in trust for construction financing of certain natural gas storage facilities of Sempra Pipelines & Storage. Because this restricted cash will be expended for construction of long-lived assets, we have concluded that these amounts should be presented as a noncurrent asset. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, this restricted cash is presented as Restricted Cash under Investments and Other Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We believe that the effect of presentation of restricted cash is not material to the previously issued balance sheets and have not corrected the classification of the restricted cash amount at December 31, 2009. The presentation of restricted cash on the balance sheet has no impact on earnings or cash flows for any period presented.

NOTE 2. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

We describe below recent pronouncements that have had or may have a significant effect on our financial statements. We do not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on or are unrelated to our financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.

SEMPRA ENERGY, SDG&E, PE AND SOCALGAS

ASU 2009-17, "Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities" (ASU 2009-17): ASU 2009-17 amends Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities – an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46(R)), which provides consolidation guidance related to variable interest entities.

ASU 2009-17 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation, and requires

§a qualitative approach for identifying the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity based on 1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, and 2) the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entity;

§ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; and

§separate disclosure by the primary beneficiary on the face of the balance sheet to identify 1) assets that can only be used to settle obligations of the variable interest entity, and 2) liabilities for which creditors do not have recourse to the primary beneficiary.

We adopted ASU 2009-17 on January 1, 2010 and it did not have a material effect on earnings, nor on presentation on the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Sempra Energy and SDG&E. We provide the required additional disclosure in Note 5. ASU 2009-17 did not impact PE’s nor SoCalGas’ condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2010-06, "Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements" (ASU 2010-06): ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and requires the following additional fair value measurement disclosures:

§transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2

§segregation of classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value

§valuation techniques and inputs used for Level 2 and Level 3 instruments

§detailed activity for Level 3 instruments, including separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements

We adopted ASU 2010-06on January 1, 2010, and we provide the additional disclosure in Note 8.

NOTE 3. RECENT INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

SEMPRA PIPELINES & STORAGE

Acquisition of Mexican Pipeline and Natural Gas Infrastructure

On April 30, 2010, Sempra Pipelines & Storage completed an acquisition resulting in the purchase of the Mexican pipeline and natural gas infrastructure assets of El Paso Corporation for $307 million ($292 million, net of cash acquired).

The acquisition consists of El Paso Corporation’s wholly owned natural gas pipeline and compression assets in the Mexican border state of Sonora and its 50-percent interest in a joint venture with PEMEX, the Mexican state-owned oil company. The joint venture operates two natural gas pipelines and a propane system in northern Mexico. The acquisition expands our scale and geographic footprint in a strong growth region in Mexico. The pipeline assets are backed substantially by long-term contracts with a history of consistent revenue streams, allowing us to expand our natural gas infrastructure business in northern Mexico.

The ~~allocation of the purchase price is preliminary and will be completed when we receive final closing information from El Paso Corporation. The~~ following table summarizes the ~~preliminary~~ consideration paid in the acquisition and the recognized amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at April 30, 2010:

(Dollars in millions)
Cash consideration (fair value of total consideration)		$	307
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
	Cash		15
	Accounts receivable		4
	Investment in equity method investee		256
	Property, plant & equipment		25
	Other liabilities		(11)
Total identifiable net assets			289
Goodwill(1)		$	18
Acquisition-related costs (included in Other Operation and Maintenance expense in
	the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months
	the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months
	and six months ended June 30, 2010)	$	1
	ended September 30, 2010)	$	1
(1)	The goodwill, which represents the residual of the consideration paid over the identifiable net assets, is assigned to the Sempra Pipelines & Storage segment and is attributed to the strategic value of the transaction. None of the goodwill recorded is deductible in Mexico for income tax purposes.

Included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are revenues and earnings of $14 million and $512 million, respectively, for the period May 1, 2010 to ~~June~~September 30, 2010 related to the assets acquired from El Paso Corporation, including revenues and earnings of $3 million and $7 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Proforma impacts on revenues and earnings for Sempra Energy had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2009 were immaterial.

Natural Gas Storage Projects

Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s Sempra Midstream owned 60 percent of Mississippi Hub, LLC (Mississippi Hub) through December 31, 2008 and on January 16, 2009, purchased the remaining 40-percent ownership interest for $94 million in cash.

NOTE 4. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

SEMPRA ENERGY AND SDG&E

Available-for-Sale Securities

In June 2009, SDG&E remarketed $176 million of its industrial development bonds at a fixed rate of 5.875 percent, maturing in 2034. Prior to SDG&E's remarketing, SDG&E purchased $152 million of the bonds from Sempra Energy. We discuss these bonds further in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

SEMPRA COMMODITIES

RBS Sempra Commodities LLP (RBS Sempra Commodities) is a limited liability partnership formed in the United Kingdom to own and operate the commodities-marketing businesses previously operated through wholly owned subsidiaries of Sempra Energy. We account for our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities under the equity method, and report our share of partnership earnings in the Sempra Commodities segment.

~~For~~Excluding the impairment charge discussed below, for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we recorded pretax equity ~~losses~~earnings of $1624 million and $915 million, respectively, from RBS Sempra Commodities. Pretax equity earnings from RBS Sempra Commodities were $~~126~~105 million and $~~279~~384 million for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively. The partnership income that is distributable to us on an annual basis is computed on the partnership's basis of accounting, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the European Union. For the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our share of distributable income, on an IFRS basis, was $3222 million and $3153 million, respectively. In the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, our share of distributable income, on an IFRS basis, was $~~102~~60 million and $~~216~~276 million, respectively. In the second quarter of 2010, we received the remaining distribution of 2009 partnership income of $198 million. In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, we received cash distributions from the partnership of $~~375~~407 million. We discuss the equity method investment in RBS Sempra Commodities further in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

WeIn ~~have~~November ~~indemnified~~2009, our partner in the ~~partnership~~joint ~~for~~venture, ~~certain~~The ~~litigation~~Royal ~~and~~Bank ~~tax~~of ~~liabilities~~Scotland ~~related~~(RBS), announced its intention to divest its interest in RBS Sempra Commodities in connection with a directive from the ~~businesses~~European ~~purchased~~Commission byto dispose of certain assets. In February 2010, Sempra Energy, RBS and the partnership entered into an agreement with J.P. WeMorgan ~~recorded~~Ventures ~~these~~Energy ~~obligations~~Corporation at(J.P. aMorgan ~~fair~~Ventures), ~~value~~a unit of $5J.P. ~~million~~Morgan Chase & Co. (JP Morgan), for J.P. Morgan Ventures to purchase the global metals and oil businesses and the European natural gas and power business from the joint venture. This transaction was completed on ~~April~~July 1, ~~2008~~2010, and we received the ~~date~~majority weof ~~formed~~the proceeds in early July 2010 and the ~~partnership~~remainder in September 2010. ~~This~~The ~~liability~~purchase isprice ~~being~~was ~~amortized~~$1.6 ~~over~~billion, ~~its~~and ~~expected~~our ~~life~~share of the proceeds was approximately $1 billion, including distributions of 2009 partnership income attributable to the businesses sold, which were $134 million of the $198 million in distributions we received in April 2010.

InThis ~~November~~sale ~~2009,~~to J.P. Morgan Ventures did not include RBS ~~announced~~Sempra Commodities' North American power and natural gas trading businesses and its ~~intention~~retail energy solutions business. In September 2010, Noble Group Ltd. (Noble Group) agreed to ~~divest~~acquire ~~its~~the ~~interest~~U.S. inretail commodity marketing business of the RBS Sempra Commodities joint venture for $318 million in ~~connection~~cash, ~~with~~plus aassumption ~~directive~~of ~~from~~all ~~the~~debt, ~~European~~and ~~Commission~~the totransaction ~~dispose~~closed ofon ~~certain~~November ~~assets~~1, 2010. In ~~February~~October 2010, ~~Sempra~~J.P. ~~Energy~~Morgan Ventures agreed to purchase, subject to regulatory approval, most of the remaining assets of RBS ~~and~~Sempra Commodities for approximately $220 million. The assets to be sold include the ~~partnership~~joint ~~(Seller~~venture’s ~~Parties)~~wholesale ~~entered~~natural ~~into~~gas anand ~~agreement~~power (trading agreements, as well as over-the-counter ~~Purchase~~and ~~Agreement)~~exchange-traded transactions, with Jcounterparties across North America.P. ~~Morgan~~The ~~Ventures~~counterparties ~~Energy~~include ~~Corporation~~natural ~~(J.P.~~gas ~~Morgan~~producers, ~~Ventures)~~pipeline and storage providers, ~~for~~power Jplants, regasification facilities, utilities and municipal customers.P. ~~Morgan~~The ~~Ventures~~sale is expected to ~~purchase~~close ~~the~~before ~~following~~year-end ~~businesses~~and ~~from~~will complete the ~~joint~~divestiture ~~venture:~~of the remaining principal assets of RBS Sempra Commodities.

§We expect our share of the ~~global~~proceeds ~~oil,~~from ~~metals,~~the ~~coal,~~sales ~~emissions~~of ~~(other~~all ~~than~~of ~~emissions~~the partnership businesses and related cash distributions to ~~the~~total ~~partnership’s~~$1.8 ~~North~~billion ~~American~~to ~~power~~$1.9 ~~business),~~billion. ~~plastics~~This includes approximately $1.3 billion expected from the announced transactions, ~~agricultural~~plus ~~commodities~~$500 ~~and~~million ~~concentrates~~to ~~commodities~~$600 ~~trading~~million consisting primarily of cash and ~~marketing~~accounts ~~business~~receivable, as well as net margin that is expected to be collected as customers are transferred to JP Morgan. The transfer of all accounts to JP Morgan will be done as soon as possible following closing, but is expected to continue into 2011.

§Projected cash distributions from RBS Sempra Commodities are net of expected transition costs and are not expected to fully recover the ~~European~~goodwill ~~power~~included in the carrying value of our investment in the partnership. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax non-cash charge of $305 million ($139 million after-tax) for the three months and ~~gas~~nine ~~business~~months ended September 30, 2010 to reduce our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities. This charge is included in Equity Earnings (Losses) from RBS Sempra Commodities LLP on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities was significantly impacted by unobservable inputs (i.e., Level 3 inputs) as defined by the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, which we discuss below in Note 8. The inputs included estimated future cash distributions expected from the partnership, excluding the impact of costs anticipated for transactions that have not closed as of September 30, 2010. The investment balance of $825 million at September 30, 2010 reflects our portion of the partnership’s earnings, distributions received from the partnership and the non-cash charge to bring the investment to fair value.

§the investor products business

The Purchase Agreement does not include RBS Sempra Commodities' North American power and natural gas trading businesses and its retail energy solutions business. These businesses have historically generated 40 to 60 percent of total earnings of the businesses in the partnership, and have averaged more than 50 percent. RBS and Sempra Energy are actively soliciting offers for the sale of these remaining businesses.

The transaction with J.P. Morgan Ventures was completed on July 1, 2010 and we received the majority of the proceeds in early July 2010. The purchase price was $1.6 billion, and our share of the proceeds is approximately $1 billion, including distributions of 2009 partnership income attributable to the businesses sold, which were $134 million of the $198 million in distributions we received in April 2010. We and RBS continue to engage in an active sales process for the remaining partnership businesses. Based on preliminary indications of value from potential buyers and discussions with our partner with respect to the ultimate allocation of proceeds, we currently believe that our share of the proceeds from the partnership for the sale to J.P. Morgan Ventures and proceeds from the sale or ultimate disposition of the remaining joint venture assets will be sufficient such that their application to our equity method investment will not have a material effect on our earnings. We and RBS are also continuing to discuss amending various provisions to our partnership agreement in light of the sale to J.P. Morgan Ventures and the sales process for the remaining businesses.

The following table shows summarized financial information for RBS Sempra Commodities (on a GAAP basis):

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Gross revenues and fee income	$	~~188~~72	$	~~367~~291	$	~~394~~466	$	~~876~~1,167
Gross profit		~~174~~74		~~342~~268		~~372~~446		~~828~~1,096
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(237)		~~153~~115		(1320)		~~389~~504
Partnership net income (loss)		(237)		~~153~~115		(1320)		~~389~~504

We provide information regarding the Sempra Commodities segment in Note 11.

SEMPRA PIPELINES & STORAGE

In the first quarter 2010, Sempra Pipelines & Storage contributed $65 million to Rockies Express, a joint venture to own and operate the Rockies Express Pipeline, ~~which~~to ~~contribution~~complete ~~was~~ the ~~last required for the~~ construction phase of the project. Sempra Pipelines & Storage contributed $~~188~~315 million ~~in the three months ended June 30, 2009~~ and $~~213~~527 million in the ~~six~~three months and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively. We discuss this investment in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage owns 43 percent of two Argentine natural gas utility holding companies, Sodigas Pampeana and Sodigas Sur. The Argentine economic decline and government responses (including Argentina’s unilateral, retroactive abrogation of utility agreements early in 2002) continue to adversely affect the operations of these Argentine utilities. In 2002, Sempra Pipelines & Storage initiated arbitration proceedings at the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) under the 1994 Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United States and Argentina for recovery of the diminution of the value of its investments that has resulted from Argentine governmental actions. In September 2007, the tribunal ~~officially closed the arbitration proceedings and~~ awarded us compensation of $172 million, which ~~includes~~included interest up to the award date. In January 2008, Argentina filed an action at the ICSID seeking to annul the award. In June 2010, the Annulment Committee granted Argentina’s petition for annulment of the award. This action did not impact our earnings, as we did not record the original award pending assurance of collectability. WeOn ~~are~~November ~~currently~~3, ~~evaluating our options~~2010, ~~which~~Sempra ~~include~~Pipelines ~~filing~~& aStorage ~~new~~resubmitted arbitration ~~claim~~proceedings against Argentina before the ~~Government~~ICSID ofon ~~Argentina.~~the same and similar grounds as the 2002 filing.

In a separate but related proceeding related to our political risk insurance policy, we negotiated a $48 million settlement that was collected in September 2010. The proceeds from the settlement are reported in Other Income, Net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

We continue to actively pursue the sale of our investments in the two Argentine companies. In September 2010, we concluded that, although the ICSID claim had been annulled as discussed above, rate increases sought in Argentina would continue to be delayed. We believe this continued uncertainty has impacted the fair value of our net investment in the two Argentine companies, and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $24 million, which is reported in Equity Earnings (Losses), Net of Income Tax, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Sodigas Pampeana and Sodigas Sur fair value was significantly impacted by unobservable inputs (i.e., Level 3 inputs) as defined by the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, which we discuss below in Note 8. The inputs included discount rates and estimated future cash flows. Such cash flows considered the value of those businesses with positive cash flows, the value of the non-operating assets, and the probability-weighted value of anticipated rate increases, considering both the timing and magnitude of such increases.

SEMPRA GENERATION

Sempra Generation and BP Wind Energy currently hold 50-percent ownership interests in Fowler Ridge II Wind Farm LLC (Fowler Ridge), a joint venture which operates a 200-MW wind farm project located in Benton County, Indiana. As of December 2009, Sempra Generation had invested $235 million in the joint venture. In August 2010, Sempra Generation received a $180 million return of capital from Fowler Ridge. We discuss this further in Note 6 below and provide additional information in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

NOTE 5. OTHER FINANCIAL DATA

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

We consolidate a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE’s activities. Our determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary is based upon qualitative and quantitative analyses, which assess

§the purpose and design of the VIE;

§the nature of the VIE's risks and the risks we absorb;

§the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE; and

§the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE.

SDG&E has agreements under which it purchases power generated by facilities for which it supplies all of the natural gas to fuel the power plant (i.e., tolling agreements). SDG&E’s obligation to absorb natural gas costs may be a significant variable interest. In addition, SDG&E has the power to direct the dispatch of electricity generated by these facilities. Based upon our analysis, the ability to direct the dispatch of electricity may have the most significant impacts on the economic performance of the entity owning the generating facility because of the associated exposure to the cost of natural gas, which fuels the plants, and the value of electricity produced. To the extent that SDG&E 1) is obligated to purchase and provide fuel to operate the facility, 2) has the power to direct the dispatch, and 3) purchases all of the output from the facility for a substantial portion of the facility’s useful life, SDG&E may be the primary beneficiary of the entity owning the generating facility. SDG&E determines if it is the primary beneficiary in these cases based on the operational characteristics of the ~~power plant~~facility, including its expected power generation output relative to its capacity to generate and the financial structure of the entity, among other factors. If we determine that SDG&E is the primary beneficiary, Sempra Energy and SDG&E consolidate the entity that owns the facility as a VIE, as we discuss below.

Otay Mesa VIE

SDG&E has a 10-year agreement to purchase power generated at the Otay Mesa Energy Center (OMEC), a 605-MW generating facility that began commercial operations in October 2009. In addition to tolling, the agreement provides SDG&E with the option to purchase the power plant at the end of the contract term in 2019, or upon earlier termination of the purchased-power agreement, at a predetermined price subject to adjustments based on performance of the facility. If SDG&E does not exercise its option, under certain circumstances, it may be required to purchase the power plant at a predetermined price.

The facility owner, Otay Mesa Energy Center LLC (OMEC LLC), is a VIE (Otay Mesa VIE), of which SDG&E is the primary beneficiary. SDG&E has no OMEC LLC voting rights and does not operate OMEC. In addition to the risks absorbed under the tolling agreement, SDG&E absorbs separately through the put option a significant portion of the risk that the value of Otay Mesa VIE could decline. Sempra Energy and SDG&E have consolidated Otay Mesa VIE since the second quarter of 2007, and have continued to consolidate it through the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010. Otay Mesa VIE's equity of $~~121~~107 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and $146 million at December 31, 2009 is included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other Noncontrolling Interests for Sempra Energy and in Noncontrolling Interest for SDG&E.

OMEC LLC has a loan outstanding of $~~370~~367 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the proceeds of which were used for the construction of OMEC. The loan is with third party lenders and is secured by OMEC's property, plant and equipment. SDG&E is not a party to the loan agreement and does not have any additional implicit or explicit financial responsibility to OMEC LLC. The loan fully matures in April 2019 and bears interest at rates varying with market rates. In addition, OMEC LLC has entered into interest rate swap agreements to moderate its exposure to interest rate changes. We provide additional information concerning the interest rate swaps in Note 7.

Other Variable Interest Entities

SDG&E's power procurement is subject to reliability requirements that may require SDG&E to enter into various power purchase arrangements which include variable interests. SDG&E evaluates these contracts to determine if variable interests exist and, based on the qualitative and quantitative analyses described above, if SDG&E, and thereby Sempra Energy, is the primary beneficiary. SDG&E has determined that no contracts other than that relating to Otay Mesa VIE mentioned above result in SDG&E being the primary beneficiary. In addition to the tolling agreements described above, other variable interests involve various elements of fuel and power costs, including certain construction costs, tax credits, and other components of cash flow expected to be paid to or received by our counterparties. In most of these cases, the expectation of variability is not substantial, and SDG&E generally does not have the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the other VIEs. If our ongoing evaluation of these VIEs were to conclude that SDG&E becomes the primary beneficiary and consolidation by SDG&E becomes necessary, the effects are not expected to significantly affect the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of SDG&E. SDG&E is not exposed to losses or gains as a result of these other VIEs, because all such variability would be recovered in rates.

Sempra Energy’s other business units also enter into arrangements which could include variable interests. We evaluate these contracts based upon the qualitative and quantitative analyses described above. We have determined that these contracts are not variable interests in a VIE and therefore are not subject to the requirements of ASU 2009-17.

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The following three tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost:

NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST -- SEMPRA ENERGY CONSOLIDATED
(Dollars in millions)
	Pension Benefits				Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	20	$	2017	$	85	$	7
Interest cost		41		42		14		1514
Expected return on assets		(36)		(3534)		(1112)		(1211)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost (credit)		1		1		(1)		(1)
Prior service cost		1		1		-		-
Actuarial loss		78		6		2		1
Regulatory adjustment		105		(1314)		21		51
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	4339	$	2118	$	1410	$	1512
	Six months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	4262	$	3956	$	1520	$	1421
Interest cost		84125		85127		2943		2943
Expected return on assets		(72108)		(70104)		(2335)		(2435)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost (credit)		23		23		(1)		(1)
Actuarial loss		1523		1218		46		23
Regulatory adjustment		(1914)		(3953)		45		45
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	5291	$	2947	$	2838	$	2436

NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST -- SDG&E
(Dollars in millions)
	Pension Benefits				Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	7	$	65	$	12	$	12
Interest cost		12		12		32		23
Expected return on assets		(11)		(8)		(12)		(1)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		-		-		1		1
Actuarial loss		3		4		-		-
Regulatory adjustment		73		-(2)		-		1-
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	1814	$	1411	$	43	$	45
	Six months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	1421	$	1217	$	35	$	35
Interest cost		2436		2436		57		47
Expected return on assets		(2132)		(1624)		(35)		(23)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		1		1		23		23
Actuarial loss		69		812		-		-
Regulatory adjustment		(52)		(1416)		1		1
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	1933	$	1526	$	811	$	813

NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST -- SOCALGAS
(Dollars in millions)
	Pension Benefits				Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,				Three months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	11	$	119	$	53	$	46
Interest cost		2425		2425		11		1211
Expected return on assets		(2223)		(2224)		(109)		(10)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost (credit)		-1		-1		(1)		(1)
Actuarial loss		2		-		2		1
Regulatory adjustment		32		(1310)		21		41
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	18	$	-1	$	97	$	108
	Six months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	2334	$	2231	$	1013	$	915
Interest cost		4974		4974		2334		2334
Expected return on assets		(4568)		(4670)		(2029)		(2131)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost (credit)		12		12		(23)		(23)
Actuarial loss		57		-		46		23
Regulatory adjustment		(1412)		(2535)		34		34
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	1937	$	12	$	1825	$	1422

Benefit Plan Contributions

The following table shows our year-to-date contributions to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans and the amounts we expect to contribute in 2010:

	Sempra Energy
(Dollars in millions)	Consolidated		SDG&E		SoCalGas
Contributions through June 30, 2010:
Contributions through September 30, 2010:
Pension plans	$	5391	$	2135	$	1937
Other postretirement benefit plans		2739		812		1926
Total expected contributions in 2010:
Pension plans	$	~~169~~163	$	6362	$	7572
Other postretirement benefit plans		5552		1615		3633

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table provides the per share computations for our earnings for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009. Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing earnings attributable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the potential dilution of common stock equivalent shares that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Numerator:
Earnings	$	~~222~~131	$	~~198~~317	$	~~328~~459	$	~~514~~831
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding for basic EPS		246,~~784~~668		~~242~~243,~~718~~925		246,~~435~~513		242,~~245~~806
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units		23,~~943~~143		4,~~372~~536		3,~~400~~260		34,~~794~~069
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding for diluted EPS		249,~~727~~811		~~247~~248,~~090~~461		249,~~835~~773		246,~~039~~875
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.9053	$	01.8230	$	1.3386	$	23.1242
Diluted	$	0.8953	$	01.8027	$	1.3184	$	23.0937

The dilution from common stock options is based on the treasury stock method. Under this method, proceeds based on the exercise price plus unearned compensation and windfall tax benefits or minus tax shortfalls related to the options are assumed to be used to repurchase shares on the open market at the average market price for the period. The windfall tax benefits are tax deductions we would receive upon the assumed exercise of stock options in excess of the deferred income taxes we recorded related to the compensation expense on the stock options. Tax shortfalls occur when the assumed tax deductions are less than recorded deferred income taxes. The calculation excludes options for which the exercise price on common stock was greater than the average market price during the period. We had 2,~~177~~132,~~855~~975 and 2,~~171~~158,~~016~~528 such stock options outstanding during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively. We had 1,~~506~~505,~~783~~096 and 21,~~250~~507,~~061~~361 such stock options outstanding during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively.

We had 3310,~~889~~800 and ~~862~~8,~~027~~407 stock options outstanding during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009~~2010, respectively, that were anti-dilutive because of the unearned compensation and windfall tax benefits included in the assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method. We had no890,781 such anti-dilutive stock options during the ~~three~~nine months orended ~~six~~September 30, 2009 and none for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~2009.

The dilution from unvested restricted stock awards and units is also based on the treasury stock method. Assumed proceeds equal to the unearned compensation and windfall tax benefits or minus tax shortfalls related to the awards and units are assumed to be used to repurchase shares on the open market at the average market price for the period. The windfall tax benefits or tax shortfalls are the difference between tax deductions we would receive upon the assumed vesting of restricted stock awards and units and the deferred income taxes we recorded related to the compensation expense on the restricted stock awards and units. There were no such anti-dilutive restricted stock awards or units during any period presented.

COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

In September 2010, we entered into a Collared Accelerated Share Acquisition Program under which we prepaid $500 million to repurchase shares of our common stock in a share forward transaction. The total number of shares purchased (subject to a minimum of 8,078,000 shares and maximum of 10,321,889 shares) will be determined by dividing the $500 million purchase price by the volume-weighted average trading prices of shares of our common stock during a valuation period, minus a fixed discount and subject to a minimum and maximum price set during a hedging period. The program may extend into the first quarter of 2011.

Our outstanding shares used to calculate earnings per share are reduced by the number of shares repurchased when they are delivered to us, and the $500 million purchase price was recorded as a reduction in shareholders’ equity upon its prepayment. We received 5,670,006 shares during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and 2,407,994 shares on October 4, 2010. We will receive any additional repurchased shares above the minimum at the end of the valuation period, which will continue until the program is completed.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

We discuss our share-based compensation plans in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. We recorded share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes, of $64 million ~~and $5 million~~ for both the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively,~~ and $1317 million and $1115 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Pursuant to our share-based compensation plans, we granted 687,600 non-qualified stock options and 773,616 restricted stock units during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, primarily in January 2010.

CAPITALIZED FINANCING COSTS

Capitalized financing costs include capitalized interest costs and, at the Sempra Utilities, an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) related to both debt and equity financing of construction projects. The following table shows capitalized financing costs for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009.

CAPITALIZED FINANCING COSTS
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
AFUDC related to debt	$	56	$	4	$	1016	$	711
AFUDC related to equity		1413		10		2740		1828
Other capitalized financing costs		119		2515		1827		4762
Total Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	3028	$	3929	$	5583	$	72101
SDG&E:
AFUDC related to debt	$	45	$	23	$	712	$	47
AFUDC related to equity		1011		78		1930		1321
Other capitalized financing costs		-		2		-		24
Total SDG&E	$	1416	$	1113	$	2642	$	1932
SoCalGas:
AFUDC related to debt	$	1	$	21	$	34	$	34
AFUDC related to equity		42		32		810		57
Total SoCalGas	$	5	$	5	$	11	$	8
Other capitalized financing costs		-		1		-		1
Total SoCalGas	$	3	$	4	$	14	$	12

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following ~~tables~~table ~~provide~~provides a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,
		2010						2009
		Share-		Non-				Share-		Non-
		holders'		controlling		Total		holders'		controlling		Total
		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Net income (loss)(2)	$	~~225~~133	$	(206)	$	~~205~~127	$	~~201~~319	$	(1217)	$	~~189~~302
	Foreign currency translation
	adjustments		~~(17)~~53		-		~~(17)~~53		54(11)		-		54(11)
	Financial instruments		(93)		21		(72)		20(5)		-		20(5)
	Available-for-sale securities		~~(3)~~4		-		~~(3)~~4		48		-		48
	Net actuarial gain		21		-		21		12		-		12
	Comprehensive income (loss)	$	~~198~~188	$	(185)	$	~~180~~183	$	~~280~~313	$	(1217)	$	~~268~~296
SDG&E:
	Net income (loss)	$	76108	$	(215)	$	55103	$	71110	$	20(18)	$	9192
	Financial instruments		-		21		21		-		1-		1-
	Net actuarial gain		1		-		1		1		-		1
	Comprehensive income (loss)	$	108	$	(4)	$	104	$	110	$	(18)	$	92
	Comprehensive income (loss)	$	77	$	(19)	$	58	$	72	$	21	$	93
PE:
	Net income(2)	$	7179	$	-	$	7179	$	6373	$	-	$	6373
	Financial instruments		1		-		1		1-		-		1-
	Comprehensive income	$	7280	$	-	$	7280	$	6473	$	-	$	6473
SoCalGas:
	Net income	$	7078	$	-	$	7078	$	6674	$	-	$	6674
	Financial instruments		1		-		1		1-		-		1-
	Comprehensive income	$	7179	$	-	$	7179	$	6774	$	-	$	6774
(1)	Shareholders' equity of Sempra Energy Consolidated, SDG&E, PE or SoCalGas as indicated in left margin.
(2)	Before preferred dividends of subsidiaries.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Continued)
(Dollars in millions)
		Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010						2009
		Share-		Non-				Share-		Non-
		holders'		controlling		Total		holders'		controlling		Total
		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Net income (loss)(2)	$	~~333~~466	$	(2834)	$	~~305~~432	$	~~519~~838	$	(522)	$	~~514~~816
	Foreign currency translation
	adjustments		~~(21)~~32		-		~~(21)~~32		8069		-		8069
	Financial instruments		(912)		45		(57)		2318		(3)		2015
	Available-for-sale securities		~~(3)~~1		-		~~(3)~~1		1321		-		1321
	Net actuarial gain		34		-		34		24		-		24
	Comprehensive income (loss)	$	~~303~~491	$	(2429)	$	~~279~~462	$	~~637~~950	$	(825)	$	~~629~~925
SDG&E:
	Net income (loss)	$	~~160~~268	$	(2934)	$	~~131~~234	$	~~171~~281	$	279	$	~~198~~290
	Financial instruments		-		45		45		2		(3)		(1)
	Net actuarial gain		1		-		1		1		-		1
	Comprehensive income (loss)	$	~~161~~269	$	(2529)	$	~~136~~240	$	~~174~~284	$	246	$	~~198~~290
PE:
	Net income(2)	$	~~136~~215	$	-	$	~~136~~215	$	~~122~~195	$	-	$	~~122~~195
	Financial instruments		12		-		12		2		-		2
	Comprehensive income	$	~~137~~217	$	-	$	~~137~~217	$	~~124~~197	$	-	$	~~124~~197
SoCalGas:
	Net income	$	~~135~~213	$	-	$	~~135~~213	$	~~125~~199	$	-	$	~~125~~199
	Financial instruments		12		-		12		2		-		2
	Comprehensive income	$	~~136~~215	$	-	$	~~136~~215	$	~~127~~201	$	-	$	~~127~~201
(1)	Shareholders' equity of Sempra Energy Consolidated, SDG&E, PE or SoCalGas as indicated in left margin.
(2)	Before preferred dividends of subsidiaries.

The amounts for comprehensive income in the ~~tables~~table above are net of income tax expense (benefit) as follows:

INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,
		2010						2009
		Share-		Non-				Share-		Non-
		holders'		controlling		Total		holders'		controlling		Total
		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Financial instruments	$	(61)	$	-	$	(61)	$	12(2)	$	-	$	12(2)
	Available-for-sale securities		~~(1)~~-		-		~~(1)~~-		16		-		16
	Net actuarial gain		1		-		1		1-		-		1-
SDG&E:
	Financial instruments	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
PE:
	Financial instruments	$	1	$	-	$	1	$	-	$	-	$	-
SoCalGas:
	Financial instruments	$	1	$	-	$	1	$	-	$	-	$	-
		Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010						2009
		Share-		Non-				Share-		Non-
		holders'		controlling		Total		holders'		controlling		Total
		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity		Equity(1)		Interests		Equity
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Financial instruments	$	(67)	$	-	$	(67)	$	1412	$	-	$	1412
	Available-for-sale securities		(1)		-		(1)		410		-		410
	Net actuarial gain		23		-		23		2		-		2
SDG&E:
	Financial instruments	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1	$	-	$	1
PE:
	Financial instruments	$	12	$	-	$	12	$	1	$	-	$	1
SoCalGas:
	Financial instruments	$	12	$	-	$	12	$	1	$	-	$	1
(1)	Shareholders' equity of Sempra Energy Consolidated, SDG&E, PE or SoCalGas as indicated in left margin.

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

The following two tables provide a reconciliation of Sempra Energy and SDG&E shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009. There were no changes in the equity of PE's noncontrolling interests for the three months or ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 or 2009.

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
(Dollars in millions)
		Sempra
		Energy		Non-
		Shareholders'		controlling		Total
		Equity		Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	9,007	$	244	$	9,251
Comprehensive income (loss)		~~303~~491		(2429)		~~279~~462
Share-based compensation expense		2231		-		2231
Common stock dividends declared		(~~193~~287)		-		(~~193~~287)
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries		(57)		-		(57)
Issuance of common stock		4653		-		4653
Tax benefit related to share-based compensation		13		-		13
Repurchase of common stock		(2502)		-		(2502)
Common stock released from ESOP		1113		-		1113
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	9,190	$	220	$	9,410
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		-		(10)		(10)
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	8,802	$	205	$	9,007
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	7,969	$	340	$	8,309
Comprehensive income (loss)		~~637~~950		(825)		~~629~~925
Purchase of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		(10)		(84)		(94)
Share-based compensation expense		2028		-		2028
Common stock dividends declared		(~~190~~287)		-		(~~190~~287)
Preferred dividends of subsidiaries		(57)		-		(57)
Issuance of common stock		4481		-		4481
Tax benefit related to share-based compensation		510		-		510
Common stock released from ESOP		711		-		711
Equity contributed by noncontrolling interests		-		7		7
Balance at June 30, 2009	$	8,477	$	255	$	8,732
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	8,745	$	238	$	8,983

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
(Dollars in millions)
		SDG&E		Non-
		Shareholders'		controlling		Total
		Equity		Interest		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	2,739	$	146	$	2,885
Comprehensive income (loss)		~~161~~269		(2529)		~~136~~240
Preferred stock dividends declared		(24)		-		(24)
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	2,898	$	121	$	3,019
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		-		(10)		(10)
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	3,004	$	107	$	3,111
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	2,542	$	128	$	2,670
Comprehensive income		~~174~~284		246		~~198~~290
Common stock dividends declared		(150)		-		(150)
Preferred stock dividends declared		(24)		-		(24)
Equity contributed by noncontrolling interest		-		67		67
Balance at June 30, 2009	$	2,564	$	158	$	2,722
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	2,672	$	141	$	2,813

TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Loans to Unconsolidated Affiliates

Sempra Pipelines & Storage has a U.S. dollar-denominated loan to Camuzzi Gas del Sur S.A., an affiliate of Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s Argentine investments, which we discuss in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. The loan to Camuzzi Gas del Sur S.A. has a $28 million balance outstanding at a variable interest rate (7.5329 percent as ofofSeptember ~~June~~ 30, 2010). In May 2010, the maturity date of the loan was extended from June 2010 to June 30, 2011. The loan is fully reserved at ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Investments

In November 2009, Sempra Pipelines & Storage purchased $50 million of 2.75-percent bonds issued by Chilquinta Energía S.A., an unconsolidated affiliate, that are adjusted ~~(or indexed)~~ for Chilean inflation. The bonds mature on October 30, 2014. The carrying value of the bonds after the effect of foreign currency translation was $4855 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010. We discuss this investment in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Other Affiliate Transactions

Sempra Energy, SDG&E and SoCalGas provide certain services to each other and are charged an allocable share of the cost of such services. Amounts due to/from affiliates are as follows:

AMOUNTS DUE TO AND FROM AFFILIATES AT SDG&E, PE AND SOCALGAS
(Dollars in millions)
		June 30,		December 31,
		September 30,		December 31,
		2010		2009
SDG&E
Current:
Due from Sempra Energy		$	-	$	2
Due from SoCalGas			113		3
Due from various affiliates			1		3
		$	124	$	8
Due to Sempra Energy		$	1621	$	-
Income taxes due from Sempra Energy(1)		$	(3492)	$	(37)
Noncurrent:
Promissory note due from Sempra Energy, variable rate based on short-term commercial paper rates (0.24% at June 30, 2010)		$	1	$	2
Promissory note due from Sempra Energy, variable rate based on
short-term commercial paper rates (0.13% at December 31, 2009)		$	-	$	2
Pacific Enterprises
Current:
Due from Sempra Energy		$	~~260~~113	$	7
Due from various affiliates			45		5
		$	~~264~~118	$	12
Due to affiliate		$	84	$	84
Due to SDG&E			113		3
		$	9587	$	87
Income taxes due to (from) Sempra Energy(1)		$	261	$	(2)
Noncurrent:
Promissory note due from Sempra Energy, variable rate based on short-term commercial paper rates (0.24% at June 30, 2010)		$	504	$	513
Promissory note due from Sempra Energy, variable rate based on
short-term commercial paper rates (0.17% at September 30, 2010)		$	504	$	513
SoCalGas
Current:
Due from Sempra Energy		$	~~260~~118	$	6
Due to SDG&E		$	113	$	3
Income taxes due to (from) Sempra Energy(1)		$	325	$	(2)
(1)	SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas are included in the consolidated income tax return of Sempra Energy and are allocated income tax expense from Sempra Energy in an amount equal to that which would result from the companies' having always filed a separate return.

Revenues from unconsolidated affiliates at the Sempra Utilities are as follows:

REVENUES FROM UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES AT THE SEMPRA UTILITIES
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
SDG&E	$	41	$	2	$	56	$	46
SoCalGas		1011		79		2132		1524

Transactions with RBS Sempra Commodities

Several of our business units engage in transactions with RBS Sempra Commodities. Amounts in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements related to these transactions are as follows:

AMOUNTS RECORDED FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH RBS SEMPRA COMMODITIES
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
		Three months ended				Nine months ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2010		2009		2010		2009
Revenues:
Sempra LNG(1)		$	6660	$	~~(2)~~16	$	~~139~~199	$	521
Sempra Commodities			76		27		1319		411
SoCalGas			3		2		7		3
SDG&E			-		2		-		2
Sempra Generation			(7)		8		(4)		9
SoCalGas			1		3		8		6
Total revenues		$	69	$	10	$	155	$	21
Sempra Generation			4		(15)		-		(6)
Total revenues		$	71	$	13	$	226	$	34
Cost of natural gas:
Sempra LNG		$	7863	$	-	$	~~145~~208	$	-
Sempra Generation			1230		-		2858		-
SoCalGas			1110		1		2333		56
Sempra Pipelines & Storage			76		45		1622		1015
SDG&E			-1		-		12		-
Total cost of natural gas		$	~~108~~110	$	56	$	~~213~~323	$	1521
						June 30,		December 31,
						September 30,		December 31,
						2010		2009
Fixed-price contracts and other derivatives - Net Asset (Liability):
Sempra Generation						$	1728	$	7
Sempra LNG							(3436)		(47)
Total						$	(178)	$	(40)
Due to unconsolidated affiliates:
Sempra Generation						$	8	$	13
Sempra LNG							-		13
Sempra Pipelines & Storage							2		3
Total						$	10	$	29
Due from unconsolidated affiliates:
Sempra Commodities						$	1	$	1
Sempra Generation							87		22
Sempra LNG							1917		15
Parent and other							45		3
Total						$	3230	$	41
(1)	Includes (losses) gains of $(3) million and $1411 million for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively, and losses of $46 million ~~loss~~ and $15 million ~~gain~~ for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, related to a natural gas sales agreement with RBS Sempra Commodities which is subject to mark-to-market accounting. Under this agreement, which extends for five years beginning September 1, 2009, RBS Sempra Commodities will market natural gas that Sempra LNG purchases and does not sell under other contracts.

WRITE-OFF OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

In the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a pretax write-off of $132 million related to certain assets at one of Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s Liberty Gas Storage natural gas storage projects. Sempra Pipelines & Storage owns a 75-percent interest in the partnership that is developing the project. Our partner’s 25-percent share of the pretax charge was $33 million, which is included in Losses Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the ~~three~~nine months ~~and six months~~ ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The impact to our net income and to our earnings was $97 million and $64 million, respectively, for ~~both~~the ~~periods~~nine months ended September 30, 2009. We discuss this write-off further in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

Other Income (Expense), Net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of the following:

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
		2010		2009		2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		$	1413	$	10	$	2740	$	1828
Regulatory interest, net			-		-		(1)		-
Investment gains(1)			10		20		15		40
Investment gains(1)			2		37		5		20
Gains (losses) on interest rate instruments(2)			(17)		(10)		(40)		19
Gains (losses) on interest rate instruments(2)			(14)		19		(23)		29
Regulatory interest, net			1		4		-		4
Sundry, net			6		4		8		6
Sundry, net(3)			59		-		67		6
	Total	$	866	$	7024	$	1682	$	7397
SDG&E:
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		$	1011	$	78	$	1930	$	1321
Regulatory interest, net			1		-		-		-
Gains (losses) on interest rate instruments(2)			(17)		(11)		(51)		19
Gains (losses) on interest rate instruments(2)			(25)		20		(34)		30
Regulatory interest, net			-		5		-		5
Sundry, net			~~(2)~~4		-(1)		~~(1)~~3		1-
	Total	$	(162)	$	271	$	(1618)	$	4445
SoCalGas and PE:
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		$	42	$	32	$	810	$	57
Sundry, net			(2)		1		(2)		-
Regulatory interest, net			-		(1)		-		(1)
	Total at SoCalGas and PE	$	2	$	4	$	6	$	5
Sundry, net			-		(2)		(2)		(2)
	Total at SoCalGas		2		(1)		8		4
Additional at PE:
Sundry, net			-		(3)		-		(3)
	Total at PE	$	2	$	(4)	$	8	$	1
(1)	Represents investment gains on dedicated assets in support of our executive retirement and deferred compensation plans. These amounts are partially offset by corresponding changes in compensation expense related to the plans.
(2)	Related to Otay Mesa VIE. Sempra Energy Consolidated also includes additional instruments.
(3)	Amounts in 2010 include proceeds from a legal settlement of $48 million, as we discuss in Note 4.

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) AND EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
		Income Tax	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Income Tax Expense	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Expense	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
		(Benefit)	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	59(32)	25(32)	%	$	90128	3531	%
SDG&E		4456	4435			2853	2437
PE		3342	3235			4041	3936
SoCalGas		3442	3335			3742	36
		Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
		Income Tax	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Expense	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	~~117~~85	3118	%	$	~~199~~327	30	%
SDG&E		75131	36			88141	3133
PE		90132	4038			76117	38
SoCalGas		90132	4038			73115	37

Changes in Effective Income Tax Rates

Sempra Energy Consolidated

The ~~decrease~~change in effective income tax rate for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to:

§$5 million tax benefit in 2010 compared to $20 million tax expense in 2009 due to Mexican currency translation and inflation adjustments;

§higher planned investment tax credits;

§higher ~~self-developed~~exclusions ~~software~~from ~~costs,~~taxable ~~which are deductible for~~ income ~~tax~~of ~~purposes~~the ~~but~~equity ~~capitalized~~portion ~~for~~of ~~book purposes~~AFUDC; and

§higher ~~exclusions~~pretax ~~from~~income ~~taxable~~(including ~~income~~a $175 million gain related to our share of the ~~equity~~RBS ~~portion~~Sempra ofCommodities ~~AFUDC~~sale to J.P. Morgan Ventures on July 1, 2010) in countries with lower statutory rates; offset by

§~~lower~~$11 ~~pretax~~million state income intax ~~countries~~expense ~~with~~related ~~lower~~to ~~statutory~~our ~~rates~~exit from the RBS Sempra Commodities business;

§lower favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues; ~~and~~

§~~higher~~an ~~difference~~increase ~~between~~in the amount by which book depreciation ~~and~~exceeds normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes.; and

~~For~~§$5 ~~the~~million ~~six~~tax ~~months~~expense ~~ended~~in ~~June 30,~~ 2010, ~~the~~compared ~~increase~~to in$3 ~~effective~~million ~~income~~ tax ~~rate~~benefit ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~2009 due to: Mexican currency translation and inflation adjustments.

~~§lower~~For ~~pretax~~the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the effective income intax ~~countries~~rate ~~with~~decreased ~~lower~~primarily ~~statutory~~due ~~rates;~~to:

§a $16 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other post employment benefits, as a result of a change in U.S. tax law that eliminates a future deduction, starting in 2013, for retiree healthcare funded by the Medicare Part D subsidy; and

§higher difference between book depreciation and normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher planned investment tax credits;

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs;

§higher pretax income (including a $4175 million ~~lower~~gain ~~income~~related ~~tax~~to ~~expense~~our ~~due~~share of the RBS Sempra Commodities sale to ~~Mexican~~J.P. ~~currency~~Morgan ~~translation~~Ventures ~~and~~on ~~inflation~~July ~~adjustments~~1, 2010) in countries with lower statutory rates; and

§higher ~~favorable~~exclusions ~~impact~~ from ~~the~~taxable ~~resolution~~income of ~~prior~~the ~~years'~~equity ~~income~~portion ~~tax~~of ~~issues~~AFUDC; ~~and~~offset by

§~~higher~~$11 ~~exclusions~~million ~~from~~state ~~taxable~~ income oftax expense related to our exit from the ~~equity~~RBS ~~portion~~Sempra ofCommodities ~~AFUDC.~~business;

§lower favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues;

§a $16 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other postretirement benefits, as a result of a change in U.S. tax law that eliminates a future deduction, starting in 2013, for retiree healthcare funded by the Medicare Part D subsidy;

§an increase in the amount by which book depreciation exceeds normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; and

§$4 million higher tax expense in 2010 due to Mexican currency translation and inflation adjustments.

SDG&E

The ~~increase~~decrease in SDG&E's effective income tax rate for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to:

§the impact of Otay Mesa VIE;

§~~lower~~a ~~favorable~~decrease ~~impact~~in ~~from~~ the ~~resolution~~amount ofby ~~prior~~which ~~years'~~book ~~income~~depreciation exceeds normalized tax ~~issues~~depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; ~~and~~

§higher difference between book depreciation and normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC; and

§higher ~~deductions~~favorable ~~for~~impact ~~self-developed~~from ~~software~~the ~~costs.~~resolution of prior years' income tax issues; offset by

~~For~~§lower ~~the~~deductions ~~six~~for ~~months~~self-developed ~~ended~~software ~~June~~costs; ~~30, 2010, the increase in SDG&E's effective income tax rate was primarily due to:~~

§lower deductions for other postretirement benefits; and

§lower utility repair allowance.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the increase in SDG&E's effective income tax rate was primarily due to:

§the impact of Otay Mesa VIE;

§a $3 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other ~~post~~postretirement ~~employment~~ benefits as a result of a change in U.S. tax law, as we discuss above; ~~and~~

§~~higher~~lower ~~favorable~~deductions ~~impact~~for ~~from~~other ~~the~~postretirement ~~resolution of prior years' income tax issues~~benefits; and

§~~higher~~lower ~~deductions~~utility ~~for~~repair ~~self-developed software costs~~allowance; ~~and~~offset by

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC.; and

§higher favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues.

SDG&E's results include Otay Mesa VIE, which is consolidated, and therefore, SDG&E's effective income tax rate is impacted by the VIE’s stand-alone effective income tax rate.

PE and SoCalGas

The decrease in PE's and SoCalGas' effective income tax rates for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to:

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs; offset by

§~~higher~~lower ~~exclusions~~deductions ~~from~~for ~~taxable~~other ~~income~~postretirement ~~of the equity portion of AFUDC~~benefits; and

§~~lower~~an ~~unfavorable~~increase ~~resolution~~in ofthe ~~prior~~amount ~~years’~~by ~~income~~which book depreciation exceeds normalized tax ~~issues~~depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the increase in ~~PE’s and~~ SoCalGas’ effective income tax ~~rates~~rate was primarily due to:

§a $13 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other ~~post~~postretirement ~~employment~~ benefits as a result of a change in U.S. tax law, as we discuss above; ~~offset by~~

§lower deductions for other postretirement benefits; and

§an increase in the amount by which book depreciation exceeds normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs; and

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC.

Although it did not change year-over-year, these fluctuations are also reflected in PE’s effective income tax rate.

NOTE 6. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

COMMITTED LINES OF CREDIT

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, Sempra Energy Consolidated had $4.3 billion in committed lines of credit to provide liquidity and to support commercial paper and variable-rate demand notes, the major components of which we detail below. Available unused credit on these lines at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $3.14 billion. WeIn ~~discuss~~October ~~the~~2010, ~~terms~~we ofentered into new credit agreements to replace our previous principal credit agreements. inThe ~~Note~~new 6agreements have a longer term and, in light of our exit from the ~~Notes~~commodities tojoint ~~Consolidated~~venture ~~Financial~~which ~~Statements~~we discuss in ~~the~~Note ~~Annual~~4, ~~Report~~a lower credit commitment by $500 million (at Sempra Global).

Sempra Energy

In October 2010, Sempra Energy ~~has~~entered into a new $1 billion, ~~three~~four-year syndicated revolving credit agreement expiring in ~~August~~October ~~2011.~~2014, ~~Borrowings~~replacing ~~bear~~the ~~interest~~previous at$1 ~~benchmark~~billion ~~rates~~three-year ~~plus~~credit aagreement ~~margin~~scheduled ~~that~~to ~~varies~~expire ~~with~~in ~~market~~2011. ~~index~~Citibank, ~~rates~~N.A. ~~and~~serves ~~Sempra~~as ~~Energy's~~administrative ~~credit~~agent ~~ratings.~~for Atthe ~~June~~syndicate ~~30,~~of ~~2010,~~23 ~~Sempra~~lenders. ~~Energy~~No ~~had~~single nolender ~~outstanding~~has ~~borrowings~~greater ~~under~~than ~~the~~a ~~facility~~7-percent share.

Borrowings bear interest at benchmark rates plus a margin that varies with market index rates and Sempra Energy's credit ratings. The facility requires Sempra Energy to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization (as defined in the agreement) of no more than 65 percent at the end of each quarter. The facility also provides for issuance of up to $400 million of letters of credit on behalf of Sempra Energy with the amount of borrowings otherwise available under the facility reduced by the amount of outstanding letters of credit.

Under the previous credit agreement at September 30, 2010, Sempra Energy had no outstanding borrowings supported by the facility.

Sempra Global

In October 2010, Sempra Global ~~has~~entered into a new $2.5 billion, ~~three~~four-year syndicated revolving credit agreement expiring in ~~August~~October ~~2011.~~2014, ~~The~~replacing ~~facility~~the ~~also~~previous ~~provides~~$2.5 ~~for~~billion ~~issuance~~three-year ofcredit upagreement scheduled to ~~$300~~expire ~~million~~in of2011. ~~letters~~Citibank, ofN.A. ~~credit~~serves onas ~~behalf~~administrative ofagent ~~Sempra~~for ~~Global with~~ the ~~amount~~syndicate of ~~borrowings~~23 ~~otherwise~~lenders. ~~available~~No ~~under~~single ~~the~~lender ~~facility~~has ~~reduced~~greater bythan ~~the~~a ~~amount~~7-percent ~~of outstanding letters of credit~~share.

Sempra Energy guarantees Sempra Global’s obligations under the credit facility. Borrowings bear interest at benchmark rates plus a margin that varies with market index rates and Sempra Energy’s credit ratings. AtThe ~~June~~facility ~~30,~~requires ~~2010,~~ Sempra ~~Global~~Energy ~~had~~to ~~letters~~maintain ofa ~~credit~~ratio of $7total ~~million~~indebtedness ~~outstanding~~to ~~and~~total nocapitalization ~~outstanding~~(as ~~borrowings~~defined ~~under~~in the ~~facility.~~agreement) ~~The~~of ~~facility~~no ~~provides~~more ~~support~~than ~~for~~65 ~~$860~~percent ~~million~~at ofthe ~~commercial~~end ~~paper~~of ~~outstanding~~each ~~at June 30, 2010~~quarter.

Under the previous credit agreement at September 30, 2010, Sempra Global had $7 million of letters of credit outstanding, $38 million of variable-rate demand notes outstanding, and $574 million of commercial paper outstanding supported by the facility.

Sempra Utilities

In October 2010, SDG&E and SoCalGas ~~have~~entered into a new combined $800 million, ~~three~~four-year syndicated revolving credit agreement expiring in ~~August~~October 2014, replacing the previous $800 million three-year credit agreement scheduled to expire in 2011. JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as administrative agent for the syndicate of 22 lenders. No single lender has greater than a 7-percent share. The agreement permits each utility to individually borrow up to $600 million, subject to a combined limit of $800 million for both utilities. It also provides for the issuance of letters of credit on behalf of each utility subject to a combined letter of credit commitment of $200 million for both utilities. The amount of borrowings otherwise available under the facility is reduced by the amount of outstanding letters of credit.

Borrowings under the facility bear interest at benchmark rates plus a margin that varies with market index rates and the borrowing utility's credit rating. ~~Each~~The ~~utility’s obligations under the~~ agreement ~~are~~requires ~~individual~~each ~~obligations, and a default by one~~ utility ~~would~~to ~~not~~maintain ~~constitute~~ a ~~default~~ratio byof ~~the~~total ~~other~~indebtedness ~~utility~~to ortotal ~~preclude~~capitalization ~~borrowings~~(as ~~by,~~defined orin the ~~issuance~~agreement) of ~~letters~~no ofmore ~~credit~~than on65 ~~behalf~~percent ~~of,~~at the ~~other~~end ~~utility~~of each quarter.

AtEach ~~June~~utility’s ~~30,~~obligations ~~2010, SDG&E and SoCalGas had no outstanding borrowings~~ under ~~this~~the ~~facility.~~agreement ~~SDG&E~~are ~~had~~individual ~~$25~~obligations, ~~million~~and ofa ~~outstanding~~default ~~letters~~by ofone ~~credit~~utility ~~and~~would ~~$237~~not ~~million~~constitute ofa ~~variable-rate~~default ~~demand~~by ~~notes~~the ~~outstanding~~other ~~supported~~utility byor ~~this~~preclude ~~facility~~borrowings ~~at June 30~~by, ~~2010.~~or ~~The~~the ~~facility~~issuance ~~also~~of ~~provides~~letters ~~support~~of ~~for~~credit ~~$63~~on ~~million~~behalf of, ~~commercial~~the ~~paper~~other ~~outstanding at SDG&E at June 30, 2010~~utility.

Under the previous credit agreement at September 30, 2010, SDG&E and SoCalGas had no outstanding borrowings and SDG&E had $25 million of letters of credit outstanding and $237 million variable-rate demand notes outstanding supported by the facility. Available unused credit on ~~these~~the lines at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $~~275~~338 million at SDG&E and $~~475~~538 million at SoCalGas; SoCalGas' availability reflects the impact of SDG&E's use of the combined credit available on the line.

GUARANTEES

RBS Sempra Commodities

OnAs ~~July~~we 1,discuss ~~2010~~in Note 4, Sempra Energy, RBS and RBS Sempra Commodities have completed the sale of certain businesses within the partnership, asand wethere ~~discuss~~is inone ~~Note~~pending 4.transaction ~~J.P.~~for ~~Morgan~~the issale inof the ~~process~~remaining principal assets expected to close before year-end. In connection with each of ~~replacing~~these transactions, the buyers are, subject to certain qualifications, obligated to replace any guarantees that we have issued in connection with the applicable businesses sold towith ~~J.P.~~guarantees ~~Morgan~~of ~~Ventures with~~their Jown.P. ~~Morgan~~During ~~guarantees.~~the Inprocess of replacing the ~~meantime~~guarantees, ~~J.P.~~they ~~Morgan~~are isobligated ~~indemnifying~~to indemnify us in accordance with the applicable transaction documents for any claims or losses in connection with the guarantees that we issued in connection with the businesses sold. With respect to ~~J.P.~~the ~~Morgan~~transaction ~~Ventures~~with Noble Group, for those guarantees that Noble Group is not able to replace, we have agreed to allow Noble Group to continue trading under such guarantees until June 1, 2011.

~~RBS~~We ishave ~~obligated~~indemnified tothe ~~provide~~partnership ~~RBS~~for ~~Sempra~~certain ~~Commodities~~litigation ~~with~~and ~~all~~tax ~~growth~~liabilities ~~capital,~~related ~~working-capital~~to ~~requirements~~the ~~and~~businesses ~~credit~~purchased ~~support.~~by ~~However,~~the aspartnership. aWe ~~transitional~~recorded ~~measure,~~these weobligations ~~continue~~at toa ~~provide~~fair ~~back-up~~value ~~guarantees~~of ~~for~~$5 amillion ~~portion~~on ofApril ~~RBS~~1, ~~Sempra~~2008, ~~Commodities’~~the ~~trading~~date ~~obligations.~~we ~~Some~~formed ofthe ~~these~~partnership. ~~back-up~~This ~~guarantees~~liability ~~may~~is ~~continue~~being ~~for~~amortized aover ~~prolonged~~its ~~period~~expected ~~of time~~life. ~~RBS,~~Certain ~~which~~of isthese ~~controlled~~obligations bymay ~~the~~be ~~government~~remeasured ofwhen the ~~United~~indemnity ~~Kingdom,~~is ~~has~~reissued ~~fully~~to ~~indemnified~~the usbuyers ~~for~~of ~~any~~the ~~claims~~Sempra orCommodities ~~losses in connection with these arrangements~~businesses.

RBS is obligated to provide RBS Sempra Commodities’ ~~net~~with ~~trading~~all ~~liabilities~~working-capital ~~supported~~requirements byand ~~Sempra~~credit ~~Energy’s~~support. ~~guarantees~~However, atas ~~June~~a 30transitional measure, ~~2010~~we ~~were~~continue ~~$632~~to ~~million,~~provide ~~consisting~~back-up guarantees for a portion of ~~guaranteed~~RBS Sempra Commodities’ trading obligations. ~~net~~Some of ~~collateral.~~these ~~The~~back-up ~~amount~~guarantees ofmay ~~guaranteed~~continue ~~net~~for ~~trading~~a ~~liabilities~~prolonged ~~varies~~period ~~from~~of ~~day~~time. toRBS, ~~day~~which ~~with~~is controlled by the ~~value~~government of the ~~trading~~United ~~obligations~~Kingdom, ~~and~~has ~~related~~fully ~~collateral~~indemnified us for any claims or losses in connection with these arrangements.

RBS Sempra Commodities’ net trading liabilities supported by Sempra Energy’s guarantees at September 30, 2010 were $561 million, consisting of guaranteed trading obligations net of collateral. The amount of guaranteed net trading liabilities varies from day to day with the value of the trading obligations and related collateral.

Other Guarantees

Sempra Energy, Conoco Phillips (Conoco) and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (KMP) currently hold 25-percent, 25-percent and 50-percent ownership interests, respectively, in Rockies Express. Rockies Express operates a natural gas pipeline linking natural gas producing areas in the Rocky Mountain region to the upper Midwest and the eastern United States. In April 2010, Rockies Express’ $2 billion, five-year credit facility expiring in May 2011 that provided for revolving extensions of credit guaranteed by Sempra Energy, Conoco and KMP in proportion to their respective ownership percentages was reduced to $200 million, and Sempra Energy, Conoco and KMP were released from their guarantor obligations. Long-term debt of $1.7 billion issued in March 2010 was used to pay down the credit facility; this new debt is not separately guaranteed by the partners.

Sempra Generation and BP Wind Energy currently hold 50-percent ownership interests in Fowler Ridge. In August 2010, Fowler Ridge obtained a $348 million term loan expiring in August 2022. The proceeds were used to return $180 million of each owner’s investment in the joint venture. The loan agreement requires Sempra Generation and BP Wind Energy to return cash to the project in the event that the project does not meet certain cash flow criteria or in the event that the project’s debt service and operation and maintenance reserve accounts are not maintained at specific thresholds. Sempra Generation recorded a liability of $9 million for its obligation associated with the cash flow requirements, which constitutes a guarantee. The outstanding loan is not separately guaranteed by the partners. We provide additional information about the investment in Note 4 above and in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATES

AtThe ~~June 30, 2010, the~~ weighted average interest ~~rate~~rates on the total short-term debt outstanding at Sempra Energy ~~was~~were 0.4739 percent. Atand ~~June 30, 2010, the weighted average interest rate on the total short-term debt outstanding at SDG&E was~~ 0.2479 percent. ~~The weighted average interest rate on the total short-term debt outstanding~~ at ~~Sempra~~September ~~Energy~~30, ~~was~~2010 ~~0.79~~and ~~percent at~~ December 31, 2009, respectively. The short-term debt outstanding at SDG&E at December 31, 2009 was a non-interest bearing loan at Orange Grove ~~VIE~~.

LONG-TERM DEBT

In August 2010, SDG&E publicly offered and sold $500 million of 4.50-percent first mortgage bonds, maturing in 2040.

In May 2010, SDG&E publicly offered and sold $250 million of 5.35-percent first mortgage bonds, maturing in 2040.

SDG&E has two power purchase agreements with peaker plant facilities that went into commercial operation in June 2010 and are accounted for as capital leases. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, capital lease obligations for these leases, ~~both~~each with a 25-year term, were $~~183~~181 million.

INTEREST RATE SWAPS

We discuss our fair value interest rate swaps and interest rate swaps to hedge cash flows in Note 7.

NOTE 7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We use derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business. These exposures are commodity market risk and benchmark interest rate risk. Our use of derivatives for these risks is integrated into the economic management of our anticipated revenues, anticipated expenses, assets and liabilities. Derivatives may be effective in mitigating these risks that could lead to declines in anticipated revenues or increases in anticipated expenses, or that our asset values may fall or our liabilities increase. Accordingly, our derivative activity summarized below generally represents an impact that is intended to offset associated revenues, expenses, assets or liabilities that are not presented below.

We record all derivatives at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We designate each derivative as 1) a cash flow hedge, 2) a fair value hedge, or 3) undesignated. Depending on the applicability of hedge accounting and, for the Sempra Utilities and other operations subject to regulatory accounting, the requirement to pass impacts through to customers, the impact of derivative instruments may be offset in other comprehensive income (cash flow hedge), on the balance sheet (fair value hedges and regulatory offsets), or recognized in earnings. We classify cash flows from the settlements of derivative instruments as operating activities on the Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

In certain cases, we apply the normal purchase or sale exception to derivative accounting and have other commodity contracts that are not derivatives. These contracts are not recorded at fair value and are therefore excluded from the disclosures below.

HEDGE ACCOUNTING

We may designate a derivative as a cash flow hedging instrument if it effectively converts anticipated revenues or expenses to a fixed dollar amount. We may utilize cash flow hedge accounting for derivative commodity instruments and interest rate instruments. Designating cash flow hedges is dependent on the business context in which the instrument is being used, the effectiveness of the instrument in offsetting the risk that a given future revenue or expense item may vary, and other criteria.

We may designate an interest rate derivative as a fair value hedging instrument if it effectively converts our own debt from a fixed interest rate to a variable rate. The combination of the derivative and debt instruments results in fixing that portion of the fair value of the debt that is related to benchmark interest rates. Designating fair value hedges is dependent on the instrument being used, the effectiveness of the instrument in offsetting changes in the fair value of our debt instruments, and other criteria.

ENERGY DERIVATIVES

Our market risk is primarily related to natural gas and electricity price volatility and the specific physical locations where we transact. We use energy derivatives to market energy products and manage these risks. The use of energy derivatives in our various businesses depends on the particular energy market, and the operating and regulatory environments applicable to the business.

§The Sempra Utilities use natural gas energy derivatives, on their customers' behalf, with the objective of managing price and basis risks and lowering natural gas costs. These derivatives include fixed price natural gas positions, options, and basis risk instruments, which are either exchange-traded or over-the-counter financial instruments. This activity is governed by risk management and transacting activity plans that have been filed with and approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Natural gas derivative activities are recorded as commodity costs that are offset by regulatory account balances and are recovered in rates. Net commodity cost impacts on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are reflected in Cost of Electric Fuel and Purchased Power or in Cost of Natural Gas.

§SDG&E is allocated and may purchase congestion revenue rights (CRRs), which serve to reduce the regional electricity price volatility risk which may result from local transmission capacity constraints. Unrealized gains and losses do not impact earnings, as they are offset by regulatory account balances. Realized gains and losses associated with CRRs are recorded in Cost of Electric Fuel and Purchased Power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

§Sempra Generation uses natural gas and electricity instruments to market energy products and optimize the earnings of its power generation fleet. Gains and losses associated with these derivatives are recognized in Sempra Global and Parent Revenues or in Cost of Natural Gas, Electric Fuel and Purchased Power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

§Sempra LNG and Sempra Pipelines & Storage use natural gas derivatives to market energy products and optimize the earnings of the liquefied natural gas business and Sempra Pipelines & Storage's natural gas storage and transportation assets. Sempra Pipelines & Storage also uses natural gas energy derivatives with the objective of managing price risk and lowering natural gas prices at its Mexican distribution operations. Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s derivatives are either undesignated or are recorded as commodity costs that are offset by regulatory account balances and are recovered in rates. ~~Sempra~~The ~~LNG’s~~impacts ~~derivatives~~on earnings are ~~undesignated~~recognized ~~and~~in ~~their~~Sempra ~~impact~~Global onand ~~earnings~~Parent isRevenues ~~recorded~~or in ~~Sempra~~Cost ~~Global~~of Natural Gas, Electric Fuel and ~~Parent~~Purchased ~~Revenues~~Power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. ~~The~~ ~~impacts~~Sempra onLNG’s ~~earnings~~derivatives are ~~recognized~~undesignated inand ~~Sempra~~their ~~Global~~impact ~~and~~on ~~Parent~~earnings ~~Revenues~~is orrecorded in ~~Cost~~Sempra ofGlobal ~~Natural Gas, Electric Fuel~~ and ~~Purchased~~Parent ~~Power~~Revenues on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

§From time to time, our various businesses, including the Sempra Utilities, may use other energy derivatives to hedge exposures such as the price of vehicle fuel. ~~These derivatives are typically accounted for as cash flow hedges.~~

We summarize net ~~commodity~~energy derivative volumes as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as follows:

Business Unit and Commodity			Volume
Sempra Utilities:
	SDG&E:
		Natural gas	4448 million MMBtu	(1)
		Congestion revenue rights	1119 million MWh	(2)
	SoCalGas - natural gas		4 million MMBtu
Sempra Global:
	Sempra LNG - natural gas		7 million MMBtu
	Sempra Pipelines & Storage - natural gas		1 million MMBtu
	Sempra Generation - electric power		1 million MWh
(1)	Million British thermal units
(2)	Megawatt hours

In addition to the amounts noted above, we frequently use commodity derivatives to manage risks associated with the physical locations of our customers, assets and other contractual obligations, such as natural gas purchases.

INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES

We are exposed to interest rates primarily as a result of our current and expected use of financing. We periodically enter into interest rate derivative agreements intended to moderate our exposure to interest rates and to lower our overall costs of borrowing. We utilize interest rate swaps typically designated as fair value hedges, as a means to achieve our targeted level of variable rate debt as a percent of total debt. In addition, we may utilize interest rate swaps, which are typically designated as cash flow hedges, to lock in interest rates in anticipation of future financings.

Interest rate derivatives are utilized by the Sempra Utilities as well as by other Sempra Energy subsidiaries. Although the Sempra Utilities generally recover borrowing costs in rates over time, the use of interest rate derivatives is subject to certain regulatory constraints, and the impact of interest rate derivatives may not be recovered from customers as timely as described above with regard to natural gas derivatives. Accordingly, interest rate derivatives are generally accounted for as hedges at the Sempra Utilities, as at the rest of Sempra Energy's subsidiaries. Separately, Otay Mesa VIE has entered into interest rate swap agreements to moderate their exposure to interest rate changes.

The net notional amounts of our interest rate derivatives as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were:

		June 30, 2010
		September 30, 2010
(Dollars in millions)		Notional Debt		Maturities
Sempra Energy Consolidated(1)		$	215-355	2011-2019
SDG&E(1)			285-372	2019
SoCalGas			150	2011
(1)	Includes Otay Mesa VIE. All of SDG&E's interest rate derivatives relate to Otay Mesa VIE.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

The following table provides the fair values of derivative instruments, without consideration of margin deposits held or posted, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
		June 30, 2010
		September 30, 2010
									Deferred
									credits
			Current				Current		and other
			assets:				liabilities:		liabilities:
			Fixed-price		Investments		Fixed-price		Fixed-price
			contracts		and other		contracts		contracts
			and other		assets:		and other		and other
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments			derivatives(1)		Sundry		derivatives(2)		derivatives
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments	$	53	$	-	$	-	$	-
SoCalGas:
	Interest rate instruments	$	53	$	-	$	-	$	-
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments(3)	$	9	$	3036	$	(2426)	$	(7492)
	Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery		8690		2834		(7270)		(3941)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(3829)		(1213)		3829		1213
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		12		45		(4761)		(2332)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(3953)		(2230)		3953		2230
	Total	$	3029	$	2832	$	(6675)	$	(~~102~~122)
SDG&E:
	Interest rate instruments(3)	$	-	$	-	$	(1617)	$	(5162)
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		78		45		(3548)		(2332)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(3548)		(2230)		3548		2230
	Total	$	(2840)	$	(1825)	$	(1617)	$	(5264)
SoCalGas:
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery	$	64	$	-	$	(5)	$	-
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(45)		-		45		-
	Total	$	2(1)	$	-	$	~~(1)~~-	$	-

		December 31, 2009
									Deferred
									credits
			Current				Current		and other
			assets:				liabilities:		liabilities:
			Fixed-price		Investments		Fixed-price		Fixed-price
			contracts		and other		contracts		contracts
			and other		assets:		and other		and other
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments			derivatives(1)		Sundry		derivatives(2)		derivatives
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments	$	12	$	2	$	-	$	-
	Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery		1		-		-		-
	Total	$	13	$	2	$	-	$	-
SoCalGas:
	Interest rate instruments	$	6	$	2	$	-	$	-
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments(3)	$	9	$	15	$	(25)	$	(33)
	Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery		74		30		(64)		(42)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(34)		(6)		34		6
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		20		7		(20)		(13)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(14)		(9)		14		9
	Total	$	55	$	37	$	(61)	$	(73)
SDG&E:
	Interest rate instruments(3)	$	-	$	-	$	(17)	$	(26)
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		18		7		(13)		(9)
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(13)		(9)		13		9
	Total	$	5	$	(2)	$	(17)	$	(26)
SoCalGas:
	Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery	$	2	$	-	$	(1)	$	-
	Associated offsetting commodity contracts		(1)		-		1		-
	Total	$	1	$	-	$	-	$	-
(1)	Included in Current ~~assets~~Assets: Other for SoCalGas.
(2)	Included in Current ~~liabilities~~Liabilities: Other for SoCalGas.
(3)	Includes Otay Mesa VIE. All of SDG&E's amounts relate to Otay Mesa VIE.

The effects of derivative instruments designated as hedges on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 were:

FAIR VALUE HEDGE IMPACT ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
			Gain (loss) on derivative recognized in earnings
			Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
			Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
		Location	2010		2009		2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments	Interest Expense	$	52	$	-5	$	79	$	-5
	Interest rate instruments	Other Income, Net		(72)		(15)		(911)		(712)
	Total(1)		$	~~(2)~~-	$	~~(1)~~-	$	(2)	$	(7)
SoCalGas:
	Interest rate instrument	Interest Expense	$	12	$	-(5)	$	35	$	-(5)
	Interest rate instrument	Other Income, Net		-(2)		-(1)		(24)		(23)
	Total(1)		$	1-	$	-(6)	$	1	$	(28)
(1)	There has been no hedge ineffectiveness on these swaps. Changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying long-term debt.

CASH FLOW HEDGE IMPACT ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
		Pretax gain (loss) recognized					Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI
		in OCI (effective portion)					into earnings (effective portion)
		Three months ended June 30,					Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,					Three months ended September 30,
		2010		2009		Location	2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	$	-	$	24(8)	Interest Expense	$	(42)	$	~~(1)~~4
	Interest rate instruments		-		-	Other Income, Net(2)		10		-
	Commodity contracts not					Revenues: Sempra Global
	subject to rate recovery		-		-	and Parent		-		~~(1)~~2
	Commodity contracts not					Cost of Natural Gas, Electric
	subject to rate recovery		-		2(3)	Fuel and Purchased Power		-		(31)
	Commodity contracts not					Equity Earnings (Losses): RBS
	subject to rate recovery		(1)		-	Sempra Commodities LLP		57		-
	Total	$	(1)	$	26(11)		$	115	$	(5)
SDG&E:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	$	-	$	-	Interest Expense	$	(21)	$	-6
SoCalGas:
	Interest rate instruments	$	-	$	-	Interest Expense	$	(21)	$	(1)
		Pretax gain (loss) recognized					Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI
		in OCI (effective portion)					into earnings (effective portion)
		Six months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
		2010		2009		Location	2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	$	-	$	2113	Interest Expense	$	(79)	$	~~(4)~~-
	Interest rate instruments		-		-	Other Income, Net(2)		10		-
	Commodity contracts not					Revenues: Sempra Global
	subject to rate recovery		-		11	and Parent		-		1618
	Commodity contracts not					Cost of Natural Gas, Electric
	subject to rate recovery		-		(25)	Fuel and Purchased Power		-		(89)
	Commodity contracts not					Equity Earnings (Losses): RBS
	subject to rate recovery		-1		-	Sempra Commodities LLP		714		(9)
	Total	$	-1	$	3019		$	1015	$	~~(5)~~-
SDG&E:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	$	-	$	-	Interest Expense	$	(45)	$	~~(2)~~4
SoCalGas:
	Interest rate instruments	$	-	$	-	Interest Expense	$	(34)	$	(23)
(1)	~~Includes~~Amounts in 2010 include Otay Mesa VIE. All of SDG&E's 2010 interest rate ~~derivatives~~derivative ~~relate~~activity relates to Otay Mesa VIE.
(2)	Gains reclassified into earnings due to changes in cash requirements and associated impacts on forecasted interest payments, primarily related to proceeds received from RBS Sempra Commodities. See Note 4.

Sempra Energy expects that losses of $35 million, which are net of income tax ~~expense~~benefit, that are currently recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to cash flow hedges will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months as the hedged items affect earnings. Actual amounts ultimately reclassified to earnings depend on the commodity prices and interest rates in effect when derivative contracts that are currently outstanding mature. ~~For all forecasted transactions, the maximum term over which we are hedging exposures to the variability of cash flows, excluding interest payments, is 30 months at June 30, 2010.~~ The maximum term over which RBS Sempra Commodities hedges forecasted natural gas purchases and sales is 6663 months.

SDG&E and SoCalGas expect that losses of $6 million and $32 million, respectively, which are net of income tax benefit, that are currently recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to these cash flow hedges will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months as the hedged items affect earnings.

The effects of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 were:

UNDESIGNATED DERIVATIVE IMPACT ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions)
			Gain (loss) on derivative recognized in earnings
			Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
			Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
		Location	2010		2009		2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	Other Income, Net	$	(2417)	$	19(10)	$	(3350)	$	2919
	Commodity contracts not subject
	to rate recovery	Revenues: Sempra Global and Parent		15		~~(9)~~60		3045		~~(25)~~35
	Commodity contracts not subject	Cost of Natural Gas, Electric
	to rate recovery	Fuel and Purchased Power		(97)		11(49)		(1522)		19(30)
	Commodity contracts subject	Cost of Electric Fuel
	to rate recovery	and Purchased Power		(939)		43(18)		(61100)		(624)
	Commodity contracts subject
	to rate recovery	Cost of Natural Gas		1(4)		~~(2)~~-		(15)		(3)
	Commodity contracts subject	Cost of Natural Gas, Electric
	to rate recovery	Fuel and Purchased Power		-(1)		-		(34)		-
	Total		$	(2653)	$	62(17)	$	(83136)	$	14(3)
SDG&E:
	Interest rate instruments(1)	Other Income (Expense), Net	$	(2517)	$	20(11)	$	(3451)	$	3019
	Commodity contracts subject	Cost of Electric Fuel
	to rate recovery	and Purchased Power		(939)		43(18)		(61100)		(624)
	Total		$	(3456)	$	63(29)	$	(95151)	$	24(5)
SoCalGas:
	Commodity contracts subject
	to rate recovery	Cost of Natural Gas	$	1(4)	$	~~(2)~~-	$	(15)	$	(3)
(1)	Related to Otay Mesa VIE. Sempra Energy Consolidated also includes additional instruments.

CONTINGENT FEATURES

For Sempra Energy and SDG&E, certain of our derivative instruments contain credit limits which vary depending upon our credit ~~rating~~ratings. Generally, these provisions, if applicable, may reduce our credit limit if a specified credit rating agency reduces our rating. In certain cases, if our credit ~~rating~~ratings were to fall below investment grade, the counterparty to these derivative liability instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization.

For Sempra Energy, the total fair value of this group of derivative instruments in a net liability position at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 is $45 million. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, if the credit ratings of Sempra Energy and SDG&E were both reduced below investment grade, $45 million of additional assets could be required to be posted as collateral for these derivative contracts.

For SDG&E, the total fair value of this group of derivative instruments in a net liability position at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 is $1 2 million. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, if the credit ~~rating~~ratings of SDG&E were reduced below investment grade, $12 million of additional assets could be required to be posted as collateral for these derivative contracts.

For Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas, some of our derivative contracts contain a provision that would permit the counterparty, in certain circumstances, to request adequate assurance of our performance under the contract. Such additional assurance, if needed, is not material and is not included in the amounts above.

NOTE 8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of certain of our financial instruments (cash, temporary investments, accounts and notes receivable, dividends and accounts payable, short-term debt and customer deposits) approximate their carrying amounts. The following table provides the carrying amounts and fair values of the remaining financial instruments at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(Dollars in millions)
		June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
		September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
		Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
Investments in affordable housing partnerships(1)		$	3129	$	6058	$	34	$	59
Total long-term debt(2)			78,~~886~~152		89,~~780~~288		8,~~050~~004		8,~~618~~572
Due to unconsolidated affiliate			2		2		2		2
Preferred stock of subsidiaries			179		~~164~~171		179		156
SDG&E:
Total long-term debt(3)		$	3,~~010~~308	$	3,~~214~~594	$	2,~~672~~652	$	2,~~828~~808
Contingently redeemable preferred stock			79		7982		79		76
PE and SoCalGas:
Total long-term debt(4)		$	1,~~288~~266	$	1,~~393~~396	$	1,~~296~~270	$	1,~~382~~356
PE:
Preferred stock		$	80	$	6669	$	80	$	61
Preferred stock of subsidiary			20		1920		20		19
SoCalGas:
Preferred stock		$	22	$	21	$	22	$	20
(1)	We discuss our investments in affordable housing partnerships in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.
(2)	Before reductions for unamortized discount of $21 million at September 30, 2010 and $17 million at ~~June~~December 31, 2009, and excluding capital leases of $214 million at September 30, 2010 and $46 million at December 31, 2009.
(3)	Before reductions for unamortized discount of $10 million at September 30, 2010 and $4 million at ~~June~~December 31, 2009, and excluding capital leases of $197 million at September 30, 2010 and $20 million at December 31, 2009.
(4)	Before reductions for unamortized discount of $2 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and $2 million at December 31, 2009, and excluding capital leases of $17 million at September 30, 2010 and $26 million at December 31, 2009.

Sempra Energy based the fair values of investments in affordable housing partnerships on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at rates available for similar investments. All entities based the fair values of ~~the~~ long-term debt and preferred stock on their quoted market prices or quoted market prices for similar securities.

Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts

We discuss SDG&E's investments in nuclear decommissioning trust funds in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. The following table shows the fair values and gross unrealized gains and losses for the securities held in the trust funds:

NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING TRUSTS
(Dollars in millions)
					Gross		Gross		Estimated
					Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
			Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
As of June 30, 2010:
As of September 30, 2010:
Debt securities
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies(1)		$	~~160~~141	$	2224	$	-	$	~~182~~165
Municipal bonds(2)			8185		35		(21)		8289
Other securities(3)			2622		34		-		2926
Total debt securities			~~267~~248		2833		(21)		~~293~~280
Equity securities			~~217~~240		~~157~~201		(62)		~~368~~439
Cash and cash equivalents			1418		-		-		1418
Total available-for-sale securities		$	~~498~~506	$	~~185~~234	$	(83)	$	~~675~~737
As of December 31, 2009:
Debt securities
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	141	$	12	$	(3)	$	150
Municipal bonds			85		3		(3)		85
Other securities			12		1		-		13
Total debt securities			238		16		(6)		248
Equity securities			238		188		(5)		421
Cash and cash equivalents			9		-		-		9
Total available-for-sale securities		$	485	$	204	$	(11)	$	678
(1)	Maturity dates are 2011-~~2039~~2040.
(2)	Maturity dates are ~~2010~~2012-2057.
(3)	Maturity dates are ~~2010~~2011-2049.

The following table shows the proceeds from sales of securities in the trusts and gross realized gains and losses on those sales:

SALES OF SECURITIES
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Proceeds from sales	$	~~110~~97	$	4962	$	~~150~~247	$	88150
Gross realized gains		24		1-		37		4
Gross realized losses		(52)		(76)		(79)		(2430)

Net unrealized gains (losses) are included in Regulatory Liabilities Arising from Removal Obligations on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We determine the cost of securities in the trusts on the basis of specific identification.

The fair value of securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010 was $80 million. The unrealized losses of $8 million were primarily caused by a negative market environment in early 2009. We do not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2010.

Derivative Positions Net of Cash Collateral

Each Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the offsetting of net derivative positions with fair value amounts for cash collateral with the same counterparty when management believes a legal right of offset exists.

The following table provides the amount of fair value of cash collateral receivables that were not offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2010		2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	3024	$	36
SDG&E		2421		30
SoCalGas		53		5

Fair Value Hierarchy

We discuss the valuation techniques and inputs we use to measure fair value and the definition of the three levels of the fair value hierarchy in Notes 1 and 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. We have not changed the valuation techniques or inputs we use to measure fair value during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

The three tables below, by level within the fair value hierarchy, set forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. We also discuss our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. We classify financial assets and liabilities in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities, and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The fair value of commodity derivative assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with our netting policy, as discussed above under "Derivative Positions Net of Cash Collateral."

The determination of fair values, shown in the tables below, incorporates various factors, including but not limited to, the credit standing of the counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits, letters of credit and priority interests).

We discuss our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis further in Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASURES -- SEMPRA ENERGY CONSOLIDATED
(Dollars in millions)
		At fair value as of June 30, 2010
		At fair value as of September 30, 2010
									Collateral
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)
Equity securities		$	~~368~~439	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	~~368~~439
Debt securities:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies			~~148~~132		3433		-		-		~~182~~165
Municipal bonds			-		8289		-		-		8289
Other securities			-		2926		-		-		2926
Total debt securities			~~148~~132		~~145~~148		-		-		~~293~~280
Total nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)			~~516~~571		~~145~~148		-		-		~~661~~719
Interest rate instruments			-		4449		-		-		4449
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			2721		1-		712		-		3533
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			5		6379		-		(2120)		4764
Investments			139		-		-		-		139
Total		$	~~561~~606	$	~~253~~276	$	712	$	(2120)	$	~~800~~874
Liabilities:
Interest rate instruments		$	-	$	98117	$	-	$	-	$	98117
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			5479		910		-		(5479)		910
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			-		6269		-		-		6269
Total		$	5479	$	~~169~~196	$	-	$	(5479)	$	~~169~~196
		At fair value as of December 31, 2009
									Collateral
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)
Equity securities		$	421	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	421
Debt securities:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies			111		39		-		-		150
Municipal bonds			-		85		-		-		85
Other securities			-		13		-		-		13
Total debt securities			111		137		-		-		248
Total nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)			532		137		-		-		669
Interest rate instruments			-		38		-		-		38
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			32		3		10		-		45
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			7		62		-		(40)		29
Investments			1		-		-		-		1
Total		$	572	$	240	$	10	$	(40)	$	782
Liabilities:
Interest rate instruments		$	-	$	59	$	-	$	-	$	59
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			9		9		-		(9)		9
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			-		65		-		-		65
Total		$	9	$	133	$	-	$	(9)	$	133
(1)	Excludes cash balances and cash equivalents.

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASURES -- SDG&E
(Dollars in millions)
		At fair value as of June 30, 2010
		At fair value as of September 30, 2010
									Collateral
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)
Equity securities		$	~~368~~439	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	~~368~~439
Debt securities:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies			~~148~~132		3433		-		-		~~182~~165
Municipal bonds			-		8289		-		-		8289
Other securities			-		2926		-		-		2926
Total debt securities			~~148~~132		~~145~~148		-		-		~~293~~280
Total nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)			~~516~~571		~~145~~148		-		-		~~661~~719
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			2320		-		712		-		3032
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			1		-		-		-		1
Total		$	~~540~~592	$	~~145~~148	$	712	$	-	$	~~692~~752
Liabilities:
Interest rate instruments		$	-	$	6779	$	-	$	-	$	6779
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			5478		12		-		(5478)		12
Total		$	5478	$	6881	$	-	$	(5478)	$	6881
		At fair value as of December 31, 2009
									Collateral
			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)
Equity securities		$	421	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	421
Debt securities:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government corporations and agencies			111		39		-		-		150
Municipal bonds			-		85		-		-		85
Other securities			-		13		-		-		13
Total debt securities			111		137		-		-		248
Total nuclear decommissioning trusts(1)			532		137		-		-		669
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			29		2		10		-		41
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery			1		-		-		-		1
Total		$	562	$	139	$	10	$	-	$	711
Liabilities:
Interest rate instruments		$	-	$	43	$	-	$	-	$	43
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery			9		-		-		(9)		-
Total		$	9	$	43	$	-	$	(9)	$	43
(1)	Excludes cash balances and cash equivalents.

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASURES -- SOCALGAS
(Dollars in millions)
	At fair value as of June 30, 2010
	At fair value as of September 30, 2010
								Collateral
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Interest rate instruments	$	-	$	53	$	-	$	-	$	53
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		41		1-		-		-		51
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery		2		-		-		-		2
Total	$	63	$	63	$	-	$	-	$	126
Liabilities:
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery	$	-1	$	1-	$	-	$	-(1)	$	1-
	At fair value as of December 31, 2009
								Collateral
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		netted		Total
Assets:
Interest rate instruments	$	-	$	8	$	-	$	-	$	8
Commodity contracts subject to rate recovery		3		1		-		-		4
Commodity contracts not subject to rate recovery		3		-		-		-		3
Total	$	6	$	9	$	-	$	-	$	15

There were no transfers into or out of Level 1 or Level 2 for Sempra Energy Consolidated, SDG&E or SoCalGas during the periods presented.

Level 3 Information

The following table sets forth reconciliations of changes in the fair value of net trading and other derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for Sempra Energy Consolidated and SDG&E:

	Three months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2010		2009
Balance as of April 1	$	9	$	27
Balance as of July 1	$	7	$	25
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains		(2)		1
Realized and unrealized losses		(1)		(8)
Settlements		-		(3)
Allocated transmission instruments		7		15
Balance as of June 30	$	7	$	25
Settlements		(1)		-
Balance as of September 30	$	12	$	32
Change in unrealized gains relating to
instruments still held at June 30	$	-	$	-
instruments still held at September 30	$	-	$	-

	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2010		2009
Balance as of January 1	$	10	$	27
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains		(4)		1
Realized and unrealized losses		(5)		(7)
Settlements		1		(3)
Allocated transmission instruments		7		15
Balance as of June 30	$	7	$	25
Settlements		-		(3)
Balance as of September 30	$	12	$	32
Change in unrealized gains relating to
instruments still held at June 30	$	-	$	-
instruments still held at September 30	$	-	$	-

There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during the periods presented.

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) for Level 3 recurring items are primarily related to SDG&E's congestion revenue rights and were included in Cost of Electric Fuel and Purchased Power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measures – Sempra Energy Consolidated

We discuss non-recurring fair value measures and the associated accounting impact in Note 4.

NOTE 9. SEMPRA UTILITIES' REGULATORY MATTERS

POWER PROCUREMENT AND RESOURCE PLANNING

Sunrise Powerlink Electric Transmission Line

In December 2008, the CPUC issued a final decision authorizing SDG&E to construct a 500-kilovolt (kV) electric transmission line between the Imperial Valley and the San Diego region (Sunrise Powerlink). This line is designed to provide 1,000 MW of increased import capability into the San Diego area. This CPUC decision approved SDG&E’s request to construct the Sunrise Powerlink along a route that would generally run south of the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. The decision also approves the environmental impact review conducted jointly by the CPUC and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and establishes a total project cost cap of $1.9 billion, including approximately $190 million for environmental mitigation costs. In January 2009, the BLM issued its decision approving the project, route and environmental review.

The CPUC decision requires SDG&E to adhere to certain commitments it made during the application process, as follows:

§not to contract, for any length of term, with conventional coal generators to deliver power via the Sunrise Powerlink;

§if any currently approved renewable energy contract that is deliverable via the Sunrise Powerlink fails, to replace it with a viable contract with a renewable generator located in the Imperial Valley region; and

§voluntarily raise SDG&E's Renewables Portfolio Standard Program goal (discussed below under "Renewable Energy") to 33 percent by 2020.

After the issuance by the CPUC of its final decision ~~and denial of rehearing applications~~, ~~in August 2009,~~ the Utility Consumers Action Network (UCAN) and the Center for Biological Diversity/Sierra Club (CBD) applied for rehearing of the final decision. After the CPUC denied these rehearing applications, in August 2009, UCAN and the CBD jointly filed a petition with the California Supreme Court challenging the CPUC's decision with regard to implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ~~In March 2010,~~ UCAN also filed a petition with the California Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) challenging the decision on other legal grounds, ~~and~~which the Court of Appeal ~~procedurally~~denied ~~granted~~in ~~review~~August ~~of the petition~~2010. The UCAN/CBD appeal will be addressed by the California Supreme Court ~~after~~now that the Court of Appeal ~~rules~~has ondismissed ~~the~~UCAN's first petition.

In addition, three appeals of the BLM decision were filed with the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) by individuals, a community organization, and the Viejas Indian tribe. The Viejas Indian tribe withdrew its appeal and the IBLA denied the other two appeals ~~were denied~~.

Opponents who filed the BLM appeals also filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court for ~~Declaratory~~declaratory and ~~Injunctive~~injunctive ~~Relief~~relief regarding Sunrise Powerlink. The complaint alleges that the BLM failed to properly assess the environmental impacts of the approved Sunrise Powerlink route and the related potential development of renewable resources in east San Diego County and Imperial County. The complaint requests a declaration that the BLM violated ~~Federal~~federal law in approving Sunrise Powerlink and an injunction against any construction activities. On October 25, 2010, the court granted SDG&E's motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for want of standing; the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November 5, 2010.

In ~~July~~September 2010, the CPUC and BLM jointly approved the final Project Modification Report, accepting all of the proposed modifications to the approved route and finding that no additional environmental studies are required. In October 2010, the United States Forest Service (USFS) issued a ~~Record~~decision ofrejecting ~~Decision~~all pending appeals and reaffirming its July 2010 decision approving the segment of Sunrise Powerlink's route within its jurisdiction. The USFS ~~decision~~ is ~~also~~expected ~~subject~~to issue a special use permit to ~~potential~~SDG&E ~~administrative~~by ~~appeals~~year-end, which will allow SDG&E to begin construction on USFS land. On October 22, 2010, the CBD and ~~judicial~~the ~~challenges~~plaintiffs in the Federal District Court suit against BLM filed an application for rehearing with the CPUC challenging its approval of the Project Modification Report. The CPUC summarily rejected this application for rehearing as contrary to the CPUC's rules. On October 25, 2010, the BLM federal court plaintiffs filed an appeal with the IBLA challenging the BLM's approval of the Project Modification Report. This appeal was accompanied by a motion for a stay of construction of the project, which SDG&E opposed on November 4, 2010. SDG&E will also oppose the IBLA appeal.

Sunrise Powerlink costs will be recovered in SDG&E's Electric Transmission Formula Rate, where SDG&E must demonstrate to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that such costs were prudently incurred.

The total amount invested by SDG&E in the Sunrise Powerlink project as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $~~366~~447 million, which is included in Property, Plant and Equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Sempra Energy and SDG&E. SDG&E expects the Sunrise Powerlink to be in commercial operation in the second half of 2012.

We provide additional information concerning Sunrise Powerlink in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Renewable Energy

Certain California electric retail sellers, including SDG&E, are required to deliver 20 percent of their retail energy sales from renewable energy sources beginning in 2010. The rules governing this requirement, administered by both the CPUC and the California Energy Commission (CEC), are generally known as the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program. In September 2009, the Governor of California issued an Executive Order which set a target for each California utility to procure 33 percent of their annual electric energy requirements from renewable energy sources ~~starting~~by ~~no later than~~ 2020. This Executive Order designates the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as the agency responsible for establishing the compliance rules and regulations under CARB's Assembly Bill 32 authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In September 2010, CARB adopted a requirement known as the California Renewable Energy Standard (RES), which obligates California utilities to procure 33 percent of their annual electric energy requirements from renewable energy sources by 2020. CARB has not yet issued the final version of formal regulations articulating the requirement or detailing how the RES will be implemented.

In 2008, the CPUC issued a decision defining flexible compliance mechanisms that can be used to defer compliance with or meet the RPS Program mandates in 2010 and beyond. The decision established that a finding by the CPUC of insufficient transmission is a permissible reason to defer compliance with the RPS Program mandates. This decision also confirmed that any renewable energy procured in excess of the established targets for prior years, currently and in the future, could be applied to any procurement shortfalls in the years 2010 and beyond.

SDG&E continues to procure renewable energy supplies to achieve the RPS Program goals and the Executive Order/RES requirements. A substantial number of these supply contracts, however, are contingent upon many factors, including:

§access to electric transmission infrastructure (including SDG&E's Sunrise Powerlink transmission line);

§timely regulatory approval of contracted renewable energy projects;

§the renewable energy project developers' ability to obtain project financing and permitting; and

§successful development and implementation of the renewable energy technologies.

SDG&E believes it will be able to comply with the RPS Program requirements based on its contracting activity and application of the flexible compliance mechanisms. SDG&E's failure to comply with the RPS Program requirements in 2010, or in any subsequent years, could subject it to a CPUC-imposed penalty of 5 cents per kilowatt hour of renewable energy under-delivery up to a maximum penalty of $25 million per year. A determination regarding RES compliance is not possible at this time, as program details are not yet known.

Solar Photovoltaic Program

InThe ~~July~~CPUC ~~2008,~~issued ~~SDG&E~~a ~~filed~~decision anin ~~application~~September ~~with~~2010 ~~the~~approving ~~CPUC~~a ~~proposing~~new tosolar ~~invest~~photovoltaic (PV) program upfor toSDG&E. ~~$250~~Under ~~million~~the adopted toprogram, ~~install~~SDG&E ~~solar~~may ~~photovoltaic~~develop ~~panels~~up into ~~the~~100 ~~San~~MW ~~Diego~~of ~~area.~~solar ~~These~~PV in ~~panels~~its service ~~could~~area, ~~generate~~consisting ~~approximately~~of 50up to 26 MW of ~~direct~~utility ~~current~~owned ~~power~~generation and ~~(approximately~~up ~~equivalent~~ to 3574 MW of purchased power ~~to the electric grid)~~ from independent producers. InIndividual ~~March~~project ~~2009,~~size ~~SDG&E,~~may ~~UCAN~~range ~~and~~up ~~other~~to ~~interested~~5 ~~parties~~MW. ~~submitted~~Over athe ~~settlement~~5-year ~~agreement which~~program, ifSDG&E ~~approved~~will bybe ~~the~~allowed ~~CPUC,~~to ~~would,~~spend up ~~among~~to ~~other~~$100 ~~provisions,~~million ~~reduce~~in capital ~~SDG&E's~~costs ~~investment~~for in the ~~program~~systems toit ~~the~~owns, ~~lesser~~based ofon ~~$125~~an ~~million~~overall orcost 26cap MWof ~~(direct current)~~$3.50 ~~The~~per ~~CPUC~~watt, ~~issued~~including a ~~proposed~~10-percent ~~decision~~contingency infactor. ~~July~~A ~~2010,~~cost ~~with~~cap aof ~~final~~$235 ~~decision~~per ~~expected~~MWh inwill ~~the~~apply ~~third~~to purchased ~~quarter~~power ofunder ~~2010~~the program.

East County Substation

In August 2009, SDG&E filed an application with the CPUC for authorization to ~~construct~~proceed with the East County Substation Project, which will include construction of a new 500/230/138-kV substation, rebuilding of the existing Boulevard Substation and construction of a new 138-kV transmission line connecting the two substations. The project, estimated to cost approximately $~~270~~280 million, would allow interconnections from new renewable-generation sources and enhance the reliability of electric service to a number of communities. The CPUC and BLM have agreed to prepare a joint environmental impact report and environmental impact statement. A CPUC decision on this project is expected in 2011.

GENERAL RATE CASE (GRC)

The CPUC uses a general rate case proceeding to prospectively set rates sufficient to allow the Sempra Utilities to recover their reasonable cost of operations and to provide the opportunity to realize an acceptable rate of return on their investments. The Sempra Utilities ~~will~~filed ~~file~~ their Notices of Intent (NOI) for the 2012 General Rate Case (2012 GRC) in ~~early~~ August 2010 ~~with the CPUC~~. These NOIs are preliminary applications that ~~will~~propose ~~request~~ revenue requirement increases of $246 million for SDG&E and $282 million for SoCalGas over their respective 2011 authorized revenue. These increases would equate to anincreases ~~increase~~ in rates of 7% percent for SDG&E and 7.4% percent for SoCalGas over their 2010 rates. ~~After~~In October 2010, the CPUC staff ~~conducts~~completed aits review of the NOIs and accepted the proposed filings, enabling both SDG&E and SoCalGas ~~will~~to file atheir final ~~application~~applications in mid-December 2010 ~~to address any deficiencies identified by the CPUC staff~~. The CPUC is scheduled to issue a decision on each of the final applications in late 2011, with changes in rates to become effective on January 1, 2012.

A number of parties ~~continue~~have toasked ~~ask~~ the CPUC to delay the filing of SDG&E's and SoCalGas' next GRC applications for at least a year. To date, the CPUC has denied all such requests and has ordered SDG&E and SoCalGas to follow their original GRC schedules.

UTILITY INCENTIVE MECHANISMS

The CPUC applies performance-based measures and incentive mechanisms to all California utilities, under which the Sempra Utilities have earnings potential above authorized base margins if they achieve or exceed specific performance and operating goals.

We provide additional information regarding these incentive mechanisms in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report, and updates below.

Natural Gas Procurement

In January 2010, the CPUC approved a Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism (GCIM) award of $12 million for SoCalGas' procurement activities during the 12-month period ending March 31, 2009. In June 2010, SoCalGas applied to the CPUC for approval of a GCIM award of $6 million for SoCalGas' procurement activities during the 12-month period ending March 31, 2010. SoCalGas expects a CPUC decision in 2011.

Energy Efficiency

In December 2009, the CPUC awarded $0.3 million and $2.1 million, net of a 35 percent holdback pending a final true-up in 2010, to SDG&E and SoCalGas, respectively, for their performance during the 2006 – 2008 program period. In February 2010, the Sempra Utilities filed a petition with the CPUC to correct errors in the computation of the awards. If adopted, the changes would increase the awards by $0.4 million for SDG&E and $1.3 million for SoCalGas, net of the 35 percent holdback.

An Administrative Law Judge draft decision and a Commissioner alternate decision were issued in September 2010 regarding the final true-up of the energy efficiency incentive earnings for the 2006 – 2008 program period. The draft decision rules that no additional incentive payments are warranted for the final true-up of incentive earnings. The alternate decision approves additional incentive awards of $6 million for SDG&E and $3.9 million for SoCalGas for the final true-up of the amounts held back for prior years' awards, but makes no determination on the petition to correct errors. A final decision is expected by the end of 2010.

COST OF CAPITAL

A cost of capital proceeding determines the Sempra Utilities' authorized capital structure and the authorized rate of return that the Sempra Utilities may earn on their electric and natural gas distribution and electric generation assets.

In January 2010, the CPUC approved SDG&E's and the ~~DRA~~Division of Ratepayer Advocates's (DRA) joint petition to delay SDG&E's next scheduled cost of capital proceeding for two years. With this approval, SDG&E's next cost of capital application is scheduled to be filed in April 2012 for a 2013 test year, consistent with the schedule for cost of capital applications for each of Southern California Edison (Edison) and Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E).

In addition to establishing the authorized rate of return, a cost of capital proceeding also addresses market-based benchmarks to be monitored to determine whether an adjustment to the established authorized rate of return is required during the interim years between cost of capital proceedings. SDG&E’s cost of capital benchmark is based on the 12-month average monthly A-rated utility bond yield as published by Moody’s for the 12-month period October through September of each fiscal year. If this 12-month average falls outside of the range of 5.02 percent to 7.02 percent, SDG&E’s authorized rate of return would be adjusted, upward or downward, by one-half of the difference between the 12-month average and 6.02 percent (SDG&E’s benchmark interest rate), effective January 1 following the year in which the benchmark range was exceeded.

SoCalGas’ cost of capital trigger mechanism identifies two conditions for determining whether a change in the authorized rate of return is required. Both conditions are based on the 30-year Treasury Bond Yields – one being the most recent 12-month rolling average yield and the second being the corresponding 12-month forecasted rolling yield on 30-year Treasury Bonds as published by Global Insights. If both interest rates fall outside a range of 3.88 percent to 6.88 percent, SoCalGas’ authorized rate of return would be adjusted, upward or downward, by one-half of the difference between the historical 12-month rolling average yield and 5.38 percent (SoCalGas' benchmark interest rate), effective January 1 following the year in which both conditions were exceeded.

At September 30, 2010, neither SDG&E’s nor SoCalGas’ benchmark ranges have been exceeded.

ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE

In April 2010, the CPUC issued a decision approving SoCalGas' application to upgrade approximately six million natural gas meters with an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), subject to certain safeguards to better ensure its cost effectiveness for ratepayers. The approved cost of the project is $1.05 billion (including approximately $900 million in capital investment), with SoCalGas being subject to risk/reward sharing for costs above or below this amount. Installation of the meters is expected to begin in late 2012 and continue through 2017.

In May 2010, The Utility Reform Network (TURN) and the Utility Workers Union of America (UWUA) Local 132, parties opposing SoCalGas' AMI application, filed an application for rehearing of the CPUC's decision. The application for rehearing is still pending.

SDG&E REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INVEST IN WIND FARM

In July 2010, SDG&E filed a request with the CPUC seeking authority to make a tax equity investment in the holding company of a wind farm project in an amount not to exceed $600 million. SDG&E is seeking to treat the investment as a ~~regulatory~~rate-based asset for which it would earn its authorized rate of return. A CPUC decision is expected in 2011.

If approved by the CPUC, and after the wind farm project has met all of the conditions precedent set forth in the definitive documents, SDG&E would invest in one or more project holding companies in an amount not to exceed 80% of the project costs (not to exceed an aggregate amount of $600 million) upon the initiation of commercial operation of the project. SDG&E expects the project to be in commercial operation in the second half of 2012.

2007 WILDFIRES COST RECOVERY FOR COMPANY FACILITIES

~~SDG&E~~In ~~filed~~October an2010, ~~application with~~ the CPUC inissued ~~March~~a ~~2009~~decision ~~seeking~~approving a settlement agreement between SDG&E and the DRA, authorizing SDG&E to recover ~~the~~$43 ~~incremental~~million ~~cost~~of capital costs incurred to replace and repair company facilities under CPUC jurisdiction damaged by the October 2007 wildfires. This ~~application~~decision was ~~filed~~ in ~~accordance~~response ~~with~~to ~~the~~an ~~CPUC~~application ~~rules~~that ~~governing~~SDG&E ~~incremental~~filed ~~costs~~with ~~incurred~~the asCPUC ain ~~result~~March of2009 aseeking ~~declared~~to ~~emergency~~recover ~~or catastrophic event~~$49.8 ~~The~~million ~~DRA filed a protest to SDG&E's request for recovery~~ of ~~the~~ incremental costs, ~~requesting~~($43 ~~that~~million ~~the~~of ~~CPUC~~capital ~~stay~~costs ~~the~~and ~~proceeding~~$6.8 ~~until~~million ~~completion~~ of ~~the~~operation ~~fire investigations, which we describe in Note 10. SDG&E~~ and ~~the~~maintenance ~~DRA~~costs), ~~have reached an agreement regarding the cost recovery request~~ which, ifapplication ~~approved by the CPUC, would result in SDG&E recovering $43 million. The settlement agreement~~ was ~~filed~~protested ~~with~~by the ~~CPUC in June 2010~~DRA.

SDG&E also incurred $30.1 million of incremental costs for the replacement and repair of company facilities under FERC jurisdiction, which are currently being recovered in SDG&E's electric transmission rates.

We discuss recovery of 2007 wildfire litigation costs in Note 10.

INSURANCE COST RECOVERY

SDG&E filed an application with the CPUC in August 2009 seeking authorization to recover higher liability insurance premiums, which SDG&E began incurring commencing July 1, 2009, and any losses realized due to higher deductibles associated with the new policies. Evidentiary hearings were held in April 2010 and a final CPUC decision is expected by the end of 2010. SDG&E made the filing under the CPUC’s rules allowing utilities to seek recovery of significant cost increases incurred between GRC filings resulting from unforeseen circumstances. SDG&E is requesting a $29 million revenue requirement for the 2009/2010 policy period for the incremental increase in its liability and wildfire insurance premium costs above what is currently authorized in rates and proposes a mechanism for recovery of future liability insurance costs incurred in the 2010/2011 policy period and the first six months of the 2011/2012 policy period. The CPUC's rules allow a utility to ~~recover~~seek recovery of incurred costs that meet certain criteria, subject to a $5 million deductible per event. SDG&E has asked that the increase in liability insurance costs for the 2009/2010, 2010/2011 and the first six months of the 2011/2012 policy periods be deemed a single event subject to one $5 million deductible. In the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, SDG&E's ~~pretax~~after-tax earnings were adversely impacted by $~~18.~~20 million and $5 million, respectively, due to the incremental insurance premiums associated with its wildfire coverage.

EXCESS WILDFIRE CLAIMS COST RECOVERY

SDG&E and SoCalGas filed an application, along with other related filings, with the CPUC in August 2009 proposing a new mechanism for the future recovery of all wildfire-related expenses for claims, litigation expenses and insurance premiums that are in excess of amounts authorized by the CPUC for recovery in rates. In connection with these filings, SDG&E is seeking the recovery of costs incurred by SDG&E for the 2007 wildfire losses that are in excess of amounts recovered from its insurance coverage and other potentially responsible third parties, as well as similar costs for future wildfires, if and when incurred. The application for a new mechanism for recovery of costs incurred for future wildfires was made jointly with Edison and PG&E. In July 2010, the CPUC approved the utilities' requests for separate regulatory accounts to record the subject expenses while the joint utility application is pending before the CPUC. Several parties protested the original application and, in response, the utilities submitted an amended application in July 2010. A proceeding schedule has not yet been established.

We provide additional information about 2007 wildfire litigation costs and their recovery in Note 10.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We record loss reserves for legal proceedings when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amounts of the loss can be reasonably estimated. However, the uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings make it difficult to estimate with reasonable certainty the costs and effects of resolving these matters. Accordingly, actual costs incurred may differ materially from reserved amounts, may exceed applicable insurance coverages and could materially adversely affect our business, cash flows, results of operations, and financial condition.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, Sempra Energy’s reserves for material legal proceedings, on a consolidated basis, were $~~527~~619 million, of which $150 million is offset by an insurance receivable for wildfire litigation and $~~117~~102 million is for previously resolved matters. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, these reserves for SDG&E and SoCalGas were $~~242~~345 million (also offset by the $150 million insurance receivable) and $13 million, respectively. We provide additional information about previously resolved matters in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

SDG&E 2007 Wildfire Litigation

In October 2007, San Diego County experienced several catastrophic wildfires. Reports issued by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) concluded that two of these fires (the Witch and Rice fires) were SDG&E "power line caused" and that a third fire (the Guejito fire) occurred when a wire securing a Cox Communications' fiber optic cable came into contact with an SDG&E power line "causing an arc and starting the fire." Cal Fire reported that the Rice fire burned approximately 9,500 acres and damaged 206 homes and two commercial properties, and the Witch and Guejito fires merged and eventually burned approximately 198,000 acres, resulting in two fatalities, approximately 40 firefighters injured and approximately 1,141 homes destroyed.

A September 2008 staff report issued by the CPUC's Consumer Protection and Safety Division reached substantially the same conclusions as the Cal Fire reports, but also contended that the power lines involved in the Witch and Rice fires and the lashing wire involved in the Guejito fire were not properly designed, constructed and maintained. In November 2008, the CPUC initiated proceedings to determine if any of its rules were violated and in October 2009, SDG&E and the Consumer Protection and Safety Division entered into a settlement agreement, approved by the CPUC in April 2010, that resolves these proceedings by SDG&E's payment of $14.75 million.

Numerous parties have sued SDG&E and Sempra Energy in San Diego County Superior Court seeking recovery of unspecified amounts of damages, including punitive damages, from the three fires. These include owners and insurers of properties that were destroyed or damaged in the fires and public entities seeking recovery of firefighting, emergency response, and environmental costs. They assert various bases for recovery, including inverse condemnation based upon a California Court of Appeal decision finding that another California investor-owned utility was subject to strict liability, without regard to foreseeability or negligence, for property damages resulting from a wildfire ignited by power lines. In ~~June~~October ~~2009~~2010, the court of appeal affirmed the trial court's ~~ruled~~ruling that these claims must be pursued in individual lawsuits (rather than as class actions on behalf of all persons who incurred wildfire damages)~~, and the plaintiffs have appealed that ruling~~. SDG&E has filed cross-complaints against Cox Communications seeking indemnification for any liability that SDG&E may incur that relates to the Guejito fire, astwo ~~well~~SDG&E ascontractors ~~cross-complaints~~seeking ~~against~~indemnification ~~two~~in connection with the Witch fire, and one SDG&E ~~contractors~~contractor seeking indemnification in connection with the ~~Witch~~Rice fire. The court has scheduled a Guejito fire trial for ~~three~~two individual plaintiffs ~~and Cal Fire~~ to begin in March 2011.

SDG&E has settled substantially all of the 19,000 claims of homeowner insurers relating to the three fires, including claims for payment by the insurers to their policyholders for approximately 1,000 of the 1,300 houses, mobile homes, and apartment units identified in public records as having been destroyed. Under the settlement agreements, SDG&E has paid or will pay 57.5 percent of the approximately $1.6 billion paid or reserved for payment by the insurers to their policyholders and received an assignment of the insurers’ claims against Cox Communications and other parties potentially responsible for the fires.

The wildfire litigation also includes claims of non-insurer plaintiffs for damage to uninsured and underinsured structures, business interruption, evacuation expenses, agricultural damage, emotional harm, personal injuries and other losses. SDG&E has settled the claims of approximately ~~350~~450 of these plaintiffs. Of the approximately 2,~~100~~500 remaining plaintiffs, approximately 1,~~050~~200 have thus far submitted settlement demands or damage information. Individual and business claims total approximately $~~570~~825 million and government entity claims total approximately $~~170~~150 million. SDG&E expects to receive additional settlement demands and damage estimates as settlement negotiations continue.

SDG&E's settlements and defense costs have exceeded its $1.1 billion of liability insurance coverage. SDG&E has established reserves for its estimated cost of resolving the remaining claims for ~~economic~~ damages of approximately 1,300 plaintiffs. It expects that its wildfire reserves and amounts paid to resolve wildfire claims will continue to increase as it obtains additional information. ~~SDG&E~~and is unable to reasonably estimate the amount or timing of recoveries from other potentially responsible parties.

SDG&E has concluded, however, that it is probable that it will be permitted to recover from its utility customers substantially all reasonably incurred costs of resolving wildfire claims in excess of its ~~$1.1 billion of~~ liability insurance coverage and any amounts recovered from other potentially responsible parties. Accordingly, although recovery from utility customers will require future regulatory actions as we discuss in Note 9, SDG&E has recorded a regulatory asset in an amount substantially equal to the aggregate amount it has paid or reserved for payment for the resolution of wildfire claims and related costs in excess of its liability insurance coverage. SDG&E will increase the amount of the regulatory asset as additional amounts are paid or reserves are recorded and reduce it by any amounts recovered from other potentially responsible parties. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the amount of the regulatory asset was $~~191~~311 million.

Consequently, Sempra Energy and SDG&E expect no significant earnings impact from the resolution of the remaining wildfire claims. However, SDG&E’s cash flow will be adversely affected by timing differences between the resolution of claims and recoveries from other potentially responsible parties and utility customers, which may extend over a number of years. Also, recovery from customers will require future regulatory actions, and a failure to obtain recovery, or any negative assessment of the likelihood of recovery, would likely have a material adverse effect on Sempra Energy's and SDG&E's cash flows and results of operations.

SDG&E will continue to gather information to evaluate and assess the remaining wildfire claims and the likelihood, amount and timing of related recoveries from other potentially responsible parties and utility customers and will make appropriate adjustments to wildfire reserves and the related regulatory asset as additional information becomes available.

Sempra LNG

Sempra LNG has been engaged in a long-running land dispute relating to property adjacent to its Energía Costa Azul liquefied natural gas (LNG) receipt terminal near Ensenada, Mexico. The adjacent property is not required by environmental or other regulatory permits for the operation of the terminal. A claimant to the adjacent property has nonetheless asserted that his health and safety are endangered by the operation of the facility. In June 2010, a Mexican federal appeals court revoked a district court order, issued at the behest of the claimant, directing Mexican regulatory authorities to provisionally suspend authorizations for the operation of the LNG terminal. No terminal permits were affected as a result of these proceedings and the terminal has continued to operate normally. The Mexican district court is expected to conduct additional proceedings regarding the claimant’s assertions and whether the terminal’s permits should be modified or revoked.

The property claimant has also filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court in San Diego seeking compensatory and punitive damages and earnings from the Energía Costa Azul LNG terminal based on his allegations that he was wrongfully evicted from the adjacent property and that he has been harmed by other allegedly improper actions.

Energy Crisis Litigation Settlement

Sempra Energy, RBS Sempra Commodities and Sempra Generation have reached ~~an agreement in principle for~~ a comprehensive settlement to resolve substantially all of ~~the~~their remaining energy crisis litigation ~~described below~~ for a total payment of $410 million. ~~The~~Described ~~matters~~in tomore bedetail below, the matters resolved by the settlement ~~would~~ include the multiple actions brought by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and other parties with respect to the validity, pricing and operation of Sempra Generation’s contract with the DWR and the FERC refund and manipulation proceedings against RBS Sempra Commodities. ~~Any~~Two settlement agreements ~~would~~were besubmitted ~~subject~~in October 2010 to the FERC for its approval. ofWe anticipate that the FERC will act on the settlements in the first quarter of 2011.

We ~~describe the matters to be resolved below under "DWR Contract," "FERC Refund Proceedings," and "FERC Manipulation Investigation." We~~ expect the settlement of $410 million to be funded largely from previously recorded reserves and receivables at RBS Sempra Commodities. Sempra Energy has also recorded an additional pretax charge of $159 million in the first quarter of 2010 to provide for the remainder of the settlement, including $139 million at Sempra Generation and $20 million at Sempra Commodities.

DWR Contract

InAmong ~~February~~other ~~2002~~relief from existing and potential disputes, under the ~~California~~terms ~~Energy~~of ~~Oversight~~the ~~Board~~settlement ~~(CEOB)~~reached ~~and~~on the ~~CPUC~~DWR ~~filed~~contract, ~~challenges~~all atclaims, ~~the~~appeals ~~FERC~~and proceedings related to the DWR's ~~contracts~~contract ~~with~~will ~~Sempra~~be ~~Generation~~dismissed. ~~and~~These ~~other~~matters ~~power~~include ~~suppliers.~~the ~~After~~2002 ~~the~~challenge ~~FERC~~brought ~~upheld~~by the ~~contracts~~California inEnergy ~~2003,~~Oversight ~~the~~Board (CEOB) and the CPUC ~~appealed~~at to the ~~U.S.~~FERC ~~Court~~asserting ofthat ~~Appeals for~~ the ~~Ninth~~DWR ~~Circuit~~contract ~~(Ninth~~with ~~Circuit~~Sempra ~~Court~~Generation ofcontained ~~Appeals)~~unjust and ~~challenged~~unreasonable rates; the ~~FERC'~~DWR’s ~~application~~appeal ofin ~~the~~response ~~Mobile-Sierra~~to ~~doctrine's~~the ~~"public~~denial ~~interest" standard~~ of ~~review~~its to2002 ~~the~~claims ~~contracts.~~for Inmisrepresentation ~~June~~and ~~2008,~~breach ~~the~~of ~~United~~contract ~~States~~in ~~Supreme~~San ~~Court~~Diego ~~(Supreme~~Superior Court); ~~ruled~~and ~~that~~ the ~~FERC~~2008 ~~was~~arbitration ~~correct~~proceedings toin ~~apply~~which the ~~Mobile-Sierra~~DWR ~~doctrine~~asserted ~~(which presumes~~ that ~~contract~~Sempra ~~rates~~Generation ~~are~~had ~~just~~breached ~~and reasonable) absent a demonstration that one of~~ the ~~contracting~~ parties' ~~engaged~~agreement in ~~unlawful~~various ~~market~~operational ~~manipulation~~respects, ~~that~~and ~~directly~~violated ~~affected~~the ~~contract~~order ~~rates.~~issued ~~The~~by ~~Supreme~~an ~~Court~~earlier ~~ruled~~arbitration ~~that~~panel ~~the~~relating ~~FERC~~to ~~should~~the ~~clarify~~amount ~~its~~refunded ~~findings~~to onthe ~~this~~DWR ~~issue~~ and ~~consider whether~~ the ~~contract~~manner ~~rates~~in ~~seriously~~which ~~harm~~Sempra ~~the~~Generation ~~public interest~~operates. ~~The FERC has not yet acted.~~

At various times since the contract's inception, Sempra Generation and the DWR have also had disputes regarding the meaning of terms and performance of the agreement under which Sempra Generation sells electricity to the DWR. In 2002, in a state civil action, the DWR sought to terminate its contract with Sempra Generation claiming misrepresentation and breach of contract, and seeking rescission, damages, injunctive and declaratory relief, and $100 million in punitive damages. After various procedural decisions and appeals, on November 30, 2009, a San Diego jury returned a verdict denying all of the DWR's claims and requested relief, and granting all of Sempra Generation's requested relief. The DWR has appealed the judgment.

In September 2008, the DWR initiated an arbitration proceeding against Sempra Generation, alleging that Sempra Generation had breached the parties' agreement in various operational respects, and violated the order issued by an earlier arbitration panel relating to the amount refunded to the DWR and the manner in which Sempra Generation operates. The DWR seeks approximately $80 million in damages and an order terminating the contract. Arbitration hearings are scheduled for January 2011.

FERC Refund Proceedings

The settlement involving RBS Sempra Commodities includes, among other things, resolution of the following matters: the FERC's isinvestigation ~~investigating~~of prices charged by various electric suppliers to buyers in the California Power Exchange (PX) and Independent System Operator (ISO) markets.; Ina ~~March~~complaint ~~2003,~~involving short-term bilateral sales up to one month in the Pacific Northwest (the settlement resolves the sales between the DWR and Sempra Commodities); the California Attorney General's complaint that electricity sellers had failed to comply with the FERC's ~~ordered~~quarterly ~~suppliers~~reporting requirements; and the California Attorney General's complaint seeking to ~~pay~~collect ~~refunds~~for onalleged ~~certain~~overcharges ~~sales~~related ~~made~~to ~~during~~all short-term bilateral transactions between sellers and the ~~October~~DWR 2from January 18, ~~2000~~2001 through June 20, 2001 ~~time period~~.

Various parties, including Sempra Commodities, appealed the FERC's order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In August 2006, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the FERC had properly established October 2, 2000 through June 20, 2001 as the refund period and had properly excluded certain short-term bilateral transactions between sellers and the DWR from the refund proceedings. However, the court also held that the FERC erred in excluding certain multi-day transactions from the refund proceedings. Finally, while the court upheld the FERC's decision not to extend the refund proceedings to the summer period (prior to October 2, 2000), it found that the FERC should have considered other remedies for tariff violations that are alleged to have occurred prior to October 2, 2000. The FERC is in the process of addressing these issues on remand.

In August 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision reversing and remanding FERC orders declining to provide refunds in a related proceeding regarding short-term bilateral sales up to one month in the Pacific Northwest. The court found that some of the short-term sales between the DWR and various sellers (including Sempra Commodities) that had previously been excluded from the refund proceeding involving sales in the ISO and PX markets in California were within the scope of the Pacific Northwest refund proceeding. The FERC has not yet acted on the court's order.

In a separate complaint filed with the FERC in 2002, the California Attorney General contended that electricity sellers had failed to comply with the FERC's quarterly reporting requirements. The Attorney General requested that the FERC order refunds from suppliers. The FERC dismissed the complaint and instead ordered sellers to restate their reports. After an appeal by the California Attorney General, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that failure to file transaction-specific quarterly reports gave the FERC authority to order refunds with respect to jurisdictional sellers. The FERC is in the process of addressing these issues on remand.

In May 2009, the California Attorney General filed another complaint at the FERC against various sellers, including Sempra Commodities. In this complaint, the Attorney General seeks to collect for alleged overcharges related to short-term bilateral transactions between sellers and the DWR from January 18, 2001 through June 20, 2001. These transactions also have been the subject of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' orders in the proceedings described above. The FERC has not yet acted on the complaint.

In the cases described above, the FERC could order additional refunds or the disgorgement of profits. RBS Sempra Commodities has reserves for its estimate of the effect of the FERC's revision of the benchmark prices it will use to calculate refunds and other related developments. Pursuant to the agreements related to the formation of RBS Sempra Commodities, we have indemnified RBS related to these proceedings should the liability from the final resolution be greater than the reserves.

FERC Manipulation Investigation

The settlement involving RBS Sempra Commodities also includes resolution of the FERC's ~~has~~separate ~~separately~~investigation ~~investigated~~into whether there was manipulation of short-term energy markets in the western United States that would constitute violations of applicable tariffs and warrant disgorgement of associated profits.

InSempra ~~June~~Energy ~~2003,~~and ~~the~~RBS ~~FERC~~Sempra ~~ordered~~Commodities ahave ~~number~~recorded ofreserves ~~entities,~~for ~~including~~the ~~Sempra~~full ~~Commodities,~~amount toof ~~show~~the ~~why~~settlement ~~they~~and ~~should~~other ~~not~~litigation. ~~disgorge~~Pursuant ~~profits~~to ~~from~~the ~~certain~~agreements ~~transactions~~related ~~between~~to ~~January~~the 1,formation ~~2000~~of ~~and~~RBS ~~June~~Sempra 20Commodities, ~~2001~~we ~~that are asserted to~~ have ~~constituted~~indemnified ~~gaming~~RBS ~~and/or~~should ~~anomalous~~the ~~market~~liability ~~behavior~~from ~~under~~ the ~~California~~final ~~ISO~~resolution ~~and/or~~of PXthese ~~tariffs.~~matters Inbe ~~October~~greater ~~2003,~~than ~~Sempra~~the ~~Commodities~~reserves ~~agreed~~related to ~~pay~~Sempra $7Commodities.2 ~~million~~Pursuant into ~~full~~our ~~resolution~~agreement ofwith ~~these~~the ~~investigations.~~Noble ~~That~~Group ~~liability~~as ~~was~~we ~~recorded~~discuss asin ofNote ~~December 31~~4, ~~2003.~~we ~~The~~have ~~Sempra~~also ~~Commodities~~indemnified ~~settlement~~Noble ~~was~~Americas ~~approved~~Gas by& ~~the~~Power ~~FERC~~Corp. inand ~~August~~its ~~2004~~affiliates ~~and~~for ~~reaffirmed~~all inlosses ~~November~~incurred ~~2008.~~by ~~The~~such ~~California~~ parties ~~have~~resulting ~~appealed~~from ~~the~~these ~~FERC's~~proceedings ~~orders~~as related to ~~the~~Sempra ~~Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals~~Commodities.

Other Litigation

Sempra Energy and several subsidiaries, along with three oil and natural gas companies, the City of Beverly Hills, and the Beverly Hills Unified School District, are defendants in a toxic tort lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court by approximately 1,000 plaintiffs. This lawsuit claims that various emissions resulted in cancer or fear of cancer. We have submitted the case to our insurers, who have reserved their rights with respect to coverage. In November 2006, the court granted the defendants' summary judgment motions based on lack of medical causation for the 12 initial plaintiffs scheduled to go to trial first. The court also granted summary judgment excluding punitive damages. The court has stayed the case as to the remaining plaintiffs pending the appeal of the rulings. A mediation occurred in June 2010, after which the plaintiffs’ counsel agreed to recommend a settlement of the lawsuits as to Sempra Energy and its subsidiaries for an amount that is not significant. Any such settlement will require approval by each of the plaintiffs. If approval is obtained, finalization of the settlement is expected to occur within six months.

RBS Sempra Commodities assumed litigation reserves related to Sempra Commodities, however, we have indemnified RBS should the liabilities from the final resolution of these matters be greater than the reserves.

We are also defendants in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our businesses, including personal injury, product liability, property damage and other claims. California juries have demonstrated an increasing willingness to grant large awards, including punitive damages, in these cases.

Wildfire Reserves and Insurance Receivables

In 2009 and 2010, as liabilities for wildfire litigation have become reasonably estimable, SDG&E has recorded related reserves as a current liability. The impact of this liability is offset by a current receivable resulting from SDG&E’s ~~$1.1 billion of~~ liability insurance and, for reserves in excess of the insurance coverage, the recognition of a regulatory asset, as discussed above. There was no effect on SDG&E's or Sempra Energy's 2009 earnings ~~and~~from nothe ~~significant~~recording ~~effect~~of the reserves. The impact on their 2010 earnings ~~from~~was ~~the~~$7 ~~recording~~million ofand $17 million in the ~~reserves~~three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, wildfire litigation reserves were $~~241~~344 million and the receivable from SDG&E's insurers was $150 million.

NUCLEAR INSURANCE

SDG&E and the other owners of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) have insurance to cover claims from nuclear liability incidents arising at SONGS. This insurance provides $375 million in coverage limits, the maximum amount available, including coverage for acts of terrorism. In addition, the Price-Anderson Act provides for up to $12.2 billion of secondary financial protection (SFP). If a nuclear liability loss occurring at any U.S. licensed/commercial reactor exceeds the $375 million insurance limit, all nuclear reactor owners could be required to contribute to the SFP. SDG&E's contribution would be up to $47 million. This amount is subject to an annual maximum of $7 million, unless a default occurs by any other SONGS owner. If the SFP is insufficient to cover the liability loss, SDG&E could be subject to an additional assessment.

The SONGS owners, including SDG&E, also have $2.75 billion of nuclear property, decontamination, and debris removal insurance. In addition, the SONGS owners have up to $490 million insurance coverage for outage expenses and replacement power costs due to accidental property damage. This coverage is limited to $3.5 million per week for the first 52 weeks, then $2.8 million per week for up to 110 additional weeks. There is a 12-week waiting period deductible. These insurance coverages are provided through a mutual insurance company. Insured members are subject to retrospective premium assessments. SDG&E could be assessed up to $8.5 million.

The nuclear property insurance program includes an industry aggregate loss limit for non-certified acts of terrorism (as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act). The industry aggregate loss limit for property claims arising from non-certified acts of terrorism is $3.24 billion. This is the maximum amount that will be paid to insured members who suffer losses or damages from these non-certified terrorist acts.

CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS

Sempra Energy Consolidated

In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, significant increases in commitments at Sempra Energy were

§the issuance of $250 million of 5.35-percent first mortgage bonds and $500 million of 4.50-percent first mortgage bonds maturing in 2040 at SDG&E;

§$~~431~~453 million for purchased-power contracts at SDG&E;

§$223 million for ~~the~~ costs associated with nuclear fuel fabrication at SONGS;

§$78133 million at SDG&E for ~~the~~ engineering, material procurement and construction costs associated with the Sunrise Powerlink project;

§$4554 million ~~for~~at ~~construction~~SDG&E ~~and~~for ~~infrastructure~~electric ~~improvements~~distribution ~~for~~systems, ~~gas~~advanced ~~transmission~~metering infrastructure, and ~~distribution~~electric ~~operations~~generation atplant ~~SoCalGas;~~ and equipment;

§$3852 million atfor ~~Sempra~~construction ~~Pipelines~~and &infrastructure ~~Storage~~improvements for ~~natural~~ gas ~~contracts.~~transmission and distribution operations at SoCalGas; and

~~The future payments for the contractual commitments listed above are expected to be~~ §$~~166~~315 million ~~for~~at ~~2010,~~Sempra ~~$114~~Pipelines ~~million~~& ~~for~~Storage ~~2011,~~and ~~$89~~Sempra ~~million~~LNG for ~~2012,~~natural ~~$83~~gas ~~million for 2013, $69 million for 2014 and $945 million thereafter~~contracts. ~~These amounts include expected interest payments on the mortgage bonds using the stated interest rate.~~

~~Reserves~~The ~~for~~future ~~Sempra~~payments ~~Energy~~for ~~and~~the ~~SDG&E~~contractual ~~wildfire~~commitments ~~litigation~~listed above are ~~discussed~~expected ~~above~~to inbe ~~“SDG&E~~$280 ~~2007~~million ~~Wildfire~~for ~~Litigation.”~~2010, ~~Reserves~~$187 million for ~~Sempra~~2011, ~~Energy~~$151 ~~related~~million tofor ~~the~~2012, ~~FERC~~$135 million for 2013, $112 million for 2014 and ~~DWR~~$2.2 ~~contract~~billion ~~settlement~~thereafter. ~~litigation~~These ~~are~~amounts ~~discussed~~include ~~above~~expected ininterest ~~“Energy~~payments ~~Crisis~~on ~~Litigation~~the first mortgage bonds using the stated interest rates.”

~~Changes~~Reserves for Sempra Energy and SDG&E related to ~~SoCalGas’~~wildfire ~~natural~~litigation ~~gas~~are ~~purchase~~discussed ~~and~~above ~~pipeline~~in ~~capacity~~“SDG&E ~~commitments~~2007 ~~and~~Wildfire Litigation.” Reserves for Sempra ~~LNG’s~~Energy ~~natural~~related ~~gas~~to ~~purchase~~the ~~commitments~~FERC and DWR contract settlement litigation are discussed ~~below~~above in “Energy Crisis Litigation Settlement.”

Changes to SoCalGas’ natural gas purchase and pipeline capacity commitments and Sempra LNG’s natural gas purchase and transportation commitments are discussed below.

At December 31, 2009, Sempra LNG had LNG purchase agreements with Tangguh PSC Contractors and Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Company. We discuss these agreements further in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

In April 2010, Sempra LNG entered into an LNG supply option agreement with Gazprom Global LNG Limited (GGLNG), a subsidiary of OAO Gazprom. The multi-year agreement, which commenced in June 2010, ~~will~~allows ~~allow~~ GGLNG to deliver and sell up to two LNG cargoes per month to Sempra LNG at its Cameron receipt terminal. GGLNG pays Sempra LNG a fee for the right to deliver and sell the LNG cargoes using a predetermined pricing formula based on a market index.

Sempra LNG’s commitments under all LNG purchase agreements, reflecting the additional recent agreement with GGLNG, changes in forward prices since December 31, 2009, and actual transactions for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, are expected to decrease by $~~854~~1.4 ~~million~~billion in 2010, ~~increase~~and by $~~212~~2 million in 2011, to increase by $~~268~~121 million in 2012, and to decrease by $4381 million in 2013, ~~and decrease by~~ $~~137~~254 million in 2014 and $~~474~~4.4 ~~million~~billion thereafter compared to December 31, 2009.

The LNG commitment amounts above are based on Sempra LNG’s commitment to accept the maximum possible delivery of cargoes under the agreements. Actual LNG purchases for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 have been significantly lower than the maximum amounts possible.

Sempra LNG has a natural gas transportation agreement to provide service from the U.S./Mexico border to Southern California and Arizona. At September 30, 2010, Sempra LNG’s remaining commitment on this contract, which runs through August 2022, is $226 million.

SDG&E

In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, significant increases to contractual commitments at SDG&E were the issuance of $250 million of 5.35-percent first mortgage bonds maturing in 2040, the issuance of $~~431~~500 million of 4.50-percent first mortgage bonds maturing in 2040, $453 million for purchased-power contracts, $223 million for ~~the~~ costs associated with nuclear fuel fabrication at SONGS, ~~and~~ $78133 million for ~~the~~ engineering, material procurement and construction costs associated with the Sunrise Powerlink project and $54 million for electric distribution systems, advanced metering infrastructure, and electric generation plant and equipment.

The future payments for these contractual commitments are expected to be $96180 million for 2010, $~~101~~143 million for 2011, $89120 million for 2012, $83107 million for 2013, $6993 million for 2014 and $~~945~~2 ~~million~~billion thereafter. These amounts include expected interest payments on the first mortgage bonds using the stated interest ~~rate~~rates.

SoCalGas

In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, significant increases to contractual commitments at SoCalGas were $4552 million for construction and infrastructure improvements for gas transmission and distribution operations. The future payments for these contractual commitments are expected to be $3239 million for 2010 and $13 million for 2011.

SoCalGas’ natural gas purchase and pipeline capacity commitments have decreased by $~~516~~682 million since December 31, 2009. The decrease, primarily due to a reduction of $~~816~~1.1 ~~million~~billion based on lower natural gas forward prices and actual transactions for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, is offset by new natural gas purchase and pipeline capacity contracts of $~~300~~415 million. Net future payments are therefore expected to decrease by $~~617~~903 million for 2010 and to increase by $64124 million for 2011, $1252 million for 2012, $1129 million for 2013, $1014 million for 2014 and $42 million thereafter compared to December 31, 2009.

CAPITAL LEASES

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the future minimum lease payments and present value of the net minimum lease payments under these capital leases for both Sempra Energy Consolidated and SDG&E were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)
	2010	$	126
	2011		24
	2012		24
	2013		24
	2014		24
	Thereafter		489
	Total minimum lease payments(1)		~~597~~591
	Less: estimated executory costs		(9897)
	Less: interest(2)		(~~316~~313)
	Present value of net minimum lease payments(3)	$	~~183~~181
(1)	This amount will be recorded over the lives of the leases as Cost of Electric Fuel and Purchased Power on Sempra Energy's and SDG&E's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. This expense will receive ratemaking treatment consistent with purchased-power costs.
(2)	Amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value at the inception of the leases.
(3)	Includes $7 million in Current Portion of Long-term Debt and $~~176~~174 million in Long-term Debt on Sempra Energy's and SDG&E's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

NOTE 11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have six separately managed reportable segments, as follows:

1. SDG&E provides electric service to San Diego and southern Orange counties and natural gas service to San Diego County.

2. SoCalGas is a natural gas distribution utility, serving customers throughout most of Southern California and part of central California.

3. Sempra Commodities holds our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities, a joint venture with RBS. The partnership was formed ~~from~~fromour ~~our~~ commodities-marketing businesses previously reported in this segment. The partnership's commodity trading businesses serve customers in natural gas and electricity, and prior to July 1, 2010, also in petroleum and petroleum products, and base metals. Sempra Commodities also includes the operating results of Sempra Rockies Marketing, which holds firm service capacity on the Rockies Express Pipeline.

In February 2010, Sempra Energy, RBS and the partnership entered into an agreement to sell certain businesses within the partnership, which agreement was consummated on July 1, 2010. In September and October of 2010, the partnership entered into two additional agreements for transactions which will complete the divestiture of the last of the joint venture’s principal assets. One of these transactions was completed on November 1, 2010, and the second transaction is expected to be completed by year-end. We discuss ~~this~~these ~~transaction~~transactions and other matters concerning the partnership in Note 4 above and in Notes 4 and 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. ~~We and RBS continue to engage in an active sales process for the remaining partnership businesses.~~

4. Sempra Generation develops, owns and operates, or holds interests in, electric power plants and energy projects in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Indiana, Hawaii and Mexico to serve wholesale electricity markets in the United States and Mexico.

5. Sempra Pipelines & Storage develops, owns and operates, or holds interests in, natural gas and propane pipelines and natural gas storage facilities in the United States and Mexico, and companies that provide natural gas or electricity services in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and Peru. We are currently pursuing the sale of our interests in the Argentine utilities, which we discuss further in Note 4 above and in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report. Sempra Pipelines & Storage also operates a ~~small~~ natural gas distribution utility in ~~Southwest~~ Alabama.

6. Sempra LNG develops, owns and operates receipt terminals for importing LNG in the U.S. and Mexico, and has supply and marketing agreements to purchase LNG and sell natural gas.

We evaluate each segment's performance based on its contribution to Sempra Energy's reported earnings. The Sempra Utilities operate in essentially separate service territories, under separate regulatory frameworks and rate structures set by the CPUC. The Sempra Utilities' operations are based on rates set by the CPUC and the FERC. We describe the accounting policies of our segments in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

In the first quarter of 2010, Sempra LNG became a reportable segment. We have revised segment disclosures for 2009 to reflect this.

The following tables show selected information by segment from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Amounts labeled as "all other" in the following tables consist primarily of parent organizations.

SEGMENT INFORMATION
(Dollars in millions)
	Three months ended June 30,								Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
	2010				2009				2010				2009
REVENUES
SDG&E	$	~~692~~811	3438	%	$	~~631~~773	3742	%	$	12,~~434~~245	3234	%	$	12,~~363~~136	3638	%
SoCalGas		~~834~~776	4237			~~694~~662	4136			2,~~016~~792	4442			12,~~614~~276	4240
Sempra Commodities		2624	1			1324	1			4973	1			2650	1
Sempra Generation		~~242~~269	1213			~~245~~250	1513			~~537~~806	12			~~542~~792	14
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		7577	43			98	65			~~185~~262	4			~~230~~328	6
Sempra LNG		~~166~~183	89			2568	14			~~371~~554	8			57125	2
Adjustments and eliminations		(2)	-			-(2)	-			13	-			-(2)	-
Intersegment revenues		(2526)	(1)			(1720)	(1)			(5177)	(1)			(3555)	(1)
Total	$	2,~~008~~116	100	%	$	1,~~689~~853	100	%	$	46,~~542~~658	100	%	$	35,~~797~~650	100	%
INTEREST EXPENSE
SDG&E	$	3137			$	2129			$	6299			$	4675
SoCalGas		1617				1816				3350				3551
Sempra Commodities		-2				31				13				67
Sempra Generation		34				43				711				811
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		610				79				1525				1423
Sempra LNG		1213				28				2437				412
All other		7973				6170				~~166~~239				~~120~~190
Intercompany eliminations		(4445)				(3740)				(96141)				(72112)
Total	$	~~103~~111			$	7996			$	~~212~~323			$	~~161~~257
INTEREST INCOME
SoCalGas	$	-			$	1			$	-			$	2
SDG&E	$	-			$	1			$	-			$	1
Sempra Generation		3				3				5				6
SoCalGas		1				1				1				3
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		4				4				8				8
Sempra Commodities		6				-				6				-
All other		41				34				91				67
Sempra Generation		6				4				11				10
Intercompany eliminations		(44)				(37)				(96)				(72)
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		4				5				12				13
Total	$	4			$	5			$	8			$	11
Sempra LNG		1				-				1				-
All other		32				34				123				101
Intercompany eliminations		(45)				(40)				(141)				(112)
Total	$	5			$	5			$	13			$	16
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
SDG&E	$	9596	44	%	$	81	4341	%	$	~~187~~283	44	%	$	~~158~~239	42	%
SoCalGas		7778	36			7573	3937			~~152~~230	36			~~147~~220	4039
Sempra Generation		16	7			1514	87			3147	7			2943	87
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		1011	5			913	57			2132	5			1932	56
Sempra LNG		13	6			710	45			2538	6			1323	34
All other		4	2			25	13			913	2			611	2
Total	$	~~215~~218	100	%	$	~~189~~196	100	%	$	~~425~~643	100	%	$	~~372~~568	100	%
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
SDG&E	$	4456			$	2853			$	75131			$	88141
SoCalGas		3442				3742				90132				73115
Sempra Commodities		(12147)				3730				(20167)				74104
Sempra Generation		318				3430				(3719)				4676
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		723				(299)				1336				(1726)
Sempra LNG		43				(10)				1619				(2232)
All other		(2127)				(78)				(2047)				(4351)
Total	$	59(32)			$	90128			$	~~117~~85			$	~~199~~327

SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,								Six months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
EQUITY EARNINGS (LOSSES)
Earnings (losses) recorded before tax:
Sempra Commodities		$	(16281)			$	~~126~~105			$	(9290)			$	~~279~~384
Sempra Generation			(1)				~~(6)~~4				(12)				(62)
Sempra Pipelines & Storage			1210				1118				2232				2139
All other			(31)				(34)				(56)				(610)
Total		$	(8273)			$	~~128~~123			$	7(266)			$	~~288~~411
Earnings recorded net of tax:
Earnings (losses) recorded net of tax:
Sempra Pipelines & Storage		$	27(4)			$	2320			$	4642			$	3959
EARNINGS (LOSSES)
SDG&E(1)		$	75106	3481	%	$	70108	3534	%	$	~~158~~264	4858	%	$	~~169~~277	33	%
SoCalGas(1)			6978	3159			6574	3323			~~134~~212	4146			~~124~~198	24
Sempra Commodities			-(134)	-(102)			8575	4324			(5139)	(230)			~~199~~274	3933
Sempra Generation			4856	2243			3343	1714			~~(5)~~51	~~(2)~~11			76119	1514
Sempra Pipelines & Storage			3943	1733			~~(27)~~54	~~(14)~~17			77120	2426			1064	28
Sempra LNG			135	64			~~(12)~~-	~~(6)~~-			4550	1411			(19)	(42)
All other			(2223)	(1018)			(1637)	(812)			(7699)	(2322)			(4582)	(910)
Total		$	~~222~~131	100	%	$	~~198~~317	100	%	$	~~328~~459	100	%	$	~~514~~831	100	%
										Six months ended June 30,
										Nine months ended September 30,
										2010				2009
EXPENDITURES FOR PROPERTY PLANT & EQUIPMENT
SDG&E										$	~~522~~822	6261	%	$	~~443~~633	4746	%
SoCalGas											~~216~~337	2625			~~227~~336	24
Sempra Generation											532	12			821	12
Sempra Pipelines & Storage											90151	11			~~116~~149	1311
Sempra LNG											49	-1			~~142~~230	1517
All other											23	-			2	-
Total										$	~~839~~1,354	100	%	$	~~938~~1,371	100	%
										June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
										September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
ASSETS
SDG&E										$	1011,~~727~~496	3740	%	$	10,229	36	%
SoCalGas											7,~~362~~350	25			7,287	25
Sempra Commodities											21,~~141~~963	7			2,255	8
Sempra Generation											2,~~281~~383	8			2,048	7
Sempra Pipelines & Storage											45,~~948~~108	1718			4,485	16
Sempra LNG											2,~~292~~329	8			2,277	8
All other											~~618~~492	2			596	2
Intersegment receivables											(12,~~283~~172)	(48)			(665)	(2)
Total										$	2928,~~086~~949	100	%	$	28,512	100	%
INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY METHOD INVESTEES
Sempra Commodities										$	~~1,956~~825			$	2,172
Sempra Generation											~~428~~256				434
Sempra Pipelines & Storage											1,~~721~~746				1,429
All other											1918				21
Total										$	42,~~124~~845			$	4,056
(1)	After preferred dividends.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report), and "Risk Factors" contained in our Annual Report and Part II of this Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

Sempra Energy is a Fortune 500 energy services holding company whose business units provide electric, natural gas and other energy products and services to their customers. Our operations are divided principally between the Sempra Utilities and Sempra Global. The Sempra Utilities consist of two California regulated public utility companies, 1) San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) and 2) Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Sempra Global consists of businesses engaged in providing energy products and services.

This report includes information for the following separate registrants:

§Sempra Energy and its consolidated entities

§SDG&E

§Pacific Enterprises (PE), the holding company for SoCalGas

§SoCalGas

References in this report to "we," "our" and "Sempra Energy Consolidated" are to Sempra Energy and its consolidated entities, collectively, unless otherwise indicated by the context.

PE's operations consist solely of those of SoCalGas and additional items (e.g., cash, intercompany accounts and equity) attributable to serving as a holding company for SoCalGas.

Below are the summary descriptions of our operating business units.

SEMPRA ENERGY BUSINESS UNITS

The Sempra Utilities consist of SDG&E and SoCalGas.

SEMPRA UTILITIES
	Market	service territory
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (SDG&E) A regulated public utility; infrastructure supports electric generation, transmission and distribution, and natural gas distribution	§Provides electricity to 3.5 million consumers (1.4 million meters) §Provides natural gas to 3.2 million consumers (845,000 meters)	Serves the county of San Diego, CA and an adjacent portion of southern Orange County covering 4,100 square miles
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (SOCALGAS) A regulated public utility; infrastructure supports natural gas distribution, transmission and storage	§Residential, commercial, industrial, utility electric generation and wholesale customers §Covers a population of 20.7 million (5.8 million meters)	Southern California and portions of Central California (excluding San Diego County, the city of Long Beach and the desert area of San Bernardino County) covering 20,000 square miles

Sempra Global is a holding company for most of our subsidiaries that are not subject to California utility regulation. Sempra Global's principal business units, which provide energy-related products and services, are

§Sempra Commodities

§Sempra Generation

§Sempra Pipelines & Storage

§Sempra LNG

SEMPRA GLOBAL
	Market	Geographic Region
SEMPRA COMMODITIES Holds an interest in RBS Sempra Commodities LLP, a commodities-marketing business joint venture with The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS)	§Natural gas; natural gas liquids §Power Prior to July 1, 2010: §Petroleum and petroleum products §Coal §Emissions §Ethanol §Base metals	§North America Prior to July 1, 2010: §Global
SEMPRA GENERATION Develops, owns and operates, or holds interests in, electric power plants and energy projects	§Wholesale electricity	§U.S.A. §Mexico
SEMPRA PIPELINES & STORAGE Develops, owns and operates, or holds interests in, natural gas and propane pipelines and natural gas storage facilities, and natural gas and electric service providers	§Natural gas §Electricity	§U.S.A. §Mexico §Argentina §Chile §Peru
SEMPRA LNG Develops, owns and operates receipt terminals for importation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and sale of natural gas	§Liquefied natural gas §Natural gas	§U.S.A. §Mexico

In February 2010, we, RBS and our joint-venture partnership, RBS Sempra Commodities LLP (RBS Sempra Commodities), entered into an agreement to sell certain businesses within the joint venture, which agreement was consummated on July 1, 2010. In September and October of 2010, the partnership entered into two additional agreements which will complete the divestiture of the last of the joint venture’s principal assets. One of these transactions was completed on November 1, 2010, and the second transaction is expected to be completed by year-end. We discuss these transactions and other matters concerning the partnership in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Notes 4 and 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We discuss the following in Results of Operations:

§Overall results of our operations and factors affecting those results

§Our business unit results

§Significant changes in revenues, costs and earnings between periods

In the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our earnings ~~increased~~decreased by $24186 million (1259%) to $~~222~~131 million primarily due to ~~improved~~a ~~results~~$139 atmillion after-tax write-down of our investment in RBS Sempra ~~Pipelines~~Commodities &in ~~Storage,~~the Sempra ~~LNG~~Commodities segment and ~~Sempra~~lower ~~Generation~~earnings from the joint venture, as we discuss in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein. Diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ~~increased~~decreased by $0.0974 (1158%) per share to $0.8953 per share, primarily from the ~~higher~~write-down and lower earnings at Sempra Commodities.

In the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our earnings decreased by $~~186~~372 million (3645%) to $~~328~~459 million primarily due to ~~losses~~lower joint-venture earnings and the investment write-down at Sempra Commodities and lower earnings at Sempra Generation, inpartially ~~2010~~offset ~~compared~~by toimproved ~~earnings~~results inat ~~2009~~Sempra LNG and Sempra Pipelines & Storage. In the first quarter of 2010, Sempra Generation and Sempra Commodities recorded after-tax litigation expense of $84 million and $12 million, respectively, related to the agreement ~~in principle~~ to settle certain energy crisis litigation, as we discuss in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein. Diluted earnings per share for the ~~six~~nine months decreased by $01.7853 (3745%) per share to $1.3184 per share, primarily from the ~~lower~~write-down ~~earnings~~at inSempra ~~2010~~Commodities and net lower earnings.

Earnings in ~~both~~ the ~~three~~nine-month ~~and~~period ~~six-month periods~~ of 2009 were negatively impacted by an after-tax asset write-off of $64 million related to assets at Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s Liberty Gas Storage (Liberty) project.

The following table shows our earnings by business unit, which we discuss below in "Business Unit Results."

SEMPRA ENERGY EARNINGS (LOSSES) BY BUSINESS UNIT
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
Sempra Utilities:
SDG&E(1)		$	75106	3481	%	$	70108	3534	%
SoCalGas(1)			6978	3159			6574	3323
Sempra Global:
Sempra Commodities			-(134)	-(102)			8575	4324
Sempra Generation			4856	2243			3343	1714
Sempra Pipelines & Storage			3943	1733			~~(27)~~54	~~(14)~~17
Sempra LNG			135	64			~~(12)~~-	~~(6)~~-
Parent and other(2)			(2223)	(1018)			(1637)	(812)
Earnings		$	~~222~~131	100	%	$	~~198~~317	100	%
		Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
Sempra Utilities:
SDG&E(1)		$	~~158~~264	4858	%	$	~~169~~277	33	%
SoCalGas(1)			~~134~~212	4146			~~124~~198	24
Sempra Global:
Sempra Commodities			(5139)	(230)			~~199~~274	3933
Sempra Generation			~~(5)~~51	~~(2)~~11			76119	1514
Sempra Pipelines & Storage			77120	2426			1064	28
Sempra LNG			4550	1411			(19)	(42)
Parent and other(2)			(7699)	(2322)			(4582)	(910)
Earnings		$	~~328~~459	100	%	$	~~514~~831	100	%
(1)	After preferred dividends.
(2)	Includes after-tax interest expense ($3735 million and $33 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $75110 million and $67100 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively), intercompany eliminations recorded in consolidation and certain corporate costs.

BUSINESS UNIT RESULTS

The following section is a discussion of earnings by business unit, as it appears in the table above.

EARNINGS BY BUSINESS UNIT –-- SEMPRA UTILITIES (Dollars in millions)

SDG&E

SDG&E business unit earnings were

§$75106 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ($76108 million before preferred dividends)

§$70108 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ($71110 million before preferred dividends)

§$~~158~~264 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010 ($~~160~~268 million before preferred dividends)

§$~~169~~277 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009 ($~~171~~281 million before preferred dividends)

The ~~increase~~decrease of $52 million (72%) in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was due to:

§$9 million from the resolution of regulatory matters ~~in 2009~~ that ~~adversely~~favorably impacted 2009 earnings;

§$56 million ~~favorable~~increase ~~impact from a decrease~~ in litigation reserves in 2010; and

§$45 million higher ~~California~~liability ~~Public~~insurance ~~Utilities~~premiums ~~Commission~~for ~~(CPUC)~~wildfire ~~authorized margin in excess of higher operation and maintenance expenses~~coverage; ~~and~~offset by

§$212 million higher ~~electric~~authorized ~~transmission~~ margin; ~~offset~~for operations regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and lower operation and maintenance expenses (excluding insurance premiums for wildfire coverage); and

§$104 million ~~due~~higher toelectric ~~the~~transmission ~~favorable resolution of prior years’ income tax issues in 2009; and~~margin.

§The decrease of $613 million ~~higher~~(5%) ~~liability~~in ~~insurance~~the ~~premiums~~nine ~~for~~months ~~wildfire~~ended ~~coverage.~~September 30, 2010 was due to:

~~The decrease of~~ §$1116 million ~~(7%)~~higher inliability ~~the~~insurance ~~first~~premiums ~~six~~for ~~months~~wildfire ~~of 2010 was due to:~~ coverage;

§$11 million ~~higher~~lower ~~liability~~favorable ~~insurance~~impact ~~premiums~~from ~~for~~the ~~wildfire~~resolution ~~coverage;~~of prior years’ income tax issues;

§$1011 million ~~due~~net unfavorable impact from an increase in litigation reserves in 2010 compared to the favorable resolution of ~~prior~~litigation ~~years’ income tax issues~~ in 2009; and

§$53 million due to the ~~favorable~~write-down ~~resolution~~of deferred tax assets as a result of ~~litigation~~the inchange ~~2009~~to U.S. tax law regarding the Medicare Part D subsidy; ~~and~~offset by

§$312 million ~~due~~higher toauthorized ~~the~~margin ~~write~~for CPUC-~~down~~regulated ofoperations ~~deferred~~in ~~tax~~excess ~~assets as a result~~ of ~~the~~higher ~~change~~operation ~~in U.S. tax law regarding the Medicare Part D subsidy, which we discuss in "Changes in Revenues, Costs~~ and ~~Earnings~~maintenance –expenses ~~Income~~(excluding ~~Taxes"~~insurance ~~below~~premiums ~~and~~for inwildfire ~~Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein~~coverage); ~~offset by~~

§$9 million ~~from~~higher ~~the~~electric ~~resolution~~transmission ~~of regulatory matters in 2009 that adversely impacted earnings~~margin; and

§$56 million lower income taxes as a result of higher ~~electric~~software ~~transmission~~development ~~margin~~costs and incremental depreciation expense deductions for tax purposes which, for ratemaking purposes, are not treated as deferred taxes.

SoCalGas

SoCalGas business unit earnings were

§$6978 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 (~~$70~~both ~~million~~ before and after preferred dividends)

§$6574 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (~~$66~~both ~~million~~ before and after preferred dividends)

§$~~134~~212 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010 ($~~135~~213 million before preferred dividends)

§$~~124~~198 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009 ($~~125~~199 million before preferred dividends)

The increase of $4 million (65%) in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to ahigher ~~lower~~authorized ~~effective~~margin ~~tax~~for ~~rate~~CPUC-regulated inoperations ~~2010, which we discuss~~ in ~~“Changes~~excess inof ~~Revenues,~~higher ~~Costs~~operation and ~~Earnings~~maintenance ~~– Income Taxes” below~~expenses.

The increase of $1014 million (87%) in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010 was due to:

§$812 million higher ~~CPUC~~ authorized margin for CPUC-regulated operations in excess of higher operation and maintenance expenses;

§$45 million net favorable earnings impact primarily due to the effect of self-developed software costs on the effective income tax rate; and

§$3 million higher regulatory awards; ~~and~~offset by

§$313 million ~~lower~~due ~~net~~to ~~bad~~the ~~debt~~write-off ~~expense;~~of ~~offset~~deferred bytax assets as a result of the change in U.S. tax law regarding the Medicare Part D subsidy.

§$13 million due to the write-down of deferred tax assets associated with the Medicare Part D subsidy, which we discuss below.

EARNINGS (LOSSES) BY BUSINESS UNIT – SEMPRA GLOBAL

(Dollars in millions)

Sempra Commodities

Sempra Commodities recorded business unit earnings (losses) of:

§$0(134) million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

§$8575 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

§$(5139) million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010

§$~~199~~274 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009

The change in earnings for ~~both~~ the three months ~~and six months~~ ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was due to approximately break-even performance in 2010 from the RBS Sempra Commodities LLP joint venture compared to positive earnings in 2009, primarily due to lower results from crude oil, oil products and natural gas, and higher employee retention costs.:

§a $139 million write-down of our investment in the RBS Sempra Commodities joint venture (as we discuss in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein);

§equity earnings from RBS Sempra Commodities of $18 million in 2010 compared to $75 million in 2009; and

§$11 million state income tax expense related to our exit from the RBS Sempra Commodities business.

The change in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was due to:

§the $139 million write-down of our investment in the RBS Sempra Commodities joint venture;

§equity earnings from RBS Sempra Commodities of $24 million in 2010 compared to $278 million in 2009;

§$12 million litigation expense related to an agreement to settle energy crisis litigation associated with the DWR contract, as we discuss in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein; and

§$11 million state income tax expense related to our exit from the RBS Sempra Commodities business.

The equity earnings from the joint venture were adversely impacted by the sale on July 1, 2010 of the global metals and oil businesses and the European natural gas and power business; lower volatility in the U.S. natural gas and power business; and the disruptions caused by the process to sell the partnership’s businesses.

Sempra Generation

Sempra Generation recorded business unit earnings ~~(losses)~~ of:

§$4856 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

§$3343 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

§$~~(5)~~51 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010

§$76119 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009

The increase in earnings of $1513 million (4530%) in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was due to:

§$2212 million ~~higher~~ renewable energy tax credits primarily due to additional investments in the Copper Mountain Solar project ~~and adjustments to the expected completion date of the project~~; and

§$16 million ~~income~~mark-to-market ~~tax~~gains ~~benefit~~on ~~related~~forward tocontracts ~~Mexican~~with ~~currency~~RBS ~~translation~~Sempra Commodities and ~~inflation~~other ~~adjustments~~counterparties in 2010 compared to $42 million ~~income~~mark-to-market ~~tax~~losses ~~expense~~ in 2009; offset by

§$79 million lower earnings from operations, primarily ~~from~~due ~~increased~~to ~~scheduled~~less ~~plant~~favorable ~~maintenance~~market ~~and~~pricing ~~associated down time~~ in 2010~~, and expenses and associated down time from earthquake damage to our Mexicali power plant; and~~.

~~§$3~~The ~~million~~decrease ~~mark-to~~in ~~market~~earnings ~~losses~~of on$68 ~~forward~~million ~~contracts~~(57%) ~~with~~in ~~RBS~~the ~~Sempra~~nine ~~Commodities~~months ~~and~~ended ~~other~~September ~~counterparties~~30, in 2010 ~~compared~~was toprimarily $3due ~~million mark-~~to~~-market gains in 2009.~~:

~~The~~§$86 ~~change~~million in ~~the~~litigation ~~six~~expense ~~months~~related ~~ended~~to ~~June~~an 30agreement to settle energy crisis litigation associated with the DWR contract, ~~2010~~as ~~was~~we ~~primarily~~discuss ~~due~~in Note 10 of the Notes to: Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein;and

§$8526 million inlower ~~litigation~~earnings ~~expense~~from ~~related~~operations, toprimarily anfrom ~~agreement~~increased inscheduled ~~principle~~plant tomaintenance ~~settle~~and ~~energy~~associated ~~crisis~~down ~~litigation~~time ~~associated~~in ~~with~~2010, ~~the~~less ~~DWR~~favorable ~~contract~~market pricing, asand weexpenses ~~discuss~~and inassociated ~~Note~~down 10time offrom ~~the~~earthquake ~~Notes~~damage to ~~Condensed~~our ~~Consolidated~~Mexicali ~~Financial~~power ~~Statements~~plant ~~herein~~in the second quarter of 2010; ~~and~~offset by

§$1937 million ~~lower~~renewable ~~earnings~~energy ~~from~~tax ~~operations,~~credits ~~primarily from increased scheduled plant maintenance and associated down time~~ in 2010~~, and expenses and associated down time from earthquake damage to our Mexicali power plant in the second quarter of 2010; offset by~~.

§$25 million renewable energy tax credits in 2010.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage

Sempra Pipelines & Storage recorded business unit earnings ~~(losses)~~ of:

§$3943 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

§$~~(27)~~54 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

§$77120 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010

§$1064 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009

The ~~improvement~~decrease inof ~~earnings~~$11 inmillion ~~both~~(20%) in the three months ~~and six months~~ ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was ~~primarily~~ due to:

§a $24 million write-down of our investment in Argentina; and

§$15 million from the favorable resolution of prior years’ income tax issues in 2009; offset by

§$48 million in proceeds received from a legal settlement in 2010, less a related income tax effect of $17 million.

The improvement in earnings of $56 million (88%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily due to:

§$64 million lower earnings in 2009 from a write-off of assets at Liberty; and

§$548 million ~~related~~in toproceeds ~~the~~received Elfrom ~~Paso~~a ~~pipelines~~legal ~~acquisition~~settlement in ~~April~~ 2010., less a related income tax effect of $17 million; offset by

§a $24 million write-down of our investment in Argentina; and

§$15 million from the favorable resolution of prior years’ income tax issues in 2009.

We discuss the investment write-down and legal settlement in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Statements herein.

Sempra LNG

Sempra LNG recorded earnings (losses) of:

§$135 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

§$~~(12)~~0 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

§$4550 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010

§$(19) million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009

The improvement in earnings of $255 million and $69 million in the three months and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively, was primarily ~~due~~from to higher earnings from the start-up in 2009 of marketing operations, the Cameron receipt terminal and the nitrogen-injection facility at the Energía Costa Azul receipt terminal.

The improvement in earnings of $64 million in the first six months of 2010 was primarily from higher earnings from operations, of which $11 million relates to revenues that are not expected to recur over the long-term related to contractual counterparty obligations for non-delivery of cargoes. Results for 2010 also include $9 million mark-to-market gains.

Parent and Other

Losses for Parent and Other were

§$2223 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

§$1637 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

§$7699 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010

§$4582 million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2009

The ~~increase~~decrease in losses of $614 million (38%) in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to ~~$15~~lower ~~million~~income oftax ~~investment gains in 2009 on dedicated assets in support of our executive retirement and deferred compensation plans due to improved market conditions~~expense. ~~This amount is net of the change in deferred compensation liability associated with the investments.~~

The increase in losses of $3117 million (6921%) in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010 was primarily due to: higher net interest expense.

§$32 million higher income tax expense; and

§$12 million higher net interest expense; offset by

§$9 million lower general and administrative expenses.

CHANGES IN REVENUES, COSTS AND EARNINGS

This section contains a discussion of the differences between periods in ~~the~~ specific line items of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas.

Sempra Utilities Revenues

The current regulatory framework permits the cost of natural gas purchased for core customers (primarily residential and small commercial and industrial customers) to be passed on to customers substantially as incurred. However, SoCalGas' Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism (GCIM) provides SoCalGas the opportunity to share in the savings and/or costs from buying natural gas for its core customers at prices below or above market-based monthly benchmarks. This mechanism permits full recovery of costs incurred when average purchase costs are within a price range around a monthly benchmark price. Any higher costs or savings realized outside this range are shared between the core customers and SoCalGas. We provide further discussion in Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

The regulatory framework also permits SDG&E to recover the actual cost incurred to generate or procure electricity based on annual estimates of the cost of electricity supplied to customers. The differences in cost between estimates and actual are recovered in the next year through rates.

Sempra Utilities: Natural Gas Revenues and Cost of Natural Gas

The tables below show natural gas revenues for Sempra Energy, SDG&E and SoCalGas for the ~~six~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30. The Sempra Energy Consolidated amounts reflect SDG&E and SoCalGas revenues, net of intercompany transactions. Because the cost of natural gas is recovered in rates, changes in the cost are reflected in the changes in revenues. In addition to the change in market prices, the average cost of natural gas recorded during a period is impacted by the difference between customer billings and recorded or CPUC-authorized costs. These differences are required to be balanced over time, resulting in over- and undercollected regulatory balancing accounts.

SEMPRA ENERGY CONSOLIDATED
NATURAL GAS SALES AND TRANSPORTATION
(Volumes in billion cubic feet, dollars in millions)
	Natural Gas Sales			Transportation			Total
Customer class	Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue
2010:
Residential	~~155~~195	$	1,~~522~~943	1	$	2	~~156~~196	$	1,~~524~~945
Commercial and industrial	6286		~~484~~657	~~134~~203		~~118~~177	~~196~~289		~~602~~834
Electric generation plants	-		-	83153		1936	83153		1936
Wholesale	-		-	1217		3	1217		3
	217	$	2,006	230	$	142	447		2,148
	281	$	2,600	374	$	218	655		2,818
Other revenues									4870
Balancing accounts(1)									80246
Total								$	23,~~276~~134
2009:
Residential	~~149~~187	$	1,~~280~~624	1	$	2	~~150~~188	$	1,~~282~~626
Commercial and industrial	6285		~~413~~553	~~130~~205		~~104~~163	~~192~~290		~~517~~716
Electric generation plants	-		-	~~110~~203		2851	~~110~~203		2851
Wholesale	-		-	1012		3	1012		3
	211	$	1,693	251	$	137	462		1,830
	272	$	2,177	421	$	219	693		2,396
Other revenues									4875
Balancing accounts(1)									~~(5)~~133
Total								$	12,~~873~~604
(1) We discuss balancing accounts and their effects in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our natural gas revenues increased by $~~144~~127 million (1817%) to $~~926~~858 million, and the cost of natural gas increased by $~~110~~77 million (4437%) to $~~359~~285 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our natural gas revenues increased by $~~403~~530 million (2220%) to $2.3.1 billion, and the cost of natural gas increased by $~~328~~405 million (4241%) to $1.14 billion. The primary factor contributing to the increased natural gas revenues and cost of natural gas in both the ~~second~~ third-quarter and year-to-date periods was higher natural gas prices in 2010. We discuss the increase in the cost of natural gas individually for SDG&E and SoCalGas below.

SDG&E
NATURAL GAS SALES AND TRANSPORTATION
(Volumes in billion cubic feet, dollars in millions)
	Natural Gas Sales			Transportation			Total
Customer class	Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue
2010:
Residential	1923	$	~~207~~260	-	$	-	1923	$	~~207~~260
Commercial and industrial	811		6082	46		69	1217		6691
Electric generation plants	-		-	1421		35	1421		35
	27	$	267	18	$	9	45		276
	34	$	342	27	$	14	61		356
Other revenues									1827
Balancing accounts									(128)
Total(1)								$	~~282~~375
2009:
Residential	1923	$	~~188~~230	-	$	-	1923	$	~~188~~230
Commercial and industrial	811		5976	35		57	1116		6483
Electric generation plants	-		-	3045		913	3045		913
	27	$	247	33	$	14	60		261
	34	$	306	50	$	20	84		326
Other revenues									1625
Balancing accounts									(2)
Total(1)								$	~~275~~353
(1) Includes sales to affiliates of $1 million in each of 2010 and 2009.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SDG&E's natural gas revenues increased by $715 million (719%) to $~~103~~93 million, and the cost of natural gas increased by $7 million (1923%) to $4437 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SDG&E's natural gas revenues increased by $722 million (36%) to $~~282~~375 million, and the cost of natural gas increased by $916 million (710%) to $~~133~~170 million. The average cost of natural gas for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $4.2986 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) compared to $34.5727 per Mcf for the corresponding period in 2009, a 2014-percent increase of $0.7259 per Mcf, resulting in higher revenues and cost of $75 million. For the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010, SDG&E’s average cost of natural gas was $54.0398 per Mcf compared to $4.5952 per Mcf for the corresponding period in 2009, a 10-percent increase of $0.4446 per Mcf, resulting in higher revenues and cost of $1216 million.

SOCALGAS
NATURAL GAS SALES AND TRANSPORTATION
(Volumes in billion cubic feet, dollars in millions)
	Natural Gas Sales			Transportation			Total
Customer class	Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue
2010:
Residential	~~136~~172	$	1,~~315~~683	1	$	2	~~137~~173	$	1,~~317~~685
Commercial and industrial	5475		~~424~~575	~~130~~197		~~113~~169	~~184~~272		~~537~~744
Electric generation plants	-		-	69132		1631	69132		1631
Wholesale	-		-	76108		811	76108		811
	190	$	1,739	276	$	139	466		1,878
	247	$	2,258	438	$	213	685		2,471
Other revenues									4667
Balancing accounts									92254
Total(1)								$	2,~~016~~792
2009:
Residential	~~130~~164	$	1,~~092~~394	1	$	2	~~131~~165	$	1,~~094~~396
Commercial and industrial	5474		~~354~~477	~~127~~200		~~100~~157	~~181~~274		~~454~~634
Electric generation plants	-		-	80158		1938	80158		1938
Wholesale	-		-	6899		710	6899		710
	184	$	1,446	276	$	128	460		1,574
	238	$	1,871	458	$	207	696		2,078
Other revenues									4367
Balancing accounts									~~(3)~~131
Total(1)								$	12,~~614~~276
(1) Includes sales to affiliates of $21 million in 2010 and $15 million in 2009.
(1) Includes sales to affiliates of $32 million in 2010 and $24 million in 2009.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SoCalGas' revenues increased by $~~140~~114 million (2017%) to $~~834~~776 million, and the cost of natural gas increased by $~~104~~72 million (4940%) to $~~318~~252 million. The increase in revenues was primarily due to:

§the increase in cost of natural gas, which was caused primarily by higher natural gas prices, as we discuss below;

§$2225 million higher ~~recovery of~~ CPUC-authorized ~~costs~~cost recovery, for which revenues are fully offset in operation and maintenance expenses; and

§$13 million higher authorized base margin in accordance with the CPUC's 2008 General Rate Case (GRC) decision.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SoCalGas’ revenues increased by $~~402~~516 million (2523%) to $2.08 billion, and the cost of natural gas increased by $~~323~~395 million (4847%) to $~~992~~1.2 ~~million~~billion. The increase in revenues was primarily due to:

§the increase in cost of natural gas, which was caused primarily by higher natural gas prices, as we discuss below;

§$3560 million higher ~~recovery of~~ CPUC-authorized ~~costs~~cost recovery, for which revenues are fully offset in operation and maintenance expenses; and

§$2639 million higher authorized base margin in accordance with the CPUC's 2008 GRC decision.

SoCalGas' average cost of natural gas for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $4.3240 per Mcf compared to $3.1036 per Mcf for the corresponding period in 2009, a 3931-percent increase of $1.2204 per Mcf, resulting in higher revenues and cost of $9059 million. For the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended September 30, 2010, SoCalGas' average cost of natural gas was $5.2304 per Mcf compared to $3.6357 per Mcf for the corresponding period in 2009, a 4441-percent increase of $1.6047 per Mcf, resulting in higher revenues and cost of $~~303~~362 million.

Sempra Energy and SDG&E: Electric Revenues and Cost of Electric Fuel and Purchased Power

The table below shows electric revenues for Sempra Energy and SDG&E. Sempra Energy amounts are shown after eliminating intercompany transactions. Because the cost of electricity is substantially recovered in rates, changes in the cost are reflected in the changes in revenues.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, electric revenues increased by $5224 million (103%) to $~~586~~717 million at Sempra Energy and by $5423 million (103%) to $~~589~~718 million at SDG&E. The increase in revenues was primarily due to:

§$2216 million increase due to tolling payments and natural gas supply costs in 2010 associated with the ~~cost~~power ofgenerated ~~electric~~by ~~fuel~~Otay ~~and~~Mesa VIE in excess of purchased power costs in 2009 for the equivalent amount of power;

§$1315 million higher authorized transmission and electric generation margins;

§$79 million higher authorized base margin on electric distribution; and

§$6 million ~~higher~~increase ~~recoverable~~in ~~expenses~~the ~~that~~cost ~~are~~of ~~fully~~electric ~~offset~~fuel inand ~~operation~~purchased ~~and~~power ~~maintenance~~excluding ~~expenses.~~Otay Mesa VIE; offset by

~~During the six months ended June 30, 2010, electric revenues increased by~~ §$6316 million ~~(6%)~~lower atrecoverable ~~Sempra~~expenses ~~Energy~~that toare ~~$1.1~~fully ~~billion,~~offset ~~and by $64 million (6%) at SDG&E to $1.2 billion. The increase~~ in ~~revenues~~operation ~~was~~and ~~primarily~~maintenance ~~due~~expenses; ~~to:~~and

§$239 million ~~higher~~resolution ~~authorized~~of ~~transmission~~regulatory ~~and~~matters ~~electric~~in ~~generation~~2009 ~~margins;~~that favorably impacted earnings.

~~§$19~~During ~~million~~the ~~increase~~nine inmonths ~~the~~ended ~~cost~~September of30, 2010, electric ~~fuel~~revenues increased by $87 million (5%) at both Sempra Energy and ~~purchased~~SDG&E ~~power;~~to $1.9 billion. The increase in revenues was primarily due to:

§$1622 million ~~higher~~increase ~~recoverable~~due ~~expenses~~to ~~that~~tolling ~~are~~payments ~~fully~~and ~~offset~~natural gas supply costs in ~~operation~~2010 ~~and~~associated ~~maintenance~~with ~~expenses;~~the ~~and~~power generated by Otay Mesa VIE in excess of purchased power costs in 2009 for the equivalent amount of power;

§$1338 million higher authorized ~~base~~transmission ~~margin~~and on electric ~~distribution.~~generation margins;

~~The~~§$22 ~~cost~~million ofhigher ~~electric~~authorized ~~fuel~~base ~~and~~margin ~~purchased~~on ~~power~~electric atdistribution; ~~both Sempra Energy~~ and ~~SDG&E did not change for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, but included the following offsetting variances:~~

§$2212 million increase in the cost of electric fuel and purchased power ~~resulting~~excluding ~~from~~Otay anMesa ~~increase in power procurement costs, both from higher prices and volumes, and balanced in revenues above~~VIE; offset by

§$219 million ~~decrease~~resolution ~~in the amount~~ of ~~power~~regulatory ~~purchased~~matters ~~from third-party generators as a result of the start up of new power generation at Otay Mesa VIE, which commenced commercial operations~~ in ~~the fourth quarter of~~ 2009. ~~The~~that ~~lower~~favorably ~~cost~~impacted ~~of electric fuel and purchased power is partially offset by operating costs and depreciation for Otay Mesa VIE~~earnings.

AtThe cost of electric fuel and purchased power at both Sempra Energy and SDG&E decreased in the three months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to an $11 million decrease in the cost of ~~electric~~power ~~fuel~~purchased ~~and~~from ~~purchased~~third-party generators as a result of the start up of new power ~~decreased~~generation at Otay Mesa VIE, which commenced commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2009, offset by a $236 million ~~(8%)~~increase toin ~~$277~~other ~~million~~fuel ~~for~~and ~~the~~purchased ~~six~~power ~~months~~costs. ~~ended~~Associated ~~June~~with 30this decrease, ~~2010~~SDG&E’s ~~primarily~~operating ~~due~~costs ~~to:~~increased by $11 million from Otay Mesa VIE’s operations.

§At both Sempra Energy and SDG&E, the cost of electric fuel and purchased power decreased by $28 million (6%) to $480 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to a $40 million decrease in the ~~amount~~cost of power purchased from third-party generators as a result of the start up of new power generation at Otay Mesa VIE;, which commenced commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2009, offset by a $12 million increase in other fuel and purchased power costs. Associated with this decrease, SDG&E’s operating costs increased by $31 million from Otay Mesa VIE’s operations.

§$19 million increase in the cost of electric fuel and purchased power resulting from an increase in power procurement costs, both from higher prices and volumes, and balanced in revenues above.

ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION
(Volumes in millions of kilowatt-hours, dollars in millions)
	2010			2009
Customer class	Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
Residential	5,406	$	756	5,671	$	831
Commercial	5,017		651	5,302		725
Industrial	1,598		167	1,716		194
Direct access	2,365		90	2,290		80
Street and highway lighting	76		9	79		10
	14,462		1,673	15,058		1,840
Other revenues			77			102
Balancing accounts			115			(164)
Total		$	1,865		$	1,778
SDG&E:
Residential	5,406	$	756	5,671	$	831
Commercial	5,017		651	5,302		725
Industrial	1,612		169	1,724		195
Direct access	2,365		90	2,290		80
Street and highway lighting	76		9	79		10
	14,476		1,675	15,066		1,841
Other revenues			80			106
Balancing accounts			115			(164)
Total(1)		$	1,870		$	1,783
(1) Includes sales to affiliates of $5 million in each of 2010 and 2009.

ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION
(Volumes in millions of kilowatt-hours, dollars in millions)
	2010			2009
Customer class	Volumes	Revenue		Volumes	Revenue
Sempra Energy Consolidated:
Residential	3,539	$	507	3,605	$	496
Commercial	3,201		418	3,370		434
Industrial	1,028		111	1,104		118
Direct access	1,484		54	1,490		51
Street and highway lighting	50		6	53		6
	9,302		1,096	9,622		1,105
Other revenues			52			68
Balancing accounts			-			(88)
Total		$	1,148		$	1,085
SDG&E:
Residential	3,539	$	507	3,605	$	496
Commercial	3,201		418	3,370		434
Industrial	1,039		113	1,109		119
Direct access	1,484		54	1,490		51
Street and highway lighting	50		6	53		6
	9,313		1,098	9,627		1,106
Other revenues			54			70
Balancing accounts			-			(88)
Total(1)		$	1,152		$	1,088
(1) Includes sales to affiliates of $4 million in 2010 and $3 million in 2009.

We do not include in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations the commodity costs (and the revenues to recover those costs) associated with long-term contracts that are allocated to SDG&E by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). However, we do include the associated volumes and distribution revenues in the table above. We provide further discussion of these contracts in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Sempra Global and Parent Revenues and Cost of Sales

In the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our Sempra Global and Parent revenues increased by $~~123~~112 million (3326%) to $~~496~~541 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our Sempra Global and Parent revenues increased by $~~279~~391 million (3331%) to $1.17 billion. The increases in both the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were due to higher revenues at Sempra LNG, primarily due to increased marketing operations and the start up of operations at its Cameron LNG receipt terminal and the nitrogen-injection facility at the Energía Costa Azul receipt terminal, partially offset by lower revenues at Sempra Pipelines & Storage due to the ~~completion~~expiration of the Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE) natural gas supply contract in 2009. At the ~~completion~~expiration of the contract, Sempra LNG began supplying the CFE under a separate contract ending December 2022.

In the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our cost of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased power increased by $7072 million (3733%) to $~~257~~292 million. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our cost of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased power increased by $~~140~~212 million (31%) to $~~595~~887 million. The increases in both periods were primarily associated with the higher revenues at Sempra LNG, offset partially by lower costs at Sempra Pipelines & Storage resulting primarily from the ~~completion~~expiration of the CFE contract.

Litigation Expense

Sempra Energy Consolidated

We recorded $~~167~~184 million in litigation expense in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~compared~~which toincluded ~~a favorable litigation adjustment of~~ $3163 million inrelated to the ~~corresponding~~agreement ~~period~~to ofsettle ~~2009.~~certain ~~The~~energy crisis litigation. ~~expense~~We indiscuss ~~2010~~this ~~included~~settlement ~~$161~~agreement ~~million~~in ~~related~~Note to10 of the ~~agreement~~Notes ~~in principle~~ to ~~settle~~Condensed ~~certain~~Consolidated ~~energy~~Financial ~~crisis~~Statements ~~litigation~~herein.

Other Operation and Maintenance

Sempra Energy Consolidated

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our other operation and maintenance expenses increased by $3422 million (64%) to $~~616~~590 million, primarily due to an increase at SoCalGas. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our other operation and maintenance expenses increased by $87109 million (87%) to $1.28 billion., ~~The increases were~~ primarily due to higher operation and maintenance expenses at both SDG&E and SoCalGas.

We discuss the changes in operation and maintenance expenses at SDG&E and SoCalGas below.

Operation and Maintenance

SDG&E

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SDG&E's operation and maintenance expenses ~~increased~~decreased by $51 million ~~(2%)~~to $235 million, primarily due to $~~237~~12 million. ~~The~~lower ~~increase~~expenses ~~was~~recoverable ~~primarily~~in ~~due~~revenues ~~to:~~as incurred, offset by $10 million higher litigation expense in 2010.

§For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SDG&E's operation and maintenance expenses increased by $1355 million ~~higher~~(8%) ~~expenses~~to ~~recoverable~~$704 inmillion. ~~revenues~~The asincrease ~~incurred;~~was ~~offset~~due byto:

§$721 million ~~decrease~~higher inother ~~litigation~~operational ~~reserves~~and maintenance costs (including $22 million of higher liability insurance premiums for wildfire coverage and $12 million at Otay Mesa VIE due to commencement of plant operation in ~~2010.~~October 2009, offset by $13 million lower other operational and maintenance costs);

~~For~~§$18 ~~the~~million ~~six~~net ~~months~~unfavorable ~~ended~~impact ~~June~~from ~~30,~~an ~~2010,~~increase ~~SDG&E's~~in ~~operation~~litigation ~~and~~reserves ~~maintenance~~in ~~expenses~~2010 ~~increased~~compared ~~by $56 million (14%)~~ to ~~$469~~the ~~million.~~favorable ~~The~~resolution ~~increase~~of ~~was~~litigation ~~due~~in ~~to:~~2009; and

§$2715 million higher expenses recoverable in revenues as incurred; .

§$20 million higher other operational and maintenance costs, including $15 million of higher liability insurance premiums for wildfire coverage and $6 million at Otay Mesa VIE due to commencement of plant operation in October 2009; and

§$8 million favorable resolution of litigation in 2009.

SoCalGas

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SoCalGas' operation and maintenance expenses increased by $2833 million (1113%) to $~~293~~285 million. The increase was due primarily to $2225 million higher expenses recoverable in revenues as incurred.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, SoCalGas’ operation and maintenance expenses increased by $3972 million (89%) to $~~555~~840 million due primarily to $3560 million higher expenses recoverable in revenues as incurred.

Write-off of Long-lived Assets

In the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a $132 million write-off related to certain assets at one of Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s Liberty ~~Gas Storage~~ natural gas storage projects. Sempra Energy's after-tax share of this write-off was $64 million. We discuss the write-off of the assets in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Equity Earnings (Losses) Before Income Taxes

Sempra Energy Consolidated

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, equity losses from our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities were $16281 million compared to equity earnings of $~~126~~105 million in the corresponding period of 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, equity losses from our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities were $290 million compared to equity earnings of $384 million in the corresponding period of 2009. Equity earnings were adversely impacted by several factors, as we discuss above in “Business Unit Results – Sempra Commodities.” Results for both periods in 2010 include a $305 million pretax write-down of our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities. We discuss the write-down further in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, equity losses from our investment in RBS Sempra Commodities were $9 million compared to equity earnings of $279 million in the corresponding period of 2009.

We provide additional information about the determination and allocation of this investment's earnings in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Sempra Energy Consolidated

In the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, other income, net, ~~decreased~~increased by $6242 million (89175%) to $866 million primarily due to:

§proceeds of $2548 million infrom ~~losses~~a onlegal ~~interest~~settlement ~~rate swaps in 2010~~ at ~~Otay~~Sempra ~~Mesa~~Pipelines ~~VIE~~& ~~compared to $20 million in gains in 2009~~Storage; ~~and~~offset by

§a $3517 million ~~decrease~~ in ~~gains~~losses ~~from~~on ~~investment~~interest ~~activity~~rate ~~related~~instruments toin ~~our~~2010 ~~executive~~at ~~retirement~~Otay ~~and~~Mesa ~~deferred~~VIE ~~compensation~~compared ~~plans~~to $11 million in ~~2010~~2009; ~~offset by~~and

§a $10 million decrease in gains from investment activity related to our executive retirement and deferred compensation plans in 2010.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, other income, net, decreased by $15 million (15%) to $82 million primarily due to:

§$51 million in losses on interest rate instruments in 2010 at Otay Mesa VIE compared to $19 million in gains in 2009; and

§a $25 million decrease in gains from investment activity related to our executive retirement and deferred compensation plans in 2010; offset by

§proceeds of $48 million from a legal settlement at Sempra Pipelines & Storage;

§$12 million increase in allowance for equity funds used during construction; and

§a $10 million gain recognized on an interest rate instrument at Parent and Other.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, other income, net, decreased by $57 million (78%) to $16 million primarily due to:

§$34 million in losses on interest rate swaps in 2010 at Otay Mesa VIE compared to $30 million in gains in 2009; and

§a $15 million decrease in gains from investment activity related to our executive retirement and deferred compensation plans in 2010; offset by

§a $10 million gain recognized on an interest rate instrument at Parent and Other.

SDG&E

The changes in SDG&E’s other income (expense), net, in the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~was~~were primarily due to the losses and gains from interest rate ~~swaps~~instruments at Otay Mesa VIE ~~in 2010 compared to gains in 2009~~, as we discuss above.

Interest Expense

Sempra Energy Consolidated

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our interest expense increased by $2415 million (3016%) to $~~103~~111 million. The increase included:

§$2117 million higher interest expense, primarily from long-term debt issued in 2009 and 2010 at Parent and Other and SDG&E; ~~and~~offset by

§$105 million lower ~~capitalized~~ interest, ~~including~~expense ~~$12~~from ~~million~~maturities ~~at Sempra LNG due to completion~~ of ~~construction~~debt ~~projects;~~at ~~offset~~Parent byand Other.

~~§$10~~During ~~million~~the ~~lower~~nine months ended September 30, 2010, our interest expense ~~from~~increased ~~maturities~~by of$66 ~~debt~~million at(26%) ~~Parent~~to ~~and~~$323 ~~Other~~million. The increase was primarily due to:

~~During~~§$70 ~~the~~million ~~six~~higher ~~months~~interest ~~ended June 30~~expense, ~~2010,~~primarily ~~our~~from ~~interest~~long-term ~~expense~~debt ~~increased~~issued byin ~~$51~~2009 ~~million~~and ~~(32%)~~2010 toat ~~$212~~Parent ~~million.~~and ~~The~~Other ~~increase~~and ~~was~~SDG&E; ~~primarily due to:~~and

§$5126 million ~~higher~~lower ~~interest~~capitalized ~~expense~~interest, primarily ~~from~~at ~~long-term~~Sempra ~~debt~~LNG ~~issued~~due into ~~2009~~completion ~~and~~of ~~2010~~construction ~~at Parent and Other and SDG&E~~projects; ~~and~~offset by

§$2322 million lower ~~capitalized~~ interest, ~~primarily~~expense atfrom ~~Sempra~~maturities ~~LNG~~of ~~due~~debt toat ~~completion~~Parent ofand ~~construction projects~~Other; ~~offset by~~and

§$1714 million lower short-term debt interest expense, primarily from ~~maturities~~lower ofaverage ~~debt~~commercial paper borrowings and interest rates, and reduced interest expense related to energy crisis litigation reserves at Parent and Other~~; and~~.

§$12 million lower short-term debt interest expense, primarily from lower average commercial paper borrowings, lower interest rates at Parent and Other and reduced interest expense related to energy crisis litigation reserves.

Income Taxes

The table below shows the income tax expense (benefit) and effective income tax rates for Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) AND EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES
(Dollars in millions)
		Three months ended June 30,
		Three months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
		Income Tax	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Income Tax Expense	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Expense	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
		(Benefit)	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	59(32)	25(32)	%	$	90128	3531	%
SDG&E		4456	4435			2853	2437
PE		3342	3235			4041	3936
SoCalGas		3442	3335			3742	36
		Six months ended June 30,
		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
		Income Tax	Effective Income			Income Tax	Effective Income
		Expense	Tax Rate			Expense	Tax Rate
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	~~117~~85	3118	%	$	~~199~~327	30	%
SDG&E		75131	36			88141	3133
PE		90132	4038			76117	38
SoCalGas		90132	4038			73115	37

Sempra Energy Consolidated

The ~~decrease~~change in income tax expense in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was due to ~~both~~ lower pretax income and a lower effective income tax rate. ~~The lower effective income tax rate was~~ primarily ~~due~~resulting tofrom:

§$5 million tax benefit in 2010 compared to $20 million tax expense in 2009 due to Mexican currency translation and inflation adjustments;

§higher planned investment tax credits;

§higher ~~exclusions~~pretax ~~from~~income ~~taxable~~(including ~~income~~a $175 million gain related to our share of the ~~equity~~RBS ~~portion~~Sempra ofCommodities ~~allowance~~sale ~~for~~to ~~funds~~J.P. ~~used~~Morgan ~~during~~Ventures ~~construction~~Energy ~~(AFUDC~~Corporation on July 1, 2010) in countries with lower statutory rates; offset by

§~~lower~~$11 ~~pretax~~million state income intax ~~countries~~expense ~~with~~related ~~lower~~to ~~statutory~~our ~~rates~~exit from the RBS Sempra Commodities business;

§lower favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues; ~~and~~

In§$5 ~~the~~million ~~six months ended June 30, 2010, Sempra Energy's income~~ tax expense ~~decreased~~in ~~primarily~~2010 ~~due~~compared to ~~lower~~$3 ~~pretax~~million ~~income, offset slightly by a higher effective income~~ tax ~~rate.~~benefit ~~The~~in ~~higher~~2009 ~~effective~~due ~~income~~to ~~tax~~Mexican ~~rate~~currency ~~was~~translation ~~primarily~~and ~~due~~inflation ~~to:~~ adjustments.

§In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Sempra Energy's income tax expense decreased due to lower pretax income inand ~~countries~~a ~~with~~lower effective income tax rate. The lower ~~statutory~~effective ~~rates;~~income tax rate was primarily due to:

§higher difference between book depreciation and normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher planned investment tax credits;

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs;

§higher pretax income (including a $4175 million ~~lower~~gain ~~income~~related ~~tax~~to ~~expense~~our ~~due~~share of the RBS Sempra Commodities sale to ~~Mexican~~J.P. ~~currency~~Morgan ~~translation~~Ventures ~~and~~Energy ~~inflation~~Corporation ~~adjustments~~on July 1, 2010) in countries with lower statutory rates; and

§higher ~~favorable~~exclusions ~~impact~~ from ~~the~~taxable ~~resolution~~income of ~~prior~~the ~~years'~~equity ~~income~~portion ~~tax~~of ~~issues~~AFUDC; ~~and~~offset by

§~~higher~~$11 ~~exclusions~~million ~~from~~state ~~taxable~~ income oftax expense related to our exit from the ~~equity~~RBS ~~portion~~Sempra ofCommodities ~~AFUDC.~~business;

§lower favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues;

§an increase in the amount by which book depreciation exceeds normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; and

§$4 million higher tax expense in 2010 due to Mexican currency translation and inflation adjustments.

SDG&E

The increase in SDG&E's income tax expense in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to a higher ~~effective~~pretax income ~~tax rate~~, offset by a lower ~~pretax~~effective income tax rate. The ~~higher~~lower effective income tax rate was primarily due to:

§the impact of Otay Mesa VIE;

§higher difference between book depreciation and normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC; and

§higher ~~deductions~~favorable ~~for~~impact ~~self-developed~~from ~~software~~the ~~costs.~~resolution of prior years' income tax issues; offset by

~~In the six months ended June 30, 2010, SDG&E's income tax expense decreased primarily from~~ §lower ~~pretax~~deductions ~~income,~~for ~~partially~~self-developed ~~offset~~software bycosts; ~~a higher effective income tax rate resulting primarily from:~~

§lower deductions for other postretirement benefits; and

§lower utility repair allowance.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SDG&E's income tax expense decreased primarily from lower pretax income, partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate resulting primarily from:

§the impact of Otay Mesa VIE;

§a $3 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other ~~post~~postretirement ~~employment~~ benefits, as a result of a change in U.S. tax law, as we discuss above; ~~and~~

§~~higher~~lower ~~favorable~~deductions ~~impact~~for ~~from~~other ~~the~~postretirement ~~resolution of prior years' income tax issues~~benefits; and

§~~higher~~lower ~~deductions~~utility ~~for~~repair ~~self-developed software costs~~allowance; ~~and~~offset by

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC.; and

§higher favorable impact from the resolution of prior years' income tax issues.

SDG&E's results include Otay Mesa VIE, which is consolidated, and therefore, SDG&E's effective income tax rate is impacted by the VIE’s stand-alone effective income tax rate.

PE and SoCalGas

The decrease in PE'’s and SoCalGas'’ effective income tax ~~expense~~rates in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was primarily due to ~~lower effective income tax rates. The lower effective income tax rates were primarily due to~~:

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs; offset by

§~~higher~~lower ~~exclusions~~deductions ~~from~~for ~~taxable~~other ~~income~~postretirement ~~of the equity portion of AFUDC~~benefits; and

In the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, income tax expense increased at PE and SoCalGas primarily due to higher pretax income. ~~and~~The ~~higher~~ effective income tax ~~rates~~rate ~~resulting~~at SoCalGas increased slightly primarily ~~from~~due to:

§a $13 million write-down of the deferred tax assets related to other ~~post~~postretirement ~~employment~~ benefits, as a result of a change in U.S. tax law, as we discuss above; ~~offset by~~

§lower deductions for other postretirement benefits; and

§an increase in the amount by which book depreciation exceeds normalized tax depreciation, which is not treated as a deferred tax asset for ratemaking purposes; offset by

§higher deductions for self-developed software costs; and

§higher exclusions from taxable income of the equity portion of AFUDC.

Although it did not change year-over-year, these fluctuations are also reflected in PE’s effective income tax rate.

Equity Earnings (Losses), Net of Income Tax

Equity losses, net of income tax, were $4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to equity earnings of $20 million for the corresponding period in 2009. Equity earnings, net of income tax, decreased by $17 million (29%) to $42 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The change in both the three months and nine months was primarily due to a $24 million write-down of Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s investment in Argentina.

Losses (Earnings) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Sempra Energy Consolidated

Losses attributable to noncontrolling interests ~~increased~~decreased by $811 million (6765%) in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to: a $13 million decrease in losses attributable to noncontrolling interests at SDG&E, which we discuss below.

~~§$25~~Losses ~~million~~attributable into ~~losses~~noncontrolling oninterests ~~interest~~increased ~~rate~~by ~~swaps~~$12 inmillion ~~2010~~(55%) atin ~~Otay~~the ~~Mesa~~nine ~~VIE~~months ~~compared~~ended toSeptember ~~$20~~30, ~~million~~2010. inThe ~~gains~~change inwas ~~2009;~~primarily ~~offset~~due byto:

§$43 million increase in losses attributable to noncontrolling interests at SDG&E, which we discuss below; offset by

§$33 million associated with the write-off of assets at Liberty in 2009.

Losses attributable to noncontrolling interests increased by $23 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change was primarily due to:

§$34 million in losses on interest rate swaps in 2010 at Otay Mesa VIE compared to $30 million in gains in 2009; offset by

§$33 million associated with the write-off of assets at Liberty in 2009.

SDG&E

Losses attributable to noncontrolling interests, all related to Otay Mesa VIE, were $215 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to ~~earnings of~~ $2018 million in the corresponding period of 2009. The change was primarily due to ~~$25 million in losses on interest rate swaps in 2010 at Otay Mesa VIE compared to $20 million in gains in 2009.~~:

~~Losses~~§a ~~attributable to noncontrolling interests were~~ $2920 million inincrease ~~the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to earnings of $27 million~~ in ~~the~~operating ~~corresponding~~income; ~~period~~offset ~~of 2009. The change was primarily due to $34 million in losses on interest rate swaps in 2010 at Otay Mesa VIE compared to $30 million in gains in 2009.~~by

§a $6 million increase in losses on interest rate instruments in 2010.

Losses attributable to noncontrolling interests, all related to Otay Mesa VIE, were $34 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to earnings of $9 million in the corresponding period of 2009. The change was primarily due to:

§$51 million in losses on interest rate instruments in 2010 compared to $19 million in gains in 2009; offset by

§a $36 million increase in operating income.

Earnings

We discuss variations in Sempra Energy's earnings by business unit above in "Business Unit Results."

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

We expect our cash flows from operations to fund a substantial portion of our capital expenditures and dividends. In addition, we may meet our cash requirements through the issuance of short-term and long-term debt and the proceeds from the ~~transaction~~transactions to sell ~~certain~~the businesses within RBS Sempra Commodities, as we discuss below.

Our committed lines of credit provide liquidity and support commercial paper. ~~They~~As ~~expire~~we discuss in ~~August~~Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein, in October 2010, Sempra Energy, Sempra Global and the Sempra Utilities entered into agreements for new credit facilities, to replace the previous principal credit agreements that were scheduled to expire in 2011. The new agreements have a longer term (four years) and, in light of our exit from the commodities joint venture, a lower total credit commitment by $500 million at Sempra Global. At Sempra Energy and Sempra Global, ~~they~~the new agreements are syndicated broadly among 2023 different ~~banks~~lenders and at the Sempra Utilities, among 1722 different ~~banks~~lenders. No single ~~bank~~lender has greater than ana 117-percent share in any agreement.

The table below shows the amount of available funds at ~~June~~September 30, 2010:

AVAILABLE FUNDS AT JUNE 30, 2010
AVAILABLE FUNDS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(Dollars in millions)
		Sempra Energy
		Consolidated		SDG&E		PE/SoCalGas
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents		$	~~188~~547	$	28332	$	~~101~~72
Available unused credit(1)			3,~~108~~419		~~275~~338		~~475~~538
(1)	Borrowings on the shared line of credit at SDG&E and SoCalGas are limited to $600 million for each utility and $800 million in total. SDG&E's available funds reflect letters of credit outstanding of $25 million, and variable-rate demand notes outstanding of $237 million ~~and commercial paper of $63 million~~ supported by the line. SoCalGas' availability reflects the impact of SDG&E's use of the combined credit available on the line.

Sempra Energy Consolidated

We believe that these available funds and cash flows from operations, distributions from equity method investments and security issuances, combined with current cash balances, will be adequate to:

§finance capital expenditures

§meet liquidity requirements

§fund shareholder dividends and common stock repurchases

§fund ~~any~~ new business acquisitions or start-ups

As we discuss in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein, in July 2010, RBS Sempra Commodities ~~consummated~~sold anits ~~agreement~~global tometals ~~sell~~and ~~certain~~oil ofbusinesses, ~~its~~as ~~businesses~~well onas ~~July~~the 1,European ~~2010~~natural gas and power business. Our share of the proceeds from this transaction ~~approximates~~approximated $1 billion, including a $134 million distribution of 2009 partnership earnings related to the businesses sold. We ~~plan~~In September 2010, Noble Group Ltd. agreed to ~~use~~acquire the U.S. retail commodity marketing business of RBS Sempra Commodities for $~~500~~318 million in cash, plus assumption of all debt, which agreement was consummated on November 1, 2010. In October 2010, the ~~proceeds~~joint toventure ~~fund~~entered ainto ~~buy~~an ~~back~~agreement to sell most of ~~our~~its ~~shares~~remaining ~~under~~assets anto ~~accelerated~~J.P. ~~stock~~Morgan ~~repurchase~~Ventures ~~program~~Energy ~~beginning~~Corporation in(J.P. ~~the~~Morgan ~~third~~Ventures), ~~quarter~~a unit of ~~2010,~~J.P. ~~and~~Morgan ~~may~~Chase ~~use~~& ~~the~~Co. ~~remaining~~(JP ~~proceeds~~Morgan), for ~~additional~~approximately ~~share~~$220 ~~repurchases,~~million. toThis ~~fund~~transaction ~~growth~~is ~~opportunities~~expected orto ~~reduce~~close ~~debt~~by year-end.

We expect our share of the proceeds from the sales of all of the partnership’s businesses and related cash distributions to total $1.8 billion to $1.9 billion. This includes approximately $1.3 billion expected from the announced transactions, plus $500 million to $600 million consisting primarily of cash and accounts receivable, as well as net margin that is expected to be collected as customers are transferred to JP Morgan. The transfer of all accounts to JP Morgan will be done as soon as possible, but is expected to continue into 2011. We are using $500 million of the proceeds to repurchase shares of our common stock under a Collared Accelerated Share Acquisition Program, which began in September 2010. We discuss the share repurchase program further in Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

SDG&E has issued long-term debt in 2010 and both Sempra Energy and SDG&E issued long-term debt in 2009. Changing economic conditions could affect the availability and cost of both short-term and long-term financing. If cash flows from operations were to be significantly reduced or we were to be unable to borrow under acceptable terms, we would reduce or postpone discretionary capital expenditures and investments in new businesses. If these measures were necessary, they would primarily impact our Sempra Global businesses, as credit availability for the Sempra Utilities has not been significantly impacted by the credit crisis. Discretionary expenditures at Sempra Global include projects that we have not yet made firm commitments to build, primarily renewable generation facilities. We continuously monitor our ability to finance the needs of our operating, investing and financing activities in a manner consistent with our intention to maintain strong, investment-quality ratings.

We have significant investments in several trusts to provide for future payments of pensions and other postretirement benefits, and nuclear decommissioning. The value of the trust funds’ investments declined in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 due to a decrease in the equity market and volatility in the fixed income market. Values increased from favorable market activity later in 2009 and in 2010. However, these markets continue to be volatile. The changes in asset values have not affected the funds’ abilities to make required payments, but may impact funding requirements for pension and other postretirement benefit plans. At the Sempra Utilities, funding requirements are generally recoverable in rates.

We discuss our principal credit agreements more fully in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Sempra Utilities

The Sempra Utilities expect that cash flows from operations and debt issuances will continue to be adequate to meet operating and ~~utility~~ capital expenditure requirements. Due to the extended review period associated with the Sunrise Powerlink project and the resultant delay in initiating construction activities, SDG&E declared and paid a $150 million common dividend to Sempra Energy in the first quarter of 2009. However, the level of future common dividends from SDG&E and SoCalGas may be reduced or eliminated during periods of increased capital expenditures. The level of future common dividends from PE is dependent upon common dividends paid by SoCalGas. Sempra Energy may from time to time make additional equity contributions to SDG&E or SoCalGas to support the Sempra Utilities' capital expenditure programs.

As we discuss in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein, SDG&E’s and therefore Sempra Energy’s cash flows are likely to be adversely impacted by cash flows related to the 2007 wildfire litigation.

Sempra Commodities

InWe ~~2008,~~discuss weabove the completed ~~the~~and ~~formation~~pending oftransactions ~~RBS~~and ~~Sempra~~anticipated ~~Commodities,~~cash aflows ~~partnership~~related to ~~own~~the ~~and~~dissolution ~~operate~~of the RBS Sempra ~~Energy's~~Commodities ~~commodities-marketing~~joint ~~businesses~~venture, which generally ~~comprised~~comprises the Sempra Commodities business unit. The impact of the sale transactions on cash flow will depend on many factors, including the final proceeds received from the transactions, potential changes to the partnership agreement, and any sales of residual assets. Our partner in the joint venture, RBS, is obligated to provide the joint venture with all ~~growth capital,~~ working-capital requirements and credit support. However, we are providing transitional back-up guarantees, some of which may continue for a prolonged period of time. RBS ~~has~~or JP Morgan have fully indemnified us for any claims or losses in connection with these arrangements.

OnWe ~~July~~account 1,for ~~2010,~~our ~~Sempra~~investment ~~Energy,~~in ~~RBS and~~ the partnership ~~completed~~under the ~~sale~~equity method. RBS Sempra Commodities intends to distribute all of ~~certain~~its ~~businesses~~net income on an annual basis, although the distributions are within the ~~partnership~~discretion toof ~~J.P.~~the ~~Morgan~~board ~~Ventures~~of directors of the partnership. WeIn ~~discuss~~limited ~~this~~cases, ~~transaction~~the inpartnership ~~Note~~may 4retain ofearnings allocable to the ~~Notes~~partners to ~~Condensed~~replenish ~~Consolidated~~capital ~~Financial~~depleted ~~Statements~~through ~~herein~~losses. ~~J.P.~~In ~~Morgan~~the isfirst innine ~~the~~months ~~process~~ of ~~replacing~~2010, ~~any~~we ~~guarantees~~received ~~that~~cash wedistributions ~~have~~from ~~issued~~the inpartnership ~~connection~~of ~~with~~$1 ~~the~~billion, ~~businesses~~which ~~sold~~includes toour ~~J.P.~~share ~~Morgan~~of ~~Ventures~~proceeds from the transaction with J.P. Morgan ~~guarantees~~Ventures. In the ~~meantime~~first nine months of 2009, ~~J.P.~~we ~~Morgan~~received iscash ~~indemnifying~~distributions usfrom ~~for~~the ~~any~~partnership ~~claims~~of or$407 ~~losses~~million. inBased ~~connection~~on ~~with~~the joint venture’s results through the ~~guarantees~~third ~~that~~quarter of 2010, we ~~issued~~currently indo ~~connection~~not ~~with~~expect ~~the~~distributions ~~businesses~~for ~~sold~~2010 results to ~~J.P.~~be ~~Morgan Ventures~~material.

We ~~and~~provide ~~RBS~~additional ~~are~~information ~~actively~~about ~~marketing~~RBS ~~the~~Sempra ~~businesses~~Commodities ~~which were not sold to J.P. Morgan Ventures~~ and ~~are also continuing to discuss amending certain provisions of~~ the ~~partnership~~sales ~~agreement~~transactions ~~entered~~in ~~into~~Notes ~~upon~~4 ~~the~~and ~~formation~~6 of the ~~joint~~Notes ~~venture.~~to ~~The~~Condensed ~~impact~~Consolidated ofFinancial ~~the~~Statements ~~sale~~herein ~~transaction~~and onin ~~cash~~Notes ~~flow~~3, ~~will depend on many factors~~4, ~~including~~6 ~~the~~and ~~final~~20 ~~proceeds~~of ~~received from~~ the ~~transaction,~~Notes ~~potential changes~~ to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~partnership~~Financial ~~agreement,~~Statements ~~and~~in ~~any sale of~~ the ~~remaining~~Annual ~~businesses~~Report.

We account for our investment in the partnership under the equity method. RBS Sempra Commodities intends to distribute all of its net income on an annual basis, although the distributions are within the discretion of the board of directors of the partnership. In limited cases, the partnership may retain earnings allocable to the partners to replenish capital depleted through losses. In April 2010, we received cash distributions from the partnership of $198 million. In the first six months of 2009, we received cash distributions from the partnership of $375 million. Based on the joint venture’s results through the second quarter of 2010, we currently do not expect distributions for 2010 results to be material.

We provide additional information about RBS Sempra Commodities and the transaction with J.P. Morgan Ventures in Notes 4 and 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Notes 3, 4, 6 and 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Sempra Generation

We expect Sempra Generation to require funds for the development of electric generation facilities, primarily renewable energy projects. Projects at Sempra Generation may be financed through a combination of operating cash flow, project financing, funds from the parent and external borrowings. Cash flows from operations at Sempra Generation are expected to decrease upon the expiration of their contract with the DWR in late 2011 due to less favorable pricing on replacement contracts. Also, Sempra Generation may not be able to replace all of the lost revenue. We expect the litigation settlement recorded in the first quarter of 2010 related to the DWR litigation to be funded from operations.

Sempra Generation's long-term power sale contracts may contain collateral requirements, although the DWR contract does not contain such requirements. The collateral arrangements require Sempra Generation and/or the counterparty to post cash, guarantees or letters of credit to the other party for exposure in excess of established thresholds. Sempra Generation may be required to provide collateral when market price movements adversely affect the counterparty's cost of replacement energy supplies if Sempra Generation fails to deliver the contracted amounts. Sempra Generation had no outstanding collateral requirements under such contracts at ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage

Sempra Pipelines & Storage is expected to require funding from the parent or from external sources to fund projects, including the development and expansion of its natural gas storage projects.

Also, on April 30, 2010, Sempra Pipelines & Storage completed an acquisition resulting in the purchase of the Mexican pipeline and natural gas infrastructure assets of El Paso Corporation for $307 million ($292 million, net of cash acquired). We discuss the acquisition further in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

Sempra LNG

Sempra LNG required funding from 2004 through 2009 for its development of the Energía Costa Azul and Cameron LNG receipt terminals. As both of these facilities are now in service, Sempra LNG is expected to provide operating cash flow for further development within Sempra Global.

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(Dollars in millions)
	2010		2010 Change				2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	1,~~307~~602	$	(~~218~~282)	(1415)	%	$	1,~~525~~884
SDG&E		~~221~~416		(~~127~~203)	(3633)			~~348~~619
PE		~~610~~562		5317	103			~~557~~545
SoCalGas		~~621~~569		6120	114			~~560~~549

Sempra Energy Consolidated

Cash provided by operating activities at Sempra Energy decreased in 2010 primarily due to $~~177~~209 million lower distributions received from RBS Sempra Commodities.

SDG&E

Cash provided by operating activities at SDG&E decreased in 2010 primarily due to $97117 million of settlement payments in 2010, net of cash received from liability insurance, compared to $36 million of cash received from liability insurance in 2009, net of settlement payments, related to the 2007 wildfire litigation.

PE and SoCalGas

Cash provided by operating activities at PE and SoCalGas increased in 2010 primarily due to the effect on working capital balances at SoCalGas of higher natural gas prices in 2010 compared to 2009. Higher natural gas prices in 2010 produced a $15 million liability for temporary LIFO liquidation compared to a $43 million asset in 2009. Temporary LIFO liquidation represents the difference between the carrying value of natural gas inventory withdrawn during the period (valued by the last-in, first-out method) for delivery to customers and the projected cost of the replacement of that inventory during summer months.:

~~The~~§$60 ~~table~~million ~~below~~higher ~~shows~~net ~~the~~income, ~~contributions~~net toof ~~pension~~noncash ~~and~~adjustments, ~~other~~at ~~postretirement~~SoCalGas; ~~benefit plans for the six months ended June 30, 2010.~~and

			Other
	Pension		Postretirement
(Dollars in millions)	Benefits		Benefits
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	53	$	27
SDG&E		21		8
PE/SoCalGas		19		19

§a $71 million accounts payable decrease in 2010 compared to a $185 million decrease in 2009, primarily due to higher natural gas prices in 2010 compared to 2009; offset by

§a $66 million decrease in regulatory balancing accounts in 2010 compared to a $52 million increase in 2009. Over- and undercollected regulatory balancing accounts reflect the difference between billings and recorded or CPUC-authorized costs. These differences are required to be balanced over time; and

§a $272 million accounts receivable decrease in 2010 compared to a $306 million decrease in 2009, primarily due to higher natural gas volumes and cost of natural gas in 2010 compared to 2009.

The table below shows the contributions to pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

			Other
	Pension		Postretirement
(Dollars in millions)	Benefits		Benefits
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	91	$	39
SDG&E		35		12
PE/SoCalGas		37		26

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(Dollars in millions)
	2010		2010 Change				2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	(~~1,167~~633)	$	~~180~~(1,337)	18(68)	%	$	(~~987~~1,970)
SDG&E		(~~509~~813)		~~122~~233	3240			(~~387~~580)
PE		(~~455~~435)		~~233~~106	~~105~~32			(~~222~~329)
SoCalGas		(~~468~~445)		~~241~~109	~~106~~32			(~~227~~336)

~~Sempra~~SempraEnergy ~~Energy~~ Consolidated

Cash used in investing activities at Sempra Energy ~~increased~~decreased in 2010 primarily due to:

§~~Sempra~~$849 ~~Pipelines~~million &of ~~Storage’s~~distributions ~~$285~~from ~~million~~RBS ~~acquisition~~Sempra ~~(net~~Commodities ofLLP ~~cash~~at ~~acquired)~~Sempra ~~resulting~~Commodities in 2010 related to the ~~purchase~~sale of ~~Mexican~~businesses ~~pipeline~~within ~~and~~the ~~natural~~joint ~~gas~~venture, ~~infrastructure~~as ~~assets;~~we ~~and~~discuss in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein;

§$~~176~~180 million ~~proceeds~~of distributions from ~~remarketing~~Fowler ofRidge ~~industrial~~II ~~development~~Wind ~~bonds~~Farm in(Fowler ~~2009;~~Ridge) ~~offset~~at bySempra Generation in 2010;

§~~$148~~a ~~million lower contributions to Rockies Express. The~~ $65182 million ~~contribution~~investment in ~~the~~Fowler ~~first~~Ridge ~~quarter~~by ofSempra ~~2010~~Generation ~~was~~in ~~the last required for the construction phase of the project~~2009; and

§$99462 million ~~decrease~~lower incontributions ~~capital~~to ~~expenditures~~Rockies ~~primarily~~Express. The ~~due~~$65 tomillion ~~the~~contribution ~~completion~~in ofthe ~~Sempra~~first ~~LNG’s~~quarter ~~Cameron~~of ~~receipt~~2010 ~~terminal~~was ~~and~~ the ~~nitrogen-injection~~last ~~facility~~required atfor ~~its~~the ~~Energía~~construction ~~Costa~~phase ~~Azul~~of ~~receipt~~the ~~terminal~~project; ~~and~~offset by

§$27176 million ~~higher~~proceeds ~~distributions~~ from ~~investments.~~remarketing of industrial development bonds in 2009; and

§Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s $292 million acquisition (net of cash acquired) resulting in the purchase of Mexican pipeline and natural gas infrastructure assets.

SDG&E

The increase in cash used in investing activities at SDG&E in 2010 was due to:

§a $79189 million net increase in capital expenditures (a $~~141~~265 million increase at SDG&E, offset by a decrease of $6276 million at Otay Mesa VIE);

§net proceeds of $24 million related to industrial development bonds in 2009; and

§a $1920 million lower decrease in loans to affiliates.

PE and SoCalGas

Cash used in investing activities at PE and SoCalGas increased in 2010 primarily due to a $~~254~~108 million increase in advances from SoCalGas to Sempra Energy in 2010.

FUTURE CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS

The amounts and timing of capital expenditures are generally subject to approvals by the CPUC, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other regulatory bodies. However, in 2010, we expect to make capital expenditures and investments of $~~2.9~~3 billion, including:

§$21.9 billion at the Sempra Utilities (excluding Otay Mesa VIE) for capital projects and plant improvements ($1.4 billion at SDG&E and $~~600~~500 million at SoCalGas)

§$~~900~~1.1 ~~million~~billion at our other subsidiaries for the development of natural gas storage facilities and pipelines, and renewable generation projects

The Sempra Utilities expect the capital expenditures to include:

§$780 million for additions to SDG&E’s natural gas and electric distribution systems, advanced metering infrastructure, and electric generation plant and equipment

§$~~600~~500 million at SoCalGas for improvements to distribution and transmission systems, and for advanced metering infrastructure

§$~~490~~400 million at SDG&E for the Sunrise Powerlink transmission line

§$190 million for improvements to SDG&E’s electric transmission infrastructure

The Sempra Utilities expect to finance these expenditures and investments with cash flows from operations, cash on hand and debt issuances. ~~These amounts do not include expected capital expenditures of Otay Mesa VIE.~~

The expected capital expenditures of $~~900~~1.1 ~~million~~billion at our other subsidiaries include:

§approximately $150 million to $250 million for Copper Mountain Solar (a 48-megawatt (MW) solar generation facility under construction by Sempra Generation in Boulder City, Nevada);

§approximately $230 million for investments in Cedar Creek II Wind Farm, a 250-MW project in northern Colorado;

§approximately $250 million to $300 million for Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s contribution to Rockies Express and the development of natural gas storage projects at Bay Gas and Mississippi Hub; and

§~~approximately~~ $~~300~~307 million for Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s acquisition resulting in the purchase of Mexican pipeline and natural gas infrastructure assets which closed in April 2010 and that we discuss in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

Our level of capital expenditures and investments in the next few years may vary substantially and will depend on the cost and availability of financing, regulatory approvals and business opportunities providing desirable rates of return. We intend to finance our capital expenditures in a manner that will maintain our strong investment-grade ratings and capital structure.

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
(Dollars in millions)
	2010		2010 Change				2009
Sempra Energy Consolidated	$	(62532)	$	(111,043)	~~(22)~~204	%	$	~~(51)~~511
SDG&E		~~303~~716		96483	46207			~~207~~233
PE		(~~103~~104)		(100)	(32,~~333~~500)			(34)
SoCalGas		(101)		(100)	(10,000)			(1)

Sempra Energy Consolidated

~~Cash~~At ~~used~~Sempra inEnergy, financing activities atused ~~Sempra~~cash ~~Energy~~ in 2010 ~~increased~~compared ~~slightly~~to ~~and~~providing ~~included~~cash ~~the~~in ~~following~~2009, ~~substantially~~primarily ~~offsetting~~due ~~activity~~to:

§a $~~534~~502 million ~~increase~~repurchases inof ~~short-term~~common ~~debt~~stock in 2010 ~~compared to a $612 million decrease in 2009~~; ~~and~~

§$94410 million ~~for~~lower ~~the~~issuances ~~purchase~~ of ~~the remaining 40-percent ownership interest in Mississippi Hub in 2009~~debt; ~~offset by~~and

§$~~838~~402 million ~~lower~~higher ~~issuances of~~ debt payments; ~~and~~offset by

§$~~399~~94 million ~~higher~~for ~~debt~~the ~~payments.~~purchase of the remaining 40-percent ownership interest in Mississippi Hub in 2009; and

§$184 million increase in short-term debt in 2010 compared to a $52 million decrease in 2009.

SDG&E

Cash provided by financing activities at SDG&E increased primarily due to:

§$150 million common dividends paid to Sempra Energy in 2009; and

§$63358 million ~~increase~~higher inissuances ~~short~~of long-term debt ~~in 2010; offset by~~.

§$108 million lower issuances of long-term debt; and

§$5 million higher payments on long-term debt.

PE and SoCalGas

Cash used in financing activities at PE and SoCalGas in 2010 increased due to $100 million common dividends paid to Sempra Energy and PE, respectively.

COMMITMENTS

We discuss significant changes to contractual commitments at Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

FACTORS INFLUENCING FUTURE PERFORMANCE

SEMPRA ENERGY OVERVIEW

The Sempra Utilities' operations ~~and Sempra Global's long-term contracts~~ generally provide relatively stable earnings and liquidity. However, for the next few years, SDG&E and SoCalGas intend to limit their common stock dividends to reinvest their earnings in significant capital projects. Also, Sempra Generation's contract with the DWR, which provides a significant portion of Sempra Generation's revenues, ends in late 2011. Because it is unable to forecast with certainty future electricity prices and the cost of natural gas, contracts it enters into to replace the DWR contract, if obtained, or merchant (daily) sales may provide substantially lower earnings. Sempra Generation is also undertaking several projects for the construction of renewable generation facilities, with planned in-service dates ranging from late 2010 to 2012.

~~We expect that~~ Sempra ~~LNG~~Global's ~~and~~long-term ~~Sempra~~contracts ~~Pipelines~~also &generally ~~Storage will~~ provide relatively stable earnings and liquidity, ~~from~~but ~~their~~are ~~current~~subject ~~operations.~~to ~~Sempra~~variability ~~Pipelines~~due &to ~~Storage~~fluctuations isin ~~also~~commodity ~~expected~~prices. toAlso, ~~provide~~Sempra ~~earnings~~Generation's ~~from~~contract ~~construction~~with ~~programs~~the ~~when~~DWR, ~~completed~~which ~~and~~provides ~~other~~a ~~investments,~~significant ~~but~~portion ~~will~~of ~~require~~Sempra ~~substantial~~Generation's ~~funding~~revenues, ~~for~~ends ~~these~~in ~~investments~~late 2011. AtBecause ~~Sempra~~it ~~LNG,~~is ~~until~~unable ~~there~~to ~~are~~forecast ~~firm~~with ~~LNG~~certainty ~~supply~~future orelectricity ~~capacity~~prices ~~services~~and ~~contracts~~the ~~from~~cost ~~third~~of ~~parties~~natural ~~that~~gas, ~~would~~contracts ~~subscribe~~it toenters ~~100~~into ~~percent~~to ofreplace the ~~capacity~~DWR ofcontract, ~~Sempra~~if ~~LNG's~~obtained, ~~Cameron~~or ~~receipt~~merchant ~~terminal,~~(daily) ~~Sempra~~sales ~~LNG~~may ~~will~~provide ~~seek~~substantially tolower ~~purchase~~earnings. ~~and~~Sempra ~~market~~Generation ~~short-term~~is ~~LNG~~also ~~supplies~~undertaking ~~and~~several ~~sell~~projects ~~short-term~~for ~~capacity,~~the ~~which~~construction ~~may~~of ~~result~~renewable ingeneration ~~greater~~facilities, ~~variability~~with planned in-service ~~revenues~~dates ~~and~~ranging ~~earnings.~~from late 2010 to 2012.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage is also expected to provide earnings from construction programs when completed and other investments, but will require substantial funding for these investments. At Sempra LNG, until there are firm LNG supply or capacity services contracts from third parties that would subscribe to 100 percent of the capacity of Sempra LNG's Cameron receipt terminal, Sempra LNG will seek to purchase and market short-term LNG supplies and sell short-term capacity, which may result in greater variability in revenues and earnings.

The Sempra Utilities' performance will depend primarily on the ratemaking and regulatory process, environmental regulations, economic conditions, actions by the California legislature to address the state budget crisis and the changing energy marketplace. Their performance will also depend on the successful completion of capital projects that we discuss in various sections of this report. As the 2008 General Rate Case provides for fixed annual increases through 2011 rather than adjustments based on inflation indices as in the past, performance will depend on the Sempra Utilities' ability to manage costs, including bad debts. Starting in the third quarter of 2009, SDG&E's liability insurance premiums increased significantly, by approximately $40 million annually, due to the increased costs of wildfire coverage as compared to the previous policy year. Starting in the third quarter of 2010, SDG&E has secured additional insurance coverage of approximately $560 million with respect to any future wildfire liabilities. SDG&E's maximum loss recovery due to a wildfire incident from insurance carriers is now approximately $960 million, with the remainder of Sempra Energy's business units' maximum coverage for a wildfire incident remaining at $400 million, the same as in the previous policy year. Starting in the third quarter of 2010, SDG&E's insurance premiums increase by approximately $30 million (pretax) annually for the increased coverage.

In regard to the 2007 wildfire litigation, SDG&E has exceeded its $1.1 billion of liability insurance coverage in settling wildfire claims. However, it has concluded that it is probable that it will be permitted to recover from its utility customers substantially all reasonably incurred costs of resolving wildfire claims in excess of its ~~$1.1 billion of~~ liability insurance coverage and any amounts recovered from other potentially responsible parties. Consequently, Sempra Energy and SDG&E expect no significant earnings impact from the resolution of the remaining wildfire claims. However, SDG&E’s cash flow will be adversely affected by timing differences between the resolution of claims and recoveries from other potentially responsible parties and utility customers, which may extend over a number of years. In addition, recovery from customers will require future regulatory actions, and a failure to obtain recovery, or any negative assessment of the likelihood of recovery, would likely have a material adverse effect on Sempra Energy's and SDG&E's cash flows and results of operations.

SDG&E has a 20-percent ownership interest in San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), a 2,150-MW nuclear generating facility near San Clemente, California. SONGS is operated by Southern California Edison (SCE) and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). SCE is currently addressing a number of regulatory and performance issues at SONGS, and the NRC has required SCE to take actions to provide greater assurance of compliance by SONGS personnel. SCE continues to implement plans and address the identified issues, however a number of these issues remain outstanding. To the extent that these issues persist, the likelihood of further required action by SCE persists, which may result in increased SONGS operating costs and/or adversely impacted operations. Currently, SDG&E is allowed to fully offset its share of SONGS operating costs in revenue. If further action is required, it may result in an increase in SDG&E’s Operation and Maintenance Expense, with any increase being fully offset in Operating Revenues – Electric or, if electric generation is adversely impacted, require SDG&E to procure additional electricity supply from other sources. We provide more information about SONGS in Notes 7, 15 and 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report, and in Items 1 and 1A of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

InBoth ~~2008,~~SDG&E's weand ~~completed~~SoCalGas' ~~the~~cost ~~formation~~ of acapital ~~partnership,~~decisions ~~RBS~~include ~~Sempra~~provisions ~~Commodities,~~that tocan ~~own~~result ~~and~~in ~~operate~~adjustments, ~~our~~upwards ~~commodities-marketing~~or ~~businesses~~downwards, ~~which~~to ~~generally~~their ~~comprised~~return ~~our~~on ~~Sempra~~capital ~~Commodities~~in ~~segment.~~periods Inbetween ~~November~~cost ~~2009,~~of ~~RBS~~capital ~~announced~~filings. ~~its~~As ~~intention~~a toresult ~~divest~~of ~~its~~the ~~interest~~worldwide inrecession, ~~the~~interest ~~joint~~rates ~~venture~~have ~~following~~remained aat ~~directive~~relatively ~~from~~low ~~the~~levels ~~European~~for ~~Commission~~an toextended ~~dispose~~period of ~~certain assets~~time. InIf ~~February~~the ~~2010~~cost of capital benchmark interest rates, ~~Sempra~~for ~~Energy~~either company, ~~RBS~~recorded ~~and~~in the ~~partnership~~third ~~entered~~quarter ~~into~~of an2010 ~~agreement~~were to ~~sell~~continue ~~certain~~at ~~businesses~~the ~~within~~same levels through the ~~partnership~~second quarter of 2011, ~~which~~one ~~agreement~~or ~~was~~both ~~consummated~~companies’ authorized return on ~~July~~capital could be adjusted downward effective January 1, ~~2010~~2012. ~~Our~~It ~~joint~~is ~~venture~~estimated ~~partner,~~that ~~RBS~~if such a downward adjustment were to occur, ~~continues~~it would result in an adverse impact to beearnings ~~obligated~~in 2012 of $15 million at SDG&E and $23 million at SoCalGas. Both SDG&E and SoCalGas are planning to ~~provide~~file ~~the~~a ~~partnership~~cost of capital application with ~~all~~the ~~growth~~CPUC ~~capital,~~in ~~working-capital~~April ~~requirements~~2012. ~~and~~Once ~~credit~~approved ~~support~~by the CPUC, asthe weapplications ~~discuss~~would ~~above~~establish inreturn ~~"Capital~~on ~~Resources~~capital and ~~Liquidity~~cost –of ~~Sempra~~debt ~~Commodities~~recovery for both SDG&E and SoCalGas starting in January 2013."

WeIn ~~and~~2008, we completed the formation of a partnership, RBS ~~continue~~Sempra Commodities, to ~~engage~~own inand anoperate ~~active~~our ~~sales~~commodities-marketing ~~process~~businesses, ~~for~~which ~~the~~generally ~~remaining~~comprised ~~partnership~~our ~~businesses~~Sempra Commodities segment. ~~Based~~In onNovember ~~preliminary~~2009, ~~indications~~RBS ofannounced ~~value~~its ~~from~~intention ~~potential~~to ~~buyers~~divest ~~and~~its ~~discussions~~interest ~~with~~in ~~our~~the ~~partner~~joint ~~with~~venture ~~respect~~following toa directive from the ~~ultimate~~European ~~allocation~~Commission ofto ~~proceeds,~~dispose weof ~~currently~~certain ~~believe~~assets. ~~that~~In ~~our~~February ~~share~~2010, ofSempra ~~the~~Energy, ~~proceeds~~RBS ~~from~~and the partnership ~~for~~entered ~~the~~into ~~sale~~an agreement to ~~J.P.~~sell ~~Morgan~~certain ~~Ventures~~businesses ~~and~~within ~~proceeds from~~ the ~~sale~~partnership, orwhich ~~ultimate~~agreement ~~disposition~~was ofconsummated ~~the~~on ~~remaining~~July ~~joint~~1, ~~venture~~2010. ~~assets~~In ~~will~~September be2010, ~~sufficient~~the ~~such~~parties ~~that~~announced ~~their~~an ~~application~~agreement to ~~our~~sell ~~equity~~the ~~method~~U.S. ~~investment~~retail ~~will~~commodity ~~not~~marketing ~~have~~business aof ~~material~~RBS ~~effect~~Sempra onCommodities, ~~our~~which ~~earnings.~~closed Weon ~~and~~November ~~RBS~~1, ~~are~~2010. ~~also~~In ~~continuing~~October to2010, ~~discuss~~the ~~amending~~joint ~~various~~venture ~~provisions~~entered tointo ~~our~~an ~~partnership~~ agreement into ~~light~~sell most of ~~the~~its ~~sale~~remaining assets to J.P. Morgan Ventures. ~~and~~This ~~the~~transaction ~~sales~~is ~~process~~expected ~~for~~to close by year-end. Our joint venture partner, RBS, continues to be obligated to provide the ~~remaining~~partnership ~~businesses~~with all working-capital requirements and credit support.

~~Future~~We ~~earnings~~expect ~~and~~our ~~distributions~~share ~~from~~of the ~~partnership~~proceeds ~~will~~from ~~depend on~~ the ~~profitability~~sales ~~achieved~~of inall of the ~~partnership~~joint venture's ~~remaining~~ businesses ~~until their final disposition~~ and ~~the~~related ~~continued~~cash ~~ability~~distributions ~~of RBS~~ to ~~provide~~total ~~capital~~$1.8 ~~and~~billion ~~credit~~to ~~support~~$1.9 ~~for the partnership~~billion. ~~Results~~These ofdistributions ~~the~~are ~~joint~~net ~~venture in the first half~~ of ~~2010~~expected ~~were~~transition ~~impacted~~costs byand ~~low~~are ~~commodity~~not ~~prices~~expected ~~and~~to ~~the~~fully ~~disruptions~~recover ~~caused by~~ the ~~process~~goodwill toincluded ~~sell~~in the ~~partnership's~~carrying ~~businesses.~~value Weof ~~provide~~our ~~additional~~investment ~~information~~ in ~~Notes~~the 4joint ~~and~~venture. 6Accordingly, ofin the ~~Notes~~third toquarter ~~Condensed~~of ~~Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Notes 3~~2010, 4,we 6recorded ~~and~~an 20after-tax charge of ~~the~~$139 ~~Notes~~million to ~~Consolidated~~reduce ~~Financial~~our ~~Statements~~investment in ~~the~~RBS ~~Annual~~Sempra ~~Report~~Commodities.

WeFuture ~~may~~earnings beand ~~further~~distributions ~~impacted~~from bythe ~~depressed~~partnership ~~and~~will ~~rapidly~~depend ~~changing~~on ~~economic~~the ~~conditions.~~profitability ~~Moreover,~~achieved in the ~~dollar~~partnership's ~~has~~remaining ~~fluctuated~~businesses ~~significantly~~through ~~compared~~their final disposition dates and the continued ability of RBS to ~~some~~provide ~~foreign~~capital ~~currencies,~~and ~~especially~~credit support for the partnership. Results of the joint venture in ~~Mexico~~the ~~and~~first ~~South~~three ~~America~~quarters ~~where~~of we2010 ~~have~~were ~~significant~~adversely ~~operations.~~impacted ~~These~~by ~~factors~~the sale on July 1, ~~coupled~~2010, ~~with~~of ~~very~~the ~~low~~global metals and oil businesses and the European natural gas ~~prices~~and ~~which~~power ~~affect~~business; ~~profitability~~lower atvolatility ~~Sempra~~in ~~Generation~~the U.S. natural gas and ~~Sempra~~power ~~LNG,~~business; ~~could,~~and ifthe ~~they~~disruptions ~~remain~~caused ~~unchanged,~~by ~~adversely~~the ~~affect~~process ~~profitability~~to sell the partnership's businesses. ~~Additionally,~~We ~~given~~provide ~~the~~additional ~~uncertainty~~information ofin ~~commodity~~Notes ~~markets~~4 and 6 of the ~~lack~~Notes ofto ~~debt~~Condensed ~~financing~~Consolidated ~~for~~Financial ~~energy~~Statements ~~infrastructure,~~herein ~~which~~and ~~impact~~in ~~related~~Notes ~~hedging~~3, ~~activity~~4, ~~growth~~6 atand ~~RBS~~20 ~~Sempra~~of ~~Commodities~~the ~~could~~Notes beto ~~dampened~~Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

We may be further impacted by depressed and rapidly changing economic conditions. Moreover, the dollar has fluctuated significantly compared to some foreign currencies, especially in Mexico and South America where we have significant operations. North American natural gas prices, which affect profitability at Sempra Generation and Sempra LNG, are currently significantly below Asian and European prices. These factors could, if they remain unchanged, adversely affect profitability.

We discuss additional matters that could affect our future performance in Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Notes 15 through 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES REFORMS

In July 2010, federal legislation to reform financial markets was enacted that significantly alters how over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are regulated, which may impact all of our businesses. The law increased regulatory oversight of OTC energy derivatives, including (1) requiring standardized OTC derivatives to be traded on registered exchanges regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), (2) imposing new and potentially higher capital and margin requirements and (3) authorizing the establishment of overall volume and position limits. The law gives the CFTC authority to exempt end users of energy commodities which could reduce, but not eliminate, the applicability of these measures to us and other end users. These requirements could cause our OTC transactions to be more costly and have an adverse effect on our liquidity due to additional capital requirements. In addition, as these reforms aim to standardize OTC products, they could limit the effectiveness of our hedging programs, because we would have less ability to tailor OTC derivatives to match the precise risk we are seeking to protect.

LITIGATION

We describe legal proceedings which could adversely affect our future performance in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

SEMPRA UTILITIES – INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS

We describe capital projects, electric and natural gas regulation and rates, and other pending proceedings and investigations that affect our business in Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein and in Notes 15 and 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

SEMPRA GLOBAL INVESTMENTS

As we discuss in "Cash Flows From Investing Activities," our investments will significantly impact our future performance. In addition to the discussion below, we provide information about these investments in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" herein and “Capital Resources and Liquidity” and “Factors Influencing Future Performance” in the Annual Report.

Sempra Generation

Copper Mountain Solar

Pacific Gas and Electric has contracted for 48 MW of solar power from Copper Mountain Solar, a new plant under development in Boulder City, Nevada by Sempra Generation on land adjacent to the 10-MW El Dorado Energy Solar plant. Construction has begun and we expect it to be completed in late 2010.

Mesquite Solar

Mesquite Solar is a photovoltaic generation facility under development by Sempra Generation in Maricopa County, Arizona. When fully developed, the project will be capable of producing approximately 400 MW to 600 MW of solar power. Mesquite Solar will connect to the 500-kilovolt Hassayampa switchyard via our existing Mesquite Power natural gas generation plant. ~~Construction of the first phase of 150 MW is expected to begin in 2011 and be completed in 2012.~~

Construction of the first phase (Mesquite Solar I) of 150 MW is expected to begin in 2011 and be completed in 2013. In October 2010, Sempra Generation announced that PG&E has contracted, subject to CPUC approval, for 150 MW of solar power at Mesquite Solar I for 20 years.

Cedar Creek II Wind Farm

In October 2010, Sempra Generation invested $209 million for a 50 percent-ownership interest in Cedar Creek II Wind Farm LLC, a joint venture with BP Wind Energy for the development of a 250-MW wind farm in northern Colorado expected to be operational in mid-2011. Public Service Company of Colorado, an Xcel Energy company, has contracted for all of the power from the facility for 25 years.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage

Natural Gas Storage Projects

Currently, Sempra Pipelines & Storage has ~~11.4~~23 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of operational working natural gas storage capacity~~. We~~, ~~are~~including inapproximately ~~construction~~12 toBcf ~~increase~~which ~~operational~~recently ~~capacity~~became byoperational ~~12.5~~at ~~Bcf~~its byMississippi ~~the~~Hub ~~end~~and ofBay ~~2010~~Gas ~~(for~~natural agas ~~total~~storage offacilities. 24We ~~Bcf) and we~~ plan to develop as much as 75 Bcf of total storage capacity by 2015.

Sempra Pipelines & Storage’s natural gas storage facilities and projects include

§Bay Gas Storage Company, a facility located 40 miles north of Mobile, Alabama, that provides underground storage and delivery of natural gas. Sempra Pipelines & Storage owns 91 percent of the project. It is the easternmost salt dome storage facility on the ~~Gulf~~gulf ~~Coast~~coast, with direct service to the Florida market and markets across the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions.

§Mississippi Hub storage facility, ~~currently~~located ~~under construction~~ in Simpson County, Mississippi, an underground salt- dome natural gas storage project with ~~planned~~access ~~direct interconnections~~ to ~~the~~shale ~~natural~~basins ~~gas~~of ~~production~~East ~~areas~~Texas inand ~~eastern Texas~~Louisiana, ~~Oklahoma~~traditional gulf supplies and ~~Arkansas~~LNG, aswith ~~well~~multiple asinterconnections to serve the Southeast and Northeast ~~market~~regions.

§Liberty Gas Storage Expansion, a salt cavern facility in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Sempra Pipelines & Storage owns 75 percent of the project and ProLiance Transportation LLC owns the remaining 25 percent. The project’s location provides access to several LNG facilities in the area.

Acquisition of Mexican Pipeline and Natural Gas Infrastructure

On April 30, 2010, Sempra Pipelines & Storage completed the acquisition resulting in a purchase of the Mexican pipeline and natural gas infrastructure assets of El Paso Corporation for $307 million ($292 million, net of cash acquired).

We discuss the acquisition more fully in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

We view certain accounting policies as critical because their application is the most relevant, judgmental and/or material to our financial position and results of operations, and/or because they require the use of material judgments and estimates. We discuss these accounting policies in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Annual Report.

We describe our significant accounting policies in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

We discuss the relevant pronouncements that have recently become effective and have had or may have an impact on our financial statements in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We provide disclosure regarding derivative activity in Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein. We discuss our market risk and risk policies in detail in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Annual Report.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The table below shows the nominal amount and the one-year VaR for long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations, at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	Sempra Energy
	Consolidated				SDG&E				PE/SoCalGas
	Nominal		One-Year		Nominal		One-Year		Nominal		One-Year
(Dollars in millions)	Debt		VaR(1)		Debt		VaR(1)		Debt		VaR(1)
At June 30, 2010:
At September 30, 2010:
Utility fixed-rate	$	3,~~317~~817	$	~~520~~701	$	2,~~204~~704	$	~~410~~585	$	1,113	$	~~111~~116
Utility variable-rate		~~756~~754		4244		~~606~~604		4244		150		-
Non-utility, fixed-rate and variable-rate		3,~~588~~578		~~454~~481		-		-		-		-
At December 31, 2009:
Utility fixed-rate	$	3,067	$	369	$	1,954	$	273	$	1,113	$	97
Utility variable-rate		848		43		698		43		150		-
Non-utility, fixed-rate and variable-rate		4,075		392		-		-		-		-
(1) After the effects of interest rate swaps.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the net notional amount of interest rate swap transactions ranged from $215 million to $355 million at Sempra Energy (ranges relate to amortizing notional amounts). We provide additional information about interest rate swap transactions in Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RATE RISK

We discuss our foreign currency rate risk in detail in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Annual Report. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were no significant changes to our exposure to foreign currency rate risk since December 31, 2009.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas have designed and maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in their respective reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and communicated to the management of each company, including each respective Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating these controls and procedures, the management of each company recognizes that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives; therefore, the management of each company applies judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of other possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officers of Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas, each company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on these evaluations, the Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officers of Sempra Energy, SDG&E, PE and SoCalGas concluded that their respective company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no changes in the companies' internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the companies' internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not party to, and our property is not the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings (other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our businesses) except for the matters 1) described in Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein, or 2) referred to in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" herein and in the Annual Report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have not been any material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, except for the following additional risk that was disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010:

RECOVERY OF 2007 WILDFIRE LITIGATION COSTS

As we discuss in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein, SDG&E is subject to numerous lawsuits arising out of the San Diego County wildfires in 2007. It expects that substantially all reasonably incurred costs of resolving 2007 wildfire claims that exceed its liability insurance coverage and any amounts recovered from other potentially responsible parties will be recovered from utility customers. However, recovery from customers will require future regulatory actions, and a failure to obtain recovery, or any negative assessment of the likelihood of recovery, would likely have a material adverse effect on Sempra Energy’s and SDG&E’s cash flows and results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On September 21, 2010, we entered into a Collared Accelerated Share Acquisition Program with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association under which we prepaid $500 million to repurchase shares of our common stock, as we discuss in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2010 and in Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

The following table sets forth information concerning purchases made by us, from the program authorized above, of our common stock during the third quarter of 2010:

					Maximum
				Total Number of	Dollar Value of
		Total		Shares Purchased as	Shares that May
		Number	Average	Part of Publicly	Yet Be Purchased
		of Shares	Price Paid	Announced Plans	Under the Plans
		Purchased (1)	Per Share (1)	or Programs (1)	or Programs

September 2010		5,670,006		5,670,006
		5,670,006		5,670,006	$500 million remaining (2)
(1)	All shares were purchased under the Collared Accelerated Share Acquisition Program entered into on September 21, 2010. The weighted average cost to us of shares purchased under the program will not be determinable until the completion of the program, which is expected to extend into the first quarter of 2011. Additional information regarding the program is provided in Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein.
(2)	Our board of directors has authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock provided that the amounts expended for such purposes do not exceed the greater of $2 billion or amounts expended to purchase no more than 40 million shares. We prepaid $500 million under a Collared Accelerated Share Acquisition Program with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association on September 21, 2010 and expended an additional $1 billion pursuant to a share repurchase program completed in 2008. Therefore, approximately $500 million remains authorized by the board for the purchase of additional shares. We also may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock from restricted stock plan participants who elect to sell a sufficient number of vesting restricted shares to meet minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 3 -- BYLAWS AND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
3.1	Amended and Restated Bylaws of San Diego Gas & Electric Company effective June 15, 2010 (Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2010, Exhibit 3).
Pacific Enterprises
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Pacific Enterprises effective June 14, 2010 (Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2010, Exhibit 3.2).
Southern California Gas Company
3.3	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Southern California Gas Company effective June 14, 2010 (Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2010, Exhibit 3.1).
EXHIBIT 10 -- MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Sempra Energy
10.1	~~First~~Master ~~Amendment~~Confirmation tofor Share Purchase ~~and Sale~~ Agreement, dated as of ~~June~~September 3021, 2010, ~~entered~~between ~~into by and among J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation,~~ Sempra Energy ~~Trading LLC, RBS Sempra Commodities LLP, Sempra Energy~~ and ~~The~~JPMorgan ~~Royal~~Chase Bank, ofNational ~~Scotland plc~~Association.
10.2	Form of Sempra Energy 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan, 2010 Restricted Stock Unit Award for Sempra Energy’s Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 12 – STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
Sempra Energy
12.1	Sempra Energy Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
12.2	San Diego Gas & Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
Pacific Enterprises
12.3	Pacific Enterprises Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
Southern California Gas Company
12.4	Southern California Gas Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
EXHIBIT 31 -- SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS
Sempra Energy
31.1	Statement of Sempra Energy's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2	Statement of Sempra Energy's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
31.3	Statement of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.4	Statement of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pacific Enterprises
31.5	Statement of Pacific Enterprise's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.6	Statement of Pacific Enterprise's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Southern California Gas Company
31.7	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.8	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
EXHIBIT 32 -- SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
Sempra Energy
32.1	Statement of Sempra Energy's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
32.2	Statement of Sempra Energy's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
32.3	Statement of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
32.4	Statement of San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
Pacific Enterprises
32.5	Statement of Pacific Enterprise's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
32.6	Statement of Pacific Enterprise's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
Southern California Gas Company
32.7	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
32.8	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
EXHIBIT 101 -- INTERACTIVE DATA FILE
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Southern California Gas Company
SIGNATURES
32.7	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
Sempra Energy:
32.8	Statement of Southern California Gas Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
EXHIBIT 101 -- INTERACTIVE DATA FILE
	SEMPRA ENERGY,(Registrant)
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
Date: November 9, 2010	By: /s/ Joseph A. Householder
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	Joseph A. HouseholderSenior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES
San Diego Gas & Electric Company:
Sempra Energy:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
	SEMPRA ENERGY,(Registrant)
	SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY,(Registrant)
Date: August 3, 2010	By: /s/ Joseph A. Householder
Date: November 9, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
	Joseph A. HouseholderSenior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
	Robert M. SchlaxVice President, Controller, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

San Diego Gas & Electric Company:
Pacific Enterprises:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
	SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY,(Registrant)
	PACIFIC ENTERPRISES,(Registrant)
Date: August 3, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
Date: November 9, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
	Robert M. SchlaxVice President, Controller, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Pacific Enterprises:
Southern California Gas Company:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
	PACIFIC ENTERPRISES,(Registrant)
	SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY,(Registrant)
Date: August 3, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
Date: November 9, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
	Robert M. SchlaxVice President, Controller, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Southern California Gas Company:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
	SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY,(Registrant)
Date: August 3, 2010	By: /s/ Robert M. Schlax
	Robert M. SchlaxVice President, Controller, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Filing Compare · PACIFIC ENTERPRISES INC